Code of Ordinance Amendment - Title 10 Allowing Leashed Dogs/Cats in Desingated ParksCity of Dubuque
ITEM TITLE:
SUMMARY:
SUGGESTED DISPOSITION:
Copyrighted
March 2, 2020
Action Items # 4.
Code of Ordinance Amendment - Title 10 Allowing
Leashed Dogs and Cats in Designated Parks
Park and Recreation Advisory Commission recommending
amendments to the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances
allowing leashed dogs and cats in designated parks.
ORDINANCE Amending City of Dubuque Code of
Ordinances Title 10 Public Ways and Property, Chapter 5
Parks and Recreation, Article B Use Regulations, Section
10-5B-1 Definitions
ORDINANCE Amending City of Dubuque Code of
Ordinances Title 10 Public Ways and Property, Chapter 5
Parks and Recreation, Article B Use Regulations by
repealing Section 10-5B-4 Dogs, Cats and other Domestic
Animals and adopting a new Section 10-5B-4 Dogs and
Cats in lieu thereof
Suggested Disposition: Receive and File; Motion B; Motion
A
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Commission Memo
Staff Memo
Current Ordinance 10-5B-1 Definitions and 10-5B-4
Dogs, Cats and Domestic Animals
ORDINANCE: 10-5B-1 Definitions
ORDINANCE: 10-5B-4 Dogs and Cats
Pet -Friendly Assessment 8-19
Compilation of Public Input
Pet -Friendly Work Group Executive Summary 1-20
Two -by -Two Information Sheet
Suggested Motion Wording
Type
Supporting Documentation
Staff Memo
Supporting Documentation
Ordinance
Ordinance
Supporting Documentation
Supporting Documentation
Supporting Documentation
Supporting Documentation
Supporting Documentation
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
Dubuque
Wand
AII•America City
II
2007.2012*2013
2017*2019
TO: Mayor Roy Buol and the Dubuque City Council
FROM: City of Dubuque Park and Recreation Commission Members
SUBJECT: Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation to Amend 10-5B-4
Related to Allowing Leashed Dogs and Cats in Designated Parks
DATE: February 20, 2020
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
The City of Dubuque Park and Recreation Commission, along with members of the Pet -
Friendly Work Group, have been working diligently to determine an action plan related
to becoming a more pet -friendly community. It is after much discussion, review, public
input, and drafts that we bring the City of Dubuque Park and Recreation Commission's
proposal and unanimous recommendation to a change in ordinance 10-5B-4 related to
allowing leashed dogs and cats in designated city parks. Below is a timeline with
background, and history, detailing the efforts of both the Commission and the Pet -
Friendly Work Group which has brought us to this point.
Background
Becoming a pet -friendly community was selected as a City Council policy agenda high
priority item during the 2018 goal setting session. The guidance from the City Council
included that this would not only be about leashed dogs and cats in parks, but also
would engage partners in how we could become a more pet -friendly community.
Imagine Dubuque 2037: A Call to Action, 2017 Comprehensive Plan, included "dog -
friendliness" as an important consideration in helping Dubuque's appeal as a socially
vibrant and desirable place to live.
The 2017 Imagine Dubuque Comprehensive Plan also contained these
recommendations related to becoming a pet -friendly community:
• Re-evaluate the Parks and Recreation Plan, potentially through a strategic
update or addendum, to identify opportunities to provide flexible, programmable
space; improve active recreation connectivity in neighborhoods; and enhance
Dubuque's "dog -friendliness."
• Evaluate and revise, as appropriate, the dog -related policies for all of Dubuque's
park and recreation facilities.
At the November 19, 2018 City Council meeting, a "Pet -Friendly Community Action Plan
Process" was approved. The process would include developing an action plan for
becoming a more pet -friendly community and completion of a community assessment.
The assessment chosen, the U.S. Conference of Mayors Pet -Friendly City Assessment,
had been recommended to Mayor Roy Buol at the United States Conference of Mayors
and served as the basis for the Pet -Friendly Work Group.
After the approval of an action plan process by the City Council, representatives were
selected/appointed by each of the groups/organizations outlined in the council memo.
Those representatives are listed below. The Work Group began meeting on February
20, 2019 and met almost every other week to review information, facts and data, listen
to presentations, review drafts, work on the community survey, and research
information.
The Work Group consists/has consisted of the following members:
Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager (Co -Facilitator of Work Group)
Jeremy Jensen, Assistant Police Chief (Co -Facilitator of Work Group)
Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager
Steve Fehsal, Park Division Manager
Marie Ware, Leisure Services Manager
Mary Rose Corrigan, Public Health Specialist
Amanda Shaffer, Dubuque Humane Society Representative
Rebecca Kuhle, Park and Recreation Commission Representative
Lisa Johnson, Friendly Intelligent Dog Owners (FIDO) Representative
Marianne Kirkendall, Pet Business Representative (Colonial Terrace Vet)
Paul Hoffmann, Community Representative
Robin MacFarlane, Pet Business Representative (That's My Dog!)
Alternates:
Mallory Schmid, Friendly Intelligent Dog Owners (FIDO) Alternate
Ray Werner, Park and Recreation Commission Representative Alternate
Jennifer Tigges, Park and Recreation Commission Representative Alternate #2
Cori Burbach left the committee in June of 2019 and Marie Ware was designated as
Cori's replacement for Co -Facilitator of Work Group.
The Pet -Friendly Assessment represents the collaborative effort of this work group to
amass information and statistics for review of this topic. The assessment looks at four
foundational pillars of a Pet -Friendly Community: Shelters, Homes, Parks and
Businesses. This information is preceded by an in-depth City Profile section. A major
part of this assessment also included a community survey based on these four
foundational pillars. A summary of these results is included in the work group's
assessment of each section, and the full results are attached.
2
Once the Pet -Friendly Assessment was completed, it was determined by the
Commission and the Pet -Friendly Work Group to delve into the Parks section of the
assessment first.
After reviewing the Pet -Friendly Assessment and comments from the community
survey, members of the Commission began revising the current pets in parks ordinance.
It was determined through both the assessment and the survey that Dubuque was
behind the times regarding allowing leashed dogs and cats in parks.
The Commission and Pet -Friendly Work Group both reviewed the proposed ordinance
numerous times to ensure comments from the community received through the
assessment, including any concerns or issues, were being considered and addressed.
Once both groups found the proposed ordinance acceptable, the Commission set a
public input meeting date of January 14, 2020. The goal of the public input meeting was
to allow citizens to directly provide feedback related to the ordinance proposal. Along
with the public input meeting, a survey was made available (online and in -person), with
the options of "Yes, I agree with the proposed ordinance change", "Yes, however I
would recommend changes to the proposed ordinance", "No, I disagree with the
proposed ordinance change", or "I am indifferent." Comments were also allowed on the
form.
Information regarding the public input meeting and the survey was distributed through
multiple channels. A press release was issued by the City of Dubuque, which the
Telegraph Herald also published. Paper surveys were available at the following
locations: Carnegie Stout Library, Multicultural Family Center and the Leisure Services
Administrative Office. City staff added the information to the Pet -Friendly Community
webpage on the City's website (cityofdubuque.org/PetFriendlyCommunity). Interviews
regarding the proposed ordinance change were completed with both KDTH and KCRG
and included information on how to complete the survey.
The survey was available from January 2, 2020 through January 17, 2020. Overall
results from the proposed ordinance survey and public input meeting, as well as parks -
related survey results from the Pet -Friendly Community Assessment, are shown below.
Comments from both surveys can be found in their entirety in the attached documents.
3
Survey Results
Are you in favor of the proposed ordinance change?
(Survey results)
■ Yes, I agree with the proposed ordinance change. (402 responses)
■ Yes, however I would recommend changes to the proposed ordinance. (68 responses)
■ No, I disagree with the proposed ordinance change. (133 responses)
■ I am indifferent. (4 responses)
4
Comments from: "Yes, I agree with proposed ordinance
change."
60
40
20
0
Q
Po
00 0� `p NI) �'0c _op
160 comments total
Comments from: "Yes, however I would recommend changes
to the proposed ordinance."
60
40
20
0
69 comments total
ads Pe\ �n`�(Ge�ent
tj,5
Comments from: "No, I disagree with proposed ordinance
change."
60
40
20
0
125 comments total
`0g a' e�`
e�A ��a�c
Q�vo 4'c� ec�
c,e c
Qe
Qa�
Sa A4a �c
y
r`
5
Public Input Meeting Results
Are you in favor of the proposed ordinance change?
(Public input meeting results)
• Yes, I agree with the proposed ordinance change. (21 responses)
• Yes, however I would recommend changes to the proposed ordinance. (2 responses)
• No, I disagree with the proposed ordinance change. (7 responses)
Pet -Friendly Community Assessment Survey Results
(Parks -related questions)
Parks -Related Questions on the City of Dubuque's 2019 Pet -Friendliness Community Survey
(Number of Responses from 615 Respondents)
Survey Question
Strong y Disagree Neutral Strongly Agree
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AVA
Pet -friendly parks and public spaces are
located throughout our city.
261
97
71
34
37
18
14
17
45
16
Parks offer pet -friendly spaces and basic
amenities.
262
100
87
36
31
15
15
15
33
Green spaces planning includes
consideration for pets.
90
60
32
24
14
15
13
32
55
Neighborhoods have parks that are within
walking distance.
201
73
55
46
53
25
39
26
55
37
Off -leash parks and pet -friendly spaces are
planned in my city within the next five
years
180
55
26
14
26
11
15
11
23
25
Parks and public spaces in our city have
visible and accessible pet waste stations
with free waste bags and trash receptacles.
1` t'
255
106
66
41
36
13
16
13
34
34
Parks and public spaces have visible and
accessible hydration stations for pets.
237
109
77
33
33
17
18
12
33
43
Our city has signage that clearly identifies
pet amenities.
102
58
26
31
10
16
8
31
45
Our city has expanded the ways it held pet
owners find pet amenities.
67
51
31
35
22
19
12
28
92
Parks and public spaces in our city have
signage communicating where pets are
allowed or restricted.
78
37
67
53
95
55
60
53
93
20
Parks and public spaces post clear rules
about pet behavior.
105
69
60
54
79
46
48
32
77
4'
Our city has a program to educate kids
about dog behavior.
176
48
35
21
26
12
22
7
26
238
Our city has had a communication program
within the last five years about responsible
pet ownership.
165
48
40
24
27
13
9
14
24
6
History
The Commission first began working on a change to the pets in parks ordinance in
2012. A full timeline of Commission and City Council actions relating to the pets in parks
ordinance proposals can be found on pages 75-84 of the Pet -Friendly Assessment. The
timeline also includes links to the corresponding minutes from the meetings.
A summary of previous public input sessions held, survey results through the years, and
various other polls regarding allowing pets in designated city parks is below:
Data Source
For Pets in
Parks
Against
Pets in
Parks
Percentage
Total comments received by the City
of Dubuque through 2015
(website, email, petitions, public
sessions, phone calls, and letters)
203
84
73% for
Petition Signatures,
Received by 3-16-2013
1,750
1,050
63% for
Petition Signatures,
Received by 1-10-2015
2,019
1,057
66% for
P&R Public Input Session,
6-12-2012
3
2
60% for
P&R Public Input Session,
7-10-2012
10
6
63% for
P&R Public Input Session,
11-18-2014
19
10
66% for
Scan DBQ Online Discussion,
2014
235
70
77% for
Scan DBQ Online Poll,
3-16-2013
168
65
72% for
Telegraph -Herald Online Poll,
3-16-2013
151
76
67% for
Telegraph -Herald Online Poll,
7-10-2014 (with 12 neutral votes)
135
63
64% for
70% for or
neutral
Telegraph -Herald Online Poll,
December 2014
62
38
62% for
While there is a lot of history to read through, the most important item to note is this has
been an ongoing matter for the past eight years. The proposed ordinance survey and
public input meeting results indicate community support continues to be in line with the
historic trend.
In the past eight years, the Commission has recommended a change to the ordinance
twice, and it has failed at City Council for a variety of reasons. The Commission, along
with the Pet -Friendly Work Group, has been working on these concerns we have heard
in the past from City Council as well as concerns we have received from the community
through the assessment and surveys. In the following section, we will discuss common
concerns we have received and viable solutions.
7
Discussion
The majority of the concerns received regarding allowing leashed dogs and cats in
parks can be summarized into several different categories: signage and waste disposal,
education, enforcement, fear, safety, nuisance concerns related to leashed dogs and
cats, and support of pet parks as an alternative.
The Pet -Friendly Work Group discussed these issues, both during the process of
developing the ordinance change as well as considering the comments returned from
the community. The following points have been discussed as areas of focus to help
address these concerns:
1. Appropriate signage and waste bags/disposal stations would be needed. These
items represent the financial and logistical parts of the ordinance change, should
it be adopted.
a. Designs and costs of various signs and waste stations have been
reviewed by the Work Group.
b. Work Group members have made maps of the various parks in Dubuque
with suggested locations for waste stations.
c. Cost of these items can be mitigated by:
i. Use of funds already set aside in the budget to explore another pet
park.
ii. Business sponsors have expressed interest for financial support of
these items. The Work Group can discuss ways to more formally
proceed with these donations should the ordinance pass.
d. The Park and Recreation Commission recommends and encourages the
funding for signage and pet waste stations. The Work Group reviewed the
possibility of reallocating the current funding for planning a new pet park to
be used for signage and pet waste stations. We support this reallocation
for FY 2020 and allowing for additional signage and pet waste stations as
needed in funding for FY 2021.
e. We recommend the ordinance go in effect July 1st, 2020.
2. Education represents a large area of opportunity to mitigate many of these
concerns.
a. As mentioned above, clear signage including ways to easily access the
ordinance, would be a priority.
b. Two -By -Two, a local educational program that all Dubuque 2nd graders
participate in, provides character -building lessons that include responsible
pet ownership and engagement.
c. The BE AWARE program that is in development by Robin MacFarlane of
That's My Dog! provides an engaging and direct opportunity to teach
responsible pet ownership and how pet owning and non -pet owning
8
citizens can interact safely. Documents and lessons for this program are
available for review and discussion. Distribution of the information from
this program involves trained volunteers.
3. Enforcement concerns were discussed along with ways citizens could assist with
enforcement. Review of needs regarding animal control enforcement in general
will be continued by city staff in the Health, Police, and Leisure Services
Departments.
4. To accommodate public concerns, a number of parks and specific areas located
throughout the City have been designated pet -free.
5. The Pet -Friendly Work Group will continue to discuss the issue of pet parks as
well. Off -leash pet parks have different reach and implications than the current
focus of leashed dogs and cats in parks.
Conclusion
This ordinance change is supported by the community, which is evident from the public
engagement process and survey. Dubuque has had a trial run of allowing leashed pets
in at least eight different areas for the past six -and -a -half years with minimal issues as
noted in the Pet -Friendly City Assessment. The Pet -Friendly Work Group, as formed by
the City Council, and the Commission will continue to work on concerns from the
community through public awareness and education should the ordinance proposal
pass.
We believe, as a Commission, allowing leashed dogs and cats in designated city parks
will enhance the Dubuque experience and allow Dubuque to become a more inclusive
city for pet owners. We recommend the City Council pass the ordinance as presented
and that it becomes effective July 1st, 2020.
Respectfully submitted, k� , Chairperson
The City of Dubuque Park and Recreation Commission
Rebecca Kuhle — Chairperson
Ray Werner — Vice -Chairperson
Matt Garrett — Secretary
Robin Kennicker
Robert McCoy
Jennifer Tigges
Hobie Wood
9
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
Dubuque
All -America City
V PI,AIIJ-•k J...
it1r
II
2007.2012.2013
2017*2019
TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
FROM: Marie L. Ware, Leisure Services Manager
SUBJECT: Information Related to Proposed Pets in Parks Ordinance Changes
DATE: February 24, 2020
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide information for the City Council related
to the proposed pets in parks ordinance changes.
BACKGROUND
The City Council at their 2018 goal setting session adopted Pet -Friendly Community:
Policy Direction and Actions as a 2018-20 Policy Agenda High Priority. The guidance
from the Council included that this would not be only about pets in parks but would
engage partners in how we could become a more pet -friendly community.
At the November 19, 2018 City Council meeting the City Council approved a process to
create a Pet -Friendly Community Action Plan. The first step was to establish the
members of the Pet -Friendly Work Group as outlined at that meeting.
The Work Group members are as follows:
Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager (Co -Facilitator of Work Group)
Jeremy Jensen, Assistant Police Chief (Co -Facilitator of Work Group)
Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager
Steve Fehsal, Parks Division Manager
Marie Ware, Leisure Services Manager
Mary Rose Corrigan, Public Health Specialist
Amanda Shaffer, Dubuque Humane Society Representative
Rebecca Kuhle, Parks and Recreation Commission Representative
Lisa Johnson, Friendly Intelligent Dog Owners (FIDO) Representative
Marianne Kirkendall, Pet Business Representative (Colonial Terrace Vet)
Paul Hoffmann, Community Representative
Robin MacFarlane, Pet Business Representative (That's My Dog)
Alternates:
Mallory Schmid, Friendly Intelligent Dog Owners (FIDO) Alternate
1
Ray Werner, Parks and Recreation Commission Representative Alternate
Jennifer Tigges, Parks and Recreation Commission Representative Alternate #2
Cori Burbach left the committee in June of 2019 and Marie Ware was designated as
Cori's replacement for Co -Facilitator of Work Group.
The Work Group, once established set guiding principles and ground rules, created a
shared understanding of definitions and established timing. The action plan approved by
Council anticipated that data collection and assessment completion could take six -nine
months to complete. The first identified deliverable of the Work Group was to complete
the Pet -Friendly Community Assessment.
The Work Group met biweekly to review information, facts and data, listen to
presentations, review drafts, work on the community survey, call a sampling of
landlords and research information. The Pet -Friendly Community Assessment is the
compilation of that work and was recommended on July 16, 2019 by the Parks and
Recreation Commission that the City Council receive and file the assessment. The
assessment was received and filed by City Council on July 28, 2019. The Assessment
is attached to this action item.
DISCUSSION
The Park and Recreation Commission at their August 2019 meeting began the process
of proposing an ordinance change to allow pets in most City parks. The process
included public engagement, involvement and feedback from the Pet -Friendly Work
Group. The Commission drafted a proposed ordinance to allow pets in parks. The Park
and Recreation Commission and the Pet -Friendly Work Group then reviewed a draft
proposed ordinance that was prepared by the City Attorney's Office in December of
2019. Once reviewed and recommended for approval, the commission began the
public engagement related to the proposed ordinance change.
A survey was created by the Park and Recreation Commission to determine if the public
was in favor of the proposed ordinance, in favor with recommended changes, not in
favor, or indifferent and asked for comments. The survey was posted on-line, and
paper surveys were available at the Carnegie Stout Library, Multicultural Family Center
and the Leisure Services Administrative Office. City staff added the information to the
Pet Friendly Community webpage on the City's website, www.cityofdubuque.org/Pet-
Friendly-Community. Press releases, news flashes and social media posts were also
posted to notify the public about the survey. The public was advised to call Rebecca
Kuhle, Chairperson of the Park and Recreation Commission with any questions related
to the survey. The survey was available from January 2, 2020 through January 17,
2020. The survey was filled out by 607 individuals via online and paper surveys.
The Park and Recreation Commission also held a two-hour Special Meeting on January
14, 2020 at the City Council Chambers to take public input related to the proposed
ordinance change. Approximately 50 people attended the meeting with about 30
voicing their opinions. A compilation of the public meeting input, surveys, phone calls,
2
WebQA Citizen Request system, emails, letters and any other form of input is attached
to this action item.
Community and commission members asked questions related to the liability of the City
during the public input meeting. Questions included: Can someone sue the City if they
get bit by a dog? How is the City protected if a dog bites someone in a City park? What
if a dog knocks over an elderly person or small child in a park? City Attorney Crenna
Brumwell shared three statutory exemptions that would apply.
670.4 Claims exempted.
1. The liability imposed by section 670.2 shall have no application to any claim
enumerated in this section. As to any such claim, a municipality shall be liable
only to the extent liability may be imposed by the express statute dealing with
such claims and, in the absence of such express statute, the municipality shall be
immune from liability.
c. Any claim based upon an act or omission of an officer or
employee of the municipality, exercising due care, in the execution
of a statute, ordinance, or regulation whether the statute, ordinance
or regulation is valid, or based upon the exercise or performance or
the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on
the part of the municipality or an officer or employee of the
municipality, whether or not the discretion is abused.
j. Any claim based upon an act or omission of an officer or
employee of the municipality, whether by issuance of permit,
inspection, investigation, or otherwise, and whether the statute,
ordinance, or regulation is valid, if the damage was caused by a third
party, event, or property not under the supervision or control of the
municipality, unless the act or omission of the officer or employee
constitutes actual malice or a criminal offense.
o. Any claim for injuries or damages based upon or arising out of an
act or omission of an officer or employee of the municipality or the
municipality's governing body and arising out of a recreational
activity occurring on public property where the claimed injuries or
damages resulted from the normal and expected risks inherent in the
recreational activity and the person engaging in the recreational
activity was voluntarily on the public property where the injuries or
damages occurred and knew or reasonably should have known that
the recreational activity created a substantial risk of injuries or
damages.
The Pet -Friendly Work Group has remained very involved during the process. The
survey results were reviewed by the Work Group as well as the ordinance changes.
The Work Group provided input and feedback to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
3
The Work Group provided a letter regarding this ordinance change that is a part of the
action item and was shared with the Commission prior to their action.
The Pet -Friendly Work Group has continued to work on other agenda items including
public education. Robin MacFarlane, owner of That's My Dog, has created an
educational campaign called Be Aware. This provides education on how to teach
responsible pet ownership and how pet owners and non -pet owners can interact safely.
She is working with City staff on an agreement to share her campaign program and
materials.
Two by Two, a nonprofit group also spoke about pets at the December 2019 Pet -
Friendly Work Group meeting. Two by Two is a 5-week program presented to all
Dubuque public and parochial second graders. The program labeled Kindhearted Kids
teaches students about responsible pet ownership. Two by Two is very interested in
partnering for a more Pet -Friendly Dubuque Community. Two by Two information is
attached to this action item.
The Pet -Friendly Work Group has worked on potential locations for additional pet waste
stations and drinking fountains in specific parks. Signage is also a priority of the Work
Group. They continue to discuss the issues of pet parks and discussed working with the
organizers of the summer Farmer's Market to coordinate polices as it relates to pets.
The proposed draft ordinance and all input received was discussed at the February 11,
2020 Park and Recreation Commission meeting. The discussion included whether there
needs to be changes to the proposed ordinance based on feedback from the survey,
public input, and the Pet -Friendly Work Group. The timeline for when this ordinance
should take affect was considered as it relates to funding, signage, education, staff time
and costs for implementation of ordinance if it is approved as proposed.
The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the current ordinance 10-
5B-4:DOGS, CATS AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS be updated to the proposed
ordinance 10-5B-4: DOGS AND CATS to allow leashed pets in the majority of city
parks. Ordinance 10-5B-1: DEFINITIONS would also need to be updated to reflect the
ordinance change. The resolution and ordinance changes recommended by the Parks
and Recreation Commission are attached to this action item as well as a letter from the
Commission to the City Council.
The Park and Recreation Commission is unanimously recommending that the ordinance
go into effect on July 1, 2020. This will allow time for budget requests to be considered
for the current and FY 21 budget cycle. It also allows for time to begin the education
campaign as well as install appropriate signs and begin public education of a change if
adopted.
BUDGET IMPACT
Should the City Council wish to move forward with the ordinance change, funding is
needed for new signage at park and trail locations. Old no pets signs will need to be
4
removed. Staff time is required to complete this process. Pet waste stations could also
be installed in specific parks using the input of the Work Group for these locations.
Funding was approved in the FY19 budget to begin the planning process for developing
a second dog park in the community. The amount approved was $20,000 for planning
(CIP #3502737 62716). There is no additional funding in the FY20 budget or in the
proposed FY21-25 CIP budget for construction of a second dog park. The planning
money would not be useful without the construction money. The current funding for the
planning of the dog park could be used to fund signage and pet waste stations if the
proposed ordinance change is approved by City Council. The Pet -Friendly Work Group
and the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed this possibility of change of use of
funds and they were supportive of this use if an ordinance change was to be approved.
An improvement level package for $15,000 is also proposed in the FY 21 Park Division
budget that the Council is considering in the coming month. This improvement level
request is for the addition of pet friendly amenities throughout the City. This would
include amenities such as pet waste stations, and educational signage and materials.
Costs include purchase and installation of these amenities as well pet waste bags.
These costs do not include staff time that will be needed to maintain and restock waste
stations with bags as needed. That would become a duty of current staff. Additionally, it
should be noted that Park Division staff would not be available to pick up pet waste
should a citizen call and report pet waste in parks or public areas. The Division staff
does not have additional hours to monitor, police and pick up pet waste should that
happen.
An improvement package is also being proposed in the FY 21 budget in the Health
Services Department to take a part time Animal Control Officer from part-time to full-
time.
CONCLUSION
This memo is for informational purposes only as well as share a potential funding
source for signage and pet waste stations should the City Council wish to approve the
ordinance change being proposed by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Prepared by Steve Fehsal, Park Division Manager
cc: Mary Rose Corrigan, Public Health Specialist
Jeremy Jensen, Co -Facilitator of Pet Friendly Community Work Group
Cori Burbach, Past Co -Facilitator of Pet Friendly Community Work Group
Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager
5
CITY OF DUBUQUE
CURRENT ORDINANCE
10-5B-1: DEFINITIONS: Masterpiece on the Mississippi
As used in this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
AT LARGE: Any dog, cat or livestock, fowl or ferret found off the premises of the owner or
keeper.
CAT: Both male and female animals in the family Felis catus whether neutered or not.
CITY MANAGER: City Manager or City Manager's designee.
COMMISSION OR THE COMMISSION: The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission.
DOG: Both male and female animals of the canine species whether neutered or not, but not
including a law enforcement dog.
DOMESTICATED ANIMAL: An animal commonly referred to as a bovine, swine, sheep, goat,
domesticated deer, llama, poultry, rabbit, horse, pony, mule, jenny, donkey, or hinny.
KEEPER: A person other than the owner keeping, sheltering, having control or custody of or
harboring an animal.
LEISURE SERVICES MANAGER: Leisure Services Manager or Leisure Services Manager's
designee.
Dubuque
tom!
f1i1i►
2007.2012.2013
20v.201g
MULTIPURPOSE USE TRAIL OR TRAILS: A hardened trail of asphalt, concrete or other
impervious surface, typically ten feet (10') to twelve feet (12') wide and physically separated
from the motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within highway public
right-of-way or private property within an independent alignment for use by pedestrians, skaters,
joggers, bicyclists, and City maintenance vehicles.
OPEN SPACES: Available to the public for passive recreational use in and adjacent to the City,
which are under the responsibility of the commission.
OWNER: A person owning a cat, dog, or other animal.
PARKS OR PARKWAYS: Parks, parkways, buildings, park roads or driveways, and all public
service facilities or grounds, buildings and structures in and adjacent to the City, which are
under the responsibility of the commission. (Ord. 42-13, 8-5-2013)
CITY OF DUBUQUE
CURRENT ORDINANCE
10-5B-4: DOGS, CATS AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS:
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
Dubuque
IPtIV-r Cl7
I1I1II
2007-2012.2012
2017*2019
A. Animals Prohibited: No person shall be permitted to bring into any park, parkway, trail, or open
space, any dog, cat or other domestic animal, nor shall any person permit such dog, cat or other
domestic animal to run at large in any park, parkway, trail, or open space. Any unattended
animal shall be impounded and its owner may redeem the same upon paying the reasonable
costs of such impoundment.
B. Leashed Dogs And Cats Allowed In Certain Parks And Areas:
1. Notwithstanding the foregoing, leashed dogs and cats shall be permitted in the following:
A.Y. McDonald Park
Bee Branch Creek Greenway
Granger Creek Nature Trail
Heritage Trail
Jaycee Trail
John G. Bergfeld Recreation Area
Medical Associates Greenbelt Park
Miller -Riverview Park
Northwest Arterial Trail
Port of Dubuque Marina
Port of Dubuque Riverwalk Trail
Powerline Trail
Pyatigorsk Park
Southern Levy Trail
2. Leashed dogs and cats as allowed in subsection B1 of this section are subject to and must
comply with the provisions of title 7, chapter 6 of this Code.
3. The owner or keeper must pick up and dispose of or take away the dog or cats waste.
4. The owner or keeper is responsible for the actions of the dog or cat.
C. Unleashed Pets Allowed in Pet Park: Unleashed pets shall be permitted in the pet park.
D. Exceptions: This section does not apply to:
1. Service animals used by persons with disabilities;
2. As part of an approved and permitted special event under chapter 4 of this title;
3. Animals which are part of the Storybook Hill Petting Zoo at Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Park; and
4. Animals within Eagle Point Park, Murphy Park and Flora Park which are confined to an
automobile, camper, motor home (aka recreational vehicle), or other similar conveyance
during the entirety of their time within the designated park(s), parkway(s), trail(s), or open
space(s). (Ord. 23-17, 5-15-2017)
Prepared by: Crenna M. Brumwell, Esq. 300 Main Street Suite 330 Dubuque IA 52001 563 589-4381
ORDINANCE NO. 9-20
AMENDING CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES TITLE 10 PUBLIC WAYS
AND PROPERTY, CHAPTER 5 PARKS AND RECREATION, ARTICLE B USE
REGULATIONS, SECTION 10-5B-1 DEFINITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DUBUQUE, IOWA:
Section 1. Section 10-5B-1 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is hereby
amended as follows:
10-5B-1: DEFINITIONS:
As used in this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
AT LARGE: Any dog, cat or livestock, fowl or ferret found off the premises of the owner
or keeper.
CAT: Both male and female animals in the family Felis catus whether neutered or not.
CITY MANAGER: City Manager or City Manager's designee.
COMMISSION OR THE COMMISSION: The Park and Recreation Advisory
Commission.
DOG: Both male and female animals of the canine species whether neutered or not, but
not including a law enforcement dog.
KEEPER: A person other than the owner keeping, sheltering, having control or custody
of or harboring an animal.
LEISURE SERVICES MANAGER: Leisure Services Manager or Leisure Services
Manager's designee.
MULTIPURPOSE USE TRAIL OR TRAILS: A hardened trail of asphalt, concrete or
other impervious surface, typically ten feet (10') to twelve feet (12') wide and physically
separated from the motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either
within highway public right-of-way or private property within an independent alignment
for use by pedestrians, skaters, joggers, bicyclists, and City maintenance vehicles.
OPEN SPACES: Available to the public for passive recreational use in and adjacent to
the City, which are under the responsibility of the commission.
OWNER: A person owning a cat, dog, or other animal.
PARKS OR PARKWAYS: Parks, parkways, buildings, park roads or driveways, and all
public service facilities or grounds, buildings and structures in and adjacent to the City,
which are under the responsibility of the commission.
Section 2. This Ordinance takes effect July 1, 2020.
Passed, approved, and adopted the 2nd day of March 2020.
ALI
Roy D. Buck! Mayor
Attest:
Kevin g. Firnstahl, City Clerk
EFFECT OF AMENDMENT
10-5B-1: DEFINITIONS:
As used in this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
AT LARGE: Any dog, cat or livestock, fowl or ferret found off the premises of the owner
or keeper.
CAT: Both male and female animals in the family Felis catus whether neutered or not.
CITY MANAGER: City Manager or City Manager's designee.
COMMISSION OR THE COMMISSION: The Park and Recreation Advisory
Commission.
DOG: Both male and female animals of the canine species whether neutered or not, but
not including a law enforcement dog.
KEEPER: A person other than the owner keeping, sheltering, having control or custody
of or harboring an animal.
LEISURE SERVICES MANAGER: Leisure Services Manager or Leisure Services
Manager's designee.
MULTIPURPOSE USE TRAIL OR TRAILS: A hardened trail of asphalt, concrete or
other impervious surface, typically ten feet (10') to twelve feet (12') wide and physically
separated from the motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either
within highway public right-of-way or private property within an independent alignment
for use by pedestrians, skaters, joggers, bicyclists, and City maintenance vehicles.
OPEN SPACES: Available to the public for passive recreational use in and adjacent to
the City, which are under the responsibility of the commission.
OWNER: A person owning a cat, dog, or other animal.
PARKS OR PARKWAYS: Parks, parkways, buildings, park roads or driveways, and all
public service facilities or grounds, buildings and structures in and adjacent to the City,
which are under the responsibility of the commission.
Prepared by: Crenna M. Brumwell, Esq. 300 Main Street Suite 330 Dubuque IA 52001 563 589-4381
ORDINANCE NO. 10-20
AMENDING CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES TITLE 10 PUBLIC WAYS
AND PROPERTY, CHAPTER 5 PARKS AND RECREATION, ARTICLE B USE
REGULATIONS BY REPEALING SECTION 10-5B-4 DOGS, CATS AND OTHER
DOMESTIC ANIMALS AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 10-5B-4 DOGS AND CATS
IN LIEU THEREOF
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DUBUQUE, IOWA:
Section 1. Section 10-5B-4 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is hereby
repealed and the following adopted in lieu thereof:
10-5B-4: DOGS AND CATS:
A. Dogs and Cats Permitted: Leashed dogs and cats are permitted in parks,
parkways, trails, or open spaces. Any unleashed or unattended animal in a park, parkway,
trail, or open space may be impounded and its owner may redeem the same upon paying
the reasonable costs of such impoundment.
B. Dogs and Cats Prohibited: Notwithstanding Section A, dogs and cats are
prohibited in the following parks, parkways, trails, and open spaces or areas of parks,
parkways, trails, and open spaces:
1. Bunker Hill golf course
2. Marshall Park and Dubuque Arboretum and Botanical Gardens
3. Eagle Point Park
4. Murphy Park
5. Nicholas J. Sutton Swimming Pool
6. Flora Park Swimming Pool
7. The Veterans Memorial Plaza within the Gerald "Red" McAleece Park and
Recreation Complex
8. Fenced -in sporting areas, including, but not limited to, courts, fields, rinks,
arenas, and skate parks
9. Buildings or facilities within parks which are listed on the National Register
of Historic Places
10. On playground and recreational areas designed for use by children
11. Where a prohibitory sign is posted
C. Exceptions: The prohibitions in Section B do not apply to:
1. Service animals used by persons with disabilities.
2. Animals present as part of an approved and permitted special event under
Chapter 4 of this Title.
3. Animals which are part of the Storybook Hill Petting Zoo at Franklin Delano
Roosevelt Park.
4. Animals confined to an automobile, camper, motor home (a.k.a.
recreational vehicle), or other similar conveyance during the entirety of their time
within Marshall Park and Dubuque Arboretum and Botanical Gardens, Eagle Point
Park, and Murphy Park so long as the owner is compliant with the state code
related to the safety and health of the animal.
D. Animal Control Ordinance Compliance: Leashed dogs and cats are subject to and
must comply with the provisions of title 7, chapter 6 of this Code.
E. Waste Disposal: The owner or keeper must pick up and dispose of or take away
the dog or cat's waste.
F. Liability: The owner or keeper is responsible for the actions of its dogs and cats.
G. Unleashed Dogs Allowed: Unleashed dogs shall be permitted in the following
areas:
1. Pet Park.
2. John G. Bergfeld Recreation Area ponds, but only when an owner or keeper
is working or exercising a dog by tossing a retrieval dummy or other object into a
pond for out -and -back exercise. At all other times the dog must be leashed.
Section 2. This Ordinance takes effect July 1, 2020.
Passed, approved, and adopted the 2nd day of March 2020.
Roy D. Bud; Mayor
Attest:
Ke <n Firnstahl, City Clerk
STATE OF IOWA {SS:
DUBUQUE COUNTY
CERTIFICATION OF PUBLICATION
I, Suzanne Pike, a Billing Clerk for Woodward
Communications, Inc., an Iowa corporation, publisher
of the Telegraph Herald, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Dubuque, County
of Dubuque and State of Iowa; hereby certify that the
attached notice was published in said newspaper on the
following dates:
March 06, 2020,
and for which the charge is $27.49
Subscribed to before me, a Notary Public in and for
Dubuque County, Iowa,
this
to
day of
mamk
0
Notary Public and for Dubuque County, Iowa.
JANET K. PAPE
Comamleston Number 19'9559
Ity Comm, Exp. DEC 11, 2022
OFFICIAL
PUBLICATION
ORDINANCE NO. 9-20 ,
AMENDING CITY OF
DUBUQUE CODE OF
ORDINANCES TITLE
10 PUBLIC WAYS AND
PROPERTY, CHAPTER
5 PARKS AND RECRE-
ATION, ARTICLE B
USE REGULATIONS,
SECTION 10-5B-1 DEF-
INITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY
THE CITY; COUNCIL
OF THE ; CITY, OF
DUBUQUE, IOWA:
Section 1. Section 10-
5B-1 of the City of
Dubuque Code of Ordi-
nances is hereby
amended as follows:
10-5B-1: DEFINITIONS:
As used in this article,
the following terms
shall havethe follow-
ing meanings:
AT LARGE: Any dog,
cat or livestock, fowl or
ferret found bff the
premises of the owner
or keeper.
CAT: Both male and
female animals In the
family Felis catus
whether neutered or
not.
CITY MANAGER: City
Manager or City Man-
ager's designee.
COMMISSION OR THE
COMMISSION:. The
Park and Recreation
Advisory Commission:
DOG: Jpath male and
female animals of the
canine species whether
neutered or not, but
not including a law en-
forcement dog.
KEEPER: A person oth-
er than the owner
keeping,.. sheltering,
having control or cus-
tody of or harboring an
animal.
LEISURE SERVICES
MANAGER: Leisure Ser-
vices Manager or
Leisure Services Man-
ager's designee.
MULTIPURPOSE _USE
TRAIL OR TRAILS: A
hardened trail of as-
phalt, concrete or oth-
er impervious surface,
typically ten feet (10')
to twelve feet (12'),
wide and physically
separated , from the
motorized vehicular
traffic byan open
space or barrier and ei-
ther . within highway
public -:right-of-way or
private property within
anindependent align-
ment for use by pedes-
trians, skaters, joggers,
bicyclists, , and City
maintenance vehicles.
OPEN SPACES: Avail-
able to the public for.
passive recreational
use in and adjacent to
the City, which are un-
der the - responsibility
of the commission.
March 2020.
/s/Roy D. Buol, Mayor,
Attest:"/s/Kevin S„
OWNER:' A person Firnstahl, City Clerk
owning a cat, dog, or " Published officially in
other animal. the Telegrapha.Herald6th
PARKS OR PK- wppthe
WAYS Parks„'^parkARdayofnesMarcheron 2020.
waays albuioldipublicr"rivewrangs, service parks, t/3S/KCity
/6evin S..Firnstahlclerk,
roadn's,, zdy:;
d l l
facilities or grounds, •
buildings and struc-
tures ,in and adjacent
to the City, .whigh are
under,the responsibili;-
tyof the co`mmissiom
Section 2.iThis Ordi=�
nance takes effect July',
1,2020.
Passed, approved, and
adopted the 2nd day of.
STATE OF IOWA {SS:
DUBUQUE COUNTY
CERTIFICATION OF PUBLICATION
I, Suzanne Pike, a Billing Clerk for Woodward
Communications, Inc., an Iowa corporation, publisher
of the Telegraph Herald, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Dubuque, County
of Dubuque and State of Iowa; hereby certify that the
attached notice was published in said newspaper on the
following dates:
March 06, 2020,
and for which the charge is $39.38
Subscribed to before me, a Notary Public in and for
Dubuque County, Iowa,
this to day of
,20.2a.
Notary Public ' and for Dubuque Co ty, Iowa.
JANET K. PAPE
Commission Humber 19.9869
My Comm. Exp, DEC 11, 2022
OFFICIAL
PUBLICATION
ORDINANCE NO. 10-20
AMENDING CITY OF
DUBUQUE CODE OF
ORDINANCES TITLE
10 PUBLIC WAYS AND
PROPERTY, CHAPTER
5 PARKS AND RECRE-
ATION, ARTICLE B
USE REGULATIONS
BY REPEALING SEC-
TION 10-5B-4 DOGS,
CATS, AND OTHER
DOMESTIC ANIMALS
AND ADOPTING A
NEW SECTION -10.5B-
4DOGS AND CATS IN
LIEU THEREOF
Now, THEREFORE,
BE IT %ORDAINED - BY
THE CITY, COUNCIL
OF THE CITY` OF
DUBUQUE, IOWA:
Section 1.. Section 10-
5E-4 " of the City of
Dubuque Code of Ordi-
nances is hereby re-
pealed and the
following adopted in
lieu thereof:
10-5B-4: DOGS AND
CATS:
A. Dogs and Cats
Permitted: Leashed
dogs and cats are per-
mitted in parks, park-
ways, trails, or open
spaces. Any unleashed
or unattended animal
in a park, parkway,
trail, or open - space
may, be impounded and
its owner may redeem
the same ,upon paying
the reasonable costs of
such impoundment.
B. Dogs and Cats
Prohibited: Notwith-
standing Section A,
dogs and cats are pro-
hibited in the following
parks, parkways, trails,
and open spaces or ar-
eas of parks; parkways,
trails, `` and open
•spaces: •
1. Bunker Hill ;:golf
course
2. Marshall Park and
Dubuque Arboretum
and Botanical Gardens
3. Eagle Point Park
4. Murphy Park
5. Nicholas J. Sutton
Swimming Pool
6. Flora Park Swim-
ming Pool
7. The , Veterans
Memorial Plaza within
the Gerald "Red"
McAleece Park and
Recreation Complex
8. Fenced -in sporting
areas, including„ but
not limited to, courts,
fields, rinks, arenas,
and skate parks
9. Buildings., or facili-
ties within parks which
are listed on the. Na-
tional Register of His-
toric Places
10. On play-
ground and recreation-
al areas:- designed for
use by children
11. Where a pro-
hibitory sign is posted
C. Exceptions:.. The
prohibitions in Section
B do not apply to:
1. Service.` animals
used by. persons with
disabilities.
2. Animals present
as part of an approved
and >permitted special
event under Chapter 4
of this Title.
3. Animals which are
part of the Storybook
Hill Petting Zoo at
Franklin Delano -Roo-
sevelt Park.
4. Animals confined'',
to an automobile,
camper, motor home
(a.k.a.- recreational ve-
hicle), or other similar
conveyance during the
entirety of their time
within Marshall Park
and Dubuque Arbore-
tum and
Botanical Gar-
dens, Eagle Point Park,
and, Murphy Park so
long as the owner is
compliant `' with the
state code related to
the safety and health
of the animal.
D. Animal Control Or-
dinance Compliance:
Leashed dogs and cats
are subject to and
must comply with the
provisions of title, 7,
chapter 6 of this Code.
E. Waste Disposal:
The owner or keeper
must pick up and dis-
pose of or take away
the dog or cat's waste.
F. Liability: The own
er or keeper is respon-
sible for the: actions of
its dogs and cats.
G. Unleashed Dogs
Allowed: Unleashed
dogs shall be permitted
in the following areas:.
1. Pet Park.
2. John G. Bergfeld
Recreation Area ponds,
but only when an own-
er or keeper is working
or exercising a dog by
tossing a retrieval
dummy or other object
into a pond for out -
and -back exercise. At
all other times the dog
must be leashed.
Section 2. This Ordi-
nance takes effect July
1, 2020.
Passed, approved, and
adopted the 2nd day of
March 2020.`
/s/Roy D. Buoll, Mayor
Attest: /s/Kevin S.
Firnstahl, City Clerk
Published officially in
the Telegraph Herald
newspaper on the 6th
day. of March 2020
/s/Kevin S. Firnstahl,
City Clerk
It 3/6
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
BETTER CITIES FOR PETSTM
ASSESSMENT
•
0\N015HIP • I-1EALTHy,PE
Co' rns
c Vo gaton
ddress
ao6,0 pO la
pet Fr;
houtll
sing 0 t;
exit b,'on$
all ia 0r
4
j ? PY P%
44jfV
Better*
CITIES
for pets
A MARS PETCARE US PROGRAM
4S'S
COME'
70
`Nta derail and
tte$ yams make
K'/th t0 be out
YO 4r AG t
yo
44,
v
Peop►ei�ot'g
the expo s'rn
for pe` aces
p;AMC
H • dIHS��N
i
AA
•
•
August 5, 2019
1
Table of Contents
Cover Page 1
Table of Contents 2-3
Background 4
The Process .5
Executive Summary 6-8
City Profile 9
City/Community Base Demographics 10-11
City/Community Pet Statistics 11
Licensing Information 12
Pet License Statistics by Year 12
Pet License Revenue 12
Why the City of Dubuque uses PetData 13
Dubuque Animal Control Laws and Rules 13
Animal Control Duties 14
City/Community Enforcement Statistics 14
Animal Control Complaints 14
Animal Control Citations Issued 15
Wild Animal Complaints 15
Cruelty/Neglect Violations 16
Animal Bites 16
Number of Animals Picked Up 17
Pets in Parks Statistics 17
Pet -Friendly Community Survey Summary 18
Pet -Friendly Survey Summary 19-20
Shelters Profile 21-22
Dubuque Regional Humane Society 22-23
Marketing Flyer from DRHS 24
DRHS No -Kill Policy 25
Shelters Survey Summary 26
Homes Profile 27-28
Landlord Survey Conducted Summary 28-30
Homes Survey Summary 30
Parks Profile 31-32
Public Parks, Trails, and Green Spaces 33-34
Public Pet -Friendly trails and/or greenways present in the city 35
Public green spaces/ways 35-36
Dogs in Parks Comparison with Top 15 Iowa Cities 36-37
Map of Dubuque Park Locations 38
2
Pet -friendly Parks and Trails Map 39
Current Pet Signage in City Parks 40
Pet -friendly Waste Stations 40
Pet -friendly Fountains 41
Pet Park 41-42
Pet Park Financials and Expenses 42
Pet Park Scholarship Funds 42-43
Pet Park Rules 43
Current Potential City Pet Park Plans 43-44
Park and Recreation Commission and City Council Actions 44
Parks Survey Summary 45
Businesses Profile 46-47
Businesses Related to Pet Health and Wellness 47
Pet -friendly Businesses 47
Pet -friendly Lodging 48
Restaurants and Food Establishments 48
Pet -Friendly Training Services and Veterinary Clinics 49
Business Survey Summary 50
Pet -Friendly Events/Places 51-52
Appendix 53-108
A. Calculation of Pet Statistics 53
B. Quick Reference Guide: Dubuque Animal Control Rules & Laws...54-55
C. Animal Control Ordinance 56-69
D. Parks Ordinance 70
E. Landlord Survey Questions 71
F. FDR Park Master Plan includes Dog Park .72
G. SE Corner of Dodge and Locust Dog Park Planning 73
H. SE Corner of Dodge and Locust Dog Park Estimate 74
I. City Council and Commission Actions Related to Pets 2012-2019 75-84
J. Pet -friendly Survey Results 85-97
K. Pet -friendly Community Survey Comments 98-105
L. City/Community Enforcement Related to Pets in Parks 106-107
M. Travel Dubuque Pet -Friendly Destinations Flyer 108
3
BACKGROUND
PET -FRIENDLY COMMUNITY CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY
At the 2018 goal setting session, The City Council adopted the Pet -Friendly Community: Policy
Direction and Actions as a Policy Agenda High Priority. The guidance from the Council included
that this would not be only about pets in parks but would engage partners in how we could become
a more pet -friendly community. According to Iowa Code Chapter 717E, "pet" means a living
animal which is limited to a dog, cat, or an animal normally maintained in a small tank or cage in
or near a residence, including but not limited to a rabbit, gerbil, hamster, mouse, parrot, canary,
mynah, finch, tropical fish, goldfish, snake, turtle, gecko, or iguana.
IMAGINE DUBUQUE 2037: A CALL TO ACTION, 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Dog -friendliness: Making Dubuque "dog friendly" is an important consideration in helping the
City's appeal as a socially vibrant and desirable place to live. While public management in the
past typically confined canine issues to enforcement of the municipal code around public health,
animal control, and leash laws today, "dog friendliness" and dog infrastructure are part of a
socially vibrant city. As noted on the Travel Dubuque website, dogs are part and parcel of family
life for locals and travelers alike, and the ability to walk to "dog friendly" recreation areas is
increasingly seen as an expected part of a municipal recreation system. Dog parks (i.e. fully
fenced off -leash areas with water and trash services where dogs may run freely) are an
expected feature of any community that purports to attract millennials; at present, the City has
only the Pet Park adjacent to Bunker Hill Golf Course. The need to revisit limits on dogs in
public parks, and to provide park infrastructure, was emphasized in the public engagement
process.
This Comprehensive Plan also contained these recommendations related to pet -friendly
community.
• Re-evaluate the Parks and Recreation Plan, potentially through a strategic update or
addendum, to identify opportunities to provide flexible, programmable space; improve active
recreation connectivity in neighborhoods; and enhance Dubuque's "dog -friendliness."
• Evaluate and revise, as appropriate, the dog -related policies for all of Dubuque's park and
recreation facilities.
TOOLS USED IN ASSESSMENT
Mayor Roy Buol returned from the United States Conference of Mayors with a Playbook for Pet -
Friendly Cities (https://www.bettercitiesforpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Mars-Petcare-
Playbook-For-Pet-Friendly-Cities-2019-LR.pdf), Pet -Friendly City
Assessment(https://www.marspetnutrition.us/pet-friendly-city-assessment/), Pet -Friendly How -
To Guide (http://www.usmayors.org/wp-
content/uploads/2017/06/FINAL USCM HowToGuide PRINT-sm.pdf) , and 12 Traits of
4
Friendly Cities. This information was used as the basis for this assessment and document as
well as a reference for potential best practices.
THE PROCESS
After the approval of an action plan process by the City Council at the November 19, 2018 City
Council Meeting, representatives were selected/appointed by each of the groups/organizations
out lined in the council memo. Those representatives are listed below. The work group met most
every other week to review information, facts and data, listen to presentations, review drafts,
work on the Community survey, and research information.
It was anticipated the data collection and assessment would take six to nine months to
complete. The first identified deliverable of the work group was to complete the Pet -Friendly
Community Assessment.
The work group used the U.S. Conference of Mayors Pet -Friendly City Assessment as their
guide in developing this assessment of Dubuque.
The work group members are:
Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager (Co -Facilitator of Work Group)
Jeremy Jensen, Assistant Police Chief (Co -Facilitator of Work Group)
Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager
Steve Fehsal, Parks Division Manager
Marie Ware, Leisure Services Manager
Mary Rose Corrigan, Public Health Specialist
Laura Merrick, Dubuque Humane Society Representative
Rebecca Kuhle, Parks and Recreation Commission Representative
Lisa Johnson, Friendly Intelligent Dog Owners (FIDO) Representative
Marianne Kirkendall, Pet Business Representative (Colonial Terrace Vet)
Paul Hoffmann, Community Representative
Alternates:
Mallory Schmid, Friendly Intelligent Dog Owners (FIDO) Alternate
Ray Werner, Parks and Recreation Commission Representative Alternate
Jennifer Tigges, Parks and Recreation Commission Representative Alternate #2
Robin MacFarlane, Pet Business Representative (That's My Dog)
5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — Pet -Friendly Community Assessment
In 2018, the Dubuque City Council identified "pet -friendly community" as a high priority
for assessment and action in future policy direction. The City has recognized that "pet
friendliness," and specifically "dog friendliness," is an important consideration in the
social and cultural fabric of a community and contributes to expectations of a vibrant
and desirable place to live.
As part of this initiative, the City Council directed formation of a working group made up
of city officials and representatives, businesses, and citizens. This group worked
through an assessment tool called the "Better Cities for Better Pets" Program
(https://www.marspetnutrition.us/pet-friendly-city-assessment/) which has been
promoted by the US Conference of Mayors.
The following report represents the collaborative effort of this working group to amass
information and statistics for review of this topic. The assessment looks at 4
foundational pillars of a pet -friendly community: Shelters, Homes, Parks and
Businesses. This information is preceded by an in-depth City Profile section. A major
part of this assessment also included a community survey based on these four
foundational pillars. A summary of these results is included in the working group's
assessment of each section, and the full results are part of the appendix.
City Profile
• Dubuque has a population of 58,410 making up 23,934 households
• Using statistics by the American Veterinary Medical Association, it is estimated
that 8,735 of those households own dogs and 7,883 households own cats.
• Over 10,000 pets are licensed in the city. Dubuque has a robust and successful
(when compared to other communities) level of licensure for these pets.
Shelter rronie
An important aspect of pet -friendliness is the accessibility and quality of animal shelter
and rescue services available.
• Animal shelters not only provide a safe place for lost or stray animals, but also a
potential center for education on pet ownership.
• According to the assessment and survey results, the community has an overall
positive image of the shelter services provided by the Dubuque Regional
Humane Society.
Homes Profile
• A central part of promoting pet -friendliness is access to housing that allows for
pets, both in the rental and owned properties.
6
• With regards to owned properties, developers need to consider aspects such as
allowances for fencing, installation of sidewalks and walking trails (even in
developments where the city does not require this), access to greenspace, and
waterproof flooring materials.
• The pet -friendliness of rental housing in Dubuque was assessed by several
means, notably a phone survey of a sampling of landlords in Dubuque regarding
pet access, and by the results of the community survey.
• Overall, it was noted that pet -friendly housing options are limited in Dubuque.
Parks Profile
• Parks are an important aspect of pet -friendliness, particularly for dog owners. For
proper care, dogs should have access to greenspace available several times a
day.
• This need for frequent and regular use of outside spaces has the added benefit
of promoting physical and social health. As citizens are more active and outside
several times daily, there are more opportunities for interacting with neighbors
and building social capital, for dog owners and non -owners.
• Dubuque has a large and diverse network of parks, trails, and greenspaces. Pets
are restricted from most parks in Dubuque but can access trails and
greenspaces.
• Ability to interact with dogs off -leash in a safe, contained, appropriately designed
space helps foster training, exercise, and socialization interactions for dogs,
helping to make them "better citizens." There are two off -leash dog parks in
Dubuque, one city -owned and one managed by the Dubuque Regional Humane
Society.
• As part of this assessment, the top 15 population centers in Iowa were surveyed
and assessed on park access for pets. It was found that Dubuque is the only
community on this list that does not allow leashed pets to all public park spaces.
[link to community park access table]
Businesses Profile
• The pet component of the economy is one of vigorous growth. According to the
American Pet Products Association, the US Pet Industry is expected to top
$75.38 billion dollars in 2019. Even during times of recession, the pet industry
has continued to grow.
• In this evaluation, the working group looked at businesses that provide vet
services, training services, boarding, and supplies. Additionally, pet access to
restaurants and businesses was assessed. Only one restaurant has applied for a
variance from the state code that prohibits pets in restaurants.
• The results of the community survey indicated there is significant room for growth
in pet -related businesses, particularly boarding and grooming.
7
Pet -friendly Community Survey
• The community survey has been referenced several times in this document and
provides key information about respondent's views regarding pet -friendliness in
Dubuque. This survey was distributed to gather citizen responses to questions in
all of the above categories. It was completed by 615 people. The full results and
comments are available for your review.
The information in this analysis has shown that Dubuque has significant opportunities
for growth in pet -friendly criteria. Members of this working group are available to discuss
these issues further along with ideas for progress. We submit this document to the
Dubuque Parks & Recreation Commission and the Dubuque City Council for their
consideration.
8
CITY PROFILE
HAPPY PETS
WELCOME PETS
HEALTHY PETS
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERSHIP
CITY PROFILE
The City of Dubuque, Iowa, is located to the west of the Mississippi River with bridges
connecting the infrastructure to Wisconsin and Illinois. First settled in 1833, this
community has been enjoying a recent surge in growth due to its social and cultural
opportunities, broadening economy, revitalization programs, environmental protection
initiatives and high marks for livability. Dubuque has won an All -America City Award 5
times, most recently in 2019. [https://www.nationalcivicleague.org/america-city-award/]
CITY/COMMUNITY BASE DEMOGRAPHICS
Total Area (square miles): 31.63 square miles 1
EL51-1:Lt„,
lira a
DUbLltru
Rvlledge
D- buqui
�+r
Ks.) kedix.k
LQuisLLry
Fairp ay
1 https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/isfipAges/community facts.xhtml
10
Population: 58,4102
Number of Households: 23,932
Average Number of People per Household: 2.20
Number of Households that are Owner -Occupied: 15,176
Percentage of Owner -Occupied Households (total number of owner -occupied
households divided by total number of households): 63.41%
Estimated Number of Rental Units: Approximately 10,000
Estimated Percentage of Rental Units (total number of rental units divided by total
number of households): 36.58%
CITY/COMMUNITY PET STATISTICS
Refer to Appendix A on page 53 Calculation of Pet Statistics for process to establish
statistics.
Estimated Number of Dog -Owning Households: 8,7353
Estimated Number of Dogs: 15,144
Percentage of Dog -Owning Households (total number of dog -owning households
divided by total number of households): 36.50%
Estimated Number of Cat -Owning Households: 7,883
Estimated Number of Cats: 16,555
Percentage of Cat -Owning Households (total number of cat -owning households divided
by total number of households): 33%
2 American Fact Finder, 2017 Estimate
Based on American Veterinary Medicinal Association (AVMA) calculator.
11
LICENSING INFORMATION
The City of Dubuque requires all dogs and cats to be licensed when they are six (6)
months or older within 30 days of obtaining the animal. Annual license fees are $12 per
year for spayed and neutered for each pet and $30 for not spayed/neutered pet. Annual
pet license renewal reminders are sent at least one month prior to renewal dates with a
following post card reminder.
PET LICENSE STATISTICS BY YEAR
10,500
10,000
9,500
9,400
8,500
r0040
7,500
9,055
9,190
,341 9,437 914216
FY10 FY11 Y12
9,897
10,091 10,086
10,309
Since 2007, the City has outsourced pet license sales. The Health Services
Department researched various software packages for pet licensing, and ultimately
contracted with PetData, a firm whose only function is to provide full -service pet
licensing to communities. Since contracting with PetData in 2007, license revenue has
increased by 31 % and the number of licenses sold has increased 26%.
PET LICENSE REVENUE
$180,000
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$121,697
$141,538
$165,873
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 F 8
12
WHY THE CITY OF DUBUQUE USES PETDATA?
The Health Services Department investigated outsourcing pet license sales in 2007 due
to the incredibly time consuming, cumbersome, and often inefficient system used. The
City's pet licensing database was housed through the Information Services
Department's Pentamation system, primarily administered by the City Clerk's Office and
also utilized and updated by the Health Services Department. The Health Services
Department also entered all animal rabies certificates into the database; which are
supplied by local veterinarians as required by the City Ordinance. Since Pentamation
was primarily a finance software system, it was tailored to track and issue pet licenses,
but was cumbersome at best.
The Health Services Department researched various software packages for pet
licensing, and also had discussions with PetData, a firm whose only function is to
provide full -service pet licensing to communities.
• PetData's system enables the City to sell pet licenses year-round, instead of only
the three-month time periods of January — March (for dogs) and July —
September (for cats). Selling licenses year-round, with renewals on the date of
purchase, does not penalize citizens buying licenses for their dogs in, for
example, November or December when they have to turn around and buy a new
one sometime between January — March. Licenses can also be able to be
purchased online and via credit and/or debit card with PetData.
• Partly due to the amount of workload required for inputting pet license data, the
City Clerk proposed adding a part-time secretary beginning January 1, 2008.
This position was no longer necessary by utilizing PetData.
• In addition to staff time savings in the Clerk's office, Health Services and
Information Services Departments staff do not have to maintain a pet licensing
software system.
• Local veterinarians can send rabies information directly to PetData, eliminating
the data entry step performed by City staff.
• To date, license revenue is increased by 31 % and the number of licenses sold
has increased 26%. This revenue helps pay for the animal control activity.
The City evaluates PetData upon contract renewal which occurs approximately every 2
years.
DUBUQUE ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS AND RULEf
The City of Dubuque has an Animal Control Unit that is a part of the Health Department.
Appendix B on pages 54 to 55 is a quick reference guide to Dubuque's Animal Control
Rules and Laws. Appendix C on pages 56 to 69 is the Animal Control Ordinances and
Appendix D on page 70 is the Parks Ordinance regarding dogs, cats, and other
domestic animals.
13
ANIMAL CONTROL DUTIES
Animal Control enforces the City Animal Ordinance which provides for licensing of all
cats and dogs, the prohibition of dogs and cats running at -large within the city,
inoculation of all dogs and cats against rabies, investigation of animal bites and
assurance of proper rabies confinement, prohibition of harboring a vicious or potentially
vicious animal or dangerous animal and prohibition of animals causing serious
disturbance or nuisance. Current Animal Control staffing levels do not allow time for
community outreach and education on animal control and responsible pet ownership
issues.
CITY/COMMUNITY ENFORCEMENT STATISTICS
ANIMAL CONTROL COMPLAINTS
❑ POLICE COMPLAINTS
❑ ANIMAL CONTROL COMPLAINTS
I I
717
1134
854
1153
569
1096
647
1187
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
525
1073
539
942
FY1S
When Animal control is not on -duty (i.e., evenings, nights, weekends, holidays, training, etc.),
Police cover animal emergencies and complaints. This amounts to significant time and
expenditure for the Police Department, who are not as thoroughly trained in animal control.
14
ANIMAL CONTROL CITATIONS ISSUED
CITATIONS OTHER THAN LICENSES
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY 17 FY18
LICENSE CITATIONS
532
— 1446
1197
1184 1101 1153
1037
! ! !
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY 17 FY18
Citations other than licensing are issued for failure to vaccinate for rabies, running loose, failure
to confine an animal that has bitten a person, improper waste disposal, harboring a vicious
animal, improper restraint, failure to restrain, nuisance, keeping an animal in an unoccupied
property, etc.
WILD ANIMAL COMPLAINTS
15
CRUELTY/NEGLECT VIOLATIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS
UNATTENDED
ANIMALS IN
VEHICLES
NEGLECTED/CRUELTY
TO ANIMALS
ANIMAL BITES
86
38
99
117
104
91
81
98
I
30 27 9 25
19 H18
0 4 I3 3 il! 4 5
109
:21
8
1
129
47
3
r,
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
• DOG BITES • CAT BITES • OTHER BITES
Note: Average number of bites each calendar year from 2006 to 2016 is 131. The average
number of bites for 2017 and 2018 is 178, a 36% increase.
16
NUMBER OF ANIMALS PICKED UP
296
371
275
248
230
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
• POLICE • ANIMAL CONTROL
PETS IN PARKS STATISTICS
Pets in Parks Log - 2013 to 2018 Park Seasons
PARK NAME:
2013 Park
Season
2014 Park
Season
2015 Park
Season
2016 Park
Season
2017 Park
Season
2018 Park
Season
Allison Henderson Park
4
1
3
Avon Park
1
AY McDonald Park
1
1
Burden Park
2
Eagle Point Park
3
3
3
3
2
6
Flat Iron Park
1
4
2
5
Flora Park
8
2
2
4
3
1
Murphy Park
2
3
Pinard Park
2
1
Veterans Memorial Park
5
7
2
Washington Park
2
Comiskey Park
10
5
2
2
1
Valentine Park
1
3
McAleece Sports Complex
4
2
1
Usha Park
1
Jackson Park
5
1
1
TOTAL:
45
19
12
26
15
11
OTHER:
Bergfeld (Off leash)
2
1
17
PET -FRIENDLY
SURVEY SUMMARY
HAPPY PETS
WELCOME PETS
HEALTHY PETS
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERSHIP
SURVEY SUMMARY
The Pet -friendly Community work group wanted to gain insights from the community related to
the areas of the assessment including homes, shelters, businesses, and parks. Using the
questions from the Better Cities for Pets Assessment as a starting point, a survey was
developed and distributed online as well as in paper form. It was completed by 615 citizens
over a three-week period from May 14 to June 7, 2019. The survey was advertised via media
releases by the City of Dubuque to all media channels, published article in Telegraph Herald on
May 17, 2019, flyers in pet businesses including Petco, PetSmart, and the Dubuque Regional
Humane Society, paper surveys at the Carnegie Stout Public Library and by several media
television including KWWL and radio interviews including KDTH Voice of the Tri-State. A flyer
and survey was sent to all Pet -Friendly Work Group Committee Members to distribute via their
networks. The City of Dubuque shared via social media including Facebook and Next Door. The
survey was sent to the City of Dubuque Leadership team, to distribute to the city board and
commission members. Complete results for each survey question are available in Appendix J
on pages 85 to 97 as well as in table form under each pillar (Homes, Parks, Shelters, and
Businesses).
Responses 1-4 are "Disagree" (red on bar graphs with 1 strongly disagree to 4 slightly
disagree), 5 is "Neutral" (yellow), and 6-9 are "Agree" (green with 6 being slightly agree to 9
being strongly agree). N/A or Unknown is colored gray on the graphs.
When looking at the four main areas of Homes, Parks, Shelters, and Businesses, the results
showed:
• The responses for Shelters were the most positive of the four areas surveyed.
• The responses for Parks reflected the most negative of the four areas surveyed.
• Citizen's indicated that pet needs are not included in green space, park, and city
planning.
• Respondents felt that pet -friendly housing options were limited and amenities such as
relief areas, hydration stations, and green space are not available.
• Restaurants and retailers are not perceived as pet -friendly by those completing this
survey.
Parks
• Only 13% of respondents agree that our parks offer pet -friendly spaces and basic
amenities or that our parks and public spaces have visible and accessible pet waste
stations with free waste bags and trash receptacles.
• Approximately 78% of respondents disagree that pet -friendly parks and public spaces
are located throughout our city and 82% disagree that green space planning includes
consideration for pets (on- or off -leash).
19
Homes
• Greater than 75% of respondents disagree that rental and residential communities
provide pet relief areas with waste bags and hydration stations, or that these
communities have pet -friendly green space within walking distance.
• Over 80% of people responding disagreed that most rental housing allow common
household pets.
Shelters
• Approximately 84% of respondents agree that the Dubuque Regional Humane Society
has adoptable pets readily available for viewing and interaction.
• A large majority of respondents marked NA or Unknown for the questions regarding
community cat programs.
Businesses
• Less than 10% of respondents agree that our city has restaurants that welcome pets or
that our city has local ordinances that enable businesses and restaurants to welcome
pets.
• More than 80% of survey respondents disagreed that retailers in our city welcome pets.
• Over 80% of respondents do not agree that our city promotes itself as pet -friendly or has
plans to do so in the near future.
NOTE: All percentages were figured after subtracting NA/Unknown responses from total survey
responses.
20
SHELTERS PROFILE
HAPPY PETS
WELCOME PETS
HEALTHY PETS
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERSHIP
SHELTERS PROF"
The availability and accessibility to animal shelters in a community is important to pet -
friendliness. Animal shelters not only provide a place for lost or stray pets to be cared
for, but also a center for education about pet care and ownership. An educated pet -
owning population is important to helping to maintain the health and safety of all
community residents.
In the city of Dubuque, there is one animal shelter, the Dubuque Regional Humane
Society.
The following was provided by Dubuque Regional Humane Society. The flyers on the
following pages have statistics, stories, and services of DRHS. They were also provided
by DRHS.
CSOCIETY
DUBUQUE REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY (DRHS)
HU.vIANE HUMANE
DUBUQUE RECINAL
COMMUNITY OF UV`_CNIi - ONIA.L LOVE
The Dubuque Regional Humane Society (DRHS) is so much more than an animal shelter. It is
an animal resource center that delivers upon the mission of protecting and promoting the well-
being of companion animals by building life-long bonds between pets and people through
adoption, humane education, community outreach, and the prevention of cruelty. The DRHS
operates as the largest open -admission no -kill animal shelter in the tri-state area providing
critical medical and behavioral interventions and compassionate care for over 2,700 companion
animals who are lost, abandoned, surrendered by owners, or rescued from neglect. This
includes providing animal sheltering services for Dubuque (population 97,000), Jo Daviess
(population 21,600), and Grant (population 52,000) counties spanning three states and five local
municipalities (Asbury, Dubuque, Dyersville, Epworth, and Peosta). In addition to the animals
we help locally, the DRHS is an in -demand transport destination campus for over 700 animals
from overcrowded shelter and animal welfare agency relocation partners. Annually, the DRHS
enriches the lives of over 2,300 community members with the addition of a companion animal
adopted from our campus, as well as, reunites over 260 lost pets with the families that love
them and welcomes over 12,000 visitors. We actively serve our community through other
avenues such as providing numerous volunteering opportunities to be engaged in service (over
300 volunteers trained), offering character -building youth humane education programming to
over 200 campers, students and youth groups, coordinating surrender appointments for over
250 owners, hosting a pet pantry for nearly 30 owners to aid with pet retention and facilitating a
membership only dog park for over 60 members and their canine companions to enjoy extended
periods of time at play and socialization year-round. Additionally, functioning as an animal
resource center means we provide rehoming suggestions, behavior interventions guidance, and
care recommendations to countless community members.
Being a successful animal resource center is not just about the work of the DRHS. It is also
about the support of our community. A community that backs the mission and sets the
22
precedence of a cooperative commitment to creating pathways to new homes and brighter
futures in the tri-state area and beyond for the animals at the DRHS. However, achieving and
maintaining no -kill status means instituting additional programs are necessary as well as
additional challenges. Hence, all our dogs and cats are microchipped in hopes that they are
reunited with their families faster. We expanded our foster program for those animals that need
a bit more TLC to thrive, and have been researching and implementing new training
interventions (Dogs Playing for Life), environment techniques (decompression rooms) and
innovative measures (working cat program) to open more adoption opportunities for the harder
to place animals in care. Lastly, we have made the transition to be a breed free organization
with the goal of helping people find a dog whose personality fits the adopter's lifestyle rather
than depending on breed stereotypes.
HOURS:
Tuesday - Thursday: 11 AM to 5 PM
Friday: 11 AM to 7 PM
Saturday & Sunday: 11 AM to 5 PM
Monday: Closed
23
The DRHS is Here for the
Animals Because of You.
Dedication to the animals we care for means we
work on the guiding belief that companion animals
deserve ompassionate core, comfortable and safe
harbor, and a permanent and laving home where
they opt/in/ye and tea beloved member of a family.
And We Are Here for You, Our
Community, Too!
commitment to you, our cornmhmity, means we
provide the services necessary to build families
throogl, adoption, cultivate character development
through humane education, and foster the greater
good through community outreach and the
prevention of oueny.
Nearly 80 CENTS of
very dollar we raise is
reinuested to provide rare
for thousan ifs of animals
on theirjourney home and
services. our rnmmunity.
Q% OPTIOR
P,4'4IIBILITIES''"#
Going the
Distance
"I look forward to the process of us
growing together. I love him"
—Carly. Adopter
Carly, a student at Lams College, was visiting
the Dubuque Regional Humane &wiaty {DRUM
search of a mine companion when she laid
eyes on Oliver. Al jut two months old, Oliver
was being nnied irdo the NHS after among
n a transport from Arkansas. "I saw him and
jostled in love," Carly recalls. W hide Carly's
search to firm Oliver was short, Olive's road
to her was long and hit a bump or two.
Oliver had been badly injured after being
hit by a mr. W ithtwo Fractured bones in
his furelknband broken bones in his paw,
he required a spint, pan management,
andtiotia,tme to heal, and tots of TLC. Once
cleared to make the trip, Olverjoumeyed
630 miles from an uncertain future at an
WHAT 13 SEASON OF
PAWS1BIL1TIES?
Season of Pews iOil Ines Is the Dubuque Regional
Humane Society's (DRHS) annual appeal to build
a comfnu nay of unconditional love by connecting
people and pets. This Es achieved by engaging our
community in raising much needed funds to create
new pathways name for the animals at the DRHS,
recruit new volunteers, and create greater awareness
about the DA115 in our tri-state community
H / "'
Get Involved. Change Their Lives ° Yours! 1
teit
Give.
Unquestionably, financial
support and in -kind gifts
make a dcert and profound
difference in the liras of the
animals at the ORFl6.
sercrowded shelter to the DRHS The
DRHS has become a desvnaeun shelter
that offers adoptable animals like Oliver
their had chance at finding a new home
and a forever fam lly. Cady adopted
Oliver as man as he was available.
She has big plans to enroll Oliver in
obedience training and eventually
certify him for risils to children's
hospitals, however, for the lime bang,
Oliva has settled quite mmformbly into
being Carly's copilot as they travel the
road of life together.
y. °Violrhay try... Kelmrtlmn. Eairetlohhpermkoion fromfie ASMA
Volunteer.
From siud tits to retirees,
computer geeks to animal
lovers, every volrnteer at
the DRHS makes a valued
Impact.
C°°0 FOSTER
PAWSIR;i'.T!ES
Cat Burglar
Eliza, her mom, and sister actually
adopted Rory for themselves. However,
her brother, who never wanted
anything to do with animalstook a
akmg to her, and Rosy is now his rat.
Rosy is ha constant companion always
slumbering on his lap or near him. He's
always playing with her and researching
online al of the best ways to be a great
cat parent. It is sale to say that Racy
stole his heart.
Adopt.
Adopting not only saves
lines but builds families,
neater unconditional
friendships and prowl ter
the human -animal bond.
DRHS Stats
(la n uary 1—September 30, 2018}
-1a 1,656
Animals that found Forcing
homes
Vo99% Save rate
190
Animals reunited with the
people that love them
i 542
About the DRHS
Animals transferred in
The Dubuque Regional Humane Society IORHS) ismuch more than an anginal shelter. It
is an animal resource center that delivers upon the mission of protecting and pmrnoting
the wellbeing of companion animals by budding fie -long bonds between pets and
people through adoption, humane education, community outreach, and the prevention
of cruelty. operating as a 501fcj3 nor. -profit, open admission, no-kdl shelter the DRHS
provides nitical medical and behavioral interve concur and compassionate tare nor over
2,500 animals annually that are lost, abandoned, surrendered by owners, or rescued from
neglect. Our cmmmitment to ourmdssion, in tandem truth our supportive community,
creates new pathway to home and brighterfmures for 100%of the safe, healthy, and
treatable animals in our core.
"Every single day my brother tells
me new stories of what Roxy has
been up to, and the crazy things she
does that make him laugh. I think
it's safe to say that my brother loves
Roxy as his own fur child."
Adopter
Animal transport is a symbiotic partnership. White we're helpingother animal welfare
organizations, we're also meeting demands for companion animals in our tri-state region
and beyond and achieving our goals of saving lives and building families."
—Amanda, 0RRS Shelter Manager
"My wife and I 'foster kittens and cats and it's so rewarding when they get adopted. I feel
like tactually helped them find their forever home."
Jan, yolunteorand Foster Parent
CIP 1 ILJMIINE
SOCIETY
4242 Chavenelle Rd
Dubuque, IA 52002
(563)5132-6766 1 dbghumane.oag
CAI MDR
PAWSIBILIf!ES
"Dogs have always been a part of
my life. They have been my loyal
friends, companions and great
listeners. I have chosen to support
the Dubuque Regional Humane
Society because it rescues all kinds
of animals, provides medical care,
shelter, food and water, as well as,
finds forever homes for them."
— Cheryl' Donor
This is what your gp can make PAWSIBLE!
Yourgift to the DRHS is
10036tax deductible and
di 1ty supports our
animal on theirpaths
home; builds families in
the tri-states and beyond;
and promotesthe rife
enhancing bonds between
animals and people.
HOW TO
GIVE!
Gifts can be made
by sending in the
attached response
card or ONLINE at
dbghu mane. org
by clicking on the
DONATE button.
*2,500
Reduces Pet Overpopulation
Grants spay/neuter surgery for
50 animals
$1,000 Creates Healthy Companions
Enables 200 animals to receive the
rabies vaccination.
4500 Delivers Compassionate Care
Sponsors a week of comfort and
safety for 2 animals.
Provides Healing Procedures
Affords interventions that eliminate
painful condldons for an animal
in need.
$100 Enriches Daily life
Furnishes treats, toys, and activities
for countless animals.
$25
Reunites Families
Provides 4a nimals with a microchip_
24
NO -KILL
4
IiUMAE
SOCIETY
NO -KILL, OPEN ADMISSION
SHELTER AT THE DRHS.
The Dubuque Regional Humane Society (DRHS) operates as a
501(c)(3) non-profit, open admission, no -kill shelter providing
each animal in our care the best opportunity to be placed in
a safe and loving home. We will nevereuthanize a healthy,
treatable animal for lack of space, length of time, or any other
reason that is not in the best interest of the animal. The DRHS
continues to partner with residents to affirm the tri-state region
is a oompassianate, humane, no -kill community.
We meet and exceed the industry standards as advocated by
Best Friends and Maddie's Fund to operate asa no -kill, open
admission shelter As part of the Best Friends and Maddie's
Fund standards, the DRHS only euthanizes animals that are
irremediably suffering, unhealthy, untreatable, and cannot be
rehabilitated. The benchmark for achievinga no -kill status is
saving at least NU of the homeless animals the DRHS takes in.
The DRHS has proudly held a no -kill status since 2017.
In addition to helping animals find permanent homes, the DRHS
also has implemented programs to reduce the number of animals
coming into the shelter and increase adoption rates.
1
Is the DRHS a no -kill shelter?
Yes! The DRHS places 100% of our safe, healthy treatable animals
into safe and loving homes while maintaining an over 906 save
rate. This is the most widely accepted definition of no -kill, as
endorsed by Best Friends and Maddie's Fund.
Does no -kill mean no euthanasia?
No. Euthanasia is reserved solely for animals that are suffering
from illness or injury with no chance at recovery or quality of life. It
is also for animals with behaviors that make them a danger to the
community_ While these decisions are difficult, they provide the
most compassionate outcome for these animals.
How do you determine which animals are euthanized?
The DRHS staff looks at each animal as an individual, assessing his
or her situation and needs. This, in addition to determining the
quality of life moving forward, aids our staff in making these tough
decisions_ We do not make generalizations about an animal due to
its age, breed, illness, etc_ ft'struly about the individual animal.
What does open admission mean?
We will not turn away any stray animal due to its breed, age,
temperament, etc.
C11[ 1 M A N E 4242 Chavenelle Rd
S C 11 mi Dubuque, IA 52002 1110
(563) 582-6766 I dbghumane.org
25
2019 PET -FRIENDLY COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS
SHELTERS
(NUMBER OF RESPONSES FROM 615 RESPONDENTS)
Survey Question
Strongly Disagree Neutral Strongly Agree
1
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
N/A
Pets are comfortable at our city's shelters
and have room to play.
19
8
13
33
55
47
105
99
9
137
Adoptable pets are readily available for
viewing and interactions
11
7
5
21
39
32
90
127
172
,C)8
Shelter signage is welcoming and makes it
easy to figure out where to go.
11
11
14
21
39
45
90
108
153
Shelters have separate areas for owner
surrenders and adoptions
14
4
8
3
21
22
31
55
115
ali
337
Our city has a Trap -Neuter -Release (TNR)
program.
35
10
6
S
13
4
17
13
30
447
Community cats are well cared for in our
city.
37
23
29
31
39
18
24
15
23
371
Our city has one or more Working Cats
programs.
41
9
6
9
13
3
8
7
19
495
Full survey results shown in Appendix J and K on page 85 to 97.
26
HOMES PROFILE
HAPPY PETS
WELCOME PETS
HEALTHY PETS
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERSHIP
HOMES PROFILE
Any pet -friendly community needs to have access for housing for people with pets. The
National Association of Realtors recently conducted a study and presented a report
entitled "Remodeling Impact: Animals in Homes." [https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-
statistics/research-reports/remodeling-impact-animals-in-homes]. This report highlighted
the importance of pets in peoples' home choices. Some key highlights:
• 81 % of households say that animal -related considerations play a key role in
deciding their next living situation.
• 61 % of buyers who own animals say it is very difficult or difficult to find rental
properties and homeowner associations that accommodates pets.
• 52% of homeowners undertook renovations to accommodate their pets.
The report cited several important home and subdivision considerations for pets
including allowances for fencing, access to walking paths and greenspaces, and
waterproof flooring materials in construction.
As part of this evaluation for pet -friendliness in Dubuque, landlords were also surveyed.
Following is the information obtained from this evaluation:
SUMMARY OF LANDLORD CALLS CONDUCTED
Research was conducted on the pet -friendliness of rental housing. There are over 1800
landlords in Dubuque and over 10,000 rental units according to the Dubuque Housing
and Community Development Department. Greater Dubuque Development
Corporations (GDDC) rental housing list was used to conduct phone interviews with a
representative sample of Dubuque landlords by Pet -Friendly Work Group members.
Greater Dubuque Development Corporation list included 33 properties of which 19 were
interviewed.
Survey respondents represented approximately 1815 units in Dubuque, with the
smallest landlord managing one unit and the largest operating "200-300". One of these
landlords manages 20 Air b-N-b units.
28
Dogs, Cats, and Small Animals — 26%
Cats — 12%
No Pets Allowed — 68%
I. No PeEs Allowed • CaEs Dogs, Cats, and Small Animals
Additional Observations: 68% of responding landlords allow pets of some kind, but
only 38% of total units surveyed do. Landlords with smaller numbers of units were more
likely to allow pets. Of the 1815 total rental units surveyed, 38% allow pets or
approximately 690 units.
Restrictions:
Of 13 landlords (68%) who said they allowed pets:
• 2 only allow cats
• 4 enforce some type of size restrictions
• 7 enforce breed restrictions
• 3 enforce total # of pet restrictions
• 1 does not allow puppies
Enforcement procedures:
Of the 13 landlords who said they allowed pets:
• 11 indicated they charged a higher rent and/or deposit
• 1 indicated they charged a higher fee for unit cleaning if needed
• 2 indicated they kept a "closer eye" on these units in some way
Amenities: One landlord indicated they had a pet relief area. Landlords of smaller
properties indicated that most units had yards which the pets could use. No other
landlords identified any additional pet -friendly amenities in their properties.
If you don't allow pets, why not?
• Damage to units/yard (4)
• Irresponsible owners (4)
• Other renters object (3)
29
• Noise/smell (3)
• Picking up dog waste (2)
• Unknown reason (1)
• Allergies of other/future tenants (1)
• Not enough green space (1)
Are there resources the community could offer, or other incentives, that might
change your mind about allowing pets in more units?
• Unknown (3)
• Nothing would change my mind (2)
• Understanding re: certified therapy, emotional support animals (2)
• More off -leash areas for pets in community (2)
• Better enforcement of owners who don't pick up dog waste (2)
• Responsible pet owner training (1)
• Certification/documentation of history of responsible pet ownership/no damage to
units (1)
The landlord survey questions are listed on Appendix E on page 71.
2019 PET -FRIENDLY COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS
HOMES
(NUMBER OF RESPONSES FROM 615 RESPONDENTS)
Survey Question
strongly Disagree Neutral Strongly Agree
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
.v .4
Pet -owners in our city have plenty of
options for whereto he.
160
63
71
53
58
30
24
22
43
S
Most rental housing in our city allows all203
common household pets.
83
72
43
32
12
6
10
11
1{
Rental housing pet deposits or fees are
reasonable.
112
48
47
52
65
21
33
20
37
Pets are considered when housing
developments are built or updated.
186
c?
62
33
31
2
6
6
19
213
Our city does riot have breed restrictions in
place.
68
12
25
19
23
15
25
38
128
260
Our city does not restrict the nurnber of
pets a single household can have_
60
16
26
1.6
24
13
22
31
100
301
Our city does not have pet size or weight
restrictions_
42
14
v _
13
9
20
13
25
39
155
___
Rental housing in our city does not have
restrictions based on pet breed or size.
194
37
18
26
10
6
4
24
Rental and residential communities in our
city provide pet relief areas with free
waste bags_
302
97
72
33
43
17
18
11
28
.
Rental and residential communities provide
hydration stations with free water for pets_
198
114
76
29
34
16
26
13
27
Rental and residential communities have
pet -friendly green space within walking
distance.
231
76
68
31
38
22
25 1
14
29
--
Full survey results shown in Appendix J and K on pages 85 to 97.
30
PARKS PROFILE
HAPPY PETS
WELCOME PETS
HEALTHY PETS
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERSHIP
PARKS PROF!'
Access to public parks and greenspaces is vital when assessing pet -friendliness. Pet
owners, particularly dog owners, need access to greenspaces in order to properly care
for their dogs. Beyond those basic needs, owning a dog has been shown to help people
be more active which contributes to many physical and mental health benefits. In this
age of social isolationism and virtual interactions superseding face-to-face interactions,
dog ownership and access to public spaces provides for far greater opportunities for
growth of local neighborhood social relationships.
• Dog owners spend an additional 22 minutes walking each day compared to non -
dog owners [https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-
017-4422-5]
• Dog ownership and interaction with neighbors builds social capital and
connections, for dog owners and nonowners.
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827317300344]
With those facts regarding both physical and social health benefits related to dog
ownership, it is clear that access to parks and greenspaces is an important
consideration in any pet -friendly community, and the benefits of that access extend to
non -pet owners as well.
32
PUBLIC PARKS, TRAILS & GREEN SPACES
Total Square Miles of Parks: 1.34 square miles (859.20 acres)
Name of Park
Thtal Acres
AY McDonald Park`
Q.00
Bergfald Recreation NEE -
73.00
Eagle Faint Park
175.00
Flora Perk
35.1:10
Marshall Perk
00.00'
Mc,8Jeece Sports Complex
421X
Miller Riverview Perk and
C.arrtp(round "
2QCb
Murrtry Park
BD.D3
Fyatigorsk Park'
1.30
ROoseveII Park
207.1:10
V&erans Memorial Perk
73.13G
WashinortOn Park
1.00
' Jiscn Henderson Park
6.00
Comiske3r Perk
4.00
Gay Park
1;1.0C
L h9 Park
8.00
Valentine Perk
12.00
Valley High Far
6.00
Avail Perk
1.00
Burden Park
1.00
Cancer Survivor Pa-.c
0.50
Cleveland Park
4.00
Falk Perk
1.00
Rat Iron Park
1.0D
Grant Park
0.20
Ffartest View Par c
2.10
Hillcrest Park
2.00
Hi bop Park
1.0D
Jackson Park
2.00
Jefferson Park
0.50
Madison Perk
3.00
Merry Ridge Children's'Dark
4.00
Maus Park
S.90
Orange Park
0.23
Pet Park'"`
2.50
Riley Park
0.50
Pisani Fark
0.50
Rom B+_rde Jr. Park
0.10
Soulhem Park
2.00
Tedely Fear Park
1.00
Wafer -Cooper Park
0.50
Welu Fark
0.r.,-0
Creek Wood Park
1.87
33
Name of Leased Park Area
Acres
Dubuque Botanical Gardens and Arboretum
42.50
Four Mounds Park
55.00
EB Lyons Prairie and Woodland Preserve
89.00
Name of Undeveloped Parks
Acres
Eagle Valley Park
2.25
English Ridge Park
1.86
North Fork Trail Park
3.83
Pebble Cove Park
0.60
Westbrook Park
5.20
Other City Properties
Acres
Bunker Hill Golf Course
110.00
Total number of developed parks: 43
Percentage of Community that is developed parks (total park square miles divided by
total city square miles): 4.20%
Number of Parks That Allow Pets: 5 (AY McDonald, Bergfeld Recreation Area, Miller
Riverview, Pyatigorsk, Pet Park)
Percentage of Pet -Friendly Parks (total number of pet -friendly parks divided by total
number of developed parks): 11.62%
Number of OFF -Leash Dog Parks: 1, Pet Park
Number of Dog Parks Per Square Mile (total number of dog parks divided by total
square miles): .03 dog parks per square mile
Parks in our area: Eagle Point Park, Flora Park, and Murphy Park allows pets in
vehicles. Port of Dubuque. Marina and Miller Riverview
Campground allow pets on leash.
34
PUBLIC PET -FRIENDLY TRAILS AND/OR GREENWAYS PRESENT IN THE CITY
Number of Trail Miles: 26 miles
Name of Trail
AY McDonald Park Trail
Bee Branch Creek Greenway Trail
Granger Creek Nature Trail
Heritage Trail
Jaycee Trail
Bergfeld Recreation Area Trails
Miller Riverview Park Trail
Northwest Arterial Trail
Port of Dubuque Riverwalk Trail
Powerline Trail
Southern Levy Trail
Estimated Number of Miles of Pet -Friendly Trails: 16.93 miles
Percentage of Pet -Friendly Miles (total pet -friendly trail miles divided by total number
of trail miles): 65.10%
PUBLIC GREEN SPACES/WAYS
Name of Greenway
Acres
Bee Branch Greenway *
65.00
Rockdale Grandview Entry *
0.34
Medical Associate Greenbelt
33.00
Center Grove Open Space
12.93
Medical Associate Greenbelt and Center Grove Open Space are all natural areas open
to pets however are not developed areas thus referred to as open spaces.
Number of Green Space Acres: 111.27 Acres
Percentage of Pet -friendly Green Space Acres (total number of pet -friendly green space
acres divided by total number of green space acres): 88%
Estimated Number of Miles of Pet -Friendly Greenways: 1.48, Bee Branch Greenway
Trail System
35
Percentage of Pet -Friendly Greenway Miles (total pet -friendly greenway miles divided
by total number of trail miles): 100%
DOGS IN PARKS COMPARISION WITH TOP 15 IOWA CITIES
Leisure Services staff surveyed the 15 largest Iowa cities asking about their ordinance
related to dogs in parks as well as their dog parks.
• Of the 15 cities surveyed all cities but Dubuque allow leashed dogs in
parks
• The cities have between 1 and 3 dog parks.
• Annual dog park fees range from $15 to $57 and no fees to $6 for a daily
fee.
• Acreage range from 2.5 to 24.8 acres.
• Of those that charge daily fees Dubuque fee of $1 is the lowest.
• Four cities charge less, and five cities charge more for annual passes.
Top 14 Cities averages: Dubuque:
Average Dog Park Annual Fee* $30.40 $25
Average Daily Fee* $4.50 $1.00
Average Park Size 10.23 acres 2.50 acres
Dogs allowed in city parks Yes No
* of those parks that charge a fee
The detailed chart is on the next page.
36
Pin numbers to open gate
Fees may come once area
revamped
'$5..00 discount for
spayed/neutered pet
$21.00 for annual additional
dog or $2.50 additional dog
daily fee
Dog owners organized and
fundraised to create dog park
and then gifted to the city.
Midland Humane Society owns
this park.
One city owned dog park
Park owned/maintained by Linn
County Conservation but within
Marion city limits
Y
CO
[1J
1s s
tit
T
LID
o
P
a
T
uO
r�
Ln
r--
1-
C4,
r4
Leashed
Population dogs Dog Annual Fee Daily
allowed in Parks Fee
all
parks/trails
CD
LL
O
Z
CO
No Fee
No Fee
$5.00
ID
CA
CD
Q
LC}
CD
Q
'Xi
CS
Q
LC)
CD
Q
ID
C'i
CI
CC}
O
Q
or
,
CD
Co
co
CD
0
No Fee
$52.00 - $57.00 *
G
YLC)
$42.00 Resident
t
C Z
in C
a) a
CC Z
o o
Q
$25.00 Resident
$35.00 Non -Resident
Q
LC}
$25.00 City Park*
Q
Y
io
$32.00 ($5.00 discount if spayed
or >1 dog)
ce)
CV
IN
r
CV
r
r
r
r
r
{1J
Q
r
C
O
r V
r
217,521 Yes
132,228 Yes
U7
Yes
CD
CD
tl7
U7
CA
Q1
O
Z
Yes
CD
CD
CU
102,320
82,514
LC]
N-
COCD
r.-
.CD
C4
CO
65,608
62,416
r
CA
C.Q
58,276
0,
Cr
41,570
39,400
35,813
Des Moines
Cedar Rapids
Davenport
r~
O
[I?
Iowa City
Waterloo
rti
CU
i5
West Des
Moines
CU
SC
.4
Council Bluffs
Dubuque
CP
CO
1_
CI
=
Cedar Falls
Marion
Bettendorf
37
CIS
f9 `
co
N
a a
L
Cr .04
4
cb To
Z
h 't
Z
0
1-
U
0
J
cc
a
w
a
m
terpiece on the Mississippi
Y
c w q5
El_
�} w d f t d " w"
n g y8 ,2 dui icy ej a r m 2E - y a a m
W S] C W— W z W IE W 1 0=-
qx E3Q'� TV ‹�3T ���p�LLQ T2H m V =,3
8 4 m• o P
gffgER
o pa,m m[i1 ,-0 u-Emlm W a c E
25 2 ep m_ � w>
ttl ri 6 • . .•
i [o fM1 oo Oi� [V
ry e�-iv�n en en room g;t Avg
38
co
ce
co
re
o_
>-
ce
u_
iL
a
co
5
\
• N.
p
4.
•4-
q
•
a!
rri 010 ff.%to .1a17A
111.1M &T.' I
39
CURRENT PET SIGNAGE IN PARKS
NO PETS
•
PET-FRIENDI .Y WASTE STATIONS
The following chart will illustrate the location and the number of waste stations available.
Location Name
Number of Waste Stations
AY McDonald Park
2
Pyatigorsk Park
1
Miller Riverview Park
3
South Flood Wall Trail
1
Pet Park
2
Bergfeld Recreation Area
1
Middle Road Trailhead
1
Chavenelle Court
1
Heron Pond Trail
1
Total
13
Fiscal Year
Waste Bag Expense
2014
$1,823.29
2015
$1,523.45
2016
$936.00
2017
$936.00
2018
$1,415.88
2019
*
$531.96
*2019 as of March 5, 2019
Pet Waste Rags
.*-.I..ase Help Ois Krop
. it Ylrk Muan
• .^k You!
40
PET -FRIENDLY FOUNTAINS
The following chart will illustrate the location and the number of pet fountains available.
Location Name
Number of
Fountains
Chavenelle Court
1
AY McDonald Park
1
Rockdale and Grandview
1
Grandview and Finley
1
University and Grandview (near fire station)
1
Pet Park
2
Bee Branch Creek Greenway (Upper)
4
Riverwalk (Marina Area)
1
7th Street Trail
1
5th and Bluff
1
19th and Central
1
Total
15
PET PARK
City of Dubuque Pet Park is currently 2.50 acres and is divided into two sections. One
area is for dogs over 20 pounds while the other is for dogs under 20 pounds. Amenities
for this included pet -friendly drinking fountain, benches, picnic tables, trash receptacles,
portable restroom, and pet waste bags. The park is currently open from 8am to 8pm
daily.
41
PET PARK FINANCIALS
YEAR
Resident
Season
Passes
# Of
Passes
Non -Res
Season
Passes
# Of
Passes
Daily
Admissions
Total Revenue
2014
$1,225.00
49
$105.00
3
$1,086.39
$2,416.39
2015
$650.00
26
$140.00
4
$1,535.52
$2,325.52
2016
$700.00
28
$105.00
3
$993.66
$1,798.66
2017
$675.00
27
$70.00
2
$1,069.77
$1,814.77
2018
$987.50
41
$70.00
2
$1,047.30
$2,104.80
2019*
$200.00
8
$35.00
1
$620.46
$855.46
*2 019 is as of March 5, 2019
PET PARK EXPENSES
On average each year the expenses for the Dog Park is $3197. Grass mowing is $945,
portable restroom is $1800 and lighting is $400. In addition, we spent $311 in 2013 and
$399 in 2018 for envelopes. On average $52 is spent on dog tags each year.
These costs do not include performed work by Park Division Staff such as litter control,
fee collection, general repairs and maintenance and snow removal.
PET PARK SCHOLARSHIP FUNDS
The Leisure Services Department gives out 150 scholarships ($125.00) to low income
residents of Dubuque. The amounts listed below were used to purchase pet park
passes.
42
FY 17 - $25.00 (1)
FY 18 - $50.00 (2)
FY 19 - $25.00 (1)
CITY OF JUBUQUE 4FT PARK RULES
1. Owners are legally responsible for their dogs and any injuries caused by their dogs.
2. Owners must remain within the fenced area at all times.
3. Dogs must be leashed prior to entering and upon leaving the area. Gates to the
area must remain closed at all times.
4. Owners must immediately clean up after their dogs. Failure to do so can result in a
fine up to $750.
5. Dogs with a known history of, or who exhibit dangerous behavior are prohibited.
6. Dogs must be healthy, fully immunized, de -wormed, and wearing license and rabies
tags.
7. An adult must accompany children under 14; young children must be closely
supervised.
8. Puppies under four months old and female dogs in heat are prohibited.
9. Only two dogs per adult are allowed.
10. Dogs must be watched at all times.
11. Cooperation between dog owners is essential.
12. Enter at your own risk.
CURRENT POTENTIAL CITY PET PARK PLANS
The City of Dubuque has discussed the potential of a second pet park since when the
first pet park opened in 2005. Currently two plans exist related to future, potential dog
parks.
FDR PARK
The conceptual master plan shows of FDR Park was completed in 2009 and approved
by the City Council. The conceptual plan shows a large dog area of 5 acres, a small dog
area, a 1-acre training area, dog park shelters, pond, and parking area. The plan was
developed with public input at the time. Other amenities were planned for the park. This
remains a potential location. The concept plan showing the dog park and other
improvements is in Appendix F on page 72.
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOCUST AND DODGE
This property is owned by the State of Iowa. The City has requested the opportunity to
develop a dog park at this location and funding for construction had been approved. The
Iowa Department of Transportation representatives verbally felt they would issue a
permit for use as a dog park. A concept plan and cost estimate were developed. Budget
43
cuts mid -year in Fiscal Year 2014 meant the project was halted at the time as the
funding for construction was zeroed out. The concept had a 3.15-acre area for large and
small dogs. Parking was to be on -street parking with a phase 2 project of off-street
parking. The concept plan cost estimate is in Appendix G and H on pages 73 to 74.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS RELATED
TO PETS 2012-2019
There have been many actions taken by the City's Park and Recreation Commission as
well as the City Council the last seven years. The actions and support documentation
are shown in Appendix I on pages 75 to 84. The topic of both pet parks as well as dogs in
parks have been research, studied, had public hearings, much public engagement and
comment as well as numerous votes. This Appendix is for historical reference and
referral as needed.
44
2019 PET -FRIENDLY COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS
PARKS
(NUMBER OF RESPONSES FROM 615 RESPONDENTS)
Survey Question
Strongly Disagree Neutral Strongiy Agree
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
NfA
Pet -friendly parks and public spaces are
located throughout our city.
261
97
71
39
37
18
14
17
45
16
Parks offer pet -friendly spaces and basic
amenities.
262
100
87
36
31
15
15
15
33
19
Green spaces planning includes
consideration tor pets.278
90
60
32
24
14
15
13
32
55
Neighborhoods have parks that are within
walking distance.
201
73
55
46
53
25
39
26
55
37
Off -leash parks and pet -friendly spaces are
planned in my city within the next five
years
180
55
26
14
26
11
15
11
23
25
Parks and public spaces in our city have
visible and accessible pet waste stations
with free waste bags and trash receptacles.
255
106
66
41
36
13
16
13
34
34
Parks and public spaces have visible and
accessible hydration stations for pets.
237
109
77
33
33
17
18
12
33
43
Our city has signage that clearly identifies
pet amenities.
284
102
58
26
31
10
16
8
31
45
Our city has expanded the ways it held pet
owners find pet amenities.
253
—
67
51
31
35
22
19
12
28
-2
Parks and public spaces in our city have
signage communicating where pets are
allowed or restricted.
Pima
78
37
67
53
95
55
60
53
93
2r
Parks and public spaces post clear rules
about pet behavior.
105
69
60
54
79
46
48
32
77
4 2
Our city has a program to educate kids
about dog behavior.
176
48
35
21
26
12
22
7
26
238
Our city has had a communication program
within the last five years about responsible
pet ownership.
165
48
40
24
27
13
9
14
24
248
Full survey results shown in Appendix J and K on pages 85 to 97.
45
BUSINESSES
HAPPY PETS
WELCOME PETS
HEALTHY PETS
RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERSHIP
BUSINESSES PROFILE
The pet component of the economy is one of vigorous growth. According to the
American Pet Products Association, the US Pet Industry is expected to top $75.38
billion dollars in 2019. [https://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp]
Even during times of recession, the pet industry has continued to grow.
Dubuque's economy can benefit from taking advantage of this vast economic trend.
Encouraging pet -friendliness and giving businesses more opportunity to grow in this
sector will have tax revenue and job benefits.
When considering the total influence of pets on Dubuque's economy, it is difficult to
accurately assess the full extent of impact. While there are many pet -specific
businesses in the community, many retailers add pet sections of varying sizes to cater
to the needs of pet owners.
BUSINESSES RELATED TO PET HEALTH & WELLNESS:
Number of Vet Clinics: 6
Number of 24-Hour Pet Clinics: 0, Several Clinics provide after hours on -call service
but none are open 24 hours.
Number of Pet Day Care Businesses: 2
Number of Pet Training Services: 5
Number of Pet Food and Supply Stores: Many— difficult to fully assess:
Petco and PetSmart — Sell Pets & Supplies
Many retailers provide pet supplies such as
Theisen's, Blain's Farm and Fleet, Target,
HyVee, etc.
Pet Boarding Facilities: 3 + Limited Veterinary Clinics
Grooming business: About 10
PET -FRIENDLY BUSINESSES (ALLOW LEASHED PETS OTHER THAN SERVICE
ANIMALS):
- River Lights Bookstore
- Lowe's
- Blain's Farm and Fleet
- Petco
47
- Pet Smart
- White Front Feed and Seed
PET -FRIENDLY LODGING:
BEST WESTERN PLUS 3100 Dodge Street I Dubuque, IA 1563.557.8000
HOLIDAY INN DUBUQUE 450 Main Street I Dubuque, IA 1563.556.2000
DAYS INN 1111 Dodge Street I Dubuque, IA 1563.583.3297
GLENVIEW MOTEL 1050 Rockdale Road I Dubuque, IA 1563.556.2661
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 2080 Holliday Drive I Dubuque, IA 1563.556.7829
MAINSTAY SUITES 1275 Associates Drive I Dubuque, IA 1563.557.7829
MOTEL 6 2670 Dodge Street I Dubuque, IA 1563.556.0880
QUALITY INN 4055 McDonald Drive I Dubuque, IA 1563.556.3006
SUPER 8 2730 Dodge Street I Dubuque, IA 1563.582.8898
RESTAURANTS
Number of Restaurants: 333 licensed food service establishments
Number of Retail Food Establishments (grocery/food retail): 90
Estimated Number of Pet -Friendly Restaurants: 1, only outside, only allowed with
variance/permit from IDIA per State of Iowa Code
Percentage of Pet -Friendly Restaurants (estimated number of pet -friendly restaurants
divided by total number of restaurants): 0.3%
PETS IN FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS
Dubuque is required to follow the Food Code adopted by the State of Iowa. Pets are not, nor
have been allowed in food establishments, with the exceptions: The code does allow pets in
food establishments through variance process by the State of Iowa.
Travel Dubuque promotes Pet -Friendly Destinations. See Appendix M on page 108.
48
Dubuque Pet Training Services
Name
Address
Phone
Wehsite
Peicn
2541 NW Aricrial
Dubuque, [A 5.20612
(563)556-3507
u ww_ricleo cam
That's MY Dog
5110 Wolff Rd
Dubuque, !A S2002
•(563) 588-3039,
(SOO)364-S239
www_thetsrnydogco-m
Green Valley Kennels
15431 Derby Grange Rd
Dubuque, EA S2002
(563) 588-3045
www_grecovalleyl cnnels.corn
PetSmari
1300 John F Kennedy Rd
Dubuque, [A S2002
0563) 5574001
w eer pcLsrnin cum
Paw In Hand
1425 Scippcl Rd
Dubuque, EA S2002
(563)663-7554
www_pawhand.corn
City of Dubuque Veterinary Clinics
Name
Address
Phone
wehsile
Vat cram & While
Andmal Hripltal
3350 Asbury Rd
Dubuque, ]A 52002
(S63)556-30I3 uu•w.dubvqu vets.carn
Central Animal lloxpltal
I865 Central Ave
Dubuque, ]A 5208[
(S63)SS7-IS15 vww.centralanirnelhasp[taldixry.com
Pethled Anima.[ Health
Center
[170]tnsa5t
Dubuque, ]A 5200 [
IS63)583-8387 swu•w.dbgctoi d.com
Cabala) Terrace Animal
Hospital
2777 University Ave (S63)S56-2667 teaw.coinnialtcrraecanimalhaspital.earn
Dubuque, ]A 5200[
Key West Animal Clinic
2262 Flint Hill Dr
Dubuque, ]A 52003
IS63)588-1835 www.htc}weslanimslchnic.cona
Neunu[ster Animal
Hospital
3675 Crescent Rd .
Dubuque, ]A 52003
(S63)582-8417 uww.ncuorcistcranimalhospilal_c,au
49
2019 PET -FRIENDLY COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS
BUSINESSES
(NUMBER OF RESPONSES FROM 615 RESPONDENTS)
Survey Question
Strongly Disagree Neutral Strongly Agree
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
N/A
Retailers in our city welcome pets.
256
113
80
36
33
17
13
13
23
Restaurants in our city welcome pets.
323
125
47
23
26
10
5
7
18
Businesses post clear signage indicating
where pets are welcome.
228
92
51
33
47
21
28
23
48
Our city promotes itself as pet friendly or
has plans to do so in the near future.
309
77
37
18
28
16
15
9
23
Our city has local ordinances that enable
businesses welcoming pets.
258
51
32
19
18
7
7
6
r
19
194
Our city has local ordinances that enable
restaurants welcoming pets.
297
53
26
6
15
6
7
7
20
171
Our city's taxi and other fee -based car94
services allow pets.
24
13
7
11
3
4
3
9
443
Our public transportation systems allow
pets.
127
21
17
8
9
3
0
4
10
410
Our public transportation does not have
size limits for allowable pets.
96
16
9
3
8
1
0
3
10
Our closest airport has areas designated for
pets and/or pet -friendly amenities.
99
24
8
11
8
6
8
6
17
Full survey results shown in Appendix J and K on pages 85 to 97.
50
PET -FRIENDLY EVENTS/PLACES
Doggie Dip Dubuque Leisure Services, following the final day of public swimming, the family dog is
invited to take a dip in Sutton and Flora Pools. The admission is $5 per dog and includes access for
immediate family members.
2016 2017 2018
Flora — 154 Flora — 135 Flora — 240
Sutton — 103 Sutton — 133 Sutton — 150
Total 257 268 390
Theisen's Wags at the Flags is Dubuque's indoor dog park. It is
held most Wednesday evenings from 4:30pm to 8:OOpm and runs November to March in Five Flags
Arena. It accommodates both large and small dogs as well as their human counterparts. There are
cleaning supplies available, as well as the Barka Lounge for pet owners to purchase refreshments and
adult beverages. Entry is $4.00 per dog while humans are FREE. A portion of the entry fee is donated to
a charity, with this past year netting Dubuque Regional Humane Society $1,600!
Hadley's (Humane Society) Pet Park - Size, a little over an acre. A drinking fountain is available
as well as three waste stations inside the park and one outside. There are five benches throughout the
park and the hours are 6:00am to 8:OOpm. Members must pay a fee to use and show proof of
vaccinations. Membership fees start at $10 for a one-time pass, $25 for a quarterly pass, $75.00 for the
year with $10 for each additional dog. There is a $10 FOB key deposit for access to the park but the $10
is returned at the end when the FOB is turned back in.
51
STRUT YOUR MUTT — Get ready to Strut Your Mutt at
one of the only dog -friendly walks in the area for the Dubuque
Regional Humane Society (DRHS). Whether you have a mutt to
strut or simply want to strut for a great cause you are invited to
join the DRHS in raising awareness and funds for the homeless
animals in our community. This unique and furry friendly
community event is open to all ages and breeds. In addition to
the strut, there will be vendor booths, agility equipment, doggie
pools, and a dog training demonstration.
DOG-O-WEEN — An annual canine costume contest hosted by Theisen's Home -Farm -Auto. This
event gives canines — and their creative owners — a chance to have a howling good time together.
Spectators can watch the parade of pets free of charge. Proceeds benefit the Dubuque Regional Humane
Society!
DUBUQUE SUMMER FARMERS' MARKET -
Saturdays, May - October, 7 A.M. - 12 P.M.
1300 Iowa Street I Dubuque, IA Shop for locally grown produce
and handmade goods at the Dubuque Summer Farmers' Market.
Well behaved, vaccinated, leashed dogs are allowed at the
Dubuque Farmers' Market. Leashes may not be longer than 36
inches.
YAPPY HOUR - Wednesday, 11:00 A.M. to CLOSE
7 Hills Brewing Co. 11085 Washington St, Dubuque Get your dog out of the house for some social
drinking! Enjoy drinks and the beautiful atmosphere of the Millwork District. The lower patio is dog friendly
for Yappy Hour. No food allowed on lower patio.
FENELON PLACE ELEVATOR COMPANY- Open April 1 thru November 30 8 A.M. —10 P.M.
512 Fenelon Place Street I Dubuque, IA Hailed as the world's shortest, steepest elevator ride, the
Fenelon Place Elevator Company cars elevate passengers 189 feet from Fourth Street to Fenelon Place.
At the top, you and Fido will be able to see a panoramic view of the historic Dubuque business district,
the Mississippi River, and three states. The cars are very small, so only small lap dogs are welcome to
join their humans.
BARKS, BOURBON, AND BREWS —
405 Main Street I Dubuque, IA The Barks Dog Park will have enclosed safe play areas for both big dogs
and small dogs, live music, dog related vendors, and dog themed films. The bourbon and beer tasting
event will feature local and national breweries and distilleries including Buffalo Trace, Eagle Rare, Single
Speed, 7 Hills, among others. Proceeds from the event will benefit the Dubuque area Toys for Tots as
they kick off the giving season. Barks Brews and Bourbon kicks off the seasonal Wags at the Flags, a
weekly indoor dog park.
52
APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS OF PET STATISTICS
Dog/Cat population estimates for City of Dubuque- June 2019
(2012 AVA US Pet Ownership & Demographics Sourcebook)
The American Veterinary Medical Association statistics estimate the following
number of pets averaged per household:
Percentage of households
owning a pet
Number of pets
per household
Dogs 36.5 1.6
Cats 30.4 2.1
25,932 (American Fact Finder 2017 estimate households in the city of Dubuque)
25,932 X 36.5% =9465 X 1.6= 15,144 dogs
25,932 X 30.4%= 7883 X 2.1= 16,555 cats
53
APPENDIX B: QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE OF ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS & RULES
°fir Owner Responsibilities
0
DOGS AND CATS ARE ALLOWED ON LEAST{ AT:
W'i" : o
'C o
0 _ E
_ • o
E 4 2 v 4° m
t c a
• _t•
4 " w
d
Po
a� o a c� ¢5m `- 5° 4 t 2 0 T. 0 L' u 2
6)7 Z a 1Q y
a 4
• ■ ■ • ■ E
3
N
C d o T O
a 1v v_ ;o o .� 3
4 • - y 4- `
4 rnq v_ a n° 'E'° ° �v
C.0 0 = v • - w a m `° o U ,`c_ x
C 4 4 V
i C7 m c` or,
• m ° y°yvu q m
L V C . 1'` ._!_])2 C V 7 Wcr, 4
a � c7z x z °
ink -° wZ
a4 • •
• Murphy Park
m
= 0
.0 0
4 =
U
Dubuque, IA 52001.4732
Email: animalontrol@cityofdubuque.org
www.cityafduhuque.orglanimalcontrol
off North Grandview Avenue adjacent to Bunker Hill
Course_ The park Ts fenced in and offers separate are
for large and small dogs.
m
4 ▪ $
cv tl 4 c
o 4 v 8 Pi - 6 v
a 2 co • 2
A °2
a x N 4 r.
o
0 • v .- 0 g 4°
0 4 4,a
b
3
4:0 3 a.)O a
a a
5 CV a 2 -0
to
E 0
a g' .,
O • N 3 P 0. 'b
' E 10 o
0.tvi
54
APPENDIX B: QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE OF ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS & RULES (BACK)
tocte
Impoundment fee must be paid at City Clerk's
Rabies Vaccinations
Office, City Hall, before the animal may be
claimed from the Humane Society.
Animals must be leashed OR restrained
Prohibited Animals
)\
All bites must be reported to the Health Services
2
0
0
E
0
E
0
4
7
0
for ten (10) days of a veterinarian clinic or the animal may
be observed with home confinement if it meets very specific
criteria, and is approved by the Animal Control Officer.
L O p c
▪ v_
0
a ` t U
Nw Q 1 m L u 4
❑ ❑ OO c N '1
c E C q 1184
O 2 0 p R Q E Q-0.
r Y d O E "°❑ ro
G p y p C % rr. o O a c 'c Po 6
w w 0 w O N 4 '0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
v
e c
• 2.❑
❑ g 0 c 0
O
0 ❑7 27 0
G a O p -0E ; C
ru Q r 3 m 0
O d
.o o-a c o p c ° • c O. °'
= v n 3 E • d E fi o❑
, ' Leash Law and Impoundment
Pets must be leashed at al] times when off the owner or
2nd & subsequent offenses —SW
I I ' rlaa E 'ri
! ■ ■
LICENSING A NEW PET
E
0
75014-1929
E
0
C
47
p
2
0
w
m
7,
c
4:
a
N
70
m
0
55
APPENDIX C: ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
Title 7 - POLICE, FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Chapter 6 - ANIMAL CONTROL
ARTICLE A. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
7-6A-1: SALE OF BABY CHICKENS AND DUCKLINGS:
A. Sale As Pets Or Novelties: It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, or offer for sale,
barter, or give away, baby chicks or ducklings or other fowl as pets or novelties.
B. Selling For Commercial Purposes Allowed: This section shall not be construed to
prohibit the display or sale of natural chicks, ducklings in proper brooder facilities, by hatcheries
or stores engaged in the business of selling the same to be raised for commercial purposes.
C. State License Required: No person shall engage in the business of selling baby chicks,
poultry or domestic fowl within the City unless such person has been licensed to do so by the
Department of Agriculture of the State.
7-6A-2: RESTRICTIONS ON MAINTAINING LIVESTOCK:
A. Maintenance Of Pens, Yards And Enclosures: No person shall keep or maintain within
the corporate limits of the City any pens, buildings, yards, sheds or enclosures wherein any
cattle, sheep, swine or other livestock are collected, kept or fed for commercial purposes unless
such pens, buildings, yards, sheds or enclosures are erected, constructed and maintained as
provided in this section.
B. Concrete Floors: All such pens, buildings, yards, sheds or enclosures shall be erected
and maintained with floors constructed of concrete at least four inches (4") thick with a smoothly
troweled wearing surface.
C. Drainage; Catch Basins: All such concrete floors shall be constructed so as to drain to a
catch basin or basins connected with the sanitary sewage system of the City, or in the event
there is no such sewage system within two hundred feet (200') from the property line, such
basin or basins shall be connected with a sewage disposal system approved by the City
Manager.
D. Controlled Livestock Grazing:
1. A controlled livestock grazing contractor may temporarily keep or maintain within the
corporate limits of the City any pens, yards, sheds or enclosures wherein any grazing livestock
approved by the City are temporarily kept for the limited and express purposes of controlled
livestock grazing in accordance with the City's controlled livestock grazing program. Controlled
livestock grazing within the corporate limits will not be allowed in any one location for more than
thirty (30) consecutive days.
2. All such pens, yards, sheds or enclosures used for the limited and express purpose of
controlled livestock grazing will be temporary and may not remain in place more than thirty (30)
consecutive days. Due to the temporary nature of such pens, yards, sheds, or enclosures used
for the limited and express purpose of controlled livestock grazing, concrete floors will not be
required for pens, yards, sheds or enclosures used to shelter and keep animals participating in
controlled livestock grazing.
3. All fences used to keep or maintain livestock used for controlled livestock grazing within
corporate limits must comply with the fencing regulations set forth in the City's Controlled
Livestock Grazing Policy.
56
4. Any controlled livestock grazing contractor who wishes to keep or maintain livestock
within the corporate limits for controlled livestock grazing must obtain a permit from the City and
comply with all terms and conditions of the City's controlled livestock grazing program.
7-6A-3: STORAGE OF ANIMAL FOOD: All food and feed within the City for feeding chickens,
cows, pigs, horses, and other animals shall be stored in rat free and ratproof containers,
compartments, or rooms unless stored in a ratproof building.
ARTICLE B. DOGS AND CATS
7-6B-1: DEFINITIONS: The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation of this article:
AT LARGE: Any dog, cat or livestock, fowl or ferret found off the premises of the owner or
keeper. A dog or cat shall not be deemed at large if the dog or cat is:
A. Attached to a leash of sufficient strength and appropriate length to control the animal
where such leash is held by its owner or keeper; or
B. Restrained within an enclosed motor vehicle or by crate or leash of sufficient strength
and appropriate length to keep the dog or cat within the motor vehicle; or
C. Housed in a licensed veterinarian's animal hospital; or
D. Accompanied by the owner or keeper on the premises of another with such person's
consent and restrained by an adequate protective fence or by leash, cord, chain or other similar
restraint that does not allow the dog or cat to go beyond such person's property line or to come
into contact with anyone outside such person's property line.
CAT: Both male and female animals in the family Felis catus whether neutered or not.
DOG: Both male and female animals of the canine species whether neutered or not, but not
including a law enforcement dog.
HEALTH CARE PROVIDER: A person who is trained and licensed to give health care.
KEEPER: Any person other than the owner keeping, sheltering, having control or custody of or
harboring an animal.
KENNEL: A place or establishment where dogs or cats are kept or raised for the purpose of
breeding, boarding, racing at a licensed parimutuel track, exchanged or offered for sale to the
general public and which are kept under constant restraint.
NEUTERED: A surgical procedure that has been performed on a dog or a cat that renders it
incapable of siring or bearing offspring.
NUISANCE: A dog or cat shall be considered a nuisance if it:
A. Damages, soils, defiles or defecates on private property other than the owner's or
keeper's or on public walks and recreation areas unless such waste is immediately removed
and properly disposed of by the owner or keeper.
B. Causes unsanitary, dangerous or offensive conditions.
C. Causes a disturbance by excessive barking or other noisemaking that can be heard from
a position in the public right-of-way.
D. Chases vehicles, or molests, attacks or interferes with persons or other domestic
animals off the premises of the owner or keeper.
OWNER: Any person owning a cat, dog, or other animal.
VICIOUS ANIMAL: A vicious cat or dog is deemed so when it shall have attacked or bitten any
person on more than one (1) occasion without provocation or when an attack or bite results in
serious bodily injury.
7-6B-2: LICENSING; TAGS AND FEES:
A. License Required: No person shall keep a dog or cat in the City unless such dog or cat
is licensed by the City as provided in this article. This section shall not apply to veterinary clinics
and boarding facilities.
57
B. Application For License: The owner or keeper shall make application for a license with
the City Manager. The application shall give the name, physical address, date of birth or social
security number of the owner or keeper, the sex and description of the dog or cat, and if known,
its breed and age. In the event of a change of ownership, the license holder shall notify the City
Manager of such change. All dogs and cats shall be licensed by not later than six (6) months of
age. If an animal is older than six (6) months of age, the dog or cat must be licensed within thirty
(30) days of ownership or residing in the City of Dubuque, whichever is first.
C. Dogs:
1. License Fee; Neutering:
a. The license fee per calendar year, or fraction thereof, for a dog license shall be as
established by the City Manager.
b. The applicant or licensee shall furnish written proof from a licensed veterinarian that
surgical procedures have been performed that render either male or female dogs incapable of
reproduction, which may result in a reduced licensed fee.
2. Expiration; Renewal; Delinquent Fee: All dog licenses issued under this subsection shall
expire one (1) year from the date the license was issued and shall become delinquent thirty (30)
days after the license anniversary date. A delinquent fee as established by the City Manager,
shall be added to the required license fee for each delinquent dog license.
D. Cats:
1. License Fee; Neutering:
a. The license fee per calendar year, or fraction thereof, shall be as established by the City
Manager.
b. The applicant or licensee shall furnish written proof from a licensed veterinarian that
surgical procedures have been performed that render either male or female cats incapable of
reproduction, which may result in a reduced licensed fee.
2. Expiration; Renewal; Delinquent Fees: All cat licenses issued under this subsection shall
expire one (1) year from the date the license was purchased and shall become delinquent thirty
(30) days after the license anniversary date. A delinquent fee as established by the City
Manager shall be added to the required license fee for each delinquent cat license.
E. Tags:
1. Tags Not Transferable: A license issued for any dog or cat shall not be transferred to
another dog or cat.
2. Tags Attached To Collar Or Harness: The owner or keeper of a dog or cat, upon
procurement of the license, shall securely attach the license tag to a collar or harness and this
collar or harness, with the tag attached, shall at all times be kept on the dog or cat. Any dog or
cat found at large without a collar or harness with license tag attached shall be deemed
unlicensed and shall be impounded.
F. Fee For Duplicate License: The fee for a duplicate license for either a dog or cat shall be
as established by the City Manager.
G. Consent Implied From Application And Receipt: The application for and the receipt of a
license as required in this section shall include an implied consent by the owner or keeper to
permit an inspection of both real and personal property under the owner's or keeper's control for
the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this article relating to the harborage of vicious
animals or to the control of rabies outbreak or relating to the provisions of law relative to the
prohibition of cruelty to animals.
7-6B-3: KEEPING DOMESTIC ANIMALS ON UNOCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY OR
IN DANGEROUS BUILDINGS PROHIBITED: The owner or keeper of a dog or cat shall not
keep or allow the dog or cat to be kept on unoccupied property or in any building that meets the
definition of a dangerous building as set forth in section 14-3-2 of this Code. For purposes of
58
this provision, "unoccupied property" shall include but is not limited to property that is not the
primary residence of the owner or keeper or any other occupant.
7-6B-4: HARBORING VICIOUS DOG OR CAT: It shall be unlawful for any person or persons
to harbor or keep a vicious dog or cat within the City. The City may abate violations of this
section with penalties including, but not limited to, euthanization of the animal.
7-6B-5: NUISANCE: It shall be unlawful for any owner or keeper to permit a dog or cat to
commit a nuisance.
7-6B-6: FEMALE DOGS IN SEASON: It shall be unlawful for any owner or keeper to allow a
female dog in season to run at large or to so confine such dog as to attract male dogs to the
area and by their presence cause a nuisance.
7-6B-7: RUNNING AT LARGE: It shall be unlawful for any owner or keeper to permit or allow a
dog, cat, ferret, livestock or fowl to run at large.
7-6B-8: DIRECTING DOG WITH MALICIOUS INTENT: No person shall direct, encourage,
cause, allow or otherwise aid or assist any dog to threaten, charge at, intimidate, bite, harass,
menace or attack any person.
7-6B-9: USE OF DOG IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITY PROHIBITED: No person shall keep, maintain,
control or retain custody of any dog in conjunction with, or for the purpose, whether in whole or
in part, of aiding, abetting or conducting illegal activity or committing any crime.
7-6B-10: IMPOUNDMENT, REDEMPTION AND DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED ANIMALS:
A. Contract For Pound Or Shelter: The City Manager is hereby authorized to contract from
year to year with any pound or animal shelter as defined by section 162.2 of the Code of Iowa
for carrying out the provisions of this article including the collection, protection and disposition of
dogs, cats and other animals and the collection of fees for licensing and care of seized and
impounded dogs and cats.
B. Impoundment: Any unlicensed dog or cat except kennel dogs or cats and any licensed
dog or cat found at large shall be subject to seizure and impoundment in a place provided by
the City.
C. Notice To Owners Of Licensed Dogs Or Cats: Whenever any licensed dog or cat has
been seized or impounded pursuant to this article, notice of such action shall be given as
provided in this article.
D. Redemption:
1. Except as otherwise provided, the possession of any licensed dog or cat seized or
impounded pursuant to this article may be obtained by the owner or keeper by paying an
impoundment fee as established by the City Manager, together with the separate daily fee for
keeping such dog or cat each day or fraction thereof during the time that such dog or cat is
impounded. Upon the second subsequent impoundment of the same animal within three
hundred sixty five (365) days, an impoundment fee as established by the City Manager shall be
assessed together with the separate daily fee for keeping such dog or cat each day or fraction
thereof during the time which said dog or cat is impounded.
2. Upon proper identification the owner may redeem an unlicensed dog or cat seized or
impounded pursuant to this article after licensing the animal or agreeing to purchase a license
within ten (10) working days. Failure to do so shall result in an additional fee as established by
the City Manager, added to the license fee.
E. Disposition Of Unredeemed Dogs:
59
1. Licensed Dog: If the owner or keeper of a licensed dog impounded pursuant to this
article does not redeem such animal within seven (7) days after the mailing of the notice
provided for in this article, the license shall automatically be revoked and the animal disposed of
as directed by the City Manager.
2. Unlicensed Dog: Any unlicensed dog not redeemed by the owner within three (3) days
after it has been seized or impounded shall be disposed of as directed by the City Manager.
F. Disposition Of Unredeemed Cats:
1. Licensed Cat: If the owner or keeper of a licensed cat impounded pursuant to this article
does not redeem such animal within five (5) days after the mailing of the notice provided for in
this article, the license shall automatically be revoked and the animal disposed of as directed by
the City Manager.
2. Unlicensed Cat: Any unlicensed cat not redeemed by the owner within three (3) days
after it has been seized or impounded shall be disposed of as directed by the City Manager.
ARTICLE C. RABIES CONTROL
7-6C-1: VACCINATION REQUIRED:
A. Dogs And Cats; Schedule: It shall be unlawful for the owner or keeper of any
domesticated species of dog or cat to keep or maintain such animal unless the dog or cat shall
be vaccinated against rabies by a licensed veterinarian with a vaccine approved by the Iowa
Department of Agriculture and administered in accordance with the following schedule:
Dogs
Class Of Animal Age At Primary Vaccination Booster'
6 months 1 year later, triennially
thereafter
Cats
r
6 months
I
Annually or 1 year later,
triennially thereafter
Note:
1. Approved 3 year vaccine may be substituted.
B. Ferrets; Schedule: It shall be unlawful for the owner or keeper of any ferret to keep or
maintain such animal unless the ferret shall be vaccinated against rabies by a licensed
veterinarian with a vaccine licensed for the use in ferrets and administered in accordance with
the following schedule:
J
Class Of Animal Age At Primary Vaccination Booster
Ferret 6 months Annually
C. Inactivated Nervous Tissue: Inactivated nervous tissue vaccine may only be used in
accordance with the rules of the Iowa State Department of Agriculture.
D. Certificate Required: A copy of the official rabies vaccination certificate approved by the
Iowa State Department of Agriculture shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of any
license authorized by this article.
E. Veterinarian Furnish Copies: Each veterinarian within the City limits shall forward to the
City Manager by no later than the tenth of each month a copy of each official rabies vaccination
certificate, with the owner's or keeper's address, issued by the veterinarian during the preceding
month.
7-6C-2: CONFINEMENT AUTHORIZED:
60
A. Animal Suspected Of Having Rabies: The owner or keeper of any dog or cat or other
animal which has contracted rabies, or which has been subject to rabies, or which has bitten or
caused skin abrasion to any person shall produce and surrender up such dog, cat or other
animal to be held in confinement in a licensed veterinarian's animal hospital under the
supervision of a licensed veterinarian and in quarantine for observation for a period of ten (10)
days from the date the bite occurred at the expense of the owner or keeper of the animal.
B. Quarantine Of Animal Bitten By Rabid Animal: Any animal bitten or attacked by any
known rabid animal shall be quarantined under direction of the Health Officer by being confined
and in quarantine as provided above for a minimum of ninety (90) days.
C. Application For Home Quarantine; Conditions: The owner or keeper of any dog or cat or
other animal which has bitten a person may apply to the City Manager to have the animal
released for the purpose of home quarantine. Home quarantine may be permitted at the City
Manager's sole discretion. If the City Manager allows home confinement, all of the following
conditions must be met, including but not limited to:
1. The animal must have a current rabies vaccination. The vaccination certification must
bear the description of the animal, the type of vaccine used, the expiration of the vaccination,
and the signature of the veterinarian administering the vaccination.
2. The animal must have a current City license, if the animal is six (6) months of age or
older.
3. The animal must not have been running at large at the time of the bite.
4. The animal has not previously bitten any person.
5. Prior to approval of home quarantine, the owner or keeper must have the animal
examined by a veterinarian, licensed in the State of Iowa, who shall certify that the animal
appears to be free of rabies or any other zoonosis. Such examination and certification must be
repeated on the tenth day.
6. The owner or keeper must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Manager that the
owner or keeper has the proper facilities and the ability to adequately and properly confine the
animal to the owner or keeper's home or property during the quarantine period.
7. The owner or keeper must agree to immediately notify the City Manager of any changes
in the animal's health or disposition, to allow representatives of the City Manager to enter upon
the property and to examine the animal at any time and to immediately take the animal to a
licensed veterinarian for examination at any time when directed by the City Manager.
8. The owner or keeper must agree to promptly pay all costs of veterinarian examinations
during the quarantine period.
9. The owner or keeper must further agree to immediately surrender the animal at any time
the City Manager determines that the home quarantine should be terminated, or at any time that
any provisions or conditions of home quarantine are violated, in which event the animal shall be
put in the custody of a licensed veterinarian of the State of Iowa in the City of Dubuque for the
remainder of the quarantine period.
10. If the City Manager determines at any time that home confinement is not appropriate for
the animal, quarantine at a veterinary hospital shall be ordered.
11. The person bitten, or, if a minor, the person's parent or guardian, must sign an
acknowledgment indicating that the person has been advised of the risks of rabies, that if the
animal disappears during home quarantine, the person may have to undergo postexposure
rabies prophylaxis, and that the person does not object to home quarantine. The
acknowledgment shall also relieve the City of Dubuque, its agents, officers, and employees from
any liability if the animal disappears during home quarantine.
12. The owner or keeper shall also execute an indemnity agreement in favor of the City of
Dubuque, which shall provide that the owner or keeper shall save harmless, defend and
indemnify the City of Dubuque and its officers, agents and employees from any or all claims of
any kind arising out of the home quarantine.
61
13. The owner or keeper shall agree in writing that if the animal disappears during the home
quarantine, the owner or keeper shall indemnify the person bitten for any and all medical
expenses incurred as a result of the disappearance of the animal. Acceptance of any such
payments by the person bitten shall not in any way release the owner or keeper from any other
liability the owner may have to the person bitten by reason of the animal bite. It shall be the sole
responsibility of the person bitten, and not the responsibility of the City, to enforce such
agreement. This subsection shall not apply if the person bitten is the owner or keeper of the
animal or any person residing with the owner or keeper.
D. Wild Animals: If an undomesticated or wild animal such as a skunk, bat, fox, raccoon or
other carnivore bites a person, whether or not the animal's owner or keeper is known, the
animal shall be humanely destroyed and examined for rabies immediately.
7-6C-3: REPORTING RABIES; NOTICE TO CITY MANAGER:
A. It shall be the duty of the owner or keeper of any cat, dog or other domesticated animal
suspected of being rabid that has attacked, bitten or caused any skin abrasion upon any person
to report such incident to the City Manager.
B. It shall be the duty of the victim who has been attacked, bitten or caused a skin abrasion
by any cat, dog or other domesticated animal suspected of being rabid to report such incident to
the City Manager.
C. It shall be the duty of any health care provider or veterinarian practice immediately to
transmit information to the City Manager that may come to such health care provider or
veterinarian practice through such health care provider's or veterinarian practice's professional
capacity with reference to any person having been attacked, bitten or having skin abrasions by
any dog, cat or other domestic animal.
7-6C-4: NOTIFICATION TO POLICE OR CITY MANAGER OF DEAD ANIMALS: Any person
finding a dead dog or cat shall at once notify the Police Department or the City Manager.
7-6C-5: PUNISHMENT FOR HARBORING KNOWN RABID DOG, CAT OR OTHER
DOMESTIC ANIMAL: Any person or keeper who shall knowingly harbor or keep any dog, cat
or other animal infected with rabies, or with knowledge that their animal was bitten by a rabid
animal, fails to report such incident to the City Manager or police, shall be punished as provided
in section 1-4-1 of this Code.
7-6C-6: PROHIBITED ACTIONS AFTER MAYOR'S PROCLAMATION OF EMERGENCY:
When the Mayor, pursuant to resolution of the City shall declare an emergency due to rabies:
A. It shall be unlawful for the owner of any dog, cat or other domestic animal to permit such
animal to be at large. Any dog, cat or domesticated animal found to be at large shall be deemed
to be so with the permission or at the sufferance of its owner or keeper.
B. It shall be unlawful for any person except the owner or keeper of a dog, cat or other
domestic animal, or the owner's or keeper's agent to open any door or gate of any private
premises for the purpose or result of setting such animal at large.
C. Any licensed or unlicensed dog, cat or other domestic animal found at large shall be
impounded by the City Manager or Police Department.
ARTICLE D. DANGEROUS ANIMALS
7-6D-1: DEFINITIONS: Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context clearly indicates a
different intention, the following terms shall, for the purpose of this article, have the meanings in
this section:
CITY: The City of Dubuque.
62
CITY MANAGER, CHIEF OF POLICE, AND CITY CLERK: Those employees of the City of
Dubuque duly appointed and holding those positions.
DANGEROUS ANIMAL:
A. Any animal which is not naturally tame or gentle, and which is of a wild nature or
disposition, and which is capable of killing, inflicting serious injury upon, or causing disease
among, human beings or domestic animals and having known tendencies as a species to do so;
B. Any animal(s) declared to be dangerous by the City Manager or the City Manager's
designee; or
C. The following animals which shall be deemed to be dangerous animals per se:
1. Lions, tigers, jaguars, leopards, cougars, lynx and bobcats;
2. Wolves, coyotes and foxes;
3. Badgers, wolverines, weasels, skunks and mink;
4. Raccoons;
5. Bears;
6. All apes, baboons, macaques, monkeys and chimpanzees;
7. Alligators and crocodiles;
8. Scorpions;
9. Snakes that are:
a. Any member of the family atractaspidae, including but not limited to mole vipers and
burrowing asps.
b. Any member of the family elapidae, voperidae, crotalidae, atractaspidae, or hydrophidae
which are venomous, including but not limited to cobras, mambas, coral snakes, kraits, adders,
vipers, rattlesnakes, copperheads, pit vipers, keelbacks, cottonmouths, and sea snakes.
c. Any member of the superfamily henophidia, which are limited to reticulated pythons,
anacondas, and African rock pythons;
10. Reptiles that are venomous;
11. Gila monsters;
12. Opossums; and
13. Any crossbreed of such animals which have similar characteristics of the animals
specified above.
7-6D-2: DOGS, CATS EXEMPTED: The provisions of this article shall not apply to domestic
dogs or cats.
7-6D-3: KEEPING OF DANGEROUS ANIMALS RESTRICTED: No person shall keep, shelter,
or harbor for any purpose within the City a dangerous animal except as provided in sections 7-
6D-4, 7-6D-5, and 7-6D-7 of this article.
7-6D-4: EXCEPTIONS TO KEEPING AND LICENSING RESTRICTIONS: The prohibition
contained in section 7-6D-3 of this article and the provisions of section 7-6D-5 of this article
shall not apply to the keeping of dangerous animals in the following circumstances:
A. The keeping of dangerous animals in a public zoo, bona fide educational or medical
institution, humane society, or museum where they are kept as live specimens for the public to
view, or for the purpose of instruction, research or study.
B. The keeping of dangerous animals for exhibition to the public by a bona fide traveling
circus, carnival, exhibit or show licensed to perform in the City.
C. The keeping of dangerous animals in a bona fide, licensed veterinary hospital for
treatment.
D. The keeping of dangerous animals by a wildlife rescue organization, with appropriate
permit from the Iowa Conservation Commission or the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.
63
E. Any dangerous animals under the jurisdiction of and in the possession of the Iowa
Conservation Commission, pursuant to chapter 717F of the Iowa Code.
F. A bona fide commercial pet shop licensed and inspected by the Iowa Department of
Agriculture. Any such pet shop shall post in a conspicuous place, the following notice:
NOTICE
Section 7-6D-3 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances prohibits the keeping, sheltering or
harboring for any purpose within the City of Dubuque, any dangerous animal, as defined in
Section 7-6D-1. Dangerous animal includes, but is not limited to, the following:
1. Lions, tigers, jaguars, leopards, cougars, lynx and bobcats;
2. Wolves, coyotes and foxes;
3. Badgers, wolverines, weasels, skunks and mink;
4. Raccoons;
5. Bears;
6. All apes, baboons, macaques, monkeys and chimpanzees;
7. Alligators and crocodiles;
8. Scorpions;
9. Snakes that are:
a. Any member of the family atractaspidae, including but not limited to mole vipers and
burrowing asps.
b. Any member of the family elapidae, voperidae, crotalidae, atractaspidae, or hydrophidae
which are venomous, including but not limited to cobras, mambas, coral snakes, kraits, adders,
vipers, rattlesnakes, copperheads, pit vipers, keelbacks, cottonmouths, and sea snakes.
c. Any member of the superfamily henophidia, which are limited to reticulated pythons,
anacondas, and African rock pythons.
10. Reptiles that are venomous;
11. Gila monsters;
12. Opossums; and
13. Any crossbreed of such animals which have similar characteristics of the animals
specified above.
7-6D-5: REGULATIONS FOR KEEPING:
A. Keeping Animal Confined: Any person keeping, sheltering or harboring a dangerous
animal shall at all times keep such animal securely confined within a cage or other enclosure
approved by the Health Services Officer.
B. Prohibited From Public Property: No person keeping, sheltering or harboring a
dangerous animal shall permit or allow such animal to enter upon or traverse any public
property, park property, public right-of-way, or any business establishment licensed by the City,
or the property of another except when such animal is being transported while caged or
confined.
C. Report Animal Missing: It shall be the duty of the animal keeper, shelterer or harborer to
report to the City Manager/Police Department when a dangerous animal is found missing.
D. Keeping Animals Which Attack Or Bite Prohibited: No person shall keep, shelter or
harbor a dangerous animal which has demonstrated without provocation to attack or bite.
7-6D-6: GENERAL PROHIBITION AND DUTY: No person shall aid or cause any dangerous
animal, whether owned by such person or not, to escape confinement or impoundment, whether
such confinement or impoundment be upon such person's property or that of another by
opening any gate, door or window or making any opening of any fence, enclosure or structure or
by unleashing such animal.
7-6D-7: SEIZURE, IMPOUNDMENT AND DISPOSITION OF DANGEROUS ANIMALS:
64
A. Authority To Destroy: In the event that a dangerous animal is found at large upon public
property, park property, public right(s)-of-way, or the property of someone other than its keeper,
harborer or shelterer thereby creating a hazard to person or property, such animal may, in the
discretion of the City Manager, be destroyed if it cannot be confined or captured. The City shall
be under no duty to attempt the confinement or capture of dangerous animal found at large, nor
shall it have a duty to notify the keeper, harborer, or shelterer of such animal prior to its
destruction.
B. Procedure Upon Complaint; Order Removal Of Animal: Upon the complaint of any
individual that a person is keeping, sheltering, or harboring a dangerous animal on premises in
the City in violation of sections 7-6D-3, 7-6D-5 and 7-6D-6 of this article or that a person is
keeping, sheltering or harboring a dangerous animal which has demonstrated a propensity to
attack or bite without provocation, the City Manager shall order the person named in the
complaint to safely remove such animal from the City, permanently place the animal with an
organization or group allowed under section 7-6D-4 of this article to possess dangerous
animals, or destroy the animal, within three (3) days of the receipt of such order. Such order
shall be contained in a notice to remove the dangerous animal, which notice shall be in writing
and delivered personally or by certified mail to the person keeping, sheltering or harboring the
dangerous animal. Such order and notice to remove the dangerous animal shall not be required
where the Health Services Officer determines that such dangerous animal has previously
caused serious physical harm or death to any person in which case the Health Services Officer
shall cause the animal to be immediately seized and impounded or killed if seizure and
impoundment are not possible without risk of serious physical harm or death to any person.
C. Appeal; Notice; Hearing: The order to remove a dangerous animal issued by the City
Manager may be appealed to the City Council. To appeal such order, written notice of appeal
stating the grounds for the appeal must be filed with the City Clerk within three (3) days after
receipt of the order and notice to remove the dangerous animal. Failure to file such written
notice of appeal shall constitute a waiver of the right to appeal the order of the Health Services
Officer.
1. The hearing on the appeal shall be within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the notice of
appeal with the City Clerk. The hearing may be continued for good cause.
2. After such hearing, the City Council may affirm or reverse the order of the City Manager.
Such determination shall be contained in a written decision and shall be filed with the City Clerk
within three (3) days after the hearing, or any continued session thereof.
3. If the City Council affirms the action of the City Manager, the City Council shall order in
its written decision that the person sheltering, harboring, or keeping such dangerous animal,
remove such animal from the City, permanently place such animal with an organization or group
allowed under section 7-6D-4 of this article to possess dangerous animals, or destroy it. The
decision and order shall immediately be served upon the person against whom rendered in the
same manner as the notice of removal.
D. Seizure And Impoundment: If the order of the City Manager is not appealed and is not
complied with within three (3) days of its issuance, the City Manager is authorized to seize and
impound such dangerous animal. If the written decision of the City Council is not complied with
within three (3) days of this issuance, the City Manager is authorized to seize and impound such
dangerous animal. An animal so seized shall be impounded for a period of seven (7) days.
E. Disposition Of Animal: If at the end of the impoundment period, the person against
whom the decision and order of the City Manager or City Council was issued has not petitioned
the Dubuque County District Court for review of said order, the City Manager shall cause the
animal to be disposed of by sale, permanently place such animal to be disposed of by sale,
permanently place such animal with an organization or group allowed under section 7-6D-4 of
this article to possess dangerous animals, or destroy such animal in a humane manner.
65
ARTICLE E. POTENTIALLY VICIOUS DOGS
7-6E-1: DEFINITION: A "potentially vicious dog" is a dog that:
A. When unprovoked, on two (2) separate occasions, has engaged in any behavior that has
required a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and dog
were off of the property of the owner or keeper of the dog;
B. When unprovoked, has attacked or bitten a person;
C. When unprovoked, has inflicted a serious injury or caused the death of a domestic
animal, either on public or private property other than the property of the owner or keeper; or
D. When unprovoked, chases or approaches a person or domestic animal upon the streets,
sidewalks, or any public or private property other than the property of the owner or keeper, in a
menacing fashion or apparent attitude of attack.
7-6E-2: PROCEDURE FOR DECLARATION OF POTENTIALLY VICIOUS DOG:
A. Basis For Declaration: The City Manager may find and declare an animal potentially
vicious based upon the following:
1. The written complaint of a citizen that the animal has acted in a manner set forth in
section 7-6E-1 of this article;
2. Dog bite reports filed with the Health Services Department;
3. Actions of the dog witnessed by any animal control officer or law enforcement officer; or
4. Other substantial evidence.
B. Service Of Declaration Upon Owner: The declaration of a potentially vicious dog shall be
in writing and shall be served on the owner or keeper in one (1) of the following methods:
personally, by certified mail to the owner at the owner's or keeper's last known address, or if the
owner or keeper cannot be served personally or by mail, by publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the County.
C. Contents Of Declaration: The declaration shall state:
1. The description of the animal;
2. The name and address of the owner or keeper of the animal, if known;
3. The whereabouts of the animal, if not in the custody of the owner or keeper;
4. The facts upon which the declaration of potentially vicious dog is based;
5. The owner's or keeper's right to a hearing if the person objects to the declaration;
6. The restrictions placed upon the animal as a result of the declaration of potentially
vicious dog; and
7. The penalties for a violation of such restrictions.
8. If the City Manager so determines, that the owner or keeper be required to have
microchip identification implanted in the dog.
D. Objections Of Owner: The owner or keeper may object to the declaration of potentially
vicious dog by requesting a hearing before the City Manager by submitting a written request to
the City Manager within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of the declaration, or within ten (10)
days of the publication of the declaration.
1. If the City Manager finds that there is insufficient evidence to support the declaration, it
shall be rescinded, and the restrictions imposed thereby annulled.
2. If the City Manager finds sufficient evidence to support the declaration, the City Manager
shall provide the owner with written notice of such determination within five (5) working days
after the hearing.
3. Prior to and pending the outcome of the hearing, the owner or keeper of a dog that has
been declared potentially vicious must comply with all conditions and restrictions set forth by the
City Manager.
4. If it is determined by the animal control officer or law enforcement officer that probable
cause exists to believe the dog in question poses an immediate threat to public safety, then the
66
animal control officer or law enforcement officer may seize and impound the dog pending the
hearing to be held pursuant to this article. The owner or keeper of the dog shall be liable to the
City or County where the dog is impounded for the costs and expenses of keeping the dog if the
dog is later determined to be potentially vicious. When a dog has been impounded and it is not
contrary to public safety, the animal control officer shall permit the animal to be confined at the
owner's expense in a Health Services Department approved kennel or veterinary facility.
7-6E-3: NOTIFICATION OF STATUS OF POTENTIALLY VICIOUS DOG:
A. The owner or keeper shall immediately notify the Health Services Department when a
dog which has been classified as potentially vicious:
1. Is loose or unconfined;
2. Has bitten a human being or attacked another animal;
3. Is sold or given away, or dies; or
4. Is moved to another address.
B. Prior to a potentially vicious dog being sold or given away, the owner or keeper shall
provide the name, address and telephone number of the new owner or keeper to the Health
Services Department. The new owner or keeper shall comply with all the requirements of this
chapter.
7-6E-4: EXCEPTIONS TO CLASSIFICATION:
A. No dog may be declared potentially vicious if:
1. Any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time of the injury or
damage was sustained, was committing a wilful trespass or other tort upon premises occupied
by the owner or keeper of the dog, or was teasing, tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog,
or was committing or attempting to commit a crime;
2. The dog was protecting or defending a person within the immediate vicinity of the dog
from an unjustified attack or assault; or
3. The injury or damage was sustained by a person or a domestic animal, which at the time
of the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the dog.
B. No dog may be declared potentially vicious if the injury or damage to a domestic animal
was sustained while the dog was working as a hunting dog, herding dog or predator control dog
on the property of, or under the control of, its owner or keeper, and the damage or injury was to
a species or type of domestic animal appropriate to the work of the dog.
7-6E-5: DISPOSITION OF POTENTIALLY VICIOUS DOG:
A. License And Vaccination; Fee: A potentially vicious dog shall be properly licensed and
vaccinated. The potentially vicious designation shall be included in the registration records of
the dog. The City may charge a potentially vicious dog fee in addition to the regular licensing fee
to provide for the increased costs of maintaining the records of the dog.
B. Confinement; Restraint: A potentially vicious dog, while on the owner's or keeper's
property, shall at all times be kept indoors or in a securely fenced yard from which the dog
cannot escape and into which children cannot trespass. A potentially vicious animal may be off
the owner's or keeper's premises only if restrained by a substantial leash, of appropriate length,
and if the dog is under the control of a responsible adult and is humanely muzzled.
C. Notice Of Change Of Ownership And Location: If a potentially vicious dog dies, or is
sold, transferred or permanently removed from the City, the owner or keeper of the dog shall
notify the Health Services Department of the changed condition and new location of the dog in
writing within two (2) working days.
ARTICLE F. VICIOUS DOGS AND CATS
67
7-6F-1: DEFINITION: A "vicious animal" is deemed so when it has attacked or bitten any
person on more than one (1) occasion without provocation or when an attack or bite results in
serious bodily injury.
7-6F-2: PROCEDURE FOR DECLARATION OF VICIOUS ANIMAL:
A. Basis For Declaration: The City Manager may find and declare an animal vicious based
upon the following:
1. When the animal has attacked or bitten any person on more than one (1) occasion
without provocation or when an attack or bite results in serious bodily injury.
B. Service Of Declaration Upon Owner: The declaration of a vicious animal shall be in
writing and shall be served on the owner or keeper in one (1) of the following methods:
personally, by certified mail to the owner at the owner's or keeper's last known address, or if the
owner or keeper cannot be served personally or by mail, by publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the County.
C. Contents Of Declaration: The declaration shall state:
1. The description of the animal;
2. The name and address of the owner or keeper of the animal, if known;
3. The facts upon which the declaration of vicious animal is based;
4. The restrictions placed upon the animal as a result of the declaration of vicious animal;
5. The penalties for a violation of such restrictions;
6. If the City Manager so determines, that the owner or keeper be required to have
microchip identification implanted in the animal; and
7. The owner or keeper must keep the vicious animal within the City and under the owner
or keeper's ownership until resolution of the matter through City administration or the judicial
system.
D. Seizure And Impoundment: If it is determined by the animal control officer or law
enforcement officer that probable cause exists to believe the animal in question poses an
immediate threat to public safety, then the animal control officer or law enforcement officer may
seize and impound the animal pending the resolution pursuant to this article. The owner or
keeper of the animal shall be liable to the City or County where the animal is impounded for the
costs and expenses of keeping the animal if the dog is determined to be vicious.
7-6F-3: NOTIFICATION OF STATUS OF VICIOUS ANIMAL:
A. The owner or keeper shall immediately notify the City Manager when an animal which
has been classified as vicious:
1. Is loose or unconfined;
2. Has bitten a human being or attacked another animal; or
3. Dies.
B. A vicious animal may not be sold, given away, or moved to another location prior to
resolution of the matter through City administration or the judicial system.
7-6F-4: EXCEPTIONS TO CLASSIFICATION:
A. No animal may be declared vicious if:
1. Any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time of the injury or
damage was sustained, was committing a wilful trespass or other tort upon premises occupied
by the owner or keeper of the animal, or was teasing, tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the
animal, or was committing or attempting to commit a crime;
2. The animal was protecting or defending a person within the immediate vicinity of the
animal from an unjustified attack or assault; or
68
3. The injury or damage was sustained by a person or a domestic animal, which at the time
of the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the
animal.
B. No animal may be declared vicious if the injury or damage to a domestic animal was
sustained while the animal was working as a hunting dog, herding dog or predator control dog
on the property of, or under the control of, its owner or keeper, and the damage or injury was to
a species or type of domestic animal appropriate to the work of the dog.
7-6F-5: DISPOSITION OF VICIOUS ANIMAL:
A. License And Vaccination; Fee: A vicious animal shall be properly licensed and
vaccinated. The vicious designation shall be included in the registration records of the animal.
The City may charge a vicious animal fee in addition to the regular licensing fee to provide for
the increased costs of maintaining the records of the animal.
B. Confinement; Restraint: A vicious animal, while on the owner's or keeper's property,
shall at all times be kept indoors or in a securely fenced yard from which the animal cannot
escape and into which people cannot trespass. A vicious animal may be off the owner's or
keeper's premises only if restrained by a substantial leash, of appropriate length, and if the
animal is under the control of a responsible adult and is humanely muzzled.
C. Notice Of Death: If a vicious animal dies, the owner or keeper of the animal shall notify
the City Manager of the death of the animal in writing within two (2) working days.
69
APPENDIX D: PARKS ORDINANCE
101-5B-4: DOGS, CATS AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS:
A. Animal& Prohibited: No person sha[i be permitted to bring into any park, parkway, trail, or open space, any clog, cat
or other dornesttc animal, nor shall any person permit such dog, cat or other domestic animal to run at large In any
park, parkway, frail, or open space_ Any unattended animal shall be ltnpouncled and its owner may redeem the
same upon paying the reasonable costs of such impoundment.
13, Leashed Dogs And Cats Allowed In Certain Parks And Areas:
1_ Notwithstanding the foregoing, leashed dogs and cats shall be permitted In the following:
AY_ McDonald Park
Flee Hranch Creek Greenweyf
Granger Creek Nature Trail
Heritage Trail
Jaycee Trail
John G. 8ergfeid Recreation Area
Medical Associates Greenbelt Park
Miller -Riverview Park
Nor limes! Arterial Trail
Port or Dubuque tVtarina
Port of Dubuque Riverwalk Trail
Powerline Trail
Pyairgnrsk Pari
Southern Levy Trail
2. Leashed clogs and cats as allowed In subsection B1 of this section are subject to and must comply with the
provisions of /Ips i n ipicr 5 of trill Code.
3_ The owner or keeper must pick up and dispose of or take away Ilia dirt} or cat's waste.
4. The owner or keeper is responsible for lie actions of the dog OF cat.
C. Unleashed Pets AI[owed In Pet Park: Unleashed pets shall be permitted in the pet park.
D. Exceptions: This section does not apply to:
1. Service animals used by persons with disabilities;
2. As part of an approved and perrlitted special event under chanter 4 of this iit[e;
3. Animals which are part of the StoryhnoK Bill Potting Zoo at Franklin Delano Roosevelt Park; and
4. Animals within Eagle Point Park, Murphy Park and Flora Park wtilch are confined to an automobile, camper,
motor home (aka recreational vehicle), or other similar conveyance during the entirety of their -time within the
designated parks),, parKway(s), trall(s), vraperu space(s)_ (Urd_ 23-17, 5-15-2017)
70
APPENDIX E: LANDLORD SURVEY QUESTIONS
1. Landlord Name
2. Number of units owned in Dubuque
3. Number of Pet -Friendly units owned in Dubuque
4. What type of pets do you allow?
5. If you allow pets, are any of the following restrictions enforced?
- Breed restrictions
- Size restrictions
- Total number of pets
B. If you allow pets, how do you enforce any rules related to them?
(choose all that apply)
- Charge a higher rent and/or deposit
- Regular inspections of unit
7. Do you offer any of the following amenities for your Pet -Friendly units?
- Pet waste stations
- Designated pet relief area
8. If you do not allow pets at your facilities, what are the primary
reason(s) you have chosen not to?
9. Are there resources the community could offer, or other incentives,
that might change your mind about allowing pets in more units?
71
APPENDIX F: FDR PARK MASTER PLAN INCLUDES DOG PARK
•
Esarg Acylatycre
xistine Sheller-ti
Porting for disc Golf=
acid Mountain B I e Area
Res raorn Facility --
Restored %Yeedlane
Pedestrian Bridge—__
Low Water Crnss ng—
Ponds and Wer-- -
Interpretive lead Mine Area
Dog Park Main Shelter-. _
tired Parking \
Managed-, 1.
Stneantbank
Picnic
= Areas
ti
k.4ne Way Road
Twc Way Road
Dog Park Shelters
—Ponds
Asp .alt Pedestrian Trai?
nrsrng r..grotmJre
Restruarn Facility
Bleacher Seating
AEohalt Road and
Parking Surfaces
a.n Park entry
Feature
Bike Trail Head
anti Parking
-13s-ke Trail
_BeMountain ke Area
- 3O Ames
rr
I^terpnetse
Lead Mine
Area •
Woocland
Trail
-Auto Pu!I-of
and Pion
Areas
ovi. Water
Crossing
Peoesir.ari
Br age
-Mulches
We edla--d Ta l
B ke Tra ;r.:n0000noir�co
Project Limits
Mountain B ke
Bay.dary
FICA ;Ian
Roosevelt Park
trams :ence
72
APPENDIX G: SE CORNER OF DODGE AND LOCUST DOG PARK PLANNING
73
APPENDIX H:SE CORNER OF DODGE AND LOCUST DOG PARK
4155 Fermylvanin Avenue
3
cu. Pr3
E
3
k
-3
E
ƒ
§
Cnr
494
k
pia
16.
4394
tO O. § § i §
Ol
t
E 1 JI I B 2 b MI& J
§ E 2 % 2 %
0 -
DESCRIPTION
M]ucallnneoua and MobII zallvn
Chain Uitik Fer ea (00" Hal{Iht)
Chafe Link Rona (00" Halphl) MFrIvAcy Slate
5-
Drinking Fc iinlRlri
/33
_ CY _ _ CO 413. OSa c =
11]
CONSTRUCTION COST
CONTINGENCY
74
APPENDIX I:
CITY COUNCIL AND COMMISSION ACTIONS RELATED TO PETS 2012-2019
APRIL 17,
2012
Status of second Pet Park
Area selected for second pet park is owned by IDOT at SE corner of Locust and Highway
20.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/2879
JUNE 12,
2012
Commission meeting: at City Council Chambers. Voted to Receive/file petition for pets
to be allowed in parks, referred by City Council.
Reviewed current ordinance and history known (1953 CC established ordinance
prohibiting unleashed pets in public areas including parks; current ordinance in place
since at least 1969 with few changes).
Discussed other input received or referred to Leisure Services; sharing information
related to dogs in parks; proposed web survey; citizens present could share input (3-
minute limit); no action or voting.
Input session resulted in 3 for, 2 against (60% in favor of) allowing pets in parks.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3011
JULY 10,
2012
Commission meeting: at City Council Chambers. Public comment session limited to 3
minutes per person; commissioners discussed their individual proposals regarding dogs in
parks and Leisure Services areas; no action or voting.
Input session resulted in 10 for, 6 against (63% in favor of) allowing pets in parks.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3050
JULY 24,
2012
Commission special work session: info from staff on fines, liability, commissioner
comments, discussion, commissioner proposal, more discussion; special gated areas
and/or areas within a park; no action or voting.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3051
75
AUGUST
14, 2012
Commission meeting: Dogs in park draft ordinance review / discussion; no action or
voting.
At conclusion of discussion, LS Manager said goal is to incorporate current ordinance
draft, changes made with today's discussion, feedback from other City staff/depai tiuents
and type up a final format to share with all commissioners at September commission
meeting. Can then post proposal for the public to see so public is aware of what the
Ordinance is, that is being reviewed and potentially recommended to Council.
Minutes:
hops://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3149
NOVEMBER
13, 2012
Commission meeting: discussion of draft ordinance changes related to dogs and other
animals in parks suggested by Legal Department; no action or voting.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3393
DECEMBER
18, 2012
Commission meeting: Chapter 5 Parks and Recreation Ordinance Review and
Recommendation (includes dogs in parks); vote.
Approve Chapter 5 Parks and Recreation Ordinance Review and Recommendation
(includes dogs in parks) with some revisions; MOTION PASSED 6-1.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3339
MARCH
4, 2013
CITY COUNCIL: voted down the ordinance change that was recommended by
Commission at their December 2012 meeting, 5-1.
On March 18 the recommendation will go back on the Council agenda as a first voting
and they can discuss, ask for changes, etc.
Agenda:
https://cityofdubuque.novusagenda. com/AgendaPublic/MeetingView.aspx?MeetinglD=1
04&MinutesMeetingID=-1 &doctype=Agenda
Video:
http://cityofdubuque.granicus.com/player/clip/1487?meta id=40500
76
MARCH
12, 2013
Commission meeting: Pet Ordinance: council meeting action; upcoming meeting;
Veterans' Memorial request for consideration; correspondence from Council Member Ric
Jones; recommendations regarding requests for consideration / reconsideration; Vote.
Add to recommended ordinance to make all Veterans' memorials and playground
equipment areas in parks as "no pet" areas; MOTION PASSED 5-2.
Agreement with Dubuque Humane Society related to reallocation of Pet Park C.I.P.;
VOTE to table for further consideration. MOTION PASSED 5-2.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3499
MARCH
18, 2013
CITY COUNCIL:
Voted to reconsider proposed ordinance changes recommended by Park & Recreation
Commission; MOTION PASSED 7-0.
Voted to consider 1st reading of proposed ordinance w recommended changes — adding
definitions relating to animals; restricting horse drawn vehicles; permitting dogs, cats,
and domesticated animals in certain parks, open spaces and trails subject to conditions;
establishing leash and waste clean-up requirements; prohibiting animals running at -large
with parks, open spaces or trails; permitting the exercising of dogs off leash in certain
areas; and revising park, open spaces and trail descriptions. MOTION PASSED 4-3.
CC requested following changes be made to ordinance for second reading (scheduled for
4-15-13): 1) one-year trial period w evaluation; 2) evaluation on enforcement options; 3)
shorten list of eligible parks; and 4) a clear definition of the geography of play areas. CC
also requested info from staff related to funding of associated costs of amenities such as
waste bags, signage and public education.
Agenda:
https://cityofdubuque.novusagenda. com/AgendaPublic/MeetingView.aspx?MeetinglD=1
16&MinutesMeetinglD=-1 &doctype=Agenda
Video:
http://cityofdubuque.granicus.com/player/clip/1494?meta id=40637
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3473
77
APRIL 2,
2013
Commission meeting: Pets in Parks Recommendation: Council review request of 1-year
trial period with evaluation; evaluation of enforcement options; shorter list of eligible
parks; clear definition of geography of play equipment areas; costs of waste bag
dispensers, waste bags and signs.
Several motion / several votes.
Trial period, vote: Approve a one-year trial period for allowing pets in parks, to end one
year from date the ordinance change is enacted; MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
ENFORCEMENT, VOTE: Have Police, Animal Control and seasonal and full time Park
Patrol be in charge of enforcing the ordinance and use their own discretion as to whether
to issue a citation or note; MOTION PASSED 6-1.
Consideration of additional areas, Vote: Add Allison -Henderson Park, tennis courts,
basketball courts and skate parks to the present proposed no pets list; MOTION PASSED
6-1.
Geographic boundary, Vote: Define the geographic area to be 10' from the border of
mulch or hard surface play equipment or play area; MOTION PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Costs and signage, Vote: Not provide waste bag dispensers or bags in any areas not
currently provided and to place less signs but larger informational and rules signs ($60
size) at entrance to parks. Signs placed in parks would be appropriate to size of park;
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3588
APRIL 15,
2013
CITY COUNCIL:
Receive & file documents and consider second reading of proposed ordinance amending
Title 10 Public Ways and Property, Chapter 5 Parks and Recreation (see list of
proposed changes above on March 18).
MOTION FAILED 5-2.
Petition signatures resulted in 1,750 for, 1,050 against (63% in favor of) allowing pets in
parks.
Agenda:
https: //cityofdubuque. novusagenda. com/AgendaPublic/MeetingV iew. aspx?MeetinglD=1
17&MinutesMeetinglD=-1 &doctype=Agenda
Video.
http://cityofdubuque.granicus.com/player/clip/1522?meta id=41504
78
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3545
JUNE 25,
2013
Commission meeting: Park and Recreation Ordinance Revisions: adding definitions;
restricting horse-drawn vehicles; permitting leashed dogs and cats in certain trails;
referencing leash in Animal Control Ordinance; establishing clean-up requirements;
revise Park, revise Open Spaces and Trail descriptions; vote
Approve ordinance revisions as proposed; MOTION PASSED 6-1.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3768
AUGUST
5, 2013
CITY COUNCIL:
Code of Ordinances Title 10 Amendment - Animals, Definitions and Descriptions: City
Manager recommending an ordinance amendment permitting leashed dogs and cats on
certain trails, adding definitions, restricting horse drawn vehicles, establishing clean-up
requirements, and revising park, open space and trail descriptions.
Motion by Jones to receive and file the documents and that the requirement that a
proposed ordinance be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings 10
prior to the meeting at which it is to be passed be suspended. Seconded by Resnick.
Motion carried 7-0.
Motion by Jones for final consideration and passage of Amended Ordinance No. 42-13
Amending City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances Title 10 Public Ways and Property,
Chapter 5 Parks and Recreation by adding definitions relating to animals; restricting
horse drawn vehicles; permitting dogs, cats, and domesticated animals in certain parks,
open spaces, and trails subject to conditions; establishing leash and waste clean-up
requirements; prohibiting animals running at -large within parks, open spaces, or trails;
and revising park, open spaces and trail descriptions. Seconded by Resnick. Motion
carried 7-0.
Agenda:
https://cityofdubuque.novusagenda. com/AgendaPublic/MeetingView.aspx?MeetinglD=1
09&MinutesMeetingID=-1 &doctype=Agenda
Video:
http://cityofdubuque.granicus.com/player/clip/1621
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3766
79
AUGUST
13, 2013
Commission meeting: Review of past pet park location options (IDOT property,
Terminal Street, DICW, East 12th Street, McAleece Complex); no action or voting.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/3853
MARCH
11, 2014
Commission meeting: Commissioner Lydon asked if we could bring back the issue of
allowing pets in parks on next agenda since second pet park funds are on chopping block.
Discussion / consensus was to wait until May meeting and see what action City Council
took on FY 2014 cuts.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/4492
MAY 13,
2014
Commission meeting: Commissioner Lydon asked Commission to reconsider proposing
that leashed and licensed pets be allowed in city parks. She would like original ordinance
that included all parks except Eagle Point and Murphy to be reviewed, along with the
most recent approved version. Commissioners agreed to place on June agenda.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/4308
JULY 8,
2014
Commission meeting: report on communications with All Veterans' Memorial
representative and Arboretum Association Board related to pets in parks.
Decided to discuss a specific ordinance change proposal by commissioner Lydon at
august meeting. if action was taken at that meeting, then hold public meeting in
September.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/4491
AUGUST
12, 2014
Commission meeting: recommend changing the pet section of Park and Recreation
Ordinance as proposed by Commissioner Lydon; vote. MOTION PASSED 4-3.
Manager Ware said next step is to have Legal Department review the proposal.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/4533
80
SEPTEMB
ER 9,
2014
Commissioner Lydon distributed copies of a Web Poll compiled from 2013 to 2014
asking "Should dogs be allowed in Dubuque parks?" Plus an e-mail communication
from citizen in favor of pets in parks.
Web poll resulted in 454 for, 204 against (69% for) allowing dogs in Dubuque parks.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/4584
OCTOBER
14, 2014
Commission meeting: review ordinance recommendation after proposed changes from
ICAP and Legal Department and set public input process; Votes
continued
Accept changes to the language of the ordinance recommended by Legal Department and
to set a date for public input meeting. MOTION PASSED 6-1.
Hold public input meeting at City Council Chambers on Tuesday, November 18 as part
of the regular commission meeting with two -minute per person limit. MOTION
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/4657
NOVEMBER
18, 2014
Commission meeting / public hearing: recorded public opinions / concerns regarding
possible ordinance change related to pets in parks issue as part of the regular commission
meeting; no action or voting.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/4693
DECEMBER
9, 2014
Commission meeting: vote to accept changes to language of ordinance recommended by
Legal Department on December 9 and recommend proposed ordinance amendment to
City Council; MOTION FAILED 3-3 (one commissioner absent).
Manager Ware will check with Legal Department on what proper procedure is now since
vote ended in a tie with one commissioner missing.
Records of public hearing resulted in 19 for, 10 against (66% in favor of) allowing pets in
parks.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/4736
81
JANUARY
13, 2015
Commission meeting: Pets in parks ordinance recommendation; votes.
Retain current ordinance was passed by City Council in 2013 where pets are allowed in
several parks on a test basis; MOTION FAILED 2-5.
Recommend proposed changed ordinance to City Council which allows pets in all parks
with certain exceptions; MOTION PASSED 4-3.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/4782
FEBRUARY
2, 2015
CITY COUNCIL: Park and Recreation Commission recommended amendment to Code
of Ordinances to allow dogs and cats in all park areas, all trails and other department
areas, with certain exceptions.
Motion by Jones to receive and file the documents and that the requirement that a
proposed ordinance be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings
prior to the meeting at which it is to be passed be suspended. Seconded by Braig. Leisure
Services Manager Marie Ware, Police Chief Mark Dalsing, and Public Health Specialist
Mary Rose Corrigan responded to questions from the City Council regarding waste
stations, enforcement and citations, and outreach. Motion failed 5-2 with Braig and Jones
voting yay.
Motion by Jones for consideration of the first reading of a proposed ordinance allowing
Dogs, Cats and Other Domestic Animals in Parks, Trails, Open Spaces, and Areas.
Seconded by Braig. Motion failed 5-2 with Braig and Jones voting yay.
Agenda:
https://cityofdubuque.novusagenda. com/AgendaPublic/MeetingView.aspx?MeetinglD=3
20&MinutesMeetingID=-1 &doctype=Agenda
Video:
http://cityofdubuque.granicus.com/player/clip/1996?meta id=51666
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/4775
SEPTEMBER
13, 2016
Commissioner Hoffmann wondering about enforcement of no dogs allowed in
Washington Park. He witnessed two unleashed dogs fighting in the park and owners did
not clean up waste left by dogs.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/6042
APRIL 11,
2017
Discussion on pet -friendly amenities / input for City Council: commissioners discussed
more pet -friendly amenities and parks. Visitors to Dubuque are confused about where
their pets are allowed.
82
Consensus was to make sure that legalizing licensed pets on leashes in additional parks
and updating amenities and making improvements at current pet park were on
recommendation list to City Council.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/6436
MAY 8,
2018
Dog Park engagement process explained by Manager Marie Ware. Discussions for
another pet park will now be taken through an engagement process similar to selecting
the Skate Park location.
FIDO group's request to reconsider location of proposed pet park since they feel IDOT
property is not a suitable site.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/7170
OCTOBER
9, 2018
Pet -friendly Community Work Group; vote.
FIDO group addressed commission and wanted to help as discussions continue on
constructing new dog park.
Pet -friendly community discussion: Document called Playbook for Pet friendly
Communities was provided to commissioners and discussed. It provides tools to assess
where a community is at and what are the next steps to be considered. This will be good
to work through, but commissioners want to take action now to allow pets in parks and
not have it held up by going through all the steps / processes suggested in the document.
Recommended creating pet -friendly community work group to work on pet -friendly
assessment and policies; vote. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/7460
NOVEMBER
13, 2018
Dog Friendly Community update:
Manager Ware distributed handouts of information related to pet licenses as requested
from last meeting. Staff recommendation to establish a dog friendly community work
group will be on City Council agenda for November 19, 2018 meeting.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/7513
83
DECEMBER
11, 2018
Select commission representative and alternate for Dog Friendly Community Work
Group.
Recommended Commissioner Kuhle to serve as representative, Werner to serve as first
alternate and Tigges to serve as second alternate; vote. MOTION PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Commissioner Werner wants commission to move forward on action to allow pets in
parks and work parallel to the Pet -friendly Community Work Group. He would like to
have an ordinance change recommendation ready to present to City Council in Spring.
After discussion it was decided to put ordinance change related to pets in parks on
January2019 agenda. Commissioners should bring ideas to January meeting.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenterNiewFile/Item/7535
JANUARY
8, 2019
Update on Pet -friendly Community Action Plan process the City Council approved;
directed staff that there needs to be data collection and assessment completed and then
community engagement process.
Minutes:
https://www.cityofdubuque.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/7605
84
APPENDIX J: PET -FRIENDLY SURVEY RESULTS
DEMOGRAPHICS OF SURVEY PARTICIPANTS
ZIP CODES:
52001 353
52002 111
52003 111
Dubuque/Asbury 575
Non -Dubuque 23
Skipped 17
N
Q14 Your age?
Answered: 609 Skipped: 7
O% 10% 20% 30% 40% 5U% 60% 70% SO% 90% 100%
. Under 18
1.118-24 25-34 ■ 35-44 ■ 4554 1.155-64 1.55+
ANSWER CHOICES
Under18
RESPONSES
O.16°%
1
18-24
2534
35-44
45-54
55-64
55+
7.72% 47
3268% 199
2250% 137
15.44% 94
1232% 75
920%
56
609
TOTAL
85
ANSWER CHOICES
0-2 years
3-10 years
Q15 How long have you lived in Dubuque?
Answered:610 Skipped: 6
0% 10% 20% 30% 409E 5O% 60% 70% HO% 90% 100%
■ 0-2 years ■3-18 years 11.20 years ■ 21+ years
11-20 years
21+ years
TOTAL
RESPONSES
721% 44
24_59% 150
16 72% 102
51.4k %
314
610
86
Q1 Shelters are warm and welcoming to encourage adoption.
1009%
8U%
60%
20%
Pets are
comfortable at
our city's
shelters and...
•1 1112 1113
N{A / Unknown
1
Pets are comfortable
at our city's shelters
and have room to
PlaY-
Adoptable pets are
readily available for
viewing and
interaction.
2 3
Answered: 614 Skipped: 1
Adoptable pets
are readily
available tor
viewing and...
4 5
Shelter signage
is welcoming and
makes it easy to
figure out wh...
Shelters have
separate areas
for owner
surrenders an...
■7 ■8 ■9
6
7
8 9 NUA J TOTAL
UNKNOWN
3.09% 1.30% 2.12% 5.37% 8.96% 7.65% 17.10% 16.12°% 15.96%
19 8 13 33 55 47 105 99 98
1.60% 1.14% 0.82% 3-43% 6.37% 5.23% 14.71% 20.75% 28-1046
11 7 5 21 39 32 90 127 172
Shelter signage is
welcoming and
makes it easy to
figure out where to
�o.
Shelters have
separate areas for
owner surrenders and
adoptions.
22.31 %
137 614
17.65%
108 612
1.79% 1.79% 2.28% 3.43% 6.36% 7.34% 14.68% 17.62% 24.96%
11 11 14 21 39 45 90 108 153
19.74%
121 613
2.29% 0.65% 1.31% 0.49% 3.44% 3.60% 5.07% 9.17% 18.82% 55.16%
14 4 8 3 21 22
31 56 115
337 611
87
Q2 Community cat programs humanely address overpopulation.
100%
SO%
60%
4-0%
20%
Answered: 611 Skipped: 4
Our City has a
Trap -Neuter -Release
(TNR) program.
� 1 •2 1.14
▪ NJA/Unknown
Community cats are
well cared far in Our
city.
5 .18 �7
1
2
3
4
Our city has a Trap -
Neuter -Release (TNR)
program_
Community cats are well
cared for in our city.
5 6
Our city has one or
mare Working Cats
programs.
7 S
9 NIA TOTAL
UNKNOWN
5.74% 1.54% 0.98 % 0.82% 2.13% 0.66% 2.79"% 2.13°Y 4.92%
35 10 6 5 13 4 17 13 30
6.07%
3.77%
37 23
Our cLty has one or more 6.72% 1-48%
Working Cats programs_ 41 9
4.75 % 5.08% 6.39%
29 31
0.98% 1.48%
6 9
2.95%
39 15
/13% 0.49%
13 3
3.93% 2.46% 3.77%
24 15 23
1.31 %
8
1.15% 3.11%
7 19
78.20%
477 610
60.82%
371 610
81.15%
495 610
88
Q3 Pet -friendly housing options exist for all families.
100%
0096
60%
409E
20%
94G
Answered: 613 Skipped:2
Pet•owners in Mott rental Rental housing Pets are
our city have housing in our pet deposits or considered when
plenty of city allows all fees are housing
options for.. common househ... reasonable. developments...
■1 ■2 103 1.14 5 1110 017 .8 ■9
■ NIA/Unknown
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 NIA f TOTAL
UNKNOWN
Pet -owners in our 26.10% 10.28% 11.58% 8.65% 9.46% 4.89% 3.92"% 3.59% 7.61 % 14.52%
city have plenty of 160 63 71 53 58 30 24 22 43 89 613
options for where to
live.
Most rental housing 33.17% 13.56% 11.76% 7.03% 5.23°% 1.96% 0.96% 1.63% 1.60% 22.86%
in our city allows all 203 83 72 43 32 12 6 10 11 140 612
common household
pets (dogs, cats,
birds, rodents,
rabbits, fish in
aquariums, etc.).
Rental housing pet 18.36% 7.87% 7.70% 8.52% 1 J.66% 3.44% 5.41% 3.28% 6.07% 26.69%
deposits or fees are 112 48 47 52 65 21 33 20 37 175 610
reasonable_
Pets are considered 30.44% 8.67% 10.15% 5.40% 5.07°% 0.33% 0.96% 4.98% 3.11 % 34.86%
when housing 186 53 62 33 31 2 6 6 19 213 611
developments are
built or updated.
89
04 Pet ownership is not restricted by breed or size bans.
0%
Our city does
not have bread
r93trictionri in
place,
•1 •2 •3
■ N/A Jr Unknown
1
2
Our city does not have
breed restrictions in
place.
Our city does not
restrict the number of
pets a single
household can have.
Our city does not have
pet size or weight
restrictions.
Rental housng in our
city does not have
restrictions based on
pet breed or size.
3
Answered: 613 Skipped: 2
Our city does
not restrict the
number cf pets a
single househ...
1.14 5 U6
4
Our city does
not have pet
size or weight
restrictions.
Rental housing
in our city does
nbt have
restrictions...
•R •
5 6 7 6 9
11.09% 1.96% 4.08% 3.10% 3.75% 2.45% 4.08% 6.2096 20.88%
68 12 25 19 23 15 25 38 128
9.82% 2.62% 4.26% 2.95% 3.93% 2.13% 3.60% 5.07% 16.37%
60 16 26 18 24 13 22 31 100
6.871 2.29% 2.13% 1.47% 3.27% 2.13% 4.26% 6.3896 25.37%
42 14 13 9 20 13 26 39 155
31.60% 8.36% 6.0T% 2.95% 426% 1.64% 0.58% 0.66%
194 51 37 18 28 10 6 4
NSA! TOTAL
UNKNOWN
42.41 °b
260 613
49.269
301 611
45.83%
280 611
3.93°4 39.34%
24 240 610
90
Q5 Amenities are available that help pets and pet owners.
1nn%
eo%
Answered_ 614 Skipped: 1
Rental and Rental and Rental and
residential residential residential
communities in our communities provide communities have
city provide pet_., hydration stations_.. pet -friendly green.__
■ 1 U2 1.13 1.14 5 MI6 UT ■8 U9
▪ NIA 1 Unknown
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S
9
NIA
UNKNOWN
TOTAL
Rental and 32.90% 15.80% 11.73% 5.37% 7.00% 2.77% 2.93% 1.79% 4.56% 15.159
residential 202 97 72 33 43 17 18 11 28 93 614
communities
in our city
provide pet
relief areas
with free
waste hags.
Rental and 32.30% 18.60% 12.40% 4.73% 5.55% 2.61% 4.24% 2-12% 4.40% 13.05%
residential 198 114 76 29 34 16 26 13 27 80 613
communities
provide
hydration
stations with
free water
for pets.
Rental and 37.75% 12.42% 11.11% 5.07% 6.21% 3.59% 4.08% 2.29% 4.74% 12.75%
residential 231 76 68 31 38 22 25 14 29 78 612
communities
have pet -
friendly
green space
within
walking
distance
(114 mile}.
91
Q6 Pet reeds are included in green space, park and city planning.
Pet -friendly parks and
public spaces are
located throughout
our city.
Parks offer pet -
friendly spaces and
basic amenities
(trails, off -leash
areas, waste bag
dispensers, trash
receptacles, etc.).
Green space planning
includes
consideration for pets
(on- or off-Ieash play
areas, pet relief
areas, Etc.).
Neighborhoodshave
parks that are within
accessible walking
distance (1f4
Off -leash parks and
pet -friendly spaces
are planned in my city
within the next five
years-
fl%
1
Pet -friendly
parks and
public spaces
are Locate,,,
■ 1 ■ 2 ■ 3
N/A if Unknown
Answered: 515 Sk.pped: 0
Parks offer
pet -friendly
spaces and
basic,,.
Greens pace
planning
includes
Gnnsiderat „
N eighherheeds
have parks
that are
within...
■4 5 .fi U7 .B
2 3 4
42.44% 15.77% 11.54% 8-34%
261 97 71 39
Off -Leash
parks and
pet -friendly
spaces are,,.
5 6 7 11 9 WA! TOTAL
UNKNOWN
6.02% 2.93% 2.28% 2.7646 7-32%
37 18 14 17 45
4274% 16-31% 14.19% 5-87% 5.06% 2.45% 2.45% 2.45% 5-38%
262 100 87 36 31 15 15 15 33
45.35% 14.664% 9.79% 5.22% 3.92% 2-28% 2.45% 2.1246 5-22%
276 90 60 32 24 14 15 13 32
32.84% 11.93% 8.99% 7-84% 8.66% 4.08% 6.37% 4.25% 6-99%
201 73
55 48 53 25 39 26 55
29.365 8.97% 4.57% 2.28% 4.24% 1-79% 2.45% 1.79% 3-75%
180 55 28 14 26 11 15 11 23
2.60%
16 615
3.10%
19 613
8.97%
55 613
6.05%
37 612
40.78%
250 613
92
Q7 Pet hydration and waste stations are plentiful and easy to find.
140%
SO%
60%
40%
20%
0°I
Parks and public
spaces in our city
have visible and
accessible pet waste
stations with free
waste bags and trash
receptacles.
Parks and public
spaces have visible
and accessible
hydration stations for
pets, such as
water Fountains or
other hydration areas
that are low to the
ground and pet
friendly.
Our city has signage
that clearly identifies
pet amenities to help
pet owners find them_
Our city has
expanded the ways it
helps pet owners find
pet amenities
(websile, app, etc.).
Parks and
public spaces in
ou r city have
visible and,..
•1 �2 U3
E NWA / Unknown
Answered: 814 Skipped: 1
Parks and
public spaces
have visible and
atcassible...
Our city has
signage that
clearly
identifies
O ur city has
experdadthe
w ays it helps
pet owners t1,..
•4 5 ■fi in? iB M9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 N/A f TOTAL
UNKNOWN
41.53% 17.26% 10.75% 6_68% 5.88 2.12% 2.61°% 2.12% 5.54% 5.54%
255 106 66 41 36 13 16 13 34 34 614
38.73% 17.81 % 12.58% 5.39% 5.3995 2.78% 2.94% 1.96% 5.39%
237 109 77 33 33 17 18 12 33
46.48% 16.69% 9.49% 4.26% 5.07% 1.64% 2.52% 1.31% 5.07%
284 102
58 25 31 10 16 8 31
7.03%
43 612
7.36%
45 611
41.48% 10.98% 8.36"% 5.08% 5.74°% 3.61% 3.11% 1.97'. 4.59% 15.08%
253 67
51 31 35 22 19 12 28 92 610
93
Q8 People know the expectations for pets in public places.
Parks and
public spaces in
our city have
signagB...
• 1 • •3
. Nf Al Unknown
Answered: 613 Skipped: 2
Parks and
public spaces
past clear MIAs
about pet—
.4 5
Our city has a
program tc
educate kids
about d og...
Our city has
had a
communication
program withi,.,
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 a 9 NIA f TOTAL
UNKNOWN
Parks and public 12.77% 6.06% 10.97% 8.67"% 15.55% 9.00% 9.82% 8.67"% 15.22%
spaces in our city 78 37 67 53 95 55 60 53 93
have signage
communicating
where pais are
allowed or
restricted.
3.27%
20 611
Parka and public 17.16% 11.27% 9.80% 8_82% 1291% T.52% 7.84% 523% 1258%
spaces post clear 105 69 60 54 79 46 48 32 7T
rules about pet
behavior. where
pets may be off -
leash. etc_
6.86%
42 612
Ourcrey has a 28.81% 7_86% 5_73% 3.44% 426% 1.96% 3.60% 1.15% 4261{.
program to 176 48 35 21 26 12 22 7 26
educate kids about
dog behavior
into r avoiding
dog bites_
Our city has had a 26.96% 7.84% 6.54% 3.92%
communication 165 4B 40 24
program within the
last live years
about responsible
pet ownership.
38.95%
238 611
4.41% 2.12°} 1.47% 2.29% 3.92% 40.52%
27 13 9 14 24
248 612
94
Q9 Retail and restaurants make it easy to be out with your pet.
190%
ao
48%
20%
0%
Answered: 613 Skipped: 2
Retailers Restaurants Businesses Our city Our City Our city
in our city in our city pest clear promotes has Iota! has Local
welcome welcome signage itself as ordinances ordinances
pets. pets... indicati... pet... that Erna,.. that Erna...
■1 1.12 1.13 .4 5
■ NIAfllnknown
2 3
MG ■a ■a ■9
4 5 6
7 11
9 NM) TOTAL
UNKNOWN
Retailers in our city 41.97% 18.52"% 13.11% 5.90% 5.41% 2.79% 2.13% 2.13% 3.77% 4.26%
welcome pets_ 256 113 80 36 33 17 13 13 23 26 610
Restaurants in Mr 52.7a% 20.42% 7.68% 3.76% 4.25% 1.63% 0.82% 1.14% 2.94% 4.58%
city welcome pets 323 125 47 23 26 10 5 7 18 28 612
(inside or an patios)..
Businesses post clear 37.32% 15.06% 8.35% 5.40% 7.69% 3.44% 4.58% 3.76% 7.86% 6.55%
signage indicating 228 92 51 33 47 21 28 23 48 40 611
where pets are
welcome_
Our city promotes 50.57% 12.60% 6.06 2.95% 4.58% 2.62% 2.45% 1.47% 3.76% 12.93%
itself as pet friendly or 309 77 37 18 28 16 15 9 23 79 611
has plans to do so in
the near future.
Our city has local 42.23% 8.35% 5.24% 3.11 % 2.95% 1.15% 1.15% 0.98% 3.11 % 31.75%
ordinances that 256 51 32 19 18 7 7 6 19 194 611
enable businesses
welcoming peas.
Our etlyF has local 48.85% 8.72% 4.28% 0.99% 2.47% 0.99% 1.15°% 1.15% 329% 28.13%
ordinances that 297 53 26 6 15 6 T 7 20 171 608
enable restaurants
welcoming pets.
95
Q10 Traveling with pets is accessible, safe and affordable.
100%
60%
20%
0%
Our aity's taxi
and other
fee -haled car
servicss allc...
i1 ■2
■3
■ N/A/Unknown
1 2
Answered: 611 Skipped: 4
Our public Cur public Our closest
transportation transportation airport has
systems allow does not have areas designated
pets (buses,,.. size limits L. For pets andf...
�4 5
■6 ■7 ■8 ■g
3 4 3 6 7
8 9 NM Jr TOTAL
UNKNOWN
Our city-s taxi and other 15.38% 3.93% 2.13% 1.15% 1.80% 0_49% 0.65% 0.49% 1.47% 72.50%
tee based car services 94 24 13 7 11 3 4 3 9 443 611
allow pets.
Our public 20.85"% 3.45% 279% 1.31% 1.48% 0.49% 0.00% 0.643% 1.64% 67.32%
transportation systems 127 21 17 8 9 3 0 4 10 410 609
allow pets (buses,
trains, light rail. subway.
etc.).
Our public 15.79% 2.63"% 1.48% 0.49°% 1.32% 0_16% 0.00% 1149% 1.64% 75.99"%
transportation does not 96 16 9 3 8 1 4 3 10 462 608
have size Iirrtits for
allowable pets_
Our closest airport has 16.23% 3.93% 1.31% 1.80"% 1.31% 0.98% 1.31% 0.98% 2.79% 69.34"%
areas designated For 99 24 8 11 8 6 8 6 17 423 610
pets andlar pet -friendly
amenities_
96
100%
80%
60%
.1-014
20%
Q11 Does your employer allow pets?
Answered: 592 Skipped: 23
• No • If yes, name of employer;
ANSWER CHOICES
No
II yes, name of employer:
TOTAL
RESPONSES
87.33%
517
12.67% 75
592
97
APPENDIX K: PET -FRIENDLY COMMUNITY SURVEY COMMENTS
Comments Summary
Pet Amenities Requested
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
a
• Off Leash Trail areas (6)
• Waste Bags (5)
Trash Containers (4)
• Hydration Stations (3)
• Pond / Water Feature (3)
• Agility Course (2)
Pet Friendly Survey Comments
1
1
•
• Pro Dogs in Parks (40)
More Dining±bar options
(36)
More Off -Leash Dog Parks
(25)
• Mare Services & Biz (non -
dining) (16)
Dubuque is Not Pet
Friendly (15)
• More Housing Options (8)
• Anti Dogs in Parks (6)
Education Program (6)
• Better Communication (3)
98
Survey comments fall into seven general themes:
As part of the Pet -friendly Community Survey, participants were encouraged to make
comments. Of those that left feedback, the comments fell into several categories such as
general concerns that Dubuque is not pet -friendly, improving access to parks and other public
amenities, consideration for restaurants and businesses, encouragements for growth in pet -
related business areas were Dubuque is lacking, housing limitations, and responsible pet
ownership and related education and enforcement.
Dubuque is Pet Unfriendly
- Nothing about Dubuque is pet friendly. It's a disgrace.
- I really feel that Dubuque is VERY pet UNFRIENDLY!!
- Dubuque is NOT pet friendly at all
- Dubuque is the least pet friendly community I know. There are slim to none pet -friendly
services.
- Dubuque as a whole isn't pet -friendly!
- Dubuque is not pet friendly by a long shot.
- Dubuque is horrible for being pet friendly. Other cities such as Cedar Rapids, Madison
Quad Cities are so pet friendly. It disgusts me that the City of Dubuque is so against pets
in public places. I am a pet owner and always have bags to clean up. Most do. If they do
have programs they are not that well publicized. Get with the program Dubuque. Don't
penalize the responsible pet owners because of those that don't take care of there's.
They should not have them in the first place. Thanks for this survey. Now let's get PET
FRIENDLY and promote it for tourism as well.
- Dubuque is not a pet friendly city. There are many services lacking. Dubuque needs to
do so much better in this area.
- Rarely saw anyone in public with pets
All in all this town is NOT pet friendly
Pets do not need to be everywhere.
DBQ is far from pet friendly.
- No part of this city is pet friendly.
- I don't think pet owners feel entitled to too many services. I think it is good to limit pets in
public spaces
- We need to be a more pet friendly city to attract young professionals.
- Dubuque is the most unfriendly city I have ever been in. Very disappointing. Glad to see
a group working towards a city that you can take your pet to a public place and beyond .
- There isn't enough pet -friendly services or information.
Dog Park
Another dog park that is not crowded. There are sensible homeowners who take care of
their pets and would like to take their pets to public parks. Would not include Eagle Point
park or the Arboretum. I would not expect my pets to be off -leash either it would be nice
to take them to more public parks.
There aren't enough public dog parks
99
- City parks should be pet friendly. It is absolutely absurd they aren't (need) Parks allowing
pets. Dog parks, parks that are accessible for families that also allow the family pet to
come along.
- If pets are allowed in parks, people living near each park WILL let their dogs off the
leash in the park. Neighbors of a park will treat the park as an extension of their own
back yard. That is what happened when Dubuque's Heritage Trail extension was opened
to pets.
- Wish more city parks allowed dogs on leash
- I don't want pet friendly areas where dogs can be unleashed. I am terrified of dogs.
- Dogs are NOT people. Service dogs are -well -trained and calm, I feel safe around them.
Many family dogs are not, jumping on you, running around the length of their leash.
grew up on a farm, we had many different pets. But I don't feel that dogs should be
allowed everywhere their owners want to take them, their "rights" shouldn't supersede
the rights of the rest of us to walk around not having to watch where we walk, or look to
see if a barking dog is near and a danger to us. If the city feels pressured to have dogs
in the park, for example, have a separate, designated, and well marked area for those
who feel they must be there. Yes, they'll cry discrimination, but I'm not allowed to take
my toddler to the casino either. There are laws for the protection of all. The laws say I
can't drive 90 mph all the way to Dyersville, for the protection of other drivers and myself,
even though I feel confident (and even if I've had 4 0r 5 beers.)
- The park restrictions are ridiculous.
- More parks should allow pets
Pets are not allowed in any city parks.
- Most parks restrict pets even on leash. The public dog park has a very nice amenity but
there's only one of them within city limits.
- I haven't been in any other community that is so restrictive when it comes to where I can
walk my leashed dog. There are so many lovely parks around, but I feel like I can't enjoy
them since there is little reason for me to go on a walk if I can't have my dog with me. It
would be nice to have easy access to the park nearby so I don't always have to be
walking beside the traffic
- Need -allowing dogs to be in public parks
- You can't find any parks pets can go too
- we do not have a decent dog park
- More dog parks
- Parks that allow pets. Dog parks. All are needed!!
INDOOR WALKING FACILITY FOR WHEN IT RAINS AND SNOWS.
When we travel to other cities dogs are very much welcomed in parks.. It's very sad that
Dubuque will not allow animals in any of our parks
Need parks
Need Parks for on leash, parks for off leash. We can't picnic at Flora when kids swim as
dog can't stay in hot car. We can't play after work at Alison Henderson which is by my
employer for same reason. Safe, calm pets should be widely welcomed.
- Need Well taken care of dog parks free to the public agility courses
- Need Pet friendly businesses and restaurants
- Need Dog friendly local parks that don't cause me to drive across town to utilize.
- Need Off leash trails
- Need Parks, walking paths
- Not enough dog parks or access to public parks
- parks where kids can play while with pet
- Also, it is difficult to find out whether specific parks allow pets or not
- Need off -leash areas/dog parks
100
- Nice off leash dog. Park with a trail
- I wish that dogs were once again allowed in the parks with responsible pet owners who
would pick up after their dogs. I live near eagle point park and would love to be able to
walk there. I would like to see this reconsidered for all parks.
- Nearly 100% of our parks, and public spaces do no allow dogs. There are very few
places for a dog to be off their leash. The dog park we do have in Dubuque, is extremely
under par for what I have seen in other cities. It is big, but has no trees or toys, and very
limited seating for owners. Dog park was recently improved by adding more gate space
and a couple more benches, but gates are constantly locked- only one open to allow
dogs in and out. benches are only right inside the gate causing a lot of traffic in one
area. Dog park is consistently muddy.
- there are parks that aren't pet friendly, but the sidewalk leads through them.
- Need More then one off leash pet park.
- Need parks
- Need Off leash hiking trails
- Acres of wooded dog parks and hiking trails where pets can be off leash like in many
other cities
- Pets should be allowed in most if not all parks in Dubuque. I have never lived in a city
with such restrictions before. I have lived in at least 10 different cities.
off leash area for dogs
- a multi -acre dog park.
- Would like to see pets allowed in parks and public areas with being told to put them back
in your vehicle
- Allowing pets in parks at events (eg: Music in the Gardens at the Arboretum
- More parks/nature areas should allow leased animals
More parks to visit with more green space to run and play
off lead walking, jogging path
- Plus most parks aren't dog friendly
dogs allowed at all parks
More than one or two parks. Only place with pet fountains are these parks.
- Very few parks allow dogs
- Dogs should be allowed in all parks. I feel sad that I can not take my dog to most of our
lovely parks. I have taken her to parks in Galena because they are very dog friendly.
Contact with dogs improves our lives. Think of therapy dogs. They are used to cheer
people up in hospitals and even relieve stress for college students during finals week.
Yet here in Dubuque, dogs are not allowed in most of our parks. I was raised in
Dubuque, lived out of state for many years, then returned here. Dubuque is overall a
very nice place to live; the only thing that really annoys me is that dogs are not allowed
in most parks. I think this makes Dubuque a less desirable city to live in.
I cannot find any parks near me that allow dogs.
- It's very sad that Dubuque will not allow animals in any of our parks
- Nearly all parks clearly state no pets are allowed
Extremely frustrating that you cannot take your dog to a city park on a leash!!!! I'm new
back to Dubuque and hate that I can't take my puppers for a walk at eagle point park.
Leashes I get. No dogs is ridiculous.
- Need An agility park that doesn't have a membership fee or associated with a company
- Parks. I can't find a park through which it is legal to walk a dog. The city's prohibition on
dogs in most parks is outdated, wrongheaded, and discriminatory against people who
require emotional support or other assistive dogs
- More dog parks, walking trails
101
Waste disposal and public pet amenities
- (need) Waste bags placed around town
- need more pet friendly water and bags along the Bee Branch
- there are no waste containers around major walking areas, Agility course, pond.
- Walking trails with trees, ponds, dog play area water fountain etc
- Would like more hydration stations on public land. The nearest to my house is almost 3
miles away.
- agility courses
- Agility course
- Finally, does the Bee Branch have doo-doo baggies?
- More parks/nature areas should have trash receptacles for waste,
- More , waste bags/garbage disposal
- almost zero dog water bowls on trails or on common walking streets
- although there are several areas to walk dogs in the city, there are not enough waste
disposal containers stationed along those paths.
Restaurant and businesses
(need) Restaurants allowing pets. Restaurants
- It is also very difficult to find a restaurant or brewery that would allow pets on their patio
let alone inside.
- It is hard to find outside, even inside, patios and establishments where you can bring
your dog. This makes the city feel like if you want to leave your house you have to find a
dog park or leave them home alone.
- dog friendly bars and restaurants are needed
- more restaurants that allow dogs
- Restaurants allowing dogs needed
- Needed- Restaurants
- When we travel to other cities, dogs are very much welcomed in restaurant outdoor
seating areas.. It's very sad that Dubuque will not allow animals in any of our parks
- It would be nice to have a restaurant/pub that allowed pets in. There was one that did
allow them outside on their patio and the city stopped them from allowing that. I went to
Indiana for training and there were a couple eating establishments that not only let them
on the patio but ALSO inside!
- restaurants and businesses are not allowed to allow dogs/pets due to the local
ordinance
- Need Pet friendly restaurants and stores
- Need Pet friendly restaurants/ businesses
- Need pet friendly restaurants, bars,
- Cannot go to a restaurant or pub and take dog anymore like when we had the Naughty
Dog.
- Need pet -friendly restaurants
- Need pet -friendly restaurants
- Nearly 100% of our restaurants do not allow dogs.
- I do not want a pet friendly office at work.
102
- I don't believe pets belong in places of business unless that business specifically caters
to pets.
- There are no restaurants, other than DQ, where you can eat on the patio with your dog.
We travel to the river often with our dog, but if we're hungry and aren't going to lock our
dog in a hot vehicle, we have to drive to another town to eat with them.
- Need Outdoor dining
- Very limited area for dog owners and businesses are limited friendly to pets. Those few
you can bring a pet to, you are looked at as doing something wrong
- Restaurants, stores
- Need restaurants
- Need restaurants
- hardly any restaurants that you can go with your dog.
- Not allowed on restaurants patios anymore
- Allowing pets on restaurant patios
- I've lived in Europe and find it odd that dogs aren't allowed in outdoor areas of
restaurants
- More dog friendly restaurants
- Yes, there are very few places that allow pets. If they do allow pets, they are small and
crowded.
- More Restaurants allowing dogs
- Need Pet friendly patios at restaurants and bars.
- Most retail and restaurants aren't dog friendly
- Need Dining out with my dog at outdoor patios.
- Very few restaurants allow dogs
Private Services for dogs/pets
- (need) Canine chiropractor
- There are services but there aren't enough available to make any choice between them,
and while services are available, they are limited in what they are able to offer.
- Shortage of boarding.
- Doggy day cares near downtown. Fido Fit is full with a waiting list,
- Need for Affordable dog walkers
- There are only two pet stores, I believe there should be more
- Vet services aren't well promoted.
- Vet Bill's allow to make payments
- I had trouble finding a new groomer when my previous one retired. The groomers I
contacted (4 total) were full or had weight restrictions. I finally had to travel to Peosta to
find a new groomer Need doggy daycares
- Doggie day camp
- More dog daycare at a reasonable price. More dog boarding options at a reasonable
price.
- Agility training or places with actual clean water access for water dogs to swim in. There
aren't many waste disposal options when I'm walking my dog
- Dog/cat sitters and dog walkers
103
- I would love to see a nice, upscale place to board pets. I have to rely on my vet office
and I don't think those facilities are very nice. I'd love to see someone open a place like
Stone Hollow (Cascade). I think business would boom.
- There's pet friendly services but very very few
- Yes, there are very few places that allow pets. If they do allow pets, they are small and
crowded.
Rental issues
- The fact that the vast majority of landlords here don't allow pets is ridiculous!! Take a
look at Cedar Rapids, most landlords there allow pets. Also, the pet deposits in Dubuque
are designed, I believe, to discourage renters to have a pet. If someone wants to rent,
finds a place they want, but then finds out no pets, what are they supposed to do, take
their family member and surrender them to the Humane Society?? NOT FAIR!!!!
Make all rental units accept pets.
I cannot find rental property that allows medium/large dogs. It's not even breed
restricted, they just don't allow any dogs- especially in the safer parts of town.
- Trying to rent as pet owner is impossible unless you can afford ultra high rent or deposits
or are willing to live in a dump.
- There is a big shortage of pet -friendly housing in the area.
- Renting with a pet is a need
My daughter moved here with two dogs and was unable to find suitable housing to rent.
She had to rent in a less than desirable area.
Need Places to rent that allow BIG dogs
Enforcement and responsible pet ownership
- Not all pet owners are bad, in fact, most are very responsible
- Too many dog owners fail to leash their dogs. It had improved slightly a couple of years
ago but is now much worse. Dog owners need to leash their dogs and the city needs to
enforce the leash ordinance possibly with stiff fines.
- Perhaps the city website could be more clear about options neighbors have regarding
irresponsible pet owners: what can we do about scary off -leash dogs; neighbors who
purposely let their cats go free to hunt, breed in the neighborhood, and mark on houses;
and tenants who let their undocumented "therapy animals" trash rentals?
- Need Responsible pet owners. Owners need to take responsibility for their pets rather
than expecting others to provide free services. I have four dogs and one cat. I make my
choices based on what I can maintain and pay for. I do not expect others to pay for me.
If I had children, I would choose the school district I wanted to live in. I would not expect
a school to be built by my house for my convenience and expect everyone else to pay
for it.
- Personally I'd like to see more education about responsible pet ownership above all
else. Too many loose dogs accosting leashes dogs AND way too much nuisance
barking. Can't take your pet in public if it doesn't behave or it's behavior is governed by
hormones.
Before expanding pet services, there should be a focus on responsible pet ownership. I
would like to NOT be bothered by off -leash pets in public areas (even when leash rules
104
are posted), or waste that is not cleaned up. I dread having the same problems in
restaurants and local businesses.
- One thing I would like to see in Dubuque is how to educate Dubuquers on dog
behaviors. For example. there is a man that brings his dog to the dog park on Grandview
- he tells everyone the dog doesn't like other dogs but needs to socialize and the dog is
clearly uncomfortable there. This dog has not only bitten at my own dog but others. Now
whenever he comes to the dog park. I leave. this has happened on multipole times with
multipole different people. My dog suffering injuries from reckless dog owners. Maybe
offer a free training class? If people see more dogs being friendly maybe Dubuque will
become more dog friendly. If you want information, I would suggest talking to the people
who are regulars at Grandview's and the Humane Society Dog Park
- I had trouble finding a neighborhood I could move to when I moved back to Dubuque
because several of the newer communities do no allow physical fences. This is
unacceptable to me. Underground (electric) fences are not an option as they do not
prevent unfriendly dogs from entering my property nor do they prevent children who do
not know how to behave appropriately when approaching a dog from coming on to my
property.
- Annual pet licensing reminders should be sent at least a month before due.
- Annual pet license reminders are sent at least one month prior to renewal dates with a
follow up postcard reminder.
105
APPENDIX L: CITY/COMMUNITY ENFORCEMENT REALTED TO PETS
IN PARKS
Pets in Park enforcement is conducted by Park Patrol, Police, and Animal Control (AC).
A complaint may be received by:
• Dispatch- Police
• Park Division (3 seasonal employees working a total of 1809 hours for the
season from May through October)
• Health Services Department (2 part time animal control officers for a total of 58
hours per week)
Response is dependent on:
• Who is on duty at the time of complaint
• Who is available at the time of complaint (i.e., not currently working on an
incident)
• Proximity of the complaint to potential responding officers (i.e., if Park Patrol is at
Eagle Point Park and complaint is at Murphy Park, AC or Police could respond if
they're available)
Park Patrol Schedule (First Saturday in May through last Sunday in October)
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 1 Ranger 3:30 p.m. - 10:30 p.m.
Friday, Saturday, Sunday 1 Ranger 3:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.
Friday, Saturday, Sunday 1 Ranger 5:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.
Animal Control Schedule
Winter
Monday 1 Officer 8:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 1 Officer 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Friday 1 Officer 8:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Saturday 1 Officer 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
Summer
Monday 1 Officer 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 1 Officer 9:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m.
Friday 1 Officer 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Saturday 1 Officer 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
106
In August of 2019 Animal Control will have one full time and one part time for a total of
69 hours per week as an approved budget improvement package.
Enforcement may also occur via sightings/patrolling by Park Patrol, Police, and AC.
Park Fee collectors:
Park fee collectors is responsible for asking vehicles that are entering Eagle
Point Park if they have a pet in their vehicle. If a pet is present the person will be
instructed that their pet must stay in the vehicle. These patrons are recorded on a
log and this serves as their first notice.
Park Maintenance employees (Seasonal and Full-time):
All employees in this job classification are required to make contact any time
there is a pet in the park. These employees simply ask for compliance and
inform the patron of the Ordinance. Staff inform their supervisor of the contact.
Enforcement
A warning violation is completed by the enforcing officer with a copy sent to AC in
Health Services. AC monitors for repeat violators. All violators are recorded on the Pets
in Park Enforcement Log by Animal Control. Anyone receiving more than one warning
notice will be issued a civil citation. If the responding officer is aware that a second
violation has occurred, a citation can be issued immediately. If a second violation is not
noted until AC receives copy of the warning, the responding officer is notified to issue a
citation.
Police issues a warning or citation via their process and document in the Police report
that is forwarded to Health Services on a daily basis.
Fines
$85 Court Costs
$100 First Offence
$150 Second Offence
107
APPENDIX M: TRAVEL DUBUQUE PET -FRIENDLY DESTINATIONS
•
ATTRACTIONS
r
I DUBUQU.E•
FENELON PLACE ELEVATOR
3,2 Ee+fdan Mx* I D.krw r.IA
l,L. Lwa.a a i. feoii kri t . wd 1. • 61 rk l•I*1- *Pick kick rahaj - TIM tar %Nib.
lx wap, 1 mr•h of bhq iron and rir ra•rrCiposIpr1 Wry 3.1.,:64rri
RIIvER ur rrs sooxsioar
•
i 0913 f i.n.r. 3vppi I , G1 _
Kr L or�d' -_L L.L , P ,a
ANr s
. 0411541..riy, oat{,:n.el.drh.,. Mir
oil d (�L mow old i t.g i!4 wing M+a.J4r% 1- r �/s •.*R Stir}
wF Twirl 1r a prima
_DUBUQUE laildiA WO.00p41 Own '
28 k n+an Siam I Dubmp-priA
mad L4 4r WO.4liclio unif aaeemaail NAP lob yam ire is! totrrapplrixi lli+rufirrflrfd ryy
bkirumwdIv rFs lwe 4r! c34;.r.L it s i d .rrd.. alr4 amid Imp'Yvr dippnImt
ART ON THE RI .
MI !UMW. 16n11r wdpi, I Pprr cd
Tm p�o-�r d in„ r»-•• ..I d,d b;VP as do d , rr swd a.rde,y l
y,p*drfsq. u.,:Ki. az.l.oni Feu.
A.Y. MCOONAM PARK -
Howhrrra _` hra . k+ci.+.xyr
a.rd wf. ' W' I'm u �1 4au+ s bo, vk7 hrdue *oi.+� .�lJ plc
JOHN G.. BERGFEW I tLA 1Out AI - `
76k11lrrrrereir D_r.. r3„F.A0*, IJr •-
Ili 3D avri k 60+,0 r +a.2•W 61:gi Fam1 •01. kr w oc4...ih1r lady j jowl, G. i RI* heed r.risaaa
walmi sa4 pelay 1. hMaiYd #(•I and pab& Nome0.
•
PANES QF SPAN. S • -
11991 We. kle ih I.9.1?..grrtr I,+y •
da. yei. rovraraw afro .it. Y8 fir fr 6Ltg S laws,, $ yam Irarpwhr
Cyr roe mg.fadi.rnywhim era 1.iOurfprelSr&irarihbrdeelvullp,ylhp. .4'AIDA J,4 1
C4i. rr ikoarie aril it IIrr.* Slop tl.A atm..* rank r,lFlto 41 r.
•
COILIQUIL 00G PARK
•
f I. $ Yrf owl 1 gird airs gpuvh.L4.4for rug* PM_ dew. 14 l* rvhrn
Al ar, rrebr and r • -.+ - .r i c.. &v. p, e�y eddy pii�rhr Put r •
. r
HADUP 4 S .Ora
42/120. 1.*,06d I Dibrguo. irk -
Eskoor iNr Mg* d G pQ 'ewrlry alit Lkbpr .- See rr..0.* tr W# ci pwwp.X15 *Farr 1db+ ++p
plI--fy d ti b++.rr plOy aRI wckdk••,C33.1.a f*r .onrd a,d a.+ #+r day an..:s I pry
EIDO.AE
■
94 J7Aoir Slyd L G fro, IA
pi.rd r,,b raar, 60•3•P• A. E7,4rr.ral T ! yar k k, *gap' dvr ao• d F.iof14 r rIr.wi i*ofiipm...E
*ay, boisokfoiks.,mdi airw11.1! in ye.; 04:6sppy rde11.ddhr Wikyypllq, ' , I. . •
•
Flyer provided by
Travel Dubuque
EVENTS
Aceimu $..F Irpkka.rl..k YS
515l' AwL14,03.1f grow!.piALK.r+:d '
iicrilrode 0001141 a,6w.,,51r,,..s
forma' Pe.1.4
Iwrlird &, I r.* otv..,-1 Ong.
iffillelft PM* 11 mot Kr 6..Erg ,
13. ,rYn.4
WA6514F De WS
. hlor{L, [ 3A Rom} FJJ
Carr b j _,i r r4 , d2
pa& at FM; 16..dadad Col
34310. 0101s for =al aril
2. d g . 41 wain dr &AA 400.p.to
- dark and j
•
Wirt 1•16.0
fix•-13••Kim 3:04 SatAf -
GaYa+ &4 i Art kti_ae lac lama wed
ai4.Li4 IeilF7 frnk ar4 hr trtu.ila
iir7r[4* d ridi . i drw47. 11.1...
WPM hdglr{rdy 1.; Y; PI Vag •NO
r6.1d ¢ Jaw pia.
LODGING
WEilubi IiLks
3 rup Ly40.'Smr 104-•r,a ! }SP 35,7•Map'
IILk116rff Ytly{r1A114L#
• '-'51.1J .LA•;'AO » 21TA
CMS- PM
r r , P-.y:9.r I RKt..Y.., x id!
CkiNfiger *Chit
IOC Li 6.0 I FrirlagiA 13niiiaSrd
k1¢I.MYY IrI intliS
XbB "1 rAd.r I a *rr. , 1 su M&7t t
IrA MAY AMU - •
17J1I,,..1.1r.a,e.1OaM,
a N o.r*s..r 1 86.1..,1% I j1vd5l4,+,ipIG
4UAIQT Ili1
* OW aen.4Id owr 1 Ceti rl 1 *3 Sia saga
y1 i - a
3r� ir.r I t a:yaL u: w+r•JIFr
ii��++ IAI3kSt3t4xo
108
Comments received by Leisure Services clerical staff via phone, voicemail, WebQA, letters and emails
from 08/22/2019 to 02/17/2019
A citizen called the City Clerk's Office on Wednesday and spoke with Trish regarding their ill feelings towards dogs in parks.
Trish refered them to Leisure Services. Citizen did not reach out to Leisure Services. Kristen contacted citizen August 22 at
9:29am but no answer. A voicemail was left. -KD
No
Citizen came to the Park and Receration Commission Meeting and handed out a letter regarding their
beliefs towards our current pet park and some recommendations. Citizen submitted a letter to file. - KD
N/A
Citizen came to Leisure Services on Tuesday August 13, 2019 to voice their concern of Dogs in Parks. Citizen also came to the
Park and Recreation Commission Meeting. Citizen is okay with Dogs in Parks besides a select few like Eagle Point Park and
the Arboretum. -KD
No
Citzen sent email to city staff voicing their concern with pets in parks. They are against it. Email added
to file - KD
No
Citizens would like to recommend a specific piece of land that they own for the Dog Park idea. They wanted to speak with
Lisa Johnson of FIDO to discuss this further but have been unable to reach her. They are in favor of Dogs in Parks and want to
see a good piece of land used. -KD
N/A
Citizen emailed Lisa Johnson of FIDO with their opposition of dogs in city parks. Lisa Johnson forwarded the email to Kristen,
Marie, and Steve. The attachment noted in citizen's email was not fowarded.
Kristen emailed citizen for this attachment. -KD
No
Citizen came into the Leisure Services Office 8/26/19 around 11:12 am. Citizen is concerned about the length of leashes and
would like to add a rule or regulation regarding how long the leashes can be.
They are in opposition of dogs in Eagle Point Park and Marshall Park Arboretum as the citizen volunteers at these two parks
and understands and can see first hand the damage dogs can do. Citizen wrote this concern on a green sheet of paper to
which I handed to Marie Ware as there was other
information on the sheet regarding another concern. -ED
No
Citizen sent an email to City Manager, Council Member Rios, and the health department. Citizen vocalizes their issues
associated with dogs in parks and in our community. Included is citizen email
sent. -KD
No
Citizen called Steve Fehsal after the article in the TH on September 10th about the discussion of an ordinance change and left
a voicemail. Citizen rides their bike around the Hertiage Trail, Bee Branch, Flood Wall, and so on. Their concern is that when
people have their animals on leashes that they will have the expanded leash which causes accidents for bikers. If this is
something they are exploring they need to have the 6 foot leashes and not the expanded ones and we should have proper
law enforcement to make sure rules are being followed. KD kept the voicemail forwarded. -KD
No
Citizen mailed a letter and attachments regarding their opposition to opening our city parks to dogs. Filed their letter and
attachments into folder. Stephanie Valentine shared it with the Mayor, City
Council, and MVM -KD
No
Citizen sent Randy Gehl an email following the press release against pets in parks. Copied email sent to
Randy and filed it. -KD
No
Citizen emailed the department. They are opposed to any animal that could bite children. This not only would scar the child
emotionally and physically, but would also set up a lawsuit against the City of Dubuque if such a bad situation would occur.
Keep the Parks free of animals feces and let kids play safe. Thank You. KD has a file copy of email. - Jo
No
Please reconsider agenda related to allowing dogs in city parks. My dog is "part of my family" and would love to include her
on family outings. I understand concerns about responsible people cleaning up after and controlling their pets, but I believe
it is no different than responsible people puting a grocery cart back, not littering, or following rules and common courtesy.
There will always be the small percent who lack responsibility. Thank you for your time. (This came to Jolene as a WebQA.
Jolene printed off for Kristen on 1-13-2020.)
Yes
Letter received in the mail. Citizen vote is "no" for the ordinance change. Letter added to folder - KD
No
Steve Fehsal received an email from citizen regarding dogs at the Farmer's market. They are in favor of having dogs at the
Farmer's Market. Email has been printed and added to folder. -KD
Yes
Citizen wrote a letter to the editor of the TH not in favor of allowing pets in parks and other areas.
Highlighted and printed off the letter into the folder. -KD
No
Citizen emailed the department sharing their strong support for the approval of the updated ordinance and the increased
attention to making our local community pet and pet -owner friendly. (Email was
forwarded to Kristen on 1-14-2010.) -Jo
Yes
Citizen sent a WebQA to City Council in favor of pets in some parks. Attached is the webQA -KD
Yes
Please no pets in Eagle Point Park. Attached is the webQA -KD
No
Citizen is unable to attend the public input session. They wanted the City Council to know that they is
in favor of pets in parks. Attached is the WEBQA -KD
Yes
Citizen wrote a letter to the editor of the TH in favor of pets in parks. Copy of letter added to file -KD
Yes
Citizen submitted handwritten letter describing strongly against pets in parks. Added to file - KD
No
Citizen submitted WebQA stating, "Please no dogs in Eagle Point Park. Thanks" - Attached is the WebQA. -KD
No
PARK AND RECREATION SPECIAL MEETING
Tuesday, January 14, 2020
6:OOp.m., City Council Chambers, 2nd Floor of Historic Building
PRESENT: Rebecca Kuhle, Ray Werner, Matt Garrett, Hobie Wood, Jennifer Tigges,
Robin Kennicker
ABSENT: Robert McCoy
STAFF PRESENT: Marie Ware, Steve Fehsal, Dan Kroger, and Kristen Dietz
PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING PROPOSAL TO ALLOW PETS IN MOST CITY
PARKS:
Jerky Schmidt
206 Southgate
Yes - In favor of having pets in parks I am looking forward to the day when I can walk
my leashed dog in City Parks.
Sue Hass
960 Matthew John Drive
Yes/No — but only certain parks. Pet owner, grateful for city putting out bags for pets.
The community does not clean up after themselves. Not a lot of options available for
pets to go to but irresponsible pet owners' ruin it for all pet owners. The parks need to
be selective. Kids can be harmed, and things need to be enforced. It is a big task to
enforce. Water fountains, bag stations, other areas need to have careful consideration.
Mary Storm
960 Mayfair Ct
No — against. Was attacked by a dog. She had damage done to her calf. She had a
serious injury causing a blood clot and had danger of going to lungs. She had medical
bills with treatment. Animals are unpredictable. She is fearful. City parks serve people
and not pets. Pet owners are not always responsible. Develop another dog park instead
of mixing the two. Do not invite dogs to a recreational environment for people even if
they are on a leash.
Kathy Hartman
535 Candlewick Ct
No — against. I am not a pet owner, but I agree with Mary (above). Pets are
unpredictable. I live in a nice area. Pets run next to owners without leashes. There are
larger dogs that scare people in this area. My son lives in downtown Des Moines and
the apartment has different floors of the apartment building in which animals are allowed
to go to — it is restricted areas. Pets are currently allowed in AY McDonald Park,
Bergfeld Recreation Area, Port of Dubuque Marina and Pyatigorsk Park. There are a lot
of companies and businesses that allow pets currently, as well as hotels. Pet owners
need to utilize these places instead of animal non -occupied areas. Where is the
compromise?
Christiana Schmitt
1377 Wood Street
Yes — for. She believes in a change. She wants to see dogs in Eagle Point Park and
other City areas. Her dog is currently training to be a therapy dog. Dubuque would be
taking a step in the right direction for both lifetime residents and newcomers to
Dubuque. This is the only major city in Iowa that does not allow dogs in City parks. She
went to college here and is employed here currently. She likes to go to Eagle Point Park
but wants to be able to take her dog there. She asks that we do not blame animals that
poop on the grass — it is natural for them. Most owners want to clean up after their pet.
As long as the bags are available the owners will use them. We can train the owners.
Dogs are family and no family member should be left behind.
Jim (James) Meder
2283 Hoyt Street
Yes/No. People need a lot of separate places from animals. There are people that do
not want. There should be zones available for pets. Pet owners should be treated as
equal. There is going to be too much feces. Dogs are warriors. Is there a leash length
law? I would suggest 6 feet. Some areas to walk along solid surface for example Eagle
Point Park where you can enjoy the river but surrender to people walking by. As far as
water the owners should provide wherever they go.
Jordon Von Mulert
855 Valentine Drive
Yes — for. I came from Illinois — I would like to tell my different experience. It was 130
a.m. when a bomb went off in the park across the street. I tried to help the police find
the blast, but nothing was found. It was around 430 a.m. when a dog owner/walker (our
friend) went out to walk their dog. It was that dog owner that found the body of someone
who had blown themselves up. It is not just the benefits for the dogs, but dog owners
are the first and last people in the parks. This was also a park that was attached to a
playground and if the dog walker did not find this then the children would of. Keep that
in consideration.
Richard Kirkendall
1725 Alta Place
Yes — for. Five years ago, I stood in the same spot to allow dogs in parks. Commission
requested to have pets on leashes in parks and the City Council shot it down. Multiple
City Council people and Mayor said we need more time to see if dogs and coexist in
public spaces. There has been an additional research done over the past five years and
dogs have been allowed in several places like AY McDonald, Farmer's Market and such
and if we take the data, it will not show finding of dog attacks in AY McDonald that now
allows it. Ay McDonald is still a beautiful park. It has not been overly contaminated with
dog feces. Children are not getting diseases. No dog apocalypse. Every other city
allows dogs and people to coexist peacefully. Dog owners are healthier as a result. That
should be enough. We go to City Council and no one can say we have not had enough
time. We had many votes. We have had a lot of people shoot this down. But majority
have consistently said yes to allow pets in parks. I understand what it means to be part
of Commission, I was on it originally to get pets in parks. It's not about dog feces or
people getting bit. It's about having a good story and the fear will do the rest. Instead of
relying solely on data I will leave you with this, I loved my dog his name was Toby. I
found him in Texas, and he was with me every day. He was with my friends and family
when I was deployed to Afghanistan and he went to Germany with me. I came back to
Dubuque with him and we would go on adventures. We would go out to Mines of Spain,
Bergfeld Pond and a few other areas. We could not go to Allison Henderson, Flora,
Valentine Park and to suggest Eagle Point Park was a bad idea. NO pets allow. I hope
for change. He has since passed away. Any dog owner will tell you; it hurts when your
friend passes away especially when the city you live in labels dogs as dangerous and
dirty — but life does go on. Five years down the road. Though I have lost him, I am
blessed. I have a new dog. Nothing warms my heart like my two -year -old playing with
the dog. My child gets excited. He wants his child to be able to take his dog to the park.
Let my whole family go to the park.
Art Galloon
535 Heritage Drive
No — against. Thank you for serving on this Committee and volunteering your time. I
oppose the proposed ordinance and here is why. I come after my good friend, Richard
Kirkendahl. When I talk about the ordinance I am talking about the proposed ordinance
by the Commission. Health, safety, human rights vs. animal right, cost, and tourism. The
ordinance allows every park to become a pet park with a pet on a leash. Look at the
current pet rules. "Dogs with a known history of, or who exhibit dangerous behavior are
prohibited" , so dogs with a past history are allowed in the parks? The current pet park
rules should reflect in the other parks if the proposed ordinance goes through. "Dogs
must be healthy, full immunized, de -wormed, and wearing license and rabies tag". It is a
good rule, but it will not be followed because it goes under the owner not the city. Last
one, "Enter at your own risk" is listed on the pet park sign. That would be appropriate for
the ordinance if this were to pass. For example, proposed ordinance at Eagle Point Park
there would need to be sign out front at the toll booth that says, "Enter at your own risk".
Is the person at the toll booth going to check to see if pets are wearing their tags or
have had shots? How can the City or Commission guarantee the safety of people or
children or senior citizens? Dubuque requests licensing to prevent the spread rabies.
Rabies are a constant threat and can be fatal to people. Being up to date on
vaccinations are a state law and that is why licenses are mandatory for everyone. But
the ordinance mentions nothing about that. Health and safety to the will of dog owners.
That is not right. Dog events are currently available. Wags at the Flags charges animals
($4) to come in are we going to charge customer and people to go into the parks. Will a
similar cost be assessed for dog owners or will the citizens have to pay that fee? That
will cover signage, bags, staff and enforcement. The pet park rules mention about the
frequent interaction you may encounter when going into the park and how the City of
Dubuque is not held liable for these interactions. So, do we now tell park goers that use
picnic blankets on the ground that they need to be on -call? That it is possible to lay in
poo while laying on a greenspace in a park? If they are bitten, bothered or attacked do
we tell them that there is no remedy towards the City and Park and Recreation
Commission or anyone who is involved in installing the mechanism to keep dangerous
dogs out of Eagle Point Park? Apply that to every park now that dogs are not allowed.
Do children and senior citizens who walk along the bluff at Eagle point Park have the
same right to the sidewalk as leashed pets do? The ordinance mentions nothing about
the human right of way. Human rights are not said to be greater than animal right in
every instance. Are any consideration made for Eagle Point Park, Murphy Park or Flora
Park for people who want to be free in our parks from urination and defecation and with
no mechanism for enforcing. When the first altercation happens between a human and
a human with a dog, do dogs have equal rights like humans do? When the first child is
bit in the face (yes attacks do happen), will the family of that child have to sign over
paperwork going into a park with the sign, Enter at your own risk. Is that what we are
going to give the citizens of Dubuque? Dogs have their own parks. Tourism is number
one in the Dubuque industry. It is an AII-American City without letting animals into our
park. Miami Beach is an attraction but they do not take animals to the beach but what
attracts people to the beach is not allowing pets on the beach. Alternatives — Rework
the proposed ordinance and do not rush the city. Address the biohazard with urine and
feces. Propose a fee for service operation and have to pay for signage and staff
training. Allow certain parks for animals. Allows no break in period. Irresponsible pet
owners will have issues and not others. Pets not allowed does not mean bad park. It is
a pet -friendly community without having pets in every park. We are an AII-American city
without having pets in our parks. Current ordinance does not respect quality life of
people who are anti cats/dogs. Enter at your own risk. Thank you for your time.
Kristin Woodward
2319 Manson Road
Yes — in favor. Husband Steve and I have dogs and cats. Here to represent Two By
Two character development program has been providing education for over 15 years to
every second grader — children need to learn to be kind, respect, and empathic to
people, animals and the environment. Tonight, we are discussing to become a Pet -
Friendly Community. The Two By Two Board of Directors are willing to promote the
education and is currently working with Robin MacFarlane with the Be AWARE
campaign. Two By Two is interested in co -branding signage in the parks to promote
responsible pet owners.
Bob Fritsch
1264 Mount Loretta Ave
No — against. Park Division Manager previously. Refers to Arts (Art Galloon) references.
Keeping pets out of our parks has worked well in the past and it should not be changed.
There should be accommodation made for pets. I am a pet owner and I do well for
taking care of my pet. When I came back from New Zealand — the best thing living there
was what it lacked. It was not overrun by complex relationships like we are talking about
getting into here. Neighborhood parks service people first. You change the space by
adding pets into parks. After being a Park Manager I know that once you add pets in
parks that it no longer is a space for people. Once you add pets you cannot change
that.
Kim Daykin
275 Southgate Drive
No — against. Dog owner and lived in Dubuque all my life. Near EPP and not a different
area. As a dog owner, do not put this ordinance into place. People are not responsible
for their pets. Dogs are attacking other dogs. I rescued a dog from the humane society
and even with training some dogs still attack. I walked in multiple areas. Except for the
city streets pets were not on leashes but my dog was attacked. All dogs are not perfect
and there needs to be a few places where we can walk without dogs. At Heritage trail
my grandchild is not scared. I am no longer going to the Farmer's Market because the
last time that I went, a two -year -old was circled around scared by three dogs. This is
what we are dealing when we allow dogs around people. Dogs are a part of family, but
they are still animals and they act like animals. Please consider everything. I hope you
vote no.
Jess Ochoa
1970 Hale Street
No — against. I know Dubuque parks. Boseman, Montana is where I came from.
Environmental lovers and love their dogs. The park I would regularly walk through was a
dog friendly park. So, I am living in a city where people love the environment, but people
are not picking up after their dogs. I was an AmeriCorps member and we chose one
park to pick up dog poo and we picked up over 200 pounds of poo. Lima, Peru the only
place to take the pets is parks because they are not allowed anywhere else. There are a
lot of trash cans for dog poo. It is simple to pick up dog poo. My children can only play in
areas that is fenced off where the playground equipment is. You cannot go to the park
and lay on the ground because of poo and urine. This is my own personal experience. I
want to ask, have I ever been to a city where dogs are allowed in parks? Do I want our
parks to be like that?
Marianne Kirendahl
1215 Valentine
Yes — for. I am a veterinarian. My job is human and animal bond. Dogs are an
opportunity to expand our network. In the age of isolation dogs provide us with social
opportunities. We can connect with our neighbors. People with dogs are more likely to
expand their social networks and their neighbors. Build a lot of social capital, improve
overall dynamics. There have been concerns with bites and cleaning up after their pets.
Look at the other places that allow people to have pets in parks. Dubuque is the only
large city in Iowa in which you cannot walk your dogs in parks. Even Central park in
New York City you can even walk your pets in the park. People from other city are
confused as to why they cannot walk their pets in our parks. Tourism is huge in
Dubuque with river and pets on leashes can be walked and we need to protect these
areas but it's one of the few places you can walk your pets. The law was set back in
1969 and since then we need to look at the surrounding communities and be part of the
vibrant community. All family members matter. Mentioned history with the law.
Jan Zivojnovich
1600 Amelia Circle
Yes — for. I walk my dog with my child practically every day, I was just down at AY
McDonald and I walked around with my doggie bag and I am down there summer and
winter. Most people are walking their dogs. It is a great way to get exercise. I am down
there a lot probably at least 3-4 times per week year around and I have seen people are
very responsible pet owners and they pick up after their dogs and if you happen to see
someone without a leash on their dog, the responsible owners tell them to put a leash
on the dogs. I would like to walk in Eagle Point Park, and it is in our neighborhood and I
do not want to drive out to the Mines of Spain. There is a trail. It is good exercise. There
is not a problem. I was here a few years ago saying the same things as well. I was glad
they got AY back. There is nothing wrong with that.
Benjamin Carryer
450 Alpine Street
Yes — in favor. It is ridiculous that dogs are not allowed in public spaces. It is foolish not
to allow dogs in parks. We pay taxes. I hear a lot of irrelevant and irrational fears. If
people are not taking care of their pets that should not affect the ordinance. All this
current ordinance does is punish people who are responsible.
Nan Welch
729 Brookview Square
Yes — in favor. I am thinking about history of dogs in my own life. My dog spent time in
the basement as a child. My mother did not care for him. He did not get out of the
basement much. Until my dad would come home from work. As an adult I now put my
dog first before my family. I would not have taken my childhood dog to the park because
she would have been scared to death but now with the times I would. With the
millennials I would now. They showed what a furry member can be. It's now for my
children and their pets. We would like the chance to walk through parks in Dubuque with
my dog and entire family. Robin with her education will come through to help educate
the citizens of Dubuque, I work for Two by Two and the education with children will help
with that. There are the few people that would ruin it for everyone.
Kimberly Oberbroeckling
2152 Golden Eagle Drive
Yes — in favor. I have been a Dubuquer all my life. No one understands why animals
were banned from parks in1969. Likely no leash laws and we have leash laws now. I
have family in Davenport, Ames, no one has had issues with dogs in parks. 2014 Cedar
Rapids was named All American City. 100% compliance is ridiculous. There are traffic
laws and 100% does not agree but cars are not banned. I grew up in Eagle Point Park
area and I would love to take my dog there. When my extended family comes back, all
my family members cannot attend because pets are not allowed in parks. I would like to
see the ban lifted. Saying there is going to be bites and attacks is fear mongering. We
have had pets and parks that are pet friendly (5 years ago) and I have not heard about
wide spread issues with dog feces bites and attacks so I would like to see the ordinance
pass and allow dogs in the rest of the City parks. Does not seem to be a problem. Some
of the areas that they are allow in now are not accessible so it would be nice to have
neighborhood parks accessible for those people.
Robin MacFarlane
1640 Aspen Meadow Court
Yes — in favor. I did not have intention on coming up but since my name was mentioned
I figured I would step up for the benefit of the audience. This is an economic piece. I
notice some hesitation that 62% majority of pet owners are millennials. Not being able
to have pets in parks is crazy. I have been east to west and dogs are allowed in the
parks. Dubuque is behind the times. We are used to not having dogs in parks but the
fact that we are penalizing people that are responsible it is not right. Since I am a
responsible pet owner, it does not give me the chance to allow my dog in the park and
to clean up after him. I give what I can under my control. My Be Aware campaign and I
are both against irresponsible pet owners. Not having my old dog by my side sucks. I
agree with Mr. Kirkendall. Dog parks are not my thing. Quit punishing responsible
owners. I want to be able to go out in the public with my dog and not just go to dog
parks.
Cassie Bird
1561 Parkway Street
Yes — in favor. Want to start a family in Dubuque and it is not pet friendly. When my
parents bring the dogs, we are limited on where to go due to not being able to have pet
friendly. We do not have an area for the dog to properly exercise. For my generation,
we give dogs the right treatment and it is beneficial for own health. It is a huge decision
for people my age on whether or not they want to stay in Dubuque once they graduate
college. In order to make that happen, young professionals need to be able to go to the
parks with their dogs.
Kenda Summers
514 Woodland Court
Yes — for. I have a goldendoodle dog and I frequently take him to parks that allows pets
in them currently. I walk Bergfeld quite often. I have never been fearful of a dog
attacking me. When I go to Bergfeld pond it is geese feces. And no one seems to be
alarmed by geese or geese feces. I think there is a real danger in not being open to
change. The world is in constant change. There is a worry about people being stagnant.
Joshua Bird
1561 Parkway Street
Yes — for. I come to attend Loras College. My parents have a dog and it's their 3rd child.
It is tough when my parents visit because they have animals. My mother struggles with
walking so taking my mother and dog to Mines of Spain is a struggle. It would be
beneficial to leisurely walk. Not being able to bring others is not okay.
Nancy Bradley
2380 Clarke Crest Drive
Yes — in favor. In favor of an additional dog park as well. I live near the one on
Grandview currently. I have lived in Dubuque most of my life. A whole lot of smart men
and woman have brought us from a dark time. We want to be a vibrant, alive and
attractive community. We are not a pet friendly community and we know that. Thanks to
you, we have the opportunity to move forward. I thank you for the opportunity and
consideration.
Judy Greene
980 Davis Street
No — against. I do a lot of walking and riding my bike in the parks. I go to parks where
pets are not allowed. I have been on bike ride where animals have attacked. I walk in
cemetery because dogs are not allowed in there and no feces. I would not be able to
walk in any of the parks if this is passed. I have a lot of elderly people in family and dogs
have taken them out. So, if a dog charges to a kid who is going to pay the lawyer fee
and pay the bills? Is the City liable? Will there be a sign that says enter at your own
risk? If we enter at our own risk and something were to happen, I would sue the City.
Keep that in mind I love dogs and people but there are certain places for dogs and
certain places for people. I would not be able to go to the places if animals were
allowed. Elderly community would not able to go. Responsible pet owners I love them to
death — I walk down Windsor and they do not pick up after themselves. It's disgusting
and gross.
Marissa Joer
Grace Street
Yes — in favor. Moved to go to University of Dubuque and why I chose to stay here is
because of how far the city has come so far in the past five years. Has to appeal to the
younger generations. 67% of households have dogs. 80% of Millennials want to live in
cities where animals are welcomed. In proposed ordinance not all direct places so
people who do not want to be around animals will still have those options to go to. This
is not making it so every place allows pets. Children playgrounds will not allow pets
around them. Dubuque is the only major park that does not allow pets in parks.
Establish families and homes. Dubuque wants to attract these people but in order to do
some this would only be a step in the right direction. But clearly if most cities allow pets
in parks it outweighs any negatives. I am in favor of the ordinance.
Lisa Johnson
206 Southgate Drive
Yes - in favor. One step forward towards making Dubuque a more pet friendly
community.
Pat Galliart
1300 Tomahawk Drive
Yes - in favor. Thank you for your consideration.
Chuck Harris
Just a question - Does Eagle Point Park currently sit on Historic Places?
Sherry Moore
Dickeyville Wisconsin
Yes — In favor. Come at that standpoint from a tourism standpoint. If you compare to a
lot of other cities, we have a unique opportunity from a historic standpoint to make this
change and allow pets in parks. I am a responsible dog owner. We travel a lot. Choose
our travel points based on pet friendly. 90-billion-dollar industry and in the next over 5
years 100 billion dollar industry and economically good standpoint and I do feel as
though it is a loss for the city of Dubuque.
Lyle Galliart
1300 Tomahawk Drive
Yes — in favor. I think I am a boomer and it would be good for future generations. We
recognize that it would be a good thing for the community.
Gerry Welch
720 Brookview Square
Yes — in favor. Golden Lab not disturbed by the animals but by the people and the mess
that they leave. My wife says let's go to Swiss Valley, but I am afraid that we will get
mugged. I currently live two blocks from Valentine Park and I am unable to take my dog
there. Allowing pets in parks is social aspect that is needed. My family has yet to go to
the park because dogs are not allowed to go.
AJOURNMENT:
It was moved by Kennicker, seconded by Tigges to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m.
Unanimous.
Parks and Recreation Proposed Pets in Parks Ordinance Change Survey Results
(Surveys — online and paper — was available from January 2-17t", 2020)
Are you in favor of the proposed ordinance change?
L
■ Yes, I agree with the proposed ordinance change. (402)
Yes, however I would recommend changes to the proposed ordinance. (68)
■ No, I disagree with the proposed ordinance change. (133)
■ I am indifferent. (4)
1
Yes, I agree with the proposed ordinance change.
66%
402
Yes, however I would recommend changes to the proposed ordinance.
11%
68
No, I disagree with the proposed ordinance change.
22%
133
I am indifferent.
1%
4
TOTAL
100%
607
Parks and Recreation Proposed Pets in Parks Ordinance Change Survey Comments Results
(Surveys — online and paper — was available from January 2-17th, 2020)
Response options:
I am indifferent
No, I disagree with the proposed ordinance change
Yes, however I would recommend changes to the proposed ordinance
Yes, I agree with the proposed ordinance change
Comment Categories
All Parks
Allergies
Allow
Anxiety/fear
Currant
Eagle Point
Enforcement
Farmer's Market
Nuisance
Pet Parks
Safety
Waste
With restrictions
Comments from Citizens who responded "I am indifferent to the proposed
ordinance change" (4)
All Parks
- I stand up for everyone should have their pets at any parks there's no reason not to have it!! Dubuque community
needs to be pet friendly at all park!!! Davenport Iowa is all pet friendly at all of there parks!!
Allergies and also commented on Nuisance
- I don't like dogs, they bark. I am allergic to cats.
Enforcement and also commented on Anxiety/fear
1
- I'm somewhat skeptical of the ability to enforce provisions like keeping dogs on leash and picking up waste - who will
be able to do that all across the city? My three -year -old daughter is scared of big dogs, and I would hate for her
enjoyment of going to the park to be affected by irresponsible dog owners.
Comments from Citizens who responded "No, I disagree with the proposed
ordinance change." (122)
Allergies
- Our grandson is EXTREMELY allergic to dogs. Contact with a dog could send him to the emergency room.
- My grandchild is severely allergic to dogs
Allow
- Part B: Pets on leash should be allowed in city parks it helps build good neighborhoods.
Anxiety/fear and also commented on Waste, Enforcement, Pet Parks
-The parks are intended for people, mostly children, and many of which have a fear of animals. Whether it's
unfamiliarity or a previous traumatic event, it's unfair to ask community members to deal with the potential distress of
dealing with the presence of dogs in a place that is intended to be a safe, outdoor place to enjoy ourselves. It's
Particularly unfair to to ask our children to have to deal with these fears
- I am a pet owner, but I do not want pets in our parks. I have young children, and one of my kids is afraid of dogs,
especially big dogs. If dogs were allowed in parks, we would not be able to enjoy them as we do now. Some pet owners
would be responsible and keep their dogs on leashes, and pick up after them, but others would not. Even dogs on
leashes, especially big dogs, can create a tension in the park for some people. Please consider adding more dog parks
instead. Thank you.
- I myself am afraid of animals NOT on leashes. I feel we need to make everyone feel safe. We have enough violence in
this city and why try add to this.
- My son is afraid of dogs. If almost all parks are going to allow dogs, he won't want to go or will want to leave as soon as
he sees a dog.
- Are dogs more important than the children that have anxiety over them??? Parks are for kids, families, not dogs.
Believe it or not, there are many, many kids afraid of dogs. Dog owners have showing us to be irresponsible. My
granddaughters already don't go to Bergfeld because of the unleashed dogs and all the feces. The taxpayers and kids
should not be afraid to go to a park to worry about getting bitten or stepping on dog poop. Have you seen all the dog
poop around Bergfeld park? Have you seen the amount of dogs that are no on leases around Bergfeld? I have and it is
2
a fact. Dog owners have already proven to be they are not capable of following the rules. Dog bites will happen, dog
poop will be everywhere. Please use your common sense. Again, let me ask, are dogs more important than the children
that have anxiety over them? Thanks for your service.
- I think there should be some parks where pets are not allowed for the sake of people with animal allergies and so
parents can let their children play and not have to worry about pet owners not following the rules or having animals get
too close. This is very traumatic for children who have a fear of animals. And lets be honest, lots of dog owners don't
pick up waste and you shouldn't have to watch every step you take.
I have a very friendly dog. But I do not think they should be allowed in parks. To many irresponsible people. To many
people children who are,afraid of them
- Parks should be a place where children and families can run free and play on the equipment without animals or their
waste. Some children (and adults) are extremely afraid of dogs, leashed or not. Also, even though the dog feces are
supposed to picked up, the dog urination still lingers in the grass where children may come in contact with it as they play
or walk through it.
- My son with Down syndrome is very afraid of dogs (actually all animals) even after we have tried to train him
otherwise. He screams and runs from even our neighbors' very nice dogs and won't go near our nice house cat. I would
not be able to stop at a park with him if dogs were present or would need to leave if any showed up. That would be a
bummer and a bit unfair. I'm wondering if this is the case with just him, or many disabilities such as autism? Can this be
researched first?
- If all pet owners actually kept their pets on a leash and restrained, maybe I would agree to them in some parks, but not
the majority. There are many people of all ages who have a fear of dogs. They should not be restricted from the use of
the parks when they are placed in fear. Also, I do not want to be concerned with owners not picking up after their pets.
Current Ordinance is Sufficient and also commented on Eagle Point, Waste, With
restrictions, Enforcement, Safety
- I do not want the city to allow pets in any more public parks.
- The current restrictions and allowances for animals in parks is sufficient
- Dogs have enough places that accept them.if If you allow changes, please keep Eagle Point as a No Pets allowed area.
- Dog are fine at places like Heritage Trail etc. I personally do not want dogs in parks where people picnic. Some dog
owners pick up after their pets and some do not. Perhaps parks could have designated dog areas.
- No animals in the parks,leashes or unleashed.
- I am fine with leashed pets on trails and open spaces. I'm not sure what a parkway is. I am opposed to pets, leashed or
otherwise, in parks. Enforcement of leash usage and removal of pet waste will be difficult. It is also a waste of park
patrol/DNR personnel's time. Furthermore, parks are where many people gather and it will be likely that pet owner's will
not be supervising their pet as closely as they would when walking them on a trail or in an open space. This increases the
opportunity for kids to walk into pet waste or approach an animal that may not respond well to children.
- No. DOGS in the parks . The city needs to Stop this issue now
- No dogs in the park!
3
- I believe the ordinance is fine like it is with dogs not being allowed in the parks. It isn't so much that I have a problem
with the dogs, it's more the problem with their owners not training them. They allow the dogs to sniff, smell, and jump
on you without caring at all.
- I want to keep the parks dog and cat free. We have a dog park and I personally walk on the trail behind Kerper where
dogs are allowed many times I have almost stepped in crap left behind by furry little friends no offense but it is not a
good time cleaning off your shoes or wondering if this dog is going to growl or snap at you. If you ask people that have
been bitten by dogs I would be willing to bet most owners will tell you that there dog has never bitten anyone before.
Parks are for the residents to enjoy the beauty. Please take this to heart not everyone enjoys your dog. To each there
own but let me enjoy the city parks. Thank you
Eagle Point and also commented on Waste & Farmer's Market
- Eagle Point Park is a jewel. Eagle Point Park should be a park for the people. It is used for concerts, where people sit on
the grass, there is a children's wading pool, there is a fish pond and multiple play ground areas. How would you keep
dogs out of these people areas? It should be kept as a preservation for these uses. Please do not take this beautiful
park away from the people who currently enjoy it without the fear of dogs and there messes.
- I am absolutely opposed to all pets in Eagle Point Park. I am concerned because there are dog owners who continue to
refuse to follow the rules throughout the city. I do not trust enforcement of rules would happen or be possible.
- Allowing animals within city parks, most especially Eagle Point Park, will drastically alter the character and environment
of these public spaces. Children (and adults) should be free to roam and explore these parks without concern that they
will encounter others' pets (and waste). Even if an owner follows the regulations, barking dogs create a noisy, chaotic,
and potentially frightening environment that diminishes others' enjoyment of these public spaces and can further
disrupt natural wildlife including bird species. As a lifelong Point resident, I am deeply concerned that allowing pets
will forever alter the peaceful nature of Eagle Point Park, which is already on the National Register of Historic Places.
Countless individuals seek out the tranquility "the Park" (as Point residents refer to it) provides. Many of our fondest
family memories include the Park. Visits to the Park calmed my late sister as she endured the final stages of dementia
and I so enjoy taking my grandchildren there now. A small minority of vocal pet owners has persisted in this pursuit
without consideration of the impact to the rest of the community. I love animals and have owned many throughout my
lifetime. I never once felt I had the right to bring my pets with me wherever I pleased. There is a time and place for all
things. In this case, simply increase the city space allocated for pet parks. That way, all who choose to gather in those
spaces choose to be in the presence of pets and voluntarily accept the resulting environment. This is analogous to
creating skate parks or other areas designated for specific activities that would otherwise be inappropriate for general -
use public recreation spaces. On a final note, the much -cited survey included in the August 5, 2019 assessment involved
only 615 individuals — that is, approximately 1.4% of the adult population of Dubuque responded to this survey. Such a
limited survey cannot be used as the basis to make significant decisions regarding the city's public spaces. Please do not
pass this proposed ordinance. At the very least, please exclude Eagle Point Park.
- My spouse & I go to Eagle Point Park almost every day during operating season. We enjoy the tranquility, wildlife and
beauty of Eagle Point Park. Dogs aren't allowed, but this last summer a day didn't go by that a dog wasn't brought in to
the park. One dog didn't change the park, but what happens when we have 2 to 50 dogs? The park will not be the same
with dogs.
- I feel Eagle Point Park should remain pet free. There are enough parks for them to go to, it would be nice to have one
park that is free from pets. I also feel they should not be allowed at farmers market. Farmers Market is becoming a dog
show.
- Not in favor of letting dogs or cats in most city parks! Eagle Point park, Flora park and children's playgrounds should
not be included! I should have the right to use and enjoy the quietness and surrounding beauty of Eagle Point Park
4
without the concerns of barking, irresponsible pet owners not picking up after their pets! There are many irresponsible
adults that seem to own pets! I am concerned about children having fun at their playgrounds without the fear of being
bitten by a animal! Is the city prepared to accept some responsibility in incidents that may occur as they are allowing
animals to be interacting with people (children and adults) ? I would rather support a new pet park where pet owners
can take their pets and the owners can visit while the pets are confined ! Thanks for letting me voice my opinion!
- Eagle Point Park should not be allowed animals. I see people abusing the law all the time in that park. Too many kids
and they play in the grassy areas. MOST people really don't "pick up" if they can get away with not. Also, people need to
know that the fine is $750 if caught not picking up throughout the city.
- I don't mind pets in parks with the exception of Eagle Point park. Too many children's play areas and historic buildings
are here. Children should not have to be confronted by pets, or have pet urine in their play areas.
Enforcement and also commented on Eagle Point, Farmer's Market, Nuisance, Safety, Waste
- Although the proposed ordinance imposes regulations and fines, the reality is that there will be unleashed animals;
uncollected waste; and the inevitable animal bites.
- Pet owners that currently show up at parks in violation of the current ordinance often do not keep their pets on a leash
or pick up after their pets. If pet owners are unwilling to follow these rules prior to a change in ordinance, what makes
us think that they will change once numerous pets are present in the parks? At the very least I would change the
ordinance to exclude Eagle Point, Flora, and Murphy park from the list of parks that allow pets.
- I have seen first-hand too may people violating the leash law. I have never heard of the police citing anyone for not
having a dog on a leash....why?. Dog owners claim their dog doesn't bite. They have no way of knowing that, and even
with that reassurance, I would never risk being near an unleashed dog. Even one dog bite is too many. Also not every
dog owner is going to pick up after their dog. Dogs are being given too many privileges. I understand people's love for
their dogs, but dogs are not people.
- The city parks are for families and children. The addition of cats and dogs to the area is a detriment to the activity of
the kids in our parks. I have yet to see a dog on a leash - and how do you leash a cat? I understand there are some
animal owners that take care of their pets, BUT most just let them run and do NOT pick up after them. I wish it were
different, but that is what I see. The kids are way more important than the pets.
- I am an animal lover. However it is the owners who are the problem. We have a more restrictive ordinance now which
is already not being followed. People do not use common sense in how they interact with their pets. I understand pets
are like family members but many people forget that they are animals with instincts and behaviors that we cannot
always control. I often walk in areas where pets need to be leashed, often they are not, and when I turn in the license
plate number of the owner,it doesn't seem to deter the behavior. Dubuque is already welcoming to all people and
animals. That doesn't mean pets have to be in public places. To think that you will impound animals when the ordinance
is not followed is ridiculous. You will only be able to follow through on that after injury or damage is done and if owner
can be identified.
- These comments are private. I do not give my permission to have these printed or read publicly except on an
anonymous basis. Not everyone is a dog or cat person. We HAVE a dog park. I see people in the city regularly with
pets off leash. People don't follow rules in our neighborhoods. What makes us think people will pick up after their
animals in the park? Are we going to put on an enforcement officer to check dog licenses, vaccination records and
"poo" pick up patrol? Obviously, the powers that be won't be happy until this is forced upon us. At the VERY least,
leave more parks as PET FREE zones for those of us who don't wish to step in something or be sniffed and jumped on.
- I live across from Allison -Henderson Park for the last 40 years. We had a NO pets in the park sign on the light post
across from my house. It is gone! Every week people drive up to this park, get out of their cars and let their dogs out to
5
run on the kids play ground. Some play catch with their dogs others just let them out to run. No leashes, NO picking up
after their pets, NO control of the animals out in the play areas. I do not see them changing with or without your change
in the city laws. Like your rules about not putting down chemicals on the parks grounds do NOT allow the dogs and their
waste to be on the same ground the kids play on. Please vote no and just build more dog parks for the dogs. Let the
kids have their parks also with out animal waste.
- The current pet restrictions are not being obeyed nor enforced. I've witnessed daily (AM and PM) over the past 10
years, pet owners curbing, walking, or otherwise letting run free their dogs in Jackson, Madison and Eagle Point parks;
where it's clearly posted "No Pets Allowed". All it takes is one pet nipping, biting or merely scaring a person/child for
the city to be neck deep in defending an ordinance that just isn't prudent. Build a pet park in an undeveloped or
industrial area. There are reasons a majority of the the community doesn't own pets: hear us screaming into the
wilderness.
- As a dog owner, I have firsthand experience with the reality that pet owners are not all responsible, law abiding
citizens. On our strolls, we see the waste that is left behind and when walking at the farmers market, I experience the
aggressive dogs on leashes. Seriously....who is going to police this? I want my tax dollars going towards the park police
being more attentive to potential criminal and unruly behavior in the parks, rather than monitoring if someone picked
up their dog poop. Also, animals get into fights which can then escalate into their owners having confrontations. Not to
mention the liability if a child is bitten/attacked while in a city park. Regarding the scenery and the beauty of the parks -
Eagle Point Park is a beautiful park and families can enjoy their time at the park without worrying about if they/their
children are going to step in animal feces. It should be a "waste free" "pet free" zone a safe haven. This is just
another opportunity for a lawsuit if you ask me. I feel that the City is just increasing its liability if they were to open this
can of worms. You can't convince me someone is not going to relocate to Dubuque because it doesn't have "pet
friendly" parks. Keep our parks beautiful and safe. Park police and other staff need to be doing what they were hired
for...keeping the parks safe for all persons to enjoy.
- Not every one in Dubuque is comfortable being around dogs or cats. Yes they are supposed to be leashed, but there
will be exceptions to the rule. Who is going to patrol this issue along with waste not being properly removed? Who is
going to be liable if a unleashed animal attacks someone?
- I oppose this change. The inclusion of dogs in parks brings the potential of injuries from aggressive dogs, defecation,
and incessant barking. People often go to the park for peace, enjoyment, and to 'get away' from the urban setting
(without having to travel to a rural area). Allowing dogs will ruin this. People are forgetting that dogs will bark. A lot.
Dogs will get loose from leashes. Dogs will be aggressive towards other dogs. Someone will be bitten and the owner
will say the famous last words of, "He's never done that before". Having this rule is no better than loading a gun and
hoping it won't go off. Eventually, something will happen. Parks are for PEOPLE, and honestly, people cause enough
trouble themselves. Adding K-9 ingredient to this mix is a terrible idea and not for the greater good. This rules only
appeases dog owners and is not written with the spirit or intent of being good -for -all.
- I'm strongly opposed. We at least need to exclude more parks from allowing animals - ie have some pet free parks or
pet free zones within parks. I absolutely do not trust people to keep animals on leashes. It will not be enforced. I am very
much looking forward to taking my son (currently an infant) to the parks and I should not have to worry about animal
attacks or feces.
- Dogs are just everywhere and that isn't necessarily a bad thing but we need to remember they are dogs, not people.
The restrictions listed are good ones but generally won't be enforced because they won't be seen by those who could
enforce them. Children can be lured by someone with a dog to go with them and parks should be a safety zone for kids.
I've witnessed dogs behavior at Farmers Market and the lack of control some people have for their pets. Dogs in parks
would probably be similar. Thank you
6
- I strongly disagree about having pets in all our parks. You can educate pet owners all you want, and you are still going
to have inconsiderate people out there. There is no way you can enorce any of the rules. A perfect example is Farmers
Market. Not everyone likes dogs and some people have allergies. We can still be a pet -friendly community without
letting animals control my quality of life. You can have the most well behaved animal and a good responsible owner but
all it takes is once. They shouldn't be allowed in all apartments either. What if I have a cat? I should be able to bring her
to the park also without the fear of having a confrontation. Maybe having one or two small parks that animals are
allowed might be allowed for a trial period but that is it. There are too many ifs involved and too many things that could
happen. I like animals also, but i do not agree at all that they should be allowed at parks on a leash or not.
- Maybe I'm not aware of increased funding to pay for more park staff, but without that I'm concerned about
enforcement. I know several people who are dealthy afraid of dogs and would no go to parks if they were allowed and
too many don't pick up their dog's waste/ I'm an animal lover, but don't think our pets need to go everywhere with us.
Farmer's Market and also commented on Waste, Safety
- dogs at Farmer market equal congestion, not child freindly/safe & dog poop not being picked up by ALL!! dogs already
in parks & owners not obeying ordnances. Owners not all licensed for their dogs. picking up feces does not get it ALL, no
picnics on the blanket, no leaning/setting by trees, listening to barking, no going barefoot, afraid for small children
getting bit or scared. Ecoli & not all feces are solid. yuck for picnics and lawn games with dogs. How about parks for
people. Already plenty of places for dogs at breweries, restaurants sidewalks & every green space along streets & curbs
plus Farmers Market. Pin worms, hook worms, tape worms are in pet feces, also.
- Dubuque is oing to the dogs! 1. More attention is paid to having dogs/cats in the parks, etc. than is paid to the rights
of citizens to be able to enjoy an environment free of animals. I can no longer go to the farmers market because of all
the large dogs that monopolize the sidewalks. (I am afraid of large dogs and also afraid of tripping on their leashes or
the dogs themselves.) 2. Despite the claims made by pet owners, the majority do not pick up after their dogs. I have
walked the Riverwalk and cannot enjoy the scenery because I have to constantly be aware of where I am walking. Even
in my own neighborhood, I find piles of dog shit in my yard and on my sidewalk (3 times in the last two weeks). 3. Even
dogs on leashes can easily trip an elderly person or a child, or bite them. There are plenty of places for pets now. Don't
add any more, which would take away the rights of the citizens, and especially the elderly, who do not care to be around
animals.
Nuisance and also commented on Farmer's Market, Waste
- Not everyone is a dog lover. I don't want animals on leashes ( or not) sniffing at my legs , barking, jumping at me or my
grandchildren. And of course, dog poop. I stopped going to farmers market because of dogs being allowed in crowded,
food areas.
- Parks are for families and kids.I haven't enjoyed my backyard in 5 years cause of barking dogs.
- I don't care for dogs coming up to me when I am out walking.
- I live across from comiskey park there enough noise and traffice there that I can here in my house do not need any
more comotion in that area with dogs and cates they need to build of couple more pakrs from the owners to take there
animals to if not they can build a fence around there house.
- People enjoying the parks should not have to put up with the barking, running of pets, pet waste etc. while in the park.
If they are like me I get enough of it in my own neighborhood and other public places.
7
Pet Parks and also commented on Enforcement, Nuisance, Safety, Waste
- I appreciate those that love their pets, and I support the development of designated parks specific to pets, clearly
defined spaces that meet the needs of all community members by keeping these spaces separate.
- Parks are for people. Pet Parks are for animals and people that like or tolerate other people's animals. Please keep the
2 types of parks separate.
- I disagree with the proposed ordinance because owning a pet is an individual or family decision and responsibility. It is
not a community responsibility to provide for or accommodate the needs of pets and their owners. People who choose
not to own a pet do not wish to meet up with other peoples' pets in public places for many reasons. Children and adults
walk, run, and play in areas other than designated areas, trails, and playgrounds. Pet owners are not always watching
the behavior of their animals nor consistent in cleaning up pet waste.
- Pet owners have their own dog parks now. The rest of the parks should not need to be shared with pets. When
picnicking in a city park that my tax dollars pay for, I shouldn't have to worry about being bitten by or having to deal with
pet waste.
- The parks that the dogs are in currently are plenty eanough. Kids play and run in parks we don't need excited dogs
running after them. Some owners will push the limit and have them off their leases. Not everyone is a dog lover. I think
dog parks are the answer not all over our parks!
- I like dogs, but do not feel they need to be in every park. There should be one or two parks where they are allowed
and the rest should remain off limits. Most owners clean up after their dogs do their business, but many do not. The
park rangers should check to make sure registration and vacciation records are up-to-date. Its hard to walk on the
sidewalks with dogs even when they are on a lease and loud noise generated when they encounter other dogs or cats.
- Name one or two. parks and the rest are off limits. Dog owners should also have proof with them that the dog or cat is
registered and that there shots are up-to-date
- We already have a dog park. Why does every park need to be a dog park?
- The city needs two more dog parks: One downtown, perhaps at Mauss Park, and the other on the West End. We don't
need dogs in public parks. The majority are penalized by the few who don't pick up their dogs' droppings.
- There is a dog park that is fine for their use. People will have pets unsupervised and will not pick up after them. I am a
dog lover but not everyone is so people should be able to enjoy themselves.
Safety and also commented on Allergies, Enforcement, Pet Parks, Nuisance, Waste, With
restrictions
- I do not feel safe around dogs, even when they are on leashes. Every one of my family members have been bitten by
dogs, both running loose and on leashes. I also have been chased while riding my bike and have had to stop and walk
my bike even with dogs on leashes. My experience is that dog owners will not keep there dogs on leashes and will not
pick up after them. If the dogs are allowed in all parks, the parks will simply become dog parks and there will be no
parks for people who are afraid or allergic to dogs. Very sad!!!
- I wish to enjoy the parks and not worry about stepping in dog excrement or fearing encountering an unrestrained or
unvaccinated dog. Irresponsible dog owners ruin it for all.
- Please keep pets out of all parks. They can bite or threaten build another dog park rather than allow them in parks
with families.
8
- Years ago I saw a child bitten in Allison Henderson park by someone who illegally brought their dog to the park on a
leash. The child was not only injured and bleeding but also traumatized. Luckily the dog owner did stay until the police
office arrived. I am very concerned about allowing dogs into parks and interacting with children. You do not know how
children will treat an animal or how any animal will respond.
- I want to enjoy the parks and trails without concern of attacks or droppings. Current restrictions are not adhered to, so
loosening of those restrictions would not seem to be a logical change.
- Anecdotal or not, I have been accosted by two different dogs, off leashes, at public parks in my time in Dubuque.
There are already dogowners whom fail to follow existing ordinances. To allow more lenient ordinances regarding pets
in parks, the owners will become more defiant. Keep the pets in pet parks and people in other parks.
- This is just setting the City of Dubuque up for more lawsuits. It will be only a matter of time before someone gets bit.
- It is possible for dogs to break their leash or get loose from the control of their owner. My infant son was viciously
attacked by a Golden Retriever and nearly lost his ear after the dog broke free from the owner. The only failsafe way to
ensure 100% safety for our children is to restrict dogs in public spaces.
- I walk a lot in the city and in places like the Mines of Spain, Swiss Valley. Almost every walk I take dogs are off the leash
and bounding toward me. Dog poop is everywhere even in my private gardens, where I never invite dogs.
Waste and also commented on Anxiety/fear, Eagle Point, Farmer's Market, Nuisance, Safety,
With restrictions
- I oppose the ordinance proposal to allow pets in the majority of city parks in Dubuque, Iowa. Animals and the contents
of their fecal material and urine and subsequent potential exposure to humans is hazardous. Consequently, I
recommend rejection of a proposed ordinance change.
- The park does not have the resources and man power to clean up the messes. The liability when someone is bit or
mauled will be with the City.
- 1. Past experience dog waste has not been cleaned up as it should. 2. Someone is going to get bitten. 3. The city
already has a dog park. 4. People should have a park without dogs. 5. With food around it is just inviting a disaster. 6.
Costly to monitor each and every dog. 7. It will be a additional expense to the city. 8. Will need additional animal
control personal.
- Who turns in violations of pet owners not cleaning up the manure?? Do the the City Parks Lawn cutters pick up the
manure and report a violation? I volunteer at St. Patrick Church at 1425 Iowa Street. Many times I have picked up dog
manure from the church lawn and even on the sidewalks on Iowa Street. I put down Pepper powder to help deter the
problem. Too many irresponsible dog owners. City officials even estimate many dogs and cats are not even licensed.
Many owners have too long have a leash on the dog.
- I habe been in parks where dogs are no allowed and have "discovered" pet waste not picked up. I also believe that
Murphy,Flora and Eagle Point Park should be pet free.
- There are way to many people that dont pick up after their dogs. With dogs being allowed at these parks I would no
longer he able to let my kids run around in the grass for fear of finding dog poop and eating it. If you want to put up
fences in most parks for dogs I would be fine with that.
9
- Pet waste is a hazard. Especially, for little children. Many people are afraid of animals even on a leash. They take up to
much space on trails and side walks. Plus barking is an issue in this town and hardly any tickets are issued for that. No.
No. No
- Owners do not pick up waste making health hazards and kids and adults tracking through poop
- I believe there are too many irresponsible pet owners that will prohibit families from enjoying the parks. In prohibit, I
mean: dogs off leashes, feces not picked up, children being bitten. Dog owners in this town have yet to learn to take a
bag with them as they walk along sidewalks. Parks are for our children. If a pet owner takes children to the park, they
should be watching them, not a pet.
- I don't believe people will consistently comply with leash and waste rules.
- I have seen over & over that pet owners do not pick up the poop at Swiss Valley Nature Center & other parks in the
county. Sure it won't be any different in the city. It's unfortunate there are always some that spoils it for others. Thank
you
-I am opposed to dogs and cats in any parks in Dubuque. Although Item E in the proposed Ordinance requires that the
owner pick up and dispose of the waste, I know from observing pets at Farmers Market, many owners don't bother to
do it. That creates a mess and health hazard for the park patrons as well as the lawn mower operators. Although the
Ordinance requires the pets to be leashed, it just takes a second for an animal to bite a child or adult. Item F requires
the owner to be responsible for the actions of the pet. This will necessitate manpower for the City to oversee and
prosecute.
- I feel pets do not belong in City parks. Our streets are littered with dog droppings and the parks will be the same from
irresponsible pet owners. How long will it be, before the first lawsuit from someone being attacked by a vicious animal?
- I walk almost every day and some dog owner has dropped a poop bag or there is poop on the sidewalk While most pet
owners are good it just takes one to ruin time in a park
- Too many people do not pick up after their pets. When the Winter Farmers Market was in the old Colts building we
were always stepping over dog excrement in the area between sidewalks and street. Just a few such uncaring pet
owners could leave behind smelly messy problems in our parks.
- I pick up dog droppings others leave behind on the lower river walk. Bags are provided, but, from the number of bags
of waste I pick up weekly I think most dog owners do not use them. How will that be different in a park setting? It won't.
- Alot of people don't clean up after their pets, Also i don't feel comfortable around dogs.
- If you want children playing in the park walking through dog piles, then this change is a good idea. Otherwise this is a
terrible idea. I go with the latter! Parks are for families and kids - NOT dogs. Too many dog owners are not responsible
- they do not keep their dogs under control, do not pick up after them, etc.
- This subject has come up often and once again I must respond. I do not think pets should be in public Parks meant for
families and children. Even if the pet owner was responsible, and this is often debatable, even if they pick up waste
there is residue to which little bare feet and hands can be exposed. Also, pet owners tend to unleash dogs the minute
they enter Eagle Point Park. Do you think this will improve when the NO PETS sign is removed? Not likely. Who polices it,
the non pet owners? I would like to keep parks free of scary running dogs. Thank you
- Absolutely ridiculous to allow pets on golf courses, and people allow their pets to poop on private property all the time
without picking it up, so why would we think they would follow rules on public property. This proposed ordinance goes
way too far and should be significantly scaled back.
10
- I walk my dog on the river walk often. There is quite a bit of dog excrement that is not picked up. It is in the grass, in
the mulched areas and even on the walkway sometimes. Quite a few people walk their dogs without a leash down there
also. There are too many irresponsible dog owners for pets to be allowed in parks.
- Let me first say I'm 55yrs. old and I am a pet lover . I've had dogs, cats and other animals my whole life and now have a
teddy bear dog. She is my husband and my baby. She goes with us a lot and loves to ride in my car but she doesn't sit on
my lap she sits in the seat next to me that's the rule . As for pets in parks I'm against it. I don't believe they should be
allowed where people are preparing and eating food. Who wants to be eating and see a dog going pee or taking a dump.
Yes some people clean up after but not all and you don't get rid of all the smell till it rains. It also not good to have the
dogs around play areas ,kids move fast and some dogs get skittish and can change behavior and bite leaving the pet
owner saying it's never done that before. Plus with older people dogs running around even on a leash can be very
dangerous. I'm not against pets just not in our beautiful parks they are for people. We have dog parks and lots of
sidewalks and places where you can take them now. So why in city parks? Sometimes just like our kids we have to say
no, you can't go.
- I think your pets should be left at home they don't need to be in our parks! People say they will clean up after them
but they don't!!
- I don't feel dogs in all city parks and trails is safe nor sanitary. I do not feel owners would clean up after dogs, just walk
along Grandview or Fremont Avenue, as they just let their pets do their business. If they happen to bag it, they often
leave the bag for others to throw away. Pet owners have not proven themselves responsible, why reward them with
more places to mess up.
- I walk the city trails daily. It's disguising the amouts of dog feces laying on the ground plus the huge number of dogs
that are running loose!!! Most dog owners are disrespectful and will carry this same mentality into our parks! Do not let
dogs in our parks!! Keep our kids safe!!
- Too many irresponsible dog owners. I don't want to step in poop or fear a mean dog. Not everyone likes dogs. There
are many dog parks.
- I can see having a few parks where dogs are allowed, but too many people do not pick up after their animals. Look at
the poor condition of the dog park --the people who actually use it don't help do anything to maintain it, such as picking
up after their dogs. I've also seen people breaking the current ban and not even using a leash by just letting their dog
run.
- Too many people do not pick up their animal's 'waste', and there is no way to enforce this. Walking on the dike is
disgusting with all the dog poop. The parks would end up the same way. If possible, I would also like something to be
done about the dogs at farmers market. Highly annoying to get wrapped up in someone's extra long leash while their
dog explores. Also highly annoying to push someone's huge dog away when they want to climb you, or stick there snout
up your crotch...
- Parks should be primarily for people to enjoy, even if they dislike or are allergic to pets. No new parks should be
opened for dogs or cats. Pet owners are not responsible and often do not pick up their dog's waste and sometimes
cannot (dogs get diarrhea and throw up, especially when they eat strange things). Also some people are afraid of dogs
and they are a potential public liability if they injure people. The city should not encourage this except in pet parks or
limited parks already open to dogs. Not neighborhood playground parks or Eagle Point Park.
- I would not want to see my Great Grandchildren having to dodge dog poop in the parks. And it WILL be there & for the
most part the people leaving it there will not be penalized even IF they are caught & charged. If they're found guilty &
fined they won't pay or ever pay. The only people that pay are property owners because there can be a lien put against
11
their property. And you can blow smoke & sugar coat it BUT you KNOW this is the way it is. Look at "Iowa Courts on
Line" & look at how much in fines some of these people owe. They're free loaders & it will never be paid.
- People wont clean up after them.
- I use heritage trail a lot. There is always a lot of dog droppings. Even on the trail itself! I just feel like the same thing
will happen at our parks. Little kids play there and they and their parents shouldn't have to worry about them getting
into that"stuff". I use the parks also.. and while I love dogs, a lot of their "parents" aren't responsible in that regard.
- They do not pick up the poop at the dog park, by the flood wall, and when walking on public streets. I have also
watched a man walking his dog throw the bag down a sewer hole in my neighborhood every time he walks his bagel so
why not just take it home to throw out.
- People get lazy and do not pick up after their pet and dangerous for children when unfamiliar animals in play areas.
Dogs have a place and add pleasure, but not in public parks.
- People get lazy and do not pick up after their pet and dangerous for children when unfamiliar animals in play areas.
Dogs have a place and add pleasure, but not in public parks.
- As someone that uses the river walk and A Y McDonald park on an almost daily basis, I am very much aware of the lack
of cleanup by pet owners. I will admit I am a dog lover and I enjoy interacting with the dogs and owners, most are
compliant with the rules but as with everything it only takes a few ro ruin it. As a pass holder to Eagle Point park and
frequient visitor to Flora I opppse the change, I feel there are enough options for exercising your pet in the city. I know
the cleanup rules are difficult to enforce and dont want my grandchilderen in that mess.
- While most dog owners are responsible there are some that ruin it for everyone. Don't clean up after and let them
run. Also I don't think dogs should be at Farmers Market. Please ban dogs from Farmers Market.
- Some people will not pick up waste. Even if the waste is picked up, parasites can still be present on the ground.
Children shouldn't be exposed to parasites just because they're playing in the grass.
- We are new to Dubuque and are daily walkers. Wherever we go, we see dog mess that hasn't been picked up. This
includes our neighborhood, parks, riverwalk area and neighborhood. Sadly, many do not know what a trash can is for
either. Eat and toss the trash, construction activity and throw the trash in the street, drink and throw the trash on the
sidewalk, visit a store and trash all over the parking lot, drive down Hwy 20, NW arterial, etc and trash along the side of
the road. There are some that would pick up after their dogs but many that won't. I understand this is a difficult issue to
resolve and seems the negligent make it more difficult for those that pick up after their dogs to have what they desire.
- I do not believe that pets should be allowed in the public parks for children and young adults. I have to sidestep
landmines on my way to Allison Henderson Park when I'm walking there with my children, so I can only imagine what
kind of mess it would be for my children and I as we are trying to play on the equipment having dog poop everywhere.
What about children that are allergic to animals, should they have to stay away from the parks because people want
their dog's to go everywhere we go? Possibly allowing a small area of portions of certain public parks available to
animals would be all right as long as they were fenced off and not anywhere near the play equipment.
- While I am a pet lover, some people will not pick up waste. People need to know some are afraid of animals.
- While I am a pet lover, some people will not pick up waste. People need to know some are afraid of animals.
- I do not believe dogs should be allowed in parks, open areas, and most of all, Farmers Market or anywhere food is
being served. Dog owners are not all responsible and walking in dog waste, listening to dogs barking, and dealing with
dog waste bags being left all over the park would be horrible.
- To many nonresponsible per owns, walk the bee branch green way or the Riverwalk in the port.
12
- Not only do neighbors allow their dogs off leash to defecate in other neighbors' yards (with no consequence if the
owner is not "caught in the act"), I have also seen a large number of dog feces left on the paved trails at Bergfeld Pond. I
do not believe pet owners who bring their pets to the parks would act any differently. In addition, I do not see any
consequences in the ordinance for the pet owners who do not pick up after their pets. If there are no consequences for
leaving piles, having an ordinance serves no purpose. Additionally, who will be providing the bags and labor to pick up
those piles? If the City is responsible, this becomes a tax issue for residents to pay for staff time and materials. If the
City does not take on this responsibility, I envision parks that are very unhygienic for all users.
- There are to many pet owners that do not pick up the waste from their pets and I believe it would be a huge issue. Gay
park is restricted now and dog waste is a problem now.
- If you choose to go this way their needs to be a special license to cover the cost of poop clean up or very strictly
enforced fines.
- I don't feel that many owners pick up the poop. Also kids all playing in parks and having them playing in dog poop areas
is not healthy.
- Cause they won't pick up after the pet. (Some will) Kids and adults don't want to step in it. Once you start, people will
start letting their animals off leash.
- To many dog owner's don't pick up dog waste in town. Please don't allow dogs in the parks.
- To many people do not pick-up their dog waste. Not everyone is a dog lover. If a dog is on a leash, people feel safer.
With restrictions
- Dogs / cats should be allowed on leases at outdoor sports events parks veterans memorial using upmost respect for
facilities( NOT ALLOWED ON OR NEAR MEMORIAL but at a distance) and aboretum BUT in picnic area and area of
band/event on lease Not allowed in area of plants or pond area.... I do NOT agree with dogs being loose At Bergfeld
pond....
Comments from Citizens who responded "Yes, however I would recommend
changes to the proposed ordinance." (65)
All Parks
- I think it is too restrictive, but a step in the right direction
- Since we as taxpayers paid for the parks we should be able to take our pets there. All parks need to be available to us
not just designated ones you decide on.
- Dog owners should be allowed in ALL PARKS! We are tax payers and should have the right to walk our dogs anywhere.
The city is very anti dog. I lived 19 years and I could take my dog to ANY PARK. They cared about the citizens opinions
unlike here. You limit almost all the parks to us so I say open all of them up as we should have just as many rights as dog
haters! I can't wait to one day move from this city to a more friendly, fair city where our voice counts. Big brother loves
to tell us how to live!
13
- The proposal is a start, and 1 good one. I live near Murphy Park and would love to be able to take my dog (on leash) on
a walk through the park. I would also like to see larger fenced in areas where dogs can be off leash.
- Overall I agree. I would like the ability to walk my dog at the Arboretum and think it is imperative that the current dog
park have major renovations.
Eagle Point and also commented on Waste
- Please keep animals (not service related) out of Eagle Point Park and Murphy Park. When children run thru the parks
with excitement, dogs also react. And there always will be some owners that don't have the pet on a leash. We use the
park for many gatherings and family picnics with our little ones. It would still be great not to worry about strange pets
invading our space while eating or enjoying the view, not to mention stepping in the feces or urinating on the beautiful
flowers. And with the many budget cuts, who will monitor the parks? A few years ago, we presented a petition to the
City Council with many signatures of Dubuque citizens that wanted to keep Eagle Point Park free of pets. These people
had the same concerns as us. On a side note our three children have 4 dogs between them, and have said there are
many places to walk their dogs in our area. Thank you.
- Please prohibit pets in eagle point park and the port of Dubuque river walk. Pets take away from the tranquility of
walking at those locations.... for those of us that do not wish to encounter your pet and its demeanor, whether it be
friendly or not.
- We would like to see Eagle Point Park excluded as it is our premier park and when you charge admission we should not
have to tolerate animals. Everyone proclaims all pet owners follow the rules but we all know they don't. Otherwise
charge an additional fee for the pet, like motels do. Please protect citizens who don't have pets.
- Please do not include Murphy Park or Eagle Point Park in this ordinance. People in my own neighborhood don't always
clean up after they walk their pets. I just can't see policing could be done in these larger parks nor that those who feel
entitled to take their pet everywhere are always inclined to see that they are well behaved. These are beautiful parks
and very family friendly. I want them to stay that way! Barking dogs are also annoying! There is enough problems at
times with loud music in the group next to you.
- Please include eagle point park restricted when the park is open. When the park is closed in winter time. Yes people
can walk pets. Imagine a dog getting loose at someone's party with tables of food.
Enforcement
- "Where a prohibitory sign is posted"... are you guys just going to put up prohibitory signs everywhere?
- Section A is somewhat contradictory of the said proposal and with harsh punishments. Why would you take the animal
away from their owner and make them come get them? How traumatizing for both animal and human. A simple warning
or conversation could warrant a much more civilized consequence. Open areas with leashed dogs can be an accident
waiting to happen. Many dogs are trained or wear collars to protect them. Open areas are where dogs want to run free,
not be chained by someone. You're bound to have more human accidents than animal accidents with dogs pulling. One
dog park on a super inconvenient road and with no toys or obstacles does not suffice a worthy dog park. As for
Bergfeld, where exactly can an owner play fetch with their dog without being on other property? Not all dogs can swim,
or want to. This is one of our favorite spots to walk and our dog stays at our side and is leashed when others come by. If
an owner does not have a dog well trained, then they will easily be told by others with trained dogs to leave. If someone
14
who does not like dogs is walking on the trail, they should probably find a new spot since it's a super dog friendly place,
and they have no business telling dog owners what to do.
- Owners be fined $5 per pet up to 3 occurances that they don't pick up after their pet. After 3 they are banned from
said park. I have 2 large dogs, it's not hard to be a responsible pet owner. The money could be used towards a new
dog park.
- I don't agree with a dog being impounded at least on a first offense. A ticket seems more reasonable as a first offense.
- If caught without a leash, a ticket should be issued. Second offense, impound dog and pay fees. It would be traumatic
for the pet to be hauled away and thrown in a kennel because of owners stupidity on first offense.
- I feel that saying "where a prohibitory sign is posted" means that the city will just go and put signs at any of the parks
where they should be permitted.
- Provide reporting and penalty system for owners who do not pick up their pet's excrement.
- There should be a hefty fine to any owner/ caretaker if pet waste is not picked up and disposed of properly.
- As a once and future dog owner I would like to bring my dog into the parks occassionally, especially when out and
about with my whole family. However, I've witnessed first-hand the irresponsbile nature of many dog woners that could
lead to pollution and more work for city workers. I suggest an increase in pet registration fees and increased
enforcement of licensing laws to offset those costs.
Pet Parks and also commented on Enforcement
- I have a well behaved dog that I will take full responsibility it anything ever happened or maybe because I pay to
register my dog with the city of Dubuque and they provide nothing other than 1 dog park that is small forever away from
my house and hardly ever well taken car of. I don't understand why business can decide to allow all dogs but yet
something the people pay for with tax money who also pay to register dogs are not allowed
- I feel that all city green spaces should be open to leashed pets. A pet under leashed control would not cause
significant problems and frankly, people littering seem to be a bigger problem than dog/cat feces.
- I would propose permitting dogs and cats in the Veterans Memorial Plaza within the Gerald "Red" McAleece Park and
Recreation Complex, as it would be nice to bring our pets with us to watch games at the softball diamond or have picnics
at the picnic tables. I would also propose allowing dogs and cats on playground and recreational areas designed for use
by children as our pets may actively play with our children in those areas in cities that permit them.
- It's nice to have additional options for walking/hiking. Also, more places to play fetch (outside of the dog park) is
always a bonus. So if there were other locations, such as the Mines of Spain or Swiss valley, where that could take place,
that would be phenomenal.
- More dog parks.
- I would like the use of pet friendly salt if needed for safety. We have never had a dog that would wear those boots I
would like to see some other area where dogs could run free. An enclosed park would be good especially for elderly who
may have difficulty walking any distance. An area that does not get so muddy or soggy as current park
15
- I would like more options as to open fields where dogs can run off leash.
Safety and also commented on waste, Farmer's Market
- I wish we could allow dogs in our parks. However, there are some problems that should be considered. I have a
disability that makes me off balance and unsteady. Although I use a cane in public, it is dangerous for me when a dog
attempts to jump up on me or his/her lease crosses my path threatening to cause a serious fall. The same thing would a
be danger for small children. Most owners are cognizant of this fact but many are not and seem oblivious to the harm
that this could cause. I've noticed others take great care not to bump into or cause danger to someone who has a
disability. Our poor pets are not capable of recognizing those situations.
- I'm concerned with the off -leash dogs at AY McDonald Park. I walk my dog their often and there's already owners not
using a leash with dogs not under their control. Those of us owners who do control their dog and pick up after their pet
shouldn't be punished for those that don't.
- Section A: Should address the ability and responsibility of the owner to physically handle multiple leashed dogs or dogs
with aggressive behaviors.
- It may be helpful to clarify the length of allowable leash, even if defined elsewhere in the code. This would prevent
confusion. A 6' leash is plenty and I have seen people with much longer leashes. This can be problematic. I definitely
support pet -friendly parks, though.
- I agree in section A with the leash law. However I think impoundment takes to many resources and time. What if a dog
is off leash and a animal control officer approaches and the owner places the dog on leash? I think I fine in those types
of situations would be better the impoundment. This would give animal control more time to monitor for infractions
rather than spending time on impoundment. Possibly impoundment after multiple infractions. Section B subsection i. I
would like to see this removed or renamed to temporary signing. I could see temporarily restricting pets like at AY
McDonald park during July 3rd. But having a broad statement to remove pets from any park with just a sign without any
public input is not something I would like to see. Section E. The wording should be changed to solid waste or feces. It
is not feasible to require urine pickup. As a responsible dog owner I hate seeing dog poop left by other owners. I would
suggest adding a fine to this section for not picking up solid waste.
- I walk/ bike/jog on city owned property. The problem I often encounter is dog owners with their dog on an a lease that
expands to approx.. 30 feet. Often when you come from behind the dog owner is unaware but the dog isn't and almost
always approaches you. I would suggest amending the ordinance to state that all dogs must be on a 6 foot leash. There
also has to be a stated fine for those dog owners who do not abide by the ordinance.
- Unleashed if wearing a remote collar
- I would like more options as to open fields where dogs can run off leash.
Waste and also commented on Enforcement
- It's not so much the problem of the pet usually but of the owner. Pose a fine to owners that do not pick up after their
pet.
16
- There should be a fine noted for people who do not clean up after their pets. I am a dog owner and love being able to
take my dog places but it frustrates me when i see piles of poop from other dogs where the pet owners ignore. This
puts my pet at risk of catching something. Hence why i think it should be stated in the ordinance that pet owners are
subject to a fine if caught. I love how AY Mcdonald parkvhas the waste bags making it easy to pick up and dispose of the
waste. I also think that pets should be allowed in the McAleece park area. It is a nice big open flat area to walk. People
who are boating like to bring their pets so they have to be allowed around the boat ramp areas. Also being so close to
the campground where people also bring pets.
- Each handler should be required to have, within the range of the lease, a spare bag, for the purpose of waste
collection. A leash length maximum, say, 6 feet. Animals sustaining aggressive behavior should be removed. In some
cases, a proximity limit should be maintained, from restricted sites, as larger groups of people may fill a site. Say, ten
feet from a perimeter. Each pet keeper should uphold all this, as a privilege, to sustain good standing in the community.
- More trash cans need to be provided by the city for owners to dispose of pet waste, not just confined to the
downtown area. This would also cut down on the insane amount of litter throughout the city, as a bonus
- E. "Solid" waste. (Not urine.)
- I would suggest specific penalties for the failure to remove pet waste be included in the ordinance ("subject to but not
limited to"). Monetary and/or community duty.
- I do think the park patrol should be able to give people a hefty ticket for not picking up the dog waste. I pick up after
my dog and I get very upset when I see people not picking up after their dog. At least people should be able to report
these people and it should be posted in the parks that citizens have the ability to report them, providing a license plate
number, etc.
- The only change I would like to see is a fine for not picking up after your pets.
- I believe there should be a hefty fine for not picking up the animals waste and properly disposing of it. Possible small
increase in licensing fee that would pay for waste bags to be located throughout the parks should someone run out of
bags.
With Restrictions and also commented on Pet Parks
- Dogs and cats on leashes should be allowed into children parks if it is not busy or even vacant.
- Those of us who live in the Arboretum area would greatly benefit by allowing leashed pets in Marshall Park. We have a
great neighborhood and the access to the park seems reasonable. If there's an issue with the flower beds, post signs
preventing pets from those areas.
- I would like to see this develop in stages. Could we first have a handful of parks be pet friendly according to the
ordinance, see how things go with these and then expand if things go well after a trial period? I am concerned. Most pet
owners are responsible but there are always those who ruin it for the rest of us.
- Throw out part "i" under section B. City could just put up pet prohibited signs in parks to get around laws allowing pets
in parks.
- There are lots of people who walk in the arboretum. It would be nice to be able to walk with our pets in these areas
- Allow leashes pets at downtown events such as Farmers Market , and others.
17
- Arboretum would be nice to take my dog to on her leash.
- I believe that pets should be allowed in Flora Park. The pool is enclosed by a fence and walking a dog through the main
area of the park is not going to affect the pool or its patrons in any way.
- I think it would be very enjoyable for my pets and I to be able to go to the Arboretum and Gardens. As we would be
able to explore the beautiful flowers and pond together. And of course, all waste would be clean up and disposed
properly.
- Mcaleese should be open to dogs in the walking areas but not on the fields.
- Restaurants would be encouraged to permit well-behaved dogs to accompany their owner into the restaurant.
- Add areas where dogs can be off leash for exercise while supervised by owner. Allow dogs off leash in parks if nobody
else is present or over a certain distance away.
- If your animal is restrained to a.leash, while in the proposed parks, why can they not be allowed in areas with
recreational equipment (letter h)?
- Unleashed should be allowed for fetch type games with pets, on the basis that they are well behaved
- I need clarification on Flora park pool (B, d) and areas designated for children (B, h). Does this ordinance refer to only
Flora pool or is the park also prohibited? And since there are play areas for children at Flora, where would the pets be
allowed? I would love to be able to walk my dog through this park on a leash, but the current ordinance is not clear on
what would be allowed.
- I believe pets should also be prohibited at parks with unfenced areas that are used for sporting activities. For example,
the cricket ground at Usha Park, the baseball & softball areas at Flora, Gay, Valentine, and any others where citizens
could potentially step, fall, or dive into animal waste.
- I think allow access to unleash dogs in fences parks.
- Be more specific and list by name which parks fall into exclusion categories so there is no doubt or question if they are
excluded.
- The subdivision by the arboretum has many dog owners that would love to be able to walk their dogs through the
arboretum. I assume the reason for the arboretum not being on the list is keeping the beauty? Perhaps a special
permit could allow this?
- I see no mention of Eagle Point park. However, I would like to see animals prohibited from all parks, except for service
dogs for persons with disabilities. If appropriate , areas of the parks can be set aside for animals with obvious
restrictions. Those ares should be so designated. All other areas of the parks should be animal free as the waste matter,
and affects of humans can be detrimental. Dog parks are currently available for pet owners use if exercise and well
being of their pets are of concern.
- Section B, item F, H, and I should be removed, as they make no sense. If a playground or fenced in arena isn't being
used there is no reason my dog shouldn't be allowed there. I play fetch with my dog in tennis courts or hockey arenas
often as they provide a fence to keep the ball contained. I would accept these line items if it says "while not I use by
other users." Playground equipment can be great for agility training for dogs too, but I wouldn't ever use it while kids
18
are on said playground equipment. The last item, I, means that section A doesn't matter. It leaves it up to any location
to post a sign to prohibit animals and that defeats the entire purpose of this new ordinance.
- I would recommend allowing dogs at mcaleece park as it's already stated they are not allowed inside the fenced areas
there is a lot of other grassy and open areas that would be great to use for pets without any negative consequences
- Clarify that an "emotional support animal" does not exempt the prohibitions in section B as a registered Service animal
does.
- Allow pets at Vets!
- There should be more exceptions than bergfield pond to the leash requirement. Many of our parks have sufficient
room for training exercises.
- I would recommend adding a clause about pet -friendly programs (ie doggie dip at flora)
Comments from Citizens who responded "Yes, I agree with the proposed
ordinance change." (394)
Accessible/More Locations for Pets
- I would urge the approval of the ordinance change. The parks where dogs are allowed are all a several mile drive away.
It would be so nice to be able to walk the dog in our neighborhood park, where the walks are even and not hilly, there is
no traffic, and one can met with other dog walkers. And where one could walk several times a day, if so inclined. This is
something the council can do to help out all of us at very low cost to the city. Please approve this change for the
better!
- It has always been frustrating not being able to take my pet to one of Dubuque's great city parks. I also have
considered there will be those owners who do not pick up after their dogs, but I feel this should be handled whenever
witnessed by not only the park rangers, but other owners. There should be tickets written when a ranger sees this to
send a message that it's not ok. It should also be communicated that self policing is a good thing in order to keep our
parks clean and safe.
- I have a dog and know how difficult it is in Dubuque to find nice areas to walk him. We actively avoid going to many
parks because we can't bring our dog. This ordinance will encourage more people to visit the beautiful parks around
Dubuque because they can now bring their dogs.
- I would like to see leashed dogs allowed in more public places than they are today.
- I visit dubuque for shopping and to spend time walking the river trail and my dog is my companion I would love to have
more areas that we are aloud in.
- I have 2 dogs and I would like to be able to take them for walks in the city parks and can't currently do so.
- Not enough green space for my dog. She needs to go to different parks and experience other things.
- Dog owner and would like t enjoy city parks with my dog
- Am a dog owner and would like to enjoy the city parks with my dog
19
- Allow in arboretum
- Our parks are great places to visit and would be a benefit to walk dogs through them as well. Strict adherence to
owners picking up waste would be necessary and enforced.
- I have 3 dogs and they are my children. My husband and I enjoy taking our dogs with us when we walk and it would be
nice to take them with is to the parks. Parks have less traffic which is safer for all pets.
- I am in support of leashed pets being allowed in almost all public spaces.
- My dog loves to be outside and it encourages me to get outside more often. My options are limited where I can take
him. Flora & Eagle point are 2 parks I have lived near over the years and never went because my dog was not allowed.
Give pet owners a chance to prove this can be done responsibly.
Family
- Dogs are part of families so they shhold be allowed to go into a park with its family.
- Pets are part of our families and should be allowed to accompany their families on outings in the park as long as they
are leashed and picked up after
- I have children and I have dogs, often times when I get the kids and dogs out of the house for a walk we end up walking
by a park since there are several in my neighborhood, the kids always want to stop and play and I have to tell them
because we have to take the dogs home first and that always disappoints them to the point of not wanting to go to the
park anymore.
- Our pet is like a close family member. We take our dog out for exercise at least twice a day and generally we are
confined to sidewalks which are used by the walking traffic. We find the dog park to be small and most of the time
muddy. We generally take our dog to Iowa City and typically shop and eat while there.
- Animals are just like us so we should be able to take them with us in parks. They need exercise just like us, too.
- Our animals are part of our family and they go every with us.
- My dog is my kid so not being able to enjoy time at a city location limits the walks and outings we can do as a family.
- Our family loves going to the beautiful parks in Dubuque and we would love to walk our dog when we go for walks as a
family. This is a qualify of life that is huge for not only families but also those young, single people our companies are
trying to woo to Dubuque.
- Pets are family in most cases and not being able to take them with to a park for a walk or pictures is heartbreaking.
- Pets are a very important member of the modern family and should be as important to a progressive, inclusive
community that wants to promote and inspire social connections between ALL members of that community. Over the
past decade, throughout the entire country, those municipalities that have actively forged a productive relationship with
responsible pet owners have also shown tremendous social and economic growth within their communties. Allowing
pets in the parks would be a wonderful, symbolic start to forging that win -win relationship.
- Dogs are family members to many people which is why they should be allowed to join us in parks and other places we
visit. I travel with my dog and choose places to visit that are dog friendly. I believe it has been a negative for Dubuque to
have such restrictive policies toward dogs in parks and other public places. I'm sure this has been a factor in whether
someone chooses to visit or move into our community. Dubuque is also in need of a much larger and more enriching dog
park where dogs can run free, socialize and be involved in other positive activities.
20
- I'm a pet owner myself and a dog lover. Getting outside and taking my dog with me is something I enjoy doing. Not
many spots available to do that in Dubuque unlike other bigger or more developed cities. Some pets are like part of the
family to people and taking them with is all apart of the fun.
- I believe responsible owners be allowed to have their family members and pets with them for family outings.
- Being able to enjoy the parks with my pet is important to me. Both my pet and I can get our exercise in the relaxing
atmosphere of the city parks, while having the pet on a leach. Off leach dogs will still have access to the dog park. I love
to take my pet to family function in the parks because they are part of the family.
- The role of pets in families has changed for some over the years where they are now family members. That's not so
new to me. I've held them in that regard my entire life. It's about time Dubuque parks become pet friendly and let us
take all of our family members with us.
- Our dogs are a huge part of our lives, and being to share our lives with others and enjoy the scenery of Dubuque helps
us feel like part of the community we've come to love.
- I believe that allowing pets in our city parks would only be beneficial to Dubuque. There are many people in the
community where their dog is extremely important to them, including my self. I know that having the ability to bring my
dog with me to more venues around the city would raise my view and morale in terms of the City of Dubuque. I
personally owned a Certified Therapy Dog that currently spends three days of the week at Jefferson Middle School with
my fiance, who is a 6th grade science teacher there. Our dog has been able to help a multitude of situations within the
school and community. This coming week he will start spending Monday nights at a local retirement home. There are so
many positive attributes to the presence of pets throughout a community. The limiting factor, of dogs not being
welcome within Dubuque is definitely a down side, and purely sad. I am 24 years old, and have thought of and continue
to think about moving because the lack of dog friendly places. I have been to many places where dogs are allowed in an
out of almost every establishment throughout a town, which is so extremely important to me. For my generation, dogs
are extremely important and are an integral part of their families. There is only one dog park, in an inconvenient place to
many people of Dubuque and they are not allowed in parks. That creates a restricting community for our dogs and pets.
If you want to continue to make this community appealing to the younger generations, making a more pet, friendly
community is a necessity. I hope you make the right decision.
Park Usage Increase
- I think our parks would be used more if they were pet friendly.
- I specifically do not go to parks because I cannot bring my dog with me. I am a responsible dog owner but it is
unfortunate that even I cannot bring my dog to enjoy parks in Dubuque. Dubuque is very unfriendly to dog owners.
- Our family would use parks more if we could bring our dog.
- As a dog owner, I find it difficult and frustrating that I can't take my dog to beautiful places around Dubuque - such as
Eagle Point Park. If I could take my dog to parks in Dubuque I would walk my dog all the time at various Dubuque parks.
I'm 100% sure that parks around Dubuque will see a more visits.
- I am a dog owner and love taking my dogs disc golfing. It is a shame that i can't utilize the course inside dubuque even
with my dogs on a leash.
21
- Not a dog owner but would like to see parks more utilize. Parks are for the entire community, not just traditional
families. They should be a built environment that can be enjoyed by all. Let's encourage people to be apart of a
community by engaging in our community.
Responsible Pet Owners
- I believe that a majority of pet owners are responsible. Our dog is part of our family.
- If they are licensed and on a leash, pets are under the control of the owner. As a taxpayer, I should be able to use the
public areas (within reason) equally as all other community users.
- Its reasonable what they are asking. I walk my dog every day and in my pocket or my hand you will find a waste bag. I
have had people stop and thank me for picking up after my dog.
- I believe this would be great, especially for those people who cannot drive somewhere with their pet. The pet owner
must be responsible for their pet when in a public park. And if they were, maybe most parks would allow dogs. Train
them right and treat them right. It is a win -win situation. I like taking my dog to a country or county park.
- If dogs are on leashes at all times and waste is picked up, there should be no problem with allowing them in parks
- I feel Dubuque is doing an in service to responsible dog owners by not allowing pets in parks. As long as pet owners
keep their dog leashed and clean up after them it should be allowed.
- I believe it is in the best interest of the city and all residents to allow leashed pets in the parks as listed in the above
ordinance.
- As long as a dog or cat is on a leash and the waste is picked up, I agree that they should be allowed. Pets are a big part
of people's lives now and are good company for picnics and gatherings.
- I am a responsibly dog owner and feel my dogs should be able to be at the park with me on leash.
- Responsible dog owners should not be punished for irresponsible owners. Pets should be allowed in parks.
-Dogs are like family and the majority of the time less of a threat than humans. Responsible pets and owners should not
be penalized due to the few irresponsible ones.
-Leashed animals should be allowe din parks. They are being controlled by there human provider and should cause no
harm to others.
-Responsible pet owners should be able to walk dogs in the parks.
- For me personally. I train dogs to be therapy dogs, ESA dog and to show . I need to be able to have the freedom in the
city to socialize my dogs in many different situations with people and places. Very hard to do when I'm so limited as to
where I can go to socialize and introduce my dogs to situations that they might encounter on a day-to-day basis as a
therapy dog.Currently I have to leave the city in order to properly socialized my dogs in all areas needed.
- We are completely responsible with our dogs and would love to be able to take him more places.
- Common sense proposal is appreciated! I trust the penalty for animal waste violations will be strong & meaningful
- The animals are not the problem, it's the pet owners. Pet owners must take responsibility for the actions of the pet,
injuries, waste, and care don't fall on the Pet, but the owner. Allow pets to go where the owners want to go, and hold
the owner responsible for the pets actions. It's that simple.
22
- Because when we walk, we walk our dog. The parks are so beautiful, we'd appreciate the opportunity to be able to
stroll through them with our pet.
- I think the ordinance is still far too strict, but is a step in the right direction.
- I think that as long as owners are responsible and follow rules. Dogs can safely be at parks. I think a dog -friendly city is
a pleasure. Walking your dog through a park is relaxing and enjoyable, and seeing dogs in parks is also relaxing to most
pedestrains.
Welcoming Community/Progress/Quality of Life
- Dogs are an huge part of American culture. In order to attract new businesses and employees, this is an easy change to
come in -line with other modern cities.
- I believe it is an improvement to our parks.
- Personal enjoyment with pet and economic development potential
- The parks seem to be underutilized as it stands. Dogs that are social are better trained and it is an opportunity for dog
owners to socialize as well. Makes for a better community overall.
- Attractive dog parks and off lead hiking areas are a significant quality of life factor at nominal cost and would make
Dubuque a better place to live and attractive to visitors.
- I chose yes to allow pets in parks as a pet owner and as a citizen that believes in allowing people freedom of choice.
Dubuque continues to punish responsible pet owners because of a few bad ones by excluding them in the community.
This has been a discussion for last 10 years in Dubuque and it's about time Dubuque steps up for all their citizens that
pay taxes. You go to basically any other city, and pets are allowed in parks, which is great and makes me feel included in
the community when traveling.
- Our policies to restrict pets has been a point of embarrassment for years. When I go to other pet -friendly cities, such as
San Antonio, my irritation is further provoked. Aside from my personal opinions, however, I wonder what the economic
impact has been due to potential newcomers deciding AGAINST choosing Dubuque as their residence due to our archaic,
restrictive ordinances against animals in public.
- I believe the city has an interest in healthy citizens and expansion of areas of the city where dogs can be walked will
support the health of the owners.
- It is about time that dogs are allowed into Dubuque public spaces. The policy not allowing dogs feels very regressive
and puts Dubuque in a negative light.
- This is LONG overdue. With more and more young people owning pets rather than having children, how do you expect
to entice them to Dubuque? Dubuque is one of the least pet friendly places that I've ever been to. You are losing out on
revenue because the city council are too stubborn for their own good.
- We have to beat more welcoming community. Some times we fail and this is a place this beautiful community fails.
- I would love to take my dog on walks through city parks for leisure & exercise!!!
23
- Yes because it will allow for these parks and recreation areas to be better utilized and enjoyed by ALL residents and
promote an active and healthy lifestyle.
- As a recent graduate, I decided to stay in the city with my husband because of the wonderful community we found
here during college. We love our jobs and our home, and the small-town feel with plenty of things to do that Dubuque
has to offer! However, one thing that does truly impact our lives here in Dubuque is the current lack of pet friendly
facilities and areas. Our parents both live hours away, and both have dogs. When either set wants to come and stay,
there are only a select number of places that they are able to stay that allow dogs, and finding places to exercise them
after their long car rides can be difficult. We are also hoping to get a dog ourselves within the next year, but are
concerned about the availability of places to bring them. Allowing dogs in the aforementioned parks would be a huge
reason that we would feel comfortable adopting a dog, and also be a huge asset to encouraging us and our friends who
have dogs to remain in Dubuque for years to come. Our pets are our family, and we want to treat them as such!
Fulfilling their basic need to run off energy and play is a big deal to us in being responsible pet owners, and I think
passing the above ordinance would be a huge asset to Dubuque.
- I see no issue in having a leashed, well behaved dog or cat in these areas under the supervision of an owner. Many
cities across the country have already implemented these types of ordinances and it creates a more inclusive and
positive environment for all.
- A welcoming community is a pet friendly community. I support this ordinance wholeheartedly and hope to see even
more improvements in our city for pets and their owners. Thank you for considering the proposed ordinance.
- Dubuque needs to make being a pet friendly a top priority if the city wants to attract and retain young adults. It will
also make Dubuque a better place to visit for our of town visitors since right now, they only have a muddy dog park. I
travel all over the country for work and almost all cities allow dogs in parks and outdoor dining establishments. It's time
for Dubuque to make the change.
- From Dubuque now living in Chicago where it is very pet friendly. Dubuque should be the same
- It hurts the standard of living to have such restrictions on where your dog can go.
- This change would encourage people to get outside for fresh air and exercise with their pets. Healthier for all. Cities
like Denver are very dog friendly- you see the city providing frequently accessible dog waste bags and receptacles
encouraging people to get out with their pets and be responsible to keeping city clean. In Denver, I have witnessed well
managed dogs and happy pets and people being out and active socially. Why not encourage this happier and healthier
lifestyle in the city of Dubuque. What to improve mental health- promote pet ownership , getting out socially and to
exercise in the fresh air!
- I am in favor of moving into a dog -friendly city. The time is right!
- I would like to see Dubuque be more in line with what other cities allow in terms of dogs in parks, and this goes a long
way towards that. I would also like to see more dog parks, especially in areas where the community is less mobile,
perhaps a fenced -in area of an existing park.
- Inclusive environment
- Those who are responsible pet owners are those who want equal access to our City's parks. They want the right to
exercise their pets in public areas, safely introduce their pets to different surroundings and situations, and have access
to waste bins to properly dispose of their pets' waste. Irresponsible pet owners aren't concerned with any of the above
points, and a few irresponsible owners should not mean taking these rights away from the rest of us.
24
- It would be amazing to be able to bring my dog to parks in town. This would make the community more approachable
from a tourist point of view for those who travel with pets. Perhaps a suggestion would be to put more trash cans up for
easier access when throwing away their waste.
- I used to visit Dubuque for the day 1-4 times per year. Then 8 years ago I got my first dog and discovered that pets are
not welcome in Dubuque public spaces. Now, I don't even stop for gas or a rest stop in Dubuque when I am driving
through to Wisconsin. I stop in Worth or Drsville instead. You lost my tourism.
- This proposed ordinance change is what I have been waiting and hoping for for several years. I believe that it would
improve the quality of life here in Dubuque. We have many wonderful parks, but I do not visit them as often as I would
like to due to the fact that dogs are not allowed in most. It is such a pleasure to visit A.Y. McDonald Park, where dogs are
allowed. When our dog is with us, she draws people to us, and we talk and are friendly with people who we have never
met before and would most likely not talk to otherwise. It helps build community!
- I think it's a huge step forward!
- These changes are common sense and long overdue for our city.
- I am a dog owner/lover and would love to see Dubuque get more pet friendly. We have kids that live in Kansas City, KS
and Portland, OR. Dubuque is way behind the times. Move forward Dubuque!!!
- About time we have pets in parks. As long as people clean up waste
- It is just time
- I think it is about time Dubuque moved up with a new ordinance for dogs. There are a lot of responsible dog owners
who would so enjoy having their pets witb them in parks. The irresponsible- ticket and fine
- This would be a fantastic addition to Dubuque.
- Dubuque needs to be more pet friendly which gets cituzens outside and enjoying tax payers dollars!
- We love walking to the park and it would be great if we could bring our dog with while our kids play.
- My dog is my best friend, and I love to be able to take him places other than just on a walk. My brother lives in
Colorado and the whole entire state is so pet friendly and it is WONDERFUL to bring my dog out there to explore places
and things he could NEVER here in Dubuque. Pets are FAMILY, and it's about time we recognize that
- It is now 2020 and Dubuque is extremely far behind other metropolitan when it comes to pet friendly locations. Pets
have proven to make citizens more active, involved in the community, and happier overall. Research shows people often
choose where to live based on their pets and nearby pet -friendly amenities and services. Dubuque could, and will, suffer
as a city if this ordinance does not change soon.
- This 50 year old ordinance is long -past its usefulness. I am a tax -paying, law-abiding, responsible Dubuque citizen, and
I want to be legally able to walk my leashed dog through a city park.
- I support the proposed ordinance based on scientific research proving increased physical and mental health benefits of
interactions with companion animals. Allowing companion animals in public parks and recreational areas gives
individuals more space and opportunities to interact, therefore promoting greater physical and mental health. Thank
you for your time and consideration.
- This is long overdue!
25
- Dubuque has not been a dog friendly community, to its detriment.
- The proposed change would be one step in making Dubuque a more pet -friendly community. Over 5 years ago,
Dubuque allowed pets in several city parks and in the following years, and since then, there has not been a discernible
change in the number of park violations involving pets in parks. The Parks Commission and the Pet -Friendly Community
Group has worked hard to craft this proposed ordinance along with community -wide education programs for
responsible pet ownership. Dubuque is the only city of the top 15 cities in Iowa that does not allow leashed pets in their
city parks. We need to change with the current ordinance so that it's not a criminal act to walk a leashed pet in our city
parks!
- I believe that Dubuque is so behind the times in being a pet friendly community. I fully support any ordinance that
would allow pets in our community more.
- It's unfortunate dogs are currently not allowed in parks.
- Having pet friendly exercise trails and parks is very attractive to people who are looking to relocate. When we moved
here in August, I couldn't believe every trail we drove to that weekend had a sign posted for no pets. Where we lived
before, responsible pet owners brought there dogs everywhere, including restaurant patios and breweries. I have no
idea how long the current ordinance has been on the books but change needs to take place as soon as possible. Thank
you.
- This city is supposed to be an All American city, it's about time we quit living in the dark ages. People who have pets,
would like to be able to include them in family outings.
- It is time to stop punishing responsible pet owners and limiting access to green space for fear of fear what "might" be
the actions of some irresponsible people.
- Let's get on with it. Dubuque is one of the least pet -friendly cities in the midwest and we are way behind the times. The
lowest common denominator, the one who will complain about this, and probably everything else, should NOT be
accommodated any longer, on this and so many other things. Pet friendly = people friendly. Irresponsible pet owners
(the very few there are) must be accountable, but enough passing rules because a few are stupid. Halloween candy in a
parade rules for example, but I digress. Pass this now and be done. We've studied it to death. I was in Oregon this
summer for a couple of days. Dogs everywhere. Problems with it no where. The MOST pet friendly state, I was told. It
was refreshing to be in a culture where the default is to trust people to think and be responsible, rather than prohibit
things to address and guard against the few idiots (who won't respond anyway). Thank you. Let's get this done now. It's
not a big breakthrough to make this logical change to our overly prohibitive civic rules. The start of many improvements
one would hope in civic freedoms.
- After 50 years, it's time to decriminalize dog walking in Dubuque city parks. During a 5-year trial, owners have proven
to be responsible at the Mississippi Riverwalk, A.Y. McDonald Park, Bee Branch Greenway, trails, and other prized
spaces. Therefore, I urge the Parks Commission and City Council to pass this ordinance and finally allow pet owners and
their families to experience Dubuque's most beautiful outdoor spaces -- from their neighborhood parks to Eagle Point
Park -- without feeling like criminals. This is a carefully crafted ordinance which brings Dubuque in step with cities
nationwide, and aligns with many city council goals. Goals such as having a vibrant, healthy community with liveable,
walkable neighborhoods and a truly inclusive atmosphere. It will improve quality of life for residents, better welcome
visitors, and help Dubuque retain essential workforce to remain economically competitive. It is written to hold owners
accountable for their animals, to protect children's play areas, veterans' memorials, and historic structures within parks,
and to include a large pet -free park and playground (Marshall Park) for those who wish to avoid pets. Once passed, it
can be enforced and adjusted if needed, and the Pongos and Perditas of Dubuque will finally have a chance to meet and
mingle in the fresh air with their pet Rogers and Anitas. Tremendous thanks is owed to all Parks & Recreation
26
Commissioners, Pet Friendly Committee Members, and devoted staff who have worked so hard on this important policy
change - now, and over the past decade. The people and pets of Dubuque will rejoice when it is finally passed into law.
- Dubuque has been anti -dog for too long. This would make Dubuque more livable for everyone with a dog.
- Pet friendly parks would attract younger people to the area and be a convenience to everyone who has a pet. There
isn't a reason people shouldn't be able to cross a place like Wahington park while walking their dog.
- After living in about 10 different towns in Iowa, Wisconsin and Illinois I have landed in Dubuque. I am extremely
disappointed to say that Dubuque is hands down the LEAST pet friendly town that not only I've lived in but even traveled
to throughout the states. Not only should they be allowed in ALL parks, they should be allowed in restaurants if the
owners so choose. I understand that not everyone enjoys pets, but allowing them into all public parks and places doesn't
force the people to interact with pets, it merely offers the opportunity.
- This would be a valuable improvement to Dubuque. Please highly consider this change.
- The number one reason we consider moving out of Dubuque is the lack of pet friendly places to take our family. There
is a beautiful park near our house and we were shackled when we couldn't take our dogs there. We have lived in 5 cities
around America, 2 larger than Dubuque and none of the others had a pet ban.
- This makes Dubuque more dog friendly than it has ever been in the past.
- we need to be more dog/family friendly in this town
- Dubuque is behind the time. Look at all of the other bigger cities in Iowa. They all allow leashed dogs and cats in city
parks. Its time for Dubuque to make the change.
- I am a native Dubuquer (64 years old) growing up in the area of what is now called Louis Murphy Park and the past 37
1/2 years in Point Area of Dubuque. Have always had dogs in my family as now we have 2 dogs, a border collie rescue
and a golden retriver. My son and I walk everyday. We frequent A.Y. McDonald with our dogs and have not witnessed
any issues with people not complying with rules. Dogs and people and bike riders seem to co -exist well. The parks are
for everyone to enjoy including pet owners who are not only enjoying the great outdoors but getting exercise.
- Love it! Can't wait to have pets in our parks. Thanks for doing this!
Eagle Point and also commented on With restrictions
- Anything but pit bulls . Make eagle point free. Was a horrible decision to keep the tax payers out
- Opens up a great park for dogs: Eagle Point!
Enforcement
- I would like to see the License money stay here in Dubuque. I do not like sending a check to Texas for license
requirements here in Dubuque.
- The owner should receive a serious warning instead of impounding the animal if found off leash for the first offense.
- I am completely in favor of fining owners that do not pick-up their pet's waste. Is this in place already?
- The only thing I would put in. If you get caught leaving animal waste, you can get fined up to $200 or something along
those lines. Enough where people might actually respect the privilege to along animals in the parks.
27
Pet Parks
-As the pet park is the main place animals can be off leash, I would like to see other options or pet parks to be
established. Can we have three pet parks, one on west end, the current "mid town" and one on east end to help those
all around the city.
-Being a pet -friendly community is more and more important to people. A nice big dog park is also needed.
-I am a frequent user of the dog park. It desperately needs some maintenance. There are areas where standing water
collects after rain and the areas in front of the cement are constantly muddy. Maybe they should be gravel? A hose
with a sprayer would be an excellent addition to deal with muddy paws and dogs. A trail between the park and Bunker
would be a welcome addition.
-Is there another spot in addition to Bergfeld for off -leash parks? Maybe something of the eastside of town? The Pet
Park is sad.
Safety
-I agree, but I strongly encourage dog owners to PLEASE KEEP THEIR DOGS ON A LEASH.
- There is limited green space in most neighborhoods. Also, with more people using in -ground fencing, it is becoming
more challenging to actually walk a dog on a sidewalk without getting attacked by unsupervised sogs. I would also feel
safer walking in a park by myself with a dog.
Waste
-I am for dogs/cats in parks if leashes and waste disposal is enforced as I feel this will be the biggest challenge/obstacle
-I would like to take my dog on walks on trails or in parks. I do think there should be bags and receptacles provided, as
too many pet owners are not responsible.
- Fines for not picking up pet's waste
- Advise that parks provide doggy clean up bag stations and available trash recepticals. Would like to see/hear what the
plan is for disease control in commonly used parks- for both humans and animal concerns Please add another dog park!
-Owners can be responsible for the pick up of any poop, have trash cans available and require leashes.
- I think the proposed ordinance is fair. My concern is owners picking up waste in areas - and being held accountable if
they do not.
With restrictions
-As of now 5 out of 48 Parks are Pet friendly. I propose opening up half of our Parks to start with and see how it goes.
Change is alway hard for Dubuque residence but it do not make it right! So after a 2 or 3 year test lets them see it will
work out for all that live in our beautiful city!! Remember we always need to move forward not stationary or
backwards
28
-Signs need to be very clear about prohibited areas, for example staying away from any playground equipment. Dog
waste bags and garbage containers very accessible.
-You can skip all the small print rules and just go with parks posted that let's not allowed. This is a great step in making
Dubuque a livable and viable community.
- Pets are an important part of many people's lives and should be allowed in certain public areas.
- There needs to be more access for dog owners to be able to walk their dogs in the city of Dubuque. Increasing the
amount of open space and off leash walking paths can improve the lives of not only dogs but their owners by making
more of a community socialization.
- It would benefit many families and pet owners by allowing leashed dogs and cats in the areas listed above.
-There may be a problem with people tying up their dogs at city parks, and staying there all day long. That is when dogs
can bark at everyone who walks by, and make dead areas in the grass. Would it be beneficial to address this? Maybe,
allow dogs to be leashed and walking, but not allowing them to be tied up for any extended period?
Agree/support
- I support changing the ordinance to allow leashed pets in parks, as outlined above.
- I think it's reasonable to allow park users to come with their pets. I appreciate the effort the committee's efforts to
solicit input and to provide educational materials. The proposed restrictions, i.e. at pools, children's playgrounds, etc.
also seem reasonable.
- I also feel dogs should be able to be at restaurants that have outside seating. Even with food present. Let's get pet
friendly. In Germany dogs are allowed inside restaurants
- I have 2 Golden Retrievers that are very friendly and love other people and dogs.
- I would love to see our community using our beautiful parks more and I think allowing dogs access would increase the
number of people and frequency that people visit substantially
- I think it will increase the park attendance
- Neat!
- People want to be able to enjoy our beautiful parks w/their companion and best friends, their animals.
- Pets in parks is a good idea.
- Dogs should be allowed in parks
- I live by Flora park and I see dogs there a lot. Either people are not aware of the current ordinance or don't care. Most
parks have plenty of room for people and dogs to enjoy the green spaces separately and so I would like to see doge
allowed.
- I have a dog and would love if she could join me for walks in parks and she would love it, too!
- I support allowing dogs in parks on a leash!
- Dogs are the biggest fans of parks.
29
- Only change would be to allow an exception for last day of pools at Sutton / Flora.
- I like what is proposed. I think if problems arise adjustments should be made annually.
- I agree with the proposed ordinance
I love animals!
30
Pet -Friendly Work Group Executive Summary 02/08/2020
Pets in Parks Ordinance Change Public Input
The Pet Friendly Working Group, at the direction of the Dubuque City Council, has been
exploring areas of public and social policy related to pets in our community. In 2019, this group
completed an assessment with public input to identify the areas of highest priority for the
community. The issue of leashed pets in parks was one of the top priorities.
The Working Group has forwarded a proposed ordinance change to the Parks Commission for
review. This ordinance change was available for public review and comment. The Working
Group, in cooperation with the Parks Commission, offered another survey and community
public comment session with regards specifically to the ordinance change in order to gauge
public support of this topic. In the following document are the results of that survey including a
full list of the comments submitted.
A summary of the survey is as follows:
• 66% agreed with the ordinance change
• 11% agreed with the ordinance change with some modifications
• 22% disagreed with the ordinance change
• 1% were indifferent
The results of the comments during the public input session were comparable.
Comments in support of the ordinance change referred mostly to improved quality of life
concerns, demonstrations of responsible pet ownership, and increased family activity and
overall park use opportunities. The most common comments against the ordinance change
centered around concerns of waste disposal, enforcement, fear, safety, and nuisance concerns
related to pets; and support of pet parks as an alternative. Though outside of the purview of
this ordinance change and scope of this discussion, there were also a few comments in relation
to the Farmer's Market.
The Pet Friendly Working Group has discussed these issues, both during the process of
developing the ordinance change as well as considering the comments returned from the
community. The following points have been discussed as areas of focus to help address these
concerns:
1. Appropriate signage and waste bags/disposal stations would be needed. These items
represent the financial and logistical parts of the ordinance change, should it be
adopted.
a. Designs and costs of various signs and waste stations have been reviewed by the
Working Group
Pet -Friendly Work Group Executive Summary 02/08/2020
b. Working Group members have made maps of the various parks in Dubuque with
suggested locations for waste stations
c. Cost of these items can be mitigated by:
i. Use of funds already set aside in the budget to explore another pet park
ii. Business sponsors have expressed interest for financial support of these
items. The Working Group can discuss ways to more formally proceed
with these donations should the ordinance pass.
2. Education represents a large area of opportunity to mitigate many of these concerns.
a. As mentioned above, clear signage including ways to easily access the ordinance,
would be a priority
b. Two -By -Two, a local educational program that all Dubuque 2nd graders
participate in, provides character -building lessons that include responsible pet
ownership and engagement.
c. The BE AWARE program that is in development by Robin MacFarlane of That's
My Dog! provides an engaging and direct opportunity to teach responsible pet
ownership and how pet owners and nonowners can interact safely. Documents
and lessons for this program are available for review and discussion. Distribution
of the information from this program involves trained volunteers.
3. Enforcement concerns were discussed along with ways citizens could assist with
enforcement. Review of needs regarding animal control in general will need to be
reviewed by city staff in the Health, Police and Leisure Services Departments.
4. The Pet Friendly Working Group will continue to discuss the issue of pet parks as well.
Off -leash pet parks have different reach and implications than the current focus of
leashed pets in parks.
5. Members of the Pet Friendly Working Group are reaching out to the organizers of the
Farmer's Market to coordinate policies. These members are also available for further
discussion and clarification to Commission and Council members as well as other public
or private entities seeking additional comment.
The public has shown support of this ordinance change. The plans to address concerns with
regards to implementation costs and educational opportunities of this ordinance proposal have
been conceptualized. Should this ordinance change pass, the Pet Friendly Working Group is
prepared to move forward with the development of these plans, under the direction and
criteria placed by the Commission and the Council.
Pet Friendly Community Committee Meeting
December 11, 2019
Two by Two — Kindhearted Kids Program Presentation
Brief Facts About Two by Two
Kristin
Woodward-Vaassen
CEO & Founder
563-513-0059 (office)
4 563-543-7200 (cell)
kristin@twobytwoeducation.org
Character Development
470 W. 4th Street 1 Dubuque, IA 52001 1 twobytwoeducation.org
Nonprofit since 2005
- Mission: To develop responsible citizens of strong character who care for, respect, and
appreciate people, animals, and the environment.
- Annually reach over 1,500 students in Dubuque Community
- Every 2nd grader receives the Kindhearted Kids Program in Dubuque public and parochial
schools
Five -week program focuses on Kindness, Respect, Responsibility, and Empathy
- Many other character education programs are sprinkled throughout the community for
after -school time, for families, and sports teams that focus on our 8 core values:
Fairness, Kindness, Respect, Responsibility, Empathy, Cooperation, Perseverance, and
Citizenship
Kindhearted Kids Program - Responsibility Objectives
The students learn:
o The Two by Two Golden Rule: "Treat all living things the way you would want to
be treated."
o How to provide food, water, and shelter to a pet or lost pet
o Weekly responsibilities for a pet, like walking, playing, and cleaning up after
o The importance of taking a pet to the veterinarian for a check-up and shots
o To buy a collar with proper identification tags
o To give a loving home where the pet has toys and is given attention
o How to be responsible by loving and respecting all living things by not allowing
myself or others to harm or tease pets
o Importance of keeping dogs on leashes and cats inside for their protection
o Good decision making and being responsible in regards to petting other people's
animals (asking permission to pet the animal, letting the dog sniff your hand, etc.)
o How to act when a strange dog approaches you
o What to "say" or "do" to show empathy towards others
o Monetary costs of owning a pet and the responsibility that comes with that
ownership
(vaccination shots, spaying/neutering, cost of food/toys/bed/brush/etc.)
o Demonstrate how to be a responsible citizen — spay/neuter, etc.
*Kindhearted Kids Program may be tweaked to include more specific educational objectives to
provide a safe and healthy pet friendly community.
Provided by Kristin Woodward-Vaassen
CEO and Founder of Two by Two Character Development
Kevin Firnstahl
From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2020 6:12 PM
To: Kevin Firnstahl
Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website
Contact Us
Name: Henry Goldstei
Address: 3199 WINDMILL LN
Ward: 1
Phone: 563-258-1246
Email: hgoldste@gmail.com
City Department: City Council
Message: I wish to voice my strong objection to opening any more city parks to dogs.
With 6 parks and 1 dedicated park already open to dogs, I question why we need to allow dogs into all Dubuque parks. I'm sure
you've heard all the pro and con arguments on this issue. I simply want to place myself firmly on the side of not allowing dogs into
any more local parks. Thank you.
Click here to report this email as spam.
1
Keith Nilles
1705 Garfield Ave.
Dubuque, Iowa
have observed the prominent sign at the Dog Park that reads "ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK". I am not
sure that I would see our Dubuque parks as a welcoming environment for Dubuquers or Dubuque
visitors if our parks have the following signs:
Welcome to our beautiful parks — ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK.
I also find it interesting that we believe that we can solve the dogs in the park issue with Training. I
really believe that most dog owners can read. However, they currently have a very difficult time reading
signs - Dogs not allowed, Dogs must be on leashes and Owners must pick-up the poop in the provided
bags. All too frequently, this does not happen. How is more training going to help?
Also, last summer we were invited to attend a meeting of the park board and those interested in the
discussion of allowing dogs in the parks at Flora Park. While we were sitting there, a man with a dog
walked through the park, even though at that time it was not allowed. However, the Park Board Staff
and the Pet -Friendly people watched with approval and derided me when I pointed out the issue that
too many dog owners do not follow the approved rules. Based on this experience, I have too again ask -
What is more training going to accomplish? (Also, even though we obtained permission to share our
views at the meeting before the meeting, it was determined that the Pet -Friendly people could
determine who would be allowed to present their views and they concluded that it was a Pet -Friendly
discussion and anyone that had opposing views would not be allowed to participate).
Thank you for keeping the people parks for the people.
Kevin Firnstahl
From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2020 3:32 PM
To: Kevin Firnstahl
Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website
Contact Us
Name: Linda Chapman
Address: 3199 WINDMILL LN
Ward: 1
Phone:563-590-1664
Email: lindalouise63@yahoo.com
City Department: City Council
N)
ry
N
co
rn
Message: I wish to voice my opinion as to allowing pets in most of or all of our city parks. I am against this ordinance. We already
allow pets in 6 city park areas and we have a a dog park for pets.
While I have a neutral feeling about pets in general, I do not want or enjoy them in community areas. I have stopped visiting the
summer farmer's market because of all the animals allowed there. Even though they are leashed some of them still come up to you.
I do not like this and I do not trust all dogs. I have experienced the same feelings in our city parks where they are allowed and so
have my grandchildren. Some of the dogs have been unleashed and this is a problem even though their owners say, "They won't
hurt you".
I agree with Mayor Buol that parks are for families and children. Let's keep it that way and quit spending so much time on this issue.
Click here to report this email as spam.
1
Kevin Firnstahl
From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 12:54 PM
To: Kevin Firnstahl
Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website
Contact Us
Name: Mary J Giesler
Address: 2310 HIGH CLOUD DR
Ward: 1
Phone:563-583-8778
Email: mjgiesler@earthlink.net
City Department: City Council
by
r)
1/40
Message: I agree with allowing leased pets in specific city parks. We often have friends and family visit from out of town. They have
pets with them, and we enjoy walks in our parks to enjoy the river views.
Click here to report this email as spam.
1
Kevin Firnstahl
From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 10:28 AM
To: Kevin Firnstahl
Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website
Contact Us
Name: Mitchell Schaub
Address: 1745 Embassy West Dr
Ward: 1
Phone: 5635998100
Email: mitchschaub1138@gmail.com
City Department: City Council
Message: Good morning,
m
fl
It has come to my attention that the Council is considering allowing leashed pets in parks. Although I am not a pet owner, I heartily
support this motion. A pet -friendly city attracts new residents, and I have seen the benefits in other places I have lived such as West
Bend, Wisconsin; Largo, Florida, and Winnetka, IL. Leashed pets are not a threat to children or to public health. Leashed pets will
allow pet owners to socialize their animals in a responsible way, that will make the pets better citizens as well. I urge the Council to
pass the ordinance allowing leashed pets in city parks.
Thank you,
Mitchell Schaub
Click here to report this email as spam.
1
Carole Loetscher
430 Woodland Ridge
Dubuque, IA 52003
2OMAR-2 AM
THE PEOPLE'S PARKS: Eagle Point Park and the Dubuque Arboretum & Botanical Garder 1 iy CIe l'k s office
L)L Duque, IA
owned 7 dogs over a period of 45 years: 2 hunting dogs, 2 poodles, 2 Golden Retrievers, and
1 Springer Spaniel.
A Dog's World: On the Riverfront, Farmer's Market and City Sidewalks
The dog can begin its walk along the Mississippi River at Lock & Dam No. 11; have very good
sniffing at McDonald's Park; continue the sniffing along the River Walk, continuing south under the
Wisconsin bridge or east to the Veterans Memorial area. FIDO can walk through our City Hall
Farmers's Market; greet other canines and walk to Harbor Isle; go under the East Dubuque bridge and
meet and greet on the floodwall; the southerly walk.
It is, also, a People's World on the Riverfront.
Eagle Point Park, above Lock & Dam No. 11 to the end of the bluff; just a mile or so plus in
length — We, the people can walk with serenity and confidence, enjoying the gliding eagles and birds,
scampering chipmunks, squirrels, and the bunnies on this precious land that is kept in pristine
condition by our Park Service. Beginning on Mother's Day with the Boy Scout breakfast served to
hundreds of people, the summer concerts in the park, sitting on the grass or a chair, family picnics,
weddings, ringing of horseshoes, gazing into the lily pond at the various species of goldfish, the
laughter of children in the wading pool on a hot summer day. We marvel at the magnificent Dubuque
limestone buildings and walls.
But Eagle Point Park does not belong in a dog's world. Even if a visitor says, "My dog is just
sitting in the car," how would the gatekeeper make that judgement? Eagle Point Park is a Dubuque
Treasure, a haven for all ages. Please keep Eagle Point Park "The Peoples' Park." A Park for People
Only.
myself:
The Dubuque Arboretum & Botanical Gardens is maintained by 340 plus volunteers including
a) People come to the Summer Concerts; sit on the grass and eat their picnic suppers.
b) People come to the Arboretum for a peaceful walk or a sit on the bench for a meditation.
I hope you consider the opinions of many Dubuquers who find the serenity of Eagle Point Park
and the Dubuque Arboretum & Botanical Gardens as a soothing get -way for most of us in the
city and our visitors.
Thank you.
I have sent this letter for your consideration at the August Park and Recreation Commission
Meeting & the August 19, 2019 Dubuque City Council Meeting.
August 12, 2019
Updated February 28, 2020
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
I am writing this letter to let you know that I am not in favor of dogs in our city parks. Please read the
following to help understand my position.
My experiences with dogs are very different apparently from your experiences. I was bitten by a dog.
Our neighbors asked my wife and I to come over and help them move some furniture. They said they
would leave their garage door open, we should knock on the interior door and come in. We did that.
Immediately upon entering the house one of their German Shepherds bit me in the thigh and off to the
doctor I went. Similarly, my wife was walking alone and came upon a woman walking her dog on a
leash. She said good morning, passed the women, and as she did the dog bit her on the arm. Again, off
to the doctor who treated her, reported the incident, required by law and the owner had the dog put
down. Finally, we were walking on a beach which required dogs to be on leashes. Again, there was a
dog running loose that bit my daughter. Consequently, we spent the day at the doctor's office and
trying to find the dog's owner to be sure shots had been properly given.
Then in 2011, we moved back to Dubuque because my wife had Alzheimer's and we could no longer
travel and our families still lived in Dubuque. We moved into Sunset Park Place. During the 2011-2012
winter, we walked at the Mall. Then in the spring, we tried to walk outside in the neighborhood.
Because Laura could not process sight, it was difficult for her to walk on the sidewalks because of the
curbs and driveways. She fell a couple of times despite my holding her by either the arm or her hand.
Then I tried walking on the Bergfeld trail. We had to give that up because the dog poop on the trail that
she could not see, the dogs that were running loose that would jump on her, and the dogs that were on
leases that the owners thought it OK to allow then to jump on us. It was very frightening for her so we
gave it up and went back inside.
Fast forward to current. Laura passed away in 2014. Since that I have gotten back into bike riding and
walking. I live in the North End and frequently ride my bike from my home on the Heritage Trail to
Heritage Pond via the Bee Branch and along the river and the trail along Peosta Channel. There is not a
single day that I do not encounter dogs running loose. Last Tuesday, I encountered six dogs, five were
not on leases. Each caused me to change my bike route and speed to accommodate the dogs. Also, I
frequently walk on the floodwall south of the East Dubuque Bridge. Again, I seldom walk that trail
without encountering dogs that are not on leases. Also, there is always dog poop and little blue bags
with dog poop in them setting along the trail.
Finally, I believe our city parks should be people parks. I support the concept of "dog parks". I will not
intrude on their parks. I feel there should be parks where I can feel safe. I do not trust any dog. I like to
go to parks to relax and enjoy the beauty. I do not want to have to watch for dog poop, hear the barking
of dogs, get wrapped up in the 20' leashes, have dogs jumping on me, licking me and humping my leg.
These have been my experiences. I cannot accept the "myth" from my experiences that dog owners will
clean up after them, will keep them on leases or respect my privacy and space.
I also cannot accept that it is a training issue. I am sure most dog owners can read. There are many
signs about dogs not being allowed, that dogs should be kept on leases, and requesting that owner's
pick-up after their dogs. Yet there are way too many times these signs are ignored. Also, I certainly
believe that most dog owners are aware of these requirements. Certainly, most non -dog owners can
read and are already aware of these rules.
Also, last summer I attended a Park Board Meeting in Flora Park where the people in favor of dogs in the
parks were meeting. It was a public meeting. As we were sitting there a man came through the park
walking a dog. Although the dog was not supposed to be in the park, no one from the Park Board or the
pro -dog group addressed the issue and were offended when I mentioned the ignoring of the rules. Also,
we were told we could share our feelings if we attended the meeting. However the pro dogs in the park
representatives requested that we not be allowed to speak, and the Park Board representatives denied
us an opportunity to share our concerns.
Thank you for listening to me.
Sincerely, Keith J Nilles
Keith J. Nilles
1705 Garfield Ave.
Dubuque, IA 52001
563-556-1707
guessimust@hotmail.com
c
Dear Council Members,
I am writing not only as a pet owner, but as a Dubuque business owner, a member of the Pet
Friendly Initiative Committee set up by the city of Dubuque and an authority figure on the topic
of dog behavior. I have a competing obligation on Monday, March 2 and cannot attend the
Council's meeting so am writing to weigh in with thoughts that I hope may be of value.
You have been tasked to, once again, consider a request that has been proposed by your Park
Commission and many of your citizens for allowing leashed pets in the city parks. This issue
continues to return and I suspect will continue to return as long as Dubuque remains an outlier
regarding this issue.
Significant numbers within the Millennial and Gen Z demographic are delaying marriage,
childbearing and home ownership but are acquiring pets in extraordinary numbers. All trends
continue to point toward increased pet ownership and people regarding themselves as "pet
parents" treating their pets as family members. Whether any of us personally agree with this
trend or not is irrelevant to the reality of it. I would encourage the council to reach out to
members of the business community to see if their HR departments have run into issues with
Dubuque's lack of pet friendly amenities impacting the decisions these generations consider in
job seeking or relocation to Dubuque.
We have heard the argument that allowing pets into the parks is a health safety issue. It is a
simple matter of going to the CDC website to obtain more factual information on zoonotic
disease. Insight into which animals actually pose the highest risks to humans, how risk is
mitigated and what is the level of incidence of some of the diseases we may be most concerned
with is all available there. For reference on the most serious of zoonotic disease, Rabies, below
is a link you can copy and paste to view information about.the 23 cases of Rabies that have
occurred in the last 10 years within the US. Of those 23 cases, not a single incident has been
transmitted by a dog bite originating within the United States. I believe facts, rather than fears of
the unknown and stories of "what if" should be considered when we are discussing such an
important topic as the health risks to our community and citizens. While weighing the health
issue, please also consider and research the positives of animal ownership and the data that
supports not only the physical but also mental wellbeing of those who own pets.
As a dog behavior specialist, one of the most important things dog owners can do to improve
their dogs behavior is to spend time interacting with them. The most beneficial activities are
walking and play. Both relieve stress by providing a means for expending pent up energy. This
in turn solves most behaviors considered unwanted, such as nuisance barking. Some that
weighed in on this topic suggest that our community pet owners should play in their own
backyard or go to one of our surrounding trails to walk their dog, but they are overlooking that
many of our citizens don't own a home, yet live very near a lovely neighborhood park. Equally
as many of these individuals either don't have reliable transportation or don't wish to drive to
trails on the outskirts of our city for a variety of safety and convenience reasons. Why would we
expect these citizens to not enjoy the convenience of their neighborhood park just the same as
anyone else?
The answer of course is that we are afraid of the "what if". What if someone doesn't pick up the
poop? What if someone isn't responsible and lets their dog off leash? What if someone has a
dog that is wild and jumps up, scratches or even bites another person?
We can go down many rabbit holes of "what if'. But I believe you are all more reasonable than
that. The council expanded the rules to allow more areas accessible to leashed pets five years
ago and the city health department data supports that we have not had any significant rise in
disease, dog attacks or other such "what if" type incidents.
If you vote to open the parks to leashed pets it is inevitable that there will be some that will be
irresponsible with the privilege. There is always a percentage of irresponsible people that
believe the rules do not apply to them.
There are still those that drive while texting. Those that drink and drive. Those that break the
speed limit...yet we don't restrict everyone because of those that can't follow rules. We hold rule
breakers accountable as best we can while maintaining the privileges for all those that simply go
along without causing any problems. I'm asking you to vote for all the pet owners that will visit
the parks and you will never know they were there. You will never know because they left no
trace or negative image behind. Please vote for the invisible ones, not the outliers.
Ultimately this is an issue of tolerance. Some people do not want to tolerate having to share
space with pets. They want things to remain unchanged and as they have been. Dubuque can
remain as it is or it can move to meet the future and the demographic that will inherit it.
As a final thought, I would suggest all parks be open as proposed. My career has taken me
across much of North America and a few countries abroad. I have walked many famous places
with dogs by my side. Central Park, The Grand Canyon, Rocky Mountain National, Estes and
Garden of the Gods, to name a few. The idea of restricting certain parks like Eagle Point shows
a level of arrogance that I believe the city should not assign to its image. Eagle Point Park is
indeed beautiful and our communities signature park, but to say it has more value than the
neighborhood parks is a risky proposition. Are we essentially sending the message that
potential dog poop in Eagle Point is far more offensive and serious than potential dog poop in
Jackson or Commisky Park?
wish you well as you consider this decision. I know it has been an issue that brings out
emotion more than most. However, I suspect should you vote to adopt this ordinance change,
negative feedback and outcry about "what if" will diffuse as quickly as it did with the skate park
or the sledding in city parks issue.
Sincerely,
Robin MacFarlane
Owner: That's My Dog! Inc
5110 Wolff Rd Dubuque
563-599-3258
IND
(=,
17.
N)
Link to Rabies info: https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/location/usa/surveillance/human_rabies.html
Kevin Firnstahl
From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net>
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 1:39 PM
To: Kevin Firnstahl
Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website
Contact Us
Name: Robert Shaw
Address: 2210 Evergreen Drive
Ward:
Phone: 563-556-0655
Email: rej.shaw@gmail.com
City Department: City Council
Message: I want to let you know my opinion on the dogs in the city parks issue. I am against the idea for reasons that I have seen
expressed over the years by others - I walk frequently on Heritage Trail in the non -winter months and the people walking their dogs
there are always having to put their dogs back on the leash when they see me coming. They don't follow the rules otherwise in most
cases. I like normally like dogs but I am nervous when I see that the owner doesn't have control over the dogs, or they are too large
for the owner to handle, and then I worry that the dog could get loose, even if on a leash, and become a problem. The dog that the
owner loves and understands is not the same dog that I see coming down the trail. I don't know them, and I believe that many of
them are very protective of their owners, especially if there are children with them. I have to anticipate a bad response to any
stranger coming near them. I have no reason to think it would be different at any city park. If more dogs were allowed in city parks I
am sure I would have to try to find a different place to walk where it would be relaxing and peaceful.
Thank you for your work and your consideration of my opinions.
Bob Shaw.
Click here to report this email as spam.
1
Kevin Firnstahl
From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net>
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 1:14 PM
To: Kevin Firnstahl
Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website
Contact Us
Name: Donna Shaw
Address: 2210 EVERGREEN Dr.
Ward:
Phone: 556-0655
Email: shaw.donnal@gmail.com
City Department: City Council
Message: Dear Council members, I read in the paper that you were going to vote on whether or not to allow dogs in all of our parks.
I am hoping that you vote this proposal down. I am requesting this because I frequent our beautiful parks, but am fearful of dogs
because of being bit two different times while walking. When I see a dog, on a leash or not, coming toward me, I tense up and lose
the enjoyment of the walk. Many dog owners seem to believe that everyone loves his/her dogs, not taking into account others
experiences with pets. I have been a dog owner in the past so I must say my personal comfort with dogs has changed over time due
to my experiences. When I go to Farmers Market in the summer it seems as though one is inundated with pets, often jumping on me
due to owners not making the animal behave.There is no reason for me to believe this wouldn't also happen in the parks. If you
decide to allow dogs in all of the parks, would you then take into consideration to build a new park for those who do not enjoy being
around dogs. A new park for non -dog lovers would be expensive but would respect my need (and others) to have the right to go to
the park without a negative experience with dogs. Sincerely, Donna M. Shaw
Click here to report this email as spam.
1