The URL can be used to link to this page

Conceptual Development Plan - Menard, Inc. PETITION SUPPORTING ACCESS CHANGE We the undersigned support the modification of the intersection at Old Highway Road and US#20 located on the West side of Dubuque, Iowa. We support the changing of this intersection to no stop light with a right onto Old Highway Road off US#20 for westward approaching traffic and a right out only onto US#20 from Old Highway Road for westward flowing traffic. The traffic accessing this intersection from the south side ofUS#20 would retain the same existing present flow pattern. Also, we support construction a second access point to US#20 from Old Highway Road to be located near the former Boogie Nites property at 13736 Old Highway Road, Dubuque, Iowa. This access would be controlled by a stop light on US#20 as designed by the Iowa Department of Transportation, the City of Dubuque Engineering Department and Menard's engineering firm. Address Date -3tJ --()D 9'- c3 0 ,<) 0 ~ 01, ;11 WV Z-lJO 00 O=U\13:J38 /~ Y ?-......)' ../l:!-/,-~ ~c:: C> ~ A 'S' >- ~ .~ ~~ ~ t5 ;:~~~"": -;:::-" " "', ~' ~, '''0/ K L-J .9'7 QT ~ ~ ~'v"-- /D ~~ /It ~ d- ?>~ ~c:;;-- iT"_ ~ <::s- ~ r.-- ~ .......- .........-- " '. \ ...- \ \ \ September 1, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE AND US MAIL 319.589.4149 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o City Clerk City of Dubuque City Hall- 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Menard, Inc. respectfully request that the Dubuque City Council tablt: the Menard, Inc. agenda item that is currently scheduled as a public hearing on the Council's September 5, 2000 agenda. Menard, Inc. requests that the same be set for public hearing and decision at the Council's scheduled meeting in October. Menard, Inc.'s discussions with Dick Kautz, Bob Krause, and Art Gorley of the Iowa Department of Transportation ("IDOT") resulted in several access alternatives which merit further study. The necessary traffic engineering work will not be available prior to the September 5, 2000 meeting. Thus the need for tabling the request until October. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 715.876.2810. Very truly yours, lC:~iP' UJ . tJYv/'h Thomas W. 0 'Neil Real Estate Acquisitons Menard, Inc. () Ci'-<?-- c D- c- _:=-~.,- r-'; .(\j ,.-0 J> --., ff CD S> CJ) - .~ TWO/ml ::::.. ~:: Enclosures Cc: Marv Prochaska Jim Bradley, via facsimile Bill Maiers, via facsimile Bob Krause, via facsimile a <::) {/) rr, "l:J I 0') :0 r~f7 ':J ill -- ~ o 4777 MENARD DRIVE EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703-9625 TELEPHONE (715) 876-5911 FAX: 715-876-5901 - SEP 01 2000 16:53 FR MB-IARDS-GEN OFFICE ~i ----.---.. -- 715 876 2868 TO 13195894149 P.01/01 September 1, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE AND US MAlL 319.589.4149 Honorable Mayor and City CO\mcil c/o City Clerk City of Dubuque City Ha1I- 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Menard. Inc. ~spectfWly request that the Dubuque City Council table the Menard, Inc. agenda item that is currently scheduled as a public hearing on the Council's September 5, 2000 agenda. Menard. Inc. requests that the same be set for public hearing and decision at the Council's scheduled meeting in October. Menard, Ine.'s discussions with Dick Kautz, Bob Krause, and Art Gorley of the Iowa Department of Transportation (''lOOT") resulted in several access alternatives which merit further study. The necessary traffic engineering work will not be available prior to the September 5, 2000 meeting. Thus the need for tabling the request until October. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 715.876.2810. Very troly yours, 1CMMW.tf~ Thomas W. O'Neil Real Estate Acquisitons Menard, Inc. TWO/ml Enclosures Cc: Marv Prochaska Jim Bradley, via facsimile Bill Maiers, via facsimile Bob Krause, via facsimile .~ ur-.IAnn nnl\1f'" eAIII" .''''t''" Uti .~"9ft.. I'UH\I!' Tel ~"U~II:" ,.,..e\ a.,e en.. 4 e'AV. -r.... IrNt I!''''''' ** TOTRL PRGE.01 ** August 15,2000 VIA FACSIMILE AND US MAIL 319.589-4149 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o City Clerk City of Dubuque City Hall- 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque,IA 52001 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Menard, Inc. respectfully request that the Dubuque City Council table the Menard, Inc. agenda item that is currently scheduled as an Action Item on the Council's August 21, 2000 agenda. Menard, Inc. requests that the same be set for public hearing and decision at the Councils next scheduled meeting, that being Tuesday, September 5, 2000. Menard, Inc.'s discussions with Dick Kautz and Bob Kramse of the Iowa Department of Transportation ("IDOT") led us to believe that the proposed Menard, Inc. site will be outside of the scope ofthe Southwest Arterial Study. A final determination of the scope of said study would likely be available prior to the September 5, 2000 meeting, but not before the August 21, 2000 meeting. Anticipating that proposed Menard, Inc. site will be outside of the scope of the Southwest Arterial Study, Menard, Inc. will be meeting with IDOT to discuss access alternatives to the site. Menard, Inc. would appreciate the Council's participation in suggesting access alternatives, as well as the Council allowing city staff to participate in determining access as well. Menard, Inc.'s discussions with IDOT on the issue of accessed to the proposed site can only be meaningful with City of Dubuque input on the issue as well. I will be attending the Monday, August 21, 2000 meeting if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, ilumUl/JW O''/!d!J! Thomas W. O'Neil ' f Real Estate Acquisitons Menard, Inc. Cc: Marv Prochaska Jim Bradley, via facsimile Bill Maiers, via facsimile Bob Krause, via facsimile Dick Kautz, via facsimile Michael Van Milligen, via TWO/ml Enclosures TELEPHONE (715) 876.5911 FAX: 715.876.5901 July 14,2000 VIA FACSIMILE & US.MAIL 319.589.0890 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Dubuque City Hall 13 th and Central Avenue Dubuque,IA 52001 Re: Menard, Inc. Request for Re-Hearing City of Dubuque, Iowa () 0 0 O~ Co- :::0 c c: r- i-n . -,.- \..1 C) ~- _c! -.J :'-n ~..--"' );..... '....,r.,' -0 ---"'- (I) ,..- C\ 3: ........ S> -' fTJ -"'1. N -- 0 o' .. CD 0 co Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Menard, Inc. hereby renews its request for Re-Hearing of the City of Dubuque's previous decision relative to the proposed Menard, Inc. Store to be located on Highway 20. Said decision was made at the City of Dubuque's July 5, 2000, Council meeting. Menard, Inc. requests the matter be scheduled for re-hearing at one of the Council's August, 2000, meetings. This should allow Menard, Inc. sufficient time to conduct the additional fact-finding necessary to propose an access situation from Highway 20 which is acceptable to all of the parties involved, namely the City of Dubuque, the Iowa Department of Transportation, and Menard, Inc. I regret being unable to personally attend the Monday, July 17, 2000, city Council meeting. If you have any questions which you would like to direct to me, please call me at your convenience at 715.876.28910. Very truly yours, MENARD, INC. ~ W. rfU;v:t Thomas W. O'Neil Real Estate Acquisitions cc: Marv Prochaska Jim Bradley liob Krause FAX: 715-876-5901 May 23, 2000 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL Kyle Kritz City of Dubuque Planning Services Department Dubuque,IA 52001-4864 Re: Menard, Inc. Conceptual Plan Review Dear Kyle: Pursuant to your correspondence dated May 15, 2000, I am enclosing twelve (12) copies of the Menard, Inc. revised site plan for the proposed store located on Hwy 20 in Dubuque, Iowa. The revisions have been made to address the comments set forth in the above-referenced correspondence. You will note the parking lot and store have been recessed further than shown on the previously submitted site plan. The anticipated property line has been depicted with a light hyphenation twenty feet (20') removed from the existing property line. This is to account for likely laDOT right-of-way acquisition. Menard, Inc. proposes to maintain an additional five feet (5') between the anticipated property line and the parking area for landscaping purposes. Although this has not been finalized with laDOT, by carbon copy of this correspondence and site plan to Bob Krause and Will Sharp, Menard, Inc. intends to wrap this issue up once and for all. I will see you at the Zoning Advisory Commission meeting on Wednesday, June 7, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. Should you have any questions for me prior to that time, please feel free to give me a call at (715) 876-2810. Very truly yours, MENARD, INC. $AlYntMi)). ~ Thomas W. O'Neil Real Estate Acquisitions Enclosures cc: Marv Prochaska (via hand delivery) Jim Bradley (via priority mail, with enclosure) Bob Krause (via priority mail, with enclosure) Will Sharp (via priority mail, with enclosure) EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703-9625 TELEPHONE (715) 876-5911 FAX: 715-876-5901 VIA FACSIMILE AND US MAIL 319.589.4149 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o City Clerk City of Dubuque City Hall- 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque,IA 52001 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Menard, Inc. respectfully requests that the Dubuque City Council schedule for public hearing and decision Menard, Inco's request for rezoning to PUD Commercial at its next scheduled meeting on Monday, October 2, 2000. Menard, Inco's request for rehearing was previously tabled in order to allow Menard, Inc. further opportunity to obtain further traffic engineering relative to site accessibility. Such information is now available. Menard, Inc. believes there is an access alternative available which may be acceptable to the City of Dubuque, the Iowa Department of Transportation, ("IDOT") and Menard, Inc., which access alternative is also satisfactory from a traffic engineering perspective. The alternative, as suggested by IDOT and studied by WHKS, would result in the removal of the temporary signal currently located on Highway 20 at Old Highway Road, and the relocation of said signal west to an access at the proposed Menard, Inc. development. The same is more fully explained in the WHKS traffic study. Most importantly, the proposal would result in No Net Increase In Traffic Signalization on Highway 20. I will be in attendance on Monday, October 2, 2000, to renew our request for a favorable decision on the proposed rezoning, as Menard, Inc. is of the understanding that site accessibility is the sole issue which forestalled a favorable decision in the first place. Dan Coyle, an engineer with WHKS, will also be in attendance in order to fully explain the Traffic Study. Should you have any questions prior to the meeting, feel free to call me at 715.876.2810. Very truly yours, JtWfr1 W' (l~ ~:~as W. O'Neil Real Estate Acquisitions Menard, Inc. 0 a C.:Jo ,~""j' C/) C:J '-<. rr1 :0 :::_)~ -0 ;11 c.,: ..." .~ U) ". c', ,.-n (j -0 -::::: 0 :::;:: ""- -> =~ m (')" 0 ro .... TWO/js Enclosures cc: Marv Prochaska Jim Bradley, via facsimile Bill Maiers, via facsimile Bob Krause, via facsimile 4777 MENARD DRIVE TELEPHONE (715) 876-5911 FAX: 715-876-5901 EAU CLAIRE, WI 54703-9625 SEP 26 2000 16:00 FR MENARDS-GEN OFFICE 715 876 2868 TO 13195890890 P.01/01 /}~//f ~/?~4/ VL4. FA.CSIMILE AND US MAlL 319.J89.4149 Honorable Mayor and City Council clo City Clerk City ofDubuqu~ City Hall- 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque,L\ 52001 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: t.i + ~.~~: , J Menard, Inc. respectfully requests that the Dubuque City Council schedule for public hearing and decision Menard, Ino.'s request for rezonins to PUD Commercial at its next scheduled meeting on Monday, October 2, 2000. Menard, Inc:s request for rehearing was previously tabled in order to allow Menard, Inc. further opportunity to obtain further traffic engineering relative to site acoessibility. Such infonnation is now available. ~(. Menard, Inc. believes there is an access alternative available which may be acceptable to the City of Dubuque, the Iowa Department of Transportation, ("IDOT~ and Menard, Inc., which access alternative is also satisfactory from a. traffic engineering perspective. The alternative, as suggested by IDOT and studied by WHKS, would result in the removal of the temporary signal currently located on Highway 20 at .Old Highway Road, and the relocation of said sianal west to an access at the proposed Menard, Inc. development. The same is more fully explained in the WHKS traffic study. Most importantly, the proposal would result inNo Net Increase In Traffic SilDaI1zatloD on Highway 20. ~: I":: ...' ~::: I will be in attendance on Monday, October 2,2000, to renew our request for a favorable decision on the proposed rezoning, as Menard, Inc. is of the understanding that site accessibility is the sole issue which forestalled a favorable decision in the first place. Dan Coyle, an engineer with WIlKS. will also be in attendance in order to fully explain the Traffic Study. Should you have any questions prior to the meeting, feel free to call me at 715.876.2810. .,. ~~ ,:..: ~~\ ';.-: v cry truly yours, JL,u~.-W' ~ l= W. O'Neil Real Estate Acquisitions Menard, Inc. i:~ :.;. .'. ~, '. I ~,:! '!WO/js ~I,;~ .' ~~ :~ ~~ ~J.\ :r Enclosures :w ~ ~!: CC: Marv Prochaska Jim Bradley, via facsimile Bill Maiers, via facsimile Bob Krause, via facsimile A-rT7 . .1:'.' A "''' ""',\ ~r- ~..._. ..-- ....-.--- ....... ** TOT~L P~GE.01 ** OCT 03 2000 TUE 04:35 AM DBQ CO, BOARD OF SUP, FAX NO. 3195897884 P, 02/02 -~--_., ,,-- -" ._~ Jan. 11, 1993 ~ 93-022 _ APPROVING SECOND QUARTER REPO~T FOR SHERIFF'S ,. WHEREAS, Iowa Code Section 331.902(3) requires that each County Sleeted Otficial make a quarterly report to the Board of supervisors showing, by type, the fees collected during the preceding quareer; and WHEREAS, County Sheriff Leo Kennedy haa submitted ehe quarterly report for ehe Dubuque County Sheriff's Office for the quarter ending December 31, 1992 NOW THEREFORE BE 1'1' RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors herewith receivea and files said quarterly report. Motion by waller, seconded by Manternach, carried unanimously to approve and auehorize the Chair to sign Resolution 93-022. l .~: .l', ~ COMMUNICATION - TO rOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT!ON REQUESTING INTERSECTIONAL LIGHT AT INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAYS 20 AND 966 Motion by Manternach, seconded by Waller, carried unanimously to approve the communication to Iowa Department of Transportation requesting intersectional signal lighting at interseotion ot Highways 20 and 966. . VIENNA HISTOR.ICAL SOCIETY Motion by Manternach, seconded by Waller, carried unanimously to deny request for FY 1994 from New Vienna Historical Society. Hoeion withdrawn. Motion by Waller, seconded by Smith, carried unanimously to refer to the budget. . COMMUNICATION _ ANNOUNCEMENT OF DUBUQUE MSTROPOLITAN AREA SOLID WAStE ,.AGENCY WASTE TIRE COLLEctION PROGRAM Motion by Manternach, seconded by Waller, carried unanimously to receive a.nd file the announcement of Dubuque Metropolitan Area Solid Waste Agency ~aste tire colleceionprogram. ~. '.:...., . .. lCATION _ REQUEST FOR REVISED CONTRACT TERMS FOR. FISCAL YEAR '94 FROM DUBUQUE HUMANE SOCIETY ~.:: Motion by Waller, seconded by Manternach, carried unanimously to ~r refer to the budget. 19 Traffic Impact Analysis for NEW MENARD, INC. DEVELOPMENT ACCESS CONCEPTS ON US 20 IN DUBUQUE, IOWA Submitted to: THE CITY OF DUB E ~<k~ Prepared for: September 20, 2000 WHKS &Co. ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS GERALD M. WEILAND. P.E.. PRESIDENT PENNY L. SCHMITZ. VICE.PRES. & TREAS. CAROL G. KASTLER. L.S. RICK G. ENGSTROM. C.E.T. LAWRENCE A. BOYER. L.S. MICHAEL A. ZELlNSKAS. P.E. FOUAD K. DAOUD. P.E. & S.E. September 20,2000 470 CENTRAL AVENUE DUBUQUE, 1A52001-7024 phone 319-582-5481 fax 319-582-7412 e-mail dubuque@whks.ccm Mr. Michael A. Koch, P.E. Director City of Dubuque Public Works Division City Hall 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001-4864 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed Menard, Inc. Development in Dubuque Dear Mr. Koch: Enclosed is the Traffic Impact Analysis referenced above. The report contains an executive summary highlighting recommendations and conclusions from the analysis. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, WHKS & co. L9b.~ Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Project Engineer DJC/ss: 5884.1 Enclosure Cc (w/enclosure): Thomas W. O'Neil - Menard Inc. OTHER OFFICES: P.O. BOX 1467 217 N. DUFF AVENUE 2905 SO. BROADWAY 167 SINSINAWA AVENUE MASON CITY, IA 50402-1467 AMES, IA 5001(}-6637 ROCHESTER, MN 55904-5515 EAST DUBUQUE, IL 61025-1218 PHONE 641-423-8271 PHONE 515-663-9997 PHONE 507-288-3923 PHONE 815-747-8833 Traffic Impact Analysis for NEW MENARD, INC. DEVELOPMENT ACCESS CONCEPTS ON US 20 IN DUBUQUE, IOWA Submitted to: THE CITY OF E DUB ~</de-~ Prepared for: ~'..;";'..."".. .... '.. -.. .. ....".~...;.. .. ,,~ . .,~ ",\1""'" ........' xt.SS10/v."'" .... ~<)o ........ '.Lf'(" " ''''" ._ _. "'1. ., ,.- -.., ~ <J ..' ". ~ ~ f b?/ DANIEL J. \~ ~ :: ~ : COYLE : z: :: =<..)~ 15196 i[:l: -:. ::i '. : :::0 : ':r- -.. ..- ~ ~ .... .... ~ " * .......... * ..~ "'" lOW'" ,........ ""'"""" I hereby certify that this engineering document was prepared by me or under my direct personal supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Iowa. ~~~ Daniel J. Coy .E. 7.0 SeP CO Date License number 15196 My license renewal date is Decem ber 31, 2001. Pages or sheets covered b-y this seal: ALL PAGES WHKS & CO. Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Summary 1. 1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives 1.2 Executive Summary 2 Proposed Development 2. 1 Off-site Development 2.2 Description of On-site Development 3 Area Conditions 3. 1 Study Area 3.2 Study Area Land Use 3.3 Site Accessibility 4 Projected Traffic 4.1 Site Traffic 4.2 Through Traffic 5 Traffic Analysis 5. 1 Concept #1 5.2 Concept #2 5.3 Concept #3 5.4 Concept #4 5.5 Concept #5 6 Recommendations and Conclusions Appendix A - Vehicle Turning Movements Appendix B -lOOT 1997 Annual Average Daily Traffic Map Appendix C - lOOT 1997 Traffic Count Summaries Appendix 0 - Capacity and LOS for US 20 -1997 PM Peak Appendix E - Predevelopment Capacity and LOS for US 20 - 2001 PM Peak Appendix F - Existing Old Highway Road Signal - 2001 AM Peak Appendix G - Existing Old Highway Road Signal - 2001 PM Peak Appendix H - Proposed Signal at Relocated Old Highway Road - 2001 AM Peak WHKS & CO. 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 11 ii iii iv v vi xii xviii Appendix I - Proposed Signal at Relocated Old Highway Road - 2001 PM Peak Appendix J - Proposed Signal at Relocated Old Highway Road - 2001 Menard Peak Appendix K - Proposed Unsignalized Old Highway Road Intersection - 2001 AM Peak Appendix L - Proposed Unsignalized Old Highway Road Intersection - 2001 PM Peak Appendix M - Proposed Unsignalized Old Highway Road Intersection - 2001 Menard Peak List of Tables and Figures Figure 1-1 : Vicintiy Map Figure 2-1 : Location Map Figure 2-2 : Location Photo Figure 2-3 : Site Plan Table 3-1 : Intersections near Proposed Development Table 3-2: 1997 US 20 Traffic Counts at Proposed Site "- Figure 3-1 : Approximate US 20 Corridor Preservation Limits Table 4-1 : Peak Hour Volumes Generated by Proposed Development Table 4-2 : 2001 Proposed Traffic Volumes Table 4-3 : Projected 2001 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes on US 20 Figure 5-1 : Existing Temporary Signal at Old Highway Road 1 2 2 3 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 WHKS & CO. xxiv xxx xxxvi xlii xlviii 1 1 Introduction and Summary 1.1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives A traffic study was completed for Menard, Inc., entitled "Traffic Analysis for New Menard, Inc. Development," dated May 31,2000, that concluded a traffic signal was required on US 20 to provide access to the proposed Menard, Inc. development. The City of Dubuque objected to adding a traffic signal on US 20 and will not rezone the Menard, Inc. property until this issue is resolved. The purpose of this report is to present the City of Dubuque with access concepts for the proposed Menard, Inc. development that resolve this issue. This study interprets the goal of no additional traffic signals on US 20 to also mean no net increase of traffic signals on US 20. In other words, this study will consider removing an existing traffic signal and adding a new traffic signal a fulfillment of the goal. The report describes the existing traffic conditions, estimates the traffic generated by the proposed development and evaluates the operation of the traffic system after full build-out. 1.2 Executive Summary 1~2~1 Site Location The proposed Menard, Inc. development is situated on the south side of US 20 in the City of Dubuque city limits. The proposed development is a relocation I expansion of the existing Menard, Inc. store, located in the northeast quadrant of the US 20 - Menard Court intersection. The existing store is approximately one mile east of the proposed site. 1.2.2 Development Description Figure 1-1 : Vicinity Map Menard, Inc. is planning to develop a 26.25 acre site for the relocation of their Dubuque, Iowa home improvement superstore. The planned development includes a 161,640 square foot Home Improvement Superstore and 10,000 square foot out-parcel. The land use for the out-parcel is not determined, but will be defined as a High Turnover (Sit-Down Restaurant) for trip generation purposes. The new facility is estimated to open in 2001. Access to US 20 is addressed in this report. 1.2.3 Access Concepts Menard, Inc. has worked with the City of Dubuque and the Iowa Department of Transportation to develop a site access concept that requires no net increase of traffic signals on US 20. A brief history of the access concepts considered since the last traffic study are presented. WHKS & CO. 2 1.2.4 Recommendations and Conclusions An access concept exists that will serve the Menard, Inc. development with no net increase of traffic signals. The proposed signalized Intersection at US 20 I Relocated Old Highway Road I Proposed Menard Entrance can serve the AM, PM and Menard peak traffic volumes at or better than level of service (LOS) C for US 20 through movements and LOS D for the turning movements into and out of the proposed entrances and sideroads. The capacity and LOS of the existing US 20 I Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance intersection does not change with the proposed reconfiguration of the Old Highway Road intersection, removal of the temporary traffic signal at existing Old Highway Road and increased US 20 through traffic generated by the Menard, Inc. development. 2 Proposed Development 2.1 Off-site Development The proposed development is on the west edge of the existing commercial development within the city limits. Other developments are anticipated within the Study Area, especially along Seippel Road. 2.2 Description of On-site Development 2.2.1 land Use and Intensity The 26.25 acre site will be fully utilized, but will be limited by: · the South Fork of Catfish Creek floodplain on the south side of the property, · US 20 Corridor Preservation (see section 3.3.3 Existing Relevant Transportation System Management Programs). A 161,640 square feet Menard, Inc. home improvement superstore and a 10,000 square feet out-parcel are the main components of the proposed development. It is assumed that the proposed development will typically maintain long hours each day of the week. The current Menard, Inc. operation keeps the following hours: . Monday 7:00am - 10:00pm . Tuesday 7:00am - 1 0:00pm . Wednesday 7:00am - 1 0:00pm . Thursday 7:00am - 1 0:00pm . Friday 7:00am -10:00pm . Saturday 7:00am - 9:00pm . Sunday 8:00am - 7:00pm 2.2.2 location The proposed Menard, Inc. site is situated on the south side of US 20 within the City of Dubuque. ~-! i....__.._._...... ~iOad ~ w l? . , [_~~J t u HumIe Road -'I.., Old ~ ~l ! -.i Figure 2-1 : Location Map Figure 2-2 : Location Photo WHKS & CO. 3 2.2.3 Site Plan The major components of the 26.25 acres site plan are a 161,640 square foot home improvement super-store with 420 parking spaces, a 3 acre out-parcel (for a 10,000 square feet development), a 3.25 acre outside yard I shipping and receiving area and a detention pond. The remainder of the site is made up of a floodplain and fill embankments. The development fronts on 1000' of US 20 Right- of-Way. The proposed entrance location and configuration, shown on the site plan below, may be revised. /""'IlIrI"1liIIIt... ._..__..-....................__ ~..~._-- ...--..-.. . ,~ ~ /' ; ~ ill OUTSIDE YARD I ! " - SHIPPING AND RECEIVING I /~,_~ I i '\, ... : " , C I ('-------1 ~ ,,: I "I : "WT-flARCEL : , .... . "'-0....., I I IIIHi" I j -.._' . __.J--- ~ E:1Il~ ~ .' .' ~ U. S. H rOHlfAY 20 Figure 2-3 : Site Plan 2.2.4 Phasing and Timing The new home improvement super-store is estimated to open in 2001. The site development may be phased to accommodate the out-parcel construct-ion schedule. This study assumes full build-out in the design year. WHKS & CO. 4 3 Area Conditions 3.1 Study Area The proposed Menard, Inc. development site is located on US 20, approximately one mile west of the existing Menard, Inc. facility, at Menard Court. The proposed development is on the west edge of the existing commercial development within the city limits. There is a signalized intersection with Old Highway Road and numerous median openings for left turning traffic east of the proposed development, between the proposed development and the intersection with IA 32 (the Northwest Arterial). No entrances are located on the segment of US 20 from the IA 32 intersection east to the Menard Court IUS 20 intersection. An unsignalized intersection with Seippel Road is located approximately 0.6 miles west of the proposed development. West of the proposed site, the land adjacent to US 20 is cultivated, but will probably be developed as commercial property in the future. Most of the traffic generated by the proposed development originates east of the existing store location, and will approach the site as westbound traffic on US 20, turning left into the site. The traffic will pass through the signalized intersections at Old Highway Road, IA 32, and Menard Court, primarily as through traffic. 3.2 Study Area Land Use 3.2.1 Existing land Uses The existing land use of the site is agricultural. The adjoining properties to the north, south and west are all agricultural. From the proposed developn;ent east to the US 20 intersection with IA 32 (the Northwest Arterial), the properties adjacent to US 20 are primarily strip commercial. Generally, the proposed Menard, Inc. development represents the western limit of the concentrated commercial development along the US 20 corridor in Dubuque. 3.2.2 Anticipated Future Development Wrth the development of Seippel Road, other developments are anticipated within the Study Area. However, no known future developments will substantially impact the development of this site. 3.3 Site Accessibility 3.3.1 Area Roadway System The Menard, Inc. site fronts on US 20. At this location, US 20 is a divided four lane facility with at - grade access. The posted speed limit is 55 mph. A dirt field entrance currently serves the site at an unpaved median crossover. The nearest entrance to the east is approximately 1,000 feet from the proposed entrance. A field entrance is located approximately 525 feet west of the proposed entrance. There are no roadways other than US 20 that serve the site. The US 20 intersections near the site are shown in the following table. WHKS & CO. 5 Table 3-1 : Intersections near Proposed Development Distance from I D " fl' R d Proposed ntersectlon escnptlon 0 ntersectrng oa way Development (along US 20) US 20 - Seippel Road Two lane road to the City of Asbury and points north and northwest (No counts; 1997 MDT estimated to be less than 2,000) Two lane road for points west and north (1997 MDT 2,030) Four lane road (with turn lanes) to the City of Asbury, City of Dubuque and points north and northeast (1997 MDT 12,300) Access for the City and County of Dubuque and points south, southeast and southwest (1997 MDT 7,100) 0.6 mi west US 20 - Old Highway Road 0.5 mi east US 20 - IA 32 (r-NV Arterial) US 20 - Menard Court I Starli ht Drive 0.8 mi east 1.0 mi east 3.3.2 Traffic Volumes and Conditions The lOOT 1997 traffic counts can be utilized in this study without the need for additional traffic counts at the site, per discussions with the City of Dubuque. The I DOT 1997 US 20 traffic counts for the segment of US 20 from Old Highway Road to Seippel Road are given in the following table: ~Table3.':'2~;_1997~US20irafficCounts at Proposed Site US 20 - 1997 8-hour Counts All Vehicles Start Time East Bound West Bound 7:00 AM 759 520 8:00 AM 524 385 9:00 AM 497 437 10:00 AM 507 423 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1 :00 PM 2:00 PM 529 577 3:00 PM 612 644 4:00 PM 606 815 5:00 PM 551 865 The 1997 US 20 MDT is 16,800 vehicles per day at the proposed site. WHKS & CO. 6 3.3.3 Existing Relevant Transportation System Management Programs The lOOT has identified a corridor to be preserved along US 20, from Swiss Valley Road (approximately 7 miles west of the proposed development) to Old Highway Road (0.5 miles east of the proposed development) for future US 20 widening and capacity improvements. The lOOT reserves the right to review developments within the corridor and to acquire Right-of-Way for future US 20 capacity improvements. LEGEND ,---; Horcmm ",'(UIltNT .. PIOIORD flIAHUUt SURfACE _ fIOrOllD ..lOGf c-;;: CllUlDOI Pld$1lYA1IOH lONE X PIllPQ5IO ACW5 ClOSUllf Figure 3-1 : Approximate U.S. 20 Corridor Preservation Limits 4 Projected Traffic 4.1 Site Traffic US 20 corridor preservation affects this site. The concept for the US 20 capacity improvements, and the basis for the corridor preservation limits, is to improve US 20 to a limited access facility with frontage roads. It is anticipated that the entrance to Menard, Inc. in the future will be off a frontage road. 4.1.1 Trip Generation Trip generation was perfonned using the ITE Trip Generation, ft' Edition. The proposed development site contains two trip generators; a home improvement superstore and an out-parcel. To analyze the trips generated at full build-out, the land use for the out-parcel was assumed to be a high turnover (sit-down) restaurant. Gross square footage was the dependent variable to detennine trips generated by each. The peak hour volumes generated by the combination of these two trip generators are listed in the table below: Table 4-1 : Peak Hour Volumes Generated by Proposed Development , , Directional Peak Location Time ( I' I I) Remarks ve lIC es per lour Development Entrance Saturday (Peak Hour of Generator) 589 I 484 Entering I Exiting Development Entrance Weekday (Adjacent Street AM Peak) 177 / 155 Entering / Exiting Development Entrance Weekday (Adjacent Street PM Peak) 283 I 289 Entering / Exiting 4.1.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment It is assumed that the traffic entering and exiting the proposed development would be distributed 90% on the east leg of US 20 and 10% on the west leg. This assumption is based on 1997 US 20 traffic volumes, which increases east and decreases west of the proposed site. Supporting this assumption is the fact that the current population density is sharply lower west of the proposed site. WHKS & CO. 7 A sensitivity analysis for an 80% /20% split was performed in the Traffic Impact Analysis for New Menard, Inc. Development dated May 31,2000. This analysis showed insignificant change in the analysis results, and supports the 90% /10% split used in these analyses. 4.2 Through Traffic 4.2.1 Method of Projection The opening year for this development is anticipated to be 2001. To project the 1997 traffic volumes to 2001 the traffic growth rate method was used. The Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (DMA TS) was consulted to determine the traffic growth rate used in their model near the proposed development. DMATS recommended using the projected 2005 MDT (20,500) and the 1997 lOOT MDT (16,800) to develop the MDT growth rate. (The MDT growth rate and the peak hourly volume growth rate are assumed to be similar.) By this method, the MDT growth rate is estimated to be 11 % from 1997 to 2001. The following table presents the projected traffic counts for the design year 2001 : Table 4-2 : 2001 Projected Traffic Volumes US 20 - Projected 8-hour Counts All Vehicles Start Time East Bound West Bound 7:00 AM 843 577 8:00 AM 582 427 9:00 AM 552 485 10:00 AM 563 470 11 :00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 587 641 3:00 PM 679 715 4:00 PM 673 905 5:00 PM 612 960 4.2.2 Through Traffic V5. Captured Traffic A portion of the 2001 projected traffic on US 20 will pass by the proposed development while others will be captured by (or will visit) the proposed development before they continue on US 20. One percent (1 %) of the 2001 projected US 20 volumes is assumed to be captured by the proposed development. WHKS & CO. 8 4.2.3 Estimated Volumes Table 4-3 : Projected 2001 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes on US 20 . . Directional Peak Location Time ( I' I I) Remarks ve HC es per JOur US 20 at Proposed Development US 20 at Proposed Development US 20 at Proposed Development 600 I 600 Saturday (Peak Hour of Generator) (See Note Below) Weekday (AM Peak) 843 I 577 EB I WB Before Development EB I WB Before Development Weekday (PM Peak) 612 I 960 EB I WB Before Development Note: No traffic counts available for US 20 on Saturday. Projected counts are based on the 1997 mid-afternoon weekda counts. 5 Traffic Analysis The following access concepts were developed to meet the goal of no net increase of traffic signals on US 20. All of the concepts that were developed since the May 31, 2000 traffic study are presented here, whether they are viable or not viable. 5.1 Concept #1 The first concept provides access to the proposed Menard development via a frontage road along US 20 from existing Old Highway Road. The frontage road would be approximately 2000' in length and would require widening the US 20 median 24-feet (total width 27-feet) to accommodate dual left turns. This concept would use an existing traffic signal to provide access to the proposed development. This concept was deemed not viable due to the number of commercial properties affected by Right-of-Way acquisition, both east and west of Old Highway Road, and due to the uncertainty of the improvements being compatible with the ultimate US 20 capacity improvements. 5.2 Concept #2 The second concept provides access to the proposed Menard development via an unsignalized intersection on US 20. The construction of the out-parcel would be delayed, to reduce traffic generated by the site, until the frontage road along US 20 was developed. This concept was deemed not viable because the traffic generated by the home improvement superstore by itself warrants a traffic signal. 5.3 Concept #3 The third concept provides access to the proposed Menard development via an unsignalized intersection on US 20 without the left turn movement (onto WB US 20) from the development. The low volume left turn exit movement would be forced to make a right turn onto EB US 20 and u-turn at the existing Old Highway Road intersection. This concept was deemed not viable because the high volume WB US 20 left turn movement across EB US 20 by itself warrants a traffic signal. Additionally, a hazard would be created at the Old Highway Road intersection since no refuge is afforded by the 3-feet wide medain to u-turning traffic. 5.4 Concept #4 The fourth concept provides two unsignalized at-grade entrances to the proposed development off US 20, one at the east end of the development, one at the west end. The east entrance would prohibit left-out movements and the west entrance would prohibit left-in movements. WHKS & CO. 9 This concept was deemed not viable because, just like Concept #3, the high volume WB US 20 left turn movement across EB US 20 by itself warrants a traffic signal. 5.5 Concept #5 This concept removes the temporary signal at existing Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance and relocates it to a new intersection on US 20 with Relocated Old Highway Road I Menard Entrance with no net increase of traffic signals on US 20. Old Highway Road would remain open at the existing location, except the left-in, left-out and through movements to and from existing Old Highway Road would be eliminated. These movements would be served at the proposed intersection of Relocated Old Highway Road with US 20 at the Menard, Inc. development entrance. := . __I~- ~I. -----. -- Figure 5-1 : Existing Temporary Signal at Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance (Looking Southeast toward Quarry Entrance) This concept does not consider closing the connection of existing Old Highway Road to US 20, and creating a cul-de-sac. Leaving right-in and right-out movements provides some access to residents and businesses on the residual portion of Old Highway Road. Additionally, the cul-de-sac would cost more to construct than a triangular raised concrete island on existing Old Highway Road to channelize right-in and right-out movements. 5.5.1 Signal Warrant Analysis To determine if no net increase of traffic signals on US 20 is attainable with this concept a signal warrant analysis was performed at both the proposed intersection at the Relocated Old Highway Road I Menard Entrance and at the proposed intersection at Existing Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance. The FHWA's Manual on Unfform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) outlines eleven warrants for traffic signal installation. The traffic signal warrant analyses satisfied the following warrants: Relocated Old Hiahwav Road I Menard Entrance Warrant 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume Warrant 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Warrant 9 - Four Hour Volumes Warrant 11 - Peak Hour Volume Existina Old Hiahwav Rd I Quarry Entrance No warrants satisfied The satisfaction of one warrant alone indicates that an investigation of traffic safety improvements offered by a traffic signal at the Relocated Old Highway Road I Menard Entrance is needed. Also, the satisfaction of no warrants at the Existing Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance indicates that a traffic signal should not be considered at this intersection. The evaluation of traffic safety improvements offered by a traffic signal at the Relocated Old Highway Road I Menard Entrance intersection and the evaluation of the unsignalized Existing Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance intersection follows in the next section. WHKS & co. 10 5.5.2 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis The measures of intersection performance are capacity (the maximum traffic that can be accommodated by lane groups) and level of service (LOS, the ability to meet the peak traffic demand). The techniques and procedures used to compute capacity and LOS are outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Third Edition, Updated 1997 (HCM). The computations and procedures described in the HCM were performed using the Highway Capacity Software, Version 3.2 The analysis of capacity and LOS were performed at the following locations: · the existing US 20 from Old Highway Road to Seippel Road · the existing temporary signal at US 20 I Existing Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance intersection · the proposed signalized intersection at US 20 I Relocated Old Highway Road I Proposed Menard Entrance · the proposed unsignalized intersection at US 20 I Reconfigured Old Highway Road The unsignalized and signalized intersection analysis discussion in the following sections LOS C was used as the lowest acceptable LOS for US 20 through traffic. LOS 0 was the lowest acceptable LOS for the turning movements into and out of the proposed entrances and sideroads. The analysis details can be found in the Appendices along with the turning movement diagrams. 5.5.2. 1 Existing US 20 The segment of US 20 from Old Highway Road to Seippel Road is unsignalized. This multilane rural highway segment operates at LOS A for both the 1997 and 2001 traffic volumes, prior to the consideration of the proposed development. The capacity of the WB and EB lanes is 5.6 and 8.8 passenger cars per hour per lane (pcphpl) respectively for the 1997 traffic data and 6.4 and 9.8 pcphpl respectively for the projected 2001 traffic data. The capacity of US 20 (at a volume to capacity ratio equal to 1 and LOS E) is 40 pcphpl operating at 55 mph. 5.5.2.2 Existing Temporary Signal at US 20/ Existing Old Highway Road / Quarry Entrance The lOOT conducted an 8-hour traffic count at this intersection in 1997. The 1997 counts were projected to the design year, 2001. to analyze the operation of the existing intersection. The property served by what is referred to in this document as the quarry entrance was sold recently and a development plan for this property was submitted to the lOOT. This study does not address future traffic generated by that potential development since it is not known what, if any, development will take place. The lOOT has indicated that US 20 Corridor Preservation will acquire approximately 16-acres of this property. See Figure 3-1 for approximate US 20 Corridor Preservation limits. The intersection is a 4-way intersection serving east bound (EB) and west bound (WB) US 20, Existing Old Highway Road and a quarry entrance. The intersection has no turn lanes for left or right turns from any of the approaches. The signal appears to be fully actuated, to provide maximum green time to the US 20 through movement. This signal was analyzed for the AM Peak and PM peak traffic volumes. The overall intersection performance for both the AM and PM Peak traffic volumes is LOS B, with US 20 delays between 12-seconds and 20-seconds and sideroad delays between 21-seconds and 23-seconds. 5.5.2.3 Proposed Signalized Intersection at US 20/ Relocated Old Highway Road / Proposed Menard Entrance The proposed intersection is a 4-way intersection serving EB and WB US 20, Relocated Old Highway Road and proposed Menard entrance. The proposed intersection has dual left turn lanes from WB US 20, single left turn lane from EB US 20, separate right turn lane from the Menard entrance and separate left turn lane from Relocated Old Highway Road. All other left and right turn movements are shared with the respective through movement. The signal cycle was assumed to be 106 seconds, phases 1 and 2 pretimed, phases 3 and 4 acutated, only protected left turns and four second yellow change time: · Phase 1 EB Left I WB left I NB right I SB right 26-seconds WHKS &co. 11 . Phase 2 · Phase 3 . Phase 4 EB through and right I WB through and right SB left, through and right NB left, through and right 44-seconds 10-seconds 10-seconds The signal was analyzed for the AM, PM and Menard peak (Weekend, peak hour of generator) traffic volumes. The overall intersection performance for all peak hours is LOS C, with US 20 through movement delays between 24-seconds and 33-seconds, US 20 left tuming movement delays between 30-seconds and 41-seconds and sideroad delays between 23-seconds and 53-seconds. 5.5.2.4 Proposed Unsignalized Intersection at US 20/ Reconfigured Old Highway Road The proposed intersection is essentially a 3-way intersection serving EB and WB US 20 and a quarry entrance. Right-in and right-out movements are permitted into and out from Reconfigured Old Highway Road. The proposed intersection changes the operation of the existing intersection by removing the traffic signal and eliminating the left-in, left-out and through movements to existing Old Highway Road. These movements would be served by the proposed intersection at the Relocated Old Highway Road intersection with US 20. The quarry entrance would continue to have left and right entrance and exit movements to EB and WB US 20. The reconfigured intersection was analyzed for the AM, PM and Menard peak traffic volumes. During the AM and PM peak the intersection operates at LOS B, with no delays exceeding 19-seconds. During the Menard peak the intersection operates at LOS C with no delay exceeding 19-seconds. 6 Recommendations and Conclusions An access concept exists that will serve the Menard, Inc. development with no net increase of traffic signals. The proposed signalized Intersection at US 20 I Relocated Old Highway Road I Proposed Menard Entrance can serve the AM, PM and Menard peak traffic volumes at or better than LOS C for US 20 through movements and LOS D for the tuming movements into and out of the proposed entrances and sideroads. The capacity and LOS of the existing US 20 I Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance intersection does not change with the proposed reconfiguration of the Old Highway Road intersection, removal of the temporary traffic signal at existing Old Highway Road and increased US 20 through traffic generated by the Menard, Inc. development. The proposed Menard, Inc. development will have an impact on US 20. A traffic signal is warranted and recommended at the proposed intersection of US 20 I Relocated Old Highway Road I Proposed Menard Entrance. Dual left turn lanes (180' long) are recommended forWB US 20, with storage for 7 vehicles in each lane. A single left tum lane (180' long) is recommended for EB US 20, with storage for 7 vehicles. The development entrance will require 4-lanes, two entrance lanes for the dual left tum lanes from WB US 20 and two exit lanes, one for exiting left tum and through traffic, one for exiting right tums. Relocated Old Highway Road will require three lanes, one entrance lane, and two exit lanes, one for exiting right turn and through traffic and one for left tums. A traffic signal would no longer be warranted at the existing US 20 I Old Highway Road intersection and the existing temporary traffic signal is recommended to be removed. A raised concrete island is recommended to be constructed at existing Old Highway Road to prohibit through movements and left tum movements into and out of Old Highway Road. Relocating Old Highway Road is compatible with future US 20 capacity improvements. Relocating existing Old Highway Road to the west accomplishes part of the traffic control for constructing the ultimate US 20 capacity improvements. The existing US 20 I Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance intersection geometries do not support a major development. The existing median is too narrow to develop left tum lanes for a frontage road. Therefore, any plans to develop the property served by the quarry entrance, prior to the completion of US 20 capacity improvements, will require the US 20.median be widened from the existing width of 3-feet to a minimum of 15-feet to accommodate a left tum lane. This could significantly impact the existing businesses east of the intersection, especially existing median crossover access points and parking lot areas. WHKS & CO. APPENDICES WHKS & co. Appendix A - Vehicle Turning Movements ... S I" 77 u.s. HlfHMY 211 u.s. HIGtMl 211 N N 1 'EfIIR 21111 1 'tEAR 2811 .. PEAK MD.R PM'E:AK~ TRIlFFIC Tft#lFf'IC ~ ~ or o i Existing Intersection - US 20 I Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance I~ iL ~ oiL ~ I u... Hl......Y ,. lL I ,., Y... HIlttIMf ZII Illl ""'"- III .....- III F "'''''WOA P. PC;A( K1..Il --...... ""'" Ie ""'" lC T1tQffI:: Proposed Intersection - US 20 I Relocated Old Highway Road I Menard Entrance I~ --iL~. iL ~ oiL I I ~lll U... HIlHIMl' .. U.,. "lCHllll'!' ~ ..... .... ...-..... TAIlf"P"IC III ~ ..... .." ,.,. pDI( MCl.A ""'" lC III ~ ..... .... ~M!:"loO.A T"''''tC Proposed Intersection - US 20 I Reconfigured Old Highway Road I Quarry Entrance WHKS & co. ii Appendix 8 - lOOT 1997 Annual Average Daily Traffic Map U LL LL ~ I- >- -l <( 0 LL 0 W (9 0.... ~ ~ ~ Z w .. :J > .. <( ~ U 0 .. -l .. 0 U <( -l LU LU :J LL :J :J Z U (1 (1 Z <( LL :J ::l LL OJ OJ '" ~ ::l ::> a- 0 Q a- l- t- 0+- s::: c (l) 0 E',;: to at 0..0 (1)0.. o~ a e ~f- 04- -0 ~, r.:~~,~r..~~~1 is. f;?"-TfJ., /-................i (' ~- ,><;;. ";j .;:-" I II': .....1) .. '.... '-~~~.. -, J ".; ,/ /' ,,;~., /'> "';';::;;: /'. ~'?"'Y""':' r.... ./ I ~'8 ......- /r-----J -, \' ~- '-'~/~:o .'''."',''., f~ r.::-...., I ):;- ~n~~S~~m-; c'~ @'o crlol"@ ;i' ..." "". ~ l ~- t~1 ], \:\ '\-f2 "'----; ~j jl!:tj....... Co ~(~...-: \\j ) j)~__\ ,~'-'-vJ ::..... · ~\ \~I \ 'I Co \\ 8' C' I ~ o -, ~,\\ - ~ /~ r6~5J- ","". /'~ \~i-\ - ~11 . ~\ \0 .----. \\--~ ~l '. \\ ----1 .. ,..." ,m \ l-----------i \\ ~~ >:-'" ".) ]/ ~I 11 1\ f..... \\ 1\ \ _I~ \ r ~ j \ ;-.: ~\:I I '.1 :\ ~ 1 /.1 DO '..... -..... - ---- --.....-1 I 1 I I I ~L.:. 15 i;il -o--=::I. ~ 1 ,-----------7 ) I~ / :1 o >-1- Z Z5 w 00 (j ~u W W-l -l 0< ~ :J o Z ~ ~ ~ ~9 \ ! ~ I WHKS & co. Appendix C -lOOT 1997 Traffic Count Summaries " Zo;- :"'0 o ":.- ::...~ f.;5;:: cB .. .. .. " " .. .. .. -- i~~~~~~~~~ooo~ooooo e -- "'" c:'~~'~~~~~~~___.~_'.__ r.; l..;,j ~ ,-. e::: i:i ...J 0;- - ~ J: ~ ~~:,~~~~~~~:~c~oo=ooo t-: t";-:-.::;-..o:.:O""ol~;~'";:': 5 t1:-..::~ -;- :'-J ",";"':"': :;;;;: _:....1'~ :-=::2 C:J~ "' .;: 0 ,-J:j :-.~~,.:(".j -;\.;-~",:o.=. O''O::::...,l...... 0.0 .. ,.j -; .. ;- "'t !/j..J "'::I .. ::: .. " " " .. .. .. c...:~~,~;o:~~~oooo~ooc~ ~ < .-I .~'i .-I ~'.~ """'" :'; __ ;: w >- ->-- ~:-3 :::-=: .:...u;,,; .;.~ u ~s~~~~~~~~coo~oo~co :-::;~,::: _:"';-l..-l ". : ...J;: ..;.. '''':'; z: ~> OCMONOO~~~CC~OOCOOO ~ C~!- ~~~ Z ::: ..~ ~ -;~o-~-~~~cocco~oo~ ..(..... ..... -!.-u:- -!CO-.J .;.::.:: .. :;: ~~ >-:c t.;~:.; B~d ~~~ iU:> ~ - ~:~ i- .. .. ~~~~g~~~~~ooooo~~__ <'::',0;-:',[;1...:;;':--':--,. - Oil ~ ~ .. .. ., .. .. :~~3~3~~;20CCCOOOOO _ .... ;- -:..:.,. -r ~~ < ~~~~B~~:~~00~~O~~OO W (,,1 <e;' :J:- ;- .. ~o ~~~~~~o~~ooooocooo : ..';..,. ~-;- i,;,-.:l;-'" ~;: ::::~ -<to""':::; .. .. ~ .-i~-':--,.....;::'"":'~"""-!:""~OOOOOCOOO .. -1:.=....... ~.. -c...:i::J''';'= i'. ~ <: ". .ac i- ~ :-> ~ i- .. ::::::...... c:- L.::--- ,.... t- >-.... l:1 ..J ...J ~~~~~~~~~oc~~o~ooo ~.... \- ~;... ::::: <: ;... !- go Z to'"! OO~O~jCOO~OOOOOOOOO ~~~ ~:: .,,;...: ..~ ~~~~~~-~-coooo_~~~ -<:.Jo. r-i .. ;- ~C==: -i(;-;: .. "'''' >-::. <~ ...J= ::: =- ~'..;1 :E.rZ'I::E:1:'i:'E c-c<:<:.~=.:..=-':.., - C:--C-~''''<::':.i....:: I _, -'....-l ~ i..:..d::~~).~A~tl~~ 000-4 i- ::;:.; c::; -~ ...: .. ~, '" C L...' z - '" =- , ' i.J t...! t.t; rl <: Co- a :3 .:.. t_ L.. t:"; l.1 C ..J U ii. t c."l g' r--.- '" c-.~ 0-- .,z- ..1_'''; -~ ., "" " "" .. .. .. .. ~~~~~~~~~~cooo~co~o ~ r <t'""I W ,: o -- c~;~~~.-~~~.~__o=cooo ....; u r.... :::: :.J ...J 0;- 5 ~ ~~~~~~~~~ooococooo - .... ~~~ ....~ =0::1 -== "" -<0 "" ~ .... COOO-OOO....-l~OOOOOOO~ ~ ...-.. ..::> "" :::: .- - )- "'!C i'C'o.....t~..:'l'::ic.._c.:>.:..,:.ooo::.o ole I ,.j-t.... .;:,... .. r 0( ~ ... .-' .;. ~ -.CL E~~ .....-""-- ~:-::; ':'::'-1:::: :...:.:u ":C'-o_~;O =..:.:::-:....... 000-':':00000 C":-t r-l <t'""I ....... ...J- =B ::I ooocoooooooccooco~ U :c 0;..... ,- :3 <0 "' .. -!CU:- ~ -, , "'.:.::: :E ~ ~>- :- .... -oocoo~:~~oooocoooo t-, <: >- 7.: (.:1 t.'E~ ;-.:;:5 ~-~ ;S~~ gB~ 0 -' ~ ..... L:J .. ~~~~g~~~~~oooocoooo ..- \~ ~ .. < .. "" < " ~~~.o~~=~~ooooooooo ~ -......... ..... fl -.J c;::;;.,J Z~-,--1 I- .....:..:-.r..J t':! z-::z ~ ~ .:.::::::::...,. W ... ~~o-~~~~.~ooooooooo M-!;lr~.J"" ~... .... -I: cr~";'":.;~=:;o,:....~ooo.::ooco_ -it . . C'~ .. -iC!;.":i::: .. "" " .. .. ... .. .. .. c"c.;C".;..:'.,;')C"j....: o~-; 00 00 00 00 0' r - ;- i:::;-"'" cCo,. ~~ B ~ ..J ~NN~~~:~O~OOCOCOO~O - - - - H.... .... ~=.... C::: .- ...... r.J~ _ ~. ocooc~~o~ooo~cc~-~ 2 :~~ ~:: ~~ ....~v....~~oo~c~o~oco=o ~;:.. ~ .... -cC':;: ...- "" .:.. :c!:'t:::C:l:I::C::C: c-::<:"-=,:,..=-=-:..:.~ - c.:.:-..o ....."": <:";;j":-J -.... C C I' I I I I I 1;- _ t'.':};;:"C:';;"1<::"i;.-:J .... <: ...J " Z H .... :... iJ ~ z .... .- ::;: ;,::, .... c.. c:: L.. .:: r-- c u "- a ~~ C':J ,....... :=~ ~~ --~ '0- 0-'.......... i.il~:"': ~3 c C~ ~::r ;:~ iii .. -< < " ... ... ~ ~_'~~~~~~~~:.~..OCOOOOOO~ ~ i..; e c u - <;" .... ~ :c ~~~. h~~ ~5~ L.: ;.... :J ~;~~~~~~~oc~ooooco ;- .. ..iC-O ..iC.. OOCMCCOO~OOOOOOOO~ =- oi( ;- .,. :":i-1 ~.... .. L::: .. >- .. .. < .. < c~oo~o~""-co~oooooo ~ ..J _ r ;- ~ ~t~ ~-;.::l .:..uw ".... u c~oo~~~......c'coo~oo~o Z c..::.... ..1...-..... ....~ =;3 ;.... 0000000000=0000000 g~ti <: ::. ~'2 :: .... <.: :c ._i: .o;(J~ -<G-1 -!:- oooo~o~o~ooooooooo :c ~~ ~~~ I-..-:~ ~~~ :>C"'"-' cu~ ...... -.J :t: <: L! uz t::,-,...,. .z!..:-c ~~~ /1 C::~u B ::,~ .. .. .. .. < .. ~~~~g~~;~~cocoooooc ;- o~occcco~ocococcoo _ c ~~~~~~;~~~oooooooo I- ., ;- .. ~ N~~N~r~c~;~ocooooocc c ~ ~.; ..... :J ~ v <<t~~ C ~ ~ ~ -!C ~~~~oco:'~~cooooooco -< \'; -iC < oi( l-- -iC a .~ r- .. '- ~;-... Bt >-1-1 :J -l ~C"j....;i'O.:;O:-~~OOOOOO......... ..... t1 c C o H-t ..... OOOO~~~COOOOOO~OCO .....:.. ::: B~ ~ ~ o ;,;, .... l:.1..~ .....,.. 0,:... -- ~~ ~~ o~~ooo~o~occoooooo ....:-.. ~ ;- -iCee:: =- = .. ;:3 <: ..:J i= ~- - ~:...! -- ~. z<:" :J :. o :r::c: I: I: 1: t::c:z ..:-:<:<.:;.,:-:-~:.~ .==: c:.:--c~i.,";"..~"':_! -J ~.-l <: ~ r!..:hd...6i.;~~j~~ -4 1- .:= :; ;:'.::; ro;- ~~ WHKS &co. iv Appendix 0 - Capacity and LOS for US 20 - 1997 PM Peak HCS: Multilane Rural and Suburban Highways Release 3.2 WHKS & Co. Dubuque, Iowa WHKS & Co. 470 Central Ave Dubuque, IA 52001 Phone: (319) 582-5481 E-mail: dubuque@whks.com Fax: (319) 582-7412 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Highway: Analyst: From/To: A."lalysis Year: Length: Date: US 20 Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. SEIPPEL RD. to OLD HIGHWAY RD. 1997 3/4 Mile 4/13/00 FREE-FLOW SPEED Direction 1 2 Free-Flow Speed: Ideal Ideal FFS or FFSi 60.0 mph 60.0 mph Median Type Divided Divided Median Type Adjustment, FM 0.0 mph 0.0 mph Lane Width 12.0 ft 12.0 ft Lane Width Adjustment, FLW 0.0 mph 0.0 mph Lateral Clearance: Right Edge 6.0 ft 6.0 ft Left Edge 6.0 ft 6.0 ft Total Lateral Clearance 12.0 ft 12.0 ft Lateral Clearance Adjustment, HC 0.0 mph 0.0 mph Access Points per Mile 0 0 ~~CCt"SS Points Adjustnlent, FA 0.0 mph 0.0 mph .".djusted Free-Flow Speed 60.0 mph 60.0 mph Direction VolWlle, V Feak-Hour Factor, PHF Peak 15-Minute Volume, v15 Number of Lanes Terrllin Type Grade Sc!gment Length Tru..:ks dnd Buses Truck~ dnd Buses PCE, ET Re..:reational Vehicles Recreational Vehicles PCE, ER H.,.wy V<.>hicle Adjustment, fHV Drivrr Population Adjustment, fP Adjusted Flow Rdte, vp Direction AJiust~d Flow Rdtd, vp A..1 lll~t,'d F",.'e-Fh)w Sp""c1, FFS IIvq. p"""..ng..r-c.\r Tr.\v.'l Speed, S L('Vt'1 \.)! Sc'rvi,.:~t.~, [.u,s n,'n" l ty, 11 VOLUME 1 865 0.85 254 2 Level 0.00 0.00 8 1.5 1 1.2 0.96 1. 00 529 RESULTS 529 60.0 60.0 t\ 8.8 2 vph 551 0.85 162 2 Level 0.00 0.00 8 1.5 1 1.2 0.96 1. 00 337 % m1 % % pcphpl 2 pcphpl 337 mph 60.0 mph 60.0 II pc/mi/ln 5.6 vph % mi % % pcphpl pephpl mph mph pc/mi/ln WHKS & CO. v Appendix E - Predevelopment Capacity and LOS for US 20 - 2001 PM Peak HCS: Multilane Rural and Suburban Highways Release 3.2 WHKS & Co. Dubuque, Iowa WHKS & Co. 470 Central Ave Dubuque, IA 52001 Phone: (319) 582-5481 E-mail: dubuque@whks.com Fax: (319) 582-7412 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Highway: Analyst: From/To: Analysis Year: Length: Date: US 20 Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. SEIPPEL RD. to OLD HIGHWAY RD. 1997 3/4 Mile 4/13/00 FREE-FLOW SPEED Direction 1 2 Free-Flow Speed: Ideal Ideal FFS or FFSi 60.0 mph 60.0 mph Median Type Divided Undivided Median Type Adjustment, FM 0.0 mph 1.6 mph Lane Width 12.0 ft 12.0 ft Lane Width Adjustment, FLW 0.0 mph 0.0 mph Lateral Clearance: Right Edge 6.0 ft 6.0 ft Le ft Edge 6.0 ft 6.0 ft Total Lateral Clearance 12.0 ft 12.0 ft Lateral Clearance Adjustment, FLC 0.0 mph 0.0 mph Access Points per Mile 0 0 Access Points Adjustment, FA 0.0 mph 0.0 mph Adjusted Free-Flow Speed 60.0 mph 58.4 mph VOLUME Direction 1 2 Volume, V 960 vph 612 vph Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Peak IS-Minute Volume, vIS 282 180 Number of Lanes 2 2 Terrain Type Level Level Grade 0.00 % 0.00 % Segment Length 0.00 mi 0.00 mi Trucks and Buses 8 % 8 % Trucks and Buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 Recreational Vehicles 1 % 1 % Recreational Vehicles PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment, fHV 0.96 0.96 Driver Population Adjustment, fP 1. 00 1. 00 Adjusted Flow Rate, vp 587 pcphpl 374 pcphp1 RESULTS Direction 1 2 Adjusted Flow Rate, vp 587 pcphpl 374 pcphpl Adjusted Free-Flow Speed, FFS 60.0 mph 58.4 mph Avg. Passenger-Car Travel Speed, S 60.0 mph 58.4 mph Level of Service, LOS A A Density, D 9.8 pc/mi/ln 6.4 pc/mi/ln WHKS & CO. vi Appendix F - Existing Old Highway Road Signal - 2001 AM Peak HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Date: 14 SEP 00 E/W St: US 20 City/St: Dubuque, IA proj II: 5884.1 Period: AM Peak N/S St: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 I 1 1 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 LGConfig 1 LTR I LTR 1 LTR 1 LTR Volume 11 842 1 112 577 40 11 1 8 188 1 3 Lane Width I 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left P I NB Left A Thru P 1 Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left P 1 SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P 1 Right A. Peds I Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 28.0 10.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 1461 3130 0.68 0.467 15.1 B 15.1 B Westbound LTR 1424 3051 0.52 0.467 12.6 B 12.6 B Northbound LTR 244 1465 0.05 0.167 21.1 C 21.1 C Southbound LTR 271 1623 0.40 0.167 23.3 C 23.3 C Intersection Delay = 14.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 WHKS & Co. 450 Central Ave Dubuque, IA 52001 Phone: (319) 582-5481 E-Mail: dubuque@whks.com Fax: (319) 582-7412 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: City/State: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT Dubuque, IA WHKS & CO. Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound I L T R I Volume 11 PHF 10.85 PK 15 Vol 11 Hi Ln Vol I % Grade 1 Ideal Sat I ParkExist I Numpark 1 % Heavy VehlO No. Lanes I LGConfig I Lane Width I RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 1 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 10.00 NumPeds I NumBus I 0 %RightsInProtPhase Duration 0.25 842 1 0.85 0.85 248 1 2 1900 9 o 2 LTR 12.0 993 Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. 5884.1 AM Peak 14 SEP 00 US 20 Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent I Westbound I L T R I 112 10.85 14 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I 10.02 I I I Type: 1 o o 0.00 o o Area I Northbound I L T R I 11 10.85 11 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I 0.06 10.09 o 1 I o 1 All other areas VOLUME DATA 577 40 0.85 0.85 170 12 2 1900 9 o o o 2 LTR 12.0 o 740 o OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 8 0.85 0.85 1 2 2 1900 o o 1 LTR 12.0 11 o I Southbound I L T R I 188 10.85 126 I I I I 1 10 I 1 1 I I I 10.95 I I I 1 o o 0.82 o o o vii 1 3 0.85 0.85 1 1 o 1900 o o o 1 LTR 12.0 o 109 0.04 o o o viii Appr.1 Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 1 0.85 1 0 Thru 842 0.85 991 2 LTR 993 0.00 0.00 Right 1 0.85 1 0 0 Westbound Left 12 0.85 14 0 Thru 577 0.85 679 2 LTR 740 0.02 0.06 Right 40 0.85 47 0 0 Sorthbound Left 1 0.85 1 0 Thru 1 0.85 1 1 LTR 11 0.09 0.82 Right 8 0.85 9 0 0 Southbound Left 88 0.85 104 0 Thru 1 0.85 1 1 LTR 109 0.95 0.04 Right 3 0.85 4 0 0 . Value entered by user. SATUR.o,TION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Apprl Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Gr0up Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 0.918 0.990 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 0.95 1.000 0.955 3130 Westbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1. 000 0.924 0.990 1.000 1.000 1. 00 0.95 0.990 0.933 3051 Northbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 0.991 0.990 1. 000 1.000 1. 00 1. 00 0.790 0.995 1465 S,)\1 thb,)und See LT. Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1.00 0.895 0.954 1623 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Apprl Ldn~ Flow Rate Flow Rdte Ratio Ratio Capacity vie Mvmt Group (v) (s) (vis) (g/C) (e) Ratio E.\:; tbc)\1nd rri. $()t.~ ~ Le'tt Thnl LTH <)~1J 3130 . 0.32 0.467 1461 0.68 Hiqht Wt'~ t lh,\und l't'i . ~~ ('t,.~ . I.c' rt ThIll r;m 'l.lll 3051 0.24 0.467 1424 0.52 H(qht N\.'t't hl'\.\\llhi l't'! . : ~ (, ~ . . t.c" rt ThIll LTH 11 14 t>~) . 0.01 0.167 244 0.05 l(('lht WHKS & CO. Southbound pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR Right 109 1623 # 0.07 0.167 271 0.40 Sum (v/s) critical - 0.39 Lost Time/Cycle, L 12.00 see Critical v/c(X) 0.49 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.68 0.467 12.5 1.000 1461 0.50 2.6 0.0 15.1 B 15.1 B Westbound LTR 0.52 0.467 11.3 1.000 1424 0.50 1.4 0.0 12.6 B 12.6 B Northbound LTR 0.05 0.167 21.0 1.000 244 0.11 0.1 0.0 21.1 C 21.1 C Southbound LTR 0.40 0.167 22.3 1. 000 271 0.11 1.0 0.0 . 23.3 C 23.3 C Intersection Delay 14 . 6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 see Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, V1t Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, P1to Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=vltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b})]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=1-P1to PI*=P1t[1+{(N-1lg/(gf+gu/El1+4.24)}] Ell (Figure 9-7) EI2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+plt)/g or fmin=2(l+pl)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (l+Pl (Ell-I) } ], (min=fmin;max=l. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/(1+Plt(El2-1)}] +[gu/g] [1/(1+Plt(El1-1)], (min=fmin;max=1.0l or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If PI>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. IX WHKS & CO. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, PI to Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto PI*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EII+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) EI2=(1-Ptho**n)/plto, EI2>=1.0 fmin=2(1+plt)/g or fmin=2(1+pI)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ {1+PI (Ell-I) )], (min=fmin;max=1. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(EI2-1) }] +[gu/g] [1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)], (min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/NH fIt Primary 0.955 0.933 EB WB NB SB 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 2 2 2 2 1 14 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 740 993 4.00 4.00 0.02 0.23 6.49 8.71 1. 00 1.00 22.7 16.5 0.53 0.53 4.84 9.09 5.28 11.48 0.00 0.00 0.98 1. 00 0.00 0.04 3.02 3.90 1.00 1. 00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0.96 For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If PI>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red = (C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unrnet Unrnet Queue Unrnet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Paramo Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec x WHKS & CO. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 14.6 No errors to report. sec/veh ERROR MESSAGES Intersection LOS B WHKS & CO. xi xii Appendix G - Existing Old Highway Road Signal - 2001 PM Peak HCS: Signali=ed Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Date: 14 SEP 00 E!W St: US 20 City/St: Dubuque, IA proj #: 5884.1 Period: PM Peak N/S St: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes I 0 ~ 0 I 0 2 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 LGConfig I LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR Volume 11 673 7 122 905 89 18 1 28 175 1 1 Lane Width I 12.0 I 12.0 I 12.0 I 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Durati0n 0.25 Area Phase Combination 1 EB Left P Thru P Right P Peds WB Left Thru Right Pect" N8 Right S6 Righ t Green Yellow All Red Cycle Length: 2 Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 I N8 Left A I Thru A I Right A I Peds I S8 Left A I Thru A I Right A I Peds I EB Right I WB Right P P P 28.0 10.0 4.0 0.0 10.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 60.0 secs Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios now Rate (s) Summary Lane Group Approach .'\ppr/ L,1ne Grp Lane Group Capacity v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS E.lstt>o\lnd LTR 14 59 3126 0.55 0.467 13.0 8 13.0 8 Wt'stbound LTR 1415 3033 0.85 0.467 20.5 C 20.5 C N~'l.thb~'\Ind LTR 245 1468 0.18 0.167 21.8 C 21.8 C S~'\Ithbo\lnd LTR :'::71 1628 0.33 0.167 ~.2.8 C 2~.8 C In tt"r5t'\7t i,,"ln Delay - 17 .8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = 8 - ---"_._-- lies: S i'llH 1 i=ect Intersections Release 3.2 Wllt\~~ oS. C...,. .1 "ll Ct~1\t l';' l F\Vt' l'ul'\hlU(', l i\ ~'.;OO l 1'1,,'n,-: (31')) 511.~-~).1ll1 ~: -M.. i I: d\lI1\"l\l,'~wh "" . ,','III ____ClI'I::RJ\TrON<\!. AN,\LYSIS ...)x: (319) 582-7412 lilt {' r:i{'\'t i ..'1\: ,: II y !~1 t .1 I " : us 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT D\lbllo]\lt', 11\ WHKS & CO. Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound I L T R I Volume 11 PHF 10.85 PK 15 Vol 11 Hi Ln Vol I ~ Grade I Ideal Sat I parl,Exist I NumPark I ~ Heavy VehlO No. Lanes I LGConfig I Lane Width I RTOR Vol I Adj Flow I HnSharedLn I Prop Turns 10.00 NumFeds I NumBus I 0 ~RightsInProtPhase Duration 0.~5 673 7 0.85 0.85 198 2 1900 9 o 2 LTR 12.0 SOl I I I Init Unmet I Arriv. Type I Unit Ext. I r F.lctor I Lost Time I Ex t l' f g I Ped Min g I Eastbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 ~.O 2.0 3.0 Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. 5884.1 PM Peak 14 SEP 00 US 20 Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent VOLUME DATA 1 o I Westbound I L T R I 122 10.85 16 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I 10.02 I I I 0 Type: All other o o I Northbound I L T R I 18 10.85 12 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I 10.21 I I I xiii 1 o I Southbound I L T R I 175 10.85 122 I I I I I 10 I I I I I I 10.98 I I I 905 89 0.85 0.85 266 26 2 1900 9 o 2 LTR 12.0 1 28 0.85 0.85 1 8 2 1900 o o 1 LTR 12.0 1 1 0.85 0.85 1 1 o 1900 o o o o 1196 0.01 o o o Area o 43 0.09 o o OPERATING PARAMETERS areas Westbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 3.0 PHASE DATA Northbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 3.0 o 1 LTR 12.0 o o 90 0.77 o 0.01 o o o o Southbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 3.0 Ph,lse Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds wa lot' it P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Riqht P Riqht A Peds Peds NB l~iqht EB Right ~;n Hl'lht WB Riqht C:n:'('n .'tl.O 10.0 10.0 y" II ,'w 4.0 4.0 4.0 !\ll HI'd n.t) 0.0 0.0 l~ 'y'l' 1 t' {."'hlt h : (;l).O St"CS __>__.___________ r__. ______._ VOLUME AP,IUS'l'MENT W,1HKSIlEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. WHKS & CO. xiv Appr.1 Movement Mvt Volume PHF Flow No. Lane Rate Lanes Group RTOR Flow Rate In Lane Grp Left Turns Right Turns Eastbound Left 1 0.85 1 0 Thru 673 0.85 792 2 LTR 801 0.00 0.01 Right 7 0.85 8 0 0 Westbound Left 22 0.85 26 0 Thru 905 0.85 1065 2 LTR 1196 0.02 0.09 Right 89 0.85 105 0 0 Northbound Left 8 0.85 9 0 Thru 1 0.85 1 1 LTR 43 0.21 0.77 Right 28 0.85 33 0 0 Southbound Left 75 0.85 88 0 Thru 1 0.85 1 1 LTR 90 0.98 0.01 Right 1 0.85 1 0 0 * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Apprl Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1. 000 0.918 0.990 1.000 1.000 1. 00 0.95 0.999 0.954 3126 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 0.926 0.990 1.000 1.000 1. 00 0.95 0.987 0.929 3033 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 0.990 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.796 0.990 1468 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 00 1.00 0.898 0.953 1628 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Apprl Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (vis) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 801 3126 0.26 0.467 1459 0.55 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 1196 3033 II 0.39 0.467 1415 0.85 Right Northbound pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 43 1468 II 0.03 0.167 245 0.18 Right WHKS & CO. Southbound pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR Right 90 1628 # 0.06 0.167 271 0.33 Sum (v/s) critical 0.48 Lost Time/Cycle, L 12.00 sec Critical v/c(X) 0.60 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.55 0.467 11.5 1.000 1459 0.50 1.5 0.0 13.0 B 13.0 B Westbound LTR 0.85 0.467 14.1 1.000 1415 0.50 6.4 0.0 20.5 C 20.5 C Northbound LTR 0.18 0.167 21.5 1.000 245 0.11 0.3 0.0 21.8 C 21.8 C Southbound LTR 0.33 0.167 22.1 1. 000 271 0.11 0.7 0.0 22.8 C 22.8 C Intersection Delay 17.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b)}]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto PI*=Plt[l+( (N-1}g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24l)] Ell (Figure 9-7) EI2=(1-Ptho**n)/p1to, EI2>=1.0 fmin=2(1+plt)/g or fmin=2(1+PI)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,Ol fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g] [1/(1+PI(El1-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/(1+Plt(EI2-1)}] +[gu/g] [1/(1+Plt(El1-1)], (min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If PI>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. xv WHKS & CO. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=voC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+( (N-1)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+plt)/g or fmin=2(1+pl)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [II {l+Pl (Ell-I)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] + [gu/g] [II (l+Plt (Ell-I)], (min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+O. 91 (N-1)] IN** fIt Primary 0.954 0.929 EB WB NB SB 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 2 2 2 2 1 26 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 1196 801 4.00 4.00 0.02 0.43 10.49 7.03 1. 00 1. 00 22.7 13.3 0.53 0.53 13.21 5.79 5.28 14.75 0.00 0.00 0.98 1. 00 0.00 0.05 4.77 3.21 1. 00 1. 00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0.95 For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v vlc ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red = (C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: vl(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, d1 EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Ini tial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Paramo Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds d1 sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec xvi WHKS & CO. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 17.8 No errors to report. sec/veh ERROR MESSAGES Intersection LOS B WHKS & CO. xvii xviii Appendix H - Proposed Signal at Relocated Old Highway Road - 2001 AM Peak HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Date: 14 SEP 00 E/W St: US 20 City/St: Dubuque, IA proj #: 5884.1 Period: AM Peak N/S St: Proposed Menard Inc Entrance SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I 1 I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 I 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 I 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I LT R I L TR Volume 11 571 18 1150 835 1 115 8 132 188 9 3 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 /12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left P I NB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right P I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 44.0 10.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 106.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Apprl Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 438 1787 0.00 0.245 30.2 C TR 1358 3271 0.51 0.415 24.4 C 24.4 C Westbound L 842 3432 0.21 0.245 32.4 C TR 1361 3279 0.72 0.415 29.2 C 29.7 C Northbound LT 171 1808 0.16 0.094 44.6 D 26.2 C R 597 1583 0.26 0.377 23.0 C Southbound L 170 1805 0.61 0.094 52.5 D TR 172 1824 0.09 0.094 44.1 D 51.4 D Intersection Delay = 28.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 WHKS & Co. 450 Central Ave Dubuque, IA 52001 Phone: (319) 582-5481 E-Mail: dubuque@whks.com Fax: (319) 582-7412 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT WHKS & CO. City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: Dubuque, IA Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. 5884.1 AM Peak 14 SEP 00 US 20 Proposed Menard Inc Entrance VOLUME DATA I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I Volume 11 571 18 1150 835 1 115 8 132 18B 9 3 PHF 10.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 0.85 10.85 0.85 0.85 PK 15 Vol 11 16B 5 144 246 1 14 2 39 126 3 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I % Grade I 2 I 2 I 2 I 0 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 11900 1900 I 1900 1900 11900 1900 parkExist I I 1 I Numpark I I I I % Heavy VehlO 9 1 11 9 0 11 0 1 10 0 0 No. Lanes I 1 2 0 I 2 2 0 I 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR 1 LT R I L TR Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Adj Flow 11 693 1176 9B3 I 27 155 1104 15 %InSharedLn I I 1 I Prop Turns I 0.03 I 0.00 10.67 I 0.27 NumPeds I 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 NumBus 10 0 10 0 I 0 0 10 0 %RightsInProtPhase 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound I Westbound Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R L T R I L T R I I I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 13 3 3 3 13 3 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I Factor 1 1. 000 I 1. 000 1.000 I 1. 000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ped Min g 1 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right P EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 26.0 44.0 10.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 106.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET xix WHKS & co. XX Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr. I Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 1 0.85 1 1 L 1 Thru 571 0.85 672 2 TR 693 0.03 Right 18 0.85 21 0 0 Westbound Left 150 0.85 176 2 L 176 Thru 835 0.85 982 2 TR 983 0.00 Right 1 0.85 1 0 0 Northbound Left 15 0.85 18 0 Thru 8 0.85 9 1 LT 27 0.67 Right 132 0.85 155 1 R 0 155 Southbound Left 88 0.85 104 1 L 104 Thru 9 0.85 11 1 TR 15 0.27 Right 3 0.85 4 0 0 * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Apprl Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1.000 1. 00 1. 00 0.950 1787 TR 1900 1. 000 0.919 0.990 1. 000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.995 1.000 3271 Westbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1. 000 0.990 0.990 1.000 1. 000 1.00 0.97 0.950 3432 TR 1900 1.000 0.918 0.990 1.000 1.000 1. 00 0.95 1. 000 1. 000 3279 Northbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1. 000 0.993 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 1.000 0.968 1808 R 1900 1. 000 0.990 0.990 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.850 1583 Southbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.950 1805 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1. 00 1. 00 0.960 1.000 1824 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Apprl Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vie Mvmt Group (v) (s) (vis) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound pri. Sec. Left L 1 1787 0.00 0.245 438 0.00 Thru TR 693 3271 0.21 0.415 1358 0.51 Right Westbound pri. Sec. Left L 176 3432 0.05 0.245 842 0.21 Thru TR 983 3279 # 0.30 0.415 1361 0.72 Right Northbound pri. Sec. Left Thru LT 27 1808 0.01 0.094 171 0.16 WHKS-&co. xxi Right R 155 1583 # 0.10 0.377 597 0.26 Southbound pri. Sec. Left L 104 1805 # 0.06 0.094 170 0.61 Thru TR 15 1824 0.01 0.094 172 0.09 Right Sum (v/s) critical 0.46 Lost Time/Cycle, L 12.00 sec Critical v/c(x) 0.51 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 0.00 0.245 30.2 1. 000 438 0.50 0.0 0.0 30.2 C TR 0.51 0.415 23.0 1. 000 1358 0.50 1.4 0.0 24.4 C 24.4 C Westbound L 0.21 0.245 31.8 1. 000 842 0.50 0.6 0.0 32.4 C TR 0.72 0.415 25.9 1.000 1361 0.50 3.3 0.0 29.2 C 29.7 C Northbound LT 0.16 0.094 44.1 1.000 171 0.11 0.4 0.0 44.6 D 26.2 C R 0.26 0.377 22.8 1. 000 597 0.11 0.2 0.0 23.0 C Southbound L 0.61 0.094 46.1 1.000 170 0.20 6.3 0.0 52.5 D TR 0.09 0.094 43.8 1.000 172 0.11 0.2 0.0 44.1 D 51. 4 D Intersection Delay 28.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 106.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC;VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc;VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf;[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<;g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro;l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu ;g-gq if gq>;gf, ;g-gf if gq<gf n;(gq-gf)/2, n>;O Ptho=l-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+( (N-l)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24))] Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+plt)/g or fmin=2(1+pl)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) fm; [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (l+Pl (Ell-1) ) ], (min;fmin;max;1. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/(1+Plt(E12-1) )] +[gu/g] [1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)], (min=fmin;max;1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-l)]/N** flt For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>;l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto WHKS & CO. left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 106.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, 9 Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto PI*=Plt(l+((N-l)g/(gf+gu/EI1+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) EI2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, EI2>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+pI)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g] [1/(1+PI(EI1-1)}], (min=fmin;max=l.OO) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff(l/(1+Plt(EI2-1}}] +[gu/g] [l/(l+Plt(Ell-l)], (min=fmin;max=l.O) or flt=[fm+0.9l(N-l)]/N** fIt Primary For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If PI>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, 9 Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 106.0 Red = (C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0)}), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600}, ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Our. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Paramo Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec xxii WHKS & co. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 28.9 No errors to report. sec/veh ERROR MESSAGES Intersection LOS C WHKS & CO. xxiii xxiv Appendix I - Proposed Signal at Relocated Old Highway Road - 2001 PM Peak HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Date: 14 SEP 00 E/W St: US 20 City/St: Dubuque, IA proj f: 5884.1 Period: PM Peak N/S St: Proposed Menard Inc Entrance SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 I I No. Lanes I 1 2 0 I 2 2 0 I 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I LT R I L TR Volume 11 606 28 1241 950 1 129 14 246 175 14 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left P I NB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right P I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 44.0 10.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 106.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 438 1787 0.00 0.245 30.2 C TR 1357 3268 0.55 0.415 25.1 C 25.1 C Westbound L 842 3432 0.34 0.245 34.0 C TR 1361 3279 0.82 0.415 33.2 C 33.4 C Northbound LT 170 1807 0.29 0.094 45.7 D 28.7 C R 597 1583 0.48 0.377 25.8 C Southbound L 170 1805 0.52 0.094 48.5 D TR 178 1883 0.10 0.094 44.1 D 47.8 D Intersection Delay = 31.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 WHKS & Co. 450 Central Ave Dubuque, IA 52001 Phone: (319) 582-5481 E-Mail: dubuque@whks.com Fax: (319) 582-7412 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: City/State: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT Dubuque, IA WHKS & CO. Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound I L T R I Volume 11 PHF 10.85 PK 15 Vol 11 Hi Ln Vol I % Grade I 2 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 parkExist I Numpark I % Heavy VehlO No. Lanes I 1 2 LGConfig I L TR Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 11 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns I Numpeds I NumBus I 0 0 %RightsInProtPhase Duration 0.25 606 28 0.85 0.85 178 8 9 746 Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. 5884.1 PM Peak 14 SEP 00 US 20 Proposed Menard Inc Entrance VOLUME DATA 1 o I Westbound I L T R I 1241 10.85 171 I I 2 11900 1900 I I 11 1 2 I L 112.0 I 1284 1119 I I I 10 I Type: o 1 1 R 12.0 o 289 I Southbound I L T R 1 175 10.85 122 I I 0 11900 1900 I I 10 III I L TR 112.0 12.0 I 188 I I I 10 I 14 1 0.85 0.85 4 1 o o o 0.04 o I Northbound I L T R I 129 10.85 19 I I I I 1 11 I I I I I I 0.00 10.68 o I I o I All other areas o o o o 17 0.06 o o o I Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R L T R 1 L T R I 1 I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 13 3 3 3 13 3 Uni tExt. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I Factor I 1. 000 I 1.000 1. 000 I 1. 000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ped Min g I 3.0 I 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right P EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 26.0 44.0 10.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 106.0 sees 950 1 0.85 0.85 279 1 14 246 0.85 0.85 4 72 2 1900 1900 9 o o o 2 TR 12.0 o 1 LT 12.0 o o 50 o o Area OPERATING PARAMETERS VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. xxv WHKS & CO. xxvi Appr. I Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 1 0.85 1 1 L 1 Thru 606 0.85 713 2 TR 746 0.04 Right 28 0.85 33 0 0 Westbound Left 241 0.85 284 2 L 284 Thru 950 0.85 1118 2 TR 1119 0.00 Right 1 0.85 1 0 0 Northbound Left 29 0.85 34 0 Thru 14 0.85 16 1 LT 50 0.68 Right 246 0.85 289 1 R 0 289 Southbound Left 75 0.85 88 1 L 88 Thru 14 0.85 16 1 TR 17 0.06 Right 1 0.85 1 0 0 * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Apprl Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.950 1787 TR 1900 1.000 0.920 0.990 1. 000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.993 1. 000 3268 Westbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1. 000 0.990 0.990 1. 000 1.000 1.00 0.97 0.950 3432 TR 1900 1.000 0.917 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 00 0.95 1.000 1.000 3279 Northbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 0.993 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 1.000 0.967 1807 R 1900 1. 000 0.990 0.990 1. 000 1.000 1.00 1. 00 0.850 1583 Southbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1. 000 1.00 1. 00 0.950 1805 TR 1900 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.991 1. 000 1883 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Apprl Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vie Mvrnt Group (v) (s) (vis) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound pri. Sec. Left L 1 1787 0.00 0.245 438 0.00 Thru TR 746 3268 0.23 0.415 1357 0.55 Right Westbound pri. Sec. Left L 284 3432 0.08 0.245 842 0.34 Thru TR 1119 3279 # 0.34 0.415 1361 0.82 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LT 50 1807 0.03 0.094 170 0.29 Right R 289 1583 # 0.18 0.377 597 0.48 WHKS & CO. Southbound pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR Right 88 17 1805 1883 II 0.05 0.01 0.094 0.094 170 178 0.52 0.10 Sum (v/s) critical - 0.57 Lost Time/Cycle, L 12.00 sec Critical v/c(X) 0.65 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 0.00 0.245 30.2 1.000 438 0.50 0.0 0.0 30.2 C TR 0.55 0.415 23.5 1. 000 1357 0.50 1.6 0.0 25.1 C 25.1 C Westbound L 0.34 0.245 32.9 1.000 842 0.50 1.1 0.0 34.0 C TR 0.82 0.415 27.5 1.000 1361 0.50 5.7 0.0 33.2 C 33.4 C Northbound LT 0.29 0.094 44.7 1. 000 170 0.11 1.0 0.0 45.7 D 28.7 C R 0.48 0.377 25.1 1. 000 597 0.11 0.6 0.0 25.8 C Southbound L 0.52 0.094 45.7 1. 000 170 0.12 2.8 0.0 48.5 D TR 0.10 0.094 43.9 1. 000 178 0.11 0.2 0.0 44.1 D 47.8 D Intersection Delay 31.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 106.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf}/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+{(N-l)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24)}] Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+pltl/g or fmin=2(1+pl)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,Ol fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (l+Pl (Ell-I) I], (min=fmin;max=l. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g] [l/(l+Plt(Ell-l)], (min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-l)]/N** flt For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. xxvii WHKS & CO. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 106.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, PI to Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+((N-l)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+plt)/g or fmin=2(1+Pl)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (l+Pl (Ell-l) )], (min=fmin;max=l.OO) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/(1+Plt(E12-l)}] +[gu/g] [l/(l+Plt(Ell-l)], (min=fmin;max=l.O) or flt=[fm+0.9l(N-l)]/N** fIt Primary For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 106.0 Red =(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Paramo Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl see u Q veh d3 see d see xxviii WHKS & co. xxix Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 31.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS C ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. WHKS & CO. xxx Appendix J - Proposed Signal at Relocated Old Highway Road - 2001 Menard Peak HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 Inter: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Date: 14 SEP 00 E/W St: US 20 City/St: Dubuque, IA proj #: 5884.1 Period: Menard Peak N/S St: Proposed Menard Inc Entrance SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I 1 1 I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 I 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 I 1 1 0 LGConfig 1 L TR 1 L TR I LT R I L TR Volume 11 594 59 1501 594 1 148 24 412 180 29 3 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left P 1 NB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right P 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 44.0 10.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 106.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Apprl Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 438 1787 0.00 0.245 30.2 C TR 1352 3256 0.57 0.415 25.5 C 25.5 C Westbound L 842 3432 0.70 0.245 41.2 D TR 1361 3278 0.51 0.415 24.4 C 32.1 C Northbound LT 171 1808 0.49 0.094 47.8 D 39.5 D R 597 1583 0.81 0.377 38.0 D Southbound L 170 1805 0.55 0.094 49.8 D TR 176 1870 0.22 0.094 45.0 D 48.4 D Intersection Delay = 32.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.2 WHKS & Co. 450 Central Ave Dubuque, IA 52001 Phone: (319) 582-5481 E-Mail: dubuque@whks.com Fax: (319) 582-7412 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: US 20 and PROP MENARD INC ENT WHKS & CO. City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound 1 L T R I Volume 11 PHF I 0 . 85 PK 15 Vol 11 Hi Ln Vol I % Grade I 2 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 ParkExist I Numpark I % Heavy VehlO No. Lanes I 1 2 LGConfig I L TR Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 11 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns I NumPeds I NumBus I 0 0 %RightsInProtPhase Duration 0.25 594 59 0.85 0.85 175 17 9 768 I Eastbound I L T R 1 Init Unmet 10.0 Arriv. Typel3 Unit Ext. 13.0 I Factor I Lost Time 12.0 Ext of g 12.0 Ped Min g I 0.0 3 3.0 1. 000 2.0 2.0 3.0 Phase Combination 1 EB Left Thru Right Peds P WB Left Thru Right Peds P NB Right P SB Right Green Yellow All Red 26.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 106.0 secs Dubuque, IA Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. 5884.1 Menard Peak 14 SEP 00 US 20 Proposed Menard Inc Entrance VOLUME DATA I Westbound I L T R I 1501 10.85 1147 I I 2 11900 1900 I I 11 I 2 I L 112.0 1 1589 700 I I I 10 I Type: 1 o o 0.09 o o Area I Northbound I L T R I 148 10.85 114 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I 0.00 10.67 o I I o I All other areas 594 1 0.85 0.85 175 1 9 o o 24 412 0.85 0.85 7 121 2 1900 1900 o o 1 LT 12.0 3 2 TR 12.0 o o I Westbound 1 L T R I 10.0 13 13.0 I 12.0 12.0 1 84 o OPERATING PARAMETERS 2 P P P P 44.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 3 3.0 1. 000 2.0 2.0 3.0 PHASE DATA 4 Northbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5 NB Left A Thru A Right A Peds SB Left A Thru A Right A Peds EB Right WB Right 10.0 4.0 0.0 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET I Southbound I L T R 1 180 10.85 124 I I 0 11900 1900 I I 10 III I L TR 112.0 12.0 I 194 I I I 10 I 1 1 R 12.0 o 485 o o o 29 3 0.85 0.85 9 1 o o o o 38 0.11 o o o I Southbound I L T R I 10.0 13 13.0 I 12.0 12.0 I 6 10.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 3 3.0 1. 000 2.0 2.0 3.0 7 8 xxxi WHKS & co. xxxii Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.1 Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 1 0.85 1 1 L 1 Thru 594 0.85 699 2 TR 768 0.09 Right 59 0.85 69 0 0 Westbound Left 501 0.85 589 2 L 589 Thru 594 0.85 699 2 TR 700 0.00 Right 1 0.85 1 0 0 Northbound Left 48 0.85 56 0 Thru 24 0.85 28 1 LT 84 0.67 Right 412 0.85 485 1 R 0 485 Southbound Left 80 0.85 94 1 L 94 Thru 29 0.85 34 1 TR 38 0.11 Right 3 0.85 4 0 0 * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Apprl Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f .f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1. 000 0.990 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.950 1787 TR 1900 1. 000 0.924 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1.00 0.95 0.987 1. 000 3256 Westbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.990 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1.00 0.97 0.950 3432 TR 1900 1.000 0.918 0.990 1.000 1.000 1. 00 0.95 1. 000 1.000 3278 Northbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 0.993 0.990 1.000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 1. 000 0.968 1808 R 1900 1.000 0.990 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 00 1. 00 0.850 1583 Southbound See LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 00 1. 00 0.950 1805 TR 1900 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1. 000 1.00 1. 00 0.984 1. 000 1870 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Apprl Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vie Mvrnt Group (v) (s) (vis) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L 1 1787 0.00 0.245 438 0.00 Thru TR 768 3256 * 0.24 0.415 1352 0.57 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L 589 3432 0.17 0.245 842 0.70 Thru TR 700 3278 0.21 0.415 1361 0.51 Right Northbound pri. Sec. Left Thru LT 84 1808 0.05 0.094 171 0.49 WHKS & CO. xxxiii Right R 485 1583 # 0.31 0.377 597 0.81 Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 94 1805 # 0.05 0.094 170 0.55 Thru TR 38 1870 0.02 0.094 176 0.22 Right Sum (v/s) critical 0.59 Lost Time/Cycle, L 12.00 sec Critical v/c(X) 0.67 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 0.00 0.245 30.2 1.000 438 0.50 0.0 0.0 30.2 C TR 0.57 0.415 23.7 1. 000 1352 0.50 1.7 0.0 25.5 C 25.5 C Westbound L 0.70 0.245 36.4 1.000 842 0.50 4.8 0.0 41.2 D TR 0.51 0.415 23.1 1.000 1361 0.50 1.4 0.0 24.4 C 32.1 C Northbound LT 0.49 0.094 45.6 1. 000 171 0.11 2.2 0.0 47.8 D 39.5 D R 0.81 0.377 29.6 1.000 597 0.35 8.4 0.0 38.0 D Southbound L 0.55 0.094 45.9 1. 000 170 0.15 3.9 0.0 49.8 D TR 0.22 0.094 44.4 1.000 176 0.11 0.6 0.0 45.0 D 48.4 D Intersection Delay 32.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 106.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp{- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+{(N-l)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))] Ell (Figure 9-7) El2={l-Ptho**n)/Plto, El2>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+Pl)/g gdiff=max{gq-gf,O) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [11 (l+Pl (Ell-I) }], (min=fmin;max=1. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g] [l/(l+P1t(Ell-l)], (min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.9l(N-l)]/N** flt For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto WHKS & CO. left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 106.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, PIt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq, (see Eq. 9-16 or 9-20) gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O Ptho=l-Plto PI*=Plt[1+{(N-l)g/(gf+gu/EI1+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) EI2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, EI2>=1.0 fmin=2(1+pltl/g or fmin=2(1+PI)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,O) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (1+PI (Ell-l) )], (min=fmin;max=1. 00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/(1+Plt(E12-l)}] +[gu/g] [l/(l+Plt(Ell-l)], (min=fmin;max=l.Ol or flt=[fm+0.9l(N-l)]/N** fIt Primary For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If PI>=l for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 106.0 Red =(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Paramo Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d see xxxiv WHKS & CO. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 32.6 No errors to report. sec/veh ERROR MESSAGES xxxv Intersection LOS C WHKS & CO. xxxvi Appendix K - Proposed Unsignalized Old Highway Road Intersection- 2001 AM Peak HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: US 20 and Old Highway / Quarry Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Project No.: 5884.1 Date: 14 SEP 00 East/West Street: US 20 North/South Street: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street: Vehicle Approach Movement 1 L Volumes and Adjustments Eastbound 2 3 T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: 1 1 1 8 9 1 Westbound 4 5 6 L T R 255 984 40 299 1157 47 1 0 2 0 LT TR No Southbound 10 11 12 L T R 0 0 0 0 Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 791 0 930 0 2 0 T TR No Minor Street: Approach Movement Northbound 789 L T R 2 9 Exists? Storage No RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration No o o 1 R LR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, EB 1 Queue WB 4 LT Length, and Level of Northbound 789 LR Service Southbound 10 11 12 R v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 299 738 0.41 2.11 13.2 B 10 405 0.02 0.00 14 .1 B 14 .1 B o 448 0.00 0.00 13.0 B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Phone: E-Mail: Fax: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS WHKS & CO. Intersection: US 20 and Old Highway / Quarry City/State: Dubuque, IA Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Project No.: 5884.1 Time period Analyzed: AM Peak Hour Date: 14 SEP 00 East/West Street: US 20 North/South Street: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF Peak-IS Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 791 0 255 984 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 233 0 75 289 930 0 299 1157 1 40 0.85 12 47 2 0 0 2 0 T TR LT TR No No 8 9 10 11 12 T R L T R 8 0 0.85 0.85 2 0 9 0 1 0 2 0 No Minor Street Movements 7 L Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak-IS Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: 1 0.85 o 1 1 9 Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration No o o 1 R LR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Prog. Flow vph Upstream Signal Data Sat Arrival Green Cycle Flow Type Time Length vph see see Prog. Speed mph Distance to Signal feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 2 xxxvii WHKS & CO. xxxviii Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.5 6.9 6.9 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 1 1 1 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/lOO 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 t (3, It) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t (c,T): I-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 t(c) I-stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 6.9 2-stage 4.1 6.5 6.9 6.9 Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 3.30 t(f,HV) 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 P(HV) 1 1 1 0 t (f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation I-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 V(t) V(l,prot) Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (see) Cycle Length, C (see) Rp (from table 9-2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 V(t) V(l,prot) Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t (a) (see) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) p(5) p(dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? 0.000 0.000 Proportion unblocked for minor movements, p(x) (1 ) Single-stage Process (2) (3) Two-Stage Process Stage I Stage II p (1) P (4) p(7) WHKS & CO. xxxix p(8) P (9) P (10) P (11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 L 4 L 7 L 8 l' 9 R 10 L 11 l' 12 R v c,X s Px V c,u,x 930 2106 465 602 C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 Stage 1 Stage2 8 Stagel Stage2 10 Stagel Stage2 11 Stage 1 Stage2 V(c,x) s Pix) V(c,u,x) 930 1176 3400 C(r,x) C(plat,x} Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 465 547 1. 00 547 0.98 602 448 1. 00 448 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 930 738 1. 00 738 0.59 0.59 1. 00 1. 00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor C-Ip. Adj. fdctor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capdcity prob.lbility ,1f Queue free St. 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.59 1. 00 1. 00 Step ,1: loT (,'om Mi1l0l' St. 7 10 l:,)llt li,'! llhl Flc'ws Potential CdpdCity rc'd(':\ t r loin Imp('d~\n,,"~\ F,h~tor M..j. I., Mill T Imfwd.lrh'" t,lctor ~I.I j. t., M i n T Ad i. Imp l".wt<)t'. ell'. ,\dl. LI,.t,1l' du,' I,) 1l1lp,'ctinq l1Ivl1Int t-k'v(.t1\('ut l~~.tp~h.:i l y 2106 30 1. 00 0.59 0.68 0.68 21 1. 00 0.59 0.68 0.67 W"l'I..:ih,'.'t ., -C"l1Iplll.lt b'n ,'I thc' Et ("c.t ot TWO-St.hl" G.,p Acceptance :~t--t'P ,~:~'"-TlI-[-1~,,;~M~0'~-~~;t. 8 11 WHKS & CO. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a y C t Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Results for Two-stage process: a y C t Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement Volume (vph) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 1 121 7 L 348 136 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.59 348 81 1.00 1. 00 133 349 1.00 1. 00 0.59 1. 00 79 349 1. 00 0.59 1. 00 0.59 0.99 0.99 1.00 1. 00 7. 930 289 1.00 1. 00 289 87 1. 00 0.59 52 1176 205 1. 00 0.59 122 552 1. 00 0.98 543 2106 30 1. 00 0.59 0.68 0.68 21 1. 00 0.59 0.68 0.67 0.99 2.65 121 0.99 8 T 9 R 10 L 11 T 9 547 405 Movement Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches 7 L 8 T 9 R 10 L 11 T 10 xl 12 R o 448 12 R WHKS & CO. C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep + 1 ) 121 1 n max C sh SUM C sep n C act 405 547 9 Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 299 10 C(m) (vph) 738 405 vlc 0.41 0.02 95% queue length 2.11 0.00 Control Delay 13 .2 14 .1 LOS B B Approach Delay 14.1 Approach LOS B Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay 11 12 R o 448 0.00 0.00 13.0 B p(oj) v(il) , v(i2) , s (ill, s (i2l, P*(oj) d(M,LTl, Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 Movement 2 Movement 5 1. 00 0.59 0 0 2 or 5 1700 3 or 6 1700 0.59 13.2 2 Volume for Volume for Saturation Saturation stream 2 or 5 stream 3 or 6 flow rate for flow rate for stream stream lanes xli 448 o WHKS & CO. xlii Appendix L - Proposed Unsignalized Old Highway Road Intersection - 2001 PM Peak HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: US 20 and Old Highway / Quarry Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Project No.: 5884.1 Date: 14 SEP 00 East/West Street: US 20 North/South Street: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street: Vehicle Approach Movement 1 L Volumes and Adjustments Eastbound 2 3 T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 674 7 792 8 2 0 T TR No Minor Street: Approach Movement Northbound 789 L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: 8 9 1 28 32 1 2 9 Exists? Storage No RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration No o o 1 R LR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, EB 1 Queue WB 4 LT Length, and Level of Northbound 789 LR Service Southbound 10 11 12 R v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 299 825 0.36 1. 81 11.8 B 41 302 0.14 0.44 18.8 C 18.8 C o 359 0.00 0.00 15.0+ C HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Phone: E-Mail: Fax: WHKS & CO. xliii TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: US 20 and Old Highway / Quarry City/State: Dubuque, IA Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Project No.: 5884.1 Time period Analyzed: PM Peak Hour Date: 14 SEP 00 East/West Street: US 20 North/South Street: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 674 7 255 1183 89 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Peak-IS Minute Volume 198 2 75 348 26 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 792 8 299 1391 104 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 28 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 Peak-IS Minute Volume 2 8 0 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 32 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 0 Percent Grade (% ) 2 0 Median Storage 9 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 0 1 Configuration LR R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Prog. Flow vph Upstream Signal Data Sat Arrival Green Cycle Flow Type Time Length vph sec sec Prog. Speed mph Distance to Signal feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 2 WHKS & CO. xliv Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.5 6.9 6.9 t (c, hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 1 1 1 0 t (c, g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/lOO 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 t (3, It) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t (c, T) : I-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 t(c) I-stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 6.9 2-stage 4.1 6.5 6.9 6.9 Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 3.30 t(f,HV) 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 P(HV) 1 1 1 0 t (f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation I-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 V(t) V(l,prot) Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9-2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g(q2) g(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 V(t) V(l,prot) Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t (a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) p(5) p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? 0.000 0.000 Proportion unblocked for minor movements, p(x) (1) Single-stage Process (2) (3) Two-Stage Process Stage I Stage II p (1) p(4) WHKS & CO. p(7) p(8) P (9) P (10) p(l1) P (12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 L 4 L 7 L v c,x s Px V c,u,x 800 2089 C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 Stage1 Stage2 8 Stage1 Stage2 V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) 796 1293 3400 C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity 8 T 9 R 10 L 11 T 400 10 Stagel Stage2 9 400 602 1. 00 602 0.95 4 800 825 1. 00 825 0.64 0.64 8 1.00 0.64 1. 00 7 2089 31 1. 00 0.64 0.72 0.72 22 11 Stagel Stage2 748 359 1. 00 359 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.64 1. 00 1. 00 0.64 0.72 0.68 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 12 1 11 10 xlv 12 R 748 WHKS & CO. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a y C t Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt Movement Capacity Results for Two-stage process: a y C t Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement Volume (vph) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 9 109 7 L 402 1. 00 1. 00 402 1. 00 95 1. 00 0.64 61 1. 00 0.64 0.99 1. 00 796 348 1. 00 1. 00 348 1293 173 1. 00 0.64 110 2089 31 1. 00 0.64 0.72 0.72 22 0.99 3.70 109 8 T 32 602 302 8 7 9 R 101 1.00 0.64 64 1. 00 400 1. 00 1. 00 400 1. 00 0.64 0.99 1. 00 59 1. 00 0.64 38 606 1. 00 0.95 574 1. 00 0.64 0.72 0.68 0.99 10 L 11 T Movement Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches 11 7 8 9 10 11 10 xlvi 12 R o 359 12 WHKS & CO. L T R L T C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep + 1) 109 9 602 32 n max C sh SUM C sep n C act 302 Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR R v (vph) 299 41 0 C(m) (vph) 825 302 359 vlc 0.36 0.14 0.00 95% queue length 1. 81 0.44 0.00 Control Delay 11.8 18.8 15.0+ LOS B C C Approach Delay 18.8 Approach LOS C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay p(oj) v(il) , v(i2) , s (il), s (i2), P* (oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 Movement 2 Movement 5 1. 00 0.64 0 0 2 or 5 1700 3 or 6 1700 0.64 11.8 2 Volume for Volume for Saturation Saturation stream 2 or 5 stream 3 or 6 flow rate for flow rate for stream stream lanes xlvii R 359 o WHKS & CO. xlviii Appendix M - Proposed Unsignalized Old Highway Road Intersection - 2001 Menard Peak HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: US 20 and Old Highway / Quarry Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Project No.: 5884.1 Date: 14 SEP 00 East/West Street: US 20 North/South Street: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street: Vehicle Approach Movement 1 L 3 R Volumes and Eastbound 2 T Adjustments Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 1086 0 1277 0 2 0 T TR No Minor Street: Approach Movement Northbound 789 L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: 1 1 1 8 9 1 2 9 Exists? Storage No RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration o o LR Approach Movement Lane Con fig Delay, EB 1 Length, and Level of Northbound 789 LR Queue WB 4 LT v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 299 545 0.55 3.32 19.3 C 10 300 0.03 0.00 17.4 C 17.4 C Westbound 4 5 6 L T R 255 1094 40 299 1287 47 1 0 2 0 LT TR No Southbound 10 11 12 L T R 0 0 0 0 No 1 R Service Southbound 10 11 12 R o 406 0.00 0.00 13.9 B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Phone: E-Mail: Fax: WHKS & CO. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: US 20 and Old Highway / Quarry City/State: Dubuque, IA Analyst: Daniel J. Coyle, P.E. Project No.: 5884.1 Time period Analyzed: Menard Peak Hour Date: 14 SEP 00 East/West Street: US 20 North/South Street: Old Highway Rd/Rock Quarry Ent Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1086 0 255 1094 40 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Peak-IS Minute Volume 319 0 75 322 12 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1277 0 299 1287 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 8 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 Peak-IS Minute Volume 0 2 0 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 9 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 2 0 Median Storage 9 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 0 1 Configuration LR R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Prog. Flow vph Upstream Signal Data Sat Arrival Green Cycle Flow Type Time Length vph sec sec Prog. Speed mph Distance to Signal feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 2 xlix WHKS & co. Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and FOllow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.5 6.9 6.9 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 1 1 1 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,lt) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t (c,T) : I-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1. 00 0.00 1.00 1. 00 0.00 t (c) I-stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 6.9 2-stage 4.1 6.5 6.9 6.9 Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 3.30 t(f,HV) 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 P(HV) 1 1 1 0 t (f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation l-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Vet) V(l,prot) Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9-2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Vet) V(l,prot) Movement 5 V (t) V (l, prot) alpha beta Travel time, t (a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) p(5) p(dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? 0.000 0.000 Proportion unblocked for minor movements, p(x) (l) Single-stage Process (2) (3) Two-Stage Process Stage I Stage II p (1) P (4) WHKS & CO. p(7) p(8) P (9) P (10) P (11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 L 4 L 7 L v C,X S Px V c,u,x 1277 2518 C r,x C p1at,x Two-Stage Process 7 Stage1 Stage2 8 Stage1 Stage2 V(c,X) s P(x) V(c,u,x) 1277 1241 3400 C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4; LT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 8 T 9 R 10 L 11 T 638 10 Stage1 Stage2 9 638 422 1. 00 422 0.98 4 1277 545 1. 00 545 0.45 0.45 8 1. 00 0.45 1. 00 7 2518 14 1. 00 0.45 0.57 0.57 8 11 Stage1 Stage2 667 406 1. 00 406 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.45 1. 00 1. 00 0.45 0.57 0.55 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 12 1 11 10 Ii 12 R 667 WHKS & CO. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a -----------y-~_._._-------------- - C t Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Results for Two-stage process: a y C t Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 L Volume (vph) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 1 83 Iii 8 11 239 118 1.00 1. 00 1.00 0.45 239 53 1. 00 1. 00 114 239 1.00 1. 00 0.45 1. 00 51 239 1. 00 0.45 1.00 0.45 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 7 1277 177 1.00 1. 00 177 72 1. 00 0.45 32 1241 187 1. 00 0.45 84 436 1. 00 0.98 427 2518 14 1. 00 0.45 0.57 0.57 8 1. 00 0.45 0.57 0.55 0.99 2.22 83 0.99 8 T 9 R 10 L 11 T 9 422 300 Movement 7 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches 11 8 9 10 10 12 R o 406 12 WHKS & CO. L T R L T C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) 83 1 422 9 n max C sh SUM C sep n C act 300 Worksheet la-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR R v (vph) 299 10 0 C(m) (vph) 545 300 406 vlc 0.55 0.03 0.00 95% queue length 3.32 0.00 0.00 Control Delay 19.3 17.4 13.9 LOS C C B Approach Delay 17.4 Approach LOS C Worksheet ll-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay p(oj) v(ill, v(i2) , s (ill, s (i2), P* (oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through d(rank,ll Delay for stream 2 or 5 Movement 2 Movement 5 1. 00 0.45 0 0 2 or 5 1700 3 or 6 1700 0.45 19.3 2 Volume for Volume for Saturation Saturation stream 2 or 5 stream 3 or 6 flow rate for flow rate for stream stream lanes liii R 406 o WHKS & CO. . . . OCT-03-2000 TUE 04:35 AM DBQ CO. BOARD OF SUP. FAX NO. 3195897884 p, 01102 0._. _ _." "_., __ 0_. .., ::butu'Utl COlf,nt'! Boa,.J 0/ Superlli:Jo,.:J COURTHOUSE DUBUQUE,IOWA 62001.7053 DONNA L SMITH ALAN A. MANTERNACH JIM WAlLEfI PHONB: 31.5lMI U41 FAX: 319-688-4478 October 2. 2000 The Honorable Terry Duggan, Mayor City of Dubuque Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council: . .' On January II, 1993, the Dubuque County Board of~sors originally petitioned the Iowa Department of Transportation for lightina of the ~~on of U.S. 20 and Old Highway Road because of the heavy truck traffic and other safety hazard'-a~:,:~~.i~tersection. .: . ~'."".: After the careful study of sight distances, aCCi~:tu~:;~d traffic volume that the Iowa Department of Transportation routinely performs, the int~~~~~g was finally operational in February of t 996. , ~:;;:~~~}tt::.~~~:t:;~F:1J~~!];:;:":~:::.: It is difficult to believe that serious cons~~~:ao~ ~~~j-\1en to removing the light at that intersection. Not only does traffic from ih~::01dllijhwaY:~Cmne from the Fairarounds and the County's facilities on Seippel Road, ~t~~ty~~;Will result from the City's own industrial park. However, the biggest hazard ~tt ~o~~:t!\c~:_k traffic from the quarry which be re- routed. This traffic will continue unflfthe::~W:est';ArtCi'W:~omes a reality. , . .:,:;:~:;:}:i~~::~t.;::~;:?::.';;'r::':.'~::-, ~~:. >~":.':: t '<:':.;;::"Yi~~.: ::;;' ..j??i!~p:~ti::'j:i:;!'::.!:;?:;;::,: Additional! ,the Iowa ~eht:~i.1~~cm7$StUd ot: '[0' '~~it:~"':.":'" ,'l~~Qn the U.S. 20 y .. .... . .... ...... ....,.. .. Y,..J' PO. ..J~ .......,-.... Corridor is nOt~e( comp~'a.~tioti_.:ma..sbO\l)Ci, .10gicallfJji~~:~ ~dy. is accepted. Please d~~~~~rf~'~~~J:h.~~~~~~:t~;~~~~~l~~~~~'~~,~~g a roposal::_lt~. '.. 'il.5iOii~.'f'romj~' . d:wwd;' serifstii~(..~~:t<<:~1ravelin ~Ii.".~:'~.:~~;~}r?f ....~?"~f'jC~r::?'.. 9)~;~':;,::j;[~~J3~eS'I.i' '::i\, g f2,:....,.,.~~. , :: ~g<~'t.~, " . 'i;'~~~is.~~"'; . ',.':' ;,.:';... .....,.. .." jh cncl. /, '.~:. . ...... .....:::..'i. '::':~:~::::' ,;.~.,,:,,;: .~~:~ . :~:!~tlJ~~][~~'."'. ':""t6~~~~~~'~U ;'<','.,,: '::';~'::' Q~~, .:..::., ..:.... ........; ::-1 :;;,: ~-'.' . ilIl~I\"''' OCT-03-2000 TUE 04:35 AM DBQ CO. BOARD OF SUP. . , ;'} ~~. ( ~, . J. . . FAX NO. 3195897884 P, 02/02 Jan. 11, 1993 ~ 93-022 - APPROVING SBCOND QUARTER REPORT FOR SHBRIFF'S WHEREAS, Iowa code Section 331.902()) requires that each County Sleeted Official make a quarterly report to the Board of supervisors .ho~ing, by type, the fees collected during the preceding quarter 1 and WHEREAS, County. Sheriff Leo Kennedy haa submitted the quarterly report for the DUbuque County Sheriff's Office for the quarter ending December 31, 1992 .. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of superviaors herewith receives and files said quarterly report. Motion by Waller, seconded by Manternach, carried unanimously to approve and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 93-022. cOMMUNICATION - TO rOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQUESTING INTERSECTIONAL LIGHT AT INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAYS 20 AND 966 Motion by Manterna.ch, seconded by Waller, carried unanimously to approve the communication to Iowa Department of Transportation requesting intersectional signal light.ing at intersection of Highways 20 and 966. . VIENNA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Motion by Mant.ernach, seconded by Waller, carried unanimously to deny request for FY 1994 from New Vienna Historical Society. Moeion withdrawn. Motion by Waller, seconded by Smith, carried unanimously to refer to the budget. . COMMUNICATION - ANNOUNCEMENT OF DUBUQUE METROPOLITAN AREA SOLID WASTE "AGENCY WASTE TIRE COLLBC'l'ION PROGRAM ~. Hoeion by Manternach, seconded by Waller, carried unanimously to receive and file the announcement of Dubuque Metropolitan Area Solid Waste Agency ~aste tire colleceionprogram. ~ I CAT ION - REQUEST FOR REVISED CONTRACT TERMS FOR. FISCAL YEAR. ~S4 FROM DUBUQUE HUMANE SOCIETY '. ~.; . Motion by Waller, seconded by Manternach, carried unanimously to ,!r: refer to the budget. << 19 .' . . y ~ /- r:: - ;:;;~ 7/5pcJ Prepared by: Laura Carstens. City Planner Address: City Hall. 50 W. 13th Street Telephone: 589-4210 ORDINANCE NO. -00 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A (THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY RECLASSIFYING HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 20 WEST OF WESTSIDE COURT FROM C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND CS COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND WHOLESALE DISTRICT TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH A PC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGNATION AND ADOPTING A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH CONDITIONS, FOR MENARD, INC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA: Section 1. Appendix A (the Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by reclassifying the hereinafter described property from C-3 General Commercial District and CS Commercial Service and Wholesale District to PUD Planned Unit Development District with a PC Planned Commercial designation and adopting a conceptual development plan, a copy of which is attached to and made a part hereof, with conditions for Menard, Inc., as stated below, to wit: Lot 2 of Siegert's Place, Third Addition, and to the center line of the adjoining public right-of-way, all in the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 2. Pursuant to Iowa Code Section 414.5 (1993), and as an express condition of the reclassification, the undersigned property owner(s) agree(s) to the following conditions, all of which the property owner(s) further agree(s) are reasonable and imposed to satisfy the public needs that are caused directly by the zoning reclassification: A. Definitions. 1. Building-related Features: Building-related features are defined as all constructed items which rise above the grade surface of the lot. These include: a) The primary building b) All accessory or secondary buildings c} All exterior storage areas d} Exterior refuse collection areas e} Exterior mechanical equipment , . . . . . Ordinance No. Page 2 -00 f) Containerized or tank storage of liquids, fuels, gases and other materials 2) Vehicle-related Features: Vehicle-related features are defined as all areas used for the movement and parking of all vehicles within the lot. These include: a) Employee and visitor parking spaces b) Driveways from the street right-of-way line to and from parking spaces. c) Loading spaces outside of the building d) Maneuvering space and driveways to and from loading spaces e) Parking spaces for company-owned commercial vehicles f) Fire lanes 3) Open Space Features: Open space features are defined as those exterior areas and developed features of the lot. These include: a) Landscaped space containing lawn areas and plantings b) Paved, hard-surfaced pedestrian areas such as walkways, plazas, entryways and courtyards c) Surface storm water detention areas not otherwise used for building-related or vehicle-related purposes d) Open recreation areas and recreational trail e) Other non-building and non-vehicular-related space B) Use Regulations. The following regulations shall apply to all uses made of land in the above described PUD District: 1) Principal permitted uses shall be limited to: a) Retail sales/service [17] b) Indoor restaurant [20] c) Drive-in/carry-out restaurant [28] d) General offices [14] [ ] Parking group-see Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) Conditional uses reserved for future use. 3) Accessory uses shall be limited to any use customarily incidental and subordinant to the principal use it serves. .. , Ordinance No. Page 3 -00 4) Temporary uses shall be limited to any use listed as a permitted use within the PUD District of a limited duration, as established in Section 2-5.3 and as defined in Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance. C) Lot and Bulk Regulations. Development of land in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1) All building structures and activities shall be located in conformance with the attached conceptual development plan and all final site development plans shall be approved in accordance with provisions of the PUD District regulations of this ordinance and of Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) All building-related features shall be in accordance with the following lot and bulk regulations: a) Maximum lot coverage shall be limited to 75%. All building and vehicle-related features shall be considered when calculating total land area coverage. b) Maximum building height shall be 40 feet, except the following may exceed the height limit: cooling towers, condensers, elevator bulkheads, stacks and other necessary mechanical equipment and their protective housing. HVAC equipment is limited to 10 feet above 40 feet limitation subject to the provision of adequate screening. c) Setbacks for the out-lot shall be as established for the C-3 General Commercial District, set forth Section 3-3.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. D) Parking Regulations 1) All vehicle-related features shall be surfaced with either asphalt or concrete. 2) Curbing and proper surface drainage of storm water shall be provided. 3) All parking and loading spaces shall be delineated on the surfacing material by painting stripes or other permanent means. 4) The number, size and design of parking spaces shall be governed by applicable provisions of City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances in effect at the time of development of the lot. " Ordinance No. Page 4 -00 5) The number, size, design and location of parking spaces designated for persons with disabilities shall be according to the local, state or federal requirements in effect at the time of development. 6) The location and number of private driveway intersections with public streets shall be established by the City of Dubuque. E. Landscaping Regulations 1) Plant Materials: The open space area of each lot shall be planted with permanent lawn and ground covers, such as shrubs and trees. It is the intent of these regulations that the development of required open spaces shall reflect a high quality of environmental design. The following provisions shall apply to each lot: a) Landscape plans are required as part of submittals for site plan review. Landscape plans are to include type, number and size of proposed plantings. As a minimum, the submitted landscape plan should include the following: ~ For every one (1) acre of lot size, four (4) trees shall be required to a maximum of forty (40) trees. Each required tree shall be at least two (2) inches in diameter at planting. ~ Shrubs shall be used to screen parking areas and provide accent around buildings. ~ Parking areas located adjacent to a right-of-way shall be screened with a combination of trees, shrubs or berms to provide a landscape screen of 50% opacity and three (3) feet in height within three years of planting. 2) All exposed soil areas remaining after the construction of building and vehicle-related features shall be planted with a permanent ground cover to prevent erosion. Within one (1) year following completion of construction, or by the date that a building is issued an occupancy certificate by the Building Safety Department of the City of Dubuque, whichever occurs first, required landscaping shall be installed. 3) The lot owner is required to replant any and all plant materials which have died due to any cause during the effective period of this PUD ordinance. Ordinance No. -00 Page 5 F. Sign Regulations. 1) The provision of Section 4-3 (Sign Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance shall apply unless further regulated by this section. 2) Wall-Mounted Signs: a) Menard's: 1) Total allowed square footage: 600 square foot 2) Number of signs: unlimited 3) Below eave or parapet b) Out-lot: 1) Total allowed square footage: 250 square feet 2) Number of signs: unlimited 3) Below eave or parapet 3) Freestanding signs: a) Menard's: 1) Total allowed square footage: 400 square feet 2) Maximum number: 1 3) Maximum height: 50 feet b) Out-lot: 1) Total allowed square footage: 200 square feet 2) Maximum number: 1 3) Maximum height: 40 feet 4) Directional Signs: a) Menard's/Out-lot: 1) Maximum size: 6 square feet 2) Maximum number: Unlimited 3) Maximum height: 10 feet 5) Lighting: Signs may be illuminated only by means of indirect lighting whereby all light sources and devices are shielded from view by opaque or translucent materials, or internally illuminated by means of a light source completely enclosed by the sign panel. Ordinance No. Page 6 -00 6) Motion: No signs may include any device or means, mechanical, electrical or natural, which shall cause any motion of the sign panel or any part thereof. No flashing lights or changing colors shall be allowed. G) Performance Standards The development and maintenance of uses in this PUD District shall be established in conformance with Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and the following standards: 1) Site Lighting a) Exterior illumination of site features shall be limited to the illumination of the following: ~ Parking areas, driveways and loading facilities. ~ Pedestrian walkway surfaces and entrances to the building. ~ Screened storage areas. ~ Building exterior. b) Location and Design: ~ All exterior lightir;Jg shall be designed, installed and maintained so as n6t to cause glare or to shine into adjacent Ii' lots and streets. ~ All exterior lighting luminaires shall be designed and installed to shield ligJlt from the luminaire at angles above 72 degrees from vertical. ~ A lighting plan shall.be included as part of site plan submittals that indicates types of lights used and ground light pattern for lighting of building and parking-related features. ~ Fixtures mounted on a building shall not be positioned higher than the roof line of the building. ~ Wooden utility-type poles are acceptable only for temporary use during construction. ~ All electrical service lines to po~ts and fixtures shall be underground or concealed inside the posts. Ordinance No. -00 Page 7 2) Utility Locations a) Service lines: all electrical, telephone, cable and other similar utility lines serving the building and other site features shall be located underground. b) Mechanical equipment: all electrical transformers, switching gear, relay boxes, meters, air conditioning units, heat pumps and other similar mechanical equipment, including roof-mounted mechanical equipment, shall be screened from view. Mechanical equipment shall be screened in such a manner that it will appear to be an integral part of the building's overall architectural design. Fencing of at least 50% opacity, masonry walls or plantings may be used to visually screen mechanical equipment. c) Final site development plans shall be submitted in accordance with Section 4-4 of the Zoning Ordinance prior to construction of each building and vehicle-related feature unless otherwise exempted by Section 4-4. 3) Exterior Trash Collection Areas: a) The storage of trash and debris shall be limited to that produced by the principal permitted use and accessory uses of the lot. b) The ground area coverage of exterior trash collection areas shall be the area contained inside the required screening and this area shall be considered a building-related feature for purposes of calculating total land area coverages. c) Exterior trash collection areas shall be located in rear or side yards only. d) All exterior trash collection areas and the materials contained therein shall be visually screened from view. The screening shall be completely opaque fence, wall or other feature not exceeding a height of 10 feet measured from the ground level outside the line of the screen. Screens built on sloping grades shall be stepped so that their top line shall be horizontal. All exterior entrances to a screened trash area shall be provided with a gate or door of similar design to that of the screen. If a 10 foot high screen fails to shield the exterior trash collection area from view from points inside or outside of the property, evergreen plantings may be required in addition to the screening. Evergreen plant materials shall be selected and designed so that Ordinance No. -00 Page 8 they will screen the area from all off-site visibility within five (5) years. e) Other Codes and Regulations: These regulations do not relieve an owner from other applicable city, county, state or federal codes, regulations, laws and other controls relative to the planning, construction, operation, and management of property within the City of Dubuque. H. Transfer of Ownership Transfer of ownership or lease of property in this PUD District shall include in the transfer or lease agreement a provision that the purchaser or lessee acknowledges awareness of the conditions authorizing the establishment of the district. I. Modifications. Any modifications of this Ordinance must be approved by the City Council in accordance with zoning reclassification proceedings of Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. J. Recording. A copy of this ordinance shall be recorded at the expense of the property owner(s) with the Dubuque County Recorder as a permanent record of the conditions accepted as part of this reclassification approval within ten (10) days after the adoption of this ordinance. This ordinance shall be binding upon the undersigned and his/her heirs, successors and assigns. Section 3. The foregoing amendment has heretofore been reviewed by the Zoning Commission of the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 4. The foregoing amendment shall take effect upon publication, as provided by law. Passed, approved and adopted this day of ,2000. -----,-- .' -- .. Terrance M. Dug~p, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanne F. Schneider, City Clerk F:\USERS\M ELlNDA \W P\COUNCIL \ORO\M E NARDS.OR D ACCEPTANCE OF ORDINANCE NO. -00 I, Thomas O'Neil, representing Menard, Inc. purchaser, having read the terms and conditions of the foregoing Ordinance No. -00 and being familiar with the conditions thereof, hereby accept the same and agree to the conditions required therein. Dated this day of ,2000. By Thomas O'Neil Menard, Inc. '\, ACCEPTANCE OF ORDINANCE NO. -00 We, William A. Siegert and Janet L. Siegert, property owners, having read the terms and conditions of the foregoing Ordinance No. -00 and being familiar with the conditions thereof, hereby accept the same and agree to the conditions required therein. Dated this ./ I day Of,~ ' 2000. By Q. William A. Siegert B~.i./ h4 3anet L. Siegert __-1 / ) ~/--) //' ' . / . -c-) / .~~4~f/-<,.k.c/ ~ ~.). -;}//-;i?/:...~id/C:C-;:4/./~:.: ~-;)-;Z/?;Z/i~~~~ /(f~/ C/ u" U Prepared by: Laura Cal'8t~'"S. City Planner Address: City Hall. 60 W. 13th Street Telephone: 589-4210 ORDINANCE NO. -00 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A (THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY RECLASSIFYING HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 20 WEST OF WESTSIDE COURT FROM C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND CS COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND WHOLESALE DISTRICT TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH A PC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGNATION AND ADOPTING A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH CONDITIONS, FOR MENARD, INC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA: Section 1. Appendix A (the Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by reclassifying the hereinafter described property from C-3 General Commercial District and CS Commercial Service and Wholesale District to PUD Planned Unit Development District with a PC Planned Commercial designation and adopting a conceptual development plan, a copy of which is attached to and made a part hereof, with conditions for Menard, Inc., as stated below, to wit: Lot 2 of Siegert's Place, Third Addition, and to the center line of the adjoining public right-of-way, all in the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 2. Pursuant to Iowa Code Section 414.5 (1993), and as an express condition of the reclassification, the undersigned property owner(s) agree(s) to the following conditions, all of which the property owner(s) further agree(s) are reasonable and imposed to satisfy the public needs that are caused directly by the zoning reclassification: A. Definitions. 1. Building-related Features: Building-related features are defined as all constructed items which rise above the grade surface of the lot. These include: a) The primary building b) All accessory or secondary buildings c) All exterior storage areas d) Exterior refuse collection areas e) Exterior mechanical equipment Ordinance No. Page 2 -00 f) Containerized or tank storage of liquids, fuels, gases and other materials 2) Vehicle-related Features: Vehicle-related features are defined as all areas used for the movement and parking of all vehicles within the lot. These include: a) Employee and visitor parking spaces b) Driveways from the street right-of-way line to and from parking spaces. c) Loading spaces outside of the building d) Maneuvering space and driveways to and from loading spaces e) Parking spaces for company-owned commercial vehicles f) Fire lanes 3) Open Space Features: Open space features are defined as those exterior areas and developed features of the lot. These include: a) Landscaped space containing lawn areas and plantings b) Paved, hard-surfaced pedestrian areas such as walkways, plazas, entryways and courtyards c) Surface storm water detention areas not otherwise used for building-related or vehicle-related purposes d) Open recreation areas and recreational trail e) Other non-building and non-vehicular-related space B) Use Regulations. The following regulations shall apply to all uses made of land in the above described PUD District: 1) Principal permitted uses shall be limited to: a) Retail sales/service [17] b) Indoor restaurant [20] c) Drive-in/carry-out restaurant [28] d) General offices [14] [ ] Parking group-see Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) Conditional uses reseNed for future use. 3) Accessory uses shall be limited to any use customarily incidental and subordinant to the principal use it serves. Ordinance No. Page 3 -00 4) Temporary uses shall be limited to any use listed as a permitted use within the PUD District of a limited duration, as established in Section 2-5.3 and as defined in Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance. C) Lot and Bulk Regulations. Development of land in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1) All building structures and activities shall be located in conformance with the attached conceptual development plan and all final site development plans shall be approved in accordance with provisions of the PUD District regulations of this ordinance and of Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) All building-related features shall be in accordance with the following lot and bulk regulations: a) Maximum lot coverage shall be limited to 75%. All building and vehicle-related features shall be considered when calculating total land area coverage. b) Maximum building height shall be 40 feet, except the following may exceed the height limit: cooling towers, condensers, elevator bulkheads, stacks and other necessary mechanical equipment and their protective housing. HVAC equipment is limited to 10 feet above 40 feet limitation subject to the provision of adequate screening. c) Setbacks for the out-lot shall be as established for the C-3 General Commercial District, set forth Section 3-3.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. D) Parking Regul~tions 1) All vehicle-related features shall be surfaced with either asphalt or concrete. 2) Curbing and proper surface drainage of storm water shall be provided. 3) All parking and loading spaces shall be delineated on the surfacing material by painting stripes or other permanent means. 4) The number, size and design of parking spaces shall be governed by applicable provisions of City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances in effect at the time of development of the lot. Ordinance No. Page 4 -00 5) The number, size, design and location of parking spaces designated for persons with disabilities shall be according to the local, state or federal requirements in effect at the time of development. 6) The location and number of private driveway intersections with public streets shall be established by the City of Dubuque. E. Landscaping Regulations 1) Plant Materials: The open space area of each lot shall be planted with permanent lawn and ground covers, such as shrubs and trees. It is the intent of these regulations that the development of required open spaces shall reflect a high quality of environmental design. The following provisions shall apply to each lot: a) Landscape plans are required as part of submittals for site plan review. Landscape plans are to include type, number and size of proposed plantings. As a minimum, the submitted landscape plan should include the following: .. For every one (1) acre of lot size, four (4) trees shall be required to a maximum of forty (40) trees. Each required tree shall be at least two (2) inches in diameter at planting. .. Shrubs shall be used to screen parking areas and provide accent around buildings. .. Parking areas located adjacent to a right-of-way shall be screened with a combination of trees, shrubs or berms to provide a landscape screen of 50% opacity and three (3) feet in height within three years of planting. 2) All exposed soil areas remaining after the construction of building and vehicle-related features shall be planted with a permanent ground cover to prevent erosion. Within one (1) year following completion of construction, or by the date that a building is issued an occupancy certificate by the Building Safety Department of the City of Dubuque, whichever occurs first, required landscaping shall be installed. 3) The lot owner is required to replant any and all plant materials which have died due to any cause during the effective period of this PUD ordinance. Ordinance No. -00 Page 5 F. Sign Regulations. 1) The provision of Section 4-3 (Sign Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance shall apply unless further regulated by this section. 2) Wall-Mounted Signs: a) Menard's: 1) Total allowed square footage: 600 square foot 2) Number of signs: unlimited 3) Below eave or parapet b) Out-lot: 1) Total allowed square footage: 250 square feet 2) Number of signs: unlimited 3} Below eave or parapet 3) Freestanding signs: a} Menard's: 1) Total allowed square footage: 400 square feet 2) Maximum number: 1 3) Maximum height: 50 feet b} Out-lot: 1) Total allowed square footage: 200 square feet 2) Maximum number: 1 3) Maximum height: 40 feet 4) Directional Signs: a) Menard's/Out-lot: 1) Maximum size: 6 square feet 2} Maximum number: Unlimited 3} Maximum height: 10 feet 5) Lighting: Signs may be illuminated only by means of indirect lighting whereby aJllight sources and devices are shielded from view by opaque or translucent materials, or internally illuminated by means of a light source completely enclosed by the sign panel. Ordinance No. Page 6 -00 6) Motion: No signs may include any device or means, mechanical. electrical or natural, which shall cause any motion of the sign panel or any part thereof. No flashing lights or changing colors shall be allowed. G) Performance Standards The development and maintenance of uses in this PUD District shall be established in conformance with Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and the following standards: 1) Site Lighting a) Exterior illumination of site features shall be limited to the illumination of the following: .. Parking areas, driveways and loading facilities. .. Pedestrian walkway surfaces and entrances to the building. .. Screened storage areas. .. Building exterior. b) Location and Design: .. All exterior lighting shall be designed, installed and maintained so as not to cause glare or to shine into adjacent lots and streets. .. All exterior lighting luminaires shall be designed and installed to shield light from the luminaire at angles above 72 degrees from vertical. .. A lighting plan shall be included as part of site plan submittals that indicates types of lights used and ground light pattern for lighting of building and parking-related features. .. Fixtures mounted on a building shall not be positioned higher than the roof line of the building. .. Wooden utility-type pOles are acceptable only for temporary use during construction. .. All electrical service lines to posts and fixtures shall be underground or concealed inside the posts. Ordinance No. -00 Page 7 2) Utility Locations a) Service lines: all electrical, telephone, cable and other similar utility lines serving the building and other site features shall be located underground. b) Mechanical equipment: all electrical transformers, switching gear, relay boxes, meters, air conditioning units, heat pumps and other similar mechanical equipment, including roof-mounted mechanical equipment, shall be screened from view. Mechanical equipment shall be screened in such a manner that it will appear to be an integral part of the building's overall architectural design. Fencing of at least 50% opacity, masonry walls or plantings may be used to visually screen mechanical equipment. c) Final site development plans shall be submitted in accordance with Section 4-4 of the Zoning Ordinance prior to construction of each building and vehicle-related feature unless otherwise exempted by Section 4-4. 3) Exterior Trash Collection Areas: a) The storage of trash and debris shall be limited to that produced by the principal permitted use and accessory uses of the lot. b) The ground area coverage of exterior trash collection areas shall be the area contained inside the required screening and this area shall be considered a building-related feature for purposes of calculating total land area coverages. c) Exterior trash collection areas shall be located in rear or side yards only. d) All exterior trash collection areas and the materials contained therein shall be visually screened from view. The screening shall be completely opaque fence, wall or other feature not exceeding a height of 10 feet measured from the ground level outside the line of the screen. Screens built on sloping grades shall be stepped so that their top line shall be horizontal. All exterior entrances to a screened trash area shall be provided with a gate or door of similar design to that of the screen. If a 10 foot high screen fails to shield the exterior trash collection area from view from points inside or outside of the property, evergreen plantings may be required in addition to the screening. Evergreen plant materials shall be selected and designed so that Ordinance No. -00 Page 8 they will screen the area from all off-site visibility within five (5) years. e) Other Codes and Regulations: These regulations do not relieve an owner from other applicable city, county, state or federal codes, regulations, laws and other controls relative to the planning, construction, operation, and management of property within the City of Dubuque. H. Transfer of Ownership Transfer of ownership or lease of property in this PUD District shall include in the transfer or lease agreement a provision that the purchaser or lessee acknowledges awareness of the conditions authorizing the establishment of the district. I. Modifications. Any modifications of this Ordinance must be approved by the City Council in accordance with zoning reclassification proceedings of Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. J. Recording. A copy of this ordinance shall be recorded at the expense of the property owner(s) with the Dubuque County Recorder as a permanent record of the conditions accepted as part of this reclassification approval within ten (10) days after the adoption of this ordinance. This ordinance shall be binding upon the undersigned and his/her heirs, successors and assigns. Section 3. The foregoing amendment has heretofore been reviewed by the Zoning Commission of the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 4. The foregoing amendment shall take effect upon publication, as provided by law. Passed, approved and adopted this day of ,2000. ATTEST: Jeanne F. Schneider, City Clerk F:\USERS\MELlNDA \WP\COUNCIL \ORD\MENARDS.ORD ~ ACCEPTANCE OF ORDINANCE NO. -00 We, William A. Siegert and Janet L. Siegert, property owners, having read the terms and conditions of the foregoing Ordinance No. -00 and being familiar with the conditions thereof, hereby accept the same and agree to the conditions required therein. Dated this day of ,2000. By William A. Siegert By Janet L. Siegert " ACCEPTANCE OF ORDINANCE NO. -00 I, Thomas O'Neil, representing Menard, Inc. purchaser, having read the terms and conditions of the foregoing Ordinance No. -00 and being familiar with the conditions thereof, hereby accept the same and agree to the conditions required therein. Dated this day of ,2000. By Thomas O'Neil Menard, Inc. '. Brian J. Kane Gary K. Norby Les V. Reddick* D. Flint Drake** Brad J. Heying Todd L. Stevenson* Louis P. pfeiler MaryBeth pfeiler Salmon KANE, NORBY & REDDICK, P.C. ATTORNEYS 2100 ASBURY ROAD, SUITE 2 DUBUQUE, IA 52001-3069 All admitted in Iowa * Also admitted in lllinois ** Also admitted in Wisconsin July 28, 2000 Phone: (319) 582-7980 Facsimile: (319) 582-5312 E-mail: knrpC@mcleodusa.net City Clerk City Hall 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 Dear City Clerk: We are attorneys for Edward Tschiggfrie and Tschiggfrie Excavating Company. Enclosed is a copy of a July 17, 2000 letter written by the Iowa Department of Transportation to Mayor Duggan. This letter requests that the City Council adopt an ordinance imposing a one year moratorium on any development action along u.S. Highway 20. Mr. Tschiggfrie owns property south of Highway 20 which would apparently be affected by any such moratorium. In the event the City Council intends to hold a public hearing or take any action with regard to a possible moratorium, we request that you please notify us and Mr. Tschiggfrie in advance so that we may appear at that meeting. Mr. Tschiggfrie's address is: Edward D. Tschiggfrie Tschiggfrie Excavating Co. 425 Julien Dubuque Drive P.O. Box 3280 Dubuque, IA 52004-3280 Q 0-< c: 0- a Q '-- c:: r- W =0 1/1 '-:-) rn ~ ::::: - m o Thank you. (--.. ;'::; , ~t (/;- > ~_ u ::i: )>=+; o' ID CJ1 KANE, NORBY & REDDICK, P.C. Sincerely yours, \.0 GKN:meh Enclosure cc: Mr. Mike VanMilligen Mr. Edward D. Tschiggfrie /' / LA ~- ?lIe; BY~ r- Ju1 21,00 04:32p 319-589-4221 319-589-4221 p.s .. e Iowa Department Of Transportation District 6 Office 430 Sixteenth Avenue SW P.O. Box 3150. Cedar Rapids, IA 52406-3150 FAX; 319-364-0235 319-364-9614 July 17, :WOO Ref: STP-32-1(l0)--2C-31 Dubuque County City of Dubuque The Honorable Terrance M. Duggan, Mayor 50 West 13 ill Street Dubuque, IA 52001-4864 SUBJECT: Iowa 32 - Southwest Arterial Dear Mayor Duggan: As I advised you previously, our staff is beginning to evaluate an alternative for the Southwest Arterial that connects to U.S. 20 in the vicinity of Seippel Road. As we have reviewed the schedule for this process, we have concluded that we will.need about a year to fully complete this evaluation. I would like to formally request that the city council implement a moratorium for this one-year period on approving development actions (re-zoning, platting or building permit applications) along U.S. 20. At this time, the corridor study limits have not yet been established but should be in the near future. Once the limits have been established, we can be more definitive as to the impacted area. With cooperation, we will be able to consider an alternative that won't be precluded by development during the course of the planning study process. Once that process is completed and a location is approved, we can implement official corridor preservation in accord wlth Iowa law. If you have any questions about this request, please give me a eall at 319-364-0235. Very truly yours, f&.fuu~ ~ ,t'M-, Q 0 0 0':< '-- :0 c::: m c r~, : IT ~.,;: C) C ,.J co ..0 ;.~ :n ,- :J; :2 -::;:::; ffi '- r-, ..... m - ,-", )>~ - 0 .. 0 <D w Richard E. Kautz, P.E. District Engineer REK/jh cc: Robert Krause, Transportation Planner, Iowa DOT, DyersviHe, IA 52040 Tom Cackler-Director, Highway Division, Iowa DOT, i\mes, IA 500 I 0 LAW OFFICES OF REYNOLDS & KENLINE, L.L.P. LEO A. McCARTHY DAVID L. CLEMENS WILLIAM J. MAIERS CHADWYN D. COX* MARK J . SULLIVAN JEFFREY L. WALTERS PAULA M. STENLUND** JENNIFER A. CLEMENS-CONLON JOHN T. NEMMERS TODD N. KLAPATAUSKAS*** SUITE 222 FISCHER BUILDING P.O. BOX 239 DUBUQUE, IOWA 52004-0239 TELEPHONE: (319) 556-8000 FAX: (319) 556-8009 E-Mail:rkenline@mwci.net 'ALSO LICENSED IN MINNESOTA .. ALSO LICENSED IN WISCONSIN AND ILLINOIS "'ALSO LICENSED IN ILLINOIS August 15, 2000 ~c) ...!> ~ '0" CD 0 0 J:'::''''' =0 .....~-.... GO) rn -..J C) fll -0 -/ -,po ........... -~ In f'>J 0 .. W ()1 o ;:::;: 0'-< n- (~ The Honorable Terrance M. Duggan, Mayor and Members of the Dubuque City Council 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001-4864 ."', ,...- (1:' 'J) Dear Mayor Duggan and Council Members: RE: Menards' Application for Plat Approval (Action Item No.1) We represent Bill and Janet Siegert. The purpose of this letter is to respectfully request that the Council table any decision on the Menards' application for plat approval at your August 21, 2000, meeting. The City Clerk advises that this is Action Item No. 1 on your agenda. We respectfully request that any action on the application be tabled until after the IDOT meeting of August 25, 2000. In speaking with Dick Kautz of IDOT, it is our understanding that a draft of the proposed Southwest Arterial corridor is in the works. No final decision by IDOT will be made on the Southwest Arterial corridor until August 25, 2000, at the earliest. We know there are issues regarding access to the Menards' property. We cannot adequately address the access issues until we have a definite response from IDOT as to the location of the Southwest Arterial. We would appreciate the opportunity to be heard and address access alternatives after IDOT makes its final decision on the exact location of the Southwest Arterial corridor. .' ~ ,. LAW OFFICES OF REYNOLDS & KENLINE, L.L.P. 2) On behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Siegert, I thank the Council for your attention and consideration of their request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, ~ Maiers WJM/dms cc: Mr. and Mrs. William A. Siegert 13836 Old Highway Road Dubuque, IA 52002 cc: Mr. James H. Bradley prudential Friedman Realty, Inc. 3435 Asbury Road, Suite 201 Dubuque, IA 52002 cc: Mr. Thomas O'Neil Real Estate Acquisitions Menard, Inc. 4777 Menard Drive Eau Claire, WI 54703-9625 S, \WP8 \ DONNA \Siegert \Corr\081S00 -MAYOR. wpd O;,\{!SION OF MATHY CON51RtJCnON P.O. BOX 1430 DUBUQUE, IOWA 52004-1430 608/568-3433 Office 608-568-3472 Fax _s RIVER (InSTONE Asphalt is 100% recyclable. Equal Opportunity Emp/ayer September 28, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Council CiZ of Dubuque 13 and Central Ave. Dubuque IA 52001 Re: Traffic Signal at Old Highway Rd and U.S. 20 Dear Mayor and Council: It has come to our attention that there is a proposal before you, which suggests that the existing traffic signal at U.S. 20 and Old Highway Road be relocated further west at the proposed entrance to the new Menards Store. This proposal is of great concern to our firm as this traffic signal controls the access of the quarry roadway located on the south side of the intersection. The signal allows for the safe ingress and egress of thousands of vehicles in and out of the quarry every year. The majority of the traffic using the intersection is dump trucks and semi-tractors/trailers. These vehicles are slow to accelerate and would have difficulty entering the busy U.S. 20 corridor. It is our concern that without a signalized intersection at the quarry entrance an increase in accidents and injuries can be expected. An accident between a passenger car and a loaded gravel truck could have devastating consequences. With the construction of the Southwest Arterial and the reconstruction ofthe U.S. 20 corridor in the near future, the access to all businesses in this area will not only change but also improve. Keeping the existing signal and adding an additional signal at Menards would only be temporary until the corridor is improved. We welcome the construction of a new Menards; we just do not want the safety of our employees or the travelling public jeopardized. River City Stone is willing to work with all affected businesses and government agencies in finding workable solution to this issue. Very truly yours, ~~~~nn Vice President D~~ifS~{)f0 Of MATHY CON51'RU(Tj()N P.O. BOX 1430 DUBUQUE, IOWA 52004-1430 608/568-3433 Office 608-568-3472 Fax BS RIVER ClnSTONE A.phalf is 100% recyclable. Equal Opportunity Emp/oyer September 28, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Council Ci~ of Dubuque 13 and Central Ave. Dubuque IA 52001 Re: Traffic Signal at Old Highway Rd and U.S. 20 Dear Mayor and Council: It has come to our attention that there is a proposal before you, which suggests that the existing traffic signal at U.S. 20 and Old Highway Road be relocated further west at the proposed entrance to the new Menards Store. This proposal is of great concern to our firm as this traffic signal controls the access ofthe quarry roadway located on the south side of the intersection. The signal allows for the safe ingress and egress of thousands of vehicles in and out of the quarry every year. The majority of the traffic using the intersection is dump trucks and semi-tractors/trailers. These vehicles are slow to accelerate and would have difficulty entering the busy U.S. 20 corridor. It is our concern that without a signalized intersection at the quarry entrance an increase in accidents and injuries can be expected. An accident between a passenger car and a loaded gravel truck could have devastating consequences. With the construction of the Southwest Arterial and the reconstruction of the U. S. 20 corridor in the near future, the access to all businesses in this area will not only change but also improve. Keeping the existing signal and adding an additional signal at Menards would only be temporary until the corridor is improved. We welcome the construction of a new Menards; we just do not want the safety of our employees or the travelling public jeopardized. River City Stone is willing to work with all affected businesses and government agencies in fmding workable solution to this issue. Very truly yours, f~~ Vice President I A -, I A (~tl ~/';) u-;-- THE CITY OF Engineering Division 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 52001-4864 (319) 589-4270 (319) 589-4149 FAX ~ck~ JUN 06_ June 2, 2000 Mr. Bob Krause District No.6 Transportation Planner Iowa Department of Transportation PO Box 325 Dyersville, IA 52040 RE: Highway 20 Corridor Preservation Zone Decisions Dear Bob: This is in response to your May 4 and 11, 2000 letters to Mr. Kyle Kritz of the City of Dubuque's Planning Services Division regarding the proposed development of Stoney Brook Center (Mike Portzen) and Menard, Inc., both anticipated developments along the U.S. 20 Corridor Preservation Zone. In reviewing your letters, I am concerned about a couple of issues for which I would like clarification: 1 . It is my understanding that all of the acquisition agreements would be two-party agreements between the property owner and the Iowa Department of Transportation. Any agreements regarding future land use planning and site plan approvais would be made by separate agreement between the Iowa Department of Transportation and the City of Dubuque. To that extent, I would suggest that Paragraph 4 of your May 11 letter to Kyle Kritz delete the reference that lOOT would be held harmless for any present or future loss of parking in the affected purchased Menard parcel. Menard's may simply look toward the City for reimbursement of such damages. I would also ask that the next sentence read: "Further, we ask the City to stipulate that the access to the Menard property to Highway 20 may be closed, and alternative access to the Menard property be established by a frontage road at lOOT's 4. cost." Service People Integrity Responsibility Innovation Teamwork , A '.~ ." : '." ~:.~. CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM May 31, 2000 TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager FROM: Michael A. Koch, Public Works Directorr'\~~er..~)I'~~ SUBJECT: Menard, Inc. Development INTRODUCTION The following is a summary of the Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed Menard's Development on U.S. 20 West. The analysis was performed by WHKS & Co. and predicts the anticipated traffic for a planned opening in 2001 . DISCUSSION The analysis includes a 161,640 square foot Home Improvement Superstore and a 10,000 square foot high-turnover, sit-down restaurant. The report describes the existing traffic conditions, estimates the traffic generated by the proposed development, evaluates the operation of the traffic system after full build-out, and recommends site design improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic findings. Peak-hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed development during the anticipated P.M. peak hours is estimated to be 283 vehicles entering the site and 289 exiting the site. Access to the site initially in 2001 would be via a single access point onto U.S. 20. Dual left-turn lanes are recommended for westbound U.S. 20. The proposed entrance will be a four-lane access. The amount of traffic entering the existing volume of traffic on U.S. 20 would require a traffic signal for the safe operation of the highway access. The signals are anticipated to operate at a level of Service B. The future concept for U.S. 20 is a fully-controlled access facility, with access only at grade separated structures. In keeping with that concept, the proposed initial signalized intersection would be removed and reconstructed as an access from a frontage road system connected to an overpass structure. SUMMARY With the anticipated level of traffic, a traffic signal will be required at the sole access point onto U.S. 20. This signal should operate at an acceptable Level of Service B upon completion of the facility. Future plans for U.S. 20 call for the at-grade intersection and traffic signal on U.S. 20 to be replaced with overpass structures, with the access to the Menard's development off of a frontage road extending from the overpass. While lOOT is currently designing a long-range plan for this entire segment of U.S. 20, the timeframe for these improvements is unknown at this time. MAK/vjd ~ ~ CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM October 2, 2000 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager SUBJECT: Menard's The engineering firm representing Menard:s, WHKS, delivered this traffic impact analysis to the City last week. I apologize that it was not sent to you with your packets. I met with Public Works Director Mike Koch this afternoon to discuss this study. He feels there are many unanswered questions about the Menard's proposal that was in the paper this weekend. Staff was not able to discuss these questions with the developer because of previous Council direction. Should the City Council wish to consider this new proposal from Menard's to relocate the Old Highway 20 traffic light, it is the opinion of Corporation Counsel Barry Lindahl that this is a material change in the proposal and would need to be referred back to the Zoning Advisory Commission. (}l~tJ ~ fJ?JL Michael C. Van Milligen " City Manager MCVM/ksf cc: Barry Lindahl, Corporation Counsel Tim Moerman, Assistant City Manager Mike Koch, Public Works Director Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager -; / .r- //_? Planning Services Department 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 52001-4864 Phone (319) 589-4210 Fax (319) 589-4149 j5'UB~E ~<k~ June 12, 2000 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque,IA 52001 RE: Conceptual Development Plan Applicant: Menard Inc. Location: U.S. Highway 20, Southwest of Westside Court Description: To rezone property from C-3 General Commercial District and CS Commercial Service and Wholesale District to PUD Planned Unit Development District with a PC Planned Commercial designation to allow for development of a new Menard's store. Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The City of Dubuque Zoning Advisory Commission has reviewed the above-cited request. The application, staff report and related materials are attached for your review. Discussion The applicant spoke in favor of the request, stating that the proposed Menard's store will be larger than the existing store and will access U.S. Highway 20 at one location only. Staff reviewed surrounding zoning and land use and indicated that the lOOT has reached an agreement with Menard's on providing sufficient property to accommodate the planned future frontage road. The Zoning Advisory Commission discussed the request noting that the project cannot go ahead at this time without a new signal at Highway 20, and the earliest an lOOT project would begin to construct interchanges and frontage roads is seven years. The Commission noted that unless the City wants to stop all development in this corridor for the next seven to ten years, the submitted project does represent a compromise by providing for a future frontage road. Recommendation By a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council approve the request. A simple majority vote is needed for the City Council to approve the request. Respectfully submitted, R~ $d\J:!z,/~ Richard Schiltz, Chairperson Zoning Advisory Commission """'1 'r.: !~>\r;t'''''~O V c), H-,I j~..,ll' 8"111(", C: \1 ':'::1""", ~W" "";,1;-\,--" '~'.:""':'__.~ I -t.""'; ~ C :S Wd 1-J I NOr 00 Attachments 0:3/\13038 Service People Integrity Responsibility Innovation Teamwork OCT-03-2000 TUE 04:35 AM DBQ CO, BOARD OF SUP, , FAX NO. 3195897884 p, 01/02 ...... __.__'- "M__.. ----. - _.. ..--.., ---- .-... ::bulu.lju(I Cou,nl'j Boa,.J 01 SUferfli~o,.~ COURTHOUSE DUBUQUE, IOWA 62001-7053 PONNA L. SMITH ALAN A. MANTERNACH JIM WALLER PHONE: 319-!18v-4441 FAX: 31lH89-447& October 2. 2000 The Honorable Terry Duggan, Mayor City of Dubuque Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council: .. ..... On January 11, 1993, the Dubuque County Board orSupervisors originally petitioned the Iowa Department of Transportation for lightini of the iJ:!:~sec~on of U.S. 20 and Old Highway Road because of the heavy truck traffic and other safety hazardsa~<tn"'~;}p;tersection. ..," I .:' <> ::.. ::~::"':-"'~::".: '.,. After the careful study of sight distances, accidOn~JU~ri~$:ind traffic volume that the Iowa Department of Transportation routinely performs, the interse~~9ri:;li~g was finally operational in February of 1996. :::::t?~.>::::.'r:;::i::::~:;::'!':::.;:;,.:;:.:.: It is dift1cult to believe that serious cons~~~~p':;i~::aow ljiC~~!&1'Ven to removing the light at that intersection. Not only does traffic from th~:.Oh.fHiihwaY;Road)cmne from the FairifOunds and the County's facilities on Seippel Road. ~t ~utety.:.i~~~ifili,<will result from the City's own industrial park. However, the biggest hazard ~t1 ~o~:froJnjhe;:~yy!~k traffic from the quarry which be re- routed. This traffic will continue u~r.the:S~UihW:esrJ.\rt~tb~omes a reality. Admtion&ly, fue IOwa~~~~~'S~y ~:~~i~:~~~_~ the U.s. 20 Corridor is not;yet compl~te~:~~ti01!.Q~:ma~r:shoul(lJpgicallfbC:~~~~::!iritil ~~~dy. is accepted. :::~~~~~I~r4~~~~'~~~el~ .:......, ... "~~~~~et~~',.. .:... :..': .... .~ :":, : . :::Cf'.. ..:"':..:.:~;::>:i..:'::':)cl :. ..:::::i1~C3t:::~:/;... '. :::::~..\.",. :-:~:: ':::.:::,~\:;,.::i..::.:;::::::: >:':'_~::':::::':::::::'...I.(:~,;..:"',:, :. Do~a"L.:,':Smi1h... .. .' '., ,. ~~que 'Co~iY..sUpervi$Q( .,..1,...... .' . ".. .... ...'..: ..:,""; jh :'.".::: encl. \.... \, ';': ". 'i~~ilJd~~~~~if~.' ... .......... , .' .' :::::,' ,.'::::':',,: .,...., .. .. ::::i:,~::':" .,,, , .....d:~i....:;~:~:tiJ:'~:..,:13o..b6 ;:,.;.i:}.';}::?"~;~:..;:.:):.:;:;.::.' ;:.:.:. ::;:/:. .... :..:';'..: .... .. ::;:r:-i "':<.'.\;:of,.:.;:;~;;..::..:;;. . .. ..... \J'~I\I..~I:'..+;,JLJ ..: .. .....':' . .;.;::.1 .' ~~~C;J::. ,", . .,. ' :.:":'" ,..' Ol\~I\OIIoM 'i. ~~ Iowa Department of Transportation . ~.., CITY OF DUBUQUE ~ JUN 0 9 2000 P.O. Box 325 Dyersville, Iowa 52040 June 7,2000 '. .:~- ....... '.-,.1 '.~ ~ '......,..', ,. .....,.~. '..- ~ "~"."- Kyle.L. Kritz Planning Services Department City Hall Second Floor 50 West 13th Stre'et Dubuque, Iowa 52001 REFERENCE: Highway 20 Corridor Preservation Zone Decisions Dear Mr. Kritz: The Department has reviewed the Proposed Site Plan for Menard's, Dlbuque, Iowa dated 4/05/00, named Concept- 1, and drawn by B. Ash. This was sent to me by Mr. Thomas B. O'Neil on a letter dated May 23,200, and received by me on May 26,2000. This revised Proposed Site Plan indicates with a light hyphenation, a strip of 20 feet wide removed from the front of the Menard property. This strip (which actually will vary from 19 feet to 22 feet) is intended for purchase by the Iowa DOT. We are currently in the process of preparing for an acquisition of this land. This acquisition will satisfy our requirements for highway corridor preservation in this area. If all goes well, it also preserves about 10 feet which can be used for a sidewalk at a later date. Pedestrian accommodation will receive greater weight in future planning studies, as per new federal guidelines, and this must be seriously considered during the upcoming corridor study. As an addendum, I received a letter from Mike Koch, Public Works Director for the City of Dubuque, requesting changes and clarifications from my letter to you dated May 11,2000, and which concerned the Menard, Inc., development. This addresses those points raised by Mr. Koch: 1. All acquisition agreements between the private party (in this case, Menard, Inc.) and the Iowa DOT will be two-party agreements, with no City involvement. Final legal authority for building permits, subdivision plats, site plan approvals and zoning rests with the City of Dubuque, subject only to those legal powers inherent in Iowa DOT for the enforcement of the Corridor Preservation process. The Department, during the review process has willingly worked with this developer and others by offering suggestions and professional analysis with the "customer friendly" goal of bringing zoning changes, site plans, subdivision plats and building permits into conformance with Corridor Preservation requirements. We feel that it is in the public interest to work out potential conflicts early in the development process to save money for .. the private parties, and so as not to get in the way of the impending development. However, private parties working with us are advised that our advice and support (although considered heavily by the City), is not legally binding on the City, except to the extent that those actions make it possible to gain our official permission to move forward with the site plan, building permit, zoning change, subdivision plat, and the like, as per the CPZ process. 2. Reflecting on Paragraph 1 above, Iowa DOT hereby amends the May 11 letter, Paragraph 4. The first sentence in quesiton now reads "We further ask the City to stipulate that, beyond the purchase price of the land, that Iowa DOT be held harmless for any future loss of parking at the affected parcel." Because Iowa DOT intends to buy the necessary land prior to consfruction, and because the Menard site plan now indicates that no parking will be built on the land required by the Department, this sentence is hereby deleted. However, should Menard's be held to a higher parking stall standard by the City at a later date, Iowa DOT assumes no liability to Menard's or to the City for the City action. 3. Again reflecting on Paragraph 1 above the next sentence in question reads "Further, we ask the City to stipulate that the access to the Menard property to Highway 20 may be closed, and alternative access to the Menard property established via frontage road, with no additional cost to Iowa DOT beyonf the cost of construction of the frontage road." This, the Department hereby strikes, and substitutes the following sentence: "Further, we ask the City to acknowledge that Iowa DOT's approval of this site plan (pursuant to CPZ powers) is given on condition that the access to the Menard property to Highway 20 may be closed, and alternative access to the Menard property be established by a frontage road, with no additional cost to Iowa DOT beyond the costs of construction of the frontage road and access connector to the Menard parcel." Should you have questions, please contact me at the above address, or telephone me at (319) 875-8739. Respectfully, , -~/1V ~-{f<-- / <Vl/: '/ (/"- Bob Kraus6 District #6 Transportation Planner At Dyersville Attachment: Letter from Mike Koch, Public Works Director for the City of Dubuque, dated June 2, 2000 and received June 6,2000 cc: Harry Budd, Director, Office of Project Planning, Iowa DOT Brad Hofer, Project Planner, Office of Project Planning, Iowa DOT Dick Kautz, District Engineer, District 6, Cedar Rapids, Iowa DOT William McGuire, Office of ROW, Iowa DOT, Ames Clyde Barnes, Office of ROW, Iowa DOT, Ames Will Sharp, Senior Transportation Engineer, HDR, Inc., Omaha Mike Van Milligatt, City Manager, Dubuque Mike Koch, Public Works Director, Dubuque Laura Carstens, Planning Services, Dubuque Mark Jobgen, County Engineer, Dubuque County Art Gourley, Design Engineer, IaDOT, Dyersville Bruce Chrystal, MOA, IaDOT, Dyersville Will Sharp, Sr. Transportation Engineer, HDR, Omaha Barry Lindahl, Corporation Counsel, City of Dubuque Thomas O'Neil, Menard, Inc. ... .~, -'H""'~-'"""" .,'. -,.-, .','." n'"',,,"'."""'::'-';'- t>: h~:~ ."....'..~:.:u.~~ OJ< , nmCITYOF ~ DUB E ~<k~ (.....' " f' City of Dubuque Planning Services Department Dubuque fA 52001-4864 Phone: 319-589-4210 Fax: 319-589-4149 PLANNING APPLICATION FORM o Variance o Conditional Use Permit o Appeal o Special Exception o Limited Setback Waiver o/Rezoning rsI Planned District o Preliminary Plat o Minor Final Plat o Text Amendment o Simple Site Plan o Minor Site Plan o Major Site Plan o Major Final Plat o Simple Subdivision o Annexation o Temporary Use Permit o Certificate of Appropriateness o Certificate of Economic Hardship o Other: PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY IN INK Property Owner(s): William A. Siegert and Janet L. Sieg~rt c/o Prudent1al J:t'r1edman Kealty, ,mc. /Jim liradley Address: 3435 Asbury Road City: Dubuque State: Phone: 319-588-9190 319-583-7580 IA Zip: 52002 Fax Number: 319-583-7609 Mobile/Cellular Number: N / A Applicant/Agent: Menard. Inc. /Thomas W. 0' Neil Phone: 715-876-2810 Address: 4777 Menard Drive City: Eau Claire State: WI Zip: 54703 Fax Number: 715-876-2868 Mobile/Cellular Number: N / A Site location/address: Vacant land southeast of USH 20 W, City of Dubuque, Dubuque County, Iowa C 3 EUD Existing zoning: - Proposed zoning: Commercialiistoric district: N/ A Landmark: N/ A Legal description (Sidwell ParcellD number or lot number/block number/subdivision): See Exhibit 'A' Total property (lot) area (square feet or acres): 27.71 Number of lots: 2 (proposed) Describe proposal and reason necessary (attach a letter of explanation. if needed): See correspondence dated April 30, 2000~ and Site Development Plans attached as Exhibit 'B' CERTIFICATION: I/we. the undersigned. do hereby certify that: 1. The information submitted herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and upon submittal becomes public record; 2. Fees are not refundable and payment does not guarantee approval; and 3. All additional required written and graphic materials are attached. Property Owner(s): Wi~~~_~: Sieg~~ ~nd Janet L. Siegert Applicant/Agent: 7 fUlYYlfl'/ W, U ~ Menard, Inc./ Thomas W. O'Neil Date: Date: Feei l ~O. Dt:1 Received by: J CJ Property ownership list o Improvement plans o Site/sketch plan oor plan o Design review project description TION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Date: fit/eo Docket: ~ , o Plat 0 Conceptual development plan o Photo 0 Other: PLANNED DISTRICT 8T AFF REPORT Zoning Agenda: June 7, 2000 Project Name: Menard's Inc. Property Address: U.S. Highway 20 west of Westside Court Property Owner: William and Janet Siegert Applicant: Menard, Inc./Thomas W. O'Neil Proposed Land Use: Commercial Proposed Zoning: PUD Existing Land Use: Agricultural Existing Zoning: C-3 Adjacent Land Use: North - agricultural Adjacent Zoning: North - C-3 East - commercial East - C-3 South - agricultural South - County AG West - agricultural West - C-3 Flood Plain: Yes Total Area: 26.25 acres Water: Yes Existing Street Access: No Storm Sewer: No Sanitary Sewer: Yes Previous Planned District: None. Purpose: The submitted request is to rezone the subject parcel land from C-3 General Commercial to PUD Planned Unit Development with a PC Planned Commercial designation. Rezoning of this tract of land will allow construction of a new Menard's store with one outlot. Property History: The property has been used for agricultural production for many years. Physical Characteristics: The subject parcel is west of Westside Court and is currently above the grade of U.S. Highway 20. If approved, the site will be significantly regraded to create a level building pad. There is flood plain on the southeast side of the parcel behind the proposed development; however, this will not be encroached on by either the grading or construction of the new store. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan: The subject parcel is included in Growth Area 19, which states is, "primarily commercial development with controlled access and gateway design." . PLANNED DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Page 2 Staff Analysis: Streets: There are no proposed public streets as part of this development. Sidewalks: Sidewalks will be constructed along the front of the building to serve customers entering the building. Parking: The proposed conceptual plan provides parking spaces for 418 vehicles. This number of parking spaces complies with the City's standard commercial/retail parking ratio of one space for each 250 square feet of sales area. Menard, Inc. has also used this store and parking lot layout in several other communities and have found it to provide sufficient parking at all times. Lighting: New exterior lighting of the building and parking lot will require cutoff luminaires. Signage: The conceptual development plan indicates the signage package Menard's will use for this site. The attached PUD ordinance reflects the submitted information. Bulk Regulations: All structures will be located in conformance with the attached conceptual plan with the outlot regulated by setbacks established in the C-3 General Commercial District. Permeable Area (%) & Location (Open Space): Building and paved surfaces comprise approximately 43% of the 26 acre site. Landscaping/Screening: Screening with planting materials will be provided along the front of the parking lot adjacent to U.S. Highway 20. An approximately 14-foot high screening fence will be used around the back of Menard's building to screen the outside yard area. Phasing of development: None. Impact of Request on: Utilities: Existing utilities are adequate to serve the proposed development. Traffic Patterns/Counts: U.S. Highway 20 is classified as a principal arterial and carries approximately 17,000 vehicle trips a day. Public Services: Existing public services are adequate to serve the site. Environment: Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts to the environment provided adequate erosion control is provided during all phases of construction. PLANNED DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Page 3 Adjacent Properties: Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts to adjacent properties. CIP Investments: None proposed. Staff Analysis: Menard's Inc. is requesting rezoning of the subject parcel from C-3 General Commercial to PUD Planned Unit Development with a PC Planned Commercial District designation. The proposed Menard's store would replace the existing store at U.S. Highway 20 and Menard Court. The new Menard's store would be a larger one than the present store and would be on one level. The proposed development is typical for Menard's new stores, in terms of its layout of the store, outside yard area and the number of parking spaces. The proposed development also includes an outlot along the east side of the store. The rezoning of the site to planned unit development is necessary as the Zoning Ordinance requires that department stores of 60,000 square or more, be located in planned commercial districts rather than in the C-3 General Commercial district. The new Menard's will include 102,693 square feet of sales area with an additional 42,900 square feet of heated warehouse area. The conceptual development plan also provides a signage package for the Menard's store. The planned unit development ordinance attached to this staff report has been written to accommodate the Menard's signage package as requested. City sanitary sewer and water mains are accessible to the site. The City's South Fork Interceptor sewer runs along the back property line of the parcel. The City has a 16" water main within the right-of-way of U. S. Highway 20. The applicant has indicated provision of storm water detention on the site as per City of Dubuque requirements. Access to the site will be by a single new access drive to both east and west bound lanes of U.S. highway 20. The volume and speed of traffic on U.S. Highway 20 requires that a signal be installed as part of Menard's development to provide for the safe ingress and egress of traffic from the site. Public Works Director Mike Koch has provided a memo outlining his department's review of the submitted traffic study by Menard's. The subject site is within the Corridor Preservation Zone established by the IDOT in Mach, 2000. Menard's Inc. has been working with IDOT representatives and their consultants to insure that development of this site will not adversely impact future DOT plans for the improvement of U.S. Highway 20. I anticipate that I will receive correspondence from Bob Krause from the IDOT prior to the June 7 Commission meeting, and will forward any information I receive to the Commission. Staff recommends that the Zoning Advisory Commission review Section 3-5.5(F) that establishes plan approval standards for PUD applications. Prepared by: -:fL 1rf Reviewed: IJJ l}- . Date: .5/.Jt/a7 Z - o B ~ U).~ D::Ci>E ~~E :ESo 000 - o:Cca w~~ C)~~ <(CDCD Z:EC) C) M - . en 0 E_ j.c Et>> ';( 'Q; CUJ: :E E ... j CI) E.a .- E >< j CUz :E E j E :g .- ... =<C :E "'C CI) Q) Q. C >- :::J I- a c E .~ ....!. en ns ~ ... Q) a. ns L- ns a. L- a Q) > ns Q) ~ a Q) CD Q) ~ o I.l) ... Q) a. ns L- ns a. L- a Q) > ns Q) ~ a Q) CD "'C Q) ... 'E c ::::) ... Q) ~ o "lOt ..... os= -= 0" 0" U'J U'J o 0 o 0) N "'" 0) "'C C Q) ... "'C C C :::J ns a Ci) E cb ....!. Q) ns U: ~ ... Q) a. ns L- ns a. L- a Q) > ns Q) ~ a Q) CD "'C Q) ... 'E C ::::) U'J Q) .r:. o C ... Q) a. ns L- ns a. L- a Q) > ns Q) ~ a Q) CD ... Q) ~ o "lOt C") C- 0- 0) U'J . .- 0 Q) U'J U'J L- 0.- Q) I.l) E 0.- Q) a L- -=E~ . :::J Q) gEa. o'x . ons4=:: NE 0) C "'C C ns ... U'J I Q) Q) L- u.. ... ... Q) a 0 - L- --l _.C .!! a I nsCi) t>> ... ... 0 en :::J U'J L- ._ ... C 0 Q)O CI) .- _U'J Q) C E~ "'C _U'J ~ Q)(ij E j L- "'C a (!) '0 ns L- --l C") L- om C ns I Q) 0 Q) C () E ~ Q) ~ E a () "'C Q) ... 'E ..... C ::::) -= 0" U'J o o co -= -= 0" 0" U'J U'J o 0 o I.l) "O:t N 0) "'C C Q) ... "'C C C :::J ns a Ci) E I I Q) Q) ns U: ~ 0) Q) ~ co C") ..... Q) - 0) U'J ns U'J... Q) C C a .- L- U'J- :::J ... .aQ) L- Q) Q)l:; a.U'J NQ) a. -= 0" U'J C") o ..... -= 0" U'J o o "lOt 0) "'C C Q) ... "'C C C :::J ns a Ci) E cb ..!. Q) ns U: ~ (Y .............. ...........c . . . . . . .. ...., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................. -3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . County o0~ 000 o 00(\ Do \) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , , . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . , . . , , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [] Proposed area to be rezoned. B City limits Applicant: Menard Inc. Location: U.S. Highway 20, Southwest of Westside Court Description: To rezone from C-3 General Commercial District and CS Commercial Service and Wholesale District to PUD Planned Unit Development District with a PC Planned Commercial designation to allow for development of a new Menard's store. ~ ~"'>.^' :~ ./:'0 ",-"'> ~~~ \S'. ~ ,,,,-"'> ~~ _<!f:> j,,1,; ~ ~o ," .~~I,;:~C:I r I '" ~'>; I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I ! i --fr.- f I 1 1 I I I(/) I 1 I " I . en 1 "\"" I" "''-," I I '\ I I ~ ) I....~ 1 ~~^' ~~ j I~ 1 ~~J~",>~~#// I. Iv V~O . 1 .Q,~","l "'>:J:> - I I 1,,~1,,() y>"'>~ /5 / { ,'<; I I I~ I ./ i;J I I i25 I I ID 'fl>> ir- 1 SI j~ I ,~: /rry 1 1 j 1 1// I ~I (~ 1 '8/ I \ f i ~I ,I / tOl "t 1/ / ~I 1/ I , / 1/ / 1 1/ 1 I( I II ! ! I, \ I I \ "'z ~ \ II i O~ I II \ ~~ I \ Or \ "'0 \ \ O"tl 'II ~ I J' \\ ~~ \ II Ul~ \ \\ \ ~ \ . 1\ \ Ul \ aJ I' \ \ I~ 1 \ \ \ \~ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ I ---- ~--- ---- (L <[ L Z D t--I .- <[ U D ~ w .- t--I (/) -- ~ . . '" ~: 9- aat 0 ...... ~ ..... ..... :- 0 CD <[ W ~ If') <[ - ..... ..... ~ -(I) 0 QSw CD (I)~ ..... ." +1 U 00<[ 0 \0+1 I- 'If) If') ::J(Y)" \D D~cv5 ..... " "" ~ W ..-I ..-I 4: 0.. O!l:l Elz 0!!i2 .' ~u ~ ..... cj ~ ~ . ~ a\ c 0 ~ If) 10.1 II ~~ W l:l R~ 4: ~~ ~ c c ~~ ..... cj ~ ~ ..-I 4: ~ C .. ~ T ~ ~ - -' .,r'ees '\20,ss. L"N -- - OLL , . .. c 1 N 0\ ~ ~ ~ z ~ w ~ ,... ~ ,... G! ~ ~ ,... ,... L:J ~ ~ ! lIS . as c;; w ... ... ... ... ... ... -' z lu I "- L:J ~ ~ ~ ... .. ~ .. lu cr ~ .. t-4 I . - . . - (I) ~ ~ I I I I b I I I a- ., r... r... - a- a- a- -' -' 4: ~ > ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y I '1 I I L:J ~ ~ - N N N N N Cu Cu Cu Z t-4 ; ~ -' g t-4 I i ~ . :::) lit Ii! ~ R I i i '" I ~ t; ~ i ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ... !A! ~ '" lL. oJ . "~',.. ~.: lit' , :. .. '".. . 'r...... .... .. ;. :.~cJ': '.~ ".~': ::.': " '.' z ' . ,'. ., . ",0 l:l ~.< ,.......)1 'r' , ' :b;l:' ,". ." ~. , meJ' ..' . .}:;f;}~:.~~~.~ J" ~.... ... ,. . .' :3' ?}:~~ .:~:. I..;::).. '. :10" JB~ .~:. t ...' " ..~. *,.. ..... .: ~.. . SLL .. c I N .... 8040 1 . o N .. o 1 . ... 805 .9-, .... W .JO: c> 0..1- OJ Cll:l:J !3z CII:'" w~ ~u zC ~> R~ 9~ ~~ ",x RO wl") "'% "'~ tf... ~~ ~~ 1------------------ I , ~ I I I I ....= I.&.. ~. U(3(.1) <%:(.I)W ~ ~ @) ~ ....= I.&.. W. (.1)(3 ~(.I) ~~o Wwo ~~O'I <%: <%: ... W"N :X:-'V <[ LaJ Q:: <[ w It, I ~ I j I !a, / I il / I~ Ii ,I I If'\ ') l&f~ ! I 1" _I I 1~/ l / II 4 jll ;/ / ~: 1/ " 'I I I / I I ( I I ( ! I II I I i I \ ; II ~~ \ ol"l II \ :u~ I II \ ~5 \ I \1 \ %: \ J' \\ I ~ \ II \ I \ c5I II Vl \ Cd \ \ \ 19i \ \ \. \ \i: \ \ \ I I \ \ \ I, I \ \~ I \ \ \ I III \\ \0 \ I \ \ \\ \,;:e I I \ '~ \ \ \ \ I I \_~\ I 1 \ \ \ \ \ I \ I I I \ I IJ I I~ \ \~: I I IN I IWI \ \' \ \~ \ \ \ I \ I I \ I ) \ I ) I / 't>'?~~ ?{i; II ~fJ~~,~~s tv.' ,c.-"1.Jv.j' (\.O'<"~- GV~ I 1.."1 ,~c" '?~~s ., I 'bc" 't>'?~ I I l'-\ Q-20'>-. "10' "k\ ~~1>,>;\ ~Y6\ ~1>1-- \ <<61: o~ "1,>;\ ...(),~~ \ ~o /,'1( \ ~~ ~0'\ ~~\ ~\ U) <><<'l~~ ~ }.. () <<' t)..,- O>o~ \ ! 0". # ,+'W~ / 0>~-2~\ \ ~~~-;~\ \ ~> ~ 6>~ \ ~ .r.' \ ~'" <90> .-s;,Q' " \9..,~~7\ \ . ~o-J'%i;, \\ "' 0'&' \ ~ v~\ \ X"-,\ I ' I \ \ \ \ \ \. \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ ! .i // ", "\'''' ......, " ....., \ \ \ \. ., \ \ \ \. \. " \. , \\ \ i \ \ fj; j ;0 If) j oct II ~\ ~ /G ~ /1"""-- /~ !I't] / If) If) ~ i~ ~g ""u ~~ ~x ~~ ~i= iii> ~S ,------ I I ~ I I I I ZI :> t1cl UlAJl lAJa: a:CI I : I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L ~ o~~ 9- aat " ' ", .,- '" :..; .' ~ v o 00 <[ W O! <[- ~ d(l) (l)W O! +1 U 00<[ o \0+1 I-- "' If) ::)(Y)f' 0\0 - ......(Y) ~If)~:":; '~; ".0 Cl ,:., ., , . -z ' . I .,-~.' .,.'" .'~:r i'::''.'' ,.... ~ .' ", .~~ ',; .~' J " ' . . .. ", ~.,. . . " .I.:J '. .. .' .. "'f ..;......2 " ,'" ,,' . ,_.H ',' ' ~~' ,;~,~". :.- ',:' . .',....... .' ',' ',~ ............ .', "; , r .::),.. ' : ~JB~>,.~' ~ .'l'~ '; .,.. .... .. . ., . , .. o \0 .~. :.-, ,:....A::..,. " . .~Jb '; .~ ; .;. tl,~;;'; . 'CJ F=I ~. , . 'w 4:.(,.) ~. i "~-9B:.:;~ \0 N ,X It) .. "- =- S8L 08L SLL o ~ ~ OLL D S9L ~ ~ o O:::-lO ww I->(Y) 4:Wr--- 3-lr--- S9L 0---< I- 2 w~ 1-2 WD ~Q.. ~ ~ OLL OLL S9L 09L SSL- / f , ~ 2 DO 0... If) ;;, re ----.J I 1 SLL~ .. C) I Cu (J\ ~ . ' . ' 805 to- LoJ -J' <0. o.~ v ~l:J Sz ~.... lAJ~ .-u ze ~ I.&.. W (I)" ::>C3 ~[J(I) w:J:o I--WO <[~O\ W <[ .. :J:>~ ...: I.&.. I-- UG(I) <[(I)W ~+f~ oU ~o<[ ~M+f <[0\'" Zo- w 0 . __ "M .._N <[ w ~ <[ w (;? ::> <[ 0<[ W :z:w ~<[w~ <[W~<[ C)~~C) z<[~z .....(;?Q.... ...: I.&.. ...... ""',,"" <[ ~ ~+fU I--....c wS+f ~ "II) ~MN z.... . W.-ot~ _N c:Q(;?l&J ' :I:~; t-= t-= . . LL. LL. t- t-=w . .LL.LL. ,I. a..... ~ (;? cj ci l.&.. oMCI)CI) .0'0..... \0\00. ... ,,0'0 -N ... \0 N'" _0_\0 - .... ..... .. .. .. ..... , . ',It, 90S 8 o o 00 o If) 00 00 r-- r-- If) (]'> r-- r A ~ \~ \ I~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \~ \ l~ \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ) ) / / ~~? / -0 .^, ~ / 0(>) ~:J.~s /YJ / ~'~~/'^~~~~ P:) '\.,v 4' (\0 ;z~l / ;.,,!~c,y ~f?s ~ / 1:) Q,e.- -o'? / / 1'-" Q.?O>- '1s- "k" ~~t " '1>:1-- " 0Q~~ ?>a ~ \. ~ '1' " ~q" /;'S-" ~~)~ ~~~~~ \S) '(? <.<' \. ~O. "<>>o61s-o " \ 01Tb '.~:~~ \ ~..~..., 0",,, '. "^ 'Q or, \ ,. ~ ~s- 6>.., \. \ ~~"o~-Y-6" \ .~ "'-"l1:7 " i,9.. '~O:.J~~~ \\\ " ~\S'v. ~ \ ~(<' ,,\ \. \"" ~ " ',,,,, " " ~ "" ~" L'J Z .... lL. I:l o .... o c.? ~ I:l ...J 0 ~ 0 ~ > W % ...J ~ I:l U W .... :I: ~ c.? ~ .... w ~ > lL. en w X g: (\J \ \ \ i \ 1 ; i i / \ \\,' ", ,.,'\ \ '. \ I, '- '- '- \ '- " \ \\ \ \ OLL ~9L 09L ~~L- / / (})G:J /1J~ ",Y '" ~.. / ~'" / .~ C1,(Q . .. ~ Ou I~ .~ - ~ Xw W...J 1:l...J ....~ >0.. :I: .. L'J 0.... ,I :I: . ~ ~ ...J c.? W ~ W ~ U Z o u W I:l .... > w ~ :J ~ U :J ~ ~ (I) LJ 2 I---t 29 W~ W~ ...... ~: w U4! u (l)c.? 08L ~LL I- 2 W~ 1-2 WD ~Q.. \ \ \ I I I L :', :" '.' !II .'! ._ " :' . ~8L OLL ~9L o O::::....JO WW _ 1->(") <1:Wf'.. :3....Jf'.. ~9L ~ 2 DO CL. l[) '~II "'''~ ~LL OLL .. W % ~ ...J~ lL.W I:l~ ...J.... Co.. !?c.? ~I:l 1:l...J ...J~ ~% %::J ::J~ ~, W X% ~ ~...J WlL. ~I:l ~...J ....0 0..L'J c.?, u .... ~ ~ ~ lL. le ~ u c.? I:l z- ~u ...J~ ~ .. Wl:l >~ Oz :I:W u% ...J>- i~ I:ll:l O~ O...J >ft: .. ::J ~c.? " a:: >- ~ 'OJ .. >->- %~ L'J~ >-W o..~ z~ O~ c.?~ %W ....c.? ~W !:JZ ....~ ....0.. L'J~ ~, W ~' Z>- ::J% :I:L'J ~~ c.?z ....0 ~c.? W% ~.... ~~ Wu ~.. .. 0:: o ~ ~ ~ :I:~ W ~o.. ~.... ~Z , ::J c.?' ....L'J ...JZ ~.... ~o.. Zw Ow N~ Q;!U ~, :I:~ o c.?~ ::J~ ~~ W:I: a.. ....~ Z~ ::J~ ,.. ...J ...J ~ > L'J Z .... I:l ...J .... ::J ~ ~ Z o ~ lL. W ~ o ~ c.? If) (l) " If) " " in ": It) C\I C\I ~ It) ,." en C\I b o en " " " " .. . ,I - ('I) - ~ W ~ 2 <I: --.J (L w (L <I: U.. o (I):'.. t::::IlI .. 2~ <I:~ --.J~ c.? 08- 91 o o (l) If) (J\ " ~ :'L J:t~....~ I . ~' ~~; ~ (. / / Ii .. II: / / ~>- <II / L'J~ 10. / >-w laJ / 0..111 Q, I); C / Ze (J / 0111 CIl c.? R < ~~ J " UW J , Z " e eli " l:l ~ Wi " " ~., ~ " " W'_i " "~~ ~ " '\ ::J c:J ~ :I:>- " ~o.., " . " ~z " I);C W'" 111% 1);'" WI); ~ ~! el ~ ~l ~< II La.w . I !:II); CIl dir "'1 c:JCIl i ' ~' e!:l Zl !:I.J 01 .J< N e2: ... %::J el ::JIQ C III. 1: W x~ ~ ~.J ~ WLa. ~ ~j:l ... IX.J Z ....0 ::l 0.. L'J ., c.?, L ~ r - I I I ~ 6 ~ ~ I I ~ . I - 0 "'tJ r-- . ^ ^ "" Z AI . - 0 0 . 0 0 N " AI ]> 0 0 0 0 " .... "'tJ 0 0 <: . Pl Z Pl Z <: <: . Pl 0 0 AI AI 0 0 Z r -f 3: 3: 0 !Z Pl 3: ;.: .... -< ;.: <: Z -f ;.: <: Cl '" Pl ]> r 0 0 ]> -f "" .... "" c: -f -f " Z -f c: -f -f Pl Pl 0 -f -f 3: AI Z AI 0 0 3: c: 0 r Pl " " ;.: ;.: 0 Pl " " -f rrl " r 0 c: C'I AI r 0 c: AI 0 c: c: c: -f Pl rrl Z 3: 3: -f 0 Z .... .... 0 -f Z " Z ]> " " t:I ]> " r .... .... .... AI AI r Cl Pl Pl r c: Z "" c: 3: -f -< 3: .... .... 3: ]> .... Z Z AI Z ]> Cl 0 ~ ]> .... c: .... AI 3: Z r AI Pl 0 -f Pl Pl .... c: Cl "'tJ Z ~ Z "'tJ ]> -f -f ]> AI Pl 0 "" AI '" ~ Z '" .... .... Z 0 tD Z Cl Z c: Cl .... r r tD r 0 ~ 0 -f c: .... -f .... Z r Cl r r ~ .... .... .... Cl Z Cl Z Cl Z -f -f .... .... Z Z Cl Cl - '0' ;c .q: -J a ;c ~ o en l- f{] ~ '- '" I"" . 0 . GCtelC ~ ~ ~ :r> ~ r t::I r 5i= S i!I (I) -l -t _ ~ w w ~ ~ ; td N Jcl ... \D ~ rrI 0 t::j :r> A:J rrI :r> (I) -t CJ td rrI :L -< t::j A:J CJ (I) rrI rrI t::j rrI t::j Co N N ~ az ... .. ~ .. .. t::I C(! a t::I t::I t::I ... ;i: ... ~ I ~ ... ~ ~ "'U <(! i! i! c -l -l -l ~ '" ... N t::I 1'1 ... ~ ~ ; ~ -l ... -l ~ ~ C1 ... '" i :. J;; :lU 1'1 ~ ." ~ :. i ... 1'1 c: t::I ~ :lU ~ ... '" '" ... ~ ~ ~ -l ~ ~ '" ~ i! ~ ~ ;i ... '" :. '" )( '" 2 ." ~ j;: -l i ~ -l ; ; C :lU i r- ... i '" ~ :. ... ~ ~ ~ z c! ~ i r- '" :lU i -l < Rtj C1 -l f5 ~ :. (/) < ... c1 ~ ... r- ... '" n n ... z e 0 c :. r- '" ~ :'l> :lU ~ Iii t:i iJi lJ ... 1"'1 ~ !; ~ ~ ~ rrl c c c: Z :E '" .... ~ I';! i ~ :. ." r ~ :I: n ~ ~ :. ~ rrl '1 i .... Cl 1'1 '" i rrl .... ... Z 1"'1 :. 'll r: tj r- t:i ~ 0 ~ Iii ~ ~ ~ ~ i!l ~ ... ~ n -l :E ~ 1"'1 1"'1 :. I i i c: :E :. ... '" :. n n :. :lU !iV ; ~ 1'1 -l ~ ~ "IE ~ z 3t "'U Z ~ 'll 1"'1 t::I ~ ! ... i :. < n r- I iJi :. ~ :lU ~ ... :lU 1"'1 :. ... ~ ~ r: t::I :lU ~ l! ~ ... ... r- ~ sa ~ ~ R I ifi ... c- n ~ 1'1 ~ '" ~ i :lU Z 1"'1 :. :. -l ... till :. l! ~ "'U '" 1"'1 :I: :lU :lU '" ~ :I: :lU :lU ~ - - I I fig 0::,::: ~C) ~3 Qx. -'0 O[ ~~ , ~, I "" r 0 ]> r J> ~ (,,) Z "- - (J\ tj .. II (/) - I" n 0 .. J> --0 rrl --0 r J> Z --., rrl /0 tj rrl --., J> t--f r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I \ \ I I \ I ) / / / / / / / / / / "It S.36018'.32"c / ~~ -J Z / ~~~ 266.76' ~ / -........ ~;~ 807 "" c: "'tJ "'tJ r .... Plr "" ~]> .... tDZ ~ -<~ Pl "" <: 3:0 ]> Pl ]> r z"'tJ '" ]> Pl - AI.... .. !:=' i> o tD c: ....AI AI Z.... tD fln "" Pl Pl t::I "" Pl c: -f "'tJ "'tJ]> "'tJ r.... r ]>r r; Z"" t::I ;::::1(,,) Z tD. Cll!'" -<.. "" ]>. -f iJi~~" 5! Zo]>o ~ ]>~ ZAI ... AI Cl t::I3: Pl"" :! .. c: 3:Z ~ ....r Pl~ 5!! ~~ ~tD -f / " /..f> " / ~v V' ~-.0 ,i:J -u 1> t:::t co o '-J o "" -l !ij M ...... jU o Z -l ~ c: .... r t::I .... Z C\ (1)< ...:. ..I " ... .. "" ~r ~J> - ~Z .. IItj 7(/) ~n J> --0 rrl --0 r J> Z --., rrl /0 no c:o jUZ ~o :iU "1'1 -l-l ~1'1 " \ I. I \ \ \ I I I I I \ / \/ V ..~ /~q; /. ...~ /...~~~ /~4#j / ~ -..... W-I - Wl ~~. i+ (J11 -I :r> ~. ni+ A:J(I) co rrI 10 o (I). (]\ .." -t o fTl UJ () AI =0 ::I o z r--- (/) uJ Z l-..:1l- 5 5 000 ~Z~ 0..::::>0.. u..Ou.. o COO w W <.:l <.:l Btn8 uJ ~ \) I )> Z ~ ~ z c C) o ~ r 0 )> f'Tl ;0 ~ f'TlI . 0 ~\) - ~ ._ f'Tl I_ E ! ...--... (j) w z :5 o z ::> o CD I- (j) <( w '--" 'Z w o ~ 0.. u.. o W <.:l B ~ o ~ 0.. u.. o <.:l B ;:; III Il':;:::: ~<( ~g ...J 0.;>< ,0 oil': ~~ w...... -w o~ CD... I+Ul ...... l>~ ("')1+ iO (TlGo1 Go1~ "T'I :-i I ~r ",~ ",Z t::It::1 ",~ -to ~~ F~ w'1J r ~ z -t ", jU . . . . . r ~ Z t::I ~ ~~ "''1J "'", t::I'1J "'r -t~ ~z r-t w~ ..., I I ! .. . . . ~~ ~, ~~~~ ~, y;:.l <.) A. . ~ , ~~ 0 ~~\ .i' _ wI' u.. \ -d:) _ . lO- .... .- - cD..... ~.!"l ; cncn"4" ........0 \\~\\ \\ , _ , z 0 \ \. \ \ .\ \l 795 Cl-< ~~ -I~ rlt:l (")1'1 ~z Z-l C~ 1l:>> -<z ("l 1'1 790 C"l-l ~, Cl-l t::t ~, '-I;; t:l cor '-I;; U1r cor '-I or oJ) '-I 0 co UI - - - - -- r-- (j) uJ Z \-:51- Z. ~ ~oQ ~z~ Q..:JQ.. u...Ou... 00)0 W W <.:i <.:i ol-A W(j)'" uJ ~ \J , )> .2 ~ rrl Z }>C) c l<:> ('") , 0 ~ ~ ::urrl rrl' - 0 :E ~ Ui rrl ('") Z o -l ZO ~~ Z )> ::u -l ~ rrl Z -l (/) I--t -I rrl'- I--l J> 1--- '" ~ _I z o 'Z 'Z W W Q Q ~ ~ Q.. Q.. u... u... o 0 W <.:i <.:i ~ 8 (J\ o (/) n J> r f'Tl o ..... ~ II (J\ o (J\ o ..... ["\) o ..., -l --- &" - ttr---- ~~ ~, ~~\~ 5' ~~ 0 4. . ~ , ~~ 0 ~~\ ai' . wr--.u... \ <0 . . 10 ..- .. . to..... ~.!"> ; 0'0'..... ........0 \\~\\\\ , ~ ~ .~.. .~ :~ \ u...f"- ~0 ~ ~ <<:- 795 790 - - - - - '" n ~ ~ r I:!I rrl - , Z CD .. II ]> 0-: /0 I C) .. tj (/) ." ~ "'CD I Sij..~~n@ "1Jt:lrlCC~ r.....uc::Jr:1 ....~ z"1Jrl rlJr:rt:l~C:: t:lrl~ nC -fZ"1J-fZ tzlrlt:l-<~-< -<.u",r"Jr: nCt:lC:: Jr:n~z~'" rl...."1J "- z~rl"1J~r~ ~r C .url."r"'~ ~ ~rltzl~ ctzl c::'" .....".u<.u ~ o'Z" .!; ...z~ z-,...C\Z ~r<tzI~ n<cc::t:l ~~EJ~rl rl2iJr: 5 rlZC:: Z t:l r -< C\~n Jr: .... J: c:: Z '" C\ .. 40'-0. -u -< r D Z (/) I--t Cl Z .. .. . ': r ~ Z t:l CI') CI')~ 1'l"1J . . I'lrl '. . t:l"1J I'lr -f~ ~Z . r-f . . w~ L__ Cl'" J>J: ....;1 I"1t Of' J>:il z- C:;l "'U] -<. C r C1--l ::0, C1--l '=' ;:0' '-I~ t::I cor '-I~ U1r cor '-I or OJ) '-I 0 co UI - - C1' " .... w " o o n(") [J)> Zo no 1"'1~ '1:10 -Iz I)> ....;s:: I'T1 ".--... (j) \..JJ Z r:51- Q Q QDQ ~z~ 0..:)0.. \.1-0\.1- 0(00 W W .., .., ere (j) \..JJ ~ "'U r )> _2 Z lT1- }>z cG) ~ () ,CJ }> f'Tl - < ;;Of'Tl lT1' . 0 :E ~ U5f'Tl () Z o -l zCJ (j) f'Tl _ "'U Z )> ;0 -l :s::: f'Tl Z -l -0 r J> Z 0- ~ <.) ~ .-~-- ; ~ _I z o ~ J> .. . . r ~ Z t::I ~ ~~ fTl"V fTlfTl ~"V -lr ~~ ....z r-l w~ ! I 1 -0 /0 D -otj DC ~tJj3: t:jCrrl SUZ (/)CJ> ~rrl/O rl'- tj C/) ~ w Q ~ 0.. \.I- o W .., e ~ Q ~ 0.. \.I- o ~~ ~ ~~\\ 5" ~:.l U 4. . ~ , ~?'- 0 ~~\ ,).J' \ <0 ~ . 10 .- .~ ~ (0..... ~.!.'> ;- 0)0)"t ........0 \\ ,., \\ \\ , ';%0 790 .., e 795 , \l ..... to U1 ..... \D o .~ ~~ \ \.1-1"- - - -- -- - - (J\ o (,') n ~ ~ r ~ fTl - ...... Z CD .. II J> '": /0 I Q .. tj (/) -, ~~~~oQ) "Vt::IfTlCc'V r....;:oc:%1 ....~ z-ofTl r1~rt::l~6 t::I-l~"V-lZ tlCIfTl~-<~-< -<;:o~r"% %n~i~~ ~~~"V~~ ~~,,~"~ ~ ~fTltlCl~ ctlCI C:~ ....,,;:oc;:o ~rn'~< . ~~~~i ~rctlCl~ nccc:t::I ~~EJ~r1 fTli:5% 6 fTlZC: Z t::I r -< Cl~n % .... J: c: Z ~ Cl .. 40'-0- "'T'J ~ (/) n J> r f'Tl -0 -< r D Z o ..... - II (J\ o (J\ o (/) t--I Cl Z ..... f\) o .." -l ~0 ~<><<:- r-- tf) uJ Z 1-51- Z Z wow Q Q ~z~ 0..:::)0.. u..Ou.. o COO w w '-' '-' ere tf) uJ ~ \J , )> z ~ ('T\ Z :t> G) C ()~ rO ~ ~ ;;orrl rrl' . 0 :E~ U5rrl () Z o ~ ZO ~~ Z )> ;;0 ~ s::: rrl Z ~ 0.. ::t <.) . CXl .,... ~ w Q ~ 0.. u.. o uJ '-' e ~ Q ~ 0.. u.. o ~t ~ ~~\\ 5" ~:.l <.) 4. . ~ , ~.,t. 0 ~~\ ,}J' \ <P _ _ 10 ... .- . (0..... ~.!"> ;- 0)0);q- ........0 \\ ,., \\ \\ , ,%0 -0 /0 D -otj DC (/)tJj:3: (J\ 0 ~Crrl (/) OZ n J> r (/) CJ> f'Tl t--f rrl/O 0 --1 ..... - C1' ~ '- tj II , (J\ .... (/) 0 w , -0 I---i (:) (:) r J> (J\ J> 0 ("')(') [J)> Z ZO ("')0 I 1"'1~ ^,0 "'0 ~ -tz ..... ~ I)> f"\) ~ <)<<:- ....s:: 0 I'Tl .." -i '-' e E---- = ~ _I , \l - z () .~ :~\ u..l"- - '" 0 ~ ~ r ~ rl - ...... Z CD .. II J> '": /0 I Q .. t::J VI) -0 -< r D Z VI) t---i Cl Z '. . . . r ~ Z t::I (.I) ""~ I""l" I""ll""l Jil" -lr ~~ ....z r-l w~ ! , 1 795 790 " CXl U1 " \D o -- - - - - -- I ~~c~.." " <;QOQ) " t::Il""lC CV r....;Qc:%1 ....~ z,,1""l r1tlirt::l~~ t::I-l~,,-lZ atr1t::1-<~-< -<;Q""r"~ %o~!f~(.I) ~~~~~~ ~~"TIr"~ !=' ~I""lat~ cat C:(.I) ....,,;Q<;Q ~rr;'~< ~~~~!Z ~r<tG~ n<c~t::I ~~EJ:I:r1 1""l2:i% ~ I""lZC: Z t::I r -< C\~n % .... :I: c: Z "" C\ .. 40'-0' "T'J :-' \ 'X '760 / GS'SD DING',. K.- RECEIVING AREA 765 MOO WINN SONIdd08 .100 >0 i ONV SBfI0HS 'S33di / 780 770 775 YARD POLES W/ GUY WIRE DUT D AREA804_1 163,608± SQ, FT. ru 3.75± ACRES 803. MENARD TRACT T. 1,009,300± SQ. FT. 23,17± ACRES [NG AREA > AREA ) WAREHOUSE AREA 'ING AREA '54.' 1$D': LING_. AUILD1NG DVERHpNG — -160' RECESSED SIDE LOADING DOCK WITH 30'x30' CANOPY HEATED WAREHOUSE 42,900 SQ, FT. MMM ‘98-Z66L1111 1SNI lb 03Q2103321 2131V35 aye ~ � NNYS dl 3 1N3 TERI❑R PALLET ICKING 7,1 U) N. 3 G, 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 SITE LOCATION MAP BUILDING WALL SIGN LEGEND SIGNS HEIGHT LENGTH SQ. FOOTAGE MENARDS 6'-0' 52'-0' 312 NEWTS. -CENTURY 1'-6' 40'-0' 60 MILLWORK 2'-0' 9'-4' 18.7 PAINT 2'-0' 5'-2' 10.3 LUMBER 2'-0' 7'-10' 15.7 CARPET 2'-0' 7'-4 1/2' 14.8 CABINETS 2'-0' 10'-0' 20.0 ELECTRICAL 2'-0' 9'-9' 19.5 PLUMBING 2'-0' 9'-4' 18.7 HARDWARE 2'-0' 9'-10' 19.7 TOTAL SQ. FOOTAGE = 509.4 SQ. FT. 47'-0' NOTE. SEE BUILDING ELEVATION FOR LOCATION 4'-0' WIDE X 14'-0' HIGH PALLET RACK PREFINISHED METAL ROOF 2X8 VERTICAL WOOD SIDING I 1=1� 11=1 11=1 I �I I If 11=1 I I I �I 1 III -III -I 11=1 I II I I I I 1=T- I, I I1111111 11=111= 8' WIDE CONCRETE SLAB SCREENING STRUCTURE SCALE! 1/4' = 1'-0' BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMS❑N PYGMY', 'CRIMS❑N PYGMY' JAPANESE BARBERRY JUNIPERUS HARIZ❑NTALIS 'BAR HARBOR', 'BAR HARBOR' CREEPING JUNIPER STORE FRONT BUILDING WALL 131'-4' LANDSCAPE PLANTER SCALE! 1/16' = 1'-0' SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'GOLDFLAME', 'G❑LDFLAME' BUMALD SPIREA -JUNIPERUS HARIZ❑NTALIS 'BAR HARBOR', 1 'BAR HARRIIR' f.PFFPTNf; .11 INTPFP SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'G❑LDFLAME', 'G❑LDFLAME' BUMALD SPIREA 4' WOOD MULCH OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC SUPPLIED BY MENARD, INC. CONCRETE CURB (TYP.) / / i\ / / \ / / / / / / / / / / / S00'29'35'W 225.75' BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMS❑N PYGMY' p 'CRIMS❑N PYGMY' JAPANESE BARBERRY s 6, 4' WOOD MULCH OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC \ ♦c"� QI IPPI TPTI RY MFNAP11 TNf^ 750 �Ib3 7 45 755 y- ` F?1 —� — & •Ad s 760 765 806 77 0 775 _, r .175 g0 g05 DRIVE -UP DOOR W/15'x26' CANOPY 350' ENTIRE TRA 1,143,814± 26,25± ACR 161,640 SQ, FT, B 102,693 SQ, FT, S 42,900 SQ, FT, HE 16,047 SQ, FT, RE FFE 80 DRIVE -UP DOOR W/13'x17' — J CANOPY - J 60'-0' eoa LANDSCAPE PLANTER SEE DETAIL 3 80 MIN 1111•0 �I QNfO8 isv ) YARD ENTRANCE GATE CANOPY U) 0 r uo o .. J J T/ WALL 790 GRD 785 T/ WALL 785 GRD 780 i aorwwwww. wpm som 9 =---0 . 3�ado o s1 ao a3a13 �0 i70 3„1.C,6t.tcN' d00� XO�a 0 , 9l 1K3W3And 30 3003 1N3W301d 30 3003 1143W3Ad6 08 0 0S3 M) Cs3Nd,01 V NAda 3�3 i I l .......... oi - g3 6 L (8)-EUONYMUS ALATUS 'WINGED EUONYMUS', 'COMPACTA' DWARF BURNING BUSH AROUND PYLON POLE W/ 4' WOOD MULCH OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC ALL WITHIN A 8' DIAMETER CIRCLE ❑F LANDSCAPE EDGING SUPPLIED BY MENARD, INC. 71, 11 0 400 SQ, FT. MENARDS PYLON SIGN SCALE' 1/8' = 1'-0' 60 0 60 120FT SCALE: 1" =60' \C. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN PROJECT TITLE ME\ADDS DUBUQUE, IA. SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SITE PLAN REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY SCALE 1' = 60' CAD DWG NAME CONCEPT-1 1 2 DRAWN BY BASH f1 A TF SHEET NO. 411. 11 777 I 1 STORE FRONT BUILDING WALL N- CONCRETE 84'-4' CURB (TYP.) LANDSCAPE PLANTER SCALD 1/16' = 1'-0' STORE FRONT SEE DETAILS 3 & 4 FOR SHRUB PLANTING ARRANGEMENT 4' WOOD MULCH SUPPLIED BY MENARD, INC. LANDSCAPE FABRIC SUPPLIED BY MENARD, INC, SIDEWALK & CURB II-11011:-110:I P1= - I C 111-11�11,=1144 -111:11'11:11:11=11:11:11=-'ll'r1-I1" I :If ll11=11 :11=11`-1. 11=11 .11IFIFF-1111.11011=11=1=11.?1 LANDSCAPE PLANTER DETAIL SCALD 3/16' = 1'-0' LANDSCAPE LEGEND SYMBOL SIZE QUANTITY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 2' DIA. 11 FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA 'DAKOTA CENTENNIAL' 'DAKOTA CENTENNIAL' GREEN ASH `°'= ;� 2' DIA. 18 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SHADEMASTER' 'SHADEMASTER' HONEYLOCUST 1 „ 2' DIA. 25 MALUS 'PROFUSION' 'PROFUSIAN' FLOWERING CRAB a) 4.5' - 5' 11 ABIES CONCOLOR WHITE FIR ,, 18' DIA. POT 39 JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'BAR HARBOR' 'BAR HARBOR' CREEPING JUNIPER CI 18' DIA. POT 34 SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'GOLDFLAME' 'GOLDFLAME' BUMALD SPIREA 12' DIA. POT 32 BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMSON PYGMY' 'CRIMSON PYGMY' JAPANESE BARBERRY 0 18' DIA. POT 20 EUONYMUS ALATUS 'WINGED EUONYMUS" 'COMPACTA' DWARF BURNING BUSH N❑TEI ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE HYDR❑SEEDED LEGEND PROPERTY LINE - - CHAIN LINK FENCE SCREENING STRUCTURE / / / / 0-0 (1) 400 WATT M.H. CUTOFF LUMINAIRE PARKING LOT LIGHTING O ° ❑ (2) 400 WATT M.H. CUTOFF LUMINAIRE PARKING LOT LIGHTING —O 400W M.H. CUTOFF LUMINAIRE YARD LIGHTS • 400W M.H. CUTOFF LUMINAIRES MOUNTED ON BUILDING ♦ 400W M.H. STORE FRONT LIGHTING MOUNTED ON BUILDING 1 °a I CONCRETE t7.Oi7N __ 3^7bA d31b� ❑UTL❑T 134,514± SQ. FT. 3.08± ACRES 806 ro PAD 807, 0 n 0 CO NO11b001 'XOdddb NIbW Z131bM Id 0 9 eos LANDSCAPE PLANTER SEE DETAIL 3 805 OMNI 60 - 80 8C 1N3 Abd 1 1N31113Abd d0 300,3 (s3Ny7 aNnos 1S3 oz