Urban Revit Dist. O Main, CathMEMORANDUM
September 9, 2002
TO:The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM:Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT:New Urban Revitalization Plans for Three Historic Districts
Housing and Community Development Department Director David Harris recommends
that the Old Main, Cathedral, and Langworthy historic districts be designated as Urban
Revitalization districts; and that a public hearing be set for November 4, 2002.
I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
____________________
Michael C. Van Milligen
MCVM/jh
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, Corporation Counsel
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
David Harris, Housing and Community Development Department Director
CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA
MEMORANDUM
September 5, 2002
TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
FROM: David Harris, Housing and Community Development Department
SUBJECT: New Urban Revitalization Plans for Three Historic Districts
Introduction
This memorandum recommends that the City Council set a public hearing to consider
designating the Old Main, Cathedral, and Langworthy historic districts as Urban
Revitalization Districts.
Background
Chapter 404 of the Iowa Code (Urban Revitalization Act) authorizes cities to designate
areas as urban revitalization areas. Improvements to qualified real estate within these
designated areas may receive a total or partial exemption from property taxes for a
specified number of years. The exemptions are intended to stimulate private investment
by abating tax increases that usually accompany property improvements. This additional
private investment provides a long-term increase or stabilization in the area's tax base,
enhances the viability of revitalization areas and/or supports important city objectives such
as historic preservation, economic development and affordable housing development
In order to implement the provisions of Chapter 404, the City must prepare a revitalization
plan for each designated area and hold at least one public hearing after proper notice.
The taw mandates specific criteria and procedures that must be followed.
The City's Urban Revitalization Program offers a ten-year property tax abatement for
eligible improvements to residential properties in designated revitalization districts.
Discussion
In February 2001, the City Council approved the expansion of the Urban Revitalization
Program to all five historic districts. In the historic downtown area, there are currently four
urban revitalization districts: Washington, Jackson, West 11th Street, and Upper Main. Only
two historic districts, West 11th Street and Jackson Park, are located in urban revitalization
districts. The Old Main, Cathedral, and Langworthy histodc districts would now be designated
as Urban Revitalization districts with adoption of the attached plans.
The Urban Revitalization plans for the Old Main, Cathedral, and Langworthy districts will have
the same provisions as the existing Washington, Jackson, and West 11th Street urban
revitalization districts. In addition, the Old Main district will require that all of a property's
square footage must be used for residential purposes in order to qualify for the program,
instead of the 75% minimum allowed by State law. This is necessary since the district is
located within an urban renewal area where property taxes for eligible improvements can be
collected for tax increment financing (TIF).
Chapter 404 provides for a public comment period prior to the adoption of an urban
revitalization plan. Additionally, the City's Code of ordinances requires comment by the
Long Range Planning Commission on any urban revitalization plan. Based upon these
requirements, the Council is requested to set a public hearing for November 4, 2002 that
will provide a 30 day comment period on the amended plan. All property owners within the
areas will be notified. The Long Range Planning Commission will review the plan at their
October 16th meeting.
At the public hearing, the Council will be able to approve the plans and pass a first reading
of an ordinance designating the areas as urban revitalization districts. A second hearing
must be held only if the City receives within the thirty days a valid petition from at least ten
percent of owners or tenants within the designated revitalization area. If such a petition is
submitted, the City Council may set a second public hearing and proceed to act upon the
proposed Plan following that hearing. If no such petition is presented, the City Council may
simply adopt the proposed plan following the thirty day period.
Recommendation
I recommend that the City Council approve the attached resolution setting the public
hearing for November 4, 2002 to consider designating the Old Main, Cathedral, and
Langworthy historic districts as Urban Revitalization districts. At the public hearing an
ordinance can be adopted which directs the City Clerk to publish the ordinance following
the 30 day pedod if no valid petition for a second hearing is filed. This will expedite the
process.
By providing incentives for people to renovate and repair historic structures, the City can
retain and upgrade our existing housing stock, help revitalize neighborhoods, and improve
the quality of life in Dubuque.
Action Requested
The Action Step is for the City Council to adopt the attached resolution.
Prepared by: Aggie Kramer, Community Development Specialist
F:\Users',AKRAMER\Urban Revite~PlanningUR\Hist Dist UR memo 02.dec
RESOLUTION NO. 521-02
RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE DESIGNATION OF OLD MAIN,
CATHEDRAL AND LANGWORTHY URBAN REVITALIZATION PLANS ARE
NECESSARY IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND
WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA AND
PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON.
Whereas, the City Council of the City of Dubuque finds that properties in the Old
Main, Cathedral and Langworthy historic districts are in an area in which there is a
predominance of buildings or improvements which by reason age, history, architecture
or significance should be preserved or restored to productive use; and
Whereas, Chapter 404 of the Code of Iowa provides for the establishment of an
urban revitalization area for such properties following a public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DUBUQUE, IOWA:
Section 1. That the rehabilitation, conservation and redevelopment of the areas
described in the attached Langworthy Revitalization Plan, the Old Main Urban
Revitalization Plan and the Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan are found to be
necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of
the City, to wit:
Section 2. That the Langworthy Revitalization Plan, the Old Main Urban
Revitalization Plan and the Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan as proposed meet
the eligibility criteria of Chapter 404.1 of the Code of Iowa, 2001.
Section 3. That the aforementioned Urban Revitalization Plans shall be a matter
of record and shall be available for pubic inspection in the office of the City Clerk at
City Hall, 50 West 13th Street, Dubuque, Iowa.
Section 4: That the City is authorized and directed to submit the aforementioned
Urban Revitalization Plans to the City's Long Range Planning Advisory Commission
for review and comment; and
Section 5. That the City Clerk is directed to publish notice of a public hearing on
the aforementioned Urban Revitalization Area Plans to be held on November 4, 2002
at 6:30 p.m. in the Carnegie Stout Library Auditorium, 360 West 11th Street,
Dubuque, Iowa 52001; and
Section 6. That the owners of record and tenants living within the proposed
areas will be notified by the thirtieth day prior to the public hearing.
Passed, approved and adopted this 16th day of September 2002.
Attest:
Jeanne F. Schneider, City Clerk
Terrance M. Duggan, Mayor
F:\Users~AKRAMER~Urban Revite~PlanningUR',Histodc Dist UR Res.doc
CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA
MEMORANDUM
April 9, 2001
TO:Historic Preservation Commission
FROM:Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager
SUBJECT: Expansion of the Urban Revitalization Program
Introduction
On February 19, 2001, the City Council approved the expansion of the urban revitalization
program to include all histodc districts. Presently, only two of the five historic districts are
in this program. This memo transmits the recommendation of the City staff regarding the
proposed provisions for expansion of the urban revitalization program to the three
remaining historic districts. A map of the historic districts and the four existing urban
revitalization districts in the downtown area is enclosed.
Background
Iowa Code Chapter 404.1 lists five reasons for which a city or county may establish urban
revitalization plans. These are: 1) the existence of numerous buildings that are dilapidated
or deteriorated; 2) the need for preservation and restoration of buildings due to their
historic significance; 3) the area is appropriated as an economic development region as
defined in Iowa Code 403.17; 4) the need for public improvements related to housing; and
5) the encouragement of housing and residential development. State law also states that
at least 75% of a participating property's square footage must be used for residential
purposes in order to qualify for the program.
The City's urban revitalization program offers a property tax exemption for interior and
exterior improvements that increase the tax assessment, and in turn the property taxes,
for the residential property in older neighborhoods. Owners may receive a ten-year
exemption from the property tax increase due to the improvements. Maintenance is not
included in this program.
Presently, only the West 11th Street and Jackson Park historic districts are part of the
urban revitalization program. An expansion of the urban revitalization program to include
the Old Main, Cathedral and Langworthy historic districts in this program would encourage
long term property maintenance in these older neighborhoods.
Urban Revitalization Districts
Page 2
Discussion
The four existing urban revitalization districts in the histodc downtown area have different
provisions for allowable improvements. These differences appear to be related to the
types of buildings and mix of uses within the individual areas. The four existing urban
revitalization districts, and their provisions for allowable improvements, are as follows:
UR District Creation Sunset Building Additions New
Improvements Construction
Washington 1980's none yes yes no
Jackson 1980's none yes yes no
West 11th St. 1980's none yes yes no
Upper Main 1995 25 years yes no no
In addition, the Old Main historic district is located within an urban renewal area. The
urban renewal area involves collecting taxes for the tax increment financing (TIF)
program, which contradicts the tax abatement, which exists under the urban
revitalization plan.
Due to these differences, the City Council asked the Commission to review the differing
provisions for the existing urban revitalization areas, and then recommend whether to
use a common set of provisions for all urban revitalization areas, or to have unique
provisions for individual areas.
Recommendation
The City staff recommends that the provisions for allowable improvements in the new
urban revitalization areas for the Old Main, Cathedral and Langworthy historic districts
have the same provisions as the Washington, Jackson and West 11th Street urban
revitalization areas.
In addition, the City staff recommends that the urban revitalization provisions for the Old
main area be limited to residential purposes. That is, 100% of a participating property's
square footage must be used for residential purposes in order to qualify for the
program, instead of the 75% minimum allowed by State law. With this additional
provision, both urban renewal and urban revitalization plans may coexist, since the Old
Main urban revitalization plan will be restricted to residential development.
enclosure
IcarstenJwp/hpc/urexp.mern.doc
i ~ ~storicl~std~s
Ud~an Revitali~on E~stricts
~1 Washington
-~ II Jackson
I!! West 11th
IV
~la~n~ Services Depar~en~
c~ty ~
50 West 13th S~eet
Dubuque, Iowa 52001-4864
(563) 589-4210, office
(563) 589-/221 tax
(563) 690-6678 TDD
planx6~g~tyoffiubuque.org
August 30, 2002
The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
City of Dubuque
City Hall - 50 W. 13~ Street
Dubuque, IA 52001
RE: Expansion of Urban Revitalization Program to All Historic Districts
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
Introduction
The Histodc Preservation Commission is requesting that the City Council adopt urban
revitalization plans that will expand the Urban Revitalization Program to all historic districts.
A staff report and a map are attached for your consideration.
Discussion
In February 2001, the City Council approved the expansion of the Urban Revitalization
Program to all five historic districts. This was one of the historic preservation incentives
recommended by the Histodc Preservation Commission and the Preservation Task Force
in 2001.
The City's Urban Revitalization Program offers a ten year property tax abatement for
eligible improvements to residential properties in designated revitalization districts. In the
histodc downtown area, there are four urban revitalization districts: Washington, Jackson,
West 11"~ Street, and Upper Main. Only two historic districts, West 11t~ Street and Jackson
Park, are located in urban revitalization districts. The expansion of the Urban Revitalization
Program would include the Old Main, Cathedral, and Langworthy historic districts.
The Washington, Jackson, and West 11~ Street urban revitalization districts have the
same provisions for allowable improvements, and do not have a sunset clause. The Upper
Main urban revitalization district, however, has a 25 year sunset clause and allows fewer
eligible improvements. The City Council asked the Historic Preservation Commission to
review the diffedng provisions, and then recommend whether to use a common set of
provisions or individualized provisions. In addition, the Old Main historic distdct is located
within an urban renewal area, where property taxes for eligible improvements can be
collected for tax increment financing (TIF). The Commission evaluated how the TIF and
abatement provisions could both apply in Old Main.
Service People Integrity Respol~ sibility Innovation Teamwork
Expansion of Urban Revitalization Program
Page 2
Recommendation
The Commission recommends using the provisions of the Washington, Jackson, and West
11th Street urban revitalization districts for the Old Main, Cathedral, and Langworthy historic
districts. The Commission also recommends that the Old Main urban revitalization district
be limited to residential purposes, so that the urban revitalization and urban renewal
programs for this historic area can coexist.
Urban revitalization plans for the Old Main, Cathedral, and Langworthy historic districts
were prepared for your review and approval based on these recommendations. We would
greatly appreciate your adoption of these urban revitalization plans.
By providing incentives for people to renovate and repair historic structures, the City can
retain and upgrade our existing housing stock, help revitalize neighborhoods, and improve
the quality of life in Dubuque.
Sincerely,
Christopher Wand, Chairperson
Historic Preservation Commission
Enclosures
CC
David Harris Housing & Community Development Director
Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager
[carstens~Np/h pc/ur exp.ltr, doc
Old Main Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
1.0 Introduction
The following plan describes certain provisions of the Iowa Urban Revitalization Act and
proposes the creation and designation of an Old Main Urban Revitalization District.
The State of Iowa, under Iowa Code Chapter 404, allows cities to designate areas as urban
revitalization districts. Under this Act, improvements to qualified areas may receive a total
or partial exemption from property taxes for a specified number of years. The exemptions
are intended to stimulate private investment by the reduction of tax increases related to
property improvements.
Once an area is deemed to meet the requirements established in Chapter 404, a plan must be
established that identifies the district boundaries, property owners, existing conditions,
proposed plans and the basic abatement provisions for the revitalization area.
Iowa Code Chapter 404.1 lists five reasons for wkich a city. or county may establish urban
revitalization plans. These include: the existence of numerous buildings that are dilapidated
or deteriorated; the need for preservation and restoration of buildings due to their historic
significance; the area is appropriated as an economic development region as defined in Iowa
Code 403.17; the need for public improvements related to housing; and the encouragement of
housing and residential development. The law also states that at least 75% of a participating
property's square footage must be used for residential purposes in order to qualify for the
program. The Old Main Urban Revitalization plan will be based upon the need for the
encouragement of the preservation and restoration of historic buildings within the area and
because it is an economic development area.
Presently the Old Main Historic Preservation District is located within an urban renewal area,
as defined by the Iowa Code Chapter 403. The urban renewal area involves collecting taxes
for the tax increment financing program, which contradicts the tax abatement, which exists
under the urban revitalization plan. However, both urban renewal and urban revitalization
plans may coexist, since the urban revitalization plan will be restricted to residential
development.
2.0 The District
2.1 Location
Addendum Map 1 identifies the location of the Revitalization District. As indicated on
the map, this area is generally located along Main Street from the 100 block to the 400
block and encompassing the Five Flags Civic Theater.
Old Main Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 2
The boundaries of the District are:
Beginning at the comer of First Street and the alley between Iowa Street and Main
Street, continuing southwest along First Street to the alley between Main Street and
Locust Street, northwest up to the comer of Fourth Street and Main Street (400 block),
southwest to the comer of Fourth Street and Main Street (300 block), northeast on Fourth
Street and includes buildings facing Main City, continue south (inclusion of all buildings
facing Main Street) down to the comer of First Street and the alley between Iowa Street
and Main Street.
2.2 Existing and Proposed Zoning
Map 2 shows the existing zoning districts. Approximately 0.! 92 acres (4%) is zoned as
C-5 (central business district) and the remaining 4.316 acres (96%) is zoned as C-4
(downtown commercial district). Of the forty parcels inside the district only one (3%), is
zoned as C-5, while thirty-nine (97%), are zoned as C-4. Proposed zouing for the
Revitalization District is C-5 (central business district).
2.3 Existing and Proposed Land Use
Map 4 identifies the existing primary land use for the Revitalization District. The district
has mainly commercial uses as the primary land use for the forty parcels within the
dislxict. Of these, twenty-seven, (67.5%), of the district are commercial use; four, (10%),
are office use; one, (2.5%), is under institutional use; five parcels, (12.5%), are parking
lots; and three, (7.5%), are vacant parcels. The total acreage of the Old Main Historic
District is 4.508 acres of which 3.078 acres, (69%), are for commercial use. The
remaining land use acreages for the district are: 0.531 acres, (12%), for off-street parking
lots; 0.420 acres, (9%), for office use; 0.287 acres, (6%), are vacant; and the remaining
0.I 92 acres, (4%), of the total acreage is used for institutional purposes.
Map 5 shows the secondary usage for the buildings in the Revitalization District.
Because certain parcels are either used for parking lots or are single story buildings,
seven of the forty parcels have no secondary usage. The majority of the parcels'
secondary usage is multi-family residences; nine of the remaining thirty-three parcels or
28% are under that use. The remaining parcels' secondary usages are: eight or 24% are
under commercial use; six or 18% are under two-family use; four or 12% are vacant
properties; three or 9% are under office use; two or 6% are under single-family use; and
one or 3% are under institutional use. The total acreage of the parcels with secondary
uses is 3.596 acres. Of this 1.184 acres or 33% are under commercial use; 0.970 acres or
27% are under multi-family use; 0.424 acres or 12 % are under two-family use; 0.354 or
10% are vacant; 0.369 acres or 10% are under office use; 0.192 acres or 5% are under
institutional use; and the remaining 0.103 acres or 3% are under commercial use.
2.4 Assessed Valuations and Owners of Records
The existing assessed valuation of the real estate in the Revitalization District, listing
land and building values per parcel separately, is included in Chart 1. Also, in Chart 1 is
a list of the frames and addresses of the current owners of record of real estate within the
district. The total land value with/n the proposed Old Main Urban Revitalization District
is $564,600. The total building value within the district is $2,231,140 with the total
value of the area being $2,795,740.
Old Main Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 3
2.5 City Plans and Services
The City completed a downtown circulation study in 1996 that encompassed this
district. This comprehensive study reviewed and addressed traffic patterns, parking
needs and urban design issues.
3.0 Relocation
No relocation should occur due to the rehabilitation of the remaining vacant space on the
parcels identified for expansion under existing and proposed land use. Should relocation
occur as a result of rehabilitation in the Revitalization District, the person(s) causing a
qualified tenant to be displaced shall pay all of the relocation costs of the tenant as a
condition for receiving a tax-exemption under Iowa Code Section 404.3.
4.0 Qualification of the District
In May 2001, a building condition survey was conducted by the Planning Services
Department in order to determine the boundaries for the Urban Revitalization District and the
criteria to be used by the City Council establish the district. Land use information
concerning existing uses, building ages and building conditions was collected in order to
document the conditions of deterioration that presently exist.
4.1 I-Iistoric Significance
The entire area proposed for the Old Main Urban Revitalization District is within the
Old Main Historic Preservation District. Chapter 25, Historic Preservation, of the City
Code, regulates alteration of building exteriors, new construction, additions, and
demolition. In 1979 an architectural survey was done using five classifications for
historical and/or architectural significance: state or national; city; neighborhood;
supportive; and non-supportive. Approximately 39% of the structures located within the
Old Main Urban Revitalization District were classified as having a neighborhood
significance. The remaining structures were classified as the following: 23%
supportive; 19% city; 13% non-supportive; and 6% state or national. Map 5 shows the
classifications of the historical significance for the buildings within the Old Main Urban
Revitalization District.
4.2 Building conditions
The results of the building conditions survey are shown in Map 6. Major structural
components were considered in rating building conditions. These components were
ranked as good, fair, or poor under the following criteria:
Good: The building appeared to be structurally sound and free of major defects.
Ongoing maintenance such as window repair, m-pointing and painting was evident.
Old Main Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 4
Of the thirty-five buildings reviewed, thirty-four (97.14%) qualified under this
category.
Fair: The building has been the victim of deferred maintenance. As a result such
conditions as wood or mortar decay, window repair, roof repair and tuck-pointing
needs exist. The correction of these conditions may require complete replacement and
may constitute a hardship or lack of feasibility on the part of the property owner, thus
retarding the provision of housing accommodations, or constitute an economic or
social liability. Of the thirty-five structures reviewed, one (2.86°4) qualified for this
category.
Poor: The building has been the victim of little or no maintenance during recent
years. This results in the need of major repairs in the building including, but not
limited to: foundation, roofmg, siding, mortar, windows, doors, tuck-pointing, and
structural supports. Correction of these conditions will require complete replacement
if applicable or major renovation and could possibly constitute a hardship or lack of
feasibility on the part of the property owner. No buildings within the district qualified
for this category.
5.0 Revitalization Program
5.1 Tax Exemption
a) All residential property, assessed either as residential or commercial, in the
Revitalization District shall be eligible for tax abatement.
b)
c)
The abatement incentive is intended to bring back to useful purpose the vacant or
underutilized buildings, which exist in the Revitalization District. Tax abatement
shall be available only for the rehabilitation of existing structures and additions in the
Revitalization District, but not for the new construction of separate buildings.
The tax abatement schedule shall offer the same exemption opporttmity as is available
in other Urban Revitalization Districts so designated in the City of Dubuque.
Therefore, a ten-year 100% exemption on the actual value added by the
improvements as provided in Iowa Code Section 404.3 (4) shall be established as part
of this Plan.
The percent increase in value shall also reflect the standard used in other Urban
Revitalization Districts in the city. The actual value of the building(s) to which
improvements have been made must have increased the assessed value by at least
fifteen percent (15%) before an abatement is applied. Each year that an application is
made for tax abatement, the assessed value must have increased in that year by at
least fifteen percent (15%).
e) The area shall remain as a Revitalization District commencing upon the adoption of
the ordinance approving +dfis Revitalization District by the City Council.
Old Main Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 5
5.2 Eligibility
For qualified improvements to be eligible for tax exemption, a building permit and or
Historic Preservation Commission approval must be obtained in accordance with the City
of Dubuque' s Code of Ordinances. Also, due to urban renewal plan which also exists for
this area, 100% or greater of the total square footage must be used for residential
purposes in order to qualify for the pmgran~
5.3 Availability of funding
There are at present many active programs, which may provide a source of funding for
residential and commercial improvements in the Revitalization District. These include:
Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG), HOME funds, Main Street, Lt&,
Do-amtown Rehabilitation Loan Fund, and Faqade Grant Program.
6.0 Conclusion
The Old Main Urban Revitalization District will assist the rehabilitation efforts of several
vacant or deteriorating properties by providing needed housing units for the citizens of
Dubuque and the surrounding aret~ After the ten-year abatement period lapses on these
projects, the full assessed value of the rehabilitation property will go on the tax rolls to the
benefit of the entire ¢ommllnity.
\
Old Main Urban Revitalization District:
Boundaries 2002
tOld Main Urban Revitalization District:
Zoning 2002
Old Main Zoning
~ C4 - Downtown Commercial District
__ C5 - Bus/ness D/st'dot +
Main Urban Revitalization District:
Land Use 2002
Old Main Land Use
Institutional
Old Main Urban Revitalization District:
Secondary Land Use 2002
Old Main Secondary
Land Use
Single Family
Two Family
~ati-family
Institutional
~ Vacant
No Use/No Upper
lOld Main Urban Revitalization District:
Historic Significance of Buildings 2002
Old Main
Historic Significance
cit~
State or National
Neighborhood
I Non-Supportive
~ Not Evaduated ~
IOld Main Urban Revitalization District:
Building Conditions 2002
Old Main
Building Conditions
Fair
~OOT
Parcel ID Address Business Owner Name Owner Name Owner Address City Zip Land Value Bulldln~ Value Total Value
Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
1.0 Introduction
The following plan describes certain provisions of the Iowa Urban Revitalization Act and
proposes the creation and designation of a Cathedral Urban Revitalization District.
The State of Iowa, under Iowa Code Chapter 404, allows cities to designate areas as urban
revitalization districts. Under this Act, improvements to qualified areas may receive a total or
partial exemption from property taxes for a specified number of years. The exemptions are
intended to stimulate private investment by the reduction of tax increases related to property
improvements.
Once an area is deemed to meet the requirements established in Chapter 404, a plan must be
established that identifies the district boundaries, property owners, existing conditions, proposed
plans and the basic abatement provisions for the revitalization area.
Iowa Code Chapter 404.1 lists five reasons for which a city or county may establish urban
revitalization plans. These include: the existence of numerous buildings that are dilapidated or
deteriorated; the need for preservation and restoration of buildings due to their historic
significance; the area is appropriated as an economic development region as defined in Iowa
Code 403.17; the need for public improvements related to housing; and the encouragement of
housing and residential development. The law also states that at least 75% of a participating
property's square footage must be used for residential purposes in order to qualify for the
program. The Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan will be based upon the need for the
encouragement of the preservation and restoration of historic buildings within the area, it is an
economic development area, and for the encouragement of housing and residential development
in the area~
2.0 The District
2.1 Location
Addendum Map 1 identifies the location of the Revitalization District. As indicated on the
map, this area is generally located from 39 Bluff Street tl~ough most of its 700 block and is
bordered by the bluff line to the west and Locust Street and the alleyway between Locust
Street and Bluff Street to the east.
The boundaries of the District are:
Begiurfing at the comer of Locust Street and Jones Street continuing westward along
Jones Street to Bluff Street Street, westward on Emmett Street to the comer of St. Mary's
Street, north along St. Mary's Street to the comer of Third Street, east along Third Street to
the comer of Bluff Street, north along Bluff Street to the comer of Fourth Street, west along
Fourth Street until its end, from the comer of Bhiff Street and Fourth Street continue north to
Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 2
the comer of Fifth Street and continue west for one block, from the comer of Bluff Street
and Fifth Street continue north along Bluff Street until 759 Bluff Street, including only the
westward side of the 700 block, continue south to Seventh Street, continue east along
Seventh Street to the comer of Locust Street, south on Locust Street to the comer of Third
Street, continue west on Third Street until the alleyway between Locust Street and Bluff
Street, continue south on the alleyway until reaching the alleyway between First Street and
Jones Street, continue along this alleyway until reaching Locust Street and continue south to
the comer of Locust Street and Jones Street.
2.2 Existing and Proposed Zoning
Map 2 shows the existing zoning districts. Within t_he Cathedral Urban Revitalization
District there are six different zoning districts. Of the 175 parcels within the district, sixty-
tkree, (36%), are zone as OR (office residential district). The remaining parcels are zoned
as: fifty, (29%), as OC (office commercial district); forty-one, (23%), as R3 (moderate
density multifamily residential district); seventeen, (10%), as C-4 (downtown commercial
district); four, (2%), as OS (office/service district); and the remaining one parcel, is zoned as
C-3 (general commercial district). The Cathedral Urban Revitalization District is a 23.814
acre area. R3 zoning makes up 7.937 acres, (33%), of the total area. Approximately 27%, or
6.343 acres are zoned as OR; 4.878 acres, (20%), as C-4; 4.061 acres, (17%), as OC; 0.420
acres, (2%), as OS; and 0.175 acres, (< 1%), as C-3.
2.3 Existing and Proposed Land Use
Map 4 identifies the existing primary land use for the proposed district. One hundred and
seventy-five parcels are within the district. Of these, sixty-two, 935%), are in single family
use; twenty-eight, (16%), are under commercial use; twenty-three, (13%), are for
multifamily use; twenty-two, (13%), are for two family use; twelve, (7%), of the parcels are
vacant; eleven, (6%), are under office use; ten, (6%), are used for parking; six, (3%), are
used for institutional purposes; and the remaining parcel is used as public open space.
The total acreage of the Cathedral Urban Revitalization District is 23.814 acres, of which
6.101 acres, or 26%, are for institutional use. The remaining land use acreages for the
Revitalization District are: 4.424 acres, (19%), for single-family use; 3.631 acres, (15%), for
multifamily use; 2.237 acres, (10%), for commercial use; 1.947 acres, (8%), for parking use;
1.782 acres, (7%), for two family use; 1.509 acres, (6%), for public open space; 1.387 acres,
(6%), for office use; and 0.706 acres, (3%), of the total acreage remains vacant.
Map 5 shows the secondary usage for the buildings in the Revitalization District. Within the
district there are nine different secondary uses. Due to certain parcels having parking lots or
single story building as their primary use, eighteen of the one hundred and seventy-five
parcels have no secondary usage. The one hundred and fifty-seven parcels that remain have
the majority of their secondary use designated as single-family use, with eighty-five parcels,
or 54%, under that use. The other eight uses are divided up as: twenty-three, (15%), as two
family use; twenty-three, (15%), as multifamily use; eight, (5%), as commercial use; six,
(4%), as institutional use; six, (4%), for office use; five, (3%), are vacant; and the remaining
one parcel is under both commercial and single-family use. The total acreage of the parcels
with secondary uses is 20.119 acres. Of this total 6.181 acres, (31%), are under single-
Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 3
family use; 6.I0i acres, (30%), are under institutional use; 2.907 acres (14%), are under
multifamily use; 1.975 acres, (10%), are under two family use; 1.604 acres, (8%), are under
commercial use; 0.709 acres, (4%), are under office use; 0.467 acres, (2%), are vacant; and
0.175 acres, (1%), is used as commercial and single family uses.
2.4 Assessed Valuations and Owners of Records
The existing assessed valuation of the real estate in the Revitalization District, listing land
and building values separately, is included in Chart 1. Also in Chart 1 is a list of the names
and addresses of the current owners of record of real estate within the District.
2.5 City. Plans and Services
The City completed a downtown circulation study in 1996 that encompassed this area. This
comprehensive study reviewed and addressed traffic patterns, parking needs and urban
design issues.
3.0 Relocation
No relocation should occur due to the rehabilitation of the remaining vacant space on the
parcels identified for expansion under existing and proposed land use. Should relocation
occur as a result of rehabilitation in the Revitalization District, the person(s) causing a
qualified tenant to be displaced shall pay all of the relocation costs of the tenant as a
condition for receiving a tax-exemption under Iowa Code Section 404.3.
4.0 Qualification of Areas
In May 2001, a building condition survey was conducted by the Planning Services
Department in order to determine the boundaries for the Urban Revitalization District and the
criteria to be used by the City Council to establish the district. Land use information
concerning existing uses, building ages and building conditions was collected in order to
document the conditions of deterioration that presently exist.
4.1 Historic Significance
The entire area proposed for the Cathedral Urban Revitalization District is within the
Cathedral Historic Preservation District. Chapter 25, Historic Preservation, of the City
Code, regulates alteration of building exteriors, new construction, additions, and demolition.
In 1979 an architectural survey was done using five classifications: state or national; city;
neighborhood; supportive; and non-supportive Approximately 37% of the structures
located within the Cathedral Urban Revitalization District were classified as having a
nei~borhood significance. The remaining structures were classified for historical
significance as follows: 20% supportive; 17% non-supportive; 14% city; 7% state or
national; and 5% not evaluated. Map 5 shows the classifications of the historic significance
of buildings within the Cathedral Urban Revitalization District.
Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 4
4.2 Building conditions
The results of the building conditions survey are shown on Map 6. Major structural
components were considered in rating building conditions. These components were ranked
as good, fair, or poor under the following criteria:
Good: The building appeared to be structurally sound and free of major defects.
Ongoing maintenance such as window repair, re-pointing and painting was evident. Of
the one hundred and twenty-five buildings reviewed, one hundred and five, or 84%,
qualified under this category.
Fair: The building has been the victim of deferred maintenance. As a result such
conditions as wood or mortar decay, window repair, roof repair and tuck-pointing needs
exist. The correction of these conditions may require complete replacement and may
constitute a hardship or lack of feasibility on the part of the property owner, thus
retarding the provision of housing accommodations, or constitute an economic or social
liability. Of the one hundred and twenty-five structures reviewed, nineteen, or 15%,
qualified for this category.
Poor: The building has been the victim of little or no maintenance during recent years.
This results in the need of major repairs in the building including, but not limited to:
foundation, roofing, siding, mortar, windows, doom, tuck-pointing, and structural
suppo~s. Correction of these conditions will require complete replacement if applicable
or major renovation and could possibly constitute a hardship or lack of feasibility on the
part of the property owner. One structure, or 1%, out of one hundred and twenty-five
buildings qualified for this category.
5.0 Revitalization Program
5.1 Tax Exemption
a) All residential property, assessed either as residential or commercial, in the Revitalization
District shall be eligible for tax abatement.
b)
The abatement incentive is intended to bring back to useful purpose the vacant or
underutilized buildings, which exist in the revitalization District. Tax abatement shall be
available only for the rehabilitation of existing strictures in the Revitalization District, not
for the new construction of additions or separate buildings.
The tax abatement schedule shall offer the same exemption oppommity as is available in
other Urban Revitalization Districts so designated in the City of Dubuque. Therefore, a
ten-year 100% exemption on the actual value added by the improvements as provided in
Iowa Code Section 404.3 (4) shall be established as part of this Plan.
d)
The percent increase in value shall also reflect the standard used in other Urban
Revitalization districts in the city. The actual value of the building(s) to which
improvements have been made must have increased the assessed value by at least fifteen
percent (! 5%) before an abatement is applied. Each year that an application is made for
Cathedral Urban Revitalization Plan
March 2002
Page 5
tax abatement, the assessed value must have increased in that year by at least fifteen
percent (15%).
e) The proposed area shall remain as a revitalization area commencing upon the adoption of
the ordinance approving this Revitalization District by the City Council.
5.2 Eligibility
For qualified improvements to be eligible for tax exemption, a building permit and or
Historic Preservation Commission approval must be obtained in accordance with the City of
Dubuque's Code of Ordinances. Also for commercial or mixed use property, 75% or greater
of the total square footage must be used for residential purposes in order to qualify for the
program.
5.3 Availability of funding
There are at present many active programs, which may provide a source of funding for
residential and commercial improvements to the Revitalization District. These include:
Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG), HOME funds, Main Street, Ltd.,
Downtown Rehabilitation Loan Fund, and Fagade Grant Program.
6.0 Conclusion
The Cathedral Urban Revitalization District will assist the rehabilitation efforts of several vacant
or deteriorating properties by' providing needed housing units for the citizens of Dubuque and the
surrounding area. After the ten-year abatement period lapses on these projects, the full assessed
value of the rehabilitation property will go on the tax rolls to the benefit of the entire community.
Cathedral Urban Revitalization District:
Boundaries 2002
Cathedral Urban Revitalization District:
Zoning 2002
Cathedral Zoning
C3 - General Commercial District
C4- Downtown CommerdaI Disbqct
os- o~ s~
1~ - Multi-Family District
Cathedral Urban Revitalization District:
Secondary Land Use 2002
Cathedral
Secondary Land Use
Cathedral Urban Revitalization District:
Historic Significance of Buildings 2002
Cathedral Historic
Significance of Buildings
l St~teorNational
Neighborhood
Non-Supportive
Not Evah~r~
Cathedral Urban Revitalization District:
Building Conditions 2002
Cathedral
Building Conditions
1 cood
lPoor
Iqot ~Seatqe ~
Cathedral Urban Revitalization District:
Land Use 2002
Cathedral Land Use
-- Single Fam~y
I Mutti-Family
Parking
3
Langworthy Revitalization Plan
June 2002
1.0 Introduction
The following plan describes certain provisions of the Iowa Urban Revitalization Act and
proposes the creation and designation of a Langworthy Urban Revitalization area.
The State of Iowa, under Iowa Code Chapter 404, allows cities to designate areas as
urban revitalization districts. Under this Act, irnprovements to qualified areas may
receive a total or partial exemption tiom property taxes for a specified number of years.
The exemptions are intended to ~mulate private inveslment by the reduction of tax
increases related to property improvements.
Once an area is deemed to meet the requirements established in Chapter 404, a plan must
be established which identifies the district boundaries, property owners, existing
conditions, proposed plans and the basic abatement provisions for the revitalization area.
Iowa Code Chapter 404.1 lists five reasons for which a city or county may establish
urban revitalization plans. These include: the existence of numerous buildings that are
dilapidated or deteriorated; the need for preserx-ation and restoration ofbuild;.ngs due to
their historic significance; the area is appropriated as an economic development region as
defined in Iowa Code 403.17; the need for public improvements related to housing; and
the encouragement of housing and residential development. The law also states that at
least 75% of a participating property's square footage must be used for residential
purposes in order to qualify for the program. The Langworthy Urban Revitalization Plan
will be based upon the need for the encouragement of the preservation and restoration of
historic buildings within the area and for the encouragement of housing and residential
development
2.0 The Area
2.1 Location
Addendum Map 1 identifies the location of the Revitalization District. As indicated
on the map, this area is generally located fi'om 115 Alpine Street through to its 400
block and is bordered by Hill Street and Paulina Street to the east and Alpine Street
to the west.
The boundaries of the district are:
Beginning at the northeast comer of Nevada Street and 3ra Street, continue north
until 394 Nevada, exclude 394 Nevada and all buildings facing Nevada and continue
north to 5th Street, mm east and include 490 and go south, nm behind the buildings
facing Melrose Terrace to Paulina Street, follow Paulina Street south then continue
south on Winona Street, mm left on 3ra Street to the comer of Hill Street, continue
south on;~]Iill Street and nm west behind buildings facing Langworthy Street then at
Langworthy Urban Revitalization Plan
June 2002
Page 2
i i 70 Langworthy Street turn south to Solon Street, turn west on Solon Street turn
north to run behind buildings facing Alpine Street and north through the alleyway
between Nevada Street and Alpine Street to the starting point.
2.2 Zoning
Map 2 shows the existing zoning districts. Approximately t4.658 acres, or 75%, are
zoned as R-1 (single family residential district) and the remain/ng 2.687 acres or 14%
is zoned as R-2 (two family residential district). Of the eighty-three parcels inside
the district, s'mty-ene parcels or 73.5%, are zoned as R-I, while eleven or 13.3%, are
zoned as R-2.
2.3 Existing and Proposed Land Use
Map 3 identifies the existing prinmry land use for the proposed district. Eighty-three
parcels are within the district. Of these, 61 (73.5%) are in single-family use; 9
(10.8%) are for two family use; 2 (2.4%) are under multi-family use; and 11 (13.3%)
are vacan'L
The total acreage of the Langworthy Urban Kevitalization District is 19.486 acres.
The land use acreages for the Revitalization District are: 14.658 acres (75%) for
single family use; 2.379 acres (12%) for two family use; 0.308 acres (1.5%) for
multi-family use; 0.7 acres (3.6%) for secondary use of office space; 0.204 acres
(1%) for s~econdary use of commercial space, and the rema~n~.ug 2.141 acres (1 i%)
are vacant.
Map 4 shows the secondary usage for the buildings in the RexStalization District.
Within the district there are two different secondary uses. Due to certain parcels
having single story buildings as their primary use, 68 parcels of the 83 parcels have
no secondary usage. Eleven of the properties are vacant. The four remaining parcels
are designated as single-family use. Secondary use on three of the parcels (75%) is
office, while the rem*fining parcel is used for commercial purposes. The acreage for
secondary use is 0.7 acres 0.6%) for office space and 0.204 acres (1%) for
commercial use.
2.4 Assessed Valuations and Owners of Records
The existing assessed valuation of the real estate in. the Revitalization District, listing
land and building values separately, is included in Chart 1. Also in Chart 1 is a list of
the names and addresses of the current owners of record of real estate within the
District.
2.5 City Services
This area is served by city services.
3.0 Relocation
No relocation should occur due to the rehabilitation of the remaining vacant space on
the parcels identified for expansion under existing and proposed land use. Should
Langworthy Urban Revitalization Plan
June 2002
Page 3
relocation occur as a result of rehabilitation in the proposed district, the person(s)
causing a qualified tenant to be displaced shall pay all of the relocation costs of the
tenant as a condition for receiving a tax-exemption under Iowa Code Section 404.3.
4.0 Qualification of Areas
In 2002, a building condition survey was conducted by the Planning Services
Depathnant in order to determine the boundaries for the urban revitalization area and
the criteria to be used by the City Council to make a finding. Land use information
concerning existing uses, building ages and building conditions was collected in
order to doeumant the conditions of deterioration that presently exist.
4.1 Historic Significance
The entire area proposed for the Langworthy Urban Revitalization District is within
the Langworthy Historic Prese~afiun District. Chapter 25, Historic Preservation, of
the City Code, regulates alteration of building exteriors, new construction, additions,
and demolition. In 1979 an architectural survey was done using five classifications:
state or national; city; neighborhood; supportive; and non-supportive.
Approximately 41% of the one hundred and eight structures located within the
Langworthy Urban Revitalization District were classified as having a non-supportive
significance. The rema-ining structures were classified as the following: 32%
neighborhood; 18% supportive; 6% city; 3% state or national; and .9% not
evaluated. Map 5 shows the classffieatious of the buildings within the Langworthy
Urban Revitalization District.
4.2 Building Conditions
The results of the building conditions survey are provided in Chart 3. Major
structural components were considered in rating building conditions. These
components were ranked as good, fair, or poor under the following criteria:
Good.' _The building appeared to be slxucturally sound and free of major defects.
Ongoing maintenance such as window repair, re-pointing and painting was
evident. Of the seventy-three buildings reviewed, seventy-two, or 99%, qualified
under this category.
Fair: The building has been the victim of deferred maintenance. As a result such
conditions as wood or mortar decay, window repair, roof repair and tuck-pointing
needs exist The correction of these conditions may require complete replacement
and may constitute a hardship or lack of feasibility on the part of the property
owner, thus retarding the provision ofhous'mg accommodations, or constitute an
economic or social liability. None of the buildings fell into this category.
Poor: The building has been the victim of little or no maintenance during recent
yem~?~ Tt~ds results in the need of major repairs in the building including, but not
limited to: foundation, roofing, siding, mortar, windows, doors, tuck-pointing,
Langworthy Urban Revitalization Plan
June 2002
Page 4
and structural supports. Correction of these conditions will require complete
replacement if applicable or major renovation and could possibly constitute a
hardship or lack of feasibility on the part of the property owner. One structure, or
1% out of seventy-three buildings qualified for this category.
5.0 Revitalization Program
5.1 Tax Exemption
a) All residential property, assessed either as residential or commercial, in the
revitalization area shall be eligible for tax abatement.
The abatement incentive ks intended to bring back to useful purpose the vacant or
underutilized buildings, which exist in the revitalization area. Tax abatement
shall be available only for the rehabilitation of existing strictures in the
revitalization area, not for the new construction of additions or separate buildings.
c)
The tax abatement schedule shall offer the same exemption oppommity as is
available in other Urban Revitalization Disiricts so designated in the City of
Dubuque. Therefore, aten-year 100% exemption on the actualvalue added by
the improvements as provided in Iowa Code Section 404.3 (4) shall be established
as part of this Plan.
The percent increase in value shall also reflect the standard used in other urban
revitalization districts in the city. The actual value of the building(s) to which
improvements have been made must have increased the assessed value by at least
fifteen percent before abatement is applied. Each year that an application is made
for tax abatement, the assessed value must have increased in that year by at least
fifteen percent.
e)
The proposed area shall remain as a revitalization area commencing upon the
adoption of the ordinance approving this revitalization d/strict by the City
Council.
5.2 Availability of funding
There are at present many active programs, which may provide a source of funding
for residential and commercial improvements to the proposed district. These include:
Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG), HOME funds, Historic
Preservation Revolving Loan Fund, and Historic Preservation Homeowner Grant
Program.
6.0 Conclusion
The proposed urban revitalization district will assist the rehabilitation efforts of
several vacant or deteriorating properties by providing needed housing units for the
citizens of Dubuque and the surrounding area. After the ten-year abatement period
lapses omthese projects, the full assessed value of the rehabilitation property w-'dl go
on the tax rolls to the benefit of the entire communit?-.
angworthy Urban Revitalization District:
Boundaries 2002
Melrose Ter
Srd St
gispro] ~ pl \ interns \ karen \ langworthy
Langworttty tlrt~an ptezntat~zat:ton t~srrtcr:
Zoning 2002
Melrose Ter
~ /
Langworthy Zoning
~ R1 - Single Family
~ R2- Two Famiiy
Langworthy Urban l~ewtat~zaaon
Land Use 2002
Solon St
Langworthy Land Use
~-3si,~gt~r-~i~ I M~ati-~it~ ~ Of~
Two r-amit~ I Commercial
Langzoorthy Urban Revitalization 19~stnct:
Secondary Land Use 2002
Srd s!
Langworthy Secondary Land Use
~ Single Family I Multi-Family ~ Office ~ Vacant
Two Family
I Commercial
I Institutional ~ NoLIse/NoUpperFloor(s)
Langworthy Urban Revitalization District:
Historic Significance of Buildings 2002
Langworthy Historic Significance
~- ~ Sul~ortive
State or lqatioma ~ ~lon-Sul~,~ioe
Neighborhood ~] Not Evaluated
LANGWORTHY URBAN REVITALIZATION DISTRICT
Primary Landuse # of Parcel.. %
_)-FAMILY 9 10.8%
MULTI-FAMILY 2 2.4%
SINGLE-FAMiLY 61 73.5%
VACANT 11 13.3%
83 100%
Secondary Landuse
OFFICE ' 3 3.6%
COMMERCIAL 1 1.2%
VACANT 11 13.3%
NO USE 68 81.9%
83 100%
~/orthy Urban Re¥1~=iiT~flnrl District
ParcellD Condition Address Business LU201)I 2ndLU Historic Bq. Footege #floors OwnerName Owner Address City, State ZipCode
10,25,159.019 189 Hill SF N Neighborhood 1145.27 2.8 ~(OONTZ, lAN M 189 HILL ~UBUQUE IA 52001
1090 ?ECKOSH, PAUL J & t090
10,25.159~015 Lengworthy SF N State or National 2471.81 2,61 PAMELA M LANGWORTHY DUBUQUE IA 52001
1110 FORDIGE. BILLY D 8, 1110
10.25.159.010 Langworthy SF N SupportNa 1794.17 2 DEBORAH J LANGWORTHY ~UBUQUE I,a 52001
1120 KRUEGER, EDWARD J & 1120
10.25,159.009 ,? Langworthy SF N Non. Supportive 15~O.58 2,5 CATHERINE LANGWORTHY DUBUQUE IP 52001
1132 KLOPFENSTEIN, JEFFREY 1134
10.25,159,008 Langworthy SF ~1 Non-Supportive 1022,01 L& LANGWORTHY DUBUQUE I,~ 52001.
1148 1148
10.25,159.007 Langw~rthy SF ~1 ~upportNe 1268.79 2,5 FURY, THOMAS R & ANN M LANGWORTHY DUBUQUE I/ 5200~
1148
10.25.159,006 NA V V FURY, THOMAS R & ANN M LANGWORTNY DUBUQUE I! 52001
1170-1172 1170
10.25,159.005 Langwodhy 2F N Non-Supportive 1425.56 2 MEADE, LORRAINE K LANGWORTHY DUBUQUE IA 52001
104-196-1§8 GARRITY, MICHAEL J & GRANDVtEW
10.25,159,001 Alpine MF N Neighborhood 3162.32 2.5 DIANA B AVE DUBUQUE IA 52(}03
575 ENGLISH
10.25.159.002 176 Alpine MF N SupportNe 2431.03 2.5 B & W PROPERTIES LANE DUBUQUE IA 5200__~3
CHEVALIER, DENNIS A &
10.25,159.003 154 Alpine SF N Non-Supportive 1009.66 1.5 {UTHM 54 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
~ 0.25,159.004 116 AIpine iSF N Supportive 1946.93 2.5 MURPHY, ANN M 116 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
MC DONELL, DALE J &
10,25,158,009 tl 5 Alpine SF N SupportNe 1567.08 2.5 SHERRY J 1t5 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52CO1
BOWER, JV.I-FK~-'( L &
10.25,158,008 1135 Alpine SF N Neighborhood 1530.75 2.5 ~,HRISTINE A t35 ALPINE DUBUQUE IP 52001
~IYE, DANIEL EVANS 8,
10.25.158,007 155 Alpine ZF N Neighborhood 2222.18 2,~ KATIE E 155 ALPINE DUBUQUE I,~ 52001
10.25,158,006 175 Alpine 2F N Non-Supportive 1443.04 EBY, JOHN C & KRISTEN R 175.~LPINE DUBUQUE I) 52001 !
~NIGGINTON. KARLE F &
10.25.158,005 195 Alpine SF N _1_946.1( 2.5 MARY BETH 195 ALPINE DUBUQUE II 5200~1
Wallac. s Rlohard WALLACE, RICHARD L &
I0.25.155.012 Good 225 Alpine Ins. AgtS SF O Neighborhood 2286.55 2.5 NANCY M 225 ALPINE DUBUQUE I/ 52001
10.25,156.011 Good 239Alpine SF N Supportive ';S44.77 2 SCNRUP, LAURA K 239 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
SANDERS, THOMAS J &
10.25.156,010 Good 265AIptne SF N Neighborhood 2476.76 2.5 SALLYW 265ALPINE DUBUQUEIA 52001
ROTH, JAMES J &
10.25.156.009 Good 285 Alpine BF N Supportive 2740.00 2 JACQUELINE A 285 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
GOWDY, SUSAN BISSELL
10.25,152.011 NA V ,V ET AL 325 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
GOWDY, SUSAN BISSELL
10.25.152.010 NA V ¢ ETAL 325 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
GOWDY, SUSAN BISSELL
10.25.1,52,000 NA V V ET AL 525 ALPINE ~UBUOUE I/~ 52001
GOWDY, SUSAN BISSELL
10.28,152.008 ~IA V V ET AL 328 ALPINE DUBUQUE I,~ 52001
GOWDY, SUSAN BISSELL
10.25,152.019 325 Alpine SF N State or Nelloosl 3208.43 2 ETAL 325 ALPINE DUBUQUE I/ 52001
GOWDY, SUSAN BIBSELL
10.25.152.018 ~,IA iV V ETAL 325 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
-- GOWDY, SUSAN BISSELL
10.25.152.017 ~' V Supportive ETAL 325 ALPINE DUBUQUE lA 52001
10.25,182,016 i375AIptne ZF N Neighborhood 2152,07 2 DUBUQUEWOMEN'S CLUB 375ALPINE DUBUQUElA 52001
:1~,. KINGSLEY, ROBERT W &
10.25.152.O15 393 Alpine SF N Hon. Supporfive 1606.45 ~IA, THLEEN 393 ALPINE DUBUQUE lA 52001
GRANT, JAMES W &
10.25.152.014 ~1 Alpine 2F N City 3359.3~ 2 ~EONA E :431 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
~,RANT, JAMES W &
10.25.152.013 451-453 Alpine 2F N Non-Supportive 1 ~04.5{~ LEONA E ~31 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
HAMILL, DONALD E &
10.25.152,012 _ 491 Alpine , SF N Neighporhood t658.6,~ 2.~ .IANICE A ~1 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
10.25.153.001 4go Alpine SF N Neighborhood 2967.8C 2.5 LOCHER, TODD J & CARYN 490 ALPINE :)UBUGUE IA 52001
10.25,153.002 450Alpine SF N Supportive 2396.11 2.5 0TEINHAUSER, CYNTHIAM 450ALPINE DUBUQUE IP 520~
MONAGHAN, EDWARD J &
10.25.153.003 430 Alpine SF N Neighborhood 2416.81 2.5 JANEF 430 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
1087 Melrose BURKE, MICHAEL D & t087 MELROSE
t0.25.153,012 Good Ter SF N Neighborhood 1362.41 2:5 MARYM TERRACE DUBUQUEI~ 52001
1075 Melmos KESSLER, DAVID W & 1075 MELROSE
10.25.153,013 Good Ter SF N Neighborhood 1309.90 2 KATHLEEN K "ERRACE DUBUQUE I,~ 52001
1063 Melrose PREHM, GREG A & 1063 MELROSE
10.25,153.014 Good Ter SF N , Supportive 2238.80 2 SRIDGETR TERRACE DUBUQUEI,~ 52001
1055 MELROSE
10.25.153.015 Good 055 Melrose SF N Neighborhood 1409.50 1.5 FITZPATRICK, THOMAS J TERRACE DUBUQUE It 52001
045 Melmne CRIBB, LYNWOOD R & 1045 MELROSE
10.25.153.o15 Good Ter SF N Neghborhood 1436.13 2.5 LAURIEC TERRACE DUBUQUEIt 52001
1033 Melrose SHEA, THOMAS D & 1033 MELROSE
10.25.153,017 Good Ter SF iN ~lelghb0rhood 1501.06 2.5 MARGUERITE E TERRACE DUBUQUE I1 52001
025 Melrose 1025 MELROSE
10.25.153,018 Good Ter SF N ',leighborhood 1102.38 2 SCHMITZ, JEANA TERRACE DUBUQUElA 52001
IOll Melrose IO1t MELROSE
1333.20 2 NEMMERS, JOHN T TERRACE DUBUQUE IA 52001
10.25.153.01g Good Ter SF N ~upportlve
010 Melrose WILLEMS, JAMES R & 1010 MELROSE
10.25~155.010 Ter SF N Neighborhood 1540.52 2 ELIZABETH A TERRACE DUBUQUE IA
'-- 020 Metrose 1020 MELROSE
1{].25.155.O09 Ter SF N Neighborhood 2021.97 1,5 MILLER, JAMES J SR TERRACE DUBUQUE IA 52001
1030 Melrose Sohenok Barbor 1030 MELROSE
10.25,155,008 Ter Writers SF O Neighborhood 1078.29 2,5 SCHENCK, BARBARA L TERRACE DUBUQUE IA 52001
[040 Melrose WEBER, ROBERT A & IO40 MELROSE
i10.25.155.007 Ter SF N Supportive 1663.00 2 JEANETTE M TERRACE DUBUQUE I,~ 52001
1050 Melrose 1050 MELROSE
10.25.155.006 Ter SF N Neighborhood , 1396.75 2 DEVANEY, LYNNE M TERRACE ;DUBUQUE IA 82001
1052 Melrose CORKEN, DANIEL T & 1062 MELROSE
10,25.155.005 Tar SF N Neighborhood 1313.91 2,5 CHRISTINE O TERRACE DUBUQUE IAJ 52001
'-- 1070 Melrnae 1070 MELROSE
10.25.155.004 Tar SF N Neighborhood 1710,67 2 KURT, LARRY R & DENA M TERRACE DUBUQUE IA 52001
1088 Melrose LOEWEN, ROGER C 8~ 1086 MELROSE
10.25,155,003 Tar BF N Supportive 2050.12 2 DONNA E TERRACE DUBUQUE IA 52001
1090 Melmna 1090 MELROSE
10.25.155.002 Tar BF N Supportive 1369.19 2 MESSLER TRUSTEE, M K TERRACE DUBUQUE IA 52001
MC GUIRE, MICHAEL E &
10.25.155,001 390 Alpine SF N Non-Supportive 1705.53 1 LINDA S 390 ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
1095 WEST 3RD
10.25.155.011 1095 3rd St BF N State or National - 4~138,43 2 CHALMERS, WILLIAM B ST DUBUQUE lA 52001
1087 WEST 3RD
10,25.t55,012 3oDd 1087 3rd St BF N Neighborhood 1283,34 2 GILLOON, SHIRLEYANN ST DUBUQUE IA 52001
Derke David E & 1083 WEST 3RD
10.25,155.013 ;Good 1083 3rd St e, ssoolate SF O Neighborhood 1555.25 2 DERKS, DAVID E ST DUBUQUE I.~ 52001
La Gaatronomie 1075 WEST 3RD
10.25.155.014 ~ood 1075 3rd St Catering ~BF C Neighborhood 1786.30 2.5 KOPP, ANITA C ~T DUBUQUE IA 52001
MC DONELL, DANIEL T & 1057 WEST 3RD
10.25,155.015 .~ood 1057 3rd St SF N City 2063.40 2 PATRICIA BT DUBUQUE IA 52001
MC DONELL, 'DANIEL T &
10,25,155.016 INA iV V City
PATRICIA
1057W 3RD ST
DUBUQUE IA
52001
1045 WEST 3RD
10.25,155,017 :~ood 1045 3rd St ~F N City 2494.78 2.~ SCHUI..Z, ERIC A & DIANE M! ST DUBUQUE IA 52001
I ~BAUCHIERO, ROSEMARYS 1035WEST3RO
10.25.155.018 ~ood 1035 3rd St BF N Supportive 1889,32 2 IMARTY, ST iDUBUQUE I,a 52001
~ =-LLWANOER, RALPH JOHN 1027 WEST 3RD
10.25.155.019 ,~ood 10273rdSt ~F N Neighborhood 27,~60,5~ 2,~ ~,BUBAN ST [:)UBUQUEI,~ 52001
1004 WEST 3RD
10.25.157.011 ~ood 10043rdSt SF N Supportive 1470.87 2 L. OCHER, DAVIDA ST DUBUQUEI,~ 52001
1020 WEST 3RD
10.25.157.010 ~ood 1020 3rd St___ ~F_ N~._.~.: _. $_uppo___rt._t?_e_ ...... 1657,3~ ~ [.IPPE, GARY J & CAROL A ST DUBUQUE I~ 52001
DOWNING, E THOMAS & 1028 WEST 3RD
10.25.157.009 Good 10283rdSt ~F N Neighborhood 1t92,0a ' STACEYA ST DUBUQUEI,~ 52001
VIOZENA, TERRY L & 1035 WEST 3RD
I0.25.157.008 ~ood 1036 3rd St SF N City 2333.0~ 21 ~NGELA A ST DUBUQUE I,~ 52001
1042 WEST 3RD
10.25.157.007 ~ood 1042 3rd St SF N Neighborhood 275B.Q~ 2.5:~(URT, ROGER J ST DUBUQUE I~ 52001
1050.1052 3rd 1050 WEST 3RD
10.25.157.006 -~ood St 2F N Non. Supportive 1548.8~ 2 ~RAEIPOUR, MARILYN M ST DUBUQUE V 52001
1072 WEST 3RD
10.25.157.005 2~ood 1072 3rd St SF N Nalghbo_rhood 2551.3,= 2.5 DRAKE, D FLINT & JULIE L ST __ DUBUQUE I/ 52001
CAMPBELL, SUSAN
10.25.157.004 ,%od 10843rdSt SF N City 2579,2~ 2 VALERIAALTMAN 824FRANDORA HOUSTONT 77024
1090WEST 3RD
10.25,157.001 Gogd 10903rd St SF N Neighborhood 2405.11 2 MILLER, DONALD P ST DUBUQUE It 52001
YAINWRIGHT, JEREMY D
10.25,157.002 Good 264AIplna 2F N City 2929.45 2 & SHANNON 264ALPINE DUBUQUE IA 52001
LEISEN, vINCENT M &
10,25,157,003 3ood 230 Alpine SF N Neighborhood 3360,03 2 KAREN A 230 ALPINE DUBUQUE I,~ , _52001
1175 GALLOGLY, ANNE 1175
10,25,157,012 Langworthy SF N Neighborhood 1944,61 2 SPENBLEY LANGWORTHY DUBUQUE I.~ 52001
CAMPBELL, SUSAN
10.25,157,013 ~A V V VALERIAALTMAN 524FRANDORA HOUSTONT 77024
CAMPBELL, SUSAN
I0,25,157.014 NA V V VALERIAALTMAN 824FRANDORA HOUSTONT 77024
.__ _. 1133-i135
t 0,25,157,015 , Langworthy :'F N Non-Supportive 24"12,53 1
10.25,157.0t6 / ¢ V ?
1095
10.25,157'.017 Langworthy SF N ? 1789.03
,(NIGHT, RUSSELL M &
10.25,157,020 Good 205 Hill SF N Neighborhood 5357.4S 2. JOCELYNN A .~05 HILL DUBUQUE I,~ 52001
DUPREE, CHARLES C &
10.25.157.0'~9 Good 257 Hill SF N Nelghporhood 1679,72 2.E NICOLE M 257 HILL DUBUQUE I.~ 52001
EWERT, ROBERT J & TONI
10,25.157.0'~8 Good 263 Hill SF N Supportive 1550,37 2.5 L 263 HILL DUBUQUE I.a 52001