The URL can be used to link to this page

623 - 627 Arlington - Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission Decision City Clerk's Office 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 52001-4864 (319) 589-4120 (319) 589-0890 FAX THECITYOF L~ DUBDtJL~E ~~~ November 13, 2000 Vicky Bechen B & W Properties 575 English Lane Dubuque IA 52003 Tim Wood B & W Properties 550 English Lane Dubuque IA 52003 SUBJECT: Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission Action - 623-627 Arlington St. Dear Ms. Bechen and Mr. Wood: On November 6, 2000, the City Council affirmed the action of the Historic Preservation Commission to deny a Certificate of Economic Hardship to install vinyl siding on all sides of your property at 623-627 Arlington Street. If you are not satisfied by the decision of the City Council, you may appeal within sixty (60) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Services Department at 589-4210. Sincerely, ~~ ~/2) 'A:'/~4~D~'t#./ Jeanne Schneider City Clerk JS/mkr cc: Historic Preservation Commission Service People Integrity Responsibility Innovation Teamwork APPEAL OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DECISION FOR 623-627 ARLINGTON STREET Planning Services Department 30 1`:?st 13th Street Duouctue, Iowa 32001-~So-} Phone (319) 359--1210 Ear X319) 359-i2_1 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 RE: Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission Decision Applicant: Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, B&W Properties Project: Install Vinyl Siding Location: 623-627 Arlington Street District: W. 11th Street Historic District Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Introduction THE CITY OF ~~ ~UBL~~E ~~~~ ~ ~r~ October 24, 2000 The letter transmits the Historic Preservation Commission's record concerning a vinyl siding request by B & W Properties for property located at 623-627 Arlington Street in the West 11th Street Historic District. Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, property owners, are appealing the Commission's denial of installation of vinyl siding. This appeal is the owners' third appeal of the Commission's decisions regarding this property. This letter transmits information on all three appeals. Application for Certificate of Appropriateness -- Vinyl Siding on Entire Structure On May 20 and June 3, 1999, the Commission reviewed a request for a Certifrcate of Appropriateness from Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen, B&W Properties, to install vinyl siding on the structure at 623-627 Arlington Street. They requested that the current wood clapboard siding be replaced with vinyl siding due to lead paint on ttte existing siding, and the size and height of the building. After review, the Commission found that the replacement material was not appropriate and was not consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Commission noted that they must follow the Secretary's Standards, which recommend that existing wood siding be maintained and repaired as necessary, and if Sen ice People [ntagrity Responsibilihr Innovation Teamwork The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Page 2 it needs to be replaced, that the replacement material be either new wood siding or a compatible substitute material. The Commission recommended that the property owner scrape the old paint off the existing wood clapboard and repaint, or replace the wood clapboard that is in disrepair with new wood clapboard that is similar to the existing siding. The application was denied by a unanimous vote of 5 to 0. With the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness, an applicant then can apply for a Certificate of Economic Hardship. Application fior Certificate of Economic Hardship -- Vinyl Siding on Entire Struc#ure On June 17, 1999, the Commission reviewed a request for a Certificate of Economic Hardship from Mr. Wood and Ms. i3echen to install vinyl siding on the structure at 623- 627 Arlington Street. The Commission discussed with the property owners their documentation regarding the economic return on the property with removal of lead paint by scraping versus covering the existing wood siding with vinyl siding to abate the lead paint hazard. The Commission found that completing the work by scraping and painting the wood siding would not prevent the property owner from earning any reasonable return from the property, and denied the request by a vote of 4 to 1. Initial Appeal: Certificate of Economic Hardship -- Vinyl Siding on Entire Structure On August 6, 1999, the applicants submitted a letter of appeal to the City Council, and included new documentation on the economic return of the property that the Commission had not reviewed. The City Council reviewed this request at their September 7, 1999, meeting. After discussion, the City Council referred the request back to the Commission because additional materials had been presented to them, that had not been presented to the Commission. Since the Commission had not reviewed this information, the City Council could not consider it as part of the appea{. Revised Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship -- Vinyl Siding on Two Sides and Rear of Structure and Rehabilitation of Front Facade with Wood Siding The Commission met on September 16, 1999, to discuss this request. Staff suggested a compromise proposal to approve vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear of the structure, to approve redoing the front facade with wood clapboard siding, new The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Page 3 windows and wooden porch columns, and to request additional funding from the City's lead pain# abatement program because the structure is in a historic district. Due to the length of the agenda and the time constraints of Mr. Wood and Ms. Bechen, the Commission tabled their request. On October 21, 1999, the applicants indicated that they agreed with the staff's suggestions, and then discussed the project and economic documentation with the Commission. The Commission tabled the request, and asked staff investigate additional funding sources, including a request to the Housing Service Department for additional funds from the lead paint abatement program. On November 17, 1999 the Commission discussed the project, and reviewed information on additional funding available from the City's lead paint abatement program. A motion to approve the vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear of the structure, and to redo the front facade with wood siding as recommended by staff failed for lack of a majority by a 2 to 2 vote. This failed motion constituted a denial. Second Appeal: Certificate of Economic Hardship -Vinyl Siding on Two Sides and Rear of Structure and Rehabilitation of Front Facade with Wood Siding The applicants then submitted a second appeal to the City Council of the Commission's November 17, 1999, denial. The City Council reviewed this request at their December 20, 1999, meeting. After discussion, the City Council referred this request back to the Commission due to the lack of a majority vote. in addition, the City Council asked the Commission to address the following two issues: The City Council noted that the Commission initially expressed concems wi#h inadequate maintenance, but these concerns were not brought to closure. The City Council asked the Commission to bring this issue to closure. 2. The City Council asked the Commission to explain why it did not accept the recommendations of City staff. Referral of Certificate of Economic Hardship - Vinyl Siding on Two Sides and Rear of Structure and Rehabilitation of Front Facade with Wood Siding On January 20, 2000, the applicants and the Commission reviewed the request. The Commission then tabled the request to February 17, 2000, to conduct a work session The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Page 4 with the Housing Services Department on lead paint abatement requirements and costs. This work session was held on February 3, 2000. On February 17, 2000, the Historic Preserva#ion Commission tabled the request to March 16, 2000, at the applicants' request. At a March 2, 2000, work session, the Commission discussed the case with Legal staff, who advised that past history should not be addressed in regard to economic hardship. Revised Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship-- Viny! Siding on Entire Structure At the Commission meeting on March 16, 2000, the applicants submitted revised figures and costs that revised the application submitted in January, 2000. At the meeting, the applicants also indicated that their application was now revised for installation of vinyl siding on the entire structure, that they had withdrawn their request to restore the front facade and install vinyl siding on the sides and rear as recommended by staff, and they had withdrawn ftom the lead paint abatement program due to lack of funding. The Commission discussed the applicant's newly revised application materials. Planning Services staff reviewed the two questions from the City Council regarding the Commission's concerns with inadequate maintenance, and why the Commission did not accept the staff recommendation. Legal staff advised the Commission that past maintenance of this property, or lack thereof, should not be considered with this application. Legal staff also advised that since the applicants had withdrawn their support for the staff recommendation, it no longer was a consideration for the application. After further discussion of the newly submitted numbers, the Commission denied the revised request for vinyl siding on the entire structure by a vote of 3 to 2, with one abstention due to submission of a revised application at the meeting. Re-revised Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship--Vinyl Siding on Entire Structure The applicants resubmitted their request to install vinyl siding on the entire structure on April 7, 2000. On May 18, 2000, after discussion, the Commission approved vinyl siding on two sides and the rear, and restoration of the front facade by a vote of 5 to 0. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Page 5 The applicants then asked the Commission to vote on vinyl siding for the entire structure; the Commission declined to vote again, and instead asked Planning Services staff to ask for additional funding assistance from the Housing Services Department. On June 15, 2000, the Commission tabled the application to July 20, 2000, at the_ applicants' request. On July 20, 2000, the Commission again tabled the application for one month at the applicants' request, and asked Planning Services staff to obtain two appraisals: one °as is°, and one with improvements. On August 17, 2000, the two appraisals were received by Planning Services staff in the afternoon. The appraisals were faxed to the applicants, and then distributed to the Commission at their meeting that evening. The Commission reviewed the request again, as well as the two appraisals. The applicants and the Commission discussed that the applicants cannot earn a reasonable economic return under any option. The applicants then indicated that if they could receive grant money for the lead paint abatement, then they would remove the vinyl siding on the front and restore this facade as previously recommended. After public input and discussion, the Commission denied the request for vinyl siding on the entire structure by a vote of 3 to 2. Third Appeal: Certificate of Economic Hardship -- Vinyl Siding on Entire Structure On September 28, 2000, the applicants submitted an appeal to the City Council of the Commission's denial of their request to install vinyl siding on the entire structure. The following items are attached, and are the complete records of this project: 1. Letters of Appeal to the City Council. 2. Application for Certificate of Appropriateness. 3. Applications for Certificate of Economic Hardship. 4. Minutes of Historic Preservation Commission meetings of May 20, June 3, June 17, September 16, October 21 and November 17, 1999; and January 20, February 3, February 17, March 2, March 16, May 18, June 15, July 20, and August 17, 2000. 5. Notices of Decision dated July 11, 1999; November 17, 1999; and August 17, 2000. 6. Two appraisals of the property requested by the Commission. 6. Sections 25-9, 25-10 and 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 7. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Honorable Mayor and Appeal of HPC Decision: Page 6 Conclusion City Council Members 623-627 Arlington Street In conclusion, the Commission's last two votes on this project have been as follows: May 18, 2000: The Commission approved a Certificate of Economic Hardship for installation of vinyl siding on two sides and the rear, and restoration of the front facade with wood siding by a vote of 5 to 0. August 17, 2000: The Commission denied a Certificate of Economic Hardship for installation of vinyl siding on the entire structure by a vote of 3 to 2. The applicants indicated in their appeal letter to the City Council that the lengthy review of their case is due to the Commission. The-Commission feels that the lengthy review of this case is a result of both the Commission and the applicants' approaches. Some of the delays were due to tabling at the Commission's discretion, to better understand the applicants' numbers, or to obtain additional information, such as appraised value, lead pain# abatement requirements, and additional lead paint abatement grant funds. Some delays were due to tabling at the applicants' request. Some delays were due to the timeliness and organization of information from the applicants. For example, on several occasions, the applicants submitted incomplete or unorganized information, or handed out new numbers at a meeting, which made the Commission's review process confusing and lengthy for everyone involved. The applicants indicated in their appeal fetter to the City Council that the City Code sets a reasonable economic return at 10 to 12 percent. in fact, the Historic Preservation Ordinance does not define °reasonable economic return". In our initial report to the City Council on the review and update of the Ordinance, we made the following observation: There are other ordinances that do define the term. For example, New York City defines °reasonable return" to be a net annual return of 6% of valuation where net annual return is defined as net operating income excluding mortgage payments and deducting for depreciation. There is nothing particularly magic about °6%,° but rates lower than 6% could create openings for challenge in the courts. The Commission feels that we have worked hard and long to try to negotiate a solution with Ms. Bechen and Mr. Wood, and that the opportunity still exists to reach a solution. Initially, the applicants indicated their support for the staff's recommendation to install vinyl siding on the sides and rear, and restore the front facade. They then withdrew The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Page 7 their support for this recommendation, and the lead paint abatement program, at our March 16, 2000 meeting, and distributed new numbers at this meeting. At our August 17, 2000, the applicants then said they would support the staff recommendation if they could participate in the lead paint abatement program. Section 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance states that on appeal, the City Council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City Council must consider whether the Commission exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and whether the Commission's action was patently arbitrarily or capricious. Section 25-11 provides that the City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's decision, or they may refer the matter back to the Commission for such further action as may be appropriate. The Historic Preservation Commission believes that we have followed the intent of the Historic Preservation Ordinance to the best of our ability. The Commission respectfully requests that the City Council affirm the Commission's decision regarding the property at 623-627 Arlington Street. The Commission also requests the opportunity to address the City Council when this appeal is heard, to review our record and answer questions. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ ~~ Terry Mozena, Chairperson Historic Preservation Commission Attachments cc: Historic Preservation Commission Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager James O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney Tim Wood, B 8~ W Properties Vicky Bechen, B & W Properties THIRD APPEAL CITY OF E?USl;QL3c Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SO W. 13th St. Dub., Ia. 52001 P ~ 8 2000 We wish to speak to the City Council at your Nov. 6 meeting to appeal the action of the Historical Preservation Commission regarding installation of vinyl siding on a duplex at 623-627 Arlington. We purchased the Arlington duplex in 1993. At the time of the purchase, the property was an old home that had been repaired and patched over the years. We knew that the home was in a Historical Preservation District (HPD), but at the time of the purchase there was no public awareness or concern about lead-base paint. We accumulated some funds and financing and in 1998 we planned to do some signif cant internal a.nd external repairs. The exterior paint had begun to peel and the City Housing Services Department had cited us for peeling paint. It was also about this time that the public and the City of Dubuque became concerned about the _ existence of lead-base paint and, as we began to price the cost of repair, it became evident that we had a very expensive Iead-base paint problem. The City Housing Dept. had in fact tested the building for lead base paint about 5 years ago with positive results. In order to la~ow how to deal with this problem, Tim Wood took a local course and received a certificate of completion concerning lead-base paint. It quickly became apparent that, due to the presence of the lead-base paint, it was not economically feasible for us to meet the Historic Preservation Guidelines in repairing the building and at the same time earn a return on our investment. We made application to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for a certificaxe of economic hardship pursuant to the provisions of the City Ordinance. Our application to HPC for a certificate of economic hardship specified that we would place vinyl siding on the building. That suggestion met immediate resistance from HPC and for the last year and one half (approximately 12 meetings) we have been pursuing the certificate of economic hardship with HPC. We have produced voluminous materials in response to various proposals and requests from HPC, including the costs of all wood siding, three sides vinyl with the front wood, strip and paint, etc. The following is a list of some of the information that we have submitted to HPC:. 1. Bob Feiderman Appraisals shows cash shortfall. 2. Bid from the City of Dubuque- material to restore the front. 3. Bids from the City of Dubuque for lead waste disposal. 4. City of Dubuque lead department Code on Lead Removal. ~. City of Dubuque lead department met with HPC at one of the meetings. 6. Twa bids on Vinyl siding. 7. Two bids to restore the front. 8. Three bids to strip and paint the building. 9. Three bids to replace the wood siding. 10. Two bids to scrape, paint and repair rotten wood. 11. Price to use Hardie Plank siding. 12. Two bids to remove old wood siding. 13. Certified CPA report shows cash shortfall. 14. Two letters from banks stating the maximum they would lend on the property. 15. We have checked into availability of grants at the same place on two different occasions. The City of Dubuque has done an appraisal and at the last HPC meeting submitted their own analysis which showed that we could not earn an acceptable economic return on our investment on restoring the building, except by the use of vinyl siding. This has been a very lengthy and frustrating experience. For example, at the last HPC meeting when it became apparent that City Staff was in agreement with our experts that restoration of even the front of the building with wood was not economically feasible, members of the HPC switched back again to scraping and painting, an old issue that had been discussed at two previous meetings and rejected as not being cost effective. In fact, Duane Greenfield, a member pf the~~C' gt that ~mP cairn that wee w_there more than ius and our lifetime scraping the lead paint. The City Staff did not even do cost comparisons at the last meeting on scraping and painting because they believed as_we did that it was a dead issue. it was then that we insisted that the Commission take a vote on our application and either accept ow application or deny ow application for certificate of economic hardship so that we could finally resolve the problem. We have submitted for your consideration a rather large stack of documentation, appraisals, etc. We are prepared to discuss any of those materials with you, but feel a summary of their contents would be appropriate. We would particularly refer you to the letter of Bob Felderman and the latest economic evaluation done by City Staff. They show a return on our investment as follows: 1. Four sides vinyl- .2% profit ($7.00 profit per year). 2. Restore front and three sides vinyl -Loss of 2.5% {$1,335.00 loss per year) 3. Paint and patch -Loss of 2.9% ($1,673.00 loss per year) 4. Paint only, no repair of rotten wood-Loss ~.6% ($2,447.00 loss per year). Placing vinyl siding on four sides of the building is easily the least expensive way to repair the building and take care of the problem of peeling lead-base paint, yet we will only earn a return of .2% (575.00 profit per year). Even this does not constitute a reasonable economic return, but something must be done. The code states they must allow us to earn a reasonable economic return which is 10 to 12 percent. We will only earn .2 percent return on 4 sides vinyl which is the least expensive way to go to take care of the peeling lead base paint so how can it not be arbitrary and capricious to want us to earn even less of a return and in fact, be in the red. As Bob Felderman states on page 2 of his report "Based on your income and expense figures, it does not appear to be economically reasonable to place siding on your structure. However, installing all vinyl siding has less of an impact on your cash shortfall." The City of Dubuque Ordinances require the Commission to issue a certificate of economic hardship if the Commission finds that disapproval of the proposed work would prevent the property owner from earning any reasonable economic return from the property. In such an event, the Commission shall: 1. Immediately issue a certificate of economic hardship; or 2 __At its discretion, postpone, for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days, the issuance of a certificate of economic hardship. During this time, the Commission shall investigate strategies which wonid allow the property owner to earn a reasonable economic return from the property. No regulated permit shall-bey a ~gle;s a certificate of appropriateness hus been secured. If, at the end of the one hundred eighty (180) day period, the Commission, after a public meeting, finds that the property owner still cannot earn any reasonable economic return from their property, it shall issue a certificate of economic hardship. We have been involved in this process for over 18 months, have attended at least 12 HPC meetings, and have appeared before this Council twice. The first time we had new information that the HPC had not seen yet so it was sent back to them. The second time it was sent back to the HPC to ask why they turned it down because it was a 2 to 2 vote and there was no reason given. We have shown time and again that we are entitled to a certificate of economic hardship, yet the HPC has failed to follow the Ordinance Mandate that we be issued a certificate of economic hardship, the last vote being a 3-?. This should not have been an issue of what the Commission would like to see done, but rather what the Commission must do once it has been proven to them that we are entitled to a certificate of economic hardship. We respectfully request that you grant us a certificate of economic hardship for the property at 623-627 Arlington Street. Vicki Bechen Tim Wood C'lanning Set-~,~ices Department 30 6~'e5t 13th Street Dubuque, [o«a 33001 •Y3o~ THe C[T'Y OF ~~ DUB E C'hane(319)3s9--}210 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Fax (319) 339•-~1,9 CERTIFICATE OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIP NOTICE OF DECISION--DENIAL APPLICANT: Tim Wood/Vicky Bechen LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Street DISTRICT: W. 1 1 th Street -DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING/DECISION: March 16, 2000 - ---Tie-Hist~rie~res~ ~ _ e City of Dubuque, Iowa hereby renders and gives notice of its decision whether to grant a Certificate of Economic Hardship on the above-captioned application in conformance with Section 25 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. APPLICATION: The applicant seeks to install vinyl siding on the entire structure. PUBLIC MEETING: After notice, as required by law, a Public Meeting was held on March 16, 2000. Minutes of the meeting and copies of materials submitted in evidence are on file in the Office of Planning Services, City Hall, Dubuque, Iowa. FINDINGS: Based on the specific information presented at the Public Meeting and contained in the application, and in accordance with the applicable standards in the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Commission makes the following findings: 1) Standards for review set forth in Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dubuque, Iowa have not been met; and 2) With the proposed improvements, the applicant has not shown sufficient evidence that this property cannot earn a reasonable economic return. DECISION: By a vote of 3 to 2, with one abstention, as indicated in the minutes, the Historic Preservation Commission denies the request. The Commissioner who abstained stated that it was inappropriate for him to make a decision on this application at this meeting, since the applicant had just submitted new materials at the meeting and he needed more time to evaluate that information before making a decision. THEREFORE: Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dubuque, Iowa, the Commission denies permission to the City of Dubuque and its Servic: r eopic Inle~rity R~;p~n;ib~lity lnnocat;un T.am~. o,~ Notice of Decision Historic Preservation Commission designated representative(s) to issue the regulated permit(s) required to complete the approved project. APPEAL: Section 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance states that "an aggrieved party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the Planning Services Department within thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the Commission's action. Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the Planning Services Department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record _ of the action before the Comm~si9n to~he_City Clerk. On appeal, the City council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City council shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the Historic Preservation Ordinance (this chapter), and whether the Commission's actions was patently arbitrary or capricious. The City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate. The City Clerk shall give written notice of the City Council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the Historic Preservation Commission. An appellant who is not satisfied by the Decision of the City Council may appeal within sixty (60) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34." Filed in the Office of the Planning Services Department on the 17th day of March, 2000. ark No ,Assistant Planner Pfannin~ Services Department ~0 6~'est 13tH Street Dubuque, [owa 32L'01~30-~ (319) 3o9-L? 10 19 ""9 9 " DUBL~SUE t!/.C ~a ~iZ d,/n.,,Y! ~' ~'~ ~l~ `~~~` HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIP NOTICE OF DECISION--APPROVAL APPLICANT: B & W Properties LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington St. DISTRICT: W. 1 1 th Street -DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING/DECISION: May 18, 2000 The--t-irstrn'i~f=reservatrorr-C-orrTn-ii-ssf o rr-of-tire City of Dubuque, Iowa hereby renders and gives notice of its decision on the above-captioned application in conformance with Section 25 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. APPLICATION: The applicant seeks to install vinyl siding on the structure. PUBLIC MEETING: After notice, as required by law, a Public Meeting was held on May 18, 2000. Minutes of the meeting and copies of materials submitted in evidence are on file in the Office of Planning Services, City Hall, Dubuque, Iowa. FINDINGS: Based on the specific information presented at the Public Meeting and contained in the application, and in accordance with the applicable standards in the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Commission makes the following findings: 1) That disapproval of the installation of vinyl siding on the two sides and rear and restoration of the front as recommended by the Planning Services staff would prevent the property owner from earning any reasonable economic return on the property. DECISION: By a vote of 5 to 0, as indicated in the minutes, the Historic Preservation Commission approves the installation of vinyl siding on the rear and two sides, and restoration of the front, as recommended by Planning Services staff, with a condition that the Commission review the final design and materials. The renovation of the front shall include: 1) retain the existing wood clapboard siding on the second story of the front facade, with scraping and painting to abate the lead-based paint; 2) remove the existing panel siding on the first story of the front facade, with the original wood clapboard siding underneath repaired or replaced and painted to match; Service People Inte~rlC,r' Fesponsibi!i^,, Innovation Teamwork Notice of Decision Historic Preservation Commission 3) replace the two three-pane windows on the front facade with four double-hung windows to match the existing double-hung windows in size and location; 4) replace the four iron front porch columns with four square wooden columns; and 5) replace the exterior front wood corners with new wood. Expiration date is one year frt9m the_date of issuance. THEREFORE: Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dubuque, Iowa, the Commission hereby grants permission to the City of Dubuque and its designated representative(s) to issue the regulated permit(s) required to complete the approved project. Filed in the Office of the Planning Services Department on the 24th day of May, 2000. I M~ Noble, Assistant Planner THE CITY OF ~~ DUBL~`UE ~~~~~r~ Plannin' Ser~•ices Depar•.ment ~ ~U 4~~st 13tH Streit Dubuque, Iowa 3_UOl-~~ih Phone (319)>sy,,lo HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIP NOTICE OF DECISION--DENIAL APPLICANT: B & W PROPERTIES LOCATION: 623-627 ARLINGTON STREET DISTRICT: W 11TH STREET DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING/DECISION: AUGUST 17, 2000 e is ortc eservation~csr~tm«sion-ofi~tN~City of Dubuque, Iowa hereby renders and gives notice of its decision whether to grant a Certificate of Economic Hardship on the above-captioned application in conformance with Section 25 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. APPLICATION: The applicant seeks to install vinyl siding on entire house. PUBLIC MEETING: After notice, as required by law, a Public Meeting was held on August 17, 2000. Minutes of the meeting and copies of materials submitted in evidence are on file in the Office of Planning Services, City Hall, Dubuque, Iowa. FINDINGS: Based on the specific information presented at the Public Meeting and contained in the application, and in accordance with the applicable standards in the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Commission makes the following findings: 1) The property cannot earn a reasonable economic return on any of the options discussed: 1) vinyl side the rear and two sides and store the front; 2) vinyl side all four sides; 3) scrape, paint and maintain the existing wood siding; 4) utilize hardiplank siding. 2) That scraping, painting and maintaining the existing wood siding is the most viable option of all those proposed. DECISION: By a vote of 3 to 2, as indicated in the minutes, the Historic Preservation Commission denies the request. THEREFORE: Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dubuque, Iowa, the Commission denies permission to the City of Dubuque and its designated representative(s) to issue the regulated permit(s) required to complete the approved project. APPEAL: Section 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance states that "an aggrieved party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a ~ir~iir I'cu~~Ir [ntr~;rity Pe~p~m~ibilitc Innu~ation Team~~•ork Notice of Decision Historic Preservation Commission notice of appeal with the Planning Services Department within thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the Commission's action. Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the Planning Services Department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the Commission to the City Clerk. On appeal, the City council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City counci! shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the Historic Preservation Ordinance (this chapter), and whether the Commission's actions was patently-arbitrary-or cap~ici6QSfit~e~ity Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate. The City-Clerk shall give written notice of the City Council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the Historic Preservation Commission. An appellant who is not satisfied by the Decision of the City Council may appeal within sixty (fi0) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34." Filed in the Office of the Planning Services Department on the 23rd day of August, 2000. Mark No le Assistant Planner MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Thursday, January 20, 2000 5:00 p.m. Carnegie Stout Public Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Pam Bradford (arrived at 5:19 p.m.), Jim Gibbs, Terry Mozena, Duaine Greenfield and Suzanne Guinn; Staff Members Mark Noble and Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien. ABSENT: None. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the lo~va Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. MINUTES: Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Mozena, to approve the minutes of the December 16, 1999, meeting. Motion approved by the following vote: Aye: Gibbs, Mozena, Greenfield, Kringle; Nay: None. Abstain: Guinn. DESIGN REVIEW/TiM WOOD/B&W PROPERTIES (REFERRED BY CITY COUNCIL): Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship for Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen, B & W Properties, for property located at 623-627 Arlington Street, to install vinyl siding in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Tim Wood, B & W Properties, reviewed their application, noting that in December they had appealed the denial of their application to the City Council, and that the Council referred their request back to the Historic Preservation Commission. He discussed the issues that the City Council had addressed at their meeting. He reported that the property has been inspected by Housing Services Department every two years and that there has been a reoccurring problem with peeling paint, which has tested positive for lead. He noted that Senior Housing Inspector Kathy Lamb has submitted a letter stating the building has lead paint. He also added that approximately 15 percent of the house has rotted wood, and he believes the wood is bad due to the house previously having aluminum siding on it. Commissioner Mozena inquired if the wood was rotted when they bought it. Mr. Wood reported that was the case. Mr. Wood also believed that it would be easier and less costly to replace the 4vood siding versus stripping and painting it. Commissioner Mozena asked why they didn'treplace the wood when they bought the property in March, 1993. Mr. Wood reported that they had been improving a number of properties which they own over the past several years, and that this is the last property of theirs that needs repairing. Commissioner Mozena inquired about their expenses, the amount and interest rate of their loan and the length of their mortgage. Ms. Bechen reported that the amount of the loan was 527,500, it was a 15-year loan, and has an 8 percent interest rate. Commissioner Mozena reviewed the Historic Preser`~ation Commission Nteeting Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 2 financial information he had received in the application packet. He noted that there is a significant amount of profit over the seven years the applicant has o+~med the property. The Commission and the applicants discussed the reasons for improving this property. Commissioner Bradford asked what the applicants think the property could sell for. Ms. Bechen stated that they estimate the property could sell for a price in the low to mid 30's. The Commission and applicants discussed the profits and expenses for this property over the last several years, with some disagreement over the estimates. Star Member Noble reviewed the section or" the Historic Preservation Ordinance pertaining to the submittal of income and expense information for the Certificate of Economic Hardship application. The Commission and applicants stated their positions on whether there should have been any improvements made during the last several years that B & W Properties owned the property. Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien reviewed the discussion on this application request and asked that the focus be on 4vhether the property owners can earn a reasonable economic return on the property. Commissioner Greenfield reviewed his concerns. The Commission stated they are concerned with the accuracy of the figures. Mr. Wood replied that he believes that no one would spend 532,000 on improvements to this property. This figure includes savings in the form of financial assistance through the Housing Services Department for having tenants removed durinc construction work on removing lead paint from this property. He also stated that he could save money by doing some of this work himself. He stated he has taken the lead poisoning prevention program and, although he is not a contractor, he can work for a contractor and do this 4vork according to the standards of the Housing Services Department. The Commission and applicants discussed the extent of the lead paint issues, both on the inside and outside of this property. Mr. Wood stated that what the property rents for does not bring in sufficient income to make this property economically viable. The Commission, applicants and legal staff discussed how to evaluate this property and whether it could earn a reasonable economic return. Commissioner Mozena did not agree with the figures for lead paint removal and would like to see a work session with the Housing Services Department to further discuss costs of going through these programs. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Greenfield, to table this item and set up a work session with the Housing Services Department. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Guinn, i~~lozena, Kringie, Greenfield and Gibbs. Nay: None. DESIGN REVIEW/JOHN FINN/180 MAIN STREET: Application of John Finn for a Certificate of Appropriateness for property located at 180 Main Street, to renovate the building facade in the _ Old Main Historic Preservation District. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 3 Mr. Finn reviewed his project, noting the proposed exterior modifications which require the Commissions approval. He is proposing that the front doorway be recessed and be located to the right of the previous doorway. He also noted the entryway would remain recessed. Commissioner Greenfield reviewed the guidelines as outlined in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, noting that this is a rehabilitation project. He believes that the proposal looks good, but that the standards suggest that the doorway should remain as previously existed. Mr. Finn stated that the wrought iron columns exist and would be exposed as shown on his recently submitted sketch. The Commission and applicant discussed the previously approved design, noting the doorway configuration and the numerous past changes to the design. The Commission discussed the facade design in detail, noting the materials and proportions that they feel are appropriate. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Mozena, to approve the design as presented, with conditions that: 1) the facade have recessed wood paneling across the front and in the recessed entryway; and 2) that it include the original materials as first presented, with lights projecting over the top of the wood sign and angled back at the sign. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Greenfield, Kringle and Mozena. Nay: None. The Commission took a short break at 6:28 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW/BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DUBUQUE: Application of Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque for removal from the historic district for properties located at 391 W. 12th Street, 1240 Bluff Street, and 1201, 1243, 1255-57 and 1299 Locust Street. (Applicant has requested this be tabled to the February 17, 2000 meeting.) Motion by Kringle, seconded by Bradford, to table this public hearing request to the February 17, 2000, design review meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Gibbs, Greenfield, Guinn, Kringle and Mozena. Nay: None. ITEMS FROM PUBLIC: The Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque-discussion of plans for expansion of Boys and Girls Club facilities. Brian Meyer, Executive Director of the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque introduced himself; Mike Ruden, project architect with the Durrant Group; and Greg Burbach, Club President. Mr. Meyer stated they would like to discuss their plans for the expansion of the Boys and Girls Club facilities, and that they would like to bring the application requests to the Historic Preservation Commission in February for a vote. Greg Burbach reviewed the original request, which was for the removal of property from the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. He noted they have met with neighbors and have made some changes and are not actively pursuing that option. He reviewed the club membership and stated that the Board has looked into locating in the Comiskey Park/Morrison Brothers area Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 4 as well as on the west end, but they wish to pursue an expansion at their current location. Mr. Burbach stated that of the two schemes provided for the Commissioner's review, Scheme B is the one they wish to pursue. Scheme B shows they would be purchasing the McIntyre Building and connecting that building with their existing building. Scheme B also shows they would be building a gymnasium/recreation center and program space. They are also attempting to purchase two properties on Bluff Street north of 12th Street and will be seeking approval to demolish those structures for a future parking lot. - Brian Meyer reviewed the concerns expressed by the neighbors and the Commission in earlier discussions, and noted they have made modifications as suggested. Mike Ruden discussed the proposed building addition, noting the design and use of this building. He discussed how the existing Boys Club and the McIntyre Buildings would be connected, noting the proposed design and materials. He also discussed the plans for the new gym space, showing digital photos of the existing building and computer-generated photos of how the additions would look. The Commission and applicants discussed in great detail their thoughts on the design of the building addition and the demolition of the two structures. The Commission's concerns with the building additions were with the design not being fully completed, noting that they would like to see final drawings at the time they review this request. The Commission stated they would like to see locations and sizes of windows and doorways, and whether there would be a staircase as discussed. The Commission inquired whether there were other design opportunities available, with the applicant stating that the one shown is the desirable option. The Commission also addressed concerns with the demolition of properties on Bluff Street, noting that they would like to see information as per the Ordinance for the CertiTicate of Economic Hardship. They added that, as discussed with the B & W Properties request for Certificate of Economic Hardship, the Commission would also be looking for the applicants to provide information on whether there are any grants or loans available for renovation of these properties. The Commission and applicants discussed the cost involved with the purchase and renovation of these properties. The applicants felt that they can provide the necessary information to show that they cannot earn reasonable economic return on these two properties. The Commission stated that as part of the application for the Certificate of Appropriateness, they would need to see final drawings and they inquired whether the Boys Club could actually submit these applications since they are not current property owners. The Boys Club representatives stated that they will be property owners contingent on receiving the necessary approval from the Historic Preservation Commission and the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Nlotion by Kringle, seconded by Bradford to close the meeting. Nlotion was carried unanimously. ADJQW MENT: 8:16 p.m. M rk J. Nob, I~, Assistant Planner z / 1-~ /-~ Adopted MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION Thursday, February 3, 2000 5:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Public Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque IA 52001 PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Terry Mozena, Jim Gibbs, and Duaine Greenfield; Staff Members Mark Noble, Laura Carstens, Tim O'Brien and Pam Myhre. ABSENT: Commission Members Pam Bradford and Suzanne Guinn. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:03 p.m MINUTES: Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Mozena, to approve the minutes of the December 2, 1999 meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Mozena, Gibbs, Greenfield and Kringle; Nay: None. DISCUSSION WITH HOUSING SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REGARDING THE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD CONTROL PROGRAM: David Harris, Housing Services Manager, introduced himself and Kathy Lamb, Senior Housing Inspector. Ms. Lamb distributed and reviewed a handout on questions and issues concerning the Lead Based Paint Hazard Control Program, addressed Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines and explained what is a lead-based paint hazard. Ms. Lamb explained the process for removal of lead-based paint hazard and the disclosure process that must be followed for known lead-based paint hazards as well as the cost for removal of lead hazard according to the Lead Paint Hazard Program or (OSHA Guidelines. Commissioner Greenfield inquired about the amount of money available to property owners who apply to this program. Kathy Lamb stated that the owners could receive up to 55,000 per unit toward renovation of the property if they participate in the program. Ms. Lamb stated they do not have to participate in this program unless there is a known hazard. Ms. Lamb stated that Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen's property was inspected approximately four years ago as mandated by HUD and that a known lead-based paint hazard was detected; therefore, they were required to disclose this hazard to any tenants or occupants and to undertake interim controls for loose, peeling and chipping paint. Ms. Lamb also stated that as part of the Section 8 Program, applicants would need to scrape and paint any flaking paint, but that interim measures do not require following the (OSHA guidelines. Historic Preservation Minutes February 3, 2000 Page 2 Kathy Lamb stated that Tim VVood has a higher level of responsibility, as he is a trained contractor for this type of work and that he must comply with IOSHA regulations even if not participating in the HUD grant program. Commissioner iVlozena inquired about the Lead Hazard Program, and asked what process for abating the hazard is established. Ms. Lamb reviewed the specific requirements for abating or covering exposed wood, noting that one approved method is the installation of vinyl siding over lead-based paint. Commissioner Mozena was concerned that in the future, by not fully removing the lead -~ hazard, that the City is setting itself up for a liability. Kathy Lamb stated that the City program is a lead hazard abatement program which would make the property lead safe, not lead-free, and is acceptable according to HUD guidelines. Commissioner Gibbs inquired as to whether City employees monitor the progress of these types of projects. Kathy Lamb stated that inspectors monitor these projects almost on a daily basis. He also inquired whether all areas of a lead paint hazard are required to be removed. Ms. Lamb responded that only the accessible, deteriorated, friction or impact areas are addressed. She also stated that when the project is finished, the contractor needs to do an elaborate clean up process to pass clearance. She also noted that power cleaners and power sanders are optional tools that work to remove the lead hazard, but she added that it takes an artisan to properly do this work with these tools as they may create higher levels of lead dust than other methods, such as scraping and stripping the paint. IV1s. Lamb added that the proposal, which the Housing Services Department was asked to look at for 623-627 Arlington Street, dealt with restoration of the front facade and vas a good compromise that kept the front facade historical looking and allowed the property owners to vinyl side the three remaining sides at a lower cost. Commissioner Mozena expressed his concern with how both housing and historic preservation guidelines could be met by following the Secretary of Interior's Standards. Ms. Lamb reported that there is approximately 55,000 available for each unit, to which they would provide an additional 54,880 for the historic renovation to the front facade. She feels that the money available helps the property owners renovate their property in such a tivay as to comply tivith the historic guidelines as well as the lead paint guidelines. Commissioner Mozena inquired about the life expectancy of vinyl siding when following the Housing Sen,~ices Department's installation methods. IV1s. Lamb replied that there is a 20- year Life expectancy if they folloav the method recommended by the Housing Services Department. Staff Member Myhre reviewed the products mentioned and inquired as to tivhether the vinyl siding allows air to flow through it, allowing the building to breathe. Ms. Historic Preservation Minutes February 3, 2000 Page 3 Lamb stated that TyVec is a breathable material placed over the existing wood siding, under the vinyl siding, which allows moisture to seep through, but does not allow the lead dust to seep through. She noted that caulking is done at the base to keep the chips and dust from escaping and also to hold the TyVec in place. Ms. Lamb stated that even though the owner has undergone this abatement process, they still must disclose and report that the house has a hazard which was either enclosed, covered, or removed. That disclosure report also details where the lead hazard was removed, what was found, and even though it was encapsulated, ensures that the buyer is still made aware of the hazard. She stated that the goal was to provide lead-safe properties, and that total abatement would cost in the neighborhood of 540-60,000 per unit, whereas the City makes them safe for approximately 56,000 per unit. Jack Stackis, Jack Stackis Construction, inquired about the TyVec installation process and that when the siding is nailed on, is there a need to back caulk. Ms. Lamb said there is not a need to back caulk. Staff Member O'Brien asked whether Mr. Stackis would be willing to provide a cost estimate for: a) stripping and painting the existing wood siding; b) taking the old siding off and replacing with new similar wood siding; and c) covering the existing siding with TyVec and new vinyl siding. Mr. Stackis said that he would be willing to do that estimate. The Commission inquired whether they would need to tent the entire property. Kathy Lamb stated that they would need to provide protection of the neighborhood and the grounds which could be done with 6 mil plastic. Mr. O'Brien stated that the issue is what the cost would be to do this work, not how that work is done. N1s. Lamb stated that there will be a worker's course held next week from 6:00 -10:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. She said the course is free to audit and is approximately 16 hours long, with a contractor's course to be held in March. Commissioner Mozena posed questions concerning the recent inspection of 623-627 Arlington by the Housing Services Department. Lead Inspector Liz Kemp stated that the inspection of all of the siding, including the lower new siding, showed that a lead hazard existed. She also included all window and door casings in that analysis, and stated that in this case, the lead paint is in such bad shape that the entire structure is in need of work. Ms. Kemp stated that this is a costly procedure, noting that Four Mounds recently did renovation of historic buildings, and that they used volunteer labor and received equipment at a discounted rate, but that it still was a very expensive procedure. Mr. O'Brien inquired what if the property o4vner doesn't do anything - do they need to disclose this report? Ms. Lamb stated that with every inspection done by Housing Services stafr", they notify the property owner that they must eliminate flaking paint and if there is a child with an elevated lead level on the property, they must remove all of the paint. Ms. Kemp stated that she would give a report, which required scraping and painting of this property, to Jack Stackis so that he could provide a cost of improvements to make the property usable and in compliance with the Housing Code regarding deteriorated paint. Historic Preservation Minutes February 3, 2000 Page 4 ~1s. Lamb stated that if they have a known lead hazard consisting of 50 square feet or more, the owners must remove the tenants regardless of the method of abatement. Ms. Lamb also added that only through the lead hazard program could there be assistance available to tenant removal during that time of construction. The disposal cost reduction is available only if the property otivner or the contractor goes through the HUD program; otherwise, they must dispose of the waste in special containers and ship it to a special landfill, which costs significantly more than utilizing the Housing Services Department container. The Commission thanked the Housing Services Department staff for being present and able to provide answers to their inquiries, and also thanked Jack Stackis for _agreeing to provide cost estimates for improvements to 623-627 Arlington. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE REVIEW/REVISION: Staff Member Laura Carstens reviewed with the Commission the draft report, page by page, and asked for modifications. She noted that the Commission has seen this information before, and that staff has revised and condensed the information. She asked that the Commission review this draft report and then make a recommendation that staff submit this report to the City Council. Commissioner Greenfield inquired about the proposed Section 25-14, Demolition by Neglect Prohibited, and how would the City enforce this section of the ordinance. Ms. Carstens responded that the City would enforce the ordinance using the same process that the Housing and Building Departments currently use to enforce their ordinances. Commissioner Mozena inquired about the language which Tim O'Brien had drafted pertaining to disclosing on the purchase agreement for property owners in historic districts that they are in a historic district. Ms. Carstens responded that the language is in attachment number eight, titled, Affidavit Explanatory of Title, which is a document that would be recorded r'or all properties located within historic preservation districts. There were no additional questions. Ms. Carstens stated that this report would be transmitted to the City Council at their February 21, 2000, City council meeting. Nlotion by Mozena, seconded by Greenfield, to forward the report to the P~layor and City Council for their consideration. Aye: Mozena, Gibbs, Greenfield and Kringle. Nay: None. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Mark Noble, Assistant Planner Adopted MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Thursday, February 17, 2000 5:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Public Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Pam Bradford, Suzanne Guinn, Jim Gibbs, Terry Mozena, and Duaine Greenfield; Staff Members Mark Noble, Tim O'Brien, Laura Carstens and Melinda Rettenberger. ABSENT: None. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:06 p.m. MINUTES: Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Kringle, to approve the minutes of the January 20, 2000 meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Kringle, Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Mozena and Greenfield; Nay: None. DESIGN REV1EW1623-627 ARLINGTON STREET: Application of Tim Wood/Vicky Bechen for a Certificate of Economic Hardship to install vinyl siding for property located at 623-627 Arlington Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Staff member Mark Noble reported the applicant has requested this application be tabled to the i1,larch 16, 2000 meeting. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford, to table this application to the March 16, 2000 meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Greenfield, Kringle, and Mozena; Nay: None. PUBLIC HEARING (TABLED FROM JANUARY 20 2000 MEETING)1DESIGN REVIEW1391 W 12TH STREET, 1240 BLUFF STREET 1201 1243, 1255-57 8~ 1299 LOCUST STREET: Application of Boys & Girls Club of Greater Dubuque for Removal from Historic District for property located at 391 W. 12th Street; 1240 Bluff Street; 1201, 1243, 1255-57 ~ 1299 Locust Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Staff Nlember Noble reported the applicant has requested this item be tabled to the March 16, 2000 meeting. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford, to table the application to the March 16, 2000 meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Greenfield, Kringle, and Mozena; Nay: None. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 2 DESIGN REVIEW1901 LOCUST STREET: Application of American Trust & Savings Bank for a Certificate of Appropriateness to instal(tv~ro illuminated wall signs and one illuminated freestanding sign for property located at 901 Locust Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Jim Hamilton, American Trust & Savings Bank, presented an overview of the project to date. Prlr. Hamilton introduced Peg Hudson of American Trust and Dave Schultz of Larry Weitz Sign Systems. Ms. Hudson reported that she has been working closely with N1r. Schultz to develop alternative designs for the two illuminated wall-mounted and one illuminated freestanding signs. Ms. Hudson stated that after considerable research and review, the bank has chosen to proceed with internally illuminated signs for this location. She stated that the internal illumination avid provide the sign with a glow, rather than projecting light onto a sign, and the glow would be more appropriate for the bank and the neighborhood. Ms. Hudson discussed that internally lit signs would provide for a consistent application of the bank's logo for their corporate signage, and that internal illumination of signs was the most appropriate because it produced less light glare than external illumination. She noted the site's proximity to the existing internally lit sign at 9th and Locust Streets, ar,d its location in a commercial area adjacent to parking lots, a parking ramp, and the telephone company's building. Mr. Schultz displayed maps of three historic districts in Dubuque that currently have signs avrh internal illumination, stating that this request does not conflict Vrith other signs in the historic districts and is comparable to signage allowed in historic districts in other cities. He reviewe internal versus external illumination, emphasizing there will be less glare with internally lit signs. Ms. Hudson requested that the same consideration be given to their project as similar signs approved in other historic districts avithin the city of Dubuque and requested approval oP" their application. Commissioner Mozena asked for examples of the other signs they were asked to research. Mr. Schultz distributed pictures of other internally illuminated signs in the city of Dubuque Historic Districts, adding that they looked at other types of signs but felt that internal illumination was the best choice. Commissioner Greenfield stated he likes the internally illuminated signs as proposed. Commissioner Bradford asked that of those internally illuminated signs identified in other historic districts, how many were grandfathered. Mr. Schultz replied that he wasn't sure how many had been grandfathered. Staff Member Mark Noble reported that American Trust and Savings Bank is located in a C-^. Downtown Commercial District and that the sign regulations of the C-4 District were recently amended to allow freestanding and illuminated signs. Mr. Noble stated that the Jackson Park Historic District encompasses other zoning districts, some of which have permitted internally illuminated signs for many years. Commissioner Mozena stated he thought the signs presented were attractive, but that he did not think that signs made from plastic were appropriate for a historic district. He felt there were better avays to develop signage for historic districts. He noted that Dempsey's Restaurant, which is located next door to the bank, had recently submitted an application for a new externally lit Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 3 aluminum sign which was approved by the Commission, and that they had done a good job tivith their sign. Ms. Hudson reported that most or"the bank's proposed freestanding signage is not plastic and the amount of plastic in the sign can be held to a minimum. Mr. Schultz reported film strips can be added to control the amount of light emanating from the sign. Commissioner Bradford asked for the dimensions of the proposed signs. Mr. Schultz referred the Commission to the sketches included in the packet and reported that the freestanding sign is 8' x 7'3" in size. Commissioner Bradford also noted that in the Jackson Park Historic District, there appears to be three signs located on properties zoned C-4 that are smaller in size. Ms. Hudson reported that there is enough space for the proposed freestanding sign, and that this sign is smaller than the American Trust monument sign located across the street from where this sign is proposed to be located. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford; to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the three signs as submitted. Motion was denied by the following vote: Aye: Guinn and Greenfield; Nay: Gibbs, Bradford, Mozena and Kringle. DESIGN REVIEW1200 MAIN STREET: Application of Iowa Wireless Services for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install 3 pair of communication antennas and 2 two-foot diameter micro dishes on the roof of the Julien Inn, located at 200 Main Street in the Old Main Historic Preservation District. Andy Anderson, representative of lo~va Wireless, reported this project involves installing three sets of antennas and tvvo micro dishes on the roof of the Julien Inn. Mr. Anderson referred to the drawings and explained where the microwave dishes and antennas would be installed. Mr. Anderson stated that they must use microwave dishes because U.S. West cannot provide a fiber optic hookup to this site for at least six months. Commissioner Guinn asked about the size of the antennas. Mr. Anderson reviewed the dimensions of the antennas, as well as the shape and proposed color. Motion by Kringle, seconded by Greenfield, to approve the application. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Greenfield, Kringle, and Mozena; Nay: None. DESIGN REVIEW11255-57 LOCUST STREET & 1299 LOCUST STREET: Application of Boys and Girls Club of Dubuque for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct an addition to the south side of the existing facility and construct a connection to the adjacent McIntyre Building located at 125-57 Locust Street and i 299 Locust Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 4 Brian Nleyer, Executive Director of the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque, introduced ~1ike Ruden, Durrant Architects, Biil Miller, Durrant Group, and Greg Burbach, President of the Board or" Directors of the Boys and Girls Club. Mr. Meyer briefly reviewed the history of the merger between the Boys and Girls Clubs in Dubuque, and the process the Club used to arrive at their decision to expand their current operation rather than relocate. Mr. t•~leyer showed a map outlining the area served by the Boys and Girls Club and where the core group of children come from. He stated that the original plans were opposed by the neighbors, so the Boys and Girls Club met with neighbors and have developed a plan they feel meets the needs of the Club and the neighborhood. Mr. Meyer .presented the plan, labeled as Scheme B, and reviewed the changes from the original plan. Mike Ruden, Durrant Architects, referred the Commission to the application packet and reviewed the building plans, noting that the proposed addition would be south of the existing gymnasium. Commissioner Guinn questioned whether the number of parking spaces in the proposed parking lot off Locust Street was increased from the previous plans. Mr. Ruden explained that parking spaces were added because several spaces were removed from the lot on the west side of Bluff Street. Commissioner Bradford asked if the Boys and Girls Club was purchasing land from the Dubuque County Historical Society. Mr. Meyer said no purchase was being negotiated. Ruth Nash, 422 Loras, spoke in favor of Scheme B, stating it would create balance and a ver, positive vision for downtown Dubuque, and would preserve the neighborhood. Ms. Nash stated that the original plan would have destroyed ttivo very historical buildings, and that the Boys and Girls Club worked diligently with the neighbors to come up with a very positive plan. Peter Eck, 440 Loras, expressed concern that the addition will negatively impact property values of this area, and that the density of the expansion would not fit with the neighborhood. John Whalen, 1105 Highland Place, expressed concern that the Boys and Girls Club's current expansion may be suitable for today, but questioned what will be the impact on the neighborhood when they want to expand again in the future. He felt it is time for the Boys and Girls Club to look at moving to an area where they would be able to expand without constraints. Marilynne Field, 1185 Arrowhead Drive, spoke in favor of the request. She explained she was part of the merger or"the Boys and Girls Club, and has had the opportunity to work with the Boys and Girls Club on their vision. She reported that she believes the building expansion should sense the Club for a minimum of 20 years. Bob O'Brien, member of the Boys and Girls Club board of Directors, spoke in favor of the project, stating the Club serves a very valuable purpose, and that it would be extremely diriicult to find another location to serve the youth in need. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 5 John Walsh, President of Dubuque County Historical Society, spoke in opposition to the project. Mr. Walsh reported that the mission of the Historical Society is to collect, preserve and interpret for future generations, and that the city is losing historic structures in the community at an alarming rate. Regina Thibeau, 500 Sunset Ridge, spoke in opposition to the request. She stated that the proposed addition is not consistent with historic preservation nor is it appropriate to the surrounding environment. She referred to and reviewed the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Ms. Thibeau reported that it is also the feeling of adjacent land owners that this structure is not appropriate, and the fact that the Boys and Girls Club has been scheduled to .present three variances to the Zoning Board of Adjustment demonstrates that it does not int. Sr. Therese Mackin, former Boy and Girls Club Board Member, spoke in favor of the request. She asked that the Commission remember that the reason behind the requested change is to do a better job~to help the children become better citizens. John Hendry, Chairman of the Boys and Girls Club Facilities Planning Committee, spoke in favor of the request, stating that the Club spent considerable time and energy on researching various options and the development of this plan. He concluded that it was very important for the Club to be located in this area if they want to meet the needs of the youth in this area, and that the planned expansion will meet the needs of the Club for some time. Bruce Heitz, 2500 Broadway, reported that he owns the property immediately to the north of the proposed parking lot. He stated he is not opposed to the Boys and Girls Club proceeding with the project, but is concerned about how it will affect the value of his property, which the Boys and Girls Club has decided not to buy. Cheryl Whalen, 1105 Highland Place, stated she is concerned about tearing down the two houses on Bluff Street, as well as the possibility of the McIntyre Building at some point in the future. She stated that she is not opposed to the Boys and Girls Club expanding, but feels that they should look to relocate elsewhere in the city where it would not require the destruction of historic properties. Brian Meyer reported that the Boys and Girls Club looked at four or five alternate locations for their facilities, but none of the proposed locations was acceptable. He stated that the McIntyre Building will be used for the Boys and Girls Club offices and programs. Alan Spensley, Dubuque County Historical Society Board Ntember, reported that he was on the Board of the YMCA when they made the decision to join with the YWCA and move their program to the Booth Street location. He reported the YMCA/YWCA did extensive research which supported their relocation rather than expanding at their old location downtown. John O'Connor, Boys and Girls Club Board Member, stated that the YMCA/YWCA and the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque serve two totally direrent groups from different socioeconomic iLlinutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 6 backgrounds, and that many of the children they serve don't have access to transporation; therefore, he felt it was most appropriate for the Boys and Girls Club to stay where it is. Vance DeLire, 1921 Madison Street, spoke in opposition to the project, stating he feels the issue is not whether the Boys and Girls Club is a good organization, but rather, what is an appropriate proposal? Mr. DeLire stated that tearing down the building is not appropriate, and that the expansion would be a terrible use of the land.- He stated the neighborhood is improving, that the neighborhood should be left intact and that people should be encouraged to restore the old houses. He added that the Boys and Girls Club needs to remember this neighborhood is their home. Greg Burbach, President, Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque, reported that the building expansion is designed to accommodate growth for the next 20-25 years. He stated that the Club is not at this meeting to discuss alternatives to an expansion. Bob O'Brien relayed the histories of the Boys Club and the Girls Club in Dubuque, reiterating his r"eeling that the Boys and Girls Club needs to be at this location. He stated he would appreciate it if the Commission were to take into account the reasons behind the need to expand the Boys and Girls Club at its current location. John Vyverberg, Secretary of the Dubuque Boys and Girls Club Booster Club, stated that th Booster Club feels this is a very worthwhile project. He added that in the long run, the boys and girls would be the winners. Commissioner Nlozena requested that in light of the information presented, more time should be given to the Commission to review this project. Commissioner Gibbs agreed, stating he is concerned about the case of economic hardship being used for the two properties that are proposed to be torn down. He stated he is concerned that the Commission might be setting a precedent by allowing properties to be purchased at inflated values, and then using that purchase price to show economic hardshio. Commission Greenfield stated he does not have a problem with the information presented, feels that enough time has been given to this project, and that a decision should be made. Commission Bradford stated she felt the Commission needs more time to review some of the issues brought up at this meeting. Greg Burbach stated it was his understanding that the Commission would take into consideration the information presented and make a decision at this time. He r"elt it would be unfair to table this item, since he presented all of the information required by ordinance, and requested by the Commission at their work session. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 7 Commissioner Mozena replied that he needs extra time to consider the concerns of the neighbors, as this is the first time this project has been discussed with the public. Greg Burbach noted that the Commission has received all the information requested and asked that they make a decision. Commissioner Mozena stated that he feels this is a big step, and that he would like to take time to review the information presented. Jess McIntyre, 988 Indian Ridge, owner of the McIntyre Building, asked if he could answer any ~}uestions for the Commission. He reported that the McIntyre Building is being purchased by the Boys and Girls Club at fair market value, which is under the assessed value. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Mozena to table this application. Motion carried by the follotiving vote: Aye: Bradford, Gibbs, Kringle, and Mozena; Nay: Greenfield and Guinn. Brian Meyer asked what is needed for the next Commission meeting. Commissioner Mozena replied that no additional information on this application is needed. Mike Ruden asked the Commission that if more questions arise, will the Commission again table this application. Commissioner Mozena stated that he does not feel comfortable making a decision at this time, and wants to make sure he makes the right decision. Commissioner Bradford agreed. Tim O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney, reported that the Commission is required to act within o0 days after the application is submitted. DESIGN REVIEWI'1235_1243 BLUFF STREET: Application of Boys & Girls Club of Greater Dubuque for a Certificate of Economic Hardship for property located at 1235-1243 Bluff Street to demolish a structure in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Brian Meyer, Executive Director, Boys and Girls Club, reviewed this application, referring the Commission to information included in the application packet. Mike Ruden, Durrant Architects, referred the Commission to the binder section containing photographs of the interior of the building and reported on the poor condition of the structure. Mr. Ruden noted there is a structural report available for this property. Commissioner Gibbs asked if both sides of the building are structurally unsound. Bill Miller, Durrant Group, reported that the south side of the building is in worse condition than the north side; however, there are structural problems in the north portion of the building as well, and the building would not meet City Building requirements for residential structures in its present state. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 8 Commissioner Gibbs requested that the applicant review the exhibits and address which photos are of the south building and which are of the north building. Mike Ruden reviewed the photographs with the Commission. Pvir. Meyer referred the Commission to a letter from Dick Firzlaff, Housing Services Department, regarding an inspection conducted of this property and an estimate to rehabilitate the propery. Commissioner Gibbs stated he is concerned that the Commission might be allowing a situation where an applicant could manipulate the rinancial rigures to show economic hardship. Greg Burbach, President, Boys and Girls Club, reviewed the cash flow analysis in order to address Commissioner Gibbs concerns. Mr. Burbach concluded that under any circumstances, including a gift of the property at no cost, the cost to rehabilitate this building would be astronomical and would show a negative cash flow. .~. Commissioner Mozena questioned how this request complies with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien stated that the Secretary's Standards do not apply in this case. He noted that this application comes under provisions relating to a property owner being able to make a reasonable rate of return from the properly because of regulations the City imposes. Regina Thibeau, Dubuque County Historical Society, spoke in opposition to the request, stating that the Dubuque County Historical Society and several adjacent land owners have filed a petition to contest the procedure for determination of economic hardship. Ms. Thibeau read the petition, noting that a copy was previously distributed to the Commission. Ms. Thibeau also questioned the interpretation of ownership. Tim O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney, reported that the Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that anyone with any interest in the property - i.e., leaseholder, or anyone with the slightest interest in the property, is an "owner" and can rile an application for economic hardship. Amy Boyton, owner of the Mandolin Inn, 199 Loras Boulevard, expressed her concern regarding setting precedence for filing for economic hardship. She stated she could have claimed economic hardship when she renovated her property, but chose not to. She asked if there was a way to do this other than claiming economic hardship, which she feels is detrimental to historic preservation. Commissioner Mozena stated he is confused about determining economic hardship. He asked Tim O'Brien if the fair market value of a particular property is 525,000 and someone buys it for S1 G0,000, there is no ~,vay the person could have a reasonable economic return at that price, so how would the Commission determine economic hardship? Tim O'Brien explained that the Commission has to determine the value of the property. He stated that the Commission could use the purchase price, assessed value or an appraised value. He added that if, with that given value, they cannot demonstrate a reasonable economic return, the Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 9 law states the government cannot force an individual to hold on to the property as it is. He added that if the government has an interest in maintaining that property, it is obligated to buy it. He stated that the Commission's job is to evaluate the information and determine whether it can generate a reasonable economic return.. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Guinn, to approve the application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Guinn, Mozena, Greenfield and Kringle; Nay: Gibbs and Bradford. DESIGN REVIEW11265-1267 1/2 BLUFF STREET: Application of Boys & Girls Club of Greater Dubuque for a Certificate of Economic Hardship to demolish a structure located at 1265-1267 1/2 Bluff Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Greg Burbach, President, Boys and Girls Club, explained that this application addresses the Bainbridge properly. Mr. Burbach referred the Commission to the information in the application packet and reviewed the cash flow information. Commissioner Mozena questioned the utility and maintenance costs for the property. Mike Ruden, Durrant Architects, reported on some of the repairs needed on this property and indicated he feels that S3,400 is not out of line. Greg Burbach reported the figures in the application packet came from Mr. Bainbridge and he did not have all the papenrvork or utility and maintenance costs this evening. Regina Thibeau, Dubuque County Historical Society, reiterated the Dubuque County Historical Society's position that this discussion is not offering due process to adjacent landowners and neighbors, particularly the Historical Society as otivners of the Ryan House. Ms. Thibeau questioned the criteria used to evaluate economic hardship and the determination of property value. She also questioned what is the true value of the property, noting that this property is assessed at S37,500. There is an offer to purchase the property for 570,000 and there is an appraisal of S62,000. Greg Burbach replied that the Commission could choose the lowest value and it still would not show a reasonable rate of economic return. John Whalen, 1105 Highland Place, spoke in opposition to the request, stating that he has lived in an historic district for 20 years, and that there must be a better way for the Club to pursue expanding their operation. Mr. Whalen suggested the Boys and Girls Club try to get a special dispensation to tear down the building, and not set a precedent by declaring economic hardship. He concluded that he didn't see a parking lot as a bad thing, but did see the method as a bad thing. Greg 6urbach explained that the Boys and Girls Club has no other option, that there are no other avenues available and this is the only option for them to accomplish their goals. tilinutes -Historic Preser`~ation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 10 Vance DeLire, 1921 Madison Street, inquired that it"the application is approved, is there some ,~~ay to stipulate that the materials from the demolished building be recycled back into the community. Mike Roden reported they will have a contractor salvage what they can from the property as a way of recouping some of the money paid for the purchase of the property. Commissioner Guinn asked if the Commission can stipulate this. Tim O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the Commission cannot dictate this, but that the Boys and Girls Club might want to get together with those interested in the salvage material and prepare a list of salvage materials available to them. Greg Burbach reported that the Boys and Girls Clubs want everyone to know that the Club will be constructing well designed parking lots. Commissioner Mozena stated he is not comfortable with the numbers presented in the report and requested additional information on maintenance and utility costs. He stated he would tike to see this inf"ormation presented back to the Commission in writing under Mr. Bainbridge's signature, and that he also would like to have a chance to review these numbers thoroughly before making a final decision. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Bradford, to table this item. Motion carried by the following vot: Aye: Mozena, Gibbs, Guinn, Bradford, and Kringle; Nay: Greenfield. Staff Member Noble asked the commissioners to provide him a list of requested additional information and he ~viil relay that list to the Boys and Girls Club. DESIGN REVIEW1300 MAIN STREET: Application of Dubuque Area Chamber of Commerce for a CertiTicate of Appropriateness to construct athree-story building for property located at 300 Main Street in the Ofd 1V1ain Historic Preservation District. Al Urbain, Allen ~ Urbain Architects, briefly reviewed the building design. Mr. Urbain noted that this is a reproduction building, designed to enhance the Lower Main Street area. He noted that the inside of the building will have an older building theme and that the footprint of the ne~:v Chamber building is the same dimension as the previous Merchant's building. He concluded that the original design was modified to allow for a pedestrian walkway to the planned Third Street Parking Ramp by moving the building 13 feet to the north. Commissioner Gibbs asked about the type and color of the windows . Nlr. Urbain explained 'they are proposing to install white aluminum casing windows which were chosen because of their durability and appearance. Several Commissioners suggested that instead of white, a darker color be considered to eliminate the contrast. Mr. Urbain also reported on the plans for the Third Street Parking Ramp and circulated a preliminary sketch of the ramp. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 11 Commissioner Guinn questioned signage and lighting for the building. Mr. Urbain reported the building will have canvas awnings with back lighting behind the awnings. He added that signage has yet to be addressed but that a proposal will be presented to the Commission in the future. Commissioner Guinn asked what precautions have been taken to prevent cars exiting the ramp from hitting pedestrians. Mr. Urbain explained that cars will be allowed to enter only from Main Street. _ Commissioner Gibbs asked if the turret on the building will include raised wood panels. Mr. Urbain replied that they will make an effort to incorporate that design element into their construction. . Commissioner Mozena questioned the type of entrance doors to be used. Mr. Urbain reported that a store front type ofentrance door will be installed. He said that the Iowa Welcome Center will occupy the front of the building to benefit from the high visibility, and that traffic through this building is expected to be significant. Commissioner Gibbs commended Mr. Urbain on the plans for this new building and the parking ramp, adding that he feels it will be an asset to the community. Mr. Gibbs asked whether the turret could be designed to project depth of field. Mr. Urbain stated they could attempt to comply with that request. Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Greenfield, to approve the application with the suggestion to consider darker colored window frames and a depth of field element for the turret construction. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Gibbs, Greenfield, Guinn, Mozena, Kringle and Bradford; Nay: None. DESIGN REVIEW150 W. 13TH STREET: Application of the City of Dubuque for a Certificate of Appropriateness to renovate the east and the west entrances and plaza areas of City Hall (Landmark Building) located at 50 W. 13th Street. Jerry Anderson, Design Center Associates, reported he is working with the City to restore the City Hall Building to its original state. Mr. Anderson referred the Commission to their packet enclosure and reviewed the changes to both entrances to City Hall. He stated there will be double entry doors with the stairs configured similar to the original design, and that there will be three flags poles in the Central Avenue plaza. He stipulated that the doors and windows at both ends of City Hall will be wood construction similar to that done to the 13th Street entry, that there will be some repair to the brick, that the handicap ramps will be changed to fit in better with the building design and that the railings would reflect the original style. The applicant and Commission discussed that the lights on the building may or may not be installed, since both entrances to City Hall are lit on the street corners; however, the areas would be prepared so that lights could be added at a later date. Mr. Anderson added that there would be a brick enclosure around the transformer installed in the south parking lot. ~'~linutes -Historic Preservation Commission February 17, 2000 Page 12 Commissioner Gibbs asked if installing landscaping along 13th Street is a possibility. ~~1r. Anderson stated there could be some planters installed but there would not be enough room to plant trees. Commissioner Guinn asked if the low stone wall proposed for the plaza will take the place of the benches on the west side. Mr. Anderson reported the stone walls were designed for short-term sitting and would take the place of the existing benches. ~ylotion by Kringle, seconded by 6radford, to approve the application as submitted. Motion carried by the follotiving vote: Aye: Mozena, Greenfield, Bradford, Gibbs, Guinn and Kringle; Nay: None. ITEh1S FROM STAFF• Staff Member Noble reviewed the letter regarding the Historic Preservation Seminar to be held at the Loras College Alumni Center on February 29, 2000. He noted that the Commission is listed as a co-sponsor and urged each of the Commissioners attend this seminar. He stated that additional pamphlets are available for anyone needing them. Staff Member Carstens also reported that a letter has gone out to the Mayor and City Council regarding the process for review of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Ms. Carstens added that this report will be discussed at the February 21, 2000, City Council meeting and she asked th at least the chairperson and vice chairperson plan to attend the City Council meeting. Commissioner Mozena said he could not be there until after 9:00 p.m. The Commission agreed to meet on Monday February 21, 2000, from 12:00 to 2:00 p.m. to revi~~.v the report prior to the City Council meeting. Discussion followed regarding who would make presentations at the meeting Consensus was that Laura Carstens would make a shoe presentation to City Council, and then the Council could decide if they wanted a work session. ADJOURNMENT; Motion by Bradford, seconded by Gibbs to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:24 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~- 3 ~ ~A;tarl: J. Nob e Assistant Planner Adopted MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION Thursday, March 2, 2000 5:00 P.M. ICN Room, Carnegie-Stout Public Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Commissioners Pam Bradford, Suzanne Guinn, Jim Gibbs, Terry Mozena; Staff Members Mark Noble, Laura Carstens, Tim O'Brien and Pam Myhre. ABSENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle and Commissioner Duane Greenfield. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:15 p.m. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying that the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. MINUTES: Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Guinn, to approve the minutes of the February 3, 2000, meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Guinn, Gibbs, Bradford and Mozena; Nay: None. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Gibbs, to approve the minutes of the February 21, 2000, meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Gibbs, Bradford, Guinn and Mozena; Nay: None. DISCUSSION REGARDING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION INITIAL REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL: Staff Member Noble reviewed the discussion from the February 21, 2000 City Council meeting concerning the submittal of the initial report. Mr. Noble stated that the February 23rd memo mentioned that the work session with the City Council is scheduled for Monday, April 17, 2000. He suggested that the Commission should continue their discussion on the initial report, review the recommendations and be prepared to respond to the City Council on each recommendation. Mr. Noble also no#ed that he had distributed information concerning potential loan and grant programs, which were prepared by Associate Planner Pam Myhre. Staff Member Myhre reviewed the proposed historic preservation homeowner grant program, comparing the existing program to the proposed program. Ms. Myhre described the eligibility for this program and asked that the Commission further discuss that issue. She also explained the proposed change to the amount of the grant, noting that currently there is a 1:1 match fora 52,000 grant, which would be changed to a $5,000 forgivable loan fully forgiven after five years. It was noted that this program is different than that proposed by the Commission, which has been forwarded to the City Council in their initial report. Ms. Myhre explained that this would be a competitive grant that would not require a match. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 2, 2000 Page 2 Staff and the Commission discussed the grant program, addressing questions and issues concerning applicant eligibility (owner occupied versus tenant occupied) and how that would be affected if the property owner were to move within five years of receipt of that grant. The Commission and staff agreed that a loan review committee could regulate how and to whom to distribute the money, noting that it appears that one loan per owner per building would be the desirable criteria. Ms. Myhre stated that the grant program is proposed in this manner; however, the program, particularly the eligibility, may change if the proposed revolving loan program is not approved. Ms. Myhre explained that the funding sources for both the grant program and the proposed loan fund program. Staff Member Myhre next discussed the proposed historic preservation revolving loan __program, noting the budget, source of funding, eligibility, and improvements that would be acceptable for this program. Ms. Myhre also noted that this would be done as a competitive loan with a loan review committee to select those ~vho would receive this fund. Commissioner Mozena asked who would manage these programs and serve on the review committee. Staff and Commission discussed possible committee make-up, noting it could be made up of Commissioners, staff and potentially someone from the public. Staff and Commission discussed who would give final approval of these loans, as well as what information would be made part of the public record, such as financial records. Commissioners noted that the key is to distribute the money, but be careful to ensure that the loans do not go bad. Ms. Myhre stated that she currently reviews the historic preservation grants; however, if a full-time preservation planner were to be hired, that person would be the appropriate person to administer the grant and loan programs. She also noted that if a full-time historic preservation planner position is not created, either the Housing Services Department or the Community and Economic Development Department could administer the programs, or the programs could be outsourced. Staff discussed how inspections and review of these grant loan programs are handled currently. The Commission also discussed whether they should concentrate these programs on the exteriors of structures only rather than having exterior and interior work reviewed. The Commission stated that they presently do not review interior work and would be unclear how to decide whether exterior or interior work would qualify for these loans. The consensus was to limit the programs to exterior improvements only. Commission and staff discussed eligibility, noting that the revolving loan program does not require awarding based on income-eligible status whereas the grant program does. Ms. Myhre also mentioned that if the homeowner assistance incentive program which assists with down payments, and coupled with a historic preservation grant and the Operation: Paint Brush (free paint) Program, this would allow for low income property owners to make significant improvements to their property. The consensus was for the Planning Services Department to discuss these programs with the Housing Services Department and inquire whether they could help with inspections or processing of the loans/grants and the impact of these programs on staff. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 2, 2000 Page 3 The Commission next discussed broadening the application eligibility for the grant programs, mentioning that it would be beneficial to have bed and breakfast establishments eligible. It was decided that applicant eligibility, as written for the proposed grant program, should remain as shown since it would be difficult to grant an owner of a bed and breakfast additional money, but deny an apartment owner with the same number of units. Staff Member Carstens mentioned that the loan fund as shown excludes the Old Main Historic District, which presently is the only district eligible for the Downtown Loan Program. The commission and staff discussed the program budget, debating how to raise the amount of private money suggested for the loan fund. It was noted they could possibly _=apply for a-Dubuque Racing Association (DRA) grant or a Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) grant, as well as contact financial institutions, private foundations, individuals, businesses, and any other potential funding sources. Discussion continued addressing how these programs should be submitted to the City Counci! at the April 17 work session. The Commission suggested contacting City Council members prior to the joint work session to see if they have any questions or issues with the initial report as proposed. It was discussed that for the April 6, 2000, work session, Commissioners would review the revisions to the revolving loan fund and grant programs, and then discuss how to proceed with the review process. Commissioners thanked Ms. Myhre for preparing guidelines for the loan and grant programs. The Commission and staff next reviewed other recommendations addressed in the initial report. Specifically, they discussed the proposed demolition by neglect language. Commissioners asked that Planning Services staff contact the Building Services Department regarding their level of comfort with enforcing this proposed section. The Commission reviewed other recommendations as described in the initial report, noting there were no questions or suggested changes to those proposals. ITEMS FROM COMMlSSlON: The Commission expressed concern pertaining to economic hardship, questioning whether they should inquire about the past history of properties. Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien stated that past history should not be addressed. Mr. O'Brien reviewed the proposed sample evaluation forms that could help determine and simplify the Commission review of economic hardship. The Commission discussed how the Tim Wood/Vicky Bechen application compares to the Comptons and the Boys and Girls Club requests. Mr. O'Brien stated that Comptons had only submitted an application for Certificate of Appropriateness, and that Certificates of Appropriateness are very unique from Certificates of Economic Hardship. The Commission next discussed the possibility or feasibility of having applicants that are proposing demolition contact salvage contractors or historic preservation contractors to coordinate warehousing salvage materials. It was mentioned that Chicago, Minneapolis and Iowa City currently have warehousing type businesses that have extensive salvaged historical materials. The Commission noted that it might be advisable to discuss with Four Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 2, 2000 Page 4 Mounds the availability of warehouse/storage space, and the possibility of doing salvage work. The Commission also noted they were encouraged by the turnout at the February 29, 2000, historic preservation seminar and hoped that the discussion on those issues continues in the future. The Commission also inquired as to the possibility of having videos or slides presented to the City and having those programs shown on City Channel 8. ITEMS FROM STAFF: Staff Member Noble distributed a draft agenda for the March 16, 2000, meeting. The Commission and staff reviewed each of the items. The commission asked staff to contact First Presbyterian Church and inquire of the face material for their --handicap ramp. They requested that staff review the applications for economic hardship with Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien and utilize his evaluation forms to determine whether those forms are functional and whether they may be implemented in the future it they appear to address these concerns properly. Commissioners asked staff to schedule their March 16 meeting for 4:00 P.M. due to the length of the agenda. Mr. Noble noted that American Trust and Savings Bank has submitted an appeal for their sign request that will be heard at the City Council meeting on March 20, 2000. He asked that either the chairperson or vice chair be present to review the Commission's determination of that design review. ADJOURNMENT: Motion by Mozena, seconded by Bradford, to adjourn the meeting carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Mai Noble, A~~istant Planner !'S C >'I-~l~ ~ 2cT~> Adopted MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEW SESSION Thursday, March 16, 2000 4:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Pam Bradford, Suzanne Guinn, Jim Gibbs, Terry Mozena and Duane Greenfield; Staff Members Mark Noble and Tim O'Brien. - ABSENT: None. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m. MINUTES: Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradfiord, to approve the minutes of the February 17, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Kringle, Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Mozena and Greenfield; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/1266-1267 1/2 SLUFF STREET Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship by Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque to demolish structure at 1265-1267 11/2 Bluff Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Chairperson Kringle stated that the applicant submitted a letter requesting that this application be withdrawn and this item be removed from the agenda. PUBLIC HEARING/391 W. 12TH STREET: 1240 BLUFF STREET; 1201. 1243 1255-57 8~ 1299 LOCUST STREET: Application for Removal from Historic District by Boys and Girls Club or' Greater Dubuque to remove property located at 391 W. 12th Street; 1240 Bluff Street; 1201, 1243, 1255-57 and 1299 Locust Street from the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Chairperson Kringle reported that the applicant submitted a letter requesting that this application be withdrawn and this item be removed from the agenda. DESIGN REVIEW/623-627 ARLINGTON STREET: Application of Certificate of Economic Hardship by Tim WoodNicky Bechen for property located at 623-627 Arlington Street to install vinyl siding in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Tim Wood presented the Commissioners with revised figures and costs pertaining to the application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship. He indicated he is now requesting vinyl siding for the entire structure, and has withdrawn his request to restore the front facade and install vinyl siding on the sides and rear, as recommended by Planning Services staff. Mr. Wood also stated he has withdrawn from the Lead Paint Abatement Program with the Housing Services Department due to the lack of funding necessary to comply with the requirements of that program. Mr. Wood ~linutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 10, 2000 Page 2 also added that he has determined the value of the property at S33,000 based on comparables that he has received. The Commission asked why the numbers he provided were just made available today. The Commissioners were concerned that they did not have a chance to review those numbers and compare them to previous rgures. rtilr. Wood replied that he had just received the figures from his accountant. The Commission and applicant discussed the project as proposed, considering that the applicant has withdrawn from the Lead Paint Abatement Program and is now requesting vinyl siding of the entire building. The Commission, staff and applicant discussed the lead hazard issue which was addressed at a previous meeting, specifically questioning of what areas are lead hazard and would need to be resolved regardless of whether the applicant is in the Lead Paint Abatement Program or not. Staff Member Noble reviewed the concerns and issues with the lead paint, stating 4vhat the Housing Services Department would require for removal or encapsulation. Staff Member Noble reviewed the concerns that the City Council had previously addressed, asking that the Historic Preservation Commission respond to the two issues. It was noted that the applicant stated that he has dropped this property out of the lead paint program; therefore, the applicant is no longer pursuing the recommendation made by staff to allow vinyl siding on ~,vo sides and the rear, and to reconstruct the front facade using wood siding and new windows and new porch. Assistant City Attomey Tim O'Brien reiterated that since the applicant has withdra:vr that request, the Commission should forward a response to the City Council that this is no longer a viable option of the applicant. Mr. O'Brien also stated the Commissioners need to address the issue raised by the City Council pertaining to maintenance of this property, with his recommendation that the Commission present a response that they cannot consider past maintenance on this property; and, therefore, it is no longer an issue of consideration with this application. Commissioner Guinn clarified that the Commission is only looking at the numbers which pertain to the Certificate of Economic Hardship and that they are not to look at their preference of material, whether it be wood or vinyl siding. Tim O'Brien concurred with that statement, again suggesting that the Commission forward a response to the City Council that past maintenance of this property, or lack thereof, should not be considered in this application. Commissioners (~lozena and Bradford stated their concern that ne~v numbers were just presented to the Commission this evening, and they are uncomfortable making a decision on this application tonight. Several other commissioners concurred 4vith that concern. The Commission and Nir. Wood discussed the newly presented information with the Commission asking who was the accountant that provided these figures. N1r. Wood stated it was Randy Kemp front Jim Kircher's accounting office, The Commission continued their review of this project by inserting the new numbers into the analysis provided by Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien and Niark Noble and attempted to determine whether those figures show there is a reasonable economic ret~rrn for this property. The Commission questioned the value to be used for the property, with some confusion over the figures presented by the applicant. Nlinutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2000 Page 3 Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford, to approve the Certificate of Economic Hardship and approve vinyl siding on the entire building. Motion was denied by the following vote: Aye -Guinn and Green field; Nay -Bradford, Gibbs, and Kringle. Abstain: Mozena. Commissioner Mozena asked that the record sh~5w that his abstention was based on the fact that new material was submitted at the last minute and he felt it was not appropriate for a decision to be made without evaluating and reviewing that material in further detail. DESIGN REVIEW/1255-57 LOCUST STREET AND 1299 LOCUST STREET: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness by Boys & Girls Club of Greater Dubuque for property located at 1255-57 Locust Street and 1299 Locust Street to construct an addition to the south side of the existing facility-and construct a connection to the adjacent N1clntyre Building, in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Brian Meyer, Executive Director of the Boys and Girls Club, reviewed Scheme C as presented to the Commissioners. He noted that Scheme C shows the building addition as previously presented with a different configuration of the parking lots: He said that Scheme C shows that there will be a 20- space parking lot on the north/northwest side of the existing Boys and Girls Club; that there will be three spaces on the south side of the building addition, with two spaces in the lower level, and that there will be a 22-space parking lot on the west side of Bluff Street (the property where the Sprengelmeyer building currently exists). Commissioner Gibbs questioned the height of the addition in relation to the existing building. Mike Ruden, Durrant Architects, stated that the addition will be approximatefy six feet higher than the existing building. Brian Meyer reviewed the proposed addition, noting that their request to withdraw the application for demolition does not change this proposal, rather it only shows that they are going to keep the existing parking lot on the northv~rest side of their current gymnasium and facility space. Commissioner Guinn expressed concern with the scale of the addition in this neighborhood. She inquired how close this addition would be to the sidewalk. Mr. Ruden stated that the building would be set back two feet from the property line, and that the overhang would be approximatefy 8.5 feet back from the curb. The Commissioners and applicant further discussed the building setback, noting the proximity to the property line and that this addition is closer to the street than the existing facility. The Commissioners discussed the design of the building addition with the applicant, who stated that they will work with the Commission regarding the elevation design. Commissioner Gibbs stated that he would like to have input on the renal design of this building addition. Commissioners also discussed access from the building addition to the McIntyre Building. Mr. Ruden stated that they would come back before the Commission and specifically review that access situation. Commissioner Mozena commended the Boys and Girls Club for removing the request for demolition of property at 1265-67 %2 Bluff Street, and also for withdrawing their application to remove property from the Historic Preservation District. He stated that the Commission and Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2000 Page 4 applicant are dealing with a building that was inappropriate in design when it was originally constructed and that he feels that both are addressing the situation the best way that they can. Commissioner Bradford also echoed her appreciation for the Boys and Girls Club's willingness to withdraw the applications. Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Kringle, to approve the application for Certificate of Appropriateness subject to the Commission providing input into the final design of this project. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Gibbs, Mozena, Bradford, Greenfield and Kringle; Nay - Guinn. DESIGN REV1EW11684 IOWA STREET• Application for Certificate ofAppropriateness by First Pfesbyterian Church located at 1684 Iowa Street to install a handicap ramp to the front entrance of the church in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Tom Jack, representative of First Presbyterian Church, reviewed the request for the handicapped improvements to the front entrance of the church. Commissioner Guinn questioned the applicant regarding the site plan which noted that a sign was not shown on the plan. The applicant stated that the sign that currently exists will remain and that the ramp will run behind that sign. The applicant reviewed with the Commission materials used on the ramp, stating it will be concrete with evergreen bushes planted across the front of the ramp. The Commission discussed with the applicant the possibility of putting a limestone front or facinc across the front of the ramp. The Commission also discussed with the applicant the material and color of the proposed railing. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Kringle, to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness, with the condition that they include a limestone facade on the front of the ramp in keeping with the limestone foundation of the building. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford, Greenfield, Gibbs and Kringle; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/824. 62~ 636 8~ 638 ARLINGTON STREET• Application for Certificate of Appropnateness by Heartlan Investments of Iowa to construct a 4-unit apartment complex at 624, 626, 636 and 638 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Ken Moore, Heartland Investments of Iowa, reviewed the proposed design with the Commission noting that this will be two duplexes that have been approved fora 0 lot line setback, not afour- unit apartment complex as stated on the application. Commissioner Bradford questioned the applicant as to the location and number of parking spaces for this development. Ken Moore stated that he has been in discussions with City staff and it appears that they will be able to provide six parking spaces in front of the building, adding that due to the zoning requirements, he would need to request a variance for two more parking spaces. The Commission asked the applicant about grading of this property, location of the structure on the property, and size of the building. Mr. Moore reiterated that this would be two side-by-side duplexes. t-fe noted that due to significant grade change of this property and a considerable Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2000 Page 5 amount of rock just below grade, he is having a difTicult time maneuvering this building on the lot, meeting the setback regulations, and providing off-street parking spaces. Commissioner Mozena questioned whether they had consulted with an architect on the design of the building, stating that he has concerns with the design, which is not comparable or in keeping with designs of other structures in this neighborhood. Mr. Moore said he has not had an architect involved. He stated that he feels the area has quite a variety of structures, both in style and use of materials. - Commissioner Bradford also expressed concern that this structure is not in keeping with the designs of other buildings in this neighborhood. The Commissioners and applicant discussed design alternatives, specifically asking for consideration of different window treatments, such as arches or shutters, that would more reflect the design found in this neighborhood. Mr. Moore agreed that constructing a porch with a roof on the front would be appropriate, but he expressed concern with some of the design alternatives, stating that they may not comply with the current building and fire requirements of the City. Commissioner Gibbs stated that he would be abstaining from the review of this project. Commissioner Guinn noted that on the modified front elevation there shows a very small window sill. She questioned whether there could be additional detail work above or below the windows on this facade. Mr. Moore stated that detail work could be included in this project, specifically noting that the stone sill shown on the plan would be approximately 6-7 inches wide and would be more pronounced than shown on the plan. He also added that he could add detail work at the corners of the building and add a front porch. Mr. Moore stated that at the corners, he could install the brick such that it projects out from the balance of the brick on this facade thereby providing some level of detail. The Commission discussed tabling this item, suggesting that a work session be set up to discuss with the applicant how to provide more detailed information including colored designs which would more accurately reflect the appearance of the building. The Commission also suggested that the applicant visit with an architect or someone experienced in designing renovations of historic structures and seek their assistance in this particular project. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Bradford, to table this review to the April 20, 2000, meeting with a work session to begin at 4:00 p.m. on that date, with a design review to follow. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Mozena, Guinn, Bradford, Greenfield, and Kringie; Nay -None. Abstain: Gibbs. DESIGN REVIEWI340 W. 5TH STREET: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness by Kathy Fuhs to renovate the exterior of the building at 340 VV. 5th Street in the Cathedral Historic Preservation District. Kathy Fuhs reviewed with the Commission the property she had recently purchased, noting her intent to do the following improvements to the property: 1) tuckpoint the existing brick work; 2) remove the vinyl siding on the porch and install wood siding; 3) install windows back into Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission March 16, 2000 Page 6 openings which had been boarded; and 4) soffit, fascia and roof improvements. She added than the proposed use would be a restaurant on the first and second floors, and that one of the requirements for the restaurant is to provide a fire escape from the second floor. She stated she would like to remove an existing window on the south facade of the second floor and convert it to a doorway with either a wood or wrought iron stairway and railing running from the second floor down to ground level. Ms. Fuhs noted that stairway would be oriented toward the east. She stated that she and the proposed tenant would like to add decorative design work to make this stairway fit in better with the overall renovation of the building. She also added that they were required to provide an exhaust fan. The Commission discussed options to improve the appearance and possibly make the stairway a-functional element of the building. Eric Dregne stated that he will be the tenant of the building, and that his intended use is an american bistro, which would include an outdoor eating space. Commissioner Guinn inquired of staff about the removal of vinyl siding, questioning whether the Commission had to review that or not, and whether the exhaust fan on the side of the building is typically stainless steel. Staf-. Member Noble stated that the Commission needs to review and make a determination for the stairway, fan and the conversion of the window to a doorway. Noble added that other improvements to the property are all considered maintenance which do not require Commission review. Commissioner Guinn questioned the design for the new doorway. The applicant stated that the doorway will have glass above and wood below, which she felt would be the best match to the adjacent windows and other doorways found in this building. Commissioner Gibbs said he was encouraged by the property owner's plans to renovate this structure, noting that this is a very important piece of architecture in the city of Dubuque and encouraging her to consult with an architect to help with the design of this building. The Commission also discussed with the applicant the availability of funding sources and discussed in further detail whether a wood or wrought iron stairway would be more appropriate. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Greenfield, to approve the application with the condition that either the wood or wrought iron stairway be utilized. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Bradford, Guinn, Greenfield, Kringle, Mozena and Gibbs; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/365 MAIN STREET: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness by State Beauty Supply to install a projecting sign located at 365 Main Street in the Old Main Historic Preservation District. Wayne Deutsch, sign contractor for the applicant, reviewed the sign request, noting the materials to be used and that this sign would project off the south edge of the building. The Commission discussed materials, noting that it would be an aluminum sign, and also reviewed colors and use of the building. The Commission also inquired whetherthis would be a lit sign, which the applicant replied that it would not be. The Commission and applicant discussed materials, noting they would prefer wood versus aluminum. The applicant stated that his concern is that the wood would MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Thursday, May 18, 2000 5:00 p.m. Carnegie-Stout Public Library 360 W 11th St., Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Terry Mozena, Suzanne Guinn, Duaine Greenfield and Jim Gibbs; Staff Member Mark Noble. ABSENT: Commission Member Pam Bradford. AFFIDAVIT' OF COMPLIANCE' Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:04 p.m. MINUTEST Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Guinn,_to approve the minutes of the April 20, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Greenfield, Gibbs, Mozena and Kringle; Nay -None. HISTORIC PRESERVATION AWARD CEREMONY: Chairperson Kringle presented awards for the Iowa Historic Preservation Alliance's "Preservation At Its Best" awards, and then announced the winners of the Dubuque Historic Preservation Treasure Hunt. Chairperson Kringle first presented a certifica#e and plaque to Duaine and Jane Greenfield who own property at 190 Main Street, which is known as Harbor View I1. Duaine and Jane were the winners of the Small Commercial category and were commended for renovating an adult movie theater with numerous inappropriate exterior modifications into a viable commercial and residential structure. Next, Chairperson Kringle presented a certificate to Gary and Kathleen Jensen who are the owners of the Julien Art Centre at 1005 Main Street. Gary and Kathleen were honorable mention winners of the Small Commercial category. Mr. Kringle summarized the extensive work the Jensens have completed on this property, which presently houses an art center. Chairperson Kringle then announced the winners and prizes of the Dubuque Historic Preservation Treasure Hunt. Chairperson Kringle also identified the properties which were included in this contest. PUBLIC H AR1NG/REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROPOSED NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FOR FOUR MOUNDS• John Michalski, representing Four Mounds, stated he has done considerable historical research for the Four Mounds property. He reviewed avith the Commission the nomination that Four Mounds has submitted to the State Nominations Review Committee, which requests that they consider the property for placement on the National Register for Historic Places. This nomination is specifically for the four burial mounds on the property. Mr. Michalski stated that they are in the process of submitting a district nomination for the Four Mounds property in the near future. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, May 18, 2000 Page 2 Commissioner Mozena questioned the benefits for the Four Mounds site if it were to be placed on the National Register of Historic Places. Mr. Michalski stated that besides the honor and recognition of being placed on the National Register, there are also state grants and other funding sources that are available to them only if they are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Staff Member Noble stated that the Commission should discuss and vote to make a determination whether this property should be recommended for National Register eligibility or recommended for National Register ineligibility. They also should provide reasons for the recommendation. After the Historic Preservation Commission has made -their determination, this item will be forwarded to the City Council for their June 5 meeting. At that time, they will go through the same process which the Commission has undergone. After the City Council has made the determination, both the Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council's determinations will be submitted to the State Nominations Review Committee for review at their Nomination meeting on June 9, 2000. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Greenfield, to recommend that this site be determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The reasons for the recommendation are that the Commission believes this property needs to be preserved and recognized as an asset to the community. Motion was carried by the following vote: Aye -Kringle, Guinn, Gibbs, Mozena and Greenfield; Nay -None. APPLICATION FOR ECONOMIC HARDSHIP/823 - 627 ARLINGTON STREET: Application for Tim Wood and Vcky Sechen for a Certificate of Economic Hardship for 623 & 627 Arlington Street to allow installation of vinyl siding in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Tim Wood made a brief presentation and asked whether the Commission members had any questions concerning their application materials. Several commissioners expressed appreciation for the clarity of the submittal of their materials. Commissioner Mozena inquired about the applicants position on restoring the front of the building and vinyl siding the two sides and the rear, and questioned what it would cost to bring this property into compliance with the Housing Services Department's requirements. Mr. Wood stated that their preference is to vinyl side the entire property and that if they were to strip, scrape and paint the building to reach compliance with the Housing Department's requirements, they would expend between 81,600 - X3,200 every year. Commissioner Mozena questioned the necessity for the relocation of tenants if they were to scrape and paint as suggested in this application. Chairperson Kringle stated that he would prefer to see the facade restored and asked that the applicants continue their discussion with the Housing Services Department to secure additional funding. Mr. Woo~~ stated that to receive funding from the City, they would need to enroll in the Lead P~ Grant Program, which is cost prohibitive to them at this point. i f ~1 Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, May 18, 2000 Page 3 Staff Member Noble reviewed the analysis forms prepared by City staff. Mr. Wood stated that the 514,883 noted in the analysis forms is money available from Housing only if they go through the grant program. This requires that they comply with the standards for removal of lead paint on the inside, which they are not intending to pursue. Commissioner Gibbs stated that he agrees with Chairperson Kringle and that he would be favorable if they were to renovate the front facade with a condition that the Commission review the final design and that the front facade is restored to the original appearance. Commissioner Guinn stated that she had previously voted for renovation of the front and to allow vinyl on the two sides and the rear, and presently would vote for that same proposal. Tim Wood stated that the Housing Services Department has not agreed to grant them money because they are not going to do the interior in accordance with their guidelines. In addition, he stated that they are not allowed to use the City's waste containers. This means that they would need to incur additional costs for the proper removal of the lead hazard from the exterior of the building. The Commission and applicants continued discussion on the proposal for vinyl siding on the sides and the rear and restoring the front, as well as discuss why the applicants are not going to do the lead paint removal on the interior. The Commission and applicants discussed voting alternatives, one of them being to allow vinyl siding on the sides and rear and restore the front, and another to allow vinyl on all four sides. It was debated why the applicants should do the outside in a lead safe manner but not do the inside in a lead safe manner. Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Guinn, to approve vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear, and restore the front facade, subject to approval of final drawings and the materials of the front renovation being reviewed by the Commission. Motion was approved by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Gibbs, Mozena, Greenfield and Kringle; Nay -None. Commissioner Guinn asked how the Commission could assist in seeing that the applicants receive additional funding from the Housing Services Department. Staff Member Noble stated that the Commission could draft a letter to the Housing Services Department requesting that the applicants considering for receiving additional funding for this project. The Commission and applicants discussed the approved recommendation, with the applicants expressing concern that if the City does not assist in providing financial assistance, they will not be able to make an economic return on this property. Commissioner Gibbs stated that he believes the decision is satisfactory. The applicants disagreed, stating that they did not receive what they requested, which was to allow vinyl siding on the entire structure. The Commission and applicants spent considerable time discussing the Commission decision, with the applicant stressing that they are not assured Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, May 18, 2000 Page 4 of the lead grant money or any financial assistance, and would not be able to earn reasonable economic return. The applicants requested that the Commission also vote on approving vinyl siding on all four sides. The Commission and applicants discussed whether they could rescind their motion and change their vote, and provide a new motion and second to deny vinyl siding on the entire structure. The Commission also debated whether to table this item and work with the applicants and the City to determine an option that would be workable between all the affected parties. After discussion between the Commission members, they agreed that they would stay with the original decision. It was agreed that the Planning Services staff, on behalf of the Commission, should submit a letter to the Housing Services Department, asking for additional funding assistance for this - pr°perty. - ITEMS FROM COMMISSION The Commission and staff discussed the Historic Preservation Ordinance Task Force asking whether all of the task force members have been selected. Staff Member Noble stated that they are still waiting to hear back from Dubuque Main Street Ltd. and from the Dubuque County Historical Society. Additionally, it was discussed whether Jim Lansing was interested in participating as a Realtor. Commissioner Gibbs stated that Mr. Lansing expressed concern that he would not have sufficient time to dedicate to this task force, and respectfully declined to participate. The Commissioners discussed the date of the first task force meeting on June 1, noting that an agenda packet will be sent out to the task force members approximately one week before that meeting date. Staff Member Noble reviewed with the Commission that Peter Eck and Gail Naughton were selected as property owners in a historic district and that Joe Ungs and John Gronen were selected as contractors. Commissioner Gibbs discussed with the Commission the communication process that occurs at their meetings, stating that it would assist the Commissioners and applicants if all questions and responses were directed through the chairperson. He stated it is sometimes difficult to listen to the main discussion when other discussions are occurring at the same time. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~ l ~ ~-(~ Mar J. Noble, sis ant Planner Adopted MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEW SESSION Thursday, June 15, 2000 5:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Suzanne Guinn, Terry Mozena and Pam Bradford; Staff Members Mark Noble and Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien. - ABSENT: Commission Members Jim Gibbs and Duaine Greenfield. AFFIDAVIT Of COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifiying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. MINUTES: Motion by Bradford, seconded by Mozena, to approve the minutes of the April 20, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Mozena, to approve the minutes of the May 4, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Mozena, to approve the minutes of the May 15, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena and Kringle; Nay -None. Abstain -Bradford. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Bradford, to approve the minutes of the May 18, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEYVICERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/INSIDER DECOR RENTAL' Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for Inside Decor Rental to install a projecting sign at 113 Main Street in the Old Main Historic Preservation District. Jerry and Lisa Graf, operators of Inside Decor Rental, reviewed the proposed projecting sign for their business. They discussed the color and materials for the sign, noting that there will be no illumination of the sign. Commissioner Guinn asked about location of the sign. Ms. Graf stated their sign will be hung above the iron beam which runs the length of the building and will be fastened into the brick work. Commissioner Bradford asked about the size of the sign. Ms. Graf stated that the sign will be approximately 3' x 4'. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, June 15, 2000 Page 2 Motion by Kringle, seconded by Bradford, to approve the installation of the projecting sign. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay - None. DESIGN REVIEW /APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/BEHR'S FUNERAL HOME: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for Behr's Funeral Home, located at 1491 Main Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District, to construct a staircase on the south side of building; remove steel siding and repair/install brick; replace an aluminum awning with a canvas awning and install street lights on 15th 8~ Main Streets. Kevin Conlon, Behr's Funeral Home, stated they would like to relocate a set of stairs from the courtyard on the north side of the building, to an area on the south side of the building. He stated that there is no other location available for this staircase. Chairperson Kringle asked whether they had contacted the Fire Department to discuss access requirements pertaining to the Fire Code. Mr. Conlon stated the Building Services Department has reviewed the location of the proposed staircase, and that the location complies with the Building Code but he has not contacted the Fire Department. Commissioner Mozena inquired whether this is a fire escape or a primary access. Mr. Conlon stated that this staircase is for the apartments located above the funeral home, and that there would be railings on either side of the staircase. Commissioner Mozena suggested that they research and utilize a design that is in keeping with the historical building. Mr. Conlon replied that they are looking at several options of design, but due to the limited visibility of these railings, they would like to keep the cost down. Commissioner Bradford asked if their design would be a simple iron design and if they have seen any similar designed staircases in the city. Mr. Conlon stated that they have not found a similar type of staircase. He also replied that the staircase will be made of stamped steel painted black. Chairperson Kringle stated that he does not have a concern with the design as proposed, and prefers the location of the proposed stairway versus the location they currently have. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Kringle, to approve the staircase as presented. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. The Commission discussed the removal of the steel siding and the renovation of the existing covered brick. Kevin Conlon stated that steel siding was put over the brick the last time the building was remodeled. Mr. Conlon stated that due to rusting of the steel siding, they would like to remove it and the several layers of paint on the brick underneath the steel siding. He also stated that the walls that were constructed of wood, would be covered with brick to keep the same appearance as the rest of the structure. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, June 1 S, 2000 Page 3 Motion by Kringle, seconded by Mozena, to approve the removal of steel siding and install brick over the wood siding underneath. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. The Commission reviewed the request to replace the aluminum awnings with canvas awnings. The applicant stated that they want to remove the awnings which are of recent constn.rction and are of poor quality. He stated they are going to be redoing the sidewalks, the retaining wall with a wrought iron fence on it and the curbing this summer, and they would like to remove the awnings at the same time. He stated that they would like to put up new canvas awnings which would be designed with a round top, but at this point, they _ do not have many specifics about the design. He added that they anticipate that the awning will go to at least the steps on Main Street, and they may also span the sidewalk similar to the current awnings. He added that they will be either black to match the roof, or burgundy, and will be supported with iron columns. The awnings will be of the same width and height as the current awnings, which have aluminum supports that are not as sturdy as the proposed steel supports. The Commission questioned how they should review this particular item, since the fnal design is uncertain. Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien stated that the applicant could remove this awning and replace it after the construction of the sidewalks, retaining walls and curbing. Based on this, Mr. O'Brien stated that the Commission could approve the removal of the awning and then approve the design of a different awning. Commissioner Guinn asked whether it would be appropriate to approve the restoration of the awnings with steel posts, and with the same width and depth as the existing, and colored either black or burgundy. The Commission, applicant and staff discussed how to proceed with this request and decided that the applicant should withdraw this request, and then bring the final design to the Commission for their approval. The applicant agreed to withdraw this request at this time. Next, the Commission discussed the request to install street lights on 15th and Main Streets. Kevin Conlon reviewed the existing street lights, which are in bad shape and provide minimal lighting to this part of the block. He has discussed this with the City Engineering Department, noting that they have suggested that he proceed with the installation of the new City standard pedestrian type lighting currently found in the Cable Car Square area, the Riverwalk and the 8th Street area. Chairperson Kringle asked whether this type of light would supply enough illumination to this area. Mr. Conlon reviewed the design of the light, the spacing and proposed locations of these lights, adding that by installing three to four of these lights, it would providing better light and help with the safety issue in this area. Staff Member Noble reviewed his memorandum which addressed a Downtown Dubuque Streetscape Study done by the City and the consultant, LDR, Inc. He noted that the study mentioned pedestrian-type lighting as well as recommended spacing and locations, which reflect that shown by the applicant. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, June 15, 2000 Page 4 Motion by Kringle, seconded by Mozena, to approve the installation of street lights on 15th and Main Streets as presented. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. The applicant spoke concerning the reconstruction of the sidewalk and street in this area. Mr. Conlon stated that Behr Funeral Home would like to see the brick street on 15th Street saved, and asked for suggestions on how he could ensure that this happens. Assistant City Attorney O'Brien stated that the applicant could contact the City Manager about keeping the brick street. Commissioner Mozena asked Chairperson Kringle if it would be appropriate for the Commission to draft a letter asking that the brick street be saved when _ that street project is scheduled for reconstruction. Chairperson Kringle and the other Commissioners agreed, noting that the applicant should also gather support from neighbors and other people interested in seeing the brick street saved. Mr. Conlon added that they will be redoing the.limestone base/capstones and the cast iron fence, both of which need to be repaired. ~ Commissioners and s#aff stated they were in support of that improvement, with staff noting that the project is considered general maintenance by the Ordinance and does not require review or approval by the Historic Preservation Commission. DESIGN REVIEW/APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/ALDEMAN• Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for Mark and Pam Aldeman to remove an existing garage and erect a new garage with aluminum or steel siding located at 486 W. 3rd Street in the Ca#hedral Historic Preservation District. Mark Aldeman reviewed the condition of the existing garage, which is approximately 75% sided with corrugated-type steel siding. Mr. Aldeman stated that due to the proximity of Kelly's Bluff, he would like to construct a 24' x 24' steel sided garage. Chairperson Kringle asked whether he had considered a garage with wood siding, and whether he had received a cost for a garage with wood siding. Mr. Aldeman stated that his concern with a wood-sided garage was that due to the proximity of the bluff, he has experienced considerable rot on his garage; and, therefore, did not seek costs for wood siding. Mr. Aldeman added that side of the garage is not visible from the public right-of--way, and that there is moisture on that side of the garage nearly 100% of the time. Commissioner Guinn suggested that this project may be a prime candidate for Hardi plank, which is a cement or fiber-based product which has a history of holding paint well and not rotting under these types of circumstances. She also added that the cost for that product is between the cost for synthetic siding and wood siding. Mr. Aldeman stated that a lot of the surrounding properties have vinyl or aluminum siding, and asked that the Commission allow him to install aluminum siding on the garage. Commissioners discussed the slope of the roof, asking whether it would be appropriate to require a steeper slope more in keeping with the principal structure. The Commission also - discussed which siding material would be most appropriate in this situation. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, June 15, 2000 Page 5 Motion by Kringle, seconded by Mozena, to approve 3" aluminum siding on the two sides and the rear, with 3" wood siding on the front of the garage. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena and Kringle; Nay -Bradford. DESIGN REVIEW/APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESSITFM CO.: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for 100 Main Street for TFM Co. to install two wall signs/murals in the Old Main Historic Preservation District. Winne Thompson reviewed her request for two signs, one proposed on the north side of the building, and one on the south side of the building. She stated that the silhouette __=design would be constructed of wood and painted flat black, that the lettering would be plastic, but antiqued so it would not look plastic, and that the background would be painted white. She sta#ed that the sign location on the south side is in the area where a first floor window has been filled in, and that the loca#ion of the sign on the north side would be toward the rear of the building, but slightly elevated above the height of cars that park in that area. Commissioner Guinn asked whether they would be lit. Ms. Thompson stated that these signs would not be illuminated. Commissioner Mozena stated that he liked the silhouette painted on the brick, but stated he would like to see the lettering constructed of wood. Staff reviewed the requirements of signage in the C-4 district, the previously approved request for three signs on this building, and reviewed with the Commission what items should be addressed by them in this particular application. Commissioner Bradford agreed with Commissioner Mozena that the letters should be constructed of wood. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Guinn, to approve the request as presented, with the condition that the letters be constructed of wood. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. The applicant asked whether the Commission would consider having the letters painted versus made out of wood, as she was concerned that the wood fetters would rot. The Commission agreed that painting would be a viable option. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Bradford, to amend the original motion and allow the signs to either be constructed with wood letters or letters painted onto the brick. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF CONOMIC HARDSHIP/B ~ W PROPERTIES• Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship for B &~ W Properties to install vinyl siding on the entire house located at 623-627 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Staff Member Noble stated to the Commission that the applicants have requested that this item be tabled until the July 20, 2000 design review meeting. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, June 15, 2000 Page 6 Motion by Bradford, seconded by Guinn, to table this item to the July 20, 2000 Historic Preservation Commission meeting. Motion carried by the following vote; Aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIP/FRANK: Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship for Brian Frank to install vinyl siding on entire house located at 1335-1349 Dell Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Brian Frank stated that he is a contractor from Scales Mound, Illinois, and was not aware __=a permit was required for this type of project. He was informed of this requirement by Planning Services Manager Laura Carstens at the site after he had started this project. He stated he did not intend to disregard the guidelines and apologized to the Commission and staff for any inappropriate action. Mr. Frank stated that he bought the property in October, 1998, and that fie has not been able to collect documents#ion from the previous owner as recommended by staff. Staffs recommendation was based on the ordinance requirement that the applicant submit at least two years' worth of information on operatinglmaintenance expenses and rent income as wel( as to seek appraisals and information on the previous owner and the relationship to the current owner. Mr. Frank sta#ed that he spent approximately X4,500 last year on repairs. He agreed that he may have paid too much for the property. He bought it because he eventually wants to live in it, and although he may not gain an economic return on the property, he believes the money he has spent will be worth it. Mr. Frank added that the figures he submitted were for materials only and did not include labor, paint, and any disposal of lead paint. Chairperson Kringle inquired whether he started the siding project for maintenance reasons. Mr. Frank stated that the previous wood siding was in bad shape and he wanted to improve tfie appearance of the property. Commissioner Mozena asked whether the applicant knew that this property was in an historic district when he bought it. Mr. Frank replied that the information he received from the bank did not disclose that this was in an historic district, which he thought it should have done. The Commissioners noted that Mr. Frank was a first time home buyer and discussed availability of financial assistance. Chairperson Kringle explained the concern of the Commission with the proposed project, which he reiterated is similar to that of B SSW Properties. Motion by Kringle, seconded by Guinn, to table this application until the July 20 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, and that the applicant submit the additional material as required by the Ordinance and recommended by staff. Motion carried by the following vote: aye -Guinn, Mozena, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. The Commission discussed options available to the applicant, with Commissioner Mozena _ - asking whether the applicant had contacted the Housing Services Department to see if he qualifies for one of the rehab programs. The applicant stated that he is a participant in Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, June 15, 2000 Page 7 the Section 8 Program, but is not involved in the Rehab Program. Commissioner Mozena stated that the applicant should provide to the Commission what attempts he has pursued pertaining to financial incentives, including whether he qualifies for a facade grant. The applicant stated he is not intending to seek funding as part of the Lead Paint Program, which is not i-~nancially feasible to him. Mr. Frank also noted that in his neighborhood, there are four other properties that have vinyl siding on them, and a fifth structure has brick with vinyl soffit and fascia. Commissioner Mozena also inquired whether the applicant could supply the Commission a copy of the lead paint test that the Housing Services Department had conducted. Mr. Frank stated that he could do that. He also noted that the wood siding was rotted and cracked, and was 4" wide, which is the same size as the vinyl ___siding he has installed. Staff Member Noble stated that Mr. Frank would need to supply the requested information by July 3 for review at the July 20th meeting. PUBLIC HEARING/ARCHiTECTURALJHISTORICAL SURVEYIEVALUATION: Review 8~ Comment on the Revised Survey Report. Staff Member Nob{e reviewed the 90% completed survey report, stating that the consultant and staff have added a significant amount of data since the Commission's last review, particularly pertaining to banking institutions and industrial structures in the downtown area. Staff Member Noble reviewed the changes that have been completed since the last review by the Commission, noting that some items that the Commission had suggested have not been put in place, but will be included in the final report. The Commission inquired about the clarity of the photos of this report. Mr. Noble stated that their copy is several generations from the original, and that in the final report, the photos will be much clearer. The Commission suggested that this document be published and that, if possible, it be a source of fund raising for the Commission. Commissioner Guinn stated that she appreciates that the buildings which have been lost have been added to the survey, and asked that they be identiried as lost structures and if possible, what year the structures were demolished. AD.lOURNIVIENT: Motion by Guinn, seconded by Mozena, to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Respectfu I submitted, 7 /~~w ark J. No ,Assistant Planner Adopted MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEW SESSION Thursday, July 20, 2000 5:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, IA 52001 PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Suzanne Guinn, Terry Mozena, Pam Bradford, Jim Gibbs, and Chris Wand; Staff Member Mark Noble. _ ABSENT: Commission Member Duaine Greenfield. AFFIDAVIT OE COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:13 p.m. MINUTES: Motion by Guinn, seconded by Bradford, to approve the minutes of the June 15, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Bradford, Wand, Gibbs and Kringle; Nay -None. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Bradford, to approve the minutes of the June 26, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Wand, Bradford, Gibbs and Kringle; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/CERTII=KATE OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIP/B 8~ W PROPERTIES• Application of B ~ W Properties for a Certificate of Economic Hardship for property located at 623-827 Arlington Street (tabled from June 15, 2000 meeting) to install vinyl siding on entire house in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Staff Member Noble stated to the Commission that the applicants have requested that this item be tabled until the August 17, 2000 meeting. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Wand, to table this item to the August 17, 2000 Historic Preservation Commission meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Wand, Gibbs, Bradford, Guinn, and Kringle; Nay -None. P~ DESIGN REVIEW/CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/ST RAPHAEL'S CATHEDRAL: Application of St. Raphaei's Cathedral for a Certificate of Appropriateness for 231 Bluff Street to rework existing building exits/entrances in the Cathedral Historic Preservation District. Jeff Morton, architect and representative for St. Raphael's Cathedral, reviewed the proposed projects that involve three existing or proposed entryways to this building complex. The Commissioners noted that they will review and approve each project separately. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission July 20, 2000 Page 2 Mr. Morton reviewed Project A, remodeling of the rear entry. He noted that this project is intended to improve the accessibility and safety for the parishioners and general public. Mr. Morton then reviewed the proposed sign changes. Commissioner Wand questioned the design of the existing door. Mr. Morton explained that the hollow core metal door would be replaced with wood framed doors with window panels inside lights. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Gibbs, to approve Project A, remodeling the rear entryway, as proposed. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Wand, Guinn, Bradford, Gibbs and Kringle; Nay -None. __ Mr. Morton noted that Project B, remodeling of the other two entryways, is intended to improve the circulation of the parishioners. Mr. Morton explained that the project involves a proposed entryway off of a connector between the Cathedral and the Rectory that will lead to a courtyard near the rear parking lot. Mr. Morton noted that Project C eliminates ~- two sets of steps in the vestibule by raising the floor which creates the need for new steps that lead out toward Bluff Street. Mr. Morton stated the steps will be added to the exterior and that the doors will be shifted higher on the wall, so the stain glass must be removed. Commissioner Guinn asked what would happen to the stained glass transom. Mr. Morton responded that it will be saved and reused elsewhere in the church. Chairperson Kringle spoke favorably for this project, stating that it helps create better flow of parishioner circulation and the designs appear to be in compliance with the guidelines established by the Commission and the ordinance. Commissioner Guinn stated that she appreciated the attention to detail to the stairs and particularly with incorporating the limestone caps and brick faces for the steps. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Kringle, to approve Projects B and C for those entryways as proposed. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Gibbs, Guinn, Bradford, Wand and Kringle; Nay -None. ITEMS FROM THE PUBLlC: Review Dubuque County Historical Society's proposal for Railroad Depot restoration, Discovery Center addition and Woodward Museum improvements. Jerry Enzler, 1921 Simpson Street, Executive Director of the Dubuque County Historical Society, reviewed the projects proposed by the Dubuque County Historical Society. Mr. Enzler also introduced Tom Moran, who is the Administrator for the State Historical Society of Iowa, and the State Historical Preservation Office. Mr. Enzler stated that because the proposed projects are federally funded, the State Historical Society has asked that the Historic Preservation Commission review these projects and provide recommendations. Kevin Eipperle, Architect with the Durrant Group, reviewed the specifics of each of the _ - proposed projects, initiating discussion on the handicapped ramps adjacent to the Logsdon, a small riverboat. Mr. Eipperle stated that this area would have a handicapped ramp that would be made of a South American ironwood, and would include a traditional Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission July 20, 2000 Page 3 rail and design. He said the main building would have a heavy timber construction as noted on Plan EX-42 which the Commission received in their packet. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Wand, to recommend that the ramp project be completed as proposed. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Bradford, Wand, Guinn, Gibbs and Kringle; Nay -None. Mr. Eipperle next reviewed the Woodward Walk which he explained is a walkway that extends along the south side of the 1901 Railroad Freight House that currently houses the Woodward Riverboat Museum. Mr. Eipperle stated that the design would include wood _ _ posts aligned with the pilasters of the Woodward Museum and a metal roof, which would be in harmony with the Boat and Boiler Works original structure. Mr. Enzler explained that construction would be an exposed wood structure with deck material supporting the metal roof. He also explained that the soffit will have the names of the 386 boats that were made at the Dubuque Boat and Boiler Works. He said that the railings would be wood, not metal as shown on the plans. Mr. Eipperle stated that the roof pitch will match the existing roof pitch. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Gibbs, to recommend that the Woodward Walkway be renovated as proposed. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Gibbs, Wand, Bradford, and Kringle; Nay -None. Mr. Eipperle reviewed the Chicago Burlington and Quincy Railroad Depot project, which is to restore the building to the original condition. He said the project would include exposing or creating chimneys, redoing the roof, renovating the dormers, and exposing the original brick and stone exterior facades. Mr. Enzler stated that originally this structure was built in 1891 and renovated in 1947. Mr. Enzler stated that the renovations occurred at the time of the railroad decline and that since 1986, when the Historical Society leased the building from the City, they have had problems with leaks in the roof and tiles falling off the sides of the building. He stated that the period of significance was the earlier phase, and this is how they wish to renovate this structure. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Wand, to recommend that the Depot be renovated to the 1891 design, with the exception that the breezeway would be reopened as a glassed ., walkway for security purposes. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Wand, Bradford, Gibbs, Guinn and Kringle; Nay -None. The linkage to the Woodward Museum and the Boat Yard, her. Eipperle explained, would be constructed of wooden girders centered on the pilasters of the Woodward Museum, that it would be a one-story connection at the recommendation of Judy McClure, Architect with the State Historical Society of Iowa, and that the new columns would be placed in such a way that they would avoid impacting the foundation of the Woodward Museum. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission July 20, 2000 Page 4 Mr. Eipperle also explained that the proposed improvements to the Boat Yard would be a crushed gravel surface of slate and limestone that would be accessible to persons with disabilities. He said that the Museum plans to have boat launches, demonstrations and exhibits of the sights and sounds of how the Dubuque Boat and Boiler Works originally operated. Mr. Enzler added that they wip continue to do archeological digs on the site and that once the parking lot is removed, any remnants of the building foundations or any other archeological features will not be removed. Rather they will be documented and possibly exposed as exhibit areas. Motion by Wand, seconded by Bradford, to recommend the linkage and boat yard projects _ be developed as proposed. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Bradford, Gibbs, Guinn, Wand and Kringle Nay -None. Mr. Eipperle said the construction of the Discovery Wetlands inside the Ice Harbor area, noting that it would include limestone banks along the harbor and sheet piling below the water level. Mr. Eipperle also added that thewalkways and railings in the wetlands would be designed to reflect those found elsewhere in the museum complex. Commissioner Guinn questioned wfiether they could hide the speakers. Mr. Eipperle explained that they wil! hide the speakers as best as possible, wi11 probably be underneath the walkway. He said the lighting will be located under the walkway or hanging off of the railing. He also stated that the lighting will resemble that found on the peninsula and the Ice Harbor area, and that wood railings would be installed as required. Commissioner Gibbs expressed concern with the design of the wood railing, noting that they look like they would not be able to handle heavy pedestrian traffic. Mr. Eipperle stated that these railings would be made of the South American ironwood, which is very dark and very strong, yet lightweight. He also added that this wood is commonly in docking areas and the design would incorporate a nautical feel to it. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Gibbs, to recommend the wetlands area be developed as proposed. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Bradford, Guinn, Wand, Gibbs and Kringle; Nay -None. The applicants reviewed their intended plan for the renovation of the WiNiam M. Black steamboat as an informational item. Mr. Enzler stated that all that work has been reviewed, and that most of the work has been done, with the exception of a sprinkler system. Mr. Enzler stated that the William M. Black will be used for historical purposes, such as education and bed and breakfast use, and that they intend to recreate the dredge and steamboat feeling. NOTE: Commissioner Terry Mozena arrived at 6:15 p.m. The applicants reviewed the proposed renovation of the Woodward Museum, will restore the exterior window panes and that most of the indoor work will allow for the continuation of exhibits. Mr. Eipperle stated that the roof, which is currently of rubber membrane, will Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission July 20, 2000 Page 5 be replaced with a similar material, except darker to mate the rest of the development in this area. Motion by Wand, seconded by Guinn, to recommend that the renovation of the Woodward Museum be done as presented. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Gibbs, Guinn, Wand, Bradford, Mozena and Kringle; Nay -None. Mr. Eipperle reviewed the proposed construction of the canopy and ticket booth, which would be located next to the relocated Logsdon. He stated that the canopy will below profile, and that the ticket booth will be similar in appearance to a small pilot house _ commonly found on a riverboat. He stated they intend to use a metal roof to match other proposed developments in this area, and that there will be no railings necessary. Commissioner Guinn inquired if they were not to use a metal roof, what other roof would they use. Mr. Eipperle stated that the metal roof is the type they proposed, and they have not seriously pursued designs of any other types of roofs. Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Guinn, to recommend that the canopy and ticket booth be designed as presented with an additional recommendation that they include a metal roof. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Mozena, Gibbs, Guinn, Wand, Bradford and Kringle; Nay -None. The Commission reviewed the design of the River Discovery Center. Mr. Eipperle stated the exterior will be clad in metal, in addition to limestone, which would be a combination of rougher Dubuque and smoother Maquoketa stone. He said the design is intended to resemble the original Dubuque Boat and Boiler Works building, and also to create or involve a Dubuque presence with the limestone; however, they did not want to cont1ict with the depot and the museum buildings, which originally were brick structures. He stated that the metal siding would be copper that would be allowed to color slightly, and that they would mix the rough and smooth cut limestone in an appropriate looking design. Additionally, he said there would be wood trusses using South American ironwood that would be located on the upper levels on the outside patio/deck area. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Guinn, to recommend approval of the design for the River Discovery Center as presented, with an additional note that the Commission receive and be allowed to review the final plans for this project. tilotion carried by the following vote: Aye -Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Wand, Mozena and Kringle; Nay -None. ELECTION OI` OI`FICERS: Commissioner Bradford nominated Ken Kringle for Chairperson and Commissioner Guinn nominated Terry Mozena for Chairperson. Terry Mozena was elected as the chairperson by a vote of 3 to 2 with one abstention. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission July 20, 2000 Page 6 Commissioner Gibbs nominated Ken Kringle as Vice Chairperson. Ken Kringle was elected as the Vice Chairperson by a vote of 5 to 0, with one abstention (Chris Wand). ITEMS FROM COMMISSION: The Commission discussed the meetings of the Historic Preservation Task Force. Commissioner Gibbs asked the Commission to select either John or Cheryl Whalen to fill a position on the task force. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Bradford to include Cheryl Whalen on the Historic Preservation Ordinance Task Force. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Bradford, Guinn, Gibbs, Wand, Mozena and Kring{e; Nay -None. The Commission discussed the application of B 8~ W Properties. The Commission requesting staff to provide an unbiased third appraisal for this property. Commission also expressed a concern with bid prices by the applicant for scraping, repair and painting of this property. They discussed whether they should seek separate costs for the scraping, repair and painting. It was the consensus that separate numbers are not a requirement the Commission will be asking for. The Commission also discussed the proper handling of covering over rotting wood, with it noted or stipulated that one does not need to repair that wood prior to installing siding over it. It was discussed that generally, the Building Departrnent requires hard structural support underlay that the new siding can be fastened to. The Commission also requested that staff provide a strong recommendation and an analysis of the different proposals provided by the applicant. The Commission also asked whether staff could get a letter from the City Assessor's office regarding the assessed value of this property. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respec su 'tted, Mark J. Nobl Assistant Planner .,ts5~ 2~ Adopted MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DESIGN REVIEW SESSION Thursday, August 17, 2000 5:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa DEAF PRESENT: Chairperson Terry Mozena; Commission Members Jim Gibbs, Pam Bradford, Suzanne Guinn and Ken Kringle; Staff Members Mark Noble and Tim O'Brien. _ ABSENT: Commission Member Chris Wand. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE' Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the lows Open Meetings Law. CALL T~O ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:06 p.m. MINUTES: Motion by Bradford, seconded by Guinn to approve the minutes of the July 20, 2000 meeting as written. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Bradfiord, Gibbs, Kringle and Mozena; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEWICERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/ILLINOIS PCS Application of Illinois PCS for a Certificate of Appropriateness for property located at 200 Main Street (Julien Inn) to install wireless antennae on roof of Julien Inn in the Old Main Historic Preservation District. David Cunningham, representative of Illinois PCS, presented the project to the Commission, noting that this proposal is similar to a recent proposal approved for Iowa Wireless at the same location. Commissioners discussed the project, noting they had previously approved a similar request at this location. Motion by Guinn, seconded by Gibbs, to approve this project as presented. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Bradfiord, Gibbs, Kringle and Mozena; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEWICERTIFICATE OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIP/B 8~ W PROPERTIES' Application of B 8~ W Properties (Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen) for a Certificate of Economic Hardship (tabled from July 20, 2000 meeting) for property located at 623-627 Arlington Street to install vinyl siding on entire house in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Staff Member Noble. reviewed materials just distributed to the Commission, which included a letter from Jeff Mozena, 1207 Grove Terrace, and two memos from Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager, regarding recently completed appraisal and analysis forms. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, August 17, 2000 Page 2 Tim Wood reviewed their application materials. He specifically addressed the analysis of the property conducted by Bob Felderman, bids for project alternatives, and the overall investment fora 15-year time frame. Mr. Wood also reviewed an analysis from his accountant, Jim Kircher, and a letter from Dubuque Bank and Trust. Commissioner Kringle stated that based on economic hardship, he felt that the applicants cannot get an economic return from any of the options proposed. Therefore, he saw two options: 1) repair and maintain what is there; or 2) install vinyl siding on all four sides. He stated he would like to see the property repaired and maintained as that is the most economically viable option. _Mr. Wood argued that maintaining the property as it currently is would be a yearly endeavor, including removal of tenants every year. He stated this would result in increased cost over a long period of time. Commissioner Kringle stated he believed that residing the entire house would not be economically viable. Commissioner Bradford asked whether the applicants would be abating the lead paint on the inside. Mr. Wood stated they do not have available money to do that work at this point. Commissioner Bradford reiterated that both scenarios presented show no reasonable economic return. She also inquired whether they would sell the property. Vcky 8echen stated that is an available option. She also stated that vinyl siding would be a visual improvement, and that the property in its current state looks quite bad. Commissioner Guinn stated she agreed with Commissioner Kringle that the vinyl siding option and the painting and maintaining option appear to be the only two options. She stated she was in favor of seeing it restored to wood; however, based on the economic hardship issue, she felt that this was not a viable option. Mr. Wood stated that if they were to be able to receive some grant money for the lead paint program, that they would remove the vinyl siding on the front and restore it as previously recommended. Joe Ungs, 486 Clarke Drive, stated that there is a sign on the street that notes this is the Nest 11th Street Historic District, and its his interpretation that the district integrity should be saved. He added that as an alternative, they could propose using a material called Nardiplank. The Commission, Mr. Ungs and the applicants discussed this material option. Mr. Ungs also added that when he buys or sees a house in an historic district, he believes it will be improved to the guidelines established by the city, state and federal governments. Vance DeLire, 1921 Madison Street, stated he understood that they are trying to make the property more appealing, but his concern was that vinyl siding is a temporary fix, and although it is not a Queen Anne mansion, it is significant to the overall district and the guidelines should be followed. Mr. Del_ire also commended the Commission on their fine work. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, August 17, 2000 Page 3 Cinda Welu, 2609 Broadway, stated she does not live in an historic district, but they are fixing their house up for their own benefit. She said she believed the owners of the property need to maintain the integrity of the house, whether it is in an historic district or not. Mary Loney-Bichell, 1106 Grove Terrace, said she understood where the property owners were coming from. She said she believed the district was special and that appropriate improvements would benefit this property and the community in general. She said she also believed that the City needed to support the owners with grants and incentives. _ Chairperson Mozena stated that he agreed that the property owners cannot earn a reasonable economic retum based on any of the submitted proposals. Mr. Mozena stated he would like to see it scraped and maintained, as that is the most financially viable option. .Commissioner Gibbs concurred with that statement. Ms. Bechen stated they have owned the property approximately 6-7 years, and that when they bought it, lead paint was not the issue it presently is. Mr. Wood stated they will lose money if they have to scrape and paint the property. Ms. Bechen said she believed Arlington Street does not have much historical character, and that she thought the street should not be part of the historic district because of this. Commissioner Kringle agreed with Ms. Bechen #hat Arlington Street is not a collection of large mansions. He added that he believed the Commission was attempting to see that properties were properly maintained, with the intent to help people make improvements over time to restore their properties and the district in general. Bill Conzett, attorney for the applicants, stated that according to the statutes, if they cannot earn a reasonable economic return, then they should be granted the Certificate of Economic Hardship. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Guinn, to approve the Certificate of Economic Hardship. Motion denied by the following vote: Aye -Kringle and Guinn; Nay -Gibbs, Mozena and Bradford. DESIGN REVIEW/CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESSlLOEWEN• Application of Roger 8~ Donna Loewen for a Certificate of Appropriateness for property located at 1088 Melrose Terrace to remodel a rear addition in the Langworthy Historic Preservation District. Donna Loewen stated that they have lived at this address for approximately six years and the previous owners had added a rear addition to the structure. Ms. Loewen added that they intend to remodel this addition and make substantial improvements, including a fireplace, new wood shingle siding, a new deck, new windows and a french door. She stated that the fireplace would be stone and the siding would be rough cedar shake placed over the existing wood and vinyl siding. She also added there would be three side-by-side windows which would be similar to the windows on the main house. Ms. Loewen also Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, August 17, 2000 Page 4 noted the reuse of two stained glass windows which previously were on the structure. She said the deck would be made of wood, with railings similar to the neighbor's to the west. Ms. Loewen provided photos of the existing house and pictures of what they would like the house to look like when its completed. Commissioner Kringle stated he believes the materials proposed are in keeping with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Commissioners discussed with the applicant the designs of the french doors and the windows. The applicant stated that the two stained glass windows would be fixed windows, not double-hung, and that the french doors would be sliding type doors for tighter sealing, but that they would include bars to give the look _of french door style. Commissioner Gibbs stated that he believed they are trying to correct a previous wrong. He asked if they had consulted with a designer to help blend the addition with the principal structure. Tom and Cinda Welu, 2609 Broadway, stated that they had an architect help them with their last project, which was very helpful. Based on observations from the past few cases, they see that there is evidence for the need for a half to full-time preservation planner. Commissioner Bradford stated she was concerned whether cedar shake was appropriate for this structure. The Commission, staff and applicant discussed at length the need for a consultant to provide detailed design information or further research. Motion by Kringle, seconded by Guinn, to approve the project as presented, with encouragement that the applicant attempt to seek a consulting designer for this project. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Bradford, Gibbs, Kringle and Mozena; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESSIFRANCE: Application of Shirley France for a Certificate of Appropriateness for property located at 445 Bluff Street to reroof garage with asphalt shake shingles in the Cathedral Historic Preservation District. Louis Lugrain, representative for the applicant, reviewed the proposed garage roof addition, noting that the Tamko product, which is an asphalt shingle, closely resembles wood shake shingles. Mr. Lugrain also added that the proposed shingles carry a fire resistance rating. Commissioner Kringle inquired if the roof is in disrepair, and whether this is a viable alternative or if wood shakes are made anymore. Mr. Lugrain stated that this was a viable option, and that the appearance would be similar to what is existing. Commissioner Gibbs stated that the garage addition is a recent addition, that the existing wood shakes do not harmonize with the older principal structure, and he would be okay with the proposed material change. Commissioner Kringle suggested that since the area that needs repair is a small portion, that it be repaired with wood shakes or shingles. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, August 17, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Lugrain reviewed that the property owner is concerr~d with the cost of new wood shakes for the entire roof, and that replacing a few wood shakes with new ones would look different. Motion by Bradford, seconded by Mozena, to approve the project as proposed, with the stipulation that the property owner use the autumn brown color for the new shingles. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Bradford, Gibbs, Kringle and Mozena; Nay -None. DESIGN RE1/lEW(CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS/iCANE~ Application of Kevin _and Mary Kane for a Certifiicate of Appropriateness for property located at 555 W. 11th Street to construct a rear addition to the residence in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Jeff Morton, architect and representative for the Kanes, reviewed the request for an addition to the north side of the Kanes' residence. He noted that the existing house is a Spanish colonial style with a clay the roof with stucco siding, and was built in approximately 1925 by architect Kari Saam. Mr. Morton stated the property is very solid and well detailed. He reviewed the addition would include a new garage, screened porch, and additional living space. He said it will match the existing stucco, clay tiles, stone foundation and iron work found on the existing residence. Commissioner Bradford stated that this is a beautiful addition, and that the plans addressed all of the Commissioners' issues. She added that the applican# and architect have done a good job on the design of the addition. The Commission concurred with Commissioner 6radford's comments. Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Bradford, to approve the project as proposed. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye -Guinn, Bradford, Gibbs, Kringle and Mozena; Nay - None. ITEMS I=RON COMMISSION' Commissioner Kringle noted that Audrey Henson, who lives in the Old Main Historic District, was in attendance, and that he had discussed with her the possibility of submitting an application for the vacant Commission position. The Commission welcomed her involvement and briefly discussed with her the parameters of the Commission. Chairperson Mozena reviewed the draft letter regarding City budget review for the Commission's proposed historic preservation incentives. Consensus was for City staff to forward the information. Chairperson Mozena discussed the need for a liaison with the Dubuque County Historical Society. He suggested that a Commission member attend the Historical Society meetings. Commissioner Bradford expressed an interest in attending. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, August 17, 2000 Page 6 Commissioner Guinn stated that she will be attending the Old Nouse Enthusiasts meetings, and will act as a liaison with that group. Commissioner Gibbs stated that he also would like to work with the Dubuque County Historical Society, possibly on developing a task force where they could promote a °Nouse of the Month" or "Business of the Month" and provide public service announcements in the Telegraph Herald for the winners. The Commission discussed this .suggestion at length. The discussion involved Ruth Nash, 422 Loras Boulevard, regarding marketing, promotion and fundraising. __ ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Mark J. Noble, Assistant Planner Adopted CITY OF QUBUQU~E JL-N ~ 6 2~0~ b23-627 Arlington Vinyl side duplex on 3 sides in a lead safe rrsaaner 58,000.00 Repiacc with new wood siding 2,750.00 Rcplacz porch columns with square wood columns 200.00 Change out 4 windows (cut-out only) 600.00 Will be approx. 5400 more io ii~trill window if not doing inside 400.00 Prime and paint siding 3 coats _350.00 S4,300.00 To restore entire cactcrior of boost to historical standards is approx. 525,000 rzom. Price does not include chancing soffit and fascia a•td upper window trim that i9 now covered in aluminum in front. Price does not include replacing or covering front parch beams and ceiling. Matetis!-{price in maiaisl bid is figured for composit column) 54,883.70 Vacancy loss- minimum 645.00 Ha~rdous waste dump fens minimum 5000.00 Reston front S 14,828.70 Viny9 side the 3 sides plus va~ncy lo,s mimimurn _ 8.645.00 Total price to vinyl side 3 sides and restore front 523,473.(}0 13fi W Prot~erties Vicki $ccl~n Tim Woad CITY OF DUBUQUE 623-627 Arlington To make lead safe interior- J U N ~ o X000 Replace 9~% of all trim, including inside doors, door jambs, window casings, window trim, baseboards, etc. Approx. 12 windows + casings x 5350 $4,200.00 300 ft. Baseboard x $3.00 per foot 900.00 7 doors x $1~0 1,00.00 10 door casings x $75 7~ . 56,900.00 Two apartments ~ $13,800.00 This price does not include other costs that will be incurred by us, such as carpet being pulled and re-layed or needing to be replaced due to not fitting properly due to baseboards, doors etc. being replaced. Plaster being replaced due to casings~etc. being pulled off the wall,, re-painting entire apartment, loss of rent, adding insulation if none there or if old faIls out, hardware for doors etc. Approx. $8,000.00. Total for interior lead removal 21,800.00 Grant from City -10.000.00 Our portion for the interior 511,800.00 Total price to restore front 14,828.70 Hazardous Waste -S.OaO.oa 59,828.00 City Grant -4.883.00 Our portion to restore front $4,94.00 Additional money we have to have to do lead remodeling at this time $16,74.00 Side the 3 sides plus vacancy loss minimum 5 8.645.00 Total to complete City Lead Removal Program $25,390.00 This Program is voluntary and has restrictions as to who you can rent to. B&W Properties Vicki Becher Tim Wood CITY OF DUBUQUE, lOV1rA MEMORANDUM June 7, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner ,~-~/ _ SUBJECT: _ Certificate of Economic Hardship - B & W PropeA~es This memorandum transmits staff's recommendation concerning the application for Certificate of Economic Hardship from B 8~ W Properties (Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen) located at 623-627 Arlington Street. In preparing the analysis for this property and utilizing the procedure that City staff has previously used on other applications for Certificate of Economic Hardship, we believe that the information submitted may not be sufficient for the Commission to make an informed decision on whether the application does or does not earn reasonable economic return. Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission may wish to table this application until that information is supplied to the City. Staff has compared the application materials to Section 25-9(h)(2), which addresses the information that is to be provided for a Certificate of Economic Hardship (there are 14 separate line items of information that should be supplied by the applicant). In reviewing the application, staff has determined that: 1) The applicants have provided tfie purchase price of the property, assessed value of the propefij, and comparables of three other properties. It should be noted that the comparables used are for three properties which have brick construction and one which has slate construction. The applicants have not provided the estimated market value of the property in its current condition; after completion of the proposed vinyl siding; and after completion of the vinyl siding on three sides and front facade renovation previously approved by the Commission. The Commission may want to ask for one or more appraisals to determine tfiese three values. 2) If the applicants intend to include an estimate of the cost of the proposed construction that would be incurred to comply with the recommendations of the Commission, they need to provide at least two detailed bids to support all figures. ror example, the bids would be in the form of the number of hours for Certificate of Economic Hardship - 6 ~ W Properites Page 2 labor work and number of cubic yards for determining the cost for waste disposal fee. The Commission should review the attached analyses, and then consider whether they can make a determination, or if they need to table the application until the applicants have provided additional information which the Ordinance requires. MNlmkr Attachments cc: Tim Wood and Vcki Bechen 13 8 W Properties Application for Certificate of Economi c Hardship Property at 623-fi27 Arlington Street Scrape and ~II4mI . fa .lnrS r~aint wood Scrape/patch and aint (11 Assessed Value $35,800.00 $35,800.00 Cost to rehab $16,200.00 $42,500.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Total investment $52,000.00 $78,300.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $5,200.00 Annual operating exp. $4,436.00 Total ~, _63G.OQ Annual rent that the property generates $7.208 00 Economic return ($2,428.00) positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return Scrape/patch Hardie Plank New wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, and aint ( 1 B1d1IIQ ~9 ~q restore front $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $34,400.00 $21,614.00 $40,100.00 $10,020.00 $12,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $.4_.4.4 $70,200.00 $57,414.00 $75,900.00 $45,820.00 $48,100.00 $7,830.00 $7,020.00 $5,741.4b. $7,590.00 $4,582.00 $4,810. 00 $4,436.00 $12.266 00 $4,436.00 $11 456.00 $4,436.00 $10 177.40 $4,436.00 ~ $12,026.00 $4,436.00 $9 018.00 $4,436. ~9 24G 00 00 $2208 00 ($5,058.00) Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: $1.,24.4_44 ($4,248.00) $7.208 00 ($2,969.40) $7 208.44 ($4,818.00) $7 208 00 ($1,810.00) $7.2Q8 Oq ($2,038.00) Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only, B & W Properties Application for Certificate of Economi c Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Scrape and Economic factors paint wood Scrape/patch and aint (11 Purchase Price $27,500.00 $27,500.00 Cost to rehab $16,200.00 $42,500.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Total investment $43,700.00 $70,000.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $4,370.00 Annual operating exp. $4,436.00 Total $8 806.00 Annual rent that the property generates $7 208 00 Economic return ($1,598.00) positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return Scrape/patch Hardie Plank New wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, and aint (1 sidin4 ~g sidin4 ~Qre front $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $34,400.00 $21,614.00 $40,100.00 $10,020.00 $12,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $O.QO $61,900.00 $49,114.00 $67,600.00 $37,520.00 $39,800.00 $7,000.00 $G,190.00 $4,911.40. $6,760.00 $3,752.00 $3,980.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $11 43 ~ 00 $10 626 00 ~q~Q $11 196 00 X88.00 $8 416.OQ $7 208 00 ($4,228.00) ' Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: $Z.2.4~ 4.4 ($3,418.00) ~Z.208.00 ($2,139.40) $7 08.00 ($3,988.00) $7.208.00 ($980.00) $7 08 00 ($1,208.00) Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. B & W Properties Application for Certificate of Economi c Hardsf~ip Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Scrape and Economic factnr~ paint wood Scrape/patch and gip nt (11 Comparables $31,375.00 $31,375.00 Cost to rehab $16,200.00 $42,500.00 Lead Grant X0.00 $0.00 Total investment $47,575.00 $73,875.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $4,757.50 Annual operating exp. $4,436.00 Total $9 193 50 Annual rent that the property generates $7 208.00 Economic return ($1,985.50) positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return Scrape/patch Hardie Plank New wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, and aint f 1 siding sidino siding restore front $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $34,400.00 $21,614.00 $40,100.00 $10,020.00 $12,300.00 $4 44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $65,775.00 $52,989.00 $71,475.00 $41,395.00 $43,675.00 $7,387.50 $6,577.50 $5,298.90. $7,147.50 $4,139.50 $4,367.50 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $11 8 9 50 X11.013 50 $9 734.90 $11 583.50 $8 575.~Q X8.803.50 $7 208 00 ($4,615.50) `Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: $7 208 00 ($3,805.50) $7 208.44 ($2,526.90) $7.208.00 ($4,375.50) ~7 208.00 ($1,367.50) ~7 oa o0 ($1,595.50) Prepared uy the Planning Services Department as an example only. June t 3, 2Q00 dark Voble °leas~ table our c2se until the July 20 HT'C meetin; We would ]ikc to be first on the agenda a, w~ will have our altorncy, Bill Conzett there. Vicki Bechrn Tin, Wood PSanning Sen-ices Department 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 52001-864 Phone (319)589-4210 Fax (319)589-1149 ~~ . THE CITY OF ~...~~ ~~~ ~ ~. ~ ~:U ~ ~~ ~~ ~ June 27, 2000 Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen 8 & W Properties 575 English Lane Dubuque IA 52003 SUBJECT: July 20th Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Dear Tim and Vicky: This letter will serve as a reminder that your application request for a Certificate of Economic Hardship will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission on July 20, 2000. This meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at the Carnegie Stout Public Library in the Auditorium (3rd Floor). In order for the Commission to review these applications, you will need to submit any new information as requested by the City Planning Services Department or by the Commission to the Planning Services Department by July 3, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. This includes an appraisal of the property as referenced in the June 7, 2000 memo. Failure to comply with this deadline may cause your application to be tabled to the August 17, 2000 meeting. Please contact me at 589-4210 if you have any questions regarding materials requested for submittal or with this time frame. Sincerely, ark No ~ e Assistant Planner MN/mkr CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM July 12, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: _ Certifcate of Economic Hardship - B 8~ W Properties Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen are requesting that the Commission review their application request for a Certificate of Economic Hardship for property located at 623- 627 Arlington Street. This request was tabled from the June 15, 2000 Historic Preservation Commission meeting. For that meeting, staff had prepared a memorandum which addressed this application and included several analyses of this project (see attached June 7 memo). As stated in that memorandum, staff noted that information submitted may not be sufficient for the Commission to make an informed decision and therefore staff asked that additional materials be submitted to assist the Commission in determining whether the property does or does not earn reasonable economic return. In response to that request, the applicants stated that they have supplied materials, particularly the comparables that would suffice for having appraisals done of this property. No other new information has been submitted pertaining to this information. The applicants stated that the cost for waste disposal is determined primarily by the rental of the roll-off and transportation of the waste to the appropriate disposal area, and that the amount of cubic yards of waste does not have an overall affect on the price. Where there would be a substantial change in cost would be if that roll-off is shared by clean-ups at several properties or if the amount of waste would exceed the size of one roll-off and a second roll-off would be necessary. Please review this memorandum as well as the June 7 memorandum and the materials submitted by the applicant and be prepared to vote on this application at the July 20, 2000 Historic Preservation Commission meeting. MN/mkr Enclosure cc Tim Wood, B & W Properties, 650 English Lane Vicky Bechen , B ~ W Properties, 575 English Lane CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM June 7, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner SijBJECT: ~ -Certificate of Economic Hardship - B & W Properites This memorandum transmits staffs recommendation concerning the application for Certificate of Economic Hardship from B & W Properties (Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen) located at 623-627 Arlington Street. In preparing the analysis for this properfij and utilizing the procedure that City staff has previously used on other applications for Certificate of Economic Hardship, we believe that the information submitted may not be sufficient for the Commission to make an informed decision on whether the application does or does not earn reasonable economic return. Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission may wish to table this application until that information is supplied to the City. Staff has compared the application materials to Section 25-9(h)(2), which addresses the information that is to be provided for a Certificate of Economic Hardship (there are 14 separate line items of information that should be supplied by the applicant). In reviewing the application, staff has determined that: 1) The applicants have provided the purchase price of the property, assessed value of the property, and comparables of three other properties. It should be noted that the comparables used are for three properties which have brick construction and one which has slate construction. The applicants have not provided the estimated market value of the property in its current condition; after completion of the proposed vinyl siding; and after completion of the vinyl siding on tfiree sides and front facade renovation previously approved by the Commission. The Commission may want to ask for one or more appraisals to determine these three values. 2) if the applicants intend to include an estimate of the cost of the proposed construction that would be incurred to comply with the recommendations of the Commission, they need to provide at least two detailed bids to support all figures. For example, the bids would be in the form of the number of hours for Certificate of Economic Hardship - B & W Properites Page 2 labor work and number of cubic yards for determining the cost for waste disposal fee. The Commission should review the attached analyses, and then consider whether they can make a determination, or if they need to table the application until the applicants have provided additional information which the Ordinance requires. MN/mkr Attachments cc: Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen B & W Properties Application for Certificate of Economi c Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Scrape and Scrape/patch Economic factors Raint wood and aip nt !11 Purchase Price $27,500.00 $27,500.00 Cost to rehab $16,200.00 $42,500.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Total investment $43,700.00 $70,000.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $4,370.00 Annual operating exp. $4,436.00 Total $8 806 00 Annual rent that the property generates $7,208 00 Economic return ($1,598.00) positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return Scrape/patch Hardie Plank New wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, and aip nt (21 siding ~g sidin4 reskore front $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $34,400.00 $21,614.00 $40,100.00 $10,020.00 $12,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $61,900.00 $49,114.00 $67,600.00 $37,520.00 $39,800.00 $7,000. 00 $6,190.00 $4,911.40. $6,760.00 $3,752.00 $3,980.00 $4,436. $11 436 00 00 $4,436.00 $10 626 OQ $4,436.00 $9 347 40 $4,436.00 $11.196.00 $4,43G.00 $8 188 OQ $4,436.00 $8.416 00 $7 208.OQ ($4,228.00) Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: $7 208 00 ($3,418.00) $7.208.00 ($2,139.40) $7.208 00 ($3,988.00) $7.208.00 ($980.00) ~7 24.44 ($1,208.00) Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. H & W Properties Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Scrape and Scrape/patch Economic factors paint wood end aip nt (11 Comparab/es $31,375.00 $31,375.00 Cost to rehab $16,200.00 $42,500.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $Q~QQ Total investment $47,575.00 $73,875.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $4,757.50 Annual operating exp. $4,436.00 Total $9.193 50 Annual rent that the property generates $7 208 00 Economic return ($1,985.50) positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return Scrape/patch Hardie Plank New wood ~ Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, and aint (1 sidino siding siding restore front $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $31,375.00 $34,400.00 $21,614.00 $40,100.00 $10,020.00 $12,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0_00 $65,775.00 $52,989.00 $71,475.00 $41,395.00 $43,675.00 $7,387.50 $6,577.50 $5,298.90, $7,147.50 $4,139.50 $4,367.50 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 $4,436.00 X11 8 '~ 0 $11,013.50 $9,734.gQ $11,583.50 $8, 7 0 $8,803.50 $7 208 QO ($4,615.50) Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: $7 208 UO ($3,805.50) $7,208 00 ($2,526.90) $7 208.00 ($4,375.50) ~7 24$~QQ ($1,367.50) $7 208 00 ($1,595.50) Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. B 8~ W Properties Application for Certificate of Economi c Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Scrape and Economic factors paint wood Scrape/patch and paint (1) Assessed Value 535,800.00 $35,800,00 Cost to rehab 516,200.00 $42,500.00 Lead Grant 50 QQ SO.OQ Total investment 552,000.00 $78,300.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $5,200 00 Annual operating er,p. $4,436.00 Total Q9.636.00 Annual rent that the property generates $7 208.00 Economic return ($2,428.00) positive =c an earn return negative = cannot earn return Scrape/patch Hardie Plank New wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, end alR nt (?1 ~i~g ~i1111g `iiilitlg restore front $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $35,800.00 $34,400.00 $21,614.00 $40,100.00 $10,020.00 $12,300.00 $0.00 $~ $0.00 $0.00 $Q QQ $70,200.00 $57,414.00 $75,900.00 $45,820.00 $48,100.00 $7,830.00 $7,020.00 $5,741.40. $7,590.00 $4,582.00 $4,810.00 $4,436.00 $12 266.00 $4,436.00 $11 456.00 $4,436.00 $10 177.40 $4,436.00 X12 026.00 $4,436.00 $9.018.00 $4,436.00 $9 246.00 $7 208.00 ($5,058.00) ~7 208.00 ($4,248.00) $7 208.00 ($2,969.40) $7 208 00 ($4,818.00) $7 02 8.00 ($1,810.00) $7 208 00 ($2,038.00) ' Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. ...~ V' 30 May 00 To: M Noble, Planning Services Deparoriaent --mom: Da ' ;Housing Services Depaztment Re: 623=627 Arlington Here's the status on the subject property: CITY 4F DUBUQUE ,1 U ~ t~ 1 2000 The owners initially applied for financial assistance through our lead paint harard reduction program We inspected the property and verified the presence of lead paint at various locations. The next step in this process is for the owner to secure bids for performance of the work. We would require two bids, which aze then compared with the cost estimate prepazed by our lead paint inspector. As part of discussions which took place during the application process, the owners inquired regarding the availability of additional funds - in excess of the $5000 per-unit allowable. Under the policies governing our program, additional funds may be made available under certain circumstances, including in cases in which requirements for rehabilitation of properties located within historic preservation districts may increase costs. For this reason, we made a prelnninary commitment of an additional $4883, with the understanding that the street side of the building would be restored according to Section 106 requirements and subject to Historic Preservation Commission design approval. Since that time, we have not proceeded with processing this application, as the owners have attempted ahernate resolution of this issue, with the HPC. However, subject to the same conditions, our position at this time is that the Housing Department can commit a total of $14 883 to this project, which would necessarily include the treatrnent of all interior and exterior teed paint-bearing surfaces as identified in the initial inspection and work write-up. Please contact either Kathy Lamb or me if we may provide you additional information regarding this property. CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM cc: Kathy Lamb CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM May 24, 2000 TO: Kathleen Lamb, Senior Housing Inspector FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 623-627 Arlington Street This memo addresses the request from the Historic Preservation Commission concerning the property at 623-627 Arlington Street, which is owned by Vicky Bechen and Tim Wood, B ~ W Properties. At the May 18, 2000, Historic Preservation Commission meeting, the Commissioners reviewed an application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship from B & W Properties to allow vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street. After considerable discussion, the Commission voted unanimously to: (1) allow installation of vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear of the structure; and (2) require restoration of the front facade, subject to approval of final drawings and materials by the Commission. !n reviewing this application, the Commissioners questioned whether the applicants had contacted the Housing Services Department to investigate funding available to assist in this renovation. The applicants stated that since they are not presently involved in the Lead Paint Grant Program, there is no grant money available for them to do this renovation. In making the recommendation, the Commission felt that the applicants could earn a reasonable economic return with installation of vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear, and restoration the front facade, if there is financial assistance from the City. Commissioners noted that previously, the applicants had $14,883 available to them to renovate the entire property, inside and out, through the Lead Paint Grant Program. Although circumstances have changed slightly, the Commission still requests that the Housing Services Department consider providing $4,883 to the applicants to help them renovate the front facade. Additionally, the Commission asks that the City Housing Services Department provide the applicants the use of their waste containers in doing this project. Please review this request, and then respond to me by Tuesday, May 30, 2000. Thank you very much for any assistance you may be able to provide in dealing with this renovation project. MN/mkr cc: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager David Harris, Housing Services Manager B & W Properties, 650 English Lane, Dubuque CITY OF DUBUQUE JUN ~ 0 2000 623-627 .Arlington To make lead safe interior- Replace 9~% of all trim, including inside doors, door jambs, window casings, window trim, baseboards, etc. Approx_ 12 windows + casings x $3~0 $4,200.00 300 ft. Baseboard x $3.00 per foot 900.00 7 doors x $1~0 1,050.00 10 door casings x $7~ 7~ . $6,900.00 Two apartments Y~2 $13,800.00 This price does not include other costs that will be incurred by us, such as carpet being pulled and re-layed of needing to be replaced due to not fitting properly due to baseboards, doors etc. being replaced. Plaster being replaced due to casings etc. being pulled off the walls, re-painting entire apartment, loss of rent, adding insulation if none there or if old fails out, hardware for doors etc. Approx. $8,000.00. Total for interior lead removal 21,800.00 Grant from City -10.000.00 Our portion for the interior $11,800.00 Total price to restore front 14,828.70 Hazardous Waste -~ 0 .00 $9,828.00 City Grant -4.883.00 Our portion to restore front $4,94.00 Additional money we have to have to do lead remodeling at this time $16,745.00 Side the 3 sides plus vacancy loss minimum $ 8.645.00 Total to complete City Lead Removal Program $25,390.00 This Program is voluntary and has restrictions as to who you can rent to. B&W Properties Vicki Bechen Tim Wood CITY OI= DUBUQUE JUN 0 6 2007 b23-627 Arlington Vinyl side duplex on 3 sides in a bead safe manner 58,000.00 Replace with new wood siding 2,750.00 Replace porch columns with square wood columns 200.00 Change out 4 widows {cut-out only) 600.00 Will be approx. $400 more to install window if not doing inside 400.00 Prime and paint siding 3 coats ~ 50.00 54,300.00 To restore entire exterior of house to historical standards is approx. 525,000 more. Price does not include changing sol~it and fascia and upper window trim that is now covered in aluminum in front. Price does not include replacing or covering front porch beams and ceiling. Material-{price in mattrial bid is figured for composit columns) X4,883.70 Vacancy loss- minimum 545.00 Hazardous waste dump fees m,ni,,,~~m 5,000.00 Restore front 514,828.70 Vinyl side the 3 sides plus vacancy loss mimimum 8.645.00 Total price to vinyl side 3 sides and restore front 523,473.00 BMW Properties Vicki Bechen Tim Wood n ~c crrv or- L7UBC ,_ E ti+ t~ .:c- ~~ 1~ PLAlVNlNG APPLICATlGlV CORM City of Dubuque Planning Services L•::pactment Dubuque IA 5::001-48o-4 Phone: 31;; 539-4210 Fax: 31:; 539-4149 ^ Variance ^ Rezoning ^ Simple Site Plan ^ Annexation ^ Conditional Use Permit o Planned District o Minor Site Plan o Tempararr Use Permit ^ Appeal o Preliminary Plat ^ Major Site Plan ^ Certificate of Appropriateness ^ Special Exception ^ Minor Final Plat ^ Major Final Ptat ~(,,Certifcate of Economic Hardship ^ Limited Setback Waiver o Text Amendment ^ Simple Subdivision o Other: PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY IN iNK __ , t /~ l Property Owner(s): ,~~-'w ~~CI~~'-P r~r-eS-~/C~r /,.~Cfv~v,,1~000~Phone:~~~l~~~ Address: !/7 5~ ~~ Ci ~7 S ~ ~~ ty ~~~ Stata~l-fir _ Zip:.~~?cr~ /~ Fax Number: ~-'~l-~~ ~3S ~~~-~~L / 7y MobilelCellular Number: // / ApplicanUAgent: ~ / C~i ~ G''- Gt1~2 ~ ~l Yv~ ('~TZ~Gf Phone: .~ ~~~~ Address: ~/~y~~-z--- City: Fax Number: Mobile/Cellular Number State Zip; Site Iocaticnladdress: ~~/~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~'~ F ,7~i~. Existing zoning: Proposed zoning:- Historic district: ~ Landmark: Legal description (Bidwell Parcel lD number cr lot nurnher/block number/subdivision) Total propzrrr (lot} area (square feet ar acres): Number of lots: Describe proposal and reason necessary (attach a letter of explanaticn, if needed}: CERTIFICATION: I/we, the undersigned, do hereby certify that: 1 The information submitted herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and upon subn~i:tal becomes public record; ' 2 Fees are not refundable and payment does not guarantee approval; and 3. All additional required written and graphic materials are attached. ~~ ~ Property Owners}: ;` mil' ~ ~~'~'~-- Dater C! "~' G~ A~plicantlAgent: Date: FOR OFFICE USE O PPLI ATION SU~TTAL CHECKLIST Feat Received by. te: ~L-? ~t~ Docket: a Property ownership list ^ Site/sketch an FI r plan a Plat ^ Conceptual development plan improvement plans a Design review project description ^ Phoro ^ Other: 623 Arlington We have 4 choices: 1. Not to follow IOSH rules that by law we are supposed to and take a chance on poisoning children and possibly being sued. 2. Not comply with the city housing code violation and let the city shut down the building. - 3. Lose a minimum of $1,672.00 per year every year forever. Lose a minimum of $4,119.00 per year for the next 10 years. 4. Vinyl side the building and make a profit of $356.00 per year. We are allowed a reasonable ecnomic return per your code Section 25-9. A reasonable rate of return is 10 to 12%, on invested money, 10% is $1,365 per year. 623-627 Arlington 1. Side building (SO year guarantee on siding) lead safe manner- Profit 5356 per year 2. Hardie Plank lead safe manner will be a synthetic material. Width on lap siding will be 5 inches, not 3 as it is now. Price does not include paumting over next ~0 years. 3. New wood siding Iead safe manner. Price does not inch~de painting over next ~0 years. 4. Strip siding lead safe manner. __ Price does not include painting over next 50 yrs. Price does not include re-location costs of $2,000 min. ~. Scrape and patch siding lead safe manner. Price does not include painting over next 50 yrs. Price does not include scraping and painting in a lead safe manner forever. Loss 51,369.49 per yr. Loss 54,1 i9 per yr. Loss $4,477 per yr. Loss 53,271 per yr. b. Restore front in wood, and side 3 sides in vinyl in lead safe Loss 51,736 per yr. manner. Price does not include maintaining wood siding, trim, etc. over ne~-t ~0 yTS. 7. Scrape and touch up paint in lead safe manner. Loss 53,763 per yr. Price does not include patching rotten wood which city Could cite me for at any time and I would have to repair in lead safe manner. $1 x,200 Scrape: and paint lead safe manner (estimate 2) Loss Si,672 per yr. I don't think it can be done this cheap and I will be taking a huge financial risk. Price does not include patching rotten wood which the city could cite me for at any time and I would have to repair in lead safe manner- $15,200 No interest figured on money, w•e will have to come up with $ l 6,200 every 6 years. 9. Scrape and touch up paint lead safe manner. Loss 52,172 per yr. It would be almost impossble to rent an apartment if they knew they would have to move out every year. OUR RETURN OK IIYVESTIVIEYT SHOULD 8E 51,365.60 PER YEAR No tiuinagement tees have been taken out of any estimate, at 6%= $=I32 per yT. Ih~cs not include interest on our $5,500 invested if w-e have to borrow it-$2~0 per yr. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe 1 Q~44 8,156 After vinyl siding is added, house will be worth approx. $33,000. We will be increasing our equity by $5,500 5.500 13,656 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 ---- -Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over 5 years 2,408 Street Assessment 600 Vinyl side house $8,820 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=10,020-5,500 investment=4,520 at 8 1/2% over 10 years 672.00 $6,852.00 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 532 ; 7208-6852= a profit of $356 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $5,500 investment if we have to borrow it. Nothing taken out for depreciation. 3 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,00 Owe 19.344 8,16 After Hardie Plank is added, house will be worth approx. $33,000. ~Ve wzli be increasing our equity by $5,600 5.500 13,656 13,66 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,36.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 --- ~ Insurance 336 Taxes 840 iViaintainance average over Iast 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Hardie Plaiilc installed-$20,414.40 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=21,614-5,500 investment=16,114.40 at 8 1%2% over 10 years= 2.397.49 $8,77.49 Rents- $29~ + 350 = 64~ x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 532 7208-8,577.49= a loss of $1,369.49 per year Nothing; has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $5,00 investment if we have to borrow it. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe 19.344 8,156 After new wood siding is added, house will be worth approx. $33,000. We will be increasing our equity by $5,500 5.500 13,656 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 -- -Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 New wood installed-$38,100 +2,000 relocation cost Minimum=40,100-5,500 investment=34,640 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= 5.147 $11,327 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= X32 7208-11,327= a loss of $4,119 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $5,500 investment if tive have to borrow it. S 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe 19.344 8,156 After stripping siding, house will be worth approx. $33,000. We will be increasing our equity by $5,500 5.500 13,656 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 --- -Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 yeazs 2,820 Street Assessment 600 _Strip siding-$42,500-5,500=37,000 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= - 5.50 - $11,685 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 }TS. div by 2= 532 7208-11,685= a loss of $4,477 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $5,500 investment if we have to borrow it. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,00 Owe 19.344 8,16 After scraping, patching & painting, house will be worth approx. $33,000. We will be increasing our equity by $5,500 5.500 13,66 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,36.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 --- Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Scrape & patch siding-$33,200 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=34,400-x,500 investment=28,900 at 8 1/2%~over 10 years= 4 9 . $10,479 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= ~~ 7208-10,479= a toss of $3,271 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $x,500 investment if we have to borrow it. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe 1 44 8,156 After restoring front &vinyl siding 3 sides, house will be. worth approx $33,000. We will be increasing our equity x.500 by $5,500 13,656 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 -- ~ Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 _ Street Assessment 600 Restore front & vinyl 3sides-$22,883 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=24,083-5,500 investment=18,583 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= 2.764 $8,944.80 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 532 7208-8,944= a loss of $1,736 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $5,500 investment if we have to borrow it. 4 623-627 Arlington Pain 27,500 Owe 19.344 8,16 After scraping & painting, house will be. -- worth appro~c $27,500. We will not be increasing the value $8,156 x 10 % return on investment comes to $815.60 ger yeaz Per Yeaz- Interest on house 1,584 _ --- -Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Itiiaintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Scrape & paint-4 years-$15,000 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=16,200 at 8 1/2% over 4 years= 4 7 1. 0 $10,971.60 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 532 7208-10,971.60= a loss of $3,763 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $~,~00 investment if we have to borrow it. c~ 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,00 Owe 1 44 8,156 $8,156 x 10 % return on investment comes to $815.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 Insurance 336 Taxes 840 -~ Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Scrape & paint lead safe manner-6 years-$15,000 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum-=16,200 div, by 6 yrs. is $2,700 per yr. 2.700 _ (Not including interest) ~ $8,880 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yTS. div by 2= 532 7208-8880= a loss of $1,672 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $5,500 investment if we have to borrow it. f 0 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe 19.344 8, I56 53,156 x 10 % return on investment comes to $815.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 Insurance 33b _ _ _ Ta.~es 840 i\~laintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Scrape & touch up paint lead safe manner- S3 ~00 per year mininum $9,380 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy toss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 532 7208-9380= a loss of 52,172 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our 55,500 im~estment if we have to borrow it. i/ 623-627 Arlington Paid Owe 27,500 19.344 8,1 ~6 $8,156 x 10 % return on investment comes to $815.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house Insurance Taxes -- ~ Maintainance average over last 2 yeazs Street Assessment Scrape & touch uy paint lead safe manner- per year minimum 1,584 336 840 2, 820 600 X3.200 $9,380 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= ~~ 7208-9380= a loss of $2,172 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $~,~00 investment if we have to borrow it. // 1998-12 months Lawncaze 90.00 License 27.00 Repairs 1,099.00 Water 12.98 Electric 57.53 Gas 22.25 Advertisin g 85.14 1,394.22 1999-12 months Lawiicaze & snow License Repairs Gas Advertising Fees-City Extermination -195.00 27.00 3,627.97 16.04 21.33 25.00 349.80 4,262.14 Rental Ioss- $770.00 Rental loss- $295.00 Had to put in a new bath, tub and frame shower. Tear up floor to level and replace all old water supply lines, new stool, rip out baseboard & window casing & re- place door frame & casing in a lead safe maruier. $1,294.22 + 4,262.14= 5,656.3b divided by 24 months=235.68 per month Divided by 2 yeazs = 2,828.00 per yr. Rental Loss 295 + 770 = $1,065 div. by 24 mo. _ $44.37 per month Divided by 2 yrs = 532.50 per yT. Iy 623-627 Arlington Hardie Planks 6 inches wide covers 5 inches x 12 ft. at $4.40 per piece + tax = $4.46 ~ sq.ft. Per piece = $93.20 per sq. X 42 = $3,914.40 Labor to install approx. 42 sq. X $2~0 = 10,500.00 Trim corners, fir out all windows and doors-approx. 2,000.00 Paint 2 coats minimum 4.000.00 Total $20,414.40 Speaker Contruction estimated it would be around -450 per square = $18,900 and does not include painting. Hardie Plank will not be the proper material to use either. It will not be the proper width of wood siding. The wood siding has 3 inch laps and Hardie had 5 inch laps. SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION JOB WORK ORDER (815) 747-6023 4751 N. MENOMINEE RD. Date of Order: EAST DUBUQUE, 1L. 61025 March 22, 2000 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS: 575 English Lane CITY: Dub., la. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape-recommend replacing or siding over. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: ~Rpply 4 inch wood lap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- $325 per square x 42 sq.= $13,650 Labor to replace wood siding- $225 per square x 42 sq. 9,450 Apply one coat primer and 1 coat paint-Labor and material 3.300 (Paint when scaffold is set up already) $26,400 Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entire exterior siding Labor and material 8,820 50 year guarantee on vinyl siding DATE COMPLETED: TOTAL MATERIALS: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL AMOUNT: WORK ORDERED BY: /~ 623-627 Arlington Strip Siding Strip siding (Al Ames) Price to paint old wood 2 coats Price to patch rotten wood Disposal lead waste-minimum Approx Approx. $24,500 4,000 9,000 5.000 $42,500 Terry Sullivan of the lead department of City Housing said that AI Ames bid is fair and falls into his price guidelines. --I spoke to Jim at Sams Painting, he is trying to get completely out of the lead stripping business because of all the lead regulations which drive up the price so much. Al Ames is the most experieneed lead removal contractor in town. In speaking to him and several other lead removal contractors, it would be very foolish to give a firm bid on something that has so many variables without giving yourself a u e margin of error. /~ 623-627 Arlington Price to scrape and paint in a lead safe manner: Bare minimum to pass city inspection (city may cite me for rotten wood next inspection) Scrape an paint lead safe manner 15,000 Relocation costs 1-.200 Every 4 years $16,200 I will be lucky to get 4 years out of paint job since I will not be repairing rotten wood or removing all the old paint layers. Since we are not stripping the siding we will have to scrape and paint every 4 years in a lead safe manner. Tenants will have to be relocated every time. -mince we are not repairing rotten wood or removing lead from siding (if we try to sell the building, the lead report by law has to be given to the buyer), which will probably reduce the value of the building and it will not be improving the look of the house. We will not be adding to the value of the building. Price does not include replacing plywood on front of building. Price does not include any disposal of waste. I am sure we wi1L lose some tenants who will not want to re-locate and move back. i~ 623-627 Arlington Price to scrape and touch up paint in lead safe manner: The building has not been completely scraped and painted in several years. The city has been citing me for e:cterior loose paint violations every year. I have only been scraping and touching up the paint the last few year. If we continue this process now we will have to do it in a lead safe manner. Per year to re locate tenants- Nlimimum $1,200 Tent areas of building with plastic to keep lead scrapings from blowing in the wind and contaminating our yard and the neighbors. The building is 4 stories high on 2 sides over 40 feet. --Scrape and paint in lead safe manner- Minimum 2.000 Cost per year $3,200 I can't even imagine trying to move 2 households every year. Removal of paint, scraping or stripping is the most hazardous method I can comply wish the loose paint violation every year. l~ 623-627 Arlington Tear off remaining plywood siding 400.00 Remove tenant for 2months-Rent-utilities-moving expense 2,000.00 Remove wood siding in a lead-safe mariner (Al Ames) 6,300.00 Apply ne~v siding of equal quality of existing siding (Speaker Const.)23,100.00 Paint new siding (Speaker Const.) while scoffold is set up-new wood 3 3 0. 0 $35,100.00 Dump fees- Hazardous Waste ~•000•QO minimum Total $40,100.00 Randy Mesch of Crawford Insurance gave me a price using the insurance replacement guide book (~88-1883) $4.9~ per sq. ft. This price does not include removing wood, straightening out any bad framing, applying siding up to 4 stories in the air and painting. 20,790.00 Other costs that may be incurred by replacing siding- if there is any insulation in the walls, it may fall out. Some window wraps are caulked to siding and it may ruin some wraps. Aluminum soffit may have to be removed. ~~ March 23, 1999 C~ 3 ~ AL AMES Lead Removal 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner way siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6 300 Price is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump siding in their trailer at no charge if they do not, then the price will be significantly higher. Tenant will need to be removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around $7.00 per sq. ft.=$700 per square x 35 = $24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Will charge to strip--$40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not inculde repairing siding or painting Tenant v~rill need to be removed from residence approx. 7 to 9 weeks. ~/ AL~.a.-~5-2~OQ :t.~od~a - Sufie i2.i1 .~:. ~~• Daibuqu~, to b20O3 ~'~ ' • 31 ~iIb57-6~0~~ ~~',r x, ~ ~~ PROPOSAL ~ J~ ~ • `4 , ~; , • We hereby submit sper:fications artid estimates for: TIM WOOD 550 ENGLISH LANE DUBUQUE IA 52003 RE: 623-627 ARLINGTON DUBUQUE•IA 6/11/9.9 t~' ~ SCRAPE, PRIME BARE WOOD S. APPY,Y ONE COAT PAINT IN r+ b"• LEAD SAFE MANNER UNDER HUD GUIDELINES ,$ 15,000.00 ' M .f' . REPAIR APPROX 15 SQ WOOD SIDING. COST WILL INCREASE __ • IF ADDITIONAL ROTTEN~bOD :'IS DISCOVERED WHILE SCRAPING ~ 9000.00 REPLACE APPROX 7 SQ PLYWOOD. SIDING TO MATCH RE- MAINING HOUSE $ 4200.00 ;t~~ DISPOSAL FEES-HAZARDOUS WASTE APPROX„ 5000.00 , ' TOTAL 533.00.00 ~ ~f r , . ~~ Z; '~:' ' ~k''. ' . e - C.C. TIM WOOD •- ~• - :i+~: ~~. i ~: ::. VHE PflOPOSE hereby to turr~sh material and labor-~mpiett h accordance witft above apeGrkatfor>s, for ttw ~ r~ sum above noted. Payment to be made as follows: ~' . ' al malarial is guaranteed io be as spectfled. A1! work to be completed In a•workrnanlika • mariner according to standard practices. My attetatbn or devlatkxn from above speciricatbrts Involving extra costs wAl be executed only upon wdttan orders, and will become an extra charge over and above tfw estimate. ~Ul agreements coniingant upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry Ore, tornado, •• er-d other necessary Insurance. Our workers are lolly covered by Wortcrrnn'a Compot>saifon Insuranca.~ A~sttnortzed Signature: • ACCEPTANCE OF PflOPOSAL' The above prices, specificatkxns and corndltkx-s are sattslactory and are hereby accepted. You are auitnorized to do tt>o work as :pacified. Payrrwr~t ww bo ansde a outllrwd above. ~. Sigr~xe: Dated: ' . - ~;•.: - _ ~.~ ; . , ~^.. ~,~ ~y--.._ w. • ,. _ ~~ !ti j ~ ~. f: ~~•. O a~ 'I O: JOIeZR From: Oick Re: Front of 623 Arlington Date: November 9, 1999 The building at 623 Arlington is 33' 6 X 20' 9" for a total of 695 sq.lft. The cost to remove 695 sq. ft. of siding, installs tnmbnsidenof windows t nsta Icnaw woodrb Ivelad cedar siding tolmatclh and prime support column and paint front of home is as follows: ~ O tiO~ oval $500.00 1.) Remove all siding from front of home. -- ~ ' $750.00 2.) Install new wood composite columns at $250.00. a.) Install new wood columns at 5525.00 (optional) 3.) Install 4 double hung wood windows and trim inside to match 2nd floor windows - 51,200.00 to match 2nd floor windows. 4 C 5300.00 4.) Replace front siding with i4" X 6" cedar siding at I S2 273 70 513.78 per 12 ft. piece, need 165 pieces to side front. 5.) .Prime and paint new wood siding, material only, t3 gallons at 520.00. I $160.00 •• Cost for material only, no labor. I _54,883.70 Vacancy Loss 1,200.00 Labor Approx. 5,000.00 Disposal Fee-Minimum $ 5,.000.00 $16,083.70 Side the sides and back _8,000.00 $24,083.70 S1,575.00 56,458.70 a~ RENO CONSTRUCTION 1600 Rhomberg Avenue Dubuque, Iowa 520u1 (319)556-4503 Proposal Submitte To =TT ~v, t,U,~r,~~~ Street j Cit , State, Zip •~ z •, Architect Date•of Plans Phone Job Name Date Job Location L ~' ~1r. Job Phone W~=Hereby Submit Specifications and Estimates For . i' ~ ~ C t ~ _ ) ~ ~ _ _ _ ~~ ~ Q C~ C ~ ~-- S ( is. +-~ i'' ~S . We propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete ~ in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of dol 1 ors (~ S~JL (. ~>Ll~ ) Payment to be made as follows I Authorized Signature ~~(t!,~-L;C~ ~~(~~j(,~~ Note: This {i oposal may be withdrawn b us if t accepted within •t ~~•v ~ days. ~~ (~1~(`~ PTA~~~ ~RQ~Q~AL -- The above prices, specifications, and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby ~ accepted. You are authorized to do the wort: as - i specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of acceptance ~ ,~ i Signature Signature J ~7 proposal Stackis Construction Inc. N°~ 319 Kerry Ct. Date Dubuque, IA ~200?..,_ (319) 5~6-6183s~~-~'~-" Sheet No. (~t~\'"~ ~ (319) 556-439_` ~. 7t,rc, L Proposal Submitted To: Work to Be Performed At: Name Street City State Phone Street City State Date of Plans Architect / We hereby propose to fumish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of --~-f~_ r~> ~ ~p ~~ %~~ ~ aCS~ .. All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars [S ~. with payments to be made as follows: Any alteradon a Csvlatlon hom ebova apecMCetlona Inwlving exva coon, unit be Respectfully submitted e>rea~ed only upon written order, entl will became en extra cAarge over end above Ne eaJmeta. al egreamenn wntlngent upon atrlkes, acddenn or deign Per SteVtan J. Stackis, General Contractor Ceyand our control. Owner to tarty M1re, tomedo end ocher necemery Insurenca u~ ao~~9 ~~ Jack M. Stacks, Genera/ Contractor Note -This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within r~avr ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as pacified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date Signature f~ -~~ ! ~ 7 a aers a~. s ~ ~~ e. DE:.~1ZS L. BAu~~1:iOVER Ac*_o-Liie-Health-Homy and Business 2015 DODGE AT DEVON DUBUQUc, IA 52003 PH'~D1E (319) 582-1856 FAX (319) 555-0989 June O1, 1999 8 & W PROPERTIES 575 English Ln. Dubuque, is 52003-8755 June 01,1999 --- Re: LEAD ~3ASE PAINT P.EhtOVAL: D=.~.R SIRS/bLaDAht: In reply to your inquiry regarding removal of Lead Base Paint.. Our view point is: Removal of Lead Base Paint should be done " according. to OSHA AIVD HUD guidelines. Sincer ~s L~Sa mh ver STATE FARi~t AGENT 1 ~ r ,Q CONZETT ~ O'BRIEN Attorneys at Luw 491 W. 4'~ Street P. O. ~8ox 741 Dubuga~e, lowp SZ004-0741 l.ircn?cd iii lu~~•;i. Illinois aml Wi::consin Febzuary 15, 2000 VIA FAX B & W Properties c/o ~~ icki )3echen 575 English Lane Dubuque, IA 52003 Dear ~%icki: PHONE (31'.)) 55<-S??'_ FAX. (?I`.~)~~6-357? Y"QU recetltly asked if the fact thgt Tim Wood has obtained certification as a lead insF~ector/abater could affect the liability exposure ofB & W Properties f'or injuries suffered as the result v( lead-based paint. In my opinion, the certification does increase the exposure. It is probable that the training; recei~-ed by Tirn in order to obtain the certifscata would make him an expert in the area and, as an expert, he ~~~ould have a higher duty to d8tect and abate Iced-bascd paint problems Sincerely yours, .~ W-Iliam A. ~~'AC/dao 7 1)K APPRAISALS 985 Valentine Drive Dubuque, Iowa 53003 Phone 1800-373-773? Fax (319) 5833579 Janaury 27, 00 As a General Real Estate Appraiser in Dubuque, Iowa, at this time I would consider 10% to 12% a reasonable rate of return on on income producing property. Any amount of return under 10% would not be acceptable to the majority of investors due to the risk factors. Jim F{la Rea ltod`/.Albid~si iser 2~ INSPECTION R;=FORT FOR: 623 ARLINGTON DATc: FEBRUARY 18, 1999 TENANT: ANC~cL cRNZEN OWNER: 3 8. W PARTNERSHIP tae zll..==_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~ -===~7~~~»aaaa~aa a..===_ Section 118. Other defrciencies (30 days to prior to HAP CorrtraW to repair. Prior to beginning any wark you should check with the City 8ui11dittg Department (St39~1tit)) and/or the Hlstaric Proiervation Commission (t5ti9~21t)j to d~rmitfe if a permit is required. a asaa3a o___~~~o~ mac_~=_~~__oaavaaae~~~~aa~~~a~~s~~ 1. Exterior surtacas have peellnp pafrrt 2. front bedroom window sills between sash and storms have peeilnq paint. 3." Rear bedroom window sills befween sash and storms have peeling palm. 4. Pass with wmment:lrgnt Qedroom south outlet caner 13 loose. ATTENT1 O fV fOR 1JCTE$lOR l.QOBE PAINT YtOLATION Q~`Q Loose paint must fie rnmavad, by szrapfnfl andJar btushlt~, and any pafnt t:hlps must be removed from the area at this time in order to pans inspection. Now9var, due to inclemarK weather conditions far painting, an extension for ttx actual ~aintlna has been granted until JUNE 13, 1999, Another inspection will be mado at that time. 1 C~ ~~ / ~~ ; ~~a ~~. ,;.~~ INSPECTION REPORT FOR: 627 ARLINGTON DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1998 TENANT: KIMBERLEY BROWN OWNER: B & W PROPERTIES --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Section IIB. Other deficiencies (30 days to prior to HAP Contract) to repair: Prior to beginning any work you should check with the City Building Department (589-415x) and/or the Historic Preservation Commission (589210) to determine if a permit is required. --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- -1. aint. 2. IQ~est~v er e ou . 3. at t pair. 4. T 'nt. 5. Tt1~ attl~ ~ ~?nPnin ~ i en~lori nff _ I~impr~ nn} }n hP 9~~nt. 6. a ro le. ' 7. Th o 8. 9. T wa 10. or is no operable. x,11. The southwest bedroom window sill has peeling paint. 12. ~ south wan d. 13. T r ~~ 3v Date: January 24, ?000 To: Tim Woods From: Kathy Lamb Please find enclosed some waste costs which we put together in 1998. Thanks. Kathy Heritage Environmental Services, Inc. --- Roll-offtransportation per round trip SI,~00.00 (~,on/Fri) Disposal Costs S 13.00/cubic y2rd Roll-off Rental S 10.00/day Total price for 30 yard container 5~,3~0.00 Final cost per yard ~ 196.00/cubic yard HEI Consultants, Inc. RoII-ofr"transportation per round trip S 1,600.00 (tilon/Fri) ` Disposal Costs $ 8.00/cubic yard Michigan Tar S 10.00/cubic yard Roll-off Rental S Z~0.00/month Drop charge for Roll-off (one time chg) S 1,200.00/bor Total price for 30 yard container S 4,700.00 Ftr131 CDSC Der yard S 1~6.67!cubic yard LoQano Environmental Waste llanaQement Roil-off transportation per round trip S I4,333.Ou Drop Off charge (one lima chg) S 2,000.OU X11 other charges included in this bid Total price for 106 yard container 51-'.,=33.00 final cost pzr yard S 1».2?/cubic yard 3~ '` / 1l. -_..~'[ Consolidated Ltd, Realtors" cor1PET1TIVE Consolidated Ltd, Realtors' Asbury Square P1AfU;ET ANALYSIS ~ Asbury Square Dubuque, Iowa 52001 ~ Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Ousuiess (3 t9) 583.3576 Fax (319) 583-3519 Business (3t9) 583.3576 Fax 1.319) 583.3579 Compecltive Properties Bed Family fining Heat List For Sale Sq.F[. Rooms Eaths Room loom ,ara e Lot A e Air Const. Price Extra Features 1 ' _ _ ~- --- 3 4 Bed Family Dining cleat List Market Sale Ass.Val. 29,100 Solds S .Ft Rooms Baths Room Room ,ara e Lot A e Air Const. Price Time Price Extra Features 9_9g 92.5 75 CFA Upp 6 Down - Off street parking 1 56J Arlington 925 2/2 l/I 0 0 0 100 1880 0 Brick 34,900 28 dys 28,500 'aimed brick KENT $640 7-98 784 35 CFA Side by Side Assessed Va1.27,8Y~ 2 2.128-30 White 1120 2/2 1/1 0 0 0 91 1900 0 Slate 29.900 1 day 25,000 New roof shingles RENT -$500. 12-98 396 10" GF qqs .Val. 35,120 3 735 Kirkwood 70U 2/2 1/1 0 0 0 60 1856 0 Brick 34 000 991 dys34,000 Up 6 Uown (tent $ 55~. 9/98 1096 39 'FA Ass.Val. 57,620 4 422 W. Locust 1096 2/2 1/i 0 0 U 8 1876 0 Brick 38 000 U 6 downdown Rent~575. Bed Family Dining Heat SUBJECT PP.OPERTY S .Ft. Rooms Baths Room Room Gara e Lot A e Air Const. Extra Features 1096 50 GF -- 623-627 Arllnl;ton 1096 2/2 1/1 0 Yes 0 100 1900 0 Wood Side b Side Rent- $645. Ass. Val just lowered to $35,800 Prepared For Address: 623-627 Arlington Recowncnded Llst Pricc: Selling keconuucndations: Prepared By CENTURY 21 CONSOLIDATED REALTORS ASDURY SQUARE DuvuquE, Town 52001 r1i0NE (319) 583-3576 ~~' """! ~- ~ o Consolidated Ltd, Reattors'~ Asbury Square • Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Business (319) 583.3576 Fax (319) 583.3579 Competitive Properties I I Bed For Sale Sq.Ft. Roo i' z 3 4 COMPETITIVE MARKET ANALYSIS Family fining Baths Room oom arate Lot Neat Air Bed Family Dining Heat Solds S .Ft Rooms Baths Room Room ,ara e Lot A e Ai 9-99 925 75 GFA 1 567 Arlington 925 2/2 1/1 0 0 0 100 1.880 7-98 784 ~ 35 Gr 2 2.1._28-30 White 1120 2/2 1/l 0 0 0 91 1.900 12-98 396 103 GF 3 735 Kirkwood 700 2/2 ]/1 0 0 0 60 1856 9/98 1096 39 FA 4 422 W. Locust 1096 2/2 1/1 0 0 0 8 1.876 0 Bed Family Dining Heat SUBJECT PROPERTY S .Ft. Rooms Baths Room Room Gara e Lot A e Air 1096 50 GF~ 623-627 Arlington ].096 2/2 1/] 0 _ Yes 0 100 1900 / 0 Prepared For Address: 623-627 Arlington Recommended List Price: i Selling Recommendations: Prepared By CENT ASBU DUBU c Attn: Kark noble Historic Preservation Coauaissioa Please cable us until the August 17 meeting, ve are gathering more infornstion, Please put us first on the agenda. Thank you, Vicki Bechen Tim Wood CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM August 9, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commiss,,iyon Ff20M: Mark Noble, Assistan# Planoi~et~ ' ll~ SUBJECT: 623-627 Arlington Street Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen, applicants and owners of property at 623-627 Arlington Street, have submitted the attached materials for your review of tfieir application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship. This project is on the agenda for tfie August 17, 2000 Historic Preservation Commission meeting. The applicants have submitted information that is broken down into eight different sections, with each section numbered at the bottom middle of the page. The applicants have provided an index which describes each section of materials. Planning Services staff are in the process of having an independent appraiser conduct an appraisal of this property. That appraisal was scfieduled for August 10, with results due to the City on August 14. Based on that information and any other additional information, Planning Services Staff will attempt to prepare an analysis in a fashion similar to the previous analysis for this particular property. Planning Services staff will attempt to provide the Commissioners and applicants with that material before the August 17 Commission meeting. Please review this information and be prepared to discuss this at the August 17 Commission meeting. MN/mkr Enclosures cc: Tim Wood, 550 English Lane Vicky Bechen, 575 English Lane INDEX 1-Bob Felderman's figures plus what the building is worth 2- Partial price City of Dub. to restore front plus lowest bids 3-Total price to vinyl 4 sides plus lowest bids 4- Total price to restore front and vinyl 3 sides plus lowest bids S- Profit next 15 years on restoring front 6- Additional bids 7- Letter from Dub. Bank & Trust concerning value of building and amount they would lend 8- Jim Kircher Accounting- RE: Cash flow and return on investment. _- _-_ __ _- - ____. .-, _.__., _...~ .. - .. J r _: TF,I,IIS7'ATEFaEAL ESTATP SSRVI[~5 Doing Business as: Continental Realty, Falderman Appraisals, Felderman Property Inspections, Feldertnan Management, and Felderman Business Offices 1179 Iowa Street, Dubuque, Iowa 52001 (319) 557-1465 Office; (319) 588-4214 Facsimile E-mail: Continental RealtyCa~yahoo com July 25, 2000 Vicki Bechen and Tim Wood 575 English Lane Dubuque,lA 52003 RE: 623-627 Arlington Street, Dubuque, IA 52001 As we discussed the following information applies. 1. This is not an appraisal, and should not be construed as such. It discusses value based on information provided by you (the owner) and only presents one value typically considered in an appraisal 2. You purchased the duplex property listed above fnr 527,500. 3. There are two legal descriptions axording to the Ciiy of Dubuque Assessor. 4. Each unit has 1,096 square feet, With 5 rooms, 2 bedrooms, and 1 bath. 5. Current rents are at 5295 and $350 (which will be vacated soon). 6. There are street assessments of 5684.80 and 51,610.97 for total of S2,295.77. 7. Current assessed value is 517,910 each for total of $35,820. 8. Current net taxes are $408 each for total of 5816. 9. Insurance is $336 per year. 10. Your average vacancy rate is 5532 per year (6,g°/, of income). 11. Your additional costs have averaged 52, g20 per year (mainfenar~ce, license, advert+sing, snow, lawn) for the past two years. The attached papers provide some discussion about the property, and a discusson of how an Income Approach is developed (using your actual expenses). Note the discussion regarding return on and refum o' investment (Capitalization Rate, with an average of 12.68%) from the sales discussed, though the more conservative rate is selected. The lower the Capital¢ation Rate the higher the Income Approach to Value (typically this means you have less of something, such as risk or interest on loan in the rate). The last page of the presentation places all of the data in one place, Nate the yearly income, actual vacancy provided by you, actual expenses provided by you, and the estimates for management and reserves (typically not monitored by owners when self managed and maintained). ~. i%~l The final section of the page shows the actual cash flow (based or, your frgures, which appear to be typical tar the market). By calculatlng the two costs of siding plus your purchase price and subtracting a reasonable economic return for your investment you come up with a shortfall each year. This shortfall indicates that without increasing your income (or reducing your operating expenses} it is not economica!ly wise for you to invest in siding. Typically, improvement investments in income producing property should produce added income or reduced operating expenses. Since you are considering 3 sides vinyl and one side wood, part of your exterior maintenance may be decreased over the year,, though you will still have maintenance for painting the wood siding every few years, However, it is interior improvements that typically enable a rental property to substantially increase rents. The tenant does not necessarily receive any individual amenities from new siding, versus new carpet or bathroom or wall paint. There also was a question regarding the debt service being calculated on the total payment of principal and ir>terest. In real estate, your total expenses to operate (your cash flow) affects your ability to -- - maintain a -property, therefore the total debt service is considered when determined the economic feasibility of a property. Remember that the estimated return on and oP~ your investment is the total dollar invested ((equity and loan). Based on your income and expense figures it does not appear to be economically reasonable to piece siding on your structure. However, installing aU vinyl siding has less of an impact on your cash shortfall. Should you have further questions, please contact me. Thank you. Bob Felderman • Page 2 Address: 623 & '027 Arlington Street, Dubuque, Iowa Legal: {623) Lot 1-801, A. McDaniel's, (627) Lot 2-'301, A. McDaniel's; Dubuque, Iowa Building Size (Gross) Year Built: Assessor Identification: Assessed Value/Net Taxes: Last Sale $: Historic District: 1,096 square feet each unit, for total of 2,192 square feet 1900 +/- (623) i0-24-377-016 (527) 10-24-377-015 (623} $17,910 $408 (627) $17,910 % $408 (023) Special X1,610.97 (627) Special :~ 584.80 $27,500 ~n Gd. 11 ristoric District Zoning: R2A, Alternate Two Family District. 3 INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach considers the stream of income that the property is likely to produce during its economic life, and converts this income *_o a value est;-mate. Steps of the Income Approach include: 1. Estimate the Potential Gross Income (Economic Rent). 2. Add any additional sources of income (laundry, garage). ___3. Subtract the typical vacancy losses. 4. The result is Effective Gross Income. 5. Subject estimated and/or actual expenses. Fixed such as taxes, insurance, maintenance, management, licenses, utilities (if included in the rent) and long term such as reserves {future capital expenditures). o. The result is the Net Operating Income. 7. Develop a capitalization rate (derived LLU1ll l.iie cuail.et ui using the mortgage equity rate. 8. Divide the net income by the capitalization rate to determine the Income Approach Value. ECONOMIC REC1T '023 Arlington rents for $295 527 Arlington rents for $350 ~Ionthiy rent is $645, times 12 equals Annual Rent of $7,740. The owners' actual vacancy loss average for past t~•;o nears was $532 per year {Or 6.9~) TyD1Cal rates range between 0° and _0 j, SO file subject is within the t}apical range. Effective Gross Income {$7,740 less $532) 57,208 4 ESTIMATED OPERATING EXPENSES The owner has provided other actual expenses. The owner indicated that the maintenance includes licensing, lawn, sno:~~, advertising, postage, and miscellaneous expenses.. S 7,203 less taxes S SI6 equals S 6,392 S 6,392 less insurance S 33'o equals S 6,056 S 6,055 less maintenance S 2,820 equals S 3,236 Typically, real estate must have some estimates for management (even _though many properties are self mGnaged) A review of management firms, financial managers, appraisers and real estate brokers indicate that the current maYxet costs for most real estate is 2J to 10's of Effective Gross .T.~icome. The typical management fees for the area are estimated a.t'~SJ. .' `;. S 7, 208 .may times 5°s equals S 3'00 S 3,236 less S 360 equals S 2,876 Additionally, Reserves for Replacement c.-_pture future capital expenditures for items SUCK as roof, C%Lpet, S1diP_g, Or paiP_t. it is the appraisers experience that ;these typically run 5o to l00 of the Effective Gross Income. ..It is the appraiser opinion that the subject should expect a.rate of 80. S 7,20n.' times 84 equals S 577 S 2,876 less S 577 equals S 2,299 Net In:,ome $2, 299 S CAPITALIZATION RATE The term Capitalization Rate as used in real estate includes a return on and a return of investment. Return OR 1nVeStment 1S the compensation necessary to pay an investor for the time value of money, risk, and other factors associated with an investment (referred to as yield). Return of investment dials with repayment of the original principal (referred to as capital recovery). A-method of- determining a Capitalization Rate is to build a rate based on the Mortgage and Equity Yield, using mortgage rates from local lending institutions . Thi s is typically given less ,,refight ~~rhen there are rates available from the local sales market. Discussions with local lending insti mortgage rate of 8 . 0 o to 9 . 5 ~ on a 3-year balloon; as of June of 2000 rrouid be 0.120589 (Annual Compound determined from the Ellwood Tables typical borrower. tutions indicate a commercial 15-year amortization, with a the annual mortgage constant Interest Tables, Column o), for 9.00 ~ at 15 years for a An equity dividend rate of 5.500 has been selected ~;hich is based on a long-term certificate of deposit yield ;5 dears). MORTGAGE YIELD 0.75 TIMES 0.120589 EQUALS 0.0904418 EQUITY YIELD 0.25 TIMES 0.065000 EQUALS 0.0162500 OVERALL RATE 0.1066918 10.7 (rounded) Mortgage Equity Rate 6 the tilortgage Equity Rate does not take into consideratio,l additional risk that may apply for specific uses, locations, condition, or quality. Using actual Overall Rates (O. A. R.) from sales allows the appraiser to determine a rate that will include risk. A review of area sales includes the following property; 1154 WHITE 1509-11 BLUFF --- 943 W 5TH 616 PROVIDENCE 2639 PINARD 2418 BROADWAY ESTIMATED CAP RATE SELECTED 11.00% it is this appraiser opinion, with some weight given to the Commercial O.A.P..'s listed above and the Mortgage Equity Rate, thac a Capitalization Rate of llo is supported for the subject property. Capitalization Pate $ 29,500 Jun-99 9.25% $ 32,000 Sep-99 18.50% ~ 44,000 Mar-00 16.00% 5 45,000 Nov-99 9.55% 3 45,000 Mar-00 11.80% 5 48,000 Apr-00 11.00% AVERAGE 12.68% 11= 7 NET OPERATIDIG II`iCO~IE CONVERSI0~1 To convert the Estimated Net Income of 52,299, it is divided by the determined Cao~taiization Rate of 11=, for a va!Ue oL 520,900. $ 2,299 divided by 1I.00~ equals S 20,900 INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE $21,000 (rounded) 8 Z APTS LEASE S ~a5 nn c zcn 00 S 645 LANDLORD BECHEN & WOOD ADDRESS 623-627 ARLINGTON STREET DUBUQUE, IOWA INCOME YEARLY $ 7 740 LESS VACANCY , EFFECTIVE GROSS:INC OME 5 532 _ LESS EXPENSES S 7,208 ACTUAL TAXES 1999 S 816 INSURANCE 5 336 MANAGEMENT $ 360 5% SELF RESERVES 5 577 8% SELF MAINTENANCE $ 2 820 JANITOR n/a LOT MAINT. IN MAINT __ _ _ TELEPHONE n/a ELEVATOR n/a LEGAL n/a GAS Na ELECTRICITY ,~a WATE R, SEWER n/a GARBAGE _ n/a ADVERTISING ~ IN MAINT LICENSE IN MAINT ~ 4, 909 S 3 972 NET INCOME $ 2,299 , S 3.236 CAPITALIZATION RATE DIVIDED 8Y: ~ 1 00% EQUALS S 20,900 $ 29,418 ESTIMATED ACTUAL S 21,000 CASH FLOW ROUNDED $ 29,500 LESS PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST 9% 15 YEARS 553 400 S 2,299 5 3,236 (--- , , . S g qgg SHORTFALL S (4,199) (3,262) INVESTMENT PURCHASE $27,500 1 WOOD, 3 VINYL $25,900 $ 53,400 LESS REASONABLE ECONOMIC RETURN (10%) S 5,340 ESTIMATED ACTUAL SHORTFALL S (9,539) S (8,602) CASH FLOW LESS PRINCIPAL "& INTEREST FOR S37 520 $ 2,299 S 3,236 ~- , 1F USE 4 SIDES VINYL $ 10,020 5 4,565 537,520 LESS REASONABLE ECONOMIC RETURN (10%) $ 3,752 ESTIMATED ACTUAL SHORTFALL S (6,018) ~ (5,081) 9 - . . J 7U Intruduclion lu Capital Hales and Capital Hecov~•r ~ { I Y Y Introduction to Ca ~ilal Hatrs and Ca vital H~c'ovcr The turnr capitalization rate as used in real estate terminology must inclucT~r return oar and a return o/'investmunt. Return un in. s'O/ ~~'~ vustment is the com )ensution necessar to )u 0/~ - ~' f o 1 y I y an investor for the time value of money, risk, and other factors associated with apar- __ I N LO wv..l; ocular investment. In other words, it is the interest paid for the use B of money. This is also referrud to as yield. Return o/' investment deals with repayment of the original principal.'1'his is referred to as capital recovery. ~-e A yield is a percentage relationshi describi h ,l C ~ p ng ow mac 1 one ~(r~ earns on an investment. Two general types of yield must be con- }} ~ fir, trasted: (I) current yield and (2) yield to maturity. 7rlo ~ ~~~~ Current yield is a measurement of the present productivity of the current cash returns from an investment compared to the in• vestment outlay. 'Phis may be calculated by the following formula: l/Y7~ ~i~ ~~~' t ...- Current yield = Annual income Investment price A more sensitive measurement is yield to maturity. This is a measurement of the effective annual earnings as a percentage of the price of an investment, from the present until it is sold or re- deemed. It considers the amounts and timing of forecast income. Yield to maturity includes an adjustment f`rorn the current yield tot reflect anticipated capital gains or losses during the investment holding period. 'I'he yield to maturity is an effective rate of return un investment that considers current income ~u~d uxpected capital t;airr or loss prorated in a manr)er that reflects the timing of the eventual capital gain or loss realization. The rate itself considers but does not incorporate capital recovery. Because yield to maturity considers anticipated capital Bail; or loss, it is much more meaning- ful than current yield. 1lowever, determination of the yield to ma- turity requires atrial-and-error process and is much more difficult to calculate than current yield. 'There are some general rules for us- timating whether Lhe yield to maturity exceeds the current yield. The rulus are that the yield to maturity will bu: 1. Greater than the current yield when capital appreciation is anticipated. ?. Less than the current yield when a capital loss is anticipated. 3. Exactly edual to the current yield when neither gain nor loss is antlClpated. ~S. idegative whun the total of <dl currant income plus capital resale value is less than the purchase pricu. Yiclcl t~ 11•'Ialu,-ity Versos Cal~ilalizaliort Rafe A yield-to-nurturity rate incorporates only ~r whereas a capitalization rate, as used in real nology, includes a capital recovery provisir return on investment. In theory, a capitalization rate for r~, either explicitly or implicitly account for tl 1. Compensation for arisk-free, liquid inv~ 2. Compensation for risk. 3. Compensation for illiquidity. 4. Compensation fur investment manageul~ 5. Provision for forecast appreciation or da{ To illustrate how some of these factors a capitalization rate, the build-up method i~ paragraphs. Provisions fur forecast apprrr are discussed in this chapter as part of th, l:ecc~ery. Build-Up llletltod Thu Build-Up Method is a process of constr. using arisk-freu rate as a foundation and :~ necessary compensations for risk, illiquidity ment many cement. 'Phis met )o perinfts u, cific provisions for differences between real and other income streams. 'I'he analyst begins with a liquid, risl; the rate on passbook accounts offered b~ whose depositors' accounts are insured 1, agency. The rate is the minimum that mull Lion fur the lime value of money. Added to this risk-free rate is a provi~: with the specific type of real estate being :,~ risk is low where there is a strong tenant ~~. such as a U.S. post office; but risk is high weak tenants who h~rve fickle costumers su 1-LUd (11SCOthegUe. Provisions must lie made 1'ur illiyuidit surement u1' how quickly tin asset can ba c'ui estate is illiquid cumpcu•ecl to stock vul bur.. •••.•~~..~.. ~,..v .-.. I,n.~. rtdi,•• .uw ~,apl Wl ncwvery true in real estate markets when there is a tight mortgage money situation. Surne investments require very little management, 4vhereas others require a great deal. The investment management burden re- quires additional compensation. Fur example, a demand deposit in a savings bank requires very little investment management. In- vestment management entails filing tax returns, choosing among financing alternatives and decisions of holding or selling assets; it is not to be confused with property management, which requires day-to-day supervision and is a property operating expense. 'I'o illustrate how an interest rate could be developed for differ- ent types of investments, see 'T'able 5-1. TABLE 5-1 - Interest Rate Through Build-Up Meth od f31ue Income Irom Triple income From Chip Net Lease to Major Small Apartment Stock Corporate Tenant Project Risk-free rate 6.0% fi,0~° ° 6 0% Allowance . for flSk f-i.~% 4.o°/u ° Q /o 7 Allowance . (or illiquidity 0.0% 3.0% 5 0% Allowance for . investment rnanagernent 0.5`% 1.0"', 2 0`; Rate derived by build-up 12.5% 14.0% 20.0% Where does the analyst find the proper adjustments for risk, loss of• liquidity, and burden of management`? As noted in 'T'able 5-1, these costs are not the same for all investments. Many of these adjustments are subjective characteristics derived ft•om the goals, objectives, and income tax situation of the client-investor. 1n later chapters we will discuss procedures for deriving an over- all atpitalr"LattUll rate from the market, band of investment methods, and mortgage equity provisions. CAPITALITATION 1?.~1'I'ES ADJUSTIsD FOR CAPITAL RECOVER Y A rl ~italizcitiun rate is a rate which, when divided into the current income generated ~y an investment, ot•fers t.l value estimate I•or an Introduction to Capital Kates and Capital Kcc investment. Income streams that are for ~~ tufty are appropriately capitalized at the i Capitalization at the interest (or discount when there is no forecast change in the r meat. In that case, the investment expend sale. All of the income stream is yield (. However, when the asset is wasting forecast) a portion of the current incomr~ covery of the investment. The balance of on investment. In such a situation, the r•: increased so that it mathematically cots: value whereby some of the current incun)~ meat and some is a recovery of the invest when asset appreciation is forecast, all .. some of the resale proceeds are producing Resale proceeds offer all of the capital rer preciation, a capital growth rate can bra count rate to derive a capitalization raft 'To dramatize the need for capital r. vestment offering: Invest $10,000 now, and bet $?,500 per turn! Act now! 'T'he promoter promises to pay $`Z,500 per of the next four years. (After that, the invr The promoter was silent on that aspect!) 25°lo return? Certainly not. After four yen) recover his capital of $10,000, without a can be considered that the investor receiv, meat but lost the entire principal! From that this investment offering a 25`i'o retu INCOIVIL' STREAM Consider an income stream. A strea~rr peeled periodically, as contrasted with Examples of income streams are: 1. Receipt of $GO senciar)nunlly for interc~ bond that pays a 1'?"!u interest rate an~i 15 years. '?. Receipt, through a mortgage loan, of 7; . next ZJ yl'arS. ~'. ~Y_'•.; .} ~,~,~. A ~}. Discounting, and Annuities -_ 'I;`: Compound Interest, Discounting, and Annuities ~.'Y_'i . common denominator tat amount of dollars investment proposal, rcy. The amounts of >red can answer the fifers a positive rate of ~ exceed outflows, a ted. But the amounts, formation concerning xample, suppose_~100 at a later date. Is it a e answered properly Z00 being returned (or to of when it will be piaceable resources is 1. Benjamin Franklin s money." He pointed 'y lost. One way to use ~Ionev is used to earn ~t because the interest interest. The timing of ~r periods. An interval er, half-year, or year. ~•ed is crucial to any .•~stment, and X200 is fl be received the next makes a great deal of ~unts are received, the estment can then be a given time span. ~d «•ith an investment. .m the investment will 'a5t. 39 For example, a $100 bet on a v0 to 1 long shot in a horse race • has a great deal of risk. It can result in the loss of X100 or a gain of X5,000. On the other hand, X100 invested in a U.S. government bond - has less risk. After a given period of time, it will be worth X150 with ;'•'. an extremely high degree of certainty. The analyst should keep in _ mind that there are different types of risk, and that no investment is entirely free of risk. _~-_ Rate of Return ~~. :~~-' ~ti"_ Rate of return on investment is a percentage relationship between ~::~ . ~~, .~~:. earnings and invested capital. A properly derived rate of return ' 3;; - consl ers le amounts and timing of expected earnings, acid it can ~~' be used as a common denominator to rank investment proposals. S1~ - The rate of return on investment is also called the yield to maturity. ` ~,.~ - - - ~:: ` 00 ~~ For consumer loans, it is the "Annual Percentage Rate" (APRi. ~7 ..ro. . ;x~ ~ Unless investment criteria include non tnancra reasons, the .4~ ,~G.~ J~ investment offering the highest rate of return on investment is '-~` chosen first. But when all elements are not equal, forecast rates of ;` return are balanced against risk. The greater the risk, the higher the k' ~~~ 1N ~' rate of return must be to compensate an investor for assuming l;; ~~ the risk. :~~ sb-;~- COItiiPO UND INTEREST FUNCTIONS r:. =fit' `' Since compound interest is a mechanical process and because of the '~- ~; variety of income configurations that can result from different in- ~d. ~r:~ vestments, tables have been prepared and included in Appendix B ,~ :' - at various interest rates. Each page of the tables considers at least - 30 years of income and has six columns for convenient applicatit,n - to a variety of income streams. Column functions and headings are _~ ~:". listed below. See Appendix R for examples. "' - • Compound amount of one (Column 1) ~. ~- Accumulation of one per period (Column 2) `'`' Sinking fund factor (Column 3) ,.: •~` ~'-~ • Present worth of one (Column 4) =~ ?~ Present worth of an annuity (Column ~) . ~:, • Installment to amortize one (Column Ei) ~,. `'- This chapter describes the composition and use of three of the r- a- ,'7- IURCtIOnS: CO1i1pOURC{ amount of une, present worth of one, and pres- '=<. ad v,' 1 623-627 Arlington Partial Price City of Dubuque Restore Front: City of Dub. Estimate (Dick Firzlaff) to restore part of the front of the house- Material only X5,133.70 City of Dub. Lowest price for a hazardous waste durtipster 4.700.00 $9833.70 City price did not include front porch soffits and fascia that need to be done also Speaker Construction price vinyl 3 sides 8,000.00 Vacancy loss 6 weeks + re-location costs to move tenant 1.525.00 -- ~ Total ~ 19,38.00 The above price does not include labor Price does not include soffit and fascia or upper windows SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION JOB WORK ORDER (815) 747-6023 4751 N. MENOMINEE RD. Date of Order: EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 61025 March 22, 2000 BILL TO: 68~W Properties ADDRESS: 575 English Lane CITY: Dub., la. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape-recommend replacing or siding over. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: . Apply 4 inch wood. lap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- $325 per square x 42 sq.= $13,650 Labor to replace wood siding- $225 per square x 42 sq. 9,450 Apply one coat primer and 1 coat paint-Labor and material 3.300 (Paint when scaffold is set up already) $26,400 Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entire exterior siding Labor and material 8,820 50 year guarantee on vinyl siding DATE COMPLETED: WORK ORDERED BY TOTAL MATERIALS: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL AMOUNT: 1~ To: Joleen From: Oick j Ro: Front of 623 Arlington i Date: November 9, i 999 i _ The building at 623 Arll eghunrswndows to match 2tnd iloo6windo~~s, removesand installEfror,t p 9ch ~ of siding, install ~-doubt 9 support columns, trim inside of windows, install new wood beveled cedar siding to match and prime and paint front of home is as follows: I O tip anal $500.00 1,) Remova all siding from front of home. ~/~ ' $750.00 "~' -- 2.) -Install new wood carnposite columns at 3250.00. S1,G75.00 a.) Install new wood columns at $525.00 (optior~a~l) 3.) Install 4 double hung wood windows and trim inside to match 2nd floor windows i S 1200.00 to match 2nd floor windows. 4 @ S300.00 4,) Replace front siding with 'r4" X 6"cedar siding at S2 273.70 313.78 per 12 ft. piece, need 155 pieces to side fron' 5.) .Prime and paint new wood siding, material only, 8 gallons $160.00 at $20.00. i •• Cost for material o~nl(y, no la(~or: ~ L r--~~-Wi=n-~ D ' w-i-rrf-~rrr_~ ~: riQ~ t (i e G i d~ s aticr-ter-- k 34,13(33.70 SE,~S58.70 -?E3 ~=8" .~ =~ ~~ Kathy Lamb - -- -- --- --- --- --- --- -- To: Tim Woods Subject: Hazard waste disposal Tim: Please find enclosed the three bid estimates on hazardous waste disposal. These costs are costs per roll-off container and are not paid by weight but by roll-off container. It does not matter whether the container is full or only has one component in it. The cost is the same. I hope this answers your question. Thanks. Kathateen Lamb Senior Housing Inspectdt Page 1 1U Date: July I'!, 1998 To: (;athv Lamb From: Tern' Sullivan Re: 1Naste Proposals __ Kathy, listed below, you will find the comparison of the three bids we received from hazardous waste haulers. A.ll figures ~tiill be based on a thirty-day turnaround. Heritage Environmental Services, Inc. Roll-o~transportatien per round tnp 51,00.00 (ti,cn/Fri) Disposal Costs S 1>j.00/cubic yard Roll-off Rental 5 10.00/day Total price for 30 yard container 5~,3~0.00 Final cost per yard 5 191.00/cubic vard HEI Consultants, Inc. Roll-off transportation per round trip 5 (,600.00 (~(on/Fri) " Disposal Costs 5 3.00/cubic yard `Iichi~an Tax 5 10.00icubic vard Ro11-off Rental 5 20.00/%,onuh Drop charge for Roll~ff (one time chv) ~ 1,200.00~bor Total price for 30 vard container S',700.00 Final cost per yard 5 1~6.67r'cubic vard Lozano Environmental tiV•aste ~llanaQement Roll-off transportation per round trip 51=1,_ ~ ~.OU Drop Off charge (one tune chi) S 2,000 00 r~li other charges included in this bid Total price for lOti vard container ~ 1Y.=- ~ 00 final cost per yard S 1~~.3?!cubic va I[ is my recommendation that v:e acc:pt the Lozano for Rvo reasons. First, the cos is less per cubic vard Secondly, by recycling the ~yaste, it ends all future liability because the waste is being rzused in an acceptable manor to E°,-~. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION February 3, 2000 What are the HUD Guidelines. The "HUD Guidelines"is the term used to describe the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-based Paint in Housing. It does not carry the force of law but are "Guidelines" for the evaluation, control cad removal of lead-based paint hazards which must be followed for certain HUD funded programs, such as the Lead-based Pain` Hazard Control Grant Program. If you don't want io follow the Guidelines, you can not-participate in the Lead Grant program. What is the definition of "Lead-based paint"~ Lead-based point means paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to ar in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter or more than 0.5 percent by weight. The only acceptable testing method for determining if paint is lead-based is through an XRF examination or laboratory analysis. What is the definition of a "Lead-based par"nt haza;-d':~ Lead-based paint hazards means any condition that causes exposure to lead from: 1) Lead-contaminated dust, 2) Lend-contaminated soil, 3) Lead-based paint that is deteriorated, and 4) Lead-based paint that is present on accessible, impact, or friction surfaces. hat is a "known"I end based aaant hazard? A "knvcvn "f ead-based paint hazard is a hazard which has been identified either by laboratory analysis or• by XRF testing. A presumed lead-based paint hazard must not be disclosed, however a "known" lead-based paint hazard must bz disclosed for Renl Estate disclosure. `How can "knoa~n" lead-baked p~t!rLt_h_a7-~~ds be removed? Once lead-based painfi has been tested and determined to be lead, udditionnl regulations come into play as far as removal for 4vorker protection, such as IOSHA; and for waste disposal from EPA. Once alead-based paint has been tested, it can no " longer go to the landfill as.ordinary household waste unless the waste can pass a TCLP test. A TCLP test is a "toxicity characteristic leaching procedure" test which tests to see how much lead would leach out once the waste is put into fihe ground. If component 4vaste such as doors, avindows and/or baseboards are tested and the TCLP test is = to or >than 5ppm it is considered hazardous avaste and must go to a hazardous waste landfill. (It should be noted that in the Lead Grant Program, no waste has passed the . TCLP test to dnte.) c-j'~Iw does IOSf-lA affect the remova/ of "known"lead-based paint haza~ds% __ .Once lead-based paint has been tested and determined by either XRF analysis or laboratory testing, the contractor is obligated to follo4v IOSHA regulations for fihe removal and provide saf e work practices for their employees. Some of these safe work practices would include providing respirators, air locks, pre and post abatement cleaning, air monitoring and medical monitoring of workers. /hat is the difference between re~ovatitto and remode/i/Ic~and /ead--based DaiClt haza~d~emova/ aro~k? 1) The intent of the tivork to be done and 2) Is there a "known" lead-based paint hazard which has been documented by XRF analysis and/or laboratory testing? Once the hazard is "known", the contractor and/or owner can not dispute the fact that he is dealing with a "known" hazard. /hat is the cost for' the disposal of hazardous earaste? In determining hoti~.- the Lead Grant Program would dispose of hazardous :vaste for our program, the following waste proposals were reviewed: Heritage Environmental Services, Tnc. X5,850.00 (30 yard container) HEI Consultants, Inc. 4,700.00 (30 yard container) Disposal through the Lead Grant Program 275.00 per unit (paid by the Grant program.) 623-627 Arlington Total Price to Vinyl =1 sides: Speaker Construction bid to vinyl entire house X8,820.00 Vacancy loss- 1 month + re-location costs to move tenant 1.200.00 ~~ ~l0,o2o.ao SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION JOB WORK ORDER (815) 747-6023 4751 N. MENOMINEE RD. Date of Order: EAST DUBUQUE, 1L. 61025 March 22, 2000 BILL TO: B&W Properties .- ADDRESS: 575 English Lane CITY: Dub., la. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape-recommend replacing or siding over. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: --Apply 4 inch-wood lap siding #o entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- $325 per square x 42 sq.= $13,650 Labor to replace wood siding- $225 per square x 42 sq. 9,450 Apply one coat primer and 1 coat paint=Labor and material 3.300 (Paint when scaffold is set up already) $26,400 Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entire exterior siding Labor and material 8,820 50 year guarantee on vinyl siding DATE COMPLETED: TOTAL MATERIALS: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL AMOUNT: WORK ORDERED BY: ,~ l~ 623-627 Arlington Total Price to Restore Front and Vinvl 3 sides: Speaker Construction bid to restore front (not including disposal) City of Dubuque lowest price hazardous waste disposal Total front Speaker Construction price to vinyl 3 sides Vacancy loss 6 weeks + re-location costs Total Price does not include soffit and fascia and upper windows in front. S 11,67 4.700 $1 b,37~ 5,000 1 52~ $25,900 SPEAKER CONSTKUC"LION JC13 ~~'UItK (~RI)I:IZ (815) 7~t7-6023 ~47~ l N. R~IENOMINEE; IZD. Uatc ul~Uld~r: .luny I(,, 2000 EAST DUE3UQUI~, [L. G I U2~ f31LL TO: Q&~V Properties ADDRESS: 575 English Lane CI"['Y: Dub., la. 52003 JOt3 LOCA"PION: 623-627 Arlinglun Remove wood siding, 2 ~windvws, trier inside house, ~ cululnlr~ l ) di U0 7UU s usa part of porch in a lead safe manner (does not include wade . Apply ~ inch lap siding to frulrt ~- small anruunt ohtrim ~t,2UU.UU Install 4 double hung wood windu~~~s, trier exterior, trier interior, reframc fur window, drywall inside + li~ud ~ ~4OU.UU `. Cover partially and replace partially-porch ceiling, sul~fit and lrin~ nl 1775 OO new wood in lead safe manner Replace =I porch columns back to «•ood- material price dctrends GOO U(r un style Labor I ,000.UU Approx. Price l~~laterials Prime I coat and paint 2 coats, siding, exterior trim, porch, soffit, 4 ~~indows, inside friar, 2 rooms windows aCC located II1 OC)O OO ,~I I,~75.OO Price does not include front soffits, fascia, upper wilyduws that i~ already wrapi,ed now. r SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION JOB WORK ORDER (815) 747-6023 4751 N. MENO(~11NEE RD. Date of Order: EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 61025 March 22, 2000 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS: 575 English Lane CITY: Dub., la. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape-recommend replacing or siding over. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: -apply 4 inch wood lap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- 5325 per square x 42 sq.= X13,650 Labor to replace wood siding- $225 per square x 42 sq. 9,450 Apply one coat primer and 1 coat paint-Labor and materia! 3.300 (Paint when scaffold is set up already} $26,400 Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entirE~ exterior siding Labor and material 8,820 50 year guarantee on vinyl siding DATE COMPLETED: TOTAL tv1ATERIALS: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL AMOUNT: WORK ORDERED BY: ~~ ~ Date: 1at~uary 2=[, 2UUU To: Tim ~~'oods From: Ikathy Lamb Please find enclosed some avast:: costs wfuch «~e put together in 19y3. ~[ hanks. Kath~• Flerita,e Environmental Serr•ices, Inc. Roll-eFFtranspertatien (;er roufrd trip SI,500 00 (~\;oniFri) Drsposal Costs S 13.00/cubic yard Rol!-off Rental S ; O.OOidav Total price for 30 yard container 55,3~tJ.0i) Final cost per yard ~ I9~.00/cubic vard HEI Consult:urts, Inc. Roll-off transportation per round trip SI,60U.00 (~lon/Fri) ' Disposal Costs ~ S_~.00/cubic yard t\(icfii,*an Tax S ic).UO/cubic yard Roll-off Rental S 2~J.00/ntentlr Drop charge for Roll-ofi (one time chg) ~ 1,20C OOitiox Total ptic:: for 3U yard container 5 ={,700 UU Final cost per yard C I ~G.C71cuf~ic ~ aril Lo~~anu Environmental 1Vastc t\(:ur:r~rment Roil-of~ transportation per round trip ~ I-i.~ ~:.~rU Drop Ofl~chargc (rue ante ch«) S Z,00(} OU r\II curer charges included ut this bid Total price for I OV vard container 51-1, X33.00 final cost per yard C 135."iruhic ~,rrd ,I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION February 3, 2000 What aye the HUD 6uidelines~ The "HUD Guidelines"is the term used to describe the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-based Paint in Housing. It does not carry the force of law but are "Guidelines" for the evaluation, control and removal of lead-based paint hazards which must be followed for certain HUD funded programs, such as the Lead-based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program. If you don't want ~o follow the Guidelines, ---you can not participate in the Lead Grant program. ~, What is the definition of "Lead-based paint"~ Lead based paint means paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter or .more than 0.5 percent by weight. The only acceptable testing method for determining if paint is lead-based is through an XRF examination or laboratory analysis. What is the definition of a "Lead-based paint hazar~d`:~ Leod--based paint hazards means any condition that causes exposure ~to lend from: 1) Lead-contaminated dust, 2) Lend-contaminated soil, 3) Lead-based paint that is deteriorated, and 4} Lead-based paint that is present on accessible, impact, or fricfiion surfaces. /hat is a "known"lead based paint hazard? A "knvcvn"lead-based paint hazard is a hazard which has been identified either by laboratory analysis or- by XRF testing. A presumed lead-based paint hazard must not be disclosed, however a "known" lead-based paint hazard must be disclosed for Real Estate disclosure.. r~Noav can "kno~rn" lead-based aainfi hazards be removed? Once lead-based paint has been tested and determined to be lead, additional regulations come into play as far as removal for 4vorker protection, such as IOSHA; and for waste disposal from EPA. Once alead-based pain has been tested, it can no longer go to the landfill as.ordinary household waste unless the waste can pass a TCLP test. A TCLP test is a "toxicity characteristic leaching procedure" test which tests to see how much lead would leach out once the waste is put into the ground. If component waste such as doors, windows and/or baseboards are tested and the TCLP test is = to or >than 5ppm it is considered hazardous waste and must go to a hazardous waste landfill. (It should be noted that in the Lead Grant Program, no waste has passed the TCLP test to dafie.) __1-/ow does IOSHA affect the nemova/ of "known"lend-based,~Qint hazrrrds~ Once lead-based paint has been tested and determined by either XRF analysis or laboratory testing, the contractor is obligated to follow IOSHA regulations for the removal and provide safe work practices for their employees. Some of these safe work practices would include providing respirators, air locks, pre and post abatement clecning, air monitoring and medical monitoring of workers. /fiat is the difference between renovating and remodeling and /ead--bused paint hazard removal work. 1) The intent of the work to be done and 2) Is there a "known" lead-based paint hazard which has been documenfied by XRF analysis and/or laboratory testing? Once the hazard is "known", the contractor and/or owner can not dispute the fact that he is dealing with a "known" hazard. What is the cost for the di;~bosal of hazardous waste? In determining how the Lead Grant Program would dispose of hazardous waste for our program, the following waste proposals were reviewed: Heritage Environmental Services, Ync. $5,850.00 (30 yard container) HEI Consultants, Inc. 4,700.00 (30 yard container) Disposal through the Lead Grant Program 275.00 per unit (paid by the Grant program.) 623-627 Arlington Purchase Price 27,500 Owe on house approx. 19.500 My total investment as oftoday-approx. 8,000 Rehab vinyl 3 sides and restore front 25,900 New loan for rehab 25,900 + street assessment -~ of 2,300 = 28,200 @ 9 % over 15 years=$286.02 per moor a total of $51,484 over 15 yrs. Will pay out over the next 15 years Owe on building approx. 19,500 Remaining interest on house approx. 7,000 New loan 28,200 --- Interest on new loan 23 284 Total payout 15 years $77,984 Total rents 15 years-- 7,208 x 15 = 108,120 Total operating expense 59,940 Profit for 15 years 48,180 Total payout over the next 1 ~ yrs. -77.984 -29,804 Our Investment 8.000 -37,804 Sell Building for- 40.000 Profit over 15 yrs. 2,196 27,500 +28200 $55,700 Investment x 10% return= 55,570 per yr or x 15 yrs = $83,550 - x.196 profit - 581,354 negative over 15 yrs. We do not have the additional $16,500 to restore the front. `ye will have to borrow it. Restoring the front will cost us interest + principal=S30,1?3 total for 15 yrs. .~ TZ.. t. ~a»sel Co»str~ctio» ~~t I Obeche Ct. Dubuque, Iowa 52003 (319)83-8647 Proposal To: Name: B&GV Properties Address: 575 Enlish Lane City, State, Zip Dubuque, Iowa 52003{ Proposal --- Date: July 11, 2000 Description Unit Price TOTAL \Ye Propose to do the follow work on you property located at 623-627 Arlington: Remo~•e «ood siding, 2 -3 pane windows, 4 iron columns, porch ceiling and sides, all in a lead 1,200.00 s:lfe manner. install d inch lap siding and wood [rims as necessary to front of unit, and install wood sot~its and side to porch as necessan,. 6,800.00 Replace remo~•ed window with -1 double hung wood window to match upper story windows, complete with interior trim and necessary structural changes and repairs to interior rooms. 2,90.00 Labor to replace porch columns with new wood columns as selected by o~~ners. Estimated material cost fur above columns. >j0.00 I ,s~s.oo Painting of all waxi material on front of unit, l prime coat two finish coat. Painting of 2 rooms and intcriar of~window. I, I X0.00 "Total for all work covered by this proposal. " ~ I-4,3Z~.00 Items not included in this proposal: r\rty dunrpster or disposal of materials. \uy aft:r.Hilvl. rr llrvi:rtilrls li\all thc.Ila,\c K~~p ~tlillh suhmil[ tl v/~Y~' _ . y+ tllicaUlvl.a in\ol\ini, c\tra Ul<t5 «ill b~ c.\~~~II~\I r - i lMll\ l1IllV1 \\rclt Ul t,flllY, :tllll l\III I`l\t+llll :111 t\l r:l /ff ' l/ ~l ~f ' ~l ~~ ~ I ! V' ~ IiY ~ L_. ~f+~~l_ ` ~t/~~/- t ~~I.If~;~'1,1~T :ItIII :Ilk,\L tI1~t.~tltli:lt~. ;\II :1S;r ~\111~11I~ iwllin~all uran >trif.« :I~ciduris, l,r llrl.l\s hc\rllll \'++l c' ~Ilrr. Ia,ga,.,ll m.n he ll itlulralln h~ us II m~( acid+IcJ a Ithul lla\.. lair ~alh\+I. r\cccptancc of Proposal the :d„\c I+rl.~., *r+~ellirlUltil.. aln! con.6ti,~nz ;ur s.dila.tl+r~ :ullr :Ire h~~~•I,\' awl+tcd. l au arc auth~ri:rd t+, ll,r Llc llorh a~ :7+«:Ili~tl. Si~~nalurc l):rtc 5i~naturc Stackis Co~istructio~a Irtc. 3195 Kerry Ct. Dubuque, IA 52002x- (319) 556-6183,~-~~`'~-`' I~ ,t1, 0(319) j~6-439211-~1,, I~'~ _ _~_ ;~~- Name Street City Stag Phone No. Date Sheet No. Work to Be Performed At: Street City Date of Plans Architect ~;Ye hereby propose to (umish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of _ ~ L t°%;Q State S, All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with ttie drawings and specificGlions sub:,iitted for above work and completed In a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars [S j. wit~i payments to be made as follows: My a+;orv3on a CwU"m ~ rtDdvo eDeCMCrUOne Imnlvln~ eatrn cce~, w11I De Respectfully submitted eawted oNy noon vrttan ordrrn, •nd ~.Itl hammn en ertrn chnrSo over end a M.e .~e w~timete ~A epn nmmes tOntln9ant u{+on aike~, ncGdanls ar doluy~ ~ Per L•nvml ~ tc~^W'OMner to tarry Aro, remade end other r,etoefnry Inwranto Steven J. Stack/s, General Contractor Jack h1. Stackls, General Contractor Note -This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL c ~l Tae; nbovtl prices, specificallons and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. Y"ou are authorized to do the work as ~i~ecifctl. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature ~~te Signature _ Proposal Submitted To: ~ 2o- Dod ~ 9 - S uJt o 129 ~`~' r'- ~ ~ ~7 j L. --~ ~ ~ ;; Dubuque, ~ lA b2043 ' _ ~ ~ 319/b57-8099 ~~~ ~ ~~ •' PROPOSAL ~; We hereby submit specifications arKi estitt~ates for: u~: 'TIM WOOD 550 ENGLISH LANE DUBUQUE IA 52003 RE: 623-627 ARLINGTON DUBUQUE. IA ~, 6/11/9.9 ~' ~~• SCP.APE, PRIME BARE WOOD ~ APPLY ONE COAT PAINT IN - ~"~ { LEAD SAFE MANNER UNDER HUD GUIDELINES • $ 15,000.00 , - ~_. . . • REPAIR APPROX 15 SQ WOOD SIDING. COST WILL INCP,EAS£ -_ IF ADDITI0~IA.L ROTTEN ~OOD :'IS DISCOVERED WHILE SCRAPING ~ $ 9000.00 L {' a~ 3 ~. T .~'. `,. ~.~ ,. a~ C.C. TIM WOOD •• ~/ •. :;; . WE PROPOSE rsreby to lumis.h material and tabor-carnPlcts h acccxdar~cc wah above ap~aciltis, for tt~a sure above noted Payment to be made as follows: `-' . rUl material is guaranteed to be as spaciitad. AU work to t~ completed h a•wakmar>like mariner according to standard practices. Any alleratkxi or devialbn from above specii{catlons lrrvotvtng extra casts will be executed only upon written orders, and wilt bacarne an extra charfle over and above the estlrr+ate. AJI agreements contingent upon slrlkes, accldenls, or delays beyorxi our coriUol. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and Diller necessary insurance. Our workers are lolly covered by Workn~'a Comperuation Insurance.' Autt-oriied S4grtiaiwe: ACCEPTANCE OF PflOPOS11l_: The above prices, speciflcaliorts and conditkxts are satisfactory and are heretry accepted. You are authalzad to do the work as speclfiad_ ?aymeru wiu ba made as outlined above. Sigr',aiure REPLACE APPROX 7 SQ PLYWOOD. SIDING TO MATCH P,E- MAINING HOUSE ~ a7nn_nn 7-Ilr C~rlrr noel 1~1(IIIIIrnclnCC Of 1%inl'l Siding ~• Snffil I il.r.ut+ utliri cetcnui ,uhne,uilatt..\I,idc I'i, nuunt \ln•, I ~ulut:~ .utJ >ulht a tll h.tvc +!nt r~pu,uir loan aunu,phcrcc utndnuut, chdui.uily. tlir +lrantn,~, atuun ul r.unl.tll +rtll br a.!ryu.ur to +c;t;b the rim I ,cling I luac+tr. +mvl suhmt, and sulhc ,huuld hr ++:~shrd pcnudi~.tlh b+ hu,tn,~ +cuh n ganlcn h,~,r .Intl clc.u ++.ucr p:utirularlr ui thu,c :eras nut espu,rd duretl) u. r.uu. II +uu dcsut• u. du a nwrr thunuigli tic:uun~ w ++6ric lu•~h soil u,llrcuun.unduunt, uu'ur, l~~llu++ these snnplr utsuutuuus 5 It t, unpurt:utt tleu iuunrdi:nclc lalluwin,~ all t+asltiug upcrauun,, thr rntirc satiate hc, thunw;;hly rinu•d wuh Irish +vau•r (roan a ganlrn hn,c :\+utd prulungctl or high pressure nnscng of ape::. ventilau•d :ueas. b. I ur brst insult, +vhcn usint; a clcanmg suluuun, ;t•Icct an overcast caul day (» -7~ ) :nul ++ash unh snt.tll :uc:u at a time Thi; should allu++• the +cct clc:uting sulutiuu to rensun in runntct +rnh the lini,h lur a pcru,d ul nut Icss tl:.tn 3 uunutrs, then oust ++ith Iliac +valrr ~„~o,r it has a rh:utct• to dry. I l ,c .i soli-Im,tlril, Imtg-h.uullid +caslung hru,h. li .ut.tchcs w roar g:udcn bust and ntal:rs a':uhutg roar siding ca>irr. Uu not i ub +i~uruusl)' which roar ucatc glusst ,ueas u+ci the vnnl sulut:~ (tnish I ur h.rrtl-tu-u nwvr chn, ,url, ,c, soot :uul giuuc luund nt mdusuial :uc:u, wipe tht stdutg dawn +vith a suluuun consiuing ul thr lullu+ving ingn•tlirnts. I/3 cup pu++drrcd tlcu•rgrnt ("[tde, I ab ur an cyurv:+lcnt pu+rdrr tlrtcrgcnt) 2/Scup household clc:uu•r (Soil:u, ipu' ~L Span ur thr cqutvalcnt), I L;,Iluu +vau•r 3 II nuldrw is .t pn,blrnt iu your :uca, pre- p.ue thr solution above but sul);tiuur 1 yu;trt u( laundry bleach lur I qu:ut ul ++.ucr ) II ruu wash du+cn the enun• house, soot at the buuum and wui{, up to thr tap, as Ics, ,ucal:utg will result C:\L•Tlt)N. GR[:\"I1 R C~).'~CI_Nll:a[I(tNS \1:11' C:\USL D.IALIGL TO 1lIC \'IN1'L SID- ING PI'\IS[I. UO ;~'lt[ L'SL CI_E:\NCRti COfa.11NWG :1151:.151\'C P:\Ia ICLC~, ~i)L- VLN1 t)I: r1!sI~tUNI:\Il:U-7l'I'I: CI.C:\NI-Rti OIt I':11\ [ RL111)\'I-It !'Oli, CI 1:r1\'ING 711E \'I\1't. SIgINI,. \'1'III.N L51N(, r1N1' OP l I1L= r113C)\'l. CI IL~11C.-1L CL-f_~iN1NG AGENTS, ORSI:R\'l: "III[ C[Ipti11C.11. t`t:1N- UI AC[UhCR'S ItLC.U's9\•ILNUCI) 5:111:I1' I'RCC.IUII(1!~~5 I'RU[[C"[AG:\INti7 CON- 1~1C-[ Of TI IL SUI_U I Il)N \\'I"[li Ll'LS l)I( SKIN. 7 hts cleaning anti ut;unu•n:utce in[urneuiun is suggcsu•d in :m cllun u, be ul asstsutncc; huwrvcr, nc:utularuucr can assuq,c nu rrspunstbiluv lur tcsuhs obtained +vhu'h ate dependent un the sulutiou chemicals :u prcp:uctl anti nu•thud of ;ytplic.uiun I II(111IZ )'Oil fUl" C~IUOSIfIg ~1lslCi(' V111~'~ SIC~UI`~ abtdi I'rc•mium 1'ut)'I Siding is nu utduiac_y siding ll is the rcsuh of yiurs uf• uurn,nr ci•srutih tool devrlul,tnent, t;tvint' )uu a sut~l suliug u(the highest standatds~ 11'e tulu great pridi in thr cluuluy n( uu, vinyl stducg. Su nucih, in ~utt, that wr bnc h it wuh the Alsidr l.iJrunu• I incited .\'onlnuculcd l1'uctunlY. Alnt' the suggest You short the pridr tool j~liusurr of thr Alside 1'rcntiunc 1'in)'I Siducg ) uu've puti hnu•d (runt ~'uur cunnauuc !>t' trtununcnding it w yarn friends curd ncighLurs. lhnnl: )"uu ~~a Firs! lh+ Anu•rir:is I luaus Ahulr is a red trndrmark. U Alsulr, 1997 I'nutrd in U.SA. 75-2710-01 ' I , l I 1 I I ' I I lhidc I'u•nuun, Vinyl ~idin~ and Sa(lu air tvatr.uurd by the i\Ltnulacturcr. ,16u1c, :r};ain,t hh,tinn};, iutn,dut};, ILd,nt};, prcliit}; ur uaihutg as a di«n result ul drleils uirurrin(; in the nt:uw[.tiwnn}; Itrutc,s, under uurmal u;c :Intl srrviir,,ub)cit to Ihr trans and unuliliun, iuntainrd ut thu \Verrann'. II the ~lanufatuurr dctrnninc, tleu a cLlim is valid ut ariuuLutic tvuh the lrnns u( Bus \V•urant}•. Alsitlc agtcrs, at its,ulc option, to rcpatr, refinish ur rcpl.tec only the drlreut•c ;idin}; panrb :uul .n,tnnr 100'X, u(thr cost ul ntatenal :uul labor to the I'ruprrty Owner ttithin the (irsi three }cars (rum Bari u( install.uum. Thcrc:Bret, Alsitlc well assiuuc the cull of m:urrial anti labor fur :uty ttarruucd tvur4, upon pavwrnt by tlu I'rupcrty Otvncr of .I Oar I land«d Dollar (5100) ;crvice p:n•ntint Inc caih iniident tattler this \\'errann• In the event that dtr buildutg upon which the tcarrantrtl sitltn}; antVur >ullu have hrrn nutalled iumpriscs nntlliplc «sulrntial or innuncrt'tal units. iniludin~ unulununnnn>, then cant indi- t•idually addressrd unit shall br deemed lu br .t scp;uatr pntprnv atvncr unit (or all ,tpplicthtlny purposes u( ibis I-unurd \\arrantc. fur an entity other titan lirutg pcrs,uts. the ttarr:uuy period shall br fur h(tv 1>O1 teats bunt the nrtgut.Il tl.ue ul uut.tllation, under ihn I_tutuctl \Varranty. lrunsfcrnbilil~ 1'rut•isiun~ Upon transfer u( utt nrnhyt. be the un~inal purih.tsrr, the ttan:mtc tall hr iranslcrrrd to the Itrst subseyurni uttnrr ut tthiih rccnt the tcarranu• will br lur a priin.l ul hltt (50) reaps (rum the da« of m,t.ilLulwt nl the ,idin;; end/ur sulfa and it trill hr pn,ratcd pit Ihr sihrduic iunt,unctl in the last p,tra};t,y,h of the nest x•iuon in adc,utic of ;uty :yy,lii:Ihlc :nnuunt ihcn due (rout the I'n,prny Otvnrr. u,};rthrt' with phi u•n'tic p.Iynu•nt amount. lur caih inudint, an the lullutvin}; ha;~,. In the iasc ul pnq,rrty translcr ,Intl latlitt}', Alsitlc will .u,unu• 100'Y„ ul the iu,t ul nta«rial and Lthur fur rrlinisltin};, repair ur replairnu'nt within the fir>t th«r }cars (runt d;uc u( in,utlLuiun; t)2');. Burin}; the luurth year; 4'+;~ Icss than the p«ccd- iny; rear for each additional year thircaltcr thn,n~h the IOth year; 3'X. Irss than the prcirtling }•car I~,r each atlditiunal yrar thereafter; but ,11,itlc'; li,thilit}• hcrcuntlcr shall nut drelinc to Its; th.ut 9"i. a( such post of ntatcrial and labor fur rchnishin~, «pair ur rcplairment; unless Alsidr•s uhh;;etiun hcn•undir sh:Ill ira,c ;uul tcnninatr suuni r pursuant to the u•nns and atntlitiuns of thi; Lnnurd \Varranty. The b:ui> lur iunyxuing the cu,t ul rchnishin„ repair ur rcplaicmcnt shall be iurrrm ntarl.ct prices liuil I'rotrc tine Ahidr I'«ntnun Vinyl ~idin~ :uul/ur Sulfa is also warran«d against d:uir:.};c hunt haul. In;uclt cast;. upon :nuhurizatiun and parntcnt in adc:utir, the «placcux•nt materials only arc u,trrid. In the iau• ul h:ul d:unagr. Ihr huntr- otcner should first pursue its hunteutcners' ut;urancr puliiv lur cucrrtgc du•rrundcr. In the runt th.u cuccra~c is dcnird by your utsurancr e;trriir cuu trill be rntidrd to the hail protection cuccr.I~c hereunder. In addition, the I'ruprrn• Ounir nut,t p,tt Ihr first Onc Iluntbcd Dollars 0100) ul the rasp ,.I ntmcrial for n•painngcach incidrnir ul It.ul d;unagr .uul Ihcn the b,tlancr u( the iu,t ul m;urn.Il lur.utc tc,Inanird both to the h.Ill d.una~rd ,idnt~ ntau•iials ut rs,rss ul One Ilund«d Dull.tr, t~lUO) trill hr prorated hrncct•n the pn,prrtt ,,ttnrr and the \LuntLtiuu'rr un the lullutt int; h.hh. Fueling 1'rutrctiun In addwon, Alsuli I'rcnuuut \ nn I Sidut~ and ~o(ht arc tt'arrantrtl ay.un,t I;ulnt~, uthrr than es ntac rcutlt Iront nunnal ttr.nhirin~. under the Prot i;tuns u(this I_itnitetl \\'anann' I(, alter inspcrtiun.:lbidc drtcnninrs that Luling u(thi sithny nr su(In has nriurn•d. thin .1lsidc a~rccs. at us salt upuun. to rcluu,h rrpao ur «plarr the >idin~ ur su(lit al(ri«d, at a ant ul ntatcnal and labor to be prorated beniecn :lkide and the I'tuprttr Owner, upon ,,uihoii_.tuun and pavntrnt bunny the fir,t crar alter the Bari ul sidut in,tall.uion. the \I,uuilaiuu'cr trill as;untc t)~";, u( ,uih rrmaininy iu,t, u( nt:urri.tl rrplarcntcnt ul h,ul tl;unaged ,ulnty. then i"., Ic,> caih ;ubsr- yurnt scar thruu~lt the hhh tear: 7tt•',, during the si.vh crar: then the \I:uull;tintrrr ,ty;n•rs to a;;unu•• 10•'„ Ic,; .,I ,Hilt nsurri.tl n•placcntrnt iu,ts lur c.Iih adtlnwn.Il t•car thrrcahrr tllruu,h the Itlth trtr: thircaltcr Itl'',. Irss lur the I Ith ce:n and runtinuin,y ,n the rate of 'U°,~ .ts \Lnuilai tu«rs ,bars' t~l ;uih «ntaininh i u,l for ntatrri:Il iipLurnu•nt ul h;ul J.un.I~cd,idint; thum};h the Ithh year: then 5'i,. Ir„ (ut the _>Uth yrar ;uul iuntinttut}; at phi r,ur ul I i';,, thircaltcr thruu};It the _' ith yrar, ;utd thru•altctl the \lanulacuucr'+ liabtlitr hereunder luint thi ?5th yr:o ,h,Ill bi 10'i,~ nl ;ui h rrut.unin~ rusts u( nt:ucrial n•ilairntrnl tloun~h the 10th yr:Ir,;tt the end of tchii II prriud ul dine, .tll liahilitt• and ubli};atiun ul du• \I:unilaiuucr under this Ilan I'ruiritiun I intitid \1;nr,unc,hall icax• and trruti- natc. Ihr ha,i, Inc cuntpuun~ the iu,t ul ntatrrial irplaicntcni ,h:dl br iurrrm ntarhi t plia•,. Lxrlusinn., fhc ~lenu(acuurr Bur, nut ttarr:uu instalhuiun nnr deicers iau,rd by installation. Thi> \\'arruut' racers only the ,prcihi m:uwlacuuin~ drlcits es sprci(ird hrrrut. This \\'arrann• dt,r; nut paver any other d.una};rs ur ntairrial failure uteludiug, but nul limited tu, nurntal tviathrrint;, u~idaliun, Acts u( C~nd, lire, Iluod, nnpact Intm lurrign uhjrits, ihcntic:Il pollutant,. ntildrtc. suurwral defects. ncgliy;enl maintrn.utie ur abu,c. Nurntal ttcathrrin~ may iau;c any uu(arc u, usidcr. ih:III: ur aiiunnll:uc surlacr dirt ur stain; due w van'ing rytu~un•s to xutlie;ht, ticathcr :uul :uuu„phrrir runditian, l he gcugr.ythii luiaeun, the tlualin' ul the :unwsphcrc anti uthrr lur.tl laiuns in the area. acct which ,11;idr has nu iununl, ionu ibutr to rite >crctity ul the>r coridi- tiuni. -Ilti, \1~arrann• is valid unit' it grnuinr :11;idr I'«utium \'int•I 5uling nr Sul(u arc used, but slt,tll hr vuitl i(acii;>urc pruduits iniump:ut- hlc with the tiding ur sollit ari installed tchirh cau;c drlrtt, to u~cui. I hi pron,inn, .,I tlli; \\'arr.tnit ,tri the full and iontplrti tuuranit pubic i vrndad bt' .\I,idr Tlii; \\,ur.uut ,hall rcnt.un uI illrrt unit i( nnrnt.tl t lianint; pr.ti urc, arc pi rlurntrd lur nt.untrn,utu• ul Ihr sidutg ur snllit. t~rt• rivirx side lur inlunn.uiun.) 1 hu \\;tnantc shall he null and tuitl it harntlul tlcenin~c~mp~unds.t« u;cd. llil: \\.\RR.1\ (1' >1.11 I:\Il:\ (ti l:t)vL11\'[D I\ (Illti LI\II I I:It \\.\ItR.\\ I1 it f fORfII TIII: tt\Ll' L\I'!(L~5 \1'.\Rlt.1\TIIa I:.C fl:\'UI:D 141 \I.~IDI' fl)I( I I II: ~IUI\l~ (tl( DUI Pfl' .\\D l IIC I'Iat\'I~1O\~ II[RL'Of 511.1LL C.t\~~I-I fl'T(: TIII: I'kO1'Cltfl' l)\\'\I:R•5 I:.\CLl'>I11: Itl:\II:I)Y I'l1R I(RI'..11 1I l)I~ fl IIJ \\,\I:h.\\ (1•, ,\L~IUI: ~I I,\LI. \tt (141i LI:\111.1: Itt IIII_ I'Rt)I'Lltll'tt\\'\1I:Ittl( I\l IDI-\I.\I l)h (l)i:11 l~liLV (L11. U.\,\L\liCti ttl 1,`:1 I:li~l) fttl: 141:1:.\(I I ltl :1N1 I:\I'RI ti~ ttl; I\11'1.11.1) \\':U:I:.1NI1't)\ 1111: tilUl,\t~ ltl: ~t)I'I I f )anti ,t.ur, du itol alluty thi i st lustun or Iinul:uwn ul utcnli ni.il or , on,i,lurnn.il rLlnt.t,;r,. :,, Ihr ehucr linut:wun, ui i~tlu,tun, nt.tc nut ;y,plt In tau. I hi, \\.ur.nut •,ni, tau ,prulti li dal n>;ht; and ,uu m,n' al,n Itati uthri n>;ht, tthtih t'.ut Iront ,parr to ,t.nr Cluitn tlunclliu,; :1nt• plaints lur dcliit, und.t thi, 1\,ur.uut ntu,t br rrpnnr<I to .11,idr, Cun,untri art •. i,;, Group. I-ti00-Itit)-I I II ttnhut the ttaii.unc prrtod.In~l prumptlt ahtt di,.utcn .,I dti tlennrd drfict. tlr;inhin~ thi drlit! tlannid I'i,~ul ,,I pnuluit purih.t,i ,uul pua,l of prop, i n uu nrt,hilt is rryui«d Gu in,i,a~r hrrrundir Ihr Ituutruttnit nt.tc br .t,l.rd to cuutplrtr a yuisuunn.tin• and ,ubnut photos antVur santplr, ur .u .\I,ulrs ,ymun..t rrason.Iblr luuc,hall hr alluttid fur in>pnuun putpu,rs. I hi nhli~anun of :\bali. undi r thi, \\'m r.utn•. ,hall hi prrlui ntrd unit b, prrv,n; di,i,~n.nrd .utd cuntpi n,.uid b.' ,lbulr lur Ihat p~ipu,i .uul a suhirit to all other ptuci;uut> n(thi, \\'arr,uut. The uti:;ntal tt•urann prruxl ~h.tll not hr r.\trnd- cd he :utt' sup h tt orb prrlui mid. btu the n•ntautin~ tt:ur.uut' untr prii,~tl ,h,Ill ionunui nt illiit and br apple-.Ihlr unJii the tcrnt,.tnl iundiuou,,,f the, \\',oiantt u~ the tt,ut.uut ttnil. prt(urntrd. ,\ tulur tari.ut.r nt,tt u.tur hrtttirn ,utt nett rrpla.rnt,•nt panel nt ,,unpait,un to tltr orI}inallt' in,tallyd p.util, Bur u, ttc.nhinn•~ ispo>uri ,ut.l ttuuLl not hr ut,h..uni ul dileiutr ~idnt~or ~ulln .\I,idc rc,iitr- Ihr Ie'ht u~ dt,iuntinuc nr i hank arse ,idnt,' of .ulht ,Is nt.uull.u'lu«d. II iti ,idin~ ,•r ,ulht ,•n~in.tllc ut,tallyd arc not .tc,IiLlblc .utd 11>itlr Jitinnu,i, to «plarc the dilrititi ;uhn; 11a,1i ,hall hate the right tu,uh,tiuuc ~uluy;.~t ",Ihr tl.•,t;natitl M .11,u1r to hr ul iyual yu,tlut 11>uli m.tc chit to rclund Ihr ori:;ut.tl porch,-r pittr lur „nit the drlriuir nt.urtt.tl,. I ~ RENO CONSTRUCTION I 1600 Rhomberg Avenue Dubuque, Iowa SZUO1 (319)556-4503 i ~ l ~ c lsie_Hereby Submit Specifications and Estimates For . •~~~ t tl " ' 5 ~= Street Jab Name Cit , State, Zip Job Location ,~ L . -, Architect Date~of Plans Job Phone Proposal Submitte To Phone Date /j 1- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r 1rn ~i~ ~~11cz e~~~1 ~~i - - .:~~~~C~ ~~ < < ~ ~~. 1 't ~ ~~ ~7 _ ~~~~ 1 l 1 ~ \L:~ s ( ~. ~=~ c~, ^~S We propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications, far the sum of dollars (5 S ~ ] ~ k:.~1~', > Payment to be made as follows ` L ~~ T. •t Authorized Signature ~ ~ ~ Note: This {~.{-oposal may be withdrawn b \us if t accepted within .t ~~. v ~days_ l Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ F [? Q ~ Q ~~.. ~ L Signature The above prices, specifications, and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted_ You are authorized to do the wort: as Signature specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of acceptance /~ ~ ,r~y/ March 23, 1999 i;~ 3 ~ AL AMES Lead Removal 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner way siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6 300 Price is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump sidin~in their trailer at no charge if #hey do not, then the price will be significantly higher. Tenant will need to be removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around $7.00 per sq. ft.=$700 per square x 35 = $24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Wil( charge to strip--$40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not inculde repairing siding or painting Tenant will need to be removed from residence approx. 7 to 9 weeks. w' ~ I ~~-- -=~ ~~~ ~«::~ iJ JJ ~3~T CO,til,di,~RGI,aL LE~~D TEL: 1-X14-X39-?l8~ p. t)i}? i ; ; DU~UQU~BANK& T~'USl a1Ere9ER HEARTLAND FINAPIClAC USA, rNC. i]4?LF'I"4A(A%SYJf P.0.3AYii9 D~6GCU`,bt6?~G17i"3 ?H^^NF (Jf9)337~_!'!..U iL!!fgcc /6UU)J6i •ZUOU F,t%(Jf41 iSd-?v:; July 26, 2000 Vicki Bechen Tim Wood 575 English Mill Lane Dubuque, IA 52003 _ RE: 623-b27 Arlitt~aton Dear 'Vicki & Tim: As per your request, I have reviewed the financial data for 623-627 Arlington for the purpose of advising you, as owners, of the capacity to borrow money for improvements to this property. Although no formal application has been made, this letter should serve as a general description of policy requirements made by Dubuque Bank & Trust in evaluating the value of income producing property. Based on the income and expense figures provided, I believe the value of the property falls in the X30,000 range. This rou'h value is achieved by subtracting operating expenses such as taxes, insurance, and maintenance from gross rents. It also includes allocations for vacancy and management fees to run the project. pnce a net operating income is determined, the bank divides it by a CAP rate-currently 10`%. The bank may then lend up to 75 0 of that appraised value, or in this case, 522,500. Although this CAP rate is seen as a goc.l general Wile of thumb for our industry, you may want to seek a professional residential appraiser who can more adequately determine value based on additional methods and criteria. Hopefully, you will find this information useful not hesitate to call me at 589-2069. As always, if you have any questions, please do Best regards, William ~I. CaIlahan Vice President Commercial L,endin~ WHC/hlf 7 JB[op~,~ ,319 X56-3392 ~~i~ 319/556-3443 ~«n .J~ irciaer, ~~~, X41.7 C...enfu~•t ,.LJrive ~u6u~u~, .~owa s2oo2 Vicki Bechen Tim Wood 575 English Lane Dubuque, Iowa 52003 In caJ.culating return on investment all expenses, includitiy interest on debt, must be used in the calculation. Respectfully submitted, JIM KIRCHER, CPA,.P.C. B ~~ ~. Y Jim Kircher, CPA.... irn ~~ ircher, ~ ~, Vicki Bechen Tim `Wood 575 .English Lane Dubuque, Iowa 52003 .1a~op~wrse 3t9/SSh-3392 .}~~~ 319555-.i4~13 ~~ l s ~e~tt (u]]r~ ~.Urive ~ubt~r~uv. J`owa ,$?U~2 In calculating cash flows for a rental prcject, principal and. interest on: the debt must be included in the calculation. Respectfully submitted, JIP~I kI/RC~HER, CPA, P . C . y 66~~ Jim FCircher, CPA _,,1 k.. ._, .~~ ~~~ ,-, ~a~ap~wns 3! 9!536 3392 ~~i~ 3! 9,556-3943 ~int ~irclier, ~~.~t, 8 /.S CJsreEur~ .-Uriva ~u~~~«~, J`ocua 52002 July 28, 2000 Vicki Bechen .Tim Wood 575 English Lane Dubuque, Towa 52003 Re: 623-627 Arlington Street Per your request the following is information on the cash flow of --Ehe Arlington_Street property based on information from your 199S tax return. (See atcached) Gross Rents and Deposits $ 8,417 Total Expense 8,000 Net Taxable Income $ 417 Adjustment for Cash Flow: Add: 'Depreciation 1,019 Less : Principal payment on debt (1) (1,532) . Net cash flow (deficit) $ (96) Adjustment to Cash Flow: Management (self) (2) (371) Security deposits included ii'. rent 990 Adjueted project deficit $ (1,457) { 1) Coders return on equity and replace*net?t reserve . (2} 5$ of rent ($8,417 - $990 x 5%' _ $371). Tf you have any further questions please feel free to give me a call. Respectfully submitted,, JIM KIRC CPA, P.C. B ~~ ~ Y Jim Kircher, CPA JK/sd (7~1 B ~ W PROPERTIES L.C: 42-Z44Z039 Page 2 grow ~`se kind and bcatkn of each property. ' ~-- - ~ 023-27 AcZT~SNGTON ..~ ; ` ~QSVQcr , zow~ r F G Properties Rents! Real E.lafe Income ! E r= ~ G { 2 Gross rents .................... 2 8 , 417 . - ~_ i F9Cnia1 Real,Estste menses f 3 Ade~erCSing ..................... 3 Z 1 . ff ~ AUtO and V3YP1 ..... . ........... 5 G'esnin9 srrd mainrenance........ 5 4 6 6. . ~ fi Cammissons .................. ' 6 _ r Insurance ..................... L 7. 2 7 5 .1 ~ S i.egal and orhar professional tees... 8 3 0 . { . ~- 9 trterest ... . .:................. 9 { 1 7I 6 . ~ ~ 10 Raps.~•s ........................ 10 ~ 3 62 8 . . ~ 11 Tsxes ............. . .......... { i T . { 812. .~V _~ 12 tl~ities ....................... 12 I Z 6 . I { 13 Wagas and satvries ...'.......:.. 13 { _ 14 Deprscia#On (see instivctions) ..... 14 { 1 010. 15 Omer;list;-Ser3 Attached 27. ,I ~ 5 T~. I I I I 1 G Totsl ex~pansw !Or each proputy. Add Imes 3 through 15........... ` 16 ~ $ , 0 0 0 . _~ GU 9 83.51. NTF:;v7] GIB 3"9 .,.-on F l~ ~aKe~~C ~ l~f W $~r7~ .August 16, 2000 Historic Preservation Commission City Hall Dubuque, Lq 52001 RE: Tim Woods, Vicki Bcchcn -- 623, 627 Arlington St., Dubuque, L4 52001 Historic Preservation Commission Application: Request for Siding Gentlemen: This cot7espondence serves as my response to the application being considered to adhere siding on subject property over the existing deteriorated wood siding as presented in the application and agenda of the Historic Preservation Commission. I regret that I am unable: to join you this evening to personally present my regards due to a conflict in scheduling. Viy perspective is presented as a former mcmGer of the Historic Preservation Commission and as a resident of the West ] 1 `s Street Historic Preservation District. !also note that my personal residence is located approximately 3 blocks from the subject property. During the course of the past several months when improvements were being considered to this property by the Historic Preservation Commission, 1 have extensively toured the exterior of the property from tl^~c street, Goth front and rear. ,~iy unprofessional findings indicate the property exterior to be in a poorly maintained condition, which includes rotting wood siding and steps, gutters filled with growing weeds and in general exterior disrepair. In addition, inappropriate changes have been made to the property believed by previous owners over the past number of years resulting in the property poorly reflecting on an improving neighborhood. T respectfully zequest the application as submitted be c 'cd based on past findings and practices of the Historic Preservation Commission and the inappropriate application of material not deemed appropriate by National Trust for Historic Preservation Gtudclines far I'rescrvation. I, furthermore, request cansideration be given by the property owners and Historic Preservation Commission to a compromise. Recommended structure! changes would include: Rcpiaceincnt of the front horizontal inappropriate windows with appropriate double-hung windows. 2. Rcptacement oFthe porch with an appropriate small porch over entry doors. 3. Repair and replacement as necessary oCrotting eaves, gutters, fascia board, vertical end boards, rear porch and steps with appropriate and a.~: original material. I would encourage the use of vinyl, aluminum or steel siding on the horizontal areas of the structure. Again, all decorative vertical trim, soffits, bottom boards, molding, ete. would remain as original or as replaced with appropriate material. -3'iiis solution renders the property to be complimentary to the neighborhood and visually pleasing. The property valve will be significantly enhanced, by the atsthetic and practical improvements. In additioA, as may be feasible at a fitture daft, the horizo~~tal siding can be replaced with appropriate wood siding. Any consideration of an economic hardship by the applicant should be scrutinized closely by the Historic Preservation Commission as the property value when purchased refIa:ts its deteriorated condition and the lack of exterior maintenance reflects lack of appropriate reinvestment by the current ownership up until this date. 1 respect the efforts of Mr. Woods and 141s. Bechtn to make improvtmcnts to their property to reduce maintenance and to enhance the long-tetnt property value. 1 believe the alternative proposal, as detailed, meets their goals while being consistent with Historic Preservation Commission's goals of enhancing the preservation district with sppropri~tte improvements. This alternative should not be deemed arbitrary or capricious as a similar solution was applied to a deteriorated property at 1028!1030 Walnut Street on Qctober B, ] 9$S while I was on the historic Preservation Commission. Again, I regret that I am unable to share my views in person, 1 will be available at your convenience should questions arise from the applicant ar the Commission. Sincerely, ey P, Mozena 7 Grove Terrace Dubuque,]A S200I - - - ------ -------- ---- -- CITY Or flU3l~LQU~~1Qwa ___ _ ,rA_ ------- tSUDL1JItVLa t'CtiMi i Ht't'LllrH i lVIV ~.:,•;,'T,:,- o~ - ~ I ~ Z o ------ -- -- - - -- -- -- -- - _ Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. - r _ - _ - -PERMIT NUMBER -- l - 76 ~ = ~ - ~~ _ - . . - ADORE----'-- - --- - ----- ' + - --- - N LEGAL LOF-NO-----~---- - BLK- ------ SU801VISION - - ----- DESCA. _ f ~ •' _. _- --` - -- (p SEE ATTACH OWNER- -- -: ------------ -- - ADDRESS--- - --------- ---,..._--- - -TELEPHONE=.-, ` _ -T.~ ~r.y - - - 2 CONTRACTOfF - ---- ----- -- -- --ADOR TELEPHONE `- - -- ~ - 3 ~ r~~' ~ ~./ K. ~ r ~ ~ LJ r ~-• t ARCHIF£CF, ENGINEEfl OR DESIGNER--- --- - ADORESG 4 _ _ i - ~ ~ --7ELEPNONF- --- ._ _ ~•.. _ _ --- --• - S 1 - - ON SITE INSPECTOR--r ----. - --- -ADDRESS- 'i `-- -TELEPHWNE - - -{. ~- 5 r . - .. . - - . _- ,- - -- -- - ~ USE Of 13U1I~INl3 --- - --- - _ . - . C•- 7 Class ofwortc: ^ NEW ^ ADDITION ^ ALTERATION ~'~REPAIR ^ OVEN ^ REMOVE i - 't ~- - ~~ r- - - ~ .Sb fTi~ ~- Q f ci ~'-' - -'_'~ " i - - - "'- - _ •- .. -- ~ -. - - _• _ D@SCflbe WOfk: /~ •~/ 7 • II '' - --- -- ---- -- --- WaYk- ? r ~ ~ _.. W~ l f - ~/-~. s ~ .,.--~- -,eon , r ~~ ~ ~ , 9 Change of u e~ FROM _--- -- - --- - ----- _ - - ------------- _ .. _ _,- -S-Z-T1--- - - ~ -~_ _ i. i_ •a _ i cv-_ - - - - _. ~ Valuation of~work: Construction S ~~ ~ Completed Cost S- 3 4 d v SPECIAL C.ONO1TlONS: - - ~ a PLAN CHECK FEE • ~ ~ ~ ~ r - PEflMIT FEE _ . - .---•.-.. .e -^ - - -- - •-(--- ~^---- '- ; ._ - -- - - - .~'-~..-- -- / ~ . - - ~~ ill i to ~- - -- . , _- -~--_ Type of--- -- N Occupancy. .- __._ _ _-- ._._ .__V_--._---_. __.- -- _-- _ _-_-- Const--.._ ~ Group -- R- Division ~ - .~ ~-- - - -._,-_ _.... - - -- - - •- -- ~- - Slze of Bldg. -_ ,.__ Nd: of -.. - - Max. Occ:-'- - -c -_- _ . _ _ _ .~ r .~. _.._ -, _ - _ _ ..__ ~.. -. Total Sq. FL'''.._. Stories ~x ._'r - : Lcad _ ~-- ~• -• No. of ~ Zoning ' ~ Basement Dwelling Units Dist. ~ ~ 3 C No ^ Yes ~•~.ft - Historic - Otf Street Parking Automatic Extinguishing Dist `l Req Prov System p No ^ Yes • NOTICE Special Approvals Required Received Not Requir=d - - PLUMBING HEAT SEPARATEPEPMITS AFB REQUIRED FOR ELEC TR1CAL ZONING =- ^- - X-: .. --.- _ ` - t ING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. _ __ _ _ _-__ HEALTH DEPT. ____ -- `_-_ _ -_ _ _ THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID !F WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORiZEII 1S OR NO~COMMENCED WITHIN 780 DAYS IF CON FIRE DEPT. ~ ' _ - - -- - ,- - STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD _ SOIL REPORT _ __- - - __ _ _ _. _ _ _ OF 780 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. SITE PLAN _ ' ... _ ~ 1 HEREB`rCERTiFY THAT I TiAVE READ-AND EXAMINED TNIS~APPLICA• TION ANO KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT ALL PRO CITY ENGINEER •. - - . - VISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK PLAN REVIEW /~ - WILL BE C.DMPLIED WTTH WHETHER SPECiFTED HEREIN OR NOT;-THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO ARCHRECTIENGINEER VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR BOARD OF ADJUST. LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION - }iIST. PRESERVATION _ _ _ J.-r -~f . S1 AT Rc NTRA TOri OA AUTHOR~D AGENT (DA E) ~ - S ~ ATUAc WNEA QF O ER BOIL DER) ~- - (DATE) ~ ~-- WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE? THIS IS YOUR PERMIT APPLICATION AG:,EPTED BY: PLANS CHECKED BY: - -- APP VED FOR ISSUANCE 8Y: ~~ >Lr,r B"~ White - Flle • Yellow -Applicant • P1nk -Assessor • Gold -Auditor ~ Certi~ic~te of Appropriateness THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Dubuque Historic Preservation Cc~amission has reviewed and approved plans for improvements ~vzthin the W . ~ I~H S-f~..~"~f-- Historic Preservation District. The Ccnmission has determined that: '" a) Work to be done will rat have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural sioPnificance and value of either the property itself, or of the neighboring iu~rov~ents in such district; and b) The proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the district; or c) The denial of a certificate of appropriateness would prevent the owner of the improvement within an historic district from Parnirg a reasonable return or enjoying a benef icial occupancy or other interest in his property. THEREFFORE pursuant to Section 19z-8(b) of tl-~e City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances, more specifically known as the Historic Preservation Ordinance, approval is hereby given to the building co¢missioner, city engineer or other local authorities to grant required regulated permits for improvements. APPROVAL GRAiN"II;D SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ~~ ~ - „ f~t'wcb, dakM 5: csa~t ¢ - a t- o ~l~ w 1 o W ~'~ ~ 5 Y-' e~tyi4E' co~NE~ h~.oH,lrfi ~ eR 3/~t" ba4~5 ~~ eft APPROVAL GRP,~NTED T0: Property Osmer Date ~0~6_3o w~-~N~i ~-~$«ir~Ti~l Property Address Prop y ~ v ent Si.nnnage Si~~ned Chairpers Historic Preservation CoIImission VERIFICATION: Date Cczimleted work ca~lies with the provisions of t1-lis certificate: Yes No If No , L~'hy? • _ca ,~ ~°~~~~~~~i~ ~j A~~~~~~-~~~ THIS IS TO CITIFY that the Dubuque Historic Preservation Commission and approved plans for ir~rov~;eats ~~-i tin the ~'1/. /~ r~ ~~- Historic Preservation District. T"ne Coymission has deterTSred that: a) Work to be done will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural sio~nificance and value of either the property itself, or of the neighborir~ iu~rovements in such district; and b) The proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the district; or y c) The denial of a certificate of appropriateness would prevent the o~-ner of the improvement ~sithin an historic district from earnir~ a reasonable return or enj oyi r~ a benesicial occupancy or other interest in his property. ' THER"FO.T~~. pursuant to Section 19 ~-8 (b) of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordi~-~~nces , more specifically known as the Historic Preservation Ordinance, approval is h°,reby given to the building c .~~'ssioner, city er~ineer or other local authorities to grant required regulated permits for i,~~provanents. ~DPROV~L GR.~~TED SUBJECT TO T:-y FOLLO?~1I\G CONDITIONS APPROV.~s, GR.~\'TFD T0: Pr Qtly ~CvTle` Dale ~028'3~ U~~~~w~ f~dj~ Prope= _ _.tcress ~rODertV Li rOV~ment~SigP?ge S'"^ed ~- C'CL-i lrp er S On Historic Prese_-~,-ation Cc~;r,~.ission Vc?,IFIC:1TIOi• Date C~J~ t?LeQ :•:Or: CCfP.pI1C'S CTitC: tC1e D:"O: ~510?~S OL t.`11S CCrt_i? C;1te: 'i e s i;0 T_L ~,O r.;R;~~ ~er~i~~c~~e vY~ ~ppropriate~ess ~,. __ _. TrIIS IS TO Cr~TIFY that the Dubuque Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed anal approved plans for ir~rov~nents ~,ritnin the W , ~ I~ ~-n.~._ Historic Preservation Disi~-ict. The Camission has determined that: a) Work to be done wi11 not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architect~al sioQnificance and value of either the property itself, or of the neighboring immrovenents in such district; and b) The proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the district; or • c) The denial of a certificate of appropriateness would prevent the owner of the improvement within an historic district from earning a reasonable retu.-n or enjoying a beneficial occupancy or other interest in his property. THER:"FORE pursuant to Section 19 2-8 (b) of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordina-:ces , more specifically known as the Historic Preservation Ordinance, approval is hereby given to the building coani.ssioner, city engineer or other 1oca1 authorities to grant required regulated permits for improvements. APPROV_~L, GRAi~ITED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWII~'G CONDITIONS iN ~si~' - c-oLO~'• IoNi~l ~[K~ o a--czge °~l ~ / ss- Date Property Address Property Improvement/Signage APPROVAL CR.~V"PLD T0: Proper ~ Ow-n Signed Jam/, ~~""~ Chairperson Historic Prese.:rvation Comnissior. «IFICATION: Date Ccr~mleted work ca;mlies c~-i th the provisions of this certificate; Yes No I~ No , GTn,.~? ,..mod.----Sc.J4r~ tf_._f_~~3ooetv~.. fs- _ -- -- - -°_ C9- - ._ ~w`.;;.~_ x~:~.~.~~~~,~a ~$ T ~tct.- ...fps-t~}rp ~'~°~_` x'`~~- . ' ~~ ~ +?,oS~S 'o~.I ~038.,-oaBS!2 .. "'"-h ~o.K-. ~`' - .-_ Reosietl Dy I I -0 30 ~ ~ 0 3o Yi wcC..,k't- I AOO~wed Oy 1 -~_ 2 ----~- --- ~-~~- ~-_ ------__- 4 -~-- --~--- 1 -~--- 5 6 I• - _ I i - - i I II II i ~ I u I iI .I 1 it ~ Ii ~ it j li !i C Q. II A ~ it ~ i II 3 II E x=S '~+V L A I~ II I'. li I~ 2 ,I S N!c~ A a ~ I~3~z ~ zN ! y ;I ~ ~~ L 5~~. AbOENdSX ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ Ooll 3 ll ~ I r 4 - e' ---- ~I - ~ f ~ - - ~ i ~ f ; r5/oo i' ii 7 ~~ I~' ~ ~ ~,~ ' ~ ~ ~ e 9 ; ~ i ~ - ~ .. ~I 11 II ~N~~.L-~ro N -- - j, _.`_ `- _ __ ~'! -___ _.1! ------ I' ,. to i I 12I; tCEC~^ft,Lygl. (., ~I! II ~ C.SE£, i3i~ 0~ ~ ~6a~-(noo -- - - 11 M~Y~ II ' 13 P~M~N C ~+~ ~l.L..,.,.~r'~I ~~ El.~c~~~ L. ~!L A'1s I~ /f?~~cc ~J i .S`,{3 i :30 ~~ '112 14 ~ ~~~ ~~. Ho ' i!"°,~_ j `~c~ :$-jp~ ' ~ __BSLSSO' - - .: 13 ~ +~e, #~A-~r1~q -~ 15 ~ r~ II J _ ~ ~ ~~tE .~~ D ~ I ~ I ~~ 14 n '' I -- 1111 ~ ~0~00000 ~9R-- ~9V122 ~~114~~ " ~ Std I ~ ,- ~ I' '~ S~ove.s ~ _~~e~e;A~ ~o¢S_~ _~-~o aC1 S- - ~ SEF -ro --- - --~-- 314-D_o0''--- --- - -- ~~ is I _ Ls - - k~' fzx~uri~S ~. Es-~s~,g~e,_~ ~~ _~ 33~oo~f ~ is ij ~'av'~rvJ ~~ ~ Z+.1~t~s~-- C, Oa,~ ;.v I -fro ~v ~ ~~ 30 0' 001; 1~ , 7 1s : ~ f~s I~ ~Oooocl~ 18 ~ ; C~ ~ ~~r~'" I~ I I i zo ~l .~ mo.~~. At.Q, IS - _. ,... - -~I _ ~ ~ l 3 0 oil 19 21 'I ~' ----------~~_ ---- - - -- i , II - 22ii ~p~L nn -- 1~,,. At3~, ~j/~~,S~~v/~ ~S+L.~.~s1~-L' _ _ I~ - ~ QI ! 21 23 ' W N S 1~7~G~rD ~ lip Sys ~4/l~- ~,C1LC , f I 2 it i i i L.S;a~Rn 2 24 I~ i i' 23 i .~ I~ ~ ii ~ 24 ---- --- -- .. l ,I I- - Cz .~,,,` o~' Du bl' j I~ ~' SS / 8 7 80_;; . 27 I f A~~ D ~ 2 ~ ~ O o0 o v ;; 28 3Q '; ~ ~C~ ~~ II ~I ~ ~ I I' 3„' To~L .- -Fs,~..t ~:SNC~ ----Q~IiPRoJ~-~ ~I- ~, I336oa~ ;.ze J tl --- i! ~7(e s~'3 Sid' 30 33 ~ it li - .I' - - ~ 132 ~.' i' li j' i i _ ~i 33 ]~ .j Ii Ii ~{ ii i:34 li ~ ~-------- ---+- - ---------- ' -- -- I I, - ~I _ li ;~ ~I --- - - - " L3~ _ .~.,, . Ali & W Construction - ~~' ~Y-~ ~-~, P.O. Box 301 ~~~ ~-_ ~` r Holy Cross, Iowa 52053 . ~ - ,~ ~~;` -- y '^~~; `lt ~. TED MATERS 870-3265 ~ DAN WILWERT 870-4865 = i*'-~--"j= ~^ Date: cC, 7~ / y ~ y Address: 4Jc~lw u r .~ r n~,~(~ ?o, Job Estimate: ~'1rS~PNS ,S'~-t,,,,~;tt n..o1'S Price to include: 1. ~n_rsnl{~ * ].. rQrA cra arll w1o7~riQ f dH inside A- r9~.~ c1.P~ ~ / ~n~ r - 2. 12~-== ~~ ~ilr`Qiv~G LI-Z a la ift~-{~l// l~ 6C+~' .~ ~~nr1 , ~ /~ 3. Tdck ..t II /~ A ~<<~/Air1r YiG. ~ 11/lL~r 'r'rCS~`' ~+ j-in x+Iayo. tLl -~ 980.C nn ~ Joeur -C'l oc~- fabrr ` 4. 7` tQ rV1 P 1 /` ~ L tn1 L 1 ~ {,~' /yO ll G~ h o r Q I'i P P~O.oPY ~O r ~ j' ~ ~?- 6 a p ~vl f /1 16a S P wr a -'1 T' _ l~ l~ ~~ri'o S. fr[t-tiiF- ~tr t -IO(~~"' op7~ 5, ~/C~ C'PItI iNC ~ 1!fl.cl loosprn.nT ~ /7SO.G J V ~ ' 6. ~t_ off: T r -~i u wf ~ Gu i rt ~ o A P n i ~n c ~ry ~ O ~" ~' .~ ~G~ Oc l 7. _F~uK.P A ~„ ~ ~'lcor 4!J)~ S ~ L~yrn~J~ ~ aoo~~i« L_~a7pt)a/ 1Sl 6 S/O ~c 8. /0 6 i ~' ,il D 0 Oc ~~ Tv~S~'cr(! ~ ctQ~~ ~~ol S ~ /7' f'~h tPrson f+cdfPr,`vl ~ S3Sn P 10. ~pr'wtca - ~L,;>1~,~ r.~I.~r.Qoty /tr~~ lubnr' - ~ o?DO OG 11. /~/~a7 007' LJ~%~~ Lvnrk'In i.1 G~'nFPr' •~7 a~p0 Ofl it ~ t .... (O .T. u. ff ......T .}7 [ S..... ~ rrJf- : ~ ........................... ~ ~ y a.S 0, ctti"~ With payment as follows: ~. - E,~h'~ ~~,~ q T J ~ M & W Construction -_. - - .--_ P.O. Sox 301 Holy Cross, Iowa 52053 ` TED MAIERS 870-3265 ~ DAN WILWERT 870-4865 b u ~ t,~ T Date: Nov ~ 2~~~~ ~ Address: l~~/r, u 2` ~~._.(~~-L r Job Estimate: ~ ~ S Price to include: ' ~ G i tH Pit 7' ~ -~'loc~~ S /Nq rDYI a~ - ,~//07~. L t. ~l~ ~errrlrlP 60ur~~ t.~nrj~rl /4 b c t ,~/ ~SU, c 2. -- -- i 3, l~n 5 trfa 1 -t _~ i~ ~ bP r a,l-c•~ S ovt Sc'~FC~r~t 1 s D' Mu tPrlc- '" ~ /7_SL r ! ~7 ~ ~o c ~ / ~ SL7 /~r',% h r+t. r ~.~ ~ 7`- cL~t_~ ~ r ~~ / h O f j~~ P ct lJ~ ~ c+ T 1'1 -~~ut~ r i ~9ul~or; u/ -~ ~ ~.5~, 5. ~a ~ n / .~ /400 t 5. ~- - ~7. .S7~rr: n ~ ucrrnis in dear s - `~ ~ r f~ l - oy' t /a6~~ - ~' S'oo. ~ s. 9. to. ~c~nti'' fiNOb ~ 1 f. /cr ~ n /' - ~ '~Ff ~/. tt. ~4srtr ~6c~h ~'lco~5 ~ ~'af/r~rP ~al~Prir, .....T~-~.U.~......~~.:.~..~~~.e ................................ /6 ~9~. With payment as follows: ~-,ch;b~,- A ._-- --- M & W Construction P.O. Box 30t Holy Cross, Iowa 52053 TED MATERS 870-3265 ~ DAN WILWERT 870-4865 Date:_~cy. 7, / 9 ~rr~/ Address:l~lr~/ham r Sr ~. 6~,.. c~ ~ / .z'r Job Estimate: _ M 4 1 Nr 5 - 5 , b ,,,, ; rt a~ ]`-s Price to include: ` t. Sal- nL,;~a~ S ~ l'~„!17'Pr' 7'bTs ~ U .n; ~,'r s ~ ~ yG S/ ftlcr><p~fa/ ~ 2. ~f, s o r v ; ann /4 io c r' .~ lam? O O ~ 3. t/.,clorlc~imohr~ i~ .f"i'lc{~tPn 3 A h«thr~n.~,,c /r1~rfPrl4•/ ~ S/S/O c~ 4. _~ t~irf )S (n ~( ~a7'S ~~~oP - ,~ SOD LK~ s. 1Qa/se ,o; rc'h on Dn/cW ran-' ~ a A,o/ f i~ ~l/•~c fcrr7~r,u/ J~' ~i'a t/ o-c 6. ~' ~ n >: h ~! o t tc~ ~ -1"S /.J r /S r~- / 4 x 9 D rc. b r r .,~ y0U [JU - 7. ~`3 S6 i.;~, / t/cQrnc ~ 'c ^7cr7`orlul ,~ ~8~ e. ~ 1 6 0 - ~4' ~ ao. 9. _ -~o -c~'~'; t,~ ?3 A ~ rF-~ r S /rlu7`prtU I .1~ /U ~ a r to. ~crbor - .~' sso, t t t . ~1; sc . ,~ ~~o o~ ~-v~ul ~y,;s ~crJe ,~ /3 Fs go, a~ Total Estimated Cost ....... .~ yS, O a /. ~ 7`l1 i 5 ~ 5'i< i M« 7~ With payment as follows: 6ODO. ~c~ YG'CC. Ct` jnc~Uuo S -~-«,,' W ~ ~ h Q to r'!-P(~ Cuff ol'1 f>ra~, F~J Cu h o+,~ c 1 O SFrQ 1 n r~l,h~ ~lasrQ~Prl w ~~~~, S,c0~~1' ,~ ?D~/. G=-c~ Gl~c~1 ccw+ lof;d~ O~ Tr; ,~,~ ^, Ex~~b+~' A ~~ -_ _.' - --.~ -.r. . P.O. Box 301 .t, ~ ~,~,;.i _, Holy Croas, Iowa 52053 ~ ~'~~~~~~~~.: -:' ~`~ _ TED MATERS 870-3265 ~ DAN WILWERT 870-4865 """`"''~ -'-'~: ..:~~, e:~~~ A ua . ~(. l9 ~ . x .. _ ~ Address: 4)c. /rt u 7 S r ~r, ~ . ~ci `~; ~~ Job Estimate: _~ul_4r~ _~r ~ m; ~ rQP TS. Price to include: 1. _s~ C % c,' ~ /1 4 ~ P C 7`' r m r~, r -~ A~ ys O o~ ~ CrU' 2. '7' C' c~ it c t-0 ~~ L~~ n r k -~4~ g ~~ d Q 3. f' ,91 / ~ c.~ t, n ~ 7' C /' P t~ c7 i r f ~ ~ S r~ f '~% N ~ ~ ~ O U tr-['~ 4. _7- CaNS7'ru<t~ TrDnr ,Pp~c f, ~ ~3O p-t,^ 6. -t l,~; ~ c,C o ~ ~ c~' o ~ c cr ~t~ ; u s t rv, ~ r~ ~. .~' .~7 a D o-t~ .~7. _-~-_ ~a' ~ ~~~r~Q c a ~nu~~.~ c~~;., c~ ow S ~ .~ 3 ~O cTU' a. -~--~ -ru I ,Ql ~ ~ ~ -~' ~ a s o ~. 10 .~ 1 t. ~'-~ t o ~ ~ r7 c~ S / L~ Y S C-c.~ Total Estimated Cost ................................................................ 7 6 02 0~ C~ . O~ ~= With payment as follows: t r A~~ ~d=~ ~ ', CITY OF DUBUQUE, 10WA MEMORANDUM August 17, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission U FROM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager ", SUBJECT: Appraisal for 623-627 Arlington Street This afternoon, Planning Services staff received the attached appraisal prepared by William Luksetich for the property owned by B & W Properties at 623-627 Arlington Street. The appraised value of the property "as is" has been established by Mr. Luksetich as X33,000. The appraised value of the property with the recommended improvements of vinyl siding on three sides and restoration of the front facade has been established by Mr. Luksetich as X38,000. This appraisal information is provided at the Commission's request for consideration ofthe application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship by B ~ W Properties for the installation of vinyl siding on all 4 sides of 623-627 Arlington Street. Attachments cc B & W Properties, w/att. APPRAISAL OF REAL PRUPERTY LOCATED AT: 023.27 Arlington St. All of Lot 807 in A. hlc0arnels Sub. DubuGue,tA 52001 FUR: Planning Sarvice of OubuGue ACn: hlar< Nobia: 50 Wes; 13tH St; Ciry Hall; DubuGua, IA 52001 AS OF: Augcst .o, zcao SY: William H. Lu~isa;ich ~j 1 S F•_n G.t3 -•fJl•tl :':OJ'ar',v,,COwi' docausal ;,.^.v]r. Cy t!~ maC~. ,'.. - 1~31'.Q•~tL.1VICCc 00-3-R LUKSciiCH A?PRF,IS?,LS 2255 J. F. '{_~VN_DY RD. DU3U~U_. IA. 52CC2 (319;555-38-0 Dcte: august 10. 2000 C!ienC ~ICnrdrg Seriic25 of Dubuq.:a address: 023-27 ,~r!ingron St. Dubuque, I~ 52001 To `whom it ~~:?ay Concern: In cacordonce with your request for an opprGiscl or the above mentioned propery, I hareby submit the following complete CpOr ;,SCI report In G summcry report fOfmCt. -- I The a. ~eched report contains the description, anclysis cnd supportive dcta for the conclusions and final ast,maie of vcfue for the subjact propery. In my opinion, the 85timCted mCri:?t value Of the subject propary CS Of the 3CBCtive dpte Of this report is 533,000. SinCBre!y, r / I 1 ~ ~/ -~~~~~~~ William H. Lu~setich . ;r;;1 OC'!a -''Oi:L ZOCO '_. err?~'.v i" aC~ri; a~ ~eC.v 7f9 J'(3Ia T;.C'.. 'Ct. - ~-3CU-~,.,ld~0; SMALL RESIDENTIAL lNCOh1E PROPERTY APPRAISAL REPORT fi;e t,o. eo-a-~ '.ii o 3•~7 Arlir :Cn ji. :. r+ D:. jiii9 IA _~] : 5?007 +~ ^al D?;cr]tCn All or Lot 301 .n ~. ~;cDaro?IS Suo. Cccr:+ Dubucus ?star'; ~!>io 10-23-377~Ot5 3 t0-2--377075 "ax'(?zr '99.00 3. "~~'; i 323.CC SC izl .-;+si ?r:;; i 53= 30' ^,CCfrCCd :f?!C :!i 3:r? `,Id]?'' 19-C5' C'r i::i :'3[; GC07.07 ?^ ow?r Vicki Sac..^.er+T m SVOOd Curt.^! TNn?. 3. 3'N. ?r~oerres, L.C - rwrer Lnzct '/3C_ +Cv....a... _ '-r~ ?rCCef"/ .'Cr i aCafaii?^_ .~ d Jic; ~_, ,C^.C ?rC T+^ - ?LD 'CCf CCC,irn:n j NA S?'ei fir.? j NA '],° Cf S3'' `~A n?;C ^! Cn ? ^. S rrrcuc cf 3n :^x;^?ilCaraiicr; ?] ] a'C Cv ;?P ?fC •:Ci:?n; ?lannir^ 5?rr~Ca of Ocbu Ud CC:?is .~' `.13rk Mocl? 50 4'lest 13tH J'L G:v Ha!I' ^uOCCU?. IA 52C01 CCri;,! 'Pulliam H. Lu:<s?C,ch ;CC!?i; 2255 Joan r. ri?rr?Cv Rd: Dubucus. IA 5X02 LCC3uan ~ !;^g1 , Sceur]dn Rcr31 Pr°"crinar.t ~inyla family ncus,ng Pr?Cpm:r.ant 2-3 ;amily neus.n^ _ ~ " 9::1C up ~• ~,'+?r . j', ?S-i j ; UrC?r ?j ; ~ ~ 5mgiePamily -py- 'G- Occupancy ~ , CUJ) ly3j ~ 2-iramdy ?p'.. 7. Gcc:par.ry j (;cu) 7 _ :CMI fai'. ' ?c.id ~ ~:3C~? '_ $iC'.V , ~ G'Nr?f j35. La'N i~ l 3 G'N^+• 523. I_]'N i ?;Cperyvalusi :na?3s~rq ~ S;3ce _ C?c'ir.rq ^ T?n3r; 5200 Nirh 7C0- ' i'.^3r; I 5700. ?irn 7C CemanG'iupply J Snoraq? g 'n CaI3nC? ^ Over iuCply I ~ 'yaC3n; j0-j ,) I ?r?dcminznt g 'yaca;a (9S %) ~ ?recc-..:ant !d?f<zr.n i~^? ^ UrCer 3 ^cs ~ 3-0 '^^.i ^~ Ov+r d ~'nas. I _ ~ vac'."~ rcvx j'S1 ! 575. 90 ~ ~lacart rcv~r i~t ~ 5-5. Typical 2-i family bldg. iyp? ddtaChdd `fe. star?i 2 tJe. unrt; 2 Aqe ?0 yrs. i Present land ase X Land use change Typical r..^.ts S 325. b j 550. _ ',ncreasirq ~g $Lae -, D?:..,: Cr _ ._: i!y 93' g ! ct litil'/ _ I .kep c ;. reign]crnccd ap: vacancy 5 a _ Ineras;ng ~ SnC!? _ C?C:ricq ?-.tardy t j'; I _ :n ;r^c?s ;]: gent C;r,;:cs J Ye; ~ ?U _; L:+aiy t y°s Cr ~iRZly, Czscn... 'The Ddcucue Councr ; ~Iul~•tar;:ay 0'~ Trsasurer's office reoors that ;here is a or?liminarv strast assessm?nt m ;hs arr'ount of 5'03.30 I CemraC:al 2'S I on this orooar:v. ! ( t 0'; t Vote: Race and ;he racial campositian of the neighborhood are Hat acpraisal factors. VaighCCmoCd hCCnCareS dnd Cn3faC:?tI5CC5: The market area bOUndaft?S 3fe Loras Soul?yard on :he NOrh; 31uff J'.:?ef on ;ha the .35:: Univer5^, Avenue on the South: Walnut Strut on the West This is an old ra;idential market area comprised of same Cf Dubucua's fines: old homes. Some of these Cava had a.rensivs rer^..od?lin and some hays be?n conversC :o r?r.;al prco?vies. There is a=malt ar,.ouht of Hai hnomocd commercial use in the area. drers rat ar;ec; ~ a marxeacdiry cf ;"a preperes .n ~ t neignoomoed jprcximiry a emplcycert and am?.".aas. '"9lcrmmt AL^.iiir/, apea3l to raAtL at:.): ?ublic Darks. schools ar.d vanspora:wn era available to the area. Loras Cole a and down;o:•m Dubucue era within welkin distance makinc iris a desireable rehtal area. vacarcias in the ar?a era 5'S or lower. Thera ar? ,^o unfavorable factors a"ac:inq marketapui^~. i,:_ tcdewing avatlaCle li;rrgs represart ~._ mest :;:rtert, similar, aril 7rozima:e ::cper;r+? :r;?f_ei ;o ._ ~:q _ prC?ry in ~e ~.,bj?c. mi;;,crrwd. is arar/si 's :andM to evaluate ^e inv?rtcry curar.Cy on ]tz maf~eat rmeedng wr`I ~ a subje[: prpzr,/ in u : suet t Haig^bomeed ar.C rec?rt ,rice and .ref<ecnq 4ma Satds a':e^ng ~z a prcPZrt/. (Li;Srgi acsiCz ~ : >uhjec; neignhorleeC arz net convdered a;Clicarlel. The lirrq c:r. oaraeLS can be ^: rntal :r ;ale :cr,.,araCizs it ~ ^/ era eJr, ~^'/ to is IT_:VI i SU3JEC i I COti1P;R 13L: LISi'~NG ,'+0. 7 CO:VI?;q;9lc ! !S i'VG V0. ? I CChfP;.?,;3L: L~:STi :G V0. ? 523-27 A;lingtpn St. 271.73 Dorgan ?lace o25-23 Rhomberg Ave 1 1315 JdCRSpn St. ;CCns; Dubucue Dubucue Cubucue Dubucue ?raximi4r to iu^.i?Ct 5 blccks 7 2 blocks 10 blocks 1 i52n Crce ~ j NA L'cf. l ?Cr S =?.9C0 I " ~' ~ =cr... S 39.900 I Urt. ~. i -- ;]croximzt? G9.; 7.9921 2.120 I t.7G0 t.930 Ca;3 ;cur? I Appraisal I D.1LS. Assessor ! `•ILS. assessor I ;L1L$. Assessor i aJ I~ ItO: a 2 1 2 10 - 2 2 3 2 2 70 S' CCrazima;?v?arCCfa 17900 11915 ! t3?B 17390 =]cres. Czvi c ^z'<~t N,~, ! 7 50 days I ;0 days I t year = G]rCdf.iCn 7f asu.gi ;0 sGhj?C: pf]~]?."/: I h.dse Inrae COm par3b9 ii S:iCCi 3rB loco:?d 'n Simdd.' rer.;a. d - ? 3f? r0 sa~?s 0?ndinC Cr! :r lis:in S 3t this ::m?. "df<?t anCihcn~ .:~~ _;.._. _ 'zrdy ..?s .n ~:. iCOj?C, n?r .:.teed (:^ .__- .,. aee~n. :.?ignCcrccC ,nCiC_..,~ cf grow^ ._._. ;r.]."/ vase r ~ ice;=.::~.~,._. _: e3 e;drCic, Icdi Cu,:ccr;;. !r._es; ~u7CCw-s a;~ ..,r,ces;ices. _ ~,.a~<a`nq ire) arm ~revzlzr.c: dnC irc~,., in ~ L _ rznG'sup~iy, _-d ' The Cenaral market cCndi;ie:n in ;he DdocC_aland are_ is v ~ ' ^a' ; .~: mz,".<et ar:C 3 Chan e av?r ]zs~ ear.: Cer.;aiCaean ar ~?nCs .n IisCnq prices, z e _; _ / ^^ ~'•Y q ' Y .. considered to ba coCd. In 7?93. ;he int?rest ratan drooosd ;o a 30 veer lov:. i -av have risen slich;ly bet are s;il1 corsiderad ;o oa cCOd. P1eaS3 hole ;hat Ti5 iS 3 CCm01?!? a00raiSd reoor suomired in a summary reoor, format. Dimensar:s 50' x tGO' _ I icacG•apm/ Ievs1 to slcpinC Sde 3e3 5AC0 ,,,rr?r,Ct ~ `:3 ~ Y?5 S. ~ normal JpaCiFC ZCnir.q Gdisi5C3cCn and C.~]d ' ~•~A' A'rer'1d!? ^w0 family r?sid?n;.al jn3C? rec;anqular M ~ i i'^CI nanacicr~nq (Grarctacrzred us?) _, !IIr.;31 ~ !!c :]ninq '7ralnage 300?arS 3d2C'-:ad r;rirq campii3na? v L?g31 ~ ~~{, ?;e~.~~I'J;a ~ I DG~tf US? (?X„d:f) Vi?'N dVq. feSidBn al ^Iqf?St 3CG ]?;; '.i'. 3i IfnpfC'+?C: LanCri3pifq dydrage Utilities ?~:]uC L:n'_. I O;1-site lmpravemens Ty], c' aic ~nvat? 'Inv?:v3y none li N ~ ' :y o v _ ]::r'.'t ?3;'r:'.^.G ua ~ _ black~oe ;ric:^/ ~ Ga; _, ,.: Cor.crotd ~ _ l L I C v .C ~~~ ~ ~~ :l ,; `.; .~.,,.C:31 ~iCCd ^3:3rC .r~3 _ .'f 3;?r ~ ~ ~ ~ --.•.I; err X :1z] Da' J?p;. 19 ! S;r ~ i r;i ''?ctric San ;3ry i?::?r ~, _~ q' _' -. ~' ar^•. i,;.r'r i :'t?v nar.e _`d; !.too Va 195' 30 COC39 3 C3''".. __.., i? ?3;?r....,n...sr]3C.^.f^?:: Ci31 aii'i;,,..:.gyn. i,~C? _:?15. ~,i'_ ?I :f 31 CCr~CCn; ,r^~r ant^q. US?. ,.:C l Tha Siva iS aCaCC a:? 'Or ;^ ~Jn1!rdns ~ y • , ?a sam ar;5 Of 3:'C•'02C~'1 r'id.^.':3. ~CC9i5 :O tnd SI.C~?C: iii? iS IfJm ,4 iC n:'+ay :j~'1 ;'C.?r.;f 31 T:^dr, 3f9 np 30Car;^,: advars? iT.OfOvemdn;S. Avers Uet ;O Lofas 90UI?yard .O Pf3 ilia Jtre?; ;O Arlin ;nn $Ir??t. . ~.. _;J - ~.~ . _.'JJ'.~ ,..,..r.vi' __:rana S_C.va.. 7y ]'_ ....:. - ?:~~.._ ..~~_ S~~1ALL RESIDENTIAL l,`JCDI`~1~ PROPcRTY APPRAISAL REPORT genera" aescnpcan 'Jnis, ~IC^y i. 2 ' I dui Li 2 i'fG? (C?C,'3tt.) d?tdC^~ad C?s;gn (SC/I?) 2 S;onl Cuolex _ai nC~';,r000S?d exi-stin~~ L'ndzr.Crs•.^ic2cn co Y?ar 3udt t 900 _'._..'. 3G?(%.'S.) =5 Yea's ~ cr:+nCf azscnpuen (;.13;?r3lil:0nCKiCnJ raunCatton : 7UM1aCn SlOneiA~I?fdQ? ! S ^J r0 _.CenCr'N31i5 wOOC/AV?f3~ :3'al iadC_ n0 acct iL:'3~i? dSOf:d:SG OCd Sc-;, PUtr.;, n0 ~ ,,;-vii :•.vn;pti, aluminum/averape ! 73,:,Ct"si non? not?d 'Plir,CCw ^/;e dbl.hunc,,'Avara.? I j?-;~^,?nt minor" .,, I;;:rniair,Sc:rzn; aluminumJAreraga ..?S.i~.~, non3not=d I ",tanufac .nd `CUSin;' _ 'l?i ~ !!c ii ?3izmznt t 00 5 cf t„ kcr ?r?a '~~7;,~^;,li?i 'N!;1 L^2 ~iUC I~I3r.ufaC;Sr?^ ~:'CUi~ny i ?ii:.T.?ni tnli~J nova Insulat3en (~-value d 4.ewn) ! ~.Ct i 6p C:ilinf] unk, i 6 Yh:ii Unk. -' r CCr ! `iCr? _ , ,• =7 v=s ,,. ~ "•:?r,! ?. ~ceat ;tr^i: ~ CCr;:r;c.^;cn ir, S3`?r! St3rCarCi I i ++a:<out a,^,C laundr! I l.r i , ~~~ •, - i. i ~ ` t n:r„ I c. I r, ! - „.., s ~,.~ ~ ~ ,.,.~ I I I `~i ' r ~ r 1 t; 2 i I t I 1 t t '~ i I I 2 o I c 99 1 1 7 3 2 1 I t I t 1 I 2 i t i I 990 1 5 I I I I I I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I :mr ~ .,rn, ~~n~ 10 R^r l a,er^rnl;1~ 2 ar'•(•I' 1,992 rar; m~i nn•r ^ ^_ GRGSS BUILCING nn:A (GB.;) IS Cc!Nc7 AS icc iCi?L f'd~ISHc7 ,:~Hc~ QSCLCCCI; CCd.161CN A.9cAS) GP THE I".IPRGV'c1".7S!TS 3AScC L'PC;I °_{ic~ICR \ Surfaces (6latzrials, canCifien) _ ccr caroeVAvera e _ '"Vans olastadAv=raga ~ irr'nwish Dine/AveraGe ' 3a7t ftccr lino)?um/Avera a Hearng Ty~z FA (21 -~.,! ~a~s ~J~ ConCiaCn avc+i'good I KL'chen aquip. ;x / unit-cant) R?Mg?ra:Cr 9anyziCVen Ciiposal Gis~"'.va;`zr Attic ---I Ncrz g Stairs I'~ Croo 5:3ir ~ Scow? Car Storage ,"!u. Caa ~ Ga3,z ! ! Ca;~crt 4aac~d Ca~c`.zC _ 3aC`t'.vainscat pla;tidAv?ra e GCnrs one/AveraGe Cccling Czrttal no I G;i,er windowuni; ' I ; arlhccd Ccmcactor 'Pl3iczGCry?r '~ rccr _! Waizd ' J nnis~ zd AC?sat? _ InaCZGuatz C's;;eet ' { CCr,C dcn av I P.IicrCwave '~ Unfini;.`.td Ncnz =f~nlar+ 9 NA ~ I.nr^~ I Ccndicen at thz imprav=.mznts, r?pairs nze^_?d. tiealiey ct canstrucfien, adCixnal faar:r_s, r:cdzrni,3CCn, ?;c.: The subject is an ofd irama wo s;orv Cuoi?x that h nad ad?coat? home main;endnc?. Th? : ocf was r?claced scar th? haiis;orm of 199=. On? of ;n.e turndc?s is n?w?r. The wood sidino i; .n I?s. ;han av?r3 ?condition and this bri e s ;n? overall condition down to I?ss than averac?. M• aoorais?d value is'AS h.' Th?r? is an open `root oorCh and a ^.vo small locks in th? rear. 'Th?r? is soma minor sere?m?r.t in th? tour.dation that aoo?drs to have stdbiliZ?d. Tha oven?r reoorts no ft:rh?r s?c!?mer,t has been r.crced. Ozprzciadon (phys~c31, fcreCcnal, and zxtzmal inaNSacizs, etc.): Pnvsieal d?or?cia:ionror ac? and ecndition bawd on an AC?rtit? M?Ihod. Fune:ional d?or=_cia:ion for score "oor plan Iimitd;ions of 3n older hem?. No ?x;?rnal obsolescent= net?d. - Cv=ra ?nvircnmze;al c,nCi2~ls (suei ai '„? iuhjeC;;rczry, ; Nona not?d by , but rCt .ir:itzd tc. ^a._, Cccs w3sa , Dale aeCi7_i.~zi.:.:.) , _....:a . _ ireprJ'r?n ?.^.ti. ~~ ... ~, .. Cr in ~,~ -~,'C? viC., .:/ cf tnis aJOraiser. VALUATION ANALYSIS _STL61,1i0 SITC V;LUE ......._ ..................._........ = S 10.000 .S iI61n i cC PEPRCCL'CTICtI CCS i,""c'.! C~ 161?iCr_ .'..`ITS. ~ ; 55 = 5 t t o S32 S 58 CCr,.n?,^.r cn Cast ApCrac (iuci as, sourc? cf ccst zsa^tatz, si;z vaicz, sti;:arz acct caiCu, Jcn and, cr Hl1C ~~d'l,t. ~,_ estimat?d rzma;ring z.Cnc~ic life :f ~,? r; .c?^!) Tha1bla's'^a~l Swims a=sidential Cost Manual is us?d as a ccide ;o t gg C ~ Sq S S ; . . 730 73 -- = S ? = es;imat? m? cos: of tha improvements new. t ,04o q. C ~ _ ~ S . . = S Sq. C ~ ; i ~ = S i'n? es''r^~•=d '=mainin0 =conomic li°? is 50 v?ars. t ~ Sq. J ' I ~ i. 7 S'v. m?ntl f i h b t - = ] i - ~ ^d 3CC ~'ad d?Or?CidtiOn iS as fOIiOW Sf d Se Of ; ? (1098 SC t S = j ~ Pr"SiC31 = 37°', _~ I = j I SczC:31 _r.rrgy ~r',c:?rt rzni = ~ I PCFCnzi. ?3ilas. ?.~. ocrc^/sm. daCks = S 2AG0 iC;31 _i:;m3tad Gcit V?'.v .. = J 133.30? r.^.ysic?I ~unc"cr.31 :rerr3! '_zs; 17~ IUI ~ 7?,r?c:atian 52.5301 13 33& _ ~ %~-~ t ~ C? •zc:atzC `lalt:? Cr Ir;y,rcv?ra?nU ...... = S 57.3-5 i i~ 'lalu? of Si:z !r'pruwrerd; = 5 2.000 ', 'riCIC ~'?] V?! !': 3Y C ~T .?PSG lr = i 59 3-o I , ?CC? 613_ , crn i 2 . J-3: ?nGc ? ~,- „rc, i3~ - . _.,. 2000 L~ ,~.,.~.vs' .•7r3iizl icC.vg~. cy 3!a "'._.. ~ _. - t-dCU,.LAF.ICGc T^?ra 3r? n0 r?C?n: S21?S Ot vaCd.^.t lots in tr,? ar?d. Tn? ?stimat?d s.:? Yalu? of St0.000. appears to b? r?ascr.api? for ;r h+0e of :ot in ;his ar?a. _~.nie !.I ._ _, ,~ ;325 5.+111 RESIDcNTIAL INCOt`,tE PROPERT'f APPRa1SA1 REPORT ,[ ~23i; ~.r._ ,^.:~ :. Geri:~_ ,..c.c :_ .?:c^ : ir.C if:dly C ~n ~ li i?c.cn ~~,_ r?r.:31 :.-Car• .2i incUC ; ~cr?,_,.. „? most car?., r?nal :n:en^a~cn ;n ;r;?ru?s s:mddr ?nC Croz;maL' :e : ,.., __ ^f ai GCiiICIr. tihli ccm CaniCn '.5 :ai?C Cn ter.=nt r?r[dI Ca:3......:n, ~,_ r?n;al c:r, par3cl?s zfc:c3lPf ar? net ~ _ ia.,.2 :..-Gdr3r 'Ji2C .n ' ~? id125 c0mpdriCn 3n31yi~i I i`. iG7fd6dl ,,CCR S'CU!C 3i iU:. ~_ r?3C?. ; 3i :~? Un iG inC Gfcp'-G?i i?I?C;?d ii Cmp3f3bi?S 3r? CCmpdfaCl? ' .,_ i' Gf".C2C/`~tCCL7 u.2 UnliS 3Cd '.? C79f3i1 rfCG'(^7) 3G.'. 3CC;:r3;21y f',^,f'S 9rt L.2 f'n;?I ^3f<?t !Cr :12 iUC19C! ar^^9.^,/ (nl?Si C^LrxIS? 53''.d 'M.t,:in+'? r°pC I I _.'.t GUSIYAiddC_ 3'~.'l i r.G"3ri.: =tic '.C '7 CCa7;R:NL :.'!i 'lQ J :CCr?ii 320.27 Arhngron St. ~7t-77 Dorgan ?lava L 1523-23 Rhombarg :,va (73t 5 Jackson Stl Duhurua (m~~ I n.... TCL~^C/ :J iCC',2C: i I ~ blocks ! i ? blOCti J 7;cc'c; a2at icrr?' Cd:? ! ' u^us; 2000 i ,March 2000 July 2CC0 Juna 2000 Jati i.cr:_ Appraisal j ~1LS, Assas;or isassor !dLS. ~,1LS. Asassor Assessor NA iNA iNA NA I yo. Ucir,2 r:c. `LC 0 I yo Ccrt;2 ya. Vac.O Yr ?r,.: t 9; 9 I `:c. Um ; 2 No. `lic. 0 Yr ?r,.: t 399 I `ic. tJrrti2 No. Vac 0 3t' t ';25caGCCn of Yr. 3t.. 1900 I This is an old frame two s:orv I This is an old frame Pwo s;pry I This is an old brick two s•orf Creptmf•un~[i' i Old ^.vo s:orr Lama I duosez located in the lama I duplex in a similar rental market I duplex in a similar mar<?: ar r;n. dpC?31, dti V3CdnG:2; ] ? ~ I duOlez in gOOd rental ~ general rental area. Similar araa. Similar condition I I• is in similar cordi•~pn y , , anC ccndiaons ~ area in aven_ca I condition. I I ^ondi;icr.. I I V , Ci l d I 3m. Count I Si ~ Rm. Court Siva I T;tl I ;r I ? Sd. ; C I Tot 3r I 33 SC. 7C ic[al j 7rn. CCUnt Si;? Total Rm. C^urt I Si ~ I Tcr ~V1cn~ly i,?rt I ict 13r 13a SC. Ft. ntcn~ Iv earl Tctl 3r 13a Sa. =C ~ !acr^ty r vi cd umt 1 2 1 t l 990! 3 1 2 1 1 t.C60i 3251 » 2 t 9501 3501 5 1 3 1 t I S55i ]raa<Co'xn 1 2 1 t! 99o"I 5 1 2 1 t I t.C301 3501 » 2 1 t l 8501 3001 5 1 2 1 t l 93.51 I i i I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ! I ! I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I No utilities era I Haat is included. I No utilities included. Thera is Haat and water a: a irc!uded. Ualia2s, included. I Thera is off street parking. orf street parking. Them is off sleet as:rrc. fumitur?, and 3m,2.^.~~2i I There is no off t Thera are ooen porches. I I ea I sir : oar'dnc I I ncluC?d in ;?n. I I Ooen perch and 2 I I sma,l darks I I Functional utility is (Average functional utili:y. F,:II I Average !unctional utility. I Average funCtiOnal c:ili^r. Fc uncticnal anti?/ 1 averaca Full basement with no finish. Hat I Full basement with no finish. I basement with no finish. Hoc , CaS2m?nt, basamer.: with no !water Gas heat and one unit Forced air qas heat and no air i water qas heat and no air ~23Cns'Cacling. finish. Fercad air I has central air conditioning. I conditioning. I conditioning. CfC;2Ct 3m2^ICZS, 2tC. I CdS heat and unit I I I air conditior.in I »naly;is of rental data 1;d iUCOCrt for as'ca;.d eatk2t r?rts fer to indiviCudl iccj?c; unit; (inciudnG ; e idjus7nents used, ^e ade;uacy cf rr,.oar_oles, r^r;dl ccras;ions, i:cl iuEjeCt'3 renI SCf1241.'2 ih2 r?n[ iC."._CCId f?CCCC:I?i +_ CGIIC3C!' TCIC3idd ^CG;:,I'f Cidr(2t f8:'t; :C S_ 3rQ(CCr.au Su CI?C; 7nl( and 7f7viC2i u ~~_ ,.: ~ : ; iL'CI? ; ,7i0C'^.J Ih° 3CCf3h2f fnUii ?'r!?'x Jl? f?n( C^araC;'C;ACS :f ; 2 CCmC3r3(112 ial2i IO ;?G'.•tiTln2 W.^~L~?f ?i,',ma'~d i ; S"CUId f .1?Li 3Ci:31 Cf , c~C'.C '_ ?x3mQl2, If 3C;Jal r?n3 w?f2 dvail3Ci? Cn ',^.: idl2i CCmaaf3b12S and U;?d [C C°_fiV2 u`12 yrCSS 2n[ mUICCii2r (6R!.I), dC;.131 i2^iS?Cf T.? iUb;?C[ snCUld C? Ui?C. i -.ra.'.( r?r '.v?r? Ui2d ;a ~:CnS ~'CI T.2 CCmCdfaCl?i~ .^,.S ar.d C2rfu? ~2 GR .I, mdi R2; ~ ; ShCL'I;~ :? L'i2d. Th? iC[dl rrfoi5 ?Sumdi:d i?Li ^tUSi r?.,^,f?S?nI r'_nI ; .:';Gi? wiL't ~.2 Sd!di CCmCdfdCl2 Cai3 US2d ;C C?'iW C.. l^]~li.t, T~.2 ;Ct31 yr:ii °.SCma'?C .?n[ IS nai iC~USi'_d fC('/3C3CC/ L=.>s~; ;C i u~: a_v i 5 s i aa,; i.o _rl i 3 Un, a° :n L?ds2 Oa:? _--d UrvG I 7?r Lnit Total V3C3i.[ I IJnfcmish.°n :rrli^ ~?n;5 rr^?r L'r,it i::31 I'r •Pii^'n ~-ii ,e .5 ~ t 1 0 IS 2951$ S 295 29515 IS S t I 0 I 350i 3:0 3501 I I t I i I i i I ! 2 I I 0 I I i 5-~ IS 'l3Cdncy: nC:aal l35! y?3r 0 " , '?viCUi p?Jr 0 '' _ ~c.aL'C: 5 ' S 037 ..really Total grass as"mated rent S r' ;iin?i .r.Cad2C :n ?i :ma;2d r?r.'S J -._-.,~ !_ :~:~ ~r !_ ..r.. J „di _ CII '_, im;n~ci'rc^cr. - Cmm_nG':n :^.? r?r.; iC. __,... dc;uil r_..,,, ?5;;ntat2d r?nG ,?ip _, ..y : ;'r, ; Cl;t,r?rc?~ .?;x??n do?.d dnC ?i,~ma:?d r_.. ;1. :h:~_o...~.. Tara ircoca _- eq~ r.^ures warn ~ ^or•.ad tp ma by tra owner. 17?_~.~ ~.i3C rCf't i? I~-i: ?nCc) ~- 1 r_....._ .:d? r_.... ._. =.,^.. Sa3 - . ~ i;L ?':00 fCr 7,'C:'•vi dpCniidl i~^xdr? Cq i'a moC?, r.c. - t -3']0-r~.,'.1CCc SC.'fALL RESlDENT1AL 1NCOC~IE PROPt"RTY APPRAISAL REPORT ? 'r.c?r;:~n .;a; r?at?a ~.r_~ . _ nt ;ai?; ai cnc?r.,2 ,mast i•; ular s.c ~rz,.^.._ ;a _ . :r ?r,( 3r.t na; .esc .a 3e „~%t°C :, ei? ,; ar.a;}i;-. " . _ ^ ' , , , j z ~ • ry ' , ~ ~ 1 i; i i GifiC.L~!'+3n30Cn :dCr+? ._ JC;?C: 3nC ~:7CIGaf30l? CfCC?r,~2i..,.± 3ndiyiU nC7. .. an y,~ . 3 ^. '?i ..':laf ?CjU;C'1_ f r?INC':n^y "' 3 Td~.'_. , _ CCCn :C 7~C i2 iL'mi Cf i0 2zC,e., ..CC , ' iC"" ~'_d C% ~,? nldfk?t C3(a. ~ 3 nl`Can; l:m In ;112 ~ Cm^df?Ci? Gf: ^,( :i ~Cf ;C, Cr ,~Cr? .3VCfdC2 C,dn, uC?CI CiCC?•^,/, 3 mint.'i (•) dCiL'iCl2n( i5 ~~ dC?, T.L'$ . r'." „^,C+ I"' dC;us;?C SdL'S GCC'_ Cf T. mCdf?CI? CqG'-C/" .f 3 iiG,^,iiIC3C .,, gin ,. Caf3C :C ^.J i5 inhCCf :C, Cf 12;; f?v7r3Ci? ,dn, ,._ ~ rrC,?C/. 3 :iui (- , ~' 3Cy',. rt B ~mdC?, C1U; inCf'.a£r ;.? 3C u;;'. ?; Cnr CmCdt?' ^!`I ' i !' n[,^~I'/ R?n;l ~ J:''_i ~ IT=SI I SU? I CC'.1?;,~;3L: S;L='VO 'C"?;ri?3L= 5;.= Z i i,C:'.'?=,a.;3L_ S;! = •i0 J 523-27 A;lingtan St. 1573-79 Arlington S:. i 1_35 Ccrn?q S!. i 537 Afting:on St. i ;CCr?ss Duoucue D~bu c? D' o~c~? ~ Dub;.c ? Jrz:rnC+:o iue~?c( I sa,m? bIOC:< 13 bbc<s !same clock Sal?; 7c:: i i .VA I ~ Ur.f ^ -'.;n i _~ g,,0 ~;c i 3' CCO ' ~< :rf c;n. i =3.SC ia!?s Cccd o?r I: CL; l i I i 21.03 ! i 7 1.37 i 15.17 ;ro;i - :rlv r i 8=5.00 l i 980 CO ' S 1.050.00 i 8=0.C0 mc.f?nl,mcit. tI i I 127 35.2= 153 Sa!?s :? C?r ;na i i I i 21250 ' i t 3500 i t x.250 Sale; crc? ;?r room I ~ ' ~ 35=2 S 3.7C0 ! i 3583 Data 3nCCf Apprdadl i Appt3iShc Files. L1LS, i !.1LS. ~1~5, `/?PtIC3CCn iCWC?S i ASSeSSOr A55?SSOf . ASS?SSOf I ASSe$so( ;O~USi:1E`!iS I Cc3CnIFiICP! I C_SCSIPi;C• -li, CcSCR;?TIC!. --IS. ~'I _riA,?iiCfl -r-i5, - Sal?s cr financing I ( :onc2isicns Conv?a;iocal Comren;ionai Casn Dah Cf ial?,~m2 I 13•CO/Av ' S-CO/110 d3vs i t 0-99129 davs Lcca an I Goof I Similar I Simaaf ' S.ri13f L?33eCC!C.'??e Jim,CI? F?e SimCle F?? Sim018 ' F?? S~mOle I ~?? Sim^I? Sky 50 x 100 32 x iC0 I tC0 z 100 1755 x 1C0 `!?a~ av , r?;idential I Similar ~ '~ Similar i Similar '~?;1^~ iCC 3CC2dl ! 2 S:Or! Cuple.x 2 iN Cu01?:c'S~m ~ 2 S`r C::OidX'$~m. 2 &rJ duol?x'S~m. ' '_calc! Cf ccn;tr:c;icr, I AvBraC? i Similar I Similar I Slmifar 1100'/?arS 101 edtS tC1 '!?ar5 ~ 119 VeafS ' ~cr,C~ai ~ Av?n ?- I Similar ~ Similar i Scoerior -5 ii 3ci'din ;f2a 7.992 SC..t.I 2.010 ~~.. r~• 3.25; SC. '. -5.3C0 i 7.350 S ` lc.l ? Cr; I is , a i ! '.a l cc~"< I'id ,~" ~ ~ I Vc - ~ . .ac r!.r :a ya:: SIC f •I 3a ', 3c a-•;I is* rI ga i'rac r 3 ~fti r s' ' ~ ~: a . , 7 U,:rt ~ 1 1 1 1 2! 1 1 7 1 5 1 3 1 7 1 0 ! t 1 5 1 2 1 t i 0! 1 7 1 1! 2 1 t i 0 cr?akCawn t l 1 i 2 1 t l 1 1 1 5 3 1 1 1 0 t i 5 3 1 1 1 0 I l i 1 1 2 i t i 0 I; I I ! I I I I I I I I I I i t I I ( I I V I I I ! ! l i t I I I I I i ?a5?m?nt CescrCCen I Full • no finish I Full - no finish Fcil - na rinish i FuII - no ,`finish uncCcnal uCfi! Avery ~ Similar !Similar Similar - ^ 'CCCIinC I FAC2S/non? ! FA as; ncn? I FA as'non? I FACaS.'nCn? ~3r4n CfUOff ;Q? none ~nOn? i rAn? I non? ?rc;2cF am?nltie; anC _. (If acclicaCl?) r.on? none non? inOn? ~ inOn? ~nOne 3C0 i - .R -. 5 - Q - : i 5 J _ . :'t;Ci. itoiall I - - ~ ~ ;C;Ui:2C ial?s ;,rc? 1 ~ - _ I I ` -_ -. - ~ --- - E I _ _ 5 23.c i 30.700 . -- of : ^Caf3^_I? ~ - _ I i 125C0 amm?..,; an idles :~medrscn (nduCing r?ccnciiia:cn et dil r.Cicd- ~- _f +a.... .., _Cni6'. c% ?rC :..a7+? ~~ ny ~ and w;;c?.cn c! : °. C/; cal inv2s:a'i;;ur_nai?.'i Th?52 thf?? Comodra~l?s 3r? similar r?r.;3 Orcoa^i?s iocz:ed in :'? sam? f3nta! mar<B! of?a. AI:^oc Cir COn0. =3 =:CS <2;) CG'+iCn in ",1dt mai' ^ . . . Duet s;z mor.tns aco, it is still censidere^_ to ba a ood ind'c=_:or of value a mar'<?: i^.as not cr.anced si ririca^.tlv ir.:nis tlr, ?. Cep-~ =2 is sid?d in s;?ad. but ~noi atlas'?d fcr su0?riot COnditicn as :r=_ :i5'.in0 s:al?s c^ _ _rco?r:^+.^??ds'.'rcr'<. T^? ?r.?rcr cf Como. =3 is :_-- _ be in S::Defi Of COnCIiiOn aS it is SClid brick COn S:fUCtiOn. ~ :C :'~;3_g; _ J ,= `iv = _ ,L_ . n. I =!.I Sh3 - COI?S ?I = `l~r 1 I ~C!.I? ` 72Si ' NO Sdi? 1;1 pay 112 mOn:^3 35 r~r I, NO i2:e ir1 pas: 12 n'Ar1t^5 aS ]?f i NO Sa'i? in ~aS[ 72 .T,On;,`.5 3- _ ~nCe anC ]did I NO Sa!? i,^, ']a:? . I SS?SSOr. ASS?S30r, JCUC2 fCf ^,nCr ;al2i i 7 2 rOn:nS as ASS?SSOf. i ^ wit` r ?3r at ? cr?isa! , Der A-sasscr. ~_.,.?i wi~:in :~,? %?~ :, ~ ...:._ .~ :_ .. _s?i ?nC anai1 is :~ r.y C.,cr iale; cf scc;?ct drC :.- C ?- : ~ ?c f t li d - c . r? >c . . f rg c Cf sai?. CCCcr,, cf s ur2nt dgnem?c ;nalyiis cf am( a coon, or iis:i,^, s..b:?c; crco?r, r. Thi; accraiser is not a':r=_ra of arv tartan! 3 r??rant of ;ai CO = S 13580 C1CIC;i=~ V;LLE iY if~C~Si_ -.?p.0. aa n( 3ihl) - ^s; f Y . C _ gf icrl ,ro;i mcrmiy ?soma:?d r?nt S _ Comm2nG cn irrm2 dCGrac~ (nc:uCicg ?A:?n;? f3dci, If dv?ilaoi?, _rC r-.antiiaCcn cf ~,. ~..'.tj ; 33 INOICA7EO VALUE 3Y SALa CC61?ARISCN A??-r.OACH _ ..............................._......._......_.... i .- .. - _ .... ............. INCICATEDVALUE3YINCOM1IEA??~OACY ......... _.._ .. ...... .____... _ i ~9. - INOICATEOVALUE 3Y COS i A??a0AC4 iUCI'_Ci :C :Cm7L'.Cn 7?f :Idn; 3CC ' _... _?~C•,_ :f :Cr. C.-C".i i;:: 7'-IC'N ~ ?L'CrS ; i ' - ' ~ , _ . . ,o_ .___~ ?N3l i. _ C'2C; ;C :C_ 3; ;S ii^,IS 3^.^,f3iShc ii (i'.dC? '~ n 0 C °' m ^ r0 "Orr ~' ~^i~X I,-Jca•°r• r?3f Loras 1.01;?C;e. It has 'lad adeC'~2:? mai.^.:d^a".C9 ' i T S d ~Cb ? %a n^.?i Ii drd 'C"Ci;:Cn; CI ? '.fa~S11: IS in dv?f30? COn dlt~On Off"?:'311. Thy ~; AOOroacn is Fr9n IiC:e consiCa'a:ion Cu? to :r? !arcs a^ocn: of Ce Orec,a:ien of an oiCar rere. T;^a Saes CC^~ar',s „~..• ,. , =1nal r= - 1 . _. .__ anC : In~om.? AOOroaCn _ civ?n ; ? mos: _ C~a :o'n~ : na: ':> a an I coma oroduc:rc oroo?rv as a -_ ce:_ - Aocroach us~C. - - - ~,_, .~ ....,._ ._. :f ~.. .cat :as?.:n ~.? _~.? _..cc;ocri arC :._ ._.~.•~_.an.._, , r ~I : , ~I 5 : ~a:: '^3fL , , r ._ ,_ _ . _ _ ih2 ~cc;z st .^i; 3cor~isai .~ .~ .i.,,-3:: ~.. Ia? ; am ;CG-'S ;q,•, ;?n : ?rci?' n :I = 5 ' . ili. ?c :. ,,. , ~_ ._ eC_.? in -.,..._-, are .a. C rlu_ .?! 3r.C J,,,.;:ng :cnC:;cn,. and ,,._. ~_ ?i4E?EaLPRC?=3TYTH.ITISiHEiU3Ja_iCFTnIS R3?^,Ri, AS C? .a'+Cus:'0 2000 DEFINE] ^ ' ' " . _ JaLUc aS c1ESTLltaTET4cW.1n,{:T I(VV (NIHICAISTHEOAT=C?CIS,=CiiCNA:iUi7E E` E_"T',YEDAiECri'ISE?:RiJTJ3Ei 33.000 ~~ !; SU?E3'!!SCnY A??R;aE.9 iCNLY I? nE7U1aE0l: ^ , r A???16ER: --~/ ~, Ir,_.. _,. .r 'Lr. ? :^lilli2m H. Lu'<Sa'.Cn Oat? CC.' Sir A^C..' 1 7. 2000 ~^' -+I S'? - -- ' 1 C • . ~=- ficat:cn- Ca0 SIa~ AOOITIO:JAL COht.t°NTS Tha subjac: is iCCa:ad in tha Tri•S:a:a araa of Iowa, I!lino:s. and'./isconsn. Ououcua, Iowa, is the economic ;aadar of this araa a,^d ^as a ooocla:icn or r,aady 50,CCJ. CcouC-3 "as a solid industrial basa na: Batas hack saveral dacada;, yet tha Ovarall aCOnOm,C clima:a naS ~rocght :na devaiaOman; or a diversifiad grouo Of naw manufacturing and ServiC3 companies. In ratans yaan. O~ouGua'; tourism ;ndus;r; rat gro~.vn Amman;ely w:th tha added a^: actions of :ha Diamond Jo Casino, and tra Duou,ua Graynourd ?arF. DcouCua's many his;orical sites nave aP.vays Dean points of intaras:. Tna aporeisar has noted in ;ha aooreisal reoor, any advarsa conditions discoverad during the normal research involved in parforming tha appraisal. 9ecausa tha appraiser is not 3n axper, in tha field of anvironmantal hazards (such as hazardous was:as, toxic substances, ur,Carground s;oraga tanks, lead minas] the appraisal vapor, must not be considered as an envirormar,;al assassmant of 2ha propary. Tha appraiser will not ba responsibla for any such conditions that do exist or for ary enginaaring or tas ng mat mig^; ba reGuirad to Ciscover whathar such conditions exist. Any housa omit anC'or painted prcr ;0 7973 r..ay ccr.;ain laad ?ainL Thara is a HUD handout available with G13 hazards of taad paint discussed. Tha aporaisar is not an expert in tha fiatds of tarau:a infas;a:ion, and tha presarca and dangers of radon gas. and asbestos. and assumes nu r=_spon,;bi!iD;. Tha aopraaar racommands :^at Lhasa items ba tas:ad oy individuals Guafif•ad in thesa tialds. ,rm 5.;? - ~ ~ ,~ .•.CO r,r'„ , ,..«i' .tCCr.I:idl iCTe ~r+. ay ] Id mac', rc - I -5C0-~JL.tf.tCC_ .111??I ~".1~lJT':I ~flilr!Jflll!.1 DEFINITION OF h1ARKET VALUE: '.. .]..._....... n:._ i _,...^/ >:.... _. -, n ... _...v' ird ..... .are. _.,,..: is ._::c:'..:s _....:n s .:,...:....:..._..7n ., 3 >_.. ii ., i ]._...:..._.. _. ... ]a :f .,,. ~~~ ] .:: ~ ~ 7ri Nr..:y' ,t) ;c7? ~ ] '/:'.:1~~ f ...,~........ '_~ :.... ._i ..] _i. .'!?'.~ !ni:f",aA 7r N'.:~ i_. >._. _... .__.. ... N: ?~ :. ._-] _.. i .a :'hn C.], i:...: ',i' IJ':a_ i._a_: __~. ..:: .. ..: _.a. .. ~.a :r,.,.:: _:. .,.:. "'/ .d1:1 7/ ]..~..> ii 3 ~.]_,. .~ .. _.....,~, .: .3:v n .. _. ._. .i._. _.]. ..,a.a .. .._C:I'/ ',C'..~.~.__,. ].:,,._ .. ]..:?f 3fi ,,..a. _Ci~i :: r:~,..3i~'f ..: a_:?i ,_:. ],.. _....a _, ::31 .i _. ...... .,.. _..~ , _.._.:.a .~. .. .-_'_ .. ,._ ccr.:;ir?:. pr. ^/ :'/ .cr„cd;:a..:.a ;o franc^i ._.--; .:..:., :'/ 3 lCir; :ir.( ni::.__.:zl _cC:. .._. li nct re_='f in'rclv~d in ... f:, :f ._'>__.:~:. r~~"f ;~i .. ._:'( a.:Cl::d ~~.. .. ._..:.3:?.. .:. 3 ~~....~..riC31 _,.: .: .: _.::_: ...]. 7f r._ ~In_:.,: 7f ._...dii;7.: ... ..,. ... ~._~ 3..,....:. .: ^,~ 3~~i~:a.-..:.. a.. ~t::~ _._:. ,.-'~3:: ., ~::..:'(~, a :__.....:: .. .... ...:...... , :f .,.:..'iii.: a ~3i?^ ::'1 ,._ _.a.. i lud,_ :,_nC STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS AND APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: . __.,_.a..'i J?rir:i•l7r ~_...:._:i in -_ _c~rdadl fdccr, ii i:_ , c; ;c z. :,'c'h!:; 1 ~... 7.r i:a., h,ll n.! ,,. r?i:CP:iC~'. f.: ..C'..i 7f 3 'a,3i ~ _..:. ,~~_..'. _... C.?f :.. ,i :., C'f :. _ d:i'.d 7f ::_ ..:_ .~ ~ i.:: ?~:fiG 2f iii6C,?3 ~._. ~ .. ~:. ;:: _ _CC ..~_: ,..__ . 7n.. .... ..... :'/'.. ~.,,~ :.,._.. _7l _~n~.i ] __CC: .... ,._.. i:,. .:._ .:'( 'd ___: _a .. :^ ..,_ ._a.a .. n .. C; :._'f .]._: a._ . ?. :,., iii?, ii ~f7v":'d ? ],_...: ~:: .~~.. ._.f3li it ~.:... .,, ]:. ]'a __.:X1:71_.. _.~,~_.. ]...~ ] ..: _ :f7v?.~..:.] df,. _. ]....:: ] ;~r'6 _.. .".'J :J _]ao. ... a]ra. .: ... :~,~ ~i i'_d:i7. ^,~~ ;r:C'.C/?~... .CC?']... _ -. :_: _.a.. ] ..._.-.:., _., ... Jf :] ii:'. 3. ;,.. ....a:..._] ?s3...:.._ ... 3vi!;..,, . .... r]^ .. _.....I>. _..:; _ ; .__rii =„ :( .. _. _, ...... 1; c7 (7r ... _. _d'3 ]..... . _ : _a .:c:?C ~. r.. „Crilidl .:ar, wr..._^r ~.. ] il;. 's Icci:dd .n :.. ....:a..dd __._J31 n~~_ : ___:. ,.??. ~.._..]_ .. _...,._.]ir a ...., ] ]~, dyer, ._ .: ac.:..~,_a cc ; :_i adi, ds_rdii 7.. idd, r ,_ .in; °Js :....-^ind~Cn. - _ ...~_,].. :v'II ra: ~!,,~ a;-:.. ry :r d'^ _~ ,::...:; ::.__]. ..: ]..: _._ _:, :.]31 :f :... -/ Ir. , ]_......]] _:......_ ,-..:..a .. _. i.:. i:i'.. rdi di~:,~_:dd ~:.. 'Ii':. .: „_ ._'~ is .. ._.' _'_:._... _...] ' , ]. .:,. ..x .]. _. _ ,... . ...:. _. a _. ~_, «:.u.~t;;:fl l3.'_.. -..]. ].. _. _._ '1d1 _... ] .I .... ,,.:,,. ..'.~ iC.;' :..._~..] ..._.. .. .. .a._ ~: : ,_...: _,: '.vI:O _r'I :_".. :iiid! and ~_ ~:,. _..~ if ;:7 _.. >. .]__. .. i`.d "a. .,_ .,•aa ~. .., ,_.,.,:..I .,__' 3i:'( __... ]. ._.,_,...~] .., ii. . ~ .a :'_._ _~: ... ]..... .I .._'_:.:'.:i Nid:di. ._,.. . _.._ . ~ ._].f/..: .... [,"' 'i:'.:: :n ~. ... :'_: d:: '"::?"r .._. :': ]'. _:._~,. 3.v'a? a ._i."; .. ..._'31 ".i'. ii:' In I::W ~...-~-a .,. ._,. _.. ,...]> ..,..".v94 ,i'i ~ ., . ~Cri.d3! ... __. _a. .,> ~ :rr?~';' _'! `C=°' .~ . _..._ ..> .... 'ni .~ 7 _ "j .~ _] _]].-a.~ a _. .._.. _. rJ ]xn ..:.:......] drC a:._. _] -J _._r... +G;-3:.;:?i. °l:rdii ., ....J.?d, :irr, . _ ...._..i7n :f ~ . ., ...-/ ",. _. _: dli?: ~N': ~i i,.. .. ,.._:r:i~i`. ~ icr ~ ]~.:. .~r:Cl..:ni' _ _. .. :(: i. .: ..i ..'.y , .. , .. ..] , ~_. .. ::. .. _:]...". ~!?r h:d~'_r ].... 3 -.. ir.. ,.::...c( 3iia~a. ~_ ..,...,.] 7f .- -~---'~ --:: ~.(. ii r,ra_ :~ _. „rc:.,.. .,._..,._..a 7f ,.,:di3r„nd: -..~_.._. .,_::_.. ~ ', . _._:_.].. . _] __]d':..a :r .. __.:_sii _ _ r._...: .:r:r.i ::, :., _.. ___~_sil : _. ] a__, .:7 ]_`.ifi:::r( ... .. .__. ]. . _. .. a .f ~.f1 .v'..1 '. .. ... 3-_7r3~i'. a .]>._ ... ._ .., .. _ .. _. .... .. _",_, :r :a r_.::'i i:'> C 3>i ~' ~ -,-, a - N _. >... ..C ___ _>. .>. APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: ',._.-~crr,?ria.a;?,:Ci;ra?;;^;:. I Cl.. :.>a3r:..., ,.. s__ ._. ._~_~ 3r as _Cd nd'r. ;?!?_;ad 3 . ,.... _,. ., ,...._... ~_.> :! „ ,., ...s ..,,il n„r'ar 3r1 ;fa;; 1_._ ,_ __ i~ ~ _ r'/ ~_~ .Cr. i',C.'__C;1 ~„ ... id!'.i ._,..__, ~~~, _.. iyi,i ir.,, r3s..,.a_. _ __._, sr,ci ;°......... ___,._, _._ .. ........ ,.. _. _. ..___:n ... ,._>. ._.. > ., .,~_:.. i_~ .. _,. ~1 3 ;Ir, „~_, . !?r', ,'1 a ..... ., if?CI? ~ „?C/ ii>>...,.,.,.. ._ ., ,,.,.,. f3';cr3:~. ... _.. _,. s .:fL ^j.'I ^_,_ ~. _... 3 ~ _:n? s_ _> -_.., .... _____ ,". ~'iU;;?_ s_._ ;n:_ :f ,^2 s....,__. .,,i. 31:x. if 3 ily"i!i:3C~ .i_','1 ~, 3 _Cr'I;,.i __. „ . '~! > C,:.~., .~ 9f'?ii ~?'rG __.. ... _°:1>_"_ s _.. _: 'I „ i ]J;'~L.. .. ~, .... ., .,.,,. a.3;. .,.. _, :'.d i3:?i ~fl:_ 7i :.:.. _,,,.. _... __... ?. .._~_ ._n_. ..,_ ._,.>,.. _. _., _,~ ,....__.~r; .']( n3v? 3n :n'.:_., _.: 73i;,_ '.n ay . ?v?.v_...,.., if ;~_ ?;iL.._~. ,~ C1312at Ya;'_ i, .._ ___, _.;al ,.. _,_ i :._~. ,~~. C.G~.virr;y .a ~;C..~. 3C/ ,.._;~. r l:rrl_..,., r:C1 .~. __.r3U'•: ._..: ar.C I ,, ...?7?. :0 _ _ ai! Ct T,/ !4'.C'N!aCy'?. °di 3il x_...,,...,~ ~._ ~.._CT3^_:ns n .._ s31 racer, 3r a .~ __ _, , __„ __.. ~ I ,,_.?:.n v.. .__, _.>_~ ..,, .,. .^hj -, ~/ ?'rm 9riUna. _.._~3;'.,, _,. ieS;,eCal if.~~/5i. c:n;crs. i^~ .,.rceileri. 'xnic~ ir' icC;'.c: anl'j ~ ,,._ _..~, , i I n3v? nc ;,f?izni x ; ..,,? r:as;i in :'. ~rczr:/ ~ 3i s :_ ~ ; ;o ,:; ~y, r,. dnd I havz cc ;ns?^t a rr9;Ca[iv± ;arscral irdanit ar :iai wc^ _~~+.:..~ .., par..c:par„ ,n>.~._ ,_nid.,.an. I CiC rat eai?, ?rtna ,ar.3J'/ or c;mpl+tz!y. -y _riP/i; 3rC'cr ,._ ?;^.,._._ ct ..a~<et value m ~._ crrsal r..cr .., .,._ i ___. _:iC, fa: ^'Cn, >?(. ,,....~,~_,. !3mi:i31 ii1:U ;f n3dCn..~ Ct ..~df L, r .^,,@ c'xnari ar uC::3r,a :! .:. > ~ 2 ~ a j :t 'r'te^2^j ? ~r?iznt ~.:,:_.> ::r c~ ~.., .~ ,.? ;,r_c?r„ai .~ ',.? viCinr/ cf ~ a ;uClac, ,, ,,. ^j -- -- i I ea'., rc •?;?-t .. _.,.,. ,ad ,c;ura in:arS n ~:a icC, _ rj, ind ,.zits ry _...nt :r '_._... .Icy-_nt ncr ay c:r. ~ ,sa~c,.._~ _....,,.. , ;:ii ., ,. ~ _ _: _3. I ,vii nc(~ _~,rzC :, „ ,. ._.,_...,,, ?, v3;uz er Ciec..cn n v?,'__ .~_~ liver; ,~_ __.>.:! r<z cfant cr imj ra!a:?i :ae/.:._ ~r...ect :, -_ ''il'__ _'_:-a:e, ~,.__...~ r?;c:,, .. ~._ .._.,....c..~ 3 iccia,a:; ?'rz..~ m crCzr ~^ .~^>';? -,y co-^?rSdccn i~.~'cr ?-~ioyc?r,; !cr ~_„~,,-ir,; ,. ;il. I w, .... ]di_ ..._ _, .r3G3 r ,i ]^ 3'..__>.ad ~Tlr ~.,fnW'! 73~U 3:::0, - n._...: 'I?Ud..:n, ;r L'_ __~ .v i.GfU'I? 3 i,.__.,.: :'t:ry3, ;Gan. I . _. r, .^ .... 3^. dual n ,,,,;,/ x~;~. ~ _ ~_'rdorm Si3•._._ ,f ?'cfziiicnal _,ii;il , ,~__~_ ..,.~ wzr~ aCap ad ind pr,^ulg3iaC ~? ~ _ ,dl ~:3nd3r:> _Cdri .f>if :r3:;31 .:C.^~.ccn i ,. _ > .- ° Ci ,i ;'+i CCn :t d ^apaC~fa ^ ~riiCn ayv.C,i? ndta[ 'x°'° In alas _ ;f ina '.:J'/. ._ u ii 3G, f. 31, 'x.;:1 tea ?:=. r• Si_nC3rC>. 'x,^„_^ Ceai ,ct a ~Iy. I ic'c.x!eCG? `at 3n ?;arrate _f i r._>;,ca_.. _,,,. cr axc;iu;e ;n T.: ccen ray<et ii i conciCon ind_ „_.;,.,_cn ;f rate( vd!c? _rC ~,z .>~(naia I Cav?IC~'C is __r.>., ~r.t wi"t ,._ ^aC<zzng ,.,_ ,.~;?d in ~ e .,zigc ~,~,acd iz..cn of u,ii r?;,cry uNeii I ~,_:_ c~ _rxs,, i~.__ ;n r _ ,._.nc:L_:cn iae,.cn. 3. I havz craily i. _:?^. i,._ .e,arcr ~ d :rarer irai of ~ _ >_ . pamj ind :.._ ?rarer of 311 ~rparas Iii;ad is ccmQar,lai in ~ a 3,.criiiil rpc~ I 'u^',r car. h; ~ at I Nava nc:zC 3.^? ioearnt cr '~.ewn 3Cv9riz c:cc,_er.i yn ,,^z iuizc: ircrvaments. cn '1: iuo;aci i. , er cn iry ilia wn-;i ~' irn:: ~a:a :,_., ;/ ~ ~._ iuC, ;r _^,/ ~! 'x.`,.,.., I do 3'.v=_r. anc `avz ~,.___ .,:zr.'s ~cr Lria __:ara :..nC:;icc; in ^y 3n3iyiG cf 1a , cczry •ri._.:o ... aran[ ;.,.. I caC m-'<?t ?viC.nca :e iC'~cC ...?n. , .3va _se ccmraanta9 iccu: ~ ..-__; cf ~_ iC'rz. ~....nCit::ni on dta ,,,a; <e~C,Ii^j .~ ,._ is^;?c; _ r,/. 3 I ar;c,a!h/ ~r=.~ r?~ 3.1 cccci~iicni and ciricri _Ccc; -_ __, ai:3._ Lhai w=.r. >_. ,_,., in _,.. _,,dl ra, r.:f I ,=:izd cn iiy,5ci:. ,. :~cdl 3i;isi~,~_ ..cn ny inCFridc3l cr .,.,.,,,Cuili .~, ;erforTarc? .. .. __crai;al cr ,.. , _:ar:cn cf ~._ is ~>al ;cr I havz nz-ad i,.:., ,r.ci'~_c~(i) cC ~,>:'ciaC ,'a iJ__•!IC .a;'a . ,,...,,._, C~/ ^an 'n .. reccr.c:iiaccn ,__icn cf ,^ii 3p~r3i;al ;,cr. I c_n!y .3t iny!ir.CiviCt'il is ,.dyad . ,.a... aC . .._,. , _ ;ds~i 1 _ . ,. __:: ~ _,C _: y:^a :. _._ 3 c~i',a .. _°/ .. , .. ~ ..... _. f 3n 3r_.:.,. _._ .. _ , > ., _~_ .. ~,. __: _;31 ~_,~ I x' I ._.._ SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: _ c.?rr:icry 3 3:i?r ii,raC .? 3c:r;iai r?x~, ~:> cr ;,:? c.-':?i _:_ _, .> ~_.. i Cif?:y ._., :iiL ;,,_ _.Jfdii_, N'., _~.__~.~ s~_ i:..r?ii3i Sr _._ .~.'.':r?_ _.. .>_~ ,, _ x'.;, ~.. ,._..... _..U _~,~ ...nc!',.>•.. > _~ _ . ___. ~o. , _, _'c :. ___nd :y ^: a:priisar'i :.racacri rcrno_.zd , _., ,: i __cv?. ir.,. do :_. ., zixrsiciary' ~ _.. __:~~ii31 and t.. ~r_:>_. ,__~ AOORESS OF PROPERTY APPRAISED: 523-2?.:rl;ncton St.. C~bccua. I~ 5200' APPRAISER: SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (only if required): .~_~,_ WI'~~I~amH '„arch .l ~.._ D3 ~ Jiyr•C: ~uCustJi' X000 ~_ ~ 5,; ~. Si3a,,.r.:r!r3`erv CROt~_ 5'd..,.^iicarcn= ~;?;_ L. i.._ _r„_..cn ~J3:a a'_.:...._~.;n .. _._.. ,, S, ~C J' _. _,_..~,, ._.a ci ..r..._a...~, :r'_._?r;. _r... ~~A -' iJi, _ _'iC9 `..., _. ~ _,cr;'s3i i..-:r?'a ;y ? 13 ~_ ._. _ - , .~.. _...,~5_ Comparable Photo Page BonawedCSerd ~lcki BechertTm Wood Pro Address o'23-27 Artin on SL C Dubu ue Cou Dubu ue State IA Lo Code 5X01 Lender Pfannin Service of Dubu ue Comparable ~ •~__ -°- ~ _,-~:: ~i ,~_ .: t~rr ' (•Y : ,p. ' - ~; ~.~~~: J~ y, -l +~ ~,,~~ ~ ~. ~~ -,~,=~ 573-79 Arlington St Saks Pace: 42,500 G3A: 2,016 age: 104 years Comparable 2 1485Comeil SL Safes Price: 37,000 GBA: 3,254 Age: 104 years Comparable 3 567 Arlington St Saks Pdce: 28,500 GBA: 1,850 Age: 119 years form P1CPlX.CC -TOTAL 2000 far Whtdows' apprmsal sortware by a la made, ~. - 1.800-ALAMCOE Subject Photo Page $orroweriCGerrt ~licki l3echer~m Wood Address 62127 Arlin on St C' Dubu zee Cau Dubu a Stare IA Code 52001 Lender Plannin Service of Dubu zee ~ .= lski --~ d __ _-'=`~- ' Subject Front sz127 Arlington st Sales Prize: NA GBA: 1, 992 Ace: 100 years Subject Rear Subject Street ;vrrtr ~ICPCCSC - ~GTat ?coo ror whdawr appraisal software Dy a b made, irc. - t-BCO-ALIMCGE APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 523-27 Arlington St. All of Lct 801 in A. McDanials Sub. DubuGue,lA 5X01 FOR: Planning Sarvice of Oubuqua A;:n: Mark Noble; 50 Nast 13th Sr City Hall; DubuGUa, IA 52007 AS 0 F: Augusc , c, loco BY: William H. Luksa:icn i ;- ~cm u„7 -'TO i ~! ?000 for SvicCC••vs' apcraiial ;cr„vary ;y a la mcC+, inc. - 1.300-~L.t~ICOc ao-s-~ DG3C~J3, :.a. ~2J]3 ----.._. 2'__.--•-17 ~'-"---5 ~_' 7'_., _.. 3CCJ_'?.3aC2 «__.. _JJl!S °~Y_25_ COC d07_3!53~ O_ .3? dJOV2 .^.._.. !OC2~.'~. ~=J~____ _ .._ 2J'/ '_O^__ _.._ _O__O'~_^.y^ COC.7~2__ d~J=diSd~ _dOOCC _.. d _ -'......._ A?J=J CJ.^._3_::3 .._ G~dSC_!7_!O^, 3^d~f3!S 3.^.'~ 517~0_.._V2 G°3=d _J C.^._ .. J::_~..S LO.^.S d.^.~ __..__ ?S __^3__ O_ ~d~.._ _0= C.._ ~17]__J J=072__V. 11 .^..V 0~1.^.1 J::, t:2 '~_'13=2~ _ Vd~'S2 0= J.._ S'1~]?== 7I0~°_: CV d3 0= J: _ 3°..,~_~,,, / '1 ~,,,~ ~i_i __d3l -. .......{S2 __~.. 1 .1 ,- l ~ ' - ~ - ;./ rriCC.;-'?]i,~?GCUt:r..c.a~ri'._.r~iias~zNir?:y~:a,-cC?. rc -I-d~O-.~.'.1CC'_ SP~tAL1 RESI~ENTlAL INCOh1E PROPERTY APPRAISAL REPORT ca., u^ nn_za C3CCn ~~ Dr7an I_ jUCUrCan ', ?Crdl - ?- - ry 3utlt up g Ov?r i j ; _ c-i ~ ; ~ Ur.C_r _c GfCWT.?._ Rapti .g S;aCL ~ SiL•N rredominant Single?ar,.liy , Occupant/ g Cwc?r 5lnylzfamilyhcusmg o9'~r: ~~s- $ (Ouu1 (yrs`j 535. LC~N 75 Przdcminant 2-lfamliyncusln~ 2'1 ra.T.IIY ~9'f = Occupancy a frjUU) (y ~ Owref ~ 529. ! C'x ' ?rCp?ry. n_lu?s ! Inc;~ai,rg ~ j;aCle D?c:ir.:rg ~ i?nar,t ~ 5200 Hi h 100- Lnant S100 ^n 1C Cemar,G iupGly I_ Sncrag? ~~ !n Calar.ce ~ Ov?r ;u,cP/ ~ ~~ 'Jacan: (0-i ~) I ?r?dominant ! ~~~ Vacar;t (0•S'~) I Pr?Ccm:rzit hlafket:c ^me ~ UeC?r 3 -ei. ' ~ 3-o r,.oi '~ Over o ;^es ~ `hc:n 'cvn i'41 575, 90 ! Vae?it tpver i'61 515. c typical ?-1 family olCg. Type Catacnad Na. s;Lnei 2 N0. Lm's 2 .1ga 90 yrs. Typical rant; 5 325. to S 550. ;Ji incr?aiirg ~ SiaCle :Declining :iC neighccrhCCd apt. vaCanC/ 5 ~ - ;ncr?asirg ~~ S[aC!e i 0?c;inirg Rdnf CCn~'IS _j Yes g No ~_ L!k?ly it y?s cr',ikely, descnCa 'Tha Dubucua Counro Treasurer's office repots that [here is a preliminary street assessment in the amount of So81.80 ?resent land Use : Land use change Ore family 33°~ ~ Net ii'<ely ! likd 2-i family t 5"a I I In pre?ss'L !duid•fa,^ily 0°' Commercial 2°~ I on this prooar^ . ( I 0°~ I Note: Bate and the racial compasitien a1 the neighcorhaad are net aperaisal factors. jefgndCrnCCd OCUndafe5 and Lha(aC;eft;7C;: The market afe3 bpunddrlaS 3fe Loras Boulevard on the NORh: Bluff Strait on the the _35t: Univ~rSID Avenue on the South: 6Valnut Street on the West This is an ofd residential market area tom rised of some of Oubu ue's finest ofd homes. Soma of these hays haC ax:ansive remodalir.e and some have been convened tp rental properties. There is a 5•mall amount of nai hber`.cec commercial use in the area. actcrs ~ a< 3'act me markataLliiry cf u ? prcparei ~n L^.e na;gnCarheod '',;,rxi„ ary ;e ?mplcyr„art anti dritenlL'9S, ernGfUymen( ita011iry, appeal IO ~~2fk?( ?I:.): ?ubfic parks, schools and transportation are available ;o ;ha area. Loras Cella a and downtown Dubuque are within welkin distance makrc this a desiraabla rental area. Vacancies in ;ha area are 5 ; or lower. Thera are no unfavorable farors affectin marketapiiiCV. Tnz feile:ving availed? fis;~:gs f?pRieft u12 mast ecr,?r1, sir,.dar, acC :rcxima[? car,..e,^„ive arapar+s w^e ;t:hRct prop?r,/ in ~;'e ;z:cj+_ct nLiyhoemaed. L-ii arai7si, ,a ;:..^.Ced Io t`:aluate the inventor/ :urr?r;dy en ~ e market temp?Ting w,th ~ e suoj?c; prep?^/ in the Subject naighbomead and recent Arica and .m.arke5ng ;imt c~tCS affe^rg ca ;< ect prce?ry. (! ii-dngs cutiiCe ~ e subject neiyrLc~ccd are rat ccrsiCer?d applicaile). the listing ccmpan.Cles can be ~ e r.mal ar sate ::mpa2blei it They ar+. n:r~•/ for a ITchl SUo.ieCT COh1PAR,:3l=LISTING N0 1 C06tP?,R,13LE LISTING tJO.2 I COht?,1r1A31_ L'STitiG f.0.3 023-27 Artingtpn St. 271 •r'3 Dorgan ?lace ACCr?;; Dubu ue Dubuque 520"-23 anombarg Ava. 7815 Jackson St. Dubucua Dubuque ?rdxirniG to subie^_t I -- 5 blocks 112 blocks 110 blocks 1 isin^ Lrc? I S IVA I Ur.f. '' =:m. i 19.900 ' Lnf. h =urn. S 39.900 I I Unf. I I ; •_m. S ACCroximai? ~1 ~ 1.992 2.120 I 1.700 I 1.930 Data;ChlLe i Apora;sal DdLS. Assessor I WLS. Assessor n,1LS. Assessor ~!'niti.iot.^ii?P,°.~ 2 10' o_ I 2 t0 ~ 2 8 o I 2 t0 5 CLrpxima v°ar Cuii ! 1900 119! 5 11399 11840 ~ccrCx..avs Lr r,.aCC; NA 1150 Ca`a 130 C_vs I 1 vaar + Ccmpar;Ln Cf ;isin;; tp i j~c; ^ cer^/: Thaw three cpmcaraole lis:inc; era Iecated in similar rental are_ i ^ e ar a no sa!as oanc:rc on ; _ IiSC C;5 3 ;his time. !,tar<_: CCnCI%Cni .~3i si~._, ~-~ family ~fC~ ^?; In a~. a ,a.Ci itely6CCr^CCd (i,^.~:;:CILg C'_ aCCV? ^e:^yhnCr~:CCd if.CiLa::r; Cf farCWS7 fat?, CfC~ .^./ 7a:C demanC ,.ply, 3fd marrie'ry ome) 3nC ~, rf?v?i'..^.C° 3nC 'm~aCl in ,~._ iCC, , ~Taf(2t ar'._ r'.^yarCir.g :Can 'ihCCUnG, if.'=f?ii 7L'yCCWni a:,d :0002; a.... a, _ id?ntlfica:en Cf 7?ndi in ii;rq arc?i, 3v?ray? dayi Cn mark?t anG a;.y Caange Cv?r CaSi year, .__ Tha Canan_I mar'ka[ cor,Ci[ion in :he DubucuelarC area Is cor.sdered to ba oed. In 1998. the interest rates CrccpaC to a 30 vaar !ow! Thav have risen slich;Iv bu:_ra still consideraC :o be cxC. P;aasa note eat ;his is a comola[a aperaisal report supmittad in a summary moor format. Dimeniicr,; 50' z 100' TcpagraLny level ;o sloping Site aed 5.000 CCmer lot 'g ?1o J Y?; Specific mnir.g c:ai;rficaCcn a:~d CeicriLcn R-2.A: Alternate r.vo famlbr residential ~Nng :CmplianLe ;g I • al h ! eyal ,nencc~ ^ing fa,.,.,_. ?rd Ui?) IJ tl;eyal _, `.o mr,lrg ;ign?s; anC ^_?ii c;? ei improved: '~ ?rei?r,; ui? _ Otn?r Ci? ;exClasi) Si ~ normal S`.ae? rectancular Draina,? appears adecutae slew avg. residential L3nC;Caping average Uhlltl23 ^"^lIC CC~?r 1~iff'Slte lmpr~Vement3 'r^. ?"",c ~^var' d?C~..^/ rIQ j;L., biaC:<tCp ~ ~ na; ^ i~ ILL' ._~ CprCreta 'a' a DnY?'N3`/ nOf19 .aC.,af'.9!'.aYma^.a utility Only Cpr.Cr~r~ L. _ ;VC:a_f ~ I iiC?:va': Sanitary i?N?r ~~ I J;.... ':: y^"~' i eler•; L' L~ ! ..^.., ... ~:( I :.h ~ nnna ~ : _!dA j~ C'al x.000 4a_dfd nice 4'; ~• " -:l.In ,.ne X hlaC DaJ $?^ _ ==!d..' !,Iao `IC 195190 00039 (3CC3r?.~; 3CV?.'~_ ?3;?m?f.;i, '.nC;C~_..~,~.. a. :,dl 3S;?ii.'.....i. ~~~..' 3re_a. J;e,al Cr legal 0~000CntCfminy E_nmg, use. _." ;' Tna seta is aCecua:e ^en;s Theroaa~= no aoear~r[ aCv~•saueasa~-~r's or enc•oachments Access to ;ha subiac; Srta iS from HirhwaV -52'3 fCar.•a! to Loras 3ou!evarC [o Prairie Sr.eat ;o Arhne:on S;roet. _ ?r9C].. !.la_ term i 2 i ].;1 ?;Oc t ~F . F3nnl? l.ta? r:~ . __: I_ck;et,Ln 1CCraiiali St'~IALL R~S1.O~NTIAL i~ICD,;~1c Pr~O: ARTY AP4'RA,iSAL REPORT Gzneral Cescription I Fx:erier dzscripticn (fda:en3lir:cnG;;cn) FeunCatien ;rits,bl^_ys. 2 ! t ~ =CUnC3.cn stonelAvera a Slap no Stcn?s 2 I :cericr Nis restored wooC.vinv6GC. „ravel ;p3c no iypz(Cet/att.) Cetacnad i..H::cf;;:.'a_, asoha!t'GocC ISurp?u-; no ~~eSirn (S^/?) 2 stOnl dU01?Y I ~ , ~3r:1Cr:?SS nOna nOt?d 3uneri :wnipti. aluminum/firerag4 :US.'In('y'y,rCpC;'.d ?%I$IInC i'r~IfCC'N;'/.? dbl,hurC/,i'lefaGa ~?tren;?ni minOf•• UnC?, _cn;ur:ctien no I;;;ate ias:Sc.?en; aluminumis,v?rag? n'z,.,~,.~~ Wore ro[?d ~ 'r'_r 3uiit t 900 _ecr?_ .'nd nou;L^ J 'L; ~~ `la 13ai?r?r.t 100 K .f t st ie:r lea ..cuv? a;?(yr;-) =5 vaar~ s ~I ' .. _. ?; wiL~ L._ . ~L'0 !.tinc`3c::.:?C Routing 335zmzrt ..; ur, none Insulation (n-aalu? d'ciewn) I ^_ ?cc! I~ Czilirg _nk. ~Wa,l; unk. ~ I F.CCf I I I NCne _ ~;uacy vas -+r,! z.,.,iznt ter..;: - - C:ci'." cn ?nC Sa Ci 5'?GCar~; 1 walkout anC Iaur.Crr ^ I~nr- I I ~ .,Ir•1 I - I .• f ~r I nod ~ a~n..^ - I ~ •rpr I n», I ,.Ir I '-nl err i --.i ~^ ~ 7 1 1 3 2! t I 2 I t 1 i I 995 I 1 1 3 2 ~ I t ! t t I 2 I I ( 995 I I I I I ! ! I f I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I I ~ nr,~ er,err rr rah 10 qrr » ^anr,nrr;r 2 ~=~•r•1 1.992 4~r . r- •C: olnl m.•r. :.c• G~CSS BUILDIPJG aAc~ (GS.t) IS Cc=:PJcD ,S Tnc iOi,;L FsPJIShc0 .inc. (I?ICUJOINO CO~LWOPI ;R~ 7? i'r.S ItdFa0vc!dEJiS 3~ScD U?DiJ (TcRICr~ rtc Cl~p_ Fe-- ' Surfaces (flat?ri31i; ccnCiGCr.l _ Floor, caroeVAverage _ 'P13115 PlastadAvara_;e Trimjfini;h PinelAvera4e 3aL111oer linoleumlAvara a _ 3ath w3ins:,ot olas;idAverace Cccrs PinelaveraGe Heating Kitchen aGuip. (X / unit-ccnC.) Aric ! Typ? F-,~ 1-21-~ nztrig?fatcr Nenz i,,,?I gas 13a;,g~'ov?n g Stair, ~ Condition avCJCeod i Di;pcsal I ] Orep stair I I Dishwa;h?r ~ $cur'z Coaling Far bocC ~ g Flecr ~ Can7il no Cc^pac;cr I _~ Haa:ad ! C;?r window writ ~',Va;hzr,Cryzr I nrishzd I Canciecn avo. ~ Vticro•Nav? I 'g Unfinis~?d Car i[crage `JC. Cdr, 0 ,ard !^ Carcr I i A;achzd Detachzd ,1C:;u3t? Inac?•~ua:a Ci'sc?zt IVcn? g Condiccn of u1z imJr ~,?n?nts, r?pair; az?CzC, ~::31it'(Cf i,cn; ,;c~cn. 3CCiConal ~~ac~es, mcCzmi?aCcn. ?[c.: Tha subi?c[ is an old frame two story Cuoi?Y :hat t had ads ua;a `coma main:?r.anca. Tha rgcE was re0iacaC ah?r ;ra'rails:orm of t 99». Or.a Cf ;ha furnaces is raw?r. Tha wood siCinc is .n :?, than av=rage condition and [he own?rs plan to restore the front and side :he [brae rarnairir sides in vinvf. My value is subi?ct ;o th?se ImOfOVementS. Thera is an open `rant porch and a two >~all Cecks in ;ne roar. 'Thera is some minor seC.lament in :ha foundation ;hat acoears b have stabilized. Tha owner moors no furher saC.lemen[ has be?n noticed. Depr?ciatian (physical, functional, and ?x;?rtal ~naC?;udci?s, zFC.): ?hys~c=I C?orociation for ace anC condition basaC on an AgalLife h1e[hoC. Functiora depreciation for soma floor plan firm;adons of an oIC?r Noma. No a%t?rnal obsolescence net?C. - ~Cv?r;z er.vircnr?r.ial ccnCiCCn; (tech a;.:c: not fl..,._. ,~, ---~ ___s w=_;:?s. tcxc ;cc;tars?;, ? c.) pr.;?n; i^ T. ,,.,r;v?:;^_. s, on _ ~, =, ar in C e irnt?cia:a vicrr;/ cf v L iUC~aCI prCp'.^j' Ngne nOtad bV :.`'IS 3CCr3Ser. VALUATION ANALYSIS cj i ILI.~I i cD SI i. V.,U~c = ~ 10.0~0~ cSTl~hi i cD Rc?ROOUC i.CPI COST-P,cN C; I!J?n0'rc. .'ITS; !. 50 =' S 710532 S 53 ~ ,_ ? syuar' C~("n'2rti cn Coii d:: ..:h (;uca 35. ;curCZ Ct c0it ?S~mai?, sRZ valC _ .cc: c3iculatlcn anC, for Ht;0 irC'l,t, ;tz ?sbna:ed r~^,aining s.onc-ic lift ct ~z papa;;/ Tha Marshall Sw;ft R?sidential Cost D.Ianual is used as a cuiCe :o t 99 Sq ; t ~ S " S = . 730 »» = S » 13 s;ima:a the cost ,f ;he imorovem?ns n?w. 1.09 C ~ C. . . ~ ; ~ = j Tra ~s'ima~~d ^=^a rirq ~conomlc life a 50 wars. ~ t S = s sa. ?L :~ s ^ :1 ~ r ~ Tha accrt,aC deoroc:a[ion a 3s follows: , . or ;h? basam t 095 sg. h. is i = j I PhVSIC31 =»Ti = S ~ Func;icnal = 10"~ _ ~ I I - , _~ Tn?fa ar? .nC r?Can: SaiaS C; vaCar![ Ipt$ in ;he afea. a„ yy =r:c:an; gip.^:31 _nef^ i;ef~i ni C 000 = S 2 x i Tna estimated s: e value of St 0.000. appears to ba reascnacle h sm. ?c corner,?al:cS, ?L. pgrc mat?d Ccst `!?~N Tat31 c , ; = S t 33.252 I bloc of lot in :hls area. =„ 1 ~ cr l uaeCon3 ?hysical t0 »T era - i Lzss 325: 331 13 ' = S 'S 55~9 - . 0 O?7r?ciat:un 52. ^ef Ii f ` i V ' ~ _ ~ ?7 30~ .. . ntpfC +?~ 3iC _ C Dzpf?C dled T i nG t j ' ' ' ... .. .. -. _) 2.000 '~ . r"Y] e .f? (+ V31c? C ~; ii ..... _ ~ Tr=.CC:a ~Lla~ , crm i? 1•]-5: ?.~6c 2 _, r3nnle, x,13? rcrtt 10?S . .....n1- ,~?"':,'_, ~,.,....'.v;'--~..~il,,.^Ni,.:yll3^.__-. -~-?CC-=.L:.t.tCCc Six1r1LL R~SI.D~NTIAL ;`~COir1E .?~OP.n:'T ~?Pn;a1SaL .R~P17nT ; Inr?? -?nt31 :_~Oardtr.di s: culC :. a:cc?; 3 ic3.y.eC n ;,~> i_c.cf. T`.a r?n-;l :_-C3r7cl2i inC'_;c r=.?es?nt m2 mcS; :-;rr?nt renal nformaccn On ?r:0eC2s iimil3f 3fd ;,r:z:mdt? ;r ~.2 iub,'.C; CP:p?rry 3i ?Ci9Cl2. (i'tii :0m?dni0n !S C3S'.C Cn C;:c?n(r?fI31 C3:3. d1?!?'.Cn, T.e fen;31 COm?3f3C1?S ,,^j0iC311y 3n ^CI ~ e iamz comparab US?~ .n v.2 idi2i CCmFanSCn 3nL'JS~i.) i^,? 3CCr3tShc r?CCri inCCld 3SSUr. ... e3C2r ~~. UndS and ?rC?eC25 i2!?C;ed 3i C:m Car3C!?i 3fe ccmparaole to dr2 iUCjc ?rop2fty (~CL'1 r _ L'nl[a dnd S.? O'lerail ;:C?2,^,yf ind 3000f3:?I'J i??f?S?f.t r 2 fent3l m3C4I f0( 1x it Cj?C; ?f7??r2J (Unl2ii Co.?rM:Se Sid!2d Wialln ~ 2 feCC• Ii.!.I 1 SC3.;=:i I CC~I?ARa3l:~ i;L.10 ! `.t?=.?~3L: _ ";L ~ ~!??aa.;3L?R?ITA! `l0.3 ;,~„~;; 520-27 Arlington St. ~ 271-77 Dorgan ?laca 525-28 Fihomb?rq Ave. .._ _ t 3t S+Jackson St. ?rOx:mii/ t0 iCC;eCI i ~ 5 blpc:<s ! ' 2 blocks ! 0 Mocks L?aid C3I25 fd iv3d2a'I i I I ?'-nt iurr?'r Ca". I Au us: 2000 ! !.larch 2000 I Jul 2000 i Juns 2000 Appraisal I ?.1LS ~ `dLS I h1LS '~dt3 iOUfCd , I . . AS58i.ibf ~3S52SSOr A$ses3o( ASSaSSOr gent :onc2iiion; INA 'NA NA INA I !m i!rr.; ~ rem ~nr n I v,, n~a: ~ u., v~~ n v. ax - r o r a i u„ rnrt: ~ u„ v„- n v. ;n ~ aoa I u., i i.~re ~ ~r~ v~,. n w o, - , Oescripticn of Yr. ?n.: 1900 I This is an old trar..a avo srorr I This is an old trams ^wo s;oN This is an old brick two s:oN arOp2ry-undi, Old rvo s;JN !rams I Cuplax loo3ted in ;ha same I duplex in a Similar rental market ! Cuplex in a Similar markat ar C25ign, 3p0231, a e 'r3 dnCi25 duplex in gboC rental I gereral rental 3rad. Similar I area. Similar COndi;ibn. It i5 in similar COnCition. g , . C and ConCicons I area in avera s !condition. I CbnCi;ibn. I ! I I Rm. Count 1 Size I am. Caunt I Si ' Total ! Vim. Count Scz Total I Rm. Count Si ~ I iota Tat 13r 9a Sa. FL I act 9r 3a Se. FC !acnmt a2nt io[ 3r I 3a S . FL ,ucr.,;a Rdec 1 ictl ?r I 3a Sd. FC I tlcr^rr: Individual unit a l 2 t i 9901 5 2 t t,C501 0251 s 21 t 4501 3501 51 3 t i 4051 breakdown 1 2 1 t 9961 5 1 2 1 l t.C601 350! a l 2 1 t i 3501 3C0! 5 1 2 1 t l 965f I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I ! I I I I! I I I I I I i t I ( No utaires are !Heat is inc!uCed. ~ No utilities incluCed. Then is I Heat and avatar an included. L't;lidzs, ircluCed. i Than is off sveet parcnq. i off street oar!zir. I There is off street parkin . fumrtur?, and Tnen is no off i Then are open porches. ! ~ amenm2i I ! s;'ee: pa~kinG ' ',ncluC?d .n rznt I Ooen porch and 2 I I I I Sma!I decks I ! Func•ional utility is i Average functional u:ilirr. roll i Average functional utility. I Averaga functional utilirr. Fu Funcbona! ucliry avera a. Full I basement wiLn no rinish. Hot I Full basament with no finish. I basament with no finish. Hot , daszrnznt, basement with no I avatar as heat arc ores unit I Forced air cas heat and no air I avatar cas heat and no air - ;teating(cpciing, finish Forced air I has central air cenditioninq I conditioning. conditioning. project amzriti25 , e;c. ~ as heat and unit I ! air condi;ioninq. I 1 I analysis of rzntzl cats 3rrd suDOCrt ta'-s`ma;'-d r„ark2t rznis ;ar ~ a indiviCual iuhlr Brits (inc!cCing dra 3c;usvnerU uszC,'.t ad uacy of comDarv,lzs. real cCrassicns, zt:.) iuoject'srentsc.".edula ihd rot SCh2Cu!2 re_cccil2s Ce 3?pliC3dl2 ;odic:.[2C mcndy maC<dt nn;; m ~ _ _c:r:era;z seJj?ct uci~ ~.C crcvides ~Ctz eiuma;eC nnu ~- _ iubjzd; prp:^J. ir,? a^oniier must rvi?'.v ~ a r?nt char3d:znsdr of C.. cr: ~.c,2 sal?s ;u ^_'t"r^inz wn ^ ?sCma:zd r o-s i^dulC :.._.; adlal cr mac<e*, _ns. , zzampi2, if ae ~?f r?r,-s werd 3vaaadlz en ; .2 saLs compara2s and ~.- ,._,^,v? ~, gross ,znt mul~dli2r (Ga'.!), 3c':al rent 'Cr m2 iudje'; inoc!C d2 used. 1; ma; 1-"„ wen uszd :o rns~:d; u7e ccmparaClzs' rzr,'s and Ceriv? IDe Ga'd, ma~etVr iheu!d d2 us?d. The :o~!;rii ?lama:?d rent mw; r , ..a r_nt cnarac:?r i„~s :,. , _ ait~ L12 ial2s cdmcaradl? Ca[3 us2C W C?rh? ~ z GR!.I. Tn2 ;oral g'csi eS.ma[eC,: Bret ii not aCjus 'C for vaC3rcJ. L=.;3cS ;CJ,:L c!t i S cST:~1.1 i _D ~c'tTS Lease Ca-e tlb. cer'_- TeJ ??r hni; i dJ Unu; Unit c,n I -rd !Ldc Unfumisz~^. ~ ?uraiiheC I ~zn's Urd'_^isn 2d I ^is„" Fer - t 0 ct I~ •c9p' 3 I i 295 S 246 I S 5 t I i 0 I 35J' ~ 35J 350' I I I i I I I I I 1 I 2 I I o I ! I; ;~; I (S Gtn2r mcr.;:,ly mccm2 (i:.mize) ' '/3c3nc'J: _,,1.'31!3i['J=.3r 0 ?r+.ViC7S year 0 ' _~_... ~ " S 387 ..,,.ahJ Total ynsses;imatedrenl S 7 hnlme; inclcced ~n ?idmat?d ; - ~ ;.__.,,v _ ':later ~ Sd'.v=-r, J Gii ! Cd !iris' :.~,..~cn _ Omn enti un i . ~_~~. ~~,.a.., -. - ..31 r.-,,. '.S'.,`3:'_C r..,.i ~' :3.:'(' ~_ - ~ :I'-..nCei :-`.veers 3:;:.11 3...,.~,._.-. f'.f.:i).'J~.ii.'_i..,_ T.^? inCOme 3^ ?Xp?,. G urns were raporad ro me by the peon?r. "r?CC:ed.llc,Ormi? .]-d~ ?; c3':r. ?3...„?:!__.:^r;-?i Crm S33 - -„;! ?000'_, ,. , ..;:r,' accrai>31 ,~.m.v1;2 oy 1 la mcCe. • ~. - ~ _CQ-;L;.: CCc Sw1ALL RESIDENTIAL INCOP~1E PROPERTY APPRAISAL REPORT Ina unCar,„SnaC nos rzc.iac snr? cant iaLi :f prccrrai ^oit i~mliar acC prcmah io 5 . icC :rcpzC/ arA nai CaicCCZd anC army:•d „zse in ~ , ~ is. - 3 it§nifiCan('IafladCn 7aCN?en ^_ iU ; 3rC "CtnparaCle pfCp °ras, !ta 3ndlysii A C I ' 'Went fat ~e ~T, < _ ~ "=~i ~; ?j'- zc ~ CuCai~a ; ! ar ae;usL ?cCng ; a? at rzac-cn :'~ d^csz ate.^.s .r _- ~.ec:a;.a:Cr iuppened ay r.a mo'''at Cata. It a ;:gnu:Cart aam in me cemcarClz ^rcczr./ s iuoeror p, ar racra favoracle tnan.1:7e ificl?C; prcoery.. a Ticui (•) aCjus::ar.; s ^aCe.:~ui zCU: ng ; a aCjustaC salts prCa of ~.z : ^paracla prcparcf: it i s;grdicar,t i am ~n ;.? rmt;araCi? :rcc?r./ is infancy ta, cr izss favcnCle ^an, :._ ;uejzct :r:C'r/, a aui (- 3C'756- .i mdC?. L":Ui ~,nCreaS~C^y ; ± 3C,C52 ales :nC 0f ~^? CCr' dfa '"/ '! Sa.e rC'. urCSi ~~I;c^rr ?aril 1iylToLt I SU9.;cC i ~I COfd?.:?;.3! SA!c `.0 1 I CC!d?;,r'iA3!_ SpL_ !.0 ? I CCbt?,tR.;CL= S-' = `:C i '023.27 Arlington St. 573.79 Arlington S:. ~ 1 s~5 Ccrnall St. 1557 Arlington S;. .dC;?i; DUOUCUe pubuCUa ' Duxcua I D~ buCU~ ?rCxtmlhJ tC ; soma bloc:< ~~ 3 blocks I same olcd< Salei :nca i i OVA I ~ Cnf. i^ =:ra. i »~ SGO ! `,? !'rf ' ?urn. i 3' CCO < C'f '~' -.'~ S ~3 531ai;,°C?.2r;3.a ;$ i5 ~t.03 IS 11.37 ii i5.st tcs; mcn;,`,Iq :an( ! i 5»SAO I i 950.00 ; i ;.050.00 1 i 5»O.CO ~roii C.C. n[ mu',I. i i'~ I - 27 35.2» a».53 Salai Crca czr snit 1 S i i 21.50 l i t35G0 I S t=.250 ]a!?i ccce car rccm I i i ; ~ : ~~ i : z inn I : .-~ Java anCi'or ~/eflhC3(ICn SCUP:'_5 Appraisal ASSaSapf i Appraisal Filar, D.1lS. A$sasspr ~~1LS, Assn SSCr h1lS, ASSeSSOf .~JJUSi)ac^lTS o=si,?~?-~)I i J~sz?i?reN - r-1 s =Cit:i;~a^ J_sc?;?reN -1 s;cia~^~encl _scal?rep: , s; - Salai Cr finan:,rg ~ ccrcai;ior.i I Conver.tienal Cash Conventional Jatz cf aal9'^uma I 3-CO/Av 5-0011_0 days 170-9gi28 Ca s ! ceatien Good I Similar I Similar Similar ! zaiehclG=?? Simcla Fae Simpaa (Faa Sim la Fea Simola I Fay Simo(a Sit'- 50 x 7C0 132 x t00 I ICO x iC0 1 75.5 x 100 'lie'.v I av . Bsiderdal I Similar Similar I Similar J?5' n 3M aCCeal 1 2 s;orv Cuplax 12 sa Cuplax,~Sim 12 s^: Cupyx/Sim. 12 sv duolax/Si.m. flcalir cf :Cns!~!caCn Averaca ~ Similar I S~mJar I Sir,.ilar - a^a 1 100 years ! 10» years I t 0» years I t 13 ears - JCOCi;tCn Averace !Interior +5.000 i Inf?riot +5.0001 Similar JrC;i ?cilCir.^ Ara 7.992 : ~. `.I 2.013 Sc. .t• I 3.ti» 3c. h. •5.3001 7,950 SC.' Urit ~ ~• ~r_akdcwn I tlo.j im ce; ' !ia. i !w. I R~m ^cnt~I Vu.~ ~fi'ii l:t''~ -~i~:ffti. T:t l' 7fl jd I'13C. 7 1» 1 21 I I t 15 3 I 1 0 1 t i c 2 1 7 1 I t L 6 13 1 1 0 I I I I I- I II I I ! I I I I I I I ~ i fi'~, ?,^ _r,; I ;la. LCf_I is :ri 331~13C.; I t~ 5'1 21 7 1 0' i t I S~ 3 1 7 1 0 i 1 1 lI II I i I I '"~~I n~a rcra tW. l:f''l in ]rl 3d I - ~ 1 ~1 ~ 1 21 7 1 0 Ili » 21 7 1 0 I I I I I I i 7aiamant da5wf7tlCn I Full • no finish I Fuli • no finish ~ Full - no finish I Fuli - no finish =unccanal uofC I Avera a Similar Simi!a~ I Similar HaaGn 'CCCIin FACaynor.a FA as/nore FACaynor.a FA as/nona ?ar'cn cr'ctt sita none I none I none I ncna ?rojzct amzniazs and '? rf acciicaol?I nona ncna nona Inpna inana Ir,Cna _ 'iat Adi. iiCtap I - - t - '. i 5.000 i ; - - ; 5 1.3C0 I - I i -: i ndjui;ad ialas prC: Cf C ^CaraCla V ( . _ I - l i _ "7.500 - - 5 ~ ~ = _ _ _ - 35.700 ! - _ -" ! 5 23.` Ccrrr_.., cn ;alts cCmpariscn (icc!uCing r .cnciiiaacn cf all inCica:Crs :f r-_._• _~ ...:nsii ~nc/ acC falau'+z i7 ;7 3nC avaiuadcn cf ~ C/pical invz;;cfspcc:_.. mcflvaccr, in ;tiai;^ac'a;J, Thera threw cpmparablas are similar r?n;al orooerties !oca:eC ir. the same rental markat area. AlthouCh C--_ =3 cios ov=_r six months a o. it is still ccnsicaraC to ba a eccC indicator of v a_a as Ina ^af'<a' has not Shan aC sicnircan::v in ;nis tuna. ^_- =t 's adiusteC for inferior condition 3s R nds old wood Sidin Cpmp =2 i5 sided in ;:>ad. but is adit:5;ed for infaripr COndii;on as tha :i5;irc s:a:?s :.`. __: the rooemr naeds work. Coma =3 is sided in brick and is consida r?d to ~° Ln s:mil=_r condition. IT;'.i i SC?.1cC- COV7P.=?=-_cliJ. t COf.i?~.?.-3!c NO ~ I Cnut.7"r= ___ ? Data. ?r :and Data JCUf:d fcr prat salai N;rnlit V??f ^f ann?lia ' CVO sale in pas: 12 months as n?f ASS aSSCr. No sale in past 12 mot,;hs_s par Assassor. -_ I Vo saH in pas: 12 months as par I No solo in pas: t 2 -cn :-s_s ; Assassoc Assassor. analysis Ci any e:r,?nt air°arz,., Cf ialz. _._cr., cr !iicng of L^z iub;zC pr, ?ry a:;d anzr/sii of a~iy ;,ccr , .s of iu^_;eCt anC cCraaraClzs vn~ In Cr,a ;rear s~ ~ - --._ _:: ,~~ r~._ __,.._._.. ~...,.,. ~,.,^.~ „r ~^„ ~, ~~. anro~m~nr of sal?ynoticn. or Iistir.C of L.a scbiect oropany,_ I Otdl yfCSS TCna^.ly ?i"n'ai?d r°f,I ~ 990 X yrCSS r?nLT,L' ~~ :r (~nirll ».GO = ~ »3.700 iiiUli;r\i!J 7~:LU: 7" ••..~ : ~ ~ 'r'te JOmmaCls cn inCC^? 3y^piC3C:1 (inC:UCICy ?Xp?ni2 raCCi, if 3Y311dd1e, anC :'.000GIIaaCn Cf 'u""•: G.i .f) INOICaT?0'lALUE3YSALESCCMP.iRl50NA??RC.1CH ............................_......_................_........................................... s 33.( INOICATEDVaLUE3YINCCMEA??ROACH ........._ _ .. .......... ....................._. __._..._............_ .......... i »3.. INOICATcD V.1LU_ 3Y CCST A?PRCACH _ Thls 3ppfaual ii mach ~ 'ai ii iucl'.CI i0 ;na r?'".alts, 31;a.`a:Cns, iGiyaCCni. Cr :CnC;":.l> !iiiad 2'.!C'N '_ iUCjaCt ;J ::mpl2"Cn oar piani a: 7 5-_1:'C' C^. CammenG and c:nCricns':f 3G?r3ii31: Ti sub~~ct is an old fro-' 'wo s•orv Cuol=x 'oca''d naa~ Loras Collace. ~.IV value is subiec: ;o t-a a-ac^ed of imorcvemants whic'1 sta:a that ;ia front will ba restowC a..^.C ;ra ;hraa siCai sided m vim+I. '`hart is insurf~c~act data to supper, a - •_^?r va,ue baseC on his;orcal r?novas on in a ran;al orooartv. ^r.al 2c:: craa'Cn: ?Cost Aeproacn is Civen f; rle considara; n C a ;o Ira Iar^° 'mount of Capr?via;:on of an olCer Noma. Tha Sa'as C -Dori: ACOfpa^h and tha !nCpm? ApprCdCn 2fe Civ?n Iha most we~.^^; ~ B :p ;h? fdC; ;.^~ai :nis is 3.9 income OrpdCCinC prppem! as are :.^e •' arap~? u s2,"_. _ _ ' „_i„ ` u~;~ 3^ri ]Ii'1 !i ~C '_i"u^ ~~ ~ ~ I ~eIUL Of u~a r°31 r _ di '.~ ., ~c ~~~~c'.., ., ~,~ - „ ~a~_~ ~" ~~~_ .,.,~ .. .............. .. _ _... __. _..____ _ _ , and !im:;xg SCnC6i:nip and ^u;a[ valve C?ic„ ;cn ,^at atz iataC in ~ ? a'acn?'~ "C~i? !.l a: ; orn s33,`:nr.:? l.laz Pcrn t J0-3 1RevnzC ) I ,V/=) ESTIPd~TE THE ~UARKET V.LUE.;S CP?1NE0, OF iHE'nE.1L?RC?ER i (+THai IS THE SU3.ECT CF THIS RE?C'nT, AS C? AuCUS; 10. 2000 (WHICHSTHEC?.iEG?!f15?ECilOfl.t!lOiHcE~?ECiItiED.1TEC?THISRE?G'nT)TJ3E5 33.000 APPRAISER: ~ ~i~ I f i; SL'?°_R'I!5"vRyA?PRAIScR(CNLYIPR_°GUIRE7): • 'lar*? :7iiliam H Luksatlch V~ r,:._,. __ r./ CZrg?? 'Sir^,n AuCUS; 17. ~GCO D~•~ ^rr: :~r-,.,,+ ]t3 rr;Cat:Cl1 .}. Da01'7 a» _ : IA 5'?:'. G ~'t,C a:'.Crt = ~'.da. ,doe i ....~i? 1 ~-;, ~ -._c _r rafn,_ .. __ -...~ .._. , DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: i^_ mCi( ,rcJ3:~ pnc. ,v-.... i , _ '^/ ]..,.., :r:; .n i ..•.,_._., ~:d Cc?n ,-ar,_. ~nC?r ail ,.,.,. :cn; [?'y.u:f. .. 3 :_•, iii?, ,~_ C'(? 3i,~ i21!?f, _r:.1 3Cn(J r~'C?. ",'/, i4^C',v!? _ay 3.^... 3iiu,•, ... ,.,.. ii ~r~t i.'.._,_,. ~J unCU? ],,,,. .,lui InlClla[ in ~ u ,',?LCD,,. ~ a .,~. ._r iUr7:C'3::..~ of 3 iai'_ 3i Cf i;,?Cf.?d C3' ird ,.,_ ~di iiC; i ,.... ~f:r1 ]..._• .u ]U'/?f LrC?. _.,.,,,~CCi Nf;2f?~,% (;) U'J? 3rA ..._, U=. ^JJ u_:'J i~.Cf1V1:?'~~ I?; CC','1 N3~._> 3f? w?I ,~,~Cr^?d 'Jf w?!I 3C'i1i"'. 3r.7 ___.~ 3': J'j :n carat ... __ri:C?ri ,•~] .:V,^, _?i. f:_f?i' ~~) a f?3iC,.~.,~_ 1,.,.. ~5,...^.'.V?C :,...~....., .:'. Ja',-,nr ,. -,~ .a,,,,,.. ~'- 7J?r. ~lr,z:: , , a r..3C? In :2r-..; ;f :3;h In U ~ ._•._.] ar'.,~ ._, ..a .. ,,,,_, _al i. _ ... s ccr.;; ,..~_ ~._..,,. 3r.C ril cx2 ]....a .... ~.,,,~3! _..~.a..?r3Jcn ,'Jr ;,.? prcc CJ icld '_.._.~._._.:'/ .. _. ., .._,.,. ~.,,a-~c:r, ia!?i __..~_,a~~, a .;~?C s'J i^qrn: _aa~.._.__ 'N~,,, C;Ui:r.'.~..a .~ ., . _CC~:C3r3C.?3 ,T~;1ii __ •'naC? „~ ]..::31 ':f ., ._':'r? ~.,._nC:rry ':f ]_..] ._rC?aa._. ]. .~ ]~;Ji~^...^.;i _,. i,_.°iidr/ ~_. ,.._a. .:i;i ',v.^....~ 3i? ~~~~Tall'/ ]3i~ ]'/ ]..~..] ii 3 i'.i~:: ,~ ._..,.Cn Cf :d'.v :n i ~-~di<d( 1(?3; .._]. _~iii 3f? (?aC~l'J iC:..tlfil~l? ],.,_. ... sill?r ?yi a.zi2 _..a,a ,~, n ~'3lhJ a;l sa!2s c3niacJCrs S; t.31 Cr _.._C'r? finan,.r, aC' ....?r.'u Carl ,._ maC? tc ,•_ ...-.3r3C12 prmr,J Jy CCrparsors ;J Fndncing ,_..,,, orf2f?d 7y d third .3cJ ..s~,~CCrt1 IznC?r ~._, i; nct ilre3C•J involved in u.2 r ^J .~ ,,.nil:_:o. n'J 3~';us.~?r i^CU:C ..., :? .dlcClat2^_ Jn 3 ,.,.:hanicJ dc.:3r .:r .char __], Jf ~ z financin^y cr Ccrces;icn __~ ~.. CCII3r ar^C.n, Jf rrJ iC;cs -.rt ]`cuiC 3C.,~ox:~^a:? ,. _ ~ar'e ; ._..cn :o _.. fcacc:rg :r ..,,c2siicns Cas2C cr, , _ 3CCflla?f ' CCy' .....~ STATEMENT Of LIMITING CONDITIONS AND APP'RAISER'S CERTIFICATION CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: i:i? acceis?r'; ._^5C3iiCn ~ a: i - 3r, in :. pprdiial epcr, is icC;eCt to L^.z .':ilc'.va'.q :000ICJr1i. 1 I~Cd 3C, 'iG?• :vill rC( :. ~?ipCnirCl? fCf nlai?ri CI 3 I2^,31 ~:3.^.:!? u':?I 3f`?C...~,.. ,. .^.J ]. ~ 3C^, ?~i2C :r T~. ,.,.. (D ii, i*2 3.pr3ii°r 3iiU-?5 r:3( ~,_ il(:. ii , '"C ifC ~••dr<?.__._ 3Cd......:f?, ,v!!I nC[ r?r.C_, 3c'J C~iniCna 3Ju.. ~._ .,._. ih „ . _:^/ ii _ 'aii=_^, cn u._ SdSi CI d ~~nQ rC?f r.]. _, 5,,,._ ?. ,.. _.Jfau..• hd] pr:v',Ca.C 3 ]n_.... in ..._ 3CLf3:ial f?JCL .., a,~CW 3C;r:x:^di2 Cir.ni;cri af -.:r;rC'r?^..r:i w.d u.. 3k2IC ii inciud2d CNJ ~iiSl „,...JC?. ,~ ~.. , ar, I,~'r'i_3ii:ng J~? ~r;,2^J 3rC ,.nCU;:lnciry .? 3p;^ lii?r i C...••„~~.,.ricn cf i(i ]._.. i, i... . Jf?ii?. .._a ?.xar,.,,.2d u._ av1'7a.,•. iICCd ^aii ,.~e. _. :rCVld?C .'/ .._ ~ .. _.'31 ~~.-X' :'/ :!_ ,_ ,._i~, ,_ C/ ~Cf ~.,u._f Ca._ iCCC a) _rd tai .•u:"' .n ;? ?L^y"raii?I .?~C~ Nt1=_i~2f u:2 il:'C',]_C( i~ G !CC3i'_d i0 3n 'C?nZ.~l?d ~p2C:al ;!CCC :'..__,.'nr?l. j2CaUa2 u_ G3ii2f i5 nCi 3 iCrN_y7f, ,_ Cf i,._ C,c,.a ao ;c3rar:2?i. ?x~r2si Cr irrcfi2d, r=.garding ;:is Czt?,^inaCcn. - it. - _,].. 'Niil r,ct ;Pr? :2simany :r 3i:p?3r in CC_,...._.,]. ,._ :r ]... ,~ ._. _., a~^,_a31 _, _. prc^ ^/ n , ?iccn, unLss ,~,~ array; ...r.,, a Cc S i.:? -aii?f n3i zi~~T.at?d ~._ vile? Cf t.2 .a..C in C'_ ::i: _-_ch .~ .~ ".23: _nC =.]..a_ ?rC ~_ . 'CV=.-?n's 3t r2ir C_,.~ ~u;Cry v?isa. -.s. c...n!'___~•,, :P ;.a IdnC _cG in•J Cv?.^„_.^,'S ..-~,us ~.., _. .a?^ :n _Cnjur._.cn w:n ,y r_.?r __ iaf .;.d ar? inv3iid if ~,?'J ar. iC .a?C. °C;= ~ i a ~ i ] ''=^r?C._ u. i?CC2 _~ ,•-_-.CCGi '.YBa-. ;C C: o. i`.? ._. _.].. .._a ,._.__ in ~._ _~Jr3G31 ,=.CC~^ _r.y _ .... __._.~~ • ~i'~__• 3i. ..... .__. . ]._]._.,._]...:.I Ci2rr?C C':riny ._ irs~a_.,cn _~ .•_ ] , ' ^,J Cr s _, ~..., ], _ _.._•-. i:v3:? a _.. . ,•~,.-31 ,_a.?r:a icvcPad :. _..._....c, ... ir,1 Cr..]a ,...r«is? i;3.._ s ~ . aCCr3ii3f ~._. , .._ _ cr]ii.. ,~_ ~ '4"cw':=~', of _:y r,cC?n _~ _, ,_re.., ~c~.,.,~~,.] cf .. - ^r cr aC7?. ].. .. ,,~,,.,r.. 3 ._nC;,~ni Qr.c:cC Cg .'?i?.,_. „ ..___i _..Ci y:vai L'], .:.cb: a._a._... :.) ~_, Nc~_.~ .~~,_ ~. pr,^ ^/ ..Cr. Cr !2]a 'n_li,_-_• .,,_ _] 3ii_.:.?C ~ _. ~,_.. ~. ,., ]~... _:rC:'cns .nd „a:?i .:c ._L.??i ., w?ran^._]. =~cf?]a :r .~,,.,,.._. ,- _.c,; ~,. ccnCi:.~, _~ .:. -r./. i... __.,_.,.• ..i.I ~,~. __ ..__...a..,._ ~~• .; 'J ]~.,, cacCl..c] . _. _. _?zi: _~ .~ ie/ ?nG:r?_rrg ., ._a. _. -,ly:-,( .. , ,cirri :a _sccv?r wcz-?. ]::i ......... a ?ci;. _..___. .,. .]_, s , ct ?n ?xJ.' .. ,•?IC .. .n•rr.r,...-.:31 .,---•-'. ~ . _- .,_, ,_.~,: ~„_]~ cc( __ _...a._..., a] an ...r~r~......21 3ii?am~,.C, _, _, cC?r.J ~ ,.~' __Cf31i.• :Ci3n^'.C _,. in;.~37CC. 'sJ^a:?i. i.^.G .._i.;CfS :3i 'N?f? ?S1f?ii?C If1 ,._ ___~..i'_I ~?:C~; 'r:~'1 iCCi C:i u7at ~._ „ its? CCriiC..a :J _. ~.i.__•. _,... .... d'1?a ....,~ :C ,. „~. 3CC ...~,.__ ~~,. 3"._?li?. CC?i nC! _]a_.... .?iCCni(C~iCJ C~ ... __.. _, Cf ]~Cn I:?^i ~•c, w?f? ~,.fCii'~__ _~ct ':? i. ~. i;:. raii?r wiil ~.,, Cis::CS? .,_ _.,.._,.,] .~ .. _ .~]31 ~.:crt ?xc?_, is CviC?d ._~ .n :.. „crc~,., S:an__,_, cf , •ct?iiIC,31 .aril -,..a._ ? ~,.. ._cra:a,~ ._] __az"_ hii cr .... __.riii3l r?JCr, ,. _ v?Ic3CCn _:cc:uilcn ,_, in ic; _sal 7a: a a :C iac;faC;Cry ccnJizaon, __ ~. .~ il`._, _..,~,a .,..... aaa~. ~_,.'~:n :,_~ __ r ..Jn :~ ., . ~:n~ ,.~, _..s ,.,,~ _ , .,crc.?C n 3 Ncrc,._,,,,,_ •-_~.,:.. ~„ i"? .__flli.. .~„] r '.IC? nl3 ., ~~?f Jr;J! ',v ~.. 2n __..a.... .. .,~. .... ~_..^.C?.. :.. .,,^.I ij,=':...._ ~. .. ~_ '-"'..a3i ~_._~ :3n _~a...CU:2 ~,_ r _,ail ~._..~, ('~^:.__ _.,,~~...]~.~~] __J6( L`~2 u ^/ 'l i.0.. .._ 3J_~ia?.] iC?n'd/ af.C :r:.?iiIC, 31 _. , :ICCa, _r_ ~.... ..._2i ,.. 3n'J •-mwr21 ___..,i?I ..^J:....•.] :r ,,.. ~r1 .«:;,', wnlC`1 ... raii?f ali 3i nu~._..Cl .u _n'/C ~. ,.,..• .'3n ,._ _:fr:'.v?. .',. .~. , , -~ .] a..~_?iiCfi irC _ii yni; ~'. ,_, r.i_r?.. ._• ~_,._ ,]. „ .a]•anll __.,_. ,., _ci:3^Cr.i ^rJ a._.. a ....?Ily 3c_~CV?^_ ~.,._~..il .]..._.., .• ^,'/ C?C3'~? ~. _ :y. Jr ,ra__-_.._'J ~t ... _, ... i:_.'i .~ rJ a.. _, .._ OIiC._, cf .a7C,T._,a ?x:?:, .._..~ . .. .......... ~ aJ .a,. __.... _~.. ^./ _] Cn i?C;;rn ,~ .... r?c8rt .:./ . --.. :.,~~. _..,... ~~ f?J_.. , ,.. ,~ i) N~;^CCt ~,.., y ;J .~,_.,. _.. __Cf iii?• ] .,•".Cf N,:i,.~ .....a..... .. a__,:•a., ] NC.'?n ~Cni2.., 3r ~ _.., ,.31 ~, .a. ~~. ,,. ,,:_,, ... ., .,:f? ..~. 3C_i _,i31 .3n ,.. _:nv?•/? :~ ._'1 ,: ... .... ,..,. _., , _:'i:. _]Ly'. _~,_ r?i3::CCa. n?,.•rs. ]_.'_i. _~ ..-.. ,... _.... APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: - . -_]ra:;rr:?=:;.zi acd i;:??i ~ is ~. i...__ . _ a . ,,._. v, lr'._ _, . n3'.. a.._..._ 3 ~. .~., w i .. ~_. _., a_..a _ „ .,ai ~..,, , ,,...._i _. _ .Ja: ^._._ :0 .n_ a ;'.C ,., ,,:,r.i,Cirlr':r. ~..,.. a_,_a .....__..a.... _.~l:yis _.._ ._,. „___ i ._.!ir 1C,~_ -..., tvre.. _,_ .. >._ :7 r?!,__.... ~.._.ata.____~.., ,.,,a_ .._...a ct , vlr.d;an ~~ 3 ,-..~_.. ~:em in 3 ._,. carat. _ ^f ii a,....:r :,, .~ .,,,. ~_,.,__ ..nlr,, ,.. a i .,_...,._ ,. ~' ^/ -'. 3 ' ..era ~ ._____ _ :eC a...s ., _. _~ .,. _crc_._... _... ~ ay .ir; „_..... _ __. carr_,. _, .. ^/ a ,.. _.._.., his t3v,._ci? ,. _. _ _ a_ , , a./, I ^.~. ..__. ?. l h3v? ;?::<en r;a ..ri,C_,_„~,. ,.. a_.:ri .._..._,_ 3n ~r. c,._.:n ._.,. 'n ".•; "/?.~„~~ ..~. _. _ ..>.,~,_._ .~ mar,_, vil;,..., _._ iC_r3u31 cr,. I , a.. :, 4"O:rr.;;'f N;;......, ny ityn ~C3Ct ~.JL~3i; _.~ .,.~~, ... a^_'1ii11 ~. 3rC I :?!'.. .. :0 ;N _?i: ., ?1'/ :4^~0'N!'~'y ii _.i a,.,_..,?nii 3r_ ir.'r''^13Cw, ~. -. a^uprliidi ?,,^,0' af? ~ _? ir.t1 s'....._,. 3. I a.. ~:.n ,.. _s31 , ...rPl ~y ...,, _eri.:,.:i.... _>._ _~ , _ .teii..~ it _~.3P/i'S, ,_.., _: a. ia. _acclui:c. >. wt._..... > , cely „ ,,. __r I r3'H nv erei'".t Cf : _..~. ~.._r?i. '.. . „ _ :'/ :._ S `? iGO,' s : ~i f_, .. ?r,i.i ..,... n0 rr?i'.^.I :r ~'C i:'_::':? 2.'iJr31 i-._::it:~ Ciai «:: r?i;,?'...:0 a. r3~:~~.03Cli .n v.... _G53C.Jf1. I ..._ GCt+:3i.'.. _..~`ef ; .__ay er ._ ^.I'.'_i /,y "Y( 3ra:ji a 3r,.7f .._ ei ~~~,_, I c1 -a(C?• 'AiL_ '0 :._ _ 3;ial .__~. .,, .~.~ rac?. _clcr, r.!;gicr,. i?x. . _, .. _~-.,.,dl a,_._a. cr ^_,,,ril „ ....._, . _ crci; .~.. ,.....a :r ac: ~,,, •:f ,.,. a ,r.,,?C/ cr ct _._ _..a.... c:,n_.a cr cc_.cznr> _~ .. :+r,ei .n ;._ .,:.~ .:r ::, a._ a -- . I ;a';? nc .r?i?,,, .~ _.,,.,_ .'1._. .':r ,..:..a~ in „. a _ry, ar,. .._ .. ^y ,.,~.,..., .~._... ~icyr„„_.,..,~ -y cr..; ni3Jw, .a ~ .,~...-, ..> 9. I '.vzi nc; , ,cir?. ,,, ,.>_" a ;, _.._.,,.,,.:_ `r?' ,..~._cer.... v;_.:._ ~_..,, , _ .__ ..~ _....,~ct ;r ny r_._._ '/.... ~,cuc, cf ;'. vaD:? esr_._. ., 1 ,,._^t cf 3 i; _nc _>,.~. . _ _. _. .-__ .; ? i:ca _~.. 'r __. .. ._e.r? ^r ., ,_,>_..cn _~,,.~ '~1 -. -r r?~crir, _ - _.». i .,~ nci ._a..,~_ ___._.aal r___., cn t r , ,:i,. -.. ... c.-~',_,caeca. l ._._..: vi':ud...~ :r 2_ °C :a a_c.:v? 1 i;?:,~., -cr.;a, _~ . i I p?dcr?C ~ ii praiial 'n ...~„crrf w,:, .,_ L'nit;,n Stac~_._> .~ ?r.,esiicndl ,,,.~r_-iiz! ._._._ L73t '.v?r. 3Cc_ _ _rd ,rcmWy_ __ Cy ._ . --.izl SlanCd. _> 7ciw cf iie .accnisal ~ __..__~cn _„_ ..at w? _ in c~d__ _> :f :._ _-._ar? ._._ .~ 51ii _--,_,,al, 'ni[.'1 ;^~ exc cn .~ ... ar,_'r crcrscn ,~ r._>_ S:iauar>. '.vr.ic,~ Cc?i nat >. ;iy. I zc'.,:,e'+r!e^ _ _. _~, as:G-a;e ., _ ._>_,..,._ .~ .. or eroic,. ,~, .._ pzn ^a'<at is 1 ~:;:rciCcn :n ,.? Cerinican :f ,rar:zt 'r?..._ _rC ~~_ ?i:Slldte I ,.?'.'. . ii ..~ >>,.nt yvir, . _ .z_.,.. , ~„_ ,.~.._ in . _ , .,rceC a___cr, cf :.ii ?cr cL.?ii I cav? .,,._r.vu_ >._t?d in -. 3. I hdv? rericnaily inipac:?d ~._ .~,....., zcC '.x:?^er if eai ct =,_ ice; rect./ anC t.._ ez;?rer :~ a.l ]r7r?r?i lis:_d di ccr,.carClai in ~ _ a~crdisdl r_._.,. I Icr,~,?r eery w~at I h_.. ,.~:eC any a ,_~~, cr'ce'.v,^, 1Cv=,. __,,.i:c^a~:n ;,.? ieaj°'a im.r;.e^zc6. en 7e iubject iit_... cr, any „t wain r>,. ;rr„ec._.. ~da., Ief :t ,.. a ^./ of weicn 1 an z«are _'.C ~...~. ,~,__. ic,'a ~-..,,,> .cr ;%?i? aC•:..>. __,._,...r.i is ^y iray;ii ci : ry va!u? to ~~ ere, -_, I ~__ ~.-arzi:?viC?..~_ ~~ a__..~, ,..?n. , .'.3v? >.a„ _...,.~.._~ :?^ i_~.. -..-._~ ar t,a aC`:?r;? _~, ,.,`.cn, ;n ~,? ^ar'<e:_.i;iq ~i ~._ a 'cc?^/. 3 I cnady prepareC ail _~c,ic;icr.s a.:d ^, c.icns iCCU ~ . ._~ _>,_,_ ;^a; '«'?r. >_. ,_. _. n ,.. a?~raiial ~?ccr ~ I r_..?d c^ iigc<icdnt c .. .,...-- _ii~i;a~,~_ ,a,~ _ny incviCCal cr .~ .,eCed!i .,, >. r.cr-~_.... ., :._ _ ,anal .~ .. ere^_.__... ., ;~,a _ 'dual n.c ; I .._.. n2^?d i:Yn irtiviGu , , ._ _,ac,0i?d'.~_ ac?':,~,_ :ai::i ,nor-e_ cy '_., .~~ . _ ~._.~,~,~___., i'___„ of .,.> _ anal r_ I _.riyy _ ~,7 ..~irccdl a.. ,._,.._^ a ~ifi?; . _r._.,.. _..._a. ~. I ':,. •ct a.~ C :r'; c „_.,_ _ _ ~ :./ ._ _ . __:. ~ ., .... _. ._.. _ , ~i ~_-_ .. -_ _eeraiial ' I e"'. _ .. ~ ~Cnil. ili^/ `_. ~.. SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: a i ,.,>crr '_.~-•ier i.;"=.^ '„- _ecaiidl ; _ , _ v i..? c~^iei dnC z, _a _ _.. i ,...._Cy iccern;_ ,.,_ raiie. ~wr. _,_... -_-,_,,1! ,.__ ~ ._ .,..~,_..:,. . _~>_. ._. _ w ,,. .:_..._..s :,.,..cr.c..,>,,.,s .~ .,. .._.:... _, _ : J? :ccnc rf ;^? a "rlli?r a :_. ~,,.._.....,> _c_.... :. . __... _ .~ i,~ '_..:-.;'c,l ~ei~crs,_ 'f ic. ~,_ ;.~ri'ii! z„~ ... _ . _sa! r__..:. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY APPRAISED: 523-2' -:'irc:on S:.. Dubucca. I^ 5200' APPRAISER: SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (only if required): ~'~ ._. _ ~/. ~ /~i ._ ~_~ ~ ~,~ ._.. N'^_ ':`llili3rn H. Sul 0CC^ `l d.T.._ O1:? Sirs .. a r • 17 ~r•C4 _,. ayr . S'a:e ,...,~,~.:;dr, ~ Cn012= S:a3 _., .., ~__cn c _._.. I ~ ~ `'.. _ ~ _ ....,, ,.a_..; .__ ~r r:'.L L''l. d,i~~: =::1 =3? ~~iJ ~;ya 7 ;; 7 r3ne CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM August 17, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager `'~~~~ SUBJECT: Certificate of Economic Hardship for 623-627 Arlington Street B & W Properties has applied for a Certificate of Economic Hardship to install vinyl siding on all 4 sides of their duplex at 623-627 Arlington Street. Planning Services staff have recommended that the front facade be restored and vinyl siding be installed on the remaining 3 sides. Based on information supplied by the applicant and the appraisal of the property prepared by William Luksetich, Planning Services staff prepared the attached analyses of the applicant's request and the staffs recommendation using various economicfactors. These analyses are examples only. Based on information submitted by the applicant's certified public account, Jim Kircher, the property does not generate a positive cash flow at the present time. Attachments cc B ~ W Properties, w/att. B & W Properties Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Vinyl siding, Vinyl 3 sides, Economir> factors 4 sides restore front Assessed Value $35,820.00 $35,820.00 Cost to rehab $10,020.00 $25,900.00 Lead Grant $0.04 $0.00 Total investment $45,840.00 $61,720.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $4,584.00 $6,172.00 Annual operating exp. $3,972.00 $3,972.00 Total $8.556 00 $10 144 00 Annuai rent that the property generates $7 ?08 00 $7.208 00 Economic return ($1,348.00) ($2,936.00) positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: 17-Aug-00 Vinyl siding, Vinyl 3 sides, Comparables $31,375.00 $31,375.00 Cost to rehab $10,020.00 $25,900.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Total investment $41,395.00 $57,275.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $4,139.50 $5,727.50 Annual operating exp. $3,972.00 $3,972.OQ Total $8 111 50 $9 699.50 Annual rent that the property generates $7.208.00 $7.208 OQ Economic return ($903.50) ($2,491.50) Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. B & W Properties Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Vinyl siding, Vinyl 3 sides, Purchase Price $27,500.00 $27,500.00 Cost to rehab $10,020.00 $25,900.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Total investment $37,520.00 $53,400.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $3,752.00 $5,340.00 Annual operating exp. $3,972.00 $3,972.00 Total $7 724 00 $9.312.QQ Annual rent that the property generates ~,~08.00 $7 ?Ot3 OQ Economic return ($516.00) ($2,104.00) positive =can earn return negative = cannot earn return "Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: i ' i 17-Aug-00 Vinyl siding, Vinyl 3 sides, Income Approach $21,000.00 $21,000.00 Cost to rehab $10,020.00 $25,900.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Total investment $31,020.00 $46,900.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return $3,102.00 $4,690.00 Annual operating exp. $3,972.00 $3,972.00 Total $7 074.00 $$.662.00 Annual rent that the property generates $7,208.00 $7.208.00 Economic return $134.00 ($1,454.00) Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. B & W Properties ' 17-Aug-00 Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Vinyl siding, Vinyl 3 sides, Vinyl siding, Vinyl 3 sides, Economic factors_ 4 sides restore front Economic factors 4 sides ~ restore front Appraised Value $33,000.UO $33,000.00 Appraised Value $38,000.00 $38,000.00 "as is" with improvements Cost to rehab $10,020.00 $25,900.00 Cost to rehab $10,020.00 $25,900.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Lead Grant $0.00 $0.00 Total investment $43,020.00 $58,900.00 Total investment $48,020.00 $63,900.00 Annual income to Annual income to earn a 10% return $4,302.00 $5,890.00 earn a 10% return $4,802.00 $6,390.00 Annual operating exp. $3,972.00 $3,972.00 Annual operating exp. $3,972.00 $3,972.00 Total $8.274.00 $9 862 00 Total $8.774 00 $10.362.00 Annual rent that the Annual rent that the property generates $7 0.~ 8 00 $7 208 00 property generates $7 208.00 $7 208 00 Economic return ($1,OG6.00) ($2,G54.00) Economic return ($1,566.00) ($3,154.00) positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties: Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an exarnple only. CfTY OF DUBUQUE, 10~1/A MEMORANDUM January 3, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission _F'~OM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager ~(~Ci SUBJECT: Referral of 623-627 Arlington Street At their December 20, 1999, meeting, the City Council voted to refer the appeal of Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, B & W Properties, regarding installation of vinyl siding at 623- 627 Arlington Street, to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for further action as may be appropriate. In addition to this referral, the City Council has asked that the HPC address the following two issues regarding this case: 1. The HPC initially expressed concerns with inadequate maintenance, but these concerns were not brought to closure. The City Council would like the HPC to bring this issue to closure. 2. The City Council would like to know why the HPC did not accept the recommendations of staff. LC/mkr cc: Tim Wood, 550 English Lane ',"~' CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOVi/A ~, -~- .,- ~''~ MEMORANDUM ~~~ January 7, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission c/o Mark Noble Planning Dept. 7~ - --ROM: Mary A. Davis, City Clerk ~/;~,~~~ I' SUBJECT: Referral from City Council meeting held on December 20, 1999. At the Regular Session of the City Council meeting held on December 20, 1999, upon motion the following agenda item was referred back to the Historic Preservation Commission for further action as may be appropriate. "Historic Preservation Commission requesting Council to affirm or reverse their decision regarding appeal of Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, B&W Properties regarding installation of vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington St. " HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WORK SESSION February 3, 2000 What ore the HUD Guidelines? The °HUD Guidelines"is the term used to describe the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-bused Paint in Housing. It does not carry the force of law but are "Guidelines" for the evaluation, control and removal of lead-based paint hazards which must be followed for certain HUD funded programs, such as fihe Lead-based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program. If you don't want to follow the Guidelines, --you can not participate in the Lead Grant program. What is the de initi n of "Lea -based floes int"~ Lead-based point means paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter or more than 0.5 percent by weight. The only acceptable testing method for determining if paint is lead-based is through an XRF examination or laboratory analysis. What is the definition of a "Lead-based Joint hazard"~ Lead-based paint hoza~ds means any condition that causes exposure to lead from: 1) Lead-contaminated dust, 2) Lead-contaminated soil, 3) Lead-based paint that is deteriorated, and 4) Lead-based paint that is present on accessible, impact, or friction surfaces. What is a "known"lend based paint hazards A "known"lead-based paint hazard is a hazard which has been identified either by laboratory analysis or by XRF testing. A presumed lead-based paint hazard must not be disclosed, however a "known" lend-based paint hazard must be disclosed for Real Estate disclosure. How can "known" lead-based paint hazards be removed Once lead-based paint has been tested and determined to be lead, additional regulafiions come into play as far as removal for worker protection, such as IOSHA; and for waste disposal from EPA. Once alead-based paint has been tested, it can no longer go to the landfill as ordinary household waste unless the waste can pass a TCLP test. A TCLP test is a °toxicity characteristic leaching procedure" test which tests to see how much lead would leach out once the waste is put into the ground. If component waste such as doors, windows and/or baseboards are tested and the TCLP test is = to or >than 5ppm it is considered hazardous waste and must go to a hazardous wnsfie landfill. (It should be noted that in the Lead Grant Program, no waste has passed the TCLP test to date.) L-/ow does IOSHA affect the remova/ of °known"lead-based~aint hazards Once lead-based paint has been tested and determined by either XRF - arralysTS-o~~abo~atory-testing; the contractor is obligated to follow IOSHA regulations for the removal and provide safe work practices for their employees. Some of these safe work practices would include providing respirators, air locks, pre and post abatement cleaning, air monitoring and medical monitoring of workers. What is the difference between renovati29 and remode/ink and lead-bused aaint hazard remova/ work? 1) The intent of the work to be done and 2) Is there a "known" lead-based paint hazard which has been documented by XRF analysis and/or laborafiory tesfiing? Once the hazard is "known", the contractor and/or owner can not dispute the fact that he is dealing with a "known" hazard. What is the cost for the disbosal of hazardous wastes In determining how the Lead Grant Program would dispose of hazardous waste for our program, the following waste proposals were reviewed: Heritage Environmental Services, Inc. $5,850.00 (30 yard container) HEI Consultants, Inc. 4,700.00 (30 yard container) Disposal through the Lead Grant Program 275.00 per unit (paid by the Grant program.) '~11r Z~ 1 Q- DLIBUQL]E'S CHILDHOOD LE~.D POl50~l~G PFEVENTION PJ~oc~~~,J B ~ W Properties 550 English Lane Dubuque, IA 52003 Re: 627 Arlington Street Dear Mr. VVood: December 20, 1999 ~ c,°C Vv ~-yk Se 5 s ~ ~~, On December 15, 1999 an environmental investigation of 627 Arlington Street, Dubuque, Iowa was completed as per your request. The investigation was performed to point out lead hazards that must. be corrected at this residence when you participate in Dubuque's Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program. Of particular concern is the prevention of lead poisoning. Lead poisoning is a disease that occurs when a person is exposed to too much lead. Children are most susceptible because of their hand to mouth activities and because of their developing growth activities. Several ways that children may become lead poisoned are by: ^ ingesting lead-based paint chips ^ ingesting settled household dust containing lead ^ ingesting lead dust if they are present when lead-based paint is being removed by scraping, sanding or heat gun. Ideally, the most effective way to keep children from being lead poisoned is to keep their hands and toys out of their mouths. This is nearly an impossible task, so the next step is to keep their living environment as free of lead hazards as possible. Many surfaces in your residence were found to be painted with lead-based paint and treatments. Although these surfaces may have been repainted with alead-free paint, a previous layer or layers of the coating contained lead. Often when the paint chips come or of these surfaces, all layers of paint come off, including the lead-based paint layer. Thew chips and dust then become available to be ingested by children. The attachment entitled "Eliminating Lead Hazards" details ~~vhat makes lead-based paint and coatings hazardous and hotiv to safely remove these hazards. Flease read this before starling any work on the paint. Lead Hazards The enclosed report sheets give groom-by-room list cf where we found lead hazards from lead- based paint and coatings. Please refer to the enclosed test report for particular locations of leas hazards. {i~Joie: r, positive er neg4tive re.=ding on a tes,ed comper~ent. such as a winde~~~/. dcc~. O" t?,rs~~DOar d. pl1eS nGt Onl;/ i0 the CCrirpCr'.cni i~S~'~' F'~., ciSC •`.v ~ ~,c . ap anV sii;illa. C^vi:~:,Gnc,^:i ili..:i, ~.. .i ,, •.r:h :~ hi ~~..~r:,~ ~c'r ~. i,: .. •,i.ti;~~~r:~. 1_ .r: L'.;i \•.. •a:~ _ .. _..~•i ;oi~ ~i i ._ ~ _ .. ~.\ the rocm.) The purpose ofi our lead investigation is to identity lead paint hazards which are accessible to children. The readings located on the column marked "PbL" of the report indicate the quantity of lead found on the identified surface. Readings greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm'- Pb indicate the quantity of lead found on the surface. Readings greater than or equal to 1.0 shall be considered positive for the presence of lead. IT !S REQUIRED THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS MUST BE PROPERLY STRIPPED, REPLACED, OR ENCLOSED BECAUSE THEY T ESTED POSITIVE FOR LEAD AND ARE A LEAD HAZARD: 627 Arlington Street -~ ^ EXTERIOR -Replace, strip, orenclose all window components, upper trim on front porch, and siding. ^ ROOM 1 -Replace, strip, orenclose door components. Replace or strip all window sash (3}. ~ ROOItii 2 -Replace, enclose, or strip all window components, a!1 door components, and baseboards. Replace or strip all window sash (2) and doors (1}. ~ KITCHEN - Replace, strip, or enclose all window components and all door components. Replace or strip aU window sash (2). ~ STAIRWELL -Replace, strip, orenclose all baseboards, bottom rails, and uppertrim. ^ HALL -Replace, strip, or enclose all window components, door components, and baseboards. Replace, or strip al window sash (1 }and doors (1). ^ BATH - Replace or strip ail window sash (1). ^ ROOM 3 -Replace, strip, orenclose all window components, door components, and baseboards. Replace or strip all window sash (2). ^ ROOM 4 -Replace, strip, or enclose al! window components, door components, and baseboards. Replace or strip all window sash (2}. ^ STAIRWELL A -Replace, strip, orenclose all baseboards and risers. ^ ATTIC- Replace, strip, orenclose all window components, baseboards, rail cap, and balustrades. Replace or strip all window sash (1}. ^ STAIRWELL B-Replace, strip, orenclose stairrisers, doorcomponents, and header. ^ BASEMENT- Replace, strip, or enclose all window components and door componen#s. Replace or strip all window sash (3) and doors (2). When you are removing the lead hazards noted on the a~ ached test report, please remember that you are working with a toxic material. Have workers wear respirators, take steps to reduce dust (wet down surfaces, cover vents, seal or rcoms being worked on), and make sure no children or women of child bearing age are present while the wor',c is being done. During any lead hazard removal project, it is imporant that the house be kept very clean no~,v, during, and after all of the Headed work is done. Aster the lead paint removal work is completed, the entire house must be thoroughly washed and vacuumed. HEPA vacuums are available for your use to assist you with your clean-up efforts. (There is a small fee charged for the use and Tor bag replacement. These vacuums are checked out at the Haalth Services Department at 1300 ~Aain. Call Sb°181 t0 reS2Ne a vacuum unit). This will ensure that moss of the lead dust is removed from your residence. You will also need to periodically check the condition of all lead painted surfaces so you can repair deteriorated paint before it causes problems. Remember that no children or women of child bearing age may be present while the work is being done and care must be taken to assure that children and women in adjoining properties are adequately protected during any remediation prccess. Please submit a plan of correction prior to renovation as to how you plan to correct the lead hazards identified in the attached lead investigation test data. Two bids are required from certified lead hazard reduction contractors detailing your plan of action. We have included a list of contractors certified in lead hazard reduction for your convenience. This office will want to conduct at least two more investigations at this property during the lead removal process. ----After all the lead painted surfaces have had the lead remediated a final visit at the completion of the project is required to complete final clearance that includes: dust wipes, soil tes`ang, and work performance approval. REAL ESTATE DISCLOSURES REGARDING LEAD-BASED PAINT A.n explanation of the rules about disclosure of lead-based paint/hazards is included for your convenience. It is important that you follow these rules from this point in time. if you have any questions about lead poisoning or how to prevent lead poising from occurring, please contact me at 589-1724 or the Dubuque Health Serrices or~ce at 589-4181. Si~ rely, Liz Kemo Lead Paint Insoector cc: Mary Rose Corrigan, Public Heaith Specialist Kim °rown, Tenant i ~~. DUDUQUE I-IEALTI-I AND I-LOUSING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CHILDI-i00D LEAD POISONING PREVENTION PROGRAM 1II05 CENTRAL AVENUE DUE3UQUE, IA 52001 (319) 5f39-1724 fax (319) 589-4244 December 21, 1999 LEAD INSPECTION FINAL SUMMARY REPORT XRF Manufacturer: NITON Corporation XPF Device: XRf= Serial No Source: NITON XL 309 341 Activity 10 mCi, Assay Date 9/15/9G Source Serial No.: U341 D450G NITON Training Certificate No.: 99033153915 Inspection Date and Time: 12/15/99, 9:21 AM Inspection Site: G27 Arlington Street, Dubuque, IA lnspector Name: Elizabeth Kemp Inspector Title: Lead Paint Inspector State License No.: IATRAIN-INSP-0001 E[3L License No.: ~~/ / Inspector Signature:_ E',~~~_(~~r__~~r fj~~,i~J d 131 testing combinations were tested within tl~e above identified mouse. Lead in quantities greater than the Dubuque Residential Housing Cocie and the I-IUD Guidelines was found in paint on Gt3 of the 131 testing combinations as per the attached lead inspection report. tl•~Ar~ot rr6/5vz1 rr ri cL 7s•ri sO.1 srr 7o•s« uaa.l•) P"In\ y'Inaa.l 2xil-'Ic"5 ~„'I111In\ n •'niv r nnm r,r, snr CI~RCYII (r(i/SIR[ I'C 11'1 D'L r C'LI SOd 9i'[ 711'5« 'raa•1•) P11,1\ y'rll•,a.I lxil-IIIS e+11'IIA\ i! '2111' f 10110 (i6 )O2 6h1Lf101 46/SI/ZI 1'C 0'Z i'L 711'61 SOd CZ't 711'5« uaa.l•) I'^IA\ y"Iliad Ix;l-9c"S e+^1111,1\ 11 •,P11' r Ig011 6(i (III 6111Lf'OI 6(r/SI/iI 0'C 6'I Z'p ~ y'Zl SOd CL'I ~ (1'S« "M1.11[ PIIA\ PIIIS PI)hy11c^:) A111'"1.11 11 x1111' C I(IllO-Gf, Zll l RIY)C~OI ~(/SI/ZI II'C 0'i L'ATL'fI SQd IA'!'r(1'S« +1I,L I'^'bN PIIIS .laau{NS x~'IIIS P \'-Ila++•'!'n5 i Ig0(I64 A6 [51CC10t 6(i/SUZI I'f S'f 12'77 ['CI SOd F4'f X11'5« 1°,I. I'^IA\ PIIIS -raFhl ~'I'•IS \' \'-Ila^+~'!"IS Z 112011-(4 L4 IIL~IIf~OI fi(r/SI/ZI C'S S'1 S'Z ~ 1'f SOd 17(1 ~ pl•'Z all'IM.1.10 I'^IA1 9illaad Ix'tl-9cIS ^+IP"IA\ J I'-'"^^21 Z 11100 G6 t4 f10~llC~(1I (i(i/SI/ZI II'f I'Z S'r2I ~ h'AC 5<)d S['I 7 0'S« a219A\.LIU P"IA\ II"Ilia.! Ixgl-praq•2-rn,l mOp1!,1\ J F-'11021 Z 111110 66 f4 Ch~6Z10I 4fi/SI/ZI Z'C ' p'C II'(174'hZ Sl7d L'I'I7(1'S« at19,1\J.10 P^IA\ 9111aad lxil-IIIS ^+^1'"IA1 J P-111121 Z IU11064 Z4 Ah1Li~111 46/SI/ZI C C II'lll L'fi71'IC. SOd 11'1'CT1-'5« a119A\J.IO I""'A1 PIIIIS 11115 ~+IP1'IA\ J 1'-111121 Z 1000.44 116 6ZtLi~(11 46/SI/LI C't ' II'OI N'(rrL'7C SU.1 AI'C70'S« all'L1\.L10 1'11,1\ I'll"5 P121-y11c'rJ ^+11101,\1 J I-"'^121 Z 101111-44 6N ZO~Li~III (r6/SI/il Z C ' 11'11! 1'111 T Z')C 5Od C9'i 70'S« all'IA\.IJO PO^r11 PIIIS I'•r+'"'laFnrl 11",1\ J 1'-'11" 21 Z Illlifh(r(i H9 1'h~S1~01 4(r/51/ZI C C 0'111 Z'1l 7 L'hh 5O.I IL'f F 11'5« x119,111.10 1111.11 PIIIS 1g21-y"Ic1'J -r11(I (1 t--11f1)1 Z 1 111 - ' LS°CZ~III 641St/II I'f r.'C I'll \' 9'Sh SO.I fCI 711'S« .Ca-r;) P^^,11 PII^S P1119xF"^ 11",11 J [-111021 Z 0 1 66 IOnn 6 JH III~IZ~III 64)51/11 i'f h'Z f'1. 7 i'fl SUd IY'1 711'S« x219A\.LIU I1O0.1\ %1iII''a.l Ixif-'Ic"S "'011OL1\ Y -"'^" 4 YH fS~11Zt(1[ 66/SI/ZI Z'f I2'i Y4 7 i'HZ SOd U•'Z'f f7'C xll'IA\J.IU P^IA\ ~1iVFaad 2x;1-1"'x9'6'Id ^+11'"IA1 \' r 21 f--111121 Z Z Ig011 66 - 11 119 IrP111~0I fi(i/5I/il A'hl ' Z'i 1'175'1 SOd 6Z'117ii'I xll'IA\l.iO P^1.1\ '1"Iliad lx"tl-IIIS ~+IPIL1\ \' r-t11121 Z 100 64 1 111111 6 6 6G RL ZC~frl112I 66/SUZI f f [I'll[ N'll[7L'6C SOd IL'CT(1'S« xtl'IA1,1.10 1111.\\ 1'IIOS IJ'h7i1c"J n'^Pul 1\ 1' C-'1^IN i 111 116 CItG1101 fi(i/51/Z[ C'C H'R f'l1I 7 C'Sf SOd '1L'i 711'S« a219A\JJO P^IA1 P111S 1^"IS , e+I PIIA\ Y [-111021 Z 11 6 100 -6( LL ' 61'191~I11 66/SI/ZI f'C I''1 L'IIrL'SI' SO.1 RL'Z711'S« xll'IA1.1.1O P^^A1 PII^S P•111'Iaclrl II" 11 V -"'^^ 0 , . IL ZI'Llrlll fi4/SI/il Z'f L'(i 1'll 7 L'f1' S(AI 1')'Z 711'5<! x119A1.1.1O 1100,11 I'll°S 1'121-~I"Ii°;) . .r^^(f (1 f 21 f- 1'1021 i Z 11100 6(1 - SL HZr51~111 (i6/SVZI Z'f 7'C f'S711'(i S(2.1 fll'imll'S« x119,\\JIO I"'OA\ ~"II~'•;I I jc?I-P0~9.1.1^ n,u u ' ' 1011(I (i6 rC NS'h1111[ 66/SI/ZI L'L 11'1 N'175't 50.1 09'11rfh'Z x119A\.1.10 1'1^,\\ ~1illxx 2 , lxil-'Ic"S P L11 "+0 11 \ ' Ir"II 1 Z 111111164 IL hI1hR11I 6fi/SUZI 1'111 4'I R'I7p'h 5Od CY'lISS6'[ x11'IA\J.IU 1111,1\ , y+'llxx.f Ix;d-IIIS 1 1,1\ ^+^I"'1 1\ \ Y 111111 ' 1" Z IOOthG6 OL 7S°9111(11 fi(i/SI/ZI C'f L'4 L'G T 11'If SO.1 LR'Z 7II'S« x119M.1JO PIIA\ 1'IIOS •r^^(I , 111 1 II " Z 10011-66 G'I 7f~911~111 66/SI/ZI C'f 11'N 1'(r76'fiZ S().1 YI'f'(11'S« xll'IA\11() 1""'A\ %lilll~,a.i 1 1'1-`•1iI"11 ) (1 ~111r(I (1 11 II II II"If i 10110 66 i7 11'70°01 fib/51/11 C'C 11'L GIII T 9'Ch S(>d NL'Z r ZC'C xtl'IAI.1.11) PI^A\ %1i12~",t , . P~1119'"Ifl IP'A\ " Z 111111/66 NS AC~SO'll( frfr/SI/il 11'C C'I 9779'L SUd hl-1711'S« xll'IA\J.iO P"OA\ y"Ilia.! jx}I-qc"S A111'"1 11 J ) II II I " Z 1000 r6 ' LS ' 91~50~(1[ (rfi/Sl/ZI i'C !'C A'7 T Z'pl S(hl 1')'f r 11'5« xll'IA\.LIO PI^A\ y'rllax.l 1x;1-1115 . "'IPIL\1 . J I 11 II''ll I I011(I riG - )5 75'hl~'(2t 46/SI/Z[ I'C CC S'670'ZC S()d LC[F11'S« x11'IA1.11() I,Ollnl Y111aad Ix;l-I'r.ary•j.Ir.,I n,IrPul \\ ) II''21 Z Z IOOq fr6 11 S5 (r0~t0Yll f4/SI/ZI f'f L'6 4'679-Sf 5Od 114'1711'5« xIPIM.IJO 1'00,11 '11111ax11 I„OIS , "„'111IM . ) II1°II 101166 - (S ZF~CIYIII fi(i/SI/11 C'f 5'L L'6 7 fi'7+C S<)J (r(i'Z 711'5 << xtl'IA1J.10 P^"A1 y'lllaxd 2J'1-:fulcn,) n,upul l\ . ) II" Z 1111111 6 6 {5 rn~zn~nl 66/SUit z•f ' n'r 1•-1 7L'I•r sOd n9.17n•s« xn'In11JO 1111.\\ y"nxx.l •r'41-11111.1. , nIn\ . n II n,,+-'1„Is I z IOIIq 66 Innn rr, iS ns )F1111~0[ 6(i/SI/il Z f ' S'Y 7'(7 L'6l SO.I ZL'I 711'5« xt19A1,1.1O I'^",11 y111axd II" r 1'1^II^If ti'P'IS 11 IF"`-'!"IS Z I(IIIII-6(i 4P IIZ~AS~(ill 6G/StRI Z C 5'h 9'6Tf'fC SO.1 77'1711'5« xIP1A\JI(> PI^.11 Y"IIaxJ 1'"'11Ixc^fl IP'nl (1 I('+,,rl"IS I 1000-66 rl- fI1t11S'(rll fib/St/il L'S 11'111 1-'f 711'fi SOd III'[ 711 Y'1 xll'L1\.IlO P"^A\ ~2illxxd •rm•1-gcrt5 n,nP11,\\ J "~„1•'11)1 f 10110-64 II' ZZ16r1G0 64/51/11 L'S 11'0[ 1''C 7'J'A SO.1 19'11;97'11 xll'IA\.1.10 1'11,\\ y"Iliad 1921-y"I""J ^+"I'"1,11 J '1x9.,1[2 1 IU00-66 Ilt IIS~Ahr(rll 46/5UZ1 F'lll C'6 n•z 7 z•r SOd 6A'0 7 fll'I xtl'1,\\1.IU I'11A\ y"Iliad 11115 M^PIIA\ J "a'NIDI I IOOq-66 (If ZI.5h~60 66/SUZI C'C 11'01 0'S 7 Y11 SO.I YS'C 712'5« xtl'IA\J10 POIA\ I'll°S t.l'1-~'ric"J •r^^(1 22 Ia9.,IDI I 100(1-66 fr GS~ZHfiII (r(r/51/11 1'f 'I'1 A'h 7 f'lll SO.1 RZ'1 712'$« x119A\J.1p PIIA\ •7i11•'ad lxil-'Ic''5 A11Pr'IA\ 11 1-110^21 1 10110.66 IIC IIh~iY60 66/51/11 i'f h'f 11'9 T 1'tl SOd RL'[ 70'5« xll'IA\JIU I"'^A\ 'flilaxd 1x:•1-Ills ^+^P"L1\ 11 1-1'1121 I 1000 r, r, r,i F1YZ1'•GII 6G/SI/ZI 1'C C'Z ['Ol 79'9[ 5Od I'l't 711.5« a11'IA\J.IU P111A1 ~t111aad lxil-11119'j.nt,l e,oP'l1A\ 21 2-111")I I 1110(I-(i4 HZ iHr1Y(irl 6G/5f/11 f'C R'A 6'll s p'yh 5Od LF'f 711'5« x114,1\J.IO 1110,11 1'1115 11f25 ^+^PI'1,11 f2 1-'11121 1 1(100-44 'IZ 6nmr~4o G6/5I/ZI C'C [I'll[ I'Z[ 7 ['th 50d Lf'Z 7 ZL'f x110A\.LI(> PI^,1\ I'll"S t.i'I-y"Ic"J "+IP"1,1\ II 1.11^" 21 I 1(1110-66 5Z IHLC~60 G(i/SI/ZI f'C II'OI Z'T17Z'Ch S<)d ZI-'17LL'f xll'IA\.1.10 PIOA\ PIIIS 1'121-y11c",7 a^I(1 (I 2-111^21 I 11100'66 Zi 51~LC~(rll 6fr/SIR[ C'C 12'(1[ 9'111 7 f'Zt 5Od YA'i 77Z'C x119A1.1.1O PI^,\\ I'll"5 J^I(1 .m^(1 (I i-un1021 I f0(IIh44 IZ r,h~S[~fi0 6(r/SI/ZI C'f 11'11[ A'117GAh 5U.I LIIZ7LC'Z xlPln\.i.lO PIIA\ PII"S p•la^gaF'91 111,\\ a 2-111121 l 1000-r,r, 6I IIS~1f~fi0 6fi/5t/ZI t'f b'nt h'f176'il' SO.1 56'Z75I'f xtl'IA\.1.10 PI"A\ 1'll°S t.l'I ~"IcIJ ~11^fl .) 1-1111)1 1 IOIIIPG6 S( L1~61~611 (r6/SI/il 9'61 6'S 1'f 75'1 SO.1 1'C'11791'll x11'1,\1.1.10 POIA\ P11"S ~'*+'1-9cn5 n,Ip11,\1 \' I-"'1^11 1 IOOIh66 ZI iirC1~611 64/St/if C'4l 5'Z t'I7C'0- SO,1 51'11770'1 ,LSIN 1.1015 ai^'9IP'.) 1000-66 1- IIC~ZI~411 66/51/11 6'AI 'll'f I'17A'il 50.1 GII.117y6'll ,[,SIN 1,1125 al1°~411''J 20011 G6 C ZF~11~611 66/51/11 0'LI 4'Z 11'17f'rl- SUd If'117r1C'I ,LSIN 1"'IS an'."111"J 1000'66 i :11112.1 .xjl:(1 ,1.1FS III X14.1 5,'121 (,111.1/;IIIIY 111,1 .11•) 11115 [III ) 11!.1,1 ,l.l jri x1115 111111121 .11,2 IIFIII 11 \..1 SJ.1 ail^x(I :(SO.1>JNI>;)i1N) FaYu 121 ' 6fi/SI/Z! x1''(1 1111115 1'I'a nlrngn(I '•j5 uojY11I'1' LZ') IPI "A1111.1, ~xtlS 7115t(i ll'ffl GII('1 VI l"r 'a5 n u+.l9ua ,1 uoljnxnx.l,l 9u11°FI°d I'Ix'1 P O^'l 1'1111• ) F~an6n41(1 1 ^Aud jlmd ~ Slte: 'I'lln \Vuud, G27 ,\liluglun St., UuLuq ur, 1.1 S211U1 Uatr: 12/1 S/'J9 ~. I'uiN 1'uLec 2 Il:ulgrx (NI:(:~1NC~1'US) : Ilcslcr 1'('S YI,No Inxp I•lr Huam Sldr Strc I~cul Cnd Sub ('Ir 1'LL(Ing/cul`) I(1?S 1'LIC UI Ssrc Uutr '1'Inlr lU7 9'J-11U111 3 .laic (' 11hd1 IluxrLuard Suild 1Vuud (n-ry »5.1111.1111 1'OS 211.0110.1! 1.-1 2.9 12/!5/'1'1 1U:3'J:32 11] 'J'J Ulllll I Stabwcll-11 D 1Vall Iluxcbunrd Sulld N'uud (:rry »5.111 I.GS 1'US 29.2112.2 IJ ].U 12/IS/'J'J 111:d3:UJ 113 99-11U111 1 Stuinvcll-II D Stulrx Rlxrr Snlld 1Voud (:rry »5.01 1.55 POS 27.1 ~ d.7 3.2 3.1 12/l5/'J'J lU:a3:-O 11-! 99~UUU1 1 Stalrlvrll-I1 ,\ Dour llrudrr Solid 1Vuud Off 11'Idlc »5.11 ~: l.da I'OS I).2 1 a.0 79 5.6 12/15/'1'1 111:~IJ:17 115 9'J-UIIUI 1 Slulnvell-Il .1 Uuor Cuxlug-I(Lt Sulld Wuud UI'f 1\'Lltc »S,U i 1.22 1'l I5 37.d 1'1.7 2.3 3.1 12/15/99 lU:al:al llfi 'J9-IIUUI II Ituxrlllellt Il DIIIII' C'using-I(bt Sullll \I'uud \Vldlc »5.1111.16 1'US 2.1.317.9 2.t1 3.1 12/!5/99 llt:.(5:3! 117 99-(111111 U lluxrnlrllt 1! \Vlnduw Sluul Sollll \Vuod \Vbllc »5.111 1.-12 1'US 20.-(1 7.1 2.-1 3.1 !2/15/99 IU:a5:~9 ]2U 9')-UUU( II lluxrulrut C lluur I)uur Sulld Cuucrlc 1VLIlr »5.011.'18 I'US 3'J.51111.a a.2 3.2 12/15/'19 IU:J7:2d 121 9'J-0001 Oulsldr A Exl \VIIII Slding Sul(d Wuud Crrrn 11.02 i U.ld 1'U5 4.6 i 1J 2.! 111.2 12/15/99 11:12:53 12a 'J9-UUlll 1'urcb A 1'urcb 'I'liw-IJPr Sulld \1'oud Grcrn »S.U ~ 1.56 I'US ]3.1 1 1-1.5 2.! 3.U 12/15/99 11:1-(:-Id 125 9')-0001 Uutsldr 11 I?><t 41'all Slding Sulld Wood (:rrrn 2.53 i 1.6d 1'US 1G.61 G.2 • 3.d 3.2 12/15/'19 11:16:11 127 99-0001 Oulsldr (' 1{>;t 111u11 Slding Sulld 1Vood \I'Lllr »5.0i 1.67 I'US 23.71 7.d. 3.G 3.2 12/15/99 11:17:5( 12d 9'J-llUlll Uulslde (' 1)uur Uuor Sulld \1'uud (:rccn »S.U12.3a 1'OS .111.311U.9 5.-7 3.2 12/15/')9 Il:ld:ll 129 9'J-UU0] CuIlLrutr 1?ud NIS'f 1.11 111.25 PUS -11.21 Lll 2.5 21.G 12/15/99 11:19:1] 1311 99-UUIII CaIILI-a1r 1?ud NISI' 11,96111.119 1'US U.3111.'J 1.11 21.1 12/15/99 I1:2U:11 131 'J9.11UU1 CuIlLratr lind NISI' l.ll] 1 U.1'J 1'US 0.91 ll.d 2.-1 3U.7 12/15/9'1 11:21:Ud !. Pula( I'ugc I Uubuqur's ('Llldluwd Lrad I'ulauulug I'rrvrnllun 1'rugr:u u Srl i:d ll\1-SII'J-ll]alll-15116 Sllc:'I'Iw \I'uu d, (27 ,\rlin glon SL, Du6uy ur, L\ 5 211111 1):,Ic 12/IS/'J9 l t:u,ges (NI{C<IN('<I'O5): Ucvlec 1'('5 - \1 \u luap l lr Itnuu, tilde Slrr I~rul l'nd SuU ('Ir PLI-(mg/cw') Itl•a 1'Lli UI Sarc U:,(r '1•irur I 99-(lUlll ':Luttcr('ul-I 11,5210.011 ll(I111,1 ll.ll 86.1 12/15/99 119:1'):31 ? 99-01101 ('uliLn,('- Start NISI' 1.]11111.11 1'OS -11.1 s 1.11 2.'J 17.1) 12/15/9) 0'1:21:12 J '1'l Ubb! ('uliLr.,tr st:,r( N15'1' 11.96 k 0.07 1'US O.N s I.1 1.11 IN.9 IZ/IS/'J9 119:22:511 'J'1-110111 ('ulibr.,tr Sl:u1 NIS'1' 1.11(k 11.25 I'OS •11.3 1 I.1 2.S 19.3 12/IS/9'J 11'1:2!:22 5 'J'1-0001 I I(uum-I A 1\'nll 1Yn11-IJpr SuliJ Urywull OIf11'hilc (1011 t 0.111 IJH(i -1.-1 1 18 1.0 8.0 I"2/15/9') 119:?5:21 (, 99-01101 I Ruwn-I .\ Wall Ilu>ebuurd Solid \Vuud OII'\Vhilc 1100 ~ 0,02 IJIS(; 0.9 t 2.3 1.0 ).3 12/13/99 09:26:13 7 'i9-0001 1 Itoorn-I .\ Uuor ('uaing-IUd Solid \Vuud OII'\\'hitc (1,(10) 11,12 NISI; -O.G 1 2.8 LlJ 3.2 12/13/99 09:26:32 N 99-0001 I ltuuu-1 :\ Uuor lamb Solid \Voud "fun 0.110 111.02 NI?(i 11.•1 t 2.9 1.11 -l.2 I1/15/99 119;':6: 5'J 9 'i9.ODUI I ltuurn-I ,l ))our Jun,6 Solid \Vuud \VLite 0.O(I t 0.13 NISQ •llb ~ 3.11 Lll 3.2 12/lS/9'J (19:27:-23 10 99-Uli01 I Ituonrl .\ \Vmduw C'uaing-L!1 Solid \Voud Olf \Vhile (1.00 / (102 IJE(i -11.3 , 3.1 1.11 3.3 12/15/99 119;27:52 I I 'J9-0001 I (loom-I ,\ \Yindo,v Stool Soli) \Vood OI--\Vhilc 0.00 (0.(11 NI?(; 1.1 , 2.7 1.11 3..3 12:15/99 119:28:37 12 ')'J 01101 I ltuurn l ,\ \\'Induw Sua6-I..vr Snlld Wand /)fl' \Vhlle 11.26 k 11.31 1'Oti 2.5 1 1.1 5.9 19.( 12/15/99 119:29:27 I4 rJ-Haul I Itoorn-I Is \'/,rll \Vull-I1pr Solid Urywull OII'\V6ilc (1.111 t (1.211 Nl?(i IL2 t I.:1 .1.2 IS.I 12/15/99 119:311:•13 11 99-0001 I Itnuu,-I (' \Vull 1'Jnll-llpr Solid Urywull OII'\Vl,ile (1(11 1 0.11.1 NIS(; 11.6 r 11,9 Lll 22.2 12/15/99 (1'1:31:•111 15 'J9 110111 1 Itouw-1 (' Uuor ('uaing-Lft Sulld \I'uud OIf \1'hllc 3.151 2.93 1'OS •12.91 11.•1 111.11 ].3 12/13/99 11'):32:511 I!, 'J'i 0001 I kuum-I U \Vull \\hdl•lJpr 5ulid UrysnJl OII'1Vhile (l.U(I 1 0.(11 NIS(i •U 8, I.•I I.U 12.7 12/15/99 09:]3:17 17 99-uOUI I ltuurn-'_ :\ \\'ull 1Vall•Upr Solid Ibywull OII'\Vl,itc 0.01 t (1.(IG Nli(; 0.-l , I.0 1.2 22.2 12/15/99 (19;3.1:11 IN 99-111,111 I Itnuru-? I) 1'/all 1'1„11-llpr Solid I)rywull OII'1Vl,ilc 0.(IU t 0.10 IJIS(i -I.ll r :1.3 I.U 3.3 12/IS/'1'J 119:33:23 1'J 9'J-0001 1 Ib,un, 2 I) \\'ull IlasrLuard Sulld \Voud OI'I' WLllr 2.37 1 2.07 Pl)S -18.9 s I l.N 10.0 3.J 12/15/99 119:15:19 2U 9'i"0001 I ltuonr ~ U 1Vull I(rgistcr Solid f`Idul O11~\Vhitc (1.02 t 0.09 NI?Ci -(1.1 , I.I 2.1 22.2 12/15/99 119:36:1 S 21 h9 bbbl I Itnuru-? I) Uuor lluor Sulld 4l'uud Uff \V611c 3.261 2.N1 1'05 12.1 t 10.6 111.11 3.J 12/13/99 09;)7:25 2? " ')h 111101 I Ituun,-2 I1 Dour Caalnl;-Itht Sulld \Vuud O1'f \V611c 3.77 i 2.•12 1'(>S •13.2 k 11.2 (ILO 3J 12/!5/9'1 119:37:11 !3 99.0001 1 ltuurn-2 (' \Vull \Vull-lJpr Solid Urywull Olf \Vltile (Lill t 0.U8 NIS(; O.N 1 f1.N I.5 29 2 I2/I 5/99 09:38:(1:1 21 (9.000( I Itoorn-? H \Vull \Vull•lJpr Solid 1)rywnll OIl'1Vhilc 0.(11 .t 0,1.1 NE(i •0.21 I.G I.I . 10.•1 12/15/99 09:)9:31 25 '1'11111111 1 Itunw-2 11 11'Induw ('ualn(;-l.ft Sulld 11'oud Ofl'\Vldle 3.7212.]7 1'O`i -11.1112.1 111.11 3.1 12/IS/'1'J 11'1:111:119 2G 27 99 UUlll 1 99 00111 1 (Gana-2 I Il \Vlndusv Stuul Solid \Voud OI'I' \Vhllc »3.111 3.•17 1'OS -(6.N t I L9 B.N ].3 12/15/99 119:•III;a2 . ' ' <uoni-2 I I 1Vinduw Scalrl.svr Solid \Vood OIl' 1VLilc 0.07 ~ 0.37 NI?(; •(1.1 , 2.5 3.7 3.3 12/1 S/'>7 09:11:01 2N 1-1111111 I J ' ' Ituuur? Il \l'Induw 1'url.Lrad-1?xl I'rcling \vuud Off \Vhllr »5.111 1.2-1 1'l)S 16.6 s 11).1 2.3 J.1 12/I U99 11'1:-12:I1a 29 1 J 111101 I ' ' Itnuru-2 Il \\'Grdr,w SIII-I•.xl 1'rrllr,~ \\'111111 ()II 1Vldlr »5.111 ].7N 1'()S 11.1 i (.11 3.1 !.2 . 12/15/99 119:12:111 JII l~Ullol I J ' Ituuw~? I1 Y\'Indusv Sualt-b:xl 1'rrling \Vood UI'f N'hllr »5.11 k 1.2N 1'OS 111.3 k 1.N L(i ) 1 12/15/99 09:12:59 31 " 1'J-0001 1 ' r I;d1,eu U 1Yull \Vull-lJpr Solid Urywull U(I•\Vhile 0.0110.(16 NI?li -1.0,1.6 Lll . 80 12/15/99 09;.1.1:(13 3 ? ) J-uUUI I hncLc^ It Uuur ('using-I.II Solid \Vood Olf\Vhile 11A1)10,U2 NISU ll.l 12.5 LO 3 2 12/15/99 119:.13:(1(1 3J 'J'J I10U1 I Kllrhrn Il Uuor ('nalug-1.1'1 5nlld 11'uud (1ff \Vhlle »5.111 J.S1 I'OS 11.•1 k 5.11 111.11 . J 3 12/15/9'1 11'1:-15:12 31 vo.000I I ' l:,~clirn :\ \Vnll 1Vull-lJpr Solid Urywull UIl'\Vhile 0,111 t 0.1-I IJIS(; (LU.i 0.9 111.0 . 22 1 1.2/15/99 (19:15:3.1 35 9 )-(1001 1 {;itcLen U \Vull \Vull-lJpr Solid Urywull Ulf 1VLilc 0.111 1 0.111 NIS(; -11.6 , 1.•I 3.•I . Ill .( 12/1 Sl99 119:.16:18 36 99.0001 I ' I:itc6rn U ('ubincl Uoor-Ou1 Solid \Vood Hnxvn 0.(161 0,1.1 NI?Q 181 1.6 I.•1 . 5 6 12/15/99 (19:17:25 37 i9"0(101 I I:itchcn (' 1Vu11 1Vull-Upr Solid Drywall OI)•\Vhilc 0.2.1 10.31 NIS(; (1,3 t 1.2 7.N . 12 7 12/15/99 (19:17:55 38 ' 99-UUlll I I;dd,cn (' \Vull Uuscbounl Solid \Vuud OII•\Vhile (1,111 1(1.2.1 NE(I -(1.1 1 2•I 7.11 . 3 3 12/15/99 119:1N:35 1 ] '1'J-01101 I KltcLen <' 1Vluduw Sluol 1'rcllug \Vuud Ofl'N'Idte 1.11! k ILN9 1'OS 1.2 s 2.11 'l.J . 11) •1 12/15/99 09;1N:S11 111 9'J-0001 I ' ' KIIrLrn (' ' 11'Induw ('uaing-1111 1'ccling \Vood UI'f \Vhllc 11.6(1 k (1.62 1'US N.6 J.1 111.11 . 5.7 12/15/9'! 119:1'1:21 11 J 1 IIUU1 1 I:Uchru ( \\'Induw Such-Lwr 1'crling \Voud OI'f \1'hltc 1.•101 1.11) 1'US 9.11 k J.~1 10.1) 7 5 12/15/99 11'1:SII:IIJ 1! 99-Ulllll I Stuin,dl U \IMII 1Vu11-llpr ('nuasd Urywull OII'\Vhile (1.(101 (1,(11 NIS(1 •11.7 1 1.3 1.11 . 12.7 12/15/99 (('1:37:31 11 9'1 UUIII 1 ' St:drarll I) 1\'ull ItuacLuurd 1'rcling \Voud 01'1'\I'Idlc >>5.111 1.66 1'05 J.LJ k 9.fi 1.5 J.2 12/15/9'1 11'):SN:211 •II 9 J-111101 I tilnuwcll II \Vull \Vull-llpr Solid Ihywull UI!•W6ilo 0.(1111 0.(11 NISI; U.S ~ 1.11 1.11 19.8 12115/'!'1 119:58:•11 15 99-0001 I `auinvcll U Su,irs Ilund-roil peeling Wuud OII'1V6ile (1.111 10.02 NH(; •I.S , 2.8 I.I J.7 12/15/99 119:59:•11 14 99-11(Illl _ Stuinvcll U Stairs Ncwul-post Peeling Wuud Ulf 1V6ile 0.1 S 1 1).31 NI?(i •ll, l t LG ].I 7 9 12/1 5/99 111:011:23 17 'i9•0001 .. Stninccll U Sluirs Ilund•ruil feeling \Vood OIl'\Vhilc 0.01 1 0.21 NIiQ -ll,l a Z.5 1.11 . ) 3 12/15/99 10:011:33 d8 ' 99-0001 ' St„ir,vcll I! Sluirc Ilulualcr 1'celiug \Vood OII'1Vhile 0.27 (.(1.29 NGG ll"I) I.•I 2.8 . 7.8 12/13/99 1(41)1:13 1 / 99.1111111 2 Stulr,vrll 1l Stalra IloUutn tall I'crling \Voud O1'f \1'Lllc »5.111 1.72 1'l)S 19.7 i 7.6 •LS 3 2 12/15/'19 111:111:-1~1 SU 99 uUUI ? tilulrs,ell II ' Woll 'llim-llpr 1'rrling Wuud 01'1'\Vhlle ~>S.US: 160 I'OS 11.7111.1 -1.11 . J 2 12(15/')9 111:112:111 51 '/9 uU01 ~ )lull ( ' 1Vull \Vnll-lJpr 1'ccling I)rywull OII' WLilc 11,117 1. (1,13 IJI?Q (1.11 r (1.9 111.0 . 2•LS 12/11/99 111:02:13 57 7'J uUUI ! ILdI ( \\'luduw <b~ing-1.11 1'cellug \1'nud <)I'11V611c ~>5.111 2.9'1 I'OS ]2.'11 9.7 7.S !.J 12/15/9'1 111:IIJ:12 SI~GC~01 GG/SI/ZI CC A'I 6'7, r(i'll UiIN LCU rAll'll "nrn'(I PnnA\ I"InS II"A\•all`!IV II"A\ J a'It\' 1. I000'G6 701 IHACYII 6Ci/51/ZI l'f I'i L'L75'YL SV.1 5Z'17p'S<< uaa.t,J P^oAI %Iullaa,I )x:E-gs+rg n,^p„I,\1 rl nltl\' I' 1p0116G 501 CI~Af~OI G(r/SI/il 1'f 11'Z II'L 7 E"LI SOd 7Z't ~ 11'S« uaaa.) I'^nA\ %1111aad )x;•1-IIIS n`^P11,\\ it altt\' E- 10011'6!1 YIII fiYtLftOl GG/5l/Z[ 1'f 11'1 Z'L 7IP6f 50d LZ'1 70'5« uaa.t!) P^^A\ yl,Ilaad lx;l-9"r.g n+^p11,1\ EI •'!'t\' C 10110 66 CO[ GO~LE~III fr(i/SI/ZI II'f G'I Z'A 7IZI SOd fL'[ ~ 0'S« 'In+^~qI P^nA\ P11nS )9)1-911c°,) ^+nP°1,11 11 •,ltt\' C 111110-6 6 Z01 IZ~9C~01 GG/SI/Z•I L'ZI 0-I S'1 "ri-I- !);IN 01'0 r0(1'0 n'^Ila,l II"^,~'CI P!1^S !'IO'll"A\ II"A\ fl a'0\' 1: I(A)II-(iG IIII ZS~Sf~01 GG/5121 E'E G'I L'~ r E 0 !);IN SU'0'( 10'0 unto.tEl I'^^A1 1'!IoS II"A\-alP!IV II"A\ \' 'nl\' i 10u0-G6 001 YC~YGIII GG/SI/ZI A'ZI (1'I C'I r t.'0 DiIN 10'0 'r 00'0 a0gA1.1i0 II^n,'(!(I P!I^S II"A\-alp!IV II"A\ ,) ~'01r 10110•rir, 66 AO~FC~OI G(,/SI/Zf (1'f IIY L'A 7 L'{'1 Sod IR'1 711'S« (,+,,-, p^^.1\ I'll^S •,aalrF,15 c,P'1S \' \'-11,++•'!''t5 i II)Ilq'66 AG IStff~ll[ GG/St/ZI 1'f S'f 1)'7 T IYI Sod h6'I ~ 11'5« In,I. I"'nA\ PII"5 Ja"I)f ~'I")S \' \'-II,+~rl''tS Z 1000.6!, L6 RZ'ZC~UI C,G/SI21 R'ZI (1'I Z'I + L'0• UiIN 7U'O r00'0 ^I!qA\.110 II"^,•C'(I P!I^S !')(1.11^A1 II"A\ \ Y-'non)I i IIIOU•66 7G EZ~IE~01 (iG/5121 7.'ZZ Y'I 0'I 71'(1 !)i1N 01'01 I11'U al!'IA1.110 II"^,~!(I P'I^S !'1(1-11"A\ II'N\ it Y-'n^n)1 i 1000-!16 SG IIZtOfI(II fr6/SVZI C'S 5'1 S'Z 7 1'C 50J 17'01 RY'Z a)I'IA\.L10 I'^"A\ aullaa,l Is}l-qs^5 nwp"IA\ J Y 111011 Z It1110 rib Y6 1)IIIOC~111 6(i/51/if Il'f I'Z 5'111 71''Af SO.1 51'1 70'5« x119.1\.1.10 I"'^A\ :f„11•,ad t'il-11ta'I'1~r".1 n+"I'"I,\\ J Y """')1 Z I11111)~6ri f6 fY~fiZ~lll (i(i/SI/ZI Z'f A'C 11'G 76'1.1 SOd L7'1 711'5« x11'1,1\,L10 P^^A\ y'Vhad )t;l-IIIS n+nP'ri,1\ J Y-'"nn)I i 1111111 66 Z6 SZ~AZ~01 GG/SI/ZI 9'S S'Z 0'Z r 1'0• U:IN UC'U t 1.1'0 al!'IA1.ll0 P^^A\ PII^S !•+,'1.4x^S ^,^P^!A\ .) I-"'n^)I 1000-G(i I6 RY~LZ~III GG/51/ZI f'f II'III L'(r r 1'IC 50d 09'f 7 (1'S« a1PIA\.I10 P^^,U PII°S I"^)5 n+nP"I,\\ .) Y-"'no)1 Z !01111 66 116 6Z~LZ1111 (i(i/SI/ZI E'C 11'(11 A'fi T L'7f SOd AI'f 711'S« x119,\\.1.10 I"'nA\ PII"S 1'RI•Arrls^.) n+nP"1,11 J Y-"'n"11 Z 10(I(1~6G 6A ZII~LZ~(II (i(r/SI/Zt i'f 11'111 1'(Il 7 i'9f 50.1 fTi 711'5« a119A\.LIU I'^^A\ PIInS 1'•'^n'In""II 11",\\ J Y 1'n")I Z 1000 66 RR ZC 9Z~01 GG/S I/Z I 0 R D' I L' 1 , Z'0' !)iIN 10'0 7 00'0 ^)!qA\.IIO IP'^,~'<I PII^S !'1(1-11"A\ II"A\ .) Y•n'^o)I I n00-6G LR YY~SZtOI (r(r/S1/il C'f II'1)I i'l 17 CYI' Sod li'E T 11'S« a119A\.1.10 !'^^.1\ I'lln5 Ppl-%t"i""J ~'^"tl (I Y-"'nn)I Z 1000 66 ')R I1S YZ 111 GG/SI/ZI S'LI C S %'I r 1'0- !);IN 70'0 T Z0'U at!9A\.110 11"n+'(!(I P'I^S !i11)-II"A1 II'L\\ (I I'-^'~^)I - IUUIh(,G SR LS~fZYII 6(i/S!/il 1'f GC 1'll 79'SY SUd fL'[ 711'S« .Ca-q) I""'A\ I'll"S Ir.Ir^9a4111 II"A\ J f-11^"11 Z 111111)-66 IR UZ~EZ~01 GG/SI21 C'C S'I I'Z r Z'0 UiIN IZ'0'r IU'U ^IPIAI,LIO P^^A\ P!I^S !^n(1 !^^(! ,) C-"'^n)I i. 10011-G6 ER SC~ZZ~01 GG/SI/ZI h'(ll (1'I E'1 I O'1- !)iIN IU'11700'0 al!9A\.IIO II"n,~'(I P!I^S !'1!1-11°A\ II"A\ ,) t-"'^")I ". II)U0-66 i.R LI-~IZ~01 6G/SI/ZI I•'UI L'9 L'I IL'll- !)iW I.1'UT911'0 ^I!gA1.ll0 II'rn,.S.'<1 1'!InS !rli)•II"A1 II"A1 si !-"'^n)I II10(1.6~i IR O[I1i~11I Gfi/SI/LI i'f h'Z f'Y r Z'R SOd 1'J'I 70'S« ^IIr1A\.1.10 Pn"A\ %1111x.1 Ix;f-'1"''5 n`nl'"I,\1 \' C'"'^n)I L 11100-66 OR fS'11Z~III G(r/51/ZI Z'f 11'Z Y'(i 7 Z'AI SUd LY'Z 7 C'1'f ^11'Ir\1.1.10 Po^A\ ylllaa.l 1*;1-I'n'„I't lnd n+^P'V.\\ \' f ""rn)I Z IDllll G4 fL Ill~llitllf (ifi/51/LI A'YI i'Z 1'I7S'Z SO.I 6i'll7ZZ'I a)PIA\J.1p D^"A\ :fl,llaa.( )x?1-1115 n'^1111,\\ ~' C-,""^)I Z 1111111'66 RL ZEtG1~11I (i(r/SI/il C'f 11'0[ R'(11 7 L'frC Sod IL'f 70'S« all'IA\.L10 Pn^A\ I'll^S ).1"1x01"^,) n+ol",IA\ \' C-'"^n)I Z 10110 6ri LL CIIGI~III (iW51/LI f'f R'R !'0170'5! SOd 7LY711'S« a119A\J10 P^nA1 PIInS I^^)S n+"I'^IA\ \' C-"'n^)1 Z 111011'(i(r 'JL ~Y'AI.111 G(i/51/ZI E'f I'7 L'll f L'Sh 50d AL'Z 7 U'5« a)19A\.IJO i'o^A\ PIp,S p~r,^gasr'll II''A\ \' f-1Onn)I Z IIIIIII'66 SL 11'~L1~01 GG/5121 ZZZ CI 0'I t 0'U !)'rIN LO'0! 110'(1 al!9A\,110 II°A,,C'(I P!I^S „1(1-11"Al II"A\ \' C-^'o^)I ~ 1000'(iG PL Zl'L1~01 G6/SI/iI i'C C(r i'l l 7 CCh Sod 1'I'Z 711'5« a)I'IA1J.10 Ir^^A\ PIInS 19)1',,,1"^J •111(1 (I C-""'nll Z Ig110-46 CL C1~91~UI GG/5121 9'61 S'L G'0 r C'U• J;IN LO.O r E'0'0 al!9A\,110 II"^,•('<I P'I^S „1(1-11"A\ II"A\ (I t-"'n^)I IOOU-(i6 ZL AZ~5I~01 66/51/ZI Z'f 9'f f'S 711'(r Sod f0'Z 711'5« a119A\.IJO I'^^,1\ 7„Ilaad lx;•I-111711'1~".f n+^I'1!A\ \' 'It^II I 101111-64 EL RS~YI~11I 6(r/51/ZI L'L IIY fl'1 T 5'F SOd 117'0 7 fY'Z a119A\.1.10 Pn"A\ Ylliaad 1z;~h9wt5 n,nP°IA1 \' 'Ir''fl Z 11100-fib OL YI~YI~01 (r(r/51/Z[ I"111 G'I fl'l7A'Y SO.1 fY'(1756'1 a119A\.110 I'^"A\ y„11•,x.1 tz;l-IIIS n'ol1°L\\ \' 'It'4ll Z It1011-66 67 Z.Z CI 01 GG/S 121 Z'E' 0'1 I'Z I A'0 !)iIN ZO'U 1' 00'0 al!9A\.110 PoOA1 P!I^5 I^^t5 ^'^P"'A\ \' 'U"U i- 1000-G(i R7 L1YC1~01 GG/5121 Z'C 0'I 1-'Z t R'll• !)iIN IU'0 ! UO'U al!9A\.110 I'o^A\ P!i^ti Iq)I-An!x"J n'nP"'A\ \' 'll"fl 10g0-Grr L7 SC Z1~01 C,G/SI/%I 0'R 0'1 9'1 1 I'0 JiIN I I'O t 00'U al!9A\.110 II"^`~'CI PIInS !'111-11"A\ II",1\ \' 41"11 .. I110U-6(i 77 I~Z1 01 GG/SIIZI L'S 0'I Z'Z 19'0• !);W 10'0 ~ W'U al!IIA\J10 II'rn,.(!(I PgoS !J(1-II^A\ II°A\ (I '0"EI i, IUUO-GG 59 GZ~11~01 66/5121 CC ll'1 9'ZtR'0' OiIN ZO'0100'0 al!'IA1.1.10 II"^`~'(I PIInS P!"^9asr'EI II"N EI 'll"FI % 1000-66 P7 0Y~U1~(11 (16;1121 R'ZI 0'1 I'I r S0• 'J'rW GO'0t 10'0 al!'IA\JIO II^m6lCI P!1^S !,I(1-IInA\ II^A\ II '0"11 Z 1000-0,6 C7 95~AOY11 6G/51/ZI f'f L'6 C6 T 11'If SOd LA'Z 711'5« a119A1.1.10 I'^n,\\ I'll"S .,^0(1 ,ro^(1 Q II"II Z IQ(10-(r6 i') SI'RIY01 GCi/il/ZI R'ZI U'lll Y'1 t R'0- !)iIN 71'OtUI'0 alPlA\.p0 II^n,,(!(I Arlo` xln-II"A\ II"A\ (i II"II i I000.6(i 17 GI~L001 CG/SIIZI 1'01 I''Z S'I 1 Z0 !);IN Zt)'0 t 10'0 al!IIA\,110 II"n,d!(1 P9^S !rlO-II"A\ II",11 fl II"II Z 1000-66 07 SS~7(1~01 66/SI/ZI C'C 0'I I•'Z r 1'0- UiIN AI'U' (10'0 al!'IA\,IIO P°nA\ :!^rlaa.l x,o(l ,o^(I FI II"II ,. 1000-6(i 6S ')fl')II~III 66/51/ZI C'f 11'R 1'6 T 6'61 SOd YI'f 711'Su at19A1.1.10 I'"".1\ :1111.,,.1 1.1'1'y"I"".) ~""(1 11 II"I( i 10(111-66 A5 11~90~I11 (i(i/51/ZI f'C Il'L 6-III 7 9'CY SOd flL'Z 7 Zf'C a11'L1\.1.10 1110,11 y111aaJ 1'-11^'las,'ll II'',\\ J II''ll i 10011-6(1 LS Af~50~111 66/SI/ZI Il'f f'1 7'Y 77'1 SOd YI'1 711'5« x11'1\\.1.10 1"'".\1 7111•'x.1 Iz;I-,Is''S n"'1",IA\ J it"ll Z 1(111(1'6(1 75 71~51)~111 66/SIRI Z'l' 1'C R) 7 Z'RI 50.1 1'7'1 711'5« xtl'IA\.1.1O I'^",1\ y"Ilxxd Ixil-IIIS n"'1/11.11 J II'lll Z 111111/66 55 ')S~PII~III 6G/51lZI I'C t'f S'fi i ll'if 50.1 Lf'I 711'5« x119.111.10 I""'A\ %1"11•'xJ t~;l-I1141fI'1."'d n+01'161\ J II''ll Z 1 111111-6 6 YS 60~Y11~111 (r6/cI/ZI f-f L'(i G'6F7'Sf SOd O(i'Zsll'S<< x11,1A\.1.10 I'^"r1\ y„Ilxx.l I""IS n+nP^!A\ J II'~11 Z 11100-6!1 f5 au,lL x11(1 aas5 I(1 ?19J S;I)1 4uu/yu,)'19.1 •,IJ 915 111,) lr:a;l a.n5 aplti ur^n)I ~'I:I rlsul "K'IS SJd a.,!,.,(l :(ti0.1 =JNl>'>:!\ ) Fayuc)1 Z a3",l lun''i ~ 6W51lZI :x)^(1 IO0Z5 \'I'an l,ngn(1'•Iti a")y^ !111' LL'I'Irou,\11 '!.1 :.')!;i Atl'IZt1I GG/Sl/Z[ L'llC h'Z A'O T fi'n SU.I GI'O ~ CII'1 LSIN P°il a Il~OUfI G(i/SI/ZI 1'IZ tl'1 G'llTf'll SO.1 fi0'tl'(YG'll , ISIN P°il t"'9!I"J a e Inns G4 ICI Clt(ilrll fife/SI/ZI 9'li S'Z 11'1 ~ Z'll- sO.1 SZ'l1 T II'1 , ISIN Prril t .nlll"J a r " (IIIIO-((r nCl IItRIt1I (iG/SI/ZI Z'C F'S (i'OI;C'(Ih S(J.1 Yf'ZFU'S« uan•q) , 1'n".\\ I'll^S •"'"(I 'n" r . 111".) a • Iltt)11-~(i !Zl I5'Lirll G(r/SI/ZI Z'f Y'C h'L rCfi sO.i LY'I ~11'S« 'x119,11 p^nA1 PII^s %t'rll'IS (I IIn \\ tx:•I ) ) u'O Pl a •tr' ItlllO.4(i Ail I'UL1~11 GG/SI/ZI S'S F.'1 Z'Z r S'U- J:IN (:Z•Ua CS'lt oaarO P^nA\ P!I^s t^,unlo ) , gero l , Pl O O1n InUn-r,r, Lil II~YItII fi(r/51/il Z'f R'f i'9 TY'Yl st).1 AY'I Tf5'Z uaa•rJ I'n"A\ 1'll"s , ~OII'IS , I 1° t~ (I 4 •I a ' ~ IuQrPf,G 7Z1 Rhrhlrll Gfi/51/LI 0'f l'Z S'hl r I'CC 5O.1 Y5'I FII'S« rraa.r:) po°A\ I'll"s ~rlll-rrrN f I A\ ;•I 4 , rn fl ' l I t"c) 'r II1t111 fG 5Z1 9S•C1~11 GG/SI/ZI 9'S L'1• U'Z tL'U 1)ifN hZ'0r9U'n :+(!qA1 p^nA\ f'!i^S . . (~;I-~I°"s . . d n'^I't'L\\ \ \ 9 n.l ^ n'tn IUOtI (ir hZl SGC1~11 GG/SIRI E'C Z'1 S'Z t 1'0- UiIN (It•'U't ZO'u nu9n\ Po^A\ P!I^S t"il-Ilrs ^`nl""A1 \' <) I ' "`t" Innn-(i6 EZI ' CSrZlrll G(r/L'1/II i'lll f'Z 6'1 s 9'1' S(k( pl'll f ZII'll °aa.r;) Pr'^A\ I'll°s 9rr11'I5 1\ 7t;1 II" \' O I al'I`tr'O It10t)-GG - u ,I AitLh~lll (r(r/SI/ZI Z'f Z'h Ytll T S'(rf 5O.1 RG'l F 11'S« aiI9A\ n).rann;) I'll"S .tit"(I , .nn,(I tuarnacr 4(, Illlln IZt UI•~9h~(11 (rG/SI/ZI YS ' L'I ' 6'1 i I'Z- O;IN GI'07RU'U :+ygn1 alro"^,) P!I^S tr'O-~ooCl t°114",) ,) (I .11 q t"n'rr~~"fl U Illnn !f, IOUII-GG IIZI GII SIYYh~01 ~ ' GG/SI/ZI U R ' U I ' G'I 1 S'0- J:IN LU'U70U'U a1pIA\ e)rmr^,) p!Io5 ~'I(1'll"A\ II"A1 11 t'ra'naa"II n IUt)11-GG RII Gh l1I Sh ' f(r/SI/ZI 1 f ' h Z I'L r Y'l1Z sO.1 Zh'I 1: (1'S« a)I'IA1 Pn'rA\ PIIns (nrrls ,NnprrL\\ FI rrra"r~~''!1 11 Iflllq-fG LI I IC~Sh •(11 G(i/SI/il 1 f ' 0'Z G'L>•C'hZ 5O.1 9C'IfU'S« all'1,1\ Pit"A\ PilnS PI)f-Urt1""J .lnn(I (I t'rar"•rsr'II II Itl0(1-fiG Yll Ih~rrol f (ifi/SI/ZI 1 f ' f'Z ' L'G~R'LC sOd Zi'lf(1'S« a119,\\1.10 I'nn,\\ I'll"s t'111-attl"'rJ .tnn(I \' II-Ilrr~rl''1C I In(111.6G SII Ll hh9ll ~ GG/SI/ZI Y S ' G L II'h=Z'CI 5O.1 hR'f~ll'$« a)IrL\1.1)O I"'",\\ runs •r•'I'"all ~nn(I \' 11-n„~rl^ts i IUnUGr rrl Ch fhrlll GG/5IK1 1 C ' L'F ' L'R s 1'LZ ' 5O.1 sS'[ ~0'S<c ~a•t;) I'n",11 1'll"S •r""111 tirlrets (I f1-11'r~rl"is 1 Illiln-GG C[1 LZ CN(11 ~ ~ (iG/SI/ZI Z E ' n I ' h Z r G'0 ' ;);IN I I'U't ('Z'll ~?'J P^^A\ P'I^S Pnall. ,nntS (I f1-11=''rn"IS I II)0U-Gf ZI I GII Ch tll fiG/SI/ii 0 C G 1 ~ Z ZI TZ'GZ SOd SY'1 Fn'S« ,Ca•,;) pno,\\ I'll"S P-r"n'I„'"tl ilr'A\ (1 )I-n-,.".rI"ts ( Inuit 4fi l)) nz zrul Gc/sl~zl A ZI ' rz f'I r ro I)iIN zu'o 1 Ino ~I!'In\.uo nnn,•(!0 I'9^s ,dirnnn\ n"m rl frn~r~r'"Is ) looo-rr nl I U-~Ih~t)I Gti/SVZI h UI ' f;'9 ' 9'I t I'0' ' ;)iIN CU'U t 1:U'U ~1!9A\,110 Iln^'~!<I P9^5 ~J(1-iinn\ II"A1 ,) fl-IWn'n"iS I , InU(PG(i G01 fUUI•~01 ~ ' G(,/SU%I h 01 U 1 I rlf0 S lJ:IN IU'OTtlll'u ~tt9A\,110 IIn^f'(~(I P'I^S )'I(1-IInA1 II"n\ (I aittl, ! InuU'GG R111 if Gf 01 anr (ifi/SI/ZI GZ YI 0'111 711'l1Z sO.l (111'1 ~11'S« ~a•r;) pa"A\ I'll"s 1'rnn9aF''ll II",1\ J •'Pt\' C I111111'fiG LIII l, 1, at"(I .tags I(1 'I'Id S:I11 Gttt•V%Ir'tYl'id •rIJ 9"S P"J )"a;l .r.rls al'IS rl~l ruuntl d^u n ' . l ti IS ( nAnil ptur~l ~ SJ,I aa!~atl :(sO.l >.)NI>;)iIN) ca:lu"11 I (,G/51/ZI :an'(1 innzc \•I'anb ngn(I' tg notaullr\• LZ')'I11O,1\ u' l.I. ~atls Owncr's Namc Owncr's SQdre_1 FnQ F~ni'~~1~~n ~ nn2 11tC1~1~~irc' ~~. ~~~CV~ p. apc^i :+_der'ss (i1 eit,c ezt) (~ L~ `rd`~n c f,Y~ ~'I' . ~-~r'r-, >•'IC~r~ 1 ~ `j OT i 0 ~ C.! LE , ~f ~ - - /. I - - ~ - ~ ~ .I _ Sr~lu%ct15 I I, ~ -~ ... .~ .....~ . L~ ...........~i :::: ~lY .. -~ ~. B~ i i ~ D . . ~~,~~u ~ . . . . . . ~____ i - • . . . •~ k~o~r; I j _- -~ \ { ~ , Owncr's Name ~'(' ~ ~~__-~ ~ '~ ~ __ ~ +~M_ ~~.~OU~i Owaer's :~:ddr~_sri~ F,,~~;s~n L~~~~. J ~lL~r ~Gr ~ IQ• . ~~CO ~ U ~ Props^~ Addrus (it di~ler~.^. [) ,`%.,r/ }~~~~.J1aZ`y1 ~ i . Cdr- r~~~,~ ~' ~ , ,~ .~~ ~ NOT TO SC_'_? B - ~ +~ i ~;I i ~ • III ~ o c~ ~`~~- L i • f . 1 _ ~ ~!o'~. C'_~~'r l } • I \I . l . i . , .'~. 1 V. ~ ii rn~r~t.~! ''! ~h~ 1~ ~! ~~ ~ Gw~ ~1 ...~.~~ ~~ ,,~_ _, ~~ . . ^~ ~ i . .~~ . ~ . i D Owntr's Nzme Vi C~. E~'7 ~G~~~/1 ~' ~~M ~l'~nr~rr Ow;~er's .-_ddr~_s ~~ i-~cliC~/~ ~ rzllo i ~ u , ?ropt^~ .~.ddrzss (ii d'ultr~nt) Cp"?7 ~-f Lt~~~c~(1 ~ , P~~~~ J _._ .: I I I~ . ~ . ~ . i D . ~ - - 'I~'1/~ . ~ - - . i~i~ ~~w ~+ i a ((~~ ~--~ Ow~tr's Name ~~t C ~' =.~CC,VlP7~ ~( (i~L` ~C~.~ Ow-~z-'s ~ddrz_:s -ri~ f n~~iC~,n r'~y1~. 1 `~~ ~i`t~c~~~ lf~. ~~~3 ~rooC^~ .~.ddrzss (ii dit~ere~t) (~2~ .~' '(~~~'~i~11 \T• ~"-r-~r~C,'~Yturi' J ' C NO ~ TO SC.'_ ~ E i ~~ II i li I I • I I . '~ Cf~, f . 1/ . . i ~,1 ~. .~•~p_ i . ~ ~ • D CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM February 10, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 623-627 Arlington Street Planning Services staff have received inspection reports of the property at 623-627 Arlington Street. These inspections were performed by Housing Services Department to point out lead hazards and were done February 16, 1996 and December 15, 1999. These reports were discussed briefly at the February 3, 2000 work session with staff from the Housing Services Department. The Commission should review the attached reports in addition to the packet of application materials each commissioner has previously received and be prepared to make a decision on the B & W Properties' application request for a certificate of economic hardship at the February 17, 2000 Commission meeting. Planning Services staff have not yet received cost estimates from Jack Stackis, Stackis Construction. Upon receipt of those estimates, I will immediately distribute the information to you for your review of the B & W Properties' request at the February 17 meeting. As previously communicated to you, Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager, asked that the Commission address a referral of the City Council concerning the appeal of Tim Wood and Vicki 6echen, B & W Properties. In addition to referring the appeal back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate, the Council asked that the Commission address the following two issues regarding this case: 1. The Commission initially expressed concerns with inadequate maintenance, but tf~ese concerns were not brought to closure. The City Council would like the Cor~tmission to bring this issue to closure. 2. The City Council would like to know why the Commission did not accept the recorTimendations of staff. Please revie~v these issues and be prepared to give me a response which I can transmit to the City Council. t~ttachntent iioui.^^.~ fir.-Aces Dt~sion lti~ Central A~•enue DL'~L•CUe. IO«3 ~_CO i•JotO rebruary 23, 1996 B and W Partnership ~ Vickie Bechen 575 English Lane Dubuque, Iowa 52003-8755 Re: 623 - 627 Arlington Dear B and W Partnership: THE 1:71 CAF ~~ ''~~ -~ Z i~ L~`•~J ~:_ On Februa-ry Z6, an environmental investigation of 623 - 627 Arlington, Dubuque,_Iowa was completed. An investigation was performed to point out lead hazards which may exist in this residence since children under ~~he age of seven are living at these addresses and because this residence was rehabilitated under the moderate rehabilitation program. Of particular concern is the prevention poisoning is a disease that occurs when too much lead. Children are most susce hand to mouth activities and because of activities. Several ways that children are bv: of lead poisoning. Lead a person is exposed to ~tible because of their their developing growth may become lead poisoned - ingesting lead-based paint chips • ingesting settled household dust containing lead • inhaling lead dust if they are present when lead based- paint is being removed by scraping, sanding or heat gun Ideally, the most effective way to keep children from being lead poisoned is to keep their hands and toys out or" their mouths. This is nearly an impossible task, so the next step is to keep their living environment as free of lead hazards as possible. Several surfaces in your rental property were found to be painted with lead-based paint and treatments. Although these surfaces may have been repainted with a lead-free paint, a previous layer or layers of paint contained lead. Often when the paint chips come off of these surfaces, all layers of paint come off, including the lead-based paint layer. These chips and dust then become available to be ingested by children. \.•rv i.c I'ruF+L• Intr ftnh Fr.sv~n+i bil,l~ Inner. ~~wn TfJTtiurw The attachment entitled "Eliminating Lead Hazards" details what makes lead-based paint hazardous and how to safely remove these hazards. Please read this before starting any work on the paint. Lead Hazards The enclosed report sheets give a room-by-room list of where we found lead hazards from lead-based paint in the house. Please refer to the enclosed test report for particular locations of lead paint. The purpose of our lead investigation is to identify lead paint hazards which are accessible to children. You are not rewired at this time to make these surfaces lead safe. However, you are required to notify all tenant or interested tenants of the presence of lead hazards in your units and where these lead hazards have been identified. The readings located on the coluan marked "PbL" of the report indicate the quantity of lead found on the identified surface. Readings equal to or greater than 1.0(mg/cm~ Pb) indicate the quantity of lead found on the surface. Readings greater than or equal to 1.0 shall be considered positive for the presence of lead. If you are considering removing the lead paint hazard noted on the attached test report, please remember that you are working with a toxic material. Have workers wear respirators, take steps to reduce dust (wet down surfaces, cover vents, seal off rooms being worked on), and make sure no children or women of child bearing age are present while the work is being done. During any lead paint removal project, it is important that the house be kept very clean now, during and after all of the needed work is being done. After the lead paint removal work is completed, the entire house must be thoroughly washed and vacuumed. HEPA vacuums are available for your use to assist you with your clean up efforts. (There is a small fee charged for the use and for bag replacement. These vacuums are checked out at the Health Services Department at 1300 Main. Call 589-4181 to reserve a vacuum unit.) This will ensure that most of the lead dust is removed from your residence. You also need to periodically check the condition of all lead painted surfaces so you can repair deteriorated paint before it causes problems. The Housing Services Rehabilitation Office is offering a grant and loan program for lead paint removal and repair for all Moderate Rehabilitation Program Units. If you are interested in this program, please contact Joleen Patterson at 589-4239. If you decide to remedy the lead hazard identified in the enclosed test results, please submit a plan of correction prior to renovation as to how you plan to correct the lead hazards identified in the attached lead investigation test data. This office will want to conduct at least two more investigations at this property during the lead removal process - once after all the lead painted surfaces have had the lead removed and a third visit at the completion of the project. If you have any questions about lead poisoning or how to prevent lead poisoning from occurring, please contact me at 589-4231 or Mary~Rose Corrigan, Public Health Specialist, at 589-4181. And of course, if you have any questions about the rehabilitation process, please contact the Rehabilitation Office, at 589-4239. Sincerely, ~` ~~~~~ Ka haleen Lamb Senior Housing Inspector KL/kl cc: Mary Rose Corrigan, Health Service Department Joleen Patterson, Rehabilitation Specialist Janet Walker, Assisted Housing Supervisor 3/7/96 Childhood Lend Poisoning page 1 Prevention Program Dubuque, Iove 52001 TEST SIT=: B end :7 Partaersb_lp, 623 Arlington, Dubuque, Iowa TEST DATE: 02/15/96 No. F lr Room Side St_-ucture peature Cond. Substr. L N DL PbL to PDK hi Res 1 Calibrate 1 1.0 1.7 0.7/22.8 ?os 2 Calibrate 1 2.1 1.8 2.2/20.5 Pos 3 1 Llvlnq Rm A Door Door So1Sd Ne tai 1 2.5 O.O O.O/53.2 3 1 LS wing Rm A Door Casing-Lft Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O -6.0/59.0 5 1 Living Rm A :Jell Wall-Qpr Solid Plnste r 1 1.0 O.O 1.2/38.0 6 1 Llvlnq Ra A :tall Basebonrd Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O -6.8/37.0 7 1 Llvlnq Ra A window SLOOl Solid Wood 1 2.0 O.O O.O/38.8 8 1 Giving Ra A Window Casing-Lft S01Sd Wood 1 1.0 O.O -3.7/36.2 9 1 Llvlnq Ra C Door Casing-LSL Solid wood 1 10.0 1.1 3.9/52.6 Pos - - 10 1 Living Ra C Wall Baseboard So11d Wood 1 5.9 O.O 1.4/d5.0 11 2 Llvlnq Ra C Door Jamb-Ltt Solid wood 1 10.0 1.3 1.2/5].0 Pos 12 1 Living Ra D wnll Baseboard So11d wood 1 7.1 5.1 3.7/63.8 Pos 13 1 Li wing ~ D Door Casing-Rht Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/50.6 13 1 Dining Rm A Door Casing-LPt Solid wood 1 B.3 O.5 -6.0/57.1 15 1 Dlninq Rm B wall wail-Cpr Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/51.9 16 1 Dining Rm D Wnll Baseboard Solid Wood 1 10.0 7.2 16.8/112.7 2os 17 1 Dining Rm D Window Casing-Rht Solid Wood 1 10.0 2.3 19.3/97.7 Pos 18 1 Dlninq Rm D wlndov Stool Solid Wood 1 10.0 1.3 2.3/63.8 Pos 19 1 DS Wing Rm D wlndov Snsh-Lwr Solid wood 1 5.3 1.6 -1.9/13.7 Pos 20 1 Dining Rm D Window 5121-Exi Solid wood 1 1.0 O.1 O.O/23.5 21 1 Dining ~ D wlndov Part bead-Ext So11d wood 1 1.9 5.1 O.O/29.2 Pos 22 1 Dining Ra C Window Casing-Rhi Solid Wood 1 10.0 3.1 19.2/lOd.6 Pos 23 1 DinSnq Rm C Window Stool Solid wood 1 3.8 O.5 22.8/112.9 23 1 Dlninq Ra C Wlndov Sash-Lwr Solid wood _ 1.0 O.O -3.7/39.9 25 Z Dlninq Ra C Door Caslnq-Rht Solid wood 1 9.3 2.5 -O.i/22.5 Pos 26 1 DinSnq Ra C Door Jn mD-Z~t Solid Wood 1 10.0 1.3 -5.0/22.7 Pos 27 1 Dinlnq Ra B Door Door Solid Wood 1 10.0 5.1 21.9/159.4 Pos 28 1 Dlninq Rm 8 Door Caslnq-Lit So11d wood 1 10.0 4.5 9.3/76.3 ?os 29 1 Kitchen D Door Caslnq- L L Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/35.2 30 1 Kitcban D Door Door Solid Hetal 1 1.0 O.O -5.3/32.6 31 1 Kitchen D Wall wail-Cpr Solid Plaster 1 2.6 O.O O.O/33.8 32 1 Kitchen D wlndov Casing-RhL Solid wood 1 5.8 1.3 5.1/d3.0 Pos 33 1 Kitchen D Window Stool Solid Wood 1 5.8 2.3 - 2.6/18.] Pos 31 1 Kitchen D wlndov Sash-Lvr So11d Wood 1 5.0 1.5 6.7/60.1 Pos 15 1 Kitc San D wlndov 5111-Ext Solid He tnl 1 5.7 3.0 6.]/65.0 Pos 36 1 Kitchen D Wlndou Part.bead-Ext Peallnq Wood 1 1.0 O.1 2.5/53.9 37 1 Kitchen D wlndov Caslnq-Kilt Peallnq wood 1 10.0 1.3 -].0/37.7 7os 38 1 Kitchen C Window Sash-Lvr Peallnq Wood 1 9.1 2.0 - 1.8/38.0 Pos ]9 1 Kitchen C Gilndov Stool Peallnq wood 1 3.2 0.2 0.0/:5.] 30 1 Kitchen C Wnll Bnsabonrd Solid wood 1 10.0 2.5 -1.9!52.8 Pos L-Inspe ctor N-Note DL-Depth Index XR° Results by Tast Nunber, Negative < 0.9, Posltl•:e >~ 1.0 mq/cn2 Eti ton XLS 3/7/96 Childhood Lend Polsoni ng page 2 Prevention Progrns Dubuque, Iove 52001 TEST SITE: 8 and w Psttnershlp, 623 Arlington, Dubuque, Iove TST DATE: 02/15/96 No. Flr Room aide Structure Feature Cond. Substr. I N DI PbL to PtK bl Ras it 1 Kitchen A Door Casing-Rht Solid Wood _ 3.7 1.0 0.2/20.5 Pos 42 2 Stalr~ell B Stairs Stringer P-cling Wood 1 8.2 5.1 9.2/31.9 Pos 43 2 Stairwell B Door Cnsinq-Lrt Cached wood 1 10_0 5. 1 25.6/127.9 Pos as 2 Stel rlny D Band Casing C=ached wood 1 a.5 5.1 -2.0/60.6 Pos s5 2 Stairwell D Noslnq Caslnq Peeling wood I 6.5 5.1 O.O/51.3 Poa s6 2 Stair+ell D Steins Naval post Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O l.a/a2.8 a7 2 Stairwell D Stairs Ra11 cap Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/41.3 ae 2 Stairwell D Stelrs Baluster Solid Wood 1 1.7 O.1 -3.2/32.8 a9 2 Ha11 C Window Stool So21d wood 1 9.1 2.} 16.1/87.3 Pos - 50 2 Hnll C Window Sash-Lvr Solid Wood 1 6.6 O.5 O.O/i3.0 51 2 Hall C Window Casing-Rht Solid Wood 1 9.8 5.1 8.5/75.5 Pos 52 2 Hell C Window Sill-Ext So11d Wood 1 1.2 O.a -5.5/21.3 53 2 Hall C Window Part.bead-Ext Solid Wood 1 2.2 5.1 O.O/28.1 Pos 53 2 Hall B Wall well-Dpr So11d Plaster 1 1.0 O.O -3.6/53.8 55 2 Hall B well Baseboard Solid Wood 1 10.0 5.1 a.5/60.8 Pos 56 2 Hell D Door-1 Casing-Rht So11d Wood 10.0 5.1 2<.1/166.5 Pos 57 2 Hall D Door-1 Door Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/62.2 58 2 Hall D Door-2 Casing-Rht So11d Wood 1 6.1 5.1 1.3/53.7 Pos 59 2 Hnll D Door-2 Door Solid Wood 1 3.} O.O O.O/37.9 60 2 Hall A Door Door Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O -}.5/3J.2 61 2 Hall A Door Casing-Rhi Solid wood 1 8.2 5.2 1.7/76.6 Pos 62 2 Ha11 A Door Jamb-LSt Solid Wood 1 8.2 5.1 1.8/70.2 Pos 63 2 Ha11 8 Door-] Door Solid wood i 7.1 5.1 }5.7/205.2 Pos 6i 2 Hall B Door-] Casing-Rht Solid Wood I 8.0 5.1 10.0/89.} Pos 65 2 North Br. B Door Casing-LSt Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O 1_0/]0.9 66 2 North Br. B wall wail-Opr Solid Plaster 1 2.9 O.1 -5.7/55.5 67 2 North Br. A wall Baseboard Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O -S.6/33.8 68 2 North Br. A Door Cesinq-LPt So11d wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/37.6 69 2 Nor`-h Br. A Door Door Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O 1.9/65.7 70 2 North Br. D window Stool Solid Wood I 5.3 5.1 -5.2/31.2 Pos 71 2 North Br. D window Casing-Lft Solid Wood 1 10.0 5.1 22.8/156.9 Pos 72 2 North 8r. D window Sash-Lwr Solid Wood 1.6 O.l O.O/18.1 73 2 North Br. D window Cesinq-Rht Solid Wood 1 6.6 5.1 1.}/58.0 Pos 73 2 North er. D wlndou Sash-Lvr Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O -0.6/59.7 75 2 North Hr. C window Stool Solid Wood 6.1 i.] 1}.1/90.1 Pos 76 2 NorL~ Br. C wlndou 5111-Ext Solid Wood 1 1.6 1.5 1.3/55.9 Pos 7? - North Br. C window Part.bend-Est Solid Wood 1 2.1 s.l 8.9/79.0 Pos 78 2 South Br. A window Stool So11d Wood 1 6.] 5.1 15. i; 1}7.8 Pos 79 2 Sou L9 Br. A Wlndov Cesinq- L t Solid Wood 1 6.} 5.1 1.J/59.7 Pos 80 2 SouL7 Br. A Window Sesh-Lvr Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/]3.7 I-Inspector N-Note DI-Dap LS Index XRF Results by Test-Number, Negative c 0.9, Positive >- I.O mq%co2 NLton XL? 3%~/9o Childhood Leed Poisoning Pnga 3 Prevnntlon Proq; ao Dubuque, Zova 52001 "ES =' SZ "=: B and w ?n~lershlp, 623 Arllnq _on, Dubuqua, Iona TEST DATE: 02/15/95 Yo. Flr Roo> Slda SL-ucture Feature Gond. SubsL-. I V DZ PDL to ?bK hi Res 81 -' South 9r. A window-2 5111-~st So11d :food 1 2.8 3.8 21.0/131.3 Pos 32 - .ioutS 3r. A Windou-2 ?art.. be ed-~zt Solid 'wood 1 -.3 5.1 9.2/82.3 Pos 83 2 South Br. D we11 well-Upr Solid Plaster 1 3.3 O.0 O.O/50.6 8a 2 South Br. D Wall Baseboard Solid wood 1 2.2 1.6 O.O/29.2 Pos a5 2 So utn Br. D Wnll Baseboard Solid wood 1 1.2 5.1 O.O/29.a Pos dd 2 South 3r. D Paint Ghlp Baseboard So11d Wood 1 1.3 5.1 7.3/98.0 Pos 87 2 South 9r. D Window Stool Solid Wood 1 10.0 1.9 2.1/33.2 Pos 88 2 SouL`f Br. D Windou Cnslnq-Rht Solid wood 1 10.0 3.1 10.0/87.1 Pos 89 -' South 3r. D window Sesh-Lar Solid wood 1 1.3 O.O -5.2/33.3 - - 90 2 South Sr. G Door Cnsinq-Lft Solid wood 2 1.0 O.O O.O/31.2 91 2 Souk Br. C wall well-Cpr Solid Plaster 1 1.0 O.O O.O/50.3 9= 2 Batb C Door Door Solid Plaster 1 1.0 O.O O.O/a9.8 93 2 Bath D well wall-Cpr Solid Plaster 1 1.0 O.O -6.7/33.6 9a - Ba ;~ D wa11 Haseboerd Solid wood 1 1.0 O.0 -5,7/36.3 95 2 Ba tJ A window Stool Solid Wood 1 3.3 5.1 -6.0/58.7 ?os 90 = Ba t.h A window Casing-Ltt Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O -5.3/53.7 97 2 Bath A window Sass-L-.rr Solid wood I 1.3 O.O O.O/25.8 93 Ha tS A Windou 5111-Y_st Solid wood 1 3.5 5.1 -2.5/52.0 Pos 99 - Bath A Window Part.Dend-2st Solid wood 1 2.1 5.1 -2.0/57.1 Pos 100 = B-+t-h D wall Baseboard So 11d wood 1 4.9 5.2 6.0/69.6 Pos 101 O Stelrvell-Bat B Stairs wall Solid Plaster 1 10.0 O.1 -10.2/30.2 10. O Stn Sr~rell-9st D Wnll Wnll-Cor Solid Plaster 1 1.0 O.O O.O/33.8 IJ1 O Stairerall-Bat D Door Casing-R_ht Solid Plaster 1 i.8 5.1 10.2/138.2 Pos 1Ja O Stalrve ll -'ist D Door Door Solid Plaster 1 9.0 5.1 2.2/69.6 Pos 103 J Stairwell-Bat A Door Door Solid wood 1 2.3 5.1 13.5/122.1 Pos lOo O 9a a~~ent D Windou Cnslnq- Cht So 11d Wood 1 3.1 5.1 S.a/112.6 Pos iJ7 J 9a>a rant D Door Casing-LSL So 11d wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/i3.8 LOa O Bo a~.ant D Door Door Solid wood 1 6.6 5.1 15.5/137.1 Pos 109 0 9a>..ant C Door Casing-R.ht Solid wood 1 -._ 5.1 13.0/122.0 Pos 110 O Ba wstw nt 9 Door Casing-Rht Solid wood 1 2.5 5.1 5.9/7ti.2 Pos Lit Callnrate ~ 1.0 1.9 -3.3/ 9.6 Pos 113 Calibrate 1 2.1 1.9 -O.O/15.6 Pos 113 CallDrat~ 1 1.0 0.6 -1.2;22.2 Sia Ca1lDrat• 1 1.0 1.1 -2.5/16.9 pos itti GaltDra to 1 1.9 1.0 O.o/17.2 Pos L-Lnr~tw~t.t a' N-MO Cr DC-[>. pth LndeY trr wert~l ~~ ity Tam[ Mtm D.ar, !1 a~~7.it l•:a ~ J.9, POeltl•/a >~ 1.0 ~Ca ,'C~~ :ISLOn !(L.? r. ----- ! I i . C - ~~~. ~ . ( ~ ITC.} ° N . I ~~o~ ~, ~ > 1 I i .I~~ II. ....t. _ i.....~. -- - ~ i i I. 1 ~ ~ ~Nt~c-.R,oo~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? s ~T ~ r ~ I ~~ ( ~ 1• ~ I I i B®Qoo f~ ~! 4 ~ 1 R~~t~ ;~ i - - ~ _ . .11 . .~~_ __ i. _ ~ ~_ 3/7/96 ChlldLood Lend Poisoning Page 1 Prevention Program Dubuque, Iowa 52001 TEST SITE: B and W Parinarsblp, 627 Arlington, Dubuque TEST DATE: 02/15/96 No. Flr Room Slde Structure Feature Cond. Substr. I N DL POL to PbK bS Res 1 1 Livlnq Rn A Door Door Solid Hatal 1 1.1 O.O -5.9/57.7 2 1 Living Rm A Door Casing-Rht Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/51.8 3 1 Living Rm A wnll wall-Upr So11d Plaster 1 7.2 O.l O.O/52.0 3 1 Livlnq RID A Wnll Baseboard So11d wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/29.a 5 1 Livlnq Rm A Window Caslnq-Ltt Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/51.7 6 1 Livlnq Rn A wlndov Stool Solid wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/5].1 7 1 Livlnq Ra C wail Baseboard Solid wood 1 7,9 5.1 3.8/63.3 Pos 8 1 Living Rm C Door Caslnq-Ltt So1Sd wood 1 7.8 d.3 2.6/79.7 Pos 9 1 Living Rs C Door JnmD-Lft Solid :.TOOd 1 3.2 O.l O.O/31.5 - 10 1 Dlnlnq Rm A Door Casing-Ltt Solid Good 1 9.9 d.8 8.1/136.3 Pos it 1 Dining Ra A wail Baseboard Solid wood 1 9.9 5.1 8.3/81.5 Pos 22 1 Dlnlnq Ra D Door-1 CasSnq-Lit Solid Wood 1 10.0 5.1 16.8/136.5 Pos 13 1 DSnlnq Rm D Door-2 Caslnq-Rht Solid wood 1 10.0 1.9 -0.9/63.3 Pos la 1 DSnlnq Ra D Door-2 Door Solid wood - 8.7 5.1 2.d/106.0 Pos 15 1 DSnlnq Rm D wall Wall-Unr Solid Plnster 1 1.0 O.O O.O/53.1 S6 1 Dining Rm C Door Caslnq-Rbt Solid wood 1 10.0 5.1 O.O/53.2 Pos 17 1 Dining Rn C Door Ja3b-Rht Solid Wood 1 10.0 2.7 1.2/53.0 Pos 18 1 Dlnlnq Ra C window CasSnq-Rht Solid wood 1 7.1 5.1 11.3/123.6 Pos 19 1 DSnlnq Ra C Window Stool Solid wood 1 7.7 3.6 5.5/71.3 Pos 20 I Dining Ra C window Sash-Lwr Solid wood - 1.5 O.1 O.O/29.2 21 1 Dining Ra B window Stool So11d :food I 9.2 5.1 8.3/112.3 Pos 22 1 DSnlnq Ra B window CasSnq-Ltt Solid wood 10.0 5.1 25.3/130.8 Pos 2] 1 Dlnlnq Rn B Wlndov Sash-Lwr Solid :food 1 1.0 O.O -0.3/49.3 2a 1 DSnlnq Ra B window Sill-Ext So11d wood - 1.: 0.1 O.O/29 .3 25 1 DSnlnq Ra B window Pa^_.bead-EZt Solid wood 1 1.7 0.3 -3.0/33.0 2e 1 Kitchen A poor Caslnq-Ltt Solid Wood _ 10.0 3.3 -7.2/36.5 Pos 27 1 Kitchen A wall :7311-Upr Solid ?last e: - 10.0 0.1 O.O/SO.6 28 1 Kitchen B Door Caslnq-Rht Solid Plaster 1 1.0 O.O O.O/a7.0 29 1 Kitchen B Door Door Solid Hetal 1 2_2 O.O O.O/a3.6 30 1 Kitchen B wlndov Cnsinq-Lit Solid Wood 1 10.0 2.5 O.O/27.9 Pos 31 1 Kitchen 8 Window Stool Solid wood e.l 2.0 0.6/31.8 pcs J2 1 Kitchen 8 Window Sash-L•.rr So11d wood 1 7.5 3.1 -3.1/39.3 pos 33 1 Kitchen B Wlndou Slli-EYt Solid Hetal 1 6.6 2.6 -2.0/50.1 Pos 34 1 Kltehen B Wlndov pert.beed-Ext Solid He tai 1 2.1 S.a l.a/31.9 Pos 35 1 1Cl tchcn B wind ov Sash-L'v^_ Solid He tai 1 7.2 3.5 -2.0/I9.8 Pos 3c 1 Kitchen C wSnCov Casing-Rht Solid H<tal 1 9.a 2.5 7.1/63.1 Pos 17 1 Kitchen C wlndov Sash-L'= Solid Hetal I e.a 1.0 O.O/sa.0 Pos 38 1 Kitchen C wlndov Stool So1SC Ha Sal 1 7,6 1.9 - 3.1/32.8 Pos 39 1 Kitchen C Wlndov Stool Solid He tai 1 6.6 2.0 1.9/21.3 Pos 10 1 Kitchen C Window 5111-Ext Solid H~taZ 1 10.0 2.0 ].3/35.7 Pos I-Inspector N-NO Ca DI-DepG'~ Index XRF Results by Test Numb<r, !legat!ve < p.9, PoslCi va ~- ..O ay/cat l7l ton XL7 C;X vopTN - Zco; be O'T -< rnT :T sod '6'O > enT:cbaN '1aGenli nsay /q cZjnsaS s2Ia xapv= gyda0-IO ezoN_N zoZ~adsul-= T"EC/t'E- O'O O'T Z DooM PTTos :sod Trrat7 ssTr35 8 TTPS Z 8t o"t9/9•oi- o•o O'T T pooh PTTos dro TTrx sSTrZS 8 TTrH Z cs so`,* Z'sCT/t't T'S T'f T Pooh PTTos s~Tr1S bvTsoN 8 pvr8-nrn~Tr1S T 9t sod C'ZST/E'CT T'S L'Z T Pooh pTToS f.cr_Tr'~S s3Tr15 8 PvrB-/.rl'.Z TrzS T Ss L'TS/O'O t 'O O'OT T poo;•, PTTos TTva pvrg saTrnS O TTa+uTraS i is sod O'6Z/O'O T'S 6'Z T pooh PTTos aabeT nS s~Tr15 O TTa~'+=7rzs T tt t'6Z/O'O O'O s'T T pooh pTToS p_roGasrB TTrH O TTrH T Zt L'SE/S'S- L'O 8'T i Ts'+aH PTT oS :xs-PraG•:3rd noPvTM J uaAJG Tit T Ts saH TG ItGd oT 7Gd IO N Z ~sgnS •PvoJ a3n~rad aSn ~n3ZS aPTS mooya 3T3 'oN 96/ST/ZO ~eSYO .LSZ Z anbngn0 'uoZbvTT=Y LZ9 'dTGs~av^~cd ('i Pvv 9 ~3.LZS SS3S TOOZS rnoZ 'anbngn0 mr36o3d voTavanszd Z ebrd buTuosiod Pra7 PooCPTTG"J 96/L/£ 3/7/96 Childhood Lend Po lsonlnq Pege 1 Prevention Prograa DuDuqua, Zova 52001 TEST SZTE: B and W Partnership, 627 A.r l ington, Dubuque TEST DATE: 02/15/96 No. Plr Room Sl de St--actors Feature Cond. SubsL . Z V DL PDL 1o PDK Di Res 1 2 Hall B Wall SaseDonrd Solid Wood 1 8.5 5.1 6.7/72.7 ?os 2 2 Hall G Wlndov Caslnq-LEL Solid Wood 1 7.2 5.1 O.O/51.0 Pos 3 2 Hall C Wlndov Stool Solid Wood 1 6.0 5.1 O.O/50.7 Pos s 2 Hnll C Window Snsh-Lwr Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.1 -3.1/30.8 5 2 Hall C Wlndov S111-Ext Solid Wood 1 2.8 i.8 7.1/95.5 Pos 6 2 Hell C Wlndov Part.bead-Ext Solid Wood 1 1.7 3.0 O.O/36.1 Pos 7 2 Hall B Door-1 Door So11C Wood 1 1.0 O.O -6.0/58.8 e 2 Hall $ Door-1 Cnsinq-LEt Solid Wood 1 5.8 5.1 12.3/146.6 Pos 9 2 Hall 8 Door-1 Jamb-Lft Solid Wood 1 6.1 5.1 2.s/75.s Pos - - 10 2 Hnll H Wa11 Baseboard Solid wood 1 6.0 5.1 3.{/66.5 Pos 11 2 Hall B Door-2 Caslnq-Lft 9olld Wood 1 3.6 5.1 35.9/206.5 Pos 12 2 Hell B Door-2 Jamb-Lft Solid Wood 1 5.1 5.1 2.3/75.1 Pos 13 2 Hall A Door Caslnq- L°t Solid good 1 5.9 5.1 10.2/1]8.0 Pos is 2 Hall A Door Jemb-LEL Solid Wood 1 5.5 5.1 2.5/77.2 Pos 15 2 Hall D Door Caslnq-Rht Solid Wood 1 6.0 5.1 8.5/11{.2 Pos 16 2 Hnll D Door Door Solid iJOOd 1 5.5 5.1 5.6/111.6 Pos 17 2 Bath A Wlndov Caslnq-Rht Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O -i.8/a8.p 18 2 Bath A Wlndov Stool Solid Wood 1 8.5 5.1 8.5/113.3 ?os 19 2 BnLh A Wlndov Sash-Lwr Solid :food 1 '_.O O.O O.O/53.0 20 2 Bath A Wlndov 5111-Ext Solid Wood 1 2.a 0.5 -0.2/19.9 21 2 Bat, A Wlndov Pnrt.bead-Er_ Solid :food 1 2.3 5.1 1.3/60.9 Pos 22 2 Bath D Wall Well-Cpr Solid :.rood _ 2.0 5.1 O.O/39.5 Pos 23 2 3a~ B :call Baseboard 3olld Wood 1 1.0 O.O 0.6/3x.6 2s 2 Bath B Wn11 We11-Cpr Solid Plaster 1 3.3 O.O O.O/x9.3 25 2 Southwest-Br. D Wnll Wa 11-Cpr Solid Plaster I 1.0 O.O -3.0/55.2 25 2 Southwest-Br D Door Caslnq-Rht Solid Wood 1 5.0 5.1 6.7/102.6 Pos 27 2 Southwest-Br D Door Door Solid Wood - 1.0 O.O O.O/s7.a 28 2 Southwest-Sr. D Wa L' Baseboard Solid Wood 1.0 O.O -3.3/32.5 29 2 Southwest-Br. A Wlndov Stool Solid Wood 1 3.7 5.1 -3.3/71.6 Pos 30 2 Southwest-Br. A Window Cesinq-LEL Solid Wood 1 5.0 5.1 15.3/128.1 ?os 31 - Southwest-$z. A Wlndov Sash-L•r_ Solid Wood 1 1.2 O.1 O.O/29.3 ]2 2 Southwest-Br. A Window 5111-Est Solid Wood 1 2.3 3.1 1.8/56.1 Pos 33 - Southwest-Br. A Window Pa rt.beed-Ext Solid Wood 1 2.a 5.1 23.1/129.a Pos 3s 2 Southwest-$r. 8 Wlndov Stool Solid :rood 1 10.0 5.1 15.1/163.1 Pos 35 - SOLLth:le5t-$Z'. $ Wlndov Caslnq-4ht Solid wood 1 7.0 5.1 2.1/93.0 Pos 36 ~ Southwest-$r. B Wlndov Sash-L•r_ Solid 'wood 1 2.0 0.2 O.O/26.1 37 - Sou Lhvest-Hr. C Door Caslnq-L.'t Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/32.5 38 2 Southwest-9r. C Door Door So '_!d Wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/51.9 39 2 Nor:weat-$r. C Window Casing-Rht Solid Wood 1 5.1 1.7 7.6/102.7 Pos a0 2 Northwest-Br -~ C ~~-~~ Wlndov ~~~-~-~~~~~~ Sto01 ~--~~~--~~---~~ So Lid Wood 1 8.9 5.1 1 0.1/136.9 Pos I-Inspect or N-Note DI- Da pth Lndnx -~~a ~--~~e-o ~-~-~-~~ ~~» ~-~-- ~~~-~ ~~~~~~»~~-tea YRF Results by Test NunD~r, Nega five < 0.9, ?osltlve >- ..O as /cat Nlton YLt 3/7/96 ChSldhood Lend Poisonlnq Page 2 Prevention Progrem Dubuque, Zowa 52001 TEST SITE: B end W Partnership, 627 AS 1ington, Dubuque TEST DAT°_: 02/15/95 No. Fir Room Slde St--uctur< Feature Cond. SuDSL. Z N DI PDL to PDK hi Res 31 2 Northwest-Br. C Window Sash-L•.Jr So11d Wood 1 1.3 0.2 -4.6/57.5 62 2 Nortbwest-Br. C WSndov 5111-Ext SolLd Wood 1 3.2 5.1 2.3/75.3 2os 33 2 Nor:.hvest-Br. C Window Part.Dend-Ext Solid Wood 2 1.9 1.5 O.O/29.0 Pos id 2 Northwest-Br. H Window Stool ~ Solid Wood 1 7.9 1.2 0.8/36.3 POs 35 2 No rte-.:'vest-Br. 8 Window Sash-L•r- Solid Wood 1 2.3 O.1 -6.5/35.1 36 2 Northwest-Br. B Window Casinq-LLt Solid «ood 1 5.6 6.9 10.1/137.3 Pos 37 2 No r'~vest-Hr. B Window S111-Est Solid Wood 1 2.6 1.9 O.O/37.1 Pos d8 2 Nor-~.bwest-Br. H window Part.bead-Est Solid Woof 1 2.9 5.1 9.0/80.a Pos 39 2 Nothvest-Hr. A Door Casing-Rht Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/39.s 50 2 NOr~~west-Br. A Door Door Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O O.O/53.8 51 2 HorY~west-Br. 8 Well Baseboard Solid «ood 1 8.3 5.1 17.3/113.0 Pos 52 O Basement 8 Wlndov Caslnq-LSt Solid Wood 1 1.8 5.1 8.1/81.2 Pos 53 O Basement B Window Stool Solid «ood 1 1.3 0.3 O.O/19.8 53 O Basement H Door Casing-L_t Solid Wood 1 -.5 3.3 2.0/62.0 ?os 55 O Basenent B Door Door Solid Wood 1 3.7 1.1 -3.9/27.6 Pos 56 O Bnsem<nt B :Ji ndow Casinq-Rht Solid Wood 1 1.9 5.1 2.2/59.8 Pos 57 O Basement B Wlndov Stool Solid Wood 1 1.7 5.1 2.2/69.9 Pos 58 O Basement H Window-1 Stool Solid Wood 1 1.5 2.2 O.O/32.7 Pos 59 O Basement C Door Casinq-LPt Solid Wood 1 1.6 5.1 6.2/83.6 Pos 60 O Basement D Door Caslnq-LEt So 114 Wood 1 1.3 5.2 8.3/111.9 Pos 6I O Stai rre ll D Stairs Tread Solid «ood i 1.0 O.] 1.3/Sl.fi 62 O Stal rte ll D Stairs Stringer So11d «ood 1 1.9 5.1 5.7/77.3 Pos 53 O Stalrrell D Door Jamb-Rht Solid ::ood 1 1.7 5.Z -3.6/101.2 ?os 6i O Stai well B Door Casinq-LPt Solid Wood 1 2.i 5.1 13.3/127.8 Pos 55 O Sta!rleli 9 Door Door Solid Wood I 5.1 5.1 19.6/171.0 ?os 66 1 Outside A Ext WnZl Sidlnq Solid Wood 1 1.0 O.O 0.0;39.5 67 1 Ou side B Ext Wall Sidinq Solid «ood 1 3.3 5.1 -5.5/51.5 Pos I-Inspector N-Note DI- Dept,? Ind<x SRF Results D;r Test Number, N<gatlve < 0.9, Positive >- 1.0 09 '~~= Niton !CLf 3/7/96 C:Sldhood Lend Poisoning Pnge 1 ?reventlon Program Dubuque, Zovn 52001 TZST SZTR: B and it Pnrtnershlp, 627 A.clington, Dubuque TEST DATR: 02/15/96 efo. Flr Room Slde St_-uctura Feeture Cortd. Subs L^^. I 4 DI PDL to PDK hi Res 1 Cnllbretc 1 2.0 1.6 0.6/19.6 Pos 2 Cnllbrate 1 1.0 1.1 -2.1/33.9 Pos I-Inspector N-Note DL-Depth Index XRF Results Dy Test Number, Negselve < 0.9, poy!tive >- 1.0 mglcm. NLton :(L: .G ~. • ~ ~ - I T . .~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ f _ ~ - - - -~. ' - i I I ~ ~ IJ~bC• I r ~STi v ~ 1.~~1,~ ~ Ii - - I i _ _ I _ i ,. ~~ t\1Nr- 12oCn'1 . . . _ . . . I j I i i i - ~ ' i I ! i i ~~- ~; ~, I'-51 C~~V~ La7 A:~ U ~'~ ~ ~ ~:, ~ti CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM March 8, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 623-627 Arlington Street Planning Services staff have not received any additional information regarding this application. The Commission should review the packet of application materials each commissioner has previously received and be prepared to make a decision on the B & W Properties' application request for a certificate of economic hardship at the March 16, 2000 Commission meeting. As previously communicated to you, Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager, asked that the Commission address a referral of the City Council concerning the appeal of Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, B & W Properties. In addition to referring the appeal back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate, the Council asked that the Commission address the following two issues regarding this case: The Commission initially expressed concerns with inadequate maintenance, but these concerns were not brought to closure. The City Council would like the Commission to bring this issue to closure. 2. The City Council would like to know why the Commission did not accept the recommendations of staff. Please review these issues and be prepared to give me a response which I can transmit to the City Council. CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM March 9, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission f=ROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner w,~ SUBJECT: Analysis of Certificate of Economic Hardship Applications As requested by the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Services staff and Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien met to discuss utilization of an analysis procedure for the applications for Certificates of Economic Hardship from B&W Properties and the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque. The basis of that discussion was to evaluate a form which could be used to determine whether property can earn a reasonable economic return. After review of the forms, Assistant City Attorney Tim O'Brien and Planning Services staff tested the forms by using information provided by the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque request for the Bainbridge property at 1265/1267'/ Bluff Street, as well as information submitted by B&W Properties in their application for property at 623/627 Arlington Street. Planning Services staff have completed analyses for those tvvo properties utilizing several different scenarios. For the Bainbridge property, the scenarios include evaluating the property using the Boys Club purchase offer of 570,000, and the purchase price of X37,500 paid by the Bainbridges in 1999. In both scenarios, the analysis showed that the property could not earn a reasonable economic return. Regarding the property at 623-627 Arlington Street, Planning Staff presented four different improvement options: 1) scrape and paint the existing wood, 2) install new wood siding and paint it; 3) install vinyl siding on the entire building; and 4) install vinyl siding on two sides and the rear and restore the front by using new wood materials, renovating the porch and installing new front windows. That property was evaluated using the assessed value of $50,100, the purchase price paid for the property in 1993, and the average of comparables that the applicants provided as part of their application. Historic Preservation Commission March 9, 2000 Page 2 Using the property's assessed value, all four options showed that the owners could not earn a reasonable economic return. Using the purchase price for the property, the owners could not earn a reasonable economic return if they would have to scrape and paint the existing wood or install new tivood siding. The owners could earn reasonable economic return if they could install vinyl siding on all four sides or install vinyl siding on three sides and restore the front facade as described above. Using the comparable values, again the owners could not earn reasonable economic return if they had to paint and scrape existing wood or install new wood siding. However, the owners could earn seasonable economic return if they could install vinyl siding on ali four sides or vinyl siding on three sides and restore the front. These analyses are provided for your information and are examples only. The Commission should those analyses and determine which property values, percent return on investment and other criteria should be utilized in determining whether the property can or cannot earn reasonable economic return. Please be prepared to discuss these analyses at the March 16, 2000, meeting. N1N/mkr Attachments cc: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager Tim O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney Pam Myhre, Associate Planner Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Bainbridge Property -- 1265-12671/2 Bluff Street Purchase Economic fa .tnrS Offer - 2000 Value of property S70,000.00 Annual income necessary to earn a 10% return S7,000.00 Annual operating expenses' 510,298.96 Total S17 298 9~i Amount of annual rent that the Purchase Price -- Bainbridge - 1 ggc S37,500.00 S3, 750.00 S 10,298.96 S14.048 96 property would generate" S12.600 00 S12 600 On Economic return -S4,698.96 -S1,448.96 positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return `Based on information submitted by the Boys and Girls Club, excluding depreciation and interest " Based on 100% occupancy Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. B ~ W Properties Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Property at 623-027 Arlington Street Scrape and Economic factors paint wood Assessed Value S50,100.00 Cost to rehab S34,100.00 Lead-based Paint Grant 514.883.00 Totaunvestment as improved S69,317.00 Annual income to eam a 10% return 56,931.70 Annual operating expenses' S2,448.00 Total S9.379.70 Amount of annual rent that the property would generate" S6.383.00 Economic retum -S2,996.70 positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return New wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, siding i in restore front S50,100.00 550,100.00 550,100.00 532,700.00 S8,820.00 517,900.00 567,917.00 S44,037.00 S53,117.00 S6,791.70 S4,403.70 S5,311.70 S2,448.00 S2,448.00 52,448.00 ~.2~ 74 S6.851.70 S7.759.70 S6.383.00 -S2,856.70 56.383.00 -S468.70 S6.383.00 -S1,376.70 based on information submitted by the B & W Properties 1998 operating/maint. expense S1,304.00 199S property taxes S814.00 1995 insurance 5330.00 total 52,448.00 " based on information submitted by the B ~ W Properties for 1998 rental income Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. B ~ W Properties Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Scrape and Economic fa .tnrS paint wood Purchase Price - 1993 527,500.00 Cost to rehab 534,100.00 Lead-based Paint Grant 514.883.00 Total-investment as improved S46,717.00 Annual income to earn a 10% return 54,671.70 Annual operating expenses' 52,448.00 Total 1 7 Amount of annual rent that the property would generate" S6.383.00 Economic return -5736.70 positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return New wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, i ~ i i restore front 527,500.00 S27,500.00 527,500.00 532,700.00 58,820.00 $17,900.00 S14.883.00 S14.883 00 S14.88 00 545,317.00 S21,437.00 S30,517.00 S4,531.70 52,143.70 S3,051.70 S2,448.00 52,448.00 S2,448.00 S6.979.70 S4.591.70 S5.499 70 S6.383.00 -S596.70 S6.383.00 S1,791.30 S6. 8 00 S883.30 ' Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties 1998 operating/maint. expense 51,304.00 1998 property taxes 5814.00 1998 insurance S330.00 total 52,448.00 " Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties for 1998 rental income Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. B & W Properties Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship Property at 623-627 Arlington Street Scrape and Ne~.v wood Vinyl Vinyl 3 sides, Economic factors paint wood i i i i restore front 3 t 3'1 ~ 3 1 3'7S 31 '~"7 S 3 i'~'1S Average of Comparables"` S3~T58,00 5~4;~50..l10 53:$8 S34,~00 ~~ a~c7 Cost to rehab 534,100.00 S32,700.00 --~. S8,820.00` 517,900.00 tb~~ry-~7 Lead-based Paint Grant S14.883.00 514.883.00 S14.883.00 514.883.00 TntaLinvestment as-improved 553,967.00 S52,567.00 S28,687.00 S37,767.00 ~! ~ ~ ~_" ~' Annual income to ~~~ ~`' ' `~ ~''-'l - earn a 10% return 55,396.70 S5,256.70 S2,868.70 S3,776.70 ~~S ~~~.. Annual operating expenses` 52,448.00 S2,448.00 S2,448.00 S2,448.00 n`~t~ _ % ~~ ~ Total S7.844.70 S7.704.70 S5.316.70 56.224 70 ~ '~~ ~ . ~ Amount of annual rent that the property would generate" 56.383.00 S6.383.00 S6.383.00 56.383.00 ~' ~~~ ---- Economic return -S1,461.70 -51,321.70 S1,066.30 S158.30 '- positive =can earn return negative =cannot earn return ' Based on information submitted by the B 8~ W Properties: 1998 operating/maint. expense 51,304.00 1998 property taxes S814.00 1998 insurance 5330.00 total 52,448.00 " Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties for 1998 rental income `"' Based on information submitted by the B & W Properties for 1998 sales of 4 properties identified by B & W Properties as comparables {(S38,000+525,000+542,000+S34,000)/4} Prepared by the Planning Services Department as an example only. ~ °G M eet,;~9 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,00 Owe 19.344 8,16 After vinyl siding is added, house will be worth approx. $33,000. We will be increasing our equity by 55,00 x.500 13,66 13,66 x 10 % return on investment comes to 51,36.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,84 ---- -Insurance 336 Taxes $40 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Vinyl side house $8,8201,200 relocation cost Minimum=10,020-~,~00 investment=4,20 at 8 1/2% over 5 years 1.112.76 $7,292.76 Rents- 5293 + 350 = 64~ x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 7208-7292.76= a loss of S84 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our 5~,~00 investment if we have to borrow it. n ~c crrv o. ~ DUB ,_ E ~~ ~~ ~ ~ PLANNING APPLICATICN PCRM City ur Dubuque Planning San+ices (:-partmznt Dubuque IA b::U01-485.4 Phone: 313-539-4210 r"ax: 3t:r 5a9-4149 e Variance ^ Rezoning ^ Simple Sita Plan ^ Annexation ^ Conditional Use Permit ^ Planned District ^ Minor Site Plan ^ Temporary Use Permit ^ Appeal ^ Preliminary Plat ^ Major Site Plan ^ Certificate of Appropriateness o Special Exception ^ Minor Final Plat o Major Final Plat Certificate of Economic Hardship ^ Limited Setback Waiver ^ Text Amendment ^ Simple Subdivision ~ Other: PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT L~EG~BLY I~N11NK , / ProPertyOwner(s): - .7)~-`w ~~"Ct~'' r^~l-~S-//C.~, Phone:~l~(ri Address: _~7 S <`"G'1 <:C~ 5 ~~ ~~ City: ~l/!r~-~'` Stata_1/~ ZiP:~~!~~ _ Fax Number: _~_%~~~ ~~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ i'LtobileJCellular Number: ~~ - ~ ~C~ / ~ / Applicant/Agent: ~ / ~~/ ~? ~ ~il~? ~ ~/ Yr7 ~~f Phone Address: ~~~~~t-L- City: Fax Number: Mobile/Cellular Number: State Zip: ~~aic../ Site Iocationladdress: ~~ ~~D ~ ~ f-t~-/ i'YI F .~^~ Existing zoning: Proposed zonina:__ Historic district: ~ Landmark: L=gal description (Bidwell Parcel fD number er !ot number,'b!ock numberlsubdivision). otai property (lot} area (square ~e~t er acres}: Number of lots: Cescrib_ proposal and reason necessary (a'tach a le."er of ~xplanaticn, if n~~ded): CERTIFICATION: I/wa, the undersigned, do hereby certifiy that: The information submitted herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and upon subr, ~i;tal becomes public record; ' Fees are not refundable and payment does not guarantee approval; and All additional required written and graphic materials are attached. Properhy O~.vner(s Date:~C1~ ~'~ A:.plican+JAgent: Date: • G. FOR OFFICE USE O PPL! AT10N SUI~TTAL CHECKLIST ~~ Fee; Received by. te: L~ ~~ Dock?t: ^ Property ownership list o Sitelsketch an FI r plan ^ Plat ^ Conceptual deve!opmenl plan ~ ' improvement plans ^ Design review projec description ^ Photo ^ Other: 623 Arlington ~Ve have 4 choices: 1. Not to follow IOSH rules that by law we are supposed to and take a chance on poisoning children and possibly being sued. 2. Not comply with the city housing code violation and let the city shut down the building. _ 3. Lose a minimum of ~ 1,672.00 per year every year forever. Lose a minimum of X4,119.00 per year for the next 10 years. 4. Vinyl side the building and make a profit of ~3~6.00 per year. We are allowed a reasonable ecnomic return per your code Section 25-9. A reasonable rate of return is 10 to 12%, on invested money, 10% is S 1,36 per year. 623-627 Arlington 1. Side building (50 year guarantee on siding) lead safe manner- Profit 536 per year 2. Hardie Plank lead safe manner will be a synthetic material. Width on lap siding will be ~ inches, not 3 as it is now. Price does not include painting over next 50 years. 3. New wood siding lead safe manner. Price does not include painting over next 60 years. 4. Strip siding lead safe manner. Price does not include painting over next 30 yrs. ---= Price does riot include re-location costs of 52,000 min. Scrape and patch siding lead safe manner. Price does not include paintirg over next ~0 yrs. Price does not include scraping and painting in a lead safe manner forever. Loss 51,369.49 per yr. Loss 54,119 per yr. Loss 54,477 per yr. Loss 53,271 per yr. 6. Restore front in wood, and side 3 sides in vinyl in lead safe Loss 51,735 per yr. manner. Price does not include maintaining wood siding, trim, etc. over next 50 yrs. Scrape and touch up paint in lead safe manner. Loss 53,763 per }'r. Price does not include patching rotten wood which city Could cite me for at any time and I would have to repair in lead safe manner. 51 x,200 8. Scrape and paint lead safe manner (estimate 2) Loss 51,672 per yr. I don't think it can be done this cheap and I wri11 be ta'.;ing a huge financial risk. Price does riot include patching rotten wood which the city could cite me for at any time and I would have to repair in lead safe manner- 51 x,200 No interest figured on money, we will have to come up with $16,200 every 6 years. 9. Scrape and touch up paint lead safe manner. Loss S2,172 per yr. It would be almost impossible to rent an apartment if they knew they would have to move out every year. OUR RETUR~Y ON INVESTMENT SHOULD BE 51,365.60 PER YEAR No ma.-tagement fees have been taken out of any estimate, at 6%= $432 per yT. Does not include interest on our 53,600 invested if we have to borrow it-$230 per yT. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 O~~•e 1 44 8,156 After vinyl siding is added, house will be worth approx. 533,000. ~Ve will be increasing our equity by 55,500 ~.~00 13,656 13,656 ~ 10 % return on investment comes to 51,365.60 per year Per 1"ear- Interest on house 1,584 Insurance 336 --_- ~ Taxes 840 I<~faintainance average over 5 years 2,408 - Street Assessment 600 Vinyl side house 58,820 +1,200 relocation cost l~finimum=10,020-6,500 investment=4,520 at 8 1/2% over 10 years ~ ~ 72 00 56,852.00 Rents- 5295 + 350 = 6=15 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yTS. div by 2= 532 7203-6S52= a profit of $356 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include u~terest on our 55,500 im~estment if we have to borrow it. i\i0th111~ t;tlen out for depreciation. 623-627 Arlington Paid Owe 27,500 19 44 8,156 After Hardie Plank is added, house will be worth approx. 533,000. We will be increasing our equity by S5,500 5.500 13,b56 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to 51,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 ____ _ Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 • Hardie Plant: installed-520,414.40 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=21,614-5,500 investment=16,114.40 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= 2.397.49 58,577.49 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 532 7208-8,577.49= a loss of 51,369.49 per year i\tothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our 55,500 investment if we have to borrow it. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe X44 8,156 Afler•new wood siding is added, house will be worth approx. $33,000. We will be increasing our equity by $5,500 5.500 13,656 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 Insurance 336 ---- Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 New wood installed-$38,100 +2,000 relocation cost Minimum=40,100-5,500 investment=34,600 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= 5.147 $11,327 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yTS. div by 2= X32 7208-11,327= a loss of $4,1 19 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $5,500 investment if we have to borrow it. S 623-527 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe 19.344 8,156 After stripping siding, house will be worth approx. 533,000. ~Ve will be increasing our equity by $5,500 5.500 13,656 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 _ Insurance 336 -- -- Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Strip siding-$42,500-5,500=37,000 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= 5.505 511,686 Rents- 5296 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= 532 7208-11,685= a loss of 5=1,477 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our 55,500 investment if w•e have to borrow it. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,00 Owe 1 34' 8,16 After scraping, patching & painting, house will be worth approx. $33,000. We will be increasing our equity by $~,~00 5.500 13,66 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to $1,36.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 _ Insurance 336 -- -- Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street- Assessment 600 Scrape & patch siding-$33,200 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=34,400-5,500 investment=28,900 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= 4 X99. 4 $10,479 Rents- $295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= ~? 7208-10,479= a loss of $3,271 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. Thi, does not include interest on our $5,00 investment if we have to borrow it. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,500 Owe 19.3=I4 8,156 After restoring front &vinyl siding 3 sides, house will be. worth approx 533,000. We will be increasing our equity ~.>00 by 55,500 13,656 13,656 x 10 % return on investment comes to 51,365.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 ____ _ Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Restore front & vinyl 3sides-$22,883 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=24,083-x,500 investment=18,583 at 8 1/2% over 10 years= 7 4 58,944.80 Rents- 5295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss Iasi 2 yrs. div by 2= X32 7208-8,9-14= a foss of 51,736 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our 55,500 investment if we ha~~e to borrow it. 623-627 Arlington Paid 27,00 Owe l 44 8,16 After scraping & painting, house will be. worth approx 527,00. We will not be increasing the value $8,156 x 10 % return on investment comes to $81 x.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 ____ _ Insurance 336 Taxes 840 Maintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment ._ ._~ 600 Scrape & paint-4 years-$15,000 +1,200 relocation cost Minimum=16,200 at 8 1/2% over 4 years= ~ 4 1. 0 510,971.60 Rents- $295 + 3~0 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yrs. div by 2= j32 7208-10,971.60= a loss of 53,763 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our $x,500 investment if we have to borrow it. 9 623-627 Arlington Paid Ou•e 27,00 19.344 8, t 6b SS, l 66 x 10 °.''o return on investment comes to 5816.60 per year Per ~"ear- Interest on house 1,684 Insurance 3 36 Ta.~es 840 ____ i\~faintsinance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Scrape & paint lead safe maiuler-6 years-S 16,000 +1,200 relocation cost ,Liinimunr=16,200 div. by 6 }TS. is 52,700 per }z. ~ 7 (tiot including interest) 58,880 Rents- 5296 + 360 = 646 ~ 12= 7740 ~'acanc}' loss Last ? }TS. div by 2= ~~~ 7208-SS80= a loss of S 1,672 per year \'othing has tKen taken out for management fee. Z"Iris doe. not include interest on our 56,600 im•esilnent if we have to borrow it. l 623-627 Arlington Paid Owe 27,500 19.344 8,156 58,156 x 10 % return on investment comes to $815.60 per year Per Year- Interest on house 1,584 Insurance 3 3 6 Taxes 840 1`~laintainance average over last 2 years 2,820 Street Assessment 600 Scrape & touch up paint lead safe manner- 53.200 per year minimum _ $9,380 Rents- 5295 + 350 = 645 x 12= 7740 Vacancy loss last 2 yTS. div by 2= 5~ 7208-9380= a loss of 52,172 per year Nothing has been taken out for management fee. This does not include interest on our 55,500 investment if we have to borrow it. 1993-12 months La~~ncare 90.00 Licen_~ 27.00 Repairs 1,099.00 «'ater 12.98 Electric 57.53 Gas 22.25 .~d~~ertising i 4 1,394.22 1999-12 months Law-ncare R sno_ ~v License Repairs Gas :~d~•ertising Fees-Gifu Extermination t 95.00 ? 7.00 3,627.97 16.04 21.33 25.00 _=~9.so =1,262.14 Rental loss- X770.00 Rental loss- 529.00 Had to put in a new bath, tub and frame shower. Tear up floor to level and replace al(old water supply Imes, new stool, rip out baseboard & window casing & re- place door frame & casing in a lead safe manner. S 1,294.22 + 4,262.14= 5,656.36 divided by 24 months=235.63 per month Di~-ided by ~ yzzrs = 2,328.00 per yT. Rentcil Loss 295 + 770 = 51,065 div. by 24 mo. = 544.37 per month Dir•ided by 2 }TS = 532.50 per }T. 623-627 ~rlin~ton Hardie Planks o inches «Zde covers ~ inches ~ 12 ft. a[ 54.40 per piece T taX = $4.46 3 sq.ft. Per piece = 593.20 per sq. X 42 = $3,914.40 Labor to iru-tall approx. 42 sq. X 520 = 10,00.00 Trim corners, fir out all ~vindo~vs and doors-approx. 2,000.00 Pant 2 coats minimum 4.000.00 Total $20,414.40 Speaker Contruction estimated it would be around ___J-130 p~:r square =.513,900 aild does not include painting. Hardie Plank will not bz the proper material to use either. It wi1I not bz the proper width of wood siding. The wood siding has 3 inch laps and Hardie had ~ filch laps. SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION JOB WORK ORDER (815) 747-6023 4751 N. MENOMINEE RD. Date of Order: EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 61025 March 22, 2000 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS: 575 English Lane CITY: Dub., la. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape-recommend replacing or siding over. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: __Apply 4 inch-wood lap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- 5325 per square x 42 sq.= ~ 513,650 Labor to replace wood siding- 5225 per square x 42 sq. 9,450 Apply one coat primer and 1 coat paint=Labor and material 3,300 (Paint when scaffold is set up already) 526,400 Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entire exterior siding Labor and material 8,820 50 year guarantee on vinyl siding DATE COMPLETED: TOTAL MATERIALS: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL AMOUNT: tiVORK ORDERED BY: le 623-627 Arlington Strip Siding Strip siding (Al Ames) Price to paint old wood 2 coats Price to patch rotten wood Disposal lead waste-minimum Approx Approx. 524,00 4,000 9,004 x.000 542,500 Terry Sullivan of the lead department of City Housing said that Al Ames bid is fair and falls into his price guidelines. I spoke to Jim at Sarris Painting, he is trying to get completely out of the lead stripping business because of all the lead regulations which drive up the price so much. _ _ _ Al Ames is the most experienced lead removal contractor in town. In speaking to him and several other lead removal contractors, it would be very foolish to give a firm bid on something that has so many variables without giving yourself a uQe margin of error. ~~ 623-627 Arlington Price to scrape and paint in a lead safe manner: Bare minimum to pass city inspection {city may cite me for rotten wood next inspection) Scrape an paint lead safe manner 1 x,000 Relocation costs 1.200 Every =I years S 16,200 I will be lucky to get 4 years out of paint job since I will not be repairing rotten wood or removing all the old paint layers. Since we are not stripping the siding we will have to scrape and paint every 4 years in a lead safe manner. Tenants will have to be relocated every time. _ Since we are not repairing rotten wood or removing lead from siding (if eve try to sell the building, the lead report by la~v has to be given to the buyer), which will probably reduce the value of the building and it will not be improving the look of the house. We will not be adding to the value of the_building. Price does not include replacing plywood on front of building. Price does not include any disposal of waste. I am sure we will lose some tenants who will not want to re-locate and move back. !~ 623-627 Arlington Price to scrape and touch up paint in lead safe manner: The building has not been completely scraped and painted in several years. The city has been citing me for eti-terior loose paint violations every year. I have only been scraping and touching up the paint the last few year. If we continue this process now we will have to do it in a lead safe manner. Per year to re locate tenants- IVlimimum $1,200 Tent areas of building with plastic to keep lead scrapings from blowing in the wind and contaminating our yard and the neighbors. The building is 4 stories high on 2 sides over 40 feet. Scrape and paint in lead safe manner- Minimum 2.000 Cost per year $3,200 I can't even imagine trying to move 2 households every year. Removal of paint, scraping or stripping is the most hazardous method I can comply with the loose paint violation every year. i~ 623-627 Arlington Tear offremaining plywood siding 400.00 Remove tenant for 2months-Rent-utilities-moving expense 2,000.00 Remove wood siding in a lead-safe manner (Al Ames) 6,300.00 Apply new siding of equal quality of existing siding (Speaker Const.)23,100.00 Paint new siding (Speaker Const.) while scoffold is set up-new wood 3 3 0.00 53 x,100.00 Dump fees- Hazardous Waste x.000.00 minimum Total 540,100.00 Randy ivlesch of Crawford Insurance gave me a price using the insurance replacement guide book (~83-1333) 54.9 per sq. ft. 20,794.00 This price does not include removing wood, straightening out ' any bad framing, applying siding up to 4 stories in the air and painting. Other costs that may be incurred by replacing siding- if there is any insulation in the walls, it may fall out. Some window ~r-raps are caulked to siding and it may ruin some ~tiTaps. Aluminum soffit may have to be remo~~ed. March 23, 1999 ~~ 3 ~ AL l/ AMES Lead Removal 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond -repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner way siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6 300 Price is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump siding in their trailer at no charge if they do not, then the price will be significantly higher. -Tenant will need to"fie removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around $7.00 per sq. ft.=$700 per square x 35 = $24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Will charge to strip--$40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not inculde repairing siding or painting Tenant tarill need to be removed from residence approx. 7 to 9 weeks. ~/ -~._ r-, ` ; ..=. , L7 ~ c+.v 1.•C•t7 y`~ J - J 11I; .a 7 tai `; ~ ; . Dubuqu~~ lA b200.3 ~ • 31 glbb7-60fl9 ~.~, ~~ • PROPOSAL ~.: ~: , ~ • We hereby submit specificatiorss and astirnates far; ~: ' y <: TZM WOOD 550 ENGLISH LANE DUBUQUE IA 52003 ~- RE : 623-fi27 ARLINGTON DUBUQUE:- IA 6/11/9.9 {{~t. 4l SCRAPE, PRIME BARE WOOD S. APPLY ONE COAT PAINT IN 6~ Cis :~ • LEAD SAFE MANNER UNDER HUD GUIDELINES $ 15,000.00 ~; • •,: REPAIR APPROX 15 SQ WOOD SIDING. COST WILL INCREASE Ir ADDITIONAL ROTTEN ~OOD"IS DISCOVERED WHILE -- - SCRAPING ~ $ 9000.00 REPLACE APPROX 7 SQ PLYWOOD. SIDING TO MATCH RE- MAINING HOUSE $ 9200.00 DISPOSAL FEES-HAZARDOUS :1ASTE APPRO:{., 5000.00 TOT_~L ~ S inn ~._ ~l ~ .. ~ - , ;~ ~ ~ ~ • . • t j},~,: C . C . TIM WOOD .. - e V ~ - ,~ •` • " ~ +.. •;.~ . -~ i ~: Y ~~ IiYE PfiOPOSE hereby to fumistr maiertal grid tabor-~comp~v~ta in accordar~ca with above spoc~tcatbor~s, for the sum above noted. Payment to ba made as follows: "' . Al( matarlal (s guaranteed to be as speckled, All work to be completed h a•workmanlike marv~ar according to standard practices. Any aAetatlon or deviatbn Irorn above apecci!{lcatbrus Irnotving extra cosh wilt be executed only upon wri-ten orders, and veal became an axis charge over and abflva 1ha estlmaie. ^!1 egraernants coniingent upon atrlkes, accldenis, or delays beyorxi our corltroi. Owner to carry tae, tornado, and aNar necessary (assurance. Our workers are fully covored by Workmsrt's Cornper-ratlon lnsuranca.~ Nsiharfzed Slanature: ACCEPTANCE OF PfiOPOSAL• The 8bove ~?tfCBS, speciflcaikxis gild t.orldJtlOrlB grA rallsiacioty arld 818 hereby accepted. You are authorized to da 11~ wont as s~cil{ad. Payrn~nt wtU be rtzadq u twillrled above. ;: .. Slpnatiua; ,~ ~ ~.: _ a ^ , ` . ~ : ~ ~' ,. .~ .. ~. I~ . .V .• \. a; o: Jo;aen =torn. rJick rye: ~ rent of o23 r.rlin;ton pate; tiovember 9, 1999 Ths building at o23 Arlington is 33' 6 X 20' 9" for a cola! of 698 sq•Ift• The cost to remove 695 sq. ft. ei siding, install 4-doubla hung windows to match 2nd floor windoyvs, remove and install front porch support columns, trim ins;da or windows, install naw wood bevala i cedar siding to match and prima and part fror}t of home is as follows' Optional t.) Remova sll siding from front of Noma. 5500.00 2 lt~stail new ~+,'ood ccmposite columns at 5250.00. ~ 5750.00 •) , _-~ 51,575.00 s.) Install new wood columns a, X0_5.00 (optional) 4 double hun wood windows and trim inside to match 3.) Install 9 2nd noor~vindo'"'~ $1,200.00 to match 2nd floor µ~ndows. 4 C S300.00 :}_) haplsce front siding with 'r." X o" cadar siding at 513.79 per 12 ft. piaca, naad 10~ pieces to sida front. 5.) .Prima snd paint na~v woad siding, material only, B gallons at X20.00. Cosi for msterial only, no labor: ~~1C3I1CY LOSS Lsbo: ~ppro~. DiSDOS31_ Fee-~[inimu:~i Side the sides and back S2,273.70 5160.00 54,883.70 $6,458.70 1,200.00 x,000.00 S x,000.00 s16,os3.7o 8,000.00 $24,OS3.70 ~~ 4~.i I I RENO CONSTFUCTION 1600 Fhomberg Avenue Dubuque, Iowa 5<Gcii (319)556-4503 Proposal Submitte~ Tc Phone =T~ ~,~~ t,L.~,r-,~ ~~ Street Jab Name Cit , State, Zip Jab Location c >`Ir ~~. Architect Date~of Plans Job Phone We Hereby Submit Specifications and Estimates For . --- \c% lit/ ~~r' t tt~~ << <~ ~ - D C~ C) -- ~- ~ .~ ~ ~~•=~1~ C=-c~a4 C .L r !~__=:> i ~ 111 ~~ r~~ We propose hereby to furnish i n accordance rri th above spe Payment to be made as follows ~~ r material and labor - complete =ifications, for the sum of ------ d o l l arr r sI (5 :~ CJ~ C k%L1 '~ Authorized Signature /~~(~~ ~~ 4~~~Cf'~ Note: This p~oposal may be withdrawn by us if vt accepted Nithin •1 ~~.n•i~ ~ days_ ~-~~~ PT~~~?~c ~RLI~CI~AL The above prices s Signature pecificat'ons, and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted_ You are authorized to do the Nor{; as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above, Signature Date of acceptance Latl -'-~~ I ,~ ~ c ~, .~zfi~o~~s~~1 Stackis Construction Ijzc. N°~ ~ 195 Kerry Ct. Date Dubuque, IA 5200?T- '~\, (319) 556-61S3--~~~~-`' Sheet No. Proposal Submitted To: Name Street CIry State {~~';~' !(319) 556-~392~~~~j.~ ~ - _ -- . Work to Be Performed At: Phone atreet Clty Date of Plans Architect State We hereby propose to tumish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of ~~ ~ > ` --~ ~, ~ ~ I All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to ba performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications j submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars [S ], with payments to be made as follows: Any aRaraddn or Cavladon from above specMcatlons inwlving extra wsa, wli! be sxecvtad only u::dn wrttan orlon, end wl~l become an ex7a cherse over end above Ns esdmate. A:I agreements wntlngent upon soikes, ac~dents ar dalay~ Capnd our Cn~l. Ov.nar to wry Rre, tamado and o7ier necessary lnwranca uticn aoova v.Crk. Jack M. Stackls, General Contractor Note -This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within davs. HCCEPTAfVCE OE PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You era authorized to do the work as ~ecified. Payment witl be made as outlined above. Date Signature Signature Respectfu{ly submitted Per Steven J. Sfackls General Contractor '1 ~ ~.e~s ~ a~ s ~ e DE.~'D1IS L. BAIT•IHOVER Auto-Life-Health-Home and Business 2615 DODGE AT DEVON DUBUQUE, IA 52003 PH0:1E (319; 53Z-1356 FA.`C (319) 555-0999 June O1, 1999 B & W PROPERTIES 575 English Ln. Dubuque, is 52003-3755 June 01,1999 _ ____ P_e: LEAD BASE PAINT REh1OVAL: Dc1R SIRS/hL~DAi~i: In reply to your inquiry regarding removal of Lead 3ase Paint.. On~r view point is: Removal o~ Lead Base Paint should be done according to OSHA APRJ HUD guidelines. i Sincere v ~~ L_nnis L. mh ver STATE FAr?hi AG~,`1T CONZETT & O'BRIEN Attorney8~at Luw 491 W. d `~ Street P. O. Box 741 Dubuque, Iowa S?OQ4-0741 I.ircnscd in lv~~a. U(inui: any! lVi.:rc~itsin PHC~PIE. (,l I !i) S jf -8 i i? FAT. (31`.t).iiC-$Si? February 15, 2000 VIA FAX ____ B & W Properties cio ~-icki Bechcn 575 English Lane Dubuque, IA 52003 Dear Vicki: You recently asked if the fact that Tim Wood has obtained certification as a lead inspectoriabater could afYzct the liability exposure ofB & tip' Properties for in}cries suffered as the result oflead-based paint. In my opinion, the certification does increase [hc exposure. It is probable that the training recei~~ed by Tiny in order to obtain the certificate would make him an expert in the area and, as an ex~tert, he ~~ oufd have a higher duty to detect and abate lead-based paint problems Si;accrcly yours, ., Wslliam A. t~'~Cldao J1K APPRAISALS Phone 1800-373-7732 Fax (;~19) ~833~79 Janaury 27, 00 98~ Valentine Drive Dubuque, Iowa 53003 As a General Real Estate Appraiser in Dubuque, Iowa, at this time I would consider 10% to 1?% a reasonable rate of return on on income producing property. Any amount of return under 10% tivould not be acceptable to the majority of investors due to the risk factors. Jim Kia e ~ ~ ~ .~- Realto / ~ aiser -" I (~VSPECTION REPORT FOR: 523 ARLINGTON DATc: FE?RUARY 15, 1~9 7El~1ANT: r,NGEL ERNZEN OtiYN_R: 3 3. ~"J PARTNERSHIP Sectfen f19. Cther defrciencies (30 days to prior to NAP ContraW to repair. ___ _= o.~owwwsaww~w~sar~wwww~ vanv= -------_ =_ Prlorto be~inning arty work you should check with the City eultdirtq Department (589~2b0) and/or the Historic Prostrvation Commission (539110) tv d~nnirtc if a perrnft Is required. _ _~ t. E.t~riorsurfacas have pesling paint 2. front bedroom window sills between sash and storms have pesiing paint. 3. Rear iredrsom w;ndgw s;lls between sash end storm' have peeNng paint. ~. Pass with commcrrt: front Cedroom south outlet cover la focse. ATit? N_Tl O N FOR EXTERIOR i.OQSE PA1iVT VIOLATION ONLYI Loose paint must ba r~movsd, by scraping andlar btushitzq, and any pain! chips must t:e removed from the aroma at this time {n order to pats inspection. Nowowr, due to inckrnsnt weather conditions for painting, an ezt+ension for tfx actual F t~ntina hag been granted until ~1CJN~ 13, 1999, Another inspection will be made at that time. a~ _- .~ , , - f~ ~ fI: INSPECTION REPORT FOR: 627 ARLINGTON DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1998 TENANT: KIMBERLEY BROWN OWNER: B ~ W PROPERTIES Section IIB. Other deficiencies (30 days to prior to HAr Contract) to repair: Prior to beginning any work you should check with the City Building Department (589-150) and/or the Historic Preservation Commission (589-4210) to determine if a permit is required. -------------- -____________----_____--- ---_______ 2. 1Alest~vtt ern ~e ou . 3. T-k~-ceiling at the botiQm pair. 4. T '~ N ' ~ 'nt. -- - 5. Tb.~attic dtanr nnP ~~~~_s~-,~~.,~ ~~iR,o~ ~~_ t t____~a oF~,,~+-t~-t~,rnt. 6- e ro ~ ~ le. 7. Th o . $. ,,, .aa~ f a 9. I Wa ~ c ~ , v . 10. cior Is not operable. x.11. The southwest bedroom window sill has peeling paint. 12. ~ T south wln , ed. 13. T r ~ .,, , 3 ~- Date: January 2=1, ?000 To: Tim Woods From: Kathy Lamb Please find enclosed some waste costs which we put together in 1993. Thanla. Kathy Heritage Environmental Services, Inc. Roll-off uansportatien per round trip Disposal Coss Roli-off Rental Total price for 30 yard coatainer Final cost per yard HEI Consultants, Inc. Roll~fftransportatioa per round trip Dispcsal Coss `tichigan Ta:c Roll-off Rental Drop charge for Roll-off (one time chi) Tctal price for .0 ~,~ard container Final cost per yard L_o_~ano Environmental Waste 11ana~ement r r`oii-o„transportation per round trip Drop OrTchar~e (one time chg) x.11 ocher charges included in this bid Toca[ prig for 106 yard container final co~~ per yard 51,00.00 (titon/Fri) S 13.00/cubic yard S 10.00/day 5~,3~0.00 S 19.00/cubic yard S 1,600.00 (tiicrv`Fri) S 3.00/cubic yard 5 10.00/cubic yard ~ 2~O.OOimerah 5 f ,ZOO.OOibox s ~,~oa.oo S 16.67%cubir vnrd S ?,000.00 :~ I!.,. ~ x.00 5 1 ».23/cubic ~~:trd J -~ ~~~M 1 L, ~r Consolidated Ltd, Realtors" n:n~~ry square hubuque, Iowa ;2001 14tsin ess (319) 583.3i7G ax (319) 583~357y Competi[ive Properties _ For Sale 1 (~ - Solds 9-99 567 Arlington 7-98 2 21_28-JO White 12-98 3 735 Kirkwood 4 9/98 422 W. Locust SUBJECT PROPERTY 61.3-627 Arllnctnn C'~~ `r.~'' "`-pry r-.1 COPTPETITIVE r`~ ~ Consolidated Ltd Realtors' MARKET ANALYSIS r ll:bury Square Dubuque, Iowa 52001 E3usiness (319) 583.3576 fax 13t9) 583.3579 Bed Family fining lleat list Rooms Eaths Room oom ,ara e l.ot A e Air Const. Price Extra Features / `_ i - - -- Bed Family Dining }leaf List Market Salc 5 .F[ Rooms Baths Room Room ,ara e Lot A e Air Const. T'ricc Time Frice I E>;tra Features Ass. Val. 29,100 925 75 GI'A 925 2/2 1/I 0 0 0 100 1880 ~ Bri.ek / 3x,900 28 dys 28 500 llpp (. Down - OCC street parkinP 'aintecl b i k 784 , r c RI'NT X640 1120 2/2 I/1 0 0 35 GPA 0 Side by Sidc Assessed Va1.27,82C 39(' ' 0 ~ 91 1900 Slate 29,900 I clay 7.5,000 New roof shi~lrs RF•.NT -$500. 10 CI' 700 2/2 1/1 Ot 0 0 60 1856 0 Brick 34 000 991 dYs 4,000 Val. 35,120 hp F, Down Rent ~ Q~~l: 109(1 39 ;FA 1096 2/2 I/I 0 0 0 8 1876 0 nrick 38 000 Ass.Val. 57,620 ll f down Rent 575 Bed Family Dining Ileat . - S .F[. Rooms Baths Room Room Gtr, e Lot A e Ai Const. Er.tra Features 1096 S0 cr -- 1096 2/2 1/I 0 Yes 0 I00 )900 0 Wonrl Side b Sidc_ Rcnt- X645. Ass. Val just lowered to 835,800 Prepared For Address: 67.3-627 Arllnl;ton Recommended list Frice: Selling Recommendations: Prepared By CENTURY 21 CONSOLIDATED RL•ALTORS ASBURY SQUARE DUISUQUE, IOWA 52001 Pl10NE (319) 583-3576 CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM May 11, 2000 TO: Historic Preservation Commission --_- - ~ .~ FROM: ~ - Mark Noble. Assistant Planner - ~;;B.~EO-T: Aflar~ts+s~f~~rt+ftc~tes~Ee~omie-Hardship Applicant for 623-G27 - -- Arlington from Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen (6&W Properties) As previously requested by the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Services staff have me# and utilized an analysis procedure for the application for Certificate of Economic Hardship for 623-627 Arlington Street from Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen (6&W Properties). Planning Services staff have completed an analysis for this property, reviewing seven different improvement options: 1. Scrape and paint existing wood. 2. Proposal #1 from AI Ames to scrape and paint the existing wood and patch with new wood as needed. 3. Proposal #2 from Alstates to scrape and paint the existing wood and patch with new wood as needed. 4. Using Hardie Plank siding. 5. Install new wood siding and paint it. 6. Install vinyl siding on the entire building. 7. Install vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear and restore the front by using new wood materials, renovating the porch and installing new front windows (Planning Services staff's recommendation). The property was evaluated using: 1) the assessed value of $57,620; 2) the value of the property as is, which is figured at the purchase price of $27,500; and 3) the average of comparables that the applicants provided as part of their application, which was $31,375. An annual return of 10% was used to calculate economic return. Calculations of Economic Return Using the property's assessed value, no options provide a reasonable economic return. Using the purchase price for the property, the owners could earn reasonable economic return with option 6. Install vinyl siding on all four sides, or option 7. Install vinyl siding on two sides and the rear and restore the front facade. Using the comparables, the owners could earn reasonable economic return with option 6. lnstalt vinyl siding on all four sides. These analyses are provided for your information and are examples only. The Commission should review those analyses and determine which property values percent return on investment and other criteria should be utilized to determine whether the property can or cannot earn reasonable economic return. Please be prepared to discuss these analysis at the May 18, 2000 meeting. MN/mkr Attachments cc: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen { B&W Properties) CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM May 24, 2000 TO: Kathleen Lamb, Senior Housing Inspector FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner ,~.~/ SUBJECT: 623-627 Arlington Street I This memo addresses the request from the Historic Preservation Commission concerning the property at 623-627 Arlington Street, which is owned by Vicky Bechen and Tim Wood, 6 i~ W Pro~er~ies. At the May 18, 2000, Historic Preservation Commission meeting, the Commissioners reviewed an application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship from B & W Properties to allow vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street. After considerable discussion, the Commission voted unanimously to: (1) allow installation of vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear of the structure; and (2) require restoration of the front facade, subject to approval of final drawings and materials by the Commission. In reviewing this application, the Commissioners questioned whether the applicants had contacted the Housing Services Department to investigate funding available to assist in this renovation. The applicants stated that since they are not presently involved in the Lead Paint Grant Program, there is no grant money available for them to do this renovation. In making the recommendation, the Commission felt that the applicants could earn a reasonable economic return with installation of vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear, and restoration the front facade, if there is financial assistance from the City. Commissioners noted that previously, the applicants had 514,883 available to them to renovate the entire property, inside and out, through the Lead Paint Grant Program. Although circumstances have changed slightly, the Commission still requests that the Housing Services Department consider providing $4,883 to the applicants to help them renovate the - front facade. Additionally, the Commission asks that the City Housing Services Department provide the applicants the use of their waste containers in doing this project. Please review this request, and then respond to me by Tuesday, May 30, 2000. Thank you very much for any assistance you may be able to provide in dealing with this renovation project. MN/mkr cc: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager David Harris, Housing Services Manager 8 & W Properties, 550 English Lane, Dubuque CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM CITY Oi~ DUBIS~tU~E J ~ ~y ~? 1 2000 30 May 00 To: Mary \N~oble, Planning Services Department From: Da~~ Harris, Housing Services Department Re: 623-627 Arlu~aton Here's the status on the subject property: The owners initially applied for financial assistance through our lead paint hazard reduction program We inspected the property and verified the presence of lead paint at various locations. The next step in this process is for the owner to secure bids for performance of the work. We would require two bids, which are then compared with the cost estimate prepared by our lead paint inspector. As part of discussions which took place during the application process, the owners inquired regarding the availability of additional funds - in excess of the $000 per-unit allowable. Under the policies governing our program, additional funds may be made available under certain circumstances, including in cases in which requirements for rehabilitation of properties located within historic preservation districts may increase costs. For this reason, we made a preliminary commitment of an additional $4883, with the understanding that the street side of the building would be restored according to Section 106 requirements and subject to Historic Preservation Commission design approval. Since that time, we have not proceeded with processing this application, as the owners have attempted alternate resolution of this issue, with the HPC. However, subject to the same conditions, our position at this time is that the Housing Department can commit a total of $14 883 to this project, which would necessariiy include the treatment of all interior and exterior lead paint-bearing surfaces as identified in the initial inspection and work write-up. Please contact either Kathy Lamb or me if we may provide you additional information regarding this property. cc: Kathy Lamb SECOND APPEAL ~~ C ~- THE CC'il' OF ~,~ l DUBL~-QUE planning Servicei Department t! f ~ (OUI~I C. I L ~ - ~ ~0 b~zst I3th Street Zr F`~zi`..LD ~ ~ p~ Dubuque. [owe >'_C01-zS6-i (319) »9-~?10 1 Z ' Z-0 - 00 (319) 3S9-zlz9 F.~X The Honorable Mayor and Cit y Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque,lA 52001 Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission Decision Applicant: Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, B&W Properties Project: Install Vinyl Siding Location: 623-627 Arlington Street District: W. 11th Street Dear Mayor and City Council Members: December 15, 1999 Introduction The letter transmits the Historic Preservation Commission's record concerning a vinyl siding request for property located at 623-627 Arlington Street in the West 11th Street Historic District. Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, property owners, are appealing the Commission's denial of installation of vinyl siding. Application for Certificate of Appropriateness -- Vinyl Siding on Entire Structure On May 20 and June 3, 1999, the Commission reviewed a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness from Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen, B&W Properties, to install vinyl siding on the structure at 623-627 Arlington Street. They requested that the current wood clapboard siding be replaced with vinyl siding due to lead paint on the existing siding, and the size and height of the building. After review, the Commission found that the replacement material was not appropriate and was not consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The Commission noted that they must follow the Secretary's Standards, which recommend that existing wood siding be maintained and repaired as necessary, and if it needs to be replaced, that the replacement material be either new wood siding or a compatible substitute material. The Commission recommended that the property owner scrape the old paint off the existing wood clapboard and repaint, or replace the wood clapboard that is in disrepair with new wood clapboard that is similar to the existing siding. The application was denied by a unanimous vote of 5 to 0. Se r-: ice people L~tegritt' (:esporsibili~: tnr.ovation Teamwork The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Page 2 Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship -- Vinyl Siding/Entire Structure With the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness, an applicant then can apply for a Certificate of Economic Hardship. On June 17, 1999, the Commission reviewed a request for a Certificate of Economic Hardship from Mr. Wood and Ms. Bechen to install vinyl siding on the structure at 623-627 Arlington Street. The Commission discussed with the property owners their documentation regarding the economic return on the property with removal of lead paint by scraping versus covering the existing wood siding with vinyl siding to abate the lead paint hazard. The Commission found that completing the work by scraping and painting the wood siding would not prevent the property owner from earning any reasonable return from the property, and denied the request by a vote of 4 to 1. Initial Appeal -- Vinyl Siding on Entire Structure On August 6, 1999, the applicants submitted a letter of appeal to the City Council, and included new documentation on the economic return of the property that the Commission had not reviewed. The City Council reviewed this request at their September 7, 1999, meeting. After discussion, the City Council referred the request back to the Commission because additional materials had been presented to them, that had not been presented to the Commission. Since the Commission had not reviewed this information, the City Council could not consider it as part of the appeal. Revised Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship -- Vinyi Siding on Two Sides and Rear of Structure and Rehabilitation of Front Facade with Wood Siding The Commission met on September 16, 1999, to discuss this item. Staff suggested a compromise proposal to approve vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear of the structure, to approve redoing the front facade with wood clapboard siding, new windows and wooden porch columns, and to request additional funding from the City's lead paint abatement program because the structure is in a historic district. Due to the length of the agenda and the time constraints of Mr. Wood and Ms. Bechen, the Commission tabled their request. On October 21, 1999, the applicants indicated that they agreed with the staffs suggestions, and then discussed the project and economic documentation with the Commission. The Commission tabled the request, and asked staff investigate additional funding sources. On November 17, 1999 the Commission discussed the project, and reviewed information on funding available from the City's lead paint abatement program. A The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Paae 3 motion to approve the vinyl siding on the two sides and the rear of the structure, and to redo the front facade in the manner suggested by staff failed for lack of a majority by a 2 to 2 vote. Second Appeal --Vinyl Siding on Two Sides and Rear of Structure and Rehabilitation of Front Facade with Wood Siding _The applicants have submitted a new appeal to the City Council. The following items are attached and are the complete records of this project: 1. Letter of Appeal to the City Council. 2. Design Review Application for Certificate of Appropriateness. 3. Economic Hardship Application. 4. Minutes of Historic Preservation Commission -May 20, June 3, June 17, September 16, October 21 and November 17, 1999. 5. Notices of Decision dated July 11 and November 17, 1999. 6. Sections 25-9, 25-10 and 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 7. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Section 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance states that on appeal, the City Council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City Council must consider whether the Commission exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and whether the Commission's action was patently arbitrarily or capricious. Section 25-11 provides that the City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's decision, or they may refer the matter back to the Commission for such further action as may be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, ., Ken Kringle, Chairperson Historic Preservation Commission Attachments cc: Historic Preservation Commission Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager Mark Noble, Assistant Planner James O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney 623-627 Arlington The first vote for economic hardship, one person on the historical comnussion voted for us and he said they should be taking these on a case-by-case basis. One member said that he understands our problem but if they let us put siding on then everyone will want to put siding on. This is not acase-by-case basis. After 4 long meetings, it was worked out that to keep it historical, the wood needs to be replaced. It was not cost effective to strip lead paint and patch. In this case from the first day we purchased the building until it would be paid for over a period of l~ years, we would lose X41,580 on the building if wood siding is put on. If vinyl sided, we would have a profit of $24,300. _ If.you start right now for the next 3 years, w would Iose X43,136 with new w-ood siding. If eve vinyl side the building, the nexrt 3 years eve will have a profit of $=I,096. This is amulti-family building--not residential--it is a business. When we purchased the building, we knew it was in an historical district but lead base paint was NOT an issue and there are numerous federal laws governing this no~v. We are still willing to do the city recommendation by Laura Carsten, if eve are able to obtain the larger city lead grant. We will work out details with Laura, our proposal is listed. We would also like to improve the neighborhood. During the last meeting, the only questions about prices was about the cost of the front of the building compared to the rest. It was explained and the issue was dropped. They had no estimates or any argument about my prices replacing wood or anything else, so we assumed they agreed on the estimates. So I am not sure how losing this amount of money on a piece of property is not economic hardship. You cannot add $32,150 plus interest and not lose money on this property, it just can't be done. B&~V Properties ~ Vicki Bechen Tim Wood CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM September 30, 1999 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager `~l'~~ SUBJECT: Certificate of Economic Hardship Request - 623-fi27 Arlington Street INTRODUCTION This memo presents the recommendation of Planning Services staff regarding a Certificate of Economic Hardship request by Tim Wood for the installation of vinyl siding on the side and rear facades and the rehabilitation of the front facade at 623- 627 Arlington Street in the West 1 1 `'' Street Historic District. BACKGROUND The Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed Mr. Wood's requests for a Certificate of Appropriateness, and then a Certificate of Economic Hardship, to install vinyl siding on all sides of his property at 623-627 Arlington Street. The HPC denied both Certificates. Mr. Wood then appealed the HPC's last decision to the City Council, and also submitted additional information pertaining to the economics of the property. The City Council referred the case back to the HPC for further action as may be appropriate. On September 1 6, Planning Services staff suggested to the HPC and Mr. Wood that vinyl siding be limited to the sides and rear of the structure, and that the front facade be rehabilitated with wood siding, appropriate windows and wood porch columns. At the September 16 meeting; the HPC and Mr. Wood agreed to table the request to October 21 . Mr. Wood subsequently modified his request for a Certificate of Economic Hardship Historic Preservation Commission page 2 for 623-627 Arlington Street. Instead of asking to install vinyl siding on the entire structure, Mr. Wood is asking to install vinyl siding on the .side and rear facades only, and to rehabilitate the front facade with wood-siding, appropriate windows and wood porch columns. DISCUSSION The West 1 1 `" Street historic district was created as a result of a historic and -er-chitectural survey of Dubuque conducted in 1978-1979. At the time of the survey, 623-627 Arlington Street was clad in aluminum siding, and the front facade was modified with panel siding, metal porch columns and two three-pane windows. As a result of these changes, the structure was rated 4 on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being highest and five being the lowest. Vinyl siding on the sides and rear will not make this structure any less contributing t an rt was w en t e istorrc drstrrct was created. The sides and rear of this structure do not contribute to its historical or architectural significance The front facade of this structure is the contributing feature. The scale and mass of the structure will not be diminished with installation of vinyl siding on the sides and rear. The sides and rear are the tallest parts of the structure, which Mr. Wood feels would be more difficult and costly to paint and scrape. Allowing installation of vinyl siding on the sides and rear would address many of Mr. Wood's issues, and would not make the structure any less significant than it was at the time the West 1 1 t" Street historic district was created. Requiring rehabilitation of the front facade would create a structure that visually contributes to the historic district more than it does currently. Since the front facade is the most important and visible feature of this structure, restoring the wood clapboard siding, wooden porch columns, wooden porch railings and double-hung ~vindo4vs would make this structure as much or more contributing as when the West 1 7 "' Street historic district was created. Staff does not believe that HPC approval of the installation of vinyl siding on this structure would constitute an endorsement of the part of the HPC to allow vinyl siding on arty end all historic structures. The merits and particulars of this case are specific to this structure alone. Each structure is evaluated individually, and a decision on this structure doss not set a precedent for each structure that comes before the HPC. Historic Preservation Commission page 3 RECOMMENDATION Mr. Wood has provided information on the economic return for the property with the installation of vinyl siding on all facades, and with the scraping and painting of the entire structure, to abate lead-based paint. Mr. Wood's information indicates that the cost to install vinyl siding is approximately one-third the cost to scrape and paint. In accordance with Section 25-9(3) a. 2. of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the HPC can postpone a decision on a Certificate of Economic Hardship and "during this -tune, the Commission shall investigate ways which would allow the property owner to earn a reasonable economic return from the property." By tabling Mr. Wood's request, the HPC has provided him with time to modify his request to what he believes would provide a reasonable economic return. His position is that the cost to scrape and paint the entire structure does not allow for a reasonable economic return on the property. He believes that he can earn a reasonable economic return if he can install vinyl siding on the sides and rear, and scrape, paint and rehabilitate the front facade. If the HPC determines that Mr. Wood has presented a case for granting a Certificate of Economic Hardship, then staff recommends that the HPC approve the Certificate with the following conditions requested by Mr. Wood: The existing wood clapboard siding shall be retained on the second story of the front facade, and shall be scraped and painted to abate lead-based paint. 2. The existing panel siding on the first story of the front facade shall be removed, and the original wood clapboard siding underneath shall be repaired, or replaced as needed with new wood clapboard siding of the same width as the existing wood siding, and then painted to match the existing 4vood siding. 3. Vinyl siding shall be installed on the side and rear facades of the building only, with the width and color of the vinyl siding to match the existing wood siding. 4. The two three-pane windows on the front facade shall be replaced with four double-hung windows that match the existing double-hung windows in size and location, to restore the original window configuration of the front facade. 5. The four iron front porch columns shall be replaced with four square wooden columns. 6. The exterior front wood corners shall be replaced with new wood, and painted to match the new or rehabilitated siding. Historic Preservation Commission page 4 In addition, staff recommends that the HPC send a letter to David Harris, Housing Services Manager, supporting the award of a lead-based paint abatement deferred payment loan of more than $5,000 (the minimum currently), because it is for a contributing structure in the West 1 1 ``' Street historic district. Mr. Harris has indicated that his office can ask the federal funding agency for the lead-based paint abatement program to consider the award of a loan of more than $5,000 on a case by case basis. cc Tim Wood, B & W Properties --- Vicki Bechen, B & W Properties Mark Noble, Assistant Planner Tim O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney -_ __ ,` DUBUQUE Prannin, ~rr~-:~~; ~; a:;::~~;;t w ~~-~:: i.:; see. . (::~) ~ :L:aO - ~ ` '• - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION APPLICANT: Tim Wood LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Street DISTRICT: W. 11th Street District DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING/DECISION: November 17, 1999 The Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Dubuque, Iowa hereby renders and gives notice of its decision whether to grant a Certificate of Economic Hardship on the above-captioned application in conformance with Section 25 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. APPLICATION: The applicant seeks to install vinyl siding. PUBLIC MEETING: After notice, as required by law, a Public Meeting was held on November 17, 1999. Minutes of the meeting and copies of materials submitted in evidence are on file in the Office of Planning Services, City Hall, Dubuque, Iowa. FINDINGS: Based on the specific information presented at the Public Meeting and contained in the application, and in accordance with the applicable standards in the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Commission makes the following findings: 1) Standards for review set forth in Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dubuque, Iowa have not been met; and 2) The applicant is able to earn a reasonable economic return from the property if the existing wood siding is either scraped and painted or replaced with new wood siding. DECISION: sy a vote of 2 to 2, as indicated in the minutes, the Historic Preservation Commission denied the request. THEREFORE: Purs;rant to Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of D~rbuque, Iowa, the Commission hereby does not grant permission to the City of D~Ibi,rque and its designated representative(s) to issue the regulated permit(s) required to complete ttie approved project. APPEAL: Section 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance states that "an agelrioved party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a notico of appeal with the Planning Services Department within thirty (30} days from ~•r~•icc ('rrr•Ir Inh•tirit~' Rrxr~un+ibilit': rnnocation Teamwork Notice of Decision Historic Preservation Commission the date of notice of the Commission's action. Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the Planning Services Department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the Commission to the City Clerk. On appeal, the City council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City council shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the Historic --Preservation Ordinance (this chapter), and whether the Commission's actions was patently arbitrary or capricious. The City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate. The City Clerk shall give written notice of the City Council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the Historic Preservation Commission. An appellant who is not satisfied by the Decision of the City Council may appeal within sixty (60) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34." Filed in the Office of the Planning Services Department on the 9th day of December, 1999. - Mark ~l;oble, Assistant Plan i. 35.9 DUBUQUE CODE n. .any other information considered nec- essary by the commission to make a determination as to whether the prop• erty does yield or may yield any rea- sonable economic return to the prop- erty owner(s), including but not limited to the income lac bracket of the own- er(s) or applicant(s) or of the principal investor(s) in the property. (3) Determination of economic hazdship. The commission shall review all of the evidence --ynd information required of an applicant for a certificate of economic hardship; and a. If the commission finds that disap- ~ proval of the proposed work would pre- - vent the property owner from eazning . any reasonable economic return from the property, the commission shall: 1. Immediately issue a certificate of economic az s p; or ' 2 At its discretion, postpone, for a _ period not to e_~cceed one hundred eighty (180) days, the issuance of a certificate of economic hardship. During this time, the commission shall investigate strategies which would allow the property owner to earn s reasonable economic return from the property. No regulated permit shall be issued during this time unless a certificate of appro- priateness has been secured. If, at the end of the one hundred eighty-day period, the comr.~;ission, aRer n public meeting, finds that the property owner still cannot earn nny reasonable economic re- turn from the property, it shall issue a cer'~ificate of economic hard• ship. If the commission finds, niter initial re- view or niter the one hundred eight}••day period of postponement, that file property o«zier has, is Cact, earned or is able to earn n reasonable eco- nomic return from the property, then the commission shall deny the applica- lion for a certificate of economic hard- Shlp. (i) No regulated permit shall be issued autho- ruing a material change in appearance of a land- mazk, landmark site or of a structure or site within a historic district until there is a determination of no material effect or a certificate of appropriate- ness or a certificate of economic hazdship filed with the building oCfcial or the city official au- thorized to issue the necessary regulated permit. (j) In the event the commission disapproves of a proposed project, the notice of disapproval shall be binding upon the building official, city engi- neer or other local authority, and no permit shall be issued in such a case. (k) The failure of the commission to approve or disapprove an application for a certificate of ap- propriateness within sixty (60) days Crom the date of the filing of an application, unless an extension is agreed upon mutually by the applicant and the commission, shall be deemed to constitute ap- proval, unless within such si~cty (60) days the com- mission has made a determination of economic hardship and has suspended its decision regazding a certificate of economic hardship pursuant to sub- section (h)(3)a.2. (Ord. No. 4fi•90, § 1, 5.21-90) Sec. ?5-10. Standards for review. (a) The commission shall consider each design review on the merits of the indi~zdual case, with due deliberation given to each proposed changers) and its s}-mpathetic relationship to the specific historic setting, architectural or historic signifi- cance, extent of previous alteration, use oC orig- inal materials and quality of design of the ex- istingstructure or site. Commission approval of a particular type of alteration or activity shall not establish a binding precedent for future commis- sionaction, but may constitute an additional factor to be considered in subsequent design reviews in- volving the same type of alteration or activity. lb) "The Secretary of Interior's Standards for Historic Presen•ation Projects," Washington, D.C., 1979, and "The Secretary of the Interior's Stan• lords for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Reha- bilitating Historic Buildings," Washington, D.C., Jupp, Vu. d 1522 HISTORIC °.T?ESERV~TIO~ azchitec*_ura[ features of the stnfc- ture, i:nprovemert or site upon which the work is to be dare will not have a substantial adverse ef- fect on the aesthetic, historic or ar- chitectural significance and value of either the property itselF or of the neighboring improvements in a district. b. The issuance of a certificate of appro- priateness shall enable the applicant -- _ to obtain a regulated permit and to pro- ceed with the proposed alteration or ac- ti~zty. (3) Disapprove tre proposed project; certij:cate o j economic hardsnin. The commission shall issue a certificate of economic hardship, upon application or upon its own motion, if: a. ~ certificate of appropriateness has been denied; and b. The commission determines that disap- proval of the proposed work or activity would prevent the property owner from earning any reasonable economic re- turn from the property. (d) The building official, city engineer or other kcal authorities shall not issue a regulated permit until there has been a determination of no mate- rial effect or a certificate of appropriateness or a certificate of economic hazaship issued. (e) The transfer of a determination of no mate- r ial et"feet, certificate of appropriateness or certif- icate of economic hardship from one structure, im- provement or site to another structure, improvement or site or from one person to an- other is prohibited. (fl Each determination of no material effect, cer- tificate of appropriateness or certificate of eco- nomic hardship issued under the provisions of this article shall expire and become null and void if the alteration, construction, repair, removal, dem- olition or excavation. for which the determination of r.o material effect, ce^i~icate of appropriate- ness or certificate of economic hazdship was is- sued is not initiated ~r-ithin ore {1) year of its is- suance. (Ord. X10. Yo-90, § 1, ~-21.90; Ord. No. 93-92, § 1, I2-7-92) § 25-9 Sec. °~-9. Procedure for the review of plans; application for certificate of appro- priateness; application for certifi• cote of economic hardship. (a) Application for regulated permit shall be made to the appropriate city official. The applica- tionshall state or the appropriate city official shall determine that the proposed alteration, activity or demolition is to be done on a landmazk, land- mark site or on a structure within a historic dis- trict. (b) Upon the filing of such application, the ap- propriate city official shall notify the applicant that the matter must be reviewed by the historic preservation commission before a regulated permit can be issued. (c) A request for review by the co*nn+i~on of the proposed work, activity or demolition must be made by the applicant. Application for commie. Sion review shall be filed in the community and economic development department. (d) Unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the commission, the Commie-. stop shall meet within twenty-one (21) days after the filing of the application for commiQS;~n re- view. The commission shall review the proposed project according to the duties and powers speci- fied in this chapter. In reviewing the proposed project, the commission may confer with the ap- plicant or the applicant's authorized representa- tive. The comm=ission may require submicci~n of such additional drawings, sketches, photographs or other exhibits as it deems reasonably neces- sary for consideration of the application_ ~~~~. `„ t~ 1020.1 ~Ji~~:C ~~:.J'^ ~~i ail~~i _. The co~~ mission saa~? aoor o~•e o: caaonro~•e If the proposed project is appro~•rd, the com- ...Ysion shall issue a certificate of aoorooria*.e- e:s. If the COm--licclOII d1S2Dprov eS s11C21 prOD03ed a:-eject, i'_ shall state its reasons and shall t-ansmit :~ the applicant a written record of its disao- proval. The commiccion may propose appropriate erisions of the applicant's proposal which, if adopted, would cruse the commission to recon- sider its disapproval. The applicant may make n:odiii:..ations to the proposed projeci and shall :ate e the right to resubmit a modi.ued proposal at :.-:~• ci:ae. ^) If ~:e commission disappro~•es a p-ooosed ~mject, it may, upon application or on its oK•n :::otion, cansider issuing a certificate of economic hn-ds^sn (I) upon application or motion for a ce.•-*sticate of economic hardship, the commission shall schedule a public meeting on that applica- tion or motion. i'-? Dats to be provided by the appiica^.t. The com--~~csion may solicit eepert testi.-nony or requi.-e List the appLc;aat for a cer•~ticate of eL~enomic hardship ms.ke submissions con- Ce_n:rgany or all of the follo~-in7 z^~o.:~:a- tion befote rendering its decision: :i. Estimate of the caa~ of the p:ropesed con- struction, alteration, demolition or re- moval and an estimate of a,•zv addi- tinnal cost that would be incurred to comply ~ti-ith the recommendations of the historic preservation corunzission for changes necessary for the issuance of it certificate of appropriateness; b. :~ report from :i licensed engineer or :ir~atrct «•ith e.~cperience in reh:zbili• t:itiott tzs to tlza structur:~l sourd:zess of :toy structures :end their suitabilit}• for rrhahilit:ition; c. 1•;stinz:ztcd market ~:Llua of t;ie ~~rup- erty in it_v currant eozzdition; suer com- plc.tiozz afthe proposed coustn:c-tion, :zl- trr:ition, demolition or remo~•al; at~cr :zszy clz:izzk~s rem-oinmended by the com- d. e. f. b' h i. k_ m 4 25-9 rzission; ard, in the case of a orooosed demolition, after renovation of the e:c- isting property for continued use; In the case of a proposed demolition, an estimate from an architect, devel- oper, real estate consultant, appraiser or other real estate professional e.~pe- rienced in rehabilitation, as to the eco- nomic feasibility of rehabilitation or reuse of the e.•cisting structure on the property; The amount paid for the property, the date of purchase and the person from whom purchased, including a descrip- tion ofthe relationship, if any, between the owner of recerd or the applicant and the person from whom the prop- erty was purchased, and any terms of financing between the seller and buyer, If the property is income-producing, the annual gross income from the property for the previous two (2) years; Itemised operating and maintenance espezses for the previous two (2) years; and depreciation deduction and annual cash flow before and after debt service, if any, during the same period; The remaining balance on any mori- gage or other financing secured by the property and annual debt service, if any, for the previous two (2) years; All appraisals obtained within the pre- vious two (2) years by the owner or ap- plicant in connection with the pur- chase, financing or ownership of the PrePe~Y~ Any listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked and offers received, if any, within the previous two (2) years; The assessed value of the property ac- cording to the two (2) most recent as- sessments; The amount of real estate taxes for the previous two (2) years and whether or not they have been paid; The form of ownership or operation of the property, whether sole proprietor- ship, for-profit or not-for-profit rnrpora- tion, limited pannership, joint venture or other; 151 ~ 25.9 DUBUQUE CODE n. .~riy other information considered nec- essary by the commission to make a determination as to whether the prop- erty does yield or may yield any rea- sonable economic return to the prop- ertyowner(s), including but not limited to the income tax bracket of the own- `er{s) or applicant(s) or of the principal investor(s) in the property. (3) Determination of economic hardship. The commission shall review all of the evidence __and information required of an applicant for a certificate of economic hardship; and a. If the commission finds that disap- proval of the proposed work would pre- vent the property owner from earning any reasonable economic return from the property, the commission shall: 1. Immediately issue a certificate of economic hazdship; or ' 2. At its discretion, postpone, for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days, the issuance of a certificate of economic hardship. During this time, the commission shall investigate strategies which would allow the property owner to earn a reasonable economic return from the properly. No regulated permit shall be issued during this time unless a certificate of appro- priateness has been secured. If, at the end of the one hundred eighty-day period, the commission, after a public meeting, finds that the property owner still cannot earn any reasonable economic re- turn from the property, it shall issue a certificate of economic hazd- s111D. tion For a certificate of economic hazd- ship. (i) No regulated permit shall be issued autho- rizing amaterial change in appearance of a land- mark, landmark site or of a structure or site within a historic district until there is a determination of no material effect or a certificate of appropriate- ness or a certificate of economic hazdship filed with the building ot~'icial or the city official au- thorized to issue the necessary regulated permit. (j) In the event the commission disapproves of a proposed project, the notice of disapproval shall be binding upon the building official, city engi- neer or other local authority, and no permit shall be issued in such a case. (k) The failure of the commission to approve or disapprove an application for a certificate of ap- propriateness within sixty (60) days from the date of the filing of an application, unless an extension is agreed upon mutually by the applicant and the commission, shall be deemed to constitute ap- proval, unless within such sixty (60) days the com- mission has made a determination of economic hazdship and has suspended its decision regazding a certificate of economic hardship pursuant to sub- section (h)(3)a.2. (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21-90) Sen. 25-10. Standards for review. (a) The commission shall consider each design review on the merits of the individual case, with due deliberation given to each proposed change(s) and its sympathetic relationship to the specific historic setting, azchitectural or historic signifi- cance, extent of previous alteration, use of orig- inal mate_Tials and quality of design of the ee- isting structure or site. Commission approval of a particular type of alteration or activity shall not establish a binding precedent for future commis- sion action, but may constitute an additional factor to be considered in subsequent design reviews in- volving the same type of alteration or activity. (b) "The Secretary of Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation Projects," Washington, D.C., 1979, and "The Secretary of the Interior's Stan- dards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Reha- bilitating Historic Buildings," Washington, D.C., b. If the commission finds, after initial re- view or after the one hundred eighty-day period of postponement, that the property owner has, in fact, earned or is able to earn a reasonable eco- nomic return from the property, then the commission shall deny the applica- Cupp. No. 4 1522 ??ISTORIC P~SERV~TIOV (Revised ! 9S3), shall provide the guidelines by ~.~•hich the commission shall review an application for a ce: ~ucate of appropriateness or certuicate of economic hardship, and any subsequent revisions of these guidelines by the Secretary of the Inte• rior may be adopted by the commission. (c) -The commission shall also be guided by any design sta.-~dards specuied in the ordinance or amendment designating the landmark, landmazk site or historic district. (Ord. \TO. 46-90, § 1, ~-21-90) Sec. 25-11. Appeals from commission action (a) An aggrieved party may appeal the commis- sion's action to the city council by filing'a notice_ ot" appeal with the community and economic de- velopment department within thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the commission's action. (b) Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the com- munity and economic development department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the commission to the city clerk_ (c) On appeal, the city council shall consider only the record of the action before the commis- sion. No new matte.T may be considered. (d) The city council shall consider whether the commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the historic preservation ordinance (this chapter}, and whether the comn,;~~;on's action was patently arbitrary or capricious. (e) The city council may affu-m or reverse the commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the commission for such further action as may be appropriate. The city clerk shall give written notice of the city council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the city council's decision to the appellant and the historic preservation com- mission. (t~ :fin :~ppellsnt who is not satisfied by the de- cision of the city council may appeal within si.~cty (60) days of the city council's derision to the Dis- trict Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.3-1. (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21.90) Supp. No, d Sec. 25-12. Inspection. § 25.13 (a) After a certi.ticate of appropriateness or cer- tificate of economic hazdship has been issued and a regulated permit granted to the applicant, the building official, city engineer or other Local au- thority may from time to time inspect the work authorized and shall take such action as is neces- sary to enforce compliance with the approved plans. (b) Historic preservation commissioners may from time to time inspect, from the public way, the work authorized and shall advise the building official or other enforcement authority as neces- sary to enforce compliance wiih the approved plans. (O~No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21-90) Sec. 25-13. Violations; penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person to disobey, omit, neglect or refuse to comply with any provi- sion of this chapter, and such person shall be sub- ject to the provisions of section 1-8 and sections 1-1~ through 1-17 of the City of Dubuque, Code of Ordinances. (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, ~-21-90} ~T'he nett page is 15fi9) 1523 Tile 5ccretary ~f the ijlterior's S~anc~a~rds f ~. oar . Rehabilitation and Guidelines for • Rella(~ilitating ~~istoric Buildings U.S. Der~arlment of the Interior Naliunal ["ark Service I'resc'rv:ilion f~ssistance Division Washington, D.C. 'llle tit.Y•-~•lary of II 1• Inluiur's SI:mJanla fur I liylurir I'ri~rvnliun I'ruj~•rls will- (:uirt}~•lincw /ur At+i~lyi--I; the Slatulnnls were 1nIU.-IIyy wrtl- len to I'176 by W. Ilrnwn Mnrlun 111 WWII Cary 1.. 1 luu-r.'1'i-c C:ulJclln~•s fur Reh;-t,llitallnl; ! Ilslurtc lfull-lingc were reviscJ unll exr~nllctil In II)d3 t,y Gary I.. I lunge and K,,y D. weeks. 'I'hc SI•vtJarJv lur ItehnbiillalJun were revlsril In 1-IrNI'{irlluwinl; n ~ubllc cummenli-t ; (•rrl-Kl. It ahuuhl l~~ uula•11 Iial the r•Ilnil~ r`cvlstuns In the 5lunllar~ls lu- ~ZQllnl)11t1•,1t11-i.Wllt ' y INTRODUCTION 'Chc Secretary of the Interior is responsible for estal~lisl~inl; stand:uds for all pnrf;rom under Dcparlmct-lal autl-ority and for advising Federal agencies un the preservation of historic properties listed or clif;ihlr for listing in the National Register of Flistor'tc Places. In partial fulfillment of this responsibility, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for I list~ric I'reservalion Projects have been developed to guide work undertaken on historic buildings-there are separate standards for acc)uisition, protection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction. The Standards for Rehabilitation (codified in 36 CFR 67) comprise that section of the overall preservation project standards and addresses the most prevalent treatment. "Rehabilitation" is defined as "the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions and feahrres of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values." Initially dcvelc,ped by the Sccrelarv c~(the Interior to dctc•rn,ine Ilre appropriateness of proposed project work on registered properties within the I listoric I'reservalion Fund grant-in-aid program, the Standards for Rehabilitation have been widely used over the years-particularly to determine if a rehabili- tation quali(ics as a Certified Rehabilitation for Federal tax purposes. In addition, the Standards have guided Federal agencies in carrying out Iheir historic preservation.responsibilities for properties in f~cderal ownership or control; and Slate and local officials in reviewing both Federal and nonfederal rehabilitation proposals. "I"hey have also been adopted by historic district and planning corn-nissions across the country. "I'he intent of Ilre Standards is to assist the long-lerni preservation of a property's significance through the preservation of historic materials and features. l'he Standards pertain to historic buildings of all maleri~ds, rnnslruclion types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and interior of the buildings. They also encompass related landscape fe,~tures and the building's site and environment, as well as attached, adjacent, or related new constnrclion. Tu be certified for Federal tax purposes, a rehabilitation project must be determined by the Secretary to be consistent with the historic character of the stnrcture(s), and where applicable, the district in which it is located. i r THE SECRETARY 01~'I'III IN"I'ERIOR'S STANDARDS~I~OR REI-IAI3ILITATION 71rc fnUowinl; Slinrl;v,l ; ;+rt• lu he :rpplit•,I lu ~.prrific rrl,.rl~ilil:rliun prt,jccls in :+ rc:+sonal,lc nr;u+ncr, I:+kinh into t•unsidcnlion cconornii :+ncl Icclu+iial feasibility. C1) A property shall be used for its Irisloric purpose nr he placed in a new use Ural requires rnini-nal change Io the defining characteristics of Ilre building and its site and environment. (2) "I~he historic clraracler u(a properly shall I,e r+•lainerl and preserved.'I'he removal of Irislorie materials ur alteration of features and spaces th.+t characterize a properiy 9ha11 be avoided. , y (SI Each properly shall be recof;nir.ed as a physical record of its lime, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical develuprnenl, soil a~ adding conjectural features or architectural clenrenls fron+ other buildings, shall not be undertaken. (4) Musl properties c{range over lime; Ihuse rlranges Ilral have acquired historic significance in ll+eir own right sl-all be retained and preserved. (5) Distinctive features, finishes, and cunslnrcliun Iecl+niques ur exan+ples of cra(tsn+anship that cl+araclerizr a Irisloric properly shall be preserved (ti) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Whcrc tlic severity of deterioration requires replacemrnl of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in devil;n, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacemen~ of mi~~ing features shall be substantiated by dncunrrnlary, physical, or pictorial evidence. (7) Chernica) Of pI+y9lcal tre,llrnent9, sucl+ as sarrrlhlasliuf;, Ilral cause damage lu historic materials shall not be used. Tl+e surface cleaning of slruc- lures, 1f appropriate, shall be underiaken using; the };cnllesl rncan9 pusslble. (B) Significant archeological resources affeclecl l,y a project sl+all be protected and preserved. I(such resources must be disturbed, mitigation n+cas- ures sl+all be undertaken. (9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. •l'he new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be cornpalible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity u the property and its environment. (10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed In the future, the essential (orn- and integrity of lire historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Wooc._ Clnt~boRrcil, rue~ther- bc~arcl, r~hlrrit-r_4, n-tcl other ruoorlen ~Jd1nU nn~lt rlecnrntlue a/et»e-tt~r Reco--t-Irertclerl IJc~c-aritir~ it ran he easily sl~..r-ed by sawing, planing, carving, and gouging, wood is the ,..ost corn- rr-c,nly usr~,l nralerial (c-r architectural features such as clapboards, cornices, brackets, entablatures, shcrllcrs, c:e,lumns and balustrades. 1'hesc wooden features-both functional and decorative-rnay be inrFc-r lanl in defining the historic character of th'e building and thus (heir retention, protection, an,l n~Fair ;-re c~( particular irnporlance in rehabilitation pmjecls. Nof Reco--t-ttett~led Identifying, retaining, and preserving wnncl features Ihal arc im- portant in de(inini; the overall historic character cif the building such as siding, cornices, brackets, window archilravc~s, and door- way pediments; and their Faints, finishes, and c~c~l~~rs. f rolecting and u~ainlainirrg wnocl features ICY Frc,vi~ling Fropcr drainage so that water is not allowed to slancl un flat, horizontal surfaces or accumulate in decorative features. /lpplying chemical preservatives to werncl features such as beam ends or outriggers that are exposed to decay Irazarcls and arc tradi- ': tionally unpainted. Retaining coatings such as paint That help prntect the wood from moisture and ultraviolet light. ('aint rernnval should he cnnsidcred only where tlrcrr is pain) surface dclcrinralicur nn-I as part of an overall maintenance nr~aram whirl, i-,,,,.I„~~ .,,.,.,;.,~;.,,. ,......_..-.. Removing or radically changir-g wood features which are impor- tant in defining the overall historic character of the building sc, Ihat, as a result, the character is diminished. (temoving a major portion of the historic wood from a facade in stead of repairing or replacing only the deteriorated wood, thcii recc-nslnrcting the facade with new material in order to achieve ;, uniform or "improved" appearance. Radically changing the type of finish or its color or accent schernc• so that the historic character of the exterior is diminished, Stripping historically painted surfaces to bare wood, then applyint; clear fir-is}res or stains in order to create a "natural look." Stripping paint or varnish to bare wood rather than repairing ur reapplying a special Finish, i.e., a grained finish to an exterior wood feature such as a front door. failing to identify, evaluate, and treat the causes of wood deterioration, including faulty (lashing, leaking gutters, cracks and holes in siding, deteriorated caulking in joints and seams, plant material growing too close to wood surfaces, or insect or fungus in- festation. Using chemical preservatives such as creosote which can change the appearance of wood ~eatures unless they were used historically. ~ ~. Stripping paint or other coatings to reveal bare wood, thus expos- frig historically coated ~ surfaccs~' 'to~~~thc c(fec~ts of accrlcratcd '' weathering. Woo. +ntlrwerl) The followinK work Is I,ighliKhted because it represents the particularly complex lechnlcal or ~des(Kn aspects of rehabilitation projects and should only be contlelerecl after the preservation concerns listed above have been addrevsed. Design for Missing Ilistoric Features . Y3e~l~tln~ and Ih~ldlllrig~s ntw tvobc~ feAlnrr. ~ucl- as a cbr- frlc~! cif dno.rwnq whin th! hlltiirlc ft:ttur~r ;~ complc•-cly ml9s- • Ing. It mAy die rii~i A•rcur:ttf t-estor:tllon using h(9tcrrical, plr~ • :; for{al, i;ht1 physltal dottlmttitaltbhr br bt ~ nt•w dealgn that r~~fiompAtlblc w1tN the 1121, acal~, inatcrlal, and coloi of the ;hlittorl~ bulldlrh~~ ~ .• • Creating a false historic appearance because the replaced wci feature is based on insufficient historical, pictorial, and physi+ documentation., Introducing a new wood feature that is incompatible in size, sr.. material, and color. Arehlteeturnl hietnls: Cctsrt nrrlritectur;rl metal features-such as cast-iron facades, porches, and steps; sheet metal cornices, Iron, steel, Jr'ressecl tin, coh- rc,c,(s, rc,c~( cresting and storefronts; and cast or rolled metal doors, window sash, entablatures, Jeer, ctlu-t>>>i-t-rt, n--tl iJnc and h•rrclw:rre--arc often highly decorative and may be important in defining flee overall historic char:rctc•r ++( Ilrc building. 'I•hcir retention, protection, and repair should be a prime consiclcralion in rrh.~l~ilil:,li++n t,rnjccts. IZL'CUIII1rIL'rlc~t'c~ Identifying, retaining, and preserving; archilectr~ral rnrlal features such as eolunu,s, cal,ital~, window hnocle, c,r tt:rirwav': that arc irn- portanl in defining; the overall historic charac lrr ~+I flit I,uilclint;; and tlrcir f inisl,cs and colors. I'rolecting and maintaining architectural metals from corrosion by providing proper drainage so Ihat water fines not stand on flat, horizontal surfaces or accurnulatc in curvc•cl, decc~ralivc fc•alures. Not Recorrlr-le--r~L~d Removing or radically clanging architectural metal features wlricl, arr. imhorlanl in clefinirif; the overall historic character of the buildint; so that, as a result, the character is diminished. Iten,nving; a major porlic,n of the historic architectural metal from .~ facade inslcacl of repair(ng or replacing only the deteriorated metal. then reconstructing the facade with new material in order to create a uni(orrn, or "improved" appearance. Radically changing the type of finish or its historical color or accent scheme. mailing to identify, evaluate, and treat the causes of corrosion, such as moisture from leaking roofs or gutters. Placing; incompatible metals together without providing a reliable separation material. Such incompatibility can result in galvanic corrosion of the less noble metal, e.g., copper 'tl corrodi~ cast iron, steel, tin, and aluminum. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission September 16, 1999 Page 4 Jim Hamilton and Dave Schultz both reviewed the proposed sign designs, noting materials, sizing and the lighting as requested. Jean Evangelista, Straka Johnson Architects, addressed the Commission regarding the size of the wall surrounding the bank property, which is approximately 2'10" in height and stated the sign will be approximately 15'6" in height and 58 square feet in area. _Staff member Noble reviewed the proposed signage stating that the freestanding sign would have a plexiglass face with internal illumination. The Commission stated they tivould be more in favor of this freestanding sign if it had aluminum cast letters and was not illuminated. Jim Hamilton reviewed the disadvantages of not having illuminated signs for their business, as in the winter time it tends to get dark at approximately 4:30 p.m. and their business would be open until 6:00 p.m. From a marketing standpoint, it is imperative that they have illuminated signs to let the customers know they are still open at that time. The Commission discussed lighting of freestanding and wall signs and also discussed the area of the freestanding sign. The Commission noted that there is a text amendment request to allow freestanding and illuminated signs. This amendment will be reviewed before the Zoning Advisory Commission and the City Council. If approved sign permit requests for properties affected by the text amendment request would still be reviewed by the HPC. The intent to revieav this proposal now was to speed up the revietiv process. The Commission inquired whether this process was going to affect the opening schedule of the bank. Mr. Hamilton replied that the signs that they need for their opening were just approved by the Commission and that the review of these signs would not delay the opening of their bank facility. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Bradford, to table this request until after the City Council has voted on the proposed text amendment. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Kringle, Bradford, Gibbs, Greenfield and Mozena. Nay: None. DESIGN REVIEVN~APPLICATION FOR ECONOMIC HARDSHIP1623 627 ARLINGTON STREETITIM WOODIW 11TH STREET: To install vinyl siding. The applicants had been in attendance but left due to a time conflict. The applicants did communicate with staff that the Commission could proceed with this request or they could table it until a later date. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission September 16, 1999 Page 5 The Commission reviewed this project and agreed to table this item until the next meeting. The Commission asked staff if they could receive additional information for that meeting. That information included whether the applicants would have information on the depreciation value and appreciation value of this property. They asked whether an appraisal has been done for this property and if so, that they be provided that appraisal. They also asked if they could get a list of improvements made to the property since the purchase, a copy of the last Housing inspection from the City, . whether this property is mortgaged through a lending institution and whether they went through the Housing Rehab Program for this property. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Kringle, to table this request to the October 21 meeting. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Kringle, Bradford, Gibbs, Greenfield and Mozena. Nay: None. ITEMS FROM STAFFIREVIEW PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST FROM LARRY WEITZ SIGN SYSTEMSIAMERICAN TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK: To exclude Jackson Park Historic District property zoned C-4 Downtown Commercial District from the historic sign regulations for that district. The Commission, staff, Mr. Hamilton from American Trust and Savings Bank, and Mr. Schultz from Larry Weitz Sign Systems, addressed this text amendment, reviewing that it pertains to allowing freestanding signs and illuminated wall signs in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District for properties zoned C-4. Staff reviewed the properties that presently are zoned C-4 in that district, noting that there are several businesses that would be included in this category. Staff noted that due to the present configuration of several of these buildings, freestanding signs would not be an option available to several of those sites as the front facades are built out to the front property line. The Commission reviewed the request stating that some properties may need signage of this nature, but they did not believe that the square footage proposed is appropriate. The Commission discussed in detail the rationale for freestanding signs and lighted wall signs in the historic district. The Commission was concerned that at some properties it may be inappropriate fora 25 foot high, 100 square foot illuminated free-standing sign to be allowed as it could adversely impact adjacent residential properties. Staff stated that the Commission was concerned with the potential for lack of input from surrounding property owners as they are not typically notified of text amendment changes or histcric preservation design reviews directly. The Commission could suggest asking that a conditional use permit be required which would require the Zoning MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Thursday, October 21, 1999 5:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Jim Gibbs, Terry Mozena, Suzanne Guinn and Duaine Greenfield; Staff Member Mark Noble. Absent: Commissioner Pam Bradford. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. REVIEW OF MINUTES: Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Mozena, to approve the minutes of September 16, 1999, as submitted. Motion carried by the following vote: Kringle, Gibbs, Mozena, Greenfield and Guinn. Nay: None. APPLICATION FOR ECONOMIC HARDSHIP 1623-627 ARLINGTON STREET (TABLED FROM LAST MEETING): Application of Tim Wood to install vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. Tim Wood, applicant, inquired whether the Commission had received Laura Carsten's memorandum dated September 30, 1999. The Commission stated that they had received that memo. Mr. Wood reported that the Housing Services Department will research the lead paint issue and determine whether there is additional funding available to assist in renovating this structure. Mr. Wood also stated that he is agreeable to the conditions mentioned in Laura Carsten's memo. Commissioner Mozena stated that he believes that if more money is available through the Housing Services Department, then the applicant could re-side this residence entirely with wood and meet the guidelines of the Secretary of Interior Standards. The Commission and applicant discussed possible funding available to renovate this residence. They also discussed the memorandum from City staff with the Commission stating they would like to stress improvements to the detail work of this structure (redo windows, trim and porch to resemble original appearance). The Commission asked the applicant how much the property has appreciated, and how much property has depreciated since they purchased it. They also asked staff to provide the applicant a copy of the Historic Preservation Ordinance which lists the materials required to be provided as part of this application. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission October 21, 1999 Page 2 Motion by Mozena, seconded by Kringle, to table this item to the November 17 meeting and direct staff to prepare a letter to Housing Services Department to inquire whether more money could be made available to repair this structure. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Kringle, Guinn, Gibbs, Mozena and Greenfield. Nay: None. DESIGN REVIEW11272 LOCUST STREET: Application of James & Marsha Scovel to construct an addition to the rear of the structure at 1272 Locust Street in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Marsha Scovel, applicant, stated that she and her husband were intending to do simple repairs to the enclosed porch because it was in disrepair and there was a considerable _~mount of wood rot. They discovered it was worse than originally anticipated, and they needed to replace this porch in its entirety. They are proposing do wood clapboard siding [with the Commission recommending 3"-4" wood siding], an asphalt roof, wood windows, and an aluminum clad door. The proposed windows are slightly different than the existing windows of the residence. The stairway will be wood with a wood or wrought iron railing. _ The Commission discussed this project, noting that the project started without a permit. They stated that the project should be considered as if it were not there, but just a plan, and recommend approval of a design which may require the applicants to remove some of the work that has already been started. The Commission considered approving 3"-4" wood siding, altering the roof line to be more consistent with the main structure (although it was noted that changing the roof may interfere with the windows of the existing structure) and modifying the window design. It was discussed and agreed upon to table this item to later in this meeting, so that the Commission and applicant can meet at this site. DESIGN REVIEW1486 W. 4TH STREET• Application of Kevin & Neal Kapp to install a carriage style door on the side porch a# 486 W. 4th Street in the Cathedral Historic Preservation District. Kevin Kapp, applicant, is requesting permission to install acarriage-style door on the side porch where currently a pedestrian entrance door and 1960's style windows exist. The siding on this porch is asphalt roofing shingles. This project would be remodeling of the first floor only with the carriage door consisting of exterior wood siding (plywood board) and wrought iron hinges. The Commission stated that this door style was typically made of "car siding" which is tongue and groove woodwork. The Commission and applicant discussed design options and the extent of this improvement. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Greenfield, to approve a design using "car siding", a tongue and groove wood siding, similar to a sketch designed by the Commission. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Greenfield, Guinn, Kringle, Mozena and Gibbs. Nay: None. The Commission recessed at 5:50 p.m. to reconvene at the alley at 1272 Locust Street. MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Wednesday, November 17, 1999 5:00 p.m. Auditorium, Carnegie Stout Library 360 W. 11th Street, Dubuque, Iowa ~ .y - _ ~. PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commissioners Jim Gibbs, Pam Bradford and - Suzanne Guinn; Staff Member Mark Noble. ABSENT: Commissioners Terry Mozena and Duaine Greenfield. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:07 p.m.. MINUTES: Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Kringle, to approve the minutes of the October 21, 1999 as submitted. Motion approved by the following vote: Aye: Kringle, Gibbs, and Guinn; Nay: None; Abstain: Pam Bradford. PUBLIC HEAR1NGlREMOVAL FROM HISTORIC DISTRICTIBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DUBUQUE: Application for request for properties to be removed from the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. Brian Meyer, representing the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Dubuque, stated that due to a recent neighborhood meeting where several concerns were discussed, the Boys and Girls Club requested that this request be tabled to the December 16, 1999, meeting in order to address those concerns. He apologized for the short notice to table this request. Motion by Kringle, seconded by Guinn, to table the request to the December 16, 1999, meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Gibbs, Bradford, Guinn and Kringle; Nay: None. DESIGN REVIEWICERTIFICATE OF ECONOMIC HARDSHIPIWOOD: Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship of Tim Wood (tabled from the October 21 meeting) to install vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. ~ t Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission a ~ ts? Wednesday, November 17, 1999 Page 2 Tim Wood, applicant, stated he has talked with personnel in the Housing Services Department about the Lead Paint Hazard Grant Program. He also discussed renovating the front facade to replicate the original appearance of the structure. Mr. Wood stated that the renovation would pertain to the first floor windows, front porch, wood siding and the wood molding consistent with the memorandum from Planning Services Manager Laura Carstens. The Commission and applicant discussed the --amount of grant money available for this project from the Housing Services Department. The Commissioners asked why the cost to repair the front facade is approximately 53,250 for the new siding, whereas the remaining three sides would cost approximately $25,000. The applicant stated the square footage is considerably less for the front facade versus the other three sides. The applicant also addressed the bid for improvements to the interior, which is approximately 513,800. He said this bid was based on previous costs for comparable type work that he has done to other properties which he owns. The Commission questioned the difference in the price for residing the front versus the remaining three sides. The applicant stated that it is primarily due to the need for scaffolding for those three sides. The Commission discussed siding options, stating that they believe it is economically feasible to do the wood siding. The Commission also discussed bid costs for this project as well as the possibility of acquiring rehab loans. Staff Member Noble noted the loan programs available through the Housing Services Department addressing the interest, the match amount, and tenant income criteria necessary to apply for those programs. The applicant stated additional costs due to loans makes this project even more costly. Property co-owner Vicky Bechen reported on conditions of other buildings on Arlington Street, noting the mixture of building materials and level of maintenance. She stated there are no architecturally significant structures in this area. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission Wednesday, November 17, 1999 Page 3 ~, , l~ ~a~ 9i Commissioner Gibbs reviewed his perspective on maintenance of structures and believes that to preserve the longevity of the structure and the investment, it is better to side the structure with wood siding; however, he stated that he is willing to approve this request with the stipulation that the City review detailed improvement plans before approving a building permit. _ the Commission and the applicant discussed what the original structure might have looked like, noting that the lower windows probably matched the upper windows which still exist. It was noted that by adding crown details to the windows, the facade would show a little more depth of field. It was also noted that a structure on Belmont Street may be comparable in design to what this house originally looked like. It was also suggested that the applicants not add four square columns; rather add turn of the century style columns. The Commission also advised that the applicant meet with Mike Gibson from the Loras College Library, who has a wealth of historical information and may be able to provide them with pictures or sketches of how this structure originally appeared. Motion by Gibbs, seconded by Guinn, to approve the installation of vinyl on the two sides and the rear, and to redo the front facade in the manner suggested by Planning Services tiianager Laura Carstens, subject to review and approval of a detailed front facade sketch duplicating the appearance of the structure at the turn of the century. Motion failed by the following vote: Aye: Gibbs and Guinn; Nay: Kringle and Bradford. DESIGN REVIEWICERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESSISCOVEL: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness of James and Marsha Scovel (tabled from the October 21 meeting) to construction an addition to the rear of the structure at 1272 Locust Street ire the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District. N1~rsha Scovel, applicant, provided a newspaper article from the Telegraph Herald (2/1/98) tiviiich commended her on the improvements she and her husband have made CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM November 9, 1999 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner SU6.lECT: Application for Economic Hardship for 623-627 Arlington Street Planning Services staff have received some additional information from the applicants regarding 623-627 Arlington Street. We have also received a response to our inquiry of the Housing Services Department whether there is any additional fending available for this structure. Please revie4v this ne~v information and be prepared to make a decision on this issue at the November 1 7, 1999 design review meeting. enclosure 623-627 Arlington Vinyl side duplex on 3 sides in a lead safe manner 58,000.00 The duplex is in an historic district. We are in the process of working out an agreement with the Historic Preservation Commission to vinyl side the 2 sides and back. The front will be restored to it's original form. Remove lead siding ~ 600.00 Replace with new wood siding 2,760.00 Replace porch columns with square wood columns 200.00 Change out =~ windows (cut-out only) (window installation inc~Iuded in interior bid) 600.00 ~ 12,060.00 Interior 13.800.00 526,860.00 To restore entire exterior of house to historical standards is approx. 526,000 more. B&bV Properties Vicki Bechen Tim Wood Reo:ace -= Lon columns ~ti;th -'. square «~ood columns Rcolace Both outside front «~ood comers with new ~~'ood Repisce or ship lop halt of «'ood siding Replace lower siding with «'ood sidii-tg to match top half Replace both 3-sectioned lower ~t'indo«'s with ~ windows to match top half B~.~~' Properties March 23, 1999 AL AMES Lead Removal 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner way siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6,300 Price is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump '-`" siding in their trailer at no charge if they do not, then the price will be significantly higher. _ Tenant wial need to be removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around X7.00 per sq. ft.=700 per square x 35 = X24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Will charge to strip--~40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not incufde repairing siding or painting Tenant ~~rrll nae~d to be removed from residence approx. 7 to 9 wreeks. SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION (3I5) 747-6023 4751 N. iviENO~ffNEE RD. EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 61025 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS:575 English Lane CITY:Dub. Ia. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape- recommend replacing or siding o~•er DESCRIPTION OF WORK: JOB WORK ORDER Date of Order: March 22. 1999 :apply 4 inch wood Iap siding to entire e:aerior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- 5325 per square x 42 sq.= 513,650 Labor to replace wood siding- 5225 per square x 42 sq. 9,450 Apply one coat primer~and I coat paint- Labor j}d material 3.300 / ~w~c,~,~,~.~ ~,~,C,~ ~-ZT ,~-y,~- C:z~i•uc~ 526,400 !~~ / -.~. ~. J, ,.i..~~ ~ 1J/ Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entire exterior siding Labor and Material 8-g70 ~~~~ %~ ~ ,~ DATE COiviPLETED: TOTAL, ~1ATERIALS: TOTAL, LABOR: TAjC: TOTAL .~~IOU`NT: «'ORK ORDERED BY: SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION JOB ~V"ORK ORDER (31 ~) 7=17-6023 47~ 1 N. MEN0~7Titi"EE RD. Date of Order: EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 6102 March 22, 1999 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS: ~7~ English Lane CITY: Dub., Ia. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape-recommend replacing or siding over. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Apply 4 inch wood lap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and t}pe of wood- 532~ per square x 42 sq.= SI3,6~0 Labor to replace wood siding-5224 per square x 42 sq. 9,460 Apply one coat primer and 1 coat paint-Labor and material ~ , S26,=100 Paint when sca$~old set up already i~i 623-627 Arlington To make lead safe interior- Replace 9~% of all trim, including inside doors, door jambs, window casings, window trim, baseboards, etc. Approx. 12 windows + casings x $3~0 ~" $4,200.00 300 ft. Baseboard x $3.00 per foot 900.00 7 doors x $1~0 1,050.00 10 door casings x $75 70.00 $6,900.00 Two apartments X: $13,800.00 "Restoring front to historical standards" Replace metal columns with wood 200.00 Cut out for 4 windows 604.00 Repair soffit and fascia ._ 4,000.00 (Remove lead paint-covered soffit and fascia~in a lead safe mamie ~ ~6OD,~.~ and replace with new woad). This price does not include other costs that will probably be incurred by us, such as carpet being pulled and re-Iayed or needing to be replaced due to not fitting properly due to baseboards being replaced. Plaster being replaced due to casings etc. being pulled off the walls, re-painting emire apartment, loss of rent, adding insulaxion if none there or if old falls out. Approx. $8,000.00. CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORA1+1D11M November 4, 1999 T0: David Harris, Housing Services Manager FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner ``~~ SUBJECT: Lead Paint Grant Assistance for Renovation of Front Facade at fi23-627 Arlington Street INTRODUCTION This memorandum is being sent to you at the request of the Historic Preservation Commission concerning the historic renovation of the front facade at 623-627 Arlington Street. This property is located in the W. 1 1 th Street Historic District. BACKGROUND Tim Wood and Vicky Bechen, owners of this property, have submitted a request to the Historic Preservation Commission to allow vinyl siding on this structure. The Commission has denied both a certificate of appropriateness and a certificate of economic hardship for this request. The otivners filed an appeal which was brought before the City Council. The City Council referred this item back to the Commission to review the project further, as there was new information submitted that the Commission had not previously seen that could alter their decision. The Commission and owners have discussed funding sources for making improvements to this property. The Commission has asked Planning Services staff to contact the Housing Services Department to check on funding available for this property. RECOMMENDATION The Commission has asked that funding be made available for improvements to the front facade of this structure which are consistent with that recommended by Planning Services staff and the Commission. These improvements would allow for the property owners to renovate the facade in a historical manner and install vinyl siding on the sides and rear of the structure. This facade renovation would include removal of the siding with lead paint on it and replace it with new wood siding, replace the existing porch columns with wood columns, and install new windows on the first floor consistent with the upper level windows. Based on estimates provided by the owner, which include renovation of the interior in compliance with the required guidelines, this cost could be S13,000 per unit (there are two units). ACTION STEP The Historic Preservation Commission has requested that the Planning Services Department inquire of the Housing Services Department whether there is any funding available for the property owners of 623-627 Arlington Street that would allow for them to make improvements to the property which would be consistent or in compliance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards. These Standards are the guidelines by which the Historic Preservation Commission base their decisions or recommendations for improvements to properties located in the City of Dubuque's Historic Districts or for designated Landmarks. Please call me with any questions regarding this issue. I would appreciate it if you could provide me a response by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 10, 1999. CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM Date: iti'ovember 10, 1999 To: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner `" From: Kathaleen Lamb, Senior ;;-Tow-ing Inspector #~~ Subj: 623 - 627 Arlington Str:~t ?his office has reviewed the two m~morardums sent to this office in referenc$ to the above ---named property. The Lead-based Faint Program has received a grant application from Tun Wood and Vicky Bechen. However, the required tenant packet/ bane not all been received yet. The required Lead In~~ction bas not bezn completed, nor have we received a completed bid packet from a certified lead pauit contractor. With the abxnce of these documents, it is diffieuk to determine the exact extend of the ngonetary assistance that the Lead-based Faint Program will be able to assist the project. Normally, the bead Program would assist with $x,000 per unit for the interior or $10,000 for thi; propert~r. Additionally, the Prod could assist with the front facade renovation in the amount of $4,883.70. See the attacl~d estimate pt'Cpared by the Rehab staff. Of course, if the owner is interea-ted in a rehab. loan, funding is available for that purpose. To: Jofeen From: Dick Re: Front of 623 Arlington Date: November 9, 1999 The building at 623 Arlington is 33' 6 X 20' 9" for a total of 695 sq.~ft. The cost to remove 695 sq. ft. of siding, install 4-double hung windows to match 2nd floor windo+~vs, remove and install front porch support calurtlns, trim inside of windows, install new woad bevels ~ cedar siding to match and prime and paint fror}t of home is es follows: Optional ____ 1.) Remove all siding from front of home. ~ i 2.) install new wood composite columns at $250.00. a.) Install new wood columns at $525.00 {optional) 3.) Insiall 4 double hung wood windows and trim inside to match 2nd door windows to match 2nd floor windows. 4 @ S300.00 4.) Replace front siding with 34" X 6" cedar siding at i S13.76 per 12 R. piece, need 165 pietas to side front. 5.) .Prime and paint now wood siding, material only, 8 gallons at 520.00. Cost far material only, no labor: $500.00 5750.04 51,575.00 5~,2oo.ao 52,273.70 5160.00 54,883.70 $6,456.70 523-6Z7 Arlington ?urc:.asad for 527.500, 3-31-93 Did not receive copy o= appraisal, but :wuld 'nave appraised fo. purchase price. u~rtgage at .~.aricaa Trust Bead-519.511 balance with payaeata of X336.00 which include ''rin-Znt-Tax, insLrance is paid separately. X2,300 approx. trill be paid ror street assese-nent. Other repairs were already subt;ltted. Latest dousia3 inapectiors are attached frot: ?eb. and August 1999. INSPECTION REPORT FOR: 523 ARCING i ON DATc: FcHRUARY 18, 1999 TENANT: F,NOEL cRNZFN OWNER: 3 ~ W PARTNERSHIP :aaaas==-v==a=-~===o=o.cc ~-_.=~==»aaaza ~zao_...=- Section IIB. Other deficisnciQS (30 days to prior to NAP ConiraW to repair. Prlorto beginning arty w+orfc you should check with the City 9uiidlrty Departrr~en! (SS9~1b0) and/or the Hiatartc Pr+estrvation Cammisaion (s3S9~T10} to d~arminerf a perrnh is required. as:zzvae :~~~_~=~a~~_c_a___~~~~aaeszzozzzzzazzzzzzs~z 1. exterior surfaces have pesilne paint (scraped) 2. ~`ront bedraom window sills between sash an+d storms have pee3M9 paint. ~ 3. Rear bsdrrom window silts between sash and s2orm3 have peeiing paint. 4. Pass with cammerrt: front Cedrbom south outlet rover Is fosse. ATTZNTION FOR EXTERIOR i.aOSE PAINT VIOLATION Q~`a Loose paint must be r+emavsd, by scraping andlar brustllny, artd any paint chips must be removed from the area ai this time in order is pass inapoctfon. Hawavor, due to incfemettt wexihar conditions for painting, an extension for tax actual gaintina has been granted until .JUN~3,1~99. Another inspection will be made at that time. 1A13PcCT1ON REPORT FOR: ?27 ARLINGTON DATE: AUGUST 27, 1999 TENANT: KIMBEr"2LE`! FROWN OVY~IER: e ~ W PARTNERSHIP __ --------~sn~~=son=~svs==== o=~a~=_ ===a=-=~rt~ssa=====aa==~==--=-------- Section IIS. Cater deflciendea (30 days to prior to HAP t;artiracs) to repair. Prtorto beginning anyworic you should check wfth the Ctty Building Aepartment (b89-49b0} andlar the Historic Prnsarvaiion Carnrrtission (5Eg-210} to detenntne ff a permit is r+aquired• • -~---~~~~~~-~~~~~~~3 ~~~~~aasa ~sisaa ss ~~=~~~JC70C11S~C~~~~~~~...C..CC..S.. 1. Roar arses of buiidlrtg has pooling paint. variance until Dec 31, t9e8. 2. Kitchen sfoves fratri right bursar won't light ~p~ariy, ~~~ ~~~ v ~~~ ~~ \J~ ~~ itL.. 023-627 :~rLn~ton BRW Properities Tim Wood Vicki Bechen «'hat specific historical significance does this building have? ~k~S ST¢ut-Jam. ~S w~v5.04~_r..`~ T~ 3"i c~ Sri?P*~CT~tf~ S\~fJ.~tC>.fC L What style is it? ~ u ~_ ~t~ `s ~ ~~ ~ ~ a c u tT~r Wit criteria are you basing your Judgment on? -- 1~i~.v'\~ Cc;1~~t~T.tN ~~.'~S oR-LtL~ ~^'~ _ ~GQ~J ~5~~-~ r~t~F APPLICATION FDR1`1 CcI~TIFICATE OF ECDN01'11C HARDSHIP Historic Preservation Commission APPLICANT Name Sri _L-.loop / ~, ~ ! ~cGF-lE~l Address _S Sa E.r~lC~us H l~-..-~ Du~uczuE~ z~ 52co3 Telephone 583- c~3 PROPERTY fl1~tNER Hame ~5o.r-T~ ~S .~~JF Address Telephone PROPOSED PROJECT Address v2~ i ~-2-~ ~.,~„~~ ~ o~ Landmar'~c or Landmark Site? Historic District? ~ LJ . ~1~` PROPOSED ALTERATION, ACTiY1TY, OR DEt70L1T1DN Please provide a short narrative explaining the nature of the proposed project_ Additfonsl sheets and illustrations, it needed, may be attached_ ~ ~! ~ u ~-.p L ~ L' .% T~ I i"1 P :U ~! ~ I H ~ ~c1%r--,`o o ~ T ~ t2= t'a ~ P~=c P~ ^ ~( aS ~oT~D oral a-t~- ~'a/lD;~~ ~~ ~=,"S.~ ~U°P~c..i iN'F /~.PP~o~(Ai ~ ~. C~2~ ~r SUPPORTINS DOCUtlEI'fTATION Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances, allows the Commission to solicit expert testimony and/or require the Applicant to submit documentation 1n support of the proposed alteration, addition or demolition. A listing of the intormation which the ma be request?d is attached to this form. ~~~_ ~ - ~~ 7 9~ Applicant Signature Date ApplfCatiOn : - n ~~ r 623-627 Arlington Replace -I iron columns with ~ square wood colunuu Replace both outside front wood corners with new wood Replace or strip top half of wood siding Replace lower siding with wrood siding to match top half Replace both 3-sectioned lower windows with ~ window's to match top half B~.tiV Properties CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDllM September 8, 1999 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Mark Noble, Assistant Planner ;~ SUBJECT: Rehearing of Application for Certificate of Economic Hardship: 623 - 627 Arlington Street An appeal by B & W Properties, otivners of property at 623-627 Arlington Street, was placed on the September 7, 1999 City Council meeting agenda. The appeal was of the denial of the Certificate of Economic Hardship application. At that meeting, the City Council voted to refer this item back to the Historic Preservation Commission for further review. This decision was based on the submittal of information by B ~ W Properties to the City Council that hadn't been part of the original materials the Commission reviewed as part of the Certificate of Economic Hardship application (Duna 17, 1999). This request is on the Commission's September 16, 1999 meeting agenda. Attached are materials that have not previously been reviewed by the Commission. The Commission is asked to revie4v this material, as well as the previously submitted material, and vote to approve, deny or table the request for a Certificate of Economic Hardship at the September 16th meeting. 623-627 Arlington Profit- 93- 4,395.55 94- 3,200.00 estimate-could not find taxes-put in new furnace that near 95- 4,817.79 96- 4,327.72 97- 2,143.31 98- 712.78 99- 410.00 $20,004.00 2000 to 2007- $1,446 x 8yrs 11,668.00 $31,572.00 divided by 1 ~ yrs = $2,104 divided by 12 months = 5175 per month pt•sfit from 1993 to 2007. $350.00 wood siding over 15 yrs. $35,400 -175.00 5175.00 54.00 Added maintainance per month to paint building every 10 }TS. over 50 yrs. $ 229.00 Loss per month $6,500 x 5 = 532,500 = $54.00 per month over 50 yrs. Binding is 50 feet high on the ends. With wood siding installed, we would lose $229 a month for the last 7 yrs. And the next 8 yTS the total loss would be 541,580 plus maintainance for the next 35 yrs-$54.00 per month Vinyl siding $6,820 divided by 15yrs. _ $45=1 divided by 12 mo. = S38.00 5175.00 - 38.00 5137.00 profit every mo. over 15 yTS.= 524,660 We will have a street assessment for Arington St. reconstruction this year of approx. 52,300, which is not figured into our expenses. We also have not deducted any management costs. 623-627 Arlington 1993- 9 months Insurance 249.00 License 2.00 Payment 2,666.00 Repairs 22.19 Water 314.26 X3,479.46 Rent- X417 x 9 mo.= 53,73.00 Rent- 548 x 9 mo.= $4.122.00 - --~- - 57,87.00 Total Profit 54,39~.>j 199- 12 months Insurance 330.00 License 2.00 Payment 4,170.00 Repairs 94.00 Water 730.11 Legal 71.00 Electric 16.10 56,296.21 Rent- 5,441 ~ 6,673= ~ 11,114.00 - 6.296.E 1 5 4,817.79 623-627 Arlin~on 1996- 12 months Insurance 330.00 License 26.00 Payment 4,126.90 Repairs 1,860.» Water 697.74 Electric 14.09 56,963.28 Rent- 56,612.00 + 6,769.00= ~ 11,281.00 - 6.963.28 --_- - 5 4,327.72 Profit 1997- 12 months Insurance 330.00 License 26.00 Payment 4,052.00 Repairs 1,309.07 Water 393.00 Electric 37.63 Legal 11.00 Advertisin g 21.66 Gas 27.43 56,206.69 Rent- 54,049.00 T 4,301.00=58,360.00 - 6.206.69 52,143.31 Pro tit 1998- 12 months Insurance 330.00 License 27.00 Payment 4.036.00 Repairs 1,099.32 Water 12.98 Electric 67.63 Gas 22.26 Advertising 86.14 56,670.2? Rent- 52,833.00 = 3,660.00= 56,383.00 -6,670.~~ 5 712.7S Profit 623-627 Arlington 1999- projected for 12 months Insurance 330.00 License 27.00 Payment =1,100.00 Advertising 73.00 Repairs 2.800.00 X7,330.00 Rent- 4,200.00 + 3,40.00= $7,7=10.00 - 7,330.00 --_- - ~ X410.00 Profit Repairs higher this year- completely remodeled a bathroom. 623-627 Arlington 2000 to 2008 Insurance 330.00 Payments 4,100.00 Utilities&License 7~.00•- Repairs-all past maintainance divided 1.444.00 . 5,949.00 Rents after up-dating- 530 per mo. for each apt. _ $8,400 minus 5350 for estimated rental loss 8.00.00 52,101.00 Up-dating 1 bathroom- $1,600 + lead abatement- $4,000 + gutters $400 = 56,900 divided by 8 = 5737 per year. 2,101.00 - 737.00 51,364.00 per yT. profit 1,364.00 Siding $6,820 di~zded by 8 yrs. = 82.00 Der yr. 5 ~ 12.00 profit per year x 8 yrs. = 54,096 Wood siding 53,400 at 8 % % interest over 8 }~rs. Profit per yT. 6,108 1.364 4,744 loss per y-r. 648 material to paint per yr. 5,392 loss per year for 8 yTS. X 8 vrs 543,136 623-627 Arlin~on Tom Glennon and Ken Brinier at ~Sautz Paint said that NO contractor they know gives a guarantee for painting oid e~cterior wood. 623-627 :~rlinston If we only scrape and paint, not strip each time, we need to scrape paint, it will have to be done in a lead safe manner. Scaffold and tent the entire house to keep lead paint from blowing into neighbors yard and house. Relocate tenants which would cost thousands of dollars each time and the old wood is not holding paint very well. Plus when he starts scraping he might have to replace more wood. .. We also lose 512,200 in grant money from the city. 510,000 grant + 800 clean-up + 1,400 relocation = 512,200. If you have any questions about the lead removal guidelines, call city housing inspection office at X89-1724. August 6, 1999 Honorable Ma~•or and Citti• Council Members 6?3-6?7 Arlington One person on the historical commission voted for us and he said they should be taking these on a case-bv-case basis. One member said that he understands our problem but if they let us put siding on then everyone ~~-ill «•ant to put siding on. This is not acase-by-case base. After 3 long, meetings, it was worked out that to keep it historical, the wood needs to be replaced. It ~~n, not cost e$ective to strip lead paint and patch. In this case from the first day we purchased the buildin, until it would bz paid for- over a period of 1 ~ yTS., we would lose on the building 5-I1,~80 if wood sidin, u put on. If vinyl sided, w•z would have a profit of X24,300. If ~•ou stsrt right now for the netit 8 years, we would lose S=#3,136 with ne~v wood siding. If we ~-inyl side the building, the ne~•t 8 years we will have a profit of 54,096.00. Ttlis is s multi-farluIy building--not residential «'~len eve purchased the buildin,, we knew it was in an historical district but lead bas:, was NOT :ul iasue :uld there are numerous federal laws governing this now. 1Ve felt tnev had ~lreadv made up their nand before w~e even started the meeting and that they ~verc not open to any new information since one member actually fell asleep during the meeting :lIld :uulthcr had to bc: asked a question nwre than once becawe he admittedly wasn't paying :itt~ntion. Another member told us we brought the wTOng information, that it vas not pertinent, :uul wc: had been told by Mark Noble to bring it so obviously he had not read the information bc: tO i2 11 t111. DESIG_\ RE«~i' :~ppLIC_-\TION c [EIIStrORICPRESERVaTT(~ti [-'n~rrccrn D:~TE: ~~2319~ P~o~~~TY _____I O W~I?rR: 1 ~Vl. ~VU D~ ~ '~ ~l~ e P,:ovE: S~ 3-Ca 3~ PROPERTY HISTORIC :~DD~ SS: ~Q Z3! (LZ1 i`~TYIt~~.~ nre-rF rr ~ • ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~- ~L~ILI~'G .ADDRESS: ~~b ~"-~~"'Syl l,Q,~, ~g~t~l.(..~, SZi)D~ COL'T'r`~CTOR: PHONE: DESCRIPT[ON OF [tE.H.~BILIT:~TION/PRESERV:~TION WORK: EXISTING FE.~TURElCONDITIO\' (PROPOSED WOR.~ EXlSTtNG FE:~TURE'COVDITION I PROPOSED WORD F`C(STi\'G ;~8.-\TU~.'CO\DiT(O~' I ?tiOPOSBD w01 I ;~f.yTEti1.-\LS F.=.QU>rSTED: PHOTOG:Z~P;{S DtiA~VT\GS.PL.-\~S COLOS S:~:tiIPLE :~f.~,TERlAL S.~:`tPLE :\GE~D:\: 4 r ~ E'L:\CBD O~ .aG.~D:\ ~P?~ov.D -_2~ T:\BLED TO NE\T :~(EETI\GlPLACED Off` L ~ 3 ,-\GB~D.-\ , ~~ Cindy ~'~is tpctsldcsav.:. ... ..........._.... DUBUQUE, IOWA Architectural Survey Inventory STREET ADDRESS BUILDING NA~~UJ _ PRESENT OWNER _ Address LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION C 4 Y, I~,C~ Source A-RCHITECT/BUILDER Source -PRESENT USE _ ~~; DESIGNED USE ~~,?~,~ Source ACCESSIBILITY RES/UNR/~N STATUS ,OC /UNO/~ BUILDING MATERIALS CONDITION Foundation ~U 5 ~~ : ~ 3 4 Walls LLa1~P~t1~`y'r^ S+(1~L{~ 3 4 Trim r.l ~T~~L ~~ 3 4 Porch/Storefr Facade N/S/E/W 3y Date ifODIFIG~TIO~IS/ADDITIONS Str7lu~ I~-!>>J Hc~p:,~ t~rlyZ.l`•( /,L~. c c c o n t~~~ cc~ f tt~ --rn ~1] 2 3 Eaves/Cornice ~,tLr-~~ CL.~~ 02 3 4 4 ~ Pl~~~, ~C-L'•^'t1 ~S Cr- I.~(1.,c1vV;~ Roof ~~`~.^~oSlZibv C himn e ~ ) ? 1 ~ 3 4 ~12.1l1J lJ~-~ C-~.i;JU~`.~Z JZ ;~Sr ~ y s ~I_I ~ t L 1 ~2 3 4 ~~u c,~,.~. r~ ~._._. `'' . ,~ DESIGN FEATURES '~~ ~ != -' ~ /~ O r~'-~ , C0:_ tiT. Style ~'~ V'-~'~?J/`: C.1~~2 ~~,;`T~ / { ~-/'~!,~-~ ~~ :;; Details oL vote: Interior Features: Site Features: . . ~valuatior~ GOr1`~NT: I QUALITY Aesthetic 1 ~ 3!-+ ..._,_ _ Historical 1 2 3~ ~ t'~ Iti ~y~~7 P~+~~~{~~ ~s Rarity 1 2 3 4 t l ~~tZ ~ ~ ~~;-~ :n II ENVIRO~'~IENTAL STATURE 1 2 3 U '~ III CONTE:{T Immediate ~2 3 4 ~ Broad Q) 2 3 4 "~ IV INTEGRITY OF FABRIC 1 2U3 4 Architectural Significance ~~~~,~ PROBABLE ADDITIONAL ARE.~S OF SIGNIFICANCE REPRESENTATION IN EYISTING SURVEYS NABS/NRHP SURVEY CONSULTANT: Bruce M. Kriviskey, AICP Date ~ Cj /~(~ ~~ 1978 N, 1979 Photogrd~h Roll ~" Frame ~ s .. ~ ,N~°' / ~ `~ ~~ ran i0 --~~ ~{ ,.~ ~~ PG~cOt., y ~ i ~ v' ~~ / r ~ NOS1212/V~_ . //n ~ , r ri S r~ rs / ~ ' ~ r 1 ~- Q ~~~yy `gip ~ ~ ' i u1 -f. ~• r~ 'O ~ ~ -1_ ~ F-1-( ' / 1~~E' ~ S~ r~ St ~~ 'ter ~ ! ~~ ~1~ L ~ It J+ ' n L ' J ~Y i ?! O T ,`` '1 ~ 7 '7 C ~ ~ ~ Ul',~ ' V1 l.. %;'~ riP ~ 1FF PL ~L~G~ ~r rJ' ~~P~ of ~ ~! % GI.tZ°~FF ~ ~ ~o. 3S0211N iD r`n °~ ' 7j rJ' G S~ U -_ ~ `~ I ~/w o 15 -IlS l ~'y OEF.~- rs ~ SQL Z tuG r ~ Svlf,~~~t rev d <t; " 1 \S S~ 'y > > ~~ r ~F"L i 0~ ~ ~\\I~ S tv r-~ U W ~-`-`- y '~~ °" °~~,~-` ' S~ o ~ N ~ ~;, S r~R ~ a~~ G~`~oo° aUa°'~` s 1 s ry G r ((F-'-'~~'-( i_ ~~)J f C~JL O ~ r~1 P~~\~\~ "%~ S S~ SSW (V ~\!i~` ' ~1 S S rrO ~\\ ~~ _ ~ g Mln~C~G`~,~ R P~ o ~SZ ~ u cn C~ ~ 1 I d j GO ~ Sj Gv ~ CEC1~ E ~_ ~~ ~ o ~ o t., M --t ti ~ S~~ pC~~ 'o~ e~ ____ ~_ cP,t~ 't SZ > cU ii, ~ ~ <t S~ `' ,~ ~ ~~ ,o in _~! F' S ~ r „' 1 S ~~~ ~ OO ~JP StP `I` rj _ ~ ~S ~~' NJIp~ S~ ~ ---~ ~. ~ ; a/ s ~ E-~ W W ~ a H ~ 1~ ~N V 7 ~ -~ ~ I o U ~. ~ ~ b0~~ ~-, ~N 11~~ _ ~-- N DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT PLEASE COMPLETE AND BRING TO YOUR SCHEDULED DESIGN REVIEW ~0~~~0~~~~~~0~~~0~0~~000~~~~00~~~~~~~00~~0~0~~~~~0~ Please decribe your project, indicating the e~cistin~ materials and their condition and the reason for the proposed work: Have you considered any other alternative remedies to solve your problem or meet your needs? Please indicate the type of construction materials to be used in this project: `Vhat is your timeline for completion of the proposed project? Will you do the work yourself, or use a contractor? Please provide nave of contractor. ~~.~ any other information or comments? Signature Date F:\ US ERSUG LE W`:~tYWF,HISTPRES\FO R:~lS1PROPOSED.PRJ 623-627 Arlington Replace wood (7 square not included) where plywood siding is, need to do something there. Remove tenant for 2months-Rent-utilities-moving expense 2,000 Remove wood siding in a lead-safe manner (Al Ames) 6,300 Dump fee for lead wood ???7~ Apply new siding of equal quality of existing siding (Speaker Const.) 23,100 Paint new siding (Speaker Const.) While scaffold is set up 3,300 Randy Mesch of Crawford Insurance gave me a price using the insurance replacement guide book (~88-1883) $4.9~ per sq. ft. 17,32 This price does not include removing wood, straightening out any bad framing, applying siding up to 4 stories in the air and P~t~• 623-627 ?.rlington Scrape, repair rotten siding, paint Siding has lead base paint. I must use lead removal guidelines for safety, you can call the lead department at the City Housing Inspection Office at X89-1724. Tom Glennon, Ken Brimer at Mautz Paint said that NO contractor they know gives a guarantee for painting old exterior wood. I had said I would get a price for scraping and painting and repairing rotten siding. Here are the reasons this will not work- __=~~ould lose $12,200.00 in grant money from the City if I don't cover or strip siding completely. S 10,000 grant + $800 clean-up + $1,400 relocation= $12,200.00. If I only scrape and paint I would have to follow lead removal guidelines every time it was necessary to scrape and re-paint (approx. every ~ years) here are just a few- Relocate tenants, scaffold entire house and put plastic tent around it to keep from contaminating neighbors. These alone would cost thousands of dollars. I personally do not want to leave lead exposed on the house where it can endanger children. 623-627 Arlington Strip Siding Strip siding (AI Ames) Approx. 524,00 Price to paint ofd wood 2 coats ??`?'??? Price to patch rotten wood ?`?'???? Hope to have a second bid for stripping by the ne:ct meeting. Terry Sullivan of the lead department of City Housing said that AI Ames bid is fair and falls into his price guidelines. spoke with Jim at Sarris Painting, he i, trying to get completely out of the lead stripping business __ because of all the lend regulations which drive up the price so much. AI Ames is the most e~-perienced lead removal contractor in town_ In speaking to him and several other Iead remo~-al contractors, it would be very foolish to give a firm bid on something that has so many variables without giving yourself a huge margin of error. SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION (81 ~) 747-6023 47~ I N. ivfENO~ffNEE RD. E:\ST DUBUQUE, IL. 6102 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS:~7~ English Lane CITY:Dub.Ia. X2003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape- recorunend replacing or siding over JOB WORT{ ORDER Date of Order: March 22, 1999 DESCRIPTION OF tiVORI~: __~._;\pply 4 inch wood Iap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type ofwood- 532~ per square x 42 sq.= 513,60 Labor to replace «'ood siding- 522 per square x 42 sq. 9,40 Apply one coat primer and ~ coats paint- Labor and material ~\ppfy double 4 vinyl siding includui, house wrap to entire exterior siding Lalx~r acid i\•faterial nt~~ i);\'I'L COQ\-[1'LETED: '1'01'\L ~[,~\'I'rIZ[~\LS: '1'O'I'r1L L:\130[Z: 't'~\\: WORK ORDERED BY: 3.300 526,400 8,820 March 23, 1999 AL AMES Lead Removal 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner, haul away siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6,300.00 Price is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump siding in their trailer at no charge if they do not, then the price will be significantly higher. Tenant will need to be removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around $7.00 per sq. ft.=$700 per square x 35 = $24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Will charge to strip--$40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not inculde repairing siding or painting Tenant will need to be removed from residence approx. 7 to 9 weeks. CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM June 3, 1999 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager=~1'i'~ SUBJECT: 623-627 Arlington Street -- Design Review This memo provides additional information on the design review case for 623-627 Arlington Street. The applicant, Tim Wood, would like to install vinyl siding, and has _ checked into the City's lead-based paint abatement program. Attached is a handout that describes the program requirements. Eligible lead hazard reduction activities are described on page 2 of the handout. At this point, Mr. Wood's request is for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install vinyl siding. If the Commission does not believe that they can grant a Certificate of Appropriateness for this project based on the requirements of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, then they can consider a Certificate of Economic Hardship. An application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship would require additional information from Mr. Wood. Attachment DUoUQUE~S CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION PROGR?~~Vt effectivz 1/27/99 LEAD-BASED pAI11rT HAZARD CONTROL PROGRAM FOR ROMEO>~ERS AND RENTAL PROPERTIES z This program provides financial assistance to low- and moderate-income homeowners and rental property owners to reduce lead-based paint hazards in their-r-esidences. Requirements 1. Location - The Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention target area includes census tracts 1,2,5,6, 7.01 and 7.02. ? Income Limits . Owner-occupied property owners must earn no more than 80% of area median income, adjusted for family~size, as follows and not less thaw 90 percent of the units assisted with deferred payment Ioans under this section shall be occupied by a child under the are of six years or shall be units where a child under the age of six years spends a si~ificant amount of time ~zsiting (at least 10% of the child's time). Household Size Maximum Income 80% ofrhe Area :i~fedian 1 S24,4~0 Income based on ~ 527,90 family side ~ 531,40 4 _ 534,90 ~ 537 70 :. - - 6 , . 540,50 ~ 543,30 8+ 546,1 ~0 - For def rred payment loans made to assist rental housing, at least ~0 percent ofthe units must be occupied by or made available to families with incomes at or below ~0 percent of the area median il-tcome level and the remain.inQ units shall be occupied or made available to families with incomes at or below 80 percent of the area median income level, and in all cases the landlord must give priority i1Z renting units for not less than 3 years following the completion of lead abatement activities, to frrnilies with a child under the age ofsiY years, -over - i=ity of pubuque Health & Housing Services Departments 130 Central .~ivenue Dubuque, Iowa 52001 •3656 • (319y 5S9.1724 • (319) 539-42•t-1 FAY Household Size IVtaximum Income 1 516,300 .SO% ojthe 2 517,600 rhea ,ifediaR 3 519,660 Ineorne based on 4 521,360 farrrlly sice 6 523,600 6 52.6,360 7 527, I00 sT s2s,s6o 3. Fli~~iole Lead Hazard Reduction Activities ~i'here the lead-based paint has been identi:Zed, it is considered a "hazard" under the following four `conditions: a. T"ne paint surface is peeling, chippi.*tg, ctacl-ing or otherwise deteriorated. b. Tne paint is "accessible" to children under age 6, or is a "chewable" surface, meaning it is within 5 f et of the floor or ground. These are protruding su.-faces, such as window sills, stair treads, and handrails and spindles/balusters. c. The paint is an "impact" surface, mean~g it is located where it may be easily chipped. These are surfaces such as doors, door jambs and stops, baseboards and wall corners that jut into a room. d. The pant is a "friction" surface, meaning ti~at movement creates lead dust. _~L,L LEND HAZARD REDUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE PERFOR~~S.ED BY CERTIFIED R'ORI~RS. Y. These acSivilirS include: a. Removal of paint, to the base mat-rial (substrate). R.-.mount may be done only by chemical stripping, wet scraping (misted s~apiag), wet sanding, scraping with heat gun (with temp below l 110 degrees F.), or sanding or hydro blasting when used with HEP.~ vacuum exhaust NOTE: All paint must be removed only on chewable, impact or friction surfaces. This gcnct3lIy means only 1-LZCh to 4-inch ships of paint must be removed. b. Enclosure, with materials such as paneling or drywal. c. Removal of the woodwork. ~, Deferred Pa}•ment Loam Amounts Up to S6,000 may be made available for lead hazard reduction activities. Eio~sehoid Size ~'taxlmL'!Tl Income 1 ~1j,300 ~0°0 of the 2 ~ 17,j00 Area ~tifedian ~ ~ 19,6j0 Income based on T 521,3j0 faintly si_e j 523,600 6 S2j,3j0 7 527,100 s~ s2s,sso 3. Eli;ible dead R'acard Reductiors activities _y «rhere the lead-based paint has been identified, it is considered a "hazard" under the followi*tg four conditions: a. Tne paint surface is peeling, chipping, cracl'ing or otlhe;~zse deteriorated. b. Tne paint is "accessible" to children under age 6, or is a "chewable" surface, meaning it is within S f et of the floor or ;round. These are pro~uding surfaces, such as window sills, stair treads, and handrails a~-~d spindlesrbalusters. c. Tne paint is an "impact" surface, meaning it is located where it may be easily chipped. These are surfaces such as doors, door jambs and stops, baseboards and wall corners that jut into a room. d. The paint is s "friction" surface, meaning that movement creates lead dust. :IL,L LE.-\D I:i•1Z:L1:.D REDUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE PERFOI2~~LED BY CERTIFIED WORKERS. ~. Thrsc acriti•ities irsclude: ~. Removal of pain[, to the base material (substrate). Removal may be done only by chemical sipping, wet scraping (misted scraping), wet sanding, scraping wZth heat gun (with temp below 1110 degrees F.), or sanding or hydro blasting when used with HEP.~ vacuum exhaust. NOTE::~ll paint m~.:st be removed only oa chewable, impact or fiicrion surfaces. 'This gencra((y means only 1-inch to :-inch strips of paint must be removed. b. Encloser:,, «•ith materials such as paneling or d-ywall. c. Removal of the woodworl. ~. Dcftrrcr! Yn}'rrscnt Laon rlmounls Up to ~Cj,000 may be made availab(c for Iced hazard reduction acri~ities. Planning Srn•icr; Depart:nrnt t~'r;t 13th Strert Dubuque, [o«•a 5'_OO1~So-1 Phony (319) 539-:?l0 Fax (319) 539-z1Y9 THE CITY OF / DuB E June 9, 1999 Tim Wood B & W Properties 550 English Lane Dubuque, IA 52003 RF: Property @ 623-627 Arlington Dear Tim, This letter is intended to provide you with information regarding the application for a certificate of economic hardship. I have attached the section of the Historic Preservation Ordinance which pertains to the process for review for a certificate of economic hardship. This application is reviewed .by the Historic Preservation Commission and I have placed you on the agenda for review at their June 17, 1999 meeting. This meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room B of City Hall (2nd floor -same room as we have previously met). Please review the materials I have sent you and provide any of the information noted in the ordinance which could help you in presenting your request for approval of a certificate of economic hardship. Please submit this information by noon on IVlonday, June 14, 1999. Please call me at 589-4210 if you have any questions regarding this process. Thank you. Sincerely, ~ ~ .~~-- Mark le Assistant Planner attachment Srr~•i<r I`r~,hl~ IntrSrit}' Rr;Pun;ibility Inno~•ation Tram«•urk DESIGN RE~~~i' APPLICaTIOti DATE: L-/9 l9 ~ PRO?ERTY~ Ow~ rER: I ,~r, ~V ~oc~ (`~~ ~i! ~-P~~ i HTSTORICPRESERV:i,T'IOti CO:~'LVIISSIO`i _ Pc-IO; tE: ~~ - ., PROPERTY HISTORIC ADDRESS: - Z~ G~tzl~ ~ ~ DISTRICT: ~~. 1 l~ S-j - ~~L~lLti`fG `J~~ ADDRESS: `J (~,~~.lS~ ~,~N~ `~j Gj~ZCD3 CONTRACTOR: Pi-TONE: DESCRIPTION OF REH.~BILITATION/PR=.SFRVATION WOR.S: EXIST[~'G FEATURE/CONDITION PRO?OSED ~VOR:~ XISTING FE.4TURE/CONDITION I PRO?OSED WORT{ EXISTING FEATUR`/CONDITION ?RO?OScD WORD ~~fATERlALS REQUESTED: ~ .Fiv1~vG~~G ~c~~~~~ 2'G-r7,¢cC ~.ps - PHOTOGR.-~?:?S COLOR S.•~~tPLE DR•~WINGS/?LANS ~~fATcRIAL SA~~IPLE AGcND,-~: PLACED ON _ ~ Il'7I`j~ AGENDA CO;~I~~IlSS[ON ACTION AP?ROVED DENIED TABLED TO NEXT i~1cETI\'GIPL:~C1=D Off! .~GcND:~ •~ ~.~ cindy1his:~rsld.s; cv,L~ 2600 Do~d~o - Suh® 12.9 :: ;;: Dubuqu~~ to 5200.3 . ~ ~ 319/Sb7-5x99 ~. PROPOSAL K~ . r~~' . We hereby submit specificatior3s and esilrrlates for: TIM WOOD 550 ENGLISH LANE DUBUQUE IA 52003 •. RE: 623-627 ARLINGT ON DUBUQUE IA 6/11/9 9 tt . . ;ti: SCRAPE, PRIME BARE WOOD & APPT,Y ONE COAT PAINT IN - -. ~i LEAD SAFE MANNER UNDER HUD GUIDELINES ,$ 15,000.00 REPAIR APPROX 15 SQ WOOD SIDING. COST WILL INCREASE --_- IF -ADDITIONAL ROTTEN ~OOD :'IS DISCOVERED WHILE SCRAPING ~ $ 9000.00 REPLACE APPROX 7 SQ PLYWOOD. SIDING TO MATCH RE- MAINING HOUSE $ 4200.00 2~~t~ ~ s` ,~ ; ;_ >_ ' ' ' ~ • C . C . TIM WOOD ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ ::; .. ~ `' L ;, .. . . WE PROPOSE rwreay to turttistt material and {a,bor-corr~ioie h ~~~a w~ ~a S~~ f« ~ sum ataove noted. Paymern to be made a~ folbws; '-' . AlI material !s guaranteed to be es specfflsd. AU work to be completed h a•workmaNika ntervwr according to standard practices, Arty atterailort of deviaikxy from above specifkatlorta Involvin e t g x ra costs wiu De executed only upon written orders, and w!U became an extra cttarpe aver and above tits esilmata . Ab agroerrtents contingent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our control. Owner to tarry lira tornado , , and outer ncccsssry lnsuranca. Our workQrs ate fully covered by Workrtwn'a Cornpensailort Insurance.' Auitio~ized Signature: ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL' Tate above prices specificatkxts aryl c~i~ys are satistaciory atxi ate twroby accepted. You are auittorized to do ttto work as specified, Payment wi1J be ny~ ~ ~~ ebwe. ., Slgrtature: • ' DaWc~ ;~,,. i~,, ~^r.t ~. ~~~ , ~~ ~~ • `Y .• \• 1 ~. 1~ • 623-627 Arlington Tear off remaining plytivood siding 700 Remove tenant for 2months-Rent-utilities-moving expense 2,000 Remove wood siding in a Lead-safe manner (Al Ames) 6,300 Apply new siding of equal quality of existing siding (Speaker Const.) 23,100 Paint new siding (Speaker Const.} While scaffold is set up-new wood 3.300 -- z- - $35,400 Randy 1~lesch of Crawford Insurance gave me a price using the insurance replacement guide book (~88-1883) $4.9~ per sq. ft. 20,790 This price does not include removing wood, straightening out any bad framing, applying siding up to 4 stories in the air and painting. ~0 yeaz vinyl siding $ 8,820 My labor ~ -2.000 $6,820 Cannot reduce wood siding cost by any significant amount because it has to be done quickly. Vinyl siding, I can do over the next 2 summers in my spare time. Other costs that may be incurred by replacing siding- if there is any insulation in the walls, it may fall out. Some window wraps are caulked to siding and 1t may ruin some wraps. Soffit may have to be removed. 623-627 Arlington 1997 annual gross income 1997 Operating & ~Viaintainance Expenses Advertising Utilities Legal & License Vfaintainance 1997 annual debt service Annual Cash Flow 1998 annual gross income 1998 Operating & iVfaintainance Expenses Advertising Utilities Legal & License Maintainance 1998 Annual debt service Annual Cash Flow Balance on mortgage $20,100 $8,330 22 459 36 1.300 $1,SI7 $4,472 $2,061 6,383 8~ 92 M 27 1.100 $1,304 $4,456 $623 ,~ r ~/ 623-b27 Arlington Strip Siding Strip siding (Al Ames) Price to paint old wood 2 coats Price to patch rotten wood Approx. Approx. 524,00 4,000 9.000 $37,500 Terry Sullivan of the lead department of City Housing said that Al Ames bid is fair and falls into his price guidelines. I spoke with Jim at Sarris Painting, he is trying to get completely out of the lead stripping business because of all the lead regulations which drive up the price so much. Al Ames is the most experienced lead removal contractor in town. In speaking to him and several other lead removal contractors, it would be very foolish to give a firm bid on something that has so many variables without ~ ving yourself a huge margin of error. March 23, 1999 AL AMES Lead Removal " 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner, haul away siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6,300.00 Price is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump sidin~in their trailer at no charge if they do not, then the price will be significantly higher. Tenant will need to be removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around $7.00 per sq. ft.=$700 per square x 35 = $24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Wiil charge to strip--$40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not incuide repairing siding or painting Tenant v~rill need to be removed from residence approx. 7 fo 9 weeks. SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION (81~) 747-6023 47~ 1 N. ~iENOLIINEE RD. EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 6102 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS:~7~ English Lane CITY:Dub.Ia. X2003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape- recommend replacing or siding over JOB WORK ORDER Date of Order: March 22, 1999 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: -Apply 4 inch wood lap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- $32~ per square x 42 sq.= $13,60 Labor to replace wood siding- $22~ per square x 42 sq. 9,460 Apply one coat primer and 1 c~ogat paint- Labor.and material 3,300 p_ . _ 11,c/~ ~Z,~~~~~v-w`~~.c~ ~JL• $26,400 Gam' Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house ~~Tap to entire exterior siding Labor and Material 8,820 DATE COMPLETED: WORK ORDERED BY: TOT.aL, M~TERI_~L.S: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL A:~10UNT: ~~ RENO CONSTRUCTION I 1600 Rhamberg Avenue ~ I Dubuque, Iowa 52Uci1 (319)556-4503 Street Job Name i + Cit •, State, Zip Job Location t c Architect Date - of PI ans Job Phone ~ Proposal Submitte~ To Phone Date - C c rti? LL~.r-~~ ~~ We Hereby Submit Specifications and Estimates For : i --- C - --f-- _ ~~1~ t ~ ~lC 111 C; r~,ti~~ ~ti ~. 1 ,=, ~~ ~~ ~"~ ~- CC_ c ~~TC ~t~~~-- C~ G~~t I'''1~S tJe propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of dol 1 ars (5 S~> [ k?J ~ 1 Payment to be made as follows I --- - .. _ut~ t t ut t_lL..!!~L 'ttc; avow prices, specifications, and onditions arc satisfactory and are hereby ccc~~tcd. 1'ou arc authorized to do the ~orH as pccificd, f`ayment will be made as outlined above. n,rr, ^1 ----~--- Signature Signature ~~ Authorized Signature ~~ ~~ ~'' 7~ ~ ~ Nate: This oposal may be withdrawn b us if t accepted within ,~ ~. ~~ ~ days_ DI.IBIaQI.IE~S CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PFZEVENTION PROGEZAivi Mr Tim Wood c/o B 8c tiV Properties 575 English Lane Dubuque, IA 52001 - -~E: 623-627 Arlington This letter is in response to your request as to what requirements the Lead Hazard Reduction Program would have fvr this property. Dubuque's Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program requires the removal of lead hazards from the home. ~ The major areas of concern are deteriorated lead-based paint, friction, impact, and accessible surfaces. The program allows three methods of_ remediating these hazards and tit e_y_~ are striDOinQ_ enclosing. and component replacement. Please contact this office if you have further questions concerning Dubuque's program, our number is 319-589-1724. Thank you for your interest in our program a11d we look forward to working with you on your project. Sincerely,-'• -~ ~ - y • Terry, Sulliva Lead Inspector - Crey of Dubuque Health & Housing Services Departments 1805 Ccnlral,wenuc Ou~uque. Icnva 5 2001-3 55 6 • (319) 589.1724 • (319 589••11.1.1 FAX r~~ DEh'NIS L. BAUhtHDVER Auto-Life-Health-Home and Business 2515 DODGE AT DEVON DUBUQUE, IA 52003 PHONE (319) 582-1856 FAX (319) 555-0989 June O1, 1999 B & W PROPERTIES -- 575 English Ln. Dubuque, is 52003-8755 June 01,1999 Re: LEAD BASE PAINT REMOVAL: DEAR SIRS/h1ADAM: In reply to your inquiry regarding removal of Lead Base Paint.. Our view point is: Removal of Lead Base Paint should be done according to OSHA AND HUD guidelines. Sincer ~„r _nnis L. mh ver STATE FARM AGE~7T 623-627 Arlineton Principal, Interest, Tares & Insurance monthly payment Payment on new wood siding 53,400 @ 81/2 % o~~er 1~ yrs Regular maintainance cost last 2 % yTS.. 1997= S 1,100 1998= 1,300 -1999= 2.00 year to date 54,900 divided by 30 months Additional maintainance cost to paint ne~v wood per month Rents= S29~ + 3~0 = Deficit every month Scrape, prune, paint house every 8 years over ~0 years= 6 x 57,000= 542,000. iviay cause damage to window wraps and soffits. 5370.00 3=19.00 163.00 70.00 592.00 645.00 5307.00 623-627 Arlington We paid 527,600 in tifarch 1993 27,600 36.400 62,900 This bldg. would not be worth $62,900 Current tax assessment is $50.100, ibis evil[ be protested at the next meeting. We protested the following properties last year and this year and had the values lowered. The reason we did not on Arlington is because when I called for the value, I was given $26,060 and we just found out that it is only for one side. 2606 Broadway - 7-plex 1091 Center Pl. -Duplex 3 ~ 7 Kaufman -Duplex 1025 Bluff - Tri-plex 755 University- Duplex 2741-2743 Jackson- Duplex 729 Lincoln -Duplex 1476-78 Jackson- Duplex i~ 623-627 Arlington Assessed Value- $50,100-(This value is too high and will be protested using the following comparables.) Wood siding 2 bedroom-side-by-side Separate Utilities Lot- 50x100 Year built- 1900 1,096 sq.ft. each floor= 2,192 sq.ft. Rents- $295 + 350= $645 422 W. Locust Ass. Val.- $57,620 Brick 2 bdr.- up and down ____ Sep. Util. Lot- 39x98 Yr. blt.- 1876 1,096 sq.ft. each floor= 2,192 sq.ft. Rents-300 + 275= $575 SOLD 9/98 for $38,000 2128-2130 White Ass. Val.- $27,820 Wood Siding 2 bdr. side-by-side Sep., Uti1. Lot- 35x91 Yr. Blt.- 1900 1,120 sq.ft-main, 784- up = 1,904 sq.ft. Rents- 205 + 295 = $500 SOLD 7/98 for 25,000 2757 Broadway Ass. Val.- $49,850 Alum. Siding 2 bdr.- up ~ down Owner pays heat 6 water Lot- 50x110 Yr. blt.- 1900 896 sq.ft. each floor= 1,792 sq.ft. Rents- $325 + 325= $650 SOLD 7/98 for $42,000 735 Kirkwood Ass. Val- $35,120 Brick 2 bdr. upb down Sep. Util. Lot- 103x60 Yr. blt- 1856 700 sq. ft, main fl. + 396 up = 1,096 sq. ft. Rents- $275 + 275= $550 SOLD 12%98 for $34,000 / `f rl.saso Area:o80 Aad: a22 w Locust sr clty:U9u ilp:~iuut C C nn AcCl: Pro):Y Ptrlod: Zonlnq:R•2A /Unlts:2 Pkq: X52,5 v 0 U+C Rents:6900 Lot Slzt: Pendlnq;Y BA 3.ON Otner: SgFt:UD:1096 uatn:1096 LL: 1096 1976 Grosa:6900 Const:9K UN Ru 8A 9T11 Ht.T AC LSE OEP REttT Terms:CSH EXP (nsur:150 Yr$1C:1976 1 5 2 I.0 GFA 0 0 0 300 Legal:LOt 2 OF uanaq: Laund: 2 5 2 I.0 GFA 0 0 0 275 1 OF 2 CITY l0T Taxes: 924 RtTyp:AS 3 670 ua1nC:414 HT•Pd:T a POS7:Ila vacnt:4la wt.Pd:T 5 Cwners:RICHESCN Utlls: E1.Pd:T 6 N OELO Other; 7 Pn: TOTAL EXP:2002 OttSce: OUGGAN REALTYSASSO Pn:556.2525 Key:Y t+Ei INC:4898 Agent:HINGTGEN, OORIS Ph:556.1092 Lock:O Remarks: MAKE OFFERf HISTORIC BRICK ON CORNER 10T. NeEOS COSUETICS. CROWN -tOLOINGS . TOUCH OF VICTORIAN, POTENTIAL uAiN FLOOR Ut+fi COULD BE ] BEOROCuS. SEPARATE UTILITIES. • Information Believed Accurate But Not Guaranteed 0:011: 9 Oaya: 0 525,Oi9 Typ:CONV at•7865 Area:080 Add: 2129 wt+ITE 30 C1ty:080 LSp:52001 dd~~ Agt•BECHEN, ViCKT Date:07/31/98 Act1:Y ProJ:O Perlod:1992oninq:R•2A NUnlts:2 Pkq;OFF •p 29,9 OQ !NC Rents: 6000 Lot Slze:75x91 Pending:Y 8A 3.0 Ocher:0 SgFt:Up:7Ba uain:952 LL:364 1900 ~ Gross: 6000 Const:w UN AM On 9TH IIC.T nc LSE UEI' aEMT ierms:eSH EXP Insur: 36] Yr81t: t900 1 5 2 1 CFA U 0 50 205 Ltqal: lot i d uanaq:0 Laund: 2 5 2 1 GFA 0 0 295 295 Lot 2 L.11. Lang to:es:778 AtTyp:AS 3 - worthy ualnt:0 HT.Pd:i a Poss:AG Vacni:0 Wt.Pd:T 5 Owners:Herrlq, Ut11a:0 E1.Pd: i 6 P1 Other:0 7 TOTAL EXP: 1141 Otflct:CENtURY 21•CONSOLI Ph:583.3576 Key:O '~ NET INC:4859 Agtnt:FELDcRUAN, JEANE Pn:582.8485 lock:0 t, Rtmarks:2130 TENANT 4A[NTAINS GAOUNOS. RENTAL INCpu E FOR '97 IS 56,000. COULD ~•° .-. $E HIGHER. POSSIBLE LAUNDRY [N BASEUEttr.2a HOUR NOTICE TO SNOW 2130 OWNS i'~ ~~~ a+• ~ ~ APPIA INC'e5, NEW AOOF SHINGLES G000 RENTER • Information 9t11eved Accurate But Not Guaranteed ' 81.7295 Area:O$0 Add: 2757 3ROAOwAY C1ty:090 21p:52001 Acii:Y ProJ:O Period:YEAZoninq:R•1 ~Untts:2 Pk q: OFF ~4 7 500 INC Rents:7800 lot SSzt:50:110 Pending:Y 8A 3.ON Other:0 SgFt:Up:896 ualn:996 LL:O 1900 Grosa:7800 Const:AL,AS UN ptJ BR 9TH Ht.T AC LSE OEP R"e NT Ttrms:CSH EXP Insur:317 Yr81t:1900 I Legal:LOt 33 uanaq:0 Laund: 2 4 2 1 Own 0 0 Y 325 Soutn Park M111 Taxes: 1072 RtTyp: 3 5 2 1 Own O Y 0 325 ualnt:0 HT.Pd: 0 a Poss:AG Vacnt: t wt.Pd: 0 5 Owners:MAt+IEY, Uti1s:1980 E1.Pd:T 5 Ph•556.6601 Other:0 7 • TOTAL EXP:3654 Otflee:CENTURY 21•CONSOLI Ph:58J•35)6 Key:Y NET INC:4146 Agent:uASSEY, ROGER Ph:583.9051 Lock:O Remarks:2 ENCLOSED PORCHES, 2 STOVES, Z REFRIG.,GAS BOILER•1994. WASHER/DRYER FOR OOwN UNIT OttLY OFF STREET PARKI1tG FOR 4 CARS, NEED TO INCREASE RENTS. OWNER PAYS WATER • Information Belitved Accurate gut Not Guaranteed - SOLO:Otf: 9 Days: 73 Agt:uASSEY, ROGER i 7 ~~~r• j ~---- 542,000 Typ:C Oate:07/02/98 •ta , -- 735 KIRKWOCO C 1cy:D00 ZSp:52001 __-_ 34 000 5 Days:99i t 534,000 Typ:CFO rl•1931 Area:OBO Add: q: xUnlta:2 t1:0 ProJ:Y Ptrlod: Zonln R2 P•nding A Pk9~ :Y , BA 3.ON 6 i0L0:0t A : L:BISPINO, HERBER ~ Datt:12/04199 ~.._,,;-r-;,^- c iNC Rents:B100 LOL S1:!:103X ua1n:700 LL :525 EP RENT 105 Terns: ~ ~ , t t~~))~ J ~~ ' _ _ ~~' Other: 3:9100 Conat: OK UN Pu 9A Bill Ilt.f SH AC LSE O 0 0 0 275 Lega1:L9,uC• : t~ ~ y,, Y 4 ~ u ~~ ~ GroS EXP Insur 200 a 2 1.0 G Yr$1t:1956 ~ 4 2 1 0 GFA d: 0 0 0 275 GRATH'S SUB. OU8tJ0UE, IA ••< {,.~ •~ ~ L y° ~ ',.. t I q; -lana Tates:58a Laun 0 RtTyD:R 3 0 Pd:T 4 0 0 0 U 0 0 Poaa: AG Ownera:JAUES/J. •+ !( " "'~`~ • uaint:4e6 HT. 0 Pd: T 5 0 0 0 t1 , • ~'-' '' i Vacnt:400 wt. 0 6 Pd:T EI p 0 0 0 Pn:34834a9 ~' "t • '•'t~ t' r -- ~ N Other: f00 0 . 7 w11 Otilce:9I5PING REALLY, PIOi:556.0820 2609 Key:YES Lock•0 ' 1 ~~~~~~' t 'Ei)Ll1`1 • ~ ~ ~ TOTAL ESP:I770 T INC:6J30 Agent'BtSPINC, HERBERT O Pn:580. R E U 5 I~ ~~~ i~ NE Remark s:90TH A PAR Tt1ENT5 PEOECORATEO a RENTE K Z NOt w0 REFRIGER 8 5TOVE5 FURNISHEO TORS C~r'fa~,"' ~~ ~ -`-~ ' ~ '~' ~~ ~'S~~ HEATERS.f IREPLACE IN LOw£R VN IT ODES EN FRAME PORCH (152 SO.Ff.) d Accurate gut Not Guaranteed ' • • ~'+%•% •~} WITH UNITS.OP Information 9elle~e / •~ MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Wednesday, May 20, 1999 5:00 p.m. City Hall. Conference Room B 50 W. 13th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Kringle, Commissioners Greenfield, Terry Mozena, Jim Gibbs and Pam Bradford.; Staff members Mark Noble and Laura Carstens and Local Governments Coordinator Kerry McGrath from the State Historical Society of Iowa. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. New commission members Mozena and Gibbs were welcomed, and introductions were made. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying that the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. MINUTES: Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Kringle to approve the minutes of March 11, 1999; motion passed unanimously. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford to approve the minutes of March 25, 1999; motion passed unanimously. Staff noted that a transcript of the March 11, 1999, meeting was included in the Commission's packets, as requested. DESIGN REVIEW Address: 84 Main St Applicant: Steven Gudenkauf District: N/A (required for Facade Grant) Project: Renovate Store Front Steven Gudenkauf, 84 Main Street, reviewed his proposal to renovate the facade of the building at 84 Main Street, known as the Old Main Hotel. Applicant has submitted a request for a facade renovation grant which includes the following: 1) installation of an awning over the south half of the building, 2) removal of the fire escape from the building facade, 3) replacement of two existing doorways and windows on the first floor of the building, 4) replacement of an existing garage door with a new garage door that will have an appearance of an old carriage garage, and 5) new raised wood panels above and below the windows and doorways. The applicant stated that he has started this project and was told by Community and Economic Development Director Jim Burke to continue the project, and that a grant can be made retroactive if approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. The grant is available to those in the tax increment financing district, which includes this property. This property is not part of the Old Main Historic District; however, due to the facade grant request, the Historic Preservation Commission must review and approve the proposal. The Commission and applicant discussed the facade renovation plans that have already occurred and what is to happen with the remainder of the facade. The applicant proposed duplicating the facade on the north half as it looks on the south half, which will include installing one large and one small window with raised wood panels below and above the ~vindo~vs. To the north of those tvvo windows, he noted there is an existing garage door that will be slightly modified to take on the appearance of carriage doors, although it will act as a standard new garage door. The Commission and applicant discussed in great detail what the facade will look like and what it looked like in the past. Staff noted there is no .photo documentation showing the facade of this building, which has caused some difficulty in knowing how to restore the facade to its original state. The applicant discussed what he has uncovered in his restoration up to this point as to what he believes the facade might have looked like. __The Commission felt that the smaller window between the garage door and the large window vas at one time an entrance and they would like to see that entry recreated. They also would like to see raised wood panels above and below the windows and the garage door that will replicate what has been done on the south half of this building. The Commission also discussed whether an awning should be constructed over the entire north half of this building or just above the entrance to the north half of the building. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford to approve the renovation on the storefront with the conditions that there be a new entrance similar to the two existing entrances and that raised wood panels above the windows, entryway and the garage door be constructed in a similar fashion to those on the south half of the building. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Greenfield and Mozena; Nay: Kringle and Gibbs. Design Review Address: 023-627 Arlington St. Applicant: Tim Wood District: W. 11th St. Project: Install vinyl siding Tim Wood, owner of the property for approximately 7-8 years, provided price estimates for replacing the existing wood and for installing vinyl siding. The applicant stated the condition of the wood is in poor shape, and that the paint includes lead. He stated that in several locations he has nailed tin over the deteriorated wood siding. His concern with removing the lead paint and repairing the wood is that the side of the house is approximately 45 feet high thus making it very difficult to contain lead paint flakes and dust. The applicant and Commissioners revie4ved the bids on the project options. The Commission asked whether this house had been tested for lead paint. The applicant responded that testing had been done by the City Housing Department. The Commission asked the applicant numerous questions on alternative ways to renovate this house, addressing the extent of wood that is in disrepair or rotted and the extent of the lead paint on the house. The Commission stated they would like to see a cost of repairing and painting as they are concerned that putting vinyl siding on the house is just covering up a problem that may require further review. The Commission also asked that they be provided a condition report as to how much of the wood is rotted. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Kringle, to table this design review and let the applicant return with one additional estimate to strip the paint and repaint the house, and that he provide two estimates to repair the rotted areas with the second request to include the percentage of the house that is in bad shape (provide square footage amount). Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Kringle, Bradford, Greenfield, Mozena & Gibbs; Nay: None. ITEMS FROM COMMISSION Staff introduced Kerry McGrath, Local Government Coordinator from the State Historical ---Society of Iowa in Des Moines. She suggested ways to consult with other communities on how to revise ordinances since the City Council has requested the Historic Preservation Commission review and revise its ordinance. McGrath stated that the Commission needs to be clear and concise with the ordinance revision. She suggested that the Commission might develop a set of guidelines, maybe different for each district, such that if amended in the future, they would not require City Council approval of that change. The ordinance needs to be clear in determining the character-identifying features of the building and that one option that could help the Commission with cases such as the project at 84 Main Street, is to develop a generic storefront guideline that should be followed throughout the Historic District. This would help eliminate questions and uncertainty of the Commission, and the applicants would be more aware of what would be required of them to do. McGrath also stated the Commission needs to build support and to make aware incentives and get information to the property owners that there are programs, local and state, to help rehab their properties. The Commission stated they would like to address the neglect issue, possibly by proactively providing letters that inform property owners in historic districts of the rehab programs when it is observed that there are some problems to their house. This would assist the Commission in the situation where if the property owner does not address those needs and later comes before the Commission to remove or replace historical components of the building, that the Commission has previously addressed that concern and would make their decision easier. Besides addressing neighborhood buildings through neglect, they also mentioned that in some neighborhoods, the City should make more of a commitment to neighborhoods through lighting, trees and other civic improvements that might inspire property owners to also make improvements. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:00 P.rV1. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ lr/3 /~i ark Nobl Adopted Assista tanner MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Thursday, June 3, 1999 5:00 p.m. Conference Room B, City Hall 50 W. 13th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Duaine Greenfield, Pam Bradford, Terry Mozena and Jim Gibbs; Staff Members Mark Noble and Laura Carstens. ABSENT: None. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:07 p.m AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented ~an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. MINUTES: The minutes of the May 20, 1999 meeting were approved as submitted. DESIGN REVIEW/623-827 ARLINGTON/WOOD W. 11TH STREET DISTRICT: Application of Tim Wood to install vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District (tabled from previous meeting). Applicant Tim Wood reviewed the issues from the previous meeting, at which time he was asked to provide additional estimates for scraping, painting and replacing existing rotted wood. Mr. Wood explained he would need to remove the tenants when he scrapes the exterior wood and would lose revenue. In addition, he would lose 510,000 worth of grant money from the Housing Department, as they want the exterior completely covered, wholly stripped and removed or replaced in full. He explained that if he has to scrape or strip completely, that it would prove to be too expensive. He stated that there are a large number of guidelines for contractors to follow which makes it difficult to hire someone who can do this work. His concern also was that his insurance agent recommended that he follow the guidelines completely to insure as little liabii"rty as possible. Mr. Woods indicated that in order to qualify for Housing grant money of 56,000 per unit, he needs to remove all lead paint from the inside as well as the outside of the structure. Based on his past experience, he is anticipating 56-7,000 per unit on the inside alone which does not include relocation of tenants. He said the units rent for approximately 5360 per unit plus clean-up costs, which he estimates at approximately 5800. The Commission asked how long he has owned this property, to which he replied he has owned it for approximately six or seven years. He stated he did some spot-paint work about two years ago. He said the area where there is some tin covering the existing wood was on the house before he bought it. The Commission asked if he was aware that he was in a historic district when he bought the home, and he replied that he was informed. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 2 Commissioner Greenfield noted that he does not think that vinyl siding is appropriate material for this project. He inquired that if siding were to be placed over the existing building, would it be feasible to go back later and remove the siding and expose the wood again. Commissioner Gibbs stated that by covering the wood siding, they are not really solving the problem, rather just doing a quick fix of the real issue. Mr. Wood stated that it would be foolish to strip the wood siding, and indicated it should be removed and replaced with new because a large percentage of it is in bad shape. The Commission and applicant discussed one bid of S26,000 to replace the wood, plus another 514,000 for the inside work. The applicant stated this would add a great cost to this property which he originally bought for 523,000. Commissioner Mozena expressed his belief that maintaining the home over the past seven years would have helped reduce the number of issues that the applicant is presently facing on this property and would have alleviated some of those financial concerns. The applicant said he believes that the problems were there before he bought the property, and that to spend 530-40,000 on this property is not economically feasible. The applicant and Commission discussed different design options and costs to renovate according to those designs. The Commission expressed their concern with the lack of maintenance over the past several years. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford, to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented. The motion was denied by the following vote: Aye -None; Nay: Bradford, Greenfield, Mozena, Kringle and Gibbs. Commissioners then indicated that they would consider an application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship, and asked Mr. Wood to contact staff for the application requirements. ITEMS FROM PUBLIC: Mary Beth Wigginton, 195 Alpine, asked to speak with the Commission. She said she is a neighbor of the Comptons, and stated they bought their house in 1994 or 1995. She stated she believes the Historic Preservation Commission is doing a disservice to the community. She believes the Commission needs to address the issue on lead paint quickly as there is concern to her children and the Comptons' children as welt as numerous other people in the City. Mrs. Wigginton stated they are approximately 12 feet from the Comptons' house, and she believes there is no feasible way to tent that residence and contain the lead dust during the removal of the lead paint. The Commission and Mrs. Wigginton discussed this issue and ways to properly remove lead paint. , N1rs. Wigginton stated more information should be presented to the property otivner up front so that they know what they are facing when they buy a home in a historic preservation district. She suggested they provide regulations to the property owners through a Realtor or provide information to the property owners at the public library. The Commission stated that their directive is to preserve history and retain the beauty of the city. The Commission and Mrs. Wigginton discussed putting together a manual to help new homeowners understand the processes they ~1linutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 3 - need to follow, both for removing lead based paint and also with regulations they must follow tivhen they live in a historic preservation district. She said the manual could also provide information on funding that is available to help fix buildings in these instances. DESIGN REVIEW/195 ALPINEIKARLE WIGGINTON/LANGWORTHY DISTRICT: Application of Kar1e Wigginton to install seamless steel soffit at 195 Alpine Street in the Langworthy Historic Preservation District. Kade_ and Mary Beth Wigginton reviewed their proposal to install aluminum soffit and fascia, stating that presently there exists a plywood soffit which is covered on the end by a 1 x 4. They said that the house was stuccoed in the early 1980s; previous to that, it was wood sided. They said they would like to remove or cover the plywood, as there is considerable rot and the wood does not provide vents. Their concern with removing the plywood is the cost, which is approximately S4,800. By removing the wood, they felt some of the existing stucco work would be destroyed, with an additional cost to replace it. If they were to place wood right over the existing wood, they felt they would be adding a considerable amount of weight to that part of the structure, which is already sagging. They said they would like to install aluminum soffit and have received a bid from ABC Seamless for approximately 51,600. They said that price is about a third of the price of wood, and also would not add additional weight to the structure. They stated that since this is not a decorative soffit, it is not a very important design element to match exactly. They said they would attempt to match the color, but their concern is its present deteriorated condition. Commissioner Gibbs commended the Wiggintons for their past work and renovations. He asked it"they had consulted with contractors, which Wiggingtons replied they had and that wood is three times the cost. Commissioner Mozena stated he didn't see any value in the existing wood, as rt is basically plywood. Both Commissioners Gibbs and Mozena asked if they looked at other design options with an architect. The applicants stated they are concerned that the work will be delayed and will not be completed this year if they research options with an architect. Commissioner Mozena explained that it seems appropriate that the Commission be given some time to review this request and look at the options, as this is the first time they have seen this project. The applicant and Commission discussed the cost to do this project. The applicants stated they cannot justify the additional cost of wood. The Commission asked that they consult again tivith architects who could give them different design suggestions. The Commission and applicants also discussed the sample aluminum soffit that the applicants had brought to the meeting. They discussed researching 3" wide metal panels, as that would be more in line with what probably existed originally on this property. Commissioners indicated that if they could not find a comparably priced 3" panel, then the Commission would reconsider the proposed panel at their next meeting. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 4 Motion by Kringle, seconded by Bradford, to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for 3" wide metal panel soffit. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye -Kringle, Bradford, Greenfield and Mozena; Nay -Gibbs. DESIGN REVIEW/432 BLUFFlKYLE COONEYlCATHEDRAL DISTRICT: Application of Kyle Cooney to install a permanent sign at 432 Bluff Street in the Cathedral Historic Preservation District. Thy applicant reviewed the proposed sign request, noting where the sign will be placed. He stated that the sign will project off the front of the building, will be approximately 4' x 1 '/' in area and will have a bracket that will be fastened to the building. The Commission and the applicant reviewed the location of the proposed sign noting that it will be located on the southern portion of the building, as the building owner is going to be installing a porch on the north hatf of the building in the near future. Motion by Kringle, seconded by Greenfield to approve the request. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye -Kringle, Greenfield, Mozena, Gibbs and Bradford; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/475 LORAS BOULEVARD/HEARTLAND HOUSING 1NITIATIVEITIM CRABB/W. '11TH STREET DISTRICT• Application of Heartland Housing Initiative, represented by Tim Crabb, to install vinyl siding and soffit at 475 Loras Boulevard in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. The applicant reviewed the proposal stating they are having difficulty finding someone who can repair the slate and may have to locate non-asbestos slate siding replace it with. He noted that the existing siding is slate that contains both asbestos and lead paint. The applicant stated that this material is not original to the property and that they believe the original structure and several additions used clap board, stucco, brick, and asphalt shingles under the existing slate siding. They are looking into the Lead Paint Abatement Program, which would give them some money to repair this work; however, they are looking at a cost of approximately 548,000 to remove and make improvements inside and outside this property, excluding the removal of the slate siding. NOTE: Commissioner Bradford left at 6:45 p.m. The Commission talked about the historical significance of the structure and inquired about what material would be appropriate. The Commission discussed meeting with the applicant at the site to look at the layers that are underneath the slate siding, and arrangements were made for meetings on Tuesday, June 8, at 5:15 p.m. and on Thursday June 10, at 5:00 p.m. at the site to review what other materials are under the existing slate siding. Motion by Kringle, seconded by Mozena, to table this item to the June 17th meeting. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye -Kringle, Mozena, Gibbs and Greenfield; Nay -none. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page ~ PROCESS FOR REVIEW/UPDATE OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: Star Member Carstens discussed the process suggested by staff for review and update of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, as referred by the City Council to the Commission. She said the ordinance is being reviewed by the Community and Economic Development Department, Legal and Planning Services staff. Staff Member Carstens reviewed the process and options available to the Commission. Based on input from City Council, City staff and citizens, she said staff believe that the Commission should consider the following issues: 1) revision of the appeal process, 2) options that should be available to applicants, 3) a clearer definition of economic hardship, 4) the-issue of economic hardship for single family home ownership, 5) addressing problems with the existing ordinance tivhich are causing conflicts, and 6) what limitations are placed on the Ordinance by the State Code. The Commission discussed the process and steps that could be followed to address these issues. Staff Member Carstens noted that City staff have begun problem-solving steps by reviewing historic preservation ordinances from other cities as 4vell as incentives used by other cities. She noted that staff are looking at ways to streamline the current ordinance, reviewing court cases for definitions of economic hardship and reviewing the Iowa Code pertaining to historic preservation. Staff suggested meeting with City Council in a work session to test the process and get direction, clarify problems opportunities and discuss goals for historic preservation. After meeting with the City Council, she suggested that a task force be created which could include existing Commissioners, property otivners in historic districts, contractors who work on district properties, a representative from the Dubuque County Historical Society and a representative from Dubuque ~~1ain Street Ltd. Staff ~~lember Carstens noted that non-voting members on the task force could be Laura Carstens, Mark Noble, Pam tilyhre and Tim O'Brien, with a facilitator of this process. She said duties or goals of this task force would be to review data, conduct focus group meetings, develop recommendations for revisions and incentives, meet with the commission to share the information, test proposals and then meet tivith the Council. She said staff also felt focus groups should be formed tivhich represent neighborhood organizations, residents and property owners in historic districts, contractors and building supply businesses. She said additional steps would be to survey design review applicants and past and current Historic Preservation Commission members to identify perceptions and problems and to review and respond to new changes and incentives. Sha also recommends a survey of City staff in various departments, and obtaining input assistance from the State Historic Preservation Office. After compiling all this information and conducting these meetings, then modification and ordinance amendment could be brought to the City Council for discussion at a tivork session and later, adoption. Tl~a Commission felt that this vas an appropriate process, and that a work session with City Council needs to be scheduled. Staff will prepare a le±ter to the City Council from the Commission raquesti!ig a work session and confirmation of the process. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 6 ITEMS FROM COMMISSION: The Commission asked how other City commissions operate. Staff Member Carstens explained the Zoning Board of Adjustment is similar to this commission, in terms of their applicants. She noted that the Board is different with respect to appeals of Board decisions, which must be made to District Court. She also explained the Zoning Advisory Commission is an advisory body that makes recommendations to the City Council. She recommended that commissioners attend meetings of the Board and Commission to see how a formal meeting is run. !TENS FROM STAFF: Staff Member Carstens suggested that the Commission limit design reviews to their second meeting of each month (on the third Thursday), and use their first meeting of each month (on the first Thursday) as work sessions to focus on the review and update of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The Commission agreed with this schedule, to begin in July. Staff Member Noble noted that training on historic preservation rehabilitation standards is scheduled for Tuesday, June 22, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the Library. Staff reviewed the presenters, and asked for input on potential issues to be addressed. Commissioners Mozena, Gibbs, and Kringle stated they will attend that meeting. Commissioner Greenfield ,who was unable to attend, asked if it would be possible to have this training session videotaped or audiotaped for his review at a later date or if the materials could be provided for his review. Staff Member Noble will contact Commissioner Bradford as to her availability for the training. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m c~ (~ ~ ~9~ Adopted Respectfully submitted, MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, June 17, 1999 5:00 p.m. City Hall, Conference Room B 50 W. 13th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle, Commissioners Duaine Greenfield, Terry Mozena, Jim Gibbs and Pam Bradford; Staff member Mark Noble. ASSENT: None. -CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying that the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. MINUTES: Minutes of the June 3, 1998 were approved as submitted. DESIGN REVIEW/475 LORAS BOULEVARD/CRABB/W. 11TH STREET DISTRICT: Application of Tim Crabb, Heartland Housing Initiative, to install vinyl siding and soffit at 475 Loras Boulevard in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District (tabled from previous 'meeting). Tim Crabb, representative for Heartland Housing Initiative, thanked those Commissioners that were able to visit the site and observe what types of siding materials are located on this building. The Commission and applicant discussed the different types of siding found at this property. The applicant stated that although it was not discovered on the exterior, he /~~ believes that brick is also included on this structure. He said that where the outer slate siding has been removed to view what is underneath, the Commission and applicant found asphalt roofing as a siding material as well as stucco, wood siding, and the existing slate. The applicant stated the garage will be removed as previously approved as well as a small addition on the rear. The Commission questioned that if vinyl were approved, would the slate be removed. The applicant stated that would be the case. Commissioner Mozena inquired that if an appropriate siding material was found during the removal of the slate, would they keep that exposed. The applicant stated that the primary concern (if wood is found below the slate) is that it probably contains lead which would require removal and additional expense. The applicant stated they would be satisfied if the Commission were to approve a certain color, width and style of vinyl siding. He also stated his concern that there is lead on the slate as well as the wood Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 1999 Page 2 underneath the slate, and that they would just paint over it and drop out of the Lead Paint Abatement Program if they are denied the vinyl siding option. The Commission discussed vinyl siding as not being a viable option. One of the Commissioner's stated he would rather see steel siding, which he feels is a more appropriate substitute material. -~,4otion by Bradford, seconded by Greenfield to approve vinyl siding. The motion was denied by the following vote: Aye: Gibbs; Nay: Bradford, Greenfield, Mozena and Kringle. DESIGN REVIEW/623-627 ARLINGTON/WOOD/W. 11TH STREET DISTRICT: Application of Tim Wood to install vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District (tabled from previous meeting). The applicant, Tim Wood, introduced his sister, Vicki Bechen, who is a part owner of B&W Properties, which owns the property. He reviewed bids and documents that were required as part of the application for economic hardship, including appraisals of this property, the assessed value of this property and comparable appraisals of properties similar in size and location. Additionally, he reviewed the financial records of operating and maintenance expenses of this property for the past several years. He also discussed the proposed costs to renovate this house, with options including stripping and painting the existing wood, replacing the wood with new wood, and installing vinyl siding over the existing wood siding. Staff Member Noble noted that some of these materials were just presented to the Commission tonight due to the short time frame between staff advising the applicant of what would be required to provide to the Commission and the actual meeting date. The Commission and applicant reviewed these materials in detail as well as the sections of the ordinance pertaining to the certificate of economic hardship process. The Commission noted that the property was purchased in 1993 and that one bid was for stripping, painting and replacing the rotted wood, which would address some of the concerns but would still leave lead paint on the remaining wood siding. They also reviewed the bid which was for completely replacing the woodwork. The Commission discussed with the applicant the figures for renovation as defined by the Lead Paint Abatement Program, with Commissioners noting that the money the applicant states they will lose is not actually their money; rather, it is money that would be given to them if they follow the Lead Paint Abatement Program. The Commission and applicant Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 1999 Page 3 reviewed the projected maintenance cost for repainting wood siding over the next several years and compared that to replacement of vinyl siding over the next several years. Motion by Duaine Greenfield, seconded by Terry Mozena, to approve the Certificate of Economic Hardship. The motion was denied by the following vote: Aye: Greenfield; Nay: Gibbs, Bradford, Mozena and Kringle. -~.TEMS FROM THE COMMISSION The Commission briefly reviewed concerns in the way historic preservation in the City was leading, noting that the recent American Tower, Merchant's Hotel and the Union Cigar Store building decisions were all overturned by the City Council. They noted that preservation is about preserving historical structures and materials and is not just for preservation sake. They suggested they. need to pursue more incentive programs to provide to the people who wish to restore and preserve their structures. ITEMS FROM STAFF Staff noted that the July 1 meeting will be held at the Library, either in the Board Room or Auditorium and that the Commission should note on their agenda for that meeting which location has been selected. All meetings in the future will be held at the Library Auditorium on the normal dates with the exception of the meeting in November which will be moved to Wednesday, November 17, due to a conflict. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 6:45 P.1~1. Respectfully submitted, ~ / 8 ~ 9 Noble, ~( sistant Planner Adopted T.-tE CITY OE DuB~ ['linninS Scrvicc; Dcplrtn:cnt -" ~'''P'"~'""~`'~~-~~'~! ~~ I,Vc;t 13th Strcct U Dubucjuc, IOIY~ 5?GOt-YSo-i July 11, 1999 Tim Wood B & ~V Properties 5~0 English Lane Dubuque, Iowa X2001 RE: Denial of Request for Certificate of Appropriateness Dear iV1r. Wood: The purpose of this letter is to officially inform you that at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on June 3, 1999, your application, to install vinyl siding at the property located at 623/627 Arlington Street, was denied a certificate of appropriateness. The Commission found, in discussing your project, that the ~ecretarv of the Interior's Tuideline for Rehabilitation, which are the guidelines mandated by City Ordinance Chapter 2~ to be used by the Commission to conduct local design reviews, recommend repairing or replacing e:cisting features with similar materials if they are still available. To maintain the integrity of materials evident on the building, the Historic Preservation Commission found that maintaining the e~cisting wood clapboard siding was the only approvable option. Section 25-1 1 of the Historic Preservation ordinance states that "an aggrieved party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the community and economic department within thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the Commission's action. Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the community and economic development department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the Commission to the City Clerk. On appeal, the City Council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City Council shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the historic preservation ordinance (this chapter), and whether the Commission's actions was patently arbitrary or capricious. The City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate. The City Clerk shall give written notice of the City Council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the historic preservation commission. An appellant who is not satisfied by the decision of the City Council may appeal within sixty (60) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34." It you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at 589-4210. Sincere ark J. oble Assistant Planner r~ L Srn•icc Pcoplr (ntc~rity Rcsponsibilitti• [nnnvition Tram~.•ork r.-~c:noF ~ DUB E ['lannin~ Scrvicc~ Department 50 4\'~a 13th Strcct Dub~:c~i:c, iocva 53001--iSo-{ July 11, 1999 Tim Wood B & W Properties »0 English Lane Dubuque, Iowa X2001 RE: Denial of Request for Certificate of Economic Hardship Dear Mr. Wood: The purpose of this letter is to officially inform you that at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on June 17, 1999, your application, to install vinyl siding at the property located at 623/627 Arlington Street, vas denied a certificate of economic hardship. The Commission found, in discussing your project, that the guidelines mandated by City Ordinance Chapter 2~ to be used by the Commission to review certificates of economic hardship have not been met. After reviewing the required information which you had submitted, the Commission determined that you have earned or are able to earn a reasonable economic return from the property. Section 2~-11 of the Historic Preservation ordinance states that "an aggrieved party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal ~iZth the community and economic department within thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the Commission's action. Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the community and economic development department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the Commission to the City Clerk. On appeal, the City Council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City Council shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the historic preservation ordinance (this chapter), and whether the Commission's actions was patently arbitrary or capricious. The City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate. The City Clerk shall give ~,vritten notice of the City Council's decision on appeal «ithin seven (7) days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the historic preservation commission. An appellant ~vho is not satisfied by the decision of the Ciry Council may appeal within sixty (60) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34." If you have any further questions, please feel free to calf me at X59-4210. Sincere( , Mark J oble Assistant Planner L ~ Srrvice People lntc~ritf FcsponSibilitt' lnno~•ation Teamwork INITIAL APPEAL Planning Services Department 50 ln,'est 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 52001~3oY Phone (319) 389210 Fax (319) 389--11;9 ~~ -~` cOUtiLI L ~ -o -1 ' ~ ' 4~ The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque,lA 52001 Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission Decision Applicant: Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, B&W Properties Project: _ .Install Vinyl.Siding Location: 623-627 Arlington Str~eC District: W. 11th Street Dear Mayor and City Council Members: 7HE CRY OF DuB E August 24, 1999 The letter transmits the Historic Preservation Commission's record concerning a vinyl siding request for property located at 623-627 Arlington Street in the West 11th Street Historic District. Tim Wood and Vicki Bechen, property owners, are appealing the Commission's denial of installation of vinyl siding. On May 20, 1999, and June 3, 1999, the Commission reviewed a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness from Tim Wood, B8~W Properties, to install vinyl siding on the structure at 623-627 Arlington Street. He requested that the current wood clapboard siding be replaced with vinyl siding. After review, the Commission found that the replacement material was not appropriate and was not consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards. The Commission noted that they must follow the Secretary's Standards, which recommend that existing wood siding be maintained and repaired as necessary, and if it needs to be replaced, that the replacement material be either new wood siding or a compatible substitute material. The Commission recommended that the property owner scrape the old paint off the existing wood clapboard and repaint, or replace the wood clapboard that is in disrepair with new wood clapboard that is similar to the existing siding. The application was denied by a unanimous vote of 5 to 0. With the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness, an applicant then can apply for a Certificate of Economic Hardship. On June 17, 1999, the Commission reviewed a request for a Certificate of Economic Hardship from Mr. Wood to install vinyl siding on the structure at 623-627 Arlington Street. The Commission discussed with the property owners their application. The Commission found that completing the work as recommenced would not prevent the property owner from earning any reasonable return from the property and denied the request by a vote of 4 to 1. Srn•ice People Integrity Rasponsibilit;: Innovation Tram~~•ork The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Appeal of HPC Decision: 623-627 Arlington Street Page 2 The following items are attached and are the complete records of this project: 1. Letter of Appeal to the City Council. 2. Design Review Application for Certificate of Appropriateness. 3. Economic Hardship Application. 4. Minutes of Historic Preservation Commission -May 20, June 3 and June 17, 1999. 5. Letters of Denial dated July 11, 1999. --f. Sections 25-9, 25-10 and 25-11 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 7. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. --Seen 2b=1-1 oftFie Historic Preservation Ordinance states that on appeal, the City Counci! shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City Council must consider whether the Commission exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and whether the Commission's action was patently arbitrarily or capricious. Subsequent to the Commission's consideration ofi the vinyl siding request, Ms. Bechen and Mr. Wood have prepared additional documentation on the economic return of the property. Since the Commission has not reviewed this information, the City Council cannot consider it as part of the appeal. The Commission could review the additional documentation, if the case is referred back to the Commission by the City Council. Section 25-11 provides that the City Council may atiirm or reverse the Commission's decision, or they may refer the matter back to the Commission for such further action as may be appropriate.- ~ ~ - Respectfully submitted, ~ ~_ Ken Kringle, Chairperson Historic Preservation Commission Attachments cc: Historic Preservation Commission Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager Mark Noble, Assistant Planner James O'Brien, Assistant City Attorney August 6, 1999 Honorable iVfayor and City Council Members 623-627 Arlington One person on the historical commission voted for us and he said they should be taking these on a case-by-case basis. One member said that he understands our problem but if they let us put siding on then everyone will want to put siding on. This is not acase-by-case basis. After 3 long meetings, it vas worked out that to keep it historical, the wood needs to be replaced. It was not cost effective to strip Lead paint and ap tch• In this case from the first day we purchased the building uritil it woii7d be paid for- over a period of 15 yrs., we would lose on the building 541,80 if wood siding is put on. If vinyl sided, we would have a profit of $24,300. If you start right now for the next 8 years, we would lose 543,136 with new wood siding. If we vinyl side the building, the next 8 years we will have a profit of $4,096.00. This is amulti-family building--not residential When we purchased the building, we knew it was in an historical district but Lead base was NOT an issue and there are numerous federal laws governing this now. We felt they had already made up their mind before we even started the meeting and that they were not open to any new information since one member actually fell asleep during the meeting and another had to be asked a question more than once because he admittedly wasn't paying attention. Another member told us we brought the wrong information, that it was not pertinent, and we had been told by Mark Noble to bring it so obviously he had not read the information before him. ~~~` . . <..~a/~ ~~ ~tix ~p ~~-n~.sS DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC~.TIOY -~('~- w ~ IHIS~ORICPRESERVATIOYCO~~IISSIO DATE: ~/Z~j ~~~ PROPERTY ~I II,, OWNER: lWl. ~VUD~ ~ ~ w ~ ~'1 e PHONE: S~ 3-C~ ~~ PROPERTY ~~//~~ ~+ /f HISTORIC ADDRESS: ~ Z3 I (~ Z-] Y~YI (~~.a,~-~v~ r~rc~nz rr-r. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ - - ,.., , , :~La1LING ADDRESS: ~~b ~"'"~~"'Sy ~ ~ . ~ gl~t~l~l-~' SZDd-~ CONTRACTOR: ~ PHONE: DESCRIPTION OF R.EH.aBILITATION/PRESERVATION WORK: EXIST~i ISj FEATURE/CO NDIT[ON PROPO SE D WORD t ~1I0"FTG~ U'~pb04'h't '~ n ' ..4''tiS~t " "- 1 l EXISTING FEATURE/CONDITION PROPOSED WORK EXISTING FE.-~TURF1CO;vDiTION I PROPOSED WORK ytATERlALS REQUESTED: PHOTOGR4PHS DRA WTNGS/PLANS AGEND.a: COLOR SAMPLE titATER1AL SAMPLE 4 PLACED ON AGENDA ~1:.~ ~9y CO:tit:`IISSION .aCT[ON ~PPROVED EN1ED ' ~ ~ ~3/9y ~~,,~~,~,,y~ -~ TABLED TO NEXT ~SEETING/PLACED ON ~ f 3 AGENDA .~ ~~ c i ndvlhistpcsldcsrcv..~ IC:~y STATE ISTORIC.aL DEPA:ZT:•~:~T, DIVISION 0: r.ISTORIC ®UB~J Illy IOWA ,Archotectura! Surve y inventory STREET ADDRESS ~Z~- C~Z ( BUILDING NA,`•lE PRESENT OWNER Address /~C'._l,{L`v ~-C•"L1 .. LEG:~L DESCRIPTION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION P { p, (D~~ Source ARCHITECT/BUILDER Source __ PRESENT USE ~x DESIGNED USE ~~ •,~r ,~ Source ACCESSIBILITY gEg/~/ STATUS ~/ ~•0/~ BUILDING MATERIALS CONDITION Foundation _ ~(~ S'~,~„I v ~ 3 4 Walls LC~'~!W'rn SIntL~C~ ~I 2 3 4 Trim M ~T~~L ~~ 3 4 Porch/Storefr t J PR:.S cRVATION 1978 Q 1979 Photograph Ro11 ~ Frame Facade N/S/E/W By Date MODIFIC_~TIONS/ADDITIONS: SI(~Il~6 IBS HDO;~.! I,rJY~I~ /sLL 7 `.kZ WCl~ L ~ ~..ZQ I ~. , on ~ ~Uc~ Eaves/Cornice ~,tL-?/J CJ~. Mr?n,L Q2 3 pO Q2 3 4 4 PWtLF~ ~C..ts,,~.tI~S C1~ C~lLc1vV~ ~ Roof C~Jw90S17(w Chimney(s) ~I 1 2 3 4 I~NJ Qts~ C.~~U~~'Z: ~ r ,t S 1 2 3 4 ~~e.,.<. l~n--`. 2.~L~:~ Z•- rZr~n(-itrll 1 2 3 4 , ~ G-;tiZ'1=~:.5 qU,'~ ~-~/L~Z ~z-cr~2`{ Wtl.~,4~~/, DESIGN FEATURES ~ ~ `~ ~' =~~% ~~ ~ Q'=rD , COiL~~NT: c Style ~~ ~~ ?!/~C C.p.1Y2 T7~.1,%l r ;~ t F Y'~~-~ = ~ v Details of Note: ~ v Interior Features: - Site Features: Evaluation I QUALITY Aesthetic 1 2 3!4~ Historical 1 Z 3 Rarity 1 2 3 4 ZI ENVIRO~fiIENTAL STATURE 1 2 3 ~J III CONTEXT -Immediate ~2 3 4 Broad Q~2 3 4 IV INTEGRITY OF FABRIC 1 2U3 4 Architectural Significance PROBABLE ADDITIONAL AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING _ SL"RVEYS C0:'fiiENT ~~~~~ NABS/NRHP d H U] H z H C'1 H SURVEY CONSULTANT: Bruce M. Kriviskey, AICP Date ~r7 ~f(~ ''; J'~ ~% S~ ~~ `P S ~ / /-'~l~ '~~--_ .~_......... ... \r\ Sty' %% ' G~ ~ J' r ~ ~ ~ S T r~ ~ d ~- s J, ~ 1 S F---( / `~ ~ ~ `~ riP Ys / p p ~ r 1 r-~ N .~ v~ ~ v~ _ -f cf• C~ O ~ ~ O F-~--( ~ '~E S~ ~ S~ ~~ ~r / ~ ~~~ X10 N\ v~ J' vl ~ / Y ~ V ~~ E-, ,- -s U~ l~ Y ~ / Yx `'~^ 7~ ~ ~ 4LuF ~, r ~ ~ ° ' p 0 EG ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ P r ~~- ~ ~ ~~ , . `-OGUS~ 5~ `~~P P~OSpGYPC "' ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ \F ~' <t; ~ _ j ~ ` ~Ff PL ~,L\G ~ rP NrM y ~ 2~ Gr~0 f~ O a N ~~~c ~~ '~ p © Y1\GN~C10 r~ ~,v~ ~i ~--?\EE S~ Y \~~,O~F' `•- S~ w ~ W rw ~ ~. 3S02J1 ~ 0 G x- -` U x --+-( p 15 -115 l Np'y ~ 0~~~ ~`n ~ Sit 7. luG ~ / ~', v\~\~\t S~ rev ~ \S Sj -y > > ~ ~ OED' '`i ~, `~' p\\r S ~ N a rw GAL -y~, ~° art GORNF-~ S S~ Y, ~ N ~ ~ W S ~t{i 1-11~~ Gr~000 avRCN S 1S ~ U w tij ~ ~~ o ~ ~;' r\C~~4 "?~ y S S~WV~ MFrC ~.(~ ,~{.. !n J ~,4~\\oC~ ~ ~j P~ St `~~ 'gin 0~\ S~ / ~1 r_V ~ Yv ~-J, ~ Gr~~ Y'~~/ ~(.GF- ~Ob 1S VNONy w ! a 1S ~ s ,- S~ (r~~ G nn ~SY~ ~N1~Nb M /~ ~~. ~`f 0 ~ U' ~ 0 1-t~~~ ~ p J p F' 1 ~ f-. 0 ~~" ~J \n\p\G ~~ pL ~ ti- S ~_`;P vi ' ~ v' ,_ s '1 C~~-j M R ~n cv ---- S~ GO o ptS E y ~ o o v, ` C~ 1 ,c. p ~ a CE r ~- Q" n~ cL ~_ ter' ~ ~ J213 I G _, ~ L1-. ~ C s ~ ~~\ro o ~ ,_ ~ cn t"~ 1~ 4 ~ ~---nt 1S in 't", S > U ~' ~ ~ 0 Q r <L S~ `~. ~ ~`q ~_p U Y ~ ~ O ~ ~ .~ ~ v Z ~ 4 1 = o S - ~ ' r S ~- u ~ / `I J' ^ o ,-~ St1 OrY ',n~ )1 O N~~~_ QNV1021 11J~~ ~~ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT PLEASE COMPLETE AND BRING TO YOUR SCHEDULED DESIGN REVIEW ~~~~0~~0~~0~0~~0~0~0~~~~~00~~0~~~~~~~~~~0~0~0~~00~~ Please decribe your project, indicating the existing materials and their condition and the reason for the proposed work: Have you considered any other alternative remedies to solve your problem or meet your needs? Please indicate the type of construction materials to be used in this project: What is your timeline for completion of the proposed project? Will you do the work yourself, or use a contractor? Please provide name of contractor. ~~ Any other information or comments? Signature Date F:IUSERSUGLE W1~fYWP',HISTPRES~FOR.ti1S1PROPOSEDPRI 623-627 Arlington Replace wood (7 square not included) where plywood siding is, need to do something there. Remove tenant for 2months-Rent-utilities-moving expense 2,000 Remove wood siding in a lead-safe manner (Al Ames) 6,300 Dump fee for lead wood 7 Apply new siding of equal quality of existing siding (Speaker Const.) 23,100 Paint new siding (Speaker Const.) While scaffold is set up 3,300 Randy Mesch of Crawford Insurance gave me a price using the insurance replacement guide book (588-1883) 54.9 per sq. ft. 17,32 This price does not include removing wood, straightening out any bad framing, applying siding up to 4 stories in the air and painting. 623-627 Arlington Scrape, repair rotten siding, paint Siding has lead base paint. I must use lead removal guidelines for safety, you can call the lead department at the City Housing Inspection Office at X89-1724. Tom Glennon, Ken Brimer at iviautz Paint said that NO contractor they know gives a guarantee for painting old exterior wood. I had said I would get a price for scraping and painting and repairing rotten siding. Here are the reasons this will not work- ---1~Vould lose $12,200.00 in grant money from the City if I don't cover or strip siding completely. $10,000 grant + $800 clean-up + $1,400 relocation= $12,200.00. If I only scrape and paint I would have to follow lead removal guidelines every time it was necessary to scrape and re-paint (approx. every 5 years) here are just a few- Relocate tenants, scaffold entire house and put plastic tent around it to keep from contaminating neighbors. These alone would cost thousands of dollars. I personally do not want to leave lead exposed on the house where it can endanger children. 623-627 Arlington Strip Siding Strip siding (Al Ames) Appro~c. $24,500 Price to paint old wood 2 coats ?:~`?`?`?? Price to patch rotten wood `??`??`?? Hope to have a second bid for stripping by the next meeting. Terry Sullivan of the lead department of City Housing said that Al Ames bid is fair and falls into his price guidelines. -f~-spoke with Jim at Sarris Painting, he is trying to get completely out of the lead stripping business because of all the lead regulations which drive up the price so much. AI Ames is the most experienced lead removal contractor in town. In speaking to him and several other lead removal contractors, it would be very foolish to give a firm bid on something that has so many variables without giving yourself a huge margin of error. SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION (810 747-b023 47~ 1 N. MENOMINEE RD. EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 6102 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS:57~ English Lane CITY:Dtib. Ia. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape- recommend replacing or siding over JOB WORK ORDER Date of Order: iVlarch 22, 1999 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: --==Apply 4 inch wood lap siding to entire exterior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- 532~ per square x 42 sq.= $13,650 Labor to replace wood siding- $225 per square x 42 sq. 9,450 Apply one coat primer and ~ coats paint- Labor and material Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entire exterior siding Labor and Material (;py, //' , C~,c~r~iz-~eJ.a~u{i~~u~~~ Il ~~iz.2~ ~/ DATE CO~~IPLETED: TOTAL MATERIALS: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL AMOUNT: WORK ORDERED BY: 3,300 526,400 8,820 March 23, 1999 AL AMES Lead Removal 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner, haul away siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6,300.00 Price_ is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump siding in their trailer at no charge if they do not, then the price will be significantly higher. -~ Tenant will need to be removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around $7.00 per sq. ft.=$700 per square x 35 = $24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Will charge to strip-$40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not incu(de repairing siding or painting Tenant will need to be removed from residence approx. 7 to 9 weeks. CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM June 3, 1999 TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager~~1'.i'~ SUBJECT: 623-627 Arlington Street -- Design Review This memo provides additional information on the design review case for 623-627 Arlington Street. The applicant, Tim Wood, would like to install vinyl siding, and has checked into the City's lead-based paint abatement program. Attached is a handout that describes the program requirements. Eligible lead hazard reduction activities are described on page 2 of the handout. At this point, Mr. Wood's request is for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install vinyl siding. If the Commission does not believe that they can grant a Certificate of Appropriateness for this project based on the requirements of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, then they can consider a Certificate of Economic Hardship. An application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship would require additional information from Mr. Wood. Attachment DUBLIQLIE'S CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION PROGRl~M effective 1/27/99 LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD CONTROL PROGRAM FOR HOMEOWNERS A_ND RENTAL PROPERTIES This program provides financial assistance to low- and moderate-income homeowners and rental property owners to reduce lead-based paint hazards in their residences. Requirements 1. Location - The Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention target area includes census tracts 1,2,5,6, 7.01 and 7.02. Income Limits .- ~- .. '- ` - =.- . - ~ -::- - .. Owner-occupied property owners must earn no more than 80% of area median income, adjusted for family size, as follows and not less than 90 percent of the units assisted with deferred payment loans under this section shall be occupied by a child under the age of six years or shall be units where a child under the age of six years spends a significant amount of time rzsiting (at least 10% of the child's time). Household Size Maximum Incom° 80% ofthe 1 524,4j0 Area Afedian . 2 527,950 _ Income based on _ - ~ 3 531,450 .. = =~ j . jamrily side 4 _ ~ - 534,950 ~::~ _" ~ _ _ S -. 537,70 -- - - ~.-~; - -__;{ ` ~~ 6 540,550 ~ r _ _ - __ 7 . - 543,350 _ 3 = --;;,' ~• -. " ~-- " _ For deferred payment loans made to assist rental housing, at least 50 percent_ofthe units must be• ' ~."`i' _ occupied by or made available to families with incomes at or below 50 percent of the area median - income level and the remaining units shall be occupied or made available to families with incomes at or below 80 percent of the area median income level, and in all cases the landlord must give priority '• in renting units for not less than 3 years following the completion of lead abatement activities, to families with a child under the age of six yea: s. , _ ~ - _ _ _ - _ -over - Ci;~~ of Dubuque Health & Housing Services Oep~rtnients 1805 Central Avenue Dubuque, lo~v~ 5 2001-3 65 6 • (319)589-1724 • (319) 539--1244 F.~?C Elousehold Size Maximum Income 1 51,300 SO% ojthe 2 S17,500 Area bfedian 3 S 19,650 Income based oa -"* S21,850 family side j S23,600 6 S2S,350 7 S27,104 s+ s?s,sso 3. Eliooible Lead Hazard Reduction Activities __~_ Where the lead-based paint has been identified, it is considered a "hazard" under the following four conditions: a. The paint surface is peeling, chipaing, cracking or otherwise deteriorated. b. The paint is "accessible" to childrea under age 6, or is a "chewable" surface, meaning it is within ~ feet of the floor or ground. These are protruding surfaces, such as window sills, stair treads, and handrails and spindles balusters. c. T'ne paint is an "impact" surface, meaning it is located where it may be easily chipped. These are surfaces such as doors, door jambs and stops, baseboards and wall cornets that jut iato a room. d. The paint is a "friction" surface, meaning that movement creates lead dust. ALL LEAD HAZARD REDUCTIOY ACTIVITIES ilfUST BE PERFOR~~IED BY CERTIFIED WORI,~RS. 4. These activities include: ' ~ ' ~ . . a. Removal of paint, to the base material (substrate). R,cmoval may be done only by chemical stripping, wet scraping (misted scraping), wet sanding, scraping with heat gun (with temp below 1110 degrees F.), or sanding or hydro blasting when used with HEP.A vacuum exhaust. NOTE: All paint must be removed only on chewable, impactor friction surfaces. This generally means only 1-inch to 4-inch strips of paint must be removed. b. Enclosure, with materials s~.:ch as paneling or dtytivall. c. Removal of the woodwork. ~. Deferred Payment Loan Amounts Up to 55,000 may be made available for lead hazard reduction activities. Flousehold Size i`~taximum [ncome 1 515,300 SD% of the 2 S 17,500 Area ~fediarr 3 519,650 Income based on .^, 521,810 family side $ 523 600 6 52,350 7 527, I00 s;- s2s,sso ~. Elio~ible Lead Hazard Reduction Activities Where the lead-based paint has been identified, it is cocLSidercd a "hazard" under the following four conditions: a. T"ne paint surface is peeling, chipping, cracking or otherwise deteriorated. b. The paint is "accessible" to children under are 6, or is a "chewable" surface, meaning it is withilZ 5 f et of the floor or ground. These are protruding surfaces, such 2; window sills, stair treads, and handrails and spindles/balusters. c. The paint is an "impact" surface, meaning it is located where it may be easily chipped. These are surfaces such as doors, door jambs and stops, baseboards and wall corners that jut into a room_ d. The paint is a "friction" surface, meaning that mov.-went creates lead dust. AL,L LEAD HA.Z~,RD REDliCTION ~CTI~VTTIES i<ITIST BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED WORI~RS. 4. These activities include: a. Removal of paint, to the base material (substrate). Removal may be done only by chemical stripping, wet scraping (misted scraping), wet sanding, scraping with heat run (with temp below 1110 degrees F.), or sanding or hydro blasting When used with HEP:~ vacuum exhaust NOTE: A11 paint m~.:st be removed only on chewable, impact or friction surfaces. This generally means only 1-inch to 4-inch strips of paint must be removed. b. Enclosure, with materials such as paneling or drywall c. Removal of the woodwork. S. Deferred Payment Laan Arrsounts Up to 55,000 may be made available for lead hazard reduction activities. Planning Services Department 50 bb'est 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 5 20 0 1--13 6-~ Phone (319) 539-1? 10 FaY (319) 539-~1~9 THE CriY OF DuB E ~.~ ~~~ June 9, 1999 Tim Wood B & W Properties 550 English Lane Dubuque, IA 52003 RE: Property @ 623-627 Arlington Dear Tim, This letter is intended to provide you with information regarding the application for a certificate of economic hardship. I have attached the section of the Historic Preservation Ordinance which pertains to the process for review for a certificate of economic hardship. This application is reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and I have placed you on the agenda for review at their June 17, 1999 meeting. This meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room B of City Hall (2nd floor -same room as we have previously met). Please review the materials I have sent you and provide any of the information noted in the ordinance which could help you in presenting your request for approval of a certificate of economic hardship. Please submit this information by noon on Monday, June 14, 1999. Please call me at 589-4210 if you have any questions regarding this process. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark le Assistant Planner attachment Sen.'ice People [ntegrity Responsibility Innovation Team~.~ork DESIGti' REVLEii' :~.PPLIC:~TIOY DATE: L-/9 l9 ~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION C01~'fiVIISSION PROPERTY nun,r_o. ~ ~ ~. PHONE: ~3 - PROPERTY HISTORIC ADDRESS: - Z~ G~~zL,~11 ~ DISTRICT: ~~_ (~~ ~. ~~L4ILING ~ 1 ~l ADDRESS: ~SZ~ ~t,(5~ ~~~~ .Y,~C.. ~2c~3 CONTR4CTOR: PHONE: DESCRIPTION OF REHABIL[TATION/PRESERVAT(ON WORi<: EXISTMG FEATURE/CONDITION PROPOSED WORN ~\lc~p GL~~~~~ I~SS~-a.t~. ~l~~~cL S~o~uy EXISTCNG FEATURE/CONDITION I PROPOSED WOR.S EXISTING FEATURE/CONDITiON I PROPOS=D ~4'OR MATERIALS REQUESTED: x _ ~t nJ=1 NG~ ~l, 1~iC~'~,~~ ~ t~ '~-t~ ¢ ~,T- Fj; DS PHOTOGR.-~PHS COLOR SAMPLE DR.4WTNGS/PLANS MATERIAL SAMPLE AGEND,-~: PLACED ON - ~ Ii'7 ~~Jy AGENDA CO~~1~~IISS[ON ACTION APPROVED DENIED TABLED T O NEXT MEETINGIPLACED ON AGc~ 1D.~ ~~ ,~ cindylhist~r_sldcsrcv,ir, . ~ ~ 2600 DodDo - Sutt® 129 :: ';t; ~ ~ Dubuque, ~ lA b2003 " ~ 319/Sb7-8099 PROPOSAL ~~, ' We Hereby submit specifications and estJrrsates tor: TIM WOOD 550 ENGLISH LANE DUBUQUE IA 52003 .,. RE: 623-627 ARLINGTON DUBUQUE. IA ~, 6/11/9.9 Y~ ~ . SCRAPE, PRIME BARE WOOD ~ APPY,Y ONE COAT PAINT IN :~~. " ~"" LEAD SAFE MANNER UNDER HUD GUIDELINES ~. REPAIR APPROX 15 SQ WOOD SIDING. COST WILL INCREASE ... --_- ~ IF ADDITIONAL ROTTEN ~OOD :ZS DISCOVERED WHILE SCRAPING $ 9000.00 REPLACE APPROX 7 SQ PLYWOOD. SIDING TO MATCH RE- MAINING HOUSE _ $ 4200.00 `T; ,'~ C.C. TIM WOOD ". ~~ • ~ -., WE PflOPflSE Hereby to fumislt material artd labor-comgivte {n acrord,~y~ ~ ~yq 8~y~z~ ~« ~ sum above noted. Payment to be made as tollows; " . All material is guararttaed to be as spectftied. AA work !o be cornpieted h a•workmaNika mariner accarding to standard practices. Arty atteratlon or deviatkxt from above speaflcatbrta Involving extra casts will be executed only upon wrftten orders, arsd will became an extra ctiarpe over arxi above iha estirttate. AlI agraerrtenis cortWtgent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our cawol. Owner to carry tire, Tornado, 8rid Outer necessary in5utanCe. Our Workers are roily covered by Woricrtwn~a ..... ~ y+v~ wwlOn InS~JrariCa.' ALiillOriZed $l~fiBlLirB: ' ACCEPTANCE Oi= PROPOSAL' The above prices, speccifkatkxts and cortdiiloris are ~~~~, arxi are heretry accepted You are authorized io do ttto work es specified, Payment! wiu be made as outJkted above. Slgnauue: Dated ;; ~ ~`' 4 is .. •. -~~ V Y~ . v ' ~•. 623-627 Arlington Tear off reIIning plywood siding 700 Remove tenant for 2months-Rent-utilities-moving e~cpense 2,000 Remove wood siding in a lead-safe manner (Al Ames) 6,300 Apply new siding of equal quality of e~cisting siding (Speaker Const.) 23,100 Paint new siding (Speaker Const.) While scaffold is set up-new wood 3,300 -- --- - ~ $3 x,400 Randy Mesch of Crawford It3surance gave me a price using the in~rance replacement guide book (588-1883) $4.95 per sq. ft. 20,790 This price does not include removing wood, straightening out any bad framing, applying siding up to 4 stories in the air and painting. ~0 yeaz vinyl siding $ 8,820 My labor -2.000 $6,820 Cannot reduce wood siding cost by any significant amount because it has to be done quickly. Vinyl siding, I can do over the next 2 summers in my spare time. Other costs that may be incurred by replacing siding- if there is any insulation in the walls, it may fall out. Some window wraps are caulked to siding and it may ruin some wraps. Soffit may have to be removed. 623-627 Arlington 1997 annual gross income 1997 Operating & Maintainance Expenses Advertising Utilities Legal & License Maintainance 1997 annual debt service Annual Cash Flow 1998 annual gross income 1998 Operating & i~faintainance Expenses Advertising Utilities Legal & License Maintainance 1998 Annual debt service Annual Cash Flow Balance on mortgage $8,350 22 __ 459 36 1.3 00 $1,817 $4,472 $2,061 6,383 8~ 92 27 1.100 $1,304 $4,456 $623 $20,100 ~- ~~ ~ ~ ' y 623-627 Arlington Strip Siding Strip siding (Al Ames) Price to paint old wood 2 coats Price to patch rotten wood Approti Approx. $24,500 4,000 9.000 $37,500 Terry Sullivan of the lead department of City Housing said that Al Ames bid is fair and falls into his price guidelines. I spoke with Jim ai Sarris Painting, he is trying to get completely out of the lead stripping business because of all the lead regulations which drive up the price so much. Al Ames is the most experienced lead removal contractor in town. In speaking to him and several other lead removal contractors, it would be very foolish to give a firm bid on something that has so many variables without giving yourself a huge margin of error. March 23, 1999 AL AMES Lead Removal 623-627 Arlington Large section of wood is rotten and beyond repair, would not recommend trying to strip siding. Siding should be removed and replaced or cover. Price to remove wood siding in a lead safe manner, haul away siding and dispose of properly- Approx. 35 sq.= $6,300.00 Price is subject to City of Dubuque lead department allowing me to dump sidin~`in their trailer at no charge if they do not, then the price will be significantly higher. Tenant will need to be removed from residence approximately 4 to 6 weeks. Price to strip siding -no soffit or windows is around $7.00 per sq. ft.=$700 per square x 35 = $24,500.00 This is an approximate price. Cannot give firm bid because of so many variables. Will charge to strip-$40 per man hour plus material. This price also does not inculde repairing siding or painting Tenant will need to be removed from residence approx. 7 fo 9 weeks. SPEAKER CONSTRUCTION (815)747-6023 47~ 1 N. MENOMINEE RD. EAST DUBUQUE, IL. 6102 BILL TO: B&W Properties ADDRESS:57~ English Lane CITY:Dub. Ia. 52003 JOB LOCATION: 623-627 Arlington Siding is in poor shape- recommend replacing or siding over JOB WORK ORDER Date of Order: Mazch 22, 1999 - DESCRIPTION OF WORK: -apply 4 inch wood lap siding to entire e.terior siding (old siding already removed including nails) Material approximate price depending on brand and type of wood- $32~ per square x 42 sq.= $13,60 Labor to replace wood siding $225 per squaze x 42 sq. 9,40 Apply one t primer and 1 coa~ t- Labor and material 3.300 ~_ _ ~ ~ ~ 'Z~;~~~~ ~ ~~L $26,400 Gu'm' Apply double 4 vinyl siding including house wrap to entire exterior siding Labor and Material 8,820 Goy ~P~ y~,,.~ ,~~cx?O,a, ~~ ~~~w~ ~yoo DATE COMPLETED: WORK ORDERED BY: TOTAL MATERIALS: TOTAL LABOR: TAX: TOTAL AMOUNT: I ~ RENO CONSTRUCTION 1600 Rhomberg Avenue Dubuque, Iowa 52Vu1 (329)556-4503 Proposal Submitte To Phone Street _ - ~ • ~, .~ Cit , State, Zip ~~ Architect Date~of Plans ~t r - 'r~ 4 Job Phone Job Name Jo/b' Locat/i o_n -We Hereby_Submit Specifications and Estimates For : .. C ~ • --~ ~ c? c (~ J -- j ~ l J~ ~~ '~ ~~ We propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications, far the sum of doI 1 ors (~ ~~~ ~ k~J ~ ) Payment to be made as follows y 1 ~' Authorized Signature _~~(T.C, rCl ~'' ~ ~ Note: This oposal may be withdrawn b s if t T accepted within ,1 ~. L.' days. AQGEPTA~Q`E RF~QFQQ~L The abcve prices, specifications, and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted_ You are authorized to do the a.or4; as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of acceptance Signature Signature CJ DLIBLIQLIE~S CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION PROGRAIvt Mr Tim Wood do II cec W Properties 575 English Lane Dubuque, IA 52001 '-RE: 623-627 Arlington This letter is in response to your request as to what requirements the Lead Hazard Reduction Program would have for this property. Dubuque's Childhood, Lead Poisoning Prevention Program requires the removal of lead hazards from the home. ~The major areas of concern are deteriorated lead-based paint, friction, impact, and accessible surfaces. The program allows three methods of remediating these hazards and t~l e_y_~ are stripping, enclosing, and component replacement. Please contact this office if you have further questions concerning Dubuque's program, our number is 319-589-1724. Thank you for your interest in our program and we look forward to working with-you on your project. Sincerely,'~'~ ~ - . y Terry, Sulliva Lead Inspector ~. .i- - City of Dubuque • Health h Housing Services Deparlrnen;s 1805 Ccntraf Avenue • Dubuque. Irnva 51001.3656 • (319) 589.1724 • (319) 589-4144 FAX DE.~';1IS L. BAUMHOVER auto-Life-Health-Home and Business 2515 DODGE AT DEVON DUSUQLTE, ZA 52003 PH0:1E (319) 592-1856 Fr1.7C (319) SS o'-0989 June O1, 1999 B & W PROPERTIES 575 English Ln. Dubuque, is 52003-8755 June 01,1999 Re: LEAD BASE PAINT REFfOVAL: DEAR SIRS/hlATJ~li~t: In reply to your inquiry regarding removal of Lead Base Paint.. Our view point is: Removal of Lead Base Paint should be done according to OSHA A.~7D HUD guidelines. Sincer i~~ ~~ n.Zis L. mh ver STATE FA.~t AGE.V'T 623-627 Arlington Principal, Interest, Taxes & Insurance monthly payment Payment on new wood siding $35,400 @ 81/2 % over 1~ yrs. Regular maintainance cost last 2 % yrs.. 1997= $1,100 1998= 1,300 1999= 2,500 year to date $4,900 divided by 30 months _ Additional maintainance cost to paint new wood per month Rents= $295 + 350 = Deficit every month Scrape, prime, paint house every 8 years over 50 years= 6 x $7,000= $42,000. May cause damage to window wraps and soffits. $370.00 349.00 163.00 70.00 $952.00 645.00 $307.00 ~~ 623-627 Arlington We paid $27,00 in March 1993 27,500 35,400 62,900 This bldg. would not be worth $62,900 Current tax assessment is $50,100, this will be protested at the next meeting. We protested the following properties last year and this year and had the values lowered. The reason we did not on Arlington is because when I called for the value, I was given $25,050 and we just found out that it is only for one side. 2506 Broadway - 7-plex 1091 Center Pl. -Duplex 357 Kaufinan -Duplex 1025 Biuff- Tri-plex 7~5 University- Duplex 2741-2743 Jackson- Duplex 729 Lincoln -Duplex 1476-78 Jackson- Duplex ~ ^' <~ 623-627 Arlington Assessed Value- $50,100-(This value is too high and will be protested using the following comparables.) :food siding 2 bedroom-side-by-side Separate Utilities Lot- 50x100 Year built- 1900 1,096 sq.ft. each floor= 2,192 sq.ft. Rents- $295 + 350= $645 422 W. Locust Ass. Val.- $57,b20 Brick 2 bdr.- up and down ____ Sep. Ut.il. Lot- 39x98 Yr. blt.- 1876 1,096 sq.ft. each floor= 2,192 sq.ft. Rents-300 + 275= $575 SOLD 9/98 for $38,000 2128-2130 White Ass. Val.- $27,820 Wood Siding 2 bdr. side-by-side Sep. Util. Lot- 35x91 Yr. Blt.- 1900 1,120 sq.ft-main, 784- up = 1,904 sq.ft. Rents- 205 + 295 = $500 SOLD 7/98 for 25,000 2757 Broadway Ass. Vai.- $49,850 Alum. Siding 2 bdr.- up b down Owner pays heat ~ water Lot- 50x110 Yr. blt.- 1900 896 sq.ft. each floor= 1,792 sq.ft. Rents- $325 + 325= $650 SOLD 7/98 for $42,000 735 Kirkwood Ass. Val- $35,120 Brick 2 bdr. ups down Sep. Util. Lot- 103x60 Yr. blt- 1856 700 sq. ft. main fl. + 396 up 1,09b sq. ft. Rents- $275 + 275- $550 SOLD 12/98 for $34,000 / ~f a1-5850 Area:080 Add: 422 W LOCUST Si C1ty:D80 Z1p:52001 Actl: Pro1:Y Period: 2onlnq:R•2A aUn1U :2 Pkq: X52,5 00 INC RenLS:6900 Lo[ S1Ze: Pendlnq:Y BA J.ON Other: SgFt:Up:1096 Main:1096 11:1098 IB76 Grosa:6900 Canst:BK UN RM BR 8TH HL.T AC LSE OEP REFIT Terms:CS11 EXP Insur:250 YrBlt:1876 1 5 2 1.0 GFA 0 0 0 J00 Legal:lOT 2 OF Manaq: Laund: 2 5 2 I.0 GFA 0 0 0 275 1 OF 2 CITY LOT Taxes:92d RITyp:AS J 670 Ma lnt:dtd HT.Pd:i 4 Posa:IM Vacnt: 4td wt.Pd:T 5 Owners: RICHE50N Utils: E1.Pd:T 6 N OELO Other; 7 Ph: 10TAL EXP:2002 Off lc e:OVGCAN REALTYdASSO Ph: 556.2525 Key:Y NET INC:4B98 Agent:MING7GEN, OORIS Ph:556.1092 Lock:O Remarks: MAKE OFFERI HISTORIC BRICK ON CORNER 10 i. NEEDS COSMETICS. CA OWN MOLD INGS . TOUCH OF VICTORIAN. POTENTIAL MAtN f100R UNti COUlO BE 3 BEDROOMS. SEPARATE UTILITIES. • Information 8tlleved Accurate But Not Guaranteed )ID:Off: !9 Days:285 SJ8,000 Typ:CASH AgL,:HING7GEN OORIS Oate:09/15/98 SOlO:Off: 9 Oays: 0 525,019 Typ:CONV /1.7865 Area: 080 Add: 2128 WHITE 30 C1ty:080 21p:52001 $29 900 A t:BECHEN VLCKI Date:07 J1/9B Aet1:Y ProJ:O Period: 199Zaninq:R-2A aUnlts:2 Pkq:OFF g,.; 3.0 INC Rents:6000 Lot S1Ze:35x91 Ptnding:Y 7900 Ocher:0 Sgft:Up:794 uain:952 LL:J64 Gross: 6000 Const:W UN AM OR 8TH i~t.T AC LSE UEf RENT Tern+s:CSH EXP Insur:363 YrB1t:1900 1 5 2 1 GFA U 0 50 205 Legal: Lot 1 b Manaq:0 Laund: 2 5 2 1 CFA 0 0 295 295 lot 2 l.Ft. lanq Taxes:778 RfTyp:AS J worthy Ma1nt:0 HT.Pd:i 4 Poss:AG Vaent:0 Wt.Pd:T 5 Owners:Herrlq, Ut11s:0 EI.Pd:T _ 6 Other:0 7 Pti. ~ ~ TOTAL EXP:1141 Oftice:CENTURY 21-CONSOL[ Ph:58J•J576 Key:O NET INC:4859 Agent:FEIDEAMAN, JEANE Ph:582•B4B5 lock:0 L i 4 Remarks:2130 TENANT MAINTAINS GROUNDS. RENTAL ItJCOM E FOR '97 IS 56,000. COULD _ :. 9E MIGNER. POSSIBLE LAUNDRY IN BASEMENT.23 HOUR NOTICE TO SHOT( 2130 OWNS ~. ~ eY ~, APPLAINCES, NEW ROOF SHINGLES G000 RENTER lii~ - Information 8elleved Accurate But Not Guaranteed /1.7285 Area: 080 Add: 2757 9ROAOwAY City:080 21p:520o1 Act1:Y ProJ:O Period:YEA2oning:R•1 aUnits:2 Pkg:OFF $47,5 0 0 INC Aents:7800 Lot S1ze:50x110 Pendlnq:Y BA J.ON Other:0 SgFt:Up:B96 Mafn:B96 LL:O 1900 Gross:7800 Const:Al,AS UN Ru BR BTt1 Ht.T AC LSE OEP RENT leral:Lot JJ EXP Insur:317 Yr81t:1900 I q Manaq:0 Laund: 2 4 2 1 Own 0 0 Y 325 South Park H111 Taxes:1032 RfTyp: 3 5 2 1 Qwn O Y 0 325 Maint:0 HT.Pd: 0 a POSS: AG Vacnt:l WL.Pd: 0 5 Oo+nera: MANIEY, Utila:1990 EI.Pd:T 6 Other:0 7 Pn:556.6601 TOTAL EXP:3654 Offlee:CENTURY 21•CONSOII Ph:58J-3576 Key:Y NET INC:41l6 Agent:MASSEY, ROGER Ph:583.9051 Lock:O Reaarks:2 ENCLOSED PORCHES, 2 STOVES, 2 REFRIG.,GAS BOILER•1994. WASHER/DRYER FOR DOWtI UNIT ONLY OFF STREET PAAKI/IG fOR 4 CARS, NEED TO INLAEASc RENTS. OWNER PAYS RATER • Information 8elleved Accurate But Not Guaranteed iOID:Oft: 5 Aat:BISP a:991 534,000 TyD:CFO HERBEA Oatt_:12/04/99 ~~~~.. .r .~.. . :; ~ ~ y uays: is •MASSEY, ROGER tom' _~. 542,000 Typ:C01N Oate:07/02/99 t•hk ~ , IJ5 KIRKWO00 clty:o9D zip:szaol $34,000 rf•18J1 Area:D80 Add: 9: NUnlts:2 Pk9' gA J.ON Aet1:0 Pro~:Y Period: Zonin R2 Pendln Y 1856 INC Rents:B100 lot SSZe: 103X60 Ma1n:700 L9 :525 Other: SgFt:Up:J96 Gross:B100 Cona::BK UN ~M ZR BTO GSHT OG OSE OOEP Z75T legal:L9,MC• EXP insur:200 YrBlt:1856 1 4 2 1 0 GFA 0 0 0 275 GnATH'S SLB. Manaq: Laund: 2 0 0 0 0 DUBUQUE, IA iaxes:564 RtTyP:R 3 D 0 0 0 Poss'AG Ma1nt:4B8 Hi.Pd: i d Drrnero:JAS1ES/J. 0 0 0 0 Vacnt:400 wt.Pd:T 5 0 p 0 0 Utlls: E1.Pd:T 6 0 D O 0 Pn:J483449 Other: 100 7 Ke YES Ottlce:9[SPING REALTY, WII Ph:556.0620 Y: TOTAL EXP:1770 lock:0 NET INC'6J30 Agent:9ISPING, HERBERT Ph:58B•2608 Remarks;BOTH APARTMENTS REDECORATED b RENTED. .SEPERATE UTIIITlES.NEwER wATEA WiTHEUNITSp OPENCFRAMEL ORCIIw(1152 SOSFTO) wOnK.2 STOVES b REFRIGERATOnS FURNISHED • [nforn,atlon 8elleved Accurate But Not Guaranteed ` _~ MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Wednesday, May 20, 1999 5:00 p.m. City Hall, Conference Room B 50 W. 13th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Kringle, Commissioners Greenfield, Terry Mozena, Jim Gibbs and Pam Bradford.; Staff members Mark Noble and Laura Carstens and Local Governments Coordinator Kerry McGrath from the State Historical Society of Iowa. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. New commission __ members Mozena and Gibbs were welcomed, and introductions were made. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying that the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. MINUTES: Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Kringle to approve the minutes of March 11, 1999; motion passed unanimously. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford to approve the minutes of March 25, 1999; motion passed unanimously. Staff noted that a transcript of the March 11, 1999, meeting was included in the Commission's packets, as requested. DESIGN REVIEW Address: 84 Main St Applicant: Steven Gudenkauf District: N/A (required for Facade Grant) Project: Renovate Store Front Steven Gudenkauf, 84 Main Street, reviewed his proposal to renovate the facade of the building at 84 Main Street, known as the Old Main Hotel. Applicant has submitted a request for a facade renovation grant which includes the following: 1) installation of an awning over the south half of the building, 2) removal of the fire escape from the building facade, 3) replacement of two existing doorways and windows on the first floor of the building, 4) replacement of an existing garage door with a new garage door that will have an appearance of an old carriage garage, and 5) new raised wood panels above and below the windows and doorways. The applicant stated that he has started this project and was told by Community and Economic Development Director Jim Burke to continue the project, and that a grant can be made retroactive if approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. The grant is available to those in the tax increment financing district, which includes this property. This property is not part of the Old Main Historic District; however, due to the facade grant request, the Historic Preservation Commission must review and approve the proposal. The Commission and applicant discussed the facade renovation plans that have already occurred and what is to happen with the remainder of the facade. The applicant proposed duplicating the facade on the north half as it looks on the south half, which will include installing one large and one small window with raised wood panels below and above the windows. To the north of those two windows, he noted there is an existing garage door that will be slightly modified to take on the appearance of carriage doors, although it will act as a standard new garage door. The Commission and applicant discussed in great detail what the facade will look like and what it looked like in the past. Staff noted there is no photo documentation showing the facade of this building, which has caused some difficulty in knowing how to restore the facade to its original state. The applicant discussed what he has uncovered in his restoration up to this point as to what he believes the facade might have looked like. --The Commission~fe(t that the smaller window between the garage door and the large window was at one time an entrance and they would like to see that entry recreated. They also would like to see raised wood panels above and below the windows and the garage door that will replicate what has been done on the south half of this building. The Commission also discussed whether an awning should be constructed over the entire north half of this building or just above the entrance to the north half of the building. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford to approve the renovation on the storefront with the conditions that there be a new entrance similar to the two existing entrances and that raised wood panels above the windows, entryway and the garage door be constructed in a similar fashion to those on the south half of the building. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Bradford, Greenfield and Mozena; Nay: Kringle and Gibbs. Design Review Address: 623-627 Arlington St. Applicant: Tim Wood District: W. 11th St. Project: Install vinyl siding Tim Wood, owner of the property for approximately 7-8 years, provided price estimates for replacing the existing wood and for installing vinyl siding. The applicant stated the condition of the wood is in poor shape, and that the paint includes lead. He stated that in several locations he has nailed tin over the deteriorated wood siding. His concern with removing the lead paint and repairing the wood is that the side of the house is approximately 45 feet high thus making it very difficult to contain lead paint flakes and dust. The applicant and Commissioners reviewed the bids on the project options. The Commission asked whether this house had been tested for lead paint. The applicant responded that testing had been done by the City Housing Department. The Commission asked the applicant numerous questions on alternative ways to renovate this house, addressing the extent of wood that is in disrepair or rotted and the extent of the lead paint on the house. The Commission stated they would like to see a cost of repairing and painting as they are concerned that putting vinyl siding on the house is just covering up a problem that may require further review. The Commission also asked that they be provided a condition report as to how much of the wood is rotted. Motion by Mozena, seconded by Kringle, to table this design review and let the applicant return with one additional estimate to strip the paint and repaint the house, and that he provide two estimates to repair the rotted areas with the second request to include the percentage of the house that is in bad shape (provide square footage amount). Motion carried by the following vote: Aye: Kringle, Bradford, Greenfield, Mozena & Gibbs; Nay: None. ITEMS PROM COMMISSION Staff introduced Kerry McGrath, Local Government Coordinator from the State Historical ~-`Society of Iowa in Des Moines. She suggested ways to consult with other communities on how to revise ordinances since the City Council has requested the Historic Preservation Commission review and revise its ordinance. McGrath stated that the Commission needs to be clear and concise with the ordinance revision. She suggested that the Commission might develop a set of guidelines, maybe different for each district, such that if amended in the future, they would not require City Council approval of that change. The ordinance needs to be clear in determining the character-identifying features of the building and that one option that could help the Commission with cases such as the project at 84 Main Street, is to develop a generic storefront guideline that should be followed throughout the Historic District. This would help eliminate questions and uncertainty of the Commission, and the applicants would be more aware of what would be required of them to do. McGrath also stated the Commission needs to build support and to make aware incentives and get information to the property owners that there are programs, local and state, to help rehab their properties. The Commission stated they would like to address the neglect issue, possibly by proactively providing letters that inform property owners in historic districts of the rehab programs when it is observed that there are some problems to their house. This would assist the Commission in the situation where if the property owner does not address those needs and later comes before the Commission to remove or replace historical components of the building, that the Commission has previously addressed that concern and would make their decision easier. Besides addressing neighborhood buildings through neglect, they also mentioned that in some neighborhoods, the City should make more of a commitment to neighborhoods through lighting, trees and other civic improvements that might inspire property owners to also make improvements. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~~----- ~ / 3 ~ ark Nobl Adopted ~ Assista tanner -, MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION Thursday, June 3, 1999 5:00 p.m. Conference Room B, City Hall 50 W. 13th Street, Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle; Commission Members Duaine Greenfield, Pam Bradford, Terry Mozena and Jim Gibbs; Staff Members Mark Noble and Laura Carstens. ABSENT: None. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:07 p.m. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. MINUTES: The minutes of the May 20, 1999 meeting were approved as submitted. DESIGN REVIEW/623-627 ARLINGTON/WOOD W. 11TH STREET DISTRICT: Application of Tim Wood to install vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District (tabled from previous meeting). Applicant Tim Wood reviewed the issues from the previous meeting, at which time he was asked to provide additional estimates for scraping, painting and replacing existing rotted wood. Mr. Wood explained he would need to remove the tenants when he scrapes the exterior wood and would lose revenue. In addition, he would lose S10,000 worth of grant money from the Housing Department, as they want the exterior completely covered, wholly stripped and removed or replaced in full. He explained that if he has to scrape or strip completely, that it would prove to be too expensive. He stated that there are a large number of guidelines for contractors to follow tivhich makes it difficult to hire someone who can do this work. His concern also was that his insurance agent recommended that he follow the guidelines completely to insure as little liabilrrty as possible. t\~tr, Woods indicated that in order to qualify for Housing grant money of $5,000 per unit, he needs to remove all lead paint from the inside as well as the outside of the structure. Based on his past experience, he is anticipating S6-7,000 per unit on the inside alone which does not include relocation of tenants. He said the units rent for approximately $350 per unit plus clean-up costs, ~vhict~ ha estimates at approximately S800, The Commission asked how long he has owned this proFaerty, to which Ise replied he has otivned it for approximately six or seven years. He stated fie did some spot-paint work about ttivo years ago. He said the area where there is some tin covering the existing wood was on the house before he bought it. The Commission asked if he was aware that hu was in a historic district when he bought the home, and he replied that he was informed. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 2 Commissioner Greenfield noted that he does not think that vinyl siding is appropriate material for this project. He inquired that if siding were to be placed over the existing building, would it be feasible to go back later and remove the siding and expose the wood again. Commissioner Gibbs stated that by covering the wood siding, they are not really solving the problem, rather just doing a quick fix of the real issue. Mr. Wood stated that it would be foolish to strip the wood siding, and indicated it should be removed and replaced with new because a large percentage of it is in bad shape. T~Commission and applicant discussed one bid of $26,000 to replace the wood, plus another 514,000 for the inside work. The applicant stated this would add a great cost to this property which he originally bought for $23,000. Commissioner Mozena expressed his belief that maintaining the home over the past seven years would have helped reduce the number of issues that the applicant is presently facing on this propefij and would have alleviated some of those financial concerns. The applicant said he believes that the problems were there before he bought the property, and that to spend $30-40,000 on this property is not economically feasible. The applicant and Commission discussed different design options and costs to renovate according to those designs. The Commission expressed their concern with the lack of maintenance over the past several years. Motion by Greenfield, seconded by Bradford, to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented. The motion was denied by the following vote: Aye -None; Nay: Bradford, Greenfield, Mozena, Kringle and Gibbs. Commissioners then indicated that they would consider an application for a Certificate of Economic Hardship, and asked Mr. Wood to contact staff for the application requirements. ITEMS FROM PUBLIC: Mary Beth Wigginton, 195 Alpine, asked to speak with the Commission. She said she is a neighbor of the Comptons, and stated they bought their house in 1994 or 1995. She stated she believes the Historic Preservation Commission is doing a disservice to the community. She believes the Commission needs to address the issue on lead paint quickly as there is concern to her children and the Comptons' children as well as numerous other people in the City. Mrs. Wigginton stated they are approximately 12 feet from the Comptons' house, and she believes there is no feasible way to tent that residence and contain the lead dust during the removal of the lead paint. The Commission and Mrs. Wigginton discussed this issue and ways to properly remove lead paint. ~1rs. Wigginton stated more information should be presented to the property owner up front so that they know what they are facing when they buy a home in a historic preservation district. She suggested they provide regulations to the property owners through a Realtor or provide information to the property owners at the public library. The Commission stated that their directive is to preserve history and retain the beauty of the city. The Commission and Mrs. Wigginton discussed putting together a manual to help new homeowners understand the processes they Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 3 need to follow, both for removing lead based paint and also with regulations they must follow when they live in a historic preservation district. She said the manual could also provide information on funding that is available to help fix buildings in these instances. DESIGN REVIEW/195 ALPINE/KARLE WIGGINTON/LANGWORTHY DISTRICT: Application of Karie Wigginton to install seamless steel soffit at 195 Alpine Street in the Langworthy Historic Preservation District. Kaf}e and Mary -Beth Wigginton reviewed their proposal to install aluminum soffit and fascia, stating that presently there exists a plywood soffit which is covered on the end by a 1 x 4. They said that the house was stuccoed in the early 1980s; previous to that, it was wood sided. They said they 4vould like to remove or cover the plywood, as there is considerable rot and the wood does not provide vents. Their concern with removing the plywood is the cost, which is approximately S4,800. By removing the wood, they felt some of the existing stucco work would be destroyed, with an additional cost to replace it. If they were to place wood right over the existing wood, they felt they would be adding a considerable amount of weight to that part of the structure, which is already sagging. They said they would like to install aluminum soffit and have received a bid from ABC Seamless for approximately 51,600. They said that price is about a third of the price of wood, and also would not add additional weight to the structure. They stated that since this is not a decorative soffit, it is not a very important design element to match exactly. They said they would attempt to match the color, but their concern is its present deteriorated condition. Commissioner Gibbs commended the Wiggintons for their past work and renovations. He asked if they had consulted with contractors, which Wiggingtons replied they had and that wood is three times the cost. Commissioner Mozena stated he didn't see any value in the existing wood, as it is basically plywood. Both Commissioners Gibbs and Mozena asked if they looked at other design options with an architect. The applicants stated they are concerned that the work will be delayed and will not be completed this year if they research options with an architect. Commissioner Mozena explained that it seems appropriate that the Commission be given some time to review this request and look at the options, as this is the first time they have seen this project. The applicant and Commission discussed the cost to do this project. The applicants stated they cannot justify the additional cost of wood. The Commission asked that they consult again with architects who could give them different design suggestions. The Commission and applicants also discussed the sample aluminum soffit that the applicants had brought to the meeting. They discussed researching 3" wide metal panels, as that would be more in line with ~.vhat probably existed originally on this property. Commissioners indicated that if they could not find a comparably priced 3" panel, then the Commission would reconsider the proposed panel at their next meeting. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 4 Motion by Kringle, seconded by Bradford, to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for 3" wide metal panel soffit. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye -Kringle, Bradford, Greenfield and Mozena; Nay -Gibbs. DESIGN REVIEW/432 BLUFF/KYLE GOONEY/CATHEDRAL DISTRICT: Application of Kyle Cooney to install a permanent sign at 432 Bluff Street in the Cathedral Historic Preservation District. Thy applicant reviewed the proposed sign request, noting where the sign will be placed. He stated that the sign will project off the front of the building, will be approximately 4' x 1 '/` in area - end will have a bracket that will be fastened to the building. The Commission and the applicant ~'~ reviewed the location of the proposed sign noting that it will be located on the southern portion of the building, as the building owner is going to be installing a porch on the nortfi hatf of the building in the near future. Motion by Kringle, seconded by Greenfield to approve the request. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye -Kringle, Greenfield, Mozena, Gibbs and Bradford; Nay -None. DESIGN REVIEW/47~ LORAS BOULEVARDJHEARTLAND HOUSING INITIATNEITIM CRABBIW. 11TH STREET DISTRICT: Application of Heartland Housing initiative, represented by Tim Crabb, to install vinyl siding and soffit at 475 Loras Boulevard in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District. The applicant reviewed the proposal stating they are having difr"iculty finding someone wfio can repair the slate and may have to locate non-asbestos slate siding replace it with. He noted that the existing siding is slate that contains both asbestos and lead paint. The applicant stated that this material is not original to the property and that they believe the original structure and several additions used clap board, stucco, brick, and asphalt shingles under the existing slate siding. They are looking into the Lead Paint Abatement Program, which would give them some money to repair this work; however, they are looking at a cost of approximately X48,000 to remove and make improvements inside and outside this property, excluding the removal of the slate siding. NOTE: Commissioner Bradford left at 6:45 p.m. The Commission talked about the historical significance of the structure and inquired about what material would be appropriate. The Commission discussed meeting with the applicant at the site to look at the layers that are underneath the slate siding, and arrangements were made for meetings on Tuesday, June 8, at 5:15 p.m. and on Thursday June 10, at 5:00 p.m. at the site to review what other materials are under the existing slate siding. Ntotion by Kringle, seconded by Mozena, to table this item to the June 17th meeting. The motion was approved by the follo+~/ing vote: Aye -Kringle, Mozena, Gibbs and Greenfield; Nay -none. Minutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 5 PROCESS FOR REVIEW/UPDATE OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: Staff Member Carstens discussed the process suggested by staff for review and update of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, as referred by the City Council to the Commission. She said the ordinance is being reviewed by the Community and Economic Development Department, Legal and Planning Services staff. Staff Member Carstens reviewed the process and options available to the Commission. Based on input from City Council, City staff and citizens, she said staff believe that the Commission should consider the following issues: 1) revision of the appeal process, 2) options that should be available to applicants, 3) a clearer definition of economic hardship, 4) the issue of economic hardship for single family home ownership, 5) addressing problems with the existing ordinance which are causing conflicts, and 6) what limitations are placed on the Ordinance by the State Code. The Commission discussed the process and steps that could be followed to address these issues. Staff Member Carstens noted that City staff have begun problem-solving steps by reviewing historic preservation ordinances from other cities as ~veli as incentives used by other cities. She noted that staff are looking at ways to streamline the current ordinance, reviewing court cases for definitions of economic hardship and reviewing the Iowa Code pertaining to historic preservation. Staff suggested meeting with City Council in a work session to test the process and get direction, clarify problems/opportunities and discuss goals for historic preservation. After meeting with the City Council, she suggested that a task force be created which could include existing Commissioners, property owners in historic districts, contractors who work on district properties, a representative from the Dubuque County Historical Society and a representative from Dubuque Main Street Ltd. Staff Member Carstens noted that non-voting members on the task force could be Laura Carstens, Mark Noble, Pam Myhre and Tim O'Brien, with a facilitator of this process. She said duties or goals of this task force would be to review data, conduct focus group meetings, develop recommendations for revisions and incentives, meet with the commission to share the information, test proposals and then meet with the Council. She said staff also felt focus groups should be formed which represent neighborhood organizations, residents and property owners in historic districts, contractors and building supply businesses. She said additional steps would be to survey design review applicants and past and current Historic Preservation Commission members to identify perceptions and problems and to review and respond to new changes and incentives. She also recommends a survey of City staff in various departments, and obtaining input assistance from the State Historic Preservation Office. After compiling all this information and conducting these meetings, then modification and ordinance amendment could be brought to the City Council for discussion at a work session and later, adoption. The Commission felt that this was an appropriate process, and that a work session with City Council needs to be scheduled. Staff will prepare a letter to the City Council from the Commission requesting a work session and confirmation of the process. Nlinutes -Historic Preservation Commission June 3, 1999 Page 6 ITEMS FROM COMMISSION: The Commission asked how other City commissions operate. Staff Member Carstens explained the Zoning Board of Adjustment is similar to this commission, in terms of their applicants. She noted that the Board is different with respect to appeals of Board decisions, which must be made to District Court. She also explained the Zoning Advisory Commission is an advisory body that makes recommendations to the City Council. She recommended that commissioners attend meetings of the Board and Commission to see how a formal meeting is run. ITE3'V1S FROM STAFF: Staff Member Carstens suggested that the Commission limit design reviews to their second meeting of each month (on the third Thursday), and use their first meeting of each month (on the first Thursday) as work sessions to focus on the review and update of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The Commission agreed with this schedule, to begin in July. Staff Member Noble noted that training on historic preservation rehabilitation standards is scheduled for Tuesday, June 22, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the Library. Staff reviewed the presenters, and asked for input on potential issues to be addressed. Commissioners Mozena, Gibbs, and Kringle stated they will attend that meeting. Commissioner Greenfield ,who was unable to attend, asked if it would be possible to have this training session videotaped or audiotaped for his review at a later date or if the materials could be provided for his review. Staff Member Noble will contact Commissioner Bradford as to her availability for the training. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m c~~~~/99 Adopted Respectfully submitted, MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, June 17, 1999 5:00 p.m. City Hall, Conference Room 6 50 W. 13th Street,,Dubuque, Iowa PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Kringle, Commissioners Duaine Greenfield, Terry Mozena, Jim Gibbs and Pam Bradford; Staff member Mark Noble. ABSENT: None. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:05 p.m. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying that the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law. MINUTES: Minutes of the June 3, 1999 were approved as submitted. OESIGN REVIEW/475 LORAS BOULEVARD/CRABBIW. 11TH STREET DISTRICT: Application of Tim Crabb, Heartland Housing Initiative, to install vinyl siding and soffit at 475 Loras Boulevard in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District (tabled from previous meeting). Tim Crabb, representative for Heartland Housing Initiative, thanked those Commissioners that were able to visit the site and observe what types of siding materials are located on this building. The Commission and applicant discussed the different types of siding found at this property. The applicant stated that although it was not discovered on the exterior, he believes that brick is also included on this structure. He said that where the outer slate siding has been removed to view what is underneath, the Commission and applicant found asphalt roofing as a siding material as well as stucco, wood siding, and the existing slate. The applicant stated the garage will be removed as previously approved as well as a small addition on the rear. The Commission questioned that if vinyl were approved, would the slate be removed. The applicant stated that would be the case. Commissioner Mozena inquired that if an appropriate siding material was found during the removal of the slate, would they keep that exposed. The applicant stated that the primary concern (if wood is found below the slate) is that it probably contains lead which would require removal and additional expense. The applicant stated they would be satisfied if the Commission were to approve a certain color, width and style of vinyl siding. He also stated his concern that there is lead on the slate as well as the wood Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 1999 Page 2 underneath the slate, and that they would just paint over it and drop out of the Lead Paint Abatement Program if they are denied the vinyl siding option. The Commission discussed vinyl siding as not being a viable option. One of the Commissioner's stated he would rather see steel siding, which he feels is a more appropriate substitute material. --Motion by Bradford, seconded by Greenfield to approve vinyl siding. The motion was denied by the following vote: Aye: Gibbs; Nay: Bradford, Greenfield, Mozena and Kringle. - DESIGN REVIEW/623-627 ARLINGTON/llVOODNY. 11TH STREET DISTRICT: Application of Tim Wood to install vinyl siding at 623-627 Arlington Street in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District (tabled from previous meeting). The applicant, Tim Wood, introduced his sister, Vicki Bechen, who is a part owner of B&W Properties, which owns the property. He reviewed bids and documents that were required as part of the application for economic hardship, including appraisals of this property, the assessed value of this property and comparable appraisals of properties similar in size and location. Additionally, he reviewed the financial records of operating and maintenance expenses of this property for the past several years. He also discussed the proposed costs to renovate this house, with options including stripping and painting the existing wood, replacing the wood with new wood, and installing vinyl siding over the existing wood siding. Staff Member Noble noted that some of these materials were just presented to the Commission tonight due to the short time frame between staff advising the applicant of what would be required to provide to the Commission and the actual meeting date. The Commission and applicant reviewed these materials in detail as well as the sections of the ordinance pertaining to the certificate of economic hardship process. The Commission noted that the property was purchased in 1993 and that one bid was for stripping, painting and replacing the rotted wood, which would address some of the concerns but would still leave lead paint on the remaining wood siding. They also reviewed the bid which was for completely replacing the woodwork. The Commission discussed with the applicant the figures for renovation as defined by the Lead Paint Abatement Program, with Commissioners noting that the money the applicant states they will lose is not actually their money; rather, it is money that would be given to them if they follow the Lead Paint Abatement Program. The Commission and applicant Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 1999 Page 3 reviewed the projected maintenance cost for repainting wood siding over the next several years and compared that to replacement of vinyl siding over the next several years. Motion by Duaine Greenfield, seconded by Terry Mozena, to approve the Certificate of Economic Hardship. The motion was denied by the following vote: Aye: Greenfield; Nay: Gibbs, Bradford, Mozena and Kringle. ~1TEMS FROM THE COMMISSION The Commission briefly reviewed concerns in the way historic preservation in the City was leading, noting that the recent American Tower, Merchant's Hotel and the Union Cigar -Store building decisions were all overturned by the City Council. They noted that preservation is about preserving historical structures and materials and is not just for preservation sake. They suggested they need to pursue more incentive programs to provide to the people who wish to restore and preserve their structures. ITEMS FROM STAFF Staff noted that the July 1 meeting will be held at the Library, either in the Board Room or Auditorium and that the Commission should note on their agenda for that meeting which location has been selected. All meetings in the future will be held at the Library Auditorium on the normal dates with the exception of the meeting in November which will be moved to Wednesday, November 17, due to a conflict. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 6:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, g ~ 9 Noble, sistant Planner Adopted ~' rxe ctn of ~~ DuBL~ ~~ ~~~ Pl.nuiin~ Scrvicc5 Dcparnizcnt 50'.~'c>t 13th Strcct Dubuque, Iowa 53001--1So•t July 11, 1999 Tim Wood B & ~V Properties »0 English Lane Dubuque, Iowa 5?001 RE: Denial of Request for Certificate of Appropriateness __ Dear Mr. Wood: ~-- ,, The purpose of this letter is to officially inform you that at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on June 3, 1999, your application, to install vinyl siding at the property located at 623f627 Arlington Street, was denied a certificate of appropriateness. The Commission found, in discussing your project, that the ~ecretarv of the Int rinr'q uidelines for Rehabilitation, which are the guidelines mandated by Ctty Ordinance Chapter 2~ to be used by the Commission to conduct local design reviews, recommend repairing or replacing existing features w1th similar materials if they are still available. To maintain the integrity of materials evident on the building, the Historic Preservation Commission found that maintaining the existing wood clapboard siding was the only approvable option. Section 25-1 1 of the Historic Preservation ordinance states that "an aggrieved party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the community and economic department within thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the Commission's action. Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the community and economic development department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the Commission to the City Clerk. On appeal, the City Council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City Council shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the historic preservation ordinance (this chapter), and whether the Commission's actions was patently arbitrary or capricious. The City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate. The City Clerk shall give written notice of the City Council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the historic preservation commission. An appellant who is not satisfied by the decision of the City Council may appeal within sixty (60) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34." If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at 589-4210. Sincere ark J. oble Assistant Planner Srn•icc Pcoplr 1ntcSrity P.csponsibility Innovation Tram~.•ork THE CTT1' OF DUB E ~~-~~4~~ ('Iinnin5 Services Dcp.ut,t,cnt July 11, 1999 ~0 Wuct 13th Strcct Du~uduc, IOIY.] 52001-18u~ Tim tiVood B & W Properties »0 English Lane Dubuque, Iowa X2001 RE: Denial of Request for Certificate of Economic Hardship Dear i/Ir. `Vood: The purpose of this letter is to officially inform you that at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on June 17, 1999, your application, to install vinyl siding at the property located at 623/627 Arlington Street, vas denied a certificate of economic hazdship. The Commission found, in discussing your project, that the guidelines mandated by City Ordinance Chapter 2~ to be used by the Commission to review certificates of economic hazdship have not been met. After reviewing the required information which you had submitted, the Commission determined that you have earned or aze able to earn a reasonable economic return from the property. Section 2~-11 of the Historic Preservation ordinance states that "an aggrieved party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the community and economic department within thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the Commission's action. Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the community and economic development department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the Commission to the City Clerk. On appeal, the City Council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. The City Council shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the historic preservation ordinance (this chapter), and whether the Commission's actions was patently arbitrary or capricious. The City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the Commission for further action as may be appropriate. The City Clerk shall give written notice of the City Council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the historic preservation commission. An appellant who is not satisfied by the decision of the City Council may appeal within si:cty (60) days of the City Council's decision to the District Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34." If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at X39-4210. Sincere! , Mark 1 obie Assistant Planner L 1 Scrvicr Pcoplc (ntcgrity Rcsuonsibility Innov~Hai, Tcan„vork HIS?ORIC ?RrSERV;~iIOV a.*chitectural features of the struc- ture, improvement or site upon which the work is to be done will not have a substantial adverse ef- fect onthe aesthetic, historic or ar- chitectural signuicance and value of either the property itself or of the neighboring improvements in a district. b. The issuance of a certificate of ao~ro- priateness shall enable the applicant ~- - to obtain a regulated permit and to pro- ceed with the proposed alteration or ac- _. tivity. (3) Disapprove the proposed project; certificate oFeconomic hardship. The commission shall issue a certificate of economic hardship, upon application or upon its own motion, if: a. A certificate of appropriateness has been denied; and b. The commission determines that disap- proval of the proposed work or activity would prevent the property owner from earning any reasonable economic re- turn from the property. (d) The building official, city engineer or other local authorities shall not issue a regulated permit until there has been a determination of no mate- rial effect or a certificate of appropriateness or a certificate of economic hardship issued. (e) The transfer of a determination of no mate- rial effect, certificate of appropriateness or certif- icate of economic hardship from one structure, im- provement or site to another structure, improvement or site or from one person to an- other is prohibited. (f) Each determination of no material effect, cer- titicate of appropriateness or certificate of eco- nomic hardship issued under the provisions of this article shall expire and become null and void if the alteration, construction, repair, removal, dem- olition or excavation for which the determination of no material effect, ce:-tiiicate of apprcpriate- ness or certificate of economic hardship was is- sued is not initiated within one (1) year of its is- suance. (Ord. No. X6.90, § 1, 5-21-90; Ord. No. 98-92, § 1, 12.7-92) § 2S3 Sec. 25.9. Procedure for the review of plans; application for certif cafe of appro- priateness: application for certif~- cate of economic hardship, (a) Application for regulated permit shall be made to the appropriate city official. The applica- tionshall state or the appropriate city official shall determine that the proposed alteration, activity or demolition is to be done on a landmark, land- mark site or on a structure within a historic dis- trict. (b) Upon the filing of such application, the ap- propriate city official shall notify the applicant that the matter must be reviewed by the historic preservation commission before a regulated permit can be issued. (c} A request for review by the comn,;~~;on of the proposed work, activity or demolition mnst be made by the applicant. Application for com*n~S- sion review shall be filed in the community and economic development department. (d) Unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the commission, the comm;~- sion shall meet within twenty-one (21) days after the filing of the application for cometiarsim, ~.. view. The commission shall review the proaased project according to the duties and powers speci- fied in this chanter. In reviewing the proposed project, the commission may confer with the ar plicant or the applicant's authorized representa- tive. The commission may require submission of such additional drawings, sketches, photograph; or other e.Yhibits as it deems reasonably neces- sary for consideration of the application. po. \~~. 1~ 1J20.1 n'ISTORIC PRESERV:~TION (e) The commission shall approve or disapprove such plan. (~ If the proposed project is approved, the com- rnission shall issue a certificate of appropriate- ness. (g) If the comm;~.Gion disapproves such proposed project, it shall state its reasons and shall transmit to the applicant a written record of its disap- proval. The commission may propose appropriate revisions of the applicant's proposal which, if __adopted, would cause the commission to recon- sider its disapproval. The applicant may make modifications to the proposed project and shall have the right to resubmit a modified proposal at any time. (h) If the commission disapproves a proposed project, it may, upon application or on its own motion, consider issuing a certificate of economic hardship. (1) Upon application or motion for a certificate of economic hazdship, the commission shall schedule a public meeting on that applica- tion or motion. (2) Data to be provided by the applicant. The co**+m7Csion may solicit expert testimony or require that the applicant for a certificate of economic hardship make submissions con- cerning any or all of the following informa- tion before rendering its decision: a_ Estimate of the cost of the proposed con- struction, alteration, demolition or re- moval and an estimate of any addi- tional cost that would be incurred to comply with_the recommendations of the historic preservation commission for changes necessary for the issuance of a certificate of approp.-iateness; b. A report from a licensed engineer or arr~itect with e_eperience in rehabili- tation as to the structural soundness of any structures and their suitability for rehabilitation; c. Estimated market value of the prop- erty in its current condition; after com- pletion ofthe proposed construction, al- teration, demolition or removal; after any changes recommended by the com- § 25-9 mission; and, in the case of a proposed demolition, after renovation of the ex- isting property for continued use; d. In the case of a proposed demolition, an estimate from an architect, devel- oper, real estate consultant, appraiser or other real estate professional expe- rienced in rehabilitation, as to the eco- nomic feasibility of rehabilitation or reuse of the existing structure on the P~Pe~Y~ e. The amount paid for the property, the date of purchase and the person from whom purchased, including a descrip- tion ofthe relationship, if any, between the owner of record or the applicant and the person from whom the prop- erty was purchased, and any terms of financing between the seller and buyer, f. If the property is income-producing, the annual gross income from the property for the previous two (2) years; g. Itemized operating and maintenance expenses for the previous two (2) years; and depreciation deduction and annual . cash flow before and after debt service, if any, during the same period; h. The rema;.,;ng balance on any mort- gage or other financing secured by the property and annual debt service, if any, for the previous two (2) years; i. All appraisals obtained within the pre- vious two (2) years by the owner or ap- plicant in connection with the pur- chase, financing or ownership of the PmFe~Y . j. Any listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked and offers received, if any, within the previous two (2) years; k_ The assessed value of the property ac- cording to the two (2) most recent as- sessments; 1. The amount of real estate taxes for the previous two (2) years and whether or not they have been paid; m. The form of ownership or operation of the property, whether sole proprietor- ship, for-profit or not-for-profit corpora- tion, limited partnership, joint venture or other; Supp. Rio. 4 1521 § 25.9 DUBUQUE CODE n. any other information considered nec- essary by the commission to make a determination as to whether the prop- erty does yield or may yield any rea- sonable economic return to the prop- erty ownerts), including but not limited • to the income taz bracket of the own- er(s) or applicant(s) or of the principal investors) in the property. (3) Determination of economic hardship. The commission shall review all of the evidence -- hnd information required of an applicant for a certificate of economic hardship; and a. If the commission finds that disap- proval ofthe proposed work would pre- vent the property owner from earning any reasonable economic return from the property, the commission shall: 1. Immediately issue a certificate of economic hazdship; or ' 2. At its discretion, postpone, for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days, the issuance of a certificate of economic hardship. During this time, the commission shall investigate strategies which would allow the property owner to earn a reasonable economic return from the property. No regulated permit shall be issued during this time unless a certificate of appro- priateness has been secured. If, at the end of the one hundred eighty-day period, the commission, after a public meeting, finds that the property owner still cannot earn any reasonable economic re- turn from the property, it shall issue a certificate of economic hazd- ship. b. If the commission finds, aver initial re- view or after the one hundred eighty-day period of postponement, that the property owner has, in fact, earned or is able to earn a reasonable eco- nomic return from the Property, then the commission shall deny the applica- Stepp. No. 4 1b22 tion for a certificate of economic hazd- ship. (i) No regulated permit shall be issued autho- rizing amaterial change in appearance of a land- mark, landmazk site or of a structure or site within a historic district until there is a determination of no material effect or a certificate of appropriate- ness or a certificate of economic hardship filed with the building official or the city official au- thorized to issue the necessary regulated permit. (j) In the event the commission disapproves of a proposed project, the notice of disapproval shall be binding upon the building official, city engi- neer or other local authority, and no permit shall be issued in such a CpCe_--_-__-- (k) The failure of the commission to approve or disapprove an application for a certificate of ap- propriateness within sixty (60) days from the date of the filing of an application, unless an extension is agreed upon mutually by the applicant and the ~' - commission, shall be deemed to constitute ap- proval, unless within such sixty (60) days the com- mission has made a determination of economic hardship and has suspended its decision regarding a certificate of economic hardship pursuant to sub- section (h)(3)a2. (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21-90) Sec. 25-10. Standards for review. (a) The commission shall consider each design . review on the merits of the individual case, with _ " due deh~eration given to each prnposed change{s) and its sympathetic relationship to the specific historic setting, architectural or historic signifi- cance, extent of previous alteration, use of orig- inal materials and quality of design of the ex- . fisting structure or site. Commission approval of a particular type of alteration or activity shall not establish a binding precedent for future commis- sion action, but may constitute an additional factor to be considered in subsequent design reviews in- volving the same type of alteration or activity. (b) "The Secretary of Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation Projects,"Washington, D.C., 1979, and "The Sersetary of the Interior's Stan- dards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Reha- bilitating Historic Buildings," Washington, D.C., r` - - -. HISTORIC PRESERVATION (Revised 1983), shall provide the guidelines by which the commission shall review an application for a certificate of appropriateness or certificate of economic hardship, and any subsequent revisions of these guidelines by the Secretary of the Inte- rior may be adopted by the commission. (c) The commission shall also be guided by any design standazds specified in the ordinance or amendment designating the landmazk, landmazk site or historic district. (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21-90) Sec. 23.11. Appeals from commission action. (a} An aggrieved party may appeal the commis- sion's action to the city council by filing a notice of appeal with the community and economic de- velopmentdepartmentwithin thirty (30) days from the date of notice of the commission's action. (b) Upon filing of a notice of appeal, the com- munity and economic development department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the commission to the city clerk. (c) On appeal, the city council shall consider only the record of the action before the commis- sion. No new matter may be considered. (d) The city council shall consider whether the commission has exercised its powers and followed the guidelines established by law and the historic preservation ordinance [this chapter), and whether the comT,,;~~;on's action was patently arbitrary or capricious. (e) The city council' may affirm or reverse the commission's action, or may refer the matter back to the commission for such further action as may be appropriate. The city clerk shall give written notice of the city council's decision on appeal within seven (7) days of the city council's decision to the appellant and the historic preservation com- mission. (f) :4n Appellant who is not satisfied by the de- cision of the city council may appeal within sixty (60) days of the city council's derision to the Dis- trict Court for Dubuque County, pursuant to Iowa Code Section 303.34. (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21-90) Supp. No. 4 Sec. 25-12. Inspection. § 25-13 (a) After a certificate of appropriateness or cer- tificate of economic hazdship has been issued and '" a regulated permit granted to the applicant, the building official, city engineer or other Iocai au- thority may from time to time inspect the work authorized and shall take such action as is neces- sary to enforce compliance with the approved plans. (b) Historic preservation commissioners may from time to time inspect, from the public way, the work authorized and shall advise the building official or other enforcement authority as neces- sary to enforce compliance with the approved plans. - (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21-90) Sec. 25-I3. Violations; penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person to disobey, omit, neglect or refuse to comply with any provi- sion of this chapter, and such person shall be sub- ject to the provisions of section 1-8 and sections 1-15 through 1-17 of the City of Dubuque, Code of Ordinances. (Ord. No. 46-90, § 1, 5-21-90) (The aezL page is 1569) 1523 ,, TI-iG SCCRCTARY OI~ TI11: IN"I'CRIOR'S STAND/1RDS FOR RCI-iAi3ILIT~1T10N The fnllc,wini; Slinr)ards irr lu lie ar~hlir•d to spr•rific rr•lu,l~ilil,ilinn pre~jecls in ;r reasun;,l,le'ni;inner, I,kinf; into cunsider,~lion econornie and technical feasibility. (1) A property shall be used fur its historic purpnse nr I,e placed in a new use Thal requires n-ini-nal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. i (2) "I'I,e hislnric cl,aracler of a properly shall be n•I.~inr•d Intl (,reserved. "('Ire remuv~l of liisluric rnalerials ur alteration u( features and spaces Thal characterize a propeNy shall be avoided. U) [:arh properly shall be recognized as a physical rernrd of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, suet, as adding conjectural features or archileclural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. i (4) Mosl properties change over time; those clranl;es Ural leave acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. (5) Dislinclive Iealures, finishes, and cunslrucliun Iecl,nirlues or examples of craftsn-anship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. i (6) Delcrioralcd historic features shall Uc repaired rather Ihan replaced. Where tl-c sevcrlly of deterioration requires replacement of a distinclivc feature, the new feature shall malrh the old in desil;n, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by dncunrenlary, physical, or pictorial evidence. (7) Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandbl:rslin(;, that cause damage Io historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of stnrr- tures, !(appropriate, shall be undertaken using; the l;entlcst means possible. (8) Significant archeological resources affected l,y a project shall be protected and preserved. 1(such resources must be disturbed, mitigation meas- ures sl-all be undertaken. (9) New additions, exterior alterations, ur related new cunslruclion shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. Tlrt new work shall bt differentiated from the old and shall be cornpalible with the massing, size, scale, and archileclural features to protect the historic integrity ul the property and its environment. (10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed In the future, the essential form and integrity n(Ilre historic properly and its environment would be unimpaired. The Secretary ~f the in~erior's Standards for Rehabilitation and G«idelines for Rellal~ilitating Historic U.S. De~~artment of the [nlerior NaliUnal Park Service Preservation Assistance Division Wasl~in~;ton, D.C. uildings 'ilic ~•crcl:-ry ul 11 -• Intcriur'a til:n-~Inr~l:~ G-r 1 livturir I'riscrvaUun I'ruk•~Iy with (;ui-I}411nra lur Ah~~lyinh Ih~ Slan~lar-la were Inhlal)yy wril- Icn In !'176 by W. Ilrawn Marlon 111 WWII Gary L. I ~uu-e.'I'l~c Gul~lrlinrs fur Rehnl,llil:-lh-g { ~Isluric UuIIJin;s wcr~• reviscJ un-I exran-I~til In I-1N3 by Cary 1.. I lun-e and KAy b. W~•~~s.'i'i-cSlanJarJa lur Itrl-abllllaUun ' were revis~Kl In I~~Ill~irlluwing n {-ubllc cummr--lli-h~ I+erhxl. II shu-ihl Ix nul~~l ll-al the r.~lnii-' r'rvlylun~ In the 5landarJa h~- ~/•hNhI1H,-h~.: w111 :• :~ _i rU :~ ~~ ~~~ INT[tODUCT[ON The Secretary o(!he Interior is respohsible for esl;~l~li:mint; staodards for all J~nrgram under I~eparlmenta) authority and for advising Federal agencies un the preservation of historic properties listed or elif;ihle for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. In partial fulfillment of this responsibility, lire Secretary of tt~e Interior's Standards for liisloric I'reserv~tion Projects gave been developed to guide work undertaken on historic buildings-there are separate standards for acquisition, protection, slabili~ation, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction. The Standards for R~habilltation (codified in 36 CFR G7) comprise that section of the overall preservation project standards and addresses the most prevalent treatment. "Rehabilitation" is defined as "the process of returninj; a properly to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an e(fic(ent contemporary use while preserving those portions and features c-f the property which ,ve significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values." Initially developed by the Secretary of the Interior to determine the appropriateness of proposed project work on rej;istered properties within the I listoric Preservation Fund grant-in-aid program, the 5tandardv fir Rehabil}lallon have been widely used over the years-particularly to determine if a rehabili- tation qualifies as a Certified Rehabilitation for Federal tax purposes. In addition, the Standards have guided Federa) agencies in carrying out their historic preservation responsibilities for properties in Federal ownership or control; and Stale ,yid local officials in reviewing both Federal and nonfederal rehabilitation proposals. They have also been adoplecl by liisloric district and planning commissions across the country. 'I~he intent of the Standards is to assist the long-term preservation o(a property's significance through the preservation of historic materials and features. ~~he Standards pertain to historic buildings of all materiels, rnnstruction types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and interior of the buildings. T}~ey also encompass related landscape features and the buildin};'s site and environment, as well as attached, adjacent, or related new construction. To be certified for Federal fax purposes, a rehabilitation project must be determined by the Secretary b be consistent with tl~e historic character o(lhe stnrcture(s), and where applicable, the district in which it is located. ~ ' tVoo~.. Clntrbonr~f, ruca~her- bonrd, shirr,Ules-, nncl other cuoocfen ~Icfln~ and decorrrtlue a/e-nents Reco-----ie--der~ IJecaosr it can he easily sl~..rred by sawing, planing,.carving, and gouging, wood is the ..,ost com- rrronly rrsr~l material (err architectural features such as clapboards, cornices, brackets, entablatures, shutters, columns and balustrades. `hhese wooden features-both functional and decorative-rnay be inrtrortanl in defining the historic character of the. building and thus their retention, protection, and rc~t~air arc crf particular irnporlanre in rehabilitation projects. ldenti(ying, retaining, and preservin[: wood (c~alurc~s Ih;rt are im- . J portant in de(inin(; the overall historic character of the building such as siding, cornices, brackets, window archilr;rves. and door- way pediments; and their paints, finishes, and colors. f'rolecttng and mainlainin~ wood (ealures by providing proper drainage so that wafer is not allowed to stand on flat, horizontal surfaces or accumulate in decorative (ealures. Applying chemical preservatives to wood f~alures Such as beam ends or outriggers Ihat are exposed to decay hazards and are tradi- ~' tionally unpainted. ,l Retaining coalinFs such as paint that help protect the wood from moisture and ultraviolet light. faint removal should he considered only where there is paint surface deterioration and as part of an OVCrdII mainlenan('P nrf~PfAtn whirl. i......1.,,,.. ..,.......,e.... ~ No( Recontn-e--r~ed Removing or radically clanging wood features which are impor- tant in defining tl~e overall historic~cl~aracter of tl~e building so that, as a result, the character is diminished. ' Removing a major portion of the historic wood from a facade in- stead of repairing or replacing only the deteriorated wood, then reconstructing the facade with new material in order to achieve a uniform or "improved" appearance. Radically changing the type of finish or its color or accent scheme so that tl~e historic character of the exterior •s diminished. Stripping historically painted surfaces !o bare wood, then applying clear finishes or stains in order to create a "natural look." Stripping paint or varnish to bare wood rather than repairing or reapplying a special finish, i.e., a grained finish to an exterior wood feature such as a Front door. failing to iclenti(y, evaluate, and treat the causes of wood deterioration, including faulty (lashing, leaking gutters, cracks and boles in siding, deteriorated caulking in joints and seams, plant rr~aferial growing too close to wood surfaces, or insect or fungus in- festation. Using chemical preservatives such as creosote which can change the appearance of wood ~eatures unless they were used historically. • ;, Pp g .p~, . ,.,, ,, Stri in ainl or other eoati~n~s to reveal bare wood, thus expos- irig histarically~''coated ~ surfaces'''~o' the effects ~~of accelerated weatlrcring. V~ mllnuccl) The following work I~ I-ighlighled because it represents Ilre particularly complex technical or design aspects of rehabilitallon projects and sl-ould only be considered after the preservation ccrnrerns listed above I-ave been addressed. ~ Design for Missing historic 1"eatures . 17t~t~tln~ ar,c~ I(~slrirlllrig'i ntw tvoEHl ItAtllrr! st,clr as a cbr- ~hjet df doo.t'wny~whEn tht hlsteric f~Atrrr~E i~ complrtcly mlts- •ing. It ttiay be iii act~ttratE Mstoratlim ustnR historical, E-k-• -'tonal, tihd phy~kat dortlmetit~tttbhf dr Ek ~ new dc+lpjn that rb'zomp~tlblc wttlti tht• ~lif; ecalt, in~trrlal, and color of the •,hntork bulldl~r~ • • '~ ~_- --- - Architectural Meta[a: Ca9t /~rclrilec'lur:~l nrelal (ealures-such as cast- ron facades, porches, and steps; sheet metal cornices, [ro», steel, pressed tin, con- ro~(s, rn~( cresting and storefronts; and c, st or rolled metal doors, window sash, entablatures, per, a[umEuur», n»rE ilne and I-arclware-are o(Ien highly decorative and may be impcrrlant in defining the overall historic cli;u:r~lc~r e.( the buildi--g. 'I~Ircir retention, t'~roterlion, and repair should be a prime considrralion in -c•I~:~I~ilil~lic~n lrrnjccls. ~ i ' Reco------e-rclecl Identifying, rel:rining, and preserving archileclur~l rnclal (ealures such as cnlunrns, capilalt, window hnc~dt, nr sl:rirw:rvs Ural arc irn- portanl in defining Ilrc nvcr:rll historic c'Ir~r;rc~lc•r nl Ilir Inrilcling; and !heir (inislres and colors. I'rolecling and maintaining architectural metals (rc~rn corrosion by providing proper drainage so that wafer does not stand on flat, horizontal surfaces or accurnulale in curved, clcc-c~rative features. Creatint; a false historic appearance because the replaced wo~:l, feature (s based on insufficient historical, pictorial, and physic docurnchtallon. Inlrodu~ing a new wood feature that is incompatible in size, scald, material, and color. ' Not Reco------e--rled Removing or radically changing archileclura) metal (ealures which j arc irnpc-rtanl in clefinirig the overall historic character of the buildint; so that, as a result, the character is diminished. Renrovint; a major porlie-n e~(Ihe historic architectural metal from a facade instead of repairint; or replacing only the deteriorated metal, then reconstructing the facade with new material in order to create a uniform, or "unproved" appearance. Itaclically changing the type of finish or its historical color or accent scheme. Failing to idrnti(y, evaluate, and treat the causes of corrosion, such as moisture from leaking roofs or gutters. flaring incompatible metals tnt;elher without providing a reliable srparation material. Such iricompaHbilily can result in galvanic corrosion of the less noble metal, e.g., copprr will corrode cast (ron tlo~+l Iln ~n~t ~t~imtn~~-n