Fair Market Value_SB Development LLC (Smith)Masterpiece on the Mississippi
Dubuque
hititi
All- AmedcaCity
I'll!
2007
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project, Purchase of Commercial Property
DATE: May 28, 2010
City Engineer Gus Psihoyos recommends the City Council establish the fair market
value of Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Addition owned by SB Development, LLC, at the
appraised value of $35,000, and authorize the City Manager to begin negotiations to
acquire this property for the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project.
I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
MCVM:jh
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
Gus Psihoyos, City Engineer
Michael C. Van Milligen
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
Dubuque
Intil
AN- AmericaCiiy
II s r
2007
TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
FROM: Gus Psihoyos, City Engineer
DATE: May 28, 2010
SUBJECT: Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project, Purchase of Commercial Property
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memo is to establish the fair market value of Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Addition
and seek authorization for the City Manager to begin negotiations to acquire the property required
for the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project.
BACKGROUND
In December of 2004, the City Council established the alignment for the Bee Branch Creek
Restoration Project, from 15th and Sycamore Streets to 24th and Washington Streets, and
established a building permit moratorium for the properties impacted based on the alignment. The
alignment established the properties necessary to be acquired for the Bee Branch Creek
Restoration Project.
DISCUSSION
The property described as Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Addition was identified for acquisition based on
the project alignment approved by the City Council. The property was appraised at $35,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City establish the fair market value of Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Addition at
the appraised value and that the City Manager begin negotiations with the property owner.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN
I respectfully request that the City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the fair
market value of Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Addition and authorizing the City Manager to commence
negotiations to acquire the property.
Prepared by Deron Muehring, Civil Engineer II
cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney
Deron Muehring, Civil Engineer II
RESOLUTION NO. 172-10
ESTABLISHING THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
OWNED BY SB DEVELOPMENT, LLC IN THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA.
WHEREAS, the City of Dubuque (City) intends to acquire certain real property
owned by SB Development, LLC (Owner), legally described as follows (the Property):
Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Addition, in the City of Dubuque, Dubuque County, Iowa
as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto for the purpose of the stormwater conveyance
associated with the restoration of the Bee Branch Creek;
AND WHEREAS, Iowa law requires that City must make a good faith effort to
negotiate with the Owner to purchase the Property before proceeding with condemnation;
AND WHEREAS, City has caused an appraisal of the property to be made and the
appraised value of the property is $35,000.00;
AND WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to establish the fair market value of
the property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DUBUQUE, IOWA:
Attest:
City Clerk
1. The fair market value of the Property is hereby established to be $35,000.00.
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to commence negotiations with the
Owner of the Property and any other interested parties for the purchase of the
Property for a purchase price which is not Tess than the fair market value
established by this resolution.
Passed, approved and adopted this 7th
eanne F. Schneider, CMC
day of June , 010.
(9
Roy D. uol, Mayor
Exhibit A
Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project Property Acquisition
Legal Description: Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Addition
r1 EL s
P Iv E P IEh- PL:+ =1
1
•
1
'
r - ▪ k \
-r . r -
� .+ E I. LOT 355 EL TGUEIJ. IJE
LOT 376 E= BTDUBIJ:IJELDD
o w.
• f
LOT 376 E=:TGUEUK
r' \
LGT36v EL.STC
r- r
_ r \ \
r
r 11•It 31; Ei ST GU BI E _C \ ,
\ 1 L ▪ 1; EL STDUBUvUEli2r \
f r
'\
p �d 31. " E-. ST DU Bsp :..0 1i1i •\
▪ .� .-. r
\
&S.' • \ r " 4e.rLOT 3 17 EL T CUEUOUE jC \
r
f \
\ r \
P
\ �.04. 111.., ‘‘...........0°.
�! E I T 352E ST C�1JEUvUE 'G
i LOT! 16
E. ST DUBU4VEi6C. \ \ r �
UBV:UE L CC, r r \ ... I \ LOT 3S_E 7CLIBU•:11E'C•[•
Ni \ y
� "
'\ r
\ �\ \ \
r _ \
�! a ` El. LOT 351 E ST GUBUuUE+ GC
a a \
LOT 313 EL:3TDUBIb:UE =COQ \ \ •
r
I:? LOT 4::. E- ST 4U 13UvUE -(1:.
L . } T 3 5 3 E A 2 T D U B U C / U E A CO
▪ Pla.P ea
L "T3EIE
r
• \ r
1'3$:
r �.
�r
\ f r ' 1.N . • LOT
..r. '
EiSTGUEUGUE'GG r -
r ` r _ �. -
l {�T:35 E= v[Duel - .LIE:: GC. r 1 y -
• r\ '� r� '\ %a 0�r
O r `r r r • \ r - r LOT: • 351 365. 38b. 3b'. 168.106L. Y13.410 x.111 it
\ EL ST C"JE'J'JE .c ii: LOT - 320 r "\
\• r'' 1
.1 E- STDUSUOLIEi4G t P.
a -r -
\ r 1 r •
� rf • \ r r r r
-
\ r� .r \
r' r r
jore 37 EL ST DU UEi P y r LOT 150 EL 3TDU81.3.:1.1 ELDD \
Date
2010
20091 2008
$01 $0
$0( $0[
2007
$0
so
+ Assessed Building Value
$0
$0
+ /Assessed Dwelling Value
+ (Assessed Land Value
$10,600
$10,6001 $10,600
$10,600
+ Exempt Value
$10,600
$10,6001 $10,600
$10,600
_'Gross Assessed Value
- !Exempt Value
$10,600
$10,6001 $10,600
$10,600
_ 'Net Assessed Value
Date
Seller
Buyer
'Recording
INUTC
'Type
(Deed
Amount
$24,000.00
18/4/2006
I
$0
1D06 -12072
,VACANT LOTS
Dubuque County, IA
Summary
Parcel ID 1024285010
Alternate ID 4- 4 -3 -15
Property Address
Sec/Twp/Rng
Brief Tax Description LOT 1 -354 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
(Note: Not to be used on legal documents)
Deed Book /Page 06-12072 (08042006)
Contract Book /Page N/A
Iowa Land Records
Gross Acres 0.00
Net Acres 0.00
Class C - Commercial
Taxing District DUBA - DUBUQUE CITY /DBQ COMM SCH
School District DUBUQUE COMM SCH
Owners
Deed Holder
Sb Development LLC
4962 Asbury Circle
Dubuque IA 52002
Land
Lot Area
Sales
Valuation
Taxation
0.08 Acres; 3,502 SF
Contract Holder Mailing Address
Includes sales on or after 1/1/2003
ObeaconTw
Click to Enlarge
Date Created: 4/28/2010
2008
2007
+
Taxable Building Value
$0
$0
+
Taxable Dwelling Value
$0
$0
+
Taxable Land Value
$10,600
$10,572
=
Gross Taxable Value
$10,600
$10,572
-
Military Credit
$0
$0
=
Net Taxable Value
$10,600
$10,572
x
Levy Rate (per $1000 of value)
34.71604
34.44665
=
Gross Taxes Due
$367.99
$364.17
-
Ag Land Credit
$0.00
$0.00
Dubuque County, IA
Summary
Parcel ID 1024285010
Alternate ID 4- 4 -3 -15
Property Address
Sec/Twp/Rng
Brief Tax Description LOT 1 -354 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
(Note: Not to be used on legal documents)
Deed Book /Page 06-12072 (08042006)
Contract Book /Page N/A
Iowa Land Records
Gross Acres 0.00
Net Acres 0.00
Class C - Commercial
Taxing District DUBA - DUBUQUE CITY /DBQ COMM SCH
School District DUBUQUE COMM SCH
Owners
Deed Holder
Sb Development LLC
4962 Asbury Circle
Dubuque IA 52002
Land
Lot Area
Sales
Valuation
Taxation
0.08 Acres; 3,502 SF
Contract Holder Mailing Address
Includes sales on or after 1/1/2003
ObeaconTw
Click to Enlarge
Date Created: 4/28/2010
- Family Farm Credit
I
$0.00
$0.00
FT Homestead Credit
I
$0.00]
$0.00
F --- Disabled and Senior Citizens Credit
I
$0.00
$0.00
Net Taxes Due
I
$368.00
$364.00
Pay Property Taxes
Special Assessments
Tax History
Year Due Date
2008 March 2010
2007 March 2009
September 2008
Photos
September 2009
Show DeediContract
Click here to enter the County Treasurer's web site.
Amount Paid Date Paid Receipt
$184 Yes
$184 Yes
$182 Yes
$182 Yes
Show Deed /Contract
02/16/2010
09/30/2009
05/18/2009
02/25/2009
385541
332185
7 }
Form 633 W 1
EMINENT DOMAIN DETAILED APPRAISAL
FEE ACQUISITION
Parcel Number: C9 Project: Bee Branch Creek Restoration County: Dubuque
Record Owner; SB Development. LLC (c/o Steve Smith)
Owner's Mailing Address: 137 Main Street. Dubuque. IA 52001
Address of Property being Appraised; Parcel 1024285010
This property is described as: Lot 1 of the Subdivision of Lot 354 in East Dubuque. an addition to the City of
Dubuque. Iowa.
This property consists of 3.502 taxable SF before the acquisition.
for highway purposes and / net SF will remain after the acquisition.
Present zoning is H -I. Heavv Industrial Present use is vacant lot
Appraised on the basis of highest and best use for Common's! Development
before the acquisition and the same after the acquisition.
MARKET VALUE UNDER EMINENT DOMAIN LAW OF THE STATE OF IOWA
Value of the entire property before the acquisition is:
Value of the remaining property after the acquisition is:
The estimate of just compensation is :
Date of Valuation
Signed:
$ 35.000
S 35.000
May 14.2010
Form 633204
I hereby certify:
CERTIFICATION OF APPRAISER
Project: Bee Branch Creek Restoration
Parcel Number. C9
That I personally made a field inspection of the property herein appraised and that 1 have afforded the property owner or his authorized
representative the opportunity to accompany me at the time of inspection. I have also personally made a field inspection of the
comparable sales relied upon in making said appraisal. The subject and the comparable sales relied upon in making said appraisal
were as represented by the photographs appropriately supplied.
That to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements contained in the appraisal herein set forth arc true, and the information
upon which the opinions expressed therein are based is correct; subject to thc limiting conditions therein set forth.
That I understand this appraisal is to be used in connection with thc acquisition of property by the City of Dubuque.
That this appraisal has been made in conformity with Iowa law, regulation, and thc Iowa Department of Transportation Appraisal
Manual as is applicable to the appraisal of this type of property for the stated purpose; and that to the best of my knowledge no portion
of the value assigned to this property consists of items which are nonconpensable under the established law of the State of Iowa.
That neither my employment nor my compensation for making this appraisal and report are in any way contingent upon the values
reported herein.
That I have no dircct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition
of such property appraised.
That I have not revealed the findings and results of such appraisal to anyone other than the proper officials of the City of Dubuque and
I will not do so until so authorized, or until 1 am required to do so by due process of law or until I am released from this obligation by
having publicly testified as to such findings.
That the conclusion set forth in this appraisal is my independent opinion of the difference between the fair market value of this
property before and after the proposed acquisition.
As of May 14. 2010 the estimate of just compensation is S 35.000
Signed:
Date of Signature: May 17.2010
1
Form 633205
PURPOSE OF THIS APPRAISAL,
Project: Bee Branch Creek Restoration
Parcel Number; C9
To estimate the market value of the ownership interest, and thc leasehold interest if any, in this property before the proposed
acquisition by the City of Dubuque and the market value of the same interest in the remainder property immediately after the proposed
acquisition. In case the proposed acquisition causes only limited damage, the purpose is to estimate just compensation resulting from
the acquisition, without reporting before and after values. This appraisal considers the loss in value, if any, of owner's rights in
advertising signs being acquired and is made without consideration of any enhancement that might accrue from the proposed
improvement.
DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE:
The cash price which would be arrived at as between a voluntary seller willing but not compelled to sell and a voluntary purchaser
willing but not compelled to buy, both of whom are acting freely, intelligently and at arm's length, bargaining in the open market for
the sale and purchase of the real estate in question. (State of Iowa Uniform Jury Instruction No. 14.4)
DEFINITION OF HIGHEST AND BEST USE:
The utilization of a property to its best and most profitable use. It is that usc, chosen from among the reasonably probable and
financially feasible alternative uses which is found to be physically practical, legally acceptable and which results in the highest present
value, as defined, as of the effective date of thc appraisal.
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE CONTAMINATION;
The appraiser observed the following signs of possible contamination: Not® As 9ribed
FIVE YEAR DELINEATION OF TITLE: (If none. so state)
Grantor
Grantee Inst Type Inakals .k & sac Sale Price
William & Dorothy Blum SB Development, LLC Warranty Deed 8-4 -2006 2006 -12072 $24,000
LEASES: (Lessee's Name. Address and Lease Termsl
None
DATE OF INSPECTION AND INVITATION:
The property owner (Steve Smith) was offered an opportunity to accompany me on my inspection of this property. Mr. Smith did not
attend the inspection.
Telephone number of owner or representative contacted: 563 -590 -1708. 1 personally inspected the subject property on May 14, 2010.
NARRATIVE APPRAISAL OF MARKET VALUE
OF THE FEE - SIMPLE INTEREST OF
LOT 1 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF LOT 354 IN EAST DUBUQUE ADDITION
DUBUQUE, IA
DOUGLAS J. HATTERY
HATTERY REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS, LLC
1216 WEST LOMBARD STREET
DAVENPORT, IOWA 52804
DATE OF APPRAISAL - MAY 14, 2010
DATE OF REPORT - MAY 17, 2010
PREPARED BY
PREPARED FOR
DERON MUEHRING, CIVIL ENGINEER
CITY OF DUBUQUE
50 WEST 13 STREET
DUBUQUE, IA 52001
1
DOUGLAS J. HATTERY
1216 WEST LOMBARD STREET
DAVENPORT, IOWA 52804
(563) 3864606
May 17, 2010
Deron Muehring, Civil Engineer
City of Dubuque
50 West 13"' Street
Dubuque, IA 52001
HATTERY REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS, LLC
REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL AND CONSULTING
RE: Narrative Appraisal of Market Value of the Fee - Simple Interest of Lot 1 of the Subdivision
of Lot 354 in East Dubuque Addition located between Cedar and Maple Street, south of 16"'
Street in Dubuque, IA, for the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project.
Mr. Muehring:
This appraisal report, plus exhibits, explains and supports my opinion of value of the subject
property. The report was prepared after an inspection of the property, neighborhood, recent
comparable sales, and other factors which I consider to be pertinent to the value of the subject
property.
The subject property consists of a 3,502 SF (51.5' x 68') vacant site which is located on the
east side of the alley between Cedar and Maple Streets, between 15"' and 16'" Streets. The
property is owned by SB Development, LLC and is currently unimproved. The proposed
acquisition by the City of Dubuque is a total acquisition in Fee Title.
The appraisal date is May 14, 2010, which is the date of inspection of the subject property.
The date of the report is May 17, 2010. This report is a Detailed Narrative Appraisal as
defined within the Appraisal Policy & Procedures Manual, August 2003 edition, provided by the
Iowa Department of Transportation, Office of Right of Way.
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the Market Value of the subject property, as of the
appraisal date, relative to the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project, which requires the
acquisition of the subject property in Fee Title. The intended use of the appraisal is to
estimate just compensation for eminent domain purposes as of the appraisal date for
acquisition by the City of Dubuque. The intended users of the appraisal are the City of
Dubuque, and other parties with an interest in the acquisition process regarding the subject
ProPerty.
No Phase I environmental audit has been provided regarding the subject property. No
hazardous conditions were obvious upon the Inspection, and the property is appraised as If
clean of ail contamination, above and below ground.
- continued-
Dubuque Vacant Lot
This appraisal was prepared according to the contract/assignment from the City of Dubuque.
The intended use of the appraisal is for eminent domain related acquisition. The appraisal is
prepared under the Jurisdictional Exception provision contained in the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice ( USPAP). In preparing the appraisal, the appraiser has
conformed with all parts of USPAP except those that are contrary to State and Federal
requirements. The appraisal was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91 -646, as amended
and Chapters 6B and 316, Code of Iowa. The report was not prepared under USPAP reporting
requirements but does conform to the requirements of State and Federal law as implemented in
the Iowa Department of Transportation Appraisal Manual reporting requirements.
As a result of my investigation, based upon my analysis of the included data, it is my opinion
that as of May 14, 2010 the Market Value of the Fee - Simple Interest of the subject property is
at, or near ;35,000.
Respectfully Submitted,
THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND NO /100 DOLLARS
HATTERY REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS, LLC
-2- May 17, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter of Transmittal
Property Photographs 1.
Purpose and Scope of the Appraisal 2.
Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions 3.
Legal Description and Address of Subject Property 4.
Neighborhood and Area Analysis 5.
Site and Improvement Analysis 6.
Statement of Highest and Best Use 7.
Valuation of the Subject Property
Cost Approach to Value 8.
Sales Comparison Approach to Value 9.
Income Capitalization Approach to Value 10.
Reconciliation and Final Value Estimate 11.
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 12.
Appraiser Qualifications
Addenda
PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS
The photo above is a view of the subject property as seen facing southeast from 16 ' Street.
PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL:
2.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the Market Value of the subject property, as of the
appraisal date, relative to the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project, which requires the
acquisition of the subject property. Eminent domain law in the State of Iowa has established
the following definition of Market Value:
The term fair and reasonable market value means the cash price which would be arrived at as
between a voluntary seller wining but not compelled to sell and a voluntary purchaser willing but
not compelled to buy, both of whom are acting freely, intelligently and at arm's length,
bargaining in the open market for the sale and purchase of the real estate in question. Such
term does not mean the value under peculiar circumstances where greater than its fair price
could be obtained, nor does it mean the price which the property would bring at a forced sale. It
does not mean what the property is worth to the plaintiff nor what the defendant can afford to
pay, but what it is fairly worth in cash on the open market, as above stated. (Uniform Jury
Instruction No. 14.4).
In short, the fair and reasonable market value of a property is to be considered in the same
manner that a knowledgeable, voluntary buyer determines the fair and reasonable market value
of a property- -what are its capabilities, what are its detriments, what is it fairly and reasonably
worth in the market place? The jury and/or Compensation Commission is entitled to be
informed of all factors which (1) the willing suer would impress upon the rolling buyer that tend
to show value, and (2) the willing buyer would impress upon the wilting seller that tend to show
lack of value -- including sales of comparable properties and evidence of its highest and best
use. (Uniform Jury Instruction No. 14.6 and annotated authorities). See also Bellew v. ISHC,
171 N.W.2d 284, 288, 289 (Iowa 1969) and In Re Primary Road No. 141, 124 N.W.2d 141, 147
(Iowa 1963).
The determination of - Market Value" may not consider or reflect any enhancement or diminution
in value of the subject, caused by the building of the project which has prompted the taking.
(No sales exhibiting these effects may be used as a comparable in arriving at the value of the
subject property, either before or after the date of condemnation.) Uniform Jury Instruction 14.3
and Soconv Vacuum Oil Co. v. State of Iowa, 170 N.W.2d 378. (Iowa 1969).
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
The subject property consists of a 3,502 SF (51.5' x 68') vacant site which is located on the
east side of the alley between Cedar and Maple Streets, between 15 and 16 Streets. The
property Is owned by SB Development, LLC and is currently unimproved. The proposed
acquisition by the City of Dubuque is a total acaui ition In Fee Title.
- continued-
DATE OF THE APPRAISAL:
DELINEATION OF TITLE:
2 -A.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL (CONTINUED)
INTENDED USE AND INTENDED USERS OF THE APPRAISAL:
The intended use of the appraisal Is to estimate just compensation for eminent domain
purposes as of the appraisal date for acquisition by the City of Dubuque. The intended users
of the appraisal are the City of Dubuque, and other parties with an interest in the acquisition
process regarding the subject property.
The appraisal date is May 14, 2010, which is the date of inspection of the subject property.
The date of the report is May 17, 2010. This report is a Detailed Narrative Appraisal as
defined within the Appraisal Policy & Procedures Manual, August 2003 edition, provided by the
Iowa Department of Transportation, Office of Right of Way.
According to the available records, the subject property last transferred on August 4, 2006 from
William and Dorothy Blum to SB Development, LLC via Warranty Deed 2006 -12072 for a
reported consideration of $24,000.
[Although the above information is believed to be true and correct, no reliance should be
assumed in that the appraiser Is not responsible for items of a legal nature.]
APPRAISAL PROCESS:
The appraisal process is a systematic method of gathering data regarding sociological,
physical, economic, and governmental forces in order to analyze and interpret their influence, In
terms of value, on a specific real property. In this process three basic approaches are typically
used, the Cost, Sales Comparison and Income Capitalization Approaches. Each is based upon
the principle of substitution which states that an informed purchased would pay no more for the
rights in a particular real property than the cost of acquiring without undue delay an equally
desirable one.
Cost Approach, according to the definition as stated on page 81 in The Dictionary of Real
Estate Appraisal, copyright 1993, by the Appraisal Institute, the Cost Approach is defined as:
"A set of procedures through which a value indication is derived for the fee simple
interests in a property by estimating the current cost to construct a reproduction of, or
replacement for, the existing structure; deducting accrued depreciation from the
reproduction or replacement cost; and adding the estimated land value plus an
entrepreneurial profit. Adjustments may then be made to the indicated fee simple value
of the subject property to reflect the value of the property interest being appraised."
- continued-
2 -B.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL (CONTINUED)
Sales Comparison Approach, according to the definition as stated on page 318 in Dia
Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, copyright 1993, by the Appraisal Institute, the Sales
Comparison Approach is defined as:
"A set of procedures in which a value indication is derived by comparing the property
being appraised to similar properties that have been sold recently, applying appropriate
units of comparison, and making adjustments to the sale prices of the comparables
based on the elements of comparison. The Sales Comparison Approach may be used
to value improved properties, vacant land, or land being considered as though vacant; it
is the most common and preferred method of land valuation when comparable sales
data are available."
Income Capitalization Approach, according to the definition as stated on page 178 in The
Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, copyright 1993, by the Appraisal Institute, the Income
Capitalization Approach is defined as:
"A set of procedures through which an appraiser derives a value indication for an income-
producing property by converting its anticipated benefits (cash flows and reversion) into
property value. This conversion can be accomplished in two ways. One year's income
expectancy can be capitalized at a market - derived capitalization rate or at a capitalization rate
that reflects a spedfied income pattem, return on investment, and change in the value of the
investment. Altemativey, the annual cash f for the holding period and the reversion can be
discounted at a specified yield rate."
The last step In the appraisal process is the Correlation and Reconciliation of the value
estimates derived by each approach used into a final estimate of value. Through the interaction
of analyzing costs and depredation, rental rates, expense estimates and capitalization rates,
and direct -sale comparables, the results of each approach to value should be similar.
SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL:
The appraisal report is prepared under a Jurisdictional Exception, based upon Article 1, Section
18 of the Iowa Constitution, which prohibits consideration of increases or decreases in a
property's value caused by the project. Ii specifically states "shall not take into consideration
any advantages that may result to said owner on account of the improvement for which it is
taken'.
In this appraisal, I have relied upon the Sales Comparison Approach. The property is
unimproved, and the Cost Approach is not applicable. Vacant lots are not typically rented, and
the Income Capitalization is not particularly applicable either. I have estimated the value of the
property based upon the comparable sales analyzed. In the Sales Comparison Approach, I
have researched and analyzed sales of similar properties (as well as the subject sale) located In
the subject market area and estimated the value of the subject by weighing various differences.
All of the sales data have been confirmed by a principal involved (buyer, seller, or broker).
3.
SUMMARY OF SALIENT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS
DATE OF APPRAISAL: May 14, 2010
DATE OF REPORT: May 17, 2010
PROPERTY TYPE: Vacant Site
SIZE OF PROPERTY: 3,502 SF
OWNERSHIP: SB Development, LLC
ZONING: H -I, Heavy Industrial
IMPROVEMENTS: None
RIGHTS APPRAISED: Market Value of the Fee - Simple Interest to the subject
property.
ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
4.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
Source: Warranty Deed 2006 -12072 (copy in Addenda).
East side of alley between Cedar and Maple
Streets between ir and 16 Streets, Dubuque, IA
Lot 1 of the Subdivision of Lot 354 in East Dubuque, an Addition to the City of Dubuque, Iowa.
FIRM
PRODUCT/SERVICE
APPROXIMATE
EMPLOYEES
JOHN DEERE
HEAVY EQUIPMENT
1,800
MERCY HEALTH CENTER
HEALTH CARE
1,325
DUBUQUE SCHOOLS
EDUCATION
1,600
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES
SEATING PRODUCTS
450
MEDICAL ASSOC CLINIC
HEALTH CARE
743
HEARTLAND FINANCIAL
FINANCIAL SERVICES
760
FINLEY HOSPITAL
HEALTH CARE
920
HOLY FAMILY SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
500
EAGLE WINDOW AND DOOR
WINDOWS AND DOORS
750
5.
AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS
Dubuque, Iowa is the largest community and the county seat of Dubuque County, and is
located in northeast Iowa. Dubuque is located 70 mites north of the IA -IL Quad Cities, 160
miles northwest of Chicago, IL, and 70 miles northeast of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Population
figures for Dubuque and Dubuque County over the last three census periods are as follows:
As can be seen from the above population figures, the loss in population through the 1980's is
consistent with many Midwestern agricultural areas which experienced decline In the decade of
the 1980's. The decade of the 1990's was generally positive, and many communities like
Dubuque have rebounded and stabilized over the past 5-7 years. The recent economic
downturn has been characterized by sluggish growth. The City of Dubuque appears to be
generally stable.
TRANSPORTATION:
The area is served by two U.S. Highways 151, 20, 52, 61 and State Highways 3 and 84. There
continues to be upgrades in Highway 61, providing expressway type traffic north and south.
The area is also served by railroad and Mississippi River barge carriers. The Dubuque
Municipal Airport Is located south of Dubuque along Highway 61 and provides some
commercial airline service through American Airlines, as well as charter service.
INDUSTRY, GROWTH TRENDS AND MAJOR EMPLOYERS:
Dubuque has a typical mixture of major employers. Aside from John Deere, the manufacturing
companies are relatively small. Although there are fluctuations in the John Deere workforce,
the employment situation appears to be relatively stable. The Dubuque area has experienced
the same economic downtums that many communities experienced in the decades of the
1970's and 1980's. A hst of some of the major employers is shown below.
- continued-
1980
1990
% change
2000
% change
Dubuque County
93,745
86,403
-7.8%
89,143
3.2%
Dubuque
62,321
57,538
-7.6%
57,686
0.3%
5.
AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS
Dubuque, Iowa is the largest community and the county seat of Dubuque County, and is
located in northeast Iowa. Dubuque is located 70 mites north of the IA -IL Quad Cities, 160
miles northwest of Chicago, IL, and 70 miles northeast of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Population
figures for Dubuque and Dubuque County over the last three census periods are as follows:
As can be seen from the above population figures, the loss in population through the 1980's is
consistent with many Midwestern agricultural areas which experienced decline In the decade of
the 1980's. The decade of the 1990's was generally positive, and many communities like
Dubuque have rebounded and stabilized over the past 5-7 years. The recent economic
downturn has been characterized by sluggish growth. The City of Dubuque appears to be
generally stable.
TRANSPORTATION:
The area is served by two U.S. Highways 151, 20, 52, 61 and State Highways 3 and 84. There
continues to be upgrades in Highway 61, providing expressway type traffic north and south.
The area is also served by railroad and Mississippi River barge carriers. The Dubuque
Municipal Airport Is located south of Dubuque along Highway 61 and provides some
commercial airline service through American Airlines, as well as charter service.
INDUSTRY, GROWTH TRENDS AND MAJOR EMPLOYERS:
Dubuque has a typical mixture of major employers. Aside from John Deere, the manufacturing
companies are relatively small. Although there are fluctuations in the John Deere workforce,
the employment situation appears to be relatively stable. The Dubuque area has experienced
the same economic downtums that many communities experienced in the decades of the
1970's and 1980's. A hst of some of the major employers is shown below.
- continued-
CONCLUSIONS:
NEIGHBORHOOD DATA:
5 -A.
AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
The trends with respect to population, employment, construction and tourism are fairly typical of
midwestern river frontage communities. The economy, in general appears to be rebounding
somewhat. The residential sector appears to be ahead of the commercial sector in this
recovery. The Dubuque area unemployment rate has risen over the past few years, and was at
7.8% in March of 2010. Which this is higher than the past few years, there are many areas that
have experienced more job losses than Dubuque.
Identification and Delineation: The subject neighborhood is just northeast of the "downtown"
area, and Is located in the eastern portion of Dubuque, Iowa. The subject neighborhood is
roughly bounded by Highway 61 on the east, 20 Street on the north, 14 Street on the south,
and the railroad ROW to the west.
Property Types: The area has a variety of uses, with a balance of vacant sites, residential,
light industrial, and commercial uses interspersed. There are several vacant sites in the area,
and the homes and commercial buildings are generally older.
Neighborhood Trends and Changes: The subject neighborhood is about 50% built -up with
various improvements. The major influence on the area is the development of the former FDL
foods 'pack site ". The large site has been purchased and has had the buildings cleared from
the site and the rough grading mostly completed. This property is owned by essentially the
same ownership group as the subject property. The property was rezoned to a PUD
classification, which would allow for large retail, or other commercial uses. The developers of
the 'pack" site have also been purchasing properties (like the subject) in the immediate subject
neighborhood in order to provide sufficient land area for development. The development of the
pack site has been slow, partially because of the general economic situation of the past few
years. Nevertheless, it appears that this portion of the community (the pack site and the area
south of 16'" Street) is poised to see development in the relatively near future.
Competition: The subject neighborhood competes with other developing intensive commercial
areas within Dubuque, but the area is somewhat distinct, as an older, fringe downtown
neighborhood. The area is generally stable, but will likely see some redevelopment In the
future, and the general outlook is basically positive.
Adverse Influences: There appears to be no obvious adverse influences on the subject
neighborhood.
Lot 1 -354 East Dubuque Add.jpg - Gmail Page 1 of I
P FI E P'v 1EW PL A
to .
joleicTi Is EAST DUBUOVE O
rA r
r goe
• r•
\
r
2% EAS VB!w3UE$CC
1
L'2
LOT 213t EA IT {!8 ADC•
• ▪ \
LOT233 EA t CV UEADD
1215 E. TC•U BUG" UE.4 \C.
-.0•
lk:TOT 201 EST DU Blk:•r1
f• l
•r .
U'Et l•:T 31S EA ST DU BUGU lr r \
1 1 .3n ......_/ . •
�Jr' \ r
\ r AtTDUBU• }UE � \ •
r\ l �. ,
r•
r • r ,\
•
• L \
E I \LOT355 EA: TC•UBUOUE \DG
t f'
r
r•1 W I\ LOT 355 EAST DUBUOU
r
•
LOT 373 EA S T DU BU•:IUE ADC
• af'fr
LOT 373 EASTDUEV
►.#
r
51 E3.TOUBU }UE DD , LCT3i0 EA TC
\ \ r
. Va
Ca
1 r
1
1
r �'' tM \ \ \ r \
y \ \
\
r
�l
r • '"' \ ' t 'r E1. 1OT351EASTDUBUCUEADO
LOT 313 WST nV
DU E A CO
\ r' I.
WN LOT 351 EA3TDUBUOUE'DD
• \ ! l
•��,r• ; \ v. ... •r LOTS
\ EA•.TDUBUOUE LOT 324 ' ,
1, r'
\ K� r ,r•
\ 1J
\ • r'
i
1,
\LOT33 1
r` r
• LOT 353 EA.1TDUB000EA DC.
,\ \
r\ ` r
r ` �! 'rr' EI. LOT352EASTDUBIh7UE�•D 01332 1
•
t LOT IS EAST DUBUQUE ADD \ \ P
• 4...' \ Al LOT 352 EA:T DUBUQUE DD
.334. 353. 385.317. 463.403A. 405.1 8 111 At
r
\
r 1
r' r
1OT380 EASTC•UBL10UEADD \
https: // mail. google .com/mail / ?ui= 2 &ik= 32ab7c5a86& view= att &th= 12846469498a 1 fie &attid= 0.1... 4/28/2010
6.
SITE ANALYSIS
Location: The subject property is a platted lot which is located between Cedar and Maple
Streets, between 15 and 1 Street.
Size and Shape: The subject lot is rectangular and consists of 3,502 SF (51.5' x 68'), as
shown on the plat on the opposite page. There is no frontage along Cedar or Maple Street, but
the property fronts the alley.
Access and Traffic Flow: The property would be accessed from the alley on the west side of
the site. Maple Street and Cedar Street are two -lane, two-way streets with onstreet parking.
Topography: The subject property is basically level and is at grade with the surrounding
streets. According to the City of Dubuque, the property is located In Zone X, which is r,Lot, a
100 -year or 500 -year floodpiain.
Zoning and Utilities: The subject property is located within the city limits of Dubuque and is
currently zoned H -1, Heavy Industrial District. This zoning classification allows for a wide variety
of commercial uses. The site Is served by all municipal utilities.
Improvements: The subject property is unimproved.
The subject site consists of a total area of 3,502 SF, and has all city utilities available. The
immediate neighborhood is partially undeveloped, and has been stable for many years.
However, there is the distinct possibility of intensive commercial development of the area,
considering the activity associated with the "pack site" to the north of the subject. According to
the City of Dubuque Zoning Department, the current zoning would allow primarily industrial
uses. The most recent activity In the neighborhood Involving the "pack site" indicates that the
subject site would have potential for some type of commercial development, if It was assembled
with surrounding land.
While the City of Dubuque would not Guarantee that rezoning would be allowed, 1 have
presumed that there is a reasonable likelihood that the property could be rezoned and utilized
as part of a larger commercial development. However, the property would not require rezoning
for many commercial uses. The use of nearby land for development indicates that the
maximally productive use of the site would likely be for a relatively intensive commercial use
of some type. Therefore, it Is my opinion that the Highest and Best Use of the subject property
is for future commercial development.
7.
STATEMENT OF HIGHEST AND BEST USE
8.
COST APPROACH TO VALUE
The subject property is essentially a vacant site, and the Cost Approach to Value is not
particularly applicable. Therefore, I have relied primarily upon the Sales Comparison Approach
in estimating the value of the subject property.
COST APPROACH TO VALUE N/A
---- ,- kw -
.0,...,..,.., .s.,
}12-
r ..„ , .... , ^ 0 ,,,
...,,.. ,....)......0....
0
00„
Apt
n..1%
102 7001 2
I,
.0 .o 1.
,..,,1 2590 5
0247'12 -
02128100
102 OS •
sr, 02 760
• .0
5 -12427000
42 3 024285
1 "N
, 3 0 10242880 .0 "
02427600 o • ..,
102327 001 0
0 , •,1
1 4279001 0
7. .19'■ ..,,,,,,,, . ,..,,,,,„..„aii:,1„0 0 28 i .,5 2 ,,, .0 .,
,. ..,
.se
.... .,
7 I.
. -76' •" st
0 42134015
02 8 002 .1'5'
n .7..,
11. 02 2850C' o 0 6 21" 5 14 0 0 428 01
..‘ .
‘ 6
10 28 007
1- ,.--
8
02427 1 t e0_,...,„
02427 0 10 8 132. .°' C"
02427
61
024282 1
0 sr, 024 820
02 S
"..... .00 2 8.30
0 Se.
,,,,,A oo 1024 8 '°
10 429020
n .60
,,•.• 1.
5
un ........ , 10
p 1124 83001 '8% 2
1.,
is 0242 41
.0%
11 4 7011
02427 01
02 701
.sas5
102428
0 42 012
10 428900
O 1 428900
tf. .,1024289 10
NN 02 288004
s '
.2<1289003 0 2 289011 ol .‘
• e
39
5 7. 21 0
'40 428800
,b1 .0
0 4288001
•,47°
42800
024
• Subject
Sale 4
0 85009
1024433010
■ .020
102428 15
10 428.2O3 11 9 1
•0
30
lt
41 53012 5
• 02 2900 4
7
-0
280
1119101024
433
1024433012
P1 2.
.24.433-073
1024433013
PI 2
PT 10.24.453.013
1 44330
12 7.1
1119152005
Pt :
9.
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE
The subject site is located northeast of the downtown area. The Immediate neighborhood is
characterized by a variety of vacant lots, residential, commercial, and Tight industrial uses. The
area has more vacaht and than the nearby downtown area, and the land values do not appear
to be as high as in the downtown area, primarily because downtown sales often involve older,
improved buildings which are demolished to create a vacant site. The cost of the improved
property Myi the cost of the demolition tends to make the vacant land very costly, relative to
other vacant commercial sites In other neighborhoods. It is not unusual to have a per square
foot land cost that is higher In the downtown area than in the most popular intensive commercial
development areas in a community. The range of sale pries per SF in the other commercial
development areas is generally from $10.00 /SF to $15.00/SF. There are sales in the
$16.00/SF to $20.00/SF range (including the recent Walgreens sale at 20 and Elm Streets),
but in my opinion these are atypical of the market, in general.
The subject neighborhood does have some current influence from the demand for land by the
developers of the "pack site ". I have researched land sales in the subject neighborhood, and
the trends appear to be consistent, with the older sales (2004 -2006) having a per SF price in
the $6.00 to $7.00 range, and the most recent sate discovered involving the developers of the
pack site having a per SF price of $10.68/SF. It is not unusual for the general market
conditions to Improve over time, but economic conditions do not always improve, and
corresponding land values do not necessarily rise, particularly if there is limited new building
activity. The economic difficulties of the past two years are well known, and there is limited new
development in the commercial sector at this time. Therefore, I have not adjusted the
comparable sales from 2007 for time, as the value of commercial development land does not
appear to have appreciated demonstrably since that lime. The sales analyzed below are good
comparables which illustrate a reasonable value range for the subject site. The comparable
sales most heavily rued upon are summarized below, with detailed writeups in the Addenda.
Sale 1 is a 2,560 SF oayed parking lot located on the east side of the 1400 block of Central
Avenue. This property was purchased in March of 2005 for $45,000 ($17.58/SF). The site is
utilized as a rental parking lot. The site has 9 spaces which have rented for $25.00/month. The
property was sold to the owner of a commercial building located across Central Avenue. In my
opinion, this sale would require downward acijustments for the paving, and for the slightly
superior location. The net adjustment to the sale price/SF Is downward, relative to the subject
property.
Sale 2 is a 2,500 SF site located in the northwest comer of 15 Street and Maple Street, just
south of the subject. This vacant parcel was sold by O S S Real Estate to the owner of the
adjacent parcel in May of 2004 for $15,000 ($6.00/SF). This site is a good direct comparable
with respect to size and location, but would require an adjustment for time (market conditions
have strengthened since 2004). Therefore, it is my opinion that an upward adjustment for time
(market conditions) is appropriate. In my opinion, the net adjustment to the sale price/SF of this
sale is significantly upward.
- continued-
9 -A.
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE (CONTINUED)
Sale 3 is the subject sale which was sold by William Blum to the current owners (SB
Development) in August of 2006 for $24,000 ($6.85 /SF). The site does not front Cedar Street
or Maple Street. In my opinion, the subject would be more desirable if it fronted a street,
although it would likely be used for assemblage with neighboring property for a more intensive
development. Nevertheless, this factor would indicate an upward adjustment, as well as a
minimal upward adjustment for time. The overall (net) adjustment is upward, in my opinion.
Sale 4 is the city block bordered by 15 and 16 Streets and by Cedar and Sycamore Streets.
This property was purchased by SB Development (the pack site developers and subject
owners) from Alvin Blum. The property was primarily vacant land, and there were small, older
buildings which the seller indicated had minimal contributory value. The property consists of 10
Tots (all 51.5' x 100') which are separated by the public alley. This 51,500 SF property was
purchased in August of 2007 for $550,000 ($10.68/SF). In my opinion, this sale Is the most
meaningful sale for a current indication of land value trends in the immediate area. This sale
would require minimal overall adjustment, although a minimal downward adjustment for direct
street frontage would be appropriate. The overall adjustments for the sales discussed above,
relative to the subject property are summarized below.
Sale Size (SF) Sale Price Sale Price/SF Net Adiustment
Sale 1 2,560 $45,000 $17.58 Downward
Sale 2 2,500 $15,000 $6.00 Large Upward
Subject 3,502 $24,000 $6.85 Large Upward
Sale 4 51,500 $550,000 $10.68 Minimal Downward
I have also considered a pending sale of a portion of the "pack site ", which the owners have
indicated would involve approximately 2 acres. The ownership has provided a copy of the
purchase agreement, which has not been fully completed. The anticipated sale price is
$10.00/SF. This would be a very positive event for the future development of the Immediate
area and could spur additional development In the near future. This is n21 a closed sale, but It
does lend some support for the value estimated for the subject land.
CONCLUSIONS: The sales primarily required adjustments for location and time. Additionally,
two of the sales are of slightly smaller sites, with the exception of Sale 4. Smaller sites typically
sell for more per SF than larger sites, and this is a factor when comparing the subject site to
other commercial sales in Dubuque. As previously mentioned, the current neighborhood trend
has been affected by the pack site development, and the demand for neighborhood parcels for
that development. The sale prices in the subject neighborhood are comparable to other parcels
in arguably more desirable commercial locations in the community. The pack site development
has been slow to materialize, but there Is a pending sale, and this may spur other development
in the Immediate area. Based upon my analysis of the sales, adjusted for differences, it is my
opinion that the market value of the 3,502 SF subject site is at, or near $35,000 ($10.00/SF).
VALUE BY THE SALES COMPARISON APPROACH $35,000
10.
INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH TO VALUE
The subject property is a vacant site, and the Income Approach to Value is not particularly
applicable. Therefore, I have relied primarily upon the Sales Comparison Approach in
estimating the value of the subject property.
INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE N/A
1 1.
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE
COST APPROACH TO VALUE N/A
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE $35,000
INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH TO VALUE N/A
The subject property consists of a 3,502 SF (51.5' x 68') vacant site which is located on the
east side of the alley between Cedar and Maple Streets, between 15 and 16 Streets. The
property is owned by SB Development, LLC and is currently unimproved. The proposed
acquisition by the City of Dubuque is a total acquisition in Fee Title.
The appraisal date is May 14, 2010, which is the date of inspection of the subject property.
The date of the report Is May 17, 2010. This report is a Detailed Narrative Appraisal as
defined within the Aporaisal Policy & Procedures Manual, August 2003 edition, provided by the
Iowa Department of Transportation, Office of Right of Way.
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the Market Value of the subject property, as of the
appraisal date, relative to the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project, which requires the
acquisition of the subject property in Fee Title. The Intended use of the appraisal is to
estimate just compensation for eminent domain purposes as of the appraisal date for
acquisition by the City of Dubuque. The intended users of the appraisal are the City of
Dubuque, and other parties with an interest in the acquisition process regarding the subject
property.
This appraisal was prepared according to the contract/assignment from the City of Dubuque.
The intended use of the appraisal is for eminent domain related acquisition. The appraisal is
prepared under the Jurisdictional Exception provision contained in the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). In preparing the appraisal, the appraiser has
conformed with aH parts of USPAP except those that are contrary to State and Federal
requirements. The appraisal was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91 -646, as amended
and Chapters 6B and 316, Code of Iowa, and in concurrence with the FAA Advisory Circular
150/5100 -17, Chapter 2. The report was not prepared under USPAP reporting requirements
but does conform to the requirements of State and Federal taw as implemented in the Iowa
Department of Transportation Appraisal Manual reporting requirements.
- continued-
CONCLUSIONS:
CONCLUSIONS:
11 -A.
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE (CONTINUED)
Exposure and Marketing time: The improved properties researched indicated a wide variety of
exposure times. Longer marketing times are generally caused by changes in Highest and Best
Use, declining desirability of locations and other factors. Considering the subject's location and
the current market conditions, I would estimate Exposure Time (i.e. the length of time the
subject property would have been exposed for sale In the market had it sold at the market value
estimated in this analysis as of the date of the valuation) to be six to 18 months. I have
estimated a similar marketing time for the subject property (the length of time it would probably
take to sell the property If exposed In the market beginning on the date of this valuation).
In addition to the contingencies and limitations stated elsewhere within this report, no survey
was available of the property to show boundaries, improvements, lot size, easements or any
encroachments, although the accompanying exhibits and descriptions herein fairly depict the
property under appraisement. No Phase I environmental audit has been provided regarding the
subject property. No hazardous conditions were obvious upon the inspection. The property is
appraised as if clean of all contamination, above and below ground.
Based upon the relative strengths and shortcomings of the various approaches to value
developed in this appraisal I have relied upon the Sales Comparison Approach M arriving at an
opinion value for the subject property. As a result of my investigation, based upon my analysis
of the included data, it is my opinion that as of May 14, 2010 the Market Value of the Fee -
Simple Interest of the subject property is at, or near $35,000.
THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND NO /100 DOLLARS
HATTERY REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS, LLC
` 1
BY: Dd J attery, Appraiser
12.
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. The photographs contained in the individual appraisal reports were taken by the appraiser
on the date the property was Inspected. Any photo taken on a different date or by another
person will be appropriately labeled.
2. The title to the property is good and merchantable, free and clear of all liens and, there are
no encumbrances other than those mentioned in the appraisal report.
3. The plans, plats, legal descriptions and other data furnished by others are assumed to be
correct and reliable but the appraiser assumes no responsibility for their accuracy.
4. The individual appraisals are made in accord with the Code of Iowa and do not reflect any
benefit from the proposed improvement or non - compensable items of damage.
5. Any temporary easement area acquired will be retained by the acquiring authority until
completion of project construction and will be returned in the condition indicated by the highway
plans.
6. The existing drainage will not be adversely affected by highway construction unless
otherwise specified In the data furnished and the tile lines on the remaining property will
function properly after highway construction is completed.
7. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership and typical management.
8. The property owner will be paid separately for the cost of fencing the new right of way tine, If
such fencing is needed, in those cases where the acquiring authority does not erect a right of
way fence. The property owner has a right to pasture livestock adjacent to any state erected
fence but must assume all responsibility for restraint of such livestock. Any effect on fencing
other than right of way fence or temporary fence will be considered in the Individual appraisal
reports.
9. The property owner or lessee will be paid separately for loss, if any, of growing crops or
completed field work.
10. The acquiring authority may use any or all of the contents of the appraisal reports only for
its normal business functions.
EDUCATION:
APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS - DOUGLAS J. HATTERY
Graduate of Galesburg Senior High School, Galesburg, Illinois, 1981
Graduate of University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 1985
Bachelor of Science in Business with majors in Marketing and Small Business
Management
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE COURSES:
Course 1A -1, Real Estate Appraisal Principles, June 1992, Tom Bennett, MAI, sponsored by
the University of Colorado and the Appraisal Institute, Boulder, Colorado
Course SPP Paris A & B, Standards of Professional Practice, March 1993, Guy Romito, MAI
and Jim Schroeder, MAI, sponsored by Chicago Chapter -of the Appraisal Institute, Chicago,
Illinois
Course 120, Real Estate Appraisal Procedures, February 1994, Joseph Magdziarz, SRPA,
SRA, sponsored by Chicago Chapter of the Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois
Course 210, Residential Case Study, March 2001, Maggie Hambleton, SRA, sponsored by
Chicago Chapter of the Appraisal institute, Chicago, Illinois
Course 310, Income Capitalization, October 1999, Joseph Magdziarz, SRPA, SRA, sponsored
by Chicago Chapter of the Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois
Course ILVII, Nonresidential Report Writing, April 2001, Susan Rex, sponsored by Chicago
Chapter of the Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois
EXPERIENCE:
Present Hattery Real Estate Appraisals, LLC, Davenport, Iowa
August 1995 — September 2006 Stahl - Hattery Valuation Services, LLC, Davenport, Iowa
January 1992 - August 1995 American Real Estate Ltd. Davenport, Iowa
CERTIFICATION:
Certified General Real Property Appraiser by the State of Iowa, Certificate #CG01824
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser by the State of Illinois, License #553.001382
ADDENDA
1 c1 1024285012 BILLMEYER, CYNTHIA A ETAL
c2 1024285015 BILLMEYER, CYNTHIA A ETAL
5282.2 1456 O'HAGEN
2641.9 2095 KERPER BLVD
DUBUQUE IA
DUBUQUE IA
52001 C
52001 I
9600 LOT 1 -354 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
8300 W 1/2 LOT 352 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
0
11172000
00
13609
2 c3 1024286001 BLUM PROPERTIES INC
5234.1 1552 MAPLE STREET
DUBUQUE IA
52001 R
7000 E 1/2 LOT 352 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
3022004
04
3261
c4 1024286002 BLUM PROPERTIES INC
5264.1 P 0 BOX 901
DUBUQUE IA
52004 C
23800 LOT 378 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
12151990
91
1364
c5 1024286003 BLUM PROPERTIES INC
5310.2 P 0 BOX 901
DUBUQUE IA
52004 C
13700 LOT 379 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
12151990
91
1364
c6 1119151001 BLUM PROPERTIES INC
5270.1 P 0 BOX 901
DUBUQUE IA
52004 C
13700 LOT 380 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
12151990
91
1364
c7 1119151002 BLUM PROPERTIES INC
5269.0 P 0 BOX 901
DUBUQUE IA
52004 C
13800 LOT 381 EAST DUBUOUE ADD
12151990
91
1364
c6 1119151003 BLUM PROPERTIES INC
26954.4 P 0 BOX 901
DUBUQUE IA
52004 C
13800 LOT 382 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
12151990
91
1364
3 c9 1024285010 BLUM. WILLIAM & DOROTHY
3591.5 137 MAIN STREET
DUBUQUE IA
52001 I
9900 W 1/2 LOT 355 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
3112005
05
3676
4 c10 1024284011 G & S REAL ESTATE
2628.7 P 0 BOX 901
DUBUQUE IA
52004 C
134500 DUBUQUE ADD
12151990
91
1364
5 c11 1024285006 JUNNIE AND RICK'S COIN
5290.7 137 MAIN STREET
DUBUQUE IA
52001 I
9700 N 1/2 LOT 316 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
3112005
05
3676
c12 1024285013 JUNNIE AND RICH'S COIN
2643.3 137 MAIN STREET
DUBUQUE IA
520011
4500 LOT 2 OF 354 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
3112005
05
3676
6 c13 1024284008 SCHWARTZ. MILTON E
5257.3 1552 MAPLE STREET
DUBUQUE IA
52001 R
10100 LOT 353 EAST DUBUQUE ADD
3022004
04
3261
PIN
OWNER NAME
ALL INFORMATION AS OF MAY, 2005
Area
OWNER ADDRESS
ATTACHMENT A
OWNER ADDRESS3 ZIPS CLASS TOTALVALUE FULLLEGAL
DEEDDATE DEEDBOOK DEEDPAGE
r±► ..,,
WILLIAM O. BLUM
.. ..,.
l w.r
EXPIRES
0 0
CtnUIOWASTATIWI i j William 0. Blum, # AT 0000U6
won knit tM,1111• IY 7001
1 /Oa TN* L$OAL VFW erne W or
Tip FORM. C01111ULTYOUR LAWYER
Return Document to: SB +, , •: nt 4962 A Cxci . • , . • ue A 5
Prepare(nfonnation: 'T <. m, 1411 Miller : ., Dubuque, M 3, (S 3) U -0775
Address Tax Statement: SB Development LLC, 4962 Asbury Circle. Dubuque. IA 52002
JJ Y�Te
.
For the consideration of Twenty Four Thouand and 00/100
William Blum and Dorothy Blum, husband and wife
do hereby Convey to
SB Development, LLC
the following described rear estate in
Coauaission #1904135
WARRANTY DEED
Dubuque County. Iowa:
Lot 1 of the Subdivision of Lot 354 in East Dubuque, an Addition to the City of Dubuque, Iowa.
Doc ID: 006400670001 Type: OEN
Recorded: 01/07 /2006 at 03:61:17 Pt1
Fee Ant: *.6o page 1 of 1
Revenue Tax: 637.00
Dubuque County Ioqwwa
Kathy Flynn Thurlew Recorder
File 2006-00012072
Grantors do Hereby Covenant with grantees, and successors In interest. that grantors hold the real estate by title in fee simple; that mey
have good and lwv/ul authority to sell and COnVIIty tit s real estate; that the real estate is Free and Clear of all Liens and Encumbrances
except as may be above stated: and grantors Covenant to Warrant and Defend me real estate against the lawful dolma old persons except
as may be above stated. Each of the undersigned hereby relinquishes as rights of dower, homestead and distributive share in and to the real
*stale.
Words and phrases herein, Including ad novAedgmert hereof. shall be construed as in the singular or plural number. and as masculine
or feminine gender. according to tin context.
(Grerto
(G rantor )
Dollar(*) and other valuable consideration.
Dorothy Blum
STATE OF IQwa COUNTY OF Dybuque
This
This i nt vets acknowledged before me on 4J ._ 200+ . by William Blum and Dorot allum. hmbsrd
ife
tom► /� 1� "°� eac
$50
3700
Kane Norby
Firet7006O 112077
SALE #: 1
ADDRESS: 1400 Central Avenue TERMS: Cash to Seller
ZONING: C -4, Commercial GRANTOR: K & L Properties
LAND SIZE (SF): 2,560 SF GRANTEE: Zapf Family Trust
SALE DATE: 3 -30 -2005 CONFIRMED BY: Grantor (Kehrli)
SALE PRICE: $45,000 RECORDING: 4622 -05
SALE PRICE /SF: $17.58
REMARKS: This parcel was sold to the owner of a commercial building located across the
street. The site is paved and is utilized as a rental parking lot, with 9 spaces. The rent is
somewhat below market, according to the seller, at $25 per month.
SALE #: 2
ADDRESS: NWC 15 & Maple
ZONING: H -I, Heavy Industrial
LAND SIZE (SF): 2,500 SF
SALE DATE: 5 -14 -2004
SALE PRICE: $15,000
SALE PRICE /SF: $6.00
REMARKS: This unimproved parcel
neighboring property.
TERMS: Cash to Seller
GRANTOR: G & S Real Estate
GRANTEE: Tony Zenner
CONFIRMED BY: Grantor (Schwartz)
RECORDING: 8376 -04
is a 1 /2 lot (25' x 100') which was sold to the owner of the
,
SALE #: 3
ADDRESS: SWQ 16 & Cedar
ZONING: H -I, Heavy Industrial
LAND SIZE (SF): 3,502 SF
SALE DATE: 8 -4 -2006
SALE PRICE: $24,000
SALE PRICE /SF: $6.85
TERMS: Cash to Seller
GRANTOR: William Blum
GRANTEE: SB Development
CONFIRMED BY: Blum
RECORDING: 12072 -06
REMARKS: This unimproved parcel does not front Cedar Street, but fronts the alley between
Cedar and Maple Street. The lot is 51.5' x 68' and was formerly improved with a single - family
home. The property was purchased by the developer of the "pack site ".
SALE #: 4
ADDRESS: Cedar St Block (15 to16 )
ZONING: H -I, Heavy Industrial
LAND SIZE (SF): 51,500 SF
SALE DATE: 8 -21 -2007
SALE PRICE: $550,000
SALE PRICE /SF: $10.68
TERMS: Cash to Seller
GRANTOR: Blum Properties
GRANTEE: SB Development
CONFIRMED BY: Alvin Blum
RECORDING: 12834 -07
REMARKS: This property is the city block bounded by 15 and 16 Streets, and by Cedar and
Sycamore Streets. The property consists of 10 lots, each 51.5' x 100', separated by the city
alley. The parcel is mostly unimproved land, with small buildings, which had no significant
contributory value according to the seller. The property was purchased by the developer of the
"pack site ".