Loading...
7 7 08 Worksession Slide Program_Downtown Parking Needs AssessmentCITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA Downtown Parking Needs Assessment Project Working Session July 7, 2008 Presented by Walker Parking Consultants ~:rr' + St~:1~ij ~r2~ +'Proj~ectSt~tus • Nietht~dol~~y • Executive ~urrarr~~r~ • Current Con~ditic~ns * future Conditians `Conclusions °~; s' ~, _._.. 4,: i ~~~I~i r~_~~.Eoi" ~_j, f ~~ ~~jl ~ r' ^;E Vii l--- f / "',. • ~'lethr~d~~C?gy • C~ern~n~d + ilflethaadolagV M~n~g~m•~rit i '`Site~ltern~tiv~es + ~ssumptic-ns • conclusions * Prr~ Forma • Conclusions --~' j Discussion ins -~ D V ..,. < %- A . O`'?' 1` . ' E ~ 1^iq ~ ~-<~ ,~~~~,E,~~~ ~ ~ ~ ;, ._ Description. - ,~ -_ ~~ ~, ~ zzr~,sr y. ~" ,~j ~°' -~ ~~, ~~ S'~ _, ,~ 1 ~ t~l E 5 i6~, ~ ~~~ 7~ ,° ~ 3~tN 5~ 4 .~ .,,S .~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ 109 city ~i®~ks i " / r- .. .~ ~, ~ _ w r r ~ ~ R' .. . ~ ~, _ 1 ~~ ~t , . ~- . ~ ; ; ~ ro - a 3 Stu ®~stricts w r ~ 1 .- ~N S , .O.s„' , _ ~ - ~u L~S~, y~.. ~, , ~~ S~ ~ s ~.,`'' ~~ ~. ~Q~,~,a -~ - ~, - ~ _ 6 Zones ,, ~© ~ - .~ , ;.-'l~~~c .,ter _;_ -.. _ ," ~a,~`'S ':. ~r ~~ ' ., n ..~ ~ neral n ~~~~ s~ ~. ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ . ~~~~~~. Ge Iy Bou ded By~ :~- st ~~ ~, s~ ~. s ~ ~.: _ - --,. ,~r h `, ~~ ~ ~~~~~ North - ~ 7tn & 14t Streets South - 1 Street ~.. ~~, - ~ ~ r .~.~< aw" East - ~J. S. 151 ~nnlE4 ~, v ~;..2r, ~,~ ~,`' ~ j~- s;T IVlississippi F~i~er ,a~ ~~ -~ r J ~.. ~~~°°~~~ ~~ y V~'est - ~lu~# Street .. %, .-p - "~ p ~ , ~. /A ~`FQt ~ '~yS~ - ~ ,_ r ~~ 3~,9 ,.+ - ,. -~" ., ,, ~~ .,.. ., n ^ .~`LLIS g~ .~ ~F ~.. ~1r ~o~: ,c s s,r . ~- _ -- Stake of Analysis l . At present the total parking demand does not exceed the total available supply. 2. A otal of 9,875 spaces are located in the study area. Of the total, 54%° are ::publicly owned and 46% .are privately owned. 3. The total-parking supply in the tudy area is approximately 50% utilized during peak weekday conditions near the hour of 1 O:OO am. 4. City-owned off-street and on-street parking is approximately 60% and 43% utilized during peak conditions, respectively. 5. Off-street City-owned reserved parking is 74% utilized and non=reserved is 49% utilized during peak conditions. 6. Private parking supply is approximately 24% utilized during peak co ditions. xecuti r 7. Future parking demand does not exceed existing supply when analyzed on an aggregate basis. 8. Future ..parking demand does exceed existing supply in specific locations when analyzed by district 9. 10-Year Projec#ions: • 1,732-space deficit is projected in Zone 5 (Warehouse Disfrict) • 227-space deficit is projected in Zone 2 (5th St. 0 1 Oth St.) • Near breakeven conditions with an 85 space surplus is projected in Zone 3 1 1. Short to Mid-term demand management strategies: Develop and implement marketing program Parking Availability Report =Low emissions vehicle and rideshare incentive programs Offer remote shuttle lot program with Transit Division Reduce number of reserved parking perm-its to 10% of total off-street supply Increase .number of general permits and oversell by 0% to 20% Improve City's parking web site to enable Execu'e r 12. Mid to Long-term parking development strategies: Warehouse District -Consider public/private partnership Phase 1: Surface .LotMinimum net gain 250 paces) Phase 2: RampMinimum net gain of 500 spaces] Balance of parking deficit to be provided by private ector Zone 2 5th to 1 Oth, Bluff St. to Central St.) -Consider public/private partnership Option 1: Owner maximizes existing lot Option 2: Public/private partnership o build N300 spaces Execute v r ,13. Walker evaluated and ranked 13 potentia`I development alternatives and recommends that the City consider the following: Add public .parking in Warehouse District a northwest corner of Elm Street and East 9th Street. Conceptual Cost Estimate = $ l , l 10,000 Estimated Debt Service = $ 93,000 - Add pu lis parking in Zone 2 at he Main :Street Fischer Lot bounded by 13th Street, 12th Street, Main Street and Iowa Street. Conceptual Cost Estimate = $ 5,877,000 Estimated Debt Service = $ 492,000 Executive r Public Private On-Street Total % of Total Study Area Zone Supply + Supply + Supply = Supply Supply .:Primary Study Area 1 0 + 360 + 479 _ 839 8% 2 92 + 558 + 536 = 1,186 12% 3 2,D33 + 769 + 456 = 3,258 33% 4 463 + 842 + .321 = ::1,626 b% :sub-Total 2,588 + 2,529 + 1,792 = 6,909 70% Warehouse District 5 0 + 628 + 478 = 1,106 1 1 Port'District b 437 + ::1.,423 + 0 _' 1,860 19% .Total 3,025 + 4,580 + "2,270 = 9,875 100% of Total Supply 31% 46% 23% 1'00% to,ooo Su I b Location PP Y Y ;, 9; 000 _ . ~_~ 8; 000 7,000 ~ - - - y .~.. ~ 6, 000 c J F i. ~~ l4 ~, 5, 000 = __ ~,~` 4; 000 ~ T> a - 3, 000 ~ ~ +~~, ~ .' 2;000 ~ ,,_ _ , - - - ~. 1 000 ~ ~~ ', _____ 0 - ~ ~ - - - - ---- Total Primary Study Warehouse Port District Area District urr ___. _.__ ....p~.~,. __ _ _ ~_........_ _ .... 1,600 _ - s _, 1,400 j 1,200 :3 ..............~.......:...........v....:~~......::.....~.::....:...::.r......::.. .....~.:. ...:.._.::...::..~.. ........ 2, 2 70 0 n-Street S pa ces 3 1,000 3 i 3 ~: i soo 2 2 (7 ~ 1V1 d a 1,5 6 % etere ($~ ,....::.:.: _:::..:...v . _,...,,:,,.: .:.::.:::.:.::.:. ..:: ® 600 LL ~ ~ ,..,,.......,.,..,,,., , .,:...,..v .:....:.. ........ :...::...:... .....:.......w~.,v,:.. .,:., ... .. v .. _- . ... . 400 ~ 748 (33%~Time Limit (Free] 200 _~ ~ f Total ~ 10 Hours 4 Hours ~ 2 Hours 1 Hour ~~ 40 Min. ~ 20 Min. of Total ~ 100% 33% ~ 6% ~ 40% ~) ~ 1 ~9% ~ 0% 1 % ~~ Metered Spaces ~~ 1,522 ~~ 501 ~ 97 ~ 608 ~j 289 ~ 6 21 _.... 48% of total public off-street supply allocated to reserved permit patrons. ~~ - ,, .~ 1, j, i =~ Industry standard Effective supply factors ~.~~~~ ~~ } 9;875 -- -- customized #or the Dubuque a.oc~o mm market 9% aggregate ESF is t--- m ~ laN ~~,~~$ reasonable Effective Su~:plyCushian~ ~$4 _ . r __ ~, ~, Effective F"arkinq ~uRniy 8.81 Effective Weighted Parking Supply Effective Effective Supply Zone Capacity Cushion Supply Factor (%) l 839 - 87 = 752 10.4% 2 1,186 - 1lb = 1;070 9.8% 3 3,258 - 338 = 2,920 10.4% 4 1,626 _ ,1..33 = 1;491 8.3% 5 1,1 Ob l 02 1,004 9.2% 6 1,860 - 1 16 = 1,744 6.2% Totals: 9,875 - $94 8,981 9.1 12,000' Weekday ~ .Weekend 10,000 - ~- - - 8,000 ~,' 6,000 ~ ~''~ Sub-Analysis ~- i ~ Public Supply: Y 4,000 ~ Total = 60%° a .2,000. F~M._'' Non-Reserved = 40% Reserved = 74% o _ _ _ _ `--- _- 8:00 10:00 1:30 6:00 10:00 7:00 AM AM PM PM AM PM Parking Occupancy 4,444 4,952 4,887 2,091 2,562 2,902 ..» .,.,..««..«.««..., ..««..... .~...~.,. 4 Parking Supply 9,875 f 9,875 9,875 9,875 ~ .9,875 9,875 Occupancy Rate 45% 50% 49% 21% ~ 26% 29% 6 ,. Base Date Applied to Calculation of New Incremental Parking Demand During Peak Weekday Conditions :Zone BI«k L«ation I Project ) LondlUse I SF 7. 17 131 W, 10th St. I Inferstate$uildina ( Office I 23.240 2 1 1398 Central Ave. I Heartland F financial I Office,$ank I - 3 8 800 Main St. I Cottinaham and Butler I Office I none new 3 18 8th and Locust St. I Dubuave Building- McKesson Coro.I Office I - 3 18 8th and Locust St I Dubuque Building I :Office- I - 3 17 700 Main St I NICCEnrollmentGrowth I College I - 3 7 Main St. 900 Block I FischerBuildina I Office I 75.000 4 10 205 Bluff I The Lofts @ Cathedral Square ) Residential ( 22,500 4 12 200 Main I IulienHotel I Hotel I 80.000 5 22 7th and White I f arlev and Loetscher I Mixed ' I 125.000 5 21 8th and White I Kirbv Building I Mixed I 125.000 5 17 8011ackson I SOl.lackson I Mixed I 100.000 5 16 9th and I ackson Beftvlane Building I Mixed I 25.000 5 16 9th and I ackson Caradaco Building I Mixed I 150.000 5 14 1000.1 ackson 1000.1 ackson I-Mixed I 120.000 5 14 11th and Washington I Restoration Warehouse Building I Mixed I 180.000 6 8 3rd and Bell I DiamondloCasino I Entertainmentl 140.000 6 9 Ice Harbor and Adams I Durrant I Office I 28.875 6 1 5th andlceHarbor I Baseball Stadiumlorooosedl I Entertainmentl 9acres 6 8 Ice Harbor and 5th I Mixed Use P hose I I Mixed I 150.000 6 8 5th Street I Mixed Use Phase II I Mixed I 100.000 6 8 5th and Bell I Mixed Use Phase III I Mixed I 60.000 6 2 Commercial St. I Intermodal Parkins Facility I Parkinn I - Future Dernanc. Assumptions Unifis Seats Rooms) Notes I Poidna'Associaled Completion I ~ I Densitv4:1000 I Unchgnaed 2008 I I I25AdditionalEmnloveesNr. I.2.40P~ivate.LeasefromCity 2009 ( I I 90 new jobs I lease from Citv 2008 I I I TotdlReductiorr=4191obs I DeoartinaLeasePka. 18 monthahase I I I Densitv4:1000 I Added CeasePka. 2010 or Bevond I I I IOOAdditionalDailvVisits.25-50 AdditionalStuden tl - 2009 I 20% Leased. target 80% I - 2010 25 Condos I I I I 25 existing 2010 133 I-Taraet70% occ. I Unchanged 2009 I ~ I 1/3Retaihl/3Office.l/3Res. 250existina 2009 ( ( I 1 /.i R etai. 1 /3 Office. 1 /3 R es. 125 existing 2012 or Bevond I ( ( 1/3 Retail. l/3 Office. l/3 Res. 130 existing 2011 or Bevond I -I 11/3Retaihl/dOffice,l/3Res. 25 surface 2012 orBevond I I 11 /3 R etaih 1 /3 Office, 1 /3 R es. Unchonged 2010 I I I 1/3 Retail.lGiOffice.T/3Res. I Unchgnaed 2009.2011 I I 11 /3 R etail. 1 /3 Office, 1 /3 R es. I 35 existing 2009-2011 I I 1.130rama.200surface Auaust2008 I Densitv4:1000 I 75 surface Februarv2008 5.500 ~ I I 250 surface March 2010 I Retail. Rest.. Entertainment.Office and Residertial - 2009 I Retail. Rest.. Entertainment.Office and Residential - 2011 ( I ( Retail.Rest..Entertainment. Office andResidentia) I - 2013 I I I ( 750soaces 2012 or Bevond WEEKDAY WEEKEM 0.2 Yea Projection 0.2 Yecr Projection Total Peak Projected Future T ota) Peak Projected Future .Zone Effective Demand Demand Adequacy Zone Effective Demand Demand. Adequacy Supply 10:00 am Increase Supply :.7:00 pm Increase 1 752 380 0 372 1 752 166 0 586 Note 2 1,072 552 63 457 2 1,072 226 -0 846 3 2;987 2,233 (280j 1,034 3 2,987 697 2 2,288 4 1,491 7T0 30 751 4 1,491 797 32 662 [[ 5 .1;035 567 363 105 5 1,035 - 167 226 642 IT E m ployeeS C-n Iy pq rk C1ff- 6 3:430 552 315 2.563 '6 ..3.430 937 822 1.671 1 Totd 10,766 4,994 491 5.2$1 Totd 10;766 2990 1,082 6,695 3-SYecrProiecti®n -3-5YecrProiecti®n street, then the parking Total Peak Projected Future Total Peak Projected Future CICIeC~UCIC}/ In ~ to ~ O Zone Effective Demand Demand Adequacy Zone Effective Demand Demand Adequacy Supply 10:00 am {ncrease Supply 7:OOpm Increase Years Could ~e. 1 752 380 0 372 1 752 166 -0 586 2 1,072 552 125 395 2 1,072 226 0 846 3 2,987 2,233 (141 j 895 3 2,987. 697 4 2,286 ZQ n e ~ _ ~ 2 ~, 4 1,491 710 58 723 4 '1,491 797 63 631 5 1,035 567 1,207 j739j 5 1;035 167 788 80 b 4:142 552 591 2.999 b 4.142 937 1:514 1.691 Totd 11,479 4.944 1.840 4,645 Totd 11,479 2990 2369 6,121 Z O tl e 3 = 8 5 6-10 Yea Projection 6• l0 Yecr Projection Total Peak Projected Future Total Peak Projected Future Zone Effective Demand Demand Adequacy Zone Effective Demand Demand Adequacy Supply 0:00 am Increase Supply 7:00 pm .'Increase 1 752 380 0 372 1 752 166 -0 586 2 1,072 552 180 340 2 fi,072 226 0 846 3 2,987 2,233 281 473 3 2,987 697 24 2,266 4 1,491 710 115 bbb 4 1,491 797 83 611 5 :1,035 567 .2200 (1,732) 5 1,035 167 '1;416 j548) b 4.142 552 1.091 2.499 6 4:142 937 2:074 1.131 Totd 11AT9 4.944 3,867 2618 Totd 11A79 2.990 3,597 4,893 0 ~utre ~r~n c eG-c n ,~ ~ ~,~ are ,~ ~ ~ ,: ~~., E' ~ ~f--,., _ :"~ ~~.~ ~11r; i ~ - - ~ S~ ZO ~~ E 6 k Oq . " _ , s r, ~ _~ _- - , t7~ r • ~,. ,-fi~~~ ~ Legend ~h_ ~ ZOI~JE 4 ~,. ~~-"' _ ~,~ 0 Zone t-4 -Primary Area ~ i - ~ ._ 1 1 {,- t ,•\; f,s i~ Zono 5 - Warohouse Dlstrlc' - !~ Zona 6 -Port District ~ i~ ~ ~ - Y ~ i c~ b ~ Future £fTectWe SuPPY n ~ ~ '~`"- "'' ~` _ ~ ~ Project Dnmand ~ 445.,1'x. ~•~ ~.,y~Future Adaquacy Posse ~~'~~ ~ - ' Futura Rdequacy N grtivo 'y _ Pr®jectec Par~~in~ ce u~c~ e~ ~« a -2 lea rs - ~~S ~ .~ ~:. ~ ~N ~ ...: ~- -.. b ~ .rte ,.; ,rte ~ ~ _ - oys} J~ QL -~ ~o4GA`~ - ~ st ~ ~,,~~~s~ ~ ~ r~,N ~L, _ _r n' r. f I ( ,a o~ ~ 6' ,.a .. _, .n. ~ 3ir~ - ~. ~ - _ E _ - ~ -ri ZG11E v f o ~~ -. - ~~~ w -- 'a - 1,035~r u - ~,,,. a ',~ ZON_ 2~ ~ ~- r - - _. ~ I~~ 1 ~ 11( ONs"~. c ._ _ J __ T t~ v . , _ C ~ "" _ • ~~~~- - ~ ~~ ~ ti~ t~ ~_ _ ~, ~~, ,o ~~s ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. _ ~ G+Q } i ^._ ,., - ..~ .. ,, - ,-._ ~ _ Z " ~Srt ~~ - ~ vn~~_.. ~ v `- ~ ,'. j ,,. ,- t L~l Pg ~ f_ ~ i _ ~~"~ ZOPJ'~ ~ , 7~js ~? ~.; ~ ~ Hct ~ - ~ ~, ~ -, - .~ - Legend ~ ~ 70fJF 4 G ~ _ _ ~~ ,: Q Zone 1-0 Pnma y A a ~ • ~ ,~ i ~ Q Zono 5 -Warehouse District \\ 1 .. ;. Q Zone 6 • Port D. strict ~~ p . 6 k Future Et(ective Suppy ~ ~~ ~uture Adoquacy Po Illve ,~ 3~~ ~ , ~,. ., c. Future Rdeyuacy N gahve ~-y ' N - _. ,. - -. S,* .- ~ - ,- - ~ ,_. .. Projected Parking eac ee ~<c_ a 3-5 Years ~ ~ 16~~ ~ ~ 5 I arse ~. „ ~ .. ~°~ - ~;, ~,; ` ~a~ Npt r - ~ _ ~ti~~~5~ ~"~~'rN ~ w a%'' - ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ -~, ~, 1 - .~ -.. - ::,. .;. ~~., Z ~,,.~ ' ~ -. 7Tys~ ,.~.~.,~~ ~ ~o_ ~ _ _ _,. ,~ ~ `' r _ , - u, ' ` "' rc y1 ZCNC 5 I ~ ~`'` ~- r - s - "~ ~ .n~~ w ~- U -; r ; _ ` ~ ~ y~~~ iJ~ ! - ~~ ~f~~_. / ~ r T ~~, _ c 1 r,~v, ~'~ ~ r l ` ' i , j ~ ~ ~N~l X51 ON5 gU ~~S ~ _ - F ~~ ~ Ye,~ LFS ~ ~ { ~ i i ~N 5~- ~r ' ~bz~ ~ a f ~Y _ ~ / £gr~ r,> . s ,~ ~~ _ ,., - X .=_ ,°~,-. . -- _ - ~ZpriFO~ :uf 7 - ~- ,~1 _,C ~ ~},~~~"( . Ci-~` Va I ~ ..rt ~ ~ 5 _ Z.~ir ; ~ r ~ ~ ~ F ~ - ~ ~ ~ `,r..~" Z~~, t ~3 ,~~II S,r ~ - Le_ end 9 ~ ,- , r ~ Tnne b4 -Primary Ame .. d- _ ~ . ~ ~ ,!}~'~ ~ . - ~ . Zone 5-rNarehouse Dlstric~. Q Zone 6 -Port DlsMCt ~` J ~ ~i Ei~. I.l ~ ~ ~ - - ~~ ___ `gyp O Fu[ure Effecfive SuPPY ~~~.~ h,~Pmject Demand ~ `~ ~~~,, _ 4 ~ , ~ . ~' ,t. Future Adequacy Posrtlve V.y ~ ' y - Future Adequacy N g [fva " ~n ._ - -. ~.., -. ~.-. _ is-.. ,.,, ,. ~. 'r Pr®jectec Parkin c ec icy ee~<c a -1 dears Conventional Parking Policies Smart Growth Parking Policies Managed for parkers convenience Managed for parking efficiency Reserved (Dedicated) parking facilities Shared parking-#acilities Maximum parking supply Optimal parking supply (balance) Prefers free or `lowest priced parking Prefers fair market priced parking Prefers low density development Prefers compact development Smart Growth (also called New Urbanism) is a general term for development policies that result in more efficient transportation and eland use patters by creating more compact development with multi- modal transportation systems. "Smart Growth," Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2005 S art Gr®t~1 Parkin anae ant trat~ies _® Primary Initiatives: Reduce the number of reserved parking spaces Offer rideshare benefits to help reduce demand Implement remote parking & Transit alternative Market public .parking to downtown organizations & business • Maximize on-line capabilities -Par.king Division Website • Simplify vita ion payment process - Go On-line Objective: To increase utilization of existing resources. P~r~cin ana~e et Strategies Methodology: Criteria, Weight & Rank 1 . Proximity to Demand 2. Probable Project Cost 3. Site Availability & Dimensions 4. Revenue Potential 5. Proximity to Demand (Nights & Weekends) 6. Traffic Impact 7. Mixed-Use Potential $. Adequacy of Option to Support Future Development 9. Economic Development Impacf ternati~e Site na ysis Matrix Analysis Preliminary Results Warehouse District -Consider public/private partnership Phase 1:Surface Lot (Minimum net gain 250 spaces) Phase 2: Ramp (Minimum net gain of 500 spaces) :Balance of parking deficit to be provided by private ector Zone 2 (5th to 10th, Bluff St. to'Central St.1. -Consider public/private partnership Option l : Owner maximizes existing lot Option 2: Public/private partnership to build N300 spaces Alternative Side na ysis Key Recommendations for Consideration 1. Redistribute Reserve &Non-Reserve Permits 2. Maximize Opportunities to Add On-Street Parking 3. Implement Marketing Program 4. Implement Low Emission & Rideshare Incentive Program 5. Conduct Level Two Due Diligence of New Parking Developments