The URL can be used to link to this page

5.15 PM - Smart Parking & Mobility Master Plan Copyrighted May 4, 2026 City of Dubuque WORK SESSION # City Council ITEM TITLE: 5:15 PM - Smart Parking & Mobility Master Plan SUMMARY: Transportation Services Director Ryan Knuckey is submitting information for the Smart Parking & Mobility Master Plan SUGGUESTED DISPOSITION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. MVM Memo Smart Parking & Mobility Master Plan —Work Session 2. Staff Memo - Work Session On-Street Mobile LPR 3. On-Street LPR Council Working Session-Final Page 11 of 668 Dubuque THE CITY OF � uhA�eMa cin DuB E ; . � , I � � I. Maste iece on the Mississi t 2oo�•zoiz•zois �P Pp zoi�*zoi9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager SUBJECT: Smart Parking & Mobility Master Plan —Work Session DATE: April 30, 2026 Transportation Services Director Ryan Knuckey is submitting information for the Smart Parking & Mobility Master Plan Work Session to be held on May 4, 2026, at 5:15 p.m. City Staff and Walker Consultants will review the Multiple Pay By Plate and Mobile License Plate Recognition Requests for Proposals. v Mic ael C. Van Milligen MCVM:sv Attachment cc: Crenna Brumwell, City Attorney Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager Ryan Knuckey, Transportation Services Director Page 12 of 668 Dubuque THE CITY OF � All•A�eri68 Ciry DuB E ;�� M.; I � � I. Maste iece on the Mississi 1 zoo��oiz-zois YP Pp 2017*2019 TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager FROM: Ryan Knuckey, Director of Transportation Services DATE: April 27, 2026 RE: Smart Parking & Mobility Master Plan —Work Session The purpose of this memorandum is to conduct a work session with City Council scheduled for Monday, May 4, 2026, beginning at 5:15 p.m. in the Historic Federal Building Council Chambers. City Staff and Walker Consultants will review the Multiple Pay By Plate and Mobile License Plate Recognition Requests for Proposals. During the work session the different system approaches submitted by vendors will be discussed. The team will discuss information including: overall average capital costs, average operation costs along with the functionality of each system including ways to pay along with mobile options. Page 13 of 668 . � � . � . � . � . � Cit of Du bu ue y a Smart Parking Management Plan-On-Street/LPR Work Session May 4, 2026 -..- - . ..: Agenda 1. Reasons for Parking Regulations 2. Mobile App and Kiosk Parking Systems RFP Results 3. Time Limit Parking 4. Mobile LPR System � 5. Mid-West Cities Comparison 6. Parking Department Recommendations ` � SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 15 of 6�8 � � i = o • easons or a r � n . e u at � ons Page 16 of 668 Benefits of Parking Controls for Schools P 1. Ensures Visitor Turnover Near School Entrances � �� Parking Controls help keep short-term spaces available for parents, volunteers, vendors, � � and visitors who need quick access to the building during the day. 2. Reduces Long-Term Parking in High-Demand Areas Without parking controls, students, staff, or nearby residents may occupy prime curb spaces all day. Parking controls preserve these spaces for short-duration school traffic. 3. Improves Safety During Drop-Off and Pick-Up Parking controls discourage unnecessary lingering near entrances, reducing congestion and improving visibility for buses, walkers, and crossing guards. 4. Manages Overflow Parking During Events Parking controls ensure some parking remains available near the school during busy events like conferences, performances, and games. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 17 of 6�8 Benefits of Parking Controls for Schools P � �� 6. Encourages Students to Use Designated Lots � � Parking controls prevent school students from taking the most convenient on-street spaces, directing them toward assigned lots and reducing curb congestion. 7. Creates a Fair System for All Users Everyone pays for only the time they need, ensuring equal access for parents, staff, substitute teachers, and service providers. 8. Supports Neighborhood Relations Properly managed curb space prevents school traffic from spilling into residential streets, reducing frustration for neighbors. 9. Makes Parking Behavior More Predictable Parking controls create consistent patterns of use, enabling schools and city planners to better understand peak times, demand, and safety needs. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 18 of 6�8 Benefits of Parking Controls for Residents P � �� 1. Flexible Times � � With parking controls, people choose how long they want to stay instead of being forced to leave after a fixed time. 2. No Need to Rush Parking controls eliminate the stress of watching the clock or cutting visits short to avoid a citation. 3. Ability to Extend Time Remotely Modern parking controls and apps let people add time from their phones, making trips far more convenient. 4. Fewer Disputed Citations Parking controls give users control over their duration. Users can extend time as needed. 5. More Predictable Parking Parking controls help ensure that at least some spaces are available, reducing circling around the block. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 19 of 6�8 Benefits of Parking Controls for Residents P � �� 6. Fair Use of Prime Spaces � � Everyone pays for what they use, preventing employees or long-term parkers from monopolizing the best curb spots. 7. Better Support for Longer Errands Appointments, shopping, dining, and events all vary in length; parking controls accommodate these events naturally. 8. Improved Downtown Experience People would rather enjoy their visit than worry about a two-hour limit or having to move their vehicle. 9. Clearer Rules Parking controls make it obvious what the rules are: pay for the time you need. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 20 of 698 Benefits of Parking Controls for Businesses P 1. Ensures Frequent Customer Turnover � �� Parking controls prevent all-day parking, keeping spaces rotating so new customers can � � access the business throughout the day. 2. Increases Customer Access to Storefronts When prime spaces stay open more often, people are more likely to stop in spontaneously, boosting walk-in traffic. 3. Reduces Employee and Residential Parking in Front of Stores Parking controls discourage employees from occupying the best spots, preserving curb space for paying customers. 4. Improves Perception of Availability Instead of seeing every curb space full, customers see open, convenient parking making downtown feel easier to access. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 21 of 6�8 Benefits of Parking Controls for Businesses P 5. Decreases Circling for Parking � �� With priced turnover, fewer cars circle the block looking for free spaces, improving the � � overall customer experience. 6. Creates Fair Access for All Customers No single driver can monopolize prime curb space. Everyone gets a fair shot at convenient parking. 7. Helps Attract Out-of-Town Visitors Visitors don't know where free long-term parking is, but they do know how to use parking control devices. Easy access increases their likelihood of shopping downtown. 8. Reinforces the Value of Curb Space Curb space is some of the most valuable real estate a business has. Parking controls ensure it's used for active customers, not storage. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 22 of 6�8 Why Larger and Growing Cities have Parking Controls P Promotes fairness in parking � ---�'� Everyone gets equal access to limited parking rather than only � � early arrivers or long-term parkers. Discourages long-term storage of vehicles Parking controls prevent cars from sitting for days on key commercial blocks. Encourages use of off-street parking options Paid curb parking directs workers and long-term parkers to use garages and lots, which are designed for longer stays. Supports urban economic development Predictable, available parking improves the downtown experience, boosting commerce and investment. Generates revenue for public services Parking control revenue can support overall repair and payments of ramps, lots and equipment. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 23 of(-3� Why Larger and Growing Cities have Parking Controls P Encourages alternative transportation � ---�'� Paid parking makes walking, biking, and transit relatively more � � appealing for short trips. Supports special events and tourism Parking controls keep turnover high, ensuring visitors can access attractions and venues without circling around the block. Aligns with environmental goals Less vehicle idling and cruising helps reduce emissions and supports climate plans. Improves the user experience Modern parking controls and apps make payment and extension easy, avoiding citations and improving convenience. Improves safety Reduced cruising and clearer curb rules help lower accident risks and keep sidewalks and walk lanes more organized. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 24 of @8� � � i = o • • . o � e an � os ar � n stems esu ts Page 25 of 668 Mobile Parking App P • Pros: � �� — Pay from your phone without walking to a parking control device Q Q — Extend time remotely — View receipts and parking history easily — Can offer reminders when time is expiring — Reduces need for physical infrastructure and maintenance — Often allows multiple payment methods (credit, digital wallet, etc.) — Helpful for visitors who have already installed the app (many have regional/national coverage) — Popular apps allow License Plate Numbers and Payment Methods to be stored on the phone for reuse • C011S: — Requires a smartphone and mobile data or Wi-Fi — App setup can be confusing for some users — Technical issues (app crashes, poor cell signal, password problems) — Some users resist creating an account or storing payment info — Can feel inconvenient for quick, low-tech transactions — Might create perception of "technology barriers" SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 26 of @� Parking Kiosk P • Pros: � �� — Easy, familiar, little to no technology learning curve Q Q — Works for people without smartphones to utilize cash and credit card options — No account or app setup required — Good for quick stops or one-time users — Provides a physical presence that reassures people the system is working • C011S: — Requires users to walk to/from the kiosk — Machines require maintenance and repairs — Cash/coin handling costs — Requires user to walk a variable distance to a kiosk SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 27 of(-3f� Direct Comparison Summary P • Advantages of a Mobile-App-Only System � .�� — No hardware purchase Q Q — No installation, repairs, or physical maintenance, only signs and sticker installation — No cash management — Much lower staff labor required • Advantages of a Kiosk System — Works for people without smartphones and that are unbanked — Provides redundancy when the app has issues — Good for tourists or users who don't want to use technology — Promotes equity/accessibility • Disadvantages of Mobile-App-Only — Requires every customer to have a smartphone and payment method — Can generate public frustration if the app is the only option and apps need to be downloaded — Perceived as less inclusive • Disadvantages of Kiosks — Higher upfront capital costs — Higher ongoing operational costs — Regular repairs and consumables — Shorter hardware lifespan compared to software systems SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 28 of(-3f� Mobile-App-Only System (No Kiosks) P Typical annual costs: � �� • Vendor / Platform Fees � � — Usually $0—$500 per year (many apps charge $0.00 upfront) — Some charge small annual service fees for custom features • Transaction Fees — Paid by the customer or the city, depending on how the system is configured. — Typically, the convenience fee is about $0.10—$0.45 per transaction — Credit card processing fees of 2%-4% per transaction • Administrative Costs — Staff time for system management, user issues, enforcement integration • Technology/Support — Integration with enforcement systems — Contract management — Minimal hardware needs • Total Annual Operating Cost Range — $0—$5,000 dollars total depending on platform — No per-device operational expense because there are no devices — Credit card processing fees of 2%-4% per transaction (which apply to all credit card transactions by any means) SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 29 of(-3E� Parking Kiosk System P • Upfront costs per kiosk include: � �� — $1,500—$7,000 per kiosk for full operations Q Q • Vendor / Platform Fees/Maintenance Fees — Vendors ranged from $300 to $1,561 annual fee per unit. • $78,875-$410,625 with 263 total units • Transaction Fees (When Credit Card is used) — Paid by the customer or the city, depending on how the system is configured. — Credit card processing fees of 2%-4% per transaction • Administrative Costs — Staff time for system management, user issues, enforcement integration — Costs for cash collection along with system repairs by Parking Technicians • Technology/Support — Integration with enforcement systems — Contract management • Total Annual Operating Cost Range — Employee expenses for paid parking range from $34,156-$36,348 — Vendors software and maintenance ranged from $78,875-$410,625 annual cost — Credit card processing fees of 2%-4% per transaction SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 30 of 6fi$ � � i = o • • • • ime imit ar in Page 31 of @� Time Limit Parking Pros • Simple to understand signage and navigate. • Lower expenses to start-up, maintain, and upgrade syste m. • No cost to parker if compliant with posted rules. �� ; �. � . I y I� � } 1 �� .� �� ,��. I�� i�, '�� * _ . pr� , �� r �� _ A�'��' (1� .� ,, ■ ��'�� t , , _ .. ,�� ., �� ',dA� - E3�� i ' " — , � �' ': � � ' � �% "� � !' .. \'— SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 32 of eE� � Time Limit Parking Cons _ — • Can create stressful or rushed visits. • No revenue generated from on-street parking. -�-�;� • Requires increased Parking Enforcement due to parked '��: vehicle needing to be observed twice for violations. ., � � _...�; �. �� ' - .. �.. • More of the costs incurred by the city to supply and ��- " ,�F��.,¢� ��'�� : - .� :._ maintain parking are borne by all taxpayers rather than � _��:._4� being supported with user fees. � �'��?" :_=, /, SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 33 of� Mid-West Cities Comparison . - ��, _ Cedar Falls, IA (population of 41,700) � — ESutSt� ■ Time limits- multiple time limit options ranging from 2 to Cedar Fall� Library I� �- PostOffice OCommunity 24-hour parking �� Centeil w �,st- Eb�h'st � ■ Downtown is strictly timed. College Hill section is both �, p Bi�� J , � Sr time limits and Kiosk/Parking App systems in parking lots. 0 , ' - -Erfi�- Parking permits in lots only incoln ■ Citation Fines- $25 per fine, multiple tickets can be me�rtary Enforced Monday-Saturday 9AM-8PM �chool On Street Parking Off Street Parking written — W 8th St � �2 Hour Limit �4 Hour Lot � ■ Downtown Enforcement- 9 a.m.- 8 p.m. manual �� C��3 Hour Limit �24 Hour Lot � -�I, �r'��, �24 Hour Limit �Shared Lot as sign ��...�na�.��.a,��u� enforcement ■ Only revenue is from parking permits and citations SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 34 of�$ Mid-West Cities Comparison . ��,�J��s �- � � � � Marshalltown, IA (population of 28,040) ��"` �`" �� ■ Time limits only- 3-hour time limits (minimal 30 to 90-minute � •� � ? � �—# � stalls in specific areas) , - -- _ _,�,� ____.. ■ Public parking lots are free downtown � � � - - �� i � � " -_" � ■ Citation Fines- $20 fine - _ ■ Enforcement- Walk, manual operation , r 3 ■ PEO (50% parking and 50% city nuisance calls) , . ', � �. ■ No paid parking locations downtown ■ Downtown area is around 3 blocks by 6 blocks, outside of the downtown area there are minor regulations (Example: Alternative side parking) SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 35 of� Mid-West Cities Comparison . Burlington, IA (population of 23,471) �J w m � .�.�...� � ��,. �Boat r� _ = 0 0= �mP ■ Time limits only, no meters, kiosks, or apps I- I- C�.�hO'�SP' � W N p Q I'I (DLUMBIA Si � F COLUMBIA Si � Z.��e, ■ 2-hour time limits on main street with businesses SNAMEr �� 5� ��4� .p�rki Potlof �ALLEY N Hall � �3 � Deak Barliogta� ti� WASH��ro�d ST '� °i wASH�N�TON ST ■ 3-hour time limits directly off of the Main Street (further out is f p�. �a Senor PostOffi�e �° � 3' `�°��` 0 � free parking) r � � � " '�6 " � f1e,�, �'°"�e = "'em°�'a' ■ Biggest issue/concern is employee parking in the time zones � � � "� Dept.�� Autlimrium . � p (�a� p H N F VALIEY Si = � VAtLEY ST LL z NAN�, � � ■ Reserved permit parking lots, some free lots and spaces u[ari[ e m � PaRx �� p IP - S ■ They do not patrol the lots. The reserved permit spaces are enforced DOWNTOWN PUBLIC PARKING �� MA"KEi Sr ` MAqKEi Si R by the permit holder OnStreet Parking OflStreet Parking I � m IJ� �2"°°`"m'P ■Pa'dPa`k'"9`°`' " I z ■ Enforcement 8 a.m.— 5 p.m. � a 3HourLimH' ReeParkingLot � � NoLimit LokwithLeasetlParkingavailable p��510N ST irai� ��d��a��b��umbe�5+ oe�� ■ PEO team is walking, chalking tires currently x PaidPa�kiogandHou�lyLimits � .' eofo�cedMonaay-F�iaay,sAMtosPM — ■ Citations- $15 past 2 hours, multiple tickets can be written ■ Citations and reserved parking are the only revenue generated SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 36 of� Mid-West Cities Comparison . Eau Claire, WI (population of 70,871) \ I�'n I . -�� CLAI RE Current time limits downtown- 2-hour time limits, enforced ..`__ � from 6 a.m.-6 p.m. except for holidays - ■ Citations are $15 for past two-hour violations. Multiple tickets can be given � ■ A License Plate Recognition system is currently being used ■ Time limits are hard to enforce, it requires multiple passes to �� enforce � , ■ Business employees biggest time limit issues -/, ..- ,__-___, y� i � � ' ;. �,�. - ! ? � '=.�" .,� ■ Currently no downtown revenue from time limits ' , � - I. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 37 of� Mid-West Cities Comparison . Eau Claire, WI (population of 70,871) I � � i � ■ Changing to a parking controlled system. Hoping for more turnover ■ Moving forward with a Kiosk system and Passport app, pay by plate J U L model ;Y;� P�AN�INud��"iSE��;�;t�, ■ Time limits are hard to enforce, it takes multiple passes to enforce ��i i � �"'� �' uM��1� ■ Currently 9 Kiosk (3 in parking lots and 6 in ramps) Adding around 8.;�:I�FM;EIMCIVV�ESS ��MEPqC�IpID�RD�' 20 more to the downtown area 8��,��f�� ■ Their downtown area is around 3 blocks wide by 7 blocks long . I��m��m�}��!ra�:n��c�a�r��i�+�ro�h�sa�s�^ �nu��3��m SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 38 of�S Time Limits VS Paid Parking P 1. Purpose & Effectiveness � �� • Time Limits: Encourage turnover but often inconsistently enforced; effectiveness � � depends on staff. • Paid Parking: Directly manages demand; pricing keeps spaces available in high-use areas. 2. User Experience • Time Limits: Can create stress and rushed visits; risk of getting a citation for staying a few minutes too long. • Paid Parking: More flexible—visitors choose how long to stay and can extend time via parking controls or app. 3. Impact on Businesses • Time Limits: May discourage longer shopping, dining, or appointments. • Paid Parking: Encourages turnover while still allowing longer stays when needed. 4. Revenue & Reinforcement • Time Limits: No revenue; requires city funding for enforcement. • Paid Parking: Generates revenue that can improve downtown parking systems. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 39 of G� Time Limits VS Paid Parking P 5. Enforcement � �� • Time Limits: Labor-intensive; requires chalking or digital marking every block. � � • Paid Parking: Easier to enforce; violations are clear. 6. Behavior Outcomes • Time Limits: Encourages "spot shuffling," where drivers move a vehicle slightly to reset the clock. • Paid Parking: Reduces unnecessary circulation because people no longer need to move their car to extend their stay. 8. Flexibility • Time Limits: One-size-fits-all; cannot adapt to different block demands or special events. • Paid Parking: Pricing can vary by location or time of day to match real-world usage patterns. 9. Modernization • Time Limits: Outdated approach that doesn't integrate well with smart city tech. • Paid Parking: Supports mobile apps, occupancy data, dynamic pricing, and real-time planning. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 40 of G$$ Current On-Street Meter Revenue P v �J��G On-Street Parking Revenue (Meters Parking Lot Revenue $645,000.0o Only) (Permits Only) $250,000.00 $640,000.00 $635,000.00 $200,000.00 $630,000.00 $150,000.00 $625,000.00 $100,000.00 $620,000.00 $615,000.00 $50,000.00 $610,000.00 $0.00 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 • Removing meters from the downtown area and lots would shift costs to the general public and away from individuals utilizing the parking system. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page41 of� � � i = o • o � e stem Page 42 of� Mobile LPR System Pros • Increases efficiency of city staff. • Can be used for multiple purposes: — Payment enforcement. a r"• l , - — Local resident permit enforcement. �.� ■__� � � . - � �- — Time restriction and Kiosk enforcement. _ :�� _ _ `� — Parking data reporting for city planning purposes. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 43 of 6� � Mobile LPR System Cons _ = • Vehicle and system maintenance costs. • Weather including fog, snow, and rain. -�. : �a. � ,�n .6� . -r�.-, ��"y �_e �!` ,�i � T�.4��. 1 ' ' ;,-r�. — — — '�� / '� �� ;.a_,�' *;,�.' ,•a � `3 ,. _ . ___ � �e."'o� � - - --� � � � � : � .,�1`_ ��1� ` {.. /-�'� .�- ' ,�' � t. .i'� �t�,�F F � . -- '" _. M � ! ,� � '� - �.. �4 � r .,, � — - I i � ��t ��P;AKKING LNft_r;� f'_�. � �� _w �a 1 %,�� ► . ._ -.., � _: ,_ � _ -, , . ;. — • I SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 44 of 6�� Mobile LPR System P Typical annual costs: � �� • Vendor / Platform Fees � � — $20,000-$35,000 per year for Software costs (SAAS, software upgrades) — Equipment costs and Installation of equipment $75,000-$200,000 for start up equipment) • Administrative Costs — Staff time for system management, user issues, enforcement integration • Technology/Support — Integration with enforcement systems — Contract management — Minimal hardware needs • Total Annual Operating Cost Range — $20,000-$35,000 per year for Software costs (SAAS, software upgrades) — Increase fuel costs depends on number of units purchased, estimated $7,800 per vehicle SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 45 of�S � � i = o • • • • � - est �t � es om a r � son Page 46 of� Mid-West Cities Comparison . Cedar Rapids, IA (population of 137,000) ■ 100% Pay-By-Plate, no meters or street space signs, only �, painted lines on street indicating spaces. ■ Using LPR enforcement. :� ■ 15 On-Street pay stations located in various, high use � , � �� areas.(Around 1100 spaces) _} � � , i�l �„ -�� - �b�� ,,; � - ■ Using Park Mobile and Passport apps. +mm,Ii._�' � �� ;L .�,; : � � � � - -ea�o��1.�_�9.� ' _ . QR Codes displayed on various street signs in the area. - ■ In 2025, 83% of Parkers used the app compared to 17% using '�, kiosks. .T' �' •�O`i1� . . - ,. _ _ SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 47 of 6� Mid-West Cities Comparison . Des Moines, IA (population of 214,133) � ■ Using Park Mobile app. �� ■ 1 or 2 Kiosks per block accepting credit or debit cards and :i==��=' _ -��- quarters only for payments. :�.'' �� !�� ■ Each space identified by a sign with space numbers, no _ ��I��0 _��_..T.T; ,,.,,�,_,,�,:: �: �I�'I�` pay by plate option. � �. :.,,, _ : , : :., .. �� _�. - - �� :�. � ;�,�� iil�� - �,�- � �� ' IIIII I ■ Not using LPR enforcement due to use of space numbers � 1, m �!��n�... �e . �' m ��r�%% �` ' ; !�I�� rather than license plates. -; - -- _ �� - — � ;� -�. m r rr n r �I�< � �-'`r. : - � _r , ,� ,, ��''� � ,�`�s �4� � '� �,�,�� ' ` l� ' ■ Text to pay is also available and some areas are limited to F , . �.. �d _ ,q��• ��t��. �'..... � �` � � � �� a 4-hour max. _ _ "I'�� ■ Currently, 70% of Parkers use the app compared to 30% . - _ .� _ __.____ --- - -� using kiosks. SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 48 of 6�8 Mid-West Cities Comparison . - lowa City, IA (population of 74,825) ■ All meters still on streets and in lots. _,� . -�.; _ ��''=�� ■ Meters accept coin and debit cards. System is not user �r�-r�rn � �i L rr7 r o, �",;r„ •.�� • f—TTTT7�T7� T�iSiTl ��.. :��+�� T- p� � friendly due to excessive steps. r ..y: �`ir'-rr�'� i �_`� CI � � : � =�"" � � � � � � ■ Planning to remove meters in three lots and going to , - �- - � � . -� � �� Y�_ �t� r �i� � � �F. - _ Park Mobile app soon. ��-�„ �;a . _�� ' � �'� ■ Not using LPR enforcement. ,, f � � b� �,,� a P , � � t ,. 9.� ; �+G� �� r � �. l � �� j �. �� '�S� yQ � i 1,. �_;'_�J 1 �y i _- t+s;, F; �y�`��i1-.� . �� ;�� i1 � `�`� t t,�" O; ,�r� � -Y�� ^. ` y;�1< ��'aeS{ '.:• � P,, �� -` .��'� l�� 5�� u� „A'�e�� s� v.:' ��f ,� :�lY� � e� .,. � w�;R� i ` � p�.i� J _ � 10 � a�� : .�.r :��. �� : : SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 49 of 6� Mid-West Cities Comparison . � �__� _ __ Waterloo, IA (population of 67,314) ' ■ First hour free Parking, LPR Vehicle enforces • After the first free hour, on-street and ramp parking will be $1.00 per hour. � - - , • For those parking on-street for more than four hours, the rate will be $2.00 per hour. �'"- • Parking kiosks (18) and a mobile option will be � • � nrn �,—, ��;� „-:�� e �� available to pay for parking. (Around 800 spaces) � � . �� - - � �e ��• - - - = ��; 6�=�� • Fines for first-time violations are at $15.00 if paid �e i �� - - -��_,�, / � '�`�� `�''' within 30 days and $20 if paid after 30 days. � /�� :;:� - - ;.� • For vehicles that remain in violation for more than four ' ' hours in a single day the fine will be $30.00 if paid �� `1 'Ly � ,� �� within 30 days and $35.00 if paid after 30 days. i. ��-- • , ,++„ �,'�'_.� __ � , , , t-.:., ;x_:�. � • , `"-� , i i SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 50 of 6�$ � � i = o • ar in e artment . ecommen at � ons Page 51 of� Recommending Mobile App and Kiosk Parking System • Parkers pay for what they use. � • Offers multiple payment options (mobile pay, physical cash, " �' �,�.� "�-�, QR code) � `= � \ ,� � � � �; � �� • Encourages turnover of the most desirable spaces. �-� '� �� r��! �t� • System produces time stamped evidence of transactions. `�l-=- �� , �� • Cash options for all to use. �1° � J�L • Data Driven future decisions. � y -0�� ;i 'rA l • On-Street Kiosk and Lots match up. - ��- SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Page 52 of 6� Recommending License Plate Recognition Technology • Increases efficiency of city staff. • Can be used for multiple purposes: — Payment enforcement. — Parking data reporting for city planning purposes. — Local resident permit enforcement. -< ,,,��s;,�:.�. 4 ,��..0 ,� - �- ��,� ' '� ,�� =��;,;�� :, . — Time restriction and Kiosk enforcement. �:: �� ' �: -� � � �� ° � .a-.�. ;� =� � ,:� - :�; �� N��;��'.�; ——� —�.- 3• � �-. i .. . L" ^�t��, " � � � « �•� '� ' �� -_ �_- t � - � •.L' .r� .-:. _ 1 � �[V3�� ' 1 �I I' ��.,��'�_��'�. I�';�'. 1'.I-(,'.. �� '\\,�� .^ � %,�\� ��I� . • , . . .._......._ -r_ .. --,. ..- _, _. ...::... .�- � •� SMART PARKING & MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN , � . � � . � . � . � . � THANK YOU ! QU ESTIONS? www.cityofdubuque.org/TheJule � www.cityofdubuque.org/Parki --•- - • ••_