Loading...
Citizen Petition_Red Light - Speed Enforcment Camera Program The Clash of Diametrically Opposed Forces! www.bhspi.org Camera Enforcement: A camera systemÈs vetting process by definition requires that a quantified engineering defect be identified and then, by design, remain uncorrected. The larger the identified engineering defect, the more the system operators are financially rewarded for unsafe practices and negligence. Cameras do not reduce accidents caused by engineering defects and at most locations their presence has actually caused accident rates to increase. www.bhspi.org à "The results in Table 3 show that the November 1980 extension of yellow duration reduced the frequency of potential conflicts in all cases studied." ["The Influence of the Time Duration of Yellow Traffic Signals on Driver Response", Stimpson/Zador/Tarnoff, ITE Journal, Institute of Transportation Engineers, November 1980, page 27] "It has frequency been claimed that if the yellow is "too long," drivers will use part of the yellow as green. More drivers - it argued - would cross after the yellow onset with long [RATHER] t "The data show that the percentage of with short yellow."........ last-to-cross vehicles clearing the intersection (T+0.2) seconds or more past the yellow onset was not appreciably changed by the extension of the yellow phase." www.bhspi.org Engineering Solution: Before Red Light Cameras that is of vehicles that could "The percentages of these vehicles, have been involved in a conflict with cross-street traffic, were substantially smaller at both sites and under all conditions after the yellow duration was extended. No evidence was found at either site, under any of the conditions, that the vehicles that were in potential conflict with cross-street traff with the extended yellow would have cleared the intersection earlier in the cycle if the yellow had not been extended¼Æ ÅThus, the extensions of yellow duration employed in this study substantially reduced the frequency of potential intersection conflicts." www.bhspi.org 1988 MUTCD - Requirements of Traffic Control Devices defined: To be effective, a traffic control device should meet five basic requirements: 1.) Fulfill a need. 2.) Command attention. 3.) Convey a clear, simple meaning. 4.) Command respect of road users. 5.) Give adequate time for proper response. [Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Part 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS, SECTION 1A-2, "Requirements of Traffic Control Devices", FHWA, 1988, page 1A-1] www.bhspi.org 1988 - Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices by FHWA contain the following provisions for traffic signals: Section 4B-20 Signal Operations Must Relate to Traffic Flow Traffic control signals shall be operated in a manner consistent with traffic requirements. Data from engineering studies shall be used to determine the proper phasing and timing for a signal. Since traffic flows and it is necessary that the engineering data be patterns change, updated and re-evaluated regularly. To assure that the approved operating pattern including timing is displayed to the driver, r checks including the use of accurate timing devices should be ma Sidebar: Removed by the USDOT in 2000 to facilitate automated en and curtail the growing number court challenges to cameras. By r factual foundations and periodic review, signal timing no longer adequacy standards to be met. We believe this violates CongressÈ safety mandate for all traffic control in the Nation. www.bhspi.org 1993 - Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE): Speed Zone Guidelines - A Recommended Practice A third "3. Rationale for Consistent Speed Zone Guidelines - .... rationale is the need for consistency between the speed limit and other traffic control devices.Signal timing and sight distance requirements, for example, should be based on the prevailing speed of traffic.If these values are based on a speed limit that does not reflect the prevailing speed of traffi safety might be compromised." ........ It is recommended that the "4. Recommended Practice - .... engineering study include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles. It is further recommended that the speed limit within speed zone be set at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed or the upper limit of the 10 mph pace. " www.bhspi.org We have the knowledge; all we need to do is apply it. Since the itÈs been known that large numbers of violators are more often t caused by engineering problems, rather than an out-of- control m public. ÅWhat we knowÆ in 1989 FHWA paper referencing a 1930Ès finding; ÅIn general, motoristsÈ noncompliance is indicative of a problem. The problem may be due to some failing on the part of the traffic engineers or the lack of understanding of the driver, but seldom is the problem a wanton disregard of the law by the motoring public.Æ www.bhspi.org Under the statutory requirements of federal law, they are also r apply nationally accepted practices as recognized by the Institu Transportation Engineers (ITE), FHWA et al, not personal opinion practice. Within the statutory national standards there use to be a profes requirement to address a wrong. It was called ÅNotice of DefectÆ 1983, FHWA, Traffic Control Devices Handbook: "Notice of Defect Æ An agency has a duty to correct a dangerous condition when that agency has actual or "constructive" notice o the hazard. Sidebar: Sadly the ITE too has succumbed to politics and the spe USDOT. ItÈs an irrefutable fact that basing signal timing on pos the actual speeds of traffic is an extremely unsafe practice. No stopped referencing the ÅNotice of DefectÆ requirement altogethe prior best practice that signal timing must meet the needs of tr dichotomy of the new ITE standard for signal timing, the yellow based on an invented number established by whim and local politi Standard that requires Uniformity? www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org Designing for prevailing conditions is critical. There is a definite symbiotic relationship between the publicÈs consensus as to what reasonable and prudent (85-90th percentile of free-flowing traff safest speed) and ensuring that all traffic control devices are safely manage the trafficÈs requirements, as found, for that par location. The traffic engineering study quantifies this publicsÈ safe for consensus and becomes the critical design guidance for all traff This is a Title 23 Federal Code of Regulations control decisions. statutory minimum requirement , applying only approved nationally accepted practices and all actions and the engineerÈs shall be documented rationale for the solution applied and findings . In all studies, designing for prevailing conditions has been shown to be the most effective practice in reducing accident rates. www.bhspi.org the engineering study quantifies In both speed limits and signal timing the bell curve of driver actions as found for that particular location. WILL NOT CHANGE traffic Changing the number on a speed limit sign speeds. WILL NOT Shortening or lengthening the duration of the Yellow interval CHANGEthe last to cross driver reactions or times. www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org Georgia: Red Light Cameras Struggle in Face of Longer Yellow Lilburn, Georgia suspends red light camera program after extende violations by 80 percent. On January 1, a new Georgia law kicked second increase in the duration of the yellow warning light at i light cameras. The result has been devastating for red light cam violations -- and revenue -- immediately plunged for the months February and March. Last week, the city of Norcross dumped photo Now the UK-owned red light camera maker Lasercraft is offering i day suspension of service to prevent cities from dropping their contracts. The cities of Lilburn and Snellville accepted this of suspended their red light camera programs. "With the passage of House Bill 77, effective January 1, 2009, t precipitous decline in the number of citations issued through th Police Chief J.B. Davidson wrote in a memo to the city council. increase in signal time created dramatic and instant results. In issued an average of 1,559 citations each month. In January, tha 80 percent to just 313.Æ thenewspaper.com www.bhspi.org ItÈs interesting to note that every pro camera study that has be none have survived peer review. examined in detail, NONE remain after engineering remedies of the camera installations are implemented to meet the safety needs of traffic. NONE! In fact, virtually every contract has sustained red light running minimum thresholds that if the entity doesnÈt meet them, or if safety me implemented or the conviction rates drop, it violates the contra cameras have clearly documented the Worse yet, even though the safety benefits from engineering solutions (yellow interval increases those vested in the cameras success et al), in every case decry these have refused to further safety/compliance results are anomalies, and adjust timing or try it at the other locations. www.bhspi.org National Motorists Association posted a In this regard the $10,000 dollar challengeto apply the to any camera location known engineering safety countermeasures to improve both compliance and safety. Not a single city took the challenge. Therefore only one conclusion can be made. The camera operators and their clients are profiting from unsafe practices. This is not safety, itÈs revenue at its worst. These short yello significant numbers of unnecessary injuries and deaths and there no reason whatsoever not to correct this, except money. Studies show 80 percent of the citation revenue is generated in the first second after the yellow interval change and in every camera location the yellow interval is greater than one second too short. Moreover, the yellow is only the time it takes to stop or proceed from the limit line, and does not include the time it takes to actually clear an intersection. www.bhspi.org Here are the prior best practices that were based on fully vette "The primary measure of effectiveness for the yellow interval is vehicles entering the intersection after the termination of the that is, during the red following the yellow." ...... "When the percent of vehicles that are last through the intersection which enter on red exceed acceptable (many agencies use a value of one to three percent), the yellow interval should be lengthened until the percentage conforms to local standards." ["Determining Vehicle Change Intervals - A Proposed Recommended Practice", Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D. page 6] The local standard was deÐned as 1 to 3 percent non compliance¼] (to meet 97th to 99th percentile of trafÐcs need) www.bhspi.org The change in the law that permitted public safety to be trumped known unsafe practices, empire building and revenue opportunitie NHTSAÈs constituents (enforcement industry) et al, and the enter and entities that benefit from these policies. The hijacking of best practices: 1994 - "The preparatory activities of the Automated Enforcement Program which began in 1994, were supported by seed money from the Natio Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)..." [ http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ ] people/outreach/safedige/Spring1998/n5-58.html "The new Automated Enforcement Program is designed to be self- supporting through the paymentof finesfor red light violations.Æ www.bhspi.org The wording that permitted unsafe practices to prevail over publ August 1994 ... as NHTSA and others were underway with their "pr activitiesÆ to drive their new national red light camera scheme: "A primary measure of effectiveness for the yellow change interv percentage of vehicles entering the intersection after the termi the yellow indication - that is, during the red following the ye "When the percentage of vehicles that entered on a red indicatio that which is locally acceptable, the yellow change intervalmay be lengthened(or shortened)until the percentage conforms to local standards,or enforcement can be used instead."["Determining Vehicle Signal Change and Clearance Intervals - An Informational Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., August page 5] for red light violations.Æ www.bhspi.org Not only are the yellows too short, what about the safety of tho November 1985 - "In a recent paper, Parsonson and Santiago reviewed a liability suit held responsible for the wrongful in which the City of Flint, Michigan, was death of a driver who died in a crash when his car was hit by a truck intersection with an inadequate yellow phase and no all-red phas that paper warned the traffic engineering profession that "the traditional design standards for timing of the clearance period (yellow plus all-re signals are inappropriate and unreasonable in some important asp can yield values that are too short for safety...." The paper then recommended improved design procedures "which the engineer would feel more comfortable defending in court." ..... "This project has shown that even the accepted practices are commonly ignored and that clearance inter are too short are statistically associated with larger than aver rates. These results and the Flint case should serve to further need to adopt improved clearance interval timing procedures thro nation." ["Effect of Clearance Interval Timing on Traffic Flow and Crashe Signalized Intersections", Zador/Stein/Shapiro/Tarnoff, ITE Journal, November 1985, pgs 36-39] www.bhspi.org www.bhspi.org ÅRed-Light Cameras Should Not Replace Sound Traffic Engineering,Æ AAA Says . "Although some local jurisdictions are looking at red-light came the quick fix, it is not always the most effective means of redu crashes at intersections," said Susan G. Pikrallidas, vice presi AAA Public Affairs. According to safety analyses conducted by AAA Michigan, various engineering safety countermeasures implementation of have resulted in significant other than red-light cameras decreases in intersection crashes. (on average greater than 50% reduction) www.bhspi.org There is a statistical curve of probability around the average t driver needs to respond to a yellow signal, and the goal is to m sure that virtually ALL of the curve is accommodated before the opposing signal turns green (97th-99th percentile). Using the al as the safety cushion. The kinematic formula is the tool for doing this; itÈs only a MO If it real-world response. It does not CONTROL driver response. takes 6 seconds to get all the traffic stopped, including heavy vehicles, buses with standees, old people, distracted drivers, d then that is what it with poor vision, in all lighting conditions, takes, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. The engineer only has one duty, to make sure the traffic control devices are set to safely manage and guide traffic to meet the trafficÈs requirements. www.bhspi.org Engineers know that the majority of motorists act in a reasonable and responsible manner and that uniformity in expectations improves safety. Using this thesis a researcher found that a 5.5 second yellow interval default setting provides the b overall compliance. If compliance can be maintained within engineering practices it should be. If safety were truly the end game here, the answer would be an inverse protocol of procedures for yellow interval timing. The b system wide uniform yellow setting should be a 5.5 second defaul except for prevailing speeds in excess of 50 mph where it must b seconds, with a minimum 0.5 second all red grace period, and lon as indicated. www.bhspi.org For improved system efficiency, yellow interval timing should only be reduced to whatever level compliance can be maintained. The yellow interval is for the time it takes a vehicle to procee or stop at the entrance to the intersection and includes no time to clear it. Thus the all-red phase must be adequate in length to assure that all conflicting traffic is held until even the slow moving large vehicles can clear the intersectionÈs conflict points befo cross traffic is given a green. For safety, fair laws, less pollution and more efficiency out of our roadways, engineering will always be the best solution for all. There are no substitutes or short cuts. Best Highway Safety Practices Institute Dedicated to the Common Good, Fact Based Standards and Laws.. www.bhspi.org RED LIGHTISPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red light and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red Tight contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE • . . 4. Al, 411 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. _l C1 -� 18. ,=,: = C D 19. ° w - - 20. ; [11 c, -n 21. _2 1_ C r.'.? ' 22. Cp cn 23. -� 24. 25. RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. I- PRINTED NAME T ADDRESS !-1'r 2: 3. __/_/4q.Z77-v_4 grr*-67zaw 4-0 4_ ve- Lo►W 4. (,) Tl,vo l- 5. v■ K ih1)V ((ai C)5 7 ti P2 W I i- Lt i S la, ?T S2sdJi [ /144 /,mss- irera u Z(eia h&s Vie <T6?( 37 I 8 . 1 , 7 / 7 r 9.Pf / -ois0 10. 11. 1 12. j 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18J 19.1 20. 21. 22. ' 23. 24. 25. 1 fi 1 RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. , PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE i I I�, L `0Ct,C Q� I,L /, 4.\I"J 1. 1 ; 983 !. i , s' • '1 2. 3. I \..,-. Iu \C4oS 0. Z J1 \ij l - 4. ' .b 23.E cv aA �,� .1 r per- � 5. 6. �d - 114 n ZWICIP viii -k. 1A 4 , ... NI ■ ! < a�Ipl '�iv\i Jo( S} Qu- t/1.TASacv�l / i • , NW 7. 8. ■ !J _.� ,_0 _- A-�L 01 4 : il// �' �L�Ia�� Is l� 4,1\- 1\kr.Xe__,r JS(A h i l�. l�ov LA 1 0 2 9,0 G Sa..ev\otiN Dr. 'ex.,' i ../J J.; Al 9. 10. 1 ' is _r,rmiiiictAt. 11. 12. 7-1- i 1(5 -ii { 2H76 VI( _ II :% co ,`s ___ Lk 13. , ' ' l Zg I 3 D t'C1 rl__l� b_ #1.1/ : #97 i1 , 14. ` A 2oGri i c Iu9,+8z( LAn - 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. H RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red light and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red Tight contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME 1 ADDRESS rrSIGN URE 1. laro i t r 1$K 7 .Mi'1 k . �doc r 2. �,r - �,e�te 600 4„. ,, a, 4 .Theo/ 3__ 'darts aa3 s{ a�rL� 4. -= /- ' €&' 1 8. 9. 10. 11.1 12. 13. 14. 15,r 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. ' 25. J RED LIGHT/SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETI 1 N We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1. /am k" Li h dell a wh� -e 1) .A. ,A e 5� o0 ! ^� / .�- . L L. / 0- k i/ 2. V ? ?/ Da . -- ,,/ 3. :.mi. _ Aid_ e.l, 4 ,l 5 c C 4. �. 1► ,,, o\,, \f5 S -- O Ck. S CA- 5 d vo ,.�/ ,0,/ r -eve ram c' =ice- 5. ,iii -' ; A — � , 'IC/ z l 7 �?/ r - ' / _-97 t EMI ��A 2 Ca .. 0.", - _ _ NV,...) • . , _► 6.i.,s► a a 5 . . , • 5 - 7. ► Z -w-.. v1 tJ ue../ n f.J c& I ('_ L L- o +-L. S T C 8. J [ I 5 ..a ,i 5 5D-&" / . All 10. /f K-/AW,% y4 3'y `7,✓ 5 / '/ 2Aeli I •' C 12. SEeOe 11,4 , A 2320 wh 5zoa 13. I Ci ✓i a.Ci' u(rJ1 232z ) Jh l' -i-r 54 9-o6( , -; %.% r �'-�' 14. ` i o Ak k 4 ti ,t,- d - s % d 1,L) 47 �-e .SD'- , d o el � %' , yI 16. PI l'c 0,, (e K.0, I 17. LAA:,,)_ tJ1i� R- 1 Ctoti 10 kOA >,G , 13 SZoto / �� . _. , / 18. S'. I✓ i1 , S a o I j we /-s _ s G7 i,_ _.� 19. ,,s . S _� Oct �A, c.. � � � .. 21. 1 � , IN l o e . Loi /4,..7 22. 23.1 24. 25. qpt ��� , 44h � dit �- `� ~�° ., -, t f A . 1 LC a. 3 oN -- cg 464.11 .' _...,, .t, , /3a J 2_o 4/.e 4 L 8t• /c1 st 4-77' 4 1i..,4' , ••_ ' .� - ?P n ,Z .- .5 k C G 7 tY -c- v1ac.t,,i_ 217 /-� CA ci Q 11- c 0 Page ci of 01' PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1. n 4 Z ?JAI^ /11:# pg-Y6le A.A./ k":r /Y 7 S Al I _, ,L_. 1 4- _ Lo12. J2. 406-104E - , ::39. Xi,t_.(-1,L Stisc 14-1.1_ )3ccoc-- NJ ectscaftz Pd 5zoo3 _,,.._ ,---- dct1 1 .1_,/, . , i 3. ,..' 1..L1.._., 1--Lcu,--4 vidcj w ilt vv tie, -.I•M 4• 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. Pa e (72- of ------. , NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1. PRINTED rcU L r_ti., 6 •0'. - Wcw\e,s-‘c, i L.m, - t' M_ A A• /GZew •Ost f_Amm" INI----fA a A r_._1 wit) 52 (_. ■ iiir -- iji.PU- 1 _ F • 3 5.;;WILti.._ MC,- 7.1. 1 _.a•ew 2De3ci0/ I .4W1,11151_ _ 6.1 ..ry 7 41/ 5-t 1 C(L____tZ4t_. C7-03( No owSE t L 1 8. 'af 7 wee . , i 9. 41 i DM T mila co i--e-.- 7 (g D'o'e-- 12. (r) /1/ CIEK ( - . , 7 /' 9 ,,;(.74,4,_ 00 2_4/44/- kih de .5'i- , 13. Ate i lA) Ukv- 14. , ki F(shtlic, 'A' a filliO.Pla 15. 16. kens i ' - a o t. • u , i . gri L. 11 (Orb. Q. r-ia-C-1-- J LL.s 9 ire, 17. &/v/1 I/ CPS-) 2e--/-5-1 - c_k .5- ors- 18. R , c_.1-, coz_P Q kt I al, C,\A,kim_, d2 4 31 4 Li 31 19. 20. 21. si cc!, Q..s / i 1/1/1/43 ' • ,:-'), 2,0 I-- -c__,, ,-'4':-- ■ : ''',4 ! VIDA' de _ . CA-CX '00G-VVI cytoAkmoc_i_av tV " 22. f 0 e x •7- / ') 7 7 7 7f/r/(- itic f 744V;•14"A‘___-- Nrt 25. ._ )4txi (:) .4-THLteig 4T-c.11-14 i A/ 13otoLit-te.‹,-1 elk_iitAtJ -?D - ! q77 5 vli 1 1 1 -1-0LYI 13 441L 1 '_, Olobdukjt,i, , 26. a , 1 27. (4,* e_A 4 '1 J-v ,.,).:- / -6- "/ "? /4/5 fr-‘ Ptafitt,), ._.. A i.,,,, :''■.....,..._ • A M' '-0 , 28. 29. 30. 7k_ L5,11/ L.N -Olt milt . OA'Ati: t IC: 4).30 a-153 Ceni-r&( Ave i IS ectst 9-- Iffinsit, ‘.1A wk`SS NrYle 4 ti. ■ ...-Z_:.". 31. jof 6 on Wtckmt- iqls /ThAf,k /1 _* 'A-0 5 l'(5t, (li'l i ' IL Ail 32. 33. S ,e,V.e, 1 AA -JeL jrfli_. • ft-- /1 i 34. cj,j1/0_ Cllr) 6) )733 sk, y LAIN& 35. 4Kb(34 0-is- LblefiA_64-416(i1 vel-ce RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1. � it r� g r, 0 s 1 4 A 3. 4 Lo •, , ' 3o4 £ 7J illD ; _ �, . / 4 / C1trw�'L�( �2�v� �� 4 .G�— - y GGv • A Mr • �. ifflinifififfiii ©l ' _ ii o„0_,, // L ,, _ 8. 5e05,14 der -76 f let- ✓e .,,5f4 %I 9. �n l � �J t I i� �{. INN _I a-91 1 i ,.l .� .� � 4- niAr4jui 1.a, mP 211 70)5 9 TreL41 s E` IA .t 1/1, Mc T,4 d..,ii -h �k fi�i% • :. M►. I. ' CP I r A Cl- 15. 1 At_ ik lR0 11! - �iI 2.0 9) • :.. IIIWAC , IOW 16. EM!Mgr I J. &7(e w; (C► wool? r D L 1 17. 18.Il1i:.. 19. 35 3o Lu,4,c,i bz 1.13 0, . ��I; I,: , i 'ce r J- • ,¢ r ,'3I or et • i'1 �' DOA L1.:� g 1 % .t I . Rd ■ . (Q. t A T . t l_ 20. rl4V -) / 8. W 1 lid 1.' l .��� 21. C-1 h(�. �,.�� a�i1 `G •.. T-f i ,G P _ itiyi-i(p ��Q n� i'c D� ii . /. r.� //�1 22. I "t- '�� � e✓ g • ce.. ! i 24. ! L. t Ai/.L i 5 /Oil ! Al //. ! _A_ /,,A . 25. 1.1 2. 3. 4. 5. WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed- enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. PRINTED NAME 1 ADDRESS CD Ce_c_i) NATURE z/0549,tatp, 11. - 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. j7. 18. 19. 20. 21. L 22. 23. 1-- 24. 25. RED LIGHTISPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red Tight contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SI� E 1. 6i RED LIGHT We, the undersigned tax payers, activated in the city of Dubuque, These devices jeopardize safety be a way to keep revenue flowing increasingly invasive, unconstitutional states have banned such cameras. enforcement cameras be interests. Cameras appear to contracts have proved to be A dozen cities and nine /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION demand that NO red Tight and speed Iowa. and put profits ahead of citizens' for municipalities and red light and violate the 6th amendment. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGN URE 1. L ,tsa s iii i iti' /V -3/7y 1 'r►e:a.hn hi-- r4 6 - c., s - 2. Z . . . - e © 7 3. L 4. 5. fl I"/ot6L- k3 q -2-erccp,ne_ ,J(r 1,2r' j►-- 6. 7. 8. 9. r 10. 11. 12. 13. r- 14.4_ 15. 16. 17. 18.E 19. 20. 21. 22.E 23. 24. i 25. RED LIGHT We, the undersigned tax payers, activated in the city of Dubuque, These devices jeopardize safety be a way to keep revenue flowing increasingly invasive, unconstitutional states have banned such cameras. /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement Iowa. and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. for municipalities and red light contracts and violate the 6th amendment. cameras be Cameras appear to have proved to be A dozen cities and nine 1. PRINTED NAME T ADDRESS UC TU' �i — - / ! y /, -- i Fee ' t/ O0 whi-te ket 2 - L__3. 4' _____67 ] 7. 8. a the 1 Clahn s,of/4 .,(/ / c////r l Gto / W. 4, P 5 o/ 3/0.2 clae c('sJ- cT , X 6' .lf Jo2°`t31 s _5. 0_, . (.L.{ 1— `� +" 1� i= i P e/SOn 7 2 / l� Gv i L v. `A v • ✓Ve - s'- vtIC St l 43- /5J r 71 ath2 1e . e,,_e_eil , k, 5 to e (.`L. �1e- 1_0 ' (41.S't=vi` ,/ / o 1 !�i '12- . Scit1e,5_Ro ,t ) i ?' �. o? %3 /-3 G 1 ,.. L 10. t 4I7 72 -7 ��t� /�,r/ ors 5 ,zai ✓/, , ,/i‹. 11. 12. 1 13. 14. J 15. 1 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.1 23 24. 25. , fi 1 1 RED LIGHT We, the undersigned tax payers, activated in the city of Dubuque, These devices jeopardize safety be a way to keep revenue flowing increasingly invasive, unconstitutional states have banned such cameras. ---1 enforcement cameras be Cameras appear to have proved to be A dozen cities and nine /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION demand that NO red Tight and speed Iowa. and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. for municipalities and red Tight contracts and violate the 6th amendment. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SI@N'A URE / !//' :r /�1/�- �/ 1. RA o'/ 5c -10-o e,i zr1(P CAC ps 1.-: Dti 4. 2. ' 0.-,,x,-/:,_ 02 /ls de-- ,: �`) U S C�2F=1►Ji� 1i 3%E,W✓� 3. �k Sct+w► -�T h 74-)s- / Ra d 5. 6. (SLiz 913 F\7144.-r.-4S 2ck G �. •_/ _ac;ca C 1kki t,sla C.N.ADK.ti Dmma •.-4i,..d . l „oat& Z- P - _ _- _ - =7l4l1 7. C __in i / 3,0 ��, tie- a. 8. f ' ftie �(__ /Oa cam) )-�> /.0,4A,4 41- / c:7----- t4- . : =.c2-.� --. - 9. ,i,'rc =-.-�- ,fey,«,: 11. s .s.A7 Ze' lLd:t -c - .,✓,r 1 .1 i, 4 , -.��_ ��.� 4/i./ I l 12. L S 0413 r ,1-n . %O. g.G�c.�df a 0 %3 d' -_Jf (11'58--// 13. ,� SA,u,¢S 14. OAP �U +✓ C 6- ct„ti- 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red light and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS 1. ,ur-0 -� SIGNATURE 2. 3. k : r .42 'V11 .--- lA1chr l'GLuQ ► 3ci E k, (i/i is P1,, �' 4. �e��1«G r < L.J (..-. C4 • 5. Pa-- cLn c2q`ir? Oleic t)ctve�oc- -� 6. A 3� q 4nd Q 9 0 0 ifg,_ ti.4.1A) Cr_D 0 Ve- r 8. 9. 102 11. WtA 1 5'7—Erz- _ Q. At ik )hC'.(�bl"i:l IG� ` J • . ``/��yV/�y�-yj\f� ''- `{'' h•, (1; P pl i k, (4 ((i { ( K r.-il C !'ct,rwt-3 • ,at . / /-4-L'- _� __... rti 11 1—� Q �.- Imo, /1_13$ S�, jlA y / � I 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. RED LIGHT We, the undersigned tax payers, activated in the city of Dubuque, These devices jeopardize safety be a way to keep revenue flowing increasingly invasive, unconstitutional states have banned such cameras. enforcement cameras be Cameras appear to have proved to be A dozen cities and nine /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION demand that NO red Tight and speed Iowa. and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. for municipalities and red light contracts and violate the 6th amendment. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNAT RE 1. ..,I:: V \� A.L_ C; -�._, zztr_544444,1 , itlii. I 2. A 3. . 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21, 22. 23. 24. 25. WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed - enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGN: TURE i, 'i- ,7 j 3. Le0n,w koe r _ et-4 d _ SID( SLA.. p k O!i i 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. , le-■ !10.x+ 11.T.' 12. j 13.1 Pfla L2 d2 CEiriE4ai ID-130 C.6-Y /4r c,lkt 3530 rl P,ies� �) &L OCO 1'10112,0V Pftia l 5 ( k .230.5' Wes 1.57L abget -.e _ 1 °.n-(' ! � / r 54 :.(-e i 4-A1 V.01 tc 14. 5i )-wv 2=4, '•its 15.1- 1'#c'qe'- 16._4 5z4 & (�o✓,,:,sc� �t 17. S_ X04, *04,5k r. 19.4 3, o. vt ,o..'4 v' 20. r/'1Q��i /- 21. �.-'I 22. 23. ('JO 24. 25.! Z f C <,.ef f C& 0- itt( <ecu /04/6-3 ge7 vest /Of- /. kra:3 s!ASr AE- Q0k CDG`.L. L r iV.,qp/Yqce L-6/ <fth0 te(1,4 /06-S-7 /" 7 ( 0--z_ I l2 r Iv,c & s ` u 1(. LA.A ISM I I boo l ck2 1(167'7(/ L cod € WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed - enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. PRINTED NAME 1� ENV 2. 4"4- , 3. / t' 4. eJ n 5. 7. 'J r ,1s I//rJ 8. 5 rC J vE �S' i , AI hi r 9. I Cyr Rld 10. 11.J 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ADDRESS Ib1 {1kbl Lab Ki &L 7,72 �L' ��k Q L u SIGNATU 1 S2_S5 `l0 2V s-/c fro W -MGm d a i°!/t/J b r P o u r / e + �Z ,3p 40211 ('`"4 1 L_ 7. 18. 19. 20.j - -1 21. 22.] 23. 24. i 25.1 P � L 1 RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME J ADDRESS 1 SjN(TURE 1. is J -J 4. ,1"-- I71/ SSG -rte �J �� 2., Joe. r ¢ . / L f a / 7 1 ' c 4. mA. r ck ` 4- _Do ca_ ► L__ >31,3___G8 5. jars< k ga_KK s 6. A ea f-)...) a vy, s 7. ,oL 1L1 8. -14k} 6-521/4 9. j 11 reki 77 cA_ )1 �B4 0`1 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18-.1 r 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. ' 25. We, activated These be increasingly states F RED LIGHT the undersigned tax payers, in the city of Dubuque, devices jeopardize safety a way to keep revenue flowing invasive, unconstitutional have banned such cameras. and speed enforcement cameras be citizens' interests. Cameras appear to Tight contracts have proved to be amendment. A dozen cities and nine /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION demand that NO red Tight Iowa. and put profits ahead of for municipalities and red and violate the 6th PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1. . II e resa ■6- )gib ai and „ , . 0_,. • _mss 3.1 11441,,,x r t' L q ,r �; �- 4• 5. i tames Baf r off K +1 S1> ib ballei W Qi1( _ rl�� �i`a RQ12i -vt1� 1110 1)- R) .1)L re- L �1 3 ,A0 JA 7 1 ;2001 . , r 6. 7. 1 8. 10. 5 1;..tri O [,a, nxi to(t'eei/t raiV►^ K� N_ [ 1'535 ,Q� kek. VA kti St �: *4 , lag sy di i s :IA 5adc, ,, /A th I .• 6' 44' I \ \ 8 7 A D 2 6 1 k SZTsoi 1 , , t,�,� �i '' t I. 1 I E kc� VI. • c ' . 1q.5 E 1- .. -3 T ll .�a 13. 14. 15., /sue' 1 (1l F ' 1 I ' SZc C3 -fit ,56rn.niuleui /iu-c I i r? 6V�l e c L.& 44- -s! lie/X001 if/ d?'kii i! % h/I! AI 526)5 i i 1 313 and.wsClwiot (Qt ?,0;1^ �21�1� i 4 F a'1'L ca-1 16. ► • `32 Q; e 00 , - 52 03 1�1� C ��'�i,�' / s/� /� - l■ �+r 17. 1 �X^ 5-4,_3_0_61_61_''t t, t Rl�cr�/ 119. 20. 1 21. 22. 23. L 24.E 25, WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed - enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. 1 PRINTED NAME ADDRESS r� I NATO E 2- ' 3. ( ,C«ctb_ .5:_ M1 — DL f e �v(�g �Mes up a j i p 5. r 8. ✓ (150y) omen ' D ,✓ - yAJ►e0 / - "` 10. r / , Or /1i r c3 24 C u Sit--7:44-10 11.1 12. CP ' A - f 1 LL K /ivi(4I 11' a ,1''/I 13. PajL 7a J fr)2 LI q _I ��`� r (Q '7cvv 14. 15. c t tY13 7 �0 zt_ 1,,:k .ie_ P L QL o ded `C ,‘Pg1J41/fd'5w "4 ckf-- h..,_,/ �lU' (,�� a c6 �l; , uze2g. / A- , 16. 17. 18. --I- , 19. 20. 21.I 22. 23. r-f ce,kr _IllLe511 ,%2rr`7,-p 770 copy viz i�(,r 9ta.E <77(....) M me i ay ' 5 05 51, _?od 3 '7.1 0 - -- 24.1 - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - 25. - - --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - 1 WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed - enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. PRINTED NAME j ADDRESS SIGNATURE 16. 1 17. 18. 19. 1 20. 21.E 22. 23. 24. - r 25. WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed - enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. PRINTED NAME ADD ESS 1 SIGNATURE 1. L_O 2. JQ.S_S_ C + Gt - 2 (,)) " Cko, L c .J be-11'1 I i 3. t.J c,t3'h J (_ H b 6 OL'i. d r ci •. 1- u 1 , trO v37 „(1 4 5. /7/74' �3g ti/), 5'7'1 t�a4)7 , — jU- �---y S�1 —7R)_11,,A:ive45,1 I)uibv cue 11. 12. �o �r�v� )t�i -e 1,13. A4 B e Aia _."-gQSY ! _17 14. eict i I- 15.1 16. 17.1 18. ;19.1 20. t j21.L ■ 22. 23. 24. 25.1 Dub_LkgL r/A 5200Z r r r We, activated These be increasingly states enforcement cameras be Cameras appear to have proved to be A dozen cities and nine RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PETITION the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red light and speed in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red Tight contracts invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE • I`\ \W C4 PpLk(rne; 2___(p [Iv awn (;o EA- l� 06 11 Da oh (2_ 01 �UuLt6L t 1 i) , /' YU 2. \ , 3. '�i' � 011 v1 S c-n �_. . L 1 1 l of .j 4. ir,, — Otvg-iZ 3w 4-7e7 /4L /71‘i 2 6z-- / • RED LIGHT We, the undersigned tax payers, activated in the city of Dubuque, These devices jeopardize safety be a way to keep revenue flowing increasingly invasive, unconstitutional states have banned such cameras. ENFORCEMENT that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to municipalities and red Tight contracts have proved to be and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine /SPEED PETITION demand Iowa. and for NAME ADDRESS 1. /PRINTED ( /'�ici i-� Cc-v, / �(c .�1�. e (.c-_ n °fir vSIGNATURE ���'`r " - 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.1 23. 24. 25. We, activated These be increasingly states L RED LIGHT/SPEED: ENFORCEMENT PETITION the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine have banned such cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1. s tIo_ x av-,_1_ i__ /N 9d 2 /7u `( d`d e..bslAa A e"..4-,- ' 2. 4. AUL,c. rAt'n e 1i I( `-ccL.S)/ ' 44 5. � "' S� 4 / / / / yy --" r 6. b Pn ro /�48cRt .9yyg GZr C2 s , 7. > ,.^ � ev e_eL a YaQ c/.St. b. Ke4Iiii-rw--- / �9 , 8.�Q - i 1. 9. L- -- - ll ra L r p_2 - 10. l ISO rr s���/` _ iI �� —�� a e) s.�X.3- i 141 .1". - I 1 Una La IR) -c Ail 11 12. - a 11 41.2_9- Le /- C Z e>2 fi g 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.1 19. 20.1- 21. 22. 23 =t_ 24.' 25. , 1 RED LIGHT/SPEED ENFORCEMENT P i'1°TI N We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red light and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red Tight contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. H L____ 1 • PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE - DOiteil. .� ' & a u �� Q Ci.I -� f H 2- -rho ckS E .n \'e_ j R.c'1c%, -e S + n uso. C 8 a Et 7s - - -5 �P. a • 5. 6. 7. /I J �r 111( ii 1 '1 h � ; ,1 f I 1 -4 �s ra ielleC/ � t( /� 'J V (KAPO - z f ' / '' ceW k r- Wvooce. .tewt e- aSq? 9' 10. �r ALN 4_ �A., (, 41 kA) Oi1■ * G, r�ea n6d ✓ a 1/15 ail �� �e 1i 11. 12. ✓� .: >��S /cam l � �q l � d� ��- A �� - -�— ��ev�A�� 414 6 0 � �7 4 g- qQ U _ ! 13.1 �r1 VUU'� ' ��r�1‘(9.442,o iJ col 9, k� tfZ p 15(2 PE 17°1 u) 2(‘'.4 3f- D&_:;), 62m ...-.4- r%, 16 x5 mss, .a 1/A 1445N c Si. LA '7 (7 t JVr i "a C� C �,- 17. 18. 19. 1 20. 21.1 22. 7- X23. 24. 25. !--- WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed- enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. ' PRINTED NAME J ADDRESS r 7Y5- ; e- ( 1Zc:1 Ne;g: 110A KO Ai-Ai Awl- 6. it-QOAllP WrN L3d3 12. 30YktS. cjt. DIvik_ i.it lit ' 7.1 tt 0,(4 323:4. Jooes 54- '-i° S'---&andArla_W licip,_9,c49_ , i),liqtn, 4 1 5itcf. ___,Givr,t,,AvocAru_ ALer_s-x_c_3:1L _ 13.1_Scoi+ 6ji 5St 04 r(A, t 14. 15. 116. ; 17. 18. 19. 20. ! 21. 22. ; r 1- 23. 24. :25. WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed - enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. ' PRINTED NAME__ __ _ - ADDRESS . 1. , tl !agjoG tr y s t j uayt _ l ---3' /1/1_ ati 14640c_ 4. , _envit'..5 n. c6/#4 a•Lay-6(,e, EA 1 ek 5.I -% 6. 7.. 8. 9. 10.1 11.--1 12. 13.� 14. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. SIGNATURE -H 1t,_ -4 RED LIGHT We, the undersigned tax payers, activated in the city of Dubuque, These devices jeopardize safety be a way to keep revenue flowing increasingly invasive, unconstitutional states have banned such cameras. /SPEED ENFORCEMENT PET1TUON demand that NO red light and speed enforcement Iowa. and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. for municipalities and red Tight contracts and violate the 6th amendment. ', cameras be Cameras appear to have proved to be A dozen cities and nine [ 1. 3. 4. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS - _ SIGNATURE ins, k U■ (kt‘A a i 11 q -1.0. in& ( e✓ I) a , 'R b t'tOi �t"Ji A.vm �1% ( 1( 1-.swk Cori 2 , , - -' 1 , i 1 ,-. , 1- } id 0 -71 ' J «� J ,11/� 49, iL 4 -// 5. 6 c' uk r a0 121,t-e714,,,, -1;;X, CK- pg : 1 4_04 >� 7. I 8. L 9. 10.T 11. 12. >- P✓Gt el(-- 1 ( Q _iito /i . .., i 0 ,, _CO 1 Qs (1f\ g3-6 nut ba ri't sf `=�' '' �l - -111-c ■ Ay bo Oc i ✓ e i • ' - , • Lurvi., i� Stn ' \ �' i ' 10 ' I :` � 1 ' QL C%/ f�CQ�Ge, -`1.3 sly i =t 13. S Gt.drc_ �� %r/ � _y l - 14. 15. ,56D 6iFi f ...; ,t ��� /73J a i(5 f /i/i� d0. s ',ek —,�Ld or/e4.0- / / k , - _ , yt- , 16. .61,1‘ -117.- 18. 20. 1 21.1 23. 24. I 25. onus An 6.. 0ctNe. tote, il A e 6.'!2/ a A-'` . 913Q, iA c, L__%.+^ -,-- �,�w Q aa_to atA, Las210 3 C-Q ( er.---- � �a, L 30 L \ ■L sku S�a(�$ • 4-22. / , I RED LIGHT /SPEED ENFORCEMENT 1 PETITION We, the undersigned tax payers, demand that NO red Tight and speed enforcement cameras be activated in the city of Dubuque, Iowa. These devices jeopardize safety and put profits ahead of citizens' interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities and red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned such cameras. 1 PRINTED NAME ADDRESS I SIGNATURE acytkuts 7�0-+' . _ .. - �1. 2. T17 tom as �s L 5 k occ-au l� ! _0 4 1 "'VI toe c'✓�ii}_ f671L`_ //_wild A,i j4 3. _ktc, ,41,Q S c 4 14)j22'//W4/4 -J� ,� ?' V / G 4-rk S -- D 4. 5. D irc ks,w11,.--e tf1°1 Ci a v11 _S _D- {T i- / 6. tdi 0,/ 2 /. J 1 7 / /=-/, 1 S " 00!4' .. L1 ✓/�� / '7•5/477 7._i eyijiv A_ 8. q YL PLC 63 S c71.2_1_1`. Z.-4,4.4.1 ' - 5- 39` �/4 h �`1f1 SJ . of _ aki. '1: , ,; ,:.2__ .i Eli 10. StsT LINO CNea AYI OW C-l- ab 0 T . / ,/ ,/, / 11. t �, Nk c C� L FR,` `-� l� e C" l o� r, C ' 12. fn S �' `.4 r 13. Oj« /D loo ©s mil 9 40 1 4411' 1 �� - � , 1 � ,, 1 , 114. v t Q 1 (G 9.' a. � r 15. rQ Qeet i , " / , 0 , e itd o F 16. q-06 C 6 -c�-. v- --7 17. t- , , ) ZY 641712,e6 �JL I,,,.� ` I. ,, T" � J 19. Ir �G� e/‹/- �i� � ei (, -e va 1 v - 4,,e-- -t 21. ;n.G,oss 2, 1. i5 w 004%1 la.. 4 3 A;A, 22. ,, d, as CO 6_jd d a vi-e 4, . ' jM ` 23. ,c � a(tv)ck11 C�LU��� _ac� Jc , - p; �� • • -, 24. 25. - Fes- �f- /83s C. b L s2vU3 i/7/ ro' hi E ILA ivfM A l i , 10 q1 --- i ? -1-5 o 11/ nul,, .,, „. (2,J -_Z A ; -4 -' .' ` / 1i ! ''?- d6,, L t# Mai)itollS _ 21 ,?4. / -/ A7 � t'y teii /1( Z� l" WE the undersigned demand that NO red light and speed - enforcement cameras be activated in the City of Dubuque. These devices jeopardize safety, and put profits ahead of citizens interests. Cameras appear to be a way to keep revenue flowing for municipalities, red light contracts have proved to be increasingly invasive, unconstitutional, and violate the 6th amendment. A dozen cities and nine states have banned the cameras. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS 347b (- 4untES c D L. f- -WeLs1 )73U 5. - 4 v4v:-ew m RA We/ 54 1. � f K¢7=N 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.� ;13.1 i 'V . - T ` c e 3 his S /5-5rp ki O irtoj )-17 P,PG``744t f 1 I EAan –� t`�V�� -r` -Sa34Mc /411 S-I-P,� 61- Gs�14fl4 ,v /) wcvc,/1 vvt. 42_ L 53 torts 6 rT . %3 62, 511 r4JV� 3� 2 k vim, r /40%1 04 4f5ixog. Li C7 2.3 D t-AA 5-c- )t C Li scc 1 (T/aiL ° 5(7 - -f L iq 0)0w Yn 9g :'L2— we(ez.-2 c 16. �Ir 17. 18.+A- -/ ! 19. 20._) 21. 23.E i 24. 25. L_ 191 AdiccV,?4.