Wild Rose Estates_WMK Investment Properties_Plat IssuesMasterpiece on the Mississippi
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: Wild Rose Estates Final Plat Correspondence from WMK Investment
Properties, Inc.
DATE: July 13, 2011
This is in response to the July 7, 2011 correspondence from the developer of the Wild
Rose Estates residential development on Middle Road in Dubuque County just outside
the City of Dubuque City limits.
On May 17, 2010, the City Council approved a preliminary plat for the proposed
subdivision. One of the conditions was, "Submitting a statement signed by a licensed
professional engineer that states there is adequate sight distance for the 85 percentile
speed of traffic at the improved intersection of Wild Rose Lane and Middle Road."
The developers have not, as of yet, satisfied that condition. Should this issue be
referred to the City Manager, the City Engineering Department will continue to work with
the developer to examine options to relocate the entrance or make roadway
modifications, thereby creating adequate sight distance and making this development
safe.
MCVM:jh
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
Gus Psihoyos, City Engineer
Michael C. Van Milligen
Dubuque
All- America City
1 1 1
2007
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
Dubuque
krzATI
AN- America City
11111!
1
2007
TO: Michael Van Milligen, City Manager -
FROM: Gus Psihoyos, City Engineer ✓. _ -�
SUBJECT: Wild Rose Estates Final Plat Correspondence from WMK Investment
Properties Inc.
DATE: July 13, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The City Council has received correspondence from WMK Investment Properties, Inc.
whose partners are Steve Weiland, Larry McDermott and Ken Kress. They are the
developers for a proposed subdivision in Dubuque County to be named Wild Rose
Estates. The proposed subdivision is being reviewed jointly by the City and County of
Dubuque as the subject property is within two miles of the City's corporate limits. The
proposed Wild Rose Estates is located on Middle Road approx one -half mile east of
Sundown Road (County Road Y -21) and approximately 1.5 miles west of Seippel Road.
The proposed subdivision will subdivide approximately 109 acre parcel into 61 single
family building lots.
BACKGROUND
The correspondence from WMK Investment Properties, Inc. outlines the progress to
date in receiving approval through the County of Dubuque and City of Dubuque. The
major concern of city staff is the location of the existing access for the proposed
subdivision. Wild Rose Estates will utilize an existing Wild Rose Lane as the access.
This access currently serves four single - family homes. The proposed subdivision would
add an additional 61 single - family homes utilizing this access to Middle Road. Adding
61 lots creates a potential for an additional 582 vehicle trips per day (ITE Trip
Generation Manual: 9.55 trips /unit) through the intersection at Middle Road
The chronology of events that have led up to the current correspondence from WMK is
as follows:
On January 26, 2010, City Planning and Engineering staff attended a pre - application
meeting with County officials and representatives of the development company to
review the proposed Wild Rose Estates Subdivision. At that time, engineering staff
did raise a concern that there is a potential for sight visibility issues where the
existing Wild Rose Lane intersects with Middle Road. The developer pointed out
this is an existing access that was approved by the County previously. City Engineering
staff pointed out that increasing the number of dwelling units from three to 61 that would
utilize this access requires that the sight visibility be reviewed prior to approval of the
subdivision. WMK Investment Properties Inc. worked with their engineers, Buesing &
Associates, to submit a preliminary plat in March 2010.
The Zoning Advisory Commission reviewed and approved the submitted preliminary plat
at their May 2010 meeting, and the Council subsequently also approved the
preliminary plat on a 4 to 3 vote at their May 17, 2010 meeting subject to the
following:
1) Waiving street width standard for Wild Rose Lane, White Clover Court, Hollyhock
Drive, Poppy Court and Crimson Court;
2) Posting no parking signs within the subdivision;
3) Waiving lot frontage requirements for Lots 33 and 49;
4) Waiving maximum cul -de -sac length; and
5) Submitting a statement signed by a licensed professional engineer that
states there is adequate sight distance for the 85 percentile speed of
traffic at the improved intersection of Wild Rose Lane and Middle Road.
85 Percentile Speed
The 85 percentile speed is a value that is commonly used for establishing regulatory
speed zones. The 85 percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of
motorist drive on any given roadway under good weather and visibility conditions and
may be considered as the maximum safe speed for that location.
Sight Distance
Sight distance, in the context of road design, is how far a road user (usually a vehicle
driver) can see before the line of sight is blocked by a hill crest, or an obstacle on the
inside of a horizontal curb or intersection. Insufficient sight distance can have
implications for the safety or operations of a roadway or intersection.
According to the A.A.S.H.T.O (American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials) manual, all intersections or connections to county roads
(hereafter referred to as access) are subject to the requirements in the site distance
section of their publication. Access includes, but is not limited to new roads or single
driveways. In the case of the proposed Wild Rose Subdivision, existing access shall
also be subject to these requirements if it will be used by new development or
expansion of existing facilities. AASHTO states that it is the responsibility of the person
or entity creating the proposed access, new development, or expansion of existing
facilities to provide required sight distance.
2
During highway design and traffic safety investigations, highway engineers compare the
available sight distance to how much sight distance is needed for the situation.
Depending on the situation, one of three following types of sight distances will be used:
Stopping Sight Distance
Stopping sight distance is the distance traveled while the vehicle driver perceives a
situation requiring a stop, realizes that stopping is necessary, applies the brake, and
comes to a stop. Actual stopping distances are also affected by road conditions, the
mass of the car, the incline of the road, and numerous other factors. For design, a
conservative distance is needed to allow a vehicle traveling at design speed to stop
before reaching a stationary object in its path. Typically the design sight distance allows
a below- average driver to stop in time to avoid a collision. The driver's eye is assumed
to be 42 inches above the pavement, and the object height is 24 inches (about the
height of vehicle taillights).
Decision Sight Distance
Decision sight distance is used when drivers must make more complex decisions than
to stop or not to stop. It is longer than stopping sight distance to allow for the distance
traveled while making a more complex decision. The decision sight distance is
"distance required for a driver to detect an unexpected or otherwise difficult -to- perceive
information source or hazard in a roadway environment that may be visually cluttered,
recognize the hazard or its threat potential, select an appropriate speed and path, and
initiate and complete the required maneuver safely and efficiently." Ideally roads are
designed for the decision sight distance — typical times detecting and understanding a
situation is about 6 to 10 seconds and 4 to 5 seconds to perform the right maneuver.
Intersection Sight Distance
Intersection sight distance is the decision needed to safely proceed through an
intersection. The distance needed depends on the type of traffic control at the
intersection, and the maneuver (left turn, right turn, or proceeding straight). All -way stop
intersections need the least, and uncontrolled intersections require the most.
Intersections should be carefully situated to avoid steep profile grades and to ensure
adequate approach sight distance. An intersection should not be situated on a short-
crest vertical curve, just beyond a short-crest vertical curve, or on a sharp horizontal
curve. The intersection sight distance is provided at intersections to allow the drivers of
stopped vehicles a sufficient view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter
the intersecting highway or to cross it. In the case of Wild Rose Estates subdivision the
existing intersection is located just west of a short-crest vertical curve. Improving the
sight distance at the intersection of Wild Rose Lane and Middle Road would require
lowering the crest of the hill on Middle Road just east of the intersection. The
developers and their engineers have stated that there is no practical alternate location
for the intersection.
3
Vehicles stopped at an at -grade intersection must have sufficient sight distance to
permit a safe departure. Since this is a T- intersection only a right -turn or left turn
maneuver can be made. And since the sight distance to the left is more than adequate
the focus needs to be on vehicles approaching from the right westbound and how the
observation of the vehicles affect left turning vehicles.
The left turn maneuver must have sufficient sight distance to permit entrance onto the
intersecting roadway and then accelerate to the posted speed limit without being
overtaken by vehicles approaching from the right westbound. The minimum
recommended sight distance for 35 mph vehicle speed is 390'. The distance increases
to 445' for 40 mph and 500' for 45 mph. The existing sight distance at the Wild Rose
intersection with Middle Road is between 415 and 420 feet.
In working with Buesing and Associates, the City Engineering Department conducted a
speed study to determine the speed of westbound traffic on Middle Road near Wild
Rose Lane. The 85 percentile speed was determined to be 46.3 mph. This was the
speed with which Buesing was to work in the design of the intersection and addressing
the sight distance deficiencies.
In February and March of 2011, at the request of Buesing, the City placed a recently
purchased speed shield on Middle Road near Wild Rose Lane in an effort to educate
motorists and thus lower travel speeds. The speed shield operates with the use of
radar and displays the speed of vehicles approaching the device. The unit is usually set
to activate a strobe light when vehicle speeds exceed 5 mph over the posted speed
limit.
In April of 2011 the Police Department did speed enforcement at the same location.
After the police enforcement project, Engineering performed another speed study which
showed an 85 percentile speed of 51.6 mph., an increase from the previous study.
Buesing and Associates provided written documentation dated 9 -30 -10 that the
intersection met stopping sight distance. The Engineering Department requested that
Buesing and Associates reevaluate the access for intersection sight distance. WMK
Investment Properties, Inc. and their Engineer, Buesing and Associates, submitted a
final plat and improvement plans in March 2011. The final plat has not been brought to
the City Council since there are still remaining issues regarding the improvement plans
with the most critical being the traffic visibility at the subdivision access point where Wild
Rose Lane intersects with Middle Road.
4
Engineering has not received any recommendations from the developers' consulting
engineer on the matter of meeting the intersection sight distance requirement. The
developer has focused their effort on meeting the requirement by concentrating on
reducing the speed of the motorists by requesting more stringent monitoring by the City
Police and County Sheriffs departments and by developing a system utilizing speed
shields and speed boards. While these practices have had a short term effect on the
speed of traffic, they have not lowered the speed of traffic.
DISCUSSION
When site plans and subdivisions are submitted for approval, evaluating the sight
distance for proposed driveways and intersections is part of the review process. Two
recent developments were required to address inadequate intersection sight distance as
part of the development. One was a subdivision south of Derby Grange Road where
the 85 percentile traffic at a proposed intersection was more than 10 mph over the
posted speed limit. The developer was required to agree to modify or lower the profile
of the roadway of Derby Grange Road to increase the sight distance. Another option
was to relocate the proposed intersection to provide the required sight distance. This
development has not proceeded as of this date. The second development was a City
project on the south side of Pennsylvania Ave. This was an entrance to a trail parking
lot where a proposed entrance onto Pennsylvania Ave. had to be shifted over 77 feet to
the west to provide the required sight distance. Significant modifications to the original
plans were made by the City to gain the additional site distance needed to meet
intersection site distance requirements.
SUMMARY
The existing permit for the entrance of Wild Rose Lane at Middle Road was based on
stopping sight distance. Site visibility for westbound traffic is between 415 and 420 feet.
While this is currently being used for a driveway for a few residences, adding 61 lots
creates a potential for an additional 582 trips per day through the intersection. This
additional traffic combined with existing traffic of approximately 680 vehicles per day on
Middle Road, gives rise to concern for adequate sight distance at the intersection. To
date, the developer has not demonstrated or proposed a design that may improve the
intersection sight distance dilemma.
RECOMMENDATION
The Engineering Department recommends that approval of the final plat of Wild Rose
Estates be denied until adequate intersection sight distance is accomplished or
proposed at the existing intersection of Wild Rose Lane and Middle Road.
5
The chronology of engineering staff working on this issue is as follows:
1 -29 -10 Engineering attended a pre - application meeting with the developer and
County officials. The question of sight visibility at the intersection of Wild
Rose and Middle Road was discussed.
2 -15 -10 Memo to MVM regarding options on requirements of development with
regard to intersection sight distance.
2 -19 -10 MVM, Barry Lindahl meeting — waive review vs waive standards
4 -08 -10 County Engineer Felderman — already an access — will redo Wild Rose
going in.
4 -10 -10 Email: Ron Turner to Gus Psihoyos on preliminary plat regulations —
speed study required.
4 -13 -10 Estimate cost to redo 1200 I.f. = $ 267,500
4 -13 -10 Survey crew field measured S.D. = 415' = 37.6 mph for intersection
4 -16 -10 Email: Ron Turner to Kyle Kyle on preliminary plat regulations — speed
study required.
4 -22 -10 Buesing & Associates submits copy of 1991 residential entrance permit
(SD = 420')
4 -22 -10 Nu- Metrics Traffic Study. 85 %tile = 46.3 mph W.B.
5 -05 -10 Preliminary Plat to ZAC (approved with conditions regarding adequate
sight distance)
5 -17 -10 Preliminary Plat to CC (approved 4 -3 with conditions regarding adequate
sight distance)
9 -30 -10 Buesing & Associates letter stating adequate Stopping Sight Distance for
the intersection.
12 -20 -10 City letter to Buesing & Associates requesting Intersection Sight Distance
evaluation.
2 -1 -11 Speed Shields Traffic Study 85 %tile = 39.0 mph
3 -10 -11 Speed Shields Traffic Study 85 %tile = 43.0mph
3 -11 -11 Final Plat submitted
3 -23 -11 Calc. Middle Road cuts for 43 mph ISD and SSD
43 mph SSD = cut 1.4' (280' Roadway)
43 mph ISD = cut 16.25' (1700' Roadway)
46 mph SSD = cut 2.6' (985' Roadway)
3 -24 -11 Comments to Planning on final plat and Imp. Plans (not addressed to
date)
4 -4 -11 Police enforcement: top speed = 43 mph
4 -19 -11 Police enforcement: top speed = 42 mph
4 -22 -11 Police enforcement: top speed = 41 mph
4 -27 -11 Nu- Metrics Traffic Study 85 %tile = 51.6 mph W.B.
5 -12 -11 Attorney Dave Clemens to City Attorney Barry Lindahl: letter with question
on denying the plat.
5 -16 -11 Barry to Dave Clemens — Response: "Street didn't meet required
standards for the drive based on speeds."
7 -7 -11 Email from WMK Investments requesting to be placed on 7 -18 -11 Council
agenda to discuss the development.
6
LIEA :- HODGSON, BRIAN G & GINA M
DGSOR PR
K INVESTM �R`�. +RERTI
MAN, KENNE
D & BARBA
tea
*J*! 7':;7.11
HODGSON, BRIAN G & GINA M HODGSO BRIAN
GRADY, J
EW&
NYA L
M
,1' .r;
e p MERKES,
DUBUQUE , *r,
GERHARD, RI r
DY, JANET /GRAIN FAM T &
GER &
ND&
1 _A
' r
MARIA A
HIGLF , R
OYSIUS P & THERESA
Legend
® 533' Buffer_of_Parcels_CMS_8
FLD_ZONE
A
Roads
LEVEL_
US Highways
State Highways
- Arterial Streets
Collector Streets
Residential Streets
Rural Roads
Alleys
Platted but never built
Mud /Level B Maintenance
Highway Ramps, - - - -- Parks & Cemeteries
Major Roads - - - - Driveways
Trunk Roads L City Limits
Kevin Firnstahl - Fwd: City Council Meeting Agenda - Wild Rose Estates
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Attachments:
Hello everyone!
Page 1 of 3
Ken Kress <kenkress @yousq.net>
<kfimsta@cityofdubuque.org>
7/8/2011 9:32 AM
Fwd: City Council Meeting Agenda - Wild Rose Estates
Wild Rose Estates - Final plat 3- 23- 11.pdf; Middle Rd. - eastbound speed study.pdf;
Middle Rd - westbound speed study.pdf
Forwarded message
From: Ken Kress <kenkress @vousq.net>
Date: Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:35 AM
Subject: City Council Meeting Agenda - Wild Rose Estates
To: rdbuol(a,,citvofdubuque.org, ctymgr(a,cityofdubuque.org, rjones(a,citvofdubuque.org,
dresnickncitvofdubuque.org, klvnchna,citvofdubuque.org, kbraig(a,citvofdubuque.org,
jconnors(a,citvofdubuque.org, lsutton(a,cityofdubuque.org, dklein(a,dbeco.org, wdemmer@dbeco.org,
emanternacha,dbeco.org, "Kenneth L. Buesing" <klbuesing @buesing.com >, "Thomas,P. Larsen"
<tplarsen(a,buesing.com >, Terry Koelker <tlkoelkera,buesing.com >, David Clemens
<dclemens@cwcmlaw.com >, gpsihoyo @cityofdubuque.org, blindahl @cityofdubuque.org, Anna O'Shea
<zoningadmina_Abuco.org >, engineera,dbeco.ora
Please allow us to introduce ourselves, we are Steve Wieland, Larry McDermott, & Ken Kress who have
formed a partnership called WMK Investment Properties Inc. for the sole purpose of development of
rural subdivision just off of Middle Road with access from Wild Rose Lane, we have attached copy of
Phase 1 plat for your review.
We purchased 95 acres in September of 2009 that is located in Dubuque Co. which is zoned residential,
and lies directly across Middle Road from land that is in the City of Dubuque and proceeded to work
with Buesing Engineering to diligently proceed through the process of surveying and platting this parcel
into a nice subdivision consisting of 3 phases that would total 61 lots. We met with all committees in
City & County and attended meetings to work through this process and finished the Preliminary Plat in
summer of 2010 with all approvals. We have been stalled since then on any further meetings.
Since that time we had a very hard time getting approval from the city on the Final Plat, the city
planning & engineer's office has dictated that we would need a speed study completed on this access
even though this driveway access, Wild Rose Lane, has been in place for the last 20 years. Also there
was a speed study previously done in April of 2010, with higher than acceptable results. The city
wanted another study done in fall of 2010 and decided to wait all winter to complete speed study and
final approval for city placed speed study was granted in April of 2011. WMK paid for the placement of
speed signs from Selco for a two week period and we were promised city police patrol on this road for
a two day period before the study was done. Even though the city only owns the westbound lane and
the county owns the eastbound lane, the sheriff's department was never contacted for patrol by the
city. After Selco removed signs and city police patrolled this area for a small time period on one day,
file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \kfirnsta \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \4E16CEADDBQ... 7/8/2011
the speed study was completed over a 24 hour period on April 28, 2011 with results of an average
speed of over 51 miles per hour, even though the speed limit is only 35 miles per hour. The city would
like WMK to produce a lower speed study to grant access for our subdivision on an existing 20 year old
driveway, Wild Rose Lane, from Middle Rd. even though the city will not patrol this area, because of
lack of manpower. City engineering has also suggested that we could re -grade a portion of Middle Rd
at our expense to help lower speeds, even though Middle road was just resurfaced last year for Ragbrai
bike ride, and since then speeds have increased on the new road. Dubuque County Sheriffs Dept. was
contacted by County Supervisors and has had two speed studies completed, one for each lane over a
week long period with a lot lower speeds, attached studies for your review. If you look at these studies
you will see some speeds over 100 mph on a stretch of road that has a 35mph speed limit with over
60% of the cars are speeding, if we could get some patrolling from our local officials this might take
care of our problem. I would hate to see a bad accident on this road with all city and county officials
knowing about the high speeds on this road and nothing has been done to enforce the speeds on this
road.
Dubuque County changed the zoning of this property back in late 1960's with the intent of residential
development. We are looking for your help in this matter to resolve this situation, Dubuque County is
losing a lot of tax revenue from the delay of this project. Looking at rough estimates, we will have
potentially 61 lots with an annual property tax assessment of anywhere from $3,000 - $4,000 per
home, which equates to over $210,000. per year in future tax revenue for Dubuque County.
We would like to be placed on the agenda for the next city council meeting on July 18 to discuss this
situation with the council and try to find a solution to this dilemma, your timely response to this matter
and any help and direction you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Please call with any questions, Sincerely,
Steve Wieland 563 - 451 -3216 Larry McDermott 563 - 542 -2712 Ken Kress 563 - 543 -6620
Ken Kress CRS, GRI
Remax Advantage Realty
4029 Pennsylvania Ave.
563 -588 -3078 Office
563 -543 -6620 Cell
563 -588 -1799 Fax
KenKress @vousca.net
www.DubuqueAreaHomes.com
Ken Kress CRS, GRI
Remax Advantage Realty
4029 Pennsylvania Ave.
563 -588 -3078 Office
563 -543 -6620 Cell
563 -588 -1799 Fax
Page 2 of 3
file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \kfirnsta \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \4E16CEADDBQ... 7/8/2011
KenKress(ayousq.net
www.DubuqueAreaHomes.com
Page 3 of 3
file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \kfirnsta \Local Settings \Temp \XPgrpwise \4E 16CEADDBQ... 7/8/2011
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing w/ at rose spur
mph
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
6/9/2011
12 :00. AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00.AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM,
5:00 PM
Total
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
0- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70-
Total < 15 < 20 < 25 < 30 < 35 < 40 < 45 < 50 < 55 < 60 < 65 < 70 < 200
48 0 0 0 12 6 16 7 4 2 0 1 0 0
2 6�.. - p...... - : 0 0 5 4 6 ` 7' 3 0 1 0 0 -0
14 0 0 2 6 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 -
27 _ 0 0 0 6 9 g_., ...:: 3 1 0.: 0 0 0 . .
7 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
14 _ 0 .:0,. 0 4 7 O . 3- 0. - 0• 0 0 0 ._' 0
0 1 2 2_" 3' 0:- 0' 0 0. o -.0
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. 3 p ' . . 0 ` . 0 1 2 . 0 0' 0 0 - 0 0 0 - .'.0
2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
.0 0 0 0 1 .. .... '.,0_•: 0' .: 0 1 0.' .. 0. 0
12 0 0 0 1 3 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0
29 :: ..'0. 0 1 2 8 9'..::.::..'-6 .- • ' 1 0:: 0 2 0 0
32 0 0 0 8 10 5 7 1 1 0 0 0 0
33 0 ,:. : .:0': 0 1 12 :.10`-:... •4 .. 4 • 2. .0 0 . 0 ' 0
35 0 0 0 6 11 9 7 2 0 0 0 0 0
37 0_ 0''• 0 6 9: 14':. •• , 4 -2. . "2: 0' 0 0 . . 0
39 0 0 1 11 5 13 5 0 3 0 0 0 1
. 46- ...: _ ' ::0 .. 0:.. 1 9 10 17 : 8'.: . 1 . • 0 . 0. 0 . 0 0
61 0 0 2 15 15 20 5 3 1 0 0 0 0
53 ' 0 • - 0 0 12 16 1.7. " 6 . 2 0 0 0 0 . " ' 0
56 0 0 0 12 7 14 14 5 2 0 1 1 0
69 0 -" 0 1 11 18 ..21 8 7 1 0 1 1 - 0
85 0 0 1 14 28 18 11 6 6 0 1 0 0
739 0 0 9 145 189 207 113 43 22 2 6 2 1
0.0 0.0 1.2 19.6 25.6 28.0 15.3 5.8 3.0 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.1
10% 15% 50% 85% 90%
27.0 29.0 35.0 42.0 45.0
29.0 - 39.0 Average 35.6 mph
446 (60.4 %) Minimum 20.0 mph
Maximum 98.0 mph
45 mph 55 mph 65 mph
8.4 % 1.5 % 0.4
62 11 3
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35 mph
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/8/2011
Wednesday
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing w/ at rose spur
mph 0 -
Total < 15
6:00 PM 63
17:00 PM 45
8:00 PM 53
9:00. PM ` 24
10:00 PM 23
11:00 PM .: 19
6/10/2011
12:0 AM: 0
1:00 AM 2
' 2::00AMF.. 0-
3:00 AM 3
4:1:10 AM:: 4
5:00 AM 10
6::00 AM 21
7:00 AM 28
'8 :00 EAM. 34.
9:00 AM 30
- 10:00 AM -':: ":" ' -'39
11:00 AM 56
12 :00 PM.'..: 44 ..
1:00 PM 55
2 :OO: PM: 44
3:00 PM 58
4.:00 "PM: .' •- • 63
5:00 PM 62
Total 780
% 0.
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
15-
< 20
0.
Percentile Speeds 10 % 15 % 50 % 85 % 90 %
(mph) 27.0 29.0 35.0 43.0 46.0
Speeds Exceeded 45 mph 55 mph 65 mph
10.6 % 2.1 % 0.4 %
Count 83 16 3
24 Flour Speed
Channel: 35 mph
20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70-
< 25 < 30 < 35 < 40 < 45 < 50 < 55 < 60 < 65 < 70 < 200
O 12 18 13 8 5 4 1 0 1 1
1 7:. ': 13:' 15. 4.- ': 4 0 0 0 0 - 1
1 7 16 20 2 3 3 0 1 0 0
O 1 10 6. 5, 0 2 0 0 0 0
O 5 9 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0
O 6 5 7. 0 1 0. . 0 0 0 '.
O 0 0 - -- 0 0 0. 0. 0' 0 0 • - 0
O 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 .`0'.' 0 0 0 0' 0 0 .- 0 0
O 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 1`: - :1 : 0 1 1 0 0 0 ' -0' ' ._0
O 1 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 2 _ ,-4 -- 9 - 4' 1 0 1 0 - 0 . 0
O 6 7 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
O 4'.. `_::"11.: 9: 7 3 0 0 0 0 - 0
O 4 14 7 2 2 1 0 0 0 0
1 . 6." 9 9 .. _7:.. 5 o' 2 0' 0' 0
1 6 12 17 11 2 6 0 0 0 1
1 .6 . ... _15= 7 10 :. 3 0.. 1 1. 0 ::. 0
1 9 14 16 11 3 1 0 0 0 0
O .7. ..8: : ' 13 ,,.:5' . 6 3 2 0 0 0
1 12 12 17 11 2 1 0 1 1 0
2 11 22. - 16 9 3 0 0 0 0 0
1 15 11 13 15 4 1 0 2 0 0
10 129 217 213 117 55 22 7 5 2 3
1.3 16.5 27.8 27.3 15.0 7.1 2.8 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.4
30.0 - 40.0 Average 36.2 mph
468 (60.0 %) Minimum 20.0 mph
Maximum 99.0 mph
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/9/2011
Thursday
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing w/ at rose spur
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35 mph
mph 0- 15- 20- 25-
Total < 15 < 20 < 25 < 30
6:00 PM 53 0 0 0 9
7:00 PM 67 •0 - 0 1 11
8:00 PM 48 0 0 1 13
- .9:00 PM 23 0 -'0: : ' 4
10:00 PM 12 0 0 0 3
11:00 PM. 18 0- • `0= '0 ' 9
6/11/2011
12:00 AM 17 0. o 0. 4 :5 3 4 0 0
1:00 AM 8 0 0 2 1 . 2 3 0 0 0
2:00 AM. 2 0 0 0 2 '0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
4:00 AM 6 0 0 0 2. 2. 1 0 1 0
5:00 AM 4 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0
6:00 AM 14 0 0 0 .4 .: 2 .7 1 0 0
7:00 AM 15 0 0 0 3 5 5 2 0 0
8:00 AM 34 0 . 0.. 0 =6 10' :. 7 5 4 2
9:00 AM 46 0 0 0 7 12 15 6 3 1
.10:00 AM 44 0' '' ; . :0 1 : 6 . .14 13 6 2 2
11:00 AM 60 0 0 2 12 13 14 10 5 3
12:00 PM 54 "0 . 1'..:. 6 . , .. 12 . : 19- 11 4 1 .'
1:00 PM 48 0 0 0 10 11 13 7 5 2
2:00 PM 49 0 0.. . '1 8' 13 . 11 9 6 1
3:00 PM 52 0 0 0 6 11 11 13 4 2
4:00 PM 32 0 0 1 ' ' 2 . '8 • 9 6 .5 0 _
5:00 PM 33 0 0 2 1 8 7 10 4 1
Total 741 0 0 13 130 192 202 115 53 19
0.0 0.0 1.8 17.5 25.9 27.3 15.5 7.2 2.6
Percentile Speeds 10 % 15 % 50 % 85 % 90 %
(mph) 27.0 29.0 36.0 43.0 45.0
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55-
< 35 < 40 < 45 < 50 < 55 < 60
14 17 6 2 2 3
`15;. 22:: 12 3 . 1'.. _- ':9,1_
16 10 4 2 0 1
6 2 1 1 .- -'
3 4 1 1 0 0
6:.. . 3 0' 0 0 " 0
29.0 - 39.0 Average 36.0 mph
438 (59.1 %) Minimum 20.0 mph
Maximum 73.0 mph
45 mph 55 mph . 65 mph
9.2 % 1.9 % 0.4 %
68 14 3
0
60 -
< 65
0
0
O 0
O 0
' 0 0
O 0
0 . .0 0
O 0
0
0
0
O 1
0
O 0
0
1
O .. 0`
1 0 0 0
0 - D '0 : 0
O 0 0 0
0 0
O 1
or .. 0 _ ' _ 1 0
O o 0 0
11 2 2 2
1.5 0.3 0.3 0.3
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/10/2011
Friday
65 - 70 -
<70 <200
O 0
1 0
O 0
O 0
-0
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing w/ at rose spur
mph
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
6/12/2011
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM'
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4 :00 PM
5:00 PM
Total
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
0- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70-
Total < 15 < 20 < 25 < 30 < 35 < 40 < 45 < 50 < 55 < 60 < 65 < 70 < 200
35 0 0 0 6 11 11 1 4 2 0 0 0 0
39 : 0 ,.:0: 0. .. 8 10- 9 5 ' 5... 0' :': 0 1 1 . 0
32 0 0 1 11 7 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 1
26 0`:. .: __.0.: 0 7 12 0 6 ...._.:::' ::0:: 0 1 0 0 0
22 0 0 1 2 8 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 0 . 0 ` - : _ 0'. 3 7 3 3 1 1. :. : `'0 0 0 0
8 0 =.`' 0[" 1 2 2 ' 1. • 2 0.. 0. 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0.: ".. 0; 0 1 0 ..0 '. .' 0 0' 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0... 0:' 1. 0 1 0 3 1 1 .. 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
_
6 0: 0 ... ,0 0 1 1 3 :1 0 0 0 0 0
23 0 0 1 3 9 6 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
33.. 0.:. :Q: :- .. 0 : ' 8 8 7 fi ..... .. 1. 1 1 0 0
41 0 0 0 8 10 14 7 2 0 0 0 0 0
34
52 0 0 0 4 16 13 15 3 '0 0 1 0 0
66 ' :. 0: 0.> - ; , :..: 2 12 15 17 11 7' 1=:. . 0 1 0 0
43 0 0 2 9 9 7 6 7 1 2 0 0 0
50 :'0'.;...- :;;0::.. 1 6 8 12 8 "' 10 __`3` 1 0 0 1
60 0 0 2 4 25 17 4 4 1 3 0 0 0
51 0 :,. ': 0: - 0 9 14 16 5 5 2 0 0 0 0
39 0 0 • 0 9 7 12 4 7 0 0 0 0 0
698 0 0 12 123 192 172 101 66 14 11 4 1 2
0.0 0.0 1.7 17.6 27.5 24.6 14.5 9.5 . 2.0 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.3
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35 mph
10% 15% 50% 85% 90%
27.0 28.0 35.0 44.0 46.0
10 mph Pace Speed 30.0 - 40.0 Average 36.2 mph
Number in Pace 399 (57.2 %) Minimum 20.0 mph
Maximum 106.0 mph
Speeds Exceeded 45 mph 55 moll 65 mph
11.2 % 2.4 % 0.3
Count 78 17 2
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/11/2011
Saturday
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing w/ at rose spur
mph 0- 15- 20- 25-
Total < 15 < 20 < 25 < 30
6:00 PM 27 0 0 1
7:00 PM .46:, 0 0 0
8:00 PM -
9:00 PM:
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
6/13/2011
12:00 AM'
1:00 AM
2:00 AM :-
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
-6:00AM
7:00 AM
8:00'.AM` -•, =:
9:00 AM
10:08 AM _-' ` =
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00' PM
3:00 PM
:4:00 •PM
5:00 PM
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
7
4 5 mph 55 mph 65 mph
8.2 % 2.7 % 1.4 %
6 2 1
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35 mph
30- 35- 40- 45-
< 35 < 40 < 45 < 50
7 4 5 3
- 12 5. 1
1% 15% 50% 85% 90%
26.0 27.0 34.0 43.0 44.0
28.0 - 38.0 Average 35.6 mph
43 (58.9 %) Minimum 24.0 mph
Maximum 67.0 mph
50 - 55 - 60 - 65 - 70 -
< 55 < 60 < 65 < 70 < 200
0 0 0 0 0
1 2 . .0 1 :0
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/12/2011
Sunday
Total 73 0 0 1 16 22 16 10 4 1 2 0 1 0
0.0 0.0 1.4 21.9 30.1 21.9 13.7 5.5 1.4 2.7 0.0 1.4 0.0
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing east
mph 0- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70 -
Total <15 <20 <25 <30 <35 <40 <45 <50 <55 <60 <65 <70 <200
1:00 PM 78 0 9 2 6 7 19 26 5 3 1 0 0 0
2:00 PM 73 0 9 1 6_. .7 -' ,. 20 • IB 6 2 4 . 0 : 0 0
3:00 PM 81 0 15 1 4 7 19 22 5 7 0 0 1 0
4:00 PM . 107.. 0 9 2 7 . '4 • 29 39 9 6 1 1 0 0
5:00 PM 90 9 7 6 2 12 19 21 18 4 0 0 0 1
6:00 PM 89 0 2 6 6 21, .. 16 24 12 1 1. 0 0., .0
7:00 PM 84 0 0 0 9 15 27 18 13 1 0 1 0 0
8:00 PM 57 0 1 0 3 8 28 6 6 4 0 0' 1 - 0
9:00 PM 58 0 3 1 7 10 17 16 2 0 1 1 0 0
10:00 PM . 29 0 1 0 1 4:. 11 5 3 2 . 2. . .,. 0 0 . 0
11:00 PM 34 0 0 0 8 5 9 9 1 1 1 0 0 0
6/25/2011
12:00 AM 6 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
• 1:00 AM 13 0 0 0 1 3. 6 5 0 0 .0 0 , .0 0
2:00 AM 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0
3:00 AM 5 0. 0 0' . 0 2. 3 0 0 0 0 " .0 . 0 0
4:00 AM 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5:00 AM 13 0 6 0 2 ).1.. 0 0 1. 1 0 0.., •0 . 2
6:00 AM 12 0 0 0 5 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 25 0 3 1 2 2 14 2 1 0 0 0" 0. 0
- 8:00 AM 35 0 0 2 7 6 6 5 7 2 0 0 0 0
9:00AM 44 0 2 0 6 6 2 12 9 0 3 1 I
10:00 AM 55 0 3 1 9 15 13 6 4 3 1 0 0 0
11 :00 AM 66. 0 2 0 4 9 20 24 5 1 1. 0. - . 0 • 0
12:00 PM 52 0 1 0 8 12 16 5 9 0 1 0 0 0
Total 1111 0 73 23 106 157 300 265 119 38 18 4 3 5
% 0.0 6.6 2.1 9.5 14.1 27.0 23.9 10.7 3.4 1.6 0.4 0.3 0.5
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
10 mph Pace Speed
Number In Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
10% 15% 50% 85% 90%
25.0 28.0 38.0 45.0 47.0
34.0 - 44.0 Average 37.2 mph
600 (54.0 %) Minimum 15.0 mph
Maximum 95.0 mph
45 mph 55 mph 65 mph
14.5% 2.1% 0.6%
161 23 7
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35mph
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/24/2011
Friday _
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing east
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35mph
mph 0- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70 -
Total < 15 < 20 < 25 < 30 < 35 < 40 < 45 < 50 < 55 < 60 < 65 < 70 < 200
1:00 PM 73 0 1 1 10 11 28 15 7 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 47 0 . 2 3 4' 11 7 7 9 , 3 ' . _ O. 0'.' 1 0
3:00 PM 57 0 0 1 3 7 13 18 9 3 3 0 0 0
4:00 PM 63 0 1 - '0 1'.' 11 17 24 9 0 0 . 0' 0 0
5:00 PM 51 0 0 0 4 9 12 18 6 2 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 72 0 . , , '..2:.. 0 . . 3 : . 7 19 22 9 . . , '7. 2,.: ,0 . 1 0
7:00 PM 61 0 0 0 9 10 20 7 12 3 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 49 0 1 :. 0 -4 10 15 11 7 1 0 0 0' 0
9:00 PM 42 0 2 2 10 4 14 8 1 0 1 0 0 0
10:00 PM 29 0 _ 0 0 ' 1 ' 7 10 5- 4' 1 1' • 0 0 0
11:00 PM 11 0 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6/26/2011 • .
12:00 AM 16 0 0 2 1 6 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 AM 4 Q 0' 0. ' - 1 3 0 0 . .. 0 .. 0..' • ' 0 0 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 AM 5 0 I '1 0 2 1 0 0- 0 0 ' 0 ' 0 0
4:00 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
5:00 AM 2 0 1- , -' -- • 0 : -' 0 ' 0 0 - 0 - 0 1 0 • - . - 10 0 a
6:00 AM 15 0 0 0 1 5 4 2 1 2 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 15 0 - 0 2. 2 - 5 4 0 2. .0 a ' 0 . 0 0
8:00 AM 34 0 4 0 5 9 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 a
9:00 AM 46 0 . .10_ .2 . : _ .: - 4 6 5 10 8'. 0 . . 0 0. ' 1 0
10:00 AM 51 0 15 0 6 11 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 84 0 8 3 11 15 19 14 6 6 0 1 0 1
12:00 PM 74 0 8 3 6 4 11 32 4 5 0 0 1 0
Total 905 0 56 20 86 156 232 206 98 38 7 1 4 1
0 iG 0.0 6.2 2.2 9.5 17.2 25.6 22.8 10.8 4.2 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.1
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
10% 15% 50% 85% °°
25.0 28.0 37.0 45.0 46.0
32.0 - 42.0 Average 36.7 mph
496 (54.8 %) Minimum 15.0 mph
Maximum 71.0 mph
45 mph 55 mph 65 mph
11.7 % 1.4 % 0.6 %
106 13 5
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/25/2011
Saturday
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing east
mph
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM'
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
6/27/2011
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
Total
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
0- 15-
Total < 15 < 20
82 0 9
81 0 13
85 0 12
58 ' 0 4
67 0 0
70 0 1.
66 0 1
66 0 2
57 0 0
'1a 0 1
28 0 0
45 mph
12.3
128
20 -
< 25
0
3,
0
1.
1
0
7
3
0
0
0 0 0
- .5 0 '
6 0 2
0. 3.
13 0 7
20 0. 2.
36 0 3 0
36- 0 1 0
49 0 2 1
42 0 0 0
49 0 3 1
52 . 0 3 0
53 0 0 1
1044 0 69 19
0.0 6.6 1.8
25 -
< 30
4
5
11
3
5
7
8
15
5
3
O 3
O 0
O 1
O 0
1 0
O 0
0 • 2
33.0 - 43.0
587 (56.2 %)
55 moh
1.5 %
16
7
7
7
4
4
5
3
109
10.4
10 % 15 % 50 %
25.0 28.0 37.0
65 mph
0.2 %
2
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35mph
30 -
< 35
10
19
13
8
7
10
9
15
15
5
0
35 -
< 40
24
23
22
18
11
21
26
17
20
5
19
O o a o 0 0 0
3 0• 0 '0 1 0 0
1 3 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 1.. 0 0 0
1 1 0 3 0 0 0
6 •5 . 2 3' 0 -- 0 0
9 12 3 0 2 0 0
8 5 11 2 0' 2 0
13 19 6 ' 1 0 0 0
12 14 '7 3 '1 . .1 0
7 21 6 6 1 0 0
9 11 15 6 2 1 0
8 20 12 8 0 1 0
188 317 188 106 27 16 3
18.0 30.4 18.0 10.2 2.6 1.5 0.3 0.
85% 90%
44.0 47.0
Average
Minimum
Maximum
40 -
<45 -
17
7
13
13
18
20
11
.
12
« 1
16
.9
2
4•
3
• r
6 0
36.2 mph
15.0 mph
71.0 mph
45 -
< 50 .
12
10'
10
50 -
< 55
1
1'
4
3
6
2
1
1
1
0
55 -
< 60
4
0
0
1
3
0
1
1'
0
1
0
60 -
< 65
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
Site:
Date:
65 -
< 70
70 -
< 200
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.1
000000000000
6/26/2011
Sunday
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing east
1.0 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
45 mph 55 Mott 65 molt
. 10.2 % 1.2 % 0.2 %
131 15 3
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35mph
mph 0- 15- 20- 25- 30 -
TOtal < 15 < 20 < 25 < 30 < 35
1:00 PM 79 0 13 1 9 10
2:00 PM . - 109 0 4 2 4 21
3:00 PM 84 0 6 3 5 13
4:00 PM 73 0 . 9 6 5 5-
5:00 PM 101 0 3 0 7 10
6:001PM 63 0 1 2 8 8
7:00 PM 70 0 1 0 12 9
8:00 PM 58 0 2 0 9 15
9:00 PM 59 0 1 3 8 11
10:00 PM 33 0 1 3 4 13
11:00 PM 13 0 0 0 0 7
6/28/2011 .: .
12:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 1
1:00 AM 6 0 0 0 Q`. , 1 . 0
2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- '3:00AM 2 0 0 0 ' 0 "0 -0
4:00 AM 6 0 0 0 1 0 2
5:00AM • 13 0 •2 0 - 4 - 3 •.2
6:00 AM 20 0 0 0 6 2 4
7:00 AM 75 0 0 0 39 8 .. 18
8:00 AM 156 0 7 0 106 7 11
9:00AM' 59 0 7 0 6. 10 13
10:00 AM 64 0 10 3 5 4 18
11:00 AM 63" 0 12 3 1 12 17.
12:00 PM 73 0 15 8 4 10 13
Total 1280 0 94 34 243 180 332
oh 0.0 7.3 2.7 19.0 14.1 25.9
Percentile Speeds 10 % 15 % 50 % 85 % 90 Q/Q
(mph) 24.0 25.0 36.0 44.0 46.0
32.0 - 42.0 Average 34.8 mph
629 (49.1 %) Minimum 15.0 mph
Maximum 70.0 mph
35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70-
< 40 < 45 < 50 < 55 < 60 < 65 < 70 < 200
19 19 7 0 0 0 1 0
41. -. 27 10 0 0 0 - 0 0
34 13 5 1 3 0 0 1
15 14 18 0 1 0 . '0 0
42 20 18 0 0 1 0 0
14 13 10 2 4 . 0'• 1 0
25 20 2 0 1 0 0 0
15 ' • 9 7 1 0 0 0 0
13 16 7 0 0 0 0 0
11 1 0 0 0 .0 `0 0
5 0 1. 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 3 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0' 0 0
O 0 2 0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0 0 0 •-'0
6 0 2 0 0 0 0
7 2 1 0 0,., 0 0
15 7 1 2 0 0 0
12 1 9 1 0 0 0
13 7 4 0 0 0 0
9 9 0 0 0 0 - 0
17 5 0 0 1 0 0
234 118 27 12 3 2 1
18.3 9.2 2.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1
Site: 000000000000
Date: 6/27/2011
Monday
Description 1:
Description 2:
Description 3:
middle road facing east
mph
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
6/29/2011
12:00 AM
- 1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5;00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
Total
a/
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
Total
94
71
64
98
99
82
84
50
69
36
4
0-
< 15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15- 20- 25-
< 20 < 25 < 30
22 9 9
10 .2: 6
15 2 4
10.' 6 .3
9 0_ 7
3 1 . 6
3 2 6
2. 0 D
2
0"
0
2
11
10
2
1 0 0 0 1
8 0 0'. . _ 0 - O
6 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0=
2 0 0 0 0
11 0 1.::.;.... _ 9 2..
28 0 0 1 2
46 0 0• 1 8
66 0 3 2 9
65 0 3 1' 10'
61 0 6 3 6
64 0 4. 2 - = .
103 0 8 3 6
1216 0 101 37 113
0.0 8.3 3.0 9.3
10 % 15 % 50
20.0 26.0 38.0
45 mph
15.0
182
35.0 - 45.0
635 (52.2 %)
55 moll
2.3%
28
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35mph
30 -
< 35
11
11
5
5
11
7
13
12
3
7
1
65 mph
0.2
3
0
0
0
0
1
I
8
6
7
17
8
6
8
148
12.2
0
4
6
3
1
1
6
6
18
11
14
26
18
274
22.5
Average
Minimum
Maximum
35 -
< 40
6
14
7
20
23
16
23
16
22
13
0
85% 90%
45.0 47.0
40 -
< 45
24
14
13
37
29
19
25
13
9
4
1
0
2
8
16
17
14
12
8
37
306
25.2
45 -
< 50
13
5
11
15
15
20 ..
8
4
12
1
0
50 -
< 55
0
-6
2
1
2
5
3
3
3
1
0
55 -
< 60
0
2
4
1
3
4
1
0
2
0
0
O 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
O 0 0 0
O 0 - '1 • 0
O 0
36.9 mph
15.0 mph
72.0 mph
0
.0
2
6
7
1
10
11
17
158
13.0
O 2
1 0
3 0
0 1
4 4
2 0
1. 1
5 0
43 25
3.5 2.1
60 -
< 65
0
0.
1
0
0
• 0
3
0
0
Site:
Date:
65 -
< 70
0
o-
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0'
0
7
0.6 0.
70 -
< 200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0.1
000000000000
6/28/2011
Tuesday
Description 1: middle road facing east Site: 000000000000
Description 2: Date: 6/29/2011
Description 3: Wednesday
24 Hour Speed
Channel: 35mph
mph 0 - 15 - 20 - 25 - 30 - 35 - 40 - 45 - 50 - 55 -
Total • <15 <20 <25 <30 <35 <40 <45 <50 <55 <60
1:00 PM 62 0 9 2 8 5 23 6 6 2
2:00 PM 79- 0 4 4 8 16 22 15. 7' 1
3:00 PM 74 0 7 9 10 6 14 14 6 7
4:00.PM 73 " • 0 5 1 11 11 17 19 7 2
5:00 PM 119 0 3 2 6 14 32 21 29 5
6:00 PM 102' . 0 . 2 1 2 10 36 23 21 5
7:00 PM 97 0 1 0 7 12 28 24 18 2
8:00 PM 64 0: .1 2 11 19 11 10 9 - 0
9:00 PM 45 0 1 0 3 4 23 7 7 0
10:00 30 '' . 0 0 0' 4 5 • 8 9 4 0.
11:00 PM 29 0 0 0 3 5 14 5 2 0
6/30/2011 '
12:00 AM 12 0 0 1 2 4 2 1 1 1
1:00 AM 8 0 . 1. 0 0 2 0 2 3 0
2:00 AM 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
3:00 AM' . 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 ' 2
4:00 AM 4 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0
5:00 AM 18' 0 1 0 3 3 6 1 1 .. 2
6:00 AM 19 0 1 0 3 7 3 2 2 0
7:00 AM - 47 • 0. :2 0 8 6" 11 12 5`' ' 0
8:00 AM 67 0 1 2 5 21 11 19 6 2
9:00 AM `51 0 , ' 6 0 5 14 8. 10 1' .. 6
10:00 AM 57 0 9 2 6 12 6 13 4 3
11:00 AM . -. '' - - - - - - _
12:00 PM - - - - -
Percentile Speeds
(mph)
10 mph Pace Speed
Number in Pace
Speeds Exceeded
Count
10% 15% 50% 85% 90%
26.0 29.0 37.0 46.0 48.0
33.0 - 43.0 Average 37.3 mph
564 (52.9 %) Minimum 15.0 mph
Maximum 105.0 mph
45 mph 55 mph 65 mph
16.9 % 2.3 % 0.5 %
180 25 5
60- 65- 70-
< 65 < 70 < 200
O 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0
O 0 0
4 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 3
O 0 0
O 0 0
O 0 0
O 0 0
0 0 0
O 0 0
0 0 0
O 0 0
O 0 0
1 0 0
O 0 0
1 0 1
O 0 0
O 1 0
O 1 0
Total 1067 0 56 26 107 179 277 213 141 41 12 9 2 4
0.0 5.2 2.4 10.0 16.8 26.0 20.0 13.2 3.8 1.1 0.8 0.2 0.4
0
Li
CC
0 01 11 11 1 I 1 1////
'
AND
40040444 sS'c'A:.
o
TERRY L.
KOELKER
15487
/OWN A \
0// /ifillim ov
i'a tti
52602'49Y A
INY
WI
S
LOT 55
TOTAL - L559 AC
S. MOW • 8125 AC
43. NET • 1.434 AC
f
LOT 5 )!,
S317
40.00'
f
95 45
•••
TOTAL • 2411 AC
, ROAR 0.110 AC
. 47 NET - 2.371 AC
C-4C
LOT 12 *-
4.536 AC4
w ROW • 0.110 AC
w PET 1.446 AC
.........
- - - . - -- C .56-
,
I
L 65.00" OT 11 s i
_ AC
TOTAL - 1.334 AC
a Ii)
Row • 0.331
'NET T - 1.003 AC
S -
Ot r i•
' i . -
0 W
IT
LOT A
TOTAL. 1090 AC
ROW • 0.323 AC
NET. 3.567 AC
PC
LOT 10
TOTAL 1.477 AC
ROW 0 120 AC
NET • 1.357 AC
saeleirt 5o4 le'
371 14'
LOT 9
IA
C- 1S
TOTAL - 1.612 AC
ROW 0.1011 AC 7
NET - 1.504 AC
Jill
'11 S
g
L4
405.58'
# .41% d LOT 8
T
NET 1.611 AC It
Te.e S8810'47W 589.68 (
52802
61
t NET - AC
LC 4
t T gel - : 0 29 AC
•
I If NET (LE
Th.e EAS 1.275 AC gla
I ;
1.011 AO „
1. 20.65
t r4
IA
.2 I z
LOT 6
, TOTAL - 1.261 AC
ROW. 0 240 AC
1 NET - 1.041 AC •
E 120.03
.3910'
249.
LOT 7 •
TOTAL • 1.432 AC
ROW. 0.057 AC
MT - 1.375 AC
.15')
1 84. 01 5
•
LOT 2 N,
TOTAL - 2.156 AC
, . ROW 0.158 AC ; 4.
s o. 40 , on . t % b wET • 1.998 AC 3
N -W O
LOT 3
TOTAL 2.132 AC ..5.
ROW 0246 AC
V ET • 1.984 AC .`
V .W / . \
.4j...
kfr.
,VR 55.00
CAS . 0.9E3 AC AC
' 4 \ NET (LESS CAS)
- 1.001 AL
226S
1
05.00• TA
'
LAS 11990 AC
NET (LESS LAS)
• 1.024 AC
1
•••
3.,
if
I ..- "1_1,9
,;r 1
-3 1... -15 ' LOT 5 s :
F.UE TOTAL • 2.316 AC
e 171:2".N1g TA
erk'z
s urt i
4 q 0V.- EAS. - 0.996 AC
NET (LESS EAS AC itip
. 1.002 319.
4
girt
- 7 --
LOCATION MAP
•
S C M
•
S
4016
12631
9651
12642
0
5.•-
o
SURVEYED PERIMETER
TOTAL AREA 71.225 AC.
ROW AREA 5.216 AC.
NET AREA w. 66 .009 AC,
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LAND SURVEYING DOCUMENT WAS
PREPARED AND THE RELATED SURVEY WORK WAS PERFORMED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT PERSONAL SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM
A DULY LICENSED L AND SU UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF IOWA. ALL MONUMENTS ARE PLACED OR SHALL BE PLACED
WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE THIS PLAT IS RECORDED.
TERRY L. KOELKER
LICENSE NUMBER: 15487
MY LICENSE RENEWAL DATE IS DECEMBER 31, 2011
(DATE)
SHEETS COVERED BY THIS SEAL : SHEETS 1, 2, & 3
LEGEND
scm (FOUND)
STANDARD CONCRETE MONUMENT
IRON PIPE (FOUND)
(1", UNLESS NOTED)
5/8" REROD (FOUND)
(CAPPED AS NOTED)
1/2" REROD (FOUND)
(CAPPED AS NOTED)
YELLOW CAP STAMPED "4016"
RED CAP STAMPED "12631"
YELLOW CAP STAMPED "9651"
YELLOW CAP STAMPED "12642"
MAG/PK NAIL (FOUND)
5/8" REROD (PLACED)
(ORANGE CAP STAMPED "15487")
NAIL (PLACED)
PROPERTY LINE
SURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
SURVEYED PERIMETER
CENTERLINE
RIGHT OF WAY (ROW)
EASEMENT LINE
RECORD DIMENSION
NOTFS
1. ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEROF.
2. LOT 2 OF WILD ROSE PLACE (PARCEL #0926176001), AND LOT 1 OF THE SW1/4 OF
THE NW1/4 (PARCEL #0926100017), ALL OF SECTION 26, T89N, R1E, ARE OWNED BY:
WMK INVESTMENT PROPERTIES INC. / 17387 HUMKE RD. / DUBUQUE, IA 52002
3. SURVEY REQUESTED BY: WMK INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, KEN KRESS.
4. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD AND NOT OF RECORD.
965
LOT 1
E1/2 NET/4
SEC. 27
LOT 2
E1/2 NE1/4
SEC.27
FOUND SCM T
0 V/1/4 COMER
C. 26, MN, R1E
Comprised of: LOT 2 OF WILD ROSE PLACE,
AND LOT 1 OF THE SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4,
ALL OF SECTION 26, T89N, R1E, OF THE 5TH P.M., DUBUQUE COUNTY,
4
-5
* §T
N88•47 395.29'
FOUND 5/r 0(600 0
NW CORNER syn N
SEC 26, T8014, R1E
LOT 2-1-2
NV/1/4 SWI/4 SEC.26
39519')
Final Plat of:
WILD ROSE ESTATES
DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA
836.35' (836.44)
LOT 2
v/ESTY/000 HEIGHTS NO. 2
2631
0' 150' 300'
LOT 2
wESTwOOD HEIGHTS
.4-
SCALE 1" = 300'
LOT 8
TOTAL - 211304 AC
(FUTURE DEVELCPMENT)
1307.47'
LOT 1-2-1
NWT/4 4811/4 5E0.28
(334.875
cr '.
ROO' •
5 TOTAL . 1.197 n
,4. ROW - 0.114 AC 5.
..... . cds S3;sz
•
...
44 •
'44 ' 02 T 4'
, 4 ,
'... .._
NET .. 1.036 AC 4,
ct" 3 . , 33;k ... Pp> : NV ; : •.• :".„ 4.
4 43 10T 594,."
/
0
2 / 4'.4 ,....; ''''tl. OTAL - 1.123 ,,..,.. .
„ /// 4 A ye' •••. N . .,. ,.... ,
ROW - 0.114 AM
, :;.,, StRob A!' LOT 60 ?I§ 4.0
$,‘ LOT 61
... ,/ ,;,g. , - .. :_ - "'OT i.35 1 , 6 Ac 3 „,,,,,,...
A .... 1.-44;t, $ TOTAL AC
• 1.274 P: t, TOTAL. 1 367 AC
ROW - 0.1116 AC , ROW. 0.261 AC 119 ....
'.›.3• ,
N..,
4 7: '411.:.t i `q, , 6,, . ---.... . .......-c
..., < 00. NET . 1.069 AC f2 NET. 1.106 AC PLE?9,../_93540
■ 4
9 ." wee '°4 6: ,
M AC ....E/9/
',T< • 1.115 4,
p 15
:*
..,••• ROW . 0.114 ! C-4
AC • C ---- - - ----C-91'
_CB
9" NET . 1.001 .?
-' 14 E-C 7
L;PTOTAL • 1.409 AC e1. 3c:: ....
, TI:,!;,0:`
, LOT 13
1 64'
N68'33'371 276.55'
1, 4 , TOTAL 1.745 AC
• ROW 0.039 AC
NET I.7C6 AC
56258'03"W
47.70' 4016
(47.64')
264
LOT 56
45
o. 7:
e
M3 e
CAP LOT 2
.34 %ELAND PLACE
(NOT PART OF WILD
61Sz., ROSE ESTATES)
18642
LOT
2
54 8'33'37E 511.55'
334.91' (334.875')
P
TOTAL -
“ L ET OT ?... AC
5
1.067
AC
ROW 05 AC
LOT 1
WELAND PLACE
(NOT PART OF WILD
ROSE ESTATES)
12642
LOT 1-1-2
NV/1/4 Sw1/4 5E1.26
35.00'
e
t V-
S 054
66.25'
(66.00')
K 31.00'
(31.00)
4488'31'58T 641.24' (641.25') 4016
1264
51321
15487
LOT I
NWT/4 542/4 SEC.26
IOWA.
888'29'42'E 932.25' 4832.
8813'29'42"E 530.53' 154197
LOT 1
WILD ROSE PLACE
se
.38 (2678.21')
FOUNO RER00 18/
YELLOW CAP STAMPED . 126•2'
ONE CORNER SW1/4 N*1/4
SEC. 26. Teal. R1E
538'35'58"E
LOT 1-1
NE1/4 W/4 SEC.26
„,
g -
IC
33.00' 33'
548
ROW
ROW
401.72' (401.74')
LOT 2
SPIEGELHALTER PLACE
401.56' (401.741
so oLl
4016
016
5487
016
LOT 1-1
NE1/4 542/4 501.26
0488'41'25
66.00'
4016
154137 •L
,
6.
NEU:1'41'25"E
33.00'
THIS IS AN ASSUMED
SEARING FOR THE PURPOSES
OF THIS SURVEY ONLY.
RI LOT 2-1
,,p NEI/4 NV/1/4 SEC.26
LA
12631 324.23' (325.31')
LOT 3
SPiEGELHALTER PLACE g
N88•31 12631 EX1S1134G
ACCESS EASEMENT
LOT 2
SET/4 NWT/4 SEC.26
• P fp 4188'33'35"E
32Y29 (315.1
LOT 1
TOTAL - 1920 AC
ROW 0.037 AC
NET 3.033 AC
4
S5034
55.00
749.23' (748.96')
• -
(AS.. 1.813 AC
NET (LESS CAS.)
- 1.420 AC
NA
L
IC
AP
12931
401
FOUND 5/Er RERCO 18/
YELLOW CAP STAMPED .1 4018 .
SE CORNER NEI/4 11121/4
NEC. 28, 039N, RIE
FOUND 5/8' REROD
0 CENTER
SEC. 26, T89N, RTE
L.L5
a
"*-
_J
SHEET
6
OF
CURVE
CHORD
REARING
CHORD
1 FNGTH
RADIUS
ARC
IFNGTH
DELTA
C -5A
N55'54'07 "E
83.66'
533.00'
83.75'
09'00'10"
C -5B
N75'35'31 "E
150.00'
533.00'
150.50'
1610'42"
C -5C
S8893'48 "E
150.00'
533.00'
150.50'
16'10'42"
C -5D
S72'03'06 "E
150.00'
533.00'
150.50'
1610'42"
C -5E
86116'38 "E
49.94'
533.00'
49.96'
05'22'14"
C -6A
N71'49'54 "E
349.08'
500.00'
356.59'
40'51'44"
C -68
573'09'53 "E
251.61'
500.00'
254.34'
29'08'42"
C -7A
N71'49'54 "E
326.04'
467.00'
333.05'
40'51'44"
C -78
573'09'53 "E
235.00'
467.00'
237.55'
29'08'42"
C -B
N11•33'24 "W
150.13'
300.00'
151.74'
28'58'49"
C -9
N11•33'24 "W
166.64'
333.00'
168.43'
28'58'49"
C -10
N11•33'24 "W
133.61'
267.00'
135.05'
28'58'49"
C -11A
N10'32'52 "E
265.01'
1000.00'
265.79'
1513'44"
C -11B
N19•44'37 "E
55.19'
1000.00'
55.20'
03'09'46"
111-12A
N10'32'52 "E
273.76'1033.00'
274.57'
15'13'44"
C -128
N0713'05 "E
154.35'
1033.00'
154.50'
0814'09'
2.-12C
N14•49'57"E
120.00'1033.00'120.07'
06'39'35"
C -120
N19•44'37 "E
57.01'
1033.00'
57.02'
03'09'46"
C -13
N12'07'45 "E
319.62'
1000.00'
320.99'
18'23'30"
C -14
N12'07'45 "E
309.07'
967.00'
310.40'
18'23'30"
C -15
508'21'30 "W
224.38'
500.00'
226.31'
25'56'00"
C -16
S10'28'35 "W
175.79'
467.00'
176.85'
21'41'50"
11-17A
SI 2'30'07 "W
153.38'
500.00'
153.99'
17'38'46"
C -17B
500'27'53 "E
72.26'
500.00'
72.32'
0817'14"
C -18A
512'30'07 "W
163.51'
533.00'
164.16'
1718'46"
C -18B
501'28'46 "W
40.91'
533.00'
40.92'
04'23'55"
2.- 19AN33'03'31
"W
53.94'
60.00'
55.94'
53'25'22"
C -19B
N3254'12 "E
75.93'
60.00'
82.21'
78'30'05"
C -19C
S68'33'43 "E
75.98'
60.00'
82.28'
78'34'07"
C -19D
512'04'10 "W
79.27'
60.00'
86.60'
82'41'39"
CURVE
CHORD
REARING
CHORD
J FNGTH
RADIUS
ARC
I FNGTH
DELTA
C -1
N24 "E
112.25'
125.00'
116.41'
53'21'25"
C -2
N24'43'19 "E
82.61'
92.00'
85.68'
53'21'25"
C -3
N24•4319 "E
141.88'
158.00'
147.14'
53'21'25"
C -4A
N57'40'37 "E
109.32'
500.00'
109.54'
12'33'09"
C -48
N73'49'01 "E
171.31'
500.00'
172.16'
19'43'40"
C- 4C
888'13'48 "E
140.71'
500.00'
141.18'
1610'42"
C -4D
572'03'06 "E
140.71'
500.00'
141.18'
1610'42"
C -4E
56116'38 "E
46.85'
500.00'
46.87'
05'22'14"
CURVE
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
I FNGTH
RADIUS
ARC
I FNGTH
DELTA
2.-20A
S2110'15 "W
71.20'
60.00'
76.23'
72'47'30"
2- 20ES84
"50'47 "W
55.00'
60.00'
57.13'
54'33'33"
2- 20CN28•34'39
"W
76.00'
60.00'
82.30'
78'35'35"
21-20C
N54•22'47 "E
82.85'
60.00'
91.44'
8719'19"
LINE
LABEL
SIZE
SERVING LOTS
E -A
EASEMENT "A"
20'x20'
1.2,3,4,11, &61
E -B
EASEMENT "B"
20'x20'
5,6,7,8,9, &10
E -C
EASEMENT "C"
20'x20'
12,13,14,15,59, &60
E -D
EASEMENT "D"
20'x20'
16,54,55,56,57, &58
LINE
BEARING
DIST.
L1
526'02'49 "W
75.00'
L2
S 2'56'00 "W
50.00'
L3
887'04'00 "W
33.00'
L4
S 4'36'30 "W
14.75'
L5
868'40'30 "E
33.00'
L6
N71 "E
35.50'
w
0
O
a
0
0
N
N
0
ce
N
0
0
J
N
re
re
0
0
0
3H TS
0
83'
O
2
U)
03
0]
(S
9651
N88 "47'05 "E 395.29'
FOUND 5/8" REROD 0
NW CORNER SW1 /4 NW1 /4
SEC. 26, T89N, R1E
•
■'
•s
LOT 55
TOTAL = 1.559 AC
S *g, ROW = 0.125 AC
'id, NET = 1.434 AC
JJ2 ti /
t4
• 7 7
LOT 5
S TOTAL = 1.197 AC
c9 :1 ROW = 0.114 AC 'Y
6 1.1% , 41E T = 1.083 ACS' >
FJ ry ./ . 1. g 4.
2 od'/
33'
N88'33'37 "E 276.55'
LOT 56
LC
J N• TOTAL = 1.745 AC
? m. ROW = 0.039 AC
9:74 NET = 1.706 AC
F n.
aNS h
s 0.
�
3
Tr
LOT 57
y"' TOTAL = 1.067 AC
ROW - 0.057 AC
NET = 1.010 AC
R60'
9 6 ,
395.19')
WELL EASEMENT TABLE
CURVE DATA
LOT 1 -2 -1
NW1 /4 NW1 /4 SEC.26
(334.875'
4l
,t
'"V.
LOT 5
TOTAL = 1.197 AC
ROW = 0.114 AC 'V
1.083 ACih 07
F 3j ^fY
,/
TY '
,
33'
33 7))
4 /' ,, fi g.
.4P/4'
LOT 16
s? /h TO O W 0.322 AC T
AL = 1.357 AC
9 R =
NET = 1.035 AC
33.00' ^^
78 J
•9
Cp L S 79 18'2"
♦°j f)-''A 260, 74• E
/.,4 LOT 58
TOTA ' � P ROW = 0 .372 AC 3�
• NET = 1.036 AC
, \�. S J
S .
?
6 3? e.0
• O'
•
i, 15 70
4, 7
J
„ = 1.409 AC
41• ROW = 0.112 AC
4 NET = 1.297 AC
o,
�
AriOTAL = 1,115 AC s'2
M ROW = 0.114 AC n.
2 NET = 1,001^ LOT 14
76
531'29'10 "W
40.00'
0 ,
n " N LOT 59 4, ti
TOTAL = 1.123 AC Y
ROW = 0.114 AC(? .3 In
J = 1.009 AC 1 4) in g
'� OT 60
a
LOT 13
v 4 / TOTAL = 2.481 AC
ROW = 0.110 AC
NET = 2.371 AC
A
0
n
eA�
d`� ry � 9$
4
, L LOT 61
' ' TOTAL = 1.274 AC r J TOTAL = 1.367 AC
ROW = 0.186 AC ROW = 0.261 AC 10' ,
NET = 1.088 AC N NET = 1.106 AC pUE�iji548
z h
` _ - 6a i
• c,
7 0
E -C
C -4C
=5 - -- '0 0- -- ,
m
LOT 12
TOTAL = 1.556 ACf
N ROW = 0.110 AC
° NET = 1.446 AC o
W
M p
0
z
0. A y19
N
C _48
_ _ erg ,
526'02'49 "W \'
65.00' 1 X
LOT 11 4
T OTAL = 1.334 ACII
rn ROW = 0,331 AC 1
NET = 1.003 AC I
0
In - I.
NT Zp �2E W •L6
6
NO
CAP
LOT A
TO = 3.890 AC
ROW = 0.323 AC
NET = 3.567 AC
LOT 10
TOTAL = 1.477 AC
ROW = 0.120 AC
NET = 1.357 AC
586'19'16 "E 404.18'
371.18'
LOT 9
TOTAL = 1.612 AC
ROW = 0.108 AC
NET = 1.504 AC
N
S8811'39 "E
275.00
X6 6 O
C - 18B J
LT/
0
m
L4
•
526'065.200' '49 "W
1 'LJO
LOT 4
TOTAL = 2.714 AC
`7 ROW = 0.429 AC
c1 • ). NET = 2.285 AC �'OS
11 ,7y/ 559'36'13 "W
1 O ( ri
fo
I I
's
3
A Id
- 1
l y
, C 80.00'
. 4), S 0 .4), Sy
EAS. = 1.275 AC �~
NET (LESS EAS.) V�
= 1.011 AC t 20.65
5,259 W
B
t s /1
0
.
F
Ll• 00 . ss.
y 6 7 0 55.00'
EAS. = 0.983 AC
• NET (LESS EAS.)
= 1.001 AC
551'40'58 "W r ,
65.00' F,
e
L3
33' -.I-
I I I
A
fi
361. "i
e0 b
EAS. = 0.990 AC ti oj�
NET (LESS EAS.)
= 1.024 AC
08-r
• 10• LOT 5 rn •
/ ' P UE TOTAL = 2.218 AC t
/A ROW = 0.205 AC TA
NET = 2.013 AC
/ $1
• 7 49 48 , 1$
N77 •50.
18248. w
/i
Y LOT 6
I1' TOTAL = 1.281 AC
I I ROW = 0.240 AC
I NET = 1.041 AC •
189.8
lk/
,
10 '
K /. PUE
e4/ ir
)^3 LOT 2 2 ' 4 ,,
S•
h TOTAL = 2.156 AC
, ROW = 0.158 AC ^1h iA
A J NET = 1.998 AC ^ 0 r
IN/C
c ',0 0 ^0/0 p
O '
61 i / 0 0
S ,O6 EAS. = 0.996 AC
NET (LESS EAS.)
= 1.002 AC �? 38.5
•
•
•
0
•
0
/.r"
176.64'
LOT 2
co
WESTW00D HEIGHTS NO. 2
N
12631
LOT B
TOTAL = 25.604 AC
(FUTURE DEVELOPMENT)
LOT
2 -2 -1
8'33'37 "E 511,55'
334.91' (334.875')
7T1 235.00'
a
LA
C^
O
LINE DATA
15487
ry
4. 0. / � 57916'52 "E
'` ♦A .c-'
260. >4.
•
rya , ' /� '? L OT 58 ,'
_I' e . , TOTAL = 1.408 AC 0 '
O ry
? ( �." •, R O W - 0.372 AC ,2
�,, NET = 1.036 AC ry 0
33 \ )) 69 21 \ , °' S , ., B \ - JJ h •
� 2 ' e ROW = 0.114 AC
\ 0 . J J ;7j _� NET = 1.009 AC ,
S31'29'1 °°•
40.00'
TOTAL = 1.559 AC
ROW = 0.125 AC
'.." NET = 1.434 AC
J @
4
LV1 JV
TOTAL = 1.745 AC
9 C'. ROW = 0.039 AC
•• $, NET = 1.706 AC ,„7 d. I A • rte• h
'E,. ° o.
LOT 55
4
PJ-
fal
s
109
S62 "58'03 "W
47.70' 4016
(47.64')
4)
n•
R60'
O Dti
'. N
2 1 ) 1�01�
12642 L6 tP.
O Wa
O t
0
LOT 2
LAND PLACE
PART OF WILD
SE ESTATES)
LOT 1
WEILAND PLACE
A LOT 57
y = 1.067 AC
. ROW = 0.057 AC
Q NET = 1.010 AC
J
(NOT PART OF WILD
ROSE ESTATES)
12642
LOT 1 -1 -2
NW1 /4 SW1 /4 SEC.26
>r
S 0'54'49 "E
66.25'
(66.00')
31.
(31.00')
15487
'31'58 "E 641.24' (641.25') 4016
12642
588'30'47"W
LOT 1
NW1 /4 SW1 /4
SEC.26
SCALE 1" = 200'
0' 100' 200'
2642
Ss
91
LOT 1
WILD ROSE PLACE
9S
0
'7sC•z
LOT 8 °>
TOTAL = 1.668 AC
ROW = 0.057 AC
NET = 1.611 AC
6 7.38' (2678.21')
FOUND 1/2" REROD W/
YELLOW CAP STAMPED "12642"
0 SE CORNER SW1 /4 NWI /4
SEC. 26, T89N, R1E
538'35'58 "E
33.00'
/
r :3'39'10 "W
/ 249.8
R60' LOT 7
TOTAL = 1.432 AC
ROW = 0.057 AC
N NET = 1.375 AC
en
588'30'47 "W 589.68' (59
405.58'
548
.15')
w
N
v'
O
O
J
r i
NO
CAP
0
184.00
SPIEGELHALTER PLACE
OD' d ,
A / F
1D'/ • O
/ a5 4
33' 5R 1" /, 0`2
LOT 3
�• ' TOTAL = 2.132 AC ,>
ROW = 0.148 AC y
,,NET = 1.984 AC 8•
016 S
U1
0)
f'1
4016
A
1 .+
N
J
m
N88'31'01 "E
401.56' (401.74')
016
15487
4016
LOT 1 -1
NE1 /4 SW1 /4 SEC.26
12631
N
15487 .
4016
Io
7
0'
LOT 3
o SPIEGELHALTER PLACE
a
NO
CAP
,15487
, d* LOT 1
/
TOTAL = 3.920 AC
ROW = 0.887 AC
NET = 3.033 AC
55.00'
749.23' (748.96'
ACCESS EASEMENT
EXISTING
LOT 2
CURVE DATA
NET (LESS EAS.)
= 1.420 AC
12631
cn
co
4016
FOUND 5/8" REROD W/
YELLOW CAP STAMPED "4016"
SE CORNER NE1/4 NW1/4
SEC. 26, T89N, R1E
CURVE DATA
co
cO
0
0
0
NO
T ar
FOUND 5/8" REROD
CENTER
co
oo
LLI
EN
Zd
M o
LLI
ce
Z co
-
0
SHEET
OF