Supervisors - Legislative priorPHONE: 563-589-4441
FAX: 563-589-7884
EMAIL: brdofsup@dbqco.org
COURTHOUSE
DUBUQUE, IOWA 52001-7053
DUBUQUE COUNTY LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
DONNA L. SMITH
ALAN R. MANTERNACH
JIM WALLER
Presented 2001
The State Budget Crisis
We are sympathetic
and the reductions that the
result of the shortfall in revenue.
However, we remind you as
impossible situation of having io
attempting to provide
fiscal year 2002. At the
for fiscal year 2002,
make in services as a
· in the
at the same time that we are
certified for fiscal year 2003 we
Onc
program
762 in
in
3. Public Health Funding
Recently Dubuque County was notified that the Community Services Contract with the
Iowa Department of Public Health has been reduced for fiscal year 2002 by $11,829.00.
That money will reduce the allocation for public health nursing to $50,414.00 and for
Senior Health Services by $3,238.00 for the balance of this fiscal year, necessitating, of
course, a reduction in services.
Dubuque County already spends $15,000 for public health nursing services to persons in
need who do not necessarily meet the criteria for the state's public health nursing
program and an additional $80,000 to pay for additional necessary public health nursing
services. We assure you that the assumption that Dubuque County will automatically
provide additional funding for services when state and federal funding is reduced is a
false assumption.
Because of federally-imposed restrictions on Medicare and Medicaid funding for home
health services, Dubuque County has reached a crisis point in providing those services.
The Visiting Nurse Association reports that Finley Home Health Care and Mercy Home
Health Care are making referrals to the programs funded through the State of Iowa Single
County Grant and County Property tax much sooner because Medicare, Medicaid and
private health insurance funding have been exhausted.
As a result, fewer clients are being served with the state and local monies. This issue
must be addressed statewide. We are asking that a significant funding increase in the year
2002 would achieve a 50% state-county partnership in funding for Public Health Nursing
and Home Care Aide programs. We suggest that tobacco money be utilized to provide
· these essential health services.
4. Abandoned Wells
The Water Well Grants-to-Counties program from the Department of Natural Resources
has been decreased from $21,500 to $15,000 per county, at the same time that the DNR is
mandating that all abandoned wells be closed. It is estimated that there are 30,000 more
abandoned wells in Iowa that need to be closed. Rehabilitation of wells has also been
added as an eligible category for the grants.
We are asking that the grants be restored to at least the $21,500 figure in order to
encourage property owners to close abandoned wells.
5. Environmental Health & Zoning Issues
We ask that the legislature insert a definition of a "farm" for zoning purposes.
The legislature must determine under what circumstances corporate cormnercial animaI
2
confinement facilities fit within the agricultural exemption for zoning purposes. If
appropriate definitions were provided in the Code, counties would gain some control over
the citing of commercial confinement facilities.
The legislature must also determine definitions counties can util/ze when rural properties
are sub-divided and precisely under what circumstances these developments fit within the
agricultural exemption
State Papers
The Dubuque County Board of Supervisors continues to be supportive of the partnership
between the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, the State, and counties for the
medical care of the indigent. During fiscal year 2002 (the current year), we had utilized
25% of our quota of state papers by November I, leaving the balance of papers for the
remaining 8 months of the year.
With the increasing number of uninsured or under insured adults, it may be t/me to
reevaluate increased availability of state papers for needy people.
We anticipate that the elimination of the Medically Needy Program under Medicaid,
which is, according to Director Rassmussen, first hi line for elimination, there will be
additional demand for State Papers, for General Relief assistance and for Veterans'
assistance. We cannot project the immediate effect of the elimination of the Medically
Needy Program, but we know that there will be increased costs, at a time that the
Dubuque County General Relief Budget is already 20% over budget for fiscal year 2002
because of heating bills from last year's increased fuel cost and bitterly cold winter.
Mental Health Parity
Iowa does not currently require that health insurance policies cover treatment of inpatient
and outpatient mental illness and chemical dependency at the same level and with the
same annual and lifetime limits as physical illnesses. The discrepancy in the law is
discrkninatory and needs to be corrected. The State should amend the Code to adopt an
insurance parity law that requires insurance carriers to use the same co-pays, deductibles
and annual and lifetime limits for mental health and chemical dependency treatment as
for treatment of other physical illnesses.
Substance Abuse Funding
Inadequate funding for substance abuse treatment has created a fragmented system with
statewide inequities to the access for treatment.
3
First, the State must appropriate monies to pay for the actual cost ofdetoxificafion, and
then. in a separate fund, the State must appropriate monies to pay for the number of
comm~mity-based treatment and follow-up services.
9. Mental Health Issues
A. Growth in Mtt/MR/DD Fund
The best possible solution to the Iowa dilemma for services for the Mentally Ill,
Mentally Retarded and Developmentally Disabled is for the State to assume
responsibility for this entire system. One way that this could perhaps be done is
for the state to assume the system and abolish the concept of legal settlement so
that clients could more freely move and be placed in appropriate settings closer to
home. Perhaps the State could assume that responsibility sooner ifcotmfies
would agree to pay to the state an mount based on current expenditures, which
would decrease each year for a period of years, at the end of which the county
responsibility would be completely gone.
On April 9, 2001, the Dubuque County Board of Supervisors wrote to you and the
Governor, following the adoption of our fiscal year 2002 budget, attaching a
memorandum from the Iowa State Association of Counties, informing all of ns
that the Governor had reduced his recommended appropriation for the MH/DD
Growth Factor from $26.5 million to $18 million, on the assumption that the new
Adult Rehabilitative Option under Medicaid and the county balances would offset
this decrease.
We had already been informed of a reduction in block grant funding from the
Federal level for fiscal year 2002, for which we were able to budget.
To date, only a few consumers have been enrolled in the Adult Rehabilitative
Option, and we are informed that it would be premature to budget for these funds
for fiscal year2003. We are also informed that the Administrative Rules are not
yet complete for the Adult Rehabilitative Option, and that reimbursement is
limited to services that meet definitions developed by the State. In other words, a
consumer may qualify for these funds for 2 hours of a day, while the County pays
for services for the other 6 hours.
Beginning in January, counties will be preparing budgets, which are due in Des
Moines to the Department of Management by March 15, 2002. We need your help
in order to arrive at a level of appropriations for this fund early in the session.
We have already been informed that the Department of Human Services must
reduce spending in Medicaid, beginning with the Medically Needy Program. We
4
have no way of knowing how further reductions in Medicaid will affect this fund
before we can certify a budget.
There is a proposal from the Department of Human Services and the Central Point
of Coordination Restructuring Task Fome to abolish the legal settlement concept
and substitute residency for it. This proposal is based on a principle of eqn/table
service access, and ideals that require funding to follow consumers wherever they
choose to live. Un/ess that goal is established first, legal settlement cannot be
abolished, because counties like Dubuque, which offer a rich array of services,
will be magnets for disabled persons from other counties.
B. State Payment Program
During any given fiscal year, Dubuque County has approximately 115 active
"State Cases". Payment for these services have been reduced by 4.3% and
providers have been notified. Because Dubuque County will be negotiating
through the County Rate Information System, based at the Iowa State Association
of Counties, for rates during subSequent fiscal years, we do not yet know the
effect of those reductions on future per diems paid for services by Dubuque
County.
At the State level, Director Rassmnssen has stated that further staff reductions
would be made in workers who manage the MHfDD State Payment Program. In
Dubuque County this means that the DHS service worker who has previously
been assigned to these 110 consumers annually will be reassigned to other duties,
leaving the Dubuque County MH/DD Department to determine legal settlement
and refer cases. If Dubuque County were to adequately budget for assessment and
service coordination for the state cases, it is projected that an additional two or
three full t/me employees would have to be hired by Dubuque County.
A larger problem with these State Cases is case management for individuals who
have no legal settlement in any Iowa County.
The restructuring at the Department of Human Services has already directly
affected the way the Dubuque County MH/DD Department operates; adult service
workers have been essentially abolished, so there is no social worker for disabled
people, so the County is contacted for these issues and must refer cases to
Medicaid Case Management, at the County's expense:
Managed Mental Health Care
Concerns about the State's managed mental health and substance abuse provider
continue with providers of service. We are concerned that services for "state
cases" managed by the provider have equal access to services, in accordance with
the county management plan of the county in which the individual needing
services lives.
Dubuque County is particularly sensitive to the "state case" issue because of our
location, and because of the county's continued responsibility to pay for
commitment costs for "state case" clients from Wisconsin and Illinois who are not
actually committed to a state institution. We are a catchment area for these
services because Mercy Medical Center provides them to consumers from a large
We suggest that the contractor's'responsibility be expanded to include all of the
commitment costs for both mental health and substance abuse, eliminating this
problem for counties located in catchment areas.
Long Term Nursing Care for Geriatric MH/DD Clients (ICF/PMI)
There are no monies available to develop specialized intermediate care facilities to
care for elderly and/or physically ill persons who have been diagnosed with
mental illness and cannot be managed in the traditional nursing home setting.
The legislature must direct the Medicaid program to develop a per diem rate for
residents based on the type of care provided, and appropriate funds to cover 100%
of the non-federal share of the cost.
This need grows consistently as people brought back to our communities through
the MI-UDD system age and require nursing care, and as the aging population
grows. Through the 109-bed geriatric unit at Sunnycrest Manor, Dubuque County
has provided care for some of these clients when they meet the county's criteria;
however, the county cannot care for all of this population at that facility for
several reasons. One of them is cost; this population requires enormous amounts
of stafftime which the regular Title XIX reimbursement does not pay for.
Another is that the facility is not licensed as a PM][ and to do so would endanger
the Medicaid money that we do receive for geriatric clients, through the
prohibition on ut/llzln§ Medicaid for a "large public mental institution."
The only beds currently providing the appropriate level of care are at Clarinda
MHI, which has been certified to receive a higher level of Medicaid
reimbursement. However, there is a long waiting list there, and persons who are
admitted to the program must leave their own communities.
Dual Diagnosis
Approximately 70 per cent of persons with chronic mental illness experience a
occurring problem with substance abuse. Treatment for dually diagnosed
individuals is a critical need. The DHS program available for these consumer is
in Mt. Pleasant, where beds are limited and costs are prohibitive; is critical that
the State and its managed care contractors approach the needs of the dually
diagnosed population in an integrated manner.
Services to the Department of Corrections
Counties are being requested to fund MH/DD services to persons who are under
the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections. This has happened to Dubuque
County in two ways:
(1)
Requests for residential placement for persons who have
disabilities and/or have disabilities at the County's expense.
(2)
Requests for vocational and/or counseling services for persons
brought to our county under the "interstate compact" to complete
requirements of probation.
It continues to be our position that persons under the jurisdiction of the
Department of Correctional Services are the responsibility of the State of Iowa.
There is nationwide concern that a substantial percentage of the people in the
corrections system have mental illness, substance abuse diagnoses and that there
is no treatment available for those people. We continue to be concerned that
people having diagnoses of mental illness or substance abuse remain the
responsibility of the Department of Correctional Services and encourage sufficient
state funding to provide the services needed by persons supervised by the
department..
Civil Court-Ordered Services
In the 1980's the State of Iowa began transitioning the funding and supervision of
court services from counties to the state. This process was never completed and it
is time to do so.
As you study the issue of the employment status of Judicial Advocates, who are
currently actively seeking employment status either through the state or the
counties, consider that the counties meet non of the federal qualifications for
"employer" for these advocates. We do not h/re, fire, train or supervise these
people; we should not be their employer for ethical reasons because the county's
interests in any case may be different from the Advocate's. Advocates should
either be paid in the same manner as Court-Appointed Attorneys, or should be
employees of the State of Iowa.
We also ask that court-ordered sheriff's transportation and other fees be paid by
the State, as well as court-appointed attorneys in the commitment process, and
any court-ordered diagnostic evaluation.
H. Brain Injury
Funding for persons with a brain injury is very limited and many of these
individuals need services that they are unable to obtain. Counties do not have
resources available to add a new population group to our management plans.
Therefore, we support the establishment of a state/federal funding stream to
provide services for persons with brain injury.
10. State Court Administrator's Office and Juvenile Court Services
As the situation currently stands, counties are paying a pro-rata share for space
occupied by State Court Administration in the Black Hawk County Courthouse.
We also provide space in our Courthouse, where space is scarce. We ask that you
amend Iowa Code Section 602.1303(1)(b) to provide only that counties provide
offices for the district court.
We also ask that the mandate that counties provide space for Juvenile Court
Services be transferred to the state, which employs the Juvenile Court Services
staff. It is chaotic for us to be negotiating to rent space for an office that is
staffed by state employees, and where we have absolutely no control over the
numbers of people and therefore the numbers of offices that are necessary.
11. Funding of State Mandates
County budgets are increasingly burdened with the cost of current and new state
mandates. In order to avoid forcing additional spending onto the property tax, any
service mandated by the state must have adequate state funds to pay for it.
The mandate issue is complex. It relates to much of what we do, and in both
direct and indirect ways. For example, Dubuque County has had to employ more
prosecutors and needs more jail space because more people are being charged and
sentenced, although we know that the legislature did not specifically intend to
cause jail overcrowding when the legislation was passed.
Particularly at this time of State budget cuts, it is essential to remember that
mandates will effect property taxes, and we note that limitation of property taxes
is also on your agenda~ It makes no sense to us that costs would be shifted to us at
the same time that you discuss limiting our ability to raise additional funds.
Unfunded mandates force additional spending onto the property tax; any service
mandated by state legislation should have adequate state funds to support it.
A recent example of this practice occurred this fall when the Department of
Management proposed eliminating a position. The proposal was made that
because the individual worked with counties on county budgets, that the counties
would "chip in" to pay for the position. From the County's General Fund!
The County Engineer was also informed by the Department of Transportation that
staffwho conduct the Needs Study to determine the percentage of Farm to Mark
and Road Use Tax Funds that will be appropriated to individual counties would be
elim/nated by the Department. The IDOT asked whether County Engineers were
willing to take the study over. A copy of the letter from that State Department is
attached.
12. Funding for County Jails
The cost of building and operating county jails continues to consume an ever-
increasing share of the budget for most counties. One way to fight this is for the
State to guarantee the necessary fund to fulfill its statutory duty to reimburse
counties for holding state prisoners in county jails. The State of Iowa is required
by statute to reimburse counties for the cost of holding parole violators in county
jails, and to reimburse counties for work release violators and some OWI
violators. The current $900,000 appropriation falls short of the millions necessary
for full reimbursement.
The state should pay counties for the entire cost of housing all prisoners under
the jurisdiction of he Department of Corrections held in county jails or other
county-paid facilities.
ISAC bas learned that in some states, Medicaid coverage is continued for adults
and children in jail or detention during the pre-trial phase. If a person has already
been determined eligible for Medicaid prior to being detained in jail or detention,
it makes sense for these people to continue eligibility.
13. Juvenile Detention
Juveniles who are currently being placed in detention facilities may have needs
that exceed the ability of detention or shelter facilities to meet. There is a backlog
of youth waiting for placement in residential programs wh/le youth needing
secure facilities may be placed in un-secured shelter facilities or in juvenile
detention facilities at costs exceeding $200 per day.
The state also continues to allow shelter facilities to charge counties for costs that
exceed the maximum paid by the state for shelter care. The disparity between the
shelter care per diem state-capped rate and allowable rates has grown to $32.07
per day, which is a cost shift to counties. We ask that the state pay the entire rote
for the cost of shelter, increase the availability of residential placements for
juveniles, provide necessary programs for them, based on their individual needs.
14. Tax Credits and Exemptions
Property tax credits and exemptions are mandated by state law and administered
by county governments on behalf of local taxing jurisdictions. Currently, military
service property tax exemption is funded by the state only to a certain tax credit
limit of $6.92 per $1,000 in property value. This only covers about 21% of the
total actual claims submitted for tax exemption, creating a shortfall of $9.7
million in state funding of this exemption that local taxing entities subsidize.
Local property taxpayers are financing the unfunded portion of the tax exemption
with property tax, although the mandate comes fi:om the state. The Dubuque
County Treasurer received half of the homestead credit reimbursement last week,
reduced by over $67,000.
15. Tax sale property
Each year, the County Treasurer delivers to the Board of Supervisors a list of
properties which have been deeded to the County. We then prepare a Request for
Proposal to s~ll this property. Some of it is sold. Other parcels, however, are
pieces of bluff, lots which are too small, too steep, or too narrow. Infrequently, a
derelict building is located on one of these lots.
Ail of this is a liability to the County, particularly resulting from the terrain of
Dubuque County. When the property is sold, proceeds are shared with all taxing
districts.
10
16.
We suggest that when these properties become delinquent and are ready to
become the property cfa public entity, properties within a city become the
propefaf of, and liability of, that city. The County would then assume the liability
and responsibility for the properties in the rural areas. When and if the property is
sold, proceeds would continue to be shared with all taxing districts applicable.
Tax Increment Financing
Tax Increment Financing Districts under Iowa Code Chapter 403 should be
changed so that the taxing authority establishing the TIF district can only create
an urban renewal area with the approval of each a~fected taxing jurisdiction of the
city or county and school that share the TIF base. TIF districts should be limited
to a certain number of years, specifically pertaining to TIF's designated for
eliminating urban slum or blight.
All TIF districts must also be required to prepare a fiscal impact statement prior to
approval. If any one of the taxing entities does not approve of the TI~ District,
than an individual taxing entity or combination of taxing entities may elect to
create a district that applies only to their portion of the tax levy.
Two cities in Dubuque County have created such districts for residential purposes;
one of the two created a district which includes almost the entire city, thereby
reducing the amount of money available for county services, although those
servmes must remain available to those citizans. Therefore, there is an additional
property tax burden on farmers, who are already facing extreme economic
difficulties.
17. Southwest Arterial
We are discouraged by the news that the Southwest Arterial has not been included
in the Iowa Department of Transportat/on's five-year plan.
Because the Southwest Arterial is such a vital link in Dubuque County's
transportation system, we believe that the project must receive a high priority
from the Iowa Department of Transportation Commission. We are asking for
your assistance in making sure that this vital !ink is included in ][DOT's five-year
plan.
encl. (2)
11
PHONE: 319589-4441
FAX: $19..589-4478
COURTHOUSE
DUBUQUE, IOWA 52001-7053
DONNA L. SMITH
ALAN R. MANTERNACH
JIM WALLER
April 9, 2001
The Honorable Tom Vilsack
Governor, State of Iowa
Statehouse
Des Moines IA 50319
Dear Tom:
It is with great disappointment that we read that you have propesed a revised fiscal year 2002 budget showing that
counties will lose $18 million in the growth fund for mental,he~}th and developmental disabilities.
In 1995, the leg/siature established propc~rty tax relie~/n/l~e fo~rn'0f state monies prov/ded to counties for
expenditures in the Mental Health/Developmental Disabilities Fund. The growth funds were established to address
service cost inflation, new consumers and ~ and efficiency.
It is our understanding that the teg/slature has ~
new proposal will take another ~
r's incentive funds; your
for a total of $429,903.
On February 20, 2001, we were notified by Services that Dubuque County would not
receive $5,035.75 in block ~xpect from that fund in
fiscal year 2002 was in doubt becanse ~
is
ontemplatmg hm~tmg prOperty mx. H~ ~e .e reduclxm~qfprop~ taxes hta brae when the
State ~s also cuttmg momes ong/~dly meant to accompEsk that goat, ~ · , ~·,. ~; ' ~
The argument~ for tak~g t~ ~ne~'~ ~imfies a~e that the proposed new-rehabii~tio/~,ger~es ~vill be
available and,~ilt ~ave property, tax, momes, tha~ program ~s notyetunder way: '~ andin~ ha~anc~ent will
not work ~ the:,*,~fDD,,func~p~ '~ because bitt/ngs from StateInsfitUti f0 i the
State are ff{C[Ue,ntty lat~ lending balance~ enable counties to pay fo~ f~rst quart~ pm~ld~rsY /~,':~ "~
These act~uns a[ep~g ¢ounUe~ m an untenable altuat~om Please restore ~heMbt/DD funct~ and allO~v loc2d
officials to make decision~ abo/ii taxati6~ Tuat is what we are el~cte4 i(~'~t0: ' ~ ' '
Sincerely,
~ .j,;/ jh
Memorandum
STATE
ASSOCIATION zo~ E CourtAve, SuiteA, Des Moines, IA 50309-4901
OF COUNTIES p.. 515-244-7181- fax 515-244-6397-e-mail mail~iowacounties, om
THE GOVERNOR'S REVISED BUDGET,
A CUT IN MENTAL HEALTH DOLLARS
Governor Vilsack's revised fiscal year 2002 budget was released yesterday
showing budget cuts and revenue adjustments totaling $285 million. Of those
cuts, counties will take a significant loss in the MH/DD growth factor. The
Governor originally recommended approximately $26.5 million dollars to be
distributed to counties meeting established criteria. The revised budget shows
an $18 million reduction. In essence, the new proposal will grant only $6 million
for mental health growth and only $2 million for counties needing to access the
risk pool.
The executive branch sites several reasons for the reduction including that the
decrease will be offset by both the new rehabilitation services available under
Medicaid and the "over $95 million available in county balances." The revised
budget further suggests that the reduction would be offset by "projected
implementation of mental health parity that would allow the private sector to
share the costs."
The premises used to establish the Governor's new growth factor
recommendation are inaccurate. First, the rehabilitation services (ARO) have not
been implemented and to date counties are unable to access matching Medicaid
dollars. Second, the $95 million in the county fund does not take into
consideration the 25-35 percent carryover that counties need to "run" the mental
health fund. Nor does that figure take into consideration funds that have already
been reserved or encumbered by the counties. Last, the first funnel ensured that
there would be no mental health parity this year thus not shifting any of the
burden to the private sector.
It is imperative that you are aware of what will happen to your mental health fund
if the growth factor is reduced by $18 million. The Iowa State Association of
Counties will be pulling together a group of county representatives to respond to
this revised proposal by the Governor. If you have any questions please call the
ISAC office at (515) 244-7181.
Iowa Department of Transportation
'~!~,~ 800 Linooln Way, Ames, ~A 50010 515-239-1661
Fax: 515-239-1120
August17,2001
Ref. No. 733
To:
From:
ICEA Executive Board
Royce Fichtner, Marshall County Engineer
Mark Nahra, Delaware County Engineer
Tom Rohe, PIymouth County Engineer
John Easter, ISAC Director of intergovernmental Affairs
Mike Wentzien, Iowa County Supervisors Association Lobbyist
Dennis Tice, Director"~k.-~
Planning and Programming Division
Subject: Proposal to Eliminate the Quadrennial Need Study
As a result of restructuring and staffing reductions here at the Department, we have
been evaluating our tasks and responsibilities to identify changes that will allow us to
function more efficiently and effectively. One item we have identified is the elimination
of the Code of Iowa requirement to conduct a Quadrennial Need Study.
As required by Section 307A.2(14) of the Code of Iowa, the Quadrennial Need Study is
conducted to investigate present deficiencies and future twenty-year maintenance and
constrUction needs of the roads and the ability of each applicable authority to meet the
needs for the planning, construction, repair and maintenance of roads within their
jurisdiction. Although the study is required to evaluate all public roads in the State, the
main function is to distribute seoondary and farm-to-market road use tax funds to the
counties.
Over the years, the need study has been scrutinized as a tool for distributing secondary
and farm-to-market road use tax funds. Currently, 70% of the secondary and farm-to-
market fund distributions are based on each county's relative share of needs. The
remaining 30% is distributed based on each county's relative share of land area. A
major concern among counties is the often-significant changes in needs for individual
counties from need study to need study. In fact, several research projects have been
completed in recent years to evaluate the need study and in one case to develop an
alternative method for distributing the secondary and farm-to-market funds.
There are other concerns with the need study as well. First, the Transportation
Commission has expressed concern regarding the fact that the need study analysis
does not include any economic considerations or any measures to prioritize the needs.
This is a concern that was also expressed in the January 1989 legislatively mandated
study of the needs and finances of towa's roads. Second, the need study requires
thousands of person-hours to complete. In Iight of the Department restructuring and
concerns with the study itself, the Department is proposing to eliminate the need study.
I:I~]~NIgN~,LLNnO0 SEtNO['
CI ^IBO bl
Proposal to Eliminate the Quadrennial Need Study
August 17, 2001
Page 2
Because the elimination of the need study will have the greatest impact on county
governments, we have set up a meeting to discuss t. his issue with you and seek your
input. The meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 29, 2001 at 10:00 am. The
meeting will be held in the Office of Systems Planning Conference Room that is located
on the first floor of the Northeast Wing of the DOT complex in Ames.
For your review, we have enclosed a copy of the proposed Code of Iowa c_hanges
under consideration by the Department for the upcoming legislative session.
If you have any questions or would like additional information please call Stu Anderson
at 515-239-1312.
Enclosure