409 Burch City acquire property
D~~@UE
~<k~
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
November 29, 2004
The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
'"'
Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: Proceedings to Acquire Vacant and Abandoned Property at 409 Burch
Street
The single family home at 409 Burch, owned by John White, has been a long-time
problem property. Complaints about this house and resulting City enforcement activities
date to 1996. Mr. White has unsuccessfully attempted, since a known date of 1995, to
undertake a comprehensive rehabilitation of the structure. The house remains vacant,
uninhabitable and a blighting influence on an otherwise well-maintained residential
neighborhood.
At the direction of Corporation Counsel, a 60-day order to repair was issued by Housing
in September 2004. A re-inspection conducted on November 5 determined substantial
non-compliance with the order. Violations include:
1.
Roof is not weather-tight and does not prevent exposure to rain and
deterioration of the structure. Areas of the roof remain covered with plastic
tarp, with no shingles installed.
2.
Door and window openings are not weather-tight and do not provide
security against unauthorized entry to the building. Openings remain
covered with plastic.
3.
Sheathing is not weather-tight and does not prevent exposure to rain and
deterioration. Substantial areas remain unpainted and/or with only sub-
sheathing (not siding) installed.
4.
Construction materials remain stored throughout the exterior of the property,
providing potential harborage.
The Legislature in its latest session passed Senate File 2291: "An Act relating to local
government authority to encourage development and rehabilitation of certain real
property. . ." It provides for a city in which an abandoned building is located to petition
the court to enter judgment awarding title to the city.
Upon filing of the city's petition, the owner has 60 days to comply with orders of the local
housing official to abate deficiencies. Subsequent to that deadline, the court will
determine whether the owner has made a good faith effort to comply with those orders.
If the court decides that such effort has not been made, and that the property meets the
statutory definition of an abandoned property, a judgment may be entered, awarding
title to the property to the city. Title will be awarded free of all liens, claims and
encumbrances.
If title is awarded to the City of Dubuque as a result of this action, the Housing
Department would in turn publish a request for proposals, for the purpose of soliciting
interest in acquiring, rehabilitating and reoccupying the property.
Housing and Community Development Department Director David Harris recommends
City Council authorization to petition the District Court to enter judgment awarding title
to this property to the City.
I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
/'Yi # ¡ l/ /l, 11
'LuLL. 411' f¡f~
Micháel C. Van Milligen -
MCVM/jh
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, Corporation Counsel
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
David Harris, Housing and Community Development Department Director
D~
~ck~
MEMORANDUM
22 November 04
To: Mike Va!1. Mill..illigen, City Manager
-:\\\
From: David Hl3nis, Housing and Community Development Department
Re: Proceedings to acquire vacant and abandoned property at 409 Burch Street
Introduction
The purpose of this memorandum is to request the City Council's authorization to
petition the District Court to enter judgment for a vacant and abandoned home located
at 409 Burch Street, awarding title to the property to the City.
Background
The single family home at 409 Burch, owned by John White, has been a long-time
problem property. Complaints about this house and resulting City enforcement activities
date to 1996. Mr White has unsuccessfully attempted since a known date of 1995 to
undertake a comprehensive rehabilitation of the structure. The house remains vacant,
uninhabitable and a blighting influence on an otherwise well-maintained residential
neighborhood.
Enforcement Historv
The building permit record indicates the history of the owner's maintenance efforts on
this property, as follows:
1. November, 1987: relocation of gas line; inspected and approved
2. November, 1995: reroof; no disposition noted
3. June, 2000: electrical permit, to rewire home due to fire; no inspection
4. June, 2000: reroof, also due to fire; no inspection
5. August, 2000: plumbing permit for sewer and water lines; inspected and
approved
6. September, 2000: permit issued for garage and new foundation for
proposed addition; a December, 2000 inspection noted no completion
7. November, 2001: unspecified permit; no inspection
8. December, 2001: reroof; no inspection
9. January, 2004: reroof; no inspection
10. February, 2004: permit issued after owner was taken to court after
Building Department's determination that some fire-related repairs had
been done without a permit; no additional progress noted to-date
In September, 1996, a citation was issued by the Zoning Enforcement Officer for
outside storage of construction materials and auto parts.
In April, 1999, the Building Department sent a letter to abate, noting the non-completed
reroofing, illegal storage of construction materials and equipment and a garage "in
danger of collapse."
In late-2000, Zoning Enforcement issued another citation, for outside storage of junk
and building materials. Housing Department staff assisted with this enforcement. The
owner successfully challenged this citation and the action was dismissed in court, in
January 2001.
An August, 2003 inspection by the Zoning Enforcement Officer noted illegal storage of
an unlicensed vehicle and trailer on the property. A September reinspection noted
compliance with the order.
A September, 2003 letter from Kevin and Mary Ellen Muelenkamp, owners of 422 Burch
Street, sent to the Planning Department noted the following:
The Animal Control officer has made several visits to the site, to set traps
to catch the many cats and raccoons living in the property, "for the past
two years."
Garbage and construction debris from the site being strewn about the
neighborhood after storms.
Use of the site by the owner for storage of construction materials, vehicles
and equipment used at other job sites.
In September, 2004, a citation was again issued by Zoning Enforcement, again for
storage of a construction trailer on the property. The owner was found in violation of the
ordinance in October.
At the direction of Corporation Counsel, a 60-day order to repair was issued by Housing
in September 04. A reinspection conducted on 5 November determined substantial
non-compliance with the order. Violations include:
1. Roof is not weather-tight and does not prevent exposure to rain and
deterioration of the structure. Areas of the roof remain covered with
plastic tarp, with no shingles installed.
2. Door and window openings are not weather-tight and do not provide
security against unauthorized entry to the building. Openings remain
covered with plastic.
3. Sheathing is not weather-tight and does not prevent exposure to rain
and deterioration. Substantial areas remain unpainted and/or with
only sub-sheathing (not siding) installed.
4. Construction materials remain stored throughout the exterior of the
property, providing potential harborage.
The inspector did note that sometime after 1 November the owner has erected
scaffolding and has made some effort at painting exterior areas of the structure.
2
A November 18 reinspection noted that the owner has covered some window openings
with sheets of plywood. Mr. White states that at this time he is willing to resume
renovation activities on the property, in the interest of complying with city enforcement
actions.
Discussion
The Legislature in its latest session passed Senate File 2291: "An Act relating to local
government authority to encourage development and rehabilitation of certain real
property. . ." It provides for a city in which an abandoned building is located to petition
the court to enter judgment awarding title to the city. In determining whether the
property meets the definition of an abandoned building, the court will consider the
following factors:
1. If property taxes or special assessments are delinquent
2. if any utilities are currently being provided to the property
3. if the building is unoccupied
4. if the building meets the city's housing code as fit for human habitation
5. if the building is exposed to the elements, such that deterioration is occurring
6. if the building is boarded up
7. past efforts to rehabilitate the building
8. presence of vermin, accumulation of debris, uncut vegetation
9. efforts expended by the petitioning city to maintain the building
1 O. past and current compliance with orders of the local housing official
Upon filing of the city's petition, the owner has 60 days to comply with orders of the local
housing official to abate deficiencies. Subsequent to that deadline, the court will
determine whether the owner has made a good faith effort to comply
with those orders. If the court decides that such effort has not been made, and that the
property meets the statutory definition of an abandoned property, a judgment may be
entered, awarding title to the property to the city. Title will be awarded free of all liens,
claims and encumbrances.
If title is awarded to the City of Dubuque as a result of this action, the Housing
Department would in turn publish a request for proposals, for the purpose of soliciting
interest in acquiring, rehabilitating and reoccupying the property.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the request to pursue legal
proceedings under the statute to acquire title. Enforcement history indicates that the
owner has been provided sufficient opportunity to address the problems at this property
and that he has been unable to sustain a satisfactory effort to do so.
The property - an impressive, historic home - is located in a neighborhood of well-
maintained houses. It presents a blighting influence, potentially reducing property
values, and has caused long-standing concerns to owners of other homes in the
neighborhood.
3
Action Step
The action requested of the City Council is to authorize the Housing and Legal
Departments to petition the District Court to enter judgment awarding title to this
property to the City.
cc:
Barry Lindahl, Corporation Counsel
Attachments:
1. June 24, 2004 letter to Housing Department from Kevin & Mary Ellen
Muehlenkamp, neighboring property owners
2. September 10, 2003 letter to Planning Department from the Muehlenkamps
3. August 29, 2003 memorandum from Housing Department to City Manager
4. August 26, 2003 memorandum to Kathy Lamb, Senior Housing Inspector, from
Susan Brennan, Zoning Enforcement Officer
5. January 23, 2001 judgment from Dubuque District Court
6. April 20, 1999 letter to owner from Gerald Stoffel, Building Inspector
4
i[õ) ~~ ~ ...D..W...... ¡g@
U1Jf3~
CITY DF DUBUQUE
PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
September 10,2003
Zoning Information/Enforcement
City Hall
50 W 13th Street
Dubuque, IA 52001
RE: Property located at 425 (7) Burch Street (John White), DBQ, IA 52001
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in regards to the property located at 425(?), John White property, Burch
Street. This house has been under construction ever since we moved into our home (422
Burch) over four years ago (1999). The construction on this home has gotten worse over
the years, not better??? We have so many concern with this property/house, here they
are:
Health hazards-there has been several animals living in this home. Animal
control has been to our house several times to set traps to catch the many cats that
have made this house their home. To date, animal control has caught 4 cats, and
there are still more cats living in the home. These cats have been roaming the
neighborhood for the past two years (more cats over time) and have been running
around the neighborhood like crazy. These cats are starving and .sick, thus the call
to animal control. There are also raccoons living in the home.
Danger to small children-We have seen children from time to time playing in the
back yard of this home and are concerned for there safety and welfare. There are
several pallets stacked up in the yard, scaffolding and ladders left set up, and junk
lying around, which might hurt small children.
. Degrading to existing homes around this property. Since this house seems to be
an ongoing project with the owner, as he only works on it a few weeks out of the
year, and doesn't seem to get anything done, we truly believe that this will bring
the property value down to the other homes next to it. The home next to ours has
been up for sale for a year now. I am sure it is not selling because of the big
eyesore of a mess across the street from it.
Garbage flying around neighborhood. The shingles, plastic and other "stuff' fly
off this house every time we have a bad storm. We end up having to clean up our
neighborhood every time strong winds come up because of all the "stuff' that
fly's off the house.
. Using the house for his construction storage and as ajunkyard. He brings in his
work trucks and trailers, which are loud, and unloads them and goes to a different
job site. Then at night brings his van back or skid steer, loads and goes again.
.
Using the yard for his construction storage.
.
A big eye sore for the entire street.
.
In a conversation with Monica Ackley (she married us at our home on Burch) she
asked us about the property. We told her what we knew. She mentioned that she
was the magistrate that oversaw his case in the past case regarding his property at
Burch, and how she now regrets her decision to give him more time and anotber
chance, as she trusted him willi his words on how tbe property would be
completed soon. This was how many years ago?
Our question is: How can we get the owner of this property to complete his construction
of his home. The way it looks, it will take another ten years for him to complete this
project. Someone needs to stop by this home and take a look at how many city codes Ibis
property is in violation of.
Sincerely,
K"m1~L~r L~ 111 ~
422 Burch Street
Dubuque, IA 52001
563-584-0863
cc.
Healtb Services
Planning Services
Animal Control
Building Permits and Inspections
Housing and Community Development
Neighborhood Development
Permits
Fire Prevention Office
City Manager
u
Kevin and Mary Ellen Muehlenkamp
422 Burch St.
Dubuque IA 52001
SUBJECT:
Pro~erty at 409 Burch Street: Owner: John White
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Muehlenkamp:
September 15, 2003
It is my understanding that a few weeks ago, Mr. Mueh/enkamp talked to Susan
Brennan, a member of our enforcement staff, about the enforcement history of the
propertY at 409 Bu~ch~treet, including existing conditions. In addition, you discussed
the limitations with respect to zoning regulations. At the time, you were referred to the
Housing Department and Building Services Office for further action because those
departments were undergoing inspections of the conditions at this property, which you
were concerned about.
ffif ~gust 2~, 20¡k/.~usan also looked at Mr. White's property at 409 Burch Street
revealing a zoning viÓ/ation. It was found that Mr. White was unlawfully storing an
unlicensed van on his property. A notice was sent to him requiring that he remove the
improperly stored vehicle, which he did. We did not observe any other zoning
violations at this time. On September 11th, a re-inspection of Mr. White's property was
made, finding no zoning violations at that time.
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
Sincerely,
I.,é!ura Carstens
Planning Services Manager
Thursday, June 24, 2004
David Harris
Housing and Community Development Department Director
%City Hall
50 West 13th Street
Dubuque, IA 5200 I
Dear Mr. Harris:
This letter is in regards to the property located at 425 Burch Street. John White is the
owner of this property. I am sure you are aware of this property. We have contacted the
City ofDBQ with letters and numerous phone cal1s regarding this property. I am
enclosing another article from The Des Moines Register. This article is a follow-up ftom
the previous article we sent you last Nov. 2003.
We live across the street ftom this property, at 422 Burch Street. Mr. White has not
worked on this property for the past 6 months. You had written us a letter last year
stating you were checking into why the city is allowing this property to continue to be an
eyesore to our neighborhood. Is there any way to have this property condemned and have
it tom down? That seems to be the most logical answer to our problems, since Mr. White
obviously has no intentions on ever completing the renovation of his property (dump)
located on Burch Street and the one he owns on Jackson Street. It seems this project has
been ongoing for the past 15 years??
I know that we have written you several letters about this property, but we feel that
nothing is being accomplished in getting this issue properly taken care of.
Can the city please do something about this property?
Thanks you for your kind consideration at making our neighborhood a nicer place to live
in and look at.
Sincerely,
1<~~ i 'tit l\i Mk~
Kevin and Mary Ellen MueWenkamp
422 Burch Street
Dubuque, IA 52001
563-584-0863
Cc. Michael Van Milligen, City Manager's Office
(It 'íUf1 hi..(/~1'M I Mv+(vr' D{1 'ì53r:¡
CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA
MEMORANDUM
29 August 03
To: Mike V~\Milligen, City Manager
From: David~rris, Housing and Community Development Department
Re: Burch Street complaint
The attached memo and supporting materials, from Sue Brennan, do a good job
of outlining our on-going problems with John White regarding his property at 409
Burch. You had sent me a complaint on this last week and I wanted to provide
you a follow-up on our enforcement actions.
I believe, however, that we should consider some larger issues, as Sue mentions
in the memo. These have to do with the lack of our legal authority regarding
monitoring of construction sites.
The basic problem is that, once an owner obtains a building permit, it becomes
very difficult to enforce a standard for the exterior appearance of the
property/structure, and this can result in an eyesore and accompanying citizen
complaints. In the great majority of cases, the owner is responsible and
continues with the project until completion. But for cases like Mr White's, the
rehab/rer....onstruction work can go on for a very long period of time.
The question for us is when to enforce. The Burch Street property is not an
occupied dwelling. So is our option to monitor it according to our vacant-
abandoned (VAB) enforcement program standards? Or is a "construction"
project. and thereby exempt from that enforcement? When does it become a
"problem property" rather than only a construction project?
I think Sue makes the point well, as she recommends that time restrictions be
imposed on completion. Those standards don't exist in any ordinance at this
time, as I understand it.
There are a couple of other related issues that we could also consider at this
time. One concerns fire-damaged properties. It appears that there is a "gap" in
our enforcement programs regarding these properties. When a home bums and
is vacated, we have the authority to require it be boarded and kept secure from
entry. That's the VAB program enforcement. But what appears to be missing is
a procedure for determination of the structural integrity of the building. I think we
need to require that this be done, in order to determine if it safe to allow the
building to remain standing or if it needs to be demolished.
One other enforcement issue concerns dumping. As I am informed by Kathy
Lamb, we also appear to have a gap in our enforcement procedures regarding
this problem. We appear to allow dumping for the purpose of filling a lot, for the
ultimate purpose of building on the lot. However, we have cases where this
dumping is occurring over long periods of time - even years - and the
accompanying eyesore and potential safety hazard is an unfair burden on a
residential neighborhood, in my opinion. In addition, no standards apply to the
type of fill: hazard debris may be part of the fill. And again, where this is
occurring in built up neighborhoods (particularly as in-fill projects involving vacant
lots), we have very ugly situations and no enforcement authority.
If you are interested, I could suggest that we convene a meeting to discuss these
issues.
cc:
Laura Carstens
Rich Russell
D~
~ck~
MEMORANDUM
August 26, 2003
TO:
FROM:
Kathy Lamb, Housing Supervisor
Susan Brennan, Zoning Enforcement officerAð
SUBJECT: 409 Burch Street
This memo is in response to a complaint reported to Mike Van Milligen concerning the
poor condition of the property at 409 Burch Street. The unoccupied house is owned by
John Henry White, whose last known address was 1620 Wyngate Drive, Apartment #6.
Since 1996, this property has presented problems in terms of maintenance. A
chronological history follows.
The single-family dwelling is situated on a large lot. The home has been the subject of
a major restoration since 1996 (and possibly before). Mr. White serves as his own
contractor for his home improvements. The project has been ongoing with work
occurring sporadically when Mr. White has spare time. Based on my knowledge, the
house has been in some degree of disrepair since 1996, with construction material and
debris stored outside the premises, including scaffolding and large piles of used lumber.
Housing Supervisor Kathy Lamb, Building Inspector Jerry Stoffel and I have all
attempted to address problems with this property.
On September 30, 1996, I issued a citation against Mr. White for failure to maintain his
yard and for outside storage of construction material and auto parts. The defendant
appeared in court and admitted the violation. Mr. White paid a $50 fine and $30 court
costs. Magistrate Lang issued an order permitting Mr. White to keep stacked firewood,
shingles for his residence, and stacked bricks for his chimney. At that time, the only
building permit outstanding was for re-roofing equal in value to $975.
On April 20, 1999, Jerry Stoffel wrote Mr. White about several Code violations (see
letter attached), including building materials and debris being stored in the yard of Mr.
White's residence.
Memo to Kathy Lamb
409 Burch Street
Page 2
On February 8, 2000, theñOme suffered a fire. At the time, Mr. White was living in the
home with his son. Captain McMahon said the fire was determined to be "accidental"
and likely caused by an improperly converted furnace from coal to fuel. According to
Captain McMahon, Mr. White had insurance, which paid-out an unknown sum for his
loss.
In June 2000, Mr. White obtained a building permit for re-roofing the home equal in
value to the amount of $1,600. The re-roofing building permit was the only pending
building permit in September of 2000, when another complaint was received about the
junk and overall condition of this property.
After unsuccessfully attempting to work with Mr. White to get him to clean up his
property and secure the proper building permits, he was again cited for outside storage
of junk and building materials by the Planning Services Department. Jerry Stoffel and
Kathy Lamb assisted with this endeavor. This time, Mr. White hired an attorney and
challenged the Zoning Ordinance he was cited under.
The Zoning regulations address property uses in broad terms and speak of
"maintenance of the yard" in a general sense, and only as being "a continuing obligation
of the owner of the property." The Zoning regulations do not specifically address or
prohibit outside storage of junk and other material. The exception is the storage of
inoperable vehicles.
Magistrate Monica Athley ruled in favor of Mr. White and dismissed our action (see
order attached). The court's ruling was not surprising. Our Health, Housing and
Building Codes (plus Nuisance Ordinance) also regulate the same activities, but in a
much more specific manner.
A positive result of the issuance of the citation was that Mr. White immediately obtained
a building permit to build a garage and 12' x 15' foundation for a future two-story
addition.
About three weeks ago, Building Inspector Dennis Hackbarth contacted me about the
conditions at this property, and was going was to review whether Mr. White had applied
for all the necessary permits for his ongoing restoration project.
I recently inspected the premises for any zoning violations and found Mr. White was
unlawfully storing an unlicensed vehicle and a trailer on his property. A notice will be
sent to him requiring that he remove the improperly stored vehicles. I did not observe
any other zoning violations at this time.
Based on my experience, the court has been somewhat reluctant to ordE!r the removal
of construction material or even construction debris when a construction projeCtÎs---- .
underway. The Building Department might want to review the current restrictions with
Memo to Kathy Lamb
409 Burch Street
Page 3
respect to storage of building materials for possibly amendments to the Code in the
future. Under City Code 11-60(d), concerning Demolition of Buildings, "...all "pieces,
parts, scraps, debris, rubbish and organic material from the building...shall be cleaned
daily unless otherwise specified on the permit." To minimize the current problems
produced at construction sites in terms of debris and storage of materials, it is also
recommended that time restrictions be imposed on completion of construction projects.
For example, under Section 11.60(c), "All buildings relocated or moved must be made
ready for occupancy within 120 days from the time the building permit is issued." No
such requirement currently exists for any other construction. The only requirement is
that the building or the job begin within so many days from the time the building permit
is issued.
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
SB/mkr
Attachments
cc:
Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager
Rich Russell, Building Services Manager
. ,i"
(
.
.
'-. -
----.. --
IN THE ¡OW A DISTRICT COURT, IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY
riLED
. 01 JAN 23 AI'I 8 n
Bldò
e: s F DIST. COURT
DUBUQUE co. IOWA
CITY OF DUBUOUE
vs.
CICV044063
JUDGMENT
JOHN HENRY WHITE
Defendant(s)
This case came before the court for trial on December 14,2000. The Defendant had
previously denied the allegation that he had violated City Ordinances 2-7.2 and 3-1.4. The ordinances
require continuing maintenance of the yard.
The Defendant's house suffered a fire that resulted in heavy damage. He undertook the task of
refurbishing the home, but it was taking quite a bit of time. In the early fall of 2000, the outside of the
home had debris allover the place, including scaffolding, lumber, fasteners, tools, household
appliances and other various contents of the home. The Defendant received a notice that he needed to
clean up the area. When he failed to do so to the satisfaction of the City, a citation was issued.
The Defendant explained that the project was tedious and ongoing. Some of the items that
were seen in the yard were building materials and were not in the same location or in the same quantity
on a regular basis. The household appliances were stored underneath plastic covers and other attempts
were made to cover the building materials so that they would not be an eye sore.
The City asserted that the building materials were being stored on the land for use at other
construction sites being worked on by the Defendant. Additionally, any accessory use of the property
did not include continuous storage of any materials.
The ordinances cited herein are fairly vague as to what is a permissible accessory use and what
is not. The ordinances do not spell out what regular maintenance is required in order to be in
compliance with the directives. The project appears to be a very large undertaking and it does show
signs of constant flux.
The burden is on the City in this matter to prove the violations and that burden has not been
met here. The action is hereby DISMISSED. .
J3 ~ ,DAYO~AA-':t .2001
. )/)!ruû ~~ ...~
DONE AND ORDERED THIS
2.
3.
4 .
Building Safety Department
SO West 13th Street
Dubuque, Iowa 52001-4864
(319) 589-4150
John Henry White
409 Burch St.
Dubuque, IA 52001
5~
~ck~
April 20, 1999
Re:
Dwelling
& Detached garage at 409 Burch St.
Dear Property Owners:
I have recently inspected the above mentioned property and observed the
following conditions which I believe to be a violation of the Dubuque
Building Code:
1.
You were issued a building permit #33795 on 11/28/95 which has expired.
The shingles have been partially removed from the house and the weather
protection has not been maintained. An approved method of providing
weather protection shall be installed.
The guardrail has been removed from the front porch.
guardrail shall be installed.
An approved
The detached garage has been allowed to deteriorate to a point where
I believe that it poses a hazard to the general public. Roof sheathing
has been removed, the ridge line is sagged, the walls are racked and
out of plumb. This structure appears to be in danger of collapsing.
Scaffolding and building materials and debris are being stored in the
side and rear yard of this residential property.
UBC Sec. 104 (d) requires that all buildings and structures, both existing
and new, and all parts thereof, shall be maintained in a safe and sanitary
condition. The owner or his designated agent shall be responsible for the
maintenance of buildings and structures.
You or your designated agent shall contact me by phone at 589-4156 or in
person at the Building Services Department of the City of Dubuque at City
Hall, 50 West 13th St. within five (5) working day of receiving this letter
between the hours of 8 A.M. and 5 P.M. to establish methods, materials and
a time table for the abatement of these safety hazards.
cc:
Respectfully,
}J
f .J r;;¡¡vr
Gerald P. Stoffel
Building Inspector
Rich Russell, Building Official, City of Dubuque ~
Sue Brennan, Zoning Enforcement Officer, City of Dubuque ~
Service
People
Integrity
Responsibility
Innovation
Teamwork
ßu.I Lf) I ~c¡
Ô.t.fJt-. - fM-ik~ r ¡.J/~(-ð~f
409 Burch~h
-- O,..J "_.J. Hoa~_____.~C~.i_e~e.J3J¡e.e:t~MetaLCo,__._---
. Reroof S,F ,Frame Dw-"llg--!3,P '._li~_.1l:-_'Z"'_§5_.__72Q.._QL_-
O-John White C-Owner
-fTO. reroofSFsd-gP3379S-TT /28/9!n;9-rs.OO-----------------
O~John Wh i te--------------C-Owner-----'-------~'--------
t/G,-'-f€fOof--5f--re s---ßP4-18í'2-'61-l512000 -11600 .00 ----.------.
,---0- J glm-Wh-i-t@----~ --6- OWRB-I"----- --- -------.--.------- -
erect 22'x32' bsmt level garage w/capped roof & 12'x15'
'--Tridñfor- f u tu re-add~-;-STBj5li2 3929/29726ÜÖ-ìlli,401L 00- -----