Iowa Department of Transportation Traffic Safety Improvement Program Equip Grant (STREETS) Copyrighted
August 19, 2019
City of Dubuque Consent Items # 9.
ITEM TITLE: lowa Departmentof Transportation Traffic Safety
Improvement Program for STREETS Equipment Grant
Application
SUM MARY: City Manager recommending authorization for the City of
Dubuque to submit an application in partnership with
Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study for an
lowa Department of Transportation Traffic Safety
I mprovement Program to assist with funding Smart Traffic
Routing with Efficient and Effective Traffic Signals
(STREETS) improvements.
RESOLUTION Approving the lowa Department of
Transportation Agreement for Traffic Safety I mprovement
Program Funding for Phase I of Smart Traffic Routing with
Efficient and Effective Traffic Signals (STREETS) Project
SUGGESTED DISPOSITION: Suggested Disposition: Receiveand File;Adopt
Resolution(s)
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
GrantApplication for STREETS Equipment-MVM City Manager Memo
Memo
Staff Memo Staff Memo
Resolution Resolutions
GrantApplication Supporting Documentation
Dubuque
THE CITY OF �
uI�AaMca cih
DuB E � �
I � � I
Maste iece on the Mississi i Zoo�•zoiz•zois
YP pp zoi�*zoi9
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: Grant Application Authorization for lowa DOT TSIP State Fiscal Year 2021
Funding for STREETS Equipment
DATE: August 14, 2019
City Engineer Gus Psihoyos recommends City Council authorization for the City of
Dubuque to submit an application in partnership with Dubuque Metropolitan Area
Transportation Study for an lowa Department of Transportation Traffic Safety
Improvement Program to assist with funding Smart Traffic Routing with Efficient and
Effective Traffic Signals (STREETS) improvements. The requested amount is
$200,000, which will assist in funding Adaptive (Dynamic) Traffic Control System and
System Integration costs for the STREETS project.
I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
v
Mic ael C. Van Milligen
MCVM:jh
Attachment
cc: Crenna Brumwell, City Attorney
Teri Goodmann, Assistant City Manager
Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager
Gus Psihoyos, City Engineer
Dubuque
THE CITY OF �
All•A�erisa Ciry
DuB E � � , . ,
� � � �b
Master•piece on tlte Mississippi zoi�*2oi9
TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
.-�
FROM: Gus Psihoyos, City Enginee����'�'
DATE: August 13, 2019
RE: Grant Application Authorization for lowa DOT TSIP State Fiscal Year 2021
Funding for STREETS Equipment
INTRODUCTION
The attached resolution provides the authorization for the City of Dubuque to submit an
application in partnership with Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study
(DMATS) for an lowa Department of Transportation (IADOT) Traffic Safety
Improvement Program (TSIP) to assist with funding Smart Traffic Routing with Efficient
and Effective Traffic Signals (STREETS) improvements. The requested amount is
$200,000.
BACKGROUND
The STREETS project is designed to improve traffic conditions throughout the Dubuque
metro area by distributing traffic more evenly on the region's major corridors. The
STREETS project will modify traffic signal timings through a seamless interface
between a signal timing model and signals used in the field. The system will reduce
congestion, shorten travel times, and improve safety in the metro area. By rerouting
traffic on the roads with extra capacities dynamically, the proposed system will reduce
traffic bottlenecks. DMATS and the City staff will also use the proposed system to
identify future congestion and safety improvement projects, and to evaluate these
projects following their implementation.
In the fall of 2016, the project received a commitment of $200,000 from IADOT and
$200,000 from DMATS to implement Task I -Systems Engineering and Task II- Model
Development. In return, IADOT has requested access to the City of Dubuque camera
system and data collected by the project.
In the winter of 2017, DMATS, IADOT and City staff had a work session with the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Overall, the FHWA staff felt the project would
be very successful if implemented as described and stated the following: "Combining
traffic control and traffic assignment — Holy Grail of traffic research — this project is
unusual because of the actual implementation piece. There has been theory presented
1
�
but not implemented. Very special project. Very hard to implement in large cities due to
their size and costs. This is special because you have the perfect size to implement"
The FHWA recommended using a robust dynamic adaptive traffic signal model that can
have a predictive pattern match embedded to keep up with the system. They suggested
increasing the budget for the model as we need to have additional funding set aside for
data collection as part of model development. DMATS approved $200,000 in Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program funds in the summer of 2017 to meet the
model requirements costs.
The City of Dubuque Traffic Engineering also requested $500,000 to provide fiber
connectivity and to upgrade the signal systems at Asbury/Chaney and Asbury/Carter
intersections as part of the overall project. These improvements are necessary to
prepare the system for the STREETS project implementation. The DMATS board
approved these funds in summer of 2017.
DMATS and the City of Dubuque hired Iteris to complete Phase I- Systems Engineering
Process. The Systems Engineering was completed in August of 2018. The completed
Systems Engineering Process, serves as a guide for future phases of the project by
defining the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved, as well as the
requirements of the system.
Based on the current status of the industry, the design team completed a Request for
Information (RFI) before finalizing requirements and preparing the RFP. Although sub-
system components are mature, the rapid micro-simulation modeling of real-time traffic
characteristics with camera analytics and other decision-making has not been
completed within the signal system industry. The RFI allows signal system vendors to
team up with micro-simulation, camera analytics and advanced traveler information
systems to present preliminary solutions and project specific challenges for th� ultimate
deployment of the STREETS project. The RFI was completed this spring and the
results will allow the design team to improve the project requirements and RFP resulting
in a better final project.
DISCUSSION
An Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) was developed to summarize the estimated costs
to construct STREETS based on requirements identified by project stakeholders.
Looking at potential funding, the project was broken into two deployment phases.
Phase 1 will include the integration and deployment of the STREETS software, servers,
camera analytics and traffic signal enhancements at 33 intersections. Phase 2 would
expand the system to add another 33 intersections. The estimated cost of Phase I is
$3,366,250, with an overall project estimate of$5,062,250.
The estimated cost of Phase 1 includes engineering services to support the
development of the final RFP and appropriate plan packages for signal enhancements.
It also includes a 15% contingency at this time due to the unknown sub-system
component costs. The table below provides a cost breakdown by component for Phase
I of STREETS project.
2
. �
PHASE I COST ESTIMATE
Components Qty Unit Price Total Price
Communication Enhancements 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
CCTV Analytics & Automation 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00
Micro Simulation Model 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Micro Simulation Model Development 1 $250,000.00 $250,000.00
STREETS Decision Support System 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00
ASCT Software 33 $14,000.00 $462,000.00
ASCT Signal Enhancements 33 $23,000.00 $759,000.00
ATMS Software 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Advanced Detection at Signals 16 $12,000.00 $192,000.00
Dynamic Message Signs 3 $90,000.00 $270,000.00
Traveler information App Development 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00
SUBTOTAL $2,693,000.00
Final Engineering, Plan Development & 1 $269,300.00 $269,300.00
Acceptance Testing (@ 10%)
Contingency 15% 1 $403,950.00 $403,950.00
SUBTOTAL $723,250.00
TOTAL �3°����,�5�.d��
The STREETS project requires good fiber �onnectivity �hrough the me#ro{�olitan area to
be successful. The investment that the City has made over the last ten years in fiber
optic conduit and cabling connecting public buildings, traffic and security cameras and
traffic signal intersections has created a platform for the STREETS project.
DMATS, the City of Dubuque and IADOT have committed $1,250,000 to this project and
lowa DOT committed $818,250 in lowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP) funds.
The City also applied for following grants listed below:
• FHWA Advanc� Innovations Deploymerot (AID) grant for $998,000.
• State of lowa Traffic Safety Improvement Program (TSIP) grant for $200,000.
The estimated Phase I cost for the STREETS project is $3.366 million. The City needs
$200,000 assuming that the City and DMATS receives AID grant. Table below provides
different funding source to complete Phase I of the project.
Grant D�scription Grant Amount
�
FHWA AID Grant $998,000
State of lowa TSIP Grant $200,000
SUB TOTAL $1,198,000
3
Existing Funding Description Approved Amount
IADOT Primary Road Funds $100,000
State of lowa ICAAP Grant $818,250
State of lowa TSIP Grant $100,000
DMATS Funds converted to Primary Road Funds $200,000
DMATS STBG Funds $700,000
City of Dubuque $250,000
SUB TOTAL $2,168,250
TOTAL $3,366,250
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City submit the lowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP)
application to IADOT in partnership with DMATS to assist in funding Adaptive (Dynamic)
Traffic Control System and System Integration cost for the STREETS project.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the filing of
the application for IADOT lowa Traffic Safety Improvement Program (TSIP) funding in
Federal Fiscal Year 2021 to assist in funding Adaptive (Dynamic) Traffic Control System
and System Integration and public update cost for the STREETS project.
Prepared by: Chandra Ravada, DMATS
cc: Jenny Larson, Budget Director
Bob Schiesl, Assistant City Engineer
Dave Ness, Civil Engineer II
Attachment
4
RESOLUTION NO. 285-19
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING FOR
PHASE I OF SMART TRAFFIC ROUTING WITH EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE
TRAFFIC SIGNALS (STREETS) PROJECT.
Whereas, the increasing growth of traffic volumes along Dubuque's major street
corridors, along with operational and safety concerns through these corridors the City of
Dubuque could be improve these conditions with the STREETS project; and
Whereas, the City of Dubuque has determined that improvements to these corridors
and associated traffic control equipment and infrastructure, as detailed in the STREETS
project, will improve traffic flow; and
Whereas, the total cost for these improvements for Phase l is $3.36 million. The Traffic
Safety Improvement Funding Program will fund $200,000 for this project.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DUBUQUE, IOWA, THAT:
Section 1. That said Traffic Safety Improvement Program Funding in the City of
Dubuque for the Phase I of STREETS project is hereby approved.
Section 2. That the Mayor be authorized and directed to execute two copies of said
Agreement for Traffic Safety Improvement Program Funding in the City of Dubuque for
Phase I of STREETS project.
Passed, approved, and adopted this 19th day of August 2019.
9L/
Roy D. Buol, Mayor
Rev. 5/18
L, IOWADOT
Application for TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE
TSIP FUNDS
GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 08/12/2019
Smart Traffic Routing with Efficient and Effective Traffic
Location / Title of Project Signals (STREETS)
Applicant City of Dubuque
Contact Person Dave Ness Title Traffic Engineer
Complete Mailing Address 50 West 13�h St, Dubuque, IA 52001
Phone 563-589-4270 E-Mail dness(c�cityofdubuque.orq
(Area Code)
If more than one highway authority is involved in this project, please indicate and
fill in the information below (use additional sheets if necessary).
Co-Applicant(s) Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (DMATS)
Contact Person Chandra Ravada Title Director of Transportation
Complete Mailing Address 7600 Commerce Park, Dubuque, IA 52002
Phone 563-556-4166 E-Mail cravada@ecia.org
(Area Code)
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PROJECT INFORMATION:
Funding Amount
Total Safety Cost $ 3,366,250
Total Project Cost $ 3,366,250
Safety Funds Requested $ 200,000
1
Rev. Sli B
APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC AGENCY
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information included in this application is true and
accurate, including the commitment oi all physical and financial resources. This application
has been duly authorized by the participating public agency(ies). I understand the attached
resolution(s), where applicable, binds the participating public agency(ies) to assume
responsibility for any additional funds, if required, to complete ihe project. In addition, ihe
participating public agency(ies) agrees to maintain any new or improved public streets or
roadways for a minimum of five years.
I understand that, although this information is sufficient to secure a commitment of funds, a
firm conirect between the applicant and the Department of Transportation Is required prior to
the authorization of funds.
Representing the Ciry of Dubuque
Signed: �1� 1��. 0 _� 1��� ��' � � � ���
Signature � Date Signed
Dave Ness
Printed Name
Attest f� o��-�,.� � c��.(,C�� Y � � S - �°I
Signature Date Signed
�c6ECT SCN�rSL
Printed Name
�
�
2
Contents
A. APPLICATION RESOLUTIdN, 4 I. ICAT CRASH SUMMARY dF MOTdR
VEHICLEACCIDENTS, 21
B. NARRATIVE, 5 Asbury Rd Crash Report, 21
Introduction, 5
STREETS Project, 6 lohn F Kennedy Rd Crash Report, 22
NW Arterial Crash Report, 23
Existing Conditions, 8
Asbury Road Corridor, 9 Pennsylvania Ave Crash Report, 24
John F Kennedy Road Corridor, 9 University Ave Crash Report, 25
NW Arterial Corridor, 10 US Highway 151J61 Crash Report, 26
Pennsylvania Avenue Corridor, 11 US Highway 20 Crash Report, 27
University Avenue Corridor, 11 J. TRAffIC VOLUMES, 28
US Highway 151J61 Corridor, 12 lohn F Kennedy Road, 28
US Highway 20 Corridor, 12 Northwest Arterial, 24
Locust Street Connector, 30
C. ITEMIZED BREAKDOWN OF ALL
COSTS, 13 US Highway 20, 31
D. TIMESCHEDULE, 14 L. BENEFITfCOST, 32
Road Segment Benefit Cost Safety
E. MAP, 15 Analysis, 32
F. COLOR PICTURES, 16 BCA Input Data, 33
G. PLAN VIEW, 19
N. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, 20
3
A. APPLICATION RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. -19
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE IOWA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FUNDING FOR PHASE I OF SMART TRAFFIC ROUTING WITH
EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS (STREETS) PROJECT.
Whereas, the increasing growth of traffic volumes along Dubuque's major street
corridors, along with operational and safety concerns through these corridors the City of
Dubuque could be improve these conditions with the STREETS project; and
Whereas, the City of Dubuque has determined that improvements to these
corridors and associated traffic control equipment and infrastructure, as detailed in the
STREETS project, will improve traffic flow; and
Whereas, the total cost for these improvements for Phase I is $3.36 million. The
Traffic Safety Improvement Funding Program will fund $200,000 for this project.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DUBUQUE, IOWA, THAT:
Section 1 . That said Traffic Safety Improvement Program Funding in the City of
Dubuque for the Phase I of STREETS project is hereby approved.
Section 2. That the Mayor be authorized and directed to execute two copies of said
Agreement for Traffic Safety Improvement Program Funding in the City of Dubuque for
Phase I of STREETS project.
Passed, approved and adopted this_ day of August 2019.
Roy D. Buol, Mayor
Attest:
Kevin S. Firnstahl, CMC, City Clerk
4
B. NARRATIVE
Introduction
The City of Dubuque, East Central Intergovernmental Association (ECIA), Dubuque Metro-
politan Area Transpartation Study(DMATS) and the Iowa Department of Transpartation (Iowa
DOT) have partnered to develop the Smart Traffic Routing with Efficient&Effective Traffic
System (STREETS) project The goal of the STREETS project is to develop a smart, next genera-
tion, traffic management and control system, Figure 1 shows the expected flow of data through
the STREETS system. In addition to providing sound information to the stakeholders, this project
will serve as a framework, nationally, for deployment of similar systems in small urban areas with
populations under 100,000.
The City of Dubuque is applying for$200,000 in TSIP funding to implement the first phase of the
STREETS Project.
Figure 1-STREETS Management and Control System
ar
, Field Data Performance Measures
• Traffic Count • Travel Time
• Speed Data • Traffic Flow
• O D • Traffic Pattern
• Signal Phasing & Timing • Incidents
. • Camera analysis • System Performance
P� - ---- �
Demand Model /
Microsimulation
Model
---------------------- •-------------------
Decision
Decision Support
System
• Route Recommendation
• Timing Recommendation
/�Ctli
ATIS ATMS/ASCT
• DMS Adaptative Signal
• Apps Control ATMS
• 511 Enhancements
5
STREETS Projec[
'IAeSIR9PISp�ye¢ will ureadvar�mdtra(ficc�trolmaregissm mable dye�ar�ictra(ficm�tr
ie�gmmavmizeNeureofm.tie�gmadarey �pa �atievioNeD�buqmmmopolibe� arm. 'IAe
demae deploymmmf SIR99TSw�1 mv¢w�e (9) ceMexwiN 65sgcalizedwsrece�
witlaotheCYtyofDub�que Somebmefitefiomwplm�mdeomftheSIR9PISiod�d.a�.
. Mp�ovedSa(ety
Rdu¢dwwandtw mm jo� mmdo�x
. Re3u¢dmcgcv9m
. Mp�ovedmvdemss
Rdu¢d m�mmorv�
. 9erhar�mdryrtm�mocib�i^S �PaEiEtiss
'IAep�opoxd SIR99TSp�jeessupeeedm dywmudly��em me�gueoo detz¢ed/p�c
AeedbytheMiao,vmNaeoomodd.andp�oaaivdydwgesgozlmnie�gbaredoop�eAaed
tra(ficflowdaawh�eAsm� aie�gme�gpcaeooandilts wteio(se�azioofsm
Re3umd moguemwillimp�we.akty byad�ae�gNewmbm ofrtop:davanhavem m�ake
wh�etravetie�giloogammdo�. Pewmrtop:willadw.eoppetwuessfsaazha-ar�dimp�we
.afatya¢ siheD�buqmmmoar�. Mplm�mdemofSIR99TSwillaq�iaimp�ovm�m¢
ma9cg agoal Tyrtmu-and ITS mfiaNudwe b mert�he op¢atiooal �equum�mt of Ne Tyr
FSgwe2xhwnthewsrecemloaeorv�bypM1areandlo�eo�whme m.tie�g travd-eme
anddabw0eawcdmca-arep�cvm[ �
Rpb}men� PR�e�
b
. l{ i
Y
e
e n
e M
a e ' �e
� > � �
" oa
.. oa e e .. A . . .
� n . � oa —
^ .
a6 e
6
An Opinion of Probable Cost(OPC) was developed to sumnzarize the estin�ated costs to con-
struct STREETS based on requiren�ents identified by project stakeholders. Looking at potential
funding,the project was broken into two deplo?nnent phases. Phase 1 wi11 include the integra-
rion and deployn�ent of the STREETS software, seraers, camera analytics and traffic signal en-
hanceinents at 33 intersections. Phase 2 would expand the systen�to adding another i2 inter-
sections. The estin�ated cost oi Phase I is slightly nzore than$3,�bb,250, Nnth an oaerall project
esfimate:y5,062,250.
`lhe completed Syste�7ls Engineering�Process, serves as a g�uide for fiztYrre phases of the project by
defining the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved, as well as the require�nents of
the syste�71.
The eslimaled cost of Phase 1 includes engineering seraices lo supporl lhe dcaelo��menl<>f the
final RFP and ap�?ropriale plan�?acl<ages for sign�il enhancemenls. Il also includes a 15% contin-
gency at this lime ilue lo the unknown sub-se�stem component cosls. Pased on lhe currenl slatus
of lhe induslre�, the design leain compleled a Requesl for Inii7maation(RFI) before finaliring
requireinents and preparing lhe RFP. Allhough sub-sy�slem componenls are inature, lhe rapid
micro-siinulation modeling of real-time trai3�ic characteristics with camera analytics and other
decision-making has nol been completed wilhin the signal syslein inilustry: The RFI all<>eved
signal system e�endors lo team up wilh inicro-siinulation, wilh cainera�analytics �and advanceil
lraveler informalion se�stems lo presenl preliininary solutions and projecl specific challenges f<>r
lhe ullimale de�?loy�menl of lhe STREETS�?roject Thc result of the RFI will all<>ca� lhe design
leam lo imgrocc lhe groject requireinents anil RFP resulting in a beller final projecl.
7
TrefficVolume LevelofService* . EXIStICIg COCICIItIOCIS
o-s,000 —n The corridors in the study
s,00i -iq000 —a area are heavily travelled
iqooi -is,000 �
is,00i -zq000 � � were most of these cor-
zqooi -zs,000 E ---� ridors are at level C or D
25,001 -3Q000 F �
with a few locations on US
3Q001 -35,000 -
sz 3 � Highway 20, Asbury Rd,
_ ou nmco sncEviuF �� UI11V2YSlty a�V2� 311C�US
��`, s, e, Highway 151/61 that are
� � �� reaching level of service
o'u�uQu �� E and F in 2010. Most of
' ASBU
z /=--- these corridors are pro-
IQ� ' ,' ��suQu jected to attain level of
' � 20 service E and F by 2045.
� ���� Figure 3 maps level of
�ENr A�A �
service in 2010 and Figure
�� 4 maps the 2045 forecast
PE sT" level of service based on
20 � � the DMATS Travel De-
\ /� mand Model.
J ',
� 51 61 The following pages con-
° � 4 tain summaries of each
oMiles
^' corridor. The summary
includes a description of
surrounding land use, av-
n�r��va�me �e�ei or se����e� erage annual daily traffic,
o-s,000 �n �
s,00,-,o,000 . e and a map of the corridor
,o,00,-,s,000 c � that highlights the corri-
� ,s,00,-zo,000 o dor' s major intersections
i zo,00�-zs,000 e
zs,00,-so,000— F � and surrounding land
so,00,-ss,000 � use. Full traffic volume
�
- _ _ ' diagrams are included in
_ ou nmco sncenuF �
`. Attachment J.
� 51 61
� �
\ 11
6���� ��
� nseu —
z /----
101 'E°sT '
�� i D U�UE
/ � 0
� � �
�,
CENT IJA � � � �
/
PE STA
� Z
L
� 51 �
0 2 4
vMiles
N
8
Asbury Road Corridor
Asbury Road is a 2.8 mile Minor Arterial that runs East-West in the urban area. This corridor provides connectivity between the western growth area
and the downtown. The primary land use is commercial, residential and institutional. The Average Annually Daily Traffic (AADT) far this corridor
ranges from 12,600 to 19,500 in 2013 and is expected to increase to range from 12,500 to 19,200 in 2045 (DMATS Model). The corridor has a delay of
69.07 sec during PM peak hour. See Attachment J for full traffic volume diagrams.
Land Use
. � � ���P"N"e P " Agricultural
- Commercial
• � `����
��
5 - Industrial
� � � 2 q�, Rp •, �s � � - Instutional
"� � r 9�`"< � ���� Multi Family Residential
Pa �
N V��9`� Q Office
1 �•. �, ��� � Open Space
��
43 s S S�Jp� � ♦ - - Park
V��s � � � e� � Single Family Residential
� o soo�,000
oFeet Vacant
John F Kennedy Road Corridor
John F Kennedy Road is a 2.5 mile Minor Arterial that runs narth-south in the urban area between US 20 and Narthwest Arterial. The primary land
use is commercial, residential and institutional. The Average Annually Daily Traffic (AADT) far this corridor ranges from 11,000 to 23,800 in 2013
and is expected to increase to range from 10,400 to 16,500 in 2045 (DMATS Model). The corridor has a delay of 78.89 sec during PM peak hour. See
Attachment J far full traffic volume diagrams.
�Aft7EaRo � � Land Use
> p
� � � �`�Ro 6 Agricultural
— Commercial
� � � W
� - Industrial
r
� _ � _ < r�, �, � Instutional
o 5'� 57 � � Multi Family Residential
� . F�� .
� � , , � Office
41 � Open Space
� - Park
- � _ �� � Single Family Residential
• N Vacant
9
NW Arterial Corridor
Po — Narthwest Arterial is a 5.5 mile State highway that runs
°�,, �o°� � � narth-south between US 52 N and US 20. The primary
�k Ro �°�� ,�pY Rp � land use is commercial. The Average Annually Daily
� , Traffic (AADT) far this corridor ranges from 11,700 to
► 23,500 in 2013 and is expected to increase to range from
� , _� 14,900 to 33,600 in 2045 (DMATS Model). The corridor
� has a delay of 73.73 sec during PM peak hour. See At-
� 41 w azrvn s'� �. .
� � - *� � tachment J for full traffic volume diagrams.
. a�
az � `
� KpNE'� 7�
� SZ
3 � , oy
�Y� FMqNN Land Use
•
Agricultural
44 , -Commercial
� �� � - Industrial
Hi��caEsr ao
� � <<pgesr a� y — Instutional
45 � �
� Multi Family Residential
�� P�Nry wn nve ' Offce
46 - � Open Space
, , - Park
� � Single Family Residential I
Vacant
/ 0 2,000 4,000
� � �i v Feet �
10
Pennsylvania Avenue Corridor
Pennsylvania Avenue is a 2.2 mile Minor Arterial that runs East-West in the urban area. This corridor provides connectivity between the western
growth area and connect to university that leads to downtown. The primary land use is commercial, residential and institutional. The Average Annu-
ally Daily Traffic(AADT) far this corridor ranges from 11,000 to 14,600 in 2013 and is expected to increase to range from 11,500 to 14,500 in 2045
(DMATS Model). The corridor has a delay of 61.89 sec during PM peak hour. See Attachment J for full traffic volume diagrams.
""`°�� �° � Land Use
o � � c qsKE o
z • • , ¢ G �, Agricultural
o � e�
— Commercial
� ' - Industrial
♦ — Instutional
.
■ 9 PE��s���""�" ""E �' � �'' Multi Family Residential
' � *� Office
� Pae � Open Space
� • J�� � - Park
` Single Family Residential
. o soo ,000
� Feet Vacant
UniversityAvenue Corridor
University Ave is a 1.57 mile Minor Arterial that runs east-west in the urban area connecting Asbury road and Pennsylvania Ave to downtown. The
primary land use is mostly commercial with some institutional the access road to from this route leads to residential development The Average An-
nually Daily Traffic (AADT) far this corridor ranges from 7,200 to 18,700 in 2013 and is expected to increase to range from 9,400 to 21,900 in 2045
(DMATS Model). The corridor has a delay of 43.25 sec during PM peak hour. See Attachment J for full traffic volume diagrams.
4� Land Use
�� ` Agricultural
IUWVER� p Cp
v� �`�o �oaAsa�vo - Commercial
' , ` ■ - Industrial
1��� � � �� � Instutional
/ � Multi Family Residential
�• r 61 , � �r�, Office
. � . '. Open Space
� \ ,.... .., ' : - Park
` � � ; Single Family Residential
�oo i,000 A
Feet ���:,, Vacant
11
US Highway 151/61 Corridor
US 151/61 is a 4.6 miles United States highway that runs narth-south across the City of Dubuque, Iowa. US 151/61 is primarily a commercial and
freight corridor with controlled access roads connecting them to downtown and part of Dubuque. The Average Annually Daily Traffic (AADT) for
this corridor ranges from 18,700 to 37,300 in 2010 and is expected to increase to range from 23,000 to 38,000 in 2045 (DMATS Model). The corridor
has a delay of 57 sec during PM peak hour. See Attachment J for full traffic volume diagrams.
� ♦�� � . � Land Use
51 61 � 1181 � � � � � / oSE��Es ,�j .R""T � �y 3 o r� A9fICUlYUf81
�,� � ' � .�, �
, � � � �s'� � � m ,,� � — Commercial
` � A
�, � • • �i��i].,��` , - Industrial
Roc� �� I� � Z /
"0` � . �a�� �s ���' �s�, .. � Instutional
51 61 52 � � � ��It i �v` ��
.-' � � �� ����� p i��'� ���a�� � Multi Family Residential
. Z�p�. ,��''�,�v �id� Office
52 � � Open Space
��
- Park
20 �� z3 Single Family Residential
�� �oe Vacant
US Highway 20 Corridor
US 20, also known as Dodge Street, is a 4.3 mile United States highway that runs east-west across the Dubuque metro area US 20 is primarily a com-
mercial corridor with access roads connecting them to residential neighborhoods and medical establishments. The Average Annually Daily Traffic
(AADT) far this corridor ranges from 3,900 to 38,000 in 2010 and is expected to increase to range from 32,000 to 51,000 in 2045 (DMATS Model).
The corridor has a delay of 219.33 sec during PM peak hour. See Attachment J for full traffic volume diagrams.
• •� p qse� r ����% ��A' Land Use
,y! �.
� U�, �� � ��♦ �
� � Agricultural
aervry � aervrvsr�vnrvin'nve ���� t �� •� � �� � aTHs � COI711710fC18�
�
. � �PS . F� ■ � �, � y � y�� - Industrial
'� • � �� � . ' �
L � ij�� p� — Instutional
►� s � �y��
� � Multi Family Residential
. q 5 i7� g � � 10 ..12� � 1� 15 *
3 - * �� Office
9 c # 16 ,.♦, Open Space
Z � �Si
i" a o �
� .��` � � - Park
� � �� � "+� Single Family Residential
� ' o i,000 2,0
Vacant
12
C. ITEMIZED BREAKDOWN OF ALL COSTS
PHASE I COST ESTIMATE
Components Qty UnitPrice TotalPrice
Communication Enhancements 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
CCTV Analytics &Automation 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00
MicroSimulation Model 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
MicroSimulation Model Development 1 $250,000.00 $250,000.00
STREETS Decision Suppart System 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00
ASCT Sofiware 33 $14,000.00 $462,000.00
ASCT Signal Enhancements 33 $23,000.00 $759,000.00
ATMS Software 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Advanced Detection at Signals 16 $12,000.00 $192,000.00
Dynamic Message Signs 3 $90,000.00 $270,000.00
Traveler information App Development 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00
SUBTOTAL $2,693,000.00
Final Engineering, Plan Development&Acceptance Testing @ 10% 1 $269,300.00 $269,300.00
Contingency 15% 1 $403,950.00 $403,650.00
SUBTOTAL $673,250.00
TOTAL $3,366,250.00
13
D. TIME SCHEDULE
TASK Start Date End Date
Systems Engineering Completed
RFI process
Release RRI using Systems Engineering 1-Mar-19 12-Apr-19
Recommendations from RRI process 30-Apr-19 17-May-19
Discussion with vendors 20-May-19 7-Jun-19
Contractapproval 10-Jun-19 21-Jun-19
RFP process
Release RRP using Systems Engineering & Info from RRI 2-Sep-19 ll-Oct-19
Selection of Consultant 14-Oct-19 1-Nov-19
Contract approval 4-Nov-19 15-Nov-19
Final Engineering, Plan Development
Devloping Implementation plan 18-Nov-19 10-Jan-20
Rinal Engineering 13-Jan-20 7-Reb-20
Test 10-Reb-20 21-Reb-20
Upgrades to Communications
Communication Enhancements 24-Reb-20 9-Oct-20
CCTV Anal ics & Automation 12-Oct-20 28-May-21
Test 24-May-21 4-Jun-21
Microsimulation Model
Data Collection 24-Reb-20 10-Apr-20
Model Development 13-Apr-20 9-Oct-20
Integrating Communications to Microsimulation 12-Oct-20 13-Nov-20
Test 16-Nov-20 27-Nov-20
Ada tive (D namic) Traffic Control S stem (ATCS)
STREETS Decision Suppart System 24-Reb-20 ll-Dec-20
ASCT Software 24-Reb-20 ll-Dec-20
ASCT Signal Enhancements 24-Reb-20 ll-Dec-20
ATMS Software 24-Reb-20 ll-Dec-20
Advanced Detection at Signals 24-Reb-20 ll-Dec-20
Intergrating Microsimulation to ATCS 14-Dec-20 8-Jan-21
Test ll-Jan-21 22-Jan-21
Public Outreach
Dynamic Message Signs 24-Reb-20 22-Jan-21
Traveler information App Development 24-Reb-20 22-Jan-21
Inte ratin ATCS with Public outreach 25-Jan-21 19-Reb-21
Test 22-Reb-21 5-Mar-21
S stem Inte ration Check
Rinal testing over all system 8-Mar-21 9-Apr-21
14
E. MAP
o�� ao
`��`' RD °``�� ^ �$
KEHHEov Ro '
s
o P
00
�9/�
sNEP� �T •�"O
� � � �� �
O
e� 0 5�
24
� o
41 w'3�tioer e� �
� m Q�e
52 'a e:� S$
8 0
q �o i
42 *� DUBUQUE w�tiEs, �'�,, � ��`s's.
,wHE�' n�°�
i E"� '"� 5
A �P
uavao S�• 3�51 � '� �uuFmnuunve ,�� �2�� 22
"�� 52 w 39 N� 23
ws a 26
� �����0 �3 54 ��� wincus.s. 2 38 �H
? 2$
p wucaeerao 57 � ��`'� 87 85 336� �4`''s�
�- 3 � � w�maesrao � cunKeoa c`� 8489 29 35� �gt
55 � 34
� = o • �$ �oMs � 88 88� 32 �
45 " 49 $g
aeHr�sv�vnHinnv aeuusv�unuinAve• 470 � �5 83 70 31 33 es C'
O p � g� 3 a'sr yd EAST
46 60 61 ''0sr � DUBU
56 �
� s`r 17� 21
20
4 5 � � g 10 12 �4 15� 20
: pp � � � ts11 qg 16•
2 �
�
1 �82
• cFo �
qR
a
�Oss a
ao � �*20!�
��NqVE 8
Project Corridors STREETS �
Intersections "
ASBURY RD PENNSYLVANIAAVE r
• Phase 1 Q
—CENTRALAVE UNIVERSITYAVE
• Phase 2 51 61 52
� IAHWY946 � USHWY151/61
JOHN F KENNEDY RD US HWY 20 Other Key
Intersections
LORAS BLVD WHITE ST
O Signalized a
— NW ARTERIAL `��
O Roundabout wFR 19
0 1 2 �
Miles
1 52
�y
�
51 61
15
F. COLOR PICTURES
Intersection of lohn F Kennedy Rd and Pennsylvania Ave lookinIg southwest
���y,:�:s'�-.'�d��.n�-�s�--.!�.�P� -0IC'�4 �-",`w SEL. tT � 1`
r'fr* � � ��L`.Y� i�. !�" ��7u'��� le� � ,^ �i� t.�', �1.
� _ q V�'+� �t+ J_ � ��--.�1 A...�- � k. � ,h�����
[ t ��
0� ,�. � w� . . ` 'a�_�__ -� � ��..u'�.a+��.a. y '
�
r . �'�._: � s% . _,� �w:-� .
��� i �,e' �. . �t�' __ _ "� �� a
/�y�g� �.
� �
� ��� ,� . C��.
li � f� - . , , .. . ;I�.
�
6� . ' ,�' . .. . � �-'i� I
� . . � � ` _ � - - ,
{ � � I ' ` 1 �
, �
r � � ,�_ � � � 1
���,` � , _
. ':� ���� `1----� '���
r . • -'� , ,
v
���_ .�,...•, ```-�� _/ \ .1 ; -
� �� ,.,,� � � � . ,
,
�
, l`-� / � � , ���`'�"��'�� �._ _
Intersection of lohn F Kennedy Rd and Pennsylvania Ave looking north
� � s��i'�k �__ s� � rti� .. ,-� ..
.: � ' � „- ._. � �
i �
�1 - � ,� li. � L*Z �. _, +������� -_r-il
` P r� � 1p� �A\ JI�r.. ' �'-�'��
_ _ _ I__ p . .—� � �
iJ- - _ . � i . .� -
� �° / �� --T - � � =�' I -
- ���,�_._� � +J° •�� �
� � I{
- �_ ��, -�-r. � .
y,�_.� z, ��jc,n. � _ � ���p y. . �
a-.�t ! I � �i_ ' �I � i ' "_
� � ,'� � �
� � ' � . b —�i,�� — +��v � �:s . '
_ c� ic�. . �����F-t _: � . �- __— ."�'����7' _ . c�
i ��—�'
� _ _ _* � S
��' _ �- ��.�� i �_ -� ��'_�
- - ~ � w� -
� .■�r
� �� � � �� . - - .
J j_�
16
US Highway 20 looking west from the intersec[ion with Locust Street
_Q� ���, F'��,
�.T7" '�� rf"�� i ..r
� Y V' y �, ��jjyy . rc-• - � ![i:
r 1 � ^ • � . ��� �
� �, �
� � 1� �..
�� ��� . �������e��'"'� �
'' � I �'�r�i
� ;1� .� '�; i zo I
1:_H_ Y 1 \ ,� . _ �.. �.
: � � � i1:, � � �
_ it _ rt
� ,E i� ,,� z
T :; A._ ��l►�?� �l' . %
�-_. _ __
� - »,ri..�ro.`'
� �"'�:,�,'��„l"i �
�l��a V ?��`
_ � bee.j,4!i�","'�� � ..
�`�.'__�.- _�---'. '�.'1' � � �
US Highway 20 Julien Dubuque Bridge looking east from the intersection with locust street
� � f llt�' � � i - �
-��!'—^�` �TT�R II A .'•�
,�: 'q.'_.�r ,��,a _._
, ��
i ! , � � ���
` _ �:.� -..
;� . -
_ '; �� �`"' _
: ���
ii _� ��` -
�.. „���i - � ��f '� 4_ -
� - ,\ -
� - ;
�� � I ��� ,
� � .
' :� - _ � . �_
i , _ � � � .
��
Pennsylvania Avenue looking north east from the intersection with Northwest Arterial
�� : - - � 11 ,r"�-� ' * .
h , a - m ���}�.. e
"` � • � � �`N[.., �� I�� �1J3 ;,� Y ��t� �iR"}` ��.
F . � UNPa[o i - .rt.. ��� � ���'Y .�t .•F
a alt. I 1^�._L_.��,:- � �.."�g �-�- � a4
� ; �ii .. {u��-�5..� �<_r (l� � �, :
- '_ F I er� ti E,'y, ,� "��4'.` �r �. . . ��, •
a � �V�� 5 � � - � -
o � �
. �� �W � " � f ;��3.�� �I�� �� ;���� �-
� � �1�0 F� _ _ . � ,_
�CV�" '` . .c
� � �i� ..��� .�60 .i-.� � ���/ �� I' =''�i{�� � �?
____���Stli���J� _ . �___,'_'_ --;� . _
. i / . �� ��J T
� �� - < --- -
� _
, _ . -
/ - � �- �
� e.�
�
/ � �
Pennsylvania Avenue looking east from the intersection wth Northwest Arterial
� � J= �
�
�� � � ��
i r'�'��1 �. �.a���-' �, , a + �� .'1
� Ya'-'!� - ' ' ' �" �� � i ,� i .
�._
�m �,
� � �r i�i ��� 4- . � ,��•�
_ ��D _ .. ,��,
�g� �
_ �
i
is
G. PLAN VIEW
The table lists the intersections included in Phase I of the STREETS project.
Phase I
Intersection Phase Acyclica Present Fiber Present System
Asbury Rd & Holiday Dr 1 No 144 SM Local
Asbury Rd & South Entrance 1 No 144 SM Local
Bryant St & Mt Loretta St 1 No No Local
Hwy 20 & Bryant-Hill Connect (North) 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Bryant-Hill Connect (South) 1 No Wireless Primary
Hwy 20 & Cedar Cross Rd (JFK) 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Century Dr 1 No 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Cresent Ridge 1 Yes 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Devon Dr 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Fremont Ave (North) 1 No 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Fremont Ave (South) 1 No Yes Primary
Hwy 20 & Grandview Ave (North) 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Grandview Ave (South) 1 No Yes Primary
Hwy 20 & Locust St 1 DA 48SM / 24MM Primary
Hwy 20 & Northwest Arterial 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Old Highway Rd 1 RoadTrend 24 Primary
Hwy 20 & University Ave 1 No 144 SM Primary
Hwy 20 & Wacker St 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Jones St & US-61/US-151 1 No 48SM / 24MM Primary
Locust St & Charter St 1 No Duct Primary
Locust St & Locust St Connector 1 No 144 SM Primary
Locust St Connect & US-61/US-151 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Northwest Arterial & Asbury Rd 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Northwest Arterial & Chavenelle Rd 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Northwest Arterial & Holiday Dr 1 No 144 SM Primary
Northwest Arterial &JFK 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Northwest Arterial & Pennsylvania 1 DA 144 SM Primary
Northwest Arterial & Plaza Dr 1 No 144 SM Primary
Northwest Arterial & US-52 1 DA 144 SM Primary
JFK & Pennsylvania Ave 1 DA 12 SM Local
JFK & Wacker Dr 1 No 48 SM Local
University Ave & Grandview Ave 1 RoadTrend Roundabout Local
University Ave & Nevada St 1 No 48/24 Local
Number of Phase 1 Intersections 33
19
H. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
���fS'J � \�� � � C/� G�' - � `�$
I y
� Cfl � .' A m 6� ��— R^u`�. �„
\� �"�t'� � ��� j�� ao r � , .,
r >
� ` «� �
Z .. � �M I R" _�� ,� . a - �
" s" � � . r �� '�`�' �r �� k�
y
. e�'.z a k'+� I..,/¢t �� � G>�r� � Q �^�T� ;Z �y .Y � �� °.
� � ' �yY � � ; cEB� z' l�n� )
� V ' 1 Gly � 1 � .
�' r/ �, � ��r C,{� r����''...^_ T ��!����'� �{� i >�'e�,��F`�;
� , � , �r � �t
.,. �+P ; r : � y ",� zam . � � � ��
�� � �� 41 �` "�./fin ,y �� bb � . s sF y{t ��.���i. g .
s j.�(���1�
,_� � 4 � t� '.� �� v 52 �N r�,v � L � '��
�r'i 'n R {1 ._kpgy S � �.
� 's" R2 � �. ♦ �T \ �`' :Y t�t.' �,�,
� �' . . i �� ' ��. r � �
! y a
..��:�,7 � � ���� h a� � t ���� d \ y� y'.�� � � � J 51 61
,+",�0{ 3 57 • - � r ' � u �era b t ,�e ?p��✓�'
_� .q�� ✓ � 2 ✓t P
� ��w��2� E F'n�F'� � .�e ��' �}`"" "�.�6 39 � �2 �� ��
�� � : a$ (__,�
E � � � �,�� 5� � � � ,�.�p���� z�„� � �
.�.,, pb ` 'r � a . �, '� ° �l •�.;+�'.� aa
'� 2�a � ��17�.! 5� -( 9 � +.` i r a '�� � " P8. '�dB f�� .
y 29�jy5
^-:±V ff ����4�9. 4j ��9S�v�'.����i•d� 55 . M1,� i § - f, �.,,,. a � 30 ]4 � : �:i. I�
45 � ��),'v�'a49 .KEYo- S1b5 59� 58 4,q5 { .t'y� � i� "ti
�{ � r+`d7 , r- i
E; l A +��,'�.�' � d " n ;3 ' ���e - ' a .,�l�r 33� ..,: , � �R =
F �� �6 1,. . S..s.: ly.,+t s .,.:60 61 -- y , J '.
. r ,_ � 56hi. ' �� F 1 �'Y : ��. k S .
'V I �fi�,W �`7y i } ��P'd�' 4� �°i�� A7�'��+20 �
� 7-� � 4 5 -. � � 8 70 � 5• � . �
�, " i � � M A. ., ��siqyr��. q3 ° ��°,
" �` �� � Y� 5 � :5 � Y[�
.�.� � �� a �� � �
"'�,..1 IS - _ /� . "J s� a �
t n • I
ae � � ,. , �� "T� , � "� �:;�i � Y 3,.R �"a'°>� + �
�� .
_ r �>
i;� � �'c ia4,, ��,,a���, t � � .
" a ,yr r�?^ � � �
Projec[ Corridors ��� � s�"' �C � •� ' ���. `
• INTERSECTIONS � MNARTERIAL +� �� � i Y i ' ,�' �"�
ASBURVRD PENNSVLVANIAAVE �� � ���� "'
�CENTRALAVE UNIVERSITVAVE � � 51 61 52 � . �`�
r e •� re 3� ,.Ac , '� '�.k
—IAHWV946 — USHWV151/61 � �i�'f� . .l �`
i
JOHN F KENNEDV RD US HWV 20 � � -�<
LORAS BLVD WHITE ST �
i_.. �t � 1 t1
0 1 2 .(�. 1 .- 79.. ,
� �e 'X�k^¢' si" �
9� s �' . � .�� n 'f
ServiceLayerQedi6�.USDA,IowaSYa[eUniversry � ;.,v, ,���7 .t 18 ��� , 52 <k,� � Y -�_,i
Source: Esn,DigiLlGlobe,GeoEye,EarthsLrGeograpM¢ CNES/Ni'§Us " � �y � r1�
� DS,USDA,USGS,AemGRID,IGN,andNeGlSUserCommumry �np� �
. ��' S1 61 � � r;: � �n�
2�
I. ICAT CRASH SUMMARY OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS
Attachment I includes crash reprots for corridors included in Phase I of the STREETS project.
Asbury Rd Crash Report
�,DOT lowa Cresh Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2014-2018
Cresh Severity 38 Injury Status Summary 14
Fatal Cresh 1 Fatal 1
Suspected Serious Injury Crash 0 Suspected serious/incapacitating 0
Suspected Minor Injury Crash 4 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 5
Possible/Unknown Injury Cresh 6 Possible(complaint of painlnjury) 8
Property Damage Only 27 Unknown 0
Not reported 0
Property/Vehicles/Occupants Average Severity
Property Damage Total (dollars): 227,200.00 Fatalities/Fatal Cresh: 1.00
Average (per cresh dollars): 5,978.95 Fatalities/Cresh: 0.03
Total Vehicles: 80.00 Injuries/Crash: 0.34
Average (per cresh): 2.11 Major Injuries/Cresh: 0.00
Total Occupants: 102.00 Minor Injuries/Crash: 0.13
Average (per cresh): 2.68 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Cresh: 021
o �.
.
�
�. G,inia�_i �� � . �. ..
:w o
^ :: �i,:�vs;:-
, � ��,
� .. �. , . � � �. � . � 1�: • ., .,.o.... , . r..�.r'a .
, -- �
, ., _ r
v
<
r
� ., �-��.��
c
21
John F Kennedy Rd Crash Report
�,DOT lowa Cresh Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2014-2018
Cresh Severity 497 Injury Status Summary 164
Fatal Cresh 0 Fatal 0
Suspected Serious Injury Crash 0 Suspected serious/incapacitating 0
Suspected Minor Injury Crash 32 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 39
Possible/Unknown Injury Cresh 91 Possible(complaint of painlnjury) 122
Property Damage Only 374 Unknown 3
Not reported 0
Property/Vehicles/Occupants Average Severity
Property Damage Total (dollars): 2,62Q646.00 Fatalities/Fatal Cresh: 0.00
Average (per cresh dollars): 5,272.93 Fatalities/Cresh: 0.00
Total Vehicles�. 1,037.00 Injuries/Cresh: 0.32
Average(per cresh): 2.09 Major Injuries/Cresh: 0.00
Total Occupants: 1,473.00 Minor Injuries/Cresh: 0.08
Average (per cresh): 2.96 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Cresh: 025
� . , u.. c r '. u. ..
... �.r �' . ' �:, 13 . �°_r"f
- �� � ��� ':: �x :0.' ..�R'ty; myu`<�. r� �� re i�" ',
- ruwyago�•�r�c�c ��c � �. r �.. � o r�
_,,aR$`" 5 � a � �a�� {�j _�.�m �o n�'¢cm.¢:�' -c " f��c�.��Q ' � . �
1 . yq{ c c � . , r F r'�@�c aq4' ,
��" r�� a� tl � k � _ i � ' � �.. U �Ituei�N�-cx*J�E' f"4`
� $� 3 � � � fFG.r�GIIP H�C J..� ��C+r[�
IY � S
�i �nmo wa � �y� ( �'-
.. ':�, . p oaoo :.a� r �{ ..,: � � . �m ° �.���a � p �, I'� g^'�.
. � _.� G 'fi� � �rr
o c o 7 m^ . -eu r„:.-.. .rt �� :�c �' � "'d t '.
� o° o ,� r `{� q - c b o cr -�i b � F �
� � � " o � �.r� �. n o 8 ��' .,�r K b
n ° e` �' ' ,. - , ��, a k a�' �. � ' � r t,�w 4} i�.
p � - o ��. � � a aC ��u e��¢'., .
�_ i . .:..-.. E� .. o<� :g� driw �,_cotwn �a�Lb���. r• �' c� �. o R�CT=<�
w
.. _ _ � :, Y� ��U D . r' Y '� - C �i9S
u m ' & � @ Ci" 'Ts c �F F�, . [..fy a. `fi � r
.. e. " G, ^ � .�N" fl�c: a. �� u. '
u tl ' � N .J
� (, , . ff'1_. ir. � r.. ��a�� �R
� p � -.C� 8 0;;�� c � (.: .�:
U ' � "t� •. �� .
r �. .,.. �. m �. - L _� � �q,
�c � `\
' . Y. �' ki, o .. �U_�' t,
:S`''s _ - " . , cr � .
��t � . .a, n.� . . . "c:�F :: _ c {� '. . l r:
� �. � �
.' a .. � .. '_
r�, ,
08/13/2019 ZZ 1 of 7
NW Arterial Crash Report
�,DOT lowa Cresh Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2014-2018
Cresh Severity 568 Injury Status Summary 219
Fatal Cresh 3 Fatal 3
Suspected Serious Injury Cresh 8 Suspected serious/incapacitating 11
Suspected Minor Injury Crash 37 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 50
Possible/Unknown Injury Cresh 112 Possible(complaint of painlnjury) 150
Property Damage Only 408 Unknown 5
Not reported 0
Property/Vehicles/Occupants Average Severity
Property Damage Total (dollars): 3,288,585.00 Fatalities/Fatal Cresh: 1.00
Average (per cresh dollars): 5,78976 Fatalities/Cresh: 0.01
Total Vehicles�. 1,111.00 Injuries/Cresh: 0.37
Average (per cresh): 1.96 Major Injuries/Cresh: 0.02
Total Occupants: 1,514.00 Minor Injuries/Cresh: 0.09
Average (per cresh): 2.67 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Cresh: 026
, , .. e.::. . - � ,t
_.. :e�. _ '� , ? ;8. . ,
�� �b ��a �� �� ��h � �t �
� r., . i:, o �:ona..�--� 0. _� �E'�' ��`f� @'r �¢.;, _ -
a ..� . �. t _ .
,,M •• ,. �e � � � h
.. C ;;o �c � � ��ata,�'FP� r ,,CC� - ..
�'.' m y t '� � p ��v.. Y f� � y � -
W ��� o�., n _�S q�r . $ !^::� v �dW=�w
� ^�o 0 0 1r . :. h � p�� ' i.
.. py �� � g �iy+�m ay�, u ���`��„ �"-� , ���5 � ����.
� . , � ��r��, <<, 4 { s .��� �
� „B o F ` `,. N .��c<rr�.J . � _ ., ..��-'
., . .r ' ,.a G . .ys
°v� �. � " , u `�., �� ,u
e _ � ; G.., ,
„ m. F,� x o��W � .,: n_ i , �r s'c
. _�,�.� .• ..; a-�.
, �' . . :"4� -- . �� �:.
t �;;
u ud � . i
,,. . . � �°. ._a' � f! c _ �y . . i i
. '7a P ' �0 � c:�
'{S� �-• t.cFj qp�� � s' :� ¢
.::c p�c, �G3-�o � �`F S �� � �'�y �'� ����..
� . ,. � @µ .- �t`
� yL
�.
t „
°-'�� `' :
� < .6-' Yl1n��rop� p r:�. t .
�'", � . G�.a �' .. ..
08/13/2019 23 1 of 7
Pennsylvania Ave Crash Report
�,DOT lowa Cresh Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2014-2018
Cresh Severity 386 Injury Status Summary 131
Fatal Cresh 0 Fatal 0
Suspected Serious Injury Crash 2 Suspected serious/incapacitating 2
Suspected Minor Injury Crash 26 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 28
Possible/Unknown Injury Cresh 69 Possible(complaint of painlnjury) 98
Property Damage Only 289 Unknown 3
Not reported 0
Property/Vehicles/Occupants Average Severity
Property Damage Total (dollars)�. 1,996,543.00 Fatalities/Fatal Cresh: 0.00
Average (per cresh dollars): 5,172.39 Fatalities/Cresh: 0.00
Total Vehicles: 798.00 Injuries/Crash: 0.33
Average (per cresh): 2.07 Major Injuries/Cresh: 0.01
Total Occupants: 1,089.00 Minor Injuries/Cresh: 0.07
Average(per cresh): 2.82 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Cresh: 025
._ " gaF'.-, c,.c.c_:. ,r .,.,c . e�,�r
Sr '
�p z` .. -. 4 �� � C.- t, L, ., ���
' p ti k
' � " �G6 e. m.,�, � � ° p o� d a��'vo o � .
0 0 �ff o �� ""� �ar, ?fy����' -
.. „c.�.p o�� � n �+ �� e� �� ' � o�� � o ::� �..�
4 0 ° o .; c�+ °4�Q �k�•.an r
a �
,,�o� xo ^ �� '� o uo ° �
6 0�$'"_ B o� �W �, � c m x�w,�..c ° _ .. �d c�:
On ma�,� _,q�
' �ou � a
.. qo c ' � v�t� � �� a y � H ��xa�¢ b
.. G�a,' p �y o q� "H ii p�v�1'p -V�" X r�+ ae�:as�+ a.e c��-e..
L 060 �+o C _'[%N 'F �l `f `� ,� O �� �Ul'I[ M.•--
V Y !� (J ! f
� [II[I4'[D R�:L (� J O OO U � p.. t �� 4 n:
� . R K : .a �a5 cr.�..¢,suq c,�J R w = � -
a �� � �
�. � ...�G .�. N t zeo°,YT i�[�C . ' � � S1
: q . . , � .,u4 � .. �'
0 ' . - oo . ., cr , ^ �� u��n cp ����5� .-
.. [� Y � p � C ' � � � ��<<SV�
.z . ,.:, . T��.- �c � $a� iSi..�u `�ra�s�aw��¢n.e��.:�. N , ..
E " '�n �f►F� a c '� h� G n �. v
r
� °o ^'� .. .. µ F.l � � .� ''` eF '� �.� �m'f.. a 8�iht�� �.��;'
" h � . !'� �y"�mrt,
N , o�{h
� n �
f� - _�x �. •c -c .d!='
���¢ q.
. u c.^ > c , gg rx �
. . ss� " _ rr� r^..,�¢�Irryyi..� �c
x: - (_. ,�,:ar �
' � � �v
.. 't•. �, r�
,ix.- '. .c.,..
08/13/2019 24 1 of 7
University Ave Crash Report
�,DOT lowa Cresh Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2014-2018
Cresh Severity 291 Injury Status Summary 75
Fatal Cresh 0 Fatal 0
Suspected Serious Injury Cresh 1 Suspected serious/incapacitating 1
Suspected Minor Injury Cresh 17 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 18
Possible/Unknown Injury Cresh 50 Possible(complaint of painlnjury) 56
Property Damage Only 223 Unknown 0
Not reported 0
Property/Vehicles/Occupants Average Severity
Property Damage Total (dollars)�. 1,423,819.00 Fatalities/Fatal Cresh: 0.00
Average (per cresh dollars): 4,892.85 Fatalities/Cresh: 0.00
Total Vehicles: 575.00 Injuries/Crash: 0.26
Average(per cresh): 1.98 Major Injuries/Cresh: 0.00
Total Occupants: 3,850.00 Minor Injuries/Cresh: 0.06
Average(per cresh): 1323 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Cresh: 0.19
r ,. u c /,, .,��
� �- _ ,. 4 � `� � r. �a-5m:c ;� fE•.. [Y � *Ni'
� F z4' �
.� �a:�v: �L Q.. . . � . �. ,yi y�p:
��=- � yd � �' x w..c n �¢rmn.L '- 7� � � ���'
_ c
_ � .� C ��1r k c ' c �� af � ,
�0 2F n� i � �7 rp��14 �_
V
r
i. � � � �op .7 . � - � � :�cu+ aEur`�Sb���E� '�"�
� y -. q� �4 � ���^c. �atociem a'cti� G'c+�; Ey�r^�
� o �+�nc � z c. �'��.- ,. o '[MY� � u �"_ � �'.�� t t' .
' '.��:. Vk � o ' oa[Fn�b �vi .p � D.. � v o ` Lf t � h�
D 6 [O�f .� -u x- .y `u,C�6 4�41 a�� ai� 'm U �' A- � t�, y E�' J'"a�.
'a � •��{L ' `� f! b. � x. �Q a �..' c xf��{:S Y F�nx�.:
q o Y � _�c R � �S �� V ,..h,tyv �,4 c
5 � 9 u ga u4 �; � :. u� c � tl .u� '99 �t�' ._ +��`rX��?�;,
o U 9 �� �
��. �.. r��.. v , , cx..a sw o.�bp . ��•_•`�� �' �
[° �
0
� f� :: �� �:Y, �FS*�� . h���4 '
� � = � �a-., x 6 r _�"��+Rr�~�d z .
. ' ' " ' <,K� V . .. v�',��6 s` Rx �`G4 [Y.� SY�t�tE��„�� r•c E
1 � Y I'
, �l r.�� '[V�''�'Cg�C ��C ��
!
.. e f i �. / � _� [.' n rm.��•j/• � C �. [
N ...
� b, •'.. D O�4. , �,��, � l�8 p� �"
�f �f�y� Y� l
. . . ][: G � O`'"� �['
�+ s
- � `� H ` n `O a. . -
k�t� a �. "� v -_ .,,
� U� C 3� � �
�� ,N= '1� a .l� . � Q: ..: ri Y . E •�
L� i .�. ir . .. . .. �
��, � �,� � - .� ., �'
08/13/2019 25 1 of 7
US Highway 151/61 Crash Report
�,DOT lowa Cresh Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2014-2018
Cresh Severity 339 Injury Status Summary 104
Fatal Cresh 0 Fatal 0
Suspected Serious Injury Cresh 1 Suspected serious/incapacitating 1
Suspected Minor Injury Crash 29 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 31
Possible/Unknown Injury Cresh 57 Possible(complaint of painlnjury) 71
Property Damage Only 252 Unknown 1
Not reported 0
Property/Vehicles/Occupants Average Severity
Property Damage Total (dollars)�. 2,192,350.00 Fatalities/Fatal Cresh: 0.00
Average (per cresh dollars): 6,467.11 Fatalities/Cresh: 0.00
Total Vehicles: 620.00 Injuries/Crash: 0.30
Average (per cresh): 1.83 Major Injuries/Cresh: 0.00
Total Occupants: 833.00 Minor Injuries/Crash: 0.09
Average(per cresh): 2.46 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Cresh: 021
. � . �. r �,..
P��_, 'L �� �S� i�S. h � .. .
. r *C�_ �icp, �y, F�, rC,.i�- I] .- .
.. F F� fi C =. C '�1' - .
�p� `" �- Y: r� j) � � � a
��p R T� YI{�
'a
�' ➢ k tl R¢:'S' �� �� � . .
�:. c� „+ O � c� � 5�+1 !� �t+'�m� �"�i t , . ��� .. ��.
g � a - � ��� �-
¢c' '�'�b�' �1r`:' i. 5_ �` .�� �r c.�``i
�3 � c�o - w'�°"' S, ,
y � r= �24i �g � �„ �. '� � '� r.r_"' .
:� �� o p z`..� k'�r a : �- �� � tq'�,�N
q<�a :w m �'�L+c a Q� � '4�`: -' ilb
� ��r z' . - �"
d 9 � B o � 'r �r. . ..
�{ ' � .` bL_ f �.i
R�T�� 'CYiibt ... Y : � �1��. C .i
�
'r � �., �GG �'NCr �u 6 .�:� �� ,i
�. u ` n r,ir �i . � . 1� ' .
y¢:.. � �-r_.o� :t �/'. 4� ,- .
�r,.i� ' � �• � a_,.
c ��., :-�:
..d� .��' �„'� � ,-, .
V' ... ma�� 0`- ��. 'fi : .
n p � � �• �� e i . � .
o � .
�'
�� � p
d p� f.,
�
�" ` °��r::� .
e
08/13/2019 26 1 of 7
US Highway 20 Crash Report
�,DOT lowa Cresh Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2014-2018
Cresh Severity 1,009 Injury Status Summary 364
Fatal Cresh 2 Fatal 2
Suspected Serious Injury Cresh 1 Suspected serious/incapacitating 1
Suspected Minor Injury Crash 63 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 74
Possible/Unknown Injury Cresh 207 Possible(complaint of painlnjury) 277
Property Damage Only 736 Unknown 10
Not reported 0
Property/Vehicles/Occupants Average Severity
Property Damage Total (dollars): 5,203,774.00 Fatalities/Fatal Cresh: 1.00
Average (per cresh dollars): 5,157.36 Fatalities/Cresh: 0.00
Total Vehicles�. 2,059.00 Injuries/Cresh: 0.35
Average(per cresh): 2.04 Major Injuries/Cresh: 0.00
Total Occupants: 2,813.00 Minor Injuries/Cresh: 0.07
Average (per cresh): 279 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Cresh: 027
o < < l
c '
�,,, y p.
. . , r�;- P:� '"�� ,, .
' __ E� , .K�-' S'� �`a . q• .F'�
.. .- ..�o ".'g� �t " �,�" �P r���' ! �.:�'
- �' o 0 0 _�s..'x °��.� -_ __
. ° co c ,� ' ' -
0 0 ._� 8 . G}��r ,[+s�' .�+��4t`�,�.�.,� cc .. � .
, � �o �� - ,���Ag _c,�� '�6' '�'. r"•� � ��,�t�� "_"'J
� d a � 'GG's� 4r�� �xy�. ��D
�o ,n � G a�b f�' a A N .::�.i t c �c
� . 08 0�'� �Y.�' � ��' ,..,�y . uc� �'f _
�i � �, r�¢{�n. ' q'� ^�i s, S
° rtl S�' Cf1 �� I i{�x� � � ( �, 'S 'i_ � .
4:. , r, il ..
r �'r�
. .;�cau �u. mo� �r , ,4`��s��;n(' �
o '� " '
.. ;_: ���': � � � � x
..� :: F �r^ M1'a ...'k � .� r -i
�p [.rn - ' I l��w�y� ¢R, � 6'�� '��C� [ i in-
: / w ^.:..,
.,�: �yoa� �uci �,�� �S` 't � . . i� .
.,. - � ��,� �t��� : ,i., b c� '"
� .rd�
c _ v e
� �- , ti� �ar� � � , ..
� � . R�
r, .:, ", � r °
�
� �
08/13/2019 27 1 of 7
J. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Attachment J includes traffic volume diagrams for corridors included in Phase I of the STREETS project.
John F Kennedy Road
0.423 miles � 0.297 miles
a �
� �,
o `x' d � � <
� 3. � �
A A ��
,- ". ,-"'. .' '�
. � � � � �
�
�— ` � L 9 600 John FKenne� ; 56 `L 22 400 John FKenne�_ � � �
����� ������ � �
�i � ' Road ( i ' Road , 49 �
♦ � _______� ♦ �
�______________� ♦ i
� � i
`�--' 9,800 � `�--' � 24,700 �, •--
� - , d g --, �
o � � 0.1% �I �� � �I 0.7% 'I e i
�
� �° - `° �
-, �,
�'
• End
�� Continue
� AverageAnnual Daily ltaffiq
2016
�'�,__�__'� AverageAnnual Daily ltaffiq
2030
_
''� x� � RateofIncreaseintraffic
annually
�� � �� Intersection
"" PrincipalArterial
2g
Northwest Arterial
0.61 miles � 0.26�les � O.SS miles —
[ ro
y � �
N � � � m�
6 p �
� � m �
0 4 --- �.
,-� .. ;-� .. , .
,
�—� '1 �_ 23,900 __N���_� � �i_ 23,900 ____'a'__r_J 45 '__ 19,200
!r � � Arterial � � �����\\
i� _ _- - - ___— �
�\ ��i �I 31�900 �� ♦� ��� ''� 31�300 �I � ���� 'I 20�600—�
�_
N '� �'I 2.4% ��I � �. '---2.2%--- `�° `5' ---0.5%----'
,
� '----------' � � �
a " 2.
a
la
�A P
6 E
�1
i
�' _��
Holiday I S O `� Hotiday
Dr � � Dr
I ♦,` i
16,500
0.09 miles I ------—--
�I 19,900 �'',
I 1.3% '
0.41 miles � — 0.4 miles
e �
C G
� `�6 d�
.--�. .'-�.
% 44 '��, � 43 `� �Z,goo --��
`�---a � is,voo _�,�;�---a �------
---
� . -- -- � •
'�-� � zo,�oo-, �_,- '�_ ia,wo �'
- --- — � -- ---
os�io d� i.o�io
I 0.84 miles l0 1.99 miles
4
� � �
� ,, x
d,` �
��� ,_,, --- - � ':41.,'• ,------ - N�.� ' 40 �' �
�` o ---------� �
42 �— iz,soo ------ ii,voo a..� �
� �a — ` , , :
�I 13,700 , 4 13,100 ,
\\ � ___________ � '_____________�� �
Continue " � 0.5% a x 0.8%
� AverageAnnual Daily ltaffiq � � �
2016
�'�,__�__'� AverageAnnual Daily ltaffiq
2030
_
''� x� � RateofIncreaseintraffic
annually
�� � �� Intersection
"" PrincipalArterial
29
Locust Street Connector
� 0.12 miles �
� End
i
i �
iN
' ~ "
� Continue
�J�
�
,�i �\\ I� \
� �� �1 I,OCIlSL SL � I �� �1
� COIIIICCLOC GV�YVV �
�. ; ----------, �. ; � Average Annual Daily Traffic,
��--' �� 25,400 '�, ���-' 2016
o � �
1.5 /o
� � � ' Average Annual Daily Traffic,
'� '� 1 �" '. �
� � 0.12 miles 2030
1
_ �_ Rate of Increase in traffic
15,400 � annually
�� 24,500 �'�, �� ��
---i--- I� � �' Intersection
�
�I 4.2% 'I `� �
'-----� �---' i
� �.
� r-� �_
; `.
J°°eS � �� ; J°°eS ____ principalArterial
sc � , sc
��,_,..
30
US Highway 20
OA2�mles 0.36�mles OAS�mles 019�1es
� �
z
a �� a o
��
.'_'� .� '� :� �.
. . . . ` ;. .
r i ��
•---I 1 �-- 26,600 =s i�p-�'-y 2 � - g00 lLC34oL°"'�'_� 3 r- 31,']00 LS716NtZ1_� A �__ 2'1,800 ___�\
'- 30
� � � ��
`-- �I 43,50�, �-- I 41,300 '�, '�, 36,900 � ��'�-'� �I 34,00�,
------- ------- ���a�� ------ � -------
�--asi---� � �'�--ZA-/---- Aa '�'__la_�_ _�'� �� �---ibi---�
a�
019�mles 0.30�mlu OA3�mles 025�mlu 0.'T3�mles
c o
�� � ��� °�
;- ��. ;- ��.
; �.
. , , ,
.
�� 29$00 y � � 29,500 �S=Sb"�__� � �__ 38,t00 _s�?J � i__ 38,200 usxA^_Z_� g __ _��
�
, ` � • 38,900
___�� ` ,, ��-___-�� �� � ��L _ `�� '�' '�,r_41,400_ � `�_��' �41,000__
'�, 34,000 I 38,200 �-' 40900 � '
���'�___lb_�___��' `�� ��'�__z.i_�_ _��' �� �'.___osi____��'� �F �'�__obi___��'� �� ��'. _°A_�___��'�
�,� a
��
021�les — � 0145 m�es �— 0158�les - 0.30�mles - l�
J
�' � / `
3,460 : ` � 5,200 1' / ' 4,590 � ��� '�L 35,850__" 2Q900
' _ ` `-_____-__ �. ________ 012miles
� �� 2,860
. . �
0 , 10 0 0 , 14 0 0
�I 3,920 ' � 9,600 � �_� �� 6,qpp �'i 9,200� ._, �� '�I 25,400 ��
� � ' �_____- � � �I I I ,
__0.94u___� '��,_ _6.04u___ N `__104u_ _���, ��I__'114u__�� �___1.64u__����, '�L__1.54u__I�
�
�� 39,800 � 114u �� , ,
I � _'�.______-� •.
r �^ `
\\___________ _ _ 31�500 ____'__________USJ7E4Y11___________�_____ � �J t_______�
IISH'
* i0 i0
� �- y �� i
�� 33,300_ I 0.44u �', ,� ' '�
I
a �'------- ���_----J 'a
� 0 0 0 ' e ozsmue:
3,460 � � 5,900 I� �� � 2,980 4,200 13 � 9,900 ^d
3,800 ` ' 9,200 i ` ' _ �I, 8 100 ` ' �������
,—____
_—___I �' '� �' '� 5,900 I, , �,_,
�_—_ I
'�, �I, �I, 13,500
__ -______I _______�
'�__-� '� '' � ___� I i� �•�
'��, oa� � i_a.a�__�I, `es%�'� �''',__e.� I, --ze�_ �'�
--- � 16 ` c��
St
� o.iz.rwes • End
i
� �
� N
� �
' \\� � Continue
� u,,y�� � .
upoo
, 17 ,Zr"'� 21 `
� � �o���� �
__
\ , -- ----- .� ; � Average Annual Daily Traffic,
____ � � 2016
�'', i.s% ,i j y ''� �'� AverageAnnualDailyltaffiq
� � o.izm�s �� 2030
� '
ispoo �'�,,_ x�_ �',� RateofInereaseintraffic
--- — annually
I u,soo �i -'
'�ra.zi—�� I' z� �� Intersection
�
_ _ _' �
_r�
� Jous ''20`' Jous � `_'
5� SY
"" PrincipalArterial
31
L. BENEFIT/COST
Road Segment Benefit / Cost Safety Analysis Rev.S/18
lowa DOT Office of Traffic & Safety
County: Dubuque Prepared by: DMATS Date Prepared: Aug 13,2019
Location: Dubuque Metro
Improvement
Proposed Improvement(s): Dynamic Adaptive system
$ 200,000 Estimated Improvement Cost, EC 10 Estimated Service Life, years, Y
$ 15,032 Other Annual Cost (after initial year), AC 8 Crash Reduction Factor (integer), CRF
$ 121,923 Present Value Other Annual Costs, OC 4.0% Discount Rate, INT
oc=� 1— � $ 321,923 Present Value All Costs,
(1+z�v7� COST= E C + OC
Traffic Volume Data
Source: lowa DOT 2017 Date of traffic count
Two-way
Length (mi.) veh/day Description 230,099 Current Vehicle Miles/ Day, VM
10.02 22,964 272,348 End of Life Veh. Miles/ Day
83,986,237 Current Veh. Miles/Year, AM
907,112,930 Total Projected Veh. Miles Over
Life of Project, TVMT
10.02 miles total r
AM � �1�G� �
TVMT=— 1—
1.7% Projected Traffic Growth (0%-10%), G
Crash Data
2014 First full year--> 2018 Last full year 5.0 years, Time Period,T
Additional months
6 Fatal Crashes 3 Fatalities @ $4,500,000 $ 13,500,000
13 Major Injuries @ $325,000 $ 4,225,000
813 Injury Crashes 208 Minor Injuries @ $65,000 $ 13,520,000
592 Possible Injuries @ $35,000 $ 20,720,000
2309 Property Damage Only (assumed cost per crash) $7,400 $ 23,147,200
-OR- enter all Property Costs of all crashes:
3128 Total Crashes, TA Total $ Loss, LOSS $ 75,112,200
625.60 Current Crashes/Year, AA= TA/T 744.9 Crashes/HMVM, Crash Rate, CR
$ 24,013 Cost per Crash, AVCR= LOSS/TA CR= TA x 10^8 /(AM x T)
6,756.9 Total Expected Crashes, TCR= CR x TVMT/10^8 $10,470,971 Present Value of Avoided
50.05 Crashes Avoided First Year AAR =AA x CRF/ 100 Crashes, BENEFIT
$1,201,795 Crash Costs Avoided in First Year, AAR x AVCR Y
AVCR x AAR � 1+G �
540.6 Total Avoided Crashes, TCR x CRF/ 100 BEN.= 1—
�INT—G� 1+INT
Benefit /Cost Ratio
Benefit : Cost = $10,470,971 . $321 ,923 = 32.53 1
32
BCA Input Data
Corridor Details Length AADT VMT Crashes
Miles
2
o eu
� � �
From To 2016 2030 2016 2030 � � ,7 ;a
� � �
� �� � v
.� � � a a'",
<d . �y �
W � � O�.i O�.i
Old Highway Rd NW Arterial 0.42 26,600 43,500 11,172 18,270
NW Arterial Crescent ridge Rd 036 30,800 41,300 11,088 14,868
Crescent ridge Rd Century Rd 0.45 31,700 36,700 14,265 16,515
Century Rd Wacker Rd 017 27,800 34,000 4,726 5,780
Wacker Rd JPK Rd 030 29,500 38,200 8,850 11,460
US 20 2 4 72 214 869
JPK Rd University Ave 0.43 38,200 40,700 16,426 17,501
University Ave Devon Dr 0.25 38,200 41,400 9,550 10,350
Devon Dr Grand View 0.46 38,700 41,000 17,802 18,860
Grandview Hill St 0.40 37,400 45,803 14,960 18,321
Hill St Locust St 0.64 39,700 47,800 25,408 30,592
US 52 John P Kennedy rd 1.99 11,900 13,100 23,681 26,069
JPK Rd Plaza Dr 0.84 12,800 13,700 10,752 11,508
Plaza Dr Asbury Rd 0.4 12,800 14,600 5,120 5,840
NW Asbury Rd Holiday Dr 0.41 18,900 20,300 7,749 8,323 1 8 23 76 321
Arterial
Holiday Dr Pennslvania Ave 0.58 19,200 20,600 11,136 11,948
Pennslvania Ave Chavenelle Rd 0.26 23,900 31,300 6,214 8,138
Chavenelle Rd US 20 0.61 23,900 31,900 14,579 19,459
Asbury Rd NW Arterial Holiday Dr 0.09 16,800 19,900 1,512 1,791 0 0 3 9 21
Locsut St Con. Locust St US 151/61 012 20,900 25,400 2,508 3,048
0 0 3 20 72
US 151/61 Locust St Connector Jones St 012 15,400 24,500 1,848 2,940
US 20 Wacker Dr 0.42 9,600 9,800 4,032 4,116
JPK Rd 0 0 10 26 141
Wacker Dr Pennsylvania Ave 03 22,400 24,700 6,720 7,410
TOTAL 10.02 230,098 273,107 3 12 111 345 1424
Crash Reduction Factor
CMF ID: 6857
http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/detail.cfin?facid=6857
33