The URL can be used to link to this page

Dream Center - Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood (First Reading) Copyrig hted April 5, 2021 City of Dubuque Action Items # 2. City Council Meeting ITEM TITLE: Dream Center- Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries SUM MARY: City Clerk transmitting correspondence from the Dream Center regarding a request to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District, and City Manager recommending approval. SUGGESTED Receive and File; Council Direction Suggested Disposition: DISPOSITION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Dream Center Request to Alter the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries by City Manager Memo Removing the Properties at 1620-1628 W hite Street- MVM Memo_UPDATED 4/5/2021 Dream Center Request to Alter the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries by City Manager Memo Removing the Properties at 1620-1628 W hite Street- MVM Memo Staff Memo Staff Memo Dream Center Letter to City Clerk Supporting Documentation Ordinance Ordinance Dream Center Operational Support City of Dubuque Supporting Documentation Request 1620-1628 W hite St. HPC Demolition Application Supporting Documentation Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Supporting Documentation Map Conservation & National Register Historic District Map Supporting Documentation City of Dubuque's Commitment to Historic Preservation Supporting Documentation Ordinance 7-75 1975 February Council Proceedings Supporting Documentation Ordinance 15-11 & February 22, 2011 Washington Neighborhood Conservation District E�ansion Council Supporting Documentation Packet Heritage Works Letter to City Council Supporting Documentation Suggested Motion Wording Supporting Documentation Citizen Input_UPDATED 4/5/2021 Supporting Documentation Dubuque THE CITY OF � ui-Aseria cih DuB E , . � . , � II � Maste iece on tj2e Mississi i zoo�•zoiz•zois YP pp zoi�*zoi9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager SUBJECT: Dream Center - Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries DATE: April 5, 2021 The purpose of this memo is to respectfully recommend that the Mayor and City Council approve the request by the Dream Center to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District. The Dream Center has been partnering with the City of Dubuque, Dubuque Racing Association, Dubuque County, Dubuque Child Care Resource and Referral and Conlon Construction to assist in establishing the Dream Center as a Licensed Child Care Center. The Dream Center has been providing childcare services to the community but has not been receiving childcare funding assistance because it is not licensed. If the Dream Center updates its facilities to meet license childcare requirements, it would provide a revenue stream to the Dream Center estimated to be $800,000 a year. Over the last year, city staff inet with members of the Dream Center and their project team members to talk about the location of an outdoor play area and renovation of their building both state requirements for becoming a licensed childcare center. lowa Administrative Code Chapter 109 requires a licensed childcare center to have; "adequate indoor and outdoor program space that is adjacent to the center is provided. Centers shall have a safe outdoor program area with at least sufficient square footage to accommodate 30 percent of the enrollment capacity at any one time at 75 square feet per child. The outdoor area shall include safe play equipment and an area of shade." The City has provided financial assistance for the Dream Center building renovations. The City has also discussed plans for converting 16th Street to outdoor play area space. Dream Center staff noted their goal is to have their daycare licensed as a childcare center by September 2021. They also noted that they have grant funds that need to be expended by July 2021 to make facility improvement to meet this goal. City Staff discussed the many steps needed to have 16th Street converted to an outdoor play area and with neighborhood meetings, reviews, approvals, and with construction dependent on weather, it would most likely not be feasible to meet the July 2021 grant funding deadline and will not meet the Dream Center's plan to be licensed by September 2021. Timing is important because every week of delay costs the Dream Center $15,000 in lost revenue. The Dream Center staff proposed moving forward with acquiring the property to the north of them, demolishing the buildings, and creating greenspace that would accommodate the required outdoor play area. In addition to the outdoor play area, the adjacent property would provide space for an external elevator addition to make the Dream Center ADA accessible. They discussed that this would be a temporary solution because of future plans for construction of a gymnasium addition to the north. The Dream Center staff noted they do not have funding for the gymnasium addition and did not have a set timeframe on when they would acquire the funds for the addition. In addition, future expansion of the Dream Center may necessitate closing of 16th Street for an outdoor play area. Planning Staff informed the Dream Center and project team members that 1620 & 1628 White Street are located in the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District and the process for requesting approval of these building to be removed. Amongst the many reasons for the conservation district was a concern that with all the public funds being spent in this area, especially to eliminate flooding and to build the Bee Branch Creek Linear Park that low-income residents would be displaced with high income earners when developers bought affordable housing and tore it down to build high end housing. The boundaries of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District were based off the boundaries of the Washington Neighborhood Association Boundary excluding the following properties: Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank & Trust— 1300 Block of White Street As part of the proposed expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District, the City Council received a request from Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank & Trust to exclude the block bounded by 13tn White, 14th and Jackson Streets from any extension of the Washington Street Conservation District. They indicated they owned several buildings on the block and had future development plans. They noted if the block is included in the district, it may deter further economic development by their companies in downtown Dubuque. The City Council approved the request to exclude these properties. Blum Elm Scrap Yard — 15th & Elm As part of the proposed expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District, it was discussed that the Blum Scrap Yard area would be appropriate to exclude. It was noted that should this property ever be considered for a change of use, the City would want the fewest obstacles to the achievement of that goal. The City Council approved the request to exclude these properties. 2 The Dream Center with assistance from their project partners approached the property owner of 1620 and 1628 White Street about seeking approval for a demolition permit. The property owner, Nottingham Properties, applied to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to seek approval for a demolition permit. Because the HPC denied the demolition permit application at their March 21, 2021 meeting, the next step for the Dream Center to pursue is a request to City Council for alteration of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries to include removal of 1620 & 1628 White Street from the district. There are no set criteria for the City Council to follow when making a determination on alteration of a conservation district. This allows the City Council to weigh multiple factors when determining whether to approve the alteration to the district boundaries. During the August 2019 & August 2020 City Council Annual Goal Setting Sessions, the City Council identified supporting the Dream Center a priority. In the 2020 session, City Council identified the Dream Center Facilities and Programs: Self-Sufficiency Additional Funding as a 2020-2022 Top Priority. At a March 1, 2021 City Council Work Session, the Dream Center presented on the organization's programming and outcomes. The Dream Center has discussed that by being licensed as a childcare center many of their families would then be able to receive Department of Human Services assistance for childcare. This would provide a revenue stream to help work towards the Dream Center becoming more self-sufficient. The City Council identified the Equitable Poverty Prevention Plan Implementation: Outcomes, Report with Options, City Role, Direction and City Actions as a 2020-2022 Top Priority. On March 1, 2021, the City Council adopted the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan. The plan has several references to the Dream Center. Most notably, located in the Chapter 3.3 Education & Skills Training where it states: The Dream Center excels at providing mentoring to youth, socio-recreational programs after school, educating and partnering with parents, and works directly with teachers in Title 1 schools so students have seamless tutoring offered at the Dream Center that can target specific skills to build for each student. A cadre of volunteers from the community serve as tutors and mentors to children attending the center. The center a/so employs several School Connectors who work with teachers from the Title 1 elementary schools to coordinate homework assignments and address learning needs of students being tutored at the Center. The program is in extremely high demand with a waiting list of 170 children from pre-K through high school (2020). A promising practice of the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan states; 3 5. Enhance Funding for& Build Upon Successful Strategies of Local Youth Programs A number of organizations in Dubuque are already succeeding at serving families and meeting the needs of local children and youth: these efforts are invaluable and must continue to be supported and built upon. These groups already doing the work in the field and understanding what children and families need include the Multicultural Family Center(MFC), Dream Center, St. Mark Youth Enrichment, HEART(Housing Education and Rehabilitation Training) and the Every Child Reads Collaborative, among others. The city of Dubuque boasts a number of community organizations that effectively meet the needs of children and youth: rather than starting from scratch, these efforts must be continually reinforced, funded, and broadly supported. The Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan also refers to Childcare. Chapter 3.7 Child Care, Early Learning and Youth explains the need for quality affordable childcare. The plan identifies that there are shortages throughout Dubuque but that low-income tracts (1 & 5) with the highest concentration of poverty and percentage of minority residents have less access to childcare. The dividing line between Tracts 1 & 5 is located one block north from the Dream Center at 17th Street. At this location, the Dream Center has the ability to provide childcare to residents of both tracts. The City Council identified Childcare Initiative: Outcomes, City Role, Partners, Directions and City Actions as a 2020-2022 High Priority. At a December 7, 2020 City Council Work Session, Economic Development Director Jill Connors and network partners from Childcare Resource & Referral, Dubuque County Early Childhood, Greater Dubuque Development Corporation, Northeast lowa Community College, and Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque presented on childcare challenges and collaboration efforts. The presentation reaffirmed the demand for quality affordable childcare in the community. The Dream Center was featured in the presentation as an organization that is launching a licensed childcare center to help meet some of the demand. In 2019, the City of Dubuque created a new 5-year Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing as required by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development to receive Section 8 funds and Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). This analysis was also prioritized to be completed as it was an equity priority for the City. As part of the City of Dubuque Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, the lack of access to childcare as a barrier to opportunity such as employment is listed as a contributing factor. At the January 19, 2021 City Council meeting, Housing & Community Development Director Alexis Steger forwarded the Housing, Human Rights 4 and Community Development Advisory Commissions recommendation for prioritization of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Action Items. Lack of access to childcare is a barrier to opportunity as employment was identified as a priority. Under Social + Cultural Vibrancy Recommendations it states: Work with community providers including non-profits, faith communities, and Dubuque-area universities to expand childcare options and resources, whether through on-site programs, clearinghouses for providers, or other means. The plan also supports historic preservation. The Washington Neighborhood Plan was designed to give residents and other stakeholders the tools needed to enhance the quality of life within the neighborhood and thereby strengthening its sense of pride. The goal of the plan is to inspire local residents, business and property owners to collaborate with the City of Dubuque to continue with neighborhood improvement efforts and revitalize the City's historic core. The core issues identified in the plan are: 1.Economic Development 2.Families Youth & Education 3.Housing The Washington Neighborhood Plan also identifies many other recommendations that relate directly and indirectly to services being provided by the Dream Center and the preservation of buildings. These include: Expand youth activities that meet the interests and needs of children of all ages and keep them engaged and active. Encourage greater parent/adult involvement in the community, particularly with youth activities. Create a welcoming atmosphere to encourage community investment, foster communication and project a new image as a hip neighborhood. Provide a greater balance of housing by promoting homeownership and homeowner maintenance. The Washington Neighborhood Plan notes that the Washington Neighborhood offers a range of activities and facilities geared towards youth and families. The many long- standing churches are on the neighborhood's greatest assets, offering activities and facilities for youth and family programs. In addition, other facilities or agencies like the Boys and Girls Club, Project Concern, Multicultural Family Center, the City's Leisure Services Department and Crescent Community Health Center off their own set of programs for the community. There is a concern that more needs to be offered, particularly in terms of offering programs that are affordable, providing guidance to youth and encouraging youth to get involved in the community. 5 The Washington Neighborhood Plan supports the preservation assets in the neighborhood. Unfortunately, Demolition Approval of Historic Structures in Historic & Conservation Districts are at times necessary. Planning Services Manager Wally Wernimont has identified that there are over 2,000 buildings in these districts and since 1998 there have been 26 demolitions of architecturally and historically significant buildings. Not every building can or should be saved based on competing priorities. The City of Dubuque has a substantial financial commitment to historic preservation. The City's commitment to historic preservation began in the mid 1970's as the community reacted to the wholesale clearance of downtown blocks through urban renewal programs. As a result of the foresight of early leaders, Dubuque has one of the largest collections of historic building stock in lowa. The community's commitment continues today and into the future with our focus on sustainability and resiliency. The City of Dubuque has a historic preservation ordinance and a variety of preservation incentives that protect and enhance our community's historic resources and identity. The City has designated 5 local historic preservation districts, 9 conservation districts, 11 local landmarks, 19 National Register Historic Districts and 3 conservation planning areas supported by an active Historic Preservation Commission. There exists overlap between many of the conservation and historic districts. Illustrated design guidelines are available for historic districts as well as the Downtown, Historic Millwork District, and older neighborhoods. The City has documented the historical and architectural significance of nearly 5,700 properties in Dubuque. Dubuque's historic preservation regulations, historic surveys, and architectural guidelines are a resource to guide property owners, contractors, and design professionals with preserving and enhancing the historic characteristics of a building, in turn fostering neighborhood stability and community vitality. The City's Financial Toolbox is extensive, with federal, state, and local incentives available for qualifying projects providing new jobs and investment in Dubuque. New and existing businesses are eligible for these economic development programs, which provide assistance to areas that include all or part of the City's 5 historic districts and 9 conservation districts. The City also has created several financial incentives geared specifically to locally designated historic properties. 6 Previous Five Years In the past five years, the Economic Development has provided $12,212,640 in incentives to properties located in historic and conservation districts, that have leveraged $109,548,106.34 in funds. These properties received funding for interior & exterior rehabilitation, farade renovation, and housing creation. In the last five years, the Housing & Community Development Department has spent $2,317,349 on rehabilitation of structures in the conservation district areas. All properties rehabilitated went through the federally mandated Section 106 review to ensure compliance to historic standards. In addition to rehabilitation of properties, the Housing Department has spent $6.5 million in Bee Branch Healthy Homes funds to keep structures viable and maintained after experiencing significant flooding in the conservation districts. All 325 units have been through a Section 106 review. Additionally, in the past five years, the Housing Department has spent $3.4 million in Lead & Healthy Homes Program, assisting structures built prior to 1976 to remediate lead hazards, which also helps maintain the structures and rehabilitate to historic standards. Next Five Years In the 5-Year CIP Budget, the Economic Development Department is expected to provide $2.7 million of incentives in these districts. In the next five years, the Housing & Community Development Department expects to spend $1.5 million in Bee Branch Healthy Homes Funds, $2.4 million in Lead & Healthy Homes Funds, and $2.1 million in rehabilitation of homes. If the City Council approves alteration of the district to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street, because the decision will be based on supporting the Dream Center and providing childcare, the ordinance should go into effect upon transfer of 1620 & 1628 White Street to Dream Center. I respectfully recommend Mayor and City Council approval of the request from the Dream Center to remove these two buildings from the conservation district. � Mic ael C. Van Milligen MCVM:sv Attachment cc: Crenna Brumwell, City Attorney Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager Wally Wernimont, Planning Services Manager 7 Dubuque THE CITY OF � ui-Aseria cih DuB E , . � . , � II � Maste iece on tj2e Mississi i zoo�•zoiz•zois YP pp zoi�*zoi9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager SUBJECT: Dream Center - Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries DATE: April 1, 2021 The purpose of this memo is to respectfully recommend that the Mayor and City Council approve the request by the Dream Center to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District. The Dream Center has been partnering with the City of Dubuque, Dubuque Racing Association, Dubuque County, Dubuque Child Care Resource and Referral and Conlon Construction to assist in establishing the Dream Center as a Licensed Child Care Center. The Dream Center has been providing childcare services to the community but has not been receiving childcare funding assistance because it is not licensed. If the Dream Center updates its facilities to meet license childcare requirements, it would provide a revenue stream to the Dream Center estimated to be $800,000 a year. Over the last year, city staff inet with members of the Dream Center and their project team members to talk about the location of an outdoor play area and renovation of their building both state requirements for becoming a licensed childcare center. lowa Administrative Code Chapter 109 requires a licensed childcare center to have; "adequate indoor and outdoor program space that is adjacent to the center is provided. Centers shall have a safe outdoor program area with at least sufficient square footage to accommodate 30 percent of the enrollment capacity at any one time at 75 square feet per child. The outdoor area shall include safe play equipment and an area of shade." The City has provided financial assistance for the Dream Center building renovations. The City has also discussed plans for converting 16th Street to outdoor play area space. Dream Center staff noted their goal is to have their daycare licensed as a childcare center by September 2021. They also noted that they have grant funds that need to be expended by July 2021 to make facility improvement to meet this goal. City Staff discussed the many steps needed to have 16th Street converted to an outdoor play area and with neighborhood meetings, reviews, approvals, and with construction dependent on weather, it would most likely not be feasible to meet the July 2021 grant funding deadline and will not meet the Dream Center's plan to be licensed by September 2021. Timing is important because every month of delay costs the Dream Center $15,000 in lost revenue. The Dream Center staff proposed moving forward with acquiring the property to the north of them, demolishing the buildings, and creating greenspace that would accommodate the required outdoor play area. In addition to the outdoor play area, the adjacent property would provide space for an external elevator addition to make the Dream Center ADA accessible. They discussed that this would be a temporary solution because of future plans for construction of a gymnasium addition to the north. The Dream Center staff noted they do not have funding for the gymnasium addition and did not have a set timeframe on when they would acquire the funds for the addition. In addition, future expansion of the Dream Center may necessitate closing of 16th Street for an outdoor play area. Planning Staff informed the Dream Center and project team members that 1620 & 1628 White Street are located in the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District and the process for requesting approval of these building to be removed. Amongst the many reasons for the conservation district was a concern that with all the public funds being spent in this area, especially to eliminate flooding and to build the Bee Branch Creek Linear Park that low-income residents would be displaced with high income earners when developers bought affordable housing and tore it down to build high end housing. The boundaries of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District were based off the boundaries of the Washington Neighborhood Association Boundary excluding the following properties: Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank & Trust— 1300 Block of White Street As part of the proposed expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District, the City Council received a request from Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank & Trust to exclude the block bounded by 13tn White, 14th and Jackson Streets from any extension of the Washington Street Conservation District. They indicated they owned several buildings on the block and had future development plans. They noted if the block is included in the district, it may deter further economic development by their companies in downtown Dubuque. The City Council approved the request to exclude these properties. Blum Elm Scrap Yard — 15th & Elm As part of the proposed expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District, it was discussed that the Blum Scrap Yard area would be appropriate to exclude. It was noted that should this property ever be considered for a change of use, the City would want the fewest obstacles to the achievement of that goal. The City Council approved the request to exclude these properties. 2 The Dream Center with assistance from their project partners approached the property owner of 1620 and 1628 White Street about seeking approval for a demolition permit. The property owner, Nottingham Properties, applied to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to seek approval for a demolition permit. Because the HPC denied the demolition permit application at their March 21, 2021 meeting, the next step for the Dream Center to pursue is a request to City Council for alteration of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries to include removal of 1620 & 1628 White Street from the district. There are no set criteria for the City Council to follow when making a determination on alteration of a conservation district. This allows the City Council to weigh multiple factors when determining whether to approve the alteration to the district boundaries. During the August 2019 & August 2020 City Council Annual Goal Setting Sessions, the City Council identified supporting the Dream Center a priority. In the 2020 session, City Council identified the Dream Center Facilities and Programs: Self-Sufficiency Additional Funding as a 2020-2022 Top Priority. At a March 1, 2021 City Council Work Session, the Dream Center presented on the organization's programming and outcomes. The Dream Center has discussed that by being licensed as a childcare center many of their families would then be able to receive Department of Human Services assistance for childcare. This would provide a revenue stream to help work towards the Dream Center becoming more self-sufficient. The City Council identified the Equitable Poverty Prevention Plan Implementation: Outcomes, Report with Options, City Role, Direction and City Actions as a 2020-2022 Top Priority. On March 1, 2021, the City Council adopted the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan. The plan has several references to the Dream Center. Most notably, located in the Chapter 3.3 Education & Skills Training where it states: The Dream Center excels at providing mentoring to youth, socio-recreational programs after school, educating and partnering with parents, and works directly with teachers in Title 1 schools so students have seamless tutoring offered at the Dream Center that can target specific skills to build for each student. A cadre of volunteers from the community serve as tutors and mentors to children attending the center. The center a/so employs several School Connectors who work with teachers from the Title 1 elementary schools to coordinate homework assignments and address learning needs of students being tutored at the Center. The program is in extremely high demand with a waiting list of 170 children from pre-K through high school (2020). A promising practice of the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan states; 3 5. Enhance Funding for& Build Upon Successful Strategies of Local Youth Programs A number of organizations in Dubuque are already succeeding at serving families and meeting the needs of local children and youth: these efforts are invaluable and must continue to be supported and built upon. These groups already doing the work in the field and understanding what children and families need include the Multicultural Family Center(MFC), Dream Center, St. Mark Youth Enrichment, HEART(Housing Education and Rehabilitation Training) and the Every Child Reads Collaborative, among others. The city of Dubuque boasts a number of community organizations that effectively meet the needs of children and youth: rather than starting from scratch, these efforts must be continually reinforced, funded, and broadly supported. The Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan also refers to Childcare. Chapter 3.7 Child Care, Early Learning and Youth explains the need for quality affordable childcare. The plan identifies that there are shortages throughout Dubuque but that low-income tracts (1 & 5) with the highest concentration of poverty and percentage of minority residents have less access to childcare. The dividing line between Tracts 1 & 5 is located one block north from the Dream Center at 17th Street. At this location, the Dream Center has the ability to provide childcare to residents of both tracts. The City Council identified Childcare Initiative: Outcomes, City Role, Partners, Directions and City Actions as a 2020-2022 High Priority. At a December 7, 2020 City Council Work Session, Economic Development Director Jill Connors and network partners from Childcare Resource & Referral, Dubuque County Early Childhood, Greater Dubuque Development Corporation, Northeast lowa Community College, and Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque presented on childcare challenges and collaboration efforts. The presentation reaffirmed the demand for quality affordable childcare in the community. The Dream Center was featured in the presentation as an organization that is launching a licensed childcare center to help meet some of the demand. In 2019, the City of Dubuque created a new 5-year Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing as required by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development to receive Section 8 funds and Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). This analysis was also prioritized to be completed as it was an equity priority for the City. As part of the City of Dubuque Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, the lack of access to childcare as a barrier to opportunity such as employment is listed as a contributing factor. At the January 19, 2021 City Council meeting, Housing & Community Development Director Alexis Steger forwarded the Housing, Human Rights 4 and Community Development Advisory Commissions recommendation for prioritization of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Action Items. Lack of access to childcare is a barrier to opportunity as employment was identified as a priority. Under Social + Cultural Vibrancy Recommendations it states: Work with community providers including non-profits, faith communities, and Dubuque-area universities to expand childcare options and resources, whether through on-site programs, clearinghouses for providers, or other means. The plan also supports historic preservation. The Washington Neighborhood Plan was designed to give residents and other stakeholders the tools needed to enhance the quality of life within the neighborhood and thereby strengthening its sense of pride. The goal of the plan is to inspire local residents, business and property owners to collaborate with the City of Dubuque to continue with neighborhood improvement efforts and revitalize the City's historic core. The core issues identified in the plan are: 1.Economic Development 2.Families Youth & Education 3.Housing The Washington Neighborhood Plan also identifies many other recommendations that relate directly and indirectly to services being provided by the Dream Center and the preservation of buildings. These include: Expand youth activities that meet the interests and needs of children of all ages and keep them engaged and active. Encourage greater parent/adult involvement in the community, particularly with youth activities. Create a welcoming atmosphere to encourage community investment, foster communication and project a new image as a hip neighborhood. Provide a greater balance of housing by promoting homeownership and homeowner maintenance. The Washington Neighborhood Plan notes that the Washington Neighborhood offers a range of activities and facilities geared towards youth and families. The many long- standing churches are on the neighborhood's greatest assets, offering activities and facilities for youth and family programs. In addition, other facilities or agencies like the Boys and Girls Club, Project Concern, Multicultural Family Center, the City's Leisure Services Department and Crescent Community Health Center off their own set of programs for the community. There is a concern that more needs to be offered, particularly in terms of offering programs that are affordable, providing guidance to youth and encouraging youth to get involved in the community. 5 The Washington Neighborhood Plan supports the preservation assets in the neighborhood. Unfortunately, Demolition Approval of Historic Structures in Historic & Conservation Districts are at times necessary. Planning Services Manager Wally Wernimont has identified that there are over 2,000 buildings in these districts and since 1998 there have been 26 demolitions of architecturally and historically significant buildings. Not every building can or should be saved based on competing priorities. The City of Dubuque has a substantial financial commitment to historic preservation. The City's commitment to historic preservation began in the mid 1970's as the community reacted to the wholesale clearance of downtown blocks through urban renewal programs. As a result of the foresight of early leaders, Dubuque has one of the largest collections of historic building stock in lowa. The community's commitment continues today and into the future with our focus on sustainability and resiliency. The City of Dubuque has a historic preservation ordinance and a variety of preservation incentives that protect and enhance our community's historic resources and identity. The City has designated 5 local historic preservation districts, 9 conservation districts, 11 local landmarks, 19 National Register Historic Districts and 3 conservation planning areas supported by an active Historic Preservation Commission. There exists overlap between many of the conservation and historic districts. Illustrated design guidelines are available for historic districts as well as the Downtown, Historic Millwork District, and older neighborhoods. The City has documented the historical and architectural significance of nearly 5,700 properties in Dubuque. Dubuque's historic preservation regulations, historic surveys, and architectural guidelines are a resource to guide property owners, contractors, and design professionals with preserving and enhancing the historic characteristics of a building, in turn fostering neighborhood stability and community vitality. The City's Financial Toolbox is extensive, with federal, state, and local incentives available for qualifying projects providing new jobs and investment in Dubuque. New and existing businesses are eligible for these economic development programs, which provide assistance to areas that include all or part of the City's 5 historic districts and 9 conservation districts. The City also has created several financial incentives geared specifically to locally designated historic properties. 6 Previous Five Years In the past five years, the Economic Development has provided $12,212,640 in incentives to properties located in historic and conservation districts, that have leveraged $109,548,106.34 in funds. These properties received funding for interior & exterior rehabilitation, farade renovation, and housing creation. In the last five years, the Housing & Community Development Department has spent $2,317,349 on rehabilitation of structures in the conservation district areas. All properties rehabilitated went through the federally mandated Section 106 review to ensure compliance to historic standards. In addition to rehabilitation of properties, the Housing Department has spent $6.5 million in Bee Branch Healthy Homes funds to keep structures viable and maintained after experiencing significant flooding in the conservation districts. All 325 units have been through a Section 106 review. Additionally, in the past five years, the Housing Department has spent $3.4 million in Lead & Healthy Homes Program, assisting structures built prior to 1976 to remediate lead hazards, which also helps maintain the structures and rehabilitate to historic standards. Next Five Years In the 5-Year CIP Budget, the Economic Development Department is expected to provide $2.7 million of incentives in these districts. In the next five years, the Housing & Community Development Department expects to spend $1.5 million in Bee Branch Healthy Homes Funds, $2.4 million in Lead & Healthy Homes Funds, and $2.1 million in rehabilitation of homes. If the City Council approves alteration of the district to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street, because the decision will be based on supporting the Dream Center and providing childcare, the ordinance should go into effect upon transfer of 1620 & 1628 White Street to Dream Center. I respectfully recommend Mayor and City Council approval of the request from the Dream Center to remove these two buildings from the conservation district. � Mic ael C. Van Milligen MCVM:sv Attachment cc: Crenna Brumwell, City Attorney Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager Wally Wernimont, Planning Services Manager 7 Dubuque THE CITY OF � AIFA�eri�a Cily DuB E �P��:��,,,k�,k� ' � II ��' Maste iece on the Mississi i z°°'�Z°lZtz°13 � pp zoi�*zoi9 TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager FROM: Wally Wernimont, Planning Services Manag� DATE: March 29, 2021 RE: Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memo is to provide information to the City Council on the request by the Dream Center to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District. I apologize for the length of the memo but feel the detailed information is necessary to address questions about the proposed request. BACKGROUND The Dream Center has been partnering with the City of Dubuque, Dubuque Racing Association, Dubuque County, Dubuque Child Care Resource and Referral and Conlon Construction to assist in establishing the Dream Center as a Licensed Child Care Center. The Dream Center has been providing childcare services to the community but has not been receiving childcare funding assistance because it is not licensed. If the Dream Center updates it facilities to meet license childcare requirements, it would provide a revenue stream to the Dream Center. On January 7, 2021, city staff met with members of the Dream Center and their project team members to talk about the location of outdoor play area, a state requirement for becoming a licensed childcare center. lowa Administrative Code Chapter 109 requires a licensed childcare center to have; "adequate indoor and outdoor program space that is adjacent to the center is provided. Centers shall have a safe outdoor program area with at least sufficient square footage to accommodate 30 percent of the enrollment capacity at any one time at 75 square feet per child. The outdoor area shall include safe play equipment and an area of shade." The discussion revolved around a concept plan for converting 16t" Street to outdoor play area space. Dream Center staff noted their goal is to have their daycare licensed as a childcare center by September 2021. They also noted that they have grant funds that need to be expended by July 2021 to make facility improvement to meet this goal. City Staff discussed the many steps needed to have 16t" Street converted to outdoor Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page2of16 play area and with neighborhood meetings, reviews, approvals, and with construction dependent on weather, it would most likely not be feasible to meet the July 2021 grant funding deadline and will not meet the Dream Center's plan to be licensed by September 2021. The Dream Center staff proposed moving forward with acquiring the property to the north of them, demolishing the buildings, and creating greenspace that would accommodate the required outdoor play area. In addition to the outdoor play area, the adjacent property would provide space for an external elevator addition to make the Dream Center ADA accessible. They discussed that this would be a temporary solution because of future plans for construction of a gymnasium addition to the north. The Dream Center staff noted they do not have funding for the gymnasium addition and did not have a set timeframe on when they would acquire the funds for the addition. In addition, future expansion of the Dream Center may necessitate closing of 16th Street for outdoor play area. Planning Staff informed the Dream Center and project team members that 1620 & 1628 White Street are located in the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District and the process for requesting approval of these building to be removed. DISCUSSION The properties at 1620 and 1628 White Street are contributing structures to the National Register Listed Washington Residential Historic District. The properties are also located in the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District. Washington Residential National Register Historic District Established (Listed): August 28, 2015 Number of Buildings/Structures: 327 Contributing Buildings: 262 Non-Contributing Buildings: 61 Non-Contributing Structures: 2 Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Established: February 10, 1975 — Ordinance 7-75 Number of Buildings/Structures: 132 (approx.) Expanded: February 22, 2011 — Ordinance 15-11 Number of Buildings/Structures: 688 (approx.) Expansion of Washinqton Street Neiqhborhood Conservation District On February 22, 2011, the City Council approved the expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District. The reason for expansion of the conservation district was a recommendation of the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. The Safe Community Task Force's recommendations for Management of Physical Environment include improving Dubuque neighborhoods by 2 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page3of16 (a) encouraging home ownership; (b) encouraging a mixed income approach to neighborhood development; and (c) creating (or re- creating) a sense of place through good design. Expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District addresses the Task Force recommendations by encouraging homeownership and mixed -use opportunities, while preserving the character and sense of place of the neighborhood. The Washington Neighborhood is a mixed —use neighborhood with many single-family and duplex units, scattered multi-family units, and major commercial zones in the Central/White corridor and the Five Points area. Washington Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries The boundaries of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District were based off the boundaries of the Washington Neighborhood Association Boundary excluding the following properties: Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank & Trust— 1300 Block of White Street As part of the proposed expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District, the City Council received a request from Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank & Trust to exclude the block bounded by 13th White, 14t" and Jackson Streets from any extension of the Washington Street Conservation District. They indicated they owned several buildings on the block and had future development plans. They noted if the block is included in the district, it may deter further economic development by their companies in downtown Dubuque. The City Council approved the request to exclude these properties. Blum Elm Scrap Yard — 15th & Elm As part of the proposed expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District, it was discussed that the Blum Scrap Yard area would be appropriate to exclude. It was noted that should this property ever be considered for a change of use, the City would want the fewest obstacles to the achievement of that goal. The City Council approved the request to exclude these properties. Dream Center's Demolition Permit Review The Unified Development Code defines a conservation district as: CONSERVATION DISTRICT: An area designated by ordinances of the city council which: A. Has defined geographic boundaries; B. Contains contiguous pieces of property under diverse ownership; C. Encompasses areas of historically and architecturally significant buildings, sites, structures, objects, or districts, including potential national or local historic districts; and D. Is important to maintain and preserve for its economic and social value and as a neighborhood or area of affordable housing. 3 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 4 of 16 Demolition permits in conservation districts are reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). Property owners submit an application to the HPC. The HPC then reviews the application and documentation and makes a determination as to the following: 1) Whether the building proposed for demolition has historic or architectural significance to the community. 2) Whether denial of the proposed demolition permit would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property. If the HPC finds that denial of the application would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property, or that the building does not have any historical or architectural significance to the community, the HPC will approve the application. If the commission finds that denial of the application would not prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property, and that the building has historical or architectural significance to the community, the HPC will deny the permit application. The Dream Center with assistance from their project partners approached the property owner of 1620 and 1628 White Street about seeking approval for a demolition permit. The property owner, Nottingham Properties, applied to the HPC to seek approval for a demolition permit (see attached demolition permit application). At their March 2021 meeting, the HPC reviewed the demolition permit application. They noted the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places as a contributing structure to the National Register Listed Washington Residential Historic District. At the meeting, the property owner explained the history of his approximately 10 years of ownership and how it has been a struggle to maintain the property, keep it rented, and receive a return on it. He stated he discussed donation or selling the property to the True North initiative, but it ultimately wasn't the right fit for the program. Tim Conlon, Chair of the Dream Center board, and owner of Conlon Construction estimated the demolition and rebuilding cost to be $600,000 and note that such expense could not be recouped with the rental prices of the area. The HPC reviewed a letter from Heritage Works that proposed using historic tax credits and other incentives to renovate the building and asked that the owner and City consider that as a viable option. The letter suggested the City to use the Demolition by Neglect section of the code to both prevent this situation and enforce upon the property owner. 4 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 5 of 16 Conlon acknowledged that they had considered tax credits, but the project budget would still have a $200,000 to $300,000 shortfall. Conlon expressed his value of preserving historic buildings, but claimed it was difficult to make this project viable. Commissioners stated that they value the Dream Center and the work that they do, but the HPC noted it needs to ensure that every avenue to preserve this building is pursued. The HPC determined that denial of the application would not prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property, and that the building has historical or architectural significance to the community, and therefore, denied the demolition permit application. Because the HPC denied the demolition permit application, the next step for the Dream Center to pursue removing of the buildings is to request to City Council alteration of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries to include removal of 1620 & 1628 White Street from the district. Under the Unified Development Code's Chapter 10 Historic Preservation Commission Applications and Procedures, is the process for requesting an alteration of a conservation district. Process for Establishment, Expansion or Alteration of Conservation District: Any person may request that the city council establish, expand or alter a conservation district. The process for establishment, expansion or alteration of a conservation district is as follows: 1. A written request for the establishment, expansion or alteration of a conservation district must be submitted to the city clerk. At its next regular meeting following receipt of the request by the city clerk, the city council may: a. approve or deny the request, b. set the request for consideration at a subsequent meeting, c. set the request for a public hearing, or d. refer the request to the commission for a recommendation before voting on the request. 2. At its next regular meeting, if a referral is made to it by the city council, the commission will review the request, and make a recommendation to the city council to: a. approve or deny the request, or b. to table the request for additional information for a specified period not to exceed sixty (60) days. Failure of the commission to act on the request within the sixty (60) day period, unless the applicant requests and the commission grants an extension of such 5 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page6of16 time, constitutes commission approval thereof. The recommendation of the commission will be transmitted to the city clerk. The city clerk will promptly transmit the recommendation and the application to the city council for its consideration. In determining whether to recommend approval or denial of the request, the commission will consider whether the proposed conservation district, or the expansion or alteration of the district, has historic or architectural significance to the community. 3. At its next regular meeting following receipt of the recommendation of the commission by the city clerk, the city council will approve or deny the request, or refer the nomination back to the commission for modification. As you will notice, there is no set criteria for the City Council to follow when making a determination on alteration of a conservation district. This allows the City Council to weigh multiple factors when determining whether to approve the alteration to the district boundaries. Auqust 2019 & Auqust 2020 Citv Council Annual Goal Settinq Session During the August 2019 & August 2020 City Council Annual Goal Setting Sessions, the City Council identified supporting the Dream Center a priority. Citv Council Goals & Priorities 2020— 2022 Top Priorities - Dream Center Facilities and Programs: Self- Sufficiency Additional Funding The City Council identified the Dream Center Facilities and Programs: Self-Sufficiency Additional Funding as a 2020-2022 Top Priority. At a March 1, 2021 City Council Work Session, the Dream Center presented on the organization's programming and outcomes. The following is a link to the work session presentation. https://citvofdubuque.granicus.com/MediaPlaver.php?view id=3&clip id=3736 As part of the work session, they provided a brochure on the Dubuque Dream Center and City of Dubuque Operational Support (see attached). The Dream Center has discussed that by being licensed as a childcare center many of their families would then be able to receive Department of Human Services assistance for childcare. This would provide a revenue stream to help work towards the Dream Center becoming more self- sufficient. 2020— 2022 Top Priorities - Equitable Poverty Prevention Plan Implementation: Outcomes, Report with Options, City Role, Direction, and City Acfions The City Council identified the Equitable Poverty Prevention Plan Implementation: Outcomes, Report with Options, City Role, Direction and City Actions as a 2020-2022 Top Priority. On March 1, 2021, the City Council adopted the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan. The plan has several references to the Dream Center. Most notably, located in the Chapter 3.3 Education & Skills Training where it states: 6 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page7of16 The Dream Center excels at providing mentoring to youth, socio-recreational programs after school, educating and partnering with parents, and works directly with teachers in Title 1 schools so students have seam/ess tutoring offered at the Dream Center that can target specific skills to build for each student. A cadre of volunteers from the community serve as tutors and mentors to children attending the center. The center also employs several School Connectors who work with teachers from the Title 1 elementary schools to coordinate homework assignments and address learning needs of students being tutored at the Center. The program is in extremely high demand with a waiting list of 170 children from pre-K through high school (2020). A promising practice of the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan states; 5. Enhance Funding for& Build Upon Successful Strategies of Local Youth Programs A number of organizations in Dubuque are already succeeding at serving families and meeting the needs of local children and youth: these efforts are invaluable and must continue to be supported and built upon. These groups already doing the work in the field and understanding what children and families need include the Multicultural Family Center(MFC), Dream Center, St. Mark Youth Enrichment, HEART(Housing Education and Rehabilitation Training) and the Every Child Reads Collaborative, among others. The city of Dubuque boasts a number of community organizations that effectively meet the needs of children and youth: rather than starting from scratch, these efforts must be continually reinforced, funded, and broadly supported. The Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan also refers to Childcare. Chapter 3.7 Child Care, Early Learning and Youth explains the need for quality affordable childcare. The following table below illustrates that there are shortages throughout Dubuque but that low-income tracts (1 & 5) with the highest concentration of poverty and percentage of minority residents have less access to childcare. The dividing line between Tracts 1 & 5 is located one block north from the Dream Center at 17th Street. At this location, the Dream Center has the ability to provide childcare to residents of both tracts. 7 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page8of16 �abEe 35: �ity of�ubuque Earl�r �hildhood Pro►rider, Demog�aphtc Sr�a�s�ot�ao � � Licensed Prav�ders 3 1 4 � 3 3 4 Farnily�hild care harnes 0 �. I � Z 3 Z �otal chdd tare capa��ty .. 55 5 �64 �4 70 3� ��4 fotal Fa�ulation 3Q1� 3747 �899 1�81 3�41 37�7 ��69 Pc�ula�ian un�er � 182 1�T; 1'S 53 ��9 3T3 �2Q� Median farr3ily ir�come �1�,750 �45.185 5�7,�75 �50,b94 �44,013 �31,985 �51,98� I'er�ento�{h�l�ren �.v{asl �1% [�4�b �6`Y� r�5°lo 75�0 -+�S�o 8996 � }�arents in workforte �Maternai labof 5596 5396 789� 8495 8395 7'�95 8996 �arti��patior� — .. _ . �er�ent non-Hispani�, 589'4 8�96 8596 SS96 �49b 7�9b 559� �uhite Per�ent tron-Hisparri�, ��9£ I 7°b I 39G 796 '-- 196 �.. 1�9b 89� � ��acl�lAfrican r�merican Fer�er�t�lispar�i�f�atirra 9°b 6% 3% 39� 19G �496 �°� C�rildren per licensed 3�5 35 �.38 3.58 3,7 Ff.66 0.9 sl�t � 2020-2022 High Priorities- Childcare Inifiafive: Outcomes, City Role, Partners, Directions and City Actions The City Council identified Childcare Initiative: Outcomes, City Role, Partners, Directions and City Actions as a 2020-2022 High Priority. At a December 7, 2020 City Council Work Session, Economic Development Director Jill Connors and network partners from Childcare Resource & Referral, Dubuque County Early Childhood, Greater Dubuque Development Corporation, Northeast lowa Community College, and Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque presented on childcare challenges and collaboration efforts. The following is a link to the work session presentation. https://citvofdubuque.granicus.com/MediaPlaver.php?view id=3&clip id=3684 The presentation reaffirmed the demand for quality affordable childcare in the community. The Dream Center was featured in the presentation as an organization that is launching a licensed childcare center to help meet some of the demand. 8 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page9of16 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housinq https://www.cityofdubuque.orq/DocumentCenter/View/44569/CityofDubuque 2019 Analysis of Impediments In 2019, the City of Dubuque created a new 5-year Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing as required by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development to receive Section 8 funds and Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). This analysis was also prioritized to be completed as it was an equity priority for the City. The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing is meant to be an analysis of current conditions, historic achievements and barriers, and a 5-year plan of action/goals. Although the plan prioritizes actions by High, Medium and Low, it does not prioritize within each category which items have a cost, which items have the largest immediate impact, and what aligns with other City Council goals and priorities. As part of the City of Dubuque Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, the lack of access to childcare as a barrier to opportunity such as employment is listed as a contributing factor. At the January 19, 2021 City Council meeting, Housing & Community Development Director Alexis Steger forwarded the Housing, Human Rights and Community Development Advisory Commissions recommendation for prioritization of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Action Items. Lack of access to childcare is a barrier to opportunity as employment was identified as a priority. Imaqine Dubuque Comprehensive Plan https://www.cityofdubuque.orq/2432/Imaqine-Dubuque There are several recommendations in the Imagine Dubuque Comprehensive Plan that are related to the request. Social + Cultural Vibrancy Recommendations Education & Empowerment Work with community providers including non-profits, faith communities, and Dubuque-area universities to expand childcare options and resources, whether through on-site programs, clearinghouses for providers, or other means. Green Buildings + Historic Preservation Recognizing the importance of historic preservation and adaptive reuse Illustrate the tangible economic and sustainability benefits — direct, indirect, and induced —to Dubuque's economy and community from the work done by the City's historic preservation program and the City's private and public sector partners. 9 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 10 of 16 Washinqton Neiqhborhood Plan https://www.cityofdubuque.orq/DocumentCenter/View/26777/Washinqton-Neiqhborhood- Plan?bidld= The Washington Neighborhood Plan was designed to give residents and other stakeholders (e.g. business owners, employees, residents, public officials, property owners) the tools need to enhance the quality of live with in the neighborhood and thereby strengthening its sense of pride. The goal of the plan is to inspire local residents, business and property owners to collaborate with the City of Dubuque to continue with neighborhood improvement efforts and revitalize the City's historic core. The core issues identified in the plan are: 1.Economic Development 2.Families Youth & Education 3.Housing As previously mentioned, the boundaries of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District were expanded as part of a recommendation of this plan. The plan also identifies many other recommendations that relate directly and indirectly to services being provided by the Dream Center and the preservation of buildings. These include: Expand youth activities that meet the interests and needs of children of all ages and keep them engaged and active. ■ Develop a Washington Neighborhood Youth Collaborative that identifies needs and concerns, plans regular activities for youth and children, and provided leadership programming and opportunities in the Washington Neighborhood. ■ Create a feedback system that gather input from youth to define their needs and interests. ■ Establish intramural sports programs that target youth ages 13-17. ■ Expand opportunities for youth activities in the neighborhood, examining possibilities for a neighborhood little league team, a hip hop dance club, a drill team, and other activities of interest. Encourage greater parent/adult involvement in the community, particularly with youth activities. ■ Develop a comprehensive after-school program that expands on existing mentoring programs for school aged children (K-12) and utilize local companies and individual (agencies, businesses, organizations and institutions) to provide expanded mentoring activities for teens in allowing them to participate in meaningful, experiential activities. 10 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 11 of 16 ■ Work with schools and churches to promote an Open Gym program that is open to families and develop a "Warm Summer Fun on Cold Winter Days" program to foster connections between youth and parents. Create a welcoming atmosphere to encourage community investment, foster communication and project a new image as a hip neighborhood. ■ Consider designating the area as a Historic District to market the area and access federal tax incentives. Provide a greater balance of housing by promoting homeownership and homeowner maintenance. ■ Continue and expand partnership with DB&T to purchase vacant buildings, target acquisitions and provide low-interest loans. Families, Youth & Education The Washington Neighborhood Plan notes that the Washington Neighborhood offers a range of activities and facilities geared towards youth and families. The many long- standing churches are on the neighborhood's greatest assets, offering activities and facilities for youth and family programs. In addition, other facilities or agencies like the Boys and Girls Club, Project Concern, Multicultural Family Center, the City's Leisure Services Department and Crescent Community Health Center off their own set of programs for the community. There is a concern that more needs to be offered, particularly in terms of offerinq programs that are affordable, providing quidance to vouth and encouraginq vouth to get involved in the community. Historic Assets The Washington Plan notes the following: "As one of the oldest and most established neighborhoods in Dubuque, other structures within the Washington Neighborhood may have historic qualities worth preserving. As illustrated on the map on page 51, many properties within the Washington Neighborhood are eligible to be listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Even if certain properties are ineligible or do not receive official recognition for being historic, preservation of such properties is still important to maintaining the character of the neighborhood. To assist in this regard, the intent of the three conservation districts that extend into the Washington Neighborhood provides the community with historic preservation precedent to help protect the history and architecture of the neighborhood. The neighborhood could help protect its historic character by extending coverage of conservation districts throughout all of the Washington Neighborhood, and by considering the establishment of an historic district." Demolition Approval of Historic Structures in Historic & Conservation Districts The following is a list of architectural and historically significant structures that were demolished. The table is arranged to show date of demolition approval, address of 11 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 12 of 16 property, property type, district (conservation or historic), who requested the demolition and what body approved the demolition. � ' • • � • • • . • • ' • : • - . • � . . . . � - • . � - � - � • � • � � � - � • � � � � � - � � � � American Old Main 7/20/1998 901 Locust Tower Commercial Historic American City Council Building District Trust Old M ain City Merchants Economic 3/15/1999 304/320 Main Hotel Commercial Historic Development City Council District Department Old M ain City 3/15/1999 330/336 Main Union Cigar Commercial Historic Economic City Council Store Development District Department Downtown 1112-1114 Neighborhood Colts Drum & 5/5/2003 Central N/A Duplex Conservation Bugle Corp City Council District Downtown Neighborhood Dubuque 9/20/2004 1150-52 Central N/A Duplex Community City Council Conservation District Schools Green Downtown Dubuque Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1246 Central Industrial Commercial Community City Council Su I Conservation Schools pp Y District 12 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 13 of 16 � . . . . - � . . - � - . . � . . . � - . . � . . . � . . . . - Downtown Dubuque Green Auto Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1256 Central Commercial Community City Council Supplies Conservation Schools District Downtown Dubuque Book Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1266 Central Exchange Commercial Conservation Community City Council District Schools Downtown Dubuque Great Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1278 Central Commercial Community City Council Dragon Conservation Schools District Downtown Dubuque Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1290 Central Klein Commercial Community City Council Conservation Schools District Downtown Dubuque Routley Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1296 Central Commercial Community City Council Center Conservation Schools District Downtown Dubuque Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1101 White N/A Apartment Community City Council Conservation Schools District Downtown Dubuque Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1129 White N/A Apartment Community City Council Conservation District Schools 13 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 14 of 16 � . . . . - � . . - � - . . � . . . � - . . � . . . � . . . . - Downtown Dubuque Stackis Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1131 White Commercial Community City Council Construction Conservation Schools District Downtown Dubuque Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1133 White N/A Apartment Community City Council Conservation District Schools Dubuque Downtown Dubuque Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1159 White Labor Commercial Community City Council Conservation Harvest Schools District Downtown Dubuque Prescott Neighborhood 9/20/2004 1249 White School School Conservation Community City Council District Schools Washington Street Richard & 9/2/2008 1672 Lenz N/A Commercial Neighborhood Kathy Neuses City Council Conservation District Washington Street State Historic City Preservation 5/23/2011 2109 Kniest House Residential Neighborhood Engineering Office Bee Conservation Branch MOA District Washington Street State Historic City Preservation 5/24/2011 2113 Kniest House Residential Neighborhood Engineering Office Bee Conservation Branch MOA District 14 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 15 of 16 � . . . . - � . . - � - . . � . . . � - . . � . . . � . . . . - Washington Street State Historic City Preservation 5/25/2011 2117 Kniest House Residential Neighborhood Engineering Office Bee Conservation Branch MOA District Washington W.A. Weiss State Historic 400 E.22nd Meats & Street City Preservation 1/21/2015 Street Grocery Residential Neighborhood Engineering Office Bee Store Conservation Branch MOA District Jackson Park Apartment- Plastic 2/21/2019 1243 Locust N/A Historic HPC Rear Unit Center District Washington Street 5/21/2020 1448 Jackson N/A House Neighborhood City Housing HPC Conservation District West 11th 12/17/2020 574 Loras N/A House Street Historic City Housing HPC District Jackson Park Building 12/28/2020 1025 Bluff N/A Apartment Historic City Housing District Official REQUESTED ACTION The request before the City Council is to determine if the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District boundaries should be altered to remove the properties at 1620 & 1628 White Street. The City Council first needs to decide what action they would like to take: a. approve or deny the request, b. set the request for consideration at a subsequent meeting, c. set the request for a public hearing, or d. refer the request to the HPC for a recommendation before voting on the request. 15 Dream Center— Request to Alter Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Boundaries Page 16 of 16 At the conclusion of the action taken, because there are no set criteria for the City Council to follow, the council should weigh all interests and make a decision on whether to alter the district boundaries to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street. RECOMMENDATION If the City Council approves alteration of the district to remove 1620 & 1628 White Street, because the decision will be based on supporting the Dream Center and providing childcare, the ordinance should go into effect upon transfer of 1620 & 1628 White Street to Dream Center. Thank you. cc: Crenna Brumwell, City Attorney Cori Burbach, Assistant City Manager Alexis Steger, Housing & Community Development Director Jill Connors, Economic Development Director Enclosures 16 * • , � - : � � �� q � �' �� - ,F_ '�� '�'` � "I ° ,; .i , Br`-*". "�� ` '�� . r s< � Q �. ,� . CENTER - � � f , +�L � � ", ,)y ... .y A Ministry of Radius Church Dubuque, lA To: The City Clerk, Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Robert Kimble, Dream Center Executive Director � ' . SUBJECT: Dubuque Dream Center Licensed Child Care Plan . DATE: March 22, 2021 . • . • • � • Greetings Adrienne, Thank you very much for your previous support of the Dubuque Dream Center, � during your time at IBM through S.T.E.M. education! We are the Dream Center have been impressed by the support of our community. . . :.. . ' " '' Wally Wernimont suggested that I reach out to you and request to be placed on , �� the AprilSth, 2021 City Council Meeting Agenda. As you may be aware, the Dubuque Dream Center has partnered with the City of � •- • Dubuque, Dubuque Racing Association, Dubuque County, Dubuque Child Care Resource and Referral, and Conlon Construction to establish the Dream Center �..- . - as a Licensed Child Care Center. � . �� During the process of assessing what the Dream Center needs to obtain our Child Care License from Iowa Department of Human Services, we were informed by Child Care Resource and Referral, that the first step for the Dream Center would be to upgrade our facility to become ADA Accessible, and to secure between 2,000-4,000 SF of Outdoor or Green Space connected to our facility. ' ' �- �� We partnered with the above-mentioned organizations to begin this process and ` ' have raised $636,000 as result of these partnerships and $276,000 of these funds •' • ' "" have been contributed through the support of the City Council and the City of '• " Dubuque. �. ' ••' As part of our ongoing assessment to determine a plan to add the required '- • ' Outdoor Space, the Dubuque Dream Center, Conlon Construction, and City of Dubuque staff from departments that included Engineering, Parks, and Planning, had ongoing discussions, separate meetings and ultimately came together on January 7t" to determine next steps. Dubuque Dream Center � 1600 White Street• Dubuque, IA,52001 � 563.845.7591 * • , � - : � � �� q � �' �� - ,F_ '�� '�'` � "I ° ,; .i , Br`-*". "�� ` '�� . r s< � Q �. ,� . CENTER - � � f , +�L � � ", ,)y ... .y A Ministry of Radius Church Dubuque, lA It was determined at the January 7th meeting, that the next best plan of action would be to seek a Demolition of the north side property next to the Dream � ' . Center, 1620 & 1628 White Street, in order to add the required Outdoor Space � � . � � required by DHS for the Dubuque Dream Center to become a Licensed Child Care Center and to accommodate an exterior elevator tower addition to make the � - • facility ADA accessible. Because these properties are located in the Washington Neighborhood � Conservation District, City representatives advised and recommended that Dubuque Dream Center, Conlon Construction, 563 Design, and the present ' • �•• ' owner of 1620 and 1628 White Street(Nottingham Properties),partner to submit ' ' '' an application and request a meeting with the Historic Preservation Commission , �� to receive a demolition permit and approval to demolish 1620 and 1628 White Street properties. ' •- • On Thursday March 18th, the Historic Preservation Commission denied the demolition permit requested officially by Nottingham Properties in partnership with Conlon Construction, and 365 Design, for the purpose and support of the �'� � Dubuque Dream Center. .- � � Wally Wernimont, Planning Services Manager noted`Because the HPC denied the application, the next step is to send a letter to the City Clerk requesting that the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District boundaries be modified to removed 1620 & 1628 from the district." � ' �- �� Therefore, I am graciously requesting to be placed on the April Sth, 2021 City ` ' Council Meeting Agenda to request that the properties of 1620 and 1628 White '' ' ' "" Street be removed from the district boundaries, so that the Dream Center can '• - purchase 1620 and 1628 White Street Properties and then proceed to demo the '• " properties to add Outdoor Space as part of the DHS requirements to become a ' ••' Licensed Child Care Center. . . - Thank you again City Clerk, Mayor and City Council Members for your support. Sincerely, Robert Kimble Executive Director Dubuque Dream Center � 1600 White Street• Dubuque, IA,52001 � 563.845.7591 Prepared by: Wallv Wernimont, Citv Planner Address: Citv Hall, 50 W. 13th St Telephone: 563-589-4210 Return to Adrienne N. Breitfelder, City Clerk Address: Citv Hall, 50 W. 13t" St Telephone: 563-589-4121 ORDINANCE NO. -21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 10-8-A-4 PERTAINING TO ALTERATION OF THE WASHINGTON STREET NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO REMOVE THE PROPERTIES AT 1620 & 1628 WHITE STREET. Whereas, the City of Dubuque established conservation districts to allow for the City's review of demolition permits that might impact buildings of historic or architectural significance; and Whereas, the City has identified the Dream Center Facilities and Program as a 2020-2022 Top Priority; and Whereas, the City has identified the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan as a 2020-2022 Top Priority; and Whereas, the Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan identifies the Dream Center as a community organization that must be continually reinforced, funded and broadly supported; and Whereas, the City's Council Goals and Priorities, Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, Equitable Poverty Reduction & Prevention Plan, and Imagine Dubuque Comprehensive Plan have identified childcare as a priority; and Whereas, there is a need for quality, affordable, licensed childcare centers in the downtown area; and Whereas, the Dream Center is applying to become a licensed childcare center; and Whereas, a licensed childcare center is required by Chapter 109 of the lowa Administrative Code to have an outdoor program area; and Whereas, becoming a licensed childcare center is an opportunity to create a sustainable source of income and funding for the Dream Center; and Whereas, the properties at 1620 & 1628 White Street are located in the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District; and Whereas, the Dream Center has the option to purchase 1620 and 1628 White Street; and Whereas, the Dream Center is requesting that if it successfully purchases 1620 & 1628 White Street that the properties be removed from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District to accommodate the deconstruction of the properties in order to facilitate construction of an outdoor program area for its licensed childcare center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA: Section 1. Title 16 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 10-8-A-4 is hereby amended as follows: 10-8-A-4 Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of E. 22nd Street and Kniest Street, thence southeasterly along Kniest Street to its intersection with Garfield Avenue, thence southwesterly along Garfield Avenue to its intersection with the City alley located between Elm Street and Kniest Street, thence southeasterly along the City alley to its intersection with E. 18th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 18th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between the lowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad right-of-way and Elm Street, thence southeasterly along the City alley to its intersection with E. 17th Street, thence northeasterly along E. 17th Street to its intersection with the lowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad right-of- way, thence southeasterly along the lowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad right-of-way to its intersection with E. 16th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 16th Street to its intersection with Elm Street, thence southeasterly along Elm Street to its intersection with E. 15th Street, thence northeasterly along E. 15th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street, thence southeasterly along the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street to its intersection with E. 14th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 14th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street, thence southeasterly along the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street to its intersection with E. 12th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 12 Street to its intersection with Elm Street, thence southeasterly along Elm Street to its intersection with E. 11 th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 11 th Street to its intersection with W. 11th Street, thence southwesterly along W. 11th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between Central Avenue and lowa Street; thence northwesterly along the City alley to its intersection with the City Hall access driveway, thence southwesterly along the City Hall access driveway to its intersection with lowa Street, thence northwesterly along lowa Street to its intersection with Loras Boulevard; thence northeasterly along Loras Boulevard to its intersection with the City alley located between lowa Street and Central Avenue, thence northwesterly along the City alley to its intersection with W. 17th Street, thence northeasterly along W. 17th Street to its intersection with Heeb Street; thence northwesterly along Heeb Street to its intersection with the northern boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-018; thence northeasterly along the northern boundary of Parcel #10-24-252- 018 to its intersection with the west boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-017; thence northwesterly along the west boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-017 to its intersection with the south boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-015, thence northeasterly along the south boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-015 to its intersection with the west boundary of Parcel #10-24-252- 013, thence northwesterly along the west boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-013 to its intersection with Heeb Street, thence northwesterly along Heeb Street to its intersection with Kaufmann Avenue, thence northeasterly along Kaufmann Avenue to its intersection with 22nd Street thence northeasterly along 22nd Street to its point of origin at the intersection of E. 22nd Street and Kniest Street excluding the following areas: (a) beginning at the intersection of E. 14th Street and Jackson Street, thence southeasterly along Jackson Street to its intersection with E. 13th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 13th Street to its intersection with White Street, thence northwesterly along White Street to its intersection with E. 14th Street, thence northeasterly along E. 14th Street to its point of origin at the intersection of E. 14th Street and Jackson Street. (b) The southerly 17 feet 8 inches of the northerly 40 feet of south middle one-fifth of City Lot 485 in the City of Dubuque, lowa, according to the United States Commissioners' Map of Town of Dubuque, lowa; and The Northerly 22 feet and 4 inches of the South Middle 1/5 of City Lot 485 in the City of Dubuque, lowa, according to the United States Commissioners' Map of Town of Dubuque, lowa. Section 2. This ordinance shall not apply to an application for a demolition permit for properties being acquired and demolished for the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project. Section 3. This ordinance shall only take effect upon submission of proof from the Dream Center that the Dream Center has acquired ownership of 1620 and 1628 White Street to the City Clerk. Section 4. Upon showing proof of Dream Center ownership, the ordinance will immediately be submitted for publication, as provided by law. Section 5. The ordinance will become effective upon publication. Passed, approved and adopted this 5t" day of April, 2021. Roy D. Buol, Mayor Attest: Adrienne N. Breitfelder, City Clerk _ - - { �� . �` � � =�w �F. 4 _ _ M1�� _- � � - �� ti�1 ry- " __ � � ��ti�� - �_--� -- _ -_ - _ . .l��i-. ��F �y , _ � _t _ - _� . � ' ��. ` _ ' _ ' _" � . _ "�� _ ,� � I 1 � - - - � �� . �� • � • • • • • • IMPACTING YOUTH. FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. D B Q � ENTEI� INDEX WHO WE BENEFIT........................................................................................................................PAGE 1 THE UNMET NEED........................................................................................................................PAGE 1 CffiLDCARE AND COVID-19......................................................................................................PAGE 2 WHATMAKES US UNIQUE.........................................................................................................PAGE 3 STUDENT SUCCESS STORIES....................................................................................................PAGE 4 YOUTH CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM......................................................................PAGE 5 OPERATIONAL BUDGET FUNDRAISING STRATEGIES.....................................................PAGE 6 SUSTAINABLE INCOME PLAN FOR OPERATIONS..............................................................PAGE 6 TRANSITIONAL INCOME SUPPORT NEED AND OPERATIONAL REQUEST................PAGE 6 WHO IS SERVED AND IMPACTED BY CITY SUPPORT.......................................................PAGE 7 COST PER STUDENT AND SERVICES PROVIDED................................................................PAGE 7 ORGINAL CITY PROPOSAL.......................................................................................................PAGE 7 STUDENT AND TEAM SPONSORSHIPS...................................................................................PAGE 8 IMPACTING YOUTH. RENGTHENIN FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. � � - � r� _ Preparing the future workforce and supporting the present workforce The Dream Center seeks to prepare the future workforce, by influencing the academic outcomes and employment soft skills of school aged youth to prepare them for high school, college or career. The Dream Center seeks to support the present workforce, by providing quality after school and summer care to school aged children of working families. In particularly in areas of concentrated poverty where quality care for children are in short supply. � By supporting the Dream Center, the City of Dubuque will be supporting an organization that is becoming established and known in the community as a Quality After School and Summer Care Site for the children of working families. Although the Dream Center targets low-income families in need, families from diverse racial-social economic backgrounds view the Dream Center as a quality option for after school and summer care for their children. The Dream Center serves students from every local public school in Dubuque as well as private school students. Childcare is a critical infrastructure that supports working families and drives economic growth. However, Centers need the proper staff support to meet the ratio of the kids we serve. lowa's labor shortage makes the need for childcare increasingly urgent. Access to quality early childhood education is critical for attracting and retaining a quality workforce Dubuque employers struggle to fill vacant positions. 28% report unfilled positions are increasing and Childcare access is a primary barrier to workforce participation, especially for low-income households and women. • Single parents making >$10.82/hr lose childcare assistance • 70% of poor, nonworking adults w/young children are not working due to family responsibilities • For each 10% increase in childcare expenses, employment rate of married mothers decreases 5-6% • 83% of millennials would leave their jobs for one with more family-friendly benefits Childcare boosts productivity and firm performance. � • One Dubuque-area employer estimates that childcare issues cause 50% of absenteeism. • Childcare-related absenteeism in the US costs businesses $4.4 billion a year. • After providing childcare, 85% of employers report improved recruitment and 2/3 report reduced turnover. Sources: Greater Dubuque De� Corp; lowa Policy Project, American Enterprise Institute (2016); Zilliak et al(2008); Care@Work Better Benefits Survey, Project HOPE Childcare Needs Assess- ment; in-person interviews; Child Care Aware, Child Care Partnership Project Employer Toolkit 1 . � IMPACTING YOUTH. RENGTHENIN FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. r��rer��-��-�� - � • - • � � � � � - At the outset of the pandemic, nearly two-thirds of child care providers said they could not survive a closure that extended longer than one month. The Center for American Progress estimates that the country could lose half of its licensed child care capacity without government intervention. Millions of American workers, hoping to get back to their jobs once the public health risk has suciently decreased, will not be able to do so until they have safe, reliable, and aordable child care. This has major consequences for the reopening of the economy but also has important implications for income and educational inequality, racial equity, geographic equity, and a potentially significant decline in the number of mothers in the labor force. COVID-19 appears to have taken a greater toll on Hispanic and Black communities, both in terms of the public health threat and the economic impact. Prior to the pandemic, most child care deserts were in low- and middle-income communities, including many predominantly Hispanic neighborhoods, and were practically ubiquitous across rural America. Communities that already lacked sufficient child care before the coronavirus are likely to be especially affected by the crisis as unemployment hits these communities harder and families are less likely to have savings to weather the economic downturn. Child care is essential for families and for the broader economy. This was true before the coronavirus crisis and may be even more widely accepted now that millions of people are working from home or laid off or furloughed until it is safe for most businesses to reopen. But the precarious state of the child care sector prior to this disruption cannot be overstated. Even in a good economy, child care programs and families with young children have a hard time financing high costs with little public funding c+ -� � � . ; .. . . . �.. . . � � � �;* �� • ` � . . 'f F NM'� - s , . � r�+L!ir iii �� . - 1` '^ •' + � "F •tisi�+ �V �'� r�'- • F + �-�� ;� � �N � � � . ; � #• J � �f. ��+r � ;' � * _5 ■ � � • + � � a�.�� * t' ' .�f � � � f �.�.i ■ � .w r� .* x�� , � � -� • � � �� F` • � ` r�..-.- _� •� i��a � F M�+��t+��YtlFM � �; ' + �'� +� - G8�_ F �, ~ ,r. �=f" � �r � ' .� � y , �K.H�w , � " �i' a��: �i � • * ''�L- 4�� .. r� � ♦ �F r �•� ? b4+h'qer� � i i � �� • }� ** + �T� �* � # � � ��{Iiho-d'�i M n � �• � w5q�t.• ��' �' ° � � ! • Eask Ou6�ue * ��} � ��:�*iR. * , k ` # ti�. .� . isii�r.:vrvr,-r. .,rr.�l ' ' n � . ..,._ iw+.x�,��.,K Source: Rasheed Malik, Katie Hamm, Won F. Lee, Elizabeth E Davis, and Aaron Sojourner, The Coronavirus Will Make Child Care Deserts Worse and Exacerbate Inequality, June 2020 2. IMPACTING YOUTH. �ENGTHENII�� FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. . . �, Although the Dubuque Dream Center is seeking to become a licensed childcare facility, our unique model as an academic center and academy is designed to prepare students for college and career. Our long-term model to serve students beginning in early childhood through 12th grade. Through the Dream Center Youth Career Development and Employment Program, we focus on the future to impact generational poverty by developing the future workforce. Our Youth Career Development and Emp/oyment Program benefits from our early school age feeder system: Youth enrolled in Dream Center programming are students who have been identified by school teachers, counselors, or administrators based on academic, social and emotional development needs during their elementary ages, K-5th. Over 80% of students who enrolled in our Youth Career Development program in the summer of 2019 have been participants in Dream Center programming since 2014, having discipline and character development values instilled and are now middle or high school students. Students have the option to enroll in our Youth Career Development and Employment program from grades 8th-12th at this time. Students enrolled receive an individual career assessment, soft skills development, and job & career readiness training in partnership with Northern lowa Community College (NICC). Students can earn Employment opportunities and Stipend through a partnership with Dubuque Works and Private Donor. Soft skills provide a critical foundation for success at school and work. Nationwide, 62% of business decision-makers have more difficulty recruiting candidates with soft skills than technical skills. 55% of Dubuque-area employers consider work ethic a major skills gap; 50% cite communication skills. Additionally, 90% of decision-makers believe soft skills are developed more easily in early childhood than later in life. Sources: Greater Dubuque Dev. Corp; lowa Policy Project, American Enterprise Institute (2016); Zilliak et al (2008); Care@Work Better Benefits Survey, Project HOPE Childcare Needs Assessment; in-person interviews; Child Care Aware, Child Care Partnership Project Employer Toolkit 3. IMPACTING YOUTH. �RENGTHENI� FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. . . - Landon- Academic Improvements Landon was a 3rd grader at Fulton Elementary School this past school year. When speaking to his coach and teacher about his biggest improvement this school year they both said the same thing, his attitude and effort. His teacher, Mrs. Molly Davis, said his biggest improvement was his attitude towards writing during his independent work every day. She also said how proud she was for him meeting his Math MAP testing goal. Coach Blake said Landon really came out of his shell this year and give a great effort when learning new things, that may not always be easy, especially in reading. When looking at the data from the past two school years it all aligns, Landon has moved from being at high reading risk in 2nd grade to some reading risk in 3rd grade. He has also improved his Reading MAP score from 161 at the beginning of 2nd grade to 193 in the winter of 3rd grade. This is only 3 points below where he needs to be to be considered at reading proficiency for in the winter of 3rd grade. He has also made big improvements on his Math MAP test by going from a 179 at the beginning of 2nd grade to 198 during the winter of 3rd grade. This puts him at math proficiency for his grade level! It is without a doubt that with Landon continuing to work hard he will meet his reading proficiency goal next year and continue to excel above the expectation in both reading and math. Nicholas- Behavior Improvements Nicholas was an 8th grader at Jefferson Middle School this past school year. He ended the school year with a 4.0 GPA. He also made great improvements in school office referrals, going from eight in 7th grade to only one referral in 8th grade. Nicholas' mom said she is most impressed with his overall behavior and respect. She is impressed how he addresses women as ma'am and men as sir. He has also improved on listening to advise. She said he is a totally different kid from 4 years ago and none of this would be possible without the Dream Center. 4. IMPACTING YOUTH. 'RENGTHENI� FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. � . . . � , . . . . . . 20 students and provide oversight for our College and Career Development program in partnership with NICC and Dubuque Works. See program outcomes below. Dubuque Dream Center Youth Career Development Summer Program Outcomes 70 hours 35 hours of 10,466 meals � � � �� of coaching cooked& served Academic Tutoring/Assistant Teaching O � 8'X 12' carpentry and maintenance � � KWWL, KCRG, & TH 20 16 students enrolled in our students graduated and Youth Development Program received a Certificate of training with NICC _� - _.� r� l�-�- - �y.� � iLI 5 �� Y _ �I ' 4 � ' � � �r � I � � � �� {l ....!'� ! L r -- 5. IMPACTING YOUTH. ��'T�"�� FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. � - . - - • . - . . . . . - . . . . - . - O � O 0 � �� 0 Private Donors other The DC raises 73% of our operational budget through fundraising from generous private donors from the community of Dubuque to support low income and working families who need affordable care for their children. 19% Grants. 8% other. � - . - - . . . - . - ' . . • . - . . In order to progress towards sustainable income to continue to provide quality and affordable care to the children of working families, the DC is seeking to become a Licensed Child Care Facility and generate funding support from the State of lowa by2021. � "� * � � � r � � ��► �� i �� I�4� � � ��. �� r � ,� � 0 ��. � � ■ �� 4 � �i • • • • - • • • - - • • • • • • - • • • - • • • - • - • • 1 • • - The DC seeks to become a Licensed Child Care Facility in order to generate income to serve low income and working families who need our support, but struggle to afford quality after school and summer care. City Funding will Support - / Low Income Students nts K-12th Grade As a CitY Top Prioritv, the Dubupue Dream Center is askinq the Citv of Dubuque for 33% of its operationa/budget, $264,000.00 for2021. Our proposed operations request of$264,000 will provide support funding for the Dream Center during the economic uncertainty of the COVID-19 Pandemic and allow us to focus on continuing to Impact children of low-income and working families as we prepare for our campaign to become a licensed childcare facility in 2021. 6. IMPACTING YOUTH. ��"��Tu�^��"� FAMILIES. BUILDING COMMUNITY. . - - . . . . . - . . . . . These 66 low income students are children K-5th grade who were most recently added from our waiting list with the help of one-time gifts from generous donors. Presently there are 90 K-5th grade students on our waiting list. The Dream Center is in need of temporary support to serve these students and their families as we seek to become a Licensed Child Care Site and receive income from the State of lowa. The Dream Center becoming a licensed childcare facility means access to affordable childcare for working families. From the mid-1970s to 2012, workforce participation rates for mothers of young children rose from 40% to 65%. In lowa, 3 out of 4 househo/ds with children under age 6 have all parents working yet childcare is inaccessible to many who need it. � - . - - . . . . . - . - . . - - . . - . The operational expense per student for fhe Dream Center is$4,000 per year for year-round services that includes: �� ' �� l ��Hea/thy Meals Transportation . � � � � Year-Round Activities and Summer Camps � � � . Schoo/Day Curricu/ums, � � Supplies and � r Academic Support � � � � _�� Character Development Administrative Overhead Curriculum and Registration Support • . . . . . . On September 10th, 2019 the Dream Center originally requested 52% ofDream Centeroperational budget $406,600 that would have supported and sustained 135 K-5th grade students. The Dream Center would still welcome and gratefully accept the original requested funds, however we would also be grateful for the minimum request of$264,000 to support 66 students for 2021. 7. � 1 �'� I� • ' �� ( -� � � �:� -- ��ii � _ � � �' '1� � :� � { �+�,�� '' `�` Q _.,�, �lir. � y� �':. � � ;'_ CENTER - ''�a � ` _` �_ � � _, � • �� -, ��. -� � � ��u� t "� 1600 White Street � Dubuque, IA, 52001 � 563.845.7591 I .� � 1 � . �� "� Impacting Youth,Strengthening Families,euilding Community r. _, � A Ministry of Radius Church Dubuque,IA —� Dream Maker Student Sponsor and Licensed Childcare Highlights The Dream Maker Student Sponsorship Model was established in April 2019 to help connect donors' dollars directly to student progress. Student sponsors support the costs associated with the benefits that students receive from the Dubuque Dream Center's holistic "In Your Life Mentoring" Model. Dream Center programming operates year round for students K-8th grade.All designated Dream Maker giving levels from $150 to $4,000 are specifically centered around supporting or sponsoring a student for a full year, school year, and/or summer session (see reverse side). Complimentary to the Dream Maker Model, the Dream Team exists to provide a more long term option far donars that would like to schedule an annual gift for multiple years to provide a student with the opportunity to receive greater impact. The Dream Center's goal for 2021 is to have 200 students full�ponsored for a FULL YEAR of programming. We are fundraising for student sponsorships beginning October 2020. The Dream Center's long term goal is to become a Licensed Childcare Center, which will generate revenue to assist in covering students'program costs. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the timeline of this projec�has been extended to 2022, however the building renovation and administrative process is eXpected to begin in 2021. Once the Dream Center is functioning as a licensed childcare, in 2022, families that request support with Dream Center program costs will be asked to complete the application for DHS State Child Care financial assistance for their students in grades K-6th. Low-income families that apply for DHS assistance could receive full support or partial support based on their household income and other state guidelines. The Dream Center recognizes that some families may not meet the requirements to receive any DHS assistance, but they may still need financial support towards Dream Center program costs due to various circumstances. In the future, it is our desire and goal to utilize our Dream Maker Student Sponsarship System to support all families who do not qualify for full or partial State Assistance but still need financial support to cover Dream Center program costs. ILL YOU CONSIDER BEING A I N 2021? s s �� $4,000 - Sponsors one student through a FULL YEAR of Dream Center Programming (includes holistic services such as Continued School Day Curriculum, Healthy Meals, Skill/Character Development and more!). $2,500 - Sponsors one student through a 9-MONTH school year session of Dream Center Programming. $1,500 - Sponsors one student through a SUMMER session of Dream Center Programming (includes full day structured programming and transportation). $500 - Supports one student's enrichment activities for a FULL YEAR of Dream Center programming (includes athletic tournament/league expenses, field experiences,performing arts equipment). $150 - Supports one student's Academic & Character Development Curriculum for a FULL YEAR(includes classroom materials and supplies). sp � �- � r dubuc�uedreamcenter:networkforgood.com � or mail in a check to 1600 White Street Dubuque,IA 52001 Checks should be made out to Dubuque Dream Center memo:Dream Maker �rrtr��rY Ur• City of Dubuque �T T� � Planning Services Department �J Dubuque, IA 520D3-48�5 NE�as�e�piere a+z Flt� rV�is�i�5i��pr Phor�e: 563-5$9-421� Fax: 5b3-S89-4221 lap nning cityaFdubuque.ory, PL,ANNING APPLICATION FORM ❑Variance ❑Prefimir�ary Plat ❑Simple 5ubdi�ision ❑Certificate of Apprapriateness ❑Conditional Use Permit ❑Major Final Plat ❑Text Amendment ❑Advisory �esign Re�iew (Public Proj�cts) ❑Appeal ❑Minor Final Piat ❑Temporary Use Permit �■Certificate of Econamic Non-Viabilitv ❑S�ecial Exception ❑Simple 5ite Plan ❑Annexation [1Historic Designatian Conserv�tion District ❑Limited Setback Wai�er ❑Minor 5ite Plan ❑Historic Re�olving Loan �Demalition ❑Rezoning/PUD/ID ❑Major 5ite Plan ❑Historic Housing Grant ❑Port of[]ubugue Design Review Pfease type or print leaibly in ink Prop��y aWne�ts�: Nottingham Properties P�,one: 563-599-96�0 Aaares$: 21 � 5 JFK Road ��,: Dubuque Stat�: �A z;p: 52001 Fax#; Cel� #: E-mail: SCOt��]/OUS(�.rlet Ap�,;�a��iA�e�t: Scott Neuwoehner Pno�e: 563-599-9610 Aaar�ss: 2� � 5 JFK Road �F�,: Dubuque Stat�: �A Z;p. 52001 Fax #: Ceil #: E-mail: SCO��IOUSC�.rle� 16�4 & '� 628 White Street Downtown 5ite location�address: Neig�barhoaci Association: OR OR N/A Existing zoning: Proposed zoning: District: Landmark: ❑ Yes � No Legal Description (Sidwefl parcel ID# or fp� number�block number/subdivision): #�O24Z67OOFJ, #10242670Q6 Total property(lat) area (square feet pr acres): � �700 S F , 2,2�o S F Describe proposal and reason neeessary (attach a letter of explanation, if needed): DeITIOII�IOCI p��h2 bUiICIIf1��S�. The building has not been accupied far many years arrd has become in a sta�e af disrepair. CERTIFICATION: I/we, the undersign�d, da hereby certify�acicnowledge that; 1. It is the property owner's responsibility to locate property lines and to review the abstract far easements ar�d restrictive covenar�ts. 2. The information submit�ed herein is true and carrect to the best of my/our knowledge and upon sUbrnittal becorr3es public record; 3. Fees are not refundable and payment does not guarantee approval, and 4. All additional requir r� en and graphic materials are attached. Praperty Owner{s): , Date: �`"� `v�� Applicant/Agent: 1 Date: s_ `I r . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY—APPLT �ION 51JBME'1TAL CFi�CKLIST $144.00 Jason Duba 563 Design 03-04-2021 #1361 Fee: Received by: Payment from: Date: �i� Check#: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (use additional pages as needed) 1) Does the property have historic or architectural significance? If not, please explain and disregard questions 2 and 3. This property is located in the Washington Neighborhood. Built in the1870's, it is a 2-story brick duplex residential dwelling with historical significance due to its age, materials, and basic 20th Century architectural style. The building is an all-brick structure with non-detailed limestone sills and arched lentils. The interior has Victorian detailing in the trim, stair railing, solid wood doors and pocket doors. 2) Are you earning an economic return from the property or have you consid- ered any other alternative opportunities to do so? Please explain. The property is not earning an economic return and currently is not rentable. The Owner has explored ways for the property to be economically viable, but it is not feasible based on the significant rehabilitation costs needed for the building. 3) What incentives have you considered, including local, state and federal pro- grams have you considered to assist in rehabilitation. The following link pro- vides a list of some of the more frequently used resources in Dubuque: www.cityofdubuque.org/2234/Financial-Toolbox. See #14 on the Demolition Application Supporting Documentation Questions. 4) What is your timeline to demolish the building? If approved, demolition would begin as soon as possible, weather permitting. 5) Please provide the name of contractor. See Demolition Bid. Signature Date City of Dubuque Planning Services Department 50 W. 13t" Street Dubuque, IA 52001 5 March 2021 Re: Demolition Application, 1620 & 1628 White Street—Supporting Documentation Questions 1. A bid from a qualified contractor showing the cost of the proposed demolition. See attached Bid...$46,542.00 2. A report from a licensed engineer, architect or contractor with experience in re habilitation as to the structural integrity of the structure(s)that the applicant proposes to demolish. See attached Structural Evaluation Report 3. The appraised value of the property by a licensed appraiser for the following conditions: (a) In the property's current condition; The appraisal notes the building has$00.000 value. (b) After completion of the proposed demolition; The appraisal was done for the proposed demolition of the building/leaving vacant lot. The appraisal notes the building has$39,000.00 value. (c)After rehabilitation of the existing property for continued use by providing sales for the previous six (6)months for at least three (3)comparable properties. If there are not sales for the previous six (6) months at comparable properties, sales for the previous year at comparable properties may be used; and The appraisal was done for a completed renovation of the building. The appraisal notes the building would have a value of$230,000.00. (d) If the property is an income-producing property, such valuation must include the rent scheduled and anticipated income after such rehabilitation, and the same for at least three (3)comparable properties to substantiate the information provided for the property in question. 1620& 1628 White Street rent schedule for the buildinq 1620 White Street, 1,600 sq.ft. $850.00 per month = $10,200/annual 1628 White Street, 1,600 sq.ft. $850.00 per month = $10,200/annual City of Dubuque 1243 Locust Street Page � 2 Rent comparable 1605 White Street, 785 sq. ft. $750.00 a month = $9,000/annual 1698 Jackson Street, sq. ft.(n/a) $650.00 a month = $7,800/annual 1631 Main Street, 1,050 sq. ft. $800.00 a month = $9,600/annual 1838 Central, 1,100 sq. ft. $700.00 a month = $8,400/annual 4. An estimate from an architect, developer, contractor, or appraiser experienced in rehabilitation as to the cost to rehabilitate the building to the point of which a reasonable use or a reasonable profit can be realized from the property, including but not limited to bringing a building up to code so it can be occupied, not necessarily its"highest and best use", preferred use, or a restoration project. See attached Cost Estimate...$688,481 5. The amount paid for the property, the date of purchase, and the person from whom the property was purchased, a description of the relationship, if any, if any between the owner of record, the applicant and the person from whom the property was purchased or is being purchased, and the terms of the purchase or proposed purchase, including financing. Property Purchased on April 30, 2010 Purchase Price-$25,000 Purchased from—Rokusek(no relation) 6. If the property is income producing, copies of the 1040 schedule E or other appropriate forms and/or schedules filed with the IRS for the previous two (2)years. Such forms must include operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation deduction and annual cash flow before and after debt service, if any. Such forms must be signed by the current property owner to certify their authenticity. Property is not income producing 7. The name of all mortgagees and the balance of all mortgages or other financing secured by the property and annual debt service, if any, for the previous two (2) years. Debt service is the amount of principle and interest payments paid annually on the property. N/A—Building is owned 8. All appraisals obtained within the previous two (2)years by the owner or applicant in connection with the purchase, financing and ownership of the property. See attached appraisal performed for this application. 9. Any listing of the property for sale or rent, the price asked and offers received for sale or rent, if any,within the previous five (5)years. N/A The building is not rentable. 10. The assessed value of the property for the previous two (2)assessment years. 2020-$42,900 2019-$42,900 City of Dubuque 1243 Locust Street Page� 3 11. The amount of real estate taxes assessed for the previous two (2)assessment years and whether or not they have been paid. 2020-$762.00—paid 2019-$788.00—paid 12. The form of ownership or operation of the property, whether sole proprietorship, for profit or not for profit corporation, limited partnership,joint venture or other. For Profit Corporation 13. Any other information considered necessary by the commission to determine whether the property yields or may yield a reasonable economic return to the property owner(s). A reasonable economic return is defined as the cost to rehabilitate the building to the point at which a reasonable use or a reasonable profit can be realized from the property. This may mean bringing a building up to code to the point at which it can be occupied, not necessarily to its"highest and best use", preferred use or a restoration project. N/A 14. Proof of the applicant's efforts to obtain financing, tax incentives, preservation grants and other incentives to allow the applicant to earn a reasonable economic return from the property. Known funding sources have been evaluated and below is a summary of those the project could qualify for and reasons why they are still economically unfeasible. The City of Dubuque Fa�ade Grant Program—We understand this as not available. The City of Dubuque Financial Consultant Grant Program—We understand this as not available. The City of Dubuque Planning & Design Grant Program—We understand this as not available. The City of Dubuque Downtown Housing Incentive Program—We understand this as not available. The City of Dubuque Tax Increment Financing (TIF)—this project would not qualify due to size, scale and impact. State & Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives—this project could qualify for this incentive; however, the expense/process to perform this incentive are not justified by the costs/return associated to the small scale of the building. 15. Documents detailing the applicant's efforts in ongoing maintenance and repair. This may include, but is not limited to, tax statements and/or copies of invoices. The windows were replaced on 1628 White Street+/-8 years ago. McDermott Excavating Estimate and Request For Proposal PROJECT GENERAL: COfllOfl C011StfllCtlOf1 DATE: 2l24l2027 1100 Rockdale Road Dubuque,lowa52003 PROJECT LOCATION: 1620&1628 Whit9 Stf86f Dubuque,lowa 52002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: BUIIdI�Q DBtYlO 8f7d Utilily di3con�ed5 MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING PROPOSES SITE WORK AS FOLLOWS: Building Dema Mobilization Barricades City sidewalk and parking lane closure Remove the existing vrood fence at the adjacent propeRy as needed Knock down the buildings and garage Sort material,load debris and disposal at the landfill Landfill fees Loatl concrete,stone,brick,cmu and disposal Backfill the excavations with lime and compaction Import and place S"of topsoil over the disturbed areas Hydroseed all disturbed areas $29,778.00 Utility Disconnects Mo6ilization in the spring Barricades and alley closure Excavation permit Remove brick pavers in the alley and salvage Saw the concrete Areen alley boarder and removal Excavate the water servicss at the City main in the alley,2 separate locations Excavate the sanitary sewer services at the City main in the alley,2 separate locations Disconnect the water and sewer services per City of Dubuque Specs Backfill with stone and compaction Fumish and install filier fabric Furnish and place clean stone,concrele stone,chips and sand per City of Dubuque Green Alley Specs Replace the concrete boarder Re-install the brick pavers g�g��gq,pp Plans Dated: Addendums Noted: TOTAL ESTIMATE BASED ON ABOVE QUANTITIES $46 542.D0 SPECIFIC JOB ITEMS NOT IItlCLUDED: No asbestos abatement or removal No new fence furnished or insfalled No brick restoration on the building to the south,if needed NoiE: Utility disconnects will be done at a later Ume in the Spring of'27 GENERAL ITEMS NOT MLLUDED WITH THIS�110TE UM_ESSSPECIFIED ABOVE: MATERIALTESTING ROCKE%CqVATION HAZAR�OUSMATEAIALS SOILSTABILIZATION ENGINEERING AND SURVEY TRAFFIC AND PE�ESTRIAN CONTROL DEWATERING SHEETING 8 SHORING SEEO,FERTILIZER,BMULCH RETAININGWALLSORASSOCIRTEDWORiC VAPORBARRIER81NSUlATION BONDING INCORPORATE�DOCUMENTS PERMR58 EROSION CONTROL DESIGN 81NAOEOUACV OF GONT OOGS ADD INSIIRNC RE�MTS NO IMPORTED TOPSOIL NO LANDSCAPING NO WATERPROOFING PRIVATE UTILIiV LOGATES NO STAKING OR LAYOUi PLEASE CALL IF YOU WANTAYV OFTMESE ITEMS INC:UDED WRH TXIS QUOTE THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION ON THIS PROJECT SIGNED: �' ��DATE: � !� _I_p l n C.MCDermori ACCEPTED: DATE: TXIS PROPOSAL NEE0.5 TO BE SIGNEO ANO RETURNEO TOOIIR OFFICE BEFORE PROCEEDIN6 WITH WORK TXIS PROPoBAL NEEQS TO BE AN ATTACHMENT IF ACONTRACT IB REW IRE� TIUS PROPOSAL IB GOOD FOR 90 OAYS VER IOWA STATE LAW OWNERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCAiNG PRNATELY OWNED UTILITE8 11672 Airbome Road• Dubuque IA 52003 . Phone:563-583-0633 � Fax:563-583-5858 DESIGN 1268 LocustStreet Qubuque,lowa 52001 Scott Neuwoeher Date:02/17/2021 Time:11am Re: 1620&1628 White Street-Structural evaluation of building(s) Dear Scott: On February 15th,2021563 Design visited the duplex building at 1620&1628 White street to evaluate the structural soundness and suitabilityfor rehabilitation of the two-story structure. Below are our findings: The main building(s)appears to have been constructed circa.1870.The dates of construction are unknown for the detached garage buildings along the alley. The main two-story building(s)exteriors appear to be in an overall poor condition.The front fa�ade requires brick repair and tuckpointing,window repair and replacement,structural improvements for the front porch, sidewalk,and steps.Tin cornice requires minimal restoration.The north fa4ade requires brick repair and tuckpointing. The rear of the two-story building(s)along with the brick additions appear to have structural damage.There is significant deterioration of the brick and mortar joints where the settlement cracks have opened the joints along the rear wall.The exterior structural damage has also extended to the interior. The two detached garage buildings at the alley are in a state of disrepair.The CMU wall structures are failing and roofs are deteriorated. The interiors of each building require extensive rehabilitation.Structural issues and roof leaks have resulted in significant water damage.Many areas have loose/falling plaster,failing drywall walls and ceilings,mold/mildew issues,and water damaged wood flooring.There is architectural detailing in the wood trim,stair railing,and doors and it is our recommendation these items are to be salvaged. Sincerely, �� Andrew McCready,Registered Architect Principal Scott Neuwoeher 1620&1628 White Street-Structural Evaluation Page� 2 . j. i� .yy �` ��: �'W .��1'r:•YS;� ;;ii I ;.a i; - - �,'�'� I .:�. � , ^M•w.,��--.�'`� � �, � ��,; {4�•� :;l;'a:;. �-n.w, � _��. i i � --- -:xc�`_— �.;�� I � �-:�� -__ =__- � _ ---__� �:��x=- _ ___ __ -... � � - -- - � � � - _ -_ �: i _ =_ �9 =-_ ___-_- _ ��;� � � _ _-- - — — _ ` - -._- -- - ; ----- _-~-�' i I ��ws t -,� _ "` h; �, _-_ :�� I ��r :�� s—.; _-_ - - .�' � ,. g;� - � �„t _ _ _ - :�: :�.� - � , i � � � �'��1�� ._ _ - -- ____ :_ --�� i � � � �: :a: ��yl =-� -, �:-�I��l�� -� -- - - � �._.___ . .�- � ��. _ . ._ � _ -. l r. . . � . 4�,. r� ,+."',�- ' _____ '' '_ j.•i�� _�y- � ... ,�� ' '.'.�' . . '°�. ,.',�� [ �� _ 7.' �. '.......�ax�'� 4 �� ' . rf� ��;�µ•'��= �, �'1'..K�•:. .•��.'i . \` .. . *Y'-; �'••. �... .,' . 1` .\ _ . . . :.:'*..� •. � } ._. . .{_.i..._ � ' ... _ .. . . - - ..�.�d.'r�:':,'�' ::! , �-_!.. ��,r � t' �..� 1 � ha�; si;�'� PHOTO 1 � . . : — • r , . • . � �, ;y<: ' . i. 'x, g,=�:#,,�j�►f• � �� . �s ' �`�l� � t'� � �y . . �R°� . �yY �!- : .=�`�.••a� � . ' �I�y.` .i:��_ - � .• �.�• ��~• � , ' s rt .; . �, �L f x � ., �,,: ,- :�'+��[��`�. :°',�! �.^ Y 1�• .,,, _ " ._�. Y ��' � J: •• ��y,, � ..'e�,:� � -.w �� _ � ' t ,f�v� •�-,` �°t'�, _'!"_. .� �- + '� " ,��. . ,:��}•�•� + •�� y � s4�. ��. .� .. ' ' . � ��:._,. �. _ ".5 . ' ��''� .�� 'R�r'� ��:� �i'*',1. {�{.'t r.r � � �•-'��Y�" .!�. .�. �'. . +�F/ ��f'.� ' ��• -�..�-,d :n.. 4, R A,.�{. � �.:�� ,� - , ° 't; - ':.IsR,�r�'• � �.`�`� 'g F �'�'� •'�rJ� .. �.�., ..�:��. �-.`�� :� --�� !.�°%-'-`.� :.z. .:;4_. •� � �•irr �-.� - ..:4,. , � . _.,:l�� , � � � _..� , .•.F� + ' _, ��+� _ .� s:k y <� � :7y . _ - _ :..� � =��.��`;��r �� .�;_ � , . - ' ;•�%y�.��a- • ' •}�;� -_� . - ' -- �� . . �cy:�'a�� . �� :i^ •�i. �- y'?-�•• .- . . -�." :.•.� • . �:. .'�F.ti'- ..+'.��+v ''J __ .._ - � ti�.�' 'Y. � ' �w-w '...- �.4ie..;.a:r.r� ' { - � , . '- �'�.:~� � -� r_ ' � i.''�.f:,�..�,' �, . ' •r, 'i. ..,,7�-;, 1 . w�, �a. .!, �\ �Fvi� �q-. 4.: ' _ ,��_ _ , i`' �-�c '' � � � f� � Y-�. =si:� i c - _ - - - ��5�- , :�- _ - :;"= :�.�,.��.4�:;;; , , � �_ a�=.�, �i ,�� - ,Y` •a;-. _ `��; � t i}� ;.�;a� _ --+R� . '�. .• ! ��1� ,� r'` x�= E� •°* - - .� ..,,, i T _ -, T•". � �'Ry - -w � �T�'t�.?i� ,,+ '..,,-. _,r�`� �.� �,..�- ` - =,�a�' ' � • Scott Neuwoeher 1620&1628 White Street-Structural Evaluation Page�4 -�.. - , �;►->,..-,. � �s�,� - . ... � h :,a s� t; • ,3w��4 ..%.° l � , ..•:�'P. 1' •1 �y-q� . ��y�. 4k1j.�.•'S�, �• �1`��ti�^�j�'}Y \' xy. '7- ' � +�.`ey� � `�. :� e�.'�`^;��: .;i��^k �-1'�iti�j,�y`��`�A�� '�t ,'. �-•ti_ . =� ', + � �M 1�� ';ti ti�,�'y �,§'� `�\ �� . .. S.hi `i:�1:-`:A� :;�' ;��; ��C`4''r�•�hrt\'•��4�S'�J��49�, ��4 . �. -4. �i1�� n ,y �. � � � e: . •�t: \. s S�y �i��` 45 i.. ��V' \� •.R_ `4.�''1,R 'h �L;e'A��a,� 4��'''v.. 4.��i�'.' �'� ♦`��4'Sti�1i � .V ��\ly'`41 �� .�1y5 � • ' ' 4�.t'i'-.��t-�.�., ��\.�� 4.:�:'5,4+��' � . •�5 °'�f �; � y t � �"�x'�: 'tY-� ^i-�::. .'��;,� , �� l'`e!�.,��5.�';�`,-a'�;3'h�`�i.,�',"•.��.t� f��;}.2��`,..�,��r, � . . `r�� ,.� ��a�� '}� .�'.��.,�:�y• ti � M1°•}..R. �a ��...��,'. V��i��Z.. .' w . ` q �y'. ��'''��'`4�� : ..y'� yti:�`��' �-:. -.. �] • r ��_; 2ti� .� �:.. ��'�.:-: �� S� • ��'' S �" '�' \ A' ' . v. �' 1 }';.`;;,.�:e`�}'. .. i� - .. .. ypl '4'�*:y�.q �..*.. . ..� ' �'•'�•'�'�•ti hq.i. ' � f! �::: �-+... ��_� _ �,.��`„ ��4,�� . 4. ,�: �ti ., ..31ati..�� .4. ti v �'uY^+�},.�.. `�. � _ .� •3, . 'T'aa �-c� �.'- 1�F�' �ti :'�: ...�,�. � �;i,r•�^�� ` +.��_ , „ ,� . •,:.!, ti � '. i� �y'� '. ,,:i:c .. . - �y�"��\:.�i'• . • •�"�` .ti ..\�'h'��` �'�c . y4:�i`: _ ':-.. �"• .. •7�� - ;�i.��4��a�'��ty��, }��k��_y ' �\ti�••._�Q1+1�� k: �� ' . . ' k�� +��t•y-„ } T.. ' .'.. " ' "r^'^y�_a__ i.�^ ,ry=,1"`�' . -�-`• ��`' �� }� , - ' `�—� .r i��.� '��"=1i�� :,;'� y, � '.}�e +.'i"ay,.-�''y -�- } �,��`-I�p? , -��`4� �J��'. �:�a� ' � `�--�� . .. . '_ . �•.- iw�' '',,,.. . $k� �.; �i�� ' .. .. _ , , _ . . ' L_ 5 ,ki ' .. ... . " .. . , � . ' . . ' " • ' • ' . ! �y: •_'. _•�"' . .. � .. _ - .. ' - - .� � - _.. �. `+x-.�- ��,, 1 .se�,. •- ... '�'.��— _... ._. � ��.� �w.t �� __,�� • � " —_ _ - �i d� .'I� , . .-- ,.. r,= _ � T � � � �� 1�"�-r'• i~I.- . � f �. �, k. �; , --- -- . •- r� ' ` � 7 �� - --� 1 4 ,� � � ` • � I� T- - ' t � ��F' �' I , . � � � � f - :� '� ,� �� , � � '�,, � � �: . y .. �:;,� :,i y � . � .;�: ; ` ._�.. +'�- . � .l� �}3 ' : !.� s r.: `. ' � �` `y r . d.• ;�``' :w . - �► �'' \ � PHOTO 3 Scott Neuwoeher 1620&1628 White Street-Structural Evaluation Page� 5 ,. �;:�• ,;.� • ��:t•�,��••:;�.;: '-... . �� yh`�•��i' ��''�' ..r . ` '.."•. . . .i.' N*16',. .. � �!v ` i�.;�\� ;. t . :��' `�S y �. l�� •;i:, � ,i � �...�1\•�• � 1c\ti,`,�.a .!�;.,r•��'�1�. � ,\`� �' 1ti.t. �� ... � ;..�ir.. .. ..� 1\� 'b+4 ti�'yt.� .y.,��.\�\k.,tti: �?�� i�;:(�':.�', . ,� a ,�:�:�::\: �.titi: � ,�.t'.�;:�'. u �1�e �a.�� '��ti• .�� a'::.-�•a ri.' ''�� `� z.. " 'j ,�, ,�,�. � , � A� • ;..•�� ,� � 'E� ' � !� �,��., `�,+ ,� . '.,r,��;�'' .. ' ._ '. — �, �.. • �� :C- . � . ,'' �h� \ '� `�w. �"'�T_.�-�.sY_�r �:.�7 0'n, .;:*':`�;'-.�'• ;�.��,:�,,. .;ar� _�..� ', .�- - �: -F�.f•.-ftr — - -- r+.�� 'ti � �ti:� �,,r'3� ... � •y i k ' Y -- ., ,� ��t �R��,�� . �,�F ny 4 �,l�� : - ��.� �;�F'�� .;: ��_.._;'� �� ~ —_ -,� ��y _ .�, , �;.r '',��.. 1 � - �'' �.' �.��h ,. `i �. ; - , � -- � _~�e��f"�r��f .. I:�� _ .+, .I _ :��.. ;,� �� ;� ��. -- - __.�:=. � . .;+. � _ � , � � � ;, _ _ �, � .� � _ . - - :� C �� -; ; _ ,� . � ,� ��s �� — � _ ' �- ., :t ; 4 ��,�� - . �� -�� • . � � f �'• ._ — i � I. �s i i:, , :r�s� . i . . ��i`4 [+� �j'r-. � , � I � �:� }. ��. k _ :� l. . . . ,�'� . . ..��'= b,��•.. - Y ]3 ti �<. � �.� �`;:: _ �� ;� . �.��; — �R , • � � � � . '�`i - � , , . PHOTO 4 Scott Neuwoeher 1620&1628 White Street-Structural Evaluation Page� 6 1 , 1 -'k.•�� '. •. __ - -� ��— �P�'�-��" � � . _ - s � � �_ i �- � - — , ,�, — . ��.. f' � •� 1 1 Y ky r � `:!}��, _�h,. f � F� ��F,,1I � • --- _'_ � .;�i':�, - E.� - •F — . �::-�F - * � _ � �=��. ^ �� ';�s _ ��_ � � ; _ - �, _ _ � • _= � - .. � ' � :�.�� 4 -c � � ' _ _ E"._r ..� . � �- •_•--i� r.�� - � �:..�. . . - � . _... 1 ;j� 4. J. ,I � _ , �'° a�:- � i' .. '�' � h ,�i p •'.n 6- 1 �'C'�.;-' -1 i ,; , �,� .� ' -- . � ��• _ q r:•,"" , :? �. . �;r - �r �� , �y�,, i _ �i>'� h'-f}. � n�„�e.,:"��"'+e,�v. `�v i��l`.� .• ya ' �5t• ti3�� Jf +i '��.�"' '�;��LZ.:; , � � ,��h-.`.r��'L..s �y�`�.� 11.�. � '`�: ��,4�.�.°Z';,s'�'l�';� ; a �;r.�w•�' I i . r' ,� c•�� ` �� ,�'�: �.�;.. � �.,.�' r�,f t�: ��'.-i��.s...�S k � �• �� ,��'= '� 4 � � +�{��¢.*;Ts*;, :•.� +7 ��;�r 1: '�.�i.V:��'�:.i;�...'�„•`''H�.ti� {'�, ��`t•;, .�.. i'� �' t: t �yt'' .. - � ''d)'..� iE.•f+�,{ _ •-: 1� � ..'�' r��t•'..��5 � � '4� }! ��.. .'}.�I: , � I,` `'�� . } I I +,��e� ��'� �'�� 4'�,�y�,i,i..,` 4 � �i_ '��. .ii�. +�! �� . 4�`l 4: '�„� t � �...�• �'Y��;:�'�i }�'- �� .- �� .�� :�� .. . :��; ;. ► � � � .�;. PHOTO 5 Scott Neuwoeher 1620&1628 White Street-Structural Evaluation Page� 7 � _ _ -- —� �-__� F�' .Iy ,�/ _ __ Lr?�. � �. � . �� ■ -- - �- � .�:1�'. ,F I ]� . I� � �. �;�f �-#�,i�. ►, � p�, � a � � - i .,_ .�� —� . : ��:.'��. , � _ ;;w �� . f ' � �c� ��,��'f�Y .' ^'� ' �.� ��,,�:�� ,� � �� ,. t .� � , � :`:� � • r� �-:�3 � `��,� ;� W r. � S. Y''�a�� ] ��•w-; `�'E� �i �'1,�;'x{4.:f �yf�'}.:.�.. � .. y�]' l� .:¢ i.. .-� � r ' _ r „ �. ,.,. . .�'..a '� �,r'�;+ .��, �`Y r. ' ' � � - - -- �� y' ��';��,` � � �:�•. �r� ;#y�,�°::.��• .,e;. ,_ � • � '��,�� . , . Y: ��:_ .. . ' ,� 3..,�� .,;. j w: + � � � . '� ��]1;Y,3'a�-.�. �r PHOTO 6 APPRAISAL OF ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE OF THE NOTTINGHAM PROPERTIES LLC PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1620 & 1628 WHITE STREET, DUBUQUE, IA 52001 PREPARED FOR: TIM CONLON, MICHAEL HUNT 1100 ROCKDALE DUBUQUE, IA, 52003 PREPARED BY: JON C. KANE THOMAS P. KANE KANE APPRAISALS & REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. 14858 WEST RIDGE LANE, SUITE #8 DUBUQUE, IOWA 52003 563-556-2068 jon@kaneappraisals.net tkane@kaneappraisals.net #21-225 �a n e «rtifieci Ap�araisals A p p r a i s a I 5 C f V I C•C 5 1�856�Vest Ridge Lane Suite B aubuque,�A 52003-9639 1563}556-2D68 March 5th, 2021 Tim Conlon, Michael Hunt 1100 Rockdale Rd Dubuque, IA, 52003 Re: The appraisal of the estimated market value of property and improvements located at 1620 & 1628 White Street, Dubuque, IA. Dear Mr. Conlon: At your request, an appraisal of the Estimated Market Value of the property and improvements located at the above-mentioned property has been completed, and its report follows. This is an Appraisal Report, in conformance with 2020-2021 Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). This report explains and supports our opinion of the value of the subject and was prepared after an inspection of the property, its neighborhood, an analysis of market data, an analysis of the cost estimate to renovate the addition, as well as other factors deemed pertinent. As a result of our investigation, and based upon the analysis of the following data, it is our opinion that the Market Value of the Fee Simple Interest of the subject property, as of February 22nd� 2021 IS as f011OwS: ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "AS IS" $0 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" $39,000 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" $230,000 Respectfully submitted, KANE APPRAISAL SERVICES � .'i �,� � f� i /:�-Gn�� ' Y� �i�� ♦ Thomas P. Kane Jon C. Kane Certified General Real Property Appraiser Associate General Appraiser lowa #CG01594 lowa #AG03587 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Photographs of Subject Property ..............................................................1. Statement of the Appraisal Problem..........................................................2. Salient Facts Summary, Legal Description ...............................................3. Regionaland City Data................................................................................4. NeighborhoodData .....................................................................................5. SiteAnalysis ................................................................................................6. Description of Improvements.....................................................................7. Highest and Best Use Analysis..................................................................8. Subject Property «As Is".............................................................................9. Subject Property "Land As Though Vacant" ..........................................10. Subject Property "Subject to Completion" .............................................11. Correlation and Final Reconciliation .......................................................12. Certification................................................................................................13. Addenda 1. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY �. t , � � � ,� ,� � �� , �� - �. � � ,� F, , � , _ �. �:� � j �' f�,,�„ �� 11 - , ��,, ��e � ��_� � a �, t ,,�,�� ' _ 4 �� ';� i.�. ,,} ��. -_ - �� „�� 'N"� ,� �� ti�'� � �'`�-.ti '^� = l � 1� { S �,�� ...�v� k� "?a M � �n �� '�c�. :` __ - I� ...�� T-1"'� � 1�� I ___ � �li ti —� � - a, , ,�, ;`} �ll�`� � .___ _ � _ ��,,,�,,b.�, . , 1 �i � — , 1� , .�� ! ,� , � ; , �� _� �_ _ - .-�-�'.:.-� -_.._ -- �>�,,��.� ; Subject Exterior— Front Side r�. ;� � � � �� '' � a ��I�� y e�` k,�' � 1 \ �.� � t � � �a�� f�' �� °� � �.w��5�$. S�� ,� T "� a - -- - `` °�r�`�: �- �f�r' �r i= r f'& � �� . �e � . � � � '��'`��[�'��."��,� A��F'��s �n+r� r% � r �y 4� W�,�! � 1�1 �� -�I � ;r�`� a o 4�3 g° � ' .t��, � e ,��4,� R�C,s� �+� ��' I � r s�'�.j- � "'� .,. ��.� �� d�.�� :��1��`k +r�.. A,, , � i :.]-• �� ,'�'�..� °z""�:�� t ! E2 . . ��" ,k t' s� , I �"-� � ft�r�°,` � r EG I � � ;��„�� ;a 5�. �,� ; � r� '� � � ��-�� f 1'��' � � — — � . - ' y'� � �' =,r .I�. i II ` i 1, J i � � ' ' y � � �i�n: i��l.. � � f j � , I. ' i i � �I , �; Sub'ect Exterior - Side I M J 1-A. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) �: I �� „ , �. ;:.,._ .� � 1 . � �� '4 ry -��' �[ ��a �._ —_ � _ ��_ _ � ` ' F �' I�� ,.� , � � � 7� —� ,�nl�rr�� !� ,, ,..I _ � _ - {�)� _ s,�l , _ �` , 4 ��J �� ' _ I � p .� ! �:r' ��`Sfu 1 �� , , ��' 't ' , � � � . - .. � •_: °�'� �� x ��.��` � � :� .�= , , � � �' � _ . . �fi .� �� :--�„� >,:. � .h , Subject Property— Rear Side �, r ' �11 , I �� ^`�� t� -- '� ,,,�l,� �� __�� tr i—'- � — p��J� - .� ' _.}. �;'• ; _ �a _ �') � . L ,. - � � 'r y; ;F� r� - P4 �� -'1 . /' �' �ir'i6 _ . •� r- �' 9 _ � � , �� ' yy .. �s $:. .v,; — _ � Subject Exterior— Rear Side 1-B. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) __�� .�. �. . 4- , � T . � ��: � : -- - 1 � -,� — � ; _ �_ d, `� _ - i. . � +� , , ,- •� _�,�'� � ,. 1� , �a �.I'i�q�y��l��.�� . �'�AdE��` _ —. :�I. �_ .. i . �� , �_ ;`;.- ' �'r= . �� ''. _�. . •�— - — Rear Alley— Looking North �� _ � � � � �.. ; �..� �� ,1 . � _,�_ \ y, � � +.- �� Sy 1 � ~�. '.\ � i�. �" i.�. � �,y • � _ '"` �+.. . � �i J� ! fk . � °u;�f. '� , rl \�f �� y ��N i • �� y,,. �,�` �+� + r _ , .�; �, _ � �, _ _ .,� .� 1 �/ .� �� -{i � � � � � ��. �''� � - "�.� _ * � � �� ,��: r�� .,�,� �� -��. .. White Street— Looking South 1-C. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) � - �� ,.,� .� ,�. �; �r: _ r; �h _ � � �w E�a _ — "� : a' �� :'�``� �"r��" .� ':�.." 1r ' _ �"'" � � .: �.I ={"�'�t... � c.,Y , a l"� '+,. , �� F � ��i7' � �� r�.t �j�,��- �"' r� � . ' �_ _ � _ �� " •� �� r 5� [ ^� - - -s— -^ ;_. � - �� - :., __ a• �� _ �;� C � �} -�� , r�:,:� ti � � � _ , �� ; � .'-,Y ,• �� ` � `.: �- � �� ,�, � .i� a r fs ,�.� � .� �� White Street— Looking North , ��' �`:�" I f _ � ,; `i 1 ✓ . ' �. l �L- ��_ � I i � .. 1 ,.._ . - '�- �� I I � � ' - .:. 's.' ..- . - . _I�, ' - � -_�..�._':�. � �� , �I ' '� �' � ,a , 1 A I+�� i�'; � � _ � � � ;r � i ' l � „� _ �� ::� � , i �, . � � � :;, ,'"` -- - ,► y ' �� :� �"`,�� `..�. ' ��.. ��` �'9, if`,�'°� � r �� ` � :'�� ` ��'` � � .�� . .. ��;� ';s�. Subject Exterior— Front Porch 1-D. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) _ � �'� „ . ;� �+ � � - ��' � � . 4 � �_ '� : v,�� .� � �. '� ` n� i :; ��`'� �f q. # ;} .�'��°'; ��°; t •;� � r � 4r � � •� � �r � - . ��.��`~ ' ' ., �' ;�^ i: � . t� .��.-- �jl�� -��.,�``y�,4 - '` o�� - � r C 5 � ��'C ,r . �T �+. �� + ��4 ��- � - � � � �' �" �,y�'�,��x^� � ;� ,,�, ' � y ��s'w� � � : *� �*'�` � � _ =-°� a � 1+ �. f,w,;� .�'y,�;xr� ;'� � �; ` �� 1 �' y� " a '�`'� � �, r'`� F � �� , �� .� s c ' ��, r.- ,� � ,` � �_ ,�� .� � �, , , -��t{� , � + t �� ,�, . �. ea � ry rr 'S��1� _ . . , �,F�� y'��f,�'i k- �d ' �� . i �-�`t�� r LL��-�. � � � �� 1��1 S#7FyS'�� Subject Property - Interior �ss=�, �,� �� * � � � � L � � � � : / \�, �� . ��► � � . � � � � . - f � .� 1 . � � i , �' , � � �i� �� - i W. ;�a �• ' � � ��;� � ��.,� '��:;"' �� f �M � ��'�•� � -�, � '��, , 11 k � � d i _ � ' ,� � � �� 3 � 1 / � ' \ � �� ',�v� ,�' � �_� � � � � ��"� �� •.'�;� , ' �,�, f , � �� F ��`,+��'� ��.� \,�� ., � � � � � � �y . �; �, fJf � ��: ,\��,� � ; � � �� ! ' , ��' :--��—��e�.��.��= � ^,�.��i��1 - - � `{'t6,�+,y�-�%'i•� s r�f;-t 'I �.';'—�' ��4'/'�`� � �' � "ha.aa�i,' �� 1,�,,`�' �`t 1 1 i i _ Y �y! '��1�I � ��`,p:�_ ._ .�-a . .\�'�^� "'.� ,`y' i�+!e'r ti—:...! �/��/ 1 ��-��j _ _ — �` i� ." f ; ; /,�, �� . .�,�, — — _ — �-�—.—x._�. �� i .._. ..____ _—- _ / Subject Property - Interior 1-E. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) f � ,, .� _�,;. , y� ` - � ;a � _ �� -��'�-_ . _ .. �4�� .. � � i _ � ♦ � \ „'� ., � '-.l��,_ - _d�.«...:.. `�*�-:'• . � �` . � Subject Property - Interior � � ..;�. .-�-. � y Y�(' �r- . � � � �_`' ��'j�j�� - � � � _ �� '�, 4�° � � � �� j � � —�.. _ '� ,� - :�.r-�_� . � i /, . _ �. /- _ �; �,.,, t �� ,.� " �.�. � � - � � . � = I ��- Subject Property - Interior 1-F. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) � �� ' + I , ` �' ' A,{ '� ,I � I� � ; � I � � � � , � __ . � , ,� _;� � �,y _`,1 i� � j ; ��: �.=.. � ��'_ �' a � �, �` �t�";.. �� A. .,�;'� _ -*.''.r ,��`� �1 �� -i��. �.�J�_Y � , 1 �`��Y'11��.ry ��e� . . ' t � ��y • ��' �j� + . '��' � "�.. �� .I :� f Y,yt,n., 4,. � x �. ��,� , � �� • � .... .f:e... ,,..- .�'JSe�. I�Y' Subject Property - Interior - _ . � TM '. �.� . '�, 'A_ ) -�i.�i � _.__ " '9 _ ��:rTi 4 . . _, " e �/' � �� ' � •�.'. � - - �. . �_ ��. i � � �. '� � ��t , ... .. . E,�,�e.,.� " � � - � � + .. , — �— -„�, . 'rR�q�.p4�.. � ' i� �+ -_�— t4t� �, -. v,,��. .. �� .`�� f r� � • " i Subject Property - Interior 1-G. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) � _ ! �- t � _ K ji' i t f .Pf � � � � �i t � � � i ..;'�{ r '�� . ' �rr Subject Property - Interior r —,;y- � � _�� . � .; �_ ,� �; _ f i , � � ,�� s �: k� , � � l , Subject Property - Interior 1-H. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY- (CONTINUED) �, i �_ � � __ - - �� ..��:' - -- : � - - � � ;� � : ' _ �'�. - �� _ . �._,��•w - .; _ .. �� .� � �_ '� � ; � ,.�'� ,_ " - .F'� ' ��t- , ��,{ � �,, �, �„� .� � {1� � �fi- - < , r-°'�^i��" �� u,y � � ' �' v i� �_i � .f�A .� •�,J ��. �� , 1 s Y .,� Subject Property - Interior - � � -�-�1 � �:' ��. '�� ,..� � � �� ' �: _ '- �: �� --. _ . ..Y - .;.�.�_ , �.�,�.�.,_.. - �. . � _ _.+ �� ' `r'?' r'- - � . . .� ��r . •- 1.;� - � . �� -�-r- �il Subject Property - Interior 1-I. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY— (CONTINUED) . . .. �,, C: — � f i .. I !'�f+� . . 'f � f' --i"' 1 " � � � , ;: I � � 1� ��i� , F - � r' � , � ;1 . .p _ � .� �, .� . � Subject Property - Interior t ' � �;� �' �} � . , � • i� � ,� � J � � , ;� �_ . :;� , �; , � ' � � - ;�: � �� ,�. .- � w _ LL,__ . _ ., � � a - _ `� . " "� �,5 � � " ,�' W '¢ �\ � If.. _.v_��R��''�:._�_ . . � � �:�.'�.r �� , k �b�'�:}.� :�.��'.�R��.1�. • � .,�.� .\ Subject Property - Interior 2. STATEMENT OF THE APPRAISAL PROBLEM PURPOSE, TYPE OF VALUE, INTENDED USE, AND INTENDED USER: The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value and feasibility of the property and improvements located at 1620 & 1628 White Street, Dubuque, lowa. Tim Conlon & Michael Hunt, of Conlon Construction have requested the appraisal, and are the intended users in analyzing and evaluating the feasibility of the subject property, which is the intended use. The appraisal report herein will include the following estimated values; the properties current condition "As Is", after completion of proposed demolition "Land As Though Vacant", and after rehabilitation of the existing property "Subject to Completion". The subject property is in very poor condition and has been reportedly vacant for several years. This data will be analyzed to provide an opinion with regard to the feasibility of rehabilitation or the consideration of demolition. Any other user of use is unintended, and requires post report dated prior written permission of the appraisers. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL: In preparing this appraisal, we have: 1. Inspected the site, as well as the interior and exterior of the building; 2. Researched public records to determine ownership and other pertinent information; 3. Identified and investigated appropriate market and cost data; 4. Developed an opinion on the estimated values; "As Is", "Land As Though Vacant", and "Subject to Completion" 5. Reconciled the various findings into an opinion on the feasibility of the rehabilitation of existing improvements or consideration of demolition. Per the request of the client and requirements of local commissions, the following criteria will be addressed. a.) In the property's current condition; This analysis will include an estimated market value of the subject property on and "As Is" basis, and the estimated cost of demolition, provided by McDermott Excavating will be taken into consideration. b.) After completion of the proposed demolition; This analysis will include a "Land As Though Vacant" estimated value of site utilizing the Cost Approach to Value. c.) After rehabilitation of the existing property for continued use; This analysis will estimate the value of the subject property "Subject to Completion" by utilizing the Sales Comparison Approach to value. The property will be compared to similar type Duplex sales within the Dubuque market area. Rehabilitation costs have been provided by Conlon Construction and will be given consideration throughout analysis herein. d.) The subject property has been vacant for several years, and is in very poor condition with significant physical deterioration. The property does not meet basic safe living standards and utilities have been disconnected for many years. A hypothetical Income Approach to Value was considered, yet not developed due to the subjective data anticipated would not produce credible results. The property is not saleable. 2-A. STATEMENT OF THE APPRAISAL PROBLEM ANALYSIS OF THE SUBJECT: The subject property is located at 1620 & 1628 White Street, Dubuque, Iowa. The property consists of(2) nearly rectangular shaped parcels (#10-24-267-005, #10-24-267-006) with a combined land area of 0.09± acres or 3,900 sq. ft. (Dubuque County Assessor). The subject site is improved with a 2-story brick duplex that was built in 1870. The subject building has a reported area of 3,411 sq. ft. above grade, with a full basement. The subject property is in very poor condition with significant deferred maintenance. The property has reportedly been vacant for several years and is deemed severely inadequate for living conditions. The subject property is located along the east side of White Street in a mixed-use neighborhood in the downtown district of Dubuque. The subject property address is 1620 & 1628 White Street, Dubuque, lowa. SALES HISTORY: The subject property has not been transferred or sold within the last 3 years. Nottingham Properties LLC is the owner of public record. See deeds in addenda of this report. DATE OF APPRAISAL: Jon Kane & Tom Kane inspected the subject property on February 22nd, 2021, which is the effective date of the appraisal. The date of the report is March 5�", 2021. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: The value estimate herein is based upon the assumption that there are no hazardous materials in the building or the site. The appraisers are not qualified to discern the presence or absence of such materials (asbestos, underground tanks, etc.), but are aware that they can have a significant negative effect upon the value of a property. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. At time of walk through and inspection, the improvements appear to have mold. The appraisers are not qualified to identify various mold, yet are aware of the dangers and negative effect on value. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this property to determine whether it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. As walk-up apartment buildings, the property does not appear to be in conformity with the ADA. A detailed survey could reveal that the property is not in compliance with more of the requirements of the ADA, which could have a negative effect upon its value. 2-B. STATEMENT OF THE APPRAISAL PROBLEM REASONABLE EXPOSURE AND MARKETING TIMES: The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice require the estimation of a reasonable exposure time for the subject property, when appropriate. Considering the age, condition, and quality of the subject addition, it is not deemed appropriate for a exposure of marketing time to be estimated. The subject property is in very poor condition and has significant deferred maintenance and physical depreciation that would be deemed inappropriate for marketing. The subject property has been vacant for the several and is not suitable for occupancy as of the effective date of this appraisal. DEFINTIONS: Fee Simple Interest is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, published by the Appraisal Institute (6th Edition, 2015, Page 90), as: "absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat" Market Value is defined by federal regulatory agencies pursuant to Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989 and in The Appraisal of Real Estate, published by the Appraisal Institute (14th Edition, 2013, Page 692), as "the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions, requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is consummation of a sale as of a specific date and passing title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. both parties are well informed or well advised and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; 3. a reasonab/e time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale." Extraordinary Assumption is defined The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, published by the Appraisal Institute (6th Edition, 2015, Page 83 & 84) as: "An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, which, if found to be fa/se, could alter the appraiser's opinion's or conclusions." 2-C. STATEMENT OF THE APPRAISAL PROBLEM (CONTINUED) DEFINTIONS (Continued): Hypothetical Condition is defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal published by the Appraisal Institute (6th Edition, 2015, Page 113) as 1. A condition that is presumed to be true when it is known to be false. (SVP) 2. 2. A condition directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of the analysis. 3. SALIENT FACTS SUMMARY DATE OF INSPECTION: February 22nd, 2021 ADDRESS: 1620 & 1628 White Street, Dubuque, lowa, 52001 TYPE OF PROPERTY: 2-Story Brick Duplex LAND AREA 0.09± acres (3,900± sq. ft.) IMPROVEMENTS: The subject property is improved with a 2-story duplex that was built in 1870. The building has a reported area of 3,411 sq. ft. above grade, with a full basement. The property is vacant and deemed to be in very poor condition with significant deferred maintenance. PRESENT OWNERSHIP: Nottingham Properties LLC ZONING: R-2A (Alternative Two-Family Residential) ASSESSED VALUE AND TAXES: 2020 Assessed Value of Subject Property Parcel #'s 10-24-267-005 & Land $ 11,700 10-24-267-006 Improvements $ 76,580 Total $ 88,280 Gross Taxes: $ 1,569 RIGHTS APPRAISED: The rights appraised will be fee simple interest. The analysis will include estimated values; "As Is", "Land As Though Vacant", and "Subject to Completion" LEGAL DESCRIPTION; Lengthy, See Copy of deeds in Addenda ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "AS IS" $0 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" $39,000 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" $230,000 4. AREA DATA DUBUQUE, IOWA ClAYT{1N Potasi � � Coiesburg e, ❑Ickeyville Ed e�Vood �.�: Luxemburg �Balltown • 9 - *...... � �s, GRANT � Gree�ey • •M11ew ❑uran�n 8enton PeterSeurg �'e"�a 6ubu ue a E.Dubuque Pelax'are 6yersville _ f �Ear�vdle f Epworth �eY. �. `�" �p F2rley• � • �`est• _ r� , �81hi• Peos[a .� �sx�; �;� Galena DELA�dIARE 1Nvnhingto-n �'"A� ;� D!1$U f1E �s� r-., +g; �.., 4 �� r��: St. • so ' Nopkinton• - Fillmare gernard : �onatus Cascade • � La Motte Zwingle � `.� Monticelln• lUNES �l 1AC1{SUN eeilevue!�� The Dubuque metropolitan area is located geographically located on the most eastern most point of the State of lowa, the southwestern most point of the State of Wisconsin and the northwestern most point of the State of Illinois. The metropolitan area is referred to as the Tri- State area. Dubuque, lowa is located 178 miles west of Chicago, Illinois, 172 miles southwest of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 281 miles south of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and 200 miles northeast of Des Moines, lowa. With a population of roughly 60,000 people, Dubuque is lowa's ninth largest city. The City of Dubuque is the county seat for Dubuque County, which has a population of nearly 94,000. Dubuque has received a number of special designations. In 2010, the city was recognized as one of the "100 Best Communifies for Young People" by the America's Promise Alliance. In 2010, the city was voted Best Small City to Raise a Family, and 1=� place in the Nation among Mid-Sized Cities for Projected Job Growth in rankings by Forbes Magazine. In 2011, made the Top 20 in U.S. for Job Growth with a 18�^ national ranking by Moody's. In June 2007, Dubuque won the All-America City Award, one of 10 cities nationally to do so. In June 2008, Dubuque was named as the "Most Livable" Small City by the United States Conference of Mayors. Nestled along the banks of the Mississippi River, America's River is the only place along the 2,400-mile stretch of the Mississippi River that celebrates the historical, environmental, educational and recreational majesty of the Mississippi. The nearly $400 million educational, entertainment and historic riverfront development project in Dubuque, lowa, features these tourism components: National Mississippi River Museum &Aquarium, Grand Harbor Resort & Water Park, Grand River Center-An Event and Conference Center, Mississippi River walk, River's Edge Plaza and Alliant Energy Amphitheater, Renovated historic Star Brewery Building / Now home to the Star Restaurant & Ultra Lounge and Stone Cliff Winery, newly constructed land-based Diamond Jo Casino and the newly renovated Mystique Casino. 4-A. AREA DATA (CONTINUED) HIGHWAYS: Dubuque is a hub for several major arterials into the area that include: Highway 20- A very modern four-lane highway stretching from the Illinois border at Dubuque, to Interstate 380 and Interstate 35 in central lowa. A two- lane highway currently carries travelers into the Illinois cities of Galena and Freeport, from Freeport a four-lane highway continues on to Rockford and Interstate 90. Highway 20 is also Dubuque's busiest east-west thoroughfare. Highway 61- Provides the Dubuque metropolitan area with a modern four-lane connection south to the Quad Cities and Interstate 80. To the north, Highway 61 provides a scenic drive on a two-lane highway through Wisconsin's western cities and towns. Highway 151 Carries business and leisure travelers on a modern four-lane highway southwest to Cedar Rapids and Interstate 380 and northeast in Wisconsin to Madison and Milwaukee. Highway 52- Offers a well-maintained two-lane highway along the great Mississippi River from lowa into Wisconsin and Illinois. This portion of the highway is part of the nationally designated "Great River Road" national scenic highway. MAJOR BUSINESS & INDUSTRY: In the City of Dubuque in March of 2012 there were 53,700 residents employed with a 5.5% unemployment rate. Top Dubuque employers include: Employer Employees John Deere Dubuque Works 2,065 Dubuque Community School District 1,946 Mercy Medical Center 1,324 Medical Associates Clinic 999 The Finley Hospital 920 Heartland Financial USA, Inc. 760 City of Dubuque 686 Holy Family Schools 575 Prudential Retirement 550 Eagle Window & Door 550 4-B. AREA DATA (CONTINUED) Some other companies with a large presence in the area include: Dubuque Racing Association, Flexsteel Industries, Diamond Jo Casino, A.Y. McDonald Mfg., Loras College, and Cottingham & Butler, McKesson Corp., and Mi-T-M. EDUCATION: The City of Dubuque is home to three colleges/universities. The University of Dubuque, Loras College, and Clark University. The Dubuque area also hosts several other educational institutions. Colleges/Universities/Seminaries 8 High Schools 4* Middle Schools/Junior High Schools 4* Elementary Schools 17* (* includes public and parochial) HEALTHCARE: Two major hospitals serve the Dubuque area, The Finley Hospital and Mercy Medical Center, in addition to other health centers. Hospitals/Healthcare Centers 11 Physicians 171 Dentists 55 Outpatient Clinics 21 Nursing Homes 22 RECREATION: The Dubuque area has an abundance of outdoor activities that provide enjoyment of the outdoors throughout all the year's seasons. Public Parks 38 Public Tennis Courts 19 Public Golf Courses (within a 15-mile radius) 6 Public Swimming Pools 2 Public Boat Ramps 3 Other Activities: Biking, Hiking, Boating, Bowling, Canoeing/Kayaking, Hunting, Skate/Bike Park, Downhill Skiing/Snowboarding, Cross-Country Skiing, Horseback Riding, Ice Skating, Hockey, Fishing, and Snowmobiling. 5. NEIGHBORHOOD DATA NEIGHBORHOOD DATA LOCATION: The subject neighborhood is located on the eastern side of Dubuque, lowa in the downtown district. The neighborhood is a mixed-use neighborhood with an influence from residential, commercial, multi-family, and institutional properties. The neighborhood boundaries would be considered Bluff Street to the west, 11th Street to the South, 20th Street to the north, and Elm Street to the east. UTILITIES: The neighborhood has City of Dubuque water and sewer. Electricity is provided by Alliant, natural gas by Black Hills Energy, phone service and fiber optic by Century Link, cable by Mediacom and police and fire protection from City of Dubuque and Dubuque County Sheriff. ACCESS: The neighborhood is bisected by 2-lane, 2-way city paved streets in all directions. Central Avenue bi-sects the neighborhood and runs north-south, and Loras Boulevard bi-sects the neighborhood and runs east-west. Public bus service is available in the neighborhood to other parts of the city. Access is deemed average for an urban neighborhood, and a copy of the traffic count is included in the addenda. ZONING: The neighborhood has mixed-use zoning that included residential, institutional and spotted neighborhood commercial areas located throughout. AREA BUILD-UP: Typically a neighborhood evolves through a four-stage cycle including Growth, Stabilization, Decline and Revitalization. It is our opinion that the subject neighborhood is in a Stabilization stage. The neighborhood is deemed 100% built-up. TOPOGRAPHY: The majority of the neighborhood is nearly level to gently sloping. There is minimal physical limitation in the neighborhood for development. CONCLUSION: The neighborhood has favorable proximity to existing major thoroughfares and public transportation. The neighborhood has all public utilities for the various uses, favorable topography, close proximity to the downtown business district and deemed 100% built-up with properties typically average maintained. No significant redevelopment pattern that would result in a change of use is foreseen in the near future. Given these factors, and no detrimental influences were discovered, we feel that the outlook for the neighborhood is stable. A neighborhood map is shown on the following page. 5-A. NEIGHBORHOOD DATA (CONTINUED) +�'�� - �-.- -. '� :7M.�- �� :; �w � �� ,�'�i• � �1� � • ��I �rt � f �r*•``t {� ��r d�'• `y{ �' .� r p f �I � / �..�� v_' � F •'� � 5'r�Y M1 '� �lf f '��' • r � f' �1 ��I{. ' �� ,�' .��y�� 54e � ��.r �� ..<f L �* ti..�� "�'��' a t.. �Y �� +� +'�5 �.'{�� y�,�� ' .�S�� l �,�1 � '�f',�•w �}� - � �p i rR, k �fi �.}�4�f`"4�z , i�' � � .#, �'?::�` f '� ,.� ,�f�' ��,r`�:}_ ,��:-'� �.�lb�. 't� ' -. ' 7i,.r"` ��• ��= �,ti e ��_'��'#�' .,�� L'� S'{. " .r ��.� .�f � . � s��_ � � �{ ',� �'��^� 4 `4 �-+^F� �, y � ' �� . - �:'�.y �,�:;;'.., 'q ''; �� ', � �`.:��n' � ,A �l�`�►' .�� r° � ��- .;� ��J_ : �: �x � � x., . • '�c.�ir+ .A s ,:�s "�{.#.�. x �� '3�� .��{ }•�•.�.{r{r - `� j � 1 a� L +}�r� '�.r �7 � ��. r. �'��,_. 'Y�:'r� _ �R S2� `•��- �:� �-�'� �� - ��J � ; �' `y �� /a �'" ., p. , . �� "�i .. � ' �� .�, 1 y. � �� a �_ •.1�6�..v.�`.�'-4� � .� !'{5 '�{-' � �• , r }� 1' _� •r' �4Y i ' ' y�i¢ r "�?�-� �+y, �Y}..�� '�.+•�" � �� i 4�� '�.�� i� � ! r ' �,, ' � ' �' � T � !�f'1� 'j,_�'`• f ;'•� ' �-;'�t '� ��:'�l ' L r� .� "., p� _`��F .- ��*�- �-. :� ��-.� ��,�� 1 ��`. ,� - a�. ,. '}� �• r � ''~ �� 4 � �4 Y 4' ,'4{-S�.� 'r�`. � . � aff#j ��'�� p.��'{-_ � �� 4i" �+r � , -� �',� � ,�� F+t..{ * Y * �. .. 4 J�.�f�4:� . �' 4 �'','-. �. r'n '� � Y.i � y . � .•. ,�� i 4 SURJE�i ,,. •1 .� aS � �, -� -,.,. ��': �':. _ '�i:•., {'�,,'` ��. ti ;��,� "r.. .'.. '�'+ ti�,} . � � �� = � v•� .'��• 15�n White �t . ,r ti w r. ,� � Y.� w � F .t' •�''"` '�S?S"t� �J �• f �� Y:��{ ;� �� I.�U�u7la. lix�lL�l.l1 .'�'�� ,-,ti �:r'- . a 'i ' .,,,, �_ ��,��. � �- �,'.: •f. �� s��';'� � �..� ,�'�,�.�� •=� '�� 1 � �`,� �* J��R- << • ��v�� ;�. Y�—�,�'<; ',.� �=�'��` ��. �� „Y r• +' � �� ii..�.,14: � k �.�C 7. 4. �� rJ� . t � ��'-� :� .�=�� ._ ��'�t � +�� . -., `��,;�� * �� -.� '�,} . x ��.'�[�:� �:�.�::�:: ;'� .��' ��'� ,�';.; �� ,.�[�.� �,'� � ,' '+,, �' ' "�� . �1��Y�''�M1'.ki � {r ��y-�Y. J �. t�1 L� �� S� ��.'-�+'T� �� } -�� x 4 �C. r t � ti � ''} k �.i�: {' ,•� ��r*�� yh'i+y4 4 i>� � .�� _�. , �y� '� �; ,�ii }'� �;. �l. ..y. .,�. � �'. ,.�C'��,:� �.' ti� i .. �tn,�, .�, '. �.�a '��`. r;. ..�� .,1- ~� � ' �� xG,i�; .� �y � + �`�� _ ��ri.:�.. - ,{ � � .� � �fs.�. 1��i''� ,i��i'�L r � •`y� ' ' _r� -�;�:� '�'�' },. �"�'� �'{ '7�' � � r � {A ;�,� � K.. � �+:. ; . �� *,r - a .s ¢4�M1,* �'i �r,'}-�� y � ��i�-� � �"�� i�' r^' '� � :�� '. �'_"� 4. ' 's k.:'''� 1 y�. � '+- =.��}y 4� ;�',�k. i r �z . 4 �'� �`-Y. { .k�! ":M1�� 7� •Y`.��.i...` �� + �'�� -r� �� 'i` ' :�.'k�.r �'a wF' L�a-.- 4�� y ��.';r �—�} .• �'-_�'~� �;�� .n;..y ''��,��V� YF� �� `� 'x•��• ' , �.�; � :, r.;�,-�'r. .y1�. F � � . #,�; ��' �_ .� �- . '� : , [ ,,.. y.:�Y .. 7 . }�� }��•�pi � .�'-r.�5. ��'. '�'� n� a5 � .},. . _ � .,� 4 , i�e'' .L.-,r.:.�.._ +r• �' ' � sk-;., Y� 'fi�' i�' 1 i `� ��y�y�.�� ' - ��'Cti ��i.�"" � _ "':� iy 'ra.� i � � 5 1 � - '�,�' Y��,r �• ` �s'd 4 r��71��1� `� 7Y �.� '.5� � � � '�r� � !sl `r.��;4�• 4 .-.c�.. } IYz � 4��'�;�t```�'�ff��7 � �: � L� .�'' i�,�'.'`i ' F *_�'+ 6 � t ��. ��• i �. � � ''�� . � �' '"{Fr '�''�.��. t."�� .'ti��" 7*4�'-r'o : U'o ':4��# � :�, �' '`'M .�' �� ,,k �;��-�� ; �;�� -r�d� �.�. r,: � - � . k � .��;a i1�. � �`� 4r�'- { SS:. . � i,.. iSF .. .T*, �*�f �. � . r�� . .}� • �r 1f� �.M1 •.�! '. f �' �' �f ��` � t� f +1}Y�'�..*��1 �.� ��W�. �� ' ''(�� . • - -�S{�-. S lY��''' �! ' 11F i �' �' �`+1�� 4' `/ r } � � ',��'��+ e k �Y� .� '~� ' }ye.�J['�. f'.5 y''�� ` 1 �� " ,`,'' � : ^j�s ��`" 7 -i ��LL .��7 � � ."��'� ��3�/ t�,� .�.�' y�:� �" � � '�}}�� . � �� .� �� 5' •F��!`'-�','Rir�M1+�y � i ,� •_IR,�F _ 5� � : �-� �� .��y�s. I. ;} I� Y V�5�� {'� � , +�'�.,�,. ' F" � ��"4�r�r `��s " Y� ..y. j.. i+�., �+.??�r� '� �5 �!� � ,��;�� `4 .�� f - i{ �Y:i:. � f. � ��'�' ` . . ':.�' i: � -- �=-. � w -s �., Y.,�+,� ��: 5`�. ¢�� r1 �� '�� _+41..r" .� �c � ar . * i„� . ._.��r ff -.\�,. r �E z. � ��' �f' .I.{ �� '�� 4 �',9 Y�,.� 4 ��s� f� It� ...I'•`` -��, h � ��` �.:� �} .:.'� � `� ��L��_ ';.i.� _}'�� • x'� 1 'rl��~. .�" �', t� f�� ,�ti � �'y-� ' �� ' �:� . �`� �� t �� ,�' .► � F�� - 6�.' y� 9 , '- �� r �� sF� ^y5�' �y %y� ��rj', ' a-.' '+ � + Y � � - .�"-M �4��1�"`�' P�:'/-� r5,v �.k; - ��'��. . '� . �+. f . _ r � }i r �'...�+ rc . S ��,�� y,��.. .��'l k M1�Y.'�'�:.��.:•, ',� �_+� 5i ��. .��:{, . ;, � � � ��171� ;..:_�.,_ s- ��iTr "� r��f:��3 • • ��;, ' . ��ir �a�� 6. SITE ANALYSIS GENERAL: The subject site consists of(2) nearly rectangular shaped parcels with a combined area of 0.09± acres or 3,900± sq. ft. (Dubuque County Assessor). The site dimensions are approximately 40'x100' (See Plat). The subject property is located along the east side of White Street, with a public alley along the west side of site. A copy of the plat is on the following page. TOPOGRAPHY: The site is nearly level to gently sloping. Surface drainage appears to be adequate. The site is located in a FEMA Flood Zone X, which is outside of the 100-year federal flood hazard area. A copy of flood map 19061 CO243F, dated August 19, 2013, is included in the Addenda. ZONING: The property is zoned R-2A (Alternative Two-Family Residential). A copy of the land use zoning regulations is included in the addenda. ACCESS: The subject property is located along the east side of White Street, which is a 1-way, 2 lane city street. There is street parking on both sides of White Street, that is not metered parking. There is also a paved public alley located along the west side of the property. The property does not have any on-site parking. UTILITIES: The subject property is currently vacant and deemed to be in very poor condition with significant deferred maintenance. All utilities to subject property have been turned off for several years, yet the subject is within the city limits of Dubuque, and does have access to city utilities are available, including water, sewer, natural gas, telephone, cable, and electricity. EASEMENTS: The subject property appears to have typical perimeter utility easements. No other adverse easements or encroachments were observed. 6-A. SITE ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) _•�� ,�. .. � �� o q S .�' f, � .. �,• - �4 � � `V � J� ,l S uq ��.' ,1{•*� . . 4 !�,� p g E �. . _} �1 �'+ �� . . �� -r p ➢O �1 .,1 �` � p N �W � a I' � -:�.�rF `�� ' ;� o c 1 � �� ^�f 4 � � ,1'. _ ,��, a _�� ' ` . o �- ` n o a � f.} tS �.�� 1 � .� d .-• �� •�' i�. �� .. � "��'�� _.�� .� 1`1 a o 0 y> ' s � '::'i r #. k' _ _y.�#,, i' � _ ' l � �.! - � l�x � � ` 1 '.��`'� /' .�l►'1 . , �'a� � -j��'i _ 'i t•� �,r.l�, '''3 �' s':.�"� �' �.• �►�`i �� tt':�i. . l.:�A, } �. �, � . `'r Y . S =4, tf fy .. . ' •' R �p �.w 'i .� f�. b_ ' �.. �7,�j,�, �. �- # '1'��•' /•. L �1-=,� ' - � � ��,s �! � 1 � • � �' • �._ '.l� �, �.. i . �j�� •5 L • ^ : � W '` . . � � .�• � �` �N Q Y f' �y�Y.�. L�t-' � 7C ' 4 f' . ..� ,, t �1 ; :�:� � , `�' ,. �f� 1�•r' ` � �u � .� �1� �',� ��'�, � � ' � . � '�'�_ �� - - 1 1 � � �. . �F ', ' � ' �4��}•` ��'� �;�5 . . :^ �, 1.� � ' , r `�� j.�:i}' � . ��~`�x �� "v ��' .. iF � ' '��i . � _ � '! ' �. t r.: �=- �' ' r �� J . � �., .}' �•� � � � N .,' • �;� n. y �yr �' y■+ r � O ��h �I •/�,-,i, �� + � � .t ca (9 : � ir `Y_�L ;� '� �. r � 'L r N K �`d I� ` 7 � �r _ + ... N F- 1 . � � � ❑ �, � - � � 7. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The subject property is improved with a 2-story brick building. The building was built in 1870, and has 3,411 sq. ft. above grade with a full basement. The property is currently vacant has been for several years and all utilities have been disconnected for several years. The property exhibits significant physical deterioration and all aspects of the improvements are deemed to be in very poor condition. As seen in photos on page 1 of the report, the property has had significant deterioration and has not been maintained. BUILDING EXTERIOR: Exterior Walls: Brick Foundation: Stone Roof: Rubber Membrane Entry—Wooden Door Windows: Double Hung (many missing windows and boarded up windows) BUILDING INTERIOR: Walls: Plaster, Drywall Ceilings: Plaster, Drywall Floors: Wood Lighting: None CONCLUSION: The subject property is deemed to be in very poor condition. The exterior and interior of the subject addition exhibit significant amounts of physical deterioration and deferred maintenance. All building components appear to have significant deterioration. The structural integrity of the property is raises concerns. The interior is in very poor condition and has unfinished flooring, walls, and ceiling. The windows and roof are 30+ years old, and exhibit significant physical deterioration and. The apartments have been vacant for several years according to property manager and all utilities have been turned off. The interior of the property does exhibit mold, which significantly affects the safety and value of property. 8. HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS DEFINITION: Highest and Best Use is defined by the Appraisal Institute in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 6th Edition, c. 2015, Page 109, as: "the reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legally permissible, physically possib/e, financially feasible and maximum productivity." Therefore, when estimating the highest and best use of a property, four basic questions must be addressed. Is the use physically possible, is it legal, is it financially feasible, and is it maximally productive? The analysis must include consideration of the highest and best use as if vacant, and as improved. Phvsical Analvsis — "AS IF VACANT": The subject property consists of(2) nearly rectangular shaped parcels with a combined reported area of 3,900 sq. ft. The subject site is relatively small in size and would have minimal development uses based on location, frontage, access, site size, and topography. The subject property has a reported frontage area to White Street of 40'. The site does have access to all public utilities and there is an Extraordinary Assumption that the soil would be suitable for development. Leqal Analysis— "AS IF VACANT": The subject property is zoned R-2A (Alternative Two-Family Residential) by City of Dubuque Officials. The district is intended to provide for protection of certain older areas of the community developed principally as single-family and two-family uses. Characteristics of the R-2A District are: smaller than average lot widths and area, established building lines much closer to the public right of way and required setback lines, and or greater lot coverage than allowed in the more recent developing areas where such requirements can be provided. A copy of the zoning permitted and conditional uses in included in the addenda of the report. Feasibilitv— "AS IF VACANT": Based upon my analysis of the market in the area, demand for well-located parcels is typically average in the neighborhood, which is an established neighborhood area that is nearly 100% built-up with continued real estate activity. There are many some properties being acquired for a change in use to further attract the ever-growing tourism business. The property is relatively small in site size, yet has adequate access to White Street and a public alley. The access, frontage, visibility and typical traffic count is deemed average for neighborhood. The subject property is located in the downtown business district, with a high demand for parking, which could be the feasible for the subject property "As If Vacant". Consideration of a park or playground area for the neighborhood is also given consideration Maximallv Productive— "AS IF VACANT": As indicated in the Physical, Legal and Financially Feasible sections of the Highest and Best Use, it is our opinion the maximally productive use of the subject property is a parking area, park, or playground for nearby neighbors. 8-A. HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Phvsical Analvsis — "AS IMPROVED": The subject property is improved with a 2-story brick duplex that was built in 1870. The building has 3,411 sq. ft. above grade, with a full basement. The improvements are deemed to be in very poor condition with significant physical deterioration. The property has been reportedly vacant for several years, and all utilities have been disconnected. The property has frontage along White Street, as well to a public alley. Leqal Analysis— "AS IMPROVED": The subject property is zoned R-2A (Alternative Two-Family Residential) by City of Dubuque Officials. The district is intended to provide for protection of certain older areas of the community developed principally as single-family and two-family uses. Characteristics of the R-2A District are: smaller than average lot widths and area, established building lines much closer to the public right of way and required setback lines, and or greater lot coverage than allowed in the more recent developing areas where such requirements can be provided. A copy of the zoning permitted and conditional uses in included in the addenda of the report. Feasibilitv— "AS IMPROVED": Based upon the preceding analysis of the subject property and pertinent market factors, the rehabilitation of the property is not deemed financially feasible based upon the estimated cost to cure. The property is in very poor condition and disarray, and the provided cost to cure far would far exceeds the value range of the property as completed. It is our opinion that demolition of the subject property is the deemed the most feasible option for the subject property. The estimated rehabilitation cost and demolition estimates are included in addenda of report. Maximally Productive— "AS IMPROVED": The subject property is located along the east side of White Street with (2) nearly rectangular shaped parcels. The property is improved with a 2-story duplex that is in very poor condition with significant physical deterioration of all building components. Based upon our cost and market analysis, as well as provided estimates for rehabilitation and demolition, it is our opinion that demolition of the subject property is deemed the maximally productive use of the subject property. Rehabilitation of the property was taken into consideration, yet the cost to cure far outweighs the estimated value range and therefore is not deemed feasible. The estimated rehabilitation cost and demolition estimated are included in addenda of report. 9. "AS IS" ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY METHODOLOGY: The Sa/es Comparison Approach to Value presumes that no prudent buyer would pay more for the subject than an amount necessary to acquire an equal substitute, assuming no undue delay. Thus, sales of similar properties are pertinent in the valuation process. The estimated value herein will be based on a value range of comparable market sa/es and the consideration of the estimated cost of demolition. The subject property has been vacant for several years and has significant physical deterioration of all building components. With the condition of the building and the apparent mold infestation throughout, raises concerns. Based upon our viewing of the property and analysis of market data, we feel that it is not appropriate to directly compare the subject property to other recent sales, as this would not produce credible data or results on the estimated "As Is" value. Thus, the following analysis will include a market analysis of duplex sa/es within the downtown district of Dubuque, lowa. The sa/es found are deemed to be in below average condition, yet none of them are within the range of quality and condition of the subject property, therefore there was no Sa/es Comparison Grid deemed necessary. The estimated cost of demolition, provided by McDermott Excavating, will be taken into consideration. COMPARABLE SALES ANALYSIS: On the following page is a market analysis of duplex sales in the downtown district in Dubuque, lowa. The first set of data was taken from the East Central lowa Multiple Listing Service, and the second set of data was taken from the Dubuque County Assessor(Beacon). The market analysis included sales that have transferred within the past 12 months. The sales range in sale price from $18,000 to $45,000. As stated in the methodology, the sales identified are all deemed to be in below average condition with significant deferred maintenance at time of sale. The subject property is deemed to be in far less favorable condition as the sales indicated in the market analysis due to the physical deterioration, quality, condition, consideration of long-term vacancy, mechanical systems, and the disconnection of utilities to property All of the sales were reportedly cash or conventionally financed transactions and no adjustments for cash equivalency are necessary. Consideration was be considered for size, zoning, condition, quality of construction, land size, amenities and location. See market sa/es on following page 9-A. "AS IS" ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY East Central lowa Multiple Listinq Service HIGH LDVJ AVERAGE MEDIAN T4TALPRIC� TDTAL HIGH LQW AVG M11EQ LI7IIPJG COIJhT: 4 DA!'S QPJ F�1AR�1: ?' 1 11 4 LISrP�ICE; �6i,�.�u�1 52_,=.�1�7 ��9,5u�7 s�a,3=�] *15R.4��.� SOL.P�ICE; �33,��d 518,64b 52B�5��) 53�,54�) 5114�')00 �I_I p��ta Pitture C� M1i5# Cfa�s iype �)Status 3}P�i�e' f}Area` Address City Units# Garage C Tatal Fin 1 [I �y * ; i��fi8s Iv1�JL1I-FAMI�Y Dl1PLEl( 50LU ,�.518,04L� DUBl1QUE Rnf�1 232fi Central Rvenue Du6uque 2 1 1,760 � h ��,�� 1� 1��;� i �;rr, i , - F � ` � '� � ��1= h1UL1I-FRI�IILY DJPLEI{ 50LQ ,�.53G, DJ6l1QUE„r�r.fL 3fi0�ifith 5 reet Duhuque 2 2 1,81� � 3 I_i �� 6 i+lE5s Iv14JL1I-FAI�IILY DUPLEIC 50LQ ,�,533�S�S�4 D'JBIJQUE AdF.rL �37�ora3 Boulevard Dd6uque 2 0 1,424 � , 4 I_I �� 1 14�353 M41L1I-FRMILY DUPLEH 50L.D ,�.533,44G pUBl1QUE R�€rL 57fi W Lacust 5�reet D�Suque 2 � 1,20a �'. Dubuque Countv Assessor (Beacon) Year Total Lot 6ed- Sa3e Sale Assessed Buf3t Area[sf; Area rooms Peop I Address� Frice� 6ate � Value < < � (sf} � � 5tyle � Ckass � Occupancy� �3��4RK57 S25.OG�� .'27.�2C-�� 58�.Sa�� 8��6 2.246 S�e�S 4 25=o�F Rzsiden*ial T:•.r-FamilyDu�lex � .1`+'15�1 Frame i:, i . 2�b'1J�I_K4fl1fST 53C�.L'C�� 1�_�:'iL-� S�rl$$�� Y''��J 1.6C�J ��.00�� :1 �`�eOF'f p251dEftiT_I3� TL•10--2fll�'; �u N Frame Cor.�rsion ■» � �ip� 35CE1F�T15T 53D.GC�� 11'�l.�t�� 5�8.2iO �89�� 1.813 �.�5�� 4 ��iori Residen*ial Tk•.n-FamilyDuplex �� Frame `�� . 242'CEhTPA_ S�S.CC�� .'3�1:�20�� 53=.�s�� =9�� 1.6?-r� �.2=_�� 4 25�ory Residen*ial T�vo-'2r�ily � �� F.4'E Framz Car.�rers�on ' •� 242GCERTPA_ S�S.G�� .`3C:�2C�� 52:.�G�� i9�� 1.8�5 =.C7�� . 25to F Residen=ial Two-F�mily � • 5� F.VE Framz Cor��ersion y�� Active Listinqs (East Central lowa Multiple Listinqs Service) HIGH LDW AVERAGE MEDIAN TQTAL PRICE TDTAL HIGH L4W AVG P1EQ ISTIPJG COl1hIT; 1 D,�YS 4FJ P�IRRKE7: 10U 100 100 ip0 LIST P�ICE; 5�0,�}�}�] 5�p,�7�}�} 5�p,�}�}�] 5�p,�}�}�} 5�p,�]�}�} SCL�P�ICE: ��j �� j �� _� ph�±v Pi�ture C h1L5# Class Type 2)Status 3}Pri�e' i)Area' Address City Units# Garage C Tntal Fn 1 I_ � �' 2 1�13;; MUL1I-FAMILY DUPLE]C ACIIVE 5�}0,060 DUBl1Ql1E AREA 1509 Bluff Street Du6uque 2 0 1,566 � � 9-B. "AS IS" ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY After an analysis of the market and consideration of the "As Is" condition, demolition of the subject improvements will be given strong consideration. Below is the estimated cost to demolish the improvements on-site. The estimated cost was provided by McDerrmott Excavating. The conclusions throughout the appraisal herein are subject to the provided estimated demolition being a market competitive cost estimate. Based on a good working knowledge of the Dubuque area typical, the represented costs appear reasonable. NirC�?r�m7t1 E1CC3�letif?y3 Estimata anC Reqvest For Propasad PkO�EC}OEafu.�� tioNo^.L�n�ueY�c.� pATE: Z12VP0$} I ip0 FI__kdaie R�»� �uh,pue:ayq 5�(;L] �wwec*wcnrwa: icaoa�s�awnaesva.� n�ww.mwns�oz �.orecr o.sc�unnoh:s�iiai�+e oano.ve uciiry csmnr�eo. NGDERYOTT _ FOLLONae eunm.re o-.ec.v --- -— n�:ar a�m ea,��ca: [�rys�oexv anopanen�u�wde�wre Remawihcir¢!�ry Utlferraa[iMaGNaiMFePcn1�*^�^tl NrOci�vxnlllu auilGmps an0 panpe SartmalenW Ioa,YOeG�I¢e�EJlapbeelrtNala�nll L-✓itlFllfees l.aM wne�ala,elene,e'ie�.rmu ard eappgal sackru�mo�.�i�o.e wim pmo ane canp� impor�s+a µa�[6'ol Wpsoli wm'mu damoetl araea Hytlreseeo all moumW ruas szo.na.au unnry nr�w��.en Mahll[xa:lon In 1h�sprinp 8amceGns xnrl elloy cla�um E.�arnlion pe.mll R:nw�a Nr;.k pevsrs m�he ciie5'yriJ yy.�py S�.r ihe mnveVe g�een ai�cy wa�tle!an0 rvmFval Eroralelhowas��su,vipa�lrf.e[i�ymm elley�Z6l9ilil010GlWM F.+�+ra�elno zanlfary au�r y�N:ya el�na Ciry mee�n Y�;�o B�Idy,2 oepelale 7p��i011i o��.h r.�.w,�...�u s.,�s��s pu cav w 000.a..sr-� a�xru�;m:m�a�a�n�.�m� Fdrzar.�a��:ieu r�i��rQn.�� F�mn�ane Oiex GGiM1 L1YA�MNeia a�nne.�ioe end sind per Ciry ol�ubyq�e G�ee�N�ey Spm Nopioco�no r.anti@�B bXYticr Rc�'inN+i�ihe b�a<mvers !1l,T9d,OP Pls�n OxtW: A6nc�l�AM¢NM�tl' TOS4 eatueaie gqgE9 OH A9OY�quANP11ES ypp saecuec�aa i�ewauoruMu+oeo� No asbenlm ivralwa�l vr rxnerql No,�vulz�re NmKlwq p f�e1011etl NO MZM rastas�on Ina h411�g io Ire�ow'.rt neg0Y0 Non: WIlrya�rannmu�Gbndan��s�lata�yqpIM1IM1OSpnnpel'21 •wa 1ML'r�c��ra�u�o ImelMweonV�'un nol�wY'Jo.�ew�iR[a wnartr�mm�n wn� AW�RYn4mlaulEe �N1NII YOI!fOR VCllp LIXlni➢EFalapA'qY 1Xg PqpIC[� ��Eo L ��„� 2,-a�t-a l �C-M[O�mmn ��L' WiE rn rwrouy�¢0¢mse�a`[o.�cnemmm ouwnv.Lwe�.sawmwa P.s+ecrW Le ez�rq,.yy5 ien�a.e n.rz uwa..ru ws r�rww.a.M urwmo rrov.id.o..�m v,.�,.. l]4iS�Wcann&eeer»uUique[nS10ol��i,o�n'Nri-�E�+��3.Fu.5ei�5R�-G1V1 9-C. "AS IS" ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Reconciliation "As Is" As stated throughout the report and pictures, the subject property is in very poor condition with significant physical deterioration of all building components. On the previous pages, an analysis of the downtown market area was done. The analysis included duplex sales that have transferred within the past 12 months, and are all considered to be in below normal condition with deferred maintenance. Based upon the far less favorable quality, condition, observation of mold, structural integrity concerns, and utility disconnection; it is our opinion that a Sales Comparison Grid would not produce credible results. Based on the "As Is" condition of the property and research on market, it is our opinion that the estimated cost of demolition far exceeds the anticipated value of the subject property. Also, the estimated cost to cure far exceeds the "As Completed" market value. Due to the "As Is" condition of the property, the property is not deemed saleable. Therefore, the "As Is" estimated value is as follows. ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "AS IS" $0 ZERO DOLLARS 10. "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY: The Cost Approach to Value presumes that no prudent buyer will pay more for the subject than an amount necessary to secure equally desirab/e land and build a substitute facility new. Generally, he will pay somewhat less than Cost New depending upon the estimated "accrued depreciation" as of the date of his inspection (the date of the appraisal). Due to the "As Is" condition of the subject property, the Cost Approach to Value will not be full developed due the significant physical depreciation.Any necessary adjustments would be completely subjective and would not produce credible results. The decision is also supported by the fact that typical buyers would not consider the Cost Approach in evaluating a purchase of a property with o/der improvements. Herein, there is an Extraordinary Assumption that there are no environment hazards of any kind, and the soil is suitable for development. Therefore, the first step in the Cost Approach to Value is to estimate "Land As Though Vacant", and this result will be the extent of the analysis. The neighborhood is nearly 100% built up with very limited comparable land sale data. Due to the limited amount of comparable sales data, the search was expanded in time to include adequate data to estimate market value of "Land As Though Vacant". Typically, any new construction would be the result of razing existing improvements. "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" ANALYSIS: The subject property is located in a neighborhood that is nearly 100% built up, with very limited comparable land sale data. On the following page is a summary of(6) comparable land sales that have transferred within a reasonable proximity to the subject in the downtown district of Dubuque, lowa. The Comparable Sales search was expanded in time to include similar land sales to provide adequate data to estimate a market value. The comparable land sales range in sale price from $10,000 to $242,862 with site size ranging from 2,574 sq. ft. to 15,376 sq. ft. The unit of value considered most applicable is the price/sq. ft. of the land area, which is the common denominator most often used for these types of properties. On a per square foot basis, the indicated range is $3.88/sq. ft. to $17.22/sq. ft. See comparable land sales on following page 10-A. "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" COMPARABLE LAND SALES Sale No. Location Sale Date Sale Price Site Size Price/SF Subject 1620 &1628 White St. 3,900 sq. ft. Dubuque, lowa 1. 2830 Central Ave 05/17 $10,000 2,574 sq. ft. $3.88 Dubuque, lowa 2. Washington St 12/20 $33,000 5,000 sq. ft. $6.60 Dubuque, lowa 3. 990 White St 03/19 $242,862 15,376 sq. ft. $15.79 Dubuque, lowa 4. 902 White St 03/19 $97,138 8,003 sq. ft. $12.14 Dubuque, lowa 5. Central Ave 02/18 $70,000 6,098 sq. ft. $11.48 Dubuque, lowa 6. 1376 Washington 06/13 $90,000 5,227 sq. ft. $17.22 Dubuque, lowa 10-B. "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" ANALYSIS COMPARABLE LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 2830 Washington 990 902 Central 1376 Central St White White Ave Washington Ave St St St Dubuque, Dubuque, Dubuque,Dubuque, Dubuque, Dubuque, IA IA IA IA IA IA $/SF $3.88 $6.60 $15.79 $12.14 $11.48 $17.22 Date of Sale -- Adjusted$/SF $3.88 $6.60 $15.79 $12.14 $11.48 $17.22 Location +15% +15% -15% -15% -15% -15% Land Size -- -- +3% +2% -- -- Topography -- -- Development +30% +30% -10% -- -- -- Potential Shape/Access +50% -- -10% -- -- -- Zoning -- -- -- -- Net Adjustments% +95% +45% -32% -13% -15% -15% Adjustments$ +$3.68 +$2•97 ($5.05) $1.57 $1.72 ($2.58) Adjusted$/SF $7.56 $9.57 $10.74 $10.57 $9.76 $14.64 10-C. "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" ANALYSIS "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" RECONCILIATION On the preceding pages are (6) comparable land sales that have transferred within the downtown district of Dubuque. The downtown district is nearly 100°/o built up, with very limited sales data. On the previous page is a comparable grid analyzing the (6) land sales. The adjusted price per square foot has a moderate range of$7.56/sq. ft. to $14.64/sq. ft. Comparable Sale #1 is given the least amount of weight in the final reconciliation, and all other sales considered. Based on the subject site size, access, and topography; we estimate the prce per square foot to be near the middle of the adjusted range, which results in "Land As Though VacanY' to be as follows; ESTIMATED "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" 3,900 sq. ft. x $9.75/sq. ft = $38,025 3,900 sq. ft. x $10.50/sq. ft. _ $40,950 (Rounded) $39,000 THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS 11. "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY: This analysis will include an estimated value of the subject property "Subject To Completion"after full rehabilitation of the property. Conlon Construction has provided cost estimates for the rehabilitation. The conclusions throughout the appraisal herein are subject to the provided renovation cost and cost to cure being a market competitive cost estimate. Based on a good working knowledge of the Dubuque area typical construction costs and a review of the Marshall & Swift Cost Manual, the represented costs appear reasonab/e. Following the approach to a value and reconciliation are the cost to cure estimates provided to appraisers. Sales Comparison Approach "Subiect To Completion" FE4F�RE SIJB,IECT ��Oh!P,�R.aBLE SALE#1 CC�159PFPABLE S'niE�#2 COh1PFRRBLE SniE�#3 a�d�=`= 1620 E 1628�rb'hite St 433'VV 3�c St 2�v1 Muscatine S' 855.1ip�ne St 7uhu ue,IA 52GC? DLL•u�ue.IA 5?�C i �u��uctie,IA`•20C 3 6ul�u �e.I,�52CG1 Prn�imrty to-Suh;ect 53iePrica � 5 7�u,OGO t 15��OG I%��;��0 53��Price:Crc:�Altlg.r.re� a aC.-. E 52.d2 sq�. 5 gr,��2 "=- 5 5?.48 '-�.n. G��MorrthlpF.er� 5 £ � i,6B0 G 1,34=. �rc�s Rent h1��liai;fr 90.?6 11:.52 P��ce per llmt "a E ng.n0�� S 75,00� 7�.O��C PncaperRoan "a � to.?•"s3 :� 1`s,63G 1"'.5��C Price pe 6edroam 5 E 32.c•67 � 3�.Onp 5 37,F,�r, ReniCon�ol �Y�� 'io �Ye3 �:;o � �:__ �'io �:'=__ �hl� ��ta Sour�e aj FALS�1d��83d.uOF�!1 h":LS r i3926d L+C�N.�nk FJLS�1a10�2 �CFA 1 .'eriFcatio^Source±sj Pu�li�RecoNl-x�eriorr raisal Pul�lic RecardlExierior Pu,�lic Record+Exieriarl,� raisal 1{�.Ll1=�TJJIJ5Th4EVTS �ESCRI°i Crd C=SC�IPTIOFI +4-ir:dlu:trrer,t JESCRIPTICN +�-'��.dju;hnent DESCRIPTICF! +i-i.�d�u:trnem SJe oF FnancEng „�ms Length ,V�ns Lenq?h �mis Length Gmice�sian: ;;cnv.N one Conv;Man e Cun v;Nane �ate o-i S��u'Tirne ��C!15;'2C20 c07+19s0$!19 11l18?2020 Loca�iQn iv.P.e�der ia h:Res�dentia� N;Residen�a+ N Residential Lea�eholdrke Simpla Fee sin� le Fee 3im le Fee sim le �ee sim le ��= 3,��0 .ft. 5�0�sf -1,04C 7,200 tf -1,C04 5.64a 51 �00 'r��v N;Res N�Res M:Res N:Res �esigr i��lej 2 Sta �u lex 2 Sto �u lex 2 Star �u lex 2 Sto Du 1ei � �ua:ityofCona+r�e�tia� Ver Good Goad +�I',O�CAuera e +15C00.4�dera e -15,000 ' ,actual rae ��1 140 129 1�9 : Ca,di5vn ��e •vaad Gaad �8,040i,vera e +12,�0�7.�uera e -12,4C0 G'css&ui!:In�A�ed 3.4 i 3,12 +5,B4C 2.30 +22,C64 2.02 =15,o"4fl ,', lJnit9realeJaxm Total Bcrms 62th� ToL:I AGrt�: Bahs Total 2d�m5 Bat�� To-;�! Btl�ms Bat,h.� ' lJnit#1 3 2 E 3 1.0 �4,000 � 3 i +4.00�7 6 2 1.0 +7,000 ' lJnit#2 � 3 Z � 3 1.4 �4 040 5 2 � +7.0��7 6 2 1.0 +7 Qp0 " L�ni:�3 " Unit�d A3::meM pe;c�p7cn 1,528 S .Ft. 1:�E0 sa_ft. i,398 s .ft. 1.29G s .[t. � 6�;emen?Fin!ehed fRmrrs hlone 2rY21�r1.CI�aOa -15,0�0 None Nnne F��ctionsl Lltlitg ,�ver:� e ,4vera e Auera e �vera e HeatingCool�g Fhafca 2 H'VV ratlrnane �4,040 Fhalca Fhalnone +�,400 Ene�gyEffcien'slt�rn. h'er Gocd Avera e �8000nuera e +p.000.�vera e +8000 Pa-kir�g 6n,Cff S�e 2 Car 7etached None +1 C,OOC 3�ar 7etached -3,C00 2 an sre +8,00� Pcrcti�Pat;,��i: 1I2i� Z'Q+1 211l1 41010 Net.`5diu�hnenl l��'' �+ ❑- 39.$00 �* ❑- � fi3.060 �+ ❑- v 7�.140 -.aju.tzd 5a�e Pr.c. �let=cj 2C.3 � IJa':.4�j L2.0 4 `aEt F.dj. 50.� `� oiCvmparsh�s 3�o��ndJ 35.fi '� S 2?5,840 Groaa.4d1 53.? °"• � 2i3,464�ro�aRc�. y0.d � S 22��+,14� 11-A. "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Sales Comparison Analvsis —Summary of Sales Comparison Approach The anticipated subject property is compared to 3 similar type duplex sales within a reasonable proximity to the subject property. A$20/sq. ft. size adjustment was made based on market data. Estimated Anticipated Market Value herein of$230,000 calculated to $67.42/sq. ft., which is above the actual price per square foot of the comparable sales yet deemed reasonable based on anticipated quality and condition. Due to the limited number of comparable sales within the immediate subject neighborhood, the search was expanded in proximity and time to include adequate data to estimate market value. Due to the limited amount of comparable data, some adjustments are larger than typical, yet deemed necessary for anticipated quality and condition. Due to the limited number of duplex sales in the subject market area, the anticipated market value was not bracketed by actual sale price of comparable sales. Comparable Sale #1 is deemed most like the anticipated subject property and given the most weight in the final reconciliation, and all other sales considered and given weight. Upward adjustments are applied/shown when the subject is deemed more favorable than the comparable sale and conversely downward adjustments are applied/shown when the subject is deemed less favorable than the comparable sale.All adjustments are based on appraiser's experience and reflected as a dollar amount for contributory value based on market data and market value. Therefore, based upon the preceding analysis, the adjusted sale price of the comparable sales is moderate. The anticipated estimated market value of the subject property "Subject to Completion" is as follows; ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" $230,000 TWO HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND 11-B. "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Fstimate campany Standard Estimate Repart paye 1 162�d 1628 Wlaite Sf Neuwoehner 212S/�021 7:A3 PIN 1fi20� 'f 628 WhTfe Neuwoehner Canstrucfion 8udget 2-19-2T Project name 162p&i628 WAite St Neuwoehner Puhuque Johsize 3415 sqft Reportfarmat Sortedby'GraupphaselPhese' '�e[ai I'summary Alfoca[e addons 11-C. "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Esfimatc Compa�7y 5tanttard Estimate Repart Pape 2 �fi24 6 7628 IrYhfte St Neuwoehnar 211512tl�7 1:43 P11R Talal [tem Clescription TakeotF4ty Amount Ol'1'l�8.dd GENERAL RELtU1REM�NTS G7712{I.dtl Suf]emitractor 9a C�neralRequirements 5.00 mnlh 6$,&B2 5u6contractor 6B,6B2 8fi8.95 Epuipment hours 074126.OR perm�ts 10 euildiny Permlf(FHO} 1.d0 Isurn i.ss2 Permits 1,962 c�nr�RA�r��vulR�rt�Frvrs 7a,saa ess.s5 Equlpmenl haulc D�DOOO.OR EXI5ITNG CONDITlONS 024773.60 8vlocilva Sfie Ovmolition 05 A6atement assessmant 7.q0 fsum A,6B2 05 AnalEmant 3,B29.pa Sqfl 8,122 05 Mold remidialion A,B2?.60 sqft 9,1�2 18 Remvve rvvfing 2,553.09 spft 1 5,312 i4 Remo�e flovr 6[qATdeCk d 629.tlG spft 12,�88 10 i2emo�edoars 3400 ea 1,548 n 15 Dumpsters t{].00 each 5,f]a6 f5 15 Remave Flaartnys 2,4 f 1.OQ sqh 2,11� 15 Remove piasferwalls 8 ceilings 13,90d Q� sqR 5�.�84 20 Ele�lrlGal B�plumhing removal 4,szs.nn syfl iq57� 2a Remo+rewlndows 2&.00 ea 2,3p8 2� Remo�e insv�ativn 1,943.flI1 sqft E98 2� Clear�wt basemer.l 1,4i8.T14 spn 2,483 2� Remove sfairs q.OQ each 1,751 SelecNve Site�emolitPan 9U,587 EXISITIhIG CDIVflITIQNS 80,587 04Uaa4.pp MAS�NRY __ a49070.I1d Masonry i0 Masonry Restaratien 2,5�O.QA sqR 19,623 Masonry �g�5Z3 MA50NRY 99,fi23 d600�a.40 INOOI]S&PLRSTICS osao�u.vo Woodc&Plasbcs n 1� Rough Carpen[ry Walls 70,989.Ofl sqR 7,Sd3 n 10 FloarJo�sl-6uild-Up 3,d11,t70 sqR 20,075 n 1❑ WoodSFairS d.00 each f1,294 n ]0 Floordeak 3,411.OD =_qk tv,R7R n 79 Jolst Frarning 1,993.00 sqH 13,7p4 n 10 RaoFdeck f,9B30Q Inft &,787 n TO p61Upp ppck Rellkng 72.atl InR d 26a n 1� SuG Floor 3,411.W aqft 1 S,d53 11-D. "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) �sfimate Company Standarsi Estirtzate Report Page3 16YU&7628 Whife St Neerwoehner 21261202t ��43 PM rotal liem pescriptfan 7akeoffqry Rmaunt Wa4ds&Plastics 93,302 0600fi0.00 Finish Carpen[ry }4 Ca6�natry 48.00 InR 24,88R 1❑ Pfast�eLamina[eCounterTops 2dA0 1nR 2,48Q 10 Vani[y Base&7o�s 12.OQ InR 5,412 7[S T:6 Wood 6aae 1.454.DU inR 8.49d 1d 4xd Waod�ao�Casing 1,3BS1.66 Inft S,:i&5 74 7x4 Wo9d WindawCasing 566.Da Inh a,aa� 70 Waop Wall Ralling 55.94 inft 7,825 19 Wood Railing xnth Salistars 32.OD Inft 2,625 Flnlsh Csrpentry 59,389 woa�s�P�.asrres �sT.ss� o�onno.ao THERl4}AL&M�ISTUR�S a�2QOn,0a Thenrrallrrsulatian i0 Insula[�on 13,ppp.Q6 5Rt! i2,183 Thermal lnsula[Inn 12,783 07539C.04 ElastamericShevtRvofing []5 Roafing ?,7 53.0� sqR 24,142 95 Shse[Metal A50.ap InR 5,646 Elaslomerfc Sheet RonTing yg�igg Q7900fl.00 JoFntSealants ❑5 Jalnt Sealanis 3,41 I.00 svtt 6,512 ,f ai nt S cAlanlS 6,57� THE'RN1RL 6 Md15TURE5 4T,883 QSQQa6.AA QPENfNGS osooao,oa �P�NINGS t0 �m.poors wHh HaMware 20.00 each iq,335 tp Int.6i-Fqld�ors 8.40 euch 3,531 40 !rt[.Sliding Doors 2.40 each 1,602 10 �XSC�I01�80f5,fr8f17B5 8�Fl7fdWdrE 5.OQ C2�ch 21,023 95 New Wndows 26.04 aach 3$,261 95 O.tl4 each �YENINGff �5,752 dAE1V1NGS rs,�sz 09dOQp.aa FINISNES — _ 09L1Q10.a0 FINISFiE5 5 092115 Gypsum Baard Walls i9,380.00 sqi{ 17,35� 5 09:f16GypsvmEoardCeffings 3.42�.00 sqft 6.1pQ n 115 OB21 15 Gypsum Tapa 8.Finish 53,8a6.00 sqR 15.e75 n ]15 p,06 sqR n 1f5 Flnfshwlndows 20.Op eaCh 3,38� n 1f5 Paini Walls B Ceiings 73,8Q0.00 sqR 75,s75 11-E. "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Estima[e Campany Standard Estimate ftepart Page4 762n 8 1828 VVhife St Neuwoehrrer 2/�fi12�2i 7:43 PM �__Fotal � I[em �escription Takeoff dty ArYiowqt 119G69fl.0U FINISHES n f15 PaintDaors 3+I.o0 eacn 3,$19 n 115 Pa+ntTnm t,eaa.aa InF 3,idA Fit315HE5 54,683 69�OUD.uO Tile 1a Tlle 4tl0.06 sqB 5,728 rire e,�xa 096dU0.00 Waop F�oprrng 10 Plank Flaoring �00.00 sqR 3,35d Wood Flooring 3,3£4 q968�0.00 Carpet Floorinp 30 Carpni 350.Od sqyd t1,774 Ga rpet F I oor4ng 1 f�7�; FrnrrsNEs ss,s�a a�oaoa,00 sP�cracrrFs �ooa4o.on SPECIA�7IES 73Q Toilet,H�th!�Laundry AccessvNes 20.00 e�ch R,965 5PEGIALTIES 4,9p5 SPECIA�TIES q,g45 7PUOUD.PD FURN15hlINGS 72007�.00 FEiRPJ2SHINGS 75 Apptlances 12.0� eaCfl 43,3{]8 FI.iRHiSHtNGS i3,3fl& FURN151i1NGS i3,348 22QO�OAO PtLlMBfItiG 2205D0.09 Piumtfing ttl Plur�bEhg 7,4S5.p0 sqR 36,337 Pium6ing 36,337 p�un�s�Nc 3fi,33� 230QQaAD---- - NVAC 23Dfi00.00 HVAG 7p HVAC 3.qil.pp s4R 38.249 NVAC 38,249 11-F. "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Estimate Company Standard Estimate Report Pags 5 4520&9628 Whits Sf Neuwaenner 212&12021 'l;q3 PM Total f Item DesCriptlon 7akeoffOty Rmount Hvac 3s,zas 26flD00.�� FtECTRfCAL 26o5up.no Electrlcal 10 EJeclricai A,629.tl� sqh 51,a4Z EICCtricel 57,442 �L�CTRICAL 51�442 39Dd00.�U EARTHiyORIC 37np�o.q0 Earthwork 72 Sitewnrk f.�9 Isum 5,607 Earfhwork 6,607 EARTHWORK 5,Bd7 320A13a.4U FJCTER1aRIMPPR�VER7�IVT5 3273fl0.a0 Rlg1d Pavemen! 77 pnves 8 Sldewafks 50fl.00 sqil 3,364 Rigid Pa�oment 3,364 azszva.ou Lsndscaping 10 Landscapfng 1,4Q0.00 sqft 3,140 Landacaping 3,740 EXT�RIDRlMPPRaUE1H�NT5 6,5Q4 Estimate Totals Tofs[ s9a,ae1 $s8,a87 talal B88,d8f 12. CORRELATION AND FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE Reconciliation Throughout the appraisal report, there were three opinions of estimated values; "As Is", "Land As Though Vacant", and "Subject to Completion". The subject property was viewed, and pertinent market data and estimated costs were evaluated. Provided to the appraisers were estimated costs to rehabilitate the property and to demolish the property. The conclusions throughout the appraisal herein are subject to the provided renovation cost and estimated demolition being a market competitive cost estimate. Based on a good working knowledge of the Dubuque area typical construction costs and a review of the Marshall & Swift Cost Manual, the represented costs appear reasonable. Based upon the preceding analysis, it is our opinion that rehabilitation of the subject property is not feasible. The estimated costs to cure, provided by Conlon Construction, far exceed the estimated "Subject to Completion" value range. Duplex properties or income producing properties typically presume that no prudent buyer will pay more for the subject than the capitalized rental value of the property (net present value), based upon the buyer's analysis of the recent income and expense history, as it should relate to the future benefits of ownership. Buyers would typically only be willing to pay the present value of what she or he perceives those benefits to be. Based upon the estimated cost to cure of approximately $688,000; the future inherent benefits of ownership are far from feasible based on market conditions. An estimated cost for demolition was provided to the appraisers by McDerrmott Excavating, which was $46,542. After analyzing the "As Is", "Land As Though Vacant", and "Subject to Completion"; it is our opinion that demolition of the As Is improvements is the most feasible option for the subject property. Due to the subject property being in very poor condition with significant physical deterioration, the cost to cure far exceeds the anticipated as completed value range of subject property. As a result of the preceding analysis, it is our opinion that the most feasible and maximally productive use of the subject property is demolition. In our opinion, a typical real estate investor/entrepreneur would not accept the subject property as a gift, considering the demolition cost. The estimated "Land As Though Vacant" limits the uses of the subject land, and the cost to renovate the existing building far exceeds the as completed value range. Therefore, based upon the preceding analysis, it is our opinion that the Market Value of the Fee Simple Interest in the subject property, as of February 22nd, 2021 is as follows: ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "AS IS" $0 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "LAND AS THOUGH VACANT" $39,000 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE "SUBJECT TO COMPLETION" $230,000 KANE APPRAISAL SERVICES ,; �.�:� _ � f� Thomas P. Kane Jon C. Kane Certified General Real Property Appraiser Associate General Appraiser lowa#CG01594 lowa#AG03587 13. CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief. . . - the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. - the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. - I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. I have not performed any appraisals on the property in the past three years. - I have performed no services as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. - I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. - My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. - My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. - My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. - I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. - As of the date of this report, I have completed the requirements under the continuing education program of the State of lowa. - No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification. March 5t'', 2021 Kane Appraisal Services 1 Jon C. Kane Associate General Real Property Appraiser lowa#AG03587 13-A. CERTIFICATION (CONTINUED) I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief. . . - the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. - the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. - I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. I have not performed any appraisals on the property in the past three years. - I have performed no services as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. - I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. - My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. - My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. - My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. - I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. - As of the date of this report, I have completed the requirements under the continuing education program of the State of lowa. - No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification. March 5t", 2021 Kane Appraisal Services , �_ f — �`�/ �� Thomas P. Kane Certified General Real Property Appraiser lowa#CG01594 13. CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS The legal description, which has been furnished by others, is assumed accurate, but no responsibility is assumed for its correctness. The report rendered herein is based on the premise that the property is free and clear of mortgage indebtedness unless specifically stated otherwise, and that there are no special assessments against the property. No report of title is rendered herewith, and it is considered good for purposes of this report. It is further assumed by the appraisers that all leases and lease amendments which have been furnished the appraisers are correct and accurate. If this is not the case, all values contained herein are voided. Any sketches in this report are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. No survey of the property has been made by the appraisers and no responsibility for its accuracy is assumed. Lacking any contrary evidence, subsurface soil conditions are assumed to be adequate to support the existing improvements. Also it is assumed that the buildings are located within the lot lines and no asbestos, or any other hazardous materials are located on the site. Possession of this report does not carry with it the right of publication, nor may it, or any part thereof, be used by anyone but the client without the previous express written consent of the appraisers. The appraisers shall not be required to give testimony or appear in court with reference to the appraisal of the property described herein, unless prior arrangements have been made. Although reasonable attempts have been made to obtain corroborative evidence, information supplied to the appraisers by the client is assumed correct and heavy reliance has been placed upon this information. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, or other media, without the written consent and approval of the author, particularly as to the valuation conclusions, the identity of the appraisers or firm for which they are connected. This is an appraisal report, and is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2-2 (b) of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The conclusions throughout the appraisal herein are subject to the provided renovation cost and estimated demolition being a market competitive cost estimate. Based on a good working knowledge of the Dubuque area typical construction costs and a review of the Marshall & Swift Cost Manual, the represented costs appear reasonable. ADDENDA y?��C21 Be:r_an-��6uqi.cW�nlv.Ih�Paroel�•�i I0�2G;70G �''1��f1 DUbUqU�COkJi4ty.l�1 sUmm,rr r.aio uMnvica 3'T' I��' �li 15dnu�l0 L'L1F8EkN0.1Lh«;I}f+ILI I Fv�Ir.tifY�a IAAY�IJIk3f - I � W 6JQ11lY43�6i I 'ic�]�P�� FYl4 �'. � `�� +,� `'-�L�a� 5]}S.M#.SH1.'SLMCIYLC}l�ds _ �' � � yir .� .. . . . I �!�•■ G��botR� -E"� �� II ��• �� Ce�aA EmY.F�• ' r mAv� IL]I �8[I.v� R41 �� v�� w�x��,�W - 6e�� ww.ww�{�et.:r.�uutwuk.i � 1! �� • ��oLLOmsk IJL'tlJ:�Lk{,:NY.KM1�[ILL*vl - ' � � �1�. �� n� �YYI�[f S a�tl Xd�r {mhskM�lr F1�14Id3�v NOLL'�r..Yvqr.o LL[ -- �.,�. 11.�bIn�Kxn�dr41 y_�..u sns e u��k S� t.and ��v u.Nr�v.::.ai.uraua �a... usa.��o:mo-a Re�edvi[oi duel�n¢ wad o.�.ur� o�� rk,a.�rw�..,a sryn. zxwrwiF .bw��ir,t �� .rmc mYn co� ��r r.�.,.�.,,, 4uo �r rd.. Rbwv� h�� Whm Fbw latrvM14�IL F�n rwo�vwi.�.l ra. �rrtw�ar�w�r rarr.�u.ia,�,,. �mex .�w�ry�. r� rrw�ano� mmw.�on.bw rr,n�ae.a�. sn��o-nrow ��n a,..i+w i� �na,.. !us �..�n�..r,.aw� �I�� ?hJ9�Ik1GIwrF�h�: .R�nu� Cwlral/lr hh x�� Iws.ta ■��u �osta� �sF�x6w�LbYttsfrm�b�{7o�1:11h� lnm�a�7o-3lk7.iFa�rh�iF2#F am .tiawon. xbwywsriwosl�{hiwm��Fi: r ¢ L6+5l�1�4Yr1�11�.1]Rhra��I�L5M11: SdI�S � var srlr r��r hRor�s f�w[co��-h�Jot r� �.d lv..q 474A711 IMI�PJSkYLkF3VlIG{;Y.MqRFJ 1NJI'1FAftW�RkORk11143LLti V}Y71!e teLen�iw�mn L'wl Y 1h^�^'� ;�7h.aa.d.rPra��cl.��.v.v��v�n..m,...rs Ov�-�i 111.56rM1.Vi<ry"i:+l'_:.AIS Ir[Yi W�mv�bl7F�a 3f3ft�1 9rxrn-Duhuque Gounl�,IA-Pamtl R�pui:iflbE2GF DOG kad�tion � 2OIS ]O�E ]P�1 tla�(s�m lLatlrJW 4Ww8Y II�tlrBN HwW�84 � .ia.��vn�r 15 wo 15 wo- i6 vfa is Yfe � ,w.r�n��stw. s, s� s, n � �.�.d�ww�nu.`. sslx+d �s1uw s36aia 3a6+7o - rrs,aa�.ww.w auvoo a�aoo- su�ao lusaa � E�coRw_. 50- w so- vs • �Aun�tlVlu l+Z970 l+�.74p fi33tr7 S+21YP iaxa[Irn 3o�r zo�a ao-�k v+'�oa�� v+em�u�o R+f3GlL,30!} - i.,.rrw�. lamx aviifi Sn�e� x Iw�Wl�iprS]OWd�� 'll'l}J]d 'lLGhaS+l. Y1V:='1� - ;r,mL�.�uur f7azii f7exeo Sx7y�s � ��a s:.,,00- iano iam - rk�Ga �mxra ire¢qv Srmav Cauntp Trraurrr No-tes sr i i.nu�ax�i�_cr..n.�W n as.�i r.,r�i�m r. Tax His[ary v.� oso.i. a.�.r ord ddrra n.vpt AL9 M��rn'lIXl= 1Bl bo �.162]0] 1'l0}M `�pN�obr]IILI �Rl Yw W]0.' O '1P111 M�rh'lff6 S]!V Yw k�15.'Pl6 891J} • ��rLl]} SJfY iw tf]R'A]Y bl1 Mrrn2pLT S]BI 1f� 6'=1FlO;T i�J7T}} ` �r]II19 S]BI 14` W3i.•1]]} aPlB M�'lPIE S+ILI W� 1';Q2]=E �L]61+ ` �o6�rT11� 1iL1 Yn riZY'2}:F PFIOEO� �� - �� ;•I "P i' � -i� �� as � . �* i ,�■� ■� �a_-- . _ __ _ sh4.,�nKdaoM�e s��: 3131�R31 Bexm-6�Wu9ue Gow�ty.IA-Puoel Rq.x1:1 UN267�Ofi �� o � K � q s : aTl�r y �% 267FFP .�. _. I+q � gg 2i6� Ibel la � P CrA sano•ry=�t�*a�.rf.ao-* City d��uque TaK{red"p Applicalions v,4, _ r.Jis Flo-tlti�w�yi fortlx lullcr��I�rLvmwvY IY�h rpAp�caF.�rl tldWp Ya�Llti�a 5W LxsF�R LYB.qH�onlv IaL��.+y�bwR u�iy�.�-.hi�. �� f17�41Mxc.W.,;_ _.r.�.�k,.• . . ._4 . . .. ..� _ '13+2�21 6tacor-E�ah�7uc Ga un F}��L4-Parocl Ede�•xi:1 o3#2fiT005 �L?$��.'�rl DUbUqU�C�Ur�ty.lA s�mm,rr tidlP V:��:81V:} �*� � AE�max10 LVhStHYhI[MJI:I�ILI �'� �� rmprlr.4�n 18;i1WFIL51 - I I LVtlJL711lJ45�P] 'Jw�T�PL� H'J� �'• Hlaav4�m N;"f+'�NW'SF'l�}{]I.IfYL'JIW= k' .''��`' .��' � o.r�oc'� � *� �' 'S �� sl EmY�}� � �Nv� UW • " ll�k.4ev 40'J � �� O�� IG IGtiE�.ii:t � o.�r� v:w ww:��tit rrvunt!^��uxy � � '* . �orw�e L}J!lJy4kC:T1h=}J�Y_YILUt� . # ;' �� . _� � ��: �� .�� -- .Jy 11 LS bin I Kxn��i4i a.. L5 S'ST_�1 Ll�qr A STIRI �Llld Lolpr�� f1�NrLo�J'iW�11F]UP �a... oosti�..��osl Resdei[ol dwelFnqs �r,�d o��.ur� Os�¢� Yxo.luvrLm.mm 9r�N T•�oarCrsL .Ldil��g� Lar.w-�on lir�Jk 1tlf0 Cvdtlm l�/Rs ��..'_".t_ #1Q m� �� fbmr� F�� d�hm Fdw [.��trM141ar11' F}k Y�I�IQRLI�1� F�� frd�or'3�x'A�r fol�IfwoaLlrl4ln• L77'S7l Alll[T�p� I�r' rr,n�o�ncum �uro�RBn.bw rr,n�ae.a�. sn�...a�,. �..om a...�v. i� �.v�na... �m�5 c.�n ro.r,.aw� n..b� zlw9.�h�cv��m.�: .ti�� c�lra�l.r hb w� Iru�� F��iu� �� ,s��.r,��nrus�e,.sF.,�.r�.a++,yre3f�+��s�x o.d. r.rtaum. ]xuYos41xs35Fli�9r�c�l: � 4 �a+fYi�asraxt7�i�G.�r�...i�cew�: Sales rw+u �Y � ��R R�ei� SiCe�n.11.fTC TW� Racr A�uM 4�MI711 �k�l`fILM4K/IL HL]�1F3GFW� IJSd'd Sl�dMoaRbnL�bFr/umd�ok-!tia 6��c Y SDd1490 4CH51mG MIL7'YkYlS4L [v� ,�I 7ti.a.m.rw�r�w.�ru.Qa.a.o�u..�..+s o-...�..w..t�..r.�,:'.;:��.r.n� i.eis..r.�Qrir vir�om ��h�"��'rPP�r�tlon.¢�¢7APaE�'906L��n1�4298Pi�TMpeI��S+�ge10.�YS�0=79Q&72292Y61�s}i'alue=l�7-0267WG in 3f3�Z�i 9aicon-6u6uqun Go��Ih,-Pamel Rc�vl:1fl2�6T-0a S kad�tion � 2915 ]O�E ]P�1 tla�(s�m lLatlrJW mdw44 �wtlr8�1 HwW�84 � .iar�LCW YIa SGd1A S{d# 1-'NP ��fW � .iw��MJ�{,1fYx 33 Lp S:1 Lp � A��`d LhN��9'FY� SS3.�ld S}il.�JG S}:Ju SYd V]d � Gaolar�wW�Yx SNHP L18�p L150S0 Li�L]AP � E�coRw_. sc� w s:� sa • �Aun�dllu y1i�P �16'JP y151tl0 5147�P Taxa[Irn 3o�r 20f4 ao-�k v.'�oa�� vnm�u�o Rrr3GlL,3P!} - i.,.dv�. arivrF �ai.ax Sras�: x Iw�W1��SlOWd�� 'll'l}JOd 'J2GhaS4 Y1V:}!; - ..�L�.uw f�ox.�a �oxa7 Seo7x � c�a s:,m it,uo- icwa - ��G� a�wv 1or�ov S�nv Caun[y Trraurrr No-tes sr i i.nu�a»i i�_cr..n.�W n as.i i r.r�i s::b iax Ha[ary Y�r O�C�1• /nv�l Rad GdRi� IE�ulpk AL9 M��c'lIXl= 1Vq *n L"i62]0] 1'lC+JI `�pN�obr]IITI S*Y 1N� W]0.' O bl3 h1�rh'lffd} 1ilY Y4` k�]S.' O 8"'�.::; • ��rT119 1ilV T4� W]R'A]Y bl1 Mrrn20L} 1k�9 1fi 6'=1FlO;T SJ}]ll ` �r]II19 �+Fti 14` W3i.•1]]} aPlB M�'lPIE SM.`� W� 1';Q2]:C �Y:F11 ` �o6�rT11� 1M6 Yn riZY'2}:F PFIOEO� �� ,, ,� �t .� �� ;� .��. .- �� •-, � � �, � ,�+�� ■� �a_.-- .y _ _ 9�v.,LkedacMrxe Slxt�hes n�z�rn.sw�e�neroo�n.00nv.acur�non.os,w«aaao=�aF'erio=srxr�,eTru+�i��a=a9¢a�x3e�aa�•ra�ue=�ocax�zoob ao 3f3120Q1 9ar_an-GUWque GauMy�W.-PamelSAe€•�19b1afiTUaS f FP � f�'� 6 i --r_—r'llll �e�# � Iml R ,'x6�. }! [r7d� xz I i �a � L�71 Sa�N rx•••+�r�n�i+r' Ghaf D�uuue TaK{redi[Aaalicatio.is _,y �<c.._ lbtlM�w�a1LL�IvrtlrlWo�y�Iw�Lvmr�v�IWdrp.iQrt�Ytl��plycG�inalaa`�MLrtsir LYb.qxionlrinLrHs�� . �� LoLL4�Lblu�k 9'S' !f.SSf.Yr MW ' " '"` _ ht�shYei:a2stlutittleropP�+�PP�Katlon.asptt7APP�=J38L��1�427dPsacTlpel�F7geid�354=19Q&12292G61Si'ji'aI�50Q-02B7�OG x3 McC�errn�it Excavati�y Eslimate and Reqvest For Propasal PRWECIOE�Krtn�• S:oNonGorc.�wJ'iy pATE: 2l2Yl0$� �ip']RctJ[tlale R»� puh.pye Iw�p�pC7 HCwEctLOCAT[aN: 7G7L 816264LhAe 91ren1 �uouque IowR S2W2 �JECT Of5Cit1�TI0h%gJlltlll'q OC{'10 Y'E lllillty tliSco�rn�dz f/�DER40Tf EAGRVAiIno pAoaoSEn Si�i NJpI[A6 FOLLOWS� amim�o.mv '-- nwe�ii�cen ea+i�xides ciry woewc,t and parwnq uiw do�,ra l3emoye 1hc p�[I�y�y][e�at I�q yJNW(K W;qpp/h��e�netletl Kroc4tlm�si Wo nuiiomgs sno garae� sar[meienm.iwy oao�is e�e diapcea�a�N�iario6u LNpf��fees WA7 CGIICIC[i.Ll�f10,MiC�u�u arW O�ppBEl eacNn[�np�yr�yp�io�a wiln hTo pr,tl Cary.poaior Ilnport anp pia�l6'0�[Op501i:vP'N�dsW�Gatl aeay 19rtl�eseeo all tllsi�mqJ��ys ��&�Q 1111Rry I]faemn.�h hlohll{za[lon In py spring garricenne nnn eiioy ciwuru Eacarnhv�ue.+�ii Ramoxs Cnck{revers inlhe slley yrid aaM pn SaV Iha m�aNe 9reenei�¢y Wa�Oe!in0 faf�vBl Ex1ava[e Ihe wa�ersn.vip�s a[rlq Glyrtm�n in Ihe e�ley,7 peaYi[a IOCA11oM F+r��vale Na san�lary xwwa�ye�aa N Na Clry meln Y�;ryo glluy,2 seps�ale�pWliOflf o��.n r.,,��a,a�se„e.s��:p�•Cay a o�o��.a sa^� Hec#fll wiEh s[one and carqac[lon FwTe'ar end inalau Rlsi fe9•i� Fumrah ane plex GCiM1 SIC�A,ca+Clala alnne,r�i0e ifnd iand per City of�u6�que G�Auay 5� Reploca No[on:rplB Wfudee Re.inpoli{�yn�ya�.s f1l.76d.OQ Plam Ox[W: M6ncnJume Hol�d' L4SAL ESi11AATE 6q8E4 OH A90YEGIyRN1iYSES 6 xOp sPecux doa iiewe rrar vcwosa No a9b�w[no�wai��l�remeval Ho navrlmn Nmknoq pr fn8ta11etl Nn Clitk rartarelxn on�nenyll�g�o��q p,�{�,R�getlDtl �TE" lNlfty dlfcnnneelf WU be dOn�RS��OH�SI1iq IM1 IRO S�jnp 4�`11 oEwuLrtW6�l0irnCCWG9 W*�Ia1No�bR4h:Eaarcrro�M�i 9�EKiFGVAn�e [a�aREmlF.ur,m1�Y[1' ]HLC'��ra�lu o FEenI�E�AROr�LW6Ya roYre�ena�qnw��Ra[2EY1Ma ICun� enFUN9uw+lGnKw'0 �mlYmx+v..�: ��MM�lNivrYwuTce ImefA�m onu�G[r ��AR�� wu[uu.m�wnin Av�M*'ex m_vc wc_�u.o x�m iw9 owi� IlMiNI�Y01!FOR Y011p LONbWEpq�pHINi TNN AROJ£CT ncHEo: �' ARTe O`�C�`�f�a+� n G.�O�rmou lSCErTEA• W1E ma.wro*.y r�xoe m ee avi.t a�o.ie*uareom ou�orr.ce ueioia.*�cuawrHwM �marnu�+�.�n.e warr.cwan..e�,s x.amm nxs.eorw�.e�.o.�.wrs r.n�vne n�reuwc�..m+uer�nv�w.a.�urw+.nvmv.ia.o..�m�...,+.s l]4�Ihe9nnwReee�il�aiq�c[AS70o]�I'I:v�s'K]-]E]-4453�F'u.563-SR�-�{�� Estimate�ompany Standard Estimate Repart Page 7 i620 E 9828 UYl�ite Si Neuwpehner 2/2SI20P7 7:d3 PR+! 1fi20& 1625 WhTfe IYeuwoehner' Canstrucfion Sudgref 2-19-21 Project name t62p&i628 WAite St Nevwoehner PuLuque Jo6 size 3411 sqft Report farmat Sorted by'Graup phaselPhese' '�e[ai I'sum mary AIloca[e addons �stimate company Stan[Eard Estimate Repart Page� �fi20 6 7628 4YhTte St Neuwoehrrer 2125/2��7 ?:a3�Aq _ Talal fMm Oescription TakeotFqty Amount or��oo.oa GENERAL RELtU1REMENTS G7712{I.Otl Suf]emitractor 9ff C�neral Requirements 5.00 mnlh 6$,&B2 5u6contractor 6B,6B2 8fifi.95 Epuipment hours a74726.aQ PermEts f 0 6uilding Perml[(F90] 1.00 isum �,3fi2 Permits - - — 1.962 c�rv�RA�.r��vu�R�n�Frvrs �a,sa4 856.fi5 Equlpmenr haurs o�0000.a4 ex►s►r►uc�oNorrrorvs 0247i3.60 Svloctiva Site dvmalition 05 A6atement assessmenf 7.[IO fsum 9,682 d5 Ahalemant 5,92B.pp sqfl 8,122 05 Mold remidialion d,B2?.60 sqft 9,1�2 1U Remo�e roofing 2,553.09 spft 15,312 14 Remo�e flpvr&r4AfdeCk d,829.tlG spft 12,�88 10 i2emo�e doars 34.a� ea 1,549 n 15 Dumpsters t{].OQ each 5,f]a6 i5 15 ]iemave flaortnge 2,4 i 9.OQ sqh T.,117 75 Remove piasferwalls 8 ceilings 13,90d.a0 sqR S�.OS4 20 EleClrlCal B�plumhing remoyal 4,824.Q0 sqq t0,572 2a Removewlndows 2&.a0 ea 2,358 2� Remo�e insu�ation 1,993.flq sqft 698 20 C1ed1 out basemen[ 1.478.A4 spn 2,483 YO Remore s;akrs A,OQ eaCh 1,75t SelecNve Site�emolition 9fl,587 EXISItIh1G CDIVa1TIQN5 8U,587 04UOOp.QQ MAS�NRY -�- a�0070.0� Masonry i0 Masonry Restaratien 2,5AO.RR sqfi 19,623 Masonry 19,523 MASONRY 99,fi29 �BDO�a.40 4YOOi]S&PLRSTICS osao7v.vo Woodc&Plasbcs n 10 Rough Cerpen[ry Walls 70,989.[]fl sqR 7,Bd3 n 10 FfaO�JO!sl-6uild-Up 3,d11.t70 sqR 2�,075 n itl WoodS�airs d.d0 each f1,294 n ]0 Floordeak 3,411.OD =_qk Sa,p7R n i9 JolSt Framing 1,993.00 sqH 14,1fl4 n 10 RaoFdeck f,9B30a Inft &,797 n TO 067app peck Reilkng 72.ptl {nR 4,28a n t0 Sub Flpor 3,411.W aqft 15,053 �sfimate Company Standard�stimate Report Page3 762a�7628 White 5t Neerwoahner 2126/202i �'43 PM rotal ttem pescriptfan 7akeofiqry Amaunt Wa4ds&PlastiCs 83,302 060060.Q0 Flnish Carpentry }4 Ca4�netry A8.00 inR 24,89R 10 Pfast�c Laminate Coun[arTvps 24.00 1nR 2,48Q 10 Vani[y 9ase&Tvps 12.OQ InR 6,412 7[S 4x6 Wood 6aae 1.154.QU init 8,49d 1a }xd Waod�oorCesing 1.3Bil.66 Inft S,:i&5 74 7x4 Wo9d WindowCasing 56p.Da Inh a,p83 i0 Wooa wali Railing 55.94 InR 7,925 t� Wood Railing xnth Salislars 32.00 Inft 2,625 flnlsl�Carpentry 59,389 woa�s�P�.psrics �ST.ssr o�oano.ao TFIERMAL&MOISTURES ilT2P00,0a Thenrrallrrsufatian i0 Insula[�on 13,9pp.Q6 5att i2,�183 Thermal lnsula[Inn 12,783 07539C.OG ElasWmericShevtRvofing [75 Roafing 7,7 53.0� sqit 24,142 ❑5 Sheet Metal A50.ap InR 5,646 Elaslomerfc Sheet RanTing �g�igg 07900fl.09 JolntSealants fl5 Jalnt 5ealanfs 3,da 1.04 satt 6,512 J olnt S enlanls s,57� THE'RMRL 6 Md15TURE5 47,883 Q8dQa6.AA DPENfNGS 0800'l0.00 OPENINGS t0 im.I]oors wltli Hardwam 20.0� eacii }p,335 tp Int.6i-F41d�ors 8.40 euch 3,531 }� lnt.Sliding Doors 2.40 each 1,�02 10 Exterl0r�a0rs,frame5 d FielydWare 5.OQ each 21,023 95 New 1Arndows 26.04 eac1� 3$,261 96 fl.tl0 each �AENING& 75,752 ❑PEIVINGS r5,�sz D9dDap.aO F1NlSFlES � tl9L1Q1 a.a0 FIf�ISNE5 5 092115 Gypsum Baard Walls i9.380.00 sqH 17,36p 5 092116 Gypsvm Soard Ceffings 3.+i2�.00 sqR 6.1 pQ n 115 OB21 15 Gypsum Tapa&Finish 13,896.OQ sq4 15.475 n ]15 p.06 sqR n ]f 5 Finfsh wlndows 20.Op eaCh 3,36� n lf5 Paint Walls B Ceilr�gs 73,8Q0.00 sqff 15,475 Estimate Compa�y 5tandarc!Estimate Repprt Page 4 762a&1828 Vllhite 5t Neuwoeh�er 217512�2] 7:d3 PM � Fotal I[em Descriptinn Takeoff dty AMount 09G69fl.0U FINISHES n 1l5 Paint Ooors 3+1.6� each 3,519 n 1 i5 Psint 7rim 1,B48.Ofl !nH 3,id8 FINISIiES 54,683 69�OOD.dO 711e 16 Tlle 4�d.0a sclfl 8,7�8 TIIe 8,728 09649Q.Qa Waap Flopring 10 Plank Flaoring �00.00 sqft 3,35d Wood Flooring 3,3£4 q968�0.00 Carpst Ftoaring 30 Carpek 350.dd aqyd 51,774 Ga rpet F I oaring i=�7�q FrnrrsNEs as,s�a a�oaoo,00 sP�craLrrEs �noa4o.on SPECIA�7IES 13ff Toilet,6ath 8 Laundry Accessvr�es 20.00 e�ch A,965 SPEGIALTIES 4,9p5 specra�rrEs 4,s45 'f2UUUD.DU FURfU15hlINGS 72007�.00 FI1RpJ2SHING5 75 Apptlances 12.00 eaCh 53,3{]8 FEiRNISHiNGS i3,3fl8 FURN15N1NGS i3,348 2204�O.p0 PL[!MBlIh1G __ 22050�.00 Plumhing 1[7 PlufrllfEryg 7,4S5.pp sqft 36,337 Plum6ing 36,337 p�unasrHc 3fi.�ar 230QQaAD------ HVAC 23Dfi00.00 NVAG �0 NVAG 3,411.p0 sRR 38,244 HVAC 38,249 � Estimate Company Standard Estimate Repart Page 5 4520 8 l628 Whits Sf Neuwaenr�er 212&1202? 9;q3 PM �otal � IFem Description 7akeoffOty Amount HYAC 38,�49 260DOa.8fl EtECTRICAL 2605�p.pp Electrical 1❑ EJeclricai A,629.Ofl sq[S 51,4d2 EIQCiricel 57,44p EL�CTR1CAt 51,d42 39DOOO.�Q ERRTHi�lOf21C 31qOSa.AG Earihwark 7 P Site work f.�0 Isum 5,6a7 Earshwork 6,G67 EARTHWDRK 5,6a7 820A80.Q8 FXTERIOR IMPPRdVEIHElVTS 3273fl0.a0 R1g1d Pavement 77 prives 8 Sldewalks 50U.00 sqA 3,364 Rfgid Pavoment 3,364 3Y@IDO.Op Landscaping ia Landscapfng 1,daQ.00 sqft 3,iR� I.andacaping 3,74Q EXT�RIOR lMPPRaVE1H�NT5 6,5a4 Estimate Totals Tofe[ 688,d81 688,481 �afaf B88,d8f Cnm parahle Phato Page ��v� P ACQr855 lgpg y�hile 5[ Chy p�Qy� CAu�M1y�u6�puP SSale IA ZipCade �ppl LexlorlCucrA Ndl�r�hem Rnoertiea Cnmparahle 1 � �� 433 W 3•d 5[ -- $a�es PrL� 198..70C � - . � Ce.R a.t�a ` �.� I__' � .'i:� ' � Aq&Yf.611. 14a i ji - �' -- M Fi � ` � � � ■ r. �- - ��... � Gar�paraple 2 2901 hluscanne SI SakSPnce 1GD,W6 G.dA 2 307 ppa'yr.g1. 129 �.:� r.=- i �c-.. - y'`.� Campara6le $ ,__, tiSs nlp�nc SI - saks Pncc +so.nan G.A.A. ?s1e p AAP/1`r.Oh. 109 .��I��1��:fl�l'��'`III' ._ � ` � � ' .�� , .. ,,,� <<�� . Fnfm RCRKCC-T]TAL'appraisal soi[ware hy x la mqfe,'vt.-1-8p0-AI AMppE 31313a29 Beacun-a��buque Gqunly,IA-Paru+i Repvrk 1 Q1315b02ES ��r"�CD�'1�� Duhuque Catrnty, lA Summary i Parccl ID t01375L02G � ��r1 Alternaee�0 1+ PropvtY RJdress 2830 CCMRRL AVC tiuBuqueins2nnf ��,WN�H�g �A ��G y�� 7 � � flr4ef Ta�Oesmption 107 2 OF SLlB N 112-W 170'OF LOT?yf f]AV IS FRHM i r .i:•I�!•�ii�,'�c�i:i.i.�:�l�..:ilr��..i�,i..�.ii� 1 Oeed 6oaklPace 20242176�212a12t120} Gonlr�ct Bnnk�Pa�ge GrossAnvs O.C�7 Ne[Avos Q.00 Class R-Residmtial . �.,..�... •.i.,.:,,....�. . , . �. �..�,� .,,��.� pistrict DV9A-9VBl74VtC�TY1P8RCOMMSCH S�fmol�lslr{r1 ➢C�6lJQl1ECfl�+1M.3CHp�L�13T Owners ❑��H4in�, co�t�a�r r�in�� Ma�n�x naa��, :•��,e�::•,:. �,..i�s•,' i.:e�i i��:��: Muench,�.�icnael6 6 Shaiahi.�e:lie .::.1�.�.;•�.�r.I�•:� :8]11„rl�soit S[ ❑ul�uw i r.�1 A 7?90] pub�q�i�ip 53P�71 4and Lal Olme�in�s REg�.lar Int a Fronl Fvptagc Frrm[ Hear 57dc 2 $Wc� F1ainLat 26.L4 yJ.tl ElS.i� 8552 ."+uh l.nt 7 R.S7P 0.00 G.W a.pp Su6 Lo[3 8L0 O.W fl.a0 OAQ Su6 Ln[3 O.dp tl.{1Q 0.0L 9,W LolRrea qpdR�res;?,57d Sf SaleS Muiti tlatc 5elleC Buyer RemMInC SaleConditian-NIJTC Typr Par�ef Amwnt 1i2012�3� hM1AIJ5,h1EVAM MLIENCH.1.11CHAEL6&SHRLABI,l.ESLIE 20-2178 Vac�ni�or f!crH S1Q,OGO�OQ VnfUrtks sBles enor ai[er 1�L'2W3 Vaivation 2o-xo �o1Q [�us�fi�a[ian Resideneial qeslden[lal + Aczrysed L.xwl Va4�e 58,8'6 51,8M10 + As;esaetl9ui[dln�Value FQ H] r Aevessndl�welllRy V Ji,e So gp • Gr6ssRssCssetlV�ue $d,8T11 $1,gdp - Fxemut Valuc S� EO - N�t1�5sp55EAVAlilc- g6,$yp $Z,SdQ 7axatlon 7A19 pay 2o2o-7pT1 - faaafiA Va+�r Y7.t713 % Levy Ra[e{per 53900 oF Voi�c; 3gp43pd = Gro:s Tax�s Dvc #32.71 � Grr..el�ls 56.0� - N�•1Ta��0�e 83I.W T3%HISt9fy Vear O�e6ale Amounc Paid patnp�lrl Rece4p[ 2�±v Mar�h 2021 516 Ye; 912 112 0 3 0 ;3+3::8 �epccm6cr2620 516 Ves 9121120?0 hlips��76eacan,schneidercorp.coml,�n�iical+an.aspx?Appl(]=938Layer1D=9298PayeTypelD=•18PayeIp�593KC.7=&06d920d.�Keyl+alue=1013f5S47ti I!� 31312021 6eacon-Out�uque Couiity,IA-Parc�nl Hep�rl�tp13t82i14•} �IBeac�n" ou��ue ca�nry, �a Summary pa.�rii❑ wtiaaa�oea Altnrnarelo 2�1h-1�i7R AropP�[yqddress wasHiNr,Trn+s�� y7 G� rJUBL1QL�F SecRwplRng N!A 9rief Tax Deseriplian L07 176 GLENTlALf A�C1 IF+�I-�re.,i.i.;��..,::,�r��,;:..i�Iv.��...•� ff Qeed 9nnkloa6r 2Q2[I•2�1155 f12!]712d2flV � ��'/d�� [pnlra�t800h/Aage Gross A�res 0.06 FYC[ACrcs 0.00 Class R-Res:dential � 1 il':rl•: Il�I•.:.i�v,.�::;��i��.,sr:�if•..>l��Vvl.[i.:s'•I i�i;��i�iiiy.� f o[Strict 17118A-pIIPUq1JFCITY�175pCqh7M5GH � srhnoi afseri�e nuL+�GuE c.oMM.sr_N�o�rnst `� Owne�s ❑crd woldcr Contracl Holdcr M a11 ing Addreu _n� ,.,•r-�•n•s _ Mcycr,��n�es i�&snarnn� ..��v�sn14�C� 1tll3[n�inrrycidepr Ep�vai Ili IA 52d45 Eryv,or51�IASRD+IS Land Lai Olme.n.inns Hr.gidarLot:50.pOr 1W.ilf3 IalRrea O.t�A[m�;5,Wn5F Resfdenlia!dweliFngs ResidenNal QwelUng O[cupancy �e[a[hed SCru[EUTes OnIV Style Ar�hlp�•cn�ral Style lrtna�Bmfi Condition Grade.•�}:.i�m�.� �r�ak or Slaiu VcMxr AllfcType � easement Arna rype w�ma�� Fr�ePi�� Porches� Oe�ks Addltlnns Gdrdgcs F1645F�Z4F W K 36F Li�f7cf fr,tnle tf3��llt lYSpf: Sales Multt Oa�e Se7ler Buyer Remrding SakCondfPf�rr-NUTC TVpe Parccl Amoun[ 7�+7 7rall:i[1 KFMiLqu.JAINF5 L TftU�T MEYFA.JAME5P 6 SHApoN L 2o-�dIy$ V,ycPpr fot Ored F.?3.OpCI.00 9I2911947 0-47l51a90 �aormall�rins•�en¢th7r�ns�rYion OeeJ 57.5IX7.nn Ind�des sales vn or aRe�7 n/7[x7:{ Ud�LIdtIR11 2[720 201P Y01g 2017 Classlfiranan R�s�ee f.iTi Resiue�ikia� Resi�kntial ResidenUal +. Psse�erdLaiwVaiue $4.750 ¢i.7ti[7 ¢4,1W q9.196 � AsseacEd9�ii4dVngValue SO SO 56 � + AssPsseuDwepinRYolue 54.650 SG,650 56,46a 36,506 = Grr,ssA,sesserlVal��e 516,4W SISAW E15,606 ;15,6f10 - Exemo[Val�re 5U 3n E4 EO = Nc=Asses3cdValuc $1dA00 S1d,40Q �i5.d40 $i5.4[N7 https-ll[�eaCtln.schneiderCorp.tomlApplir,ation.aspK7AppIQ=93&LayeriQ^929�.P��eTypelO—lBPa�}e16=593&q=6212808743VfeyValu�10T318200A I!2 i� � � �� R � � ��=., � -'--�`�- •- i � ,c- _ -� , �+� Impro�ed Cvmparahle 5ale Record Number: 3750 Address:990 White 5treeE 7ype of Praperty: 5hap 15ervice City: bubuque Sale Rrice: $242,862 StaYe: !A Sale Date: March p$,2019 County: Du�uque T�wnship: Ru�uque LIB Ratio: 7.46:i PricelSFlLand: $'E 5.79 Ass�ssor Parcel: 1Q24479�12 PricelSFlGrvund Flaor Area:$118.82 Legal OescripYion: Lengthy Prics�ISFlTatal Building Area: $1'18.82 Instrurnent;Warranty I]eed l7eed Buvk:2019-2353 Building Type: 1-Story Steel Building Condition:Average Ground FloarlSF: 2,04A Grantar: WElmac Property Company Building AreaISF:2,044 Grantee: Uvpaco Voices, LLC. BuildingAge: 19851Addltion 9994 Verified: Public Record Bas�rnent:2,044 SF Lltilities:�ublic WaterlSewer A�Gess: �irect At Grade Land Arca: 0,35 acres or 15,376 sq.ft. Zoning: PC Terms:CashlConvenfiona! Remarks:This property consists of{1 J rectangular shaped parcel located along the east side of White 5treet in the Millwork Qistrict in dawntawn Qubuqus.The property consists vf Q.35 a�res or 15,376 sq.ft.At the time vf sale,the praperiy was impraved wifh a 1-s#ory building that was deemed to 6e in paar candition and gi�en minimaE cantrit��#ary�alue.The property was purahased hy aupaco Vaices LLC for a change of use.The property was purchased to use as a parking lot for emplayees. �_ -_ -- — - -� �� i � ��-�.� -- - � � � ._�. . • t r. � ' ' impro�ed Comparahle 5ale Record�lumber: 3747 Address: 9�2 White 5tree# Type of Property: Warehfluse City: Duhuque Sa1e Price: $97,938 State: IA Sa1e�ate: March 66,2019 Cnunty: Quk�uque Township: Qubuque LIB Ratio: 3�1 PriceISFlLand:�12.14 Assessor Parcel: 1024479015 PriceISFlGround Flaor Area:$37,22 �egal Description: Lengthy PricelSFfTotal euilding Area:$37.22 Instrument:Warranty Cleed �eed B4ok:2d99-2359 Building Type; 1-Story Steel Frame Building Cvnditian: Paar Graund FloorlSF: 2,51 Q Granfor: Timafhy J.&�avida M�Namara 8uilding Area1SF:2,F10 Grantee: Dupa�o Vai�es, LLC. Building Age: 1950 Verified: PubaiG ReGard Basement: None Utilities: Public Waterl5ewer A�cess: ❑irect At Grade Land Area: 0.180 AC or 8,003 SF Zon�ng: PC Terms:CashlCanventional Remarks:This property�onsists vf[1}rectangular shaped parcel lacated along the east side af White 5treet in the dawntown illlillwork distri�t af Dubuque, lowa.The properfy consists of 0.18 a�res or 8,a03 sq,ft.At the time of sale,the subject was improued with a 1-story steel framed building that was deemed to be in�ery paor conditian and given no cantributary�al�e.The property was purchased by[7upaco Vai�es LLC,whi�h purchased the property for a ahange af use ta a parking lat for employees. v- w�r •� -� -�� • I �r� ,�,��Y 3:'� y-� '' � _, }�j� �,n� � ti�'�� r��r ��'3 q �� "i �„'�� i�'" tJ �, i •��.�� 1 .^�-z `' s �� 1��=� � 7 � ,. �• �r -� ��, `,;� ,� , . �' ,� . �a t� .�.::.� ' �-� .. '� � � � 1 ` . � � , T :�, , � r' � � :�� .�� - Comparahle Land 5ale Recard Number: 2935 Address: Centraf A�enue Type vf Property: Commercial City: D�tbuque Stat�: IA Legal description: Lengtf�y Cou�Yy: ❑uhuque Tawnship: ❑ubuque Sale Price: $70,OOD Instrument: Warranty oeed 5aie Date: February 2D,ZD18 Desd Bovk: 2fl18-��a02262 Land Area: fl.14fl AC or 6,fl98 SF Assessvr Parcel: �025237014 Grantee: Zembija Saliu A1KIA1 Zarq 5aliu Gran#or; Ra�ert D&Livija Klauer Verified: Public Record Ue�ela�ment Potential: A�erage Road 5urfa�e: Asphalf Date Inspected: Zoning: C-4��wntawn Gammarcial District PriceslBF$$1 i.48 7opography: Nearly Level Pri�e Per Acre:$$500,000 Utilities: Pu�lic Waterl5ewer Terms:CashlCvn�entionai Remarks:This is a re�tangular shaped par�el Io�ate�in a high density commercial area in the Downtown 6usiness DistrE�t af pu�uque, fawa. The parcel is gently sloping with 64ft.of frontage and dire�t at grade ac�ess to Central Rvenue. The parcel is impraved with an 18 r,ar pa�ed concrete parking lot. 7he parcel was not kisted for sale and a�quired hy adjoining property owner{Sunshine Restaurant}for additi�nal parking. The Grantee had an agreement fram 2Q12 when he purahased the acljaaenf impro�ed property from the same Grantvr thaf the parking lat could�e used at no cost and �auld be purahased far$75,Oa0 to$90,�D0 if the awner sells another nearby property. I � -= , � ��.� - .,�; � . . .. _.� '�,- �;�`� � -�,� r � ' ' ,y� � �'��i'.�� . . .;� "� F' � � -•��4'� � ' � �r l.: ''4' � �; � r� �y� � � 'f� " , �►� r y�r � • `�. .j~1 �'� �ti• '��+ � . �Y � .��'f'S�� ,'�" � ;� ' l '+%q'�1 T^3.�']-" rR �'ry - -��"� F --.�!.' . - ..yc'��- .i. Cnmparable Land 5ale Recard Num6er: 246fi Address: 1376 Washington 5treef Typ�Af Property: Residential City: Dubuque State: !A Legal Qescriptivn: Lengthy County: Dubuque 1"ownship: Dubuque 5ale Price: $Bp,qQO Instrument: Warranty Qeed Sale Date: June 18,2Q13 Qeed Bovls: 2013-OOD11Q95 Land Area: 0.�20 AC ar 5,227 5F Assessor ParceE: 1a-24-431-0�2 Grantee: qutrac Cammunity Credit Union Grantar: Regina M.McCarthy Verified: Pubiic F2ecord ❑e�elopment Potential: Average Road SurFace: Asphalt Date Inspected: 1012015 Zoning: Light Industrial PriceslSF$$iT.2Z Topography: Nearly Level I'rice Per Acre:$$750,000 Utifities: Public WaterlSewer Terms: CashlConventional Remarks:This is a rectangular shaped parcel iocated in a mixed-use residentia�and corr�mercial neighbarhaod on east side of�uhuque, lowa.The par�e!was improved with a single family residence and acquired by adjoining neighbar ta canstruct a parking lot.The�ost of demvlitia�is not in�luded. I�dlliml4G�l�l�l�li��f�l��9��1�1 oo� :o: ans�aeacaooi ryo:�r,�x Hl�d:r�wwum reEa ReCGrd�d: 06�76�.019 aL P�'13:25 W'1 Fe�ILTL: fi63.20 vyp� = 01 1 Vlevfnua iex� S3P.P0 puh•.que Cou.^.CV ZOUB Kaihy FlVn.+Th�r1oV Recorder Fs1e201Q-D400587fi Preparur fnlonn�uiun Rrssse!A.Neuwnelinrr,fiy8 C'cnirxl A�enue,Di�bui}u±.!A�?U[ll.[iG31557-8[151 Frs�i�iduaf's Name Street A�idrrss t'ity Plione &PRCE AeOVE iH15 LANE FOA RECOR[IER Address Tna 5tatamenl: ltiottingham Ymperties,L.L.C.,2115 Jnhn 3.Kennzcly Rd.,Llubuquv. 1A i?p0^ Refur�1'0: ltiotunghum Rropertiu,L.L.�..21 l�lalut F.Y:ennedy R�i.,f}uhuquc.IA�2�7�2 wA[sRA.YI'1 DEED h'or the c�nsie�c:raiian n!'Ten(S1f}.pU}Uullar[s}a�id uther�•alull6lr c��nsiderntinre,f�ichard G.Rn&ua�k and Mxr}•].kokusek.f'ic,'a Mary I.[luC'ray da hc�rel�y Cni��•ey i�?vottin�l�am Ympertics,L.L.C.thr f�llnwin�;dcscribed reai eslate in llubuyue t'ount7�.In+n^�; Thc sourher!}•17 feet S in•�li�s aFthe ciortherly 4t7 feet aFsnuth middle orse-fiflh nF ❑ut Lnt 48�in the City of Duh�yuc,icfwa,accc�rding t�tlie United Scttlss [:onur�issiuriers'Map of Tn�m of�uhu��uC,Iaws;ar�d The Nnrtiier!}•32 fect and 4 inches of the Spvth iLlidd[e!�7 ni�t�t Ln1485 in�hr City oF�ubuque,Enwa,a��nrding tu[hc Llniic�l S�rxies Cnmmissionets'Map of Town af�i�l�uqur,fnwa. Grturlors do Iierehy Co�ensnt with graz�[ees,end suc+ec.-ssors in in[ereal,ihat grnniGrs haiJ thr reni 4statc hy title in fee simnlc;that they iiave gu+�d and fawl'uk auLhority tn scll a�id Cnr+�ey tiie rex�rstaEe;�}taf the reAE estAtt is&n:and ckear pf al I licns and eizcum6ranres exccp�as may he al�o�e sta�e�l;:vid�anlors Co�cnrEn!ta Wnrrant and Clefcnd ehc real estsse against[he l:iwfii] d�ims ofalt pci^sons except as may he ahove sta[ed.�ach oT�lie undersigned here6y reiinquish�.s x1l ri�+Liu of do�vcr,hc>mcslcad and dislrihulivc share in and ta dec reel csm[e. W�rds and phrnses hcrein,including ackanwicrlgmenl hereol',shall be�unsUuzd:�.in 1he singulurarplural csumixr,arid as ma5cnlirie or fcminine�;rnder,accnrdirig tn the cunrsxt. �a�� A-6rer� 3�,a❑�r� - u�,.� .�.�._..� lLichard G.Rnkusck f.Gtt�i�tar] �ia ..Rokus�•�k[rGrynl r) 5TAl'E D1�[f}WA,AIISiJQC1E COLFNTY.ss: qn this�IZlL 3Gi_�RGl�,befdre.me,the un+�cnigacd,a Notary Pi�blic in and for said Sta�:,personsity appeared Aickanl4.ftokusek and htary 1.f{c+k��sek,flkln Msry 7.C7uCrny ta me known ln be the idcitti�rii persons named ir+and wfk�exec�ited Fi�e forcgoiag instrumcn�and avkno�vicdgcd r}�iil[hey exacuted Ehe same as their�ofueitary acE and deed. � Rohert A�Neuwo�ha¢r -- � �n J NL�INf}�SCdI c4m�i��ma�amb.�msa:n Not Public �1y Eemmllr]en£.Nlrcs 04.23+12 �� S g Rc�r.rn S-4 R-2A Alter�2ate Two-Familt�Residcnfial Th�R-?A L3is�rict is iiitended tu pro�•ide for lhr gruir�.tton ui�.�ot�iin t�1�i�r ar��}t�F thc cvmmiinity de�elaped prii��ipally as sin�le-[�i�t�ilV anck t�vu-1s�mily utics.C'hsracteristicti nf'the R- ?A L}istri�l are:smallez [Fzan a�era�r]nt widihs aiid a�t�a,esiahlislled l�uilcli3i�lines oniicli cic�scr ta the.�i�hlic ri�li�nF�vay a,id reyiiii�:d setl�ar.k lines.�izs��r greazer!or ca�erage tha�i ai�owrd in lhr m��re r�rint dcvcinring ares5 wii�rr such rctj��irci�i�nls�a�t Ue pm�idetl.Tlie R-?A Llistri�t is insende�i ta b�la�ate�in tE�os�are�s�isplayin�,un�nr�ni�re af tl�c abn�c clt�r:�cteristics.`fhe purpose uf'this dis�riel is ta�tabiii�e aiid pre5tr��e th�residci�ti:�l charuc�er nfexisti»g areas tiii•aubly the estaUlishment oF'bulk re��la►tions in cunfarmity e��itl��xis[ing caoi�litiuns. 5-�.1 Principal Permitted Uses fhL I�lluwin�uses are prrmiited in ihe R-?A I}ititrict: l. C'eiuetery,m�us�leum,nr c�[umUariiun 3. Ylace of rcligious cxcrcisa ur assem}aly 3. l'�iblic o� private park,�vlf cou�se.ai simifar nat«ral r�crcaliou ar�a. 4. Fublic,pri�uic,�r parochial sci�ual appro�etl by 4tate of in�a�a{K-I?1 5. ILailra�d fli p�iblic vr quasi-��iihlic ulility,ii�ciL«1i��g stii�staiiun fi. 5ingle-tamily�i�:lached d�vellin� 7, Tnwni�s�use{maxi�iium?dwelling tinits� ti. Tw6-family d�velling[duplex] 5-4.2 {'nnditinnai[3se5 The folla��in�candiii�iial uses tnciy be��imittcd i��h�R-2A Distri�t,subjcct tn the�rn�isipns .�f'Section 8-5: 1. Bcc�and brcaklast homr ?. Haspirr 1. [.iceilsed adult day serviees 4. Liceris�d c��ild��irc cintcr 5. �ff premises residenlial garage b. DPf street par[;.ing 7. Tuur Izomc 8. Toi��•ist liame �3. Wiizc!eiiergy cnnversion system 5-�1.3 Ac�ess�ry Lf�es Tii�fal}owin�nses arc�Scrmittcd 3s acressnry uses as prn�ided iiz 5e�tion 3-7; 1. I?eta�hed garag� 2. Fei�ce 3. Ciarage sale,prc�vidcd ihat nni mure[�an three such sales sl��ll be allv�ved per�re3nises p�r c�slen�ttr Year uncl nut n�on lhv�ihr�c cnnsecuti�c days per sale 4. Home-tiased b«si��ess 5. N4nci��nin�rCia1 gardcn,grrc��hoe�se ar nuzsery 6. s]Ff stree�parkin�anei starage af�ehi�les 7. 5a�elfite recei�in�d�sh R. Sulur cull�ctur 9. Spni7,recreatian,nr autdnar co�skit��eyuipi7]Cnt lU.Staragc huilding !1.Tei�nis�ourc,s�vimn�iiig paol ar simi[�r perm�uc�ii['aciliiy I2. Wind l«rUine{huildii�g•m«unted} 5-t1.4 '1'cttapnrary L�srs Tenipvrary i�ses sl�ali be re�uiated iEi�nnfniynance wi[h thr prc�visi[�n�irf SeCtinn 3-i4. S-d.5 Parking Minirriurtti pari�ing requireinents shalj be re�;ulated in cnntnriilfi�zce with the provisions oCArlicic 1�. 5-�.G Signs Signs Shall 6e regulaEc�3 in conl`omiance with fhe provisians of r�rticle l5. �-�[.7 liul[.Rc��ularinns _ - �, _ __ �� _- Parr.7i::r:d[,'.,05 Sing4e-Fari�ily 2,5�0 2G 50 10 50 3 1� 30 �wo-Family a,�oo 25 5fl 10 50 3 10 30 Townhouse{2 du max} �•�OOldu 25Idu 54 1fl 5p 31d 1alfl 3fl S�honk,Place oF Religlaus Exerc+se or 20,�40 10U 4p 16 -- 26 2G 75' Assem6ly Condrlronal Uses Hasplce 2,50❑ �5 50 SO — 3 10 3p Licensed Cf�lld�are Center,Licensetl Adul[ 2,504 25 5U T� -- 3 10 3p �aycare Q1t-premise residential _ 1� __ 3 & 15 garage 8ed and BreakFast �� 2$ �p 10 5U 3 iD 3d Hpme 'Minimum t+venly feet far garagos facing a street. `May 6e ereded[p a height not exceeding 75[eet,provided tha[such buildin�]s shall provide at least Une additianal foo[of yard space nn alf sides For each addiiianal foo!t�y which such buiiding exceeds[he maximum height limit oi the distri�t in which it is laca[ed, 5c�5ectian 3-17 foradjusti»e��t of ininimum froitt yard s�t�acks. Fiond Map BCmHr.r R�^�'"'°°° �eza wn�is sr "� o„e�q� _ �r o�o�4d s�b in �G' 52007 LerlOer�Ctient Y�fen Fwmf'm enies Prepared for Kana Appraisal&Real Es�ale Servlces.!nc InterFlaod � ��:=wh„�Sl n�,r,�,��,a,in 520ot �4..n,'��,- •r��*�^��, ��' �y��y'�� , �y� � rti.. � '-.�i "''; �4. ',�'4'y�+�"4 F '[�h.�A �V}+4`��. �� f 'r� . y �'. �' d►er.�.'. �'� ��5. � r. Y+�,f'�'{:' '�,� r' _��_ ��¢ � ,��` ��'�,� ' ;TM r .� *.��, �� +d �`�,, `' �a� �� +�; ��, .,;F �' �� y; . � . . ,e �� .,�,�.,: � { �� `.� �, t _ �•4' ,: a+�.•.� : ' �" 4�� - `�'��' y �l � t'!i a �i.. ��'h-. +�� •'� :. L:� . ..i[ � _ � '��.� �. , . .. . .� r � � ►�� `� SF-:. - ��.a. .� - :"t-'!Y�. `�� `" - � ;��' ��`: �'�� - ,�� n+-�� :- ��: t.�:: . � • • __ ��: '-�� . , 5 . �t ,�`�„4 e� � � �� S�, �� :��,�"` - ' .� ' -��r . .'�. A � � . Pi' Y�,�.. �y� C �, ,� ��r,. ' � - �� '• j.�• ��,� �• r��• � � �YR �� `-� ``.',- y� �� y�'. + _ '�� `,i '�� ;r� � 1 +� � r �r'.�.n�� i� . • � �� ::i�i:��}.�. �.•. 1 y � - } �� y �. S ,�� ,.j. ��- 1 � � . �*_�.��,— � � �i:- ' •��f,` �� w�. 4 � 'F � r !'� ;'!- � �' ��ra[•�' � _ � ��i�'r•• - -.��'� .�' eF`" ��- ' t�ii�'?`� � F� +� • ,a. �� Ct ..A ��.r �.•�1� . f '��;� + ti •� � -,- �.� ri► '�. �� ,< _ h1AF'UATA MAP LEGEHU Pw'P�P n�4preC9�5x FEMA 3petia!FlaOd Haxard Rrea:Ha �Areaa in�ndated hy SODyear floodinq �pm[ecled Araaa Map 1i�iR1ti&�'79dfi1CO243F 2one:1C �Area:in�ndafed hy 1G4�earHvvdinp �Floodwny hlap�ate:Auqust 19,�073 �Velocdy Herard �SuhjectArea FiPS.19061 farm AVW.H�GO-T[]FRL'aypFai�l saFRvxe hy a p mpdc,inc-1-890-A.LAAi017E ' ��}�. .1 . - � N N �.:z� '` , " � '�''' - o °� .' .5.!�'.•f� f _','�� . _ ,�.•. .. ,n � m r� � y � � � �� i��. _ _}..�J �r � } . �t � 4 �0 f. .��• ��•�� . � W l �� + '�' '� � a f ;��,� �� .� � o d �� • 4 � ,'' , ' '.Y ; �-� +,' O 0 � �� fr� � + � � �` � •. ' ~,�r`� .-�A� 4.7r l��S b O 0 �� R � r � • ' {� ^�� * ' � _ _�'{_ ` ' ` C k. ` ��:�v � "1 1 e i .r y 'J --r��' � � •� �- �� '� {; � t..�. �- ��:�'7�''I k• '?�� ' �� _ �� f?__ _ :e 'k,� .. r 1/'K' - ��'� t' �i�� '� 1 � � � .��• ; , S L '�-•+g6'� , _ � m - '�.1 r7e . lV Y � �� `` .rt�; • A .� i� . .. r: . � � .. , . t L �, • ^ : '`' �M Q] � T *d� �, � ¢ � o' f �,� �. ��:'�:.. � f` 'i �� L . 'r' ` ' i .�' ' .` � '�' �. � ,f� '� �, • a� � �1�1� ��' _ � ; � � ��+ + ��.,' .�k ��.� ' �. � . r �� ` 9 `��.�r ��K •� . ' :'x � �.�� .r� ' ' � � �� + . �. . ��r*��' �.� fyn�� v � "�r� _ � t• ' # '.�a .� �ti� .r � � '� � � Y-�} � � �, �. � � � u� �� ;� � �� r � �_�_�� E � ry � .-�,�� ' � �: ry � � ` { � + . q ~ ?�: � �'y • �� ❑ _ � .`�111/�� F;�lds af[�porma;a�a S T AT E Q F 1 O W A IpWA p�PAR7MElVT�F COMM�FtCE PRpFESSIOHAL L10EN51NG ANO REGULATIpN This is to certifythatthe below named has been granted a certification as: Certified General Appraiser. Certification Number: CG�1594 Expires:June 3�, 202❑ Status: Active Thamas P Kane Kane Appraisal 5er�ices Inc 14S5S west ridge lane suite 8 dubuque, lawa 520�3 ,4y111�� FicJd��{Ur,pa�n,aiti�s S T AT E Q F 1 O W A IQWA�EPARTMENT D�C�MlJIERCE PROFESSiONAL LICENSIMG AN�REGULATIQN Thi� is to certifythatthe below named has been granted a registratian as: Associate General Appraiser. RegistrationNumber: AGfl3587 E�pires: June3�, 2a2D Status: Rctive Jon Christopher Kane Kane Appraisal 5ervices 14855 1Nest Ridge Lane, 5uite 8 Dubuque, lowa 52a�3 Estimate Company Standard Estimate Report Page 1 9620& 9628 White St Neuwoehner 2/26/2021 1:43 PM 1620 & 1628 White Neuwoehner Construction Budget 2-19-21 Project name 1620& 1628 White St Neuwoehner Dubuque Job size 3411 sqft Report format Sorted by'Group phase/Phase' 'Detail'summary Allocate addons Estimate Company Standard Estimate Report Page 2 1620 & 1628 White St Neuwoehner 2/26/2021 1:43 PM Total Item Description Takeoff Qty Amount 011100.00 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 011120.00 Subcontractor 10 General Requirements 5.00 mnth 68,682 Subcontractor 68,682 866.65 Equipment hours 014126.00 Permits 10 Building Permit(FBO) 1.00 Isum 1,962 Permits 1,962 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 70,644 866.65 Equipment hours 020000.00 EXISITNG CONDITIONS 024113.00 Selective Site Demolition 05 Abatement assessment 1.00 Isum 1,682 05 Abatement 4,829.00 sqft 8,122 05 Mold remidiation 4,829.00 sqft 8,122 10 Remove roofing 2,153.00 sqft 11,312 10 Remove floor&roof deck 4,829.00 sqft 12,686 10 Remove doors 34.00 ea 1,548 n 15 Dumpsters 10.00 each 5,046 15 15 Remove floorings 2,411.00 sqft 2,111 15 Remove plasterwalls&ceilings 13,800.00 sqft 12,084 20 Electrical&plumbing removal 4,829.00 sqft 10,572 20 Remove windows 26.00 ea 2,368 20 Remove insulation 1,993.00 sqft 698 20 Clear out basement 1,418.00 sqft 2,483 20 Remove stairs 4.00 each 1,751 Selective Site Demolition 80,587 EXISITNG CONDITIONS 80,587 040000.00 MASONRY 040010.00 Masonry 10 Masonry Restoration 2,500.00 sqft 19,623 Masonry 19,623 MASONRY 19,623 060000.00 WOODS 8 PLASTICS 060010.00 Woods&Plastics n 10 Rough Carpentry Walls 10,389.00 sqft 7,643 n 10 Floor Joist-Build-Up 3,411.00 sqft 20,075 n 10 Wood Stairs 4.00 each 11,294 n 10 Floor deck 3,411.00 sqft 16,072 n 10 Joist Framing 1,993.00 sqft 14,104 n 10 Roofdeck 1,993.00 Inft 8,797 n 10 061000 Deck Railing 72.00 Inft 4,263 n 10 Sub Floor 3,411.00 sqft 11,053 Estimate Company Standard Estimate Report Page 3 1620& 1628 White St Neuwoehner 2/26/2021 1:43 PM Total Item Description Takeoff Qty Amount Woods&Plastics 93,302 060060.00 Finish Carpentry 10 Cabinetry 48.00 Inft 24,890 10 Plastic Laminate Counter Tops 24.00 Inft 2,480 10 Vanity Base 8 Tops 12.00 Inft 6,412 10 1x6 Wood Base 1,154.00 Inft 8,490 10 1x4 Wood Door Casing 1,360.00 Inft 8,385 10 1x4 Wood Window Casing 500.00 Inft 3,083 10 Wood Wall Railing 56.00 Inft 1,825 10 Wood Railing with Balisters 32.00 Inft 2,825 Finish Carpentry 58,389 WOODS &PLASTICS 151,691 070000.00 THERMAL & MOISTURES 072100.00 Thermallnsulation 10 Insulation 13,800.00 sqft 12,183 Thermal Insulation 12,183 075300.00 Elastomeric Sheet Roofing 05 Roofing 2,153.00 sqft 24,142 05 Sheet Metal 450.00 Inft 5,046 Elastomeric Sheet Roofing 29,189 079000.00 Joint Sealants 05 Joint Sealants 3,411.00 sqft 6,512 Joint Sealants 6,512 THERMAL &MOISTURES 47,883 080000.00 OPEN/NGS 080010.00 OPENINGS 10 Int. Doors with Hardware 20.00 each 10,335 10 Int. Bi-Fold Doors 8.00 each 3,531 10 Int.Sliding Doors 2.00 each 1,002 10 Exterior poors, Frames 8 Hardware 6.00 each 21,023 95 New Windows 26.00 each 39,261 95 0.00 each OPENINGS 75,152 OPEN/NGS 75,152 090000.00 FlNISHES 090010.00 FINISHES 5 092116 Gypsum Board Walls 10,380.00 sqft 17,350 5 092116 Gypsum Board Ceilings 3,420.00 sqft 6,100 n 115 092116 Gypsum Tape&Finish 13,800.00 sqft 15,475 n 115 0.00 sqft n 115 Finish windows 20.00 each 3,364 n 115 Paint Walls&Ceiings 13,800.00 sqft 15,475 Estimate Company Standard Estimate Report Page 4 1620& 1628 White St Neuwoehner 2/26/2021 1:43 PM Total Item Description Takeoff Qty Amount 090010.00 FINISHES n 115 Paint Doors 34.00 each 3,813 n 115 PaintTrim 1,848.00 Inft 3,108 FINISHES 64,683 093000.00 Tile 10 Tile 400.00 sqft 6,728 Tile 6,728 096400.00 Wood Flooring 10 Plank Flooring 200.00 sqft 3,364 Wood Flooring 3,364 096800.00 Carpet Flooring 30 Carpet 350.00 sqyd 11,774 Carpet Flooring 11,774 FINISHES 86,550 100000.00 SPECIALTIES 100010.00 SPECIALTIES 130 Toilet, Bath&Laundry Accessories 20.00 each 4,905 SPECIALTIES 4,905 SPECIALTIES 4,905 120000.00 FURNISHINGS 120010.00 FURNISHINGS 75 Appliances 12.00 each 13,308 FURNISHINGS 13,308 FURNISHINGS 13,308 220000.00 PL UMB/NG 220500.00 Plumbing 10 Plumbing 3,411.00 sqft 36,337 Plumbing 36,337 PLUMB/NG 36,337 230000.00 HVAC 230500.00 HVAC 10 HVAC 3,411.00 sqft 38,249 HVAC 38,249 Estimate Company Standard Estimate Report Page 5 1620 & 1628 White St Neuwoehner 2/26/2021 1:43 PM Total Item Description Takeoff Qty Amount HVAC 38,249 260000.00 ELECTRICAL 260500.00 Electrical 10 Electrical 4,829.00 sqft 51,442 Electrical 51,442 ELECTRICAL 51,442 310000.00 EARTHWORK 310010.00 Earthwork 12 Site work 1.00 Isum 5,607 Earthwork 5,607 EARTHWORK 5,607 320000.00 EXTERIOR IMPPROVEMENTS 321300.00 Rigid Pavement 17 Drives&Sidewalks 500.00 sqft 3,364 Rigid Pavement 3,364 329200.00 Landscaping 10 Landscaping 1,400.00 sqft 3,140 Landscaping 3,140 EXTERIOR IMPPROVEMENTS 6,504 Estimate Totals Total 688,481 688,481 Tofal 688,481 DEMOLITION PERMIT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 18, 2021 Property Address: 1620-1628 White Street Property Owner: Nottingham Properties Applicant: Scott Neuwoehner Project: Demolish the building Conservation District: Washington Neighborhood Landmark: No Style: Italianate/vernacular Funding: No Present Land Use: Vacant Date Built: pre-1884 for 1628; 1892-1908 for 1620 Existing Zoning: R-2A Level of Siqnificance: Level of Rehabilitation: Individual form — lowa Site Field Survey 1973 Demolition Neighborhood — Kriviskey 1978/79 Contributing to a NR District— Jacobsen 2015, listed on the National Register Phvsical Characteristics: This side-by-side brick duplex appears consistently built, but was constructed over a 10-25 year period, with the north side pre-dating the 1884 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map and the south side falling between 1891 and 1909, according to the same maps. The structures are a loose Italianate style and have been stripped of details on the porch and cornice over the years, but retain curved limestone arches over the second story elongated windows. The north section first floor fenestration under the porch has been enlarged. The units have symmetrically placed side entrances and the south structure shares a party wall with the Dream Center, formerly the St. Mary's Parish Casino. A full-width, shallow-roofed front porch is shared across the first floor. Each structure has a concrete block garage at the alley, with the 1628 unit having a early 20t" Century block and the 1620 unit with a middle 20t" Century block. 1620 has an early two-story brick addition and 1628 has a one-story brick addition with a recent balcony atop. All the structures have flat roofs. Ownership, Interest and the Request for Demolition: The Dream Center seeks to enlarge its footprint to allow for greenspace to allow them to apply for funding to cover services they are already providing to the community. Because the structure is in a City designated conservation district, the demolition request comes before the Historic Preservation Commission. Because the owner and Dream Center have been told this is a building that is listed and contributing building within the Washington Neighborhood National Register District, they are presenting an Economic Non-Viability argument along with their request for demolition. STAFF REPORT- Demolition — 1620-1628 White Street Page 2 I �` �," �I �• i �"y_. �}j 'i�l - � . ..-`.Y-2' �'�.. � _.�; I `�t : - . _ �� -. ■ � � � � !� - . _ r - - I — — �+„ .; ��••� _ yl � - -- - , �_ _- --� F. = i� �` ,� _. = � _ _ , -:.�= - - � `�i. : F°� ll[itf�� n � {� - �arirj - - __---:_��r�t .- � ��,��—. �� =t-� ` r.lL R .. .=s�:��.. .. - ....��:;, r�, p�� - --- �. _ . � - . .. . __ � ''`�„` .��<,��,,,. . . . �� .-Y�� ':�'�•. :"1�:.•. - "'.��,=.�;�� Above: Looking east at the �,�� '��zP:�;; ;-;::'4:'��Y;F;�:,� , � primary fa�ade (1620 on right, � ='.:�g:�P.�. ,. _ � -.:. '�=� { �� 1628 on left) r � � -._ �F�., r � Left: Looking southeast at the �-� � t� north facade � ; r � � � ' 1 " : �� `� Below: Looking west at the east � I j'��W� fa�ade (rear) ;� , 1 � _ � � k`?'-'`•�'+;'R:'...�'�Y'.e .. . � . - , t.'y: ��.- ..:ti�: .�� i. �r:'ti•' +r.. --_ � ..�' �. �' ,- �.�� i TM F . ..:f I":.' :�- �. F....�1 .. —��.- ' ',r� i-j � +'11�t1�� i� �: -'41 r f '`� � �. --�.. �F'� ' I � - � �� `�. ., � � � --�� • � , ' �8 �i�.� . . " . ._'-•'��.,_ � �: _ ��. ��5.• ' �{.r.i�5+ ��::`;.. .; .. '.: __ , ... _ �:Y'v};... ,{', w�J-�� , � . - _ .. ; - � _ _ `�,R,i.� r STAFF REPORT- Demolition - 1620-1628 White Street Page 3 . �. � ` �_ _ � � � =� - - - _ _ �� , _ �r �.,.'�' _-'�•: ;�-�.i��-s;� f-.. ,,�� •-= - - �:�'" _ == �.'��.�.+�� _ - _ f� . . �.,'.s��'s•�•-._f ..1.._=. �i.�__�:._ =l— �.i ��..' .— .e ,j. ��'a'�`-�_ ` - - �?'i: :.." r�_'` ' - _ C-__ .'F�`_�._�`.- E� ;;� _�. - _ __�a-,_ - - _ ^i�a.. _ _'`Y�: ` _ - . _..i. -.- •. e.�• ti r - - � �-'� --�, -- '�= � '� ,1 � �� .�. .� K - - --� r�ref�� ; �� ; :�`_� :�.- �. ;.� :, :. � ' ' . �.L �� ` F� "�' ' �. G�� • .lil;� � r�r ��,.�� , ,:�'�.. :�:ii; �� t*' T.�� . I1�i �,•� �A1l►� 1; -,�'-` - � r��" �� '� . :��'�+� . •T A�� I ; ��. �¢..�, , 'C`+�� s. '7a - - - �- - -� ��Si. �..'a'.;�.�' � - I,��w,'.. .i!. .. r - � � . .�e� .�,��{ . i _�-�'r� ,.,�_ ,��:;:;�:C`�- "::L. •.. '� c"_... -_ �" 1�_;, ` -- _' _ - — ♦.;;�'.,�a; `�. . ..,K� ��• i �«�tirf��..�-- rrc�_ . �. _ .�.�..�i ` -r:-�'�. a.er �_ �'-� �'"'� - ._..�-�.�:�� - _.... ._ d .i�� .' -.k;. _ •-7��v ;�„�.�--.'�._., . . -. ,ti _ � .'_ -°f[ = . `� �._:�+�:: ►. � v� '.� =.. '� �_:;, 3 ��1' �r �.::'� �-. � f �' . - � ♦� � 'T V . " I .L'— '_. . �� .� � 1�;� Yr-+�+ "��-.•� t l �y � .� _ .JiI f. ' ' . _ '�..:� `i��L�V+ :��' �•�\`�F� i�R`�:';�_ � � �� . . � - . . . � id�.. I� • '-.-9��'. �LA� �'SL,�:.TC':I ' �3 � Above: Rear fa�ade deterioration Below: Addition at rear of 1620 ��,� ��c `��=a,'•��:.�i�a�e�o;�:'t� ' ��`'•....�::ti.,� :�•' :�.`� . � ��''' �` ��:y�:�.-'�:3z 4��\, � :~�; ' �`� �.'^ _ � . • ';�;� =.fy� y�A, tiy •i},��.i � Y.`4�..ti'�'Yy �'.`. i� . v.�+� � ...�� .�i�'�►1�`� ,t. ";�.\ tC�� 1l..::�\ • ' O�i V.�� '�� `Z,�S�$�,�, �'�t y ',�� `F-.7'�1\�}'��,``l,,,i�,+`\�,` �� ' !��.r�lh, �o . �A� `y'�S;i�M1•�•.�R+`��. . .�. .- �� • � " S��' �:' :.. 'q,�-`�. Y��' ��tia� �-��. �`� � -�� . �'ti w� a„ • . .�.. ��. S�y��_� � . :, ..ti�.�'d�. , '.�.'4''.R?��ti�'''�'�,.'..�. -��`� ��y�''� a''�• `r.e �^''ti:�``��.�.'r;�� ;`�;��;�� ..,y��,.;':.. •, _��K ` i V. r�-f.j ��A4 . . ��"�.�� •��.��• ',��•��M1• Y `..�\` - ` � � , R i,`�e < y ��,` �. \`'�� \ 1 �1 �`w�+l� 1, . g �_'__"_� Vx�'`A�- ..l.�V��i^�� . ` � .. 4 l'. ��::. . . � �t; x�'�..��: ��• � i�.�. � , � ._�`. ,; �`` _ S `�;.:�::,`,.i'",:::; �T�'- ,�.�,_ +�. :t, ;,. _ � �� •�i v _; r_ �'�.--:.__ _�� . .�•�.4.�.�.�y- .,�,s..., . .:-;_ ..� : .�, =-�+: J� ;.:.r .H �_. .�- �r_= c•r _ �• , �. �. �- �_�_r� "�- .��5�- _�^ r �r �"s�' � � ..� �,y�� -..��- _ .;��;_. --��~y�.� ' �'��- 'y-+ � 11�r�?"a�, r' � -'y • • *'' _ -�r:. '�. _ �. ��.:;,�.._�v=�`��'-_:.� �: _- �,,,: �.�x_:� -' _ - � , � ., �� f.:.;= _ F�-�,�-�---- - .� ~�~ - � }.��,� '"' ' .a��.-_.. .�`�..-�_ _ -,- � i- - � ... �� _.. _�.:• 4�:F�,.•-F _� • � � . --, i[. �� `�•'•�..�'--. ��,_ ' ' `-�'3-�y. •= - _ - . � :y�`,. ��` +ti�i,',- ��#� �'.��`-�. ::�..�� "Y��- - -� �,- ' �. 7. `�,� �..�.,�� _._�; � . ��e. �' _ .I': �i.:. ` '�- , �'µ--�r..�,': :?� - '� ;'- .:.-•. �. __ _ . � y_� _� �.,, � . - ;:; �. � :;;_�.�,: ��, �,. - � �.;.�� :�,_�;�. ��-'_ _ � '`' s+i.�:'' ';�;�7 �i . � 'su.^�3'��a�� r: �.�_•' � _ � _'�: 4' .:,� �.r��: �_ ` �wi _ - ;.�L - . •f ` x r�-� '.i.� : 4� r a� � - •��_ r • ^+� i - I_'h��..�; �I ' s'�_ -:'I . . .� -�-�,i��y�� p � �� • S : . 3 �{ ��Y" F:� �i.nv.ry . '�a�(r+ . - � . �� .�'< . r3 � _ • - . . ' � `1~w �.�� .—_r`:� .. :f� ---� _ , �,` -f�T_ . : Y�i.: _i`,�.:,�—�if`i;,�� I'�-- .-J_ , _�.. . .. •, : , -� . - �i � �: • '•�;�:=Y ��'.� ---• _-�_ ,7�.� J. . ._.. __ 1 . _ .. . . �.-�� --��1� . i'Jj-�� ,v�1--- _ ' , �� ' - �` . ._- .. .� � ' � ., . �ll�'+r".^ �`_j¢�'-_: : ;...: � -. . � � ' _ �,, ' ' . " I:' •��t �. ^�:��,yC.=+� ''s�� ,r--- `f `' ~ ,i � Y � -Y-----� � .�: �'��: m`�� __,w -�. .,...:�r -- �`��„��i...� �:. L., �. .�, r. STAFF REPORT- Demolition - 1620-1628 White Street Page 4 _,.�, �.,,. ;.. �, _ ....,,�:-,,,. . . .; �- �,--�-`-�-� " .`*:�=_ _'. ' - '�: - - - �: - •�:s��*�-�- -� a=:'3�'..F r-::�.-:- ,�:..- �:. �: �. ;�� .�.:_}:�' �_ ' r� _ y - �-$�+� ��F..�� .��.�:fi�s�.�~$-:` , _ . ��`;�'~...��.�:��_�-.'..:_.�."�. `�- � 1w��-"r�� - _ �a�!" . :,� . , �f � �� , _ _;.�- �'�Y'�'1��`'•-.';,�^_�-� .y I _ . �� '_. ��,.•,".L:+:� - - - -..:..�..: ::�t' _ _ -�� , �� = - ��,r�"�'=�=t_''_ .... .,.. .. '�� ::� �,_"��_;•� - _ `-'%+.:��= . - �'�� . 'Sr'S`�'-�=`�-:.- - _.. �..,r��.��r '"-- - ' � ^► •� � O �**,�n�� - _ .. � �y: ' � � �aw;�� I �� .�: '1 �?"• ':',. . "[;��';�� . , .-�-�� '. - �, - �:M �� " � r,�G �G-.;R;�. �:� ::�:'�� . j ' ;��,:�'! �: �a'�i�i'� i �. �. � ��.�� ;� e�k.. .!�. ��a`�',��'�:� � ��' .��. _ _. :aF��.' 1:'f�:° ,.- � � .. - ��y '�•;.'•..�.�ii �;?�; i:..'{�Ili...�: .t-t-�.�r' ]^rf � . � ;. ' ��`; �,y�*�{. '�i� �'� � �?�. i.�;l. i 1+: ` ,�,w';.�;� � b ..�: �•j�:•,..�� :�i:.� �� r. „� ;�'�, . `.�;.,,;� � s�s�� ,� _'��r�. F .> >i,'�'x'�`�',�a :�..� i �. �r� ��..:�y�;F s, � � i " : ��i7 � 1 .t i_ y.��•:�i... ` �'. . r'� S��c�,��"�s n �. . . � , . �$ �IE ��• -�� 4 � � Above: 1620 garage Below: 1628 garage r - - r.: �� ,.�4��I�l�a�_ ,�- __ Y �4 � . - -. . .- __ "�y.,- .� �� i:aYe�� i3� - _- _- ~ � ,� �. .��'�'.• ~�- l' _ �`_�... � . — � �- �:. a�° �� _ _ ` `-'. - � ._. . - i��'��i �5'�;�,;� . .��• V�;3',k,i �''�' +�• � ,;+r•�' . � �_ � ;,.;`'y:r s �^'' �` � � •� ,�..�- : n . �.� 'k�,:�.A;'�,"" , �a,• ..._ -��>'`x�� • ,4Y . i.� r r " ' • •�"='� �V: ,��Z�'� �[�;� }�:``,..�. .% y�� ;��F'.. � j �7:�. 4�.• �;.� �a ✓,r 1•. ?(� } �'�• '� t fp:li�� •�i` , I��{��.�:.i' :,j� i ?ii,�:�t'.�� . �� :5�.�-.t r : .. �.:�y;�.� +� i ��. ,,� : � �°;��;^ 4'�,. ' f � ��;i;'r'�'��. i Y , ' . � s� �f. .�i,��} R �{�h� ' `�F�,; i:'�:;�,.; - r{�{ �,-.Q�f' '�r`•` "t�:7'F _ ',ia�' _ 'y�: ��.5' {�.� :.I� .r.d"+.' .I: �E.1° , x ,r.., �: �;• ,��.� �v. {�;'� �F F`.�;`;. 4. � � Contemporary images, January 2020 STAFF REPORT- Demolition — 1620-1628 White Street Page 5 _ ., ` rn��. � , .� � &�� _ � �' .�'_.-' ��•: _`., .� T �, +�� E�,. � .� ��'� ''?.,�,� „ - t ,�—�. � .�' . �-. � � , �' � � _ _ - D � � � 5 � •� iO �• - � t - �� '� `, - ��' � ''� '��r'r - ',��.-�H r i��; �. �` �3.. p �. ..�s1� [ E '� �r�. '� - � ,�4�- y �� Lf�� ,r �'�. � . ^+`.�1,: Y�. ' . � � � �� - � _�•,��" � 1[3�� R � �. �� , `�� . �`�Y�� . ��'�� .,-. rc . . �� • �{ .r- ' .�. ��, � ;? �� , - 4 ' _ -` �"� � � �. -� � �` ��t .�'!. � ,_� p�. .� -�.�� -- �� :.�;;�. i• '�. � � E / � C. - �� '` ■ � , 1� � � i ��, � . 'i 1 ",4'' �" . .F., i . � '��' �, � - .� � ; 6 �t■i�"*:!_.r� `� . r,. !' F • � ��; � � � ��"' �� - � , ��, �� - +r� -r t ti . � �' �' . � � ��1 �;y �. � - •' ^� � i ._ z. '� —i 4 i � �i � � , +.r �t � "� �: - �� „�;; .��.� �-, � ;�� ,. • �� i � , �. �� ;� # � t ,. { N.o- '� ; ' � 1 1 •�i. " x h� -, �4 vYH17ES'S o " �- �. -,h. , �'r�'r � 3 � � T E SS _ • i�' "Y' � I r � i i - 1 � � .s � �' r. ,.,,.... - �1' *�� : �� _ � . � � ,.-�'. � c '� ."� 4 r �- � �, '��. �� _ A ,3 . '� ��' � � u �°' s� ,R� �; , , �- � �� ' . • + ... � u`'- �� ; , �f� _ t =�'��-`� *� , �..'''�r� , '� • � -� '��. �-s � � � - �� ti� ' �� Y,, '� - . ��, �i... . ,t : '4�� ;� � �fc�r�r _ 'ti'�' � ` �._o_ � .fG'.5�� ,��`i�� 1 . ��-.-y o �� . � � ,�y��,,� � � 1�Ti � � , r. _�'�k3':''^.��N�'� �Y�� ` � �G��r - ,..� . - _ �� , �• � - -- - ' _.-.. Y' - _ ,'� '� ` ' �.�'�� ' ;r�� ;`�� ^ R ��:�.. ��-: � ,� ,,. ., f,� , �- � - - _ `1`.�� y��;� :: . ,f'_ � . . � � •�� .�'p�'.•" � �fY�i�� r '�`h . - f/Y . :► . - =.� r � , .' �� . .. ��^�� @ V. f��.L .1: - ,s -��yg�"'� ��.^`.�r�' }i .. �i��/ '�� 7!'. y" .�� y: 's. • '{` �� _ s . f �"r_ i � � .> > _ ;yM+ � �J ` �� ' �`;';l�_ '"�` - ;:� � � i ,' ` �� :� '�•��: � y ..5i- e�s�.., � -�� i`� I �: �:�� i F ..i �� •�� r� 1 a f �� .'S��r�� r ;�_ j � ..:�-:,w;;�.�,,�;; , • � .�� _. .�4:: Pictometry online, March 2020 STAFF REPORT- Demolition — 1620-1628 White Street Page 6 Historical Siqnificance: The north half of the structure dates before 1884 and the south half is dated 1892-1908, per Jim Jacobsen's 2003 Phase III survey. The structures have consistently been considered contributing, included in the 1973 survey by Sommers, the 1978-79 survey by Kriviskey and the 2003 survey by Jacobsen. The structure is a contributing building in the Washington Neighborhood National Register Historic District. Kriviskey 1978-79 Survey: ,� Neighborhood significance , � � � � v � � � , � � ►� a � Q �o� ; � . . � ►�wcfr,�crur�s�c►wcE � c�tx st�os.a n��ai � 'Ir � � � . _� Won Supporllve `� Jacobsen Phase III Survey 2003: Contributing �ection n+arnher 7 Page 14 tihlashinqtan Residential Hislari�district puhuaueCaunlv 1�� 1�Itlress,Jlistori�hl N�nie,l)�le,�.k'71IIINLI{FJI HLSt6Y'I€��D:lf:l fYl]{I.Aji{'I'af11F11S �eroisdar•R�tildin�w . coiiirtiier�it�l bin�4�. En_ 1G�U-28 1'1`hiic�Sti�eei,��rc•18f34(i��yrlh liull),1t392- ['Jtic�itFiilf lialf4rfihis d�i}�leti tip}r�ars�}n tltic C'nntribiitiii�.(�S) �9{I}�{sos�lh I�all�: 1738�I`��nl�rn rna�r. ru�ticatcd c�rncretc l�lock �t�ra��. �I�I71�I$�Ci�i7�l'II371[IIS�t��]J l�{�ild'lil�s[4G��-s�C�i')�fl71 roaf brick duplcx��la€r. Tl�c rnodcrn o4�crsizcd I-��it��lr,�iin�s iw�sr�lz7l�l�. Staff Analvsis: The structure is listed on the National Register of Historic Places as a contributing building in the Washington Neighborhood National Register Historic District. Although it is further deteriorated since the latest 2003 survey, it is not less contributing. Because the applicant is aware of the status, they moved on to the second step of the application, with an economic non-viability argument. Should the Commission concur that the structure has historic or architectural significance, then the commission shall review the portion of the application that outlines an argument for Economic Non-Viability. Role of the Commission: The Role of the Historic Preservation Commission is to review the information and decide as to the following: STAFF REPORT- Demolition — 1620-1628 White Street Page 7 1. Whether the building proposed for demolition has historic or architectural significance to the community; if so 2. Whether denial of the proposed demolition permit would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property. Standards for Demolition Review: The city of Dubuque's historic property inventory and any subsequent official architectural/historical surveys/evaluations and nominations to the National Register of Historic Places serves as the standard for review. Economic Guidelines and Review Criteria: The following guidelines and criteria is from Section 16-10-5 of the City of Dubuque Unified Development Code: F. Economic Guidelines And Review Criteria: 1. In determining whether to approve or deny the application, the commission may consider the information set forth in this subsection. The commission may also investigate strategies which would allow the property owner to earn a reasonable economic return on the property, may solicit expert testimony, and may require that the applicant make submissions concerning any or all of the following information: a. A bid from a qualified contractor showing the cost of the proposed demolition. b. A report from a licensed engineer, architect or contractor with experience in rehabilitation as to the structural integrity of the structure(s) that the applicant proposes to demolish. c. The appraised value of the property by a licensed appraiser for the following conditions: (1) In the property's current condition; (2)After completion of the proposed demolition; (3)After rehabilitation of the existing property for continued use by providing sales for the previous six (6) months for at least three (3) comparable properties. If there are not sales for the previous six (6) months at comparable properties, sales for the previous year at comparable properties may be used; and (4) If the property is an income producing property, such valuation must include the rent scheduled and anticipated income after such rehabilitation, and the same for at least three comparable properties to substantiate the information provided for the property in question. d. An estimate from an architect, developer, contractor, or appraiser experienced in rehabilitation as to the cost to rehabilitate the building to the point of which a reasonable use or a reasonable profit can be realized from the property, including, but not limited to, bringing a building up to code so it can be occupied, not necessarily its "highest and best use", preferred use, or a restoration project. e. The amount paid for the property, the date of purchase, and the person from whom the property was purchased, a description of the relationship, if any, if any between the owner of record, the applicant and the person from whom the property was purchased or is being purchased, and the terms of the purchase or proposed purchase, including financing. f. If the property is income producing, copies of the 1040 schedule E or other appropriate forms and/or schedules filed with the IRS for the previous two (2) years. Such forms must include operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation deduction and annual cash flow before and after debt service, if any. Such forms must be signed by the current property owner to certify their STAFF REPORT- Demolition — 1620-1628 White Street Page 8 authenticity. If such forms/statements are not available, income statements from a certified public accountant or licensed public accountant on letterhead and signed may be substituted. g. The name of all mortgagees and the balance of all mortgages or other financing secured by the property and annual debt service, if any, for the previous two (2) years. Debt service is the amount of principal and interest payments paid annually on the property. h. All appraisals obtained within the previous two (2)years by the owner or applicant in connection with the purchase, financing and ownership of the property. i. Any listing of the property for sale or rent, the price asked and offers received for sale or rent, if any, within the previous five (5) years. j. The assessed value of the property for the previous two (2) assessment years. k. The amount of real estate taxes assessed for the previous two (2) assessment years and whether or not they have been paid. I. The form of ownership or operation of the property, whether sole proprietorship, for profit or not for profit corporation, limited partnership,joint venture or other. m. Any other information considered necessary by the commission to determine whether the property yields or may yield a reasonable economic return to the property owner(s). A"reasonable economic return" is defined as the cost to rehabilitate the building to the point at which a reasonable use or a reasonable profit can be realized from the property. This may mean bringing a building up to code to the point at which it can be occupied, not necessarily to its "highest and best use", preferred use or a restoration project. n. Proof of the applicant's efforts to obtain financing, tax incentives, preservation grants and other incentives to allow the applicant to earn a reasonable economic return from the property. o. Documents detailing the applicant's efforts in ongoing maintenance and repair. This may include, but is not limited to, tax statements and/or copies of invoices. End of Code Section 16-10-5 Requested Action: The Commission's role is to review the attached application for demolition and supporting documentation for an Economic Non-Viability argument. If the Commission finds the building proposed for demolition does not have historic or architectural significance the Commission should approve the application. If the Commission finds the building proposed for demolition has historic or architectural significance the Commission should deny the application. Because the applicant has provided a subsequent application for a certificate of Economic Non-Viability, the Commission has the ability to review that information at this meeting, to determine whether a reasonable economic return can be earned on the property. If a reasonable economic return cannot be earned, the Commission should approve the application for demolition. Prepared by: ��----. Reviewed� Date: 03-10-2021 ��.�.�� ^�WASHI �NGTON STREET�?NEIGH�B Y �RH�O�OD��9To ��.� i"�A 7ir�-u*-- �` � �� t��.in=��:� ,��^ , \'�� j �� `\/��.�v��\�, 'sh��, ,T.�ri,q,po��1; � � � � , � � ' CONSERVATIO`N DISaTjRIC�T �`�°�� `�� ;' =,�� t ��' : ; . , � � � � ,� _ r �� . �T . :. � .k ,. ,�,�.� ,;. �� _ _ _� !�: r f�'�' �, 20 ,,�,,\��, � 1<9 ; } � , � , : "�y'� �.� � �- ' �:. i� . � ., . �� ,�r. � w �. � � KAUFMANN _�_ � . .. .,.�.. � � ' :, � ._ '. . . , T '�P� . �^,'��`S�P\ �/ , �: . 4°Po _!! �'W` "'^ „y,�e ��' '"y '� a e °�.(;� 3�' v ��''f�../^^ '�F� �f•z' �� .mgs^': �`. - � :1(. ��,�, � � � ��' \�. � � � � .. � � ! '-��,' `- ./. ��., �� r`�.. �= 'E`.f� � _ + .'.:.- � -��: �, .. <J'•. g. ��'�� 'C� r •� '� +i�- �, � , , � � m�� - r � � �- �- �- � �� y . � `'�'`"`��;'i'� � � `�'' �,r� �� ' r� s:�� ^�� r"`':yc�t``�� "� ��'�� r�� _ �. i�`" �S�'``"'�f o ' � � �.� `�"'�: �I `�� \. y ." �.,Jicy„ � '� �'� , ;� ` �j; -'iP=�, �� ! `'�� \ �/\ / �n�Vt7'�t''ii• �n��i�� /./ ,. ; � � � �� - �3P �� V , �o,y . �, �; .- ,..�+- ' .. .,+w . , l:.r—�.s. �� 2 �' � .. \� �, � aa.� z�sT � � ,I�, t � �, � .Y� •� '�� o O�;""�';`n�"""�P�� / '�,�` . a � 2. .....'� 1k',� �u�=._ i ��..�� ^ � �� GP, i. . � . �Il � e R: j ��r , � �, � 4�—� s . r., `� — �� G .� .� � �.f A r . _ r-- �� -.� � .-, w f � � � � � y � � �,- ��: , ,,��, �, � �, ,�� rv� �..'� , `��° , '��.; �f _ ,- -�----- ,�` �.. , � _ .�'�"r'� a- � � �� _ '��'w � . �'A � ,�'. �� S/ /�;��r _ - �,:; ��,'_ � � � - - - � -.a�° � ;� s` �� f �� , � ,, �� :a� �;.�,,, ` s._ ,i . `•.iiu .1". r�-'}'. ��. ..�a i.�'." .,.;� ..� � �� . .. '� ' �r ` �� . �e � ' _ " 2orH � � � � r �I,� ��•�'� t '... �Z, � ,_�I_ ` �-- -� : _;�. .:,a-. _ . .�� . . ' ^� r-�� r R+- � i �� _ t ' " ' � I �,� - � � ,4 ' � >- w r.,��, _ n-R 1 i �",� � ,r�.� 0 i� i � ,� � ef ,�`�'� � � � ` � - ` �J%/1,'� '. '�, :_ .- `�{� 'Y.r m► .. . � ��.�c1 i;e-1� � �� , - ��'� � � �wl �� '.. �I �� , ... � � 19TH - � w r � .. � � . f1��.. _ ;yr ... O _w.� _z� .7 f 4; � _.� � 'w � q��;r � ' � a I' ,/'�� _,G�� ar `q��rF ....•� - ' �'r'C�, r r 1 � t 'i�" �: - �� , ' �� t�� =1 .� y�� ,� _ � ,� �� '�_ --� ,� ,�;� �� r. t'��,3J � � . A . 8rH �,e _ �� ' - �-� ,.. .. . � .� � .�"69F �, ��_��r 4-- � -�� , , .r �� - , �,� � . �*, � , - ' " ' a' - r � �, �y m r+ �..�� ,.., 'i _=� ' �� -i•� � " - '- �� ' . �=v.�'C p�"s +� �+ �� _�- � �q- ' �" f �t' r F' � t �� : � �y r�; 3� �d �. � � . .. • : I �� I . -� '�", -., ,�� , � ; � �� ,+ r.'a'M � - .N � '�`y `� �, �"n' . . J e t �,^ �; � i +�.. ' .�_ I�I .r � � .. : `, y� �s f � � ...�- �I; � � i�� .��'iL. �� 3 _ ��_i �1.•°'=+1�^:_. I • - \ �'�. .1�`t�.}3� i�� 4, . �'- � '� � - r�17TH' _ ' 1 . '�y'1° , . _ . _ A..: _ _ � 'E � . ��`�'�� ,. , ��: � , pr.'�. _ „ � , _. ! ��.Ay � �-�- ��_ , - �: � _ _� �� _ � y�;��. ��,;i � = �1= - _r. -,r k _.. .w _ ; �s. '�°` � _ �� ' � �- _""� � _�' ' •4«. .. � .. �;'� ,rw�x r . �d.��^. Irs _ ' � O �4' - • �16TH� -� � . T - � . ,a . . . . �� i i � �� .r d , z _ `�� rp? . � \� y� S9 •' _._ sr .'.S OH '}� '� � K K ,�� '.. _ �l . z�" iI. y . `Sx. � ��+4 �_. � � � z r� ,,.. .� ` Q _ �`�'p .f� � � � �� ,. a � _ .�..1 � � � � �� • . � . .. �. ��. �f = � _ �ti. ?.�' �'-,�ir � � m ..cjS '�1p;. �yri� � _-�`-� - ' �w_ , �,, . � , . .. � - --15rH �.tr �� Q z t. � ' ' ' � � �; _ a� _ - -. ��,. � � ,� �� -�� :.,;e � � , �': �— r._._ � �� _ � � _` w � hw��- � T' --r ty '��. � ,_ � �� I o :y„�f � .. g� i a� .i�'�°.a.r ._ p'�� . -( cwi �� Q� �r _ ,� �� -� ;.s; r--�'` _ �. ,� ^// ��LORAS ,14TH -- � � ;=!'PFt'P ...._�� / j a .� � - � � r .f� �._� � Il"��.--�_ t�. � , .�. �, • ��.� ,e '�j� ; t � _ � - - � .�"-� �� KEY .n � I � f. t4 ].:�- � � �fl rI 1�i. '� t � yT �� r " �' �'� 1� � "� �='- •� ��` Washington Street Neighborhood 13TH x - - ��-�-�-- ��, t— -,_-, �- w�-- . � -'�� Conservation District 1 . 5�.. `� �. �t !�S ,� - �_ � _�I E r� ; G� '�S ! Z i ` �� , �'� a Properties to be removed from the _ '''� `, � � � � ,;� Conservation District �_ �� ~ �' � 12TH — �—'F �1 - �� .� �, ' �, ,'n/,t .r �12TH4. . ..!\' r� . ' � �`O!l , . `J �'� Q F {' . , �� 4 '� � - �; rfF �,. ,� �� ;� - - _ � R� � '� 1 "X s °� f �u� — �. - - " ' � , r �00' 250 �a 0 4; f��f(�500 Feet - � ` - � �, _— .� ->- , , � , y,� ; _; K�ftPER _- - _ �- �: , � .. -� �� r� _ - ` �'� � �., a e v .. � A» �:.; � �Jf �� . r� �� O � D . h� � ��s� �;��,� +I , 9 �� - .k��,..A T�-. 1�".' - � _ ,,• �., ��;,,�,pp',r.�-'�-`. n � � � ' r ;,� � a � a � � O � e � r�•'"�� `� - �i.� � � , � � �. s` - . .v..... - � ��. .. . . . ., �� ,-� � � � � �1 �!� �-� ' L ' � :� I `' � � � •r _ �". n4( ' a� � ' �A�, �.II� _ ^� Z � �v�` '»e �� • � � .°so��r'�.� i i�o , � KAUFMANN .,�r� ' . ,,.. , �r� . _�! . . r ._ ` �,r:-� '_. 1 �—�^ ' -�- ' ' - , a � ��''F� , ^ ��" Po - _. - - �� r � f _ --, ,r,_ ,� � , ^_ ,, � P ' � . _r�. ^ " ` - �' ,i�+�m� I � � � � ^-- �` q�SF' '� � ,. . '<r�i � `�� " \� ri, a � � � � -� - .. ^,, -'''� � � -,1j(\ � ` i ��'" . �.� � '�. _ - �°�- —� a�„-�� - � �''=4 - a ?� �;�j,, �,�' = � r-.- �-, -�- .�-- � �� -�. � ��m j,i _ ,�. � �f� �_ � � � � �.. �. �.. f�s= ....� � �� J � ��.; �+..r = .3. t �� y s p'�'� �� T ' ��w'� ti, y` � 'r,, �- �.M.� .1�+.' ITl�„ ��'�"� .�"S.�" "' p�,� ��eI �,pj1�♦ y�^ �� u't"�^ _�. �_ I�'�t .��.t. ►1P4= �. .^�T'� __ . G . /`` �+^ _ k �� -. %�' c�'� ,r�� L �,��3jM ��N . ��' V�� iJi a � ��,s� y; _ � -�� ,ti,c `,�; � �,� F'� �, � �, ,; �� `��. :f�, _ - . � �°y � o T . � -.- ...•- � ti� �, , ��. ;wK..-f . � 21ST ,� � � � . ,f o� � PQ-F ' �. ::yr�q�`� IF'..Ir }_ .�� .�r �� h�J I 1P.7■'�.. J i" �1 �� .�� ' �� '�.. .� r � �-�- _ . � � R Y '_ Am` _s«. ��y f ' �� 3y,� � �6��G t ,�, r, � f O ��m'1 F ' ,� � i �'� - ...... � �� , ., .-�',��'� . b..r. . � �� r � �. ^ � � 'a-f. . r,� ,`F'.'t� .�` �, m'_ ._�' C '9 .r�' . e- �.,�' r�� _ '�.n\' �� %i �/ �. �� /�� y./ _ _ E:. �u .,,� 0, Gi/� �': � �►"'� �'.t �- � �.I �. � i.%M' f t ''�. �$ F /� r.��,( " ; y, � - . ,�, _ � _ `3�''_�_ "i ,'' f'�' � a -:1 � - '. . R, . � / � � �i ,L �. ��.. . �'-.l�� ._. . ^ " - � 20TH . �' � � �r� f �3 �J: " ��,. �y. w.<, '. �� I�.� r- r.� �C�-�� _ r-_ � Y�y��"'s,� . . ' � � � . � m 1a. � �� -r� ��` � .f �'°'. .. . ,C� .� . � �.. � � , �� _ � � � � � ,r��-r'� 0 � � :; ��? �.. �-� 1 ,.� � , � , '� ' :. � � � � �'� ' � - - ,�i'� . �=x - ' �,. _ �.- _ - � � �` �. _ - ' � ��4� , . . ,. -.. .." ; � .Y, S� 19TH , _ Q • � � _ _, �-- �w 4 _ _ ._� .i a�� r - � . : � , ,� o��_ � ,r'--��: - _. �� _ '� !y�� . -� _ �. � �- = Q� , — _ �'` , . � F�: �. ',�'q��F � �_ .�'" �. � � I > i _� „'�� .� �I�= _� �� _ -_ , ��. :�� , � �. --E�- k' �� i:,.. I��._.�� .A � � _ o '' �� , .. ,�,.,, ��M'^S�� 18TH . a � T� �y. � �".E_t �.� '�r �� — � � �� . ' . .. . ��X� ^5%.�4 y,� W . �J��4^'� ~ � � . . ` b. .. �� ? ,�y - ��' � ,��- !''.� t i � � •` . J# .i"y , . . �. ��I Il��I �r - � �. " � .t I+ _� n -ur: �• , ' 1� e�� . '-t � V�� _ - .�� .�Y � � �'� .r1�,��.��:+V':__ . �'��. �� . i '� -,17TH" _ � _ � 1F rl" . ��.; � � ��` ' ,y � � a�� _`� _ �` . . . �:4 � ',—�'- �i f - ��`= ai` � � � � _ ;�:.�. ,r� �_ - ,, �.- -s _ � � � ,-,.- ,�. ,� i w :� .. , �� - T�� „ �� _ - .. . ; � _ � :,` � ; r— . . . ,,,�},. , - - . _ _ . d . �• • o = „� ' :� w . � :. � _ ' i. �- -;.i �.--� _ o :t•.� _ ,�. � �f � �� w � �. y � �. '� �V +'I ' U .* � "�' i +y�'-' 1Pr• ., a �. �' I �I I - r �"+F � •► �- 3� r' '_"'� 1-..r . _ o' - �F" " �. -w�:`u9� - Iww4 �J=w �. . .. , _ ..r�15TH '��i','�,� _ . ' O z � � e W '-.�,�,.�� t . � ' .. «�J�� r�..r �� _ �'�w d�-.. ' ' + . � �j , . — �y .,, , � D, .: . a `rR e�� p`-r �' �s• :..�f" ' .: �. �a � ...., � �+�'. '� .a � w�` +�� :?"�""'. � �` Y_ Q �.= . � ,�--� " T -j � J -' r + Q� � _ . , '�i Q�. .,= .. � '#�'�- ,,.a...r �' :,_ 1�':5 ,� � g� �I p �.. i �'� �" .� �.G:.. =� .,n,��, . _ .._::7a � . � ,� ' /� . a: _.4,. ,�"'� � r«.-r ? __J� ,� '.��LORAS 14TH � n � - - ' � � " � !�� F• � __ " I � -� .-- � ,:.,, � . . ---o_ . �.. . . r ' - .__ C�� s , .I_ ..Ts-.. _...,_ '..� . `J ' t _ m � � - _� � �� _�"-7 �-`, �--� �� KEY � � . � ri �� T 15i � _ "�-+.IJ��i . ��.I �, �� Q ^ $ ' '�. � � �. � � �`" � �� " � �� o� t� I Washington Residential National 13TH E: ��---- �� .,,— w . _ r.` - Register Historic District , _ =� _ I >.� r' ^' ; �-_" - "`� t � l° z Washington Street Neighborhood , • �` '''�'§ , ; �_ �� ( , � Conservation District - _ � '� �� ►,�;` !` . �" _ _ Properties to be removed from the 'f1 �� „r�=F � e. Conservation District � r- ,. � �� ' - / /-�/ / �r >— ,F � - 500 250�0 . ��<<�500 Feet � ER �.� - - � �. __ � � , • �KgPP Dubuque THE CITY OF � All•Ameriea Ci1� Du8 E ,rn� ,� ��.�,:. il Ir II Maste iece on the Mississi i z°°'.Z°iz`z°13 � pp zoi�*zo�9 TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager FROM: Wally Wernimont, Planning Services Manag� DATE: March 29, 2021 RE: City of Dubuque's Commitment to Historic Preservation INTRODUCTION Dubuque, lowa is a community well known for its natural beauty and its historic architecture that makes up much of the downtown and surrounding neighborhoods. As lowa's oldest city, Dubuque's strong historic preservation ethic goes back decades. The City of Dubuque is committed to identifying and conserving its cultural resources. We recognize that the historic, architectural and archeological resources of Dubuque are a key to our economic success and quality of life. These resources, like the Mississippi River, help form Dubuque's unique identity. Historic preservation is the poster child of sustainability—with its economic, environmental, and cultural benefits. Preservation enhances the vibrancy of neighborhoods and cities, instilling pride and value through increased property values, as well as enhanced quality of life, sense of place and neighborhood pride. Preservation translates into economic prosperity through creation of new jobs, retention of existing jobs — especially in construction trades, stimulation of private investment, tourism and business growth, and financial investment in property improvements in Dubuque. Dubuque's rise from its renown economic troubles of the 1980s was in part due to its recognition of and dedication to the notion that what makes us unique can be our source of strength. Instead of mimicking other communities or trying to reinvent ourselves, we turned to our foundation of our strong building stock and environmental and culture heritage. We set out to preserve what we have, make it functional for the 21 St Century and enhance the community with sensitive and relevant infill development when warranted. Dubuque has been continually in the forefront of historic preservation in lowa and has received national recognition. With the City's commitment to education and training, the Planning Services Department and the Historic Preservation Commission can help identify treatment approaches, potential financial incentives, and other resources available to assist property owners. BACKGROUND The City's commitment to historic preservation began in the mid 1970's as the community reacted to the wholesale clearance of downtown blocks through urban renewal programs. As a result of the foresight of early leaders, Dubuque has one of the largest collections of historic building stock in lowa. The community's commitment continues today and into the future with our focus on sustainability and resiliency. The City of Dubuque has a historic preservation ordinance and a variety of preservation incentives that protect and enhance our community's historic resources and identity. The City has designated 5 local historic preservation districts, 9 conservation districts, 11 local landmarks, 19 National Register Historic Districts and 3 conservation planning areas supported by an active Historic Preservation Commission. There exists overlap between many of the conservation and historic districts. Illustrated design guidelines are available for historic districts as well as the Downtown, Historic Millwork District, and older neighborhoods. The City has documented the historical and architectural significance of nearly 5,700 properties in Dubuque. Dubuque's historic preservation regulations, historic surveys, and architectural guidelines are a resource to guide property owners, contractors, and design professionals with preserving and enhancing the historic characteristics of a building, in turn fostering neighborhood stability and community vitality. HISTORIC RESOURCES In 1976, the Dubuque Architectural Survey was completed, and conservation districts were established as precursors to historic districts. The City Council adopted a Historic Preservation Ordinance in 1977, and then established the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) in 1979 to assist in the review, retention and promotion of historically significant properties and districts in the city of Dubuque. Survey/Evaluation Program The City Council designated 5 local historic districts, 8 conservation districts, and 8 local landmarks from 1979 to 1984 based on the 1976 Architectural Survey. This inventory was bolstered after Dubuque's many architectural themes and historic contexts were recorded in the 1999 Comprehensive Survey and the 2000 Community Assessment funded in part by the State of lowa. This documentation is the foundation for phased historical/architectural surveys/ evaluations of our older residential and commercial neighborhoods. The City has retained consultants to survey and evaluate 5,653 structures using local, state and federal funds. Year Phase Survey Area Buildings Total Grant Grant Cost Amount Source 2000 n/a Citywide n/a $9,575 $4,000 HRDP 2000 I Couler 993 $20,583 $8,700 CLG Valle 2001 II Eagle Point 2,092 $28,258 $18,753 HRDP 2003 III Downtown / 647 $28,000 $18,000 CLG Old Main 2004 IV 4 Historic 544 $27,830 $18,000 CLG Districts 2005 V Conservation 452 $21,975 $14,437 CLG Districts 2015 VI North Couler 925 $13,213 $0 n/a Valle Since 2000, based on the phased survey/evaluation program, the City Council has locally designated these additional resources: 1 new conservation district, 1 expanded conservation district, 3 local landmarks, 4 individual historic properties, and 3 conservation planning areas. In addition, the HPC was able to use the phased survey/evaluation program results for preparation of five NRHP historic district nominations that were approved in 2015. Historical Resources Inventory The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is a program led by the National Park Service to designate, coordinate and support public and private effort to identify, evaluate, and protect our country's historic and archeological resources. Many of Dubuque County's nationally recognized cultural resources are found in the City of Dubuque, including: 2 of 3 National Historic Landmarks, 1 of 5 archeological districts, 19 of 21 historic districts, and 48 of 61 structures individually listed in the NHRP. https://www.cityofdubuque.orq/2156/National-Reqister-Properties Approximately 2,500 National Historic Landmarks are designated by the National Park Service as exceptional places of national significance. There are 25 in lowa. Two of Dubuque County's 3 National Historic Landmarks are in the city of Dubuque: Old Dubuque County Jail and William M. Black steamboat. The City Council has preserved 696 structures in 5 local historic districts: Cathedral, Jackson Park, Langworthy, West 11t" Street, and Old Main. In 2005, all 5 local historic districts were listed in the National Register and designated as Urban Revitalization Areas for tax abatement. https://www.cityofdubuque.orq/387/Local-Historic-Districts The City Council has designated 11 local landmarks and landmark sites: City Hall, Dubuque County Courthouse, Old Dubuque County Jail, William M. Black steamboat, Shot Tower, Mathias Ham House, Julien Dubuque Monument, Four Mounds Estate, Eagle Point Park, Carnegie-Stout Public Library and Dubuque-Dunlieth Bridge. All 11 local landmarks also are listed in the National Register. https://www.cityofdubuque.orq/341/City-Designated-Landmarks The City Council has designated 4 individual historic properties. These properties are not of a landmark status or located within a historic district, but they do have prehistoric, historic, architectural, archeological and/or cultural significance. Two are also listed in the NRHP. The HPC reviews demolition requests in the 9 conservation districts designated by the City Council that protect 1,204 structures in the downtown and surrounding older neighborhoods outside of locally designated historic districts. https://www.cityofdubuque.orq/1461/Conservation-Districts Design Review In the locally-designated historic districts, landmarks, and individual historic properties, the HPC has design review authority for exterior alterations that require a building permit, are visible from the public right-of-way, and represent a material change in appearance. The HPC also reviews demolition requests for these sites. For exterior alterations that are not a material change or clearly conform with the established Architectural Guidelines, Planning Services staff can sign-off on the permit. These sites also are eligible for historic preservation funding. Properties in a conservation district are subject to HPC review of demolition requests only and may be eligible for this funding. The Housing and Community Development Department reviews potential housing loss with demolition requests in the historic and conservation districts. RESPONDING TO CHALLENGES In the 1990's, historic preservation faced many challenges in Dubuque. Residents in two historic districts petitioned the City Council to be removed from these areas. The Historic Preservation Commission was overturned on appeal to the City Council for the demolition of two downtown commercial structures anchoring prominent corners in two other historic districts. Historic district property owners appealed to the City Council on the Commission's prohibition to install vinyl siding to abate lead-based paint. As a result of this series of events, the City Council determined that a renewed focus on historic preservation was needed and re-assigned the program to the Planning Services Department. In April 1999, the City Council directed the HPC to review and update the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and to identify solutions to the problems and deficiencies that caused the conflicts. The HPC and Planning Services staff worked with historic district property owners, contractors, and representatives from the Dubuque Area Board of Realtors, Dubuque County Historical Society, and Dubuque Main Street. Based on the HPC's recommendations, the City Council adopted numerous measures in 2001 to encourage preservation over demolition -- using a "carrot and stick" approach of expanded incentives and stronger regulations. Expanded Historic Preservation Incentives: • Established Architectural and Streetscape/Landscape Design Guidelines. • Created a Historic Preservation Homeowner Grant Program for low to moderate income households. • Created a Historic Preservation Revolving Loan Fund for exterior improvements for property owners at any income level in the 5 historic districts. • Expanded the Urban Revitalization Program, a 10-year city property tax exemption for qualified improvements to residential properties, to all 5 historic districts. • Created the Historic District Public Improvement Program to provide matching grants for streetscape improvements in the 5 local historic districts and at landmarks. Stronger Historic Preservation Regulations: • Added a Preservation Alternatives step to the design review process, which requires a property owner to attempt to obtain financial incentives and restoration alternatives sufficient for the owner to earn a reasonable economic return. • Prohibited Demolition by Neglect, to require owners of historic property to keep their real estate in good repair, to stop a small problem before it becomes a large problem, and to offer information and assistance on preventative maintenance with historically appropriate methods and materials. • Initiated the Boarded-Up Windows and Doors Ordinance which prohibits boarded-up windows and doors on any building facade facing the street side of a property. The ordinance requires windows be maintained on street sides of buildings to combat the blighting influence boarded-up windows and doors have on buildings and neighborhoods. Since these Historic Preservation Ordinance amendments and historic preservation incentives were implemented, the HPC has not been challenged by appeals to the City Council to waive standards for exterior alterations. Using this "carrot and stick" approach of expanded incentives and stronger regulations has helped create a positive image for historic preservation efforts and spurred other local initiatives in support of historic preservation in Dubuque and elsewhere. PRESERVATION-RELATED PLANNING The City of Dubuque takes pride in our success through "People, Planning, and Partnerships". Historic preservation is a key component of these initiatives. ➢ The City Council set long-range goals and objectives for historic preservation in the City's 1995 Comprehensive Plan, reaffirming them in the 2002, 2008, 2012 and 2017 updates of the Plan. ➢ In 2002, the City Council adopted the Port of Dubuque Master Plan. The Port is home to several National Register properties and the America's River project. The Master Plan provides for a dense urban development pattern reflective of Downtown Dubuque and supports a riverFront revitalization effort that includes cultural and heritage tourism as well as design standards that reflect Dubuque's historic downtown architecture. ➢ The City Council recognized the importance of the historic, architectural and cultural resources of downtown and surrounding neighborhoods with the adoption of the Downtown Dubuque Master Plan in 2004. The Plan evaluates current conditions, catalyst opportunities, and barriers to investment for Downtown's historic features. It also describes priority actions for protecting and encouraging redevelopment of historic resources in Downtown. ➢ In 2009, the City Council adopted the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan to directly address identified issues and to plan for an improved future for the neighborhood through a broad range of strategies. The Plan includes strategies for preservation and conservation of historic resources in Dubuque's oldest neighborhood. ➢ The Historic Millwork District Master Plan adopted by the City Council in 2009 is intended to foster opportunities to retain, recruit and expand businesses, transforming over one million square feet of vacant and/or underutilized space into a "live, work, and play" community. The growing mix of office, commercial, entertainment, and residential uses is supported by the Plan's unique melding of market opportunities, sustainable and architectural design, historic preservation, and sound planning principles. DESIGN GUIDELINES Design guidelines are in place for Dubuque's historic districts, downtown, and older neighborhoods to protect and enhance their historic, cultural and aesthetic resources. Architectural Guidelines In 2001, the City Council adopted Streetscape/Landscape and Architectural Design Guidelines for the 5 local historic districts. In 2009, the City Council adopted a Downtown Design Guidelines Manual for both exterior architectural design and streetscape/landscape design. In 2014, the City Council adopted Architectural Guidelines that updated and combined these earlier Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and the Downtown into one user- friendly manual. This manual was expanded to include sustainability and accessibility guidelines. The 2014 Architectural Guidelines seek to balance objectivity with flexibility; i.e., to manage change so the traditional character of the area is respected while accommodating compatible improvements. They reflect our sustainability-oriented goals to promote economic development, enhance the image of the area, and reuse historic resources. Old Town Neighborhood Site Design Guide Adopted in 2009 as part of the Unified Development Code, these design guidelines for development in Dubuque's older neighborhoods provide form-based site design guidelines where strict application of "suburban-style" site design standards for new commercial, industrial and residential development are difficult to apply due to the dense development patterns of these older urban areas. They are intended to encourage new development that is compatible with historic districts, downtown, and older neighborhoods in conservation planning areas. HISTORIC PRESERVATION INCENTIVES Due to the commitment to historic preservation by the City Council, HPC, City staff, and neighborhood associations, Dubuque has one of lowa's best preservation programs, with many financial tools available to help finance rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic structures. Financial Toolbox The City's Financial Toolbox is extensive, with federal, state, and local incentives available for qualifying projects providing new jobs and investment in Dubuque. New and existing businesses are eligible for these economic development programs, which provide assistance to areas that include all or part of the City's 5 historic districts and 9 conservation districts. The City also has created several financial incentives geared specifically to locally-designated historic properties. The Historic Preservation Revolving Loan Fund provides 3% loans for 10 years for HPC-approved exterior changes in the historic districts and individually-designated historic properties, and to correct demolition by neglect violations in conservation districts. The program provides loans up to $25,000 to property owners at any income level on a competitive and qualifying basis. Priority is given to projects that save, restore or reconstruct original building elements. The Fa�ade Grant Program is available for qualified fa�ade renovations in the Greater Downtown Urban Renewal District. The grants are used to eliminate inappropriate additions or alterations, to repair facades to their historic appearance, to rehabilitate the farade to improve the overall appearance, and to install signage that meets the Architectural Guidelines. The Historic Property Tax Rebate Program encourage property owners to preserve, rehabilitate, restore, and reconstruct historic properties in the Greater powntown Urban Renewal District with rebates on new taxable valuation for ten years. The City of Dubuque joined its local partners to support the retention of Historic Tax Credits on the state and federal levels, knowing the importance of these two tools to help local citizens and developers take on tough projects, restoring and revitalizing Dubuque's built environment. Expansion of the Urban Revitalization District Program The Housing & Community Development Department evaluated the Urban Revitalization District Program that provides property tax exemption on improvements made to properties. These districts were expanded to cover all Community Development Block Group eligible areas located downtown. The expansion encompassed the city's historic and conservation districts as well. https://www.cityofdubuque.org/828/Urban-Revitalization-Proqram City Commitment to Funding Structures in Historic & Conservation Districts The City has been committed to funding structures located in the historic and conservation districts. Previous Five Years In the past five years, the Economic Development has provided $12,212,640 in incentives to properties located in historic and conservation districts, that have leveraged $109,548,106.34 in funds. These properties received funding for interior & exterior rehabilitation, farade renovation, and housing creation. In the last five years, the Housing & Community Development Department has spent $2,317,349 on rehabilitation of structures in the conservation district areas. All properties rehabilitated went through the federally mandated Section 106 review to ensure compliance to historic standards. In addition to rehabilitation of properties, the Housing Department has spent $6.5 million in Bee Branch Healthy Homes funds to keep structures viable and maintained after experiencing significant flooding in the conservation districts. All 325 units have been through a Section 106 review. Additionally, in the past five years, the Housing Department has spent $3.4 million in Lead & Healthy Homes Program, assisting structures built prior to 1976 to remediate lead hazards, which also helps maintain the structures and rehabilitate to historic standards. Next Five Years In the 5-Year CIP Budget, the Economic Development Department is expected to provide $2.7 million of incentives in these districts. In the next five years, the Housing & Community Development Department expects to spend $1.5 million in Bee Branch Healthy Homes Funds, $2.4 million in Lead & Healthy Homes Funds, and $2.1 million in rehabilitation of homes. BUILDING CODE OPTIONS The City Council has adopted the Uniform Code for Building Conservation, the International Building Code, and the Dubuque Historic Building Code, created in 2003. The adoption of three building codes gives owners, contractors, architects and the Building Services staff alternatives when working with existing buildings. It also reduces the barrier (real and/or perceived) of codes when property owners are contemplating renovation of their downtown buildings. PRESERVATION PARTNERSHIPS The City of Dubuque prides itself on our community partnerships, and historic preservation is no exception. The HPC has found good community support and a strong funding commitment from the City Council and other partners at the local, regional and state levels for growing list of preservation tools and incentives. The City of Dubuque participates in the Certified Local Government (CLG) program of the State Historic Preservation Office. As a CLG, the City is eligible for grants to conduct a variety of historic preservation activities. These have included development of design guidelines and the phased survey/evaluation program. The 2015 CLG grant partly funded an archeological survey/evaluation and NRHP nomination for Eagle Point Park, matched with an in-kind donation of professional services by a local preservation consultant. Generally, the City utilizes local support coupled with CLG Grants annually to support surveys, preservation plans and preservation education, like the example of co-hosting the Preserve lowa Summit in 2020. The City of Dubuque is a long-standing, award-winning Main Street Community working in partnership with the lowa Main Street Office and Dubuque Main Street. In 1985 Dubuque was chosen by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, founder of the Main Street Program, to be one of the pilot cities for the new Urban Demonstration Program. Dubuque was one of the first five communities in the nation to receive the "Great American Main Street" award. Dubuque Main Street is dedicated to the development and ongoing support of a vibrant downtown and serves seven downtown districts. Public/private partnerships and City investments have been key in the redevelopment of downtown. In recent years Dubuque has seen record amounts invested in building rehabilitation and fa�ade improvements through our Main Street program, creating thousands of full-time jobs and enabling hundreds of new businesses starts and expansions. The HPC partners with Dubuque Main Street during "Architecture Days" with presentation of the annual Ken Kringle Historic Preservations Awards. In 2004, Dubuque was one of 8 cities with a Cultural and Entertainment District designated by the State of lowa. The Cultural and Entertainment District has fast tracked downtown revitalization projects that used State tax credits. Preservation lowa was organized in 1991 as the statewide preservation organization to build partnerships that enhance our economic and cultural future through preservation of lowa's historic resources. The City of Dubuque is an active member. The National Alliance of Preservation Commissions (NAPC) is the only organization devoted solely to representing the nation's preservation design review commissions. NAPC provides technical support and manages an information network to help local commissions accomplish their preservation objectives. The City of Dubuque is an active member and hosted NAPC regional training workshops in 2008 and 2010. In 2004, Dubuque was designated as lowa's first Preserve America Community. Preserve America is a White House initiative in cooperation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and the U.S. Department of Commerce. Designation recognizes communities that: protect and celebrate their heritage; use their historic assets for economic development and community revitalization; and encourage people to experience and appreciate local historic resources through education and heritage tourism. In 2005, Dubuque was named as one of America's Dozen Distinctive Destinations by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the country's largest private, nonprofit preservation organization. This is an annual list of unique and lovingly preserved communities. Dubuque was selected from nearly 80 destinations in 44 states. In 2018, the National Trust featured Dubuque as the cover story in Preservation Magazine, entitled Finding Dubuque. The HEART (Housing Education and Rehabilitation Training) Program is a public/private partnership that provides at-risk students with vocational construction training and education through the complete rehabilitation of blighted properties in Dubuque. HEART helps revitalize older neighborhoods, creating quality, affordable, historic homes for families that follow architectural guidelines for historic preservation. Heritage Works, a preservation non-profit founded in 2015, facilitates collaboration for catalytic preservation and restoration projects; provides advocacy for historic preservation; and educates about Dubuque's rich historic and architectural heritage. FACILITATORS FOR SUCCESS For many years, the Planning Services Department has served as a facilitator more than a regulator by striving to reach a win-win-win for the property owner/developer, the neighborhood, and the community for historic preservation and development services. Since 1990, Planning Services staff has coordinated and facilitated the Development Review Team with staff representing the Fire, Water, Engineering and Building Services Departments. These staff meet weekly with developers to discuss projects. Getting everyone in the same place (one stop shop) and engaged in open dialogue is extremely beneficial. This is the formula for Dubuque's redevelopment success, which in large part involves the adaptive reuse of Downtown buildings and sites. In 2009, the City adopted the Unified Development Code (UDC) that updates and merges zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and sign regulations into a user- friendly format that recognizes the diverse physical characteristics of Dubuque's neighborhoods, encourages planned and managed growth, reduces obstacles, and incorporates sustainable design and best management practices. The flexible parking standards help preserve the built environment and also help facilitate adaptive reuse projects. Dubuque also has a historic building code that offers flexibility from modern building codes. The UDC incorporates by reference architectural and site design guidelines for development in older walkable neighborhoods where strict application of "suburban- style" site design standards for new development are difficult to apply due to the dense development patterns of these older urban areas. We want to encourage new development that is compatible with the "True Urbanism" of these neighborhoods. The success of the City's historic preservation program, however, lies more in our people than the codes or guidelines. In general, our approach is not to simply inform, but to facilitate and be a part of the project. Planning Services staff works hard to connect people to resources and incentives. We help facilitate federally mandated Section 106 reviews for potential impacts to historic properties for City projects. Staff works closely and efficiently with property owners and developers and we invest a tremendous effort in our historic preservation program. We prioritize our survey and registration program which helps connect developers to historic tax credits. FROM REGULATOR TO EDUCATOR In 2010, the HPC recognized the importance of re-introducing an education and outreach component to their regulatory duties. At that time, it was understood by all that public outreach through education, promotion, and awareness was desperately needed to reconnect preservation with the public and advance the City's preservation program. Shortly thereafter, the HPC formed an Education Task Force. By 2013, the Task Force successfully created a promotional brochure, worked with the City Assessor to label historic district buildings on their website, and hosted educational events on researching property history and available financial resources. The Task Force leveraged private and state grants to convert historic city directories to digital format in 2013 and helped sponsor a series of historic wood windows workshops in 2014, led by non-profit partners. In 2014, the City Council adopted new demolition regulations recommended by the HPC that have a two-part test: 1) Is the structure significant or not; and 2) If yes, is there a reasonable economic return based on uniform demolition review criteria. Decisions are made by the HPC. In 2014, the City Council also adopted new Architectural Guidelines that offer a combination of preferred approach and acceptable approach. The "stoplight" format is intended to facilitate the planning, review and approval process: o Green Liqht — the appropriate or preferred approach o Yellow Liqht — may be an acceptable or alternative approach; however, further research and consultation with Planning Services Staff is needed o Red Liqht - an inappropriate approach that can detract from a structure's architectural integrity or may cause damage to a building or architectural feature. https://www.cityofdubuque.org/1881/Architectural-Guidelines HPC Work Plan In 2014, the HPC voted in favor of transitioning the Commission from a role focused on design review to a role focused on education and outreach. The role is more reflective of all the duties and responsibilities of the HPC set forth in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The transition also provides for design review at the Staff level which in turn better serves our residents. The workplan identifies projects and goals under two broad categories: Outreach & Education and Survey & Registration Projects. CONCLUSION Historic Preservation is one of the most important tools for economic prosperity, environmental integrity, and social/cultural vibrancy. The greenest building is the one that is already built. As it does in other cities across the country, for decades historic preservation in Dubuque has served as a means for community education; downtown revitalization and neighborhood stabilization; attraction for tourism, job creation, film industry production; affordable, workforce and luxury housing; walkable neighborhoods and other contributions to community and economic development. Dubuque is a tremendous example of "leading edge" preservation efforts that can be accomplished through leveraging funds and forming partnerships. The City of Dubuque's array of historic preservation regulations, guidelines and incentives are not found in many communities. Dubuque's programs can serve as a model for historic preservation commissions from across the country and are especially relevant for small to medium-sized cities. Last, but certainly not least, nobody does it alone...People, Planning and Partnerships. Dubuque does partnerships perhaps better than any other community we know. The City's commitment to historic preservation through regulations, guidelines, and incentives, and our active partnerships with local, state, and national preservation organizations, has created one of the strongest historic preservation programs in lowa, the region, and maybe the country. : ; E� x� :. __ _ � -- -- ---._.___.-:.:_ - _...::.: .. . __- - -- T.,.�...� �'. __r_ ��z � ' � �± � �' ;✓. �� '� B6 Special Session, �'ebruary 10, 1.975 Special Session, Febz•ua�y 10, ].975 $7 i 4 �',�F . '_" ---- � � �� Ma7'y Billington adClT'GSSEd tlte desirable that tl}e.damo3icion of hzstorica3- aiong .A.Ipina Street to irs intersection (r) West Eleventh Street Nei hbor- 1 I and/or architecturall si nificane build- 8 ii � �i, COunCl� 1'�LjU�S�227� �p TOtaltl �flC Y Y 8 witli West T'hird Streer; tl�ence north- F✓ao�l; Beginning at elte iaitersettion ; u , ings within sueh areas be temporaxiEy wcszerl gih 5tx00� IVelphl7ox'ho0d. Rllth �- y alvng West Tl�ird Streex to of Nanth and .Blu€f 5treets thence delayed for a,period o# tiAne su€ficient zo zts intersectwn with Nevada Street; wescerly along Nin�h Street to ats � � NaSlz StaEed the Ox`d'lYla2ie0 iS ri�1n- enablc che Git G}ouncil xa.investi ate al- � �,� in1a1. Councilman BxBdy IIlOV'8C� t0 Y g xhence nortlicasterly along IVevada intersection witli LTniversity Avenue; ` ternatives to demolition, Strcet to its intersection with Wesc I refer the Ordinance to �he 11�eE�- thence Nescerly a��ng LTn,�ers�ry Ave. IF a ing 0� Febx'uaY'y 24, 1975. 'SBCOTILI- NQ� T�3EREFOR& BE IT ORDAII�T- Fifth 5treet; xhence southeasterly to ics i3iteryection with 5pruce Street; �� CCl by C4LiriC11maT1 7.'hoT17lS. V6te Ori �� E GITY COUIV�GII. OF THE along �Uest Fiftli Srreet t�a its inxer- thencc aoartl�erIq �long Spruce Scrcct CITY UF DUSUQCI�. IOWA: section with Alpine 5creet; thenCe to ics entersection with Wesr �levenrfx �� he mUI;iDT! W�S aS f031UW5: southerly along AEpine StreeY ro ita Stceet thence westerl alon ��'Iese p r. SECTSON 1. A¢�lication: The provi- y Y s �IU �Cas---COuneilmeri•Zixady,ThomS•, Sions of this Ordinance shall apply xo intiersection with Melrose 1'errace; E]eventh Screet to its entersection wich a Na ,5—Ma or Justmann COunCil- � thenca soutlxeasterlp aloi�g Mefrose l�Valnut Streec; tl�ence northerly along Y Y , all Uuildings located in 'whale or in paxt � Terrace and its southeascerl ex�en- W�hxut Srreet to its intersection �ovich i I�� m�I3 LLlildh, S�1C1��. M�OTION. 'within the following describeci neighbor- sion to its intersectian withYWinona Loras Boulevlyd; tlience wester]y r FAIT1�, hovd preas: tj Street; thesue southwesterly alaig along Lnras l3oulevard xo its intcr� i Mayor Justmann mOVL'{L :t0 "(,A) Pourth Street Nelgbborhoorl: � Winona 5trect t�o its zntersecxion witli scction weth Cox Srrcet; thence north- �; arriend prdinance �0 T'0'ad "Herl- Seginning at thc intersection oF scv- West Third Stxeet; thencc sourh- crly a[oeig Cnx 5treez to its intcr- I tage of fJubuqld0 be considered �s ench and Bluff $txeers, fhence south- casterly nlong West Third.Street; to. i`' �l cOTY1 X��]GYISi'Ve Stud fDr �he '�lls_ erly along Bluff 5creet u4 iCs inter- - ixs intersecrinn with I3i[I Street which section wixk� cha westerly extension ;�� y section wich West Fifth Str;�et; thence' � "�' is thc of West 5ixteenth Sxreet; thence east- tipI'1Ca� pT'�SCY'Va�iDri Of �.'1��' D� �lt- Point of begina�ing, erl alon West Sixteenrh Streee ar�d �', weszerly'along Wesx 1'iftk 5trcet to y - D y g I btZqtle arid' 0128 OE the gu][12,s t0 t ? �ashdn&to�a Street Neig�bor- its westcrly excensio�t to its incer- its antexaeccion with the northerly'. hovd; BegiixA�ing ac the 'inrersection seccion wixlt Montrose �"errace; tl�ence � ' . }J0 C6riSlC�el'ed at '51iC�1 '�i'ri7Q a�S�� xtensio�. of Raqmvnd Street; tl�encc — demolitlori OrmI� 1S a p1ieL� �Or 3n ; of Sixzeenth and Washingran Strcexs noxtherl alon tEic norehcasterl ex- Y g ' y i 1� P soutlaerTy .aEong Tiaycnand Srreet and tEtCrtca wescerly along Sixteenth Sxreet eension o£ 1VIontrose Tex•cace to its a re�0rence neighborhood." SOCOtId- its northerly and souther3y exten- z to its interscctinn with Jackson Streex; intersection with West T,ocast Street; �a b� C0]�riC1�.iriaII ,Staekis. Carried sions to its intersectiom .with Wesc u,� t � y � � chence northerly along Jackson Screet �l�ence southeasterlp along West Lo- I� 13y the f011oWlrig V��e: Third..5tiect;�thenCe 'easter] alon ^� to its intezestion with Ei litecnth ' cust Sereet to its ineersection mith I� r Yeas---Maynr Justmann, COUI1Cl1- West '3'hird Streat to its iacCYsectign, .' Street• thence wester] alon Ei h- Bluff St�cet• thence southerly along I� .a. Y S S > I '' men Lundh, S�aCk�S; with 5t. Mary's S#ie�t; tihance south- _ NayS--COilnCllmeri ThOmS,Bl'a[ly. erly along Sc. Mary's 5trcet ,to,its in- teenth� Streat xo its interseccian witl� Bluff StrecT tn ies intersecciou with , eersection with Emmexx Streec;tEtenec Cientxal Avenue; Yher�ce southerly Ninth Screet which is the point of j� pRq1NAN'�E.NQ. y-75 easterly along �mmett $creer co along Central Avenue to ixa inser- beginning. � '� its intersection wieh Bluff Street; secxion whh F�ourteenth S�reet; tl�ence (G) Broadwny Street Ne�ghba•hond; An 1n4e1'Im Or�l�nanCe d1Uth01'iz� thence saatherly along_ Bluff Streec easxerly along Fouxteenzh 5treec to Beginnin�; at xlie interse�cion of West y�� ing d Nlnefiy (90�} D8y W:�iting to its zntetseczion with First Street; _ its 3ntersecxion wixlz Washin oon I, �� t6encc e�ste'rl alon F3zst Sxreet � Twcnty Third Strect and Central I #�eYld(� Pt`lol' tG fh+2 1551)dnCS G� Y & � Street; chenee norther3y along Wash- Aveiiue thence westerly a[ong West I to its 'intterseccion wix1i the alley � in ton �' I a �emoli�ion Fee'mit for � An� g Street co its intersection with Twenty T6ird Street co ics inxer- betvueen Bluff and' ,I.ocuat 3treet; Sixeeenth Sxree� which is rhe oint eF section wich Lewis Street; thence �� IlI� �3ullding LoCat9d Withln � fhe y}�encc norther� aTon che alle be- . � � Y g Y � be innin �: A1'ea HEreilt DBSCF kbed, tween Bluff and Loc�ist 5treets to its ,�! � g g' ilorehwester(y along Lewis Streer to g ' P intersectz�on with Wese FifeI� Stree�; '� (�) rackson Park Nei h its intersecxion wich Pulton Street; I � Said Ordinance ha�vin been re- � a borhood: ]Be- ,I g�nning at ihe intersecCian n£ Ronr- �ence norcherly along Fulcon Street i viously presen.ted and read at the thesice eascerly along Wcst Pi£th Stxcec . � teenth S�reet aud CentxaE Avenue m res intersecEion witlx Kin Streer; I�� IiE COuri['.1� Il7eetlTlg 0� J�YlAaTy 27, to its interseccion with Locust Street; � �,� � , ,. thence westerly along Pdurteenth thence easterly along King Strect 1975. resented €or final ad0 CIOri, thercce northerly along Locust Street � . , � � � P p . . . . w - Street to iEs intersection rvith Iowa 1nd iCs easYerly extension to ccs inter- } to rts�ntersect�on w�ch 5eventh Sxreet; ,,�ry S�reee• thenca so�cf�exly a]on Iowa sectian with CentraI Avenuc• thence II� DRDINAHiC� I��'. .7-75 thence westerly along Seventh Street � Street�to its zntersecrion withg Tenth southerfy along Central Avenue to ies iE! ' Ei to its Sneersection wzth Bluff 5treet � Street 'thence westerl intersecxion witl� West Twe3�t Third ,� Ii AI3 lIQ'TERIM ORI�IIVAI3CE AU'- a,hich is the poinc of baginning. - . �„ � Y a1onS Tenth Sereex which is the Y 'h THORIZINCr .A NINSTY (9Q) DAY ,;; 5txeet ta its interseccion with Slu££ point o# be- (Zi) �'enelon Place Neigbborhnod: � Srreet; thence nartlaer] �lon� Bluff ginning." ��i � WAITTNTG PERTOT3 'Ta '1"I3� I33LJ- �e ��iin ac the intersectian of.West .' y �' AI�TCE OP .A AEMOLTT'I�N PERMI'T" � g � -- 5treet to its intexsectinn with Locuse SECTIOIV 2. laiscretio�iar tipaj�zn I!� ` Fifth and Burch Stree�s, thence soutl�- . . y 8 I,� � " FQR AIVY BUILDSI�FG I.00ATED erl alon Burch Street ta ita inter- ,`��.` Streax; thence northwesterlp a]ang Period a�a Demolataoaa Permfts: LTpon re- j� ` Wl'!`HI1�T TIiE ATZP.A HEREIN ��- Y g � �.acust Streex to its inxersection witl� ceivin� an application for a Demolition I�� , � sectiom with West Third Streex; �' s' H1Iis Street; the»ce northaxl alon Permit For an building locaxed in wholc � SCRIBEA. Y R Y � thence easrerly along West Third � Ellis Street and its northexly exten- or 3n part within thc arcas describec� Wheceas, prekiAninary stud'aes conducxed Street to its'intersection with the -� sion to ita intersection with Clarke in Section 1 0€ this orclinance, che Buit�I- li� i by chc City Elannirtg and Zvning Com- southerly extensioci' of ltaymond � �rive;' theiice' northcvesterly alon� ing Comanissioner shal! immediacelp zxotify I��' � !i � missivn have tentatively identified seven S�reet; thencc nnrthc�ly a[ong.Ray- � �larke Dxive to its intersection with nc� City Council of such a��plication. At I� ' �. neighborhoods in Du6nque as areas con- mond Sxreex and iw southecl and � ��`k I� cain n ampoxtant cpncentrations and pro- • y . �; Paul Sereat; thence nprtheasterly alnng its next rcgular inecting tlae Council rrivat � $ noccherly extens�ons eo iteinxersection � � Paul Street to its in�ersection mith then take faranal act9�on to either approvP ��. I portions af historically .and/or architec- with West Pifth Street; thenee west- ,:� I.owef] 5treet; thenre soutlieasterTy or withhold che Demolition Per�npt for tural[y significent buildings, xhe con- erly along West :Fifth Sxreet m its � I!� - along Lowel! 5treet co its incer- a spccified periad noc to exceed ninety �p � tinued maintenancc arad preaervaYion vf intcrsection uFith ]3uzch Street wlxzch � aection with Noreh I4fain Sc�eet; (90) d1ys. If t6e Gouncil fails eo take �i� which may be required by the public is the poinc of beginning. � � chence southarly along Nartl� Main actioa to approve or withhold the T3emo- we�farc, and ' C 7'hird S�+'eet Ne! hborboad: Streec to its intersecte . . S on wich 1 t ) '� ,, C axkc licion 1'ermit ac its n - ext I re ul 0Y I17CCt317 II�� Whereas, the uncontnolled demol3x�on &e imiin a� the iiitersection of West '� Drive; thence southeaster � �' � � S � !y alnng tlia Building Cnmmessivner sh�ll issue the I�'I' €: vf buitdin�a within tlie afoceinantRoned 'r'h�rd and Hill Streets thence south- . � Clarke Drive �nd its southeastezly _ Per�npt forxhwiah, The .Council ma in nei hhoehoods m�y fr.ustratc any fnznre Y. � . � wesxerly along, Hill ,Street 'to ita. � e�ctensinn to ixs interaection with its discretion wethEiold the Demotitioia I plans or programs o£the Gity of Dubuque, intersection with Langworrhq Street; � Central Avenae; chenee sauthexly Permit whenever it clexernxines that the Iuwa, so pratcct the hist6rical and arcl�i- L[ience northwestcrly alnng Lang- .�,�, r alnng Central .Avenue to its intersec- , building for which the permit is sought �� 1� tectiural assets of such neighborhovd, and wortlxy 5ereet to its incersec.rion with e tion wiCh Fourteentih Street which may be of hisxarical or archetecxural sig- : Whereas, the City Council deems it Alpine Street; xhence northeaaCerly � - is xhe point of beginning. :iificance to the Cixy. The purpose'o# . �1 . x,�.' I I � �' �' � u I�� I . � ��: �� j� � � V . . _--- -�—..�_ - .--_.—�—�——. ..____—.__.—_V i��F�:��( i....,. . ��r"��-.?�da 4�r�.r� • . . . .:.. . .... . .. .. .. . ..._. ; ..�., .... . . . . � . ' E� � �' �;,;,` �� , gg Special Session, Fe�ruary 10, l�J'�i Speciai Sessann, Febr�nry �p, ��7� 69 WHN�AS pursraant to pub- The propnsed re�szor� i�s identi.. i ch�s waiting perind is tu enab�e tlac caun- C�rnrr�ission, .Seeonded �b3� Mayor lished notice of in:tenxzan this �i.ty ca2 with an existin cil to �ave timp to investignce the hi5sor�- Jus�:manrt. Carried�by the f�ollawing cul ar arc3iicectural value o� th� b.uild- �flte: Counci� has CDI1ai1Ct(:(� a � �onEract, @�- ing to xhc cammunily and to talce sucli y��s Nlr7y0�' 'JuStmann, CaunCil- I�LI'bIiC Cept f�I' th� fe� �� Ch y men �rar�y,Lundh, Stackis,'�homs, kzearing, as. required by Sec�ion reads: action(a) as ma be appropriate to en- 419.9 t�f the ACt, �nd tI71s City sure oz encourase its preservatiom. NayS NOtle. COunCi� Cdi'err1S 1#; rieCeSSRry an� ��uE ��ndS: $3�;�j� pgp �.�,Oa� �Iow�o�:, nor3i'eng a� ch7s ordinan�cc ��,Qaf U� p��l�cation, eertafied advisable to proceed with �he proj-. �� vaIue far aI7 bonds o� a sin- 5h�ll au�horize che wkch�ol��ns by chc �� b��, o� �:otice of � eet, the issuance of the Bonds, and gle issue np to and irlcludil�g B�'rlding Commissioner nf a Dcmolition Y - - t12B 1072� of .tihe ��,G00 flOd, and $.3.QQ pex ' Pexmie for ��ore Ehan ninety (9n� days Intentio�n '�o i�su� I�aspitai F'acil- � proceeds of the ' $Z,UAO follow�n� norif�cariou to �nunc�l of a�- ity T{'irst Martga�e Reveztue Bonds, �. 13onds to the Cor,poration; pax vaIue for a11 b�onds o4 t(�at �, �ssue in excess �nf $2 400 000 �x�h � ��toat�on �nr such 1*crm�x. paresented and read. Councilm�an 1�OW, TT�-IL+3ftEFOR,E, B� ,�� R,� a miaim�zn fee of $2;500 �or any � sLCT�o�v �. Thac che reyort, "'1'IiE Tho�s nnoaed that the proo� of �OIIVED�b the �it Cpuncil of the revenue bond issue. ; �IERTTp,.�E ryF 1��7BUQuE" datied publication �be received and .filed, City of Dubuque, Iawa, as follows: Gene,ral Obfi. lvtacc6 i97a and flled of rccord on �an ��pnded by �ouncilman S�ackis �ecfiion i. Tnat at the gatiun f3Ands: $3.Q0 �ary 2�, lv�s, be cansidcred as a com. �arried by the follnw�ng�vote: � public per$I,UOp par va,l�a�� Z �antls qf hearzng conduetec� by this City a siln�Ie issue up �a �nd ineludi prchensxve 5cudy fior ihe hiscoxical pres• ye�s—M�yor Ju�stmann, +�ouneil- �; Council pursuant to publishec� no- $1,Op0,000 and ��,3� fvr �1;OOD ��a� ervation of City of �ubuque and one of m�� T�dy,��n��, �a��1S, Thoms, t�ice a�Y IOCa7 PBSltl�ilt9 �yh0 a � che guides co be considered at such time Nays-•--No1171e. P- value £Or all b9ndB o,f 'tiha� i as a demoliteon perm3t is applied for in pea�'0d we2`� giVBri ari OppOI'�u11it �� y in excess of�1;qp�,pOp with a �a�ini- _ to express� their vietivs far or nnum fee of $1,pq0 �or an � reference r�eig3�borhood. CommuniCatipn of Pau1 I1. Speer agazn5t the pro ps Y general sECTTo�r a. Eff��tzve z��+�e o} oY- & Associata�s Inc., submitting a Bonds � al fio issue �he . obligat#on bond issue. I dia¢�nce: The provieions of ch�s ordinance res:um� of infor�natfnnal �neQtings � S�cfiian 2, That this Czty Council tr c pQ1fees�are�� nder this con- �I shall 'become effective imznediately up�n an� ��eareh done in the matter deems it necessary and advisable, bonds are issueri and deliveredhen j' passage by the iCity Council. p� :�pOql[�qIl� f�Dl' �I�Cy HOapital, I� Passed, adopecd and approved chis �och �.��te� ��,� �Q�d. �ounciitnan � and here�by determines, �o roceed �� . . wi£h the P�oject, the issuance of �h� services of ��au1 D. �geer � day of Pc6ruary i9�s. gx��is moved �that t�e cammuni- NI �. Roberr JUstm�nn �.a�o� �� xeceived and filed. Sac- the Bonds, anc� the loan of ��y�e & �ssociates are eEfec�ive and `, �i„ May°C ond.�ed by Councilm�an �homs, Car- proceeds of the Bonds fo the Car- �anaber � re�ommend tha� �e C� 'll n1�3n E. Lundh ried by the fo�iowing �vn�e: aPratzon, all upon terms and cnn- g be aut�orized to .sign the !, �,� Jam�es EaCBrady �'eas—Ma ox Justyr►ann, Got�ncil- v Y satis�'actary to xevised a reement. I request your ��I y ditions mutuall g �u Goun��lm��, men Iirady,Lundh, 5tackis,'�homs. � the City and the Corporation. �ansiderataon of this matfer at �I q� A�rest; NAys—�None. ��t+an �. That this R.esoluti�on C°��cil meeting, February zp��, � Leo F, Frommelt � sha21 beeome effective immediate- Gilbert D, Chavenelle �� c�xy c[crk RESOLUT1t)N NO. 36•�5 iy upon its passage and approval. �i�Y Manager ` Publ�sheA officially in che T'elegraph V PaS58[� and a CounciJman Thoms moved that 131 Herakd Newspaper ch�s i4tih day o£ R�SQWTION defisrm�iniq� to • �a� Z�75 pproved February the communica•tion �e received �,'i! raceed' v�ith �the issuance ef � `� „ Fabruary tsys. � �" C, Rohext .�ustmann �� Ied. Seconded b Counc3�mari Leo P. �+�ommeic $4,250,OR1! Hospi!`aa Faeilify First t�: Ma ar �'��. �arried .by he fo�Iowin 1�� ;I citiy Cl�rk Mortgag� It��nue Bands .(The "� Y � i�,� �� 1t. 2-14 Firnl�y Haspi#al 'f'nojeef} �ieries �°` �t��sti: vote: �� Mayor Justmann moved fina] A, oF i�he C3ty �rf Du4�uque; 1owa, �Q'� �• Fxomzzlelt �'��s—Mayor Justmann, Council- � � � znen 8rad ; I�l ' adoption nf t3�e Orrlinance as �° City Clerk Y, Lundh Stackis Thoms, fo�� W�ER;�AS the City of Dubuque, �: Recarded �'ebruary 10; 1g7�, N'ays—None. azt►endect. Seconded by Councilman �� in the C�nn'�y of Dubuc�u�, .State Leo F. Fz•omnnelt R�SOLUTION! t�lO. 37=1'5 �I Stackis. Carried by the follorving �� ,a ,��e "�Cxty"), �xo,poses to �- �`� City Clexk ,� �'�� vote: i�ssue Ho�pi�tal Facility First Mort- -�. �, � Wki�R�AS, the Cit o ��I� Yeas�Mayor .,Tustmann, Council• �, Councilman Thoms moyed adop- Y f bubuque 41 men Brady, Lundh, �ta�kis. ��"g� ��'��u� �o�r7s (The Finley R tion of the xesolution. Seconded ha� �D�� u��aking negotiatiions ��;jl; 3��o�pital �Prajeet), "�eries A, af said � by CQunciIrnan Staekis. Carried b Wz�� Pau1 D. Spe�r & Associates Nays--�Gouncil3t�a�n Thoxns. �ity iz� �he principal amflunt of �� ti`� the following vote; y Inc., for th� employment of said I`:�I ' � f�. �� -�� mov�d to �e- Bund� for the ncilman I3rad 250 O.OQ the ) ye ..-� firm as fin ��, , as Mayor Justmann, Council- �ncial consultants to the i�€,I Cnu Y ( �i j consider adaption r�f origznal Ordi- p�rpose of lending t'he proceeds ' _ me�Brady, Lpndh� 5tackis, Thoms. ��` °£ Du�uque, Iowa; and iIl I I na�nce as amen�et1 ox► 90 day wait• t��eof to The Finley�°Haspi:tal (�the 1Va.y.s—None. WH�R:EAS, City Cauncil has ex- �3�i �� i ing perrod. Sec�nr�ed b� Council- «�orporation") to defray the cost, January 34, 1976 �11xn�0� �'�e p�"oposed terms �f man �.'hQms. V.ote on the motion tp -��a� ��punt, o� the acquisit�ion Honorable lU2ayor agreerr�ent to be entered into �by ; 'i. � was as follows: �f certain equipment a�ad i�pro�e- anc9 �ity Cnuncii and between the City nf DubUque ,�`I J ,�� Yeas--Counc�7,menBrad�,Thams. ��:t� �y ti�� orporativn :sixi�ahle I am enclosing a �etter fxorn Mr. ,lil Nays — May�r Justmann, Coixn- far use in its volnn�ary nonprofit Paul S eer and a ro� osed revised a�� he said Paul D, Speer & As- �`�! � �ilmen �.undh, S�ackis. MOTION �nspital {�he "•Prnject"), in�cl�uding p p p sociates, Inc., a copy of which pro- '�� contract for his ser+vices in eon- i�asaI is hereto attached and 6 �� j I�I F�,�D, the repayment �o£ eonstruetion nection rvith the sale of City reve- � I k refere.nce znade a part hereof. ,"�� Communication oi .Margaret Cal loans �btained by the Corporation nue and general.obIzgation laonds. NO�W TI�R�,FO�P,� g, ��j I I�y, la.g`han o� 1�57 W. ,3rci �treet ex- until permanent financing cocild be The proposed contract is effec- SOLVE}D by fhe Gity Co ncIl,� C y , � � �' pressin.g :concern o£ fhe �oning arranged, all to �Oe located on a tive onIy fnr direct City �lnanc3a� . II�II y, an d ban d wark. It is com• letel s�Se 4b r�u1, �ha�'terms of a res. il�l I h�'� change�s .fnr grou� hoines, present- si�e vai'�hin �i a e �i t a l I a n a c e o r d- � �I ed aa�d .read. Cuut�cilman �rady an-ce tuith th.e pr�visi.on of C'hap- separa�e from the contracE with nrent as seL forth i n l e t t e r o f p r o_ II,I m a v e d t ha t t he �o�rnm u na c a�i o n b e �e x 4�9 0� t h e .C o d•e o f �o�v a a 1973, M r. S p.e e r f rr r w a r k invu lv�n g i n- iEl I �� ref�;xred to the Pl�a��ing & Zaning as amended (ti�e ",Ac t"); an d - �lttslx+i&1 rev�z�tte �innds. P a s a l, d a t e d D�eem ber 17, i994, �!ii� fram P:au1 :D. Speer & �lssacaates, li�l �` i!II y,1� i��i. , i�, ��i � I�`�j . I ii , li�i� . • r =:: , ��I�., ; �il�l j'� _,,. 3 � . . _ .—— —- _—_. — _. . _ —.._ _ _-.� - - . �� .,S. �"'�.� ,�t"�='..� w ^s„ . _ � . .m�»ew.�_r: 4 .r �%,:�F.� ., -, . . . THE CITY OF Dubuque � � DUB E '�1e1,�� 1 f Masterpiece on the Mississippi � 2007 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed Expansion of Washington Neighborhood Conservation District DATE: February 17, 2011 There have been requests to exclude certain properties from the Conservation District being considered in the Washington Neighborhood. I believe two of those requests have merit. The Blum Scrap Yard area woufd be appropriate to exclude. Should this property ever be considered for a change of use, the City would want the fewest obstacles to the achievement of that goal. Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank and Trust have a long history of creating jobs in downtown and rehabilitating historic properties. They have rehabilitated both their original banfc building at 1398 Central Avenue and the former Walsh Store at 1301 Central Avenue, at a cost of millions of dollars. They are responsible for hundreds of jobs in the downtown. Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank and Trust owns several properties along the east side of White Street from 14th Street up to Brannon Monument. They are also interested in acquiring more property, to take in the entire blocks to Jackson Street. The intent of Heartland Financial/Dubuque Bank and Trust, within the next five years, is to build a new downtown office facility and create jobs. They have examined reusing the existing structures, as they did with the Walsh Store, but they do not meet their needs. Their intent would be to move the buildings, if it proved feasible. I respectFully recommend the exclusion of the Blum property from 16th Street to 15tn Street along Elm Street and the property between 14th and 13th Street from White Street to Jackson Street, from the Conservation District. i��c� �l��,� 1�,�-�+ , z Michael C. Van Milligen � (.J'�� MCVM:jh Attachment cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager David Harris, Housing and Community Development Department Director % --- ---- � ' - , i _ --__ _ _�_ • - � __, ;j I �•--J I - •` , � •� ;'; �----- -� T � `�.' �� - � - i I �=- , � � �.� �1' �� . .t � � ■ ■ �:- - . - iJ I i � ' _. .. '�j%''t • Exh i b �t A �N�V -_=- - - _ _-�_ -__ _ �..= ��,. �� - � � � � �- - - _��- .. - ��:�.-. ,F � — s-y - - - -.. .a. f "'� ,t . Q-,�.,,� ,� - �- _ _ _ �� , �;�-�.,� __ m_ _: ■ . � �.�:��, �. '' •,,v�y !�:T�R-�_'', �—- _ - ,�- � __ -= ��c,. `,li, ��. � ` •�'� �— -- -� ,:�: . -- �.. , .s:,;. `;;. . . ; - — :.� — �'y ,� � ; ;- r.��, ' - - _ �_ _- - �=.,_�=a _ ; rn ,�.,.,L. � _�: . �� :�� _ - . � ' .�,• . ;' r. __'_- ;— - r-- ' � I_2�'--- .. ,�:. `� " . .i ,. ; I —1 — Z15T`�`f.-==. < :r..�. �?, � T�� _. � - �- -: : ', r•., --..� ' ��(. %%i !I�'F, --i� -II� ..I�r- � _�� Jj ----• - - � �� : . � ' •/ . . . ,:� _ -" ,1 4-.:.g 1,.:- • _ J. ,�y�� /�/ ,T��.Q �� - � I � �� --- -, - - --" �,J� / r� r.•�� -_�--I � � � ��, ' ,, ,� �',t��. ' ,-� _��- _- �� __� -�1 � � , �+0. �� - - ' _ _ � ;,� o;� � 4 �--� __ { ' - _�� - __ --.-- �' �" E�O�'H,S`r � E ,' - [ f � � i - ��+ � — I � _ 'l '.�-. � _ — � ! ,, -- - - - ' � r � m . � � ' ' 'L1� _ ;;� , � ; � _ � �� I___ � _ '� � __ - �''T 9T H-�T- ] . "�' '', ` ' _ -� {I] - - � � , I �i ��—� - �-- .' ;� _ ��..� '` -� � '; u f i ��I� �-�i�_ ' ' � . J �___ .� •s`,�`�, � �� -- ' - '�, J '� •..1�� • 1 ��' � C_��r��_ j--'�� l�. � ."• W - � • �— __ . ; .�Q ;-- � , � ' - -- Q � 1$`TH S �,�_-:�.C, ��F� ' -- � c�- � _ _i _ � � � i _;_ - G�, �'4�I- -�� - _ - - - -_ -_ J - "��, � ! 'r�' � � � - :�- �-� � - �,, L-�� _ �- _a ...� � __- ;'i+ '; ;; �� --_ '`��7TH ST ._� �._. � _�_EI�- E`rt tffi$T - ..�, I� � � � � �_ i +�;:-,� -- I - _ � :�. �;-_ , _ � I � - �:��i i— � �I,\Y ' I I - -- �� -'� J . I � . ,--�,�� - ; � -��- ��,�___ - _ _ �-=--�1N '�6T�i�T -E-7 CTH � �—�`_�- -; �IV.1fi_ H 5T__ ._...__ �-� - ,--- �1[,�. ..�� _,' � - � P�-- f� _ .�-?�.= n _. -, �-� L[� 1►� ' _ - - I , - � �'''� i �� _ - t.,, . �y �i�.` I : �: - _ _. � : �i N � �4� � �� I�� -� � -- --- - i - W� - � � E'f'STH 5T � � � � W 'I 5TH � - . - ----- _ - - z- -- Q: :�7� —..� r4 �- �� ` - �J.' i �.. � I � � - :_-� -- �� f -� f � _ �Q -- ��— --• 1 1 �'� �-� I �� — �� -! -- � - �_ --- r�� __ �' - �� =ii - LaRASr BLVD _t��f • � � $T- -- - I r•l � r � � i -- � i= ,i i - - I I � N. ! � f�� - I � I J : _�.. ;�----� � � i _ }.,_ � � ' � I � � � , _ i� ��..-, , i.. _��L�— �� ..r" —.. i I _.i �L l ..i.. w � z W fi3 H ST� � '13TH ST - �3 i � __ � - � — � t . '� . � . • -. --- _— __ � �� , 1 � Z - -� �`- m: ; -� _ � ��' _ � - _` .. - '� �- - � �. � ''.�'; �� . l , _ _ --�i_[� � -, f ___ �-� � 'Vtit'CZTH 5T _ Q _ '1 - - _ � ti � � - - _ � ;- _ � -- -i �— .. f.— I --' �� -- .f� � � � �rl � i �ti � I �. ~ � �, I 9 I I -c17 � a Propased Boundary __— _ �� ..� _ . � , ,. Proposed Changes � ��—I �� ,� -,� - � ; ; ,�y � � � � ! � -�,�ti ; r Existing Boundary �uTH�sr� _ _ ! - � -- � , � � _ � � ; � �: � ' � � - � - i � - Histori�ally �ignificant Properties � � '� '� '� �` �� 7i z3Ro S � � � �i►��e ■ �i�� - �► �� N �1 ,n i � .. �►1� ,� � � �1�, 2 �� ♦ �� Cy� � � ;� �[ ��• � Cj� N � �� - � �� o ;_�� ,�� 5� �/ � '� � ..':,j� d: �� -,` r,: . �� . � � � . �' � r '._, ■ � . r� �. r s�. ,-}�. �► , ..� , . �, ,� �� `�y 2 � �- _- '� � . � '� � � . � � � � � � �� . N�, Nym � E�g ,,� - E�a��,5 � c�qRx �a�� :.r�� E�R �,� 0 �, �. � - � _�; � �'�!� ` �,�5'C � � � �5� � � v ��a r �' ,... ��'��N� � . ++' -o �s�N �� ' .� � 2 rm � ,5'�. ��. �'� �e� �'"►1 � � r r� �'�, .�'� ,�� ►�� { � cn� ; ��r� ,�qk�f� . � � � ` ..� Y ��._ - � � ,� ,�� r s.� ---,�� ' �y�' �,,►,� ��* ��O rN ��N � '16 �tr 'e��N �r� U�� 'i � S'C � c�Sr � � � � �r E ST 6�H S'[ � ��,� � '�� HS � � �� -v � :�_: 5� � ^� "-� 2 �6"�'�s� � �o - � �� ': H s� � � •N � n 1 � E�� oa c �``='i � r� _ � �' N� _ ��,.: „.�;� R, � �,� ` F_= . � �' � � .:� �, m .� cS,J, � '�' 2� �:�- o ` `:;� � ;�. -�� . � � � �� . � �' 1.�� '13 � cf� 1��. r� S� �- ,� � � � Praposed Boundary 0� �` � �. � � - Histarically Significant Properties- 325 ��, Conservatian Distric#- 101 � �► �� .� � � Prepared by: Laura Carstens,Citv Planner Address: Citv Hall 50 W.13th St,Dubuaue,IA 52001 Telephone: 589-4210 , Return to: Jeanne Schneider,CitV Clerk Address: Citv Hall.50 W.13th St,Dubupue.IA 52001 Telephone:589-4121 ORDINANCE NO. 15 -11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF , ORDINANCES, UNIFIED DEVELOPMERlT CODE, BYAMENDING ARTICLE 10-11-A-4 PERTAINING TO EXPANSION OF THE WASHINGTON STREET NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATlON DISTRICT Whereas, the City of Dubuque established conservatian districts to allow for the City's review of demolition permits that might impact buildings of historic or architectural significance; and Whereas, the City has adopted the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan; and Whereas, expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District is an implementation step of the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, I OWA: ' Section 1. Title 16 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 10-11-A-4 is hereby amended as follows: 10-11-A-4 Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District ; � � � � �� Beginning at the intersection of E 22"d Street and Kniest Street,thence southeasterly along Kniest Street to its intersection with Garfield Avenue, thence southwesterly along Garfield Avenue to its intersection with the City alley located between Elm Street and Kniest Street, thence southeasterly along the City aliey to its intersection with E. 18th Street, thence southwesteriy along E. 18th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between the lowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad right-of-way and Elm Street,thence southeasterly along the City alley to its intersection with E. 17th Street, thence northeasteriy along E. 17tn Street to its intersection with the lowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad right-af-way,thence southeasterly along the lowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad right-of-way to its intersection with E. 16t" Street, thence southwesterly along E. 16th Street to its intersection with Elm Street, thence southeasterly along Elm Street to its intersection with E. 15t"Street,thence i I Ordinance No. - 10 Page 2 northeasterly along E. 15th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between Elm � Street and Pine Street,thence southeasteriy along the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street to its intersection with E. 14th S#reet,thence southwesterly along E. 14th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street, thence southeasterly along the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street to its intersection with E. 12th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 12 Street to its intersection with Elm Street,thence southeasterly along Elm Street to its intersection with E. 11t"Street, thence southwesterly along E. 11t"Street to its intersection with W. 11th Street, thence sauthwesterly along W. 11�"Street to its intersection with the City alley located between Central Avenue and lowa Street; thence northwesterly along the City alley _ to its intersection with the City Hall access driveway,thence southwesterly along the City i Hall access driveway to its intersection wi#h_lowa Street, thence northwesterly along lowa � Street to its intersection with Loras Boulevard; thence northeasterly along Loras i Boulevard to its intersection with the City alley located between lowa`Street and Central Avenue, thence northwesterly along the City alley to its intersection with W. 17th Street, thence northeasterly along W. 17t"Street to its intersection with Heeb Street; thence northwesterly along Heeb Street to its intersection with the northern boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-018; thence northeasterly along the northern boundary of Parcel#10-24-252- 018 to its intersection with the west boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-017; thence northwesterly along the west boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-017 to its intersection with the � south boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-015,thence northeasterly along the south boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-015 to its intersection with the west boundary of Parcel#1d-24-252- 013,thence northwesteriy along the west boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-013 to its ! intersection with Heeb Street,thence northwesterly along Heeb Street to its intersection I with Kaufmann Avenue,thence northeasterly along Kaufmann Avenue to its intersection � with 22"d Street thence northeasterly along 22"d Street to its point af origin at the � intersection of E. 22"d Street and Kniest S#reet excluding the area beginning at the � intersection of E 14th Street and Jackson Street, thence southeasterly along Jackson Street ; to its intersection with E. 13th Street, thence southwesterly along E. 13th Street ta its I intersection with White Street, thence northwesterly along White Street to its intersection i with E. 14t" Street,thence northeasterly along E. 14th Street to its point of origin at the i intersection of E. 14t"Street and Jackson Street. � Section 2. This ordinance shall not apply to an application for a demolitian permit for properties ; being acquired and demolished for fhe Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon publication, as provided by law. Passed, appraved and adopfed this 22"d day of February, 2011. � j � ; � �.�� Roy D. Buol, Mayor � Attest: � I � I Jeanne F. Schneider, CMC City Clerk � F:\USERS\LCARSTEN\WP\Washington Neighborhood\Washington Nbad Cons District Ord.doc 1,T � � � , � �11 , �i� r.�., . -a• ♦ � ' � � � �� ' ��; � � � �� .: .� � � a � �.. � � � �� . � ,� �r � � � � r� r � �� '� � � � � M�� ,ti^ ' �� ; � � �� , � � 1 ' �� . �� , � � '�� IM • 1 ' � � � �� r ' � w� • t ' • = � = - _ s � � � ` � �TJ•' � = — - -- `-7 w � �7 �'� � . ' �!- � � � � � �■ �� ; ; � � ��I�I �i � _ . � � � � �. � � � � � a ■ C ^•� � 7 • � _ � � � � �i � r� - � a � 1 ' � i ' - � � � � • �lil.'1 �w.► � ■ � d �� i 1 �� „� � — 1! _ -_ � _ � � � � � � � �ill .� ' ■ = -- = -- `� � - , _ - � -- � � a ' - • ' � ■■ � � C � � � ,� � � � � �#� �� . � r � ... � �� = S � �� .. � � i� i� !: '� �� 7-+ �.. � � � 1;� ., � � � � � � A�" � ■ �. � �7��r+� � S � • C �� ■I■ � � � ,.� � ..� '� � � � � � � � � � �� l� = � _ � � • � �r 1�� 1,I � ■ ,� !_ _ �.. ; � •■ 11 �■ �` �� — � � � — � � � � 1� �� J . , �i - � �� ■■ ■ � ' . _ ' �'f,� � �' � � � �.�. .�' : ° � � r�i■ � .� � � � � � .� � � � � � � � � � � ■ � �-. � � �� *~ � � �` � � � �+ � � � ' - ` ■ ■ A � � i ■ ! � � r�.� w. � � � � r � r � ` � _ , •■ ■ � � � I � � � • : r � _ f ► —�1�=� ��■�� ■ � � � � Hea�rtl�a,nd FINANCIAL USA,INC. 1398 CENTRAL AVENUE P.O.BOX 778 DUBUQUE,IA 52004-0778 PHONE:(563)589-2100 February 17, 2011 WATS:(888)739-2100 FAX:{563)589-2011 C1Ty COLtriCll City of Dubuque 50 W. 13�' Street Dubuque, Iowa 52002 Re: Request to Exempt Praperty Owned by Dubuque Bank and Trust Company on White Street from the Washington Street Conservation District Dubuque Bank and Trust Company presently owns property on the east side of White Street between 13�'and 14'h Streets and may own additional property on that hlock in the future. Heartland Financial USA, Inc. and Dubuque Bank and Trust Company have invested heavily in economic development in the City of Dubuque. We have interest in further economic development in downtown Dubuque and the Washington Neighborhood. To foster our future efforts we ask the City Council to exempt the block bounded by 13�', White, 14th and Jackson Streets from any extension of the Washington Street Conservation District. Should that block be included in the district, it may deter further economic development by our companies in downtown Dubuque. We appreciate the City of Dubuque's considerable efforts in the rejuvenation of the city and the economic benefits as well as jobs that have foliowed. We are asking for this exemption in order for us to further collaborate with the City of Dubuque in our collective development efforts. S' rel `� // �.�--i� � d` � . John K. chmidt Douglas J. Horstmann COO CFO President& CEO He d Financial USA, Inc. Dubuque Bank and Trust Co. Piaziniia�;Ser�ices Department Ctt Hall TE I�il"i Y[]t� -- f�L11�L1�{L!d y 5Q West 13�SEreet D LJ B Lj � CA II� DtiUuque,IA 52007-4864 �563}5$9-42I0 phone Mrt�lc��Jri�'«'c�u fj��'Mtytily5f jij71 r��r [553}589-422�f�x ,��}y (5G3}G9�-5G78 TDD ��I�ni�ir�s;�=r'�'i4��[�frlt�hiir1iai•.t��l� January �5, 2Q11 The Hanorahle Mayor ar�d City Council Mem�ers City af Dub�que City Hall -- 50 W. �3th 5treef Du�uque IA 52D�1 Applicant: City of Dubuque Location: Vllashington Neigh�arhoad Descriptior�: Pra�osed Expansion of Washingtan Neighhorhaad Canservatian District Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Th� Ci#y of Dubuque Historic Preservation Cammission has held a public hearing an the proposed expans�on af the Washingtan Neighb�rhvod Cv�servatian Distri�t. The propvsal, an �rdinance, and refated materiaks ar� attaGhed fve your �onsiderativn. Discussion Planning 5ervices IUlanager Laura Carstens and Housing ancf Community ❑evelopment Director ❑avid Harris spoke in favar of t�e prapasal, and gave a PawerPvint presentation. StafF Mem�er Harris autfine�! the praposal, its relationship to the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan, and the recammendations of the 5afe Community Task Farce, impacts �f demolitions in the neighbvrhood, and City inWestment in the area. Staff Mem�er Carstens reviewed the r�gulatary as�ects of conser�atian d�stricts, available funding, Washington iVeighbarhvod charac#eristics vf mixed-uses, pre�alence of histarical struc#ures and age of building stock, and the b�nefits af conserva#ion districts. Max 5mith, 514 Vllavdlar�d C#., East Dubuque, Il�, spolce abaut his concern that he wnuld not �e a�le to buy additianal praperty that he woufd like tv demolish for future busin�ss expans�on along Elm 5treet. He questianed the review pro�ess far demalition permits. The Commissiar� ex�fained the #wa-part t�s�fvr d�molit+on permits: histvric sigr�ificance and reas�nab�e economic return, and nflted each case is reviewe� an i�s merits. Jacque Schroeder, �76Q Radfard Road, asked about different funding and reg�latians far histori� districts versus conservatian districts. The Cammissian reviewed the design review pracess a�d avaifable grant and loan funding for exterior alterations in his�oric districts that are visihle from th� public way and require a building perm�t. The Ser�ice Pen��le Litegi�ty Respoiisil�ility Irvlo��aliniti Teai�t«•ork The Honarable Mayor and City Council Members Page 2 Cammissian r�vi�wed the demalition permit review process and the foans available far exterior repairs in conservation clis�ri�fs. AI 61um, 3051 Arbar Daks Driv�, spake about his concern that his heavy in�ustrial �usin�ss, the scrap yard at 4�1 E. 15t� Street, is �art of the proposal, and asked why his �ro�erty is included. Mr. Blum distri�uted phQtos of his business ta the Cvmmission. The GammissEan discussed th� propvsed baundaries, and received and filed Mr. Blum's pnatas. There were nv ath�r puhlic comments. Staff Member Carstens exp�ained the �rapasal reflects the UVashington Neighbarhoo� boundaries, and �iable cammercial �usinesses and industries are included in the area. 5he reviewed that the City CQuncil has asked the Cammission for a recammendation, and that City Cade directs the Cvmmissian tv a�pro�e, deny ar table the request for m�re information. 5he na#ed the Legal sta�f has ad�ised that the Cammission cannat amer�d the proposed boundaries. The C�mmission discussed the proposal. They noted the regulations and the benefits, ar�d felt the request was appropriate. R�commendatian By a vo#e of 7 to 1, th� Hist�ric Preservatian Advisory Cammissian recommends expansian o�the Washingtan Nei�hborhoad Distr�ct, as submitt�:d. The CQmmissian further recammer�ds that the City Cauncil hold a publi� hearing on the praposal. A simple majority vate is needed for the City Council ta ap�rave �he requ�st. Respect#ully su�mitted, � . � ' ',�� '�%��..� j��,�'v 1��. Michaal Kr�ight, Chairperson Histaric Preservation Cammissian Attachments cc: David Harris, Hausing and Cammunity ❑evelapment Dire�tar Laura Ca�stens, Planning 5ervic�s Manager Jerelyn Q'Con�ar, Neighborhood Develapm�nt Spec�alist David Heiar, Econamic Devefapm�nt ❑irec#flr Si:ivice 1'eaple Inte�;rily Pes��niisihility Inn��atinn 'l�eam��ork THB CITY OF DU�OUgU@ Ail�AmericaCitY �� ' � �� Mastet�iece on the Massissippi � 3 � : � S 200/ TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROtVi: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager David Harris, Housing and Community Development Director SU�JECT: Expansion of Washington Neighborhood Conservation District DAl'E: January 13, 2011 IN1'RODl1CTION This memorandum transmits for Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) review and recommendation, an ordinance for expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District to encompass the entire neighborhood. An HPC public hearing on the proposal is scheduled for January 20, 2011. Maps and other materials are enclosed. �ACKGROUND Conservation districts provide for an HPC review process for demolition permits and access to low-interest loans for correcting Demolition by Neglect deficiencies. Expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District is an implementation step of the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. City staff will provide a brief overview of the Strategic Plan and the proposal at the HPC's public hearing. The Strategic Plan's Executive Summary is enclosed. Before making a decision on this proposal, the City Council has asked the HPC to hold a public hearing, and then send a recommendation back to the City Council. The City Council has approved a six-month demolition permit moratorium for the Washington Neighborhood through June 22, 2011 to allow the HPC an opportunity to study the expansion of the District, and to hold a public hearing on the proposed expansion. Enclosed are a letter to property owners, a flyer with questions and answers about conservation districts, a map of the proposed expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation Districf, and a notice about th� Commi�sion's public hearing that was mailed fo fihe 466 property owners in the proposed district. Expansion of Washington Neighborhood Conservation District Page 2 � DISCUSSIOI� , Expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District is an implementation ' step in the Economic Development and Housing Strategies sections of the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. Expansion of the Conservation District also responds to '; recommendations of the Safe Community Task Force. ' � Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan ' On April 20, 2009, the City Council reviewed and accepted the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. The Plan has three core strategic issues: 1. Economic Development; 2. Families, Youth and Education; and 3. Housing. The Strategic Plan lists 68 separate recommendations under these categories, covering a broad range of strategies to directly address identified issues and to plan for an ; improved future for the neighborhood. The enclosed Neighborhood Strategies Maps that highlight the recommended Economic Development and Housing action steps. � A major focus of the Strategic Plan concerns preservation, conservation, land use � control, and rezoning portions of the Washington Neighborhood. Major strategies in the E�onomic Development and Housing categories related to preservation are: ' ; • Preserve vacant storefronts to reserve an inventory of available, good quality space for expansion and new business opportunities. • Maintain and preserve the existing historic buildings and urban fabric of the � Central Avenue business district as a special part of the neighborhood's brand. � , • Expand�xis#ing conse�vafion dis�►-icts to the neigh�borhood�boundaries. ; • Consider designating the area as a historic district to market the area and access federal and state tax incentives and City historic preservation incentives. '� • Retract commercial zoning that extends into residential areas, particularly south of 14t" Street. I ; • Phase out industrial areas in the south end of the neighborhood, particularly in , light of the planned redevelopment of the Historic Millwork District. ; ; Like all planning documents, the Washington Strategic Plan will prove useful only to the ; extent that a sustained implementafion effort is maintained and achieved. The City � already has focused many of its neighborhood stabilization programs in the Washington ' Rleighborhood. The Washington Neighborhood Development Corporation has been ', created (see enclosure). Expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation j District is an important action step for neighborhood stabilizafiion that will in furn foster ' the above action steps. Distric� expansion also supporfs the substantial Cifiy investment , in fhe neighborhood's revitalization. ' Expansion of Washington Neighborhood Conservation District Page 3 Safe Corr�munity Task Force The Safe Community Task Force's recommendations for Management of Physical Environment include improving Dubuque neighborhoods by: (a) encouraging home ownership; (b) encouraging a mixed income approach to neighborhood development; and (c) creating (or re-creating) a sense of place through good design. Expansion of the.Washington Neighborhood Conservation District responds to the Task Force recommendations by encouraging homeownership and mixed-use opportunities, while preserving the character and sense of place of the neighborhood. As shown on the Existing Land Use map, the Washington Neighborhood is a mixed —use neighborhood with many single-family and duplex units, scattered multi-family units, and major commercial zones in the Central/White corridor and the Five Points area. Defining a Conservation District UDC Section 10-11 defines a Conservation District as an area which: • Encompasses historically and architecturally significant buildings, sites, structures, or districts, including potential national or local historic districts; and � Is important to maintain and preserve for its economic and social value and as a neighborhood or area of affordable housing. The 1Nashington Neighborhood meets the definition of a Conservation District. The area has a substantial collection of historically and architecturally significant residential and commercial structures. The �eighborhood encompasses one of the o(dest, most established, and most diverse residential areas of Dubuque. Many buildings are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The area offers a walkable, mixed- use neighborhood with affordable housing and commercial businesses. Dubuque has five historic districts, nine conservation districts, and three conservation planning areas. A Conservation Planning Area has defined geographic boundaries; contains areas within a historical, architectural or archeological survey; has a history of good overall maintenance and where architectural interest is high; and the City of Dubuque has undertaken the study of the area. As shown on the Relationships to Historic Surveys map, the 1Nashington Neighborhood includes a portion of all three conservation planning areas. As shown on the Historically Significant Properties map, there are 426 significant properties identified to date by historic/architectural surveys, Section 106 reviews, or preservation tax credit projects in the Washington Neighborhood. As shown on the Age of Building Stock map, most of the structures in the Washingtan Neighborhood were built prior to the 1920's. Pofenfially, a number of structures not evaluated in the existing surveys could have historic or neighborhood significance due to their construction dates and building styles. Expansion of Washingfon Neighborhood Conservation District Page 4 � Establishment of a Cons�rvation District UDC Section 10-11 of the Unified Development Code describes the process for expanding a conservation district, which is as follows. A written request is submitted to the City Clerk. Any person may make a,request to the City Council for creation of a conservation district. ! i At its next regular meeting following receipt of the request, the City Council may: ; approve or deny the request, set the request for consideration at a subsequent meeting, � set the request for a public hearing, or refer the request to the HPC for a recommendation before voting on the request. � ; Demolition Permit Review in Conservation Districfs UDC Section 10-11 B describes the process for HPC review of demolition permits in a ' conservation district. The process may take approximately 30-90 days from the date a � complete application is filed with the Planning Services Department. i The HPC must determine: 1) whether the building proposed for demolition has historic , or architectural significance to the community; and 2) whether denial of the demolition � permit would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on ; the property according to economic review criteria specified by City Code. '; If the HPC finds the building does not have historic or architectural significance, or that ; denial would prevent a reasonable economic return, the HPC must approve the permit. If the HPC finds the building has historic or architectural significance, or that denial would not prevent a reasonable econamic return, the HPC must deny the application. ' Exterior changes to property in conservation districts are not mandated or reviewed by e s are reviewed b the HPC in conservation districts. the HPC• onl demolition re u st , Y q Y In conservation districts, Demolition by Neglect is prohibited (which is similar to the �, Building Code provisions for dangerous buildings citywide). Designation as a I conservation district, however, does not mandate that property owners undertake repairs. Orders for exterior repairs to comply with City Housing or Building Codes result � from code enforcement, not from conservation district designation. In conservation districts, property owners have an additional City loan program to help with exterior repairs to their buildings. The historic preservation revolving loan fund is ! available to home owners, landlords, institutions, and commercial businesses in j conservation districts to correct exterior code violations. Loans are for up to $25,000 for 10 years at 3% interest. The HPC reviews and approves all loans, subject to ,, underwriting criteria of the Housing and Community Development Program. i, RECO�M�ND�4`fION City staff recommends expansion of fhe Washington Neighborhood Conservation District becau�e fhe Washington Neighbarhood rneets the definitien of a Con�ervation , Expansion of Washington Neighborhood Conservation District Page 5 District. The neighborhood has many historically and architecturally significant buildings. Its mix of commercial and residential structures creafies a traditianal, walkable, and affordable neighborhood, which supports a safe community and sustainability principles. City staff also recommends expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District because there are many benefits to property owners, the neighborhood, and the community with expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District. The City of Dubuque recognizes the importance of protecting architecturally and historically significant structures located in conservation districts which are threatened by continuous neglect. The City prohibits Demolition by Neglect in conservation districts to protect the integrity of threatened buildings, stabilize property values, and promote the long term economic health of these districts. Conservation districts provide a review process for the issuance of demolition permits and access to low-interest loans for correcting Demolition by Neglect deficiencies. In doing so, conservation districts stabilize neighborhoods and improve property values, retain their historic and architectural character and sense of place, and foster civic pride. Conservation districts offer other benefits. While the residents, property owners, businesses, and institutions give a neighborhood its character, the buildings and streets give a neighborhood its sense of place. Expansion of the Conservation District responds to the Safe Community Task Force recommendations by encouraging homeownership and mixed-use opportunities, while preserving the historic and architectural character— the sense of place -- of the Washington Neighborhood. Conservation District expansion also implements Economic Development and Housing action steps of the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. A major focus of the Strategic Plan concerns preservation and conservation of existing historic buildings and storefronts for expansion and new business opportunities, and as a special part of the neighborhood's identity. Expansion of the Conservation District is an important action step for neighborhood stabilization that will in turn foster additional revitalization. Another benefit of the expanded Conservation District is maintaining one of Dubuque's most unique neighborhoods. The area has a substantial collection of historically and architecturally significant residential and commercial structures. The number of brick structures from the late 1800's and early 1900's rivals downtown and the historic districts. The neighborhood encompasses one of the oldest, most established, and most diverse residential areas of Dubuque. Many buildings are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. These buildings help tell the story of Dubuque. UE T D ACl'ION With the City Council referral, the HPC is to hold a public hearing, review the proposal, and then make a recommendation to the City Council to approve or deny the request. The HPC al�o may table the request for additional infarmation for up t� 60 day�. Af its Expansion of Washington Neighborhood Canservation District Page 6 next regular meeting following receipt of the HPC's recommendation by the City Clerk, I the City Council must act on the request. � The requested action is for the HPC to hold a public hearing on th� expansion of the , Washington Neighborhood Conservation District, discuss the proposal, and then � provide a recommendation to the City Council. 1 � �c�closure� ' i � cc: David Johnson, Assistant Planner Wally Wernimont, Assistant Planner David Heiar, Economic Development Director Jerelyn O'Connor, Neighborhood Development Specialist ; Aggie Tauke, Community Development Specialist ' I ; ; i , � . . . � � Prepared by: Laura Carstens.City Planner Address: Citv Hall.50 W.13th St.Dubuaue.IA 52001 Telephone: 589-4210 Return to: Jeanne Schneider.City Clerk Address: Citv Hail,50 W. 13th St.Dubuaue,IA 52001 Telephone:589-4121 ORDINANCE NO. -11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 10-11-A-4 PERTAINING TO EXPANSION OF THE WASHINGTON STREET NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT Whereas, the City of Dubuque established conservation districts to aliow for the City's review of demolition permits that might impact buildings of historic or architectural significance; and Whereas, the City has adopted the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan; and Whereas, expansion of the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District is an implementation step of the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA: Section 1. Title 16 of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 10-11-A-4 is hereby amended as follows: 10-11-A-4 Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District ; ; ; � ; Beginning at the intersection of E 22"d Street and Kniest Streef, thence southeasterly alo�g Krriest Street to its intersection w�ith Garfield Avenue, thence �outhwresterly along Garfiield Avenue to its inter�ection with the City alley located between Elm Street and Kniest�treet, thence southeasterly along the City alley ta its intersection �rith . 1�th �treet, thenc� s�uthw��terly alor�g E. 1�th S�r�et to i�s inf�r�ectio� �it{� th� Cify alley located be ��n th� lo�a CF�icago and E��t�rn �ilroad right-of0way �r�d Irr� �tre�t, th�nce��utheasterly al�ng the Ci�yy alley to its intersection v�ith E. 17tn Str��t, �h�nc� ��rfih��terly al�ng �. 17t" �tre�t to i�s ir�ters�ction weth fh� lo�a Chicago a�d E��t�rn �ilroad righf�of��ays th�nce south�asteriy al�n fh� lowa Ordinance No. - 10 Page 2 �hicago and Eastern Railroad right-of-way to its intersection with E. 14t" Street, thence southwesferly along E. 14t" Streef fo its intersection with the City alley located between Elm Street and Pine Street, thence southeasterly along the City alley to its intersection with E. 12t" Street, thence southwesterly along E. 12 Street to its intersection with Elm Street, thence southeasterly along Elm Street to its intersection with E. 11t"Street, thence southwesterly along E. 11th Street to its intersection wi#h W. 11th Street, thence southwesterly along W. 11th Street to its intersection with the City alley located between Central Avenue and lowa Street; thence northwesterly along the City alley to its intersection with the City Hall access driveway, thence southwesterly along the City Hall access driveway to its intersection with lowa Street, thence northwesterly along lowa Street to its intersection with Loras Boulevard; thence northeasterly along Loras Boulevard to its intersection with the City alley located between lowa Street and Central Avenue, thence northwesterly along the City aliey to its intersection with W. 17t" Street, thence northeasterly along W. 77t'' Street to its intersection with Heeb Street; thence northwesterly along Heeb Street to its intersection with the northern boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-018; thence northeasterly along the northern boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-018 to its intersection with the west boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-017; thence northwesterly along the west boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-017 to its intersection with the south boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-015, thence northeasterly along the south boundary of Parcel #10- 24-252-015 to its intersection with the west boundary of Parcel#10-24-252-013, thence northwesterly along the west boundary of Parcel #10-24-252-013 to its intersection with Heeb Street, thence northwesterly along Heeb Street to its intersection with Kaufmann Avenue, thence northeasterly along Kaufmann Avenue to its intersection with 22"d Street thence northeasterly along 22"d Street to its point of origin at the intersection of E. 22"d Street and Kniest Street. Section 2. This ordinance shall not apply to an application for a demolition permit for properties being acquired and demolished for the Bee Branch Creek Restoration Project. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon publication, as provided by law. Passed, approved and adopted this day of , 2011. Roy D. Buol, Mayor Afitest: Jeanne F. Schneider, City Clerk F:\USERSILCARSTEN\WP\Washington Neighborhood\Washington Nbad Cons District Ord.doc ��Il�r'f/�Z�"',!'Il.��r � � � �� IR ��.- .- � ~ �' 11l�is 1��1 �� .� r� .� .,. � � � � � �.. ��■ _ _ �� ll 0� � � - � � � � � � , - � �y; ��►.� ■■■� i!��• � �� r� � } � � � � �� y � � � � �� ' � � � � � a . . �7�'�f� �,�. � � � �p �� :�// ' 1 �~� � � � � � � �� I� ��,'� � � � � � � _ ` �� • • a� � i� � � � eR� � �� / // .�� ! • 1 � �� .. .■.� � . % �,/ �� '� ` � � � � � � . � �� ri / � � w + � � �� _ �� , f � �� i � � , ��''� '_ , . � ' �� -- �� : 'a�}� ' ' �! � � � i1!■ � � �� y �� ■E�R� � � � � � :■ i�lll ■ � , � � � �5 _ � � � � i� � � � , � � '� � � 0 ■ � .� —� • ~ � � � s �" � � a '� � _ = :. - = : : � 1� ��. ��1 � � � . , I ,, , r� . . :��ril ► � �� . .�s _ _ • . �.:{�,.. . ,� � _ : ■� � �= �� =,■ . , a �, r ; � � � __ = � � - � �� ■ �I�I �_: � - - : � o �■ __ �I �,� � ,t � ■�� -�: s ; - - � = � � � � _ _ �. � �. � .. = � � _ Illl �' !� - � = v �- = = � ` � � , _ _ _ � • - � � � : � ' • � " . � ��!' � � � �i■ � � � � � !� � � = � � � . ` -.� � — � � � � �■ _ � `�� ! � � � �II i i or ii� �' � r � � i . ��"l� �i� � � � � �C � '� � �� _ � '�� ` � � * � , . ��'�.■ � � � .� � � C = C � � � ; ■,■ �- � � � � � � 11161[I 1 ■ : ■ - - --� � �� '� � �; � s �._ � ■ 11111111 �� ■ ■ � �_ ■ .. o : � 0 ��11 �� J �I:f !- � � � � ' = � � � � � �= � 1.�. � ... .� lllll ■ ■ �. � � . _ ■. , �. . � �i' � � � � � � p � � - �;'� : «�.r � "�` ' � � � � �� - � � � � � ;� ,� � .:� � _ � � �. ■ s = � - �- o � � � �} � � � '�� : � � � �■ � �r ■� � � ■r■ — � �� C � �w w ■ � :�_ 1 , � � i� ' � � _ ' � r � - � C ■ s _ ■ � � � � � _ � � � ■ ■ = . a : � � . � � `I ■ ,�_ �1��'f"�1��■�rr��irl■r�� ■ � • � � - .��1 Comm�nity Assessrr�ent&Revitafiiotion Strategi�s �ommunit Assessmen� & Revi�afiza�rvn S�rateg�es e • � - • i� �i � ' r e ' City o f Dubraque, louva = _ �--• : - .,.: .^ - -_ . _�•�: .. �'r� °�.; r �.��. � -- , r:� ��'��, ' `j � -- —� '3 ! �' �;�, ��,l,� -=�;; ��,,d� ; '1l ■ f , �. ■r �. . " s � `��. �'1 �� ''t� !��' .�I��} � �� ' '��'� ' � ��! � ,- '� . � i a4�i�r + i;;ti'.�,� i ��; M . +A` : : • �:i t�3 -y, �y,,� �}}�r •��?�!:�r` � T '� �S.:K,��^��:'i �.�- ..r � ' � `ra:��yl��ri� � � ^ � � 'i 1!• • . . , LZ � CN� �roFdGE��,81� Washington Neighbnrhoad �lan—City of bu6i�que IA Page 1 CommuniryAssessment&Revitalization Strategies i . • - • • - ect�on� ,.�� . ' Page#:. �. �:... x.. ;_, _, � - X___ � . _ _ _ _ r � -� -- -= - -- ___ _ _ __,_ _r. __._ _r i . ; Section (: Executive Summary 3 i Overview of the Organizational Frameworlc for Neighborhood Improvement 3 � Findings&Recommendations 4 Work Program 7 j Neighborhood Strategies Flan 9 Section II: Introduction&Background 14 Neighborhood Planning Process � I S � Purpose of this Plan 17 Organizational Framework for Neighborhood Improvement 18 Section III: Neighborhood Profile 20 Community Perspective 20 ' Economic Potential Analysis 23 � Social Services&Education Analysis 34 '; Neighborhood Planning Analysis 41 Overview of Local lnitiatives/Community Building Capacity 52 Section IV:Action Plan for Community Mobilization 57 Overview 57 ' Washington Neighborhood Development Corporation (WNDC) 57 � What is a CDC? 57 ' Community Development Resources 58 Lead& Partner Organizations 58 Worl<Program Grid: Economic Development 59 , Work Program Grid: Families,Youth & Education ' 63 � Worl<Program Grid: Housing 66 ; Appendix A: Charts&Graphics for Neighborhood Market Analysis A-I � Appendix B: Best Practice Program Examples for Families Youth& Education B-I � i � i� � Washington Neighborhood Plan-Ciry of Dubuque IA Page 2 , Corrimur�ity Rssessment&Revitalizatiar�5trategies The Washingtan NeighbQrhood Pfan is designed ta give residents and other loeal stakeholders �e.g. husiness owners, em�loyees, residents, public offlcials, property owners) the tools needed to enhance the quality, of life within the neighborhood and thereby strengthening its sense of pride. The goal of this Plan is to inspire local res'sdents, business and praperty owners ta collaborate with the City of�uhuque to cvntinue with ne':gh6orhood improvement efforts and revitalize the City's historic core. In 2a44, the City of D�6uque and the neigh�orhaad initiated the "Washington: RevitQlize!" improvement pragram. Local neighborhood organizations, not-fvr-prolit agencies and City departments have already taken steps towards addressing issues identified and further developed in the 2fl�7 visioning report. The Washi�gtvn Neighhorhoad established se�eral brvad goals ta guide this phase af the planning prvicess. T�e purpose of this Plan is to establish a more formal set ❑f recommendations that identify shvrt and long term strategies (policies} and specific actio�s {pragrams and projects} for wF�ich resources, timeiines and respansi6le parties can be ider�tified. In addition, this Plan is guided by an act+an-oriented document that translates the �ision intv projects and prograrr�s that �an he implemented over time ta ensure the Washington Neighborhood achieves the established�ision. Yhis Plan addresses bot� physital impro�ements to create a better en�ironment for economic in�estment, and programs neressary to pravide [ess-advantaged �it':xens with the capacity to "accQss the ladder of economic vpportunity that Eeads out of pvverty," This process is in#ended ta encourage, equip and expand local leadership to address local eon�erns and advance priority programs and prajects. �►►er�iew af tha Organixatiattal Framewor�c for NeigHborhood lmpra�ement To guide the implementation of the vision ar�d create action � •- — sCeps to address the neighbvrhavd's issues, a Citizen �_ �- Covrdinating Committee {CCCy was formed, �onsisting of � residents and stalceho�ders, to facifitate an acti�e citizei� � , �_.�-� �artieipativn proeess that ensures adequate represer�tation .�"�. � af differing interests and ultimatety leads to res�dents ta3cing � �e c,;�ai frr, � "' `�'j' awnership of neighborhood impro�ement efforts. `� � # rj�+'�'� :; �' �� .,,�y��. In callabaracion with the consulting team fed by Teska x - '�` Assaciates, Inc. �TAI�, including the Center for - Neighborhaod 1'e�hnolog}+ �CNT�, LISC1MetroEdge �LME}, and MJ Berr�e Consulting (MJB�, the CCC cvmened during the sUmmer of 2DU8 to dis�uss the issues and patential for tk�e Washington Neighborh��d. The end product was the identifi�ation of three core issue areas that will pravide the organixatianal framewark for mo�ing forward. The neighbarhpad's three mre issues areas are: I. Ecanomic ❑evelopment z. Families Youth&�ducation 3. Housing By working with existing organizativns and tlie City, the CCC will work tawar-ds achie�ing solutions to the neigh6orhvad's key issues in a focused and managed manner ta minimize repetitiveness, maximixe effectiveness, and encaurage the sharing af ideas, �•esources, and suecess stories. Callectively, the CCC represents a unif�ed voite �or the Washington lVeigh�orhoad with which the camm�nity can bring Washingtan Neighborhood Plan--City of Du�iuc�ue [A Page 3 Commun+ry Assessment&Revitalization 5vntegies ' attention to its issues. By contir�ual[y communicating progress and ic#es�tifying practieal salutions ta the neighbarhood's key issues, the CCC will help foster a sense of cammt�nity pride and patentialfy encourage athers residents and stalceholders to ta�e part in these grassroots efforts. Findings&_Re_commendatians, At the onset of this planning �ro�ess, t�e �onsulting team examined lo�al �oroditions and initiatives and explored comme�•cial market oAportunities and branding strategies that �o�ld 6e utilixed to ser-�e resident needs and further strengthen the Washingtpn Neighbvrhvod as a desirable place to li�e, be an entrepreneur, and enjoy entertainment and cultural opportunities. The fndings and recommendations of t�e consulting team's assessment of the Washington Neigh6orhoad are autlined below and vrganized by the three core issues areas. E�vnomic De�elopment A retail marlcet study was undertaken to assess the economic = - _- - development potential within th� Washington Neigh6arhood market ;� �� area in an effort to further inform strategies far re-marketi�g the neigt�borhovd as well as to inform stalcehalders abaut the retail ,,� . ..., devel�pment pvtential vf the Washington Neigh6orhovd marlcet area. - - �'`= �fy;��:.. _ �•• . �i� � � Key Findin�s r; - �' . k'.--°•-T=�_;:•.... _•�' The Washington Trade Area and the Washington � ��;.�a �„ � Neigh6or�vvd 6oth.ha�e a strong presence af midd[e income !'. � Y and uppe�' incame hvusehalds, both ❑f whirh are in�reasing : i'��`- � �� T; �see charts an pages A-I� and A-I I in the Appendix]. Both W�.- ' areas alsa have a cansiderahly higher concentration of 5uying power as compared ta the Iar-g� ❑u6uque trade area. � ■ More upwardfy-mobile hauseholds in the Washington Neighhori�ood will 6e mast liltely to patronixe retailers and service providers close to home that cater to their every-day con�enien�e needs, ■ An adequate number of stores serve the neighborhood, in�luding general rnerchandise a�d electranielappliance stores 6eing the only two major retai! categories with potential far expansipn. Gaps in the retail mix in the Washington Neighborhood area pro�ide pPportunities , for limited retail, such as ele�tranics, video games,autv parts, and car rental. ■ �'he 3acic af retaif sales lealcage presents an oppvrtunity to encaurage expansion of existing retaif dusters. ■ The strongest intersectian far retail is at �Im 5treet and East 2Dth Street with the �agle Country Marl�et, rec�ntly-renavated Pixza Hut, and new Walgreens, not.to mention its prvximity ta the Pa�k Site and potential to benef'tt from that future rede�elopment. The second strangest intersection for r•etail in the Washingtan Neighb�t-hoad is the one at Central Avenue and 20�h Street,anrhored by the Family[7ollar. ■ The Washington Neighhorh�od's cu�-rent retail ni�he is ane that focuses on the �on�enience- oriented needs af the trade area's residents. ■ There is np ob�ivus entity to deliver suppart services (e.g. tec�nical assistanee, proper-ty maintenan�e, design and rehab serwices, etc.) to Io�al businesses in the Washington Neighborhoad. Key Fte�amrrsendations ■ Focus a re-marlceting campaign at changing ti�e per�eptivn af the neighbarhood, perhaps led by the neighborhood stakehalder•s and the City as �hie# amhassadors. Elements of this campaign tnight include the messages that middle incame 1�ousehoEds are present and increasing, t[�at Washington NeighUorhood Pla�i-City of I]ut�uque IA Page 4� Commur�ity Rssessment&RevitaliaQtion Sirategies businesses are sucreeding, and that people fram around the comrnunity patranixe these businesses. ■ Cr•eate and marl�et a suppart infrastructure-- in terms af smal�-6usiness fnancing and t�chnical- assistance prograsns, pvtentially in partnership with area �o[leges and uni�ersities—to foster the suc�ess of independently-owned businesses within the neigh6or�ood and along Central A�enue. Creation and marketing of a support infrastructure is dependent on City in�estment. ■ Upgrade ar expand current busir�esses to hetter fit the lacal �ustomer base and meet Ivcal needs. Eff�rts that focus on in�estments and pragramming to retain existing businesses are more important than attracting new husinesses. ■ Identify a unique position within the competitive marketplace for the Washington Neighborhood to achie�e a larger draw. Howe�er, nat every neighborhood ar husiness district has ta 6e a destination. Indeed, some are only meant to serve the e�eryday needs af the people wh❑ [ive there. � Consider �lustering resta�rants and bars as this is mast lilcely to breed success when they are clustered fogether and can collectively pufl as a larger destinativn. � 6uild upon the potential presence of a larger retail an�hor on the Pack site, which in turn may build the potential to attract another general-merchandise aperator not yet in the region, lil�e Big Lots, as well as additional sit-dvwn fatnily restaurants and mvderatefy-priced clothing and shoe stores. An�, just like the redevelopment of the ri�erfrant played a majar rvle in the re�i�al of lower Main 5ti•eet, new stores at the Pa�lc site could aet as an�hors for the nearhy commercial node at Elm and East ZOth$treet. ■ Positian afder storefronts along Cencral A�enue far Iow-cost incuhatar space for early-stage entrepreneurs [e.g. pre�iously The Dark Slide} and ni�he husinesses [e.g. E! Paisano) until they rehvund in va[ue. ■ fn�est in the �reation and rnarlceting of a support infrastr�cture for local, small-scale entreprer�eurs, both in terrns of small-husiness financing and technicai-assistance program. ■ �rganize 6usiness owners along Central Avenue to �reate a merchants ❑rganiiation tv hetter ernpower them to worl�vn their awn hehalf and provide peer-ta-peer sup�ort. ■ Expand the City-s�onsored program af cosmeti� enhantement (e.g. fa�ade impro�ementsy and provide generous funding for more attracti�e signage, down-lighting, et�. �hese steps woufd, just 6y enf�ancing the �isuals, send a very different message a6vut Washington Neighbarhovd and induce.others ta treat it less d�smissi�ely. Also, the neighhorhvod's br-and wauld also 6e impra�ed if its own stalcehalders were to speak of it in more positive terms. Families Youth& Education Physi�al impra�ements ean help enhan�e the appearance anc.l -' �r• - ; i ' � charm of the neighbvrhood. Howe�er, they must bc i.- ' � ,' ; � ��; .�:r` camplemented with svcial impro�ements that raise self anr] : ;J -- _ cammunity pride and enhan�e the well �eiag of hoth �_ _ ` _ --- � �. - i n d i v i d u a l s a n d v�e r a 4 1 n e i g h b o r h o o d. �h e c a m m U n i t y m u s t �� .�-- �- ��°�� - be inspired tv change, which requires the cammitment to 6e - - ° organi=ed,to stay invol�ed,and ta communicate openly witli ` � � '= J+ ;_, ` ; eac h o t her. T a r n a i n t a i n a n e n d u r i n g a n d f o c u s e d c h a r g e �„ tawar-ds change, strang and active leadership must 6c � � t culti�ated in the community ta ir�spire and pa�e xhe way. �� -'�-':.,�'��' ___-_ , . Leadership and action can stem from indi�idua! community '�.,;:' �''�� ' �-�-•.__.�= �-��:iF4. " mem6ers, lacal organixatians, and the coliabaration vf �arious social service agencies and City government. Youti� are als❑ encouraged �o get invol�ed In the cammunity as activism and interest can fiiter onto parents, ssalings, and lriends. Washingtan Neighhorhood Platt-City aF Duhuque IA Page 5 I Community Rssessmer+t&Revital+ratror�3uotegies Key Findin�s ■ A �ariety of sacial ser-vice and Qutreach agencies serve the Washingtvn NeighborF�ood, pro�iding programs and services relating to family services, caunselir�g, SR� and transiti�naE housing o�pportunities, �lothing and food, heaEth, educatipn, employment and financial assiscance, and diversity outreach. ■ The Washington Neighborhvod vffers a limited range of acti�ities and facilities geared towards y�uth and families. More programs that are affordahfe, providing guidance ta youth, and encouraging yvuth tv get involved in the �aminunity, �ould be offered. Family prvgramming is needed across the entire age spectrum, ranging{rom young children to teenagers tv parents ta seniors. ■ The Washington Neighborhood has access to educational opportunities at all le�els; however, I�ey issc�es in�lude maintaining affordahility, praviding cnn�enient transportacian to and from sch�n[s, and �vntinually diversifying educational optians and resources to meet varying interests, needs,and ages. � � T'he Washington Neighhorhoad is served by a handful of healt�t-reFated facilities. WF�ile suhstance ahuse and mental health services are offered within and near the neigi�borF�ood, ❑ther health services and care are needed, particularly those that cnmhine education with acti�ity and cater to di€ferent age groups. � As the most recent and highly accessible additian tv the Washington Neighhorhvod, the Crescent Community Health Center is cantinually growing in its programming and services and is the best aption tQ serve as the neighharhoad's primary care health service agency. Ke Recommendations ■ Expand transportat'san options to programs. ■ Expand youth a�ti�ities{limited number of�rograms; lacic of interest�. ■ �nhan�e neighborhoad �ammunications to ensure Icnaw�edg�and awareness of p�•ograrns. � Er��ourage greater parentladuft in�afvement�especially with yauthlchildren p�•ogr•amming). Hausing The Washington Neighborhood has a law homeawnership � rate with appraximately 35°/ owners and 65% renters. � �_' _: Based on a 20[16 American Community 5urvey candu�ted : ;= . 6 the U.S.�ensus,the owner-to-renter ratio for the entire ' ��d. '��Y � � y ��;.�r: _- � .� . �,. �� City of Dubuque was t�e re�erse with 73%owners and 27% '� '`� ` _ �.- - -� �� t ,... _�., � � �r� renters. Whife single family deta�hed houses are the i i�.� � �:�� .:.- pr-edominant type of housing stru�ture, many of them are ��;��' � ' � �,�� used as rental properties or �on�erted to multiple renta.l �..-.. _ _ _ � �E;,�ill' �1�� units. About I 5q of the rental units are used for- Section 8 '---��, �--- hausing. � Key Findin�s ■ A majo�-ity of the residentia! praperties in the Washington IVeighborhvad are zoned f�-2A; however, cQncern o�er inappropriate �anversions and replacement af single-famify hvmes that have resulted in the Ioss vf the historic character must be addressed. Ta encourage mare hvmeownership vpportunities, while at the same time preserving xhe character of the neighbarhovd, cvnse�vativr� districC design standards shauld be applied to all R-2A =oned properties. ■ A�though the Washington Neighborhood is not currently an histpric d':siriet, such a designatian , may be worth explor-ing, pa�-ticularly t� help prese:we the historic h�using stocl� and aid in neighborhood revitalixation. Washiitgtan Neighl�oi-livod Plan—City af but�uque IA P�ge F I Community Assessment&Revitalization Strategies ■ While housing is generally affordable in the Washington Neighborhood, the housing stock is aging with many homes needing rehabilitation; however, some property owners and the City are undertaking rehab projects to help improve properties. ■ Based on data on new home purchases, the community investment climate in the neighborhood is less active than in the entire City and metro area. However, new purchase loans have been on the rise in the Washington Neighborhood,which could indicate that investment is on the rise. Key Recommendations ■ Create a welcoming atmosphere to encourage community investment, foster communication, and project a new image as a hip neighborhood. ■ Provide a greater balance of housing by promoting homeownership and homeowner maintenance. ■ Improve the quality, maintenance,and appearance of rental properties. ■ Encourage public and private investments to improve the appearance of the neighborhood to attract reinvestment. Work Program A Work Program is outlined in detail in Section IV of this Plan. Guided by principal strategies organized by the three core issues areas, the Work Plan is comprised of a series of programs and projects designed to encourage the community to mobilize for action in an organized manner as well as with a clear and attainable goal in mind. Each program/project is assigned a timeframe{I year, 2-3 years, or 4- 5 years) to indicate the general amount of time needed to complete the program/project. Also, each program/project is assigned a lead organization and, in many cases, partner organizations that will take responsibility for putting the program/project into action. One of the organizations recommended to take responsibility of (or be a partner for) many of the programs/projects is a proposed new organization called the Washington nleigh6orhood Deve►opment Cor�ioration (WNDC). As a community development corporation for the Washington Neighborhood, the WNDC would manage a variety of tasks, including (but not limited to) promoting and facilitating economic development (jobs and business activity), developing programs, fundraising, advocating for neighborhood issues and activities, and organizing residents, businesses and community groups. The WNDC would be separate from the Washington Neighborhood Association (WNA) but would work in collaboration with the WNA, the City, and other local community groups, schools, churches, and businesses to address the needs of the neighborhood, particularly as they pertain to the programs and projects outlined in the Work Program. Washington Neighborhood Plan-City of Dubuque IA Page 7 Community Assessment&Revitalization Strategies , - - - I I A sample of the Work Program Grid is illustrated below. The detailed strategies and recommendations outiined in the Work Program aim to help inform the City in tal<ing action and forming policies that impact the Washington Neighborhood. The complete Work Program is provided in Section IV. The core recommendations, which were determined as high priorities by the neighborhood and assessed by � the consulting group, are summarized below. i I Work Prograni Grid:Families,Youch&Educacion A p.<�m.wry arafc oE fie wo�k pro�nm sched��:&pr+oria«. �-. �.:_� . „.- . ,,. ; . � ` �4�� ?.�'k:'. - _ " - �.�, ;�^�� - r �.,m�.-� :�.. Fvnllks.YouJ�#Eduawn 1 Ery�nd tr�ntpavdm op6onc w prognms a�d x4Ndes serving she , nNghbofiood. � 1.1 frhancc erlirif{,+uansportatbn scrvkas for n_I�Faorhood programs and KTS L50.WNA,MFC wenu wi�h more reyuUr scrvice(eg.drwhmr zystcm)and(ncrcazed X � mukc' 'ranodon 1.2 Esulllsh a bltyde safety Frognm parricululy promoUng a cenificue ot X DPD(Commumry Policing ProgrLn) LSO.WIJA sompkrion and proNCang incrnUves to wear ficlmc�s. 2 Eqnnd yo��h xUriucs tha[m:ec ihe Incem:u aM neelc of chtdrm o�a�ages i arc1 kecp Jicm cr�gagc-0 and ac We. 2.)DcvdcpalNashutimnNc:ghb�rhoodYoud�Colt�boradveclu�id.nufics WNDC WNAMFC ' � necdsud<oncems.Flsnsrolh�zcriviu:sforyoud�aM<Irildren.and X I .�� Core Recommendations: Economic Development i (See pages 59-62 for complete Work Program Grid) I. Establish a business owners association. 2. Ensure neighborhood and City involvement in the development potential of the Five Points area. 3. Develop a neighborhood logo and marketing campaign to help brand the neighborhood and promote local businesses. 4. Enhance the Central Avenue corridor with streetscape improvements and gateway features. 5. Develop a retail fa�ade improvement program for local businesses. 6. Re-tenant and rehab vacant storefronts focusing on Central Avenue. Core Recommendations: Families Youth&Education ' (See pages 63-65 for complete Work Program Grid) I. Encourage the formation of a fully functioning Washington Neighborhood Development Corp. i 2. Coordinate existing services and programs to ensure efficient delivery to the neighborhood. 3. Develop a Washington Neighborhood Youth Collaborative as part of new WNDC. I 4. Create a"Calendar of Community Events"to promote the neighborhood's offerings. I, 5. Improve landscaping, sidewalks&wall<ability of neighborhood (e.g. link between Central Avenue ; and Pacl<Site through the neighborhood). Core Recommendations: Housing (See pages 66-67 for com�lete Work Program Grid) � I. Create a new Washington Neighborhood Welcoming Center. % 2. Establish a Washington Neighborhood Housing Resources web site. � 3. Establish a marketing program and design public improvements to projeet neighborhood's image. �, 4. Support new housing between I I�& 12�Street in coordination with Historic Millwork District. 5. Provide energy-efficiency incentives for new and rehab housing. _ _ - _ _ _. _._. _ - - - - --- �- - -. _._..,_ . Washington Neighborhood Plan-City of Dubuque IA Page 8 ', Community Assessment&Revitalization Strategies - - - - .�_.-� �fei�hborhood Strate�ies Plan The strategies outiined in the Work Program Grids are visually summarized on the Neighborhood Strategies Plan exhibits shown on the following pages. In particular, the overall composite Neighborhood Strategies Plan, which is provided on page 10, eoneeptually illustrates a eomprehensive approach to investment and revitalization of the Washington Neighborhood, consistent with the core recommendations outlined in this Plan. The locations of neighborhood improvement districts and corridors represent where the strategies outlined in the Work Program should be applied. ln addition, individual Neighborhood Strategies Plan exhibits are provicied for the three core issues areas (Economic Development; Family,Youth, and Education;and Housing) on pages I 1, 12, and 13, respectively. Washington Neighborhood Plan-City of Dubuque IA Page 9 � f Cf)MP�SIt�MRP-Neighborhood 5trotegies Plan , �S � r�• �� I ��{. F��'�. � � Q � � � � �1 �'� o , :,, :. � � .,;' ��- :? �, � ��. � -� r�l1;��. _ x � ❑ Y Forus intiul neighborhaod � `� J ],,�W• � ' �onservanon nnd fn�71 � � � ��, J,�� _ , e orts fn orev eost❑� F �hite St,south o f,2 f'�5; r�- �-' '< < norcl,v(!8��5c,ond west �' . ��s :� -" � of Efm 5t ond the Five .��•.. ❑ � � Pornts commerdQl distrirt �, � � � �. �� F � NE}+ y�'l+75 �� ❑ r77L1M.�AA�:� - •. .�� •• C 3F1�fH IA� � PlST t -tJjST'RT� � (1VOR7FF�;D}J'", - ' �� .` " .- � � + �-= . �. +P ,�� : - s PAGC 5lTf •r� "� ] J�` 1 t {f QBS�iEfJERA7L1fi] a4 a � � � �. ❑ _. �y . "' � ,l� Esta6lrsh sa('e nnd niVac- � ' � � uve pedestrian cannertron i � i � �. � � between Pnck Srte ond the I c�� `s � � � , � � Wasf�ington Neigitborfiood i � �', 'r 9 r .�, ,� i �. �. � ,� } I _- •+ �.:: 1- ' [�i•; ` =�3 ' �J./ r ��'� �� g] �L_,^1 MAI]fSL4J �.� � � ��. P+yp7C S �"�'.�, ��. ��'G..� � �S, $� , ''� �� r�;-.+ � �-�S � ". � '� �� `� �� ' t �:�� a [ '�CFt7�RR�.tiqe..��,�,J 3�1 � �;1 ' �y,�AfSr�R�7.,1. .� .J- J �� 1 , ..-Cr � ��. �. -� .. . � r. �:��.. ' � �,..��.� ��1 � > ��r� ;�, Prowde gureway fenture �' �}�� t�" afon [he I b�'St rarridor � .��.•• "�- .�.• '� , ,y� 1�� to merk tlie entry rnta the �,J�� '� ��] �� - .�� Wosi�inglan NerghhQrhoad a' -��-�'� �j� {�`:;� '�. .��r.- �� • r , � -iLr:',�� =�_1' - � — �L' [ �je _.�..,-. . 1'' � � rtic+�x4 ,:=.:= �� ,� � , PAAY -�:••� 1� ��.� > Prov;de(acal point wrthin -� `'� �. ��-�G�� • e �', Jacksan Park[a mwk ihe ��'"-J�;� � �-. �r_ wescem termin�s o(the �+ ��sa- 1 �� s'- 16�'St rorridor _ y �. '�� - r-,� - �� , � � . 1. 1 � e�:, � �` � ��-y � 1 � � ;� Ex fore pQtenti❑1 to 1 �j , 'j. ❑� p }-_..�. '' � � � r�, , t',� estd6fish the Washi,lgcon � � �.- � � Afergli6o�f,00d Welcom- ��- �� i ing Cen ter tivi t l�in n f�+g r,�y a PRESCOTI; . ,, �' " visiteddrea,such as a fon g ''�scr+ooia,j �� y' tfre Cen[rolAve corridor Ga�rnz�rrirr:. . •Fi50UnCf . . �� ''CL•iiFR �'� : 'r _ j'IIST,(S']�1�C,1rt . ��VYQf�IS �tL '" �' []15TRIGZ] Eni�onre ifre sireeiscape � afong rhe 16�'St�orrrdor ��' ,�`�-'" � ,1 `� � ta�reate an attmrtive C rrr.gt 6� ];__ �, �edesrrinn-0riented7ink `;-�q ��{R �� 1�etrveen CentralRve ond �r� - FnhQ�ce connecdvity to OU ❑ ' ihe fiistorr�Milhvark�is- tfre odajrent Peck Site �. Y � � i � tri[i dlongWashingion$t =j_ b `"•••� Nelghdarhood � PedesvIon-0rfented NelYh6orhaod p ; krsldentla7 r ■ CammcrdQlDJstric� GommerdolCan7dur CarsservnNon d�In�i9 RedevrJopmrstAreo ■wwn.e Nerghhorhoad�ammerriof dis- Pedesuian�arier�ted comn�errral Nergliharl�ood ronservolian to Residenfio!redeueloprr�ent ro I tricfs are dr�inrd In two ereas� corridor olong CentrelAve(iam support housinY in�lf and re- (allosv pfans estublisl�ed�or the 13'^St ta f 8'"St ta provide a hobilitafion ns wefl ns stahr�ize adjac�nt 7-Irs[oric Mrlfwork Disiri�t {rj R1ang CentralAve,rnduding unique nerghborliood commerriQ! can�n�unity�niiented f�usrnesses to tioe south. exrstir� 5usifoesses ond opportu- distri�i facus�ng an�orade im- and servi[es,portrruforl 6urld- nrUes�Or e�fre�reneurship and proveme�ifs,strecLsra�e enhunce- ing u�r1n the su�cess o�Projeri husiness inrubntQrspa�es. menis,nnd'green"inrtrQrives Conrerr�orld the Creseent Com- {e.g.specirrl reryding and[rcrsh muni[y I-Iealth Center onri�oring �Z}Witl�ri�1he Frve Aainis area, rerepiQcfes,6it�rncks,g�ee+i d1- the ada�tive reuse ai[ite�ormer indudrng exisLng Uusinesses ley progrnr�7,tiynter reryding e1c}, p�lbuque Coske[Fociary bui�ding and opportunrties�or oddivanol nergh6orhaad�oriented 6usinesses ond Iirlkages ta�uture commercial derefopmeni an ilie Pork Site. Washington NeFghbvrhood-Dubuque lA MQrch 2QDq Pagc 1❑ � I Ecorvoml�oFVE�o�mErvr-rr�l��aa��aao srRa�r��Es Pr�r� Fxj�e�d p� ❑ Wark with AxdprFw¢e endpu6lic agendrs[n ❑Seure emp�ren¢opporturrdes as rhe Po[k site � � �� prouide empfoyment o�iswnce arrd Nistorf[ IAw�k Clirnia redeva� uv�jobs�orlh�gAln ❑ Pmride neiglo5ariroodbased locd edurrnionol O lmprove a�cess tojohs in a�her par�vraubuque � N�fiyprfppoltSidN+�s. opport��r+ities ❑Cnr�sider r�cenri5r prog�ams m en�ou�age 1aw ' : �-�- P' � NiS � ❑ ldenn�yjo6 vorning options,including ueonng u sluTkdpeop�e to pdr�iripo[e in edumwn Qnd � �"� new en�pbyrne�rt�en¢er vnc)lmplerr�e�ng ferJuii- vaining progroms - •�� [olnssi�Yonce progmms 0 ldent�y goah and proYide IncerniHes(or laro!husi- ❑Prwidzjo6 sfwclowing opportorvties�aith facal rresser[a hire locof�y businesses FosGer redetirJvpmurl,and t��i1 dc�Opmud op' - - - _ — -�-�." e ' :i r� ��S��F��A� � � r �, ❑Frpdnd rypes a�pu�fic�ncenrives o/jered ta f�'f' business mme�s and de�rlopers[a fpcate in d3e ' � � Washington Neigh6orhood , • � E]1rnp�mr pFr�sicd candeuorss ta mahe neighbar- � �� hood a[+fnrpve�nr irrves�fen[ ,� ' f � ��;`dd d`��w ❑Devclop pragrant tQ en�ouro�fhe(lfi��leea � h��"`°p1f1`w�a ing and mQnagemcnt orvaront cammerdr+l 1` � n. '1 � �+ru��n��n spores[o presen�o�ainst(unt�er drefrrie �'` ❑ConsfGer a((erinp(moncio!incerrm�es ro maxF ''�. �oneo,reMrda�rnrah ~ _� ' md iM i fa(�[ure mire die Pork sitei tenant potenAo! ' � � ��S��Amene ❑Cunsidcr ocqulvt,bn o�ova�VaHe pmperties aF ` �� . � s ,� �,� Frve Poirr[s lwriness dso-irt te rr�aximirx patcnde! �� '� r� ,��•. q rr�c ,f� + x ARl 7� � y-�`� �C 1�` � :`�7� n �eQAn'r � �, t,l -- " � � n.p on rin5�noad MCxsire r r _=_� t �dd d,.,r�� ,`,- �� poas ewe�,�mry _ �� cenndA �� n � � '�en�ir�• ..._ ��:'��'' - " �edniytvn�+exsrsm2 '-�� &�obErhrd•a+dorrroc -i - - _ - •�: epyonwimef{�envt .r - Nr Prdei[+im ta�ne�kn ��' �Y "r�'.? Mu�h m k�Hlss .. � f ='I ' �'� i . M� �P P �� .� 6cr.•eert i�ock Lee dihe ''�^`�Sw�� = �°'-�� _—__ linrbnu�ptte� y .++�� ' Wosh.�ng�mNdjh6crhnad ,I:_... �i� _` a � �� r rr �'�CJ~�-___�ll � � �� ,' :.Js�i �� C' � + � n 1.; �'�' .��!{� . ��: ryl,� ;� srAha.c�d��e�n ofrnc� ' -�, �;,,�:.;� L �7X'S�A orrnea�e&�vio* • r 4d�:�. aieriaed rmtrtwGd 1.'• . �.,� � '� o , carldwAonpCenvd ��"�:�. C�• s r � - [� �1. f.- � hadde rw feave i] Yra�de nssistanre�o focaf businesses to imprave �,��,p,n,;er o,,,,;q„e '� Tt +'.• ,� ��1 �,,r�,��`6",'0}'�� their gu�ry ond md�ke�oppedi i�h6arhood�ommurid �� "..•j��.r'�'{ ry marR Ne r�v h�o iha r essrnn(unnin;en(xoae . 3'l�" +� -. '�. wasn'r,�onNd'Pwnaorhooe ❑ �fCSErvd YQCQfIi SCa72yN1'1[5[0 725EIYP Qn fliV2lF 'anfn�prtMMtS tYlNs[op� �: �.�� ,.1 - �� to a omilo6fe, aod ua' s oce(ornewar e�mremanr.e�e ��..f y?':-- ry f g 4 �}'A �;wdom�� r.�..`.t`: �� 1 P.i'�Aof7dE�I�172i�PSSPS 1�^:- �.�T, ❑ Cansider erpnndng the Moin So-eet Prngmm a� ' --- _ w,s ;�:�•�` 15.�� V 1 . � `,:.." � creaGng r�e�v enG ry s p r d(k ro rhe nerghborhood rm;de�d p9:K �n - x. N�1�r;�:-� ❑ PurNer tir*rh lacal business srhod programs�o ��"n�`d,�,,,�n�`o��: ` � •r.'�� evide ur�all business ass�s[once o+rd idenri fy �a"Si ca*d� � •S 1 ' �� ❑� �u�ng saurces�pr ecoiwmic developnunt �1� �'� , .� ❑ Pormer�srtf�kra1 bonks!o ved�eloxtinterest � �rnr�xr��a�o .�='-� �� i �� r� � � lovn progrwr�r�Or Gusinesses to io�plement N�y��yy ka�, @, "� � 7Ynre�ron[artd inleria�spare upgrades h�[en�e�wiJrn o hi laY ru�c � � ❑ Geate o fccal merc7�ants ossoriouon �tedurq n.rh e��_ IhlCenvdA�xconidw � ��'o i7f51f3i�IC �r r � t"�„ ❑ Geate business Jes o sucr 1 s[ares ta _ ��` �� Mfuxran� mnrrre[�l+em to�ustomen nndimesrars �� o�snuC7 Cnh e�he mee�c e �..1�_ .� :. � _-� -' ❑Createo"siroplocpl�y„�rogror+� d,r,j�hel5's<< �r � , �•., • �',l ❑Work vmhleco!r�evrs a e to u�sh ortides "'`°°'°°"�v°""� x�'��,;�.:'.�. $�Y D p dexerlmorientedhk . ��'�c�Ci.'v;;'..'' � FrJwmcrrunenhay[o highkgh6n�d�e nergFborhoods posirrve elcmems 6-M een CenrrdA�e md � �`;Jr.�.u+�•. � rhe Hinoric ANwork Olr� Ne odqcm�lo�k Siee �_'..�'�� .7�[-1� ViA dunpWoih'uqfon Se 1] � u CS GeQte a nzighbnriwad business promevond �_ �` ' �spla�ta p�amo�e locaf 6uincsses a!Ciry erenfs ' �� 1 .____,_.� ❑ReriR[ptlst�tampts at a�edng microen[erprise dwelapmern servires suppw-t 6y the Crry ta de[em�ine pe�e��6of(or new progrom ' � �, �,X�f�� -i^ F �y o ��g ��ia�ing�� i � � �'`i� � —•al��_� �u��¢a�1�},��id dx�mchr � �� _� �.= � n,.�} —_ 1 a�``� I� 4 Estab6sh progrnms to art�art niche 6uvnesses m�pRi� r `i��7� �� A Rtuact 5�sinesses rhot mcet residcrrts'spedrx needs �:f C7"�Lf�]'?Cd 4 .� [3 Mo�ritein ond preserm frnori�6uifo4ngs nnd ur5an �1�3 L{�?{� - ------ �q6rit ofthe CentralAve business disvrct ` �"� 1� � . 1 4I [7 Provrde fow[on lnrubnto�s�ce�or earfy-swge ------- ----- �� rnvep�eneurs ond nirhe husinesxes �� [] Dcr�fap n ndgi�harhood 7ogo�ur prorrrofion �eln,piar,3em tha� —-- � pPonrufr u�'�Gry w promole n�rd implement z . - • � Fl�1��o(��dta I. i.�,-: ,;,,, � � develnpmen!o�alicmoGS'�enc�gy soiirrer sucli ' �� „� I I� �IIIRt € as gcothem�Al mergy and hiu�nwss - ❑ Geote"gre�ri'trrfrr>olnbry h�r:irressex to proride - -' ❑ �mhrmr.ncighha�Anod sn(�ty nnd tisual __- --- �_:� �b appurtuniries ol�eul tl�fuugli s�ee�s�np��vn�1�ac�rde r` p f'annrr xTrh C �alm m�en!die devr�a rr�r�d �P�U��nnrf�rn�erty malrlieJ7nrx2 }.- r ry � �' [3 &lQhJsli accessihle�xdti�s�ria�i nnd f G. �`�� I 1 1.7 I'; o(er�e+gy und green��chnologies tieFdcuh�r�an�.ctiuns ra the�pck site �!{ i, � _i C] EnrourQge deon crrer5ry mnnagement sY�ptegies _ hy using renetiwble arod d�n encrgy ❑ Cnnsider G'ry-sponsared progmm(�r I�' iosm2G[enhqfKCrtlenis Ip bu5ine5SeS iq tha Wasiiington Ncrghborhood �� Pa;e 11 i FAMIilES,1�CHl1i�d&ECkl�G4i�'ON-NF1GH$QRF14D[]5TRA�'EGIES PtAN ��m� �i„ � � . � md��er� a�met2 rhd tx��s [ af ��►=�P� s ❑ Er�fwnce erisSng unnsportauan servi�es '-" -';� ��ct� � ES fstaG4sh a bicytle sQ/ery pmgrorro �'� -� � � q Oevefpp o yourh[oNahamtive � L � - � ❑ Gea�c a�ecdUock rysxem�iu yautli �'�"� � ❑ Fslabl�sh oppartui�rties Tvr irrtrnmurd spons,6r11e ' � '�"'�'" 1eo r ro�orns,ond 1d dorxcldri@ teom �ii�, � � g p� �.ri �'r: ,-r--:. . 4 �,. ' � �, -- �. ��ea -: _. � � �-,z�� .", �� `�,�: i € ,�,f"��lf.t�L�,S r,�.+.�.. _.. � � .�.�.. -� ❑ Gemc e calendnr a(e��rrrts ' ---. ----•_—_-_ __-.�y�., ❑ PfnnasparuondheollhfQir `; k-• 1 +�' ±. �; '[ C l.'..',,'r•!�:.�;i:!;:��,,��r�firi'��;��r;;�;c:•;;;(;�i��rir��;� i L3 Prcrnn[enn"EQ(�Creet'progrQm � � � ....-��r:�:-��-- - � - .-��., �' - - :��U'::a::�r=l�].��`' �1'.,i4�-��.�" r �, � ��'y. _ •p [ulrYyfl�Ijr �: �.1��uw7m�a!km6y Ccn:cr Q�p�py 2: Momsseh Na:ixe & 7- Prrsro«fkmrntary Scfroc! � i: AucbEvn Fkmentory SchoaJ £� 5- Sc�loys 4iurch&Prc-Schvd � 3: sc fdM:��il�«��Cn,�rcn ��: 'n �fr n i�jy�,(d'p� ]: S�John}EyccopclCAiurh = Q �m�lrGve tlOnSff SCIL7CC f0 I 8� k Arukk's Q+wrh fhe neigFr6wfrood 9: lmmonoNCon}yegadanolGunh , � 10: St M1ivul�eir twlinm Gwrh ,�� ' I!' Unrtnrivn IlniwsvLp �,:.]F� iE%i5r1Rg R711Jk5�C1r[�i2 iz Fin�NesBnniw'Chu�rh -� Green and fted lines are f7: AuverofP fer f4��' � shavn on the mQp} 19: Se Pauh Luihervl Q+urch I IS: SoAnwnArmy 7a; vu+u�gu�r:eswo�o�, � PACIC 517E !7: Crrscmt Comm.Henlch knler r$ P�� 085 GENEftATORj �s: xv:hr�y�wirooruwmy ��'y �U Preunmuon ton�m C��«r � 19 zr: imm�a��owrano�'�r Esmblish so(e end orcrar- 27: p�roGw�NnvYxw five pedestriQn cor+nection �3' k°'s"" 6cnveer�Pack Site nnd the I za; n+v�ro+fwi� �T 4Nr:sFrington Alei I,borhaod 25- !]�8uqvc FcW Ponuy g _r�' � �$ + � , 23 g . 5� r.�1 y—rr�/ s , r !D Js �' � �{i n�,nrso:� fs � � n � P� �s� r � 3 � I ;� .� r3 s3s1 p Enhon[e fhe nergh6ol �' ff � i�ood's bike rouie sys[em • � f _ � �fs � � � 25r {exrsting&�lanr7ed ror1[es j�� I2 � `� ":�. 2� � . } Provide gatcway�eoture are shawn nn[he mupJ � r r ��.� �--fr 20 _ .3t afang�he I b'6 St corrrdor Fl C�� ,, to mnrk[he eri[ry in[o the 1��! � Wnsi�ing(on Neighborhood ,�� ,p5 _ '-.F' _.. ' �+ 1 �6 zz�- ,�:.r� C_� Prav+de�ocQl paint svirhrn -�� fu[kson PQrk to mark[he westem terminus of rhe ,,:�• � �t5�4$[CpTI1dOf � �+1 ✓ � f l• ❑� 3 � •� Explore pofen[ipl ta � '.� establrsh tI�eLNas7�fngton ffj�� 7 �• ' b NergFrborhood Welcpm- � ing Cen[rr wid�in n high!y !� A �•'� aaEs[a a visited oren,such ds afang � 8 k �1, sa+aa�a �� i�te CenValAve rorrrdar �I' S • �� q'CP.ECSEQLf�A�Cf '{� FfISTp�IC �7 '; ' � M1tl�Qft Errhan�e rhe srreerscope ��i rs � , � a�S7R1C�F- olong the 16`St corridor �1. � Z''� ' to creote an ottra�tive �j, be[�veenrJCeni alAve a�nd '��, ��'�� 1 f `'�, S 1 � rhe udaj�er,t Pack 5tte '�� ❑Er�ruu�oge pwe�rt respo2si&hry ��' .S � ❑ Sup�orY t�rogrnms rQr merrtorrng,arer-sclwo! 1 �� - ncii�r[res,rerreefean,and�u6 4�oiring �� ❑ EstobhYh a"sirrrugero pn�errt'prngram i F' I J4ldrirrdn dia n�hbar�� p Ensure su�e�sb7kin�ra�nes ta fcey neighborhnod []Endb&sh n�ommun�ry gnrdrn � dSrEl.�2ePp�0�Cr11►r destin��tions ❑Pnrura K;d,rry m 1��p�r�rna�e��en r�va�;v�s �' $ Irkni�'�et�vxp ICS 9�C]Roride rrrr(r�c cahr�rng devi[es m dMe�speedmg ❑pLy��.7op greerr spore nrHi plar4s ro improve open ;��;_�� { f15'O�u�f�grarrt�ls�• m�mo)or sne��s spuce nvarlats�a[o rc•vderns r� • �� ❑Prande S+Ir rrlrks to enmurogz E�7eng ond prwi�, y_ secure 8rke slaogz ,�� ,: R Or,a'uh n re�uc nnd rr�cyrf�ng prog�on��u t�mir ri�y tl�s neigh6ori��x1,ed�irate ohou[erni�arvnen- fA!slewardshi�,nnd oaarejahs Pa};e 22 � I-fQUSING-NEIGFIBORND�D SZRATFGIES PlAI+� Cmate n�ng ❑19uride Muv�resnurces tfrou�h uWasi�ar�on ❑ F.dixo[e�omnwrrry o�rofes er+d respor+aifxlnics �' ��po�jp7�� Ncti�hborfwod Welrwr+ing Cenae� o�Drope+zY mmers,fbmeonzrcrs,und r�r+lers � mmrrrurvfyyrvrstmerr� ❑Marir[area to prospecdve nzw Fwnx6yers ❑ Prrn+de risr[s ra new�e.siderns ta�+rlcome thcm * . y'�I'.ur,, �r��L 0 FsidArsh a n�arl�ting ProBram ond drsgn to rhe r�ei�h6ortiaad � 1:f_''' � � and�mfed n neSV�nge �ubGc imprwr�rxrrts m project orea as Q'�oo!" [] EstoDGsir n Wosf6ngror��feigh6arfwod Nourng c as a hip ndEhbar�oDd nnd nekomng nei�frborhaod Resou�ces w�e6srte�or in(armarion ond resouro- Ilr � ❑Cnnrx+ct�rer�hborhaad[a o�a�en[�cts es�iromeourrers ond rerrtrrs � � . ❑Comidrr Hiscoric District designutlon _ P+nri�e egr�atabd�ce ofho�hip Consider opplyi��g che C+'ty's conservauon district , ' �: � '' bl'p+��+8�+A Q� standards m proprrties rl�rrt nre rurrenty xoned � ,��,' r'„� ' ho+►+�+'+��• R-2R to nddress cancern over ino pro�nate conver- - o Expandpar�.xrsl�p wnh�ubuque srons ond replocement o�sing1e-�milY homes Ei+at � - - - 8ank&Truse to ac uPreracarn6udd- hove resuked in tf�e loss o(d�e historu�hnructer ��'��:-� ��<<i��=� Q must he Qddressed.�fhrs wrll enrauroge more ho- '�'�•'�' inps ar�d provide►owinterrstlaaris meownershrp oppQrtuniries os�vell as preserve the _ _.. o Erpnnd hw�xmw�ersNp krrdn%pro- rhamcter a f the neighberhaod. �rom(or re�rtaf cornrcvsions •vr` : ❑ ?rm�ide a ta�eted(argivo5le foun pro- _.;�. • �1.j � p gram{ar senars for home mpnirs " - '�== ,� v r. ❑ Crtvte porme�slup with fwsinesses[a � .� � � o�zrFinrJ�ry+rrAssrstedHousinp � ., . �i� lr;�I��f ' _ � - _ ~� FQcus initial neigh6arhoad _ _ I � r-•- � �. �:'. �.r•+,' /� [onserrot1on Qad fn�i11 � y � � ;_::,��•'-., `...i �.� C3" �.3 �:;W t��.` ;� '.��_ � .� . ' � �:1� e�{oris in nren east❑( -_- �-• .'�. � �❑ Wh;te St,soutf�af 2f"5k - - - _- _ �.i: ` ,�: _ - - __ -- _:yp?:�;��r .i i -� �� • � narti�a f 18'�5�,ond west -= i :'i � , � l� . e Elm 5t and t�e Five _. { �. 1 I ��'_"{ '�� i' �. � -, Q f =i�� - �, ��_I1 , � Pnints cnmmerciol distrlct �l.Jf-=,f��-;�=..' IJ -C�� ' � � -- _ __—_=.=. �r�[::: .� .,�` _ _:� � �- � ' � -�7 �L � � � �1 krrprwe dre qua6ty,mafrrtr�wnc�.und � ci � fiACfC SITE �pp��►�p�p��. _ — {�oas c��►roRy -j � -� _ ❑ �rgQ�e a Renfe�sAssodmian �. � �` � � Estoblish sd(e nnd d[trac ❑ Aroride tQ+�eted edure�ion�w lendfnrds �ti '� �-' •—' �ve pedestrian cannertiurr ❑ fxpandr�malda[abase t' � ,�:1 ' �� ' r �', Washir+gtocNeigh6a haod Cl En�orce dry codes _ _, �_� � G�, � • - �' � :r=C � _C� � ��; r,�r . � � ��, �� •� � �: l��- _ � •:� -/ �` � ��=�. =r � , :i.:;. _� ,`J� `�� ❑ ; :w' S � � _"�. ` i. -S�� 1� �� •.J J� `"�,��. .r '� : � ' 3�...�J !'.C��, r � "� `l�� =�"�� , � ra� 1=;9��, Provide gr�te�oy(eQture .►�� , �=� ;-�' afongrhe r6 51�orridor , ta mork ihe enfry i��to tf�e C� � �i ' .1 .� � }� � Woshington Neighborhoad :�� ' �� -�,�=� _ �= ,:, . ,n� f,. �' r � F��oura e residen[rd1 Y� 1�x�s,ar ,� •� � �'�� ''1•' redeve�pment tn(al- � � ' 1aw plons estoblished�or Provide�oral poiiit+vfti�in "� � 1 � ti�e adja�ent Warei�ouse fockson Vork Io mark the . � 1 � � •. � �[ �rsirir[to ihe sou[h western[erminus o(the „s9 �1�[`� � � 16'�SI rorridor ,`�]�,] , '� _ :� • .: � � � "�� -=�:o� Expfore potenoal w estnblish the Wdsf�ingion ��` ��'�' 1� t'S� fJergl�her}�ood Wckam- ' � � � .�_ u Fn�Center Wirf�in a highly rResrrn-r. � } ' � �. 1 visreed weo,such ns n�ong scxaoi�. T. -� � tf�e CentmfAve carridor nu+ur,nr, '• , � •: 4 y15T C savacE , t�,� , �� Mrt�v�a� `a '- ` ��srRS Enhanre the sVeefscape olong[F�e fh`"5t co�rido� ��Quruge ne7ghhorhaod ronservniean tn sup�or!hoirs- to rreote nn onrective ��P+��a�+d rehohiliration as wel�us stQbrfrxe�ammunl• _ ty-ariented busir�esses and services,j�orticulorly buildrng pedesiripn-0ricnted link Enl�pnre ronnertivrty 10 be[ween CenrralRve and upon the success oTProjeet Concern and t��e Crescent the Historic M�!l�vork(?is- Communiry Neairh Center on�horing rhe edap[ive the udojcent Pack Site reuse o(the(ormerl7uhuque Casket Fodary � trid nfong Woshrngton SC Faicuumgts�ohic ar�d�rNate�eart�W � Fnhmia tha quaPfy wtd e+�e((Jde�xY ef r hrprosx d�e a�pnoror�x of tha r�dghbarfiood ho�rslny�fa�Wdathrs. i� _r. [aatlavUre�n4l�dndiG t' �� f' � � ❑Conduct�reenn;and f8f+p�i W�P�Br� t7 lmprm�c pvtdc sveetsrapes ns nn inceirfire�nr prop• ry ap n erry wnrerx ta lrnen in thev prvperaes ' o Esca�Cish rner ent 1ncmUves r rema�s � l' - C}Prorrdc o nwtrhi nd r otade im rv✓ements V YY�� ° - +'F�' �° � p Q Pmridc r�ew rosidrnrs x9rh Ir�o�matinnnl mct andporrh rcirnbs ai adrFrions rio-Rs dbwn rraimu�mnp�nerPy a��iem iwni�s -y ' �� '. Pagr.13 Dubuque, IA- �ff cial Wehsite-Wask�ingtan Neighboriiaod De�elopment Carp Page I of 1 �e4�ai €,�� ';k'drC(:�rp�G iy:r - �f.-.,�� . ..._ *��- -..t�R• ��a��E��+�Search It�e site .� ��f��.�•��I.�i-� �, .: _..a� - ,..�;�; .. .. _ .. _. � i��;�'r��.�i�.r��,., , �;i�x;"=�%j�'�.s�.��C�.�+� _ � r � ticJ�i�ii:•l:�.?�.�h,_�L':5 �:��?��f=[:V�;1�{I�h1lE ��.i��1.�<.i�.io.]�rprik��lr�liiE iE lli��IkI��E:;V{}E�"k=i��'��1��1��;��:3.[ilr.+l.dl�:�i�il�'.�i I You a:e h�:e'Hui?le�Gov2r.^.mer[��Oar;me-^.tsA-I-i�i Inusir�q R Cm-�munitv l:•a.elocmcd•_t%N�asisv��cc;�h2iah:��l��od.^.Fviial:ialiarl7 �� Ll ti S i�!l`s i�ks L"� Washingtan Nelgh�orhaad De�eEopment Corp l7[Fi�LT�7U�: Wa�hingtan �leighborhood I]e�elapment Carpnration ��- rW�'�� }�• ��•�� 7he first meeting aFthe WfdPC was held in July 2�49,signifying the formation oF a new nan-praf�t eorporalion to -"—"---- promate revilalizatian effflrts in[he Washington IJeighborhoad.The WN�C is staffed 6y a Fulltima executi�e � ;e��.�':��`-��'l��1;�;4f a director,initially Funded by tiie Cify of aubuque.A board of directors lias been recruited fo represent lhe interests af - stakeholders,including the Washingtan Neighborhood Associaifan,landlords,k�usinesses and lenders,and r,ity �I�1.��1�f1�*�!f�ifU= � y0vernRlent. LC,�U�i��,�n�C`�S 1�,�:i The corpara�ion will promote aclivities fa imprave the aelghk�orhood in a variety of ways.Pianned inilialives incfude farmirtg a 6usiness owners associalian a[slorefranl t�usinesses in the upper Cenlral Avenue carridor,eslahlfshi�g a - weEooming center and a nefghGarhood wehsite!information exchange,and creating a marketing theme far ttte tA 1� ' neighborhaad to ativavl hQme buyers and new business investmenY.Grant writing eEforts v+ill concaiitrafe on a[tracting capital 4or assistance tv new smafl pvs9nesses and'ninhe'-type retail operalions. White Street Condamin�um Praject "We see Eamtation of[his de�efapn�enl�orparation as an important slep in efforts tb impro�e the Washington Washingtan Neighbarhood Neighhorhvod,'said 6oar�1 president Jim Schumacher."We already have in pfa�e an area of hisforic housing tha[ Ele�elopment Corp wauld 6e ihe envy of maiiy olher cilies.Wa ha�e co�m,erned citixens and a responsfve cily governonenl.The WNDC can Ue titie catalyst for attracEing resources,�nEunteers,and leohnical assistance to really restora o�ir neighhorhood as a place where people want to start businesses,huy homes,and raise their families.' Select Language �' ContaC!lnfornaatian: _... ....... -._.. Powered ey��g�'TransEate Washington Neighborhaod Qevefopmeni CorporaEipn Angela Petsche-Executive Qirector 169Q Elm Streel Phane:5s3-582-1i11 Email Site Pfap � Calendar � Translation � Acress�qillty � Linking Poliry � ❑fsclaimer J Copyright Nntices � pawered�y CfVicPlus http:llwww.catyofdubuque.o�•gli��dex.aspx?NID=13�2 a 1/13/2011 Planning Services Departinent City Hall TFi�CITY OF (3u�UqUe 50 West 13�Street U �t an,an,e,�cac;ty Dubuque,IA 52001-4864 , _ � � (563)589-4210 phone Ivlasterpzece ori tl�e Iviississippi g � (563)589-4221 fax 2�� (563)690-6678 TDD �lanningC�cityofdubuque.org � January 3, 2011 Dear Washington Neighborhood Property Owner, The City Council is considering expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District. Before making a decision,the City Council has asked the Historic Preservation Commission to hold a public hearing, and then send a recominendation back to the City Council. While the Historic Preservation Commissioil studies the proposal,the City Council has prohibited new demolition permits from being issued for six months. � What is a conservation district? A conservation district is an area with architecturally and historically significant.structures where the City believes demolition permits should be reviewed before they are approved. The Historic Preservation Commission reviews demolition requests in conservation districts. In conservation districts,property owners have an additional City loan program to help with exterior repairs to their buildings. The loan program is available to homeowriers,landlords, institutions,and commercial businesses in conservation districts to correct exterior code violations. Loans are available for up to $25,000 for 10 years at 3%interest. �Why is the City considering an expansion of the conservation district? While the residents,property owners,businesses, and institutions give a neighborhood its character,the buildings and streets give a neighborhood its sense of place. Expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District responds to the Safe Community Task Force recommendations by encouraging more homeownership and mixed-use opportunities,while at the same time preserving the architectural character and sense of place of the neighborhood. � Expansion of the Conservation District also implements Economic Development and Housing action steps of the Washington Neighborhood Strategic Plan. A major focus of the Strategic Plan is preservation and conservation of existing historic buildings and storefronts for expansion and new business opportunities, and as a special part of the neighborhood's identity. Expansion of the Conservation District is an important action step for neighborhood stabilization. � V�here ean I�nd out�nore about this proposal? Enclosed you will find a flyer with questions and answers about conservation disfiricts, a map of the proposed expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District,and a notice about the Historic Preservation Commission's public hearing. You can also contact the Planning Services Department at City Hall,by phone at 563-589-4210,by fax at 563-589-4221, or by email at plannin�a,cityofdubuqe.org. Or stop by the open house from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. before the public hearing on January 20, 2011 in the City Council Chambers,Historic Federal Building. Service People Integrity Responsibility Innovation Teamwork � i Planning Services Deparfinent � Cl�H1I1 THE CTTY OF � ()U�UqUB i 50 West 13�Street �, I Dubuque,IA 52001-4864 ��'�� j (563)589-4210 phone Masfer�iece oti t�ts Mississip�i �� (563)589-4221 fax 2047 i {563)690-6678 TDD planning@ci ofdubuque.org City of Dubuque Conservation Distracts. Wha#ns a Conservation I2i�trict? � A conservation district is an area designated by the City Council that has defined geographic boundaries and contains properties that have historical or architectural value.Not all structures located in conservation districts have architectural or historical significance. The City has 9 conservation districts. Demolition requests must be reviewed by the Aistoric Preservation Commission.Appeals of Commission decisions can be made to the City Council. � Who is the Historic Preservatiori Commission? � � � � The Historic Preservation Commission is a volunteer group of 9 citizens from the community who are appointed by the City Council to make decisions on exterior alterations and demolition requests.in historic districts. The Commission only reviews demolition requests in conservation districts. The Commissioners have various backgrounds and expertise and share interest in historic preservation.IVlost of them live in a district. � What isthe difference between a Historic District and a Conservation District? � i In historic districts, the Historic Preservation Commission is required to review any exterior changes to property that require a building permit and are visible from the public right-of-way (street, alley, public steps, etc). In conservation � districts,the Historic Preservation Commission reviews demolition permits only ! When do I need a Demolition Permit? I You may need to apply for.a demolition permit from the City's Building Services Department if you are proposing to ' demolish all or part of a building or structure. � �Iow long does the application process take? � The Building Services Deparhnent will refer you to the Planning Services Department to begin the review process after ' you apply for the demolition permit. The demolition review process usually takes approximately 30-60 days from the application deadline for the Historic Preservation Commission to complete their review. � VVhat criteria are considered when reviewing a Demolition 12equest? When reviewing a demolition request, the Histaric Preservation Commission must make a determination as to: (1) � whether the building has historic or arcliiteciural significance to the community; and (2) whether denial of the proposed i demolition permit would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property. � If the Historic Preservation Commission finds that deniai of the application would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property, or that the building does not have any historical or architectural significance to the community, the Commission must approve the permit application. If the Historic Preservation ; Commission finds that denial of the application would not prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable � economic return on the properiy and that the building has historical or architectural significance to the community, the Commission must deny the permit application. What funding does the City have for Conservation Districts? - The City has an additional low-interest rehabilitation loan program to help with exterior repairs in conservation districts. Loans are available for up to$25,000 for 10 years at 3%interest per building.The loan program is available to home ,, owners,landlords,institutions,and commercial businesses in conservatiou districts to correct exterior cod�violations. ' ,Informatian is available from the Planning Services Department. i P1am1u1g Services Department Clf�H1ll THE CITY OF DttllUt(U� 50 Wesf 13�StreeE U E �� Dubuque,IA 52001-4864 � r � (563)589-4210 phone Mastet�iece oiz tlie Mississippi � (563)589-4221 fax . 2007 � (563)690-6678 TDD lannin�@ciEyofdubaque.org NOTICE OF' PUBLIC HEARING The Historic Preservation Commi�sion will hold a public hearing on proposed expansion of the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District. The public hearing will be held: DA7'E: Thursday, January 20, 2011 - TIME: 5:30 p.m. PLACE: City Council Chamber, Historic Federal Building, 350 W. 6th Street, Dubuque, lowa At the public hearing, all interested parties may present oral and written comments for � or against the following proposal: . APPLICANT: City of Dubuque LOCAT'ION: Washington Neighborhood PROPOSAL: To expand the Washington Neighborhood Conservation District as shown on the enclosed map labeled Exhibit A. Additional information is available during regular business hours at: Planning Services, . City Hall, Second Floor, 50 W. 13th Street, Dubuque, lA 52001, telephone (563) 589- . 4210. Written comments may be sent to the Historic Preservation Commission at this same address. - OPEN HOUSE Wli'H CIl"Y 1'�FF 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. City Staff from the Planning Services Department and the Housing & Community Development Deparkment will be available fo answer questions one-on-one in the City Council Chamber, Historic Federal Building, prior to the public hearing. F:\USERS1Kmunson\WP1Boards-Commissions\HPC\Wash Nbad Cons Dist 01 20 11.doc 5eroice People Integrity Responsibility Innovation Teamwork .�. ,�' � � "'� �111 �1�� ` ., � 1� - .�� ,, �, ' ',� � � � '-� , � =� �1111 � � , � ,,� ; , �� . � �! � � � � ,.,., � ; `� � ? f� �� ... ,�. ,� ��es � 1 :.� � . �� . �` � ` .�--- — : :. � �°'�' � 0 ``, �� I ��,/� ' ' .�...-• �• i'� :�= �' ,-; �'� � ;��t�- -�� j� /� ...,� : :� ■. .. �e�� ,� �i - � t`� � I ♦ f..� .. � � . � �I �j �.. ,,�, .� �.� ...�. � � ♦ I � % �,-�' - """� � �� ,�'� _ � . `,,`' , �� l � 1•,—. ....r ! � -= : � �, �: � �/ ./ ..— - -- = = o� � � ��, � � � �� ' � �j �- �- � � o r+� < � � � � � •` � �� ,�a , '� ? ��. � , �� - � � � � _ : ► � � o.� ; — � � ... � �� 1 ��r �� ■ � ■■ � .. � � - � � � � � � = � �e �a , � � � � �. •� �■1 � � �' � � � � � � � v � ,_ , e � � _ - � �' � �I� = = � �i� � � � �t. �1 � aii � - ► _ � � ; . � i► . � � �� 1 , �� = n — � ,,,, ' � _,r,�' .. � = � � � �- = 1� e . • _ ■ - � - =� � ' ' �, �!i� � �1�1 : �� _ � "' �� I� ��II �. � �� s � � �.� � �' � o � � � � � � � �1 �� _ _ � � �� — _ � � � _ , , �,� � � — � -- � .� � ` , . . � , � ��r �► � � �,� �� 3 � �� ■ � = .� � = rr 1� � � �� - ��''�-- � �� ` _ i � � � � o �"''. � � �� : � �_ �' � r �.._ � � f � � ; � �� :� . � ,, � �� "7�"� • � � . �� '. � � � � � � � � �I� �` ��rll�� _� = = � � � s: � � � � �'� : � � � �a �� _ � .- � • - � . � _. � •■ . � . �,, � :. . �. 3 1�1111� �� != � i =i � � � ��1 � _� — � � = � v ' �-- 1... � � � �I� ' ■ ■ � �� ■ _�: 1 �� : • = -�� "� �� '' • �. �;�r: � � � � �� •� � � � � � �� a� i � � � � �� a � C � � 1 �� , � �,� ��' � e� � ■ w• ■ � �s�- �� ii ■ '- ' _ � �. �� i� 0_ t � - � � �.� E� =� � �, , ., � ._ . �,,, ..; �.. , '!'._. '�', ., � ;.,,,: ,. � � _ � �� ■ ■ ' � ' , � � •� ' •; i • ! � � �� '. � � �_ _ � ,� � ��. - ' ; � � i�� .. �� _ � r � � �.,�r._ � �____.� � __ . _______�,��.��_��_��_: � —� � � � �� i � � . � � +►- r - �.��,, � � I�� ■� � 6 � 1 rl�r. � � r� � ■� ,�� . * �r /► � a�:. //� � �� ,� t � � r � . - . :� �+ i � , ,,� � , ! - �� , � t � d � w. I• � i. h �� i� ►!li �� a �' ,�'. � �� r � -�.. • `' �r1�� ,r. ► .;; �. • � _ �k '! �� ,� � � - � �! - � � � �, � y : � �y . . � ;! -� ', � '�� . � . :. � ►► 1 �� . � � ■ � � i '� _ � f �� ■ ■! 1��i �,, _� �� ■► ��•� � . � .� i� �` •r - � � • _ ,.:�4 � . �., . - �r . - � � t�'"' �/ ` ■ ��► . �� t� � , � �� . " ►�'' , ., - � �` ^ ' •. � - �- � . . `3 � - .�..�• .� E ' _ �� .. �`� ■1� � �,. �` � ■ - , + � ' � '� , . - '' -j' � �' .rfi �• _ � , ! 1 -' . �� , � ■ y� �� . . � � � i ' ��E° � _ . 1 _ ..- .. • . �� s ' I � , ��, ► ' ' �1 ' � � ... • - . ! � � 1 :.� �i �►' � � / - � � ■ ... •...� _� ,.- � f Relationship to Hist�ric Surveys , , � , � - . - � i � I � � � �� , � � 1 - � � ;� , �f �1 � .�' . � : ! � . � _ , , l� . ` t � � � ,�, � +i c, �.. � f � / � � 7 . �. 1 1• 1 �'� M1 ;: 1 , ' I •� .� _ � ' � f Legend N � Washington I�eighi�orhaad Expansi�n � Conservatian C3istrict � Warehouse �istrict � Phase I Survey Conservation Pfanning Area � Histaric Preservation �7istrict � Phase 1i Survey Cons�rvatian Planning Area I ' � � . • ■ ■ � � - - � � �� .� �■ . .� ` ;, .+ f �:_ � �. ,.� 9,; . � '� `r;� ; � �; �;. �-,:. . i1 � � £• ;: � �' �:. • :�-'' r, � � -. �,::.�•t: � ::. � � � #.:. " ■ 1 r '� ~ •� � s, �r ; r �i ►. '" •�,:. , r ^ � � �. •►. . �„�. r/, '�' y:.. •� � � 1 �. � a . � � y - .a �.a�� ' .. .� � . ,. �. r� �. . � •.:q_: - �s�.. �. � � M/ r� .�. ��L'r- �..+ � �� - "'A .-� � •,s � . . �r � � + � �y`'� . -+'� .�� . �� , 1� �� r- ',�A � .'';,3�. - ,� �` ��.. �� +�' � �'�' ■ i +�'�� '�`:. ''� X.. �' ` � � :;� � � � ��'��.,�.'�� R Y. �� . , =:. ;�A �ie � .�-9 .r: - ..'.ei�F' � �3� r.i� ... :� �. � _ � ,. ,:,�- ► . ,.:j.-�� :; ry ■�' �� a ;`�; �" ;� �+ ��' ; � t �p�� r , ;•_�.- �� r � 1 ��`;` � �~�` - ��■ � . %��;:,. ' � 1 ;�:� 4�'`�; :�.,ya �:. �`.' � i � �i r' ,�� is.�� ■ } :� � � j,. •�,. :�. ' _- 'M�� ',i I • i� ti '�, �'-:�. �� — �,y;. �.. ' � � 1. - , � i+u� `N � � ��.: :�i1� � tiiu � � � �i5� . � �` '� �L ��..� _ �:, � J i �i�`1 _- - �� '_'�� =� 4 ,. . � � 1i�� .4 � � . ,+�' � _ � � ' � �� a�� .. r ��w- � . � � ■ � ■�' o S:i � 1 � / � A , � . . � � .� � 1 �� ^ l � �� .� ��.. .'� �-�. . � � � � � � / i - _ � � .. - -::,. � � � �' � , . �,� y � ;:_ ► ,. • ■ ► �'�:i: 11' :::: a� � � ��.� _ '�� I' r� � '�'fe4s�` �; ;' � _ .�� r.A ,{� � �` '�' ��: ,�';� .� •� ,:.:' � � �; - � 1 e - �-. �' � �!� �- �"� 1:: � " .. 'ti r_ � • ;,; � ,►� 9 •W � / �� ;�:� g :'R�" ' �Tr�� .► - � '� � , � , ,� ,. . . �` _ �� _ ^ , , �e � � ��:�•. - �, =� = ',` � ��t �►.,� �' � ,� . ■ ". ►�� . �`;`�� , . � � :.� �_ . :: , : � ��,: ::1 �, i� �� '�,, � �� :� - �� if� � - :'1 � � �,.- �: . '��. � �� , � ' -�� '�T - .'# - ■ � - �:.� ■ . � � ,r-,. ' `�� • � � � � � 1 � ' . �(� �� i - � � '� � � , � ., � - '', � 1� * • 1 = �.. � •., �F.� - � ■ ; � � � , _� � �, .:, . �. .. r' �� ''.tiY r: 1 ;, `�•■ 111 : � ►► , _:�►� ►�► Section 2—Land Use Regulations Article 10:Historic Preservation Commission i0-11 Review of Demolition Permits in Conservation Districts A. Application of Section: The provisions of this section shall apply to all buildings located in whole or in part within the following described conservation districts: 1. Fourth Street Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of Seventh and Bluff Streets,thence southerly along Bluff Street to its intersection with.West Fifth Street;thence westerly along West Fi$h Street to its intersection with the northerly extension of Raymond Street; thence southerly along Raymond Street and its northerly and southerly extensions to its inter- section with West Third Street;thence easterly along West Third Street to its intersection with St.Mary's Street; thence southerly along St. Mary's Street to its intersection with Emmett Street; thence easterly along Emmett Street to its intersection with Bluff Street;thence southerly along Bluff Street to its intersection with First Street; thence easterly along First Street to its intersection with the alley between Bluff and Locust Streets; thence northerly along the alley between Bluff and Locust Streets to its intersection with West Fi$h Street;thence east- erly along West Fi$h Street to its intersection with Locust Street;thence northerly along Locust Street to its in- tersection with Seventh Street;thence westerly along Seventh Street to its intersection with Bluff Street which is the point of beginning. 2. Fenelon Place Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of West Fifth and Burch Streets,thence southerly along Burch Street to its intersec- tion with West Third Street;thence easterly along West Third Street to its intersection with the southerly exten- sion of Raymond Street;thence northerly along Raymond Street and its southerly and northerly extensions to its intersection with West Fi$h Street;thence westerly along West Fifth Street to its intersection with Burch Street which is the point of beginning. 3. Third Street Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of West Third and Hill Streets thence southwesterly along Hill Street to its intersec- tion with Langworthy Street; thence northwesterly along Langworthy Street to its intersection with Alpine Street; thence northeasterly along Alpine Street to its intersection with West Third Street; thence northwesterly along West Third Street to its intersection with Nevada Street; thence northeasterly along Nevada Street to its `- intersection with West Fifth Street; thence southeasterly along West Fifth Street to its intersection with Alpine Street;thence southerly along Alpine Street to its intersection with Melrose Terrace;thence southeasterly along ' Melrose Terrace and its southeasterly extension to its intersection with Winona Street; thence southwesterly . along Winona Street to its intersection with West Third Street; thence southeasterly along West Third Street to � its intersection with Hill Street which is the point of beginning. _y, 4. Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District �`�= Beginning at the intersection of Sixteenth and Washington Streets thence westerly along Sixteenth Street to its %3��:_� intersection with Jackson Street;thence northerly along Jackson Street to its intersection with Eighteenth Street; e`: thence westerly along Eighteenth Street to its intersection with Central Avenue;thence southerly along�Central �� Avenue to its intersection with Fourteenth Street;thence easterly along Fourteenth Street to its intersection with ��` Washington Street; thence northerly along Washington Street to its intersection with Sixteenth Street which is ;�� v the point of beginning. ��.ry 5. Jackson Park Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of Fourteenth Street and Central Avenue thence westerly along Fourteenth Street to its intersection with Iowa Street;thence southerly along Iowa Street to its intersection with Tenth Street;thence westerly along Tenth Street to its intersection with Bluff Street;thence northerly along Bluff Street to its inter- section with Locust Street;thence northwesterly along Locust Street to its intersection with Ellis Street;thence northerly along Ellis Street and its northerly extension to its intersection with Clarke Drive;thence northwesterly � along Clarke Drive to its intersection with Paul Street; thence northeasterly along Paul Street to its intersection - with Lowell Street; thence southeasterly along Lowell Street to its intersection with North Main Street;thence southerly along North Main Street to its intersection with Clarke Drive;thence southeasterly along Clarke Drive s.-a� _ _- ,niccrzroF , ' �".�-�r�,', . -= r � . _ UB E �� Section 2—Land Use Regulations Article 10:Historic Preservation Commission , and its southeasterly extension to its intersection with Central Avenue;thence southerly along Central Avenue to its intersection with Fourteenth Street which is the point of beginning. 6. VVest Eleventh Street Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of Ninth and Bluff Streets thence westerly along Ninth Street to its intersection � with University Avenue;thence westerly along University Avenue to its intersection with Spruce Street;thence northerly along Spruce Street to its intersection with West Eleventh Street;thence westerly along West Eleventh Street to its intersection with Walnut Street; thence northerly along Walnut Street to its intersection with Loras Boulevard; thence westerly along Loras Boulevard to its intersection with Cox Street; thence northerly along Cox Street to its intersection with the westerly extension of West Sixteenth Street; thence easterly along West i Sixteenth Street and its westerly extension to its intersection with Montrose Terrace;thence northerly along the ! northeasterly extension of Montrose Terrace to its intersection with West Locust Street; thence southeasterly along West Locust Street to its intersection with Bluff Street;thence southerly along Bluff Street to its intersec- tion with Ninth Street which is the point of beginning. 7. Broadway Street Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of West Twenty-third Street and Central Avenue thence westerly along West ( Twenty-third Street to its intersection with Lewis Street;thence northwesterly along Lewis Street to its intersec- � tion with Fulton Street;thence northerly along Fulton Street to its intersection with King Street;thence easterly ; along King Street and its easterly extension to its intersection with Central Avenue;thence southerly along Cen- � tral Avenue to its intersection with West Twenty-third Street which is the point of beginning. 8. Do�vntown Neighborhood Conservation District Beginning at the intersection of White Street and Eleventh Street, thence southerly along White Street to its in- tersection with Fifth Street;thence easterly along Fifth Street to its intersection the railroad tracks; thence east- _" i erly along the railroad tracks to their intersection with the Mississippi River;thence southerly along the river- front across the Ice Harbor to the eastern terminus of First Street;thence westerly alorig First Street to its inter- � section with U.S.Highway 61/151;thence southerly along U.S.Highway 61/151 to its intersection with the Lo- cust Street Connector; thence westerly along the Locust Street Connector and across Locust Street to Jones :- � Street; thence westerly along Jones Street to its intersection with Bissell Lane; thence northerly along Bissell : _ Lane extended to First Street; thence westerly along First Street to its intersection with Bluff Street; thence `:_- ' northerly along Bluff Street to its intersection with Fifth Street;thence easterly on Fifth Street to its intersection with Locust Street;thence noi�therly on Locust Street to its intersection with Seventh Street;thence westerly on � Seventh Street to its intersection with Bluff Street;thence southerly on Bluff Street to its intersection with Fifth '-° ' Street;thence westerly along Fifth Street to the bluff line;thence northerly along the bluff line to Ninth Street; � ; thence easterly along Ninth Street to its intersection with Bluff Street;thence northerly along Bluff Street to its ::= j intersection with Tenth Street; thence easterly along Tenth Street to its intersection with Iowa Street; thence ;�Y=� northerly along Iowa Street to its intersection with Fourteenth Street; thence easterly along Fourteenth Street to � - ' its intersection with White Street,thence southerly along White Street to its intersection with Thirteenth Street, ,:=rrv" ; thence westerly along Thirteenth Street to its intersection with Central Avenue, thence southerly along Central �'��, ' Avenue to its intersection with Eleventh Street, thence easterly along Eleventh Street to its intersection with �A ' White Street,which is the point of beginning. �:. ' 9. Brewery Conservation District i Lot 2-7 of Mineral Lot 322, Lot 1-1-3- 8 of Mineral Lot 322, and Lot 2-1 of Liebe's Subdivision No. 3 in the ; City of Dubuque,Iowa. B. Review of Demolition Permits in Conservation Districts: Upon receiving an application for a demolition permit for any building subject to this section, the Building Official shall immediately notify the Planning j Services Department of such application. If the application is for any building with one or more dwelling i units,the Building Official shall also immediately notify the Housing and Community Development Depart- ment. The applicant shall file the information required in this section with the Historic Preservation Com- mission at the office of the Planning Services Deparhnent by the application deadline established by the ; TE3LCfTYDF ' - - '� , ��.: L��7E��E� ::�� - ; Section 2—Land Use Regulations Article 10:Historic Preservation Commission Commission. If the application is for any building with one or more dwelling units, the Planning Services Department shall provide the filed information to the Housing and Community Development Department. l. At its next regular meeting,the Commission shall approve or deny the application, or table the applica- tion for additional information for a specified period not to exceed)90 days from the date of application with the Commission. A failure of the Commission to take action on the application within the 90-day period,unless the applicant requests and the Commission grants an extension of such time, shall consti- tute Commission approval thereof. 2. The Commission shall review all of the information submitted by the applicant and, if the application is for any building with one or more dwelling units, all of the information submitted by the Housing and Community Development Department,and shall make a determination as to the following: i. Whether the building proposed for demolition has historic or architectural significance to the com- ` munity;and ii. Whether denial of the proposed demolition permit would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property. 3. If the Commission finds that denial of the application would prevent the property owner from earning a reasonable economic return on the property,or that the building does not have any historical or architec- . tural significance to the community,the Commission shall approve the application. 4. If the Commission finds that denial of the application would not prevent the property owner from earn- ing a reasonable economic return on the property, and that the building has historical or architectural significance to the community,the Commission shall deny the permit application. - 5. If the applicant is the state of Iowa or a political subdivision of the state, the City Council shall also make a determination as to whether the denial of the application would prevent the state or#he political subdivision from accomplishing its governmental functions as follows: i. If, after weighing the interests and attempting to accommodate all conflicting governmental inter- ests,the City Council finds that denial of the application would prevent the state or the political sub- division from accomplishing its governmental functions,the City Council sliall approve the applica- tion. ii. If, after weighing the interests and attempting to accommodate all conflicting governmental inter- ests,the City Council finds that denial of the application would not prevent the state or the political subdivision from accomplishing its governmental functions,the City Council may deny the applica- = tion. b. If the City Council denies the application,it shall state its findings in writing and shall transmit a copy of such findings to the applicant. -_�. C. Historic and Architectural Significance Guidelines and Review Criteria: � � >��. �`� l. The report,"Heritage Of Dubuque"dated March 1974 and filed on record on January 27, 1975, shall be �:: �-�s considered as a comprehensive study for the histarical preservation of the City and as one of the guides _:�.- �`�. to be considered at such time as a demolition permit is applied for in a reference conservation district. `�� The City of Dubuque's historic property inventory and any subsequent official architecturaUhistorical surveys/evaluations and nominations to the National Register of Historic Places prepared for any build- ings located within the conservation districts described in subsection(a)of this section also sl�all be con- sidered as guidelines at such time. 2. In determining whether a building has historic or architectural significance, the Commission shall con- sider an application for a demolition permit in accordance with the standards for review set forth in the Secretaiy of the Interior's"Standards for ldentification and Evaluation,"and any subsequent revisions of these standards and guidelines by the Secretary of the Interior. The Commission shall also consider a �mccrry or ��`�� _ �U� E Section 2—Land Use Regulations Article 10:Historic Preservation Commission II � determination from the State Historical Preservation Office as to the potential eligibility for listing of the building proposed for demolition on the National Register of Historic Places. i D. Economic Guidelines and Review Criteria: i 1. In determining whether to approve or deny the application, the Commission may consider the informa- � tion set forth in this subsection. The Commission may also investigate strategies which would allow the � property owner to earn a reasonable economic return on the property,may solicit expert testimony, and � may require that the applicant make submissions concerning any or all of the following information: i. A bid from a qualified contractor showing the cost of the proposed demolition; ii. A report from a licensed engineer, architect or contractor with experience in rehabilitation as to the structural integrity of any structure that the applicant proposes to demolish; iii. An opinion of the market value and the appraised value of the property by a realtor or appraiser: a) � in its current condition, b) a$er completion of the proposed demolition, c) after renovation of the existing property for continued use, and d) all appraisals obtained within the last five years for the property; iv. An estimate from an architect,developer,real estate consultant,appraiser or other real estate profes- ; sional experienced in rehabilitation of the cost: a)to perform the repairs identified by the building � services deparhnent and the Housing and Community Development Department if the structure con- ; tains one or more dwelling units,and b)to rehabilitate the structure; I v. The amount paid for the property,the date of purchase and the person from whom the property was purchased, a description of the relationship, if any, between the owner of record,the applicant and the person from whom the property was purchased, and the terms of the purchase or proposed pur- � chase,including financing; vi. If the property is income producing,form 1040 Schedule E or equivalent for the previous two years; i vii. Itemized operating and maintenance expenses for the previous two years, and the depreciation de- duction and annual cash flow before and after debt service,if any,during the same period; viii.The name of all mortgagees and the balance of all mortgages or other financing secured by the prop- "__= erty and annual debt service,if any,for the previous two years; ` ix. Any listing of the properly for sale or rent, the price asked and offers received, if any, within the _ _ � previous five years; � � x. The assessed value of the property for the previous two assessment years; =-_ i xi. Th� amount of real estate taaces assessed for the previous two assessment years and whether or not �`�`� � _�,__, �,_ I they have been paid; •�_::--:. rc�: . xii. Any other information considered necessaiy by the City Council to make a determination as to E'z=� �-;-; whether the property does or may yield a reasonable economic return to the property owner(s); =_`�� i �=�. xiii.A statement of the applicant's efforts to obtain financing, taac incentives, preservation grants and �� other incentives sufficient to allow the applicant to earn a reasonable economic return from the prop- _- erty in its current condition,and after renovation of the existing property for continued use;and ! xiv.A statement of the applicant's current maintenance and repair activities. � 2. If the application is for any building with one or more dwelling units,the Housing and Community De- velopment Department may also make submissions concerning any or all of the above information, in- _ � cluding strategies which would allow the property owner to earn a reasonable economic return on the property.The Commission shall consider such information. � i ng—��ccrtoc - . _ - , 8�4.�1.3 �`'� '- - �r� x;��`��" '� Section 2—Land Use Regulations Ai�ticle 10:Historic Preservation Commission E. Guidelines and Review Criteria for Applications by the State of Iowa or a Political Subdivision of the State: l. In determining whether to approve or deny the application, the Commission may consider the informa- tion set forth in this subsection and any other information the Commission considers relevant to balanc- ing any conflicting governmental interests. 2. The Commission may require that the applicant make submissions concerning any or all of the following information for the proposed site and suitable alternative location(s): i. Fair market value of property; ii. Estimate of the cost of the proposed demolition,including hazardous material removal and remedia- tion; iii. Fair market value of any property owned by the governmental body that could be sold i�that site is not chosen for the project; iv. Properly tax impact of removing private property from the taY rolls at the proposed location and all alternative locations; v. Any other factors that contribute to making one location more suitable than others for the proposed use; vi. Any other information appropriate to evaluating how all conflicting governmental interests may be accommodated; � vii. The need for the use in question, the effect on neighboring property, and the environmental impact of the proposed use. F. Action: If the Commission fails to take action to approve,deny or withhold action on the application within .the 90-day period, or such extension as requested by the applicant,the Building Official shall issue the per- mit forthwith. ' G. Process for Establishment, Expansion or Alteration of Conservation District: Any person may make a re- quest to the City Council for establishment, expansion or alteration of a conservation district. The process _--_ for establishment,expansion or alteration of a conservation district shall be as follows: ' 1. A written request for the establishment,expansion or alteration of a conservation district shall be submit- ted to the City Clerk. At its next regular meeting following receipt of the request by the City Clerk,the City Council may approve or deny the request,set the request for consideration at a subsequent meeting, set the request for a public hearing,or refer the request to the Commission for a recommendation before �_= voting on the request. -- i. If the City Council considers the request at a public hearing, a notice of the date,time and location y of the hearing shall be published in accordance with Iowa Code section 3623. .�=y,�:: . ;rk:`� ii. The City Council may also direct the City Clerk to mail a notice of the date,time and location of the �:�':; r�<��• meeting at which the City Council will consider the request to the property owners of record in the ;��.: �r��' district. � '��' iii. If the City Council refers the request to the Commission,the City Council may also direct the secre- "��: - tary of the Commission to mail a notice of the date, time and location of the meeting at which the Commission will consider the request to the property owners of record in the district. 2. At its next regular meeting, if a referral is made to it by the City Council,the Commission shall review �. �� the request, and make a recommendation to the City Council to approve or deny the request, or to table #he request for additional information for a specified period not to exceed 60 days.A failure of the Com- mission to take action on the request within the 60-day period, unless the applicant requests and the Commission grants an extension of such time,shall constitute Commission approval thereof.The recom- mendation of the Commission shall be transmitted to the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall promptly - transmit the recommendation and the application to the City Council for its consideration. In determin- �.. ,�� r.,S;,,� ¢ _, .. _- _ , . sn¢crzroa � "�`'E's�'S3 -�"_ . < ._ , _ '- -- ` � �w �� ,,,._ ,.. " _ _ _ � R yH—� _ _?...e:.. '.�_' _._��__.'-- ' �V L i Section 2—Land Use Regulations Article 10:Historic Preservation Commission ing whether to recommend approval or denial of the request,the Commission shall consider whether the proposed conservation district, or the expansion or alteration of the district, has historic or architectural � significance to the City. 3. At its next regular meeting following receipt of the recommendation of the Commission by the City � Clerk,the City Council shall approve or deny the request. H. Demolition by Neglect Prohibited. The owner of a building or structure in any conservation district shall preserve and keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such buildings and structures and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior portion. This shall be in addition to all other provisions of law requiring property and improvements to be kept in good repair.The owner shall repair the building or structure to correct any of the following defects as deter- mined by the Building Official: . 1. Parts which are improperly or inadequately attached so that they may fall and injure persons or property; 2. A deteriorated or inadequate foundation; 3. Defective or deteriorated floor supports or floor supports that are insufficient to carry the loads imposed; � 4. Walls,partitions,or other vertical supports that split,lean,list,or buckle due to defect or deterioration or are insufficient to carry the load imposed; 5. Ceilings,roofs,ceiling or roof supports, or other horizontal members which sag, split, or buckle, due to , defect or deterioration or are insufficient to support the load imposed; ; 6. Fireplaces and chimneys which list, bulge, or settle due to defect or deterioration or are of insufficient � size or strength to carry the loads imposed; 7. Deteriorated,crumbling,or loose exterior siucco or mortar; 8. Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations, or floors, including bro- ken windows and doors; 9. Defective or lack of weather protection for exterior wall coverings,foundations,or floors,including bro- > ken windows and doors; -- 10. Any default,defect, or condition in the structure which renders it structurally unsafe or not properly wa- `- tertight; i � 11. Deterioration of any exterior featiue so as to create a hazardous condition which could make demolition � necessary for the public safety; `= i 12. Deteriaration or removal after the effective date hereof of any unique architectural feature which would ,: = ; detract from the ori inal architectural s le• `;�-?: g tY � .:�__ r>��. 13: Deterioration of exterior�stairs orches handrails window and door frames cornices wall facin s and� �"�`X ' �P > > > > g � �.._�:: I architectural details that cause instability,loss of shape and form,or crumbling; i��-=;: �¢.:�. 14. Rotting,holes,and other forms of decay;or � � 15. Leaving a building or structure open or vulnerable to vandalism,decay by the elements,or anirnal and/or =� insect infestation. 10-12 Conservation Planning Areas � At the request of the City Council,the Commission shall conduct studies and encourage special attention to the ° public planning, design, construction, and maintenance needs with respect to land use, transportation, public utilities, public facilities, housing, open space, historic preservation, urban design, and other elements of the j Comprehensive Plan in the following conservation planning areas: i i noecmor _ . ,5 ' � L7B Et ` --� � ��E� �. � i :�� Section 2—Land Use Regulatibns Article 10:Historic Preservation Commission A. Phase I Historic and Architectural Survey Area: an area located in the Washington/Jackson/Elm Street area north of the central business district in the Couler Valley, which consists primarily of the Central Avenue, White Street, Jackson Street, Washington Street, Elm Street, Pinard Street, and Kniest Street corridors be- tween 8�'and 26�'Streets. B. Phase II Historic and Architectural Survey Area: an area northeast of the original plat of the City of Du- buque with two distinct sub-areas: the Rhomberg/Eagle Point neighborhood which consists primarily of three streets(Garfield,Rhomberg and Lincoln)running Northeast and Southwest from Kniest Street to Eagle Point area; and, the Linwood district, which consists of streets located on the hillside between 22nd Street and Linwood Cemetery,from Queen Street to Jefferson Middle School. C. Warehouse District: #he area encompassed by 12th Street on the north, White Street on the west, and U.S. 61/151 on the east. 10-13 Appeals from Commission Action A. An aggrieved pariy may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the Planning Services Department within 30 days from the date of notice of the Commission's action. B. Upon filing of a notice of appeal,the Planning Services Department shall immediately transmit such notice and the record of the action before the Commission to the City Clerk. C. On appeal, the City Council shall consider only the record of the action before the Commission. No new matter may be considered. D. The City Council shall consider whether the Commission has exercised its powers and followed the guide- lines established by law and this Article, and whether the Commission's action was patently arbitrary or ca- , pricious. ` E. The City Council may affirm or reverse the Commission's action,or may refer the matter back to the Com- mission for such further action as may be appropriate. The City Clerk shall give written notice of the City Council's decision on appeal within seven days of the City Council's decision to the appellant and the His- = toric Preservation Commission. _�� F. An appellant who is not satisfied by the decision of the City Council may appeal within 60 days of the City Council's decision to the district court for Dubuque County,pursuant to Iowa Code section 303.34. -: 10-14 Inspection 1�; A._ After a Certificate of Appropriateness or Certificate of Economic Non-Viability has been issued and a regu- - = lated permit granted to the applicant,the Building Official, City Engineer or other�local autharity may from -- time to time inspect the wark authorized and shall take such action as is necessary to enforce compliance _ �== with the approved plans. ::� � ,�. � _ :+=;=�e; B. Historic Preservation Commissioners may from time to time inspect, from the public way,the work author- `_� ized and shall advise the Building Official or other enforcement authority as necessary to enforce compli- , `�� ance with the approved plans. =�; � ��, �� 10-15 �iolations;Penalties � It shall be unlawful for any person to disobey,omit,neglect or refuse to comply with any provision of this Arti- � cle,and such person shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 1-8 and 1-15 through 1-17 of the City Code. �' ' - �� - .n¢crrvor ' rta� - - - - 1�U� �125124�� H!!�eT��1 l��a�� .r., r��r�v�7[R[�P,Is��c-4-�xPQ�S{a� _T,r'�- Expans�fln of tha Washingtan �r�v c�.c.:,,.;_. � � ' _ t.J•�- NBighb0Yh0od i fi:4%�.t: ",:.;-::, ..:r f� ��C'fC.i•��[e-�::i:;.;�� -;.�� C9FISBCV3LIOf1 DISG'ICl { �_``�� iinplements: �. 111�1[_I_.l;�rl� _ n; k f,��,' r ' � Eoonomic Developmenl '��'"� � � �.A r�, and HousingStrategies of I,;:.�� .�. r, ' - '��.�. -��_�� . ". tha Washinglon . �F 'p R n ^ hleigliborhoo�5lra[egic , � � : e...,?��.�,;, Puh�ic i-laaring an Fr�posed Fxpansion of tl�e • --� _.. _ _ .. Plan "=:1'�7f.:-` � WA5[-I I NG7Q1V N EIG3-IB0�21-lQ�D Re�ommendatlons af[he � '"��F-,�� =-"�'{y�r, �� n!.y^�.!��:i!r-i� i��t�sirsr:�-ii.�nnri � i: F IT R ��. C� aERVATiC3N RISTftICT SaFeCon�munityTasl� __� - � rn�-„-er•.�.r,sn�q f.rc,��,��+ Fwcc �+ �i7R�'9'�ll., ..� ' _i �.��_::_��. WASHINGT03U NEIGNBDRHOOD ASHI�VGT��!NEIGFiB�RN00[3 :}F�ilF��f71{1F/31•.�.'!I'�flnryi.11�n�n .!�I.^l317n;�:�I..?!AL".ir�ll�l?fl�llnll� S��t��'��l�P�l� �T��E��!� MaJorsirategfes related to preservatfan: Majarstra[�gies rerated[v preservation in pface �reseNe vacan[stnrefronts la reser�e an inven�ory of and underway: available,good quslity space for expansion and new His[oric�Arc�ite�tural Svrvey�Evalualivn canduc[Ed, Gusiness opporluni[ies. 1'Jashington NeigF�borhood Revitafization Vision stated, Meinlain and pre5er�e the exiSling hisEor�c bu3ldEngs ar�d �ity,�acus of Neighhorhood Stahillza[ian Programs. urhan tabric af[he Cen[ral Avenue I�usiness district as a sper,ia]par[of ltie ne�g�ik�orhood's bra+zd. Washing[on Neighbarhoad�0�elop�nent CorporaliDn Expand exis[Fngcai�sarva�ron districis to[ha ereated. +ie7ghhorhood bour�darles., y=..'-, '�rasni^geo" 'i * S�-, ��9elgh6arhaod �� !•1 e�efopment -_ 'orporation �k#��t!l��TaN}�EiG�a��°n V�IF�,�F'I�I��a�O��VEIG�IB�RFi�OD �� vE�� — � [--�iZ�--... �rr �.;i.� D�er 531 Million in Pu61ic& � Bring[ngthe Neighborhood Back i�!�� •�� `'`� ::.z.�1 V l:<.. .��. r, + Private Inveslrnent{New ,,,,6,��,�,My One Porch at a Time E;:�� ,= '�'�' ��'-a _��.- � Cons[ruction&Rehahiiitatign}. White Street Condominiums ��:. ��-�;Y "e'�.�'•�.!; '. y,_ •-.---.,�:: �. Nearly 54 A7il[ion Invested Gy lhe 1'r�" `� . Upper Cen[ral Avenue Corridor ��,,�, ir��, � '' . ��•- �- --• '. City far ttomeowner&Ranta� -�_ e. InitiaG�e f. `��>>� �. � • � r�'j��{; r'-�i'�7 Property Rehahilita[ian. �. rT --- - - � '`�"�'�3r"=:• . , � ; '� � ��_�� F�roperlyow�iers and l+usfnesses �.:;• j.�.t�.•.•'t �' � � - , �� haUe investetl over 52,2 Million ' ` ��` � ��,1�""'� �1 , � . . � ; � :'� g `� , Y��i`;�.� �� _� ; � �'r+�,� `� for rehahiiitation. �`1 � � � ;�,.', ' L c �. - J '-'�c �= .i �� r i �1'."InE'1. -�� A _�� ;�� ___ - ... . ..r� �l• F'�J' - 1 � �i2�i2a�� AF��M�I�!1�ITY T��tS�� IMPRCT DF D�MDLlTI�N5 f3��l��f��A-li��$ err.�i_�rr� �� ,r,�,f��-��,�,�.., Resporids to 7aslt For�e recommendatiprtis: Encourage homeownershi�and mixed-use npportunities, Preserving the Neightiorhood's historic and architectural ,`,_�` `" � ; character-ii�sense of.1ace. �� '� �� _ +i-'�c=_i. .. i 41.. _ qvr �,;;-:�... � ��:,�t:, ,� ; _ _ �._'� . � � F ' �ti � �F:�_V•t�ci�7.:'r ... _:..� - _ {�I•�1 I_.. �l�s's�.;f `'',+��5 r��,� � _ � 1• ' [��. -_�1yic_ ,�Il� 1 lfl fi il�L{:=•;�''. � _ I� '.-k;i - -- _ . � t��rn�s}�wf: � `�'��—�'�'��. �� - - �� `• ��-�..�'�. I 1�VIPACT OF l7EM[ILITI{3NS I{VIPACT�F DENi�LITI��VS 1 R1s.Fl1'1 !-i�. �i! ,•Y?i-11!lNF�s !i71� `-7r�� izr 1•.if�53�1�5 �:•7 J�� ' ��->>tif�:l��. • G r. � I� � r � ��f �� ... f �• .. !{��,� }�' 's r r^ 7:: ' " �'..�lE `k:�F. '�Y��+V �; +. _ I , *�.4�..�� - �...� �u a. �� ;i'`' ' rl1 _ .._ —��- ,-.... �.r�-- S.. ' . -'�_-'-:. ��-. ... , -r`_, , • � � y .. Y � . � �_-�, �-�=- -��a - - IlV1PACT O��E'�IIQLITI�NS IMPACT�F DEMQ�ITION� 114f� �.II�i nr nrl.I{�slr�nlF� ��ri�:.ln1 ne f�i-Ihlnf=tifirn-� � i _ -.,� =.�,�: - �� : �� - _� � z 4��'i4 ',�"�'H�'�" ��4��l� eI �j�'_`.. ; c I �-� . - � .-- J �'9 I I 11_ � �;�� . �: ��..,,;� I � - �4� - .4•J.� - . � , r I filR.^ l�~ � —_ �24 �� +L _ -- __ �- . _ L � ��z�i�a�� r�r,��Hi��TaN��i�}�sa��aoa WQSljI�IGT��V��l�BO�t�flDQ �°i��YA?I��!oi�r�i�-r�xr��us�oN �'o�gs�,�v�r��o�o�s��e�ic��x�Q�as�nry MeatsCityCOdedefinftion _.- _.:--'-_-.'__ Eiis[pri�Pra��erties ;..;,:r-'"��'."'•.,'�"' - ;:Er��nn��,.:._:�._:_ ._� �� .�.. . _ � �1`��°�.�:�`. ��,�;- Encon�passes ii�storically and �,-- : j �.'{� Suhstantial collec;ian of 42fi �•"r:��7;, .: �•. architecturally signif�car�t buiidings, ; y ! ,''�' �.j� i�is[oncall and architecturall ��. �;,1,.• ��-� . � � Y Y :. ,�:: .,.��;';: sites,siructures,or distriG[s, i 'i' '�� signiTieant residentia�and ��`�; ::�r ;� ��•.K = �ls..:- including polential national or lacal ;€ � � ` �I commercia!s[ructures. :=�..,;_,°�L�j��R historic districts:and �•^� f� � �ne oF tEie olc�es[,mosLestahlished. :�:: �i��1' �'�k 1� -,:: ��; _ , .f1�.'[1. is Impor[aiit W maintain an�f �� __.�i f.J, , '� snd mos[diverse residenlial areas of �� -�.'-,�' , � �",. � �..i:: � �.�. •�•. preserve for ils Qconomic ai�d sa�ia� ' Q�+huc�ue. ` [', d-� �;1• valur�and as a neighhor�iood ar area !^,. i"';� . '�'�� Many buifdings are eligihls for the �� `�'•: '�s•�� ,,`•.r oF affurdable housing. � ' � �` ,i,�'3�. .r Nalional Register of His[oric Pla�es. ___ �. � �� .W ��L��. WA5HI�1GT�1�NEIGHBQ��flOd WA5HfHGTUN NEIGH�ORHODi7 r.ttr-�s.�s�rninf4 n�iryfar.�r± rer�� f.!,��71!}!i(]fnf,�1S�'[��!.f�-Ify(tif� CONSERV�4T1��I?T�I�T��Fp`I�S�D� C�1�5��V�TI�I�P�STI��T�xP�I�� „��:. .. ,�. .�.,� Age nf euildi�igStoc€t �,..�. �� Rel�;ia�5ftip t0 fiistoric SUrveys �. " r,� � ��".,p� �� t,i a.i. �?. ! Mast af t��e structures in tltie , �.. au6uquE nas�ve histariC dis�ricts, �-��* ,�5[':; ' � ' )y�.�l.��%�C� � � Washingion Neigtihorhood were bui�t S,;_ . nina�anservaGnn dis[ric[s,and tiy�� ".t• ��, �3.,�,�:��,. y� prior�O[fie 192a's. �-;;;•;� w• [hree�onservalion planning azeas. -.• � r f� �..'.,;;. y,��^',- - y., Poten[ially,a niimher of s[ructures �_-�;'�.�'� Wash€n ton Nei hhori�pad ineludes g � ��r�.�� /'.i��3 �� a or[ion af all tF,ree conserva[ion � nat evaluated in t�te exis[in surve s r�.` - 8 Y �;�'. ,,...,:`�., 5 p �:,=•, could liava hisloric or nei hhorhn d - `:'P S�'��` '��`3 �f � ,� ,:-=:,: g 4 +a.� � ��anning areas, ��.=,: ��r'- 4 �sr•,,. .. �igr�ifican�e c�iie to u-ieir cansiruction s.;F��. .. � ii`�:=�,.', � �iales an6 building slyles. - �,1.+��. �' ': �'d'�`i; '�' __ ��;.';�� =:�]' -- ' �. � c;:r_:-:... -- �`j]. ; ;�,; q:__ _,...-- - A i �'�4��#Il��T��!NE��R��i000 �v�syl!V�T°fi�NE�c��so��onn ' I C��SEl�VAI'14N DISTRICT EXPAHSlQN �0�15�ERVAT��]f5��C��L��15�QA1 The Histori�Preservation Commissiqn(FiPC}must: E#fect af D�signation 11 Qetermine v;lietlier 13iz puilding has hls!orir or arcli�leclur�l �x[erior changes tu�roperty in co�iser�atiori[li;iricls arc si�ifc�ncA;and not mandated:only demofition requests are revieK�eA. 2jkehether denlal of thC dCmnbUun pClrn�l Y�DUId pfG�•..nl In�•pfi�¢e�ly t�rner fmm earning a reesnnahle acannmic rqlurn r�n�h�pr��fr:rly bernal�tion by Negleol is prohi�i[ed[which is similar la the aecar�ing to econonilc revle�r criieria sueciried�y ar�c�da. �uiicting Cnde pro�isions far dangerotis huildings�itywide). If[he buildingdoes r�at have hisia�ic or archite�[uraf �esignatian as a�onservation disiri�I,l�a�veLer,dues n,yl signifiranca,or denial v�auld pra�snt a reasonap�e mancla[e lhal pra�icrty owners under[ake repalrs. economic return,lhe HPC inusl appro�e the pern�i[. ❑rders!or exleriar repairs to�nmply wi[h City Housing ar If ihe building I�as I�ic�oric nr arcniteclu�al si�if�can�e,ar 6��ilclirtig Cacles result from cnde enforcen�enl,nol from denial waufd not prevent a rzasonable econr�ii�ic ret�ir�i, cor�servation dlstric[designal�on. the kPC rnust deny the permit 3 � � 1 � 'f 12512�11 ��I��I��I��44D VV�gI•14�1�1��I�I��Q�,��d�i �o��l�l��v oisTr.��T£?�PPl�S��f ��5E�;!l�1Tf0[V Q��STRI�� P��E�� Additional City Funding Beizef;ts liistori�Preservation Re�ol4ing Lo�n Fund is ava�ia6[e to Pro[ecF architeclurally and fiis[ori�ally sign�fi�anl home owners,landiords,insfi[u[ions,and COmmerClal strtiip[ures lhrealened hy�anlinuous neglec[, busiitiessas in conser�a[ion dis[ri�ts ta cnrrect ex[ariar Pra[e�t the integrity oF Ehreatened 6uildings,stahil�re coda viola[ions. praperFy ualues,and pran�o[e Eong[erm eronamic 13eallli. Lpans ara for up to$25,flD0 For 7,p years at 396 in�eresi. Prouide a review process for deinoli[ion permits and Fhe IIPC re�iews and approvas all foans,subject lo access[o low-in�eresl loans forex[eriar repairs. underr�riling criteria of!he Housing and Cnmmunily StaUih�e neighhorhoods,retaln I�istori�and architectura! Develnpment Program. character an[I sense of place,and foster civic F�ride y�►�5M1�[G Ohl I�EEGHB4RND4 �nli-,t.�E�srr�l\iR 1RF[fyRlqr)ll}�flC1 CO�VSE�VQT�O�17I�T��T��P��I�� Ll E'S11 OI1 S? ��`_�"�;�'�.e��-r�'..i-�`=4:tz�r��a1�,. •--�=5��`� =�='i•f a.+�...:f.�aa� ;. j�' Y�":I. .a•.. ,_•:�,�.;,.,�..:;" :��y r. ,9�F.�''- .� r-':.,--`I;'::r:y3�;.;_s.�y�f p-�.•h��r.,3Fik'.0�.'._�.:{.� .c�,p;L'. =i'�` :�` =�':�s.tr:�y=�"rr��-�;� rY •�4�':,: ,, �!5=:'� ��• s.�� u��? �SC,;;�:�'�,'s�s:.i:�i`*�'§ ` wj ,c`I .� ,�•``4.'��;`.,. �y,3�f"�9j;,,;�'�y z ti �°.^:�� _ .^��+. �.• '`��`��j'�'�'h�;��f>,/� ��:�� ~'�?�'. °'_�`{. •.�/5��..� `.i�/'• '_k, 4 i . � � �[.�.��•, 5��..r�� -r� ,� l[ �: �S� 5--� " .. -__.. �. _ - � -- -_ _.__ �. � � � r � � i J � + ; ' �� .. ' -� 4 � R�� . . 4��-� - + ..�� . �.; h.' ' � "9;'';� �� .. ... . . 1[1' ; � _� ' - � �� a:. : . ��, _F� �-- � � . �- ;� F�. . -.. �i�� .� � �� -- . `� _--___ __ � � � +�_ ,,� �7 � }� �,:�:__ . � -- � � � ^ _ - �1,1�1`_ - �, y .`.; -.- , ,,� I ,;,', r ; � � � ;� ,.a� . i ,, ' { � � � ��a p ' �' � � I r' f t� �. _ • _.. - �' -�� ;�� ',' i I ��. _ __� - - v , — �-�� 4 ri.�`r - . _ { �_��„,.,, . � � �� _ _ ��__: _ �� `ti�..�•,��.� :t.. , _ � � — - I I � i i I � ,rA 1 �i . Y_�� i . � �;- _—r. '��. �i � =i� '�`' � ;`r'"�-�� , �. ,�.,! � , . , - �u _�• .. . �� _ i�� . [�[�� . � , .�;_- _� . . � -- Y- --. �__ �_ _ �� • J ' ' � ^- ^ � �+I �-. � � � - �� 1 I�`�� ti•��t II f.� r r �.,y-1•�.".--� i i f f� r r " � ' ��- �� :�— � � � . V � � � i 4'-:.:�°' � -. 1 ; � " -,r'.-� . '. f �_,{ j�Yt1 � �-._ � -.�. . . '.�s� ; - , r ,�� . � � :"d I _ � i [ � r� ll�-� ��t7�� f�j�t�v► ��v�e �c�v�.� �ll � [S��h �{, I 1 � ; •�.'� `i-5., �2'� ��, I' '�_ �F'� ;,' .` '., -- !q� �+ �F� . 1� � kr . { , ,r.�,� " _ ' f, r; 1� - �♦� y -'�� — �_d � , � ��-. :� ' •_.�e.r4h+� �� i F . f , �� , � � { - ��, � s . • � .� . � �;. � - `r � tr �'r�jl I �� _ ��.,. . _ ; �r :�' - . .+r,�....a.�. t � .�"-f.:. �i%l�.f• ' "}'i:�_••_..;;:^: - i .: ' . . "4.r�-i ' " .�,Y• Y.- -;• � .k�y,� ` t�;r: 4-�i�.� .=..�;}� e; i t a - ;��. '"y ��- I ' �� '. �'* '�"_.� - �� .•r�� i .,^r�� ''�_ - - -;•� -'�! .�. i' f.� '��' `F. . . � � r � _ a. • - • • . . ' ' - _ __ _ � t _ '_ . . _. i /" •M - ';J. 1�.3n�'� � e�' ^ � ��j.� ' . • ��' , _ .,��• -- - �� - - r � �� _ �'� _;-� �`�: r' ¢':::-:r �, .�. • ,�� i> -�' y __ . , -- - -- - �f �_;,-. _ �+ �..�': �w'�`--_ r�`J - .f+ ; • __e.• ^ _ :-_±-�=�.�1.� - , . ��r_� -'-�.. - +-r_ �'�;� , - . _. . - _ -- _ - -- -- ��..—i:�_ �iT _- T - �� ti � . ��"_ . ._ _ �_ � i�T�-� �� -- -- _.- � +ai"_ � - �,i �. • ._ `I � �� (. S . � 1: - - _ ��' x�� • �. �_ " � - 'i�•�` :'4- k• 'i, � '� -- - + _ _:s . _ _- __i�� r''s'- ��3+,ar�+� ,�� Y�F?� . �� l A'-'�f�+-ri, '��!.�-'. �^ � �� • ''��+i r , � . � i ` 8 ��r . .y, � t y � +�ar�� "j , + + - ,�' :+� _� '`�'� • . � �� -�' , .,�r • � ��• � `��'s . �. lct��l�. _ �-''� '�.,�... �� +�U �L�IE 1 �Lu,nn �.�� .��►�� , ��l � F . l S�� S-�; � - - - � � �- _ , � :, - - - --- _ . l _ I `��'� - . , �� - � F .-,rj.�';� �'. x' '_ - - � J�`��:;,. . . �� .�' t �- ��t '�. , � � � y ��J- � •�i . ir � ~Ff :rP� •"V I w�:� . % • .4 i _ _ t' . . '.�� . ' __ _ - ,i�, .� . ._ -. , ---�re ' . _.___...._� " " i'� . .� � 7. �' � � ,+I!.��I i� , � . . `. . . . T � ��r� . . ��. . . , �;:z � ;�. r � '� � '� r . .—'., ,r•�. •� ' � f . i� .''- .�•... ''+V' i�s, �� -. • � � + � - , �.�, . ..� + � � �.� , •' ��. � . , i � I I � �� S �c�l�-�a �[ � � I . HERITAGE WORKS VIA EMAIL ONLY March 26, 2021 The Honorable Roy Buol, Mayor of the City of Dubuque The Honorable Rick W. Jones, Council Member The Honorable David T. Resnick, Council Member The Honorable Laura J. Roussell, Council Member The Honorable Danny C. Sprank, Council Member The Honorable Brad M. Cavanaugh, Council Member The Honorable Susan Farber, Council Member 50 W. 13t" Street Dubuque, lowa 52001 Re: Request to remove 1620-1628 White Street from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District Dear Mayor and City Council Members, We are writing in regards to the item on the April 5, 2021 City Council meeting agenda that relates to the request to remove 1620-1628 White Street (the "Properties") from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District. Heritage Works is a local 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to promote Dubuque's historic and architectural character for its cultural value and its community development and neighborhood revitalization potential. Dubuque's iconic, unique sense of place is irrevocably bound to its historic neighborhoods and the diverse residents that live in them. When these neighborhoods and places lose that historic fabric, the value to the City and its residents starts to erode. On March 18, 2021, Nottingham Properties, the owner of the Property (the "Owner"), petitioned the Dubuque Historic Preservation Commission (the "HPC") for a permit to demolish the buildings on the Properties. That permit application was denied by the HPC by a vote of 4-1. In an effort to evade the ruling of the HPC and to avoid the process and regulations of the Dubuque Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Owner of the Property now petitions the City to remove the Property from the Washington Street Neighborhood Conservation District (the "Conservation District") so that the buildings on the Properties can be demolished without HPC review. We understand that the stated purpose of the requested demolition is to ultimately transfer ownership of the Properties in a vacant state to the Dream Center, a community outreach nonprofit located at 1600 White Street. The Dream Center intends to use the Properties for the purpose of providing additional space to expand programming that they currently have, although we are not aware of their specific plans. We want to make clear that we support the mission and work of the Dream Center and would be glad to 489 W. 4th Street � Dubuque, IA 52001 � 563.564.4080 www.heritageworksdbq.com assist them in their planning and consideration of all alternatives for accomplishing their programming goals. The Dream Center provides vital programming and services to the community and the Washington Neighborhood in particular. We want to see the Dream Center continue its important work in Dubuque. We write this letter not to oppose the Dream Center's planning and work, but to outline why the Owner's request could potentially do great long-term harm to the Washington Neighborhood and other downtown neighborhoods because it bypasses processes that have been established by City of Dubuque ordinances specifically to protect Dubuque's historic neighborhoods. By extension, these ordinances that protect Dubuque's historic neighborhoods also benefit the residents in those neighborhoods by fostering conditions that maximize access to high quality, affordable housing, jobs that pay a living wage and proximity to necessary shopping and services. Strong, well-maintained neighborhoods are the building blocks for quality living conditions. The Dubuque City government recognizes the value these historic districts and neighborhoods bring to Dubuque, and has established Conservation Districts that cover much of downtown Dubuque. The main function of the Conservation Districts is to minimize demolitions by prohibiting demolition by neglect of properties in Conservation Districts and requiring a high bar before allowing properties in Conservation Districts to be awarded a demolition permit. The City of Dubuque has made substantial public investments in the revitalization of its historic neighborhoods in which some of the most economically disadvantaged residents reside. These investments have catalyzed additional substantial private investment in those revitalization efforts as well. Over the last 20 years, organizations like Community Housing Initiatives, Four Mounds HEART Program, Gronen, True North and other stakeholders have rehabilitated over 100 houses that allow residents of north side neighborhoods to continue living affordably in those neighborhoods. Projects in the Historic Millwork District, Steeple Square, the Metz Building and Washington Court have brought additional affordable housing, jobs, vital services, retail and restaurants into these once blighted neighborhoods. Much of the investment in these neighborhoods is funded through a combination of private investment and historic tax credits that are available only for historic buildings and neighborhoods. Eroding the historic integrity of these historic neighborhoods and the individual buildings contained in these neighborhoods threatens future investment in these neighborhoods. The purpose of the Conservation District Ordinance is to protect the valuable historic integrity of Dubuque's downtown neighborhoods that help foster investments in affordable housing, job creation and other vital economic activity within those neighborhoods. The Conservation District Ordinance is also meant to prevent real estate developers from demolishing buildings and replacing them with expensive housing that neighborhood residents cannot afford, thus forcing low income residents out of neighborhoods. The ordinance contains two provisions meant to provide those protections. First, the ordinance prohibits "Demolition by Neglect." The ordinance states: 2 Demolition Bv Neqlect Prohibited: The owner of a building or structure in any conservation district shall preserve and keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such buildings and structures and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior portion. This shall be in addition to all other provisions of law requiring property and improvements to be kept in good repair. The purpose of the Demolition by Neglect provision is to assure that property owners keep properties in good condition and repair primarily so that they are quality buildings available for affordable housing, retail, neighborhood services, etc. The second protection in the ordinance requires that properties in Conservation Districts cannot be demolished without a demolition permit approved by the HPC. This protection prevents historically significant properties from being demolished unless the owner can show that there is no economically viable use for the property. This prevents historic properties from being replaced with newer properties that destroy the neighborhood's historic character and increases the cost of living in those neighborhoods. The Owner of the Properties asks the City Council to remove the Properties from the protections of Conservation District so it can demolish the historic brick side-by-side duplexes located on the Properties without getting HPC approval. In addition to the Properties being located in the Conservation District, they are also contributing properties in the Washington Residential Historic National Register Historic District added to the National Register on October 13, 2015. The Owner purchased the Properties in 2010 for a total of $25,000 according to the Dubuque County Assessor. Since then the Owner has not made any identifiable investment in the Properties. By its actions and by the definition of the ordinance, the applicant has been engaged in Demolition by Neglect with respect to these Properties for the last 11 years. It is likely that for these reasons, the HPC denied the Owners application for a demolition permit. Allowing someone who has contributed to the deterioration of property to the point where there is no economically viable use for the property to obtain a demolition permit under the ordinance would render the Demolition by Neglect provisions of the ordinance useless. By requesting that the Properties be removed from the Conservation District, the Owner is essentially asking the City Council to give it a pass for neglecting its Properties for over 10 years. It creates a precedent that will encourage other delinquent property owners to evade and violate the provisions of the Conservation District ordinance. Removing the Properties essentially amounts to spot zoning and will lead other property owners to petition to City Council to be removed from Conservation Districts throughout the City. Conservation Districts will potentially become "swiss cheese" districts that have properties similarly situated, and in many cases contiguous, subject to different rules and regulations, rendering the Conservation District ordinance meaningless. 3 The City of Dubuque has the obligation to enforce all provisions of its ordinances and should deviate only in extremely rare situations. In the case of the Conservation District ordinance, it should not allow a delinquent property owner to essentially opt out of the ordinance by requesting the City Council to remove its properties from the Conservation District. Hundreds of residents who own and utilize historic properties in Conservation Districts in Dubuque keep their properties in good condition and repair and follow the City ordinances. They contribute to the unique sense of place that all in Dubuque can enjoy. A few selected individuals should not be arbitrarily and capriciously allowed to skirt the provisions of the ordinance because they let things get too far. If the Owner cannot responsibly rehabilitate the Properties, someone more responsible should be given the opportunity to rehabilitate this property, thereby keeping it part of the fabric of historic Dubuque. A City Council vote to remove the Properties from the Conservation District sets a bad precedent and could lead to the erosion of the effectiveness of Conservation Districts as a tool for fostering revitalization, affordable housing, job creation and economic development. We would welcome a conversation with the Dream Center, the City and other partners to learn more about the Dream Center's plans and to talk about alternatives in the neighborhood that might be available to them that would allow them to continue and expand their vital programming. Please let me know if you have questions. Best regards, �� Duane Hagerty President & CEO of Heritage Works 4 Suggested Motion Wording for Ordinances - Motion B / Motion A Motion B I move to receive and file the communications and further move that the requirement that a proposed Ordinance be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which is to be finally passed be suspended. Second & vote called; then: Motion A I move final consideration and passage of the Ordinance. Second & vote called If Motion B does not pass: I move to receive and file the communications and I move first (or second) consideration of the Ordinance. Upon third reading: I move final consideration and passage of the Ordinance. Adrienne Breitfelder From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net> Sent: Sunday,April 4, 2021 3:36 PM To: Adrienne Breitfelder Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website Contact Us Name: Frank Potter Address:3050 St Anne Dr Ward: Phone:5635836031 Email: bewhouchoose@gmail.com City Department: City Council Message: In my late years I have learned how important tourism is for Dubuque as the oldest city in lowa.Avoid at all costs tearing down century old buildings Example for Dream Center. Click here to report this email as spam. � Adrienne Breitfelder From: Citizen Support Center <dubuqueia@mycusthelp.net> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:13 PM To: Adrienne Breitfelder Subject: "Contact Us" inquiry from City of Dubuque website Contact Us Name:Judy Wolf Address:780 Kelly Lane Ward: Phone:5635991479 Email:jewolf@mchsi.com City Department:City Council Message: I was part of a group that met with the Dream Center on Friday to discuss a proposal related to demolition of property north of the Dream Center,as well as the closing of a portion of 16th Street between White and Jackson Streets.Steeple Square recognizes the valuable services the Dream Center brings to the Washington Street neighborhood,and I also support their initiatives through personal donations. However, I am concerned about the agenda item being brought to the City Council tonight, believing there is more time needed for both residential and business neighbors to understand the impact that proposed actions might have on the neighborhood and beyond. I left the meeting Friday thinking that action would be delayed until all options could be reviewed with all those impacted. I ask that the Council table this agenda item to first provide an opportunity for all involved to develop solutions that will be mutually beneficial.Thank you for your consideration.Judy Wolf,Treasurer,Steeple Square-President, Marita Theisen Childcare Center Click here to report this email as spam. i