The URL can be used to link to this page

City Manager Letter to State Legislators - State of Iowa Need to be an Equitable State of Choice Copyrighted October 21 , 2019 City of Dubuque Consent Items # 7. ITEM TITLE: City Manager Letter to State Legislators - State of lowa Needs to be an Equitable State of Choice SUM MARY: City Manager submitting a copy of his letter to State legislators on how the State of lowa needs to be an equitable state of choice. SUGGESTED DISPOSITION: Suggested Disposition: Receive and File ATTACHMENTS: Description Type City Manager Letter to State Legislators City Manager Memo Letter to State Legislators Supporting Documentation Dubuque THE CITY OF � uI�AaMca cih DuB E � � I � � I Maste iece on the Mississi i Zoo�•zoiz•zois YP pp zoi�*zoi9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager SUBJECT: City Manager Letter to State Legislators — State of lowa Needs to be an Equitable State of Choice DATE: October 17, 2019 The attached letter has been sent to our State Legislators. While it details some serious issues, so far Dubuque is weathering these circumstances better than most other cities in the State of lowa. When it comes to job creation and economic development, Dubuque is a leader in the Midwest and in the State of lowa. "Would the last person to leave Dubuque please turn off the lights?" Residents used this dark humor to help deal with Dubuque's dire unemployment rate which hit 23% in January 1982. High school and college graduates left for more prosperous cities and states, taking their talent with them, with Dubuque losing almost 10% of its population in the 1980's. Dubuque has built 1,468 acres of industrial parks, now home to 55 businesses, including 47 local businesses that needed a place to expand. The City of Dubuque has committed $86 million in Tax Increment Financing incentives for businesses since 1990 in the industrial parks and in downtown Dubuque. This has leveraged $490 million in private investment by these businesses. With the use of TIF, businesses in Dubuque have retained 3,988 existing jobs and created 6,428 new jobs. To date, 78 projects have benefitted from the use of Tax Increment Financing. Dubuque's responsible use of this only meaningful local economic incentive has created a nationally-recognized transformation. The Dubuque metropolitan statistical area (MSA) total employment for June 2018 was 60,500, a 61% increase since 1983 when total employment was 37,600. In October 2018, the Dubuque MSA's unemployment rate was 1.7%. Dubuque County's Median Household Income (MHI) rose from $48,012 in 2009 to $56,154 in 2016, a 14% increase. In this same period, the national MHI increased by only 2.5%. Dubuque has been ranked by Forbes, Kiplinger, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Civic League, and the Milken Institute as one of the best cities in the United States to live and work. Fortunately from 2010-2017, Dubuque County showed a growth of 3.3%, achieving a population of 97,041. Information recently released by the State of lowa Legislative Services Agency shows the performance of Main Street lowa communities from Fiscal Year 1987 — Fiscal Year 2018. Of the Urban Main Street communities over 50,000 population, Dubuque has leveraged $716,853,589 in private and public dollars invested in acquisition and rehabilitation. This amount is the highest amount of any city and represents 37°k of the $1 ,912,278,450 grand total for the State of lowa. Downtown historic redevelopment in Dubuque has added well over 2,100 permanent jobs in buildings that had been underutilized or were deteriorating or vacant for decades. Dubuque developers have completed 35 projects to date using the lowa Historic Tax Credit Program. Just over $42.5 million in lowa HTCP funding has leveraged over $143 million in private investment. Dubuque currently has 19 more projects in the works, with an estimated $18.5 million in lowa HTCP funding, which is expected to leverage approximately $56 million in private investment. Dubuque's responsible use of historic tax credits is nationally-recognized as noted in the Fall 2018 Preservation Magazine produced by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, in Finding Dubuque: An lowa City Rediscovers Its Sense of Place by Lisa Selin Davis: "Never, in 15 years of writing about historic preservation, had I heard so many people utter the words "historic tax credits" with such passion and reverence...The tour helped me understand the unusually deep and detailed public-private partnerships that are making Dubuque a model of economic development and community revitalization. As impressive as these buildings are, just as impressive is the preservation fever that has taken hold of the city. Preservation projects are creating ripple effects— bringing in new blood, welcoming long-lost Dubuquers home, and encouraging people from all over the city to participate in the salvation of historic Dubuque. Anyone can restore a building. But Dubuque residents, together, are restoring a community." Dubuque has the lowest property tax rate per capita of the 11 largest cities in lowa (those with a population larger than 50,000). In fact, Dubuque's property tax rate is 45°k below the average of the 10 other cities. By the end of the current 5-year capital improvement program, the City will be utilizing only 37°k of the statutory debt limit and currently has general fund reserves of 22°k. Over the years, the City of Dubuque has reorganized and implemented technology improvements and actually has 27 fewer full- time employees than in 1981 , even though the City now offers more services. Dubuque sets a very high standard when it comes to fiscal responsibility. 2 This has all been achieved through Planning, Partnerships and People, leading to measurable outcomes. Dubuque believes in showing people we care, by our actions, so that they can have hope to achieve their personal goals, whatever they might be. ��.1.lLt}'t'j�,'1 �t,uy��, Mic ael C. Van Milligen MCVM:jh Attachment cc: Crenna Brumwell, City Attorney Teri Goodmann, Assistant City Manager Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager 3 DUbUQUO Ciry Manage 's Office THE CITY OF ciry xall 50 West 13th 3heet AIFAnelinCiry Dubuque,IA 52001-4845 D L L Office(563)589-4110 Far. (563)589-4149 T1'P(563)690-6678 200 20124013 ctymgr@cityofd b q e.org Masterpiece on the Mississippi zov*zoi9 „ ,. aYofa b q e.o g October 16, 2019 «Com pleteOFFICIALName_Address» Dear «Title» «Last», A crisis is occurring in the State of Iowa before our very eyes. The crisis is both partially caused by and masked by the State of lowa low unemployment rate of 2.4%. What is the crisis? In spite of some pockets of modest prosperity the State of lowa, and states similar to lowa, are struggling. This issue was highlighted in an April 4, 2018 article in the Wall Street Journal, "lowa's Employment Problem: Too Many Jobs, Not Enough People." (Attachment #1) A few lines in that article stand out, "If every employed person in the Midwest was placed in an open job, there would still be more than 180,000 unfilled positions, according to the most recent Labor Department Data. The 12-state region is the only area of the country where job openings outnumber out of workjob seekers." And, "The Midwest has seen an outflow of people. A net 1.3 million people living in the Midwest in 2010 had left by the middle of last year, according to census data." The State of lowa needs to be an Equitable State of Choice to retain and attract a skilled workforce so existing employers can grow, so lowa entrepreneurs can start new businesses and so that lowa can attract new companies to call lowa home. We know that lowa is a great place to live with a high quality of life, a good education system, modest cost of living and low crime rates, but what the numbers are telling us is that is not enough. We have all heard the definition of insanity is to keep doing things the same way and expect to get different results. I know this is not how you operate. The international economy is at a turning point as is the economy of the United States and the State of lowa. We are entering the 4th industrial revolution where the importance of an updated infrastructure is paramount to success and the most important part of that infrastructure is going to be a skilled and adequate workforce. In the attached (Attachment #2) article, "The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges," it is pointed out that, "In the future, talent, more than capital, will represent the critical factors of production." c Title» c Firsb> c Last» October 16, 2019 Page 2 lowa is competing on a world stage. In doing this, lowa must fight above its weight class. lowa only has eleven cities with a population greater than 50,000 people. �th 3.1 million people, lowa is only the 30t" largest state in the United States. lowa needs more and better tools to compete successfully forjobs and workers, and needs to use these tools more aggressively. Communities across the Midwest are having difficulties adjusting to the changing economy: • 1 1 1 ' � . • • ' • • • ' • • • :� � , � . . :� �. , � � � � � � �- . � � . • � . � . � • , � � . • � •� � . � �. . • .� . � . � . -.. • �• � � . . . • � � Information recently released by the State of lowa Legislative Services Agency shows the change in population in counties across lowa 2010-2017 (Attachment#3). It is a frightening trend that must serve as a wake-up call for all lowans. If we want our children and grandchildren to be able to stay in lowa and be successful, we must all work to make lowa a place of choice, not only for businesses but also the workforce they will need to thrive. We should be considering how to improve economic development and community rehabilitation tools to create more growth in jobs and population and to make the incentives more competitive. 3ervice People Ivtegrity Respovsibilily Ivvova[iov Tearnwo�k «Title» «First» «Last» October 16, 2019 Page 3 lowa Percent Chanae in Population bv Countv 2010-2017 State of lowa +3.2% (+gg,356) There are 99 counties in the state of lowa. Only 23 showed any growth at all over a 7- year period from 2010 to 2017. If you only consider counties that had at least 1% growth and have a population of 25,000 or more, only 11 of the 99 counties met these criteria and four of them are in the Des Moines/Ames corridor. In fact, the Des Moines/ Ames corridor accounted for 81,808 (82%) of the 99,356 of the state-wide population growth. Even some of the counties that include some of lowa's larger cities showed very little growth or an adual decline. COUNTY % Population Change: 2010-2017 Woodbury (Sioux City) +0.1% Muscatine (Muscatine) +0.3% Pottawattamie (Council Bluffs) +0.0% Jasper (Newton) +0.4% Wapello (Ottumwa) -1.7% Cerro Gordo (Mason City) -2.5% Webster (Fort Dodge) 3.4% Clinton (Clinton) -42% Looking at micropolitan areas in the State of lowa, the news on population change (2010-2015) is not any better: � _ � � � � �' ' �' . r • � i ' � � � � � 1 I 1 � • ' � � � •...- � � � service eeople Ivregiry keryovsibiliry Iemovatiov Tearr�wovk «Tltle» «Flrst» «Last» October 16, 2019 Page 4 The picture is just as discouraging when you look at the Estimated Population Migration from 2010 to 2017 (Attachment #4). This measurement represents the number of people who have moved to these counties vs. the number of people who have left. The State of lowa experienced a net inflow of only 24,342 people during this 7-year period. If you only consider counties that had a net positive change of at least 1 ,000 people, only 9 (9°k) of the 99 counties met that criteria, with 4 of those in the Des Moines/Ames Corridor. Additional information from the Legislative Services Agency shows the change in population and employment by County from 2010-2017 (Attachment #5). The news is not good: . 23 of the 99 counties have seen declines in both population and employment. . 25 of the 99 counties have seen declines in employment for a total of lost jobs of 8,047. . Clinton County lost the most jobs at 1 ,835 (8°k), but 10 counties lost more than 250 jobs. . Hamilton County lost 12.9°k (874) of their jobs, Cherokee County 12.8°k (695) and the average job loss of the 25 counties was 4.8°k. . 10 of the counties lost more than 5°k of their jobs. A 2018 report released by the lowa Business Council, which represents many of the state's largest employers, should be a great cause of concern for the State of lowa. When compared with how lowa ranks among all 50 states in key metrics comparing the year 2000 with 2017, it is clear that lowa needs to do more to support economic development, job growth, and workforce development: 2000 Ranking 2017 Ranking Median Household Income 21 26 Gross State Product 29 30 g�n Grade Reading Proficiency 11 17 g�n Grade Math Proficiency 12 14 Education Attainment High School 9 11 Education Attainment Bachelor Degree 22 34 Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index 7 19 We need to focus on how we can all work together to grow lowa and to make our communities a place of choice where our children and grandchildren want to stay and Service People Ivtegrity Respov96ilily Innovafiov Teamwock «Tltle» «Flrst» «Last» October 16, 2019 Page 5 new people want to come as we deal with the biggest problem identified by business and industry and that is the availability of a skilled workforce. We need to focus on quality of life issues, on job creation, on job training, on our children's education and on the future. To do that we need tools at the local level and we need healthy, engaged and active partners. Those partners need to support strategic initiatives around mental health, childcare, quality affordable housing, job training, workforce development, job creation and do all this looking through an equity lens. In my humble opinion, now is not the time to be timid. We need to act and we need to act now. Please look at expanding existing tools and creating new ones, while working with local governments as strategic partners in the effort to create an Equitable State of Choice. Sincerely, �:/C/'w"\ ✓ ��/��?" Y" � Mic ael C. Van Millige� City Manager MCVM:jh Attachments Service People Ivtegrity Respov96ilily Innovafiov Teamwock The Honorable Pam Jochum The Honorable Carrie Koelker The Honorable Lindsay James Senate Chamber Senate Chamber House Chamber lowa Capitol Building lowa Capitol Building lowa Capitol Building Des Moines. IA 50319 Des Moines. IA 50319 Des Moines. IA 50319 The Honorable Chuck Isenhart The Honorable Andy McKean The Honorable Shannon House Chamber House Chamber Lundgren lowa Capitol Building lowa Capitol Building House Chamber Des Moines. IA 50319 Des Moines. IA 50319 lowa Capital Buildina Attachment ��1 �AI:�; STREET J�UR:�1�� / ' NEWS — POLITICS I a �� S Em 1 m nt Pr 1 m • T o e o e . o0 y l��Ian t En h o s, o ou P 1 eo e � � � �� :��;��-_:�� -- ��;�� . t �� _ � - ; ��. . � , , � � �� --,� . , _ _ s . , y , _,..� I � .� ; � _ _ _ � - � , _ ; .� � . - � _ � . ;,� <� � � . � ,. :, � � _� � _ �' �` � .:.� � �' ;�� x �_ �� ` # D► , � .�=, `� � �� _ . - . - �� , - :� , �� -� �; _ _ � � ' � �_—_. Y-' _�..'-a _,i..._'.�.�.-:e;a... ��..r «, � � ..��t . . . "AF ,,,-, � R? � ' R_ -�-� ' ,,� ; .v , u, ' � _ . '� ,�<._ f. �r-.,a . p , ` .. -�.. � _ � - '.._. sa _t'_yy�� .., ' ,-}C � ".�; .`�' .,�:,�' t ��` ��; -�� ' _. - � ' - � , - `: ` _ =-'~„ ' . . . . ._ ., ,. `; . - ....r•� �:. � > . - -- ,� ----- __. _ . � � � - _ �_ , -_ � i, �. . .. � �, . ! . -��.`�_ `�{,�. ' .r�!� 4a •e• _ - - } . -- _ �.:`� � . z� _ . _ .. - � - �; ' ,. e ,�� . � ;.�P. States are spending tens of millions of dollars on worker training programs to address a supposed "skills gap." 1 But in places like Iowa, many of the job openings are in small towns and rural communities that are losing population as people move to bigger cities. ;� �Y��. %�. � s � � . _� 1 Y � � }� �., t � 3 �- �`� ,- � � � � � � � mr � �� .�§,r. �-. i'� i�.. 4 _"_�p __ 3-`' . �. =1 3 '4 j, � R'__ r e .- . . , .:i � /-r.. �' �� Kevin Johnson, 60 years old,teaches�velding to new hires at commercial truck equipment-maker Stellar Industries in Garner,Iowa. But the company has a backlog of orders because, like many companies in the region, it doesn't have enough workers. MASON CITY, Io�va—Manufacturers in northern Iowa are beggin;Terry Schumaker for freshly trained workers for their factories. The problem is he doesn't have enough students to train. "It's not like�ve have the people beating down our door to apply," said Mr. Schumaker, a dean at the North Iowa Area Community College in Mason City. It is a problem playing out in many parts of the Midwest, a region with lower unemployment and higher job-opening rates than the rest of the country. Employers, especially in more rural areas, are finding that there are just too few workers. That upends a long-running view in Washinaton,D.C., and many state capitals,where policy makers often say the unemployed simply lack the skills to get hired. Mr. Schumaker said Io�va has plenty of free programs to train workers. And Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds is poised to sign Tuesday legislation that would provide an estimated �18 million for worker-training programs. But shrinking high-school classes leave fewer potential trainees. Other states, like Indiana and Wisconsin, are undertaking similar moves. President Donald Trump has touted worker- training programs, and his daughter Ivanka visited Iowa in March to highlight the efforts. The U.S. labor market is the tightest it has been in nearly two decades. The national unemployment rate held at a 17- year low of 4.1% for five straight months, and the number of job openings is at a record. In the Midwest,the worker shortage is even more pronounced. If every unemployed person in the Mid�vest was placed into an open job, there would still be more than 180,000 unfilled positions, according to the most recent Labor Department data.The 12-state region is the only area of the country where job openings outnumber out-of-work job seekers. "The crux of the problem is that tive don't have the people here,"said Dave Zrostlik,president of commercial truck manufacturer Stellar Industries Inc.,based in Garner, a rural city of about 3,000 people near Mason City. The shortage of labor is hurting Stellar's bottom line. "We've got the biggest backlog of orders ever,"said iVlr. Zrostlik, as he walked past an assembly line sitting unused because he can't find the workers to stafF a second shift. Normally, his 450-employee company fills orders in about eight weeks. Today, it takes 18 weeks or more. With about 28,000 residents, Mason City is the largest town in about a 100-mile radius. It supports industries like manufacturing, construction and agriculture. A sib at an Arby's restaurant on the high�vay from Mason City to Garner proclaims, "If you're smiling, we're hiring." Firms in rural areas are more likely to report their applicant pool is limited,the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta said. Controlling for other factors, such as the size of a business or education level required for a job, 68% of rural firms reported too fe�v applicants for open jobs,versus 57% of employers in urban areas. The Midwest has seen an outflow of people. A net 1.3 million people living in the Midwest in 2010 had left by the middle of last year, according to census data. The area also attracts fewer immib ants than the rest of the country. As a result, Midwest employers are more dependent on filling jobs with workers who already live there. David Swenson, a regional economist at Iowa State University, doesn't believe Io�va suffers from a skills gap. More job training programs are a"solution to a problem that doesn't exist,"he said. "Thinking that it's going to solve rural labor issues is misguided." Beth Townsend,head of Iowa's department of workforce development, said Iowa has an abundance of lotiv-skilled workers but is facing a gap when it comes to jobs that require some specialized training. "We've got a lot of adults�vho could be easily upskilled,"she said. In particular, she is trying to get more disabled people or ex-convicts into the workforce because they often face more hurdles in finding employment. Iowa's 2.9%unemployment rate has already drawn thousands of workers off the sidelines. The share of Io�va adults working or seeking work was 67.9% in February,nearly five percentage points higher than the national average,U.S. Labor Department data sho�v.North Dakota,Minnesota, Wisconsin and Kansas similarly have a relatively high rate of adults in the labor force. That sug�ests many potential workers on the fi-inge of the labor market have come back. And those who aren't �vorkin�now may not be far other reasons, such as staying home with children or a lack of transportation. --�.- �� , ,� � �� ,�'`� � ; µ1 ,� a�-; ' � .� e ,. . .... �` � - � � }_, �' [ ��'��` ? .e _ .;: �,x..z;: :r` `"v`' . �' - � - � �� _��--`.�Ir'-'`'4 �;, Dave Zrostlik, CEO of Stellar Industries, works one of the cranes the company makes. "If someone needs to buy a car and commute 60 miles to take a job in a rural community,they may find it's not worth taking the job," said Carl Van Horn, director of the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University. Eric Sauey, CEO of Seats Inc, in rural Reedsburg, Wis., says that as his business making seats for commercial vehicles has gro�vn, it has become harder to find the workers he needs. He is competing�vith other industries in his town of 9,200, like health care and carpentry, for the same pool of workers. His company trains employees internally. In fact, Mr. Sauey said he would rather his employees weren't trained externally�vhen they get to his factory. "We'd rather people not have any experience because then they're not bringing bad habits with them,"he said. Attachment ��2 http://ijfr.sciedupress.com International Journal of Financial Research Vol.9,No.2;2018 The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges Min Xu�,Jeanne M.David'&Suk Hi Kim� �Department of Finance,College of Business Administration,University of Detroit Mercy,Detroit,MI,USA 2 Department of Accounting,College of Business Administration,University of Detroit Mercy,Detroit,MI,USA Corresponddence: Min Xu, Associate Professor of Finance, College of Business Administration, University of Detroit Mercy,Detroit,MI 48221,USA.Tel: 313-993-1225. Received:February 16,2018 Accepted:March 6,2018 Online Published:March 8,2018 doi:10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90 LTRL:https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90 Abstract The fourth industrial revolution, a term coined by Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum,describes a world where individuals move between digital domains and offline reality with the use of connected technology to enable and manage their lives. (Miller 2015, 3) The first industrial revolution changed our lives and economy from an agrarian and handicraft economy to one dominated by industry and machine manufacturing. Oil and electricity facilitated mass production in the second industrial revolution. In the third industrial revolution, information technology was used to automate production. Although each industrial revolution is often considered a separate event, together they can be better understood as a series of events building upon innovations of the previous revolution and leading to more advanced forms of production. This article discusses the major features of the four industrial revolutions, the opportunities of the fourth industrial revolution, and the challenges of the fourth industrial revolution. Keywords: fourth industrial revolution,�ve ages of civilization,3D printing technology, artificial intelligence,IoT, fusion of technology,robotics 1.Introduction The speed and measure of the changes coming about by the fourth industrial revolution are not to be ignored.These changes will bring about shifts in power, shifts in wealth, and knowledge. Only in being knowledgeable about these changes and the speed in which this is occurring can we ensure that advances in knowledge and technology reach all and benefit all. The first industrial revolution started in 1760 with the invention of the steam engine. The steam engine allowed the transition from farming and feudal society to the new manufacturing process.This transition included the use of coal as the main energy while trains were the main means of transportation.Textile and steel were the dominant industries in terms of employment,value of output, and capital invested. The second industrial revolution began in 1900 with the invention of the internal combustion engine. This led to an era of rapid industrialization using oil and electricity to power mass production. The third industrial revolution started in 1960 and was characterized with the implementation of electronics and information technology to automate production. Under the old ways, making things involved screwing or welding lots of parts together. The fourth industrial revolution now involves computer generated product design and three dimensional (3D) printing, which can create solids object by building up successive layers of materials.(Prisecaru, 57-62) Table 1 shows a short presentation of the industrial revolutions from 1760 to the present. Pi�blished by Sciecli�Press 90 ISSN 1923-4023 E-ISSN 1923-4031 http://ijfrsciedupress.com Intemational7ournal of Financial Research Vol.9,No.2;2018 Table 1.Main characteristics of industrial revolutions Transition Main Technical Main Developed Period period Energy Resource Achievement Industries Transport Means I: 1760-1900 1860-1900 Coal Steam Engine Textile,Steel Train II: 1900-1960 1940-1960 Oil Electricity Internal Combustion Metallurgy,Auto, Train,Car Engine Machine Building III: 1960-2000 1980-2000 Nuclear Energy Computers,Robots Auto,Chemistry Car,Plane Natural Gas IV:2000- 2000-2010 Green Energies Internet,3D Printer, High Tech Electric Car, Genetic Engineering Industries Ultra-Fast Train Source: Prisecaru, P. (2016). "Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution." Knowledge Horizons. Economics, 8(1), 57-62. Web https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.libraries.udmercy.edu:2443/docview/179355255 8?accountid=28018. Now a Fourth Industrial Revolution is building on the Third,the digital revolution that has been occurring since the middle of the last century. It is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical,digital,and biological spheres. There are three reasons why today's transformations represent not merely a prolongation of the Third Industrial Revolution but rather the arrival of a Fourth and distinct one: velocity, scope, and systems impact. The speed of current breakthroughs has no historical precedent.When compared with previous industrial revolutions,the Fourth is evolving at an exponential rather than a linear pace.Moreover,it is disrupting almost every industry in every country. And the breadth and depth of these changes herald the transformation of entire systems of production,management, and governance."(Schwab 2015) 2.Opportunities of the Fourth Industrial Revolution There are similarities between four industrial revolutions and the five ages of civilization: the hunter and gather age, the agricultural age,the industrial age,the information worker age, and the emerging age of wisdom. Therefore,we may infer the opportunities of the fourth industrial revohrtion through the characteristics of these five ages of civilization presented by Steven Covey in his book 8th Habit. (2011, 12-17) First, the productivity of each subsequent age goes up fifty times over the preceding age. Consider for example, the increase in productivity of the industrial age over the agricultural age. Second, each subsequent age destroys many of the jobs of the preceding age. The information age is replacing the jobs created by the industrial age.Much of losses in our industrial age jobs have less to do with government policy and free trade agreements than they do with dramatic shift in our economy to the knowledge worker. Third,in the first three ages of civilization manual workers produced most goods and services with their body,but in the last two ages,knowledge workers produce most goods and services with their mind.Knowledge workers are the link to a company's other investments. They provide focus, creativity, and leverage in using those investments to achieve the orgauization's objectives more efficiently. In other words, knowledge is an integral part of total managemeilt and cuts across functional boundaries. The main assets and primary drivers of the industrial age were machines and capital. People were necessary but replaceable. The management style of the industrial age simply does not work in the new economy. Management focused on motivating employees to perform the physical labor needed to produce the products and services. In the fourth industrial age, the challenge now is how companies can motivate their knowledge workers to release their human potential. Leading researchers argue that the fourth industrial revolution will shape the future through its impacts on government and business.People have no cont�•ol over either technology or the disruption that comes with the fourth industrial revolution. However, we can predict the opportunities that comes with the fourth industrial revolution: 1) lower barriers between inventors and markets,2)more active role for the artificial intelligence(AI),3)integration of different technics and domains (fusion), 4) improved quality of our lives (robotics) and 5) the connected life (Internet). Pttblished by Scieclu Press 91 ISSN 1923-4023 E-ISSN 1923-4031 http://ijfr.sciedupress.com International Journal of Financial Research Vol.9,No.2;2018 First, Chris Anderson predicts that the fourth industi-ial revolution is likely to reduce barriers between inventors and markets due to new technologies such as 3D printing for prototyping.(2012)For example,tissue engineers use rapid prototyping techniques to produce 3D porous scaffolds. The 3D printing technique fabricates scaffolds with a novel micro- and macro-architecture and these in turn help shape the new tissue as it regenerates.New technologies, like this 3D printing, allow entrepreneurs with new ideas to establish small companies with lower start-up costs. The entrepreneur can bring the product 'to reality' with 3D printing, without the traditional time constraints often encountered with traditional prototyping methods. The typical barriers to entry are removed from the marketing equation. Second, increasing trends in artificial intelligence point to significant economic disruptions in the coming years. Artificial systems that rationally solve complex problems pose a threat to many kinds of employment,but also offers new avenues to economic growth.A report by McKinsey& Company found that half of all existing work activities would be automated by currently existing technologies,thereby enabling companies to save billions of dollars and to create new types of jobs. (Manyika et al. 2017) For example, driverless cars may modestly replace tax and Uber drivers,but autonomous trucks may radically transform shipping with far fewer jobs for truck drivers. Third, innovative technologies will integrate different scientific and technical disciplines. Key forces will come together in "a fusion of tecluiologies that is blurring the lines between physical, digital, and biological spheres." (Schwab 2015) This fusion of technologies goes beyond mere combination. Fusion is more than complementary technology, because it creates new markets and new growth opportunities for each participant in the innovation. It blends incremental improvements from several(often previously separated)fields to create a product. Fourth,robotics can and will change our lives in the near future. Technically robots are automated motorized tools. They cook food,play our music,record our shows,and even run our cars.But we just do not see it because robots do not have a face we to whom we can talk or a butt we can kick. (Tilden) Consequently, robots have the potential to improve the quality of our lives at home, work, and many other places. Customized robots will create new jobs, improve the quality of existing jobs,and give people more time to focus on what they want to do. Fifth, the Internet of things(IoT)is the Internetworking of physical devices. Typically,the IoT is expected to offer advanced connectivity of devices, systems, and serVices that goes beyond machine-to-machine (M2M) communications and covers a variety of protocols, domains, and applications. (Holler, et al. 2014) The interconnection of these embedded devices is expected to usher in automation in nearly all fields,while also enabling advanced applications like a smart grid,and expanding to areas such as smart cities.The revolution of the connected life came about thanks to the advance of the Internet. In 1969, the first data was transmitted over the Internet and linked two main frame computers.Now,the Internet is connecting personal computers and mobile devices. "By 2010, the number of computers on the Internet had surpassed the number of people on the earth.°(Gershenfeld and Vasseur 2014,28) 3.Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution "We stand on the brink of a technological revolution that will fundamentally alter the way we live,work, and relate to one another. In its scale, scope, and complexity, the transformation will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before. We do not yet know just how it will unfold, but one thing is clear: the response to it must be integrated and comprehensive, involving all stakeholders of the global polity, from the public and private sectors to academic and civil society." (Schwab 2015) This paragraph gives us soine idea of the challenges surrounding the fourth industrial revolution. The enormity of the challenges and the breadth required of the response are reinfarced by Peters.(2017,28) The evolution of global industries in the fourth industrial revolution is both exciting and scary.Life will change with the 3D printing, the IoT, and the fusion of technologies. The fourth industrial revolution can raise income levels by allowing entrepreneurs to "run" with their new ideas. It will improve the quality of life for many people around the world. (Jee 2017, 255-256) Consumers are likely to gain the most from the fourth industrial revolution. "[T]echnological innovation will also lead to a supply-side miracle, with long-term gains in efficiency and productivity. Transportation and communication costs will drop, logistics and global supply chains will become more effective,and the cost of trade will diminish,all of which will open new markets and drive economic growth." (Schwab 2015) While there are many benefits of the fourth industrial revolution, there are several key challenges that lie ahead. At the same time,the revolution could yield greater inequality,particularly in its potential to disrupt labor markets. As automation substitutes for labor across the entire economy, the net displacement of workers by machines might Pt�blished by Scieclt�Press 92 ISSN 1923-4023 E-ISSN 1923-4031 http://ijfr.sciedupress.com International Journal of Financial Research Vol.9,No.2;2018 exacerbate the gap between returns to capital and returns to labor.The scarcest and most valuable resource in an era driven by digital technologies will be neither ordinary labor nor ordinary capital; rather it will be those people who can create new ideas and innovations. In the future, talent, more than capital, will represent the critical factor of production. People with ideas, not workers or investars, will be the scarcest resource. (Brynjolfsson, McAfee, and Spence 2014).In 2017 Bloomberg Global Business Forum,Apple CEO Tim Cook commented—"If I were a country leader,my goal would be to monopolize the world's talent." (Leswing 2017)The quest for talent will give rise to a job market that may become increasingly segregated. Low skilled and low wage jobs will be replaced by computers and digitization. The higher paid jobs rec�uiring more skills are less likely to be replaced. This increased dichotomization can lead to an increase in social tensions.(Wolf 2015, 125) In addition to the threat of massive job displacement under the ongoing fourth industrial revolution, there are a variety of challenges, such as cybersecurity,hacking, risk assessment, and others. (Lambert 2017)A higher level of alert is raised up when our lives become extensively connected to various devices, from our cell phones, cars, and light switches to our home security cameras, and smart speakers. One of the biggest trends in 2018 Consumer Electronics Show is that everything is connected and there is no gou�g back.(Goode 2018) Having everything attached to everything else in the IoT is going to monumeirtally increase the vulnerabilities present in any given network. With more knobs, comiections and burden of connectivity, systems are going to have to be more secure.The fourth industrial revolution calls for greater cybersecurity. Companies will need to map their networks,assessing the risk and critical factors relating to security. Such an assessment should examine accessibility to systems, such as possible threats from internal sources, from disgruntled employees to internal human error, and external sources including hackers and cyber terrarists. Further, companies must assess risk aud determine if these risks will be accepted,reduced,shared via insurance or other vehicles,or rejected.Risks can be from both intentional aud unintentional sources.If your house lights turn on via your computer,but you have lost the wireless connection to your house, you may be living in the dark. Unintentional sources of risk can include error s promulgated by company employees or nature itself such as storms causing disruptions in connectivity.Individuals too should assess their risks,just as companies will. It may come that the Internet will have more information about individuals than the family, friends, and colleagues of the individuals. Certainly,the ability of data to be processed and the speed in which it can be done surpasses the ability and speed of individuals.It is necessary to examine the value of processes and assets, from machinery to intellectual property,ensuring that there is insurance, security measures and that any vulnerability is sufficiently identified. When we consider the changing nature of security threats-from employees connecting personal devices to company networks to brute farce attadcs fi•om hackers - the situation is further complicated. The sophistication in risk identification and neutralization has to change with it. While data can be lost or stolen by employees, either inadvertently or intentionally,the biggest attacks in recent years have been external malicious attacks,collectively or commonly referred to as hacking. These could be hacking to move money around, such as when Russian hackers stole $10 million from Citibank customer accounts, Internet terrorism, such as the $2 million damages caused to WeaKnees.com over a six week botnet attack, Internet pump-and-dump fraud where hackers take advantage of manipulating stock prices, or software piracy which is estimated to cost over $50 billion a year. (Romney and Steinbart 2017, 159-167) The fourth industrial revolution is more than just technology-driven change. Rather, it is powered with disruptive imiovation to positively impact our core industries and sectars, such as education, health and business. In education, with the previous industrial revolutions, the focus of education changed. With the first industrial revolution, education was focused on standard modes of learning, such as the McGuffey reader. With move toward mass production in the second industrial revolution and standardized testing. Education is service oriented and with the move into the third industrial revolution we come to see students under a customer learning model.Now in the fourth industrial revolution, technologies really blur the lines between physical, digital and biological spheres. Disruptive innovation makes its way into higher education in which it redefines the conventional ways universities deliver their content to students. New modes of curriculum and teaching arise, and the focus changes from modes of teach to modes of learning.Alternative curriculums are being constantly developed.Disniptive innovation also reshapes how businesses operate. Thinking has really moved outside of the box. New markets are created and new products are de�ned.Netflix is competing with traditional television. Taxis must compete against Uber and Lyft. These offered similar product offered to customers in new ways. You could watch your shows froin your home or get a ride somewhere. With the Airbnb alternative overnight accommodations are competing against traditional hotels and motels.(Jules 2017) Paiblished by Sciedaa Press 93 ISSN 1923-4023 E-ISSN 1923-4031 http://ijfr.sciedupress.com International Journ11 of Financial Research Vol.9,No.2;2018 Last, in an era featuring AI, automation, robots, and genetic engineering, we have new ethical concerns emerging. Lots of debates have arisen in genetic engineering about the use of tools and research technologies. On one hand, preventing genetic disease by genetic engineering is desirable. On the other hand,what guidelines,or regulation, or ethical boundaries we should establish in order to prevent the over manipulation genetics for desirable traits?Is there such a thing as over manipulation? Infused with artificial intelligence and machine learning ability, robots have become smarter and more autonomous,but they still lack an essential feature-the capacity of moral reasoning.This limits their ability to make good or ethical decisions in complex situations. Further, the most critical question is whose moral standards should robots inherit. Moral values differ greatly from individual to individual, across countries, religions, and ideological boundaries. Uncertainty over which moral framework to adopt underlies the difficulty and limitations to ascribing moral values to artificial systems.(Al-Rodhan 2015) 4.Conclusion We have recently entered the dawn of the fourth industrial evolution, in which it differs in speed, scale,complexity, and transformative power compared to previous revolutions. This article has examined the opportunities and challenges that are likely to arise as a result of the fourth industrial revolution.As industrial revolutions have moved from the mechanization of production in the first industrial revolution,to the mass production in the second,and then to the automation of production in third, the standards of living for most people around the world have greatly improved.Undoubtedly,the capability of advancing technology coming forth from the latest industrial revolution has the potential to make even bigger and greater improvements on every aspect of our lives changes than the first three industrial revolutions summed together. On the other hand, there are a variety of challenges stemming from the fourth industrial revolution to overcome. From income inequality to cybersecuriry,the benefits of the fourth industrial revolution have obstacles that must be harnessed, directed and overcome, such as income inequality, cybersecurity, and ethical dilemmas. Technology and advancements in science drive transformation around the world. They create ripple effects on societies,institutions, and economies. They will transform the ways in which we live, work, and interact with one another.Understanding these new technologies and their disruption potential is critical for all nations and especially developing countries. The fourth industrial revolution may affect society and economy in a variety of ways. (Prisecaru 2016)First, a large portion of people around the world are likely to use social-media platforms to connect,learn,and change information. Second, a variety of innovative producers and competitors will have easy access to digital platforms of marketing, sales,and distribution,thereby improving the quality and price of goods and services.Third,consumers will be more and more involved in the production and distribution chains. The main effects of this revolution on the business environment are the impact it will have on consumer expectations, product quality, the move toward collaborative innovation,and iimovations in orgaxiizational forms. References Al-Rodhan, N. (2015). The Moral Cocle: How to Teach Robots Right and Wrong. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-08-12/moral-code Anderson,C.(2012).Makers: The New Inda�strial Revolution.New York:Crown Publishing. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2015). Will Humans Go the Way of Horses:Labor in the Second Machine Age. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-06-16/will-humans-go-way-horses Brynjolfsson,E.,McAfee,A., & Spence,M.(2014).New World Order:Labor, Capital, and Ideas in the Power Law Economy.Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2014-06-04/new-world-order Covey,S.(2005). The 8th Habit:From Effectiveness to Greatness(lst Free Press trade).New York:Free Press. Dan Miller. (2016, September). Natural Language: The User Interface for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Opaas Research Report. Gershenfeld,N.,&Vasseur,J.P.(2014).As Objects Go Online:The Promise(and Pitfalls)of the Internet of Things. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2014-02-12/objects-go-online Goode, L. (2018). Everything Is Connected, And There's No Going Back. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/17/16898728/ces-2018-tech-trade-shows-gadgets-iot Holler, J., et al.. (2014). From Machine-to-Machine to the Internet of Things: Introcla�ction to a New Age of Intelligence(1St ed.).Amsterdam:Elsevier. Pa�blished by Scieda�Press 94 ISSN 1923-4023 E-ISSN 1923-4031 http://ijfr.sciedupress.com International Journal of Financial Research Vol.9,No.2;2018 Jee,Y.-S.(2017).Exercise rehabilitation in the fourth industrial revolution.Joacrnal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 13(3), 255-256.https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1735012.506 Jules,T.D. (Ed.)(2017).Public Policy and Governance. The Global Ediccational Policy Environment in the Fourth Indiastrial Revoliation: Gate,Regulatecl ancl Governed. United Kingdom:Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Lambert, L. (2017). The Four Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Market Mogul. Retrieved from https:Uthemarketmogul,com/industry-4-0-challenges/?hvid=2Gt2CE Leswing,K. (2017).Apple CEO Tim Cook: 'If I were a country leader,my goal would be to monopolize the world's talent'. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-ceo-tim-cook-if-i-were-world-leader-my-goal-monopolize-talent-2017-9 Manyika, J., et al.. (2017, January).Ha�nessing Automation for A Fi�tuYe That Works.Repot�t by McKinsey Global Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/digital-disruption/harnessing-automation-for-a-future-that-works Peters, M. A. (2017). Teclmological Unemployment: Educating far the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of Self-Governance andManagementEconomics, 5(1),25-33.https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME5120172 Prisecaru,P. (2016). Challenges of the Fottrth Industrial Revolution.Knowleclge Horizons. Economics, 8(1), 57-62. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.libraries.udmercy.edu:2443/docview/1793552558?accountid=28018 Romney,M.B.,&Steinhart,P.J.(2018).Accoicntinglnformation Systems(14`h ed.).New York:Pearson. Schwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution. Tilden, M. W. Robotics Can - And Will - Change Our Lives In The Near Future. Retrieved from https:Uwww.theguardian.com/zurichfuturology/story/0„1920335,OO.htm1 guardian.co.uk Wolf, M. (2015, Ju1JAug.). Same as It Ever Was: Why the Techno-optimists Are Wrong. In The Fourth Indtiastrial Revolution.Foreign Affairs. Published by Sciedu Press 95 ISSN 1923-4023 E-ISSN 1923-4031 Attachment #3 Population by County - 2017 Estimate Total Population 3�145,711 LYON OSCEOLA DICKMSON I EMMET �KOSSUTH WINNEBAGO WORTH MITLHELL IYHOWARD WINNESHIEK ALLAMAKEE lowa Population 11,792 6,045 � 17,199 9,432 10,587 7,469 10,631 � 9,228 � 20,201 13,884 �SIOUX ��0'BRIEN CLAV PALOALTO �Q�999 HANCOCK CERROGORDO.-� � F�o�o CNICKNSAW Estimated Population 34,860 13,801 16,170 9,092 10,771 43,006 I 15,744 12,005 � .p�Er.E LLAVTON 3,686-14,136 PLYMOUTH � ��LHEROKEE �BUENAVISTA� POCNHONiAS,HUMBOL�T WRIGHT FRANKLIN BUTLER BREMER �9�796 �' �],637 , 14,137-26,484 25,220 11,316 20,110 6,846 9,564 12,784 10,164 14,606 24,911 I 26,485-50,163 '� WEBSTER ; 'PLRC.YNyY!/N !BUCHANAN DELAWARE DUBUQUE 5�,164-224,115 �� .WOODBURY IDA SAC CALHOUN HAMII.TON I HAR�IN GRUN�V L`atetlo �..�Dubuque ZZL�,116-481��3� Sioux 36 605 ��& �1,202 17,153 97,041� ., ��u 102,429 i 6,865 9,817 9,746 ' 15,115 17,048 12,333 city � � • Major Cities -T._ �1 '�_ I ' 7qry�q � BENTON LINN JONES JACKSON MONONA CRAWFORD CARROLL GREENE BOONE Si�'.EY � MARSHALL � �9e366 8,740 17,056 20,320 8,981 26,484 A�ntG 40,288 17,058 25,642 ' 224,115 z0,536 cedar I��NTON } Top Five Counties: 97�SOZ a RB�JI(�SCEDAR � 47,010 ) 1. Polk: 481,830 HARRISON SHELBY AUDUBON GUTHRIE DALLAS POLK JASPER POWESHIEK IOWA JOHNSON �$�543 r 2. Linn: 224,115 " 3. Scott: 172,509 14,136 11,628 5,578 10,670 87,235 48;�' y36,966 18,314 16,103 149,210I scoTT % lowa Cit ' 172,sos 4. Johnson: 149,210 ' West Des Moines . �i Des oines y MuscnnNe � Davenport POTTAWATTAMIE CASS ADAIR �MADISON WARREN MARION MqHASKA KEOKUK WASHINGTON 42,$$0 .. 5. Black Hawk: 132,648 93,386 13,145 7,054 16,013 50,163 33,105 22,235 10,153 22,281 � councii Biuff� _ L001SA Top Five Cities: 11,184 ( 1. Des Moines: 217,521 �f�MILLS �MONTGOMERI AOAMS �UNION ��LLARKE LULAS MONROE WAPELLO JEFFERSON HENRY 15,068 10,137 3,686 12,450 9,374 8,534 7,845 35,044 18,422 DESMOINES, 2. Cedar Rapids: 132,228 �s,863 39,a��/�J 3. Davenport: 102,320 FREMONT PAGE I 1A�lOR RINGGOLD � DECATUR WAYNE I APPNNOOSE DAVIS VANBUREN / 4. SIOUX CItY. HZ,514 6,948 - 15,224 6,178 5,034 7,950 6,476 -12,352 8,966 7,�57 LEE } 5. lowa City: 75,798 �_ � 34,295 Percent Change in Population - 2010-2017 Statewide LYON OSCEOLN �ICKINSON EMMET KOSSUTH WINNEBPGO WORTH MTCHELL HOWARD �WINNESXIEK NLLNM4KEE ��O/O �.si -s.ai 3.2% -8.1% -2.3% -1.6% -1.5% -3.6% {�, PercentChange -4.1� I -3.4% ��SIOU% 0'BRIEN CLNY PNLONLTO -3.QI NANCOp( �GERROGOR00�' �� -'-`� o � �FLOYD CHICKASNW _Ij`� +9 9,3 5 6 3.3% i -4.2% � -2.8% i -3.3% i -4.7/o -2.5% -3.5% -3.2% FNYETTE CLNYTON 4 PLYMOUTH CHEROKEE �BUENNVISTN POCNHONTHS HUMBOL�T �WRIGHT �FRNNKLIN BUTLER 'BREMER �rJ.�� Population Change -2.S� 1.0% -6.6% -1.1% -6.1% -2.3% _3.0% -5.0% -2.1% 2.5% �. WEBSTER �BLNCKHNWK BUCHNNNN �EL4WNRE �U Q E� Percent Change ��.WOO�BURY I�N SNC CpLHOUN � HNMILTON HNR�IN GRUN�Y .�te�I00 i -3.4� :�,%�Dubuque Sioux -3.4% _1,1% I 1.1% I 1.1% 3.3% ... --$.�J%t0-rJ.�% City 0.1% -2.9% -5.2% -4.1% -3.3% -2.8% I I -4.9%to-1.0% � �j�_'�_'� ` Tprytq BENTON LINN JONES JNCKSON -O.9/O tO �.O/O -2.3% �A � CRNWFOR� CpRROLL GREENE I BOONE IGTORY M4RSHNLL 5 9� �0 7� -5.5% -0.6% _2.4% -4.1% 0.8% � Ames _�0� -37% -1.6% Cedar 1.1%�O S.0% • 8�8� ' Rapids CLINTON 5.1%to 30.7% __ . _. _ ceoan -4.2% � T HNRRISON SHELBY NU�UBON GUTHRIE �NLLNS POLK JpSPER ��POWESHIEK IOWP JOHNSON • Ma or Cities ;Ankeny 13.6°/ 0.2% ✓��-- 1 -5.2% -4.5% -8.5% -2.4% 307% 11.5% 0.4% � -3.2% -1.4% scorr ��; � 4.4% � West Des Moines : �•Des Moines lowa City MUSCNTINE DaA'enport POTTNWNTTNMIE CN55 A�NIR M4�ISON WNRREN M4RION I rtMNqSKA KEOKUK I WNSHINGTON O.3� Top Five Actual o.o/ -s.s/ -a.�/ �.a/ a.2/ -o.a/ -o.a/ -3.a/ 2.�/ Chanae bv Countv: � CouncilBluffs ��5�� 1. Polk: 49,607 � -- 2. Dallas: 20,498 MILLS MONTGOh1ERY pppMS UNION CLNRKE LUCNS MONROE �MAPELLO JEFFERSON HENRY 3. Johnson: 17,917 -0.1% -5.2% -8.4% -0.5%�0.6% I -4.1% -1.9% -1.7% 9.S� �ESMOINES "��2� 4. Linn: 12,458 - -; -z.o i p PNGE TNYLOR RINGGOL� �ECNTUR WpYNE �qPPpN005E ��qV15 VNNBUREN � _ S. StO�Y. 7�V75 -4.3% _2.2/ -1.6% -5.6% 0.9% _3.9/ z.z% -5.6% '�EE Top Five Actual � _, -�•3%� Chanae bv Citv: Bottom FiveActual ' � �, 1. Ankeny: 16,834 Chanae bv Countv: �,,,,j 2. Des Moines: 14,088 99 Ciinton: -2,082 3. West Des Moines: 98 Lee: -1,552 g ggg 97. Webster: -1,278 4. lowa City: 7,936 96. Cerro Gordo: -1,087 5. Ames: 7,533 95. Fayette: -1,062 Sources: U.S.Census Bureau,2017 Population Estimate; LSA calculations LSA Staff Contact: Michael Guanci(515.729.7755)michael.auanci(a�leais.iowa.aov LS�� I.EGISLATIVE SERVICES AGENCY Servirzg tGe lmvn J,egitlrttnre Attachment #4 Estimated Population Migration -April 1, 2010, to July 1, 2017 �"LYON pom:-279 OSCEOLA UICNINSON EMMET NOSSU7H �WINNEBAGO WORTH MITCHELL �HOWRRD WINNESHIEN ALLAA7A.NEE , ��;$ Dom:d73 pom:730 Uom:�79 �om:-2G5 �om:-73 �� lirt:50 � Int 24 Ird:92 Int-0 Int 2 �om:-98 Dom:d27 pom:A08 Uom:-757 � Net:'2�4 Net-023 Net 754 Net:-787 .Net,-209 NM:-77 Ird:25 Int:72 Int l Int 159 � Dom:-482 � � � � Net:-T3 Net:d15 Net�07 Net:592 �SIOUX 0'BRIEN CLAY PALOALTO Int58 HANCOCN CERROGORUO � - Uom:-7702 Uom:d96 �om:-969 Uom:303 N��"�4 �om:d9l �om:-7184 FLOY� qiICNASAW Ird:4�9 Ird:37 Int 49 Ird:779 IrR:1l 1�:2�5 pom:532 Uom:d67 - Net£83 Net d65 Net:-520 Net:-184 Net-080 Net-929 Ird:-25 IrR:3 FAYEI'fE CLAttON � Net:b57 Net:-064 � . -_ .. . . . �om:-9&1 Dom:-477 �. } PLYMOU7H CHERONEE BUENAVISTA POCAHONfAS�HUMBOL�T WWGHT FRANRLIN BU7LER BREMER ��$� Int 26 � Uom:-299 Uom:b55 pom:-1 646 �om:362 " �om:-209 �om:-081 �om:fi74 �om:-120 �om:87 Net�33 NM._qs� j Im:193 Im:26 ��.5�,r Ir�t:3 Irrt:31 Im:99 IrR:58 IrR:71 Int 234 Net-106 Net:529 Net-7,101 Net:J59 Net-773 Net�82 Net:b56 Net:-49 Net:375 WEBS7ER BLACNHAWN BUCHANAN UELAWARE DUBUQUE WOOUBURY 10.4 , SAC CALHOUN HAMILTON HARUIN GRUNUY Dom:-0,071 Uom:�94 Uom:624 � �om:-729� Uom:339 �om:-202 �/t 2�5� �om:-I68 �om:J71 �om:-132 Int�7,935 �om:-078 Irit:43 Int 496 �om:5,582 Ird:70 Int 1 IrR:2 Net:-7,385 Int 126 Int 173 Ird:7 Net-2,736 IrR:50 Net�57 Net 7,720 Irit:1 22 Net:-N 9 Net 338 Net:-200 Net:�42 Net-258 Net:-725 Net 368 � Net�160 Tpryqq BENTON LINN JONES JACYf50N MONONA CRAWFORU C.4RROLL GREENE BOONE STORY M.4RSHALL Uom:-265 Dom:�78 � Dom:�31 �om:-922 Dom:2785 IM:96 Ir�:71 �..,�� om:�6 �om:�67 Uom:�74 Uom:-266 Uom:247 Uom:-932 �om:-1,921 Im:78 Int 35 lirt:2�70 Net:-769 Net 367 Ird:13 Ird:240 Ird:37 Ird:26 Int-77 Ird:5,702 Ird:7,086 Net:913 Net:-887 Net: 755 Net-73 Net 821 Net:837 Net-240 Net:170 Net:4,770 Net S35 CLINTON . � CEOPR �om:-2 557 . . . . . Im:2�3 �� HpRW50N SHELBY AUUUBON GUTHRIE UALLAS POLN JASPER POWESHIEN IOWA JOHNSON pom:38 Net:-2,334 �om:-629 Uom:d79 �om:-025` Dom:d84 Dom:-285 pom:3548 Irit:66 � Ird:0 Ir�:63 Int 5 �om:-270 Dom:73,324 Uom:16 Od3 Dom:-206 Int 210 lirt:�3 Int 6,6'47 Net 28 SCo1T�om:246 � Net:-629 Net396 �Netd20 , Irrt:28 Irrt:1,805 Irit:95�1 Im:77 Net:-274 Net:318 Net1Q795 Irit:7,451 Net:-782 Net:75,729 Net:2�,624 Net:-195 Net:7,697 C� MUSCATNE ��"'}�POTTAWATTAMIE CPSS hDAIR Mh�I50N WARREN MAWON MAHASNA NEONUN WRSHINGTON �om:-1546 �om:-461 �om:-357 �om:125 �om:b60 Dom:-725 �om:-0T2 Dom:750 Int5�0 Dom:-2 796 �om:2 760 Net:-996 " Int 3�5 Ird:6 Ir�t:7 Im:73 ��.�� lirt:97 lirt:774 lirt:23 Iirt:30 � � Net:-7,881 Net:-455 NM:356 NM:798 Net:2�865 Netd63 Net:-557 Net-049 Net:180 LOUISA Uom:-701 im:z5� Net Mi ration MILLS MON�GOMERY MAMS UNION CLPRNE LUCAS MONROE WAPELLO JEFFERSON HENRY Net d44 g : �om:-130 �om:-427 �om:-318 �om:-74 �om:-90 Uom:310 �om:-52 Uom:-7563 �om:-049 pE5M01NE5 Population Change '�� Int-77 Int 33 Ird:0 Int 83 Int 62 Ird:72 Int 34 Int 7�1 Int 2,097 pom:-469 :� Net:-747 Net:-394 Net:-378 Net:9 Net-28 Net-298 Net-78 Net:�12 Net7,648 Int73 �om:-1096 � � FREMONT PAGE TAYLOR RINGGOLD UECR7UR WAYNE APPANOOSE DAVIS VANBUREN Net:-396 Int:7t2 -4,�I6Ot0-�I,OOO Net:-924 �om:-424��. �om:S34 � Uom:-223 Uom:61 Uom:-5d2 Dom:49 �om:J99 Uom:-086 �om:d13 �ee -999to-500 Int70 Ir�:72 Ird:69 Ird:2 Int� Irrt:4 Ird:12 Ird:O IM:O �om:-7�,473 ��'�, Net:-414 Netd62 Net-154 Net:63 Net:-501 Net:53 Net387 Net:-086 , Net:d73 o-rt:st `�� -499to0 ... . .. _ . - ---- ... . . -. .. . . _ .. Net:-1,422 .. FREMONT Map figures represent the following: � 1 to 500 �� Top figure represents the annual net inflowloutflow of domestic population. 501 t0 1,000 �om:-424 I� .. N�t q14 Middle figure represents the annual net inFlow/outFlow of international population. 1,001 to 25,624 Bottom figure represents the sum of the domestic and international inFlow and outflow. Statewide Estimated Statewide Estimated Highest Domestic Net Migration Gain-2015-2016 Population Chanqe-2010-2017: One-Year Chanqe-2016-2017: Domestic Change: -17,695 Domestic Change: -2,724 Illinois � 4,160 International Change: +42,037 International Change: +6,836 Net Migration Change: +24,342 Net Migration Change: +4,112 ��o�g�a i,s96 Top Five States of Total Population Moving to and �da"° 1,°°5 Moving from lowa from lowa - 2015-2016 n4innesota 55a n�ovingtoiowa Norch Carolina S49 Illinois 12,997 8,837 o s000 i0000 is000 z0000 Nee�aSka s,s39 s,szs Highest Domestic Net Migration Loss-2015-2�16 Texa= z,»� Minnesota 6,834 5,870 Movi ng to lowa Nea�aska z,iss Movingfrom lowa Missouri 4,510 5,678 Newvo�k 1,�44 Movingfrom lowa � Moving to lowa carro��a i,s3s Texas 3,315 6,086 _ _ Michigan -1,339 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 ` 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Sources: U.S.Census Bureau,2017 Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change; LSA calculations LSAStaffContact: MichaelGuanci(515.725.1286)michael.guanci�leqis.iowa.gov LS'1c,� i,P.f:iS1.A.7�7VF SF.[LVICI�S ilt.ENC4" Scrnierg tl r i�wa Lc�ai�lnnnr Attachment#5 Change in Employment and Population - CY 2010-2017 The following maps explore the relationship between two variables, change in employment and change in population. Overlapping two variables can help identify where patterns may exist. In both maps,the darkest grey indicates counties with the highest increases in both employment and population, and the lightest color indicates counties with losses in both. The blue colors show counties with higher gains in employment but where population change is not coincident. Yellow colors indicate counties with smaller gains in employment but higher increases in population. Actual Change in Population and Employment by County LVON +211 OSCEOLA UICKINSON EMMET KOSSUTH wINNEBAGO WORTH MITCHELL HOWARD WINNESHIEK ALLAMANEE +756 �17 +532 -870 -279 -129 _145 -338 -855 -446 +201 +1,589 -169 325 +180 +Z53 +90 +395 +109 SIOU% 0'BRIEN CLaY PaL04lT0 674 HANCOCK CERROGOR�O FLOY� CHICKHSHW +1,156 -597 -497 -329 -570 -1,145 +1,763 +228 -357 +27g +g38 +513 -559 -434 FnveTTe CLAYTON +686 +193 -1,084 -492 PLVMOUTH CHEROKEE BUENPVISTA POCAHONTAS HUMBOLOT WRIGHT FRFlNKLIN BUTLER BREMER +�6] +Z$�j +234 -756 -150 -464 -251 _qq5 -516 -261 +635 +1,099 -695 +4g2 +32p +205 +ZZ3 +gZ _g1 +606 WEBSTER BLACKHAWK BUCHHNHN DELAWARE DUBU�UE �� WOODBURY IDA SAC CALHOUN HAMILiON HAR�IN GRUNDY 4�,rJ�JB +244 -611 +3,388 -�'408 +2,025 +330 +639 +4,370 +257 -224 -533 +76 +609 -558 -486 -120 +g51 +381 -185 -220 -874 -73 +159 TqMFl BENTON LINN JONES JACKSON MONONA CRAWFOR� CARROLL GREENE BOONE $TORY MARSHALL _�O9 -434 +12,889 -102 -482 -503 -40 -496 -355 +178 +7,g60 -360 +798 +391 +5,479 'z01 +pgg -119 -636 -203 +314 +Z63 +4,565 -742 CLINTON ceonn -2,106 HARRISON SHELBY FlU�UBON GUTHRIE �ALLAS POLK JASPEft POWESHIEK IOWFl JOHNSON +qq -1,833 +Z1,100 �51,190 +124 -600 -252 +1$328 -14 scon -792 -539 -541 -z84 +12,837 +32,834 +g01 +gq5 +1,604 +g,7pg +7,2g5 +165 +416 -106 -18 muscnrine +5,930 ' POTTAWATTAMIE GASS A�PIR MA�ISON WARREN MARION MAHASKA KEOKUK WASHINGTON +1 35 `� -811 -628 +334 +3,938 -204 -146 -358 +577 +2,162 .. +228 +236 +121 +264 +2.098 +898 +380 -113 +451 +g 17 �omsn -zos Largest/ncreases in MILLS MONTGOMERY I�AM$ UNION LLPRKE LUCA$ MONROE WqPELLO JEFFERSON HENRV +3�z Both Population +9 -603 -343 -84 +88 364 -125 -581 +1,579 oesmoiNes -329 +g3 +27 -260 +373 +287 -28 +457 +741 -Z8z _908 and Employment � FREMONT PqGE TAYLOR IiINGGOLo �ECatUR WaYNE APPANOOSE DAVIS VANBUREN +533 +1,581 d -493 -708 -139 -97 -507 +73 -535 +213 -413 �EE � + + +Z31 +185 -13 -1,567 68 -487 +275 +18 216 -38 -�29 �� Q +500Jobs� W (+5.0%change) FREMONT In both maps: � -493 Top Figure: Change in Population •� �� i +6S Bottom Figure: Change in Employment � � � �� C � � Percentage Change in Population and Employment by County � � � i i � Loss in Both � c� [LYON ��$� OSCEOLA UICKINSON EMMET KOSSUTH WINNEBAGO WORTH MITCHELL HOWARD WINNESHIEK ALLAMAKEE PQ Ulat101i �m +19.6% -6.5% +3.2% -8.4% -2.6% -1.7% -1.3% -3.5% -4.1% -3.1% p v u +g.g/ +19.3% -4.1% -7.0% +8.3% +�0% +2.3% +4.0% +22/ and Employment a o -3.5% $IOUX 0'BRIEN CLaY Pal0ALT0 +�O.6� HANCOCK CERRO GORoO FLOY� CHICKASAW �O +3.4% -4.1% -3.0% 3.5% -5.0% -2.6% /OW� hl h o± +9.4% +37% -4.0% +7J% +16.4% +2.1% -3.4% -3.5% Fare..e e�nvTor+ g +12.7% +4.2% -5.z� -z.�� Change in Population PLYMOUTH CHEROKEE 9UENpV15Ta POCAHONTpS HUMBOL�T wRIGHT FaaNKUN eUTLER BREMER +Z.4% ♦ +0.9% -6.3% -0.7% -6.3% -2.6% -3.4% -4.8% -1.8% +2.6% 4.4% +10.7% -12.8% +4.6% +12.3% +5.4% +42% +2.4% -2.3% +6.5% WEeSTER 9LaCKHaWK BUCHANAN �ELPWARE DUBUDUE WOO�BURY IDA SAC CALHOUN 3 7� HAMILiON HAR�IN GRUN�Y ��.Z� +12% -3.4% +3.6% -32% -5.1% +0.8% � -3.6% -2.8% -1.0% +2.8% +5.3% +10.6% +8.1% +0.3% +11.5% -5.8% -72% 3.4% _12.9% -1.0% +4.1% +1.7% TqMp BENTON LINN JONE$ JACKSON MONONa CRAWFOR� CaRROLL GREENE BOONE SiORY MARSHHLL _4 O� -,1.7� +6.1� -0.5% -2.4% -5.4% -0.2% -2.4% 3.8% +0.7% +8.9% -0.9% +3.3% +4.8% +Z.g/ +10.9% _q.Z� *16.4% +7.1% +4.4% -4.3% -8.5% -1 7% +1 0.3% cur�ror+ _4 3� CE�AR go� Statewide in lowa HHRRISON SHELBV aUOU90N GUTHRIE oaLLqS POLK JASPER POwESHIEK IOWa JOHNSON +O.Z% 20 1 0-20 1 7: +3�.g/ +11.9% +0.3% -32% -1.5% +14.0% -0�3� scorr+4.4%�� -5.3% -4.4% -8.8% -2.6% +41.4% +12.4% +8.5% +102% +15.7% +13.0% +7.0% +4.1% +7.7 j -5.6% -0.6% muscanNe � �� POTTAWATTAMIE CA55 ApAIR MA�ISON WflRREN MARION MAHASKq KEOKUK WASHINGTON �'O.3� � � ... -5.8% -82% +2.1% +5.5% -0.6% -07% -3.4% +2J% +102% .. +0.2% +4.1% +4.6% +72% +227% +5.5% +5.1% -4.9% +5.8% �omsn . ... � +22% -�8� Change in Population MILLS�O,�� MONTGOMERY A�AM$ UNION CLARKE LUCA$ MONROE WAPELLO JEFFERSON HENRV +5.9� _$3� -5.6% -8.5% -O7% +0.9% -4.1% -1.6% -1.6% +9.4% oes momes +2.3% +2.3% -4.0% +9.1% +9.3% -0.8% +2.9% +10.9% -1.4% -2.3% FREMONT PaGE TAYLOR IiINGGOLo �ECaTUR WAYNE aPPqN00SE DAVIS VANeUREN +5�9/ '+'7.7% -6.6% -4.4% -22% -1.9% -6.0% +1.1% -42% +2.4% -5.5% �EE +2.9% -7.4% +15.4% +1.3% +10.1% -2 A% +5.3% i� +9.7% i -0.6% -4.4% -°8� Change in Annual Average Employed Sources: U.S.Bureau of Labor Statistics,Occupational Employment Statistics; U.S.Census Bureau,2017 Population and Housinq Unit Estimates �C�� LSA Staff Contact: Ron Robinson(515.281.6256)ron.robinson(a�leqis.iowa.qov `� r.�c.ts�..�•rivE: srxvicna nc:r:tcn� ti.�rv�irtq rGe'los��m LcR+slntpn•[