The URL can be used to link to this page

Northwest Arterial/Asbury Road Reclassification / - - - -I Prepared by: Laura Carstens. City Planner Address: City Hall. 50 W. 13th Street Telephone: 589-4210 ORDINANCE NO. -99 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A (THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY RECLASSIFYING HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST ARTERIAL AND ASBURY ROAD FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH CONDITIONS, TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH PC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND PR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS AND ADOPTING A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH CONDITIONS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA: Section 1. Appendix A (the Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by reclassifying the hereinafter described property from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District, with conditions, to PUD Planned Unit Development District with PC Planned Commercial District and PR Planned Residential District designations and adopting a conceptual development plan, a copy of which is attached to and made a part hereof, with conditions as stated below, to wit: Lot 1 of QHQ Place and Lot 2 of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4, Section 20, Township 89 North, Range 2 East and to the center line of the adjoining public right-of-way, all in the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 2. Pursuant to Iowa Code Section 414.5 (1993), and as an express condition of the reclassification, the undersigned property owner agrees to the following conditions, all of which the property owner further agrees are reasonable and imposed to satisfy the public needs that are caused directly by the zoning reclassification: A. Use Regulations. The following regulations shall apply to all land uses in the above described PUD District: 'VMOI '3nDnSno >ltJ318 Al18 S I^ \fa 'V nJ'Vy'1 80 or!J8 9T J30 86_ O _h,. . -'.i }C~ " J " ~ _Jl .', ....... -'" 1 I i J..! .-, I.J ORDINANCE NO. -99 Page 2 1 ) Principal permitted uses of the lots designated for commercial development shall be limited to: · General offices--[4]. · Medical office/c1inic--[36]. · Dental/medical lab--[8]. · Personal services--[ 14]. · Barber/beauty shops--[16]. · Motel--[24]. · Gas station--[18]. · Retail sales/service--[ 17]. · Laundry/dry c1eaner--[19]. · Shoe repair--[18]. · Bakery (wholesale/commercial)--[19]. · Indoor restaurant--[20]. · Bar/tavern--[20]. · Automated gas station--[ 18]. · Service station--[21]. · Supermarket--[17]. · Tailoring/alterations--[18]. · Furniture/home furnishing--[27]. · Appliance sales/service--[27]. · Catalog center--[23]. · Drive-in/carry-out restaurant--[28]. · Drive-up automated bank teller--[8]. · Self-service carwash--[8]. · Neighborhood shopping center--[17]. · Business services--[29]. · Department stores--[17]. · Banks/savings and loans, and credit unions--[31]. · Indoor amusement center--[37]. · Vending/game machine sales and service--[19]. · Indoor recreation facilities--[37]. · Mail-order houses--[23]. · Lumberyards/building materials sales--[19]. · Printing/publishing--[32]. · Full-service carwash--[8]. · Auto sales/service--[38]. · Motorcycle sales and service--[41]. · Local shopping center--[ 1 7]. ORDINANCE NO. -99 Page 3 2) Principal permitted uses of the lots designated for office development shall be limited to: 1) Residential uses above the first floor only--[6]. 2) General office--[14]. 3) Artist studios--[5]. 4) Medical offices/clinics, less than 5,000 sq. ft.--[36]. 5) Dental and medicallabs--[8]. 6) Personal services--[ 14]. 7) Barber/beauty shop--[16]. 8) Schools of private instruction--[ 4]. 3) Principal permitted uses of the lots designated for residential development shall be limited to: 1) Single-family residential dwelling (detached)--[ 11]. 2) Churches, convents and monasteries--[7]. 3) Cemeteries, mausoleums and columbariums--[47]. 4) Public and private/parochial schools approved by Iowa State Board of Public Instruction (K-12)--[1 0]. 5) Public or private parks, golf courses, or similar natural recreation areas--[ 4 7]. 4) Accessory uses shall include any use customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use it serves. [ ] Parking group--see Section 4-2 of the Zoning Ordinance. B. Lot and Bulk Regulations. Development of land in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1 ) All building structures and activities shall be located in accordance with provisions of the PUD District regulations of this ordinance and of Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) All buildings and structures located on lots designated for commercial development shall meet bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance for the C-3 General Commercial District, Section 3-3.3(F). ORDINANCE NO. -99 Page 4 3) All buildings and structures located on lots designated for office development shall meet bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance for the C-3 General Commercial District, Section 3-1 .1 (F), except that all office buildings shall be limited to two stories in height. 4) All building and structures located on lots designated for planned residential development shall meet bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance for the R-1 Single-Family Residential District, Section 3-1.1 (F). C. Performance Standards. The development and maintenance of uses in this PUD District shall be established in conformance with Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and the following standards: 1) Proposed public streets within the Planned Unit Development District shall be designed and built to City Engineering specifications. 2) Erosion control shall be provided during all phases of construction. 3) Parking requirements for allowed uses in the PUD District shall be as per the parking group for the designated use, in accordance with Section 4-2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4) Sidewalks shall be provided adjoining all public streets. 5) Storm water detention facilities will be provided as per City Engineering requirements. 6) Adequate illumination shall be provided to areas used for vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Light fixtures shall be of a cut-off design and be mounted at a 90 degree angle to a vertical light standard. 7) The conceptual plan shall serve as the preliminary plat for the PUD District. Subdivision plats and improvement plan shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 42, Subdivision Regulations, of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances. 8) Final site development plans shall be submitted in accordance with Section 4-4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dubuque, Iowa, prior to construction of any buildings. ORDINANCE NO. -99 Page 5 D. Open Space and Landscaping Open space and landscaping in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1. A screen of deciduous and evergreen trees shall be planted adjacent to Asbury Court Place to act as a buffer between the proposed commercial/office developments and the adjacent existing residential development. The trees shall be planted concurrently with the grading and platting of the lots adjacent to Asbury Court Place Subdivision and be a minimum of 5 feet in height at planting. 2. Those areas not designated on the conceptual plan for development shall be maintained as open space, as defined by Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance, by the property owners and/or association. E. Sign Regulations. Signs in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1 ) Sign age for the lots designated for commercial development shall be regulated by the C-3 General Commercial District sign regulations of the Zoning Ordinance Section 4-3.11, except that each lot shall be limited to one (1) freestanding sign a maximum of 25 feet high and 108 square feet in size. 2) Signage for the lots designated for office development shall be regulated by the OS Office Service District sign regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 4-3.11. 3) Signage for the lots designated for residential development shall be regulated by the R-1 Single-Family Residential District sign regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 4-3.11. 4) Variance requests from sign requirements for size, number and height shall be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Adjustment in accordance with Section 5-3 of the Zoning Ordinance. F. Transfer of Ownership Transfer of ownership or lease of property in this PUD District shall include in the transfer or lease agreement a provision that the purchaser or lessee acknowledges awareness of the conditions authorizing the establishment of the PUD District. ORDINANCE NO. -99 Page 6 G. Reclassification of Subiect Property. The City of Dubuque, Iowa, may initiate zoning reclassification proceedings to the AG Agricultural District in accordance with Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance if the property owner fails to complete or maintain any of the conditions of this ordinance. H. Modifications. Any modifications of this Ordinance must be approved by the City Council in accordance with zoning reclassification proceedings of Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. I. Recording. A copy of this ordinance shall be recorded at the expense of the property owner with the Dubuque County Recorder as a permanent record of the conditions accepted as part of this reclassification approval within ten (10) days after the adoption of this ordinance. This ordinance shall be binding upon the undersigned and his/her heirs, successors and assigns. Section 3. The foregoing amendment has heretofore been reviewed by the Zoning Commission of the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 4. The foregoing amendment shall take effect upon publication, as provided by law. Passed, approved and adopted this _ day of , 1999. Terrance M. Duggan, Mayor ATTEST: Mary A. Davis, City Clerk COUNCIL\ORD\qhq.pud ORDINANCE NO. -99 Page 7 ACCEPTANCE OF ORDINANCE NO. -99 I, Michael D. Ouagliano, representing OHO Properties, property owner, having read the terms and conditions of the foregoing Ordinance No. -99 and being familiar with the conditions thereof, hereby accept the same and agree to the conditions required therein. Dated this day of , 1999. By Michael D. Ouagliano OHO Properties rl~nn,"g ServICes Division Citv H~il. I-,th &. Central A venue Dubuque. Iowa 52001 U 10) 539.4210 THE em' OF (.~ DUB1J"QuE ~~~ PLANN.ING APPLICATION FORM Zoning Board of Adjustment Variance Conditional Use Permit Appeal Special Exception Limited Setback Waiver Zoning Commission _ Rezoning L Planned District _ Preliminary Plat _ Minor Final Plat - Text/Plan Amendment Development Services Simple Site Plan Minor Site Plan Major Site Plan Major Final Plat PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY IN INK Property Owner(s): QHQ Propert ies Address: 520 No. 30th Street Applicant/Agent: Mike Quaj;tliano Address: P.O. Box 1125 Telephone: 217-221-0721 City: Quincy State: 1L Zip: Telephone: 217-221-0721 62301 City: Quincy State: 1L Zip: 62306 Site Location/Address: South of Asbury Road & west of Northwest Arterial Existing Zoning: AG and C-3 Proposed Zoning: Planned District: PC/PR Legal Description (metes and bounds. or lot number/block number/subdivision): - . Lot.1 of OHOPlace in the City'of Dubuque & Lot 2 of the:Southeast 1/4 Northeast 1/4, Section 20, Township 89 Nor-th, Range 2 East. Total Property (lot) Area (Sq. Feet or Acres): 53.4 AC Number of lots: ..IrA- Describe proposal and reason necessary (attach letter of explanation if needed): To rezone orooerty currently in the agricultural district to a planned district to provide for orderly development in conformance with the existing adjoining uses. CERTIFICATION: I/we. the undersigned. do hereby certify that: 1) The information submitted herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and upon submittal becomes a public record; 2) Fees ore not refundable and payment does not guarantee approval; and 3) All additional requir?d written an~ graphic materials are attached. i.,.. .." '. , .I I Property Owner(s): ' ii-ClId. t I). /{.,:... j : ,/. Applicant/Agent: I;t~.../\.i.,. ,.",./',.>- ".'" Date: ll/Zl/ tj (.' 't' Ii" t Date: I li6 ,,> . t FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fee: 2, {J()(J . Received by: ~ Property Ownership Ust: /' Site Plan: V'" Conceptual Development Plan: Improvement Plans: - APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Date: J J J -z../ '7 b Docket: Floor Plan: Other: Plat: ::-er\'ICl' 1\'o"lc Inle!-;r1ly Resron"b,lilV 1'1nOV~I'(ln Teamwork \ III"'ENGINEERS AND WI SURVEYORS P.c. 4155 Pennsylvania Ave. · Dubuque, IA 52002-2628 · (319) 556-2464 · Fax (319) 556-7811 Carl B. Schoenhard, Jr., LS Dennis F. Waugh, PE, SE Charles A. Cate, PE Gary D. Sejkora, PE Ross K. Abbott, LSIT Michael A. Jansen, PE, SE Ronald A. Balmer, PE, SE, AlA John M. Tranmer, LS Timothy J. Tranel, PE John F. Wandsnider, PE November 2, 1998 To: Dubuque Zoning Commission Quality Properties is submitting a Conceptual Development Plan for the proposed potential development of the tract of land lying south of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. The current zoning of the majority of the property is Agricultural and the land was cropped during the current growing season. The part of the property fronting on Asbury Road and the comer adjacent to the Northwest Arterial have already been rezoned C-3 by previous actions of the City of Dubuque and are occupied by several businesses, with construction currently occurring on two other buildings. AIdi Inc. is proposing to construct a new grocery store, as shown on the conceptual plan, on approximately 2.8 acres of the total 53.4 acre property. The City staff has requested that a development plan be submitted for the entire property. The development by AIdi Inc. requires the rezoning of only an additional 1.3 acres. The submitted conceptual development plan attempts to provide for the orderly development of the property consistent with the existing zoning districts adjoining the property and with the future potential development of the Northwest Arterial corridor. Immediately north of this proposed development, adjoining Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial, is the proposed Asbury Plaza development, an extensive commercial development of over 100 acres. The submitted development plan is requesting commercial zoning for the property adjoining the Northwest Arterial and the parcel of the property adjoining the existing commercial zoning district fronting the southerly side of Asbury Road. The proposed development plan provides for over 9 acres ofR-I, single family lots for the property adjoining the existing Sunnyslope Estates residential development. Ample undeveloped open space is also proposed to provide an extensive buffer between the residential and commercial uses. The south side of the proposed development is bounded by property owned by the City of Dubuque and which is used for open space storm water drainage. This existing open area results in a separation of approximately 300 feet from the proposed commercial development to any lot in the existing Embassy West development. The conceptual development plan also proposes a 3.4 acre district of Office/Service use to provide a transition between residential and commercial uses. IIW Engineers and Surveyors, P.C. Serving Iowa, Illinois, and Wisconsin P.O. Box 275 · Galena. IL 61036 · (815) 777-0359 302 South River Park. Guttenberg, IA 52052. (319) 252-3823 1638 Thomas. Hazel Green, WI 53811 · (608) 748-4308 \ A north/south street connecting with Asbury Road immediately south of the existing roadway into Asbury Plaza will access the proposed comrnerciallots in this development. The City of Dubuque Engineering Division has required that the street system in this proposed development connect with Red Violet Drive, an existing street built to "collector" street standards. IIW Engineers & Surveyors, P.C. /J J,/ ~- c-yc, Dennis Waugh, P.W' ~~~~ James Kaune, E.I.T. "III"'ENGINEERS AND WI SURVEYORS P.c. 4155 Pennsylvania Ave.. Dubuque,lA 52002-2628. (319) 556-2464. Fax (319) 556-7811 Carl B. Schoenhard, Jr., LS Dennis F. Waugh, PE, SE Charles A. Cate, PE Gary D. Sejkora, PE Ross K. Abbott, LSIT Michael A. Jansen, PE, SE Ronald A. Balmer, PE, SE, AlA John M. Tranmer, LS Timothy J. Tranel, PE John F. Wandsnider, PE QUALITY PROPERTIES TRAFFIC PROJECTION A traffic projection has been prepared for the attached conceptual development plan. The land use for the proposed development consists of residential, office and commercial. The only specific use currently defined for the project is a grocery store in the northeasterly comer of the property adjacent to the Northwest Arterial, as shown on the conceptual development plan. All other commercial uses were assumed based on the allowed uses consistent with the proposed zoning districts and are intended to be representative of the potential use of the property. The assumed usage mayor may not be reflective of the actual future development. The table on the following page is a summary of the average daily trips associated with the assumed land usage, estimated utilizing data from Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The proposed concept, at full development, is expected to generate approximately 14,622 trips per average weekday. The total trip generation was reduced by 10% to account for stops at more than one business per trip to the site and further reduced by 20% to account for trips by vehicles already travelling on the adjacent roadways, namely Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial. This results in an average weekday vehicle trips of 10,236. An assumption can be made that 15% of the traffic will utilize the Red Violet Drive route, resulting in 1535 average weekday vehicle trips. The remaining traffic, 8701 average weekday vehicle trips, will utilize Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial. For reference purposes, the 1997 Average Daily Traffic in vehicles per day, as provided by the City of Dubuque Engineering Division, on adjacent roadways is: 7800 on Asbury Road, 8500 on the Northwest Arterial adjacent to the site, and 2960 on Radford Road. The Average Daily Traffic on Coates Street, a residential street potentially similar to Red Violet Drive, is 1330 vehicles per day. The traffic projection is based on full development of the property, which is expected to occur over an estimated time period of approximately 10 years. IIW Engineers & Surveyors, P.C. gau~:!:-/ ~~~~ James Kaune, E.I.T. IIW Engineers and Surveyors, P.C. Serving Iowa, Illinois, and Wisconsin P.O. Box 275 · Galena. IL 61036 · (815) 777-0359 302 South River Park. Guttenberg, IA 52052. (319) 252-3823 1638 Thomas. Hazel Green, WI 53811 · (608) 748-4308 TRIP GENERATION POTENTIAL BUSINESS TYPE UNIT TRIPS/UNIT AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS Single family res. 24 houses 10 240 General Office [l Sites) 33600 sq.ft. 17.7 /1000 sq.ft. 594.72 Grocery Store 15500 sq.ft. 125.5 /100_0 sq.ft. 1945.25 Convenience store 3000 sq.ft. 322.6 /1000 sq.ft. 967.8 Drive-in Bank (2 Sites) 9000 sq.ft. 192 /1000 sq.ft. 1728 Fast Food (2 Sites) 7000 sq.ft. 553 /1000 sq.ft. 3871 Quality Restaurant (2 Sites) 18800 sq.ft. 74.9 11000 sq.ft. 1408.12 Retail Shops (5 Sites) 25000 sq.ft. 40.7 /1000 sq.ft. 1017.5 Neighborhood Shopping Ctr. 70000 sq.ft. 40.7 /1000 sq.ft. 2849 Total Site 14622 Internal Trip Deduction less 10% 1462 Pass by trips less 20% 2924 TOTAL NEW TRIPS 10236 " a: l? .8t Philomena ~ Cemetery ~ a: ".bUr'! Rd o C-3c area to be rezoned. ~ AG area to be rezoned. Applicant: QHQ Properties Proposal: To rezone property from AG and C-3 with conditions to PU D Planned District with a PC Planned Commercial and PR Planned Residential designation. 11/6198Jkm PLANNED DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Zoning Agenda: 12/2/98 Project Name: Quality Properties Planned Unit Development Property Address: Southwest corner of the Northwest Arterial and Asbury Road Property Owner: QHQ Properties Applicant: Michael Quagliano Proposed Land Use: Commercial/Residential Proposed Zoning: PUD Existing Land Use: Agricultural Existing Zoning: AG Adjacent Land Use: N--Commercial: E--Agricultural: S--Residential: W--Residential Adjacent Zoning: N--PC Planned Commercial: E--AG: S-R-1: W--R-1 Flood Plain: No Total Area: 53.4 acres Water: Yes Existing Street Access: Yes Storm Sewer: Yes Sanitary Sewer: Yes Purpose: The applicant is requesting rezoning of 53 acres from agricultural to PUD Planned Unit Development with Planned Commercial and Planned Residential designations. The PUD will provide for the extension of City streets to provide access to approximately 30 acres of commercial and office lots and approximately 10 acres of residential lots. Property History: The subject property has seen a limited amount of commercial development adjacent to Asbury Road with the balance of the property used for agricultural purposes. Physical Characteristics: The subject property generally drains to the southeast to an area currently owned by the City of Dubuque and used as a regional detention facility. The subject property has frontage on both the Northwest Arterial (Highway 32) and Asbury Road. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan: The 1995 Comprehensive Plan designated the area for development with a mixture of commercial, multi-family, and single- family development. The submitted Planned Unit Development District primarily differs in what was anticipated by the conceptual plan in that the property along the Northwest Arterial will all be used for commercial purposes, whereas the 1995 PLANNED DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Page 2 Comprehensive Plan designated the area along the Northwest Arterial as a mixture of commercial, open space and multi-family uses. The open space area has been laid out in a manner that provides a buffer between the commercial and office uses and the residential lots in the southwest corner of the parcel. Staff Analysis: Streets: The PUD provides for the extension of Red Violet Drive as a collector street, as well as a new street connecting Asbury Road and serving the interior of the proposed development. All streets shown within the PUD are to be dedicated to the public. The applicant has proposed a right-in/right-out access to the Northwest Arterial, which will require the joint approval of both the City of Dubuque and the Iowa Department of Transportation. A memo from Public Works Director Mike Koch is attached which outlines the Engineering Division's comments. Sidewalks: Sidewalks will be installed on all public streets as per the City of Dubuque regulations. Parking: Off-street parking will be required as part of the development of each of the lots within the PUD. Lighting: Lighting for each of the lots will be reviewed as part of the site plan review process. Signage: The applicant is proposing that sign age for the commercial portion of the development be as per the C-3 General Commercial District signage in the Zoning Ordinance. Signage for the office and residential portions of the PUD also will be regulated based on the Office Service and R-1 Districts' regulations contained within the City of Dubuque Zoning Ordinance regulations. Bulk Regulations: The bulk regulations will be the same as those established for the C-3 General Commercial District, OS Office Services District and the R-1 Single-Family Residential District. Permeable Area (%) & Location (Open Space): Open space is proposed in approximately the middle of the PUD and will tie in with the open space owned by the City of Dubuque that is utilized as a regional detention basin. The open space within the proposed PUD is 7.3 acres in size, which comprises approximately 14% of the total development. In addition, as each individual parcel is developed for commercial or office space, additional green space will be required; approximately 20% of the lot area. Landscaping/Screening: The applicant is proposing to plant trees planted along the west property line of the development, adjacent to Asbury Court Place PLANNED DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Page 3 Subdivision, which is within the City of Asbury corporate limits. Additional landscaping will be planted as each parcel is developed within the PUD. Phasing of development: None proposed. Impact of Request on: Utilities: Existing utilities are adequate to serve the site. Traffic Patterns/Counts: The proposed PUD will provide street access from the Northwest Arterial, Asbury Road and Red Violet Drive. The Northwest Arterial is a primary arterial, Asbury Road is a minor arterial and Red Violet Drive is a collector street. Current traffic counts: Northwest Arterial--8,500; Asbury Road--7,800; and, Red Violet Drive--none available. Public Services: Existing public services are adequate to serve the development. Environment: No adverse impact to the environment is anticipated provided adequate erosion control measures are provided during all phases of construction and appropriate storm water control is provided. Adjacent Properties: Staff anticipates that the most significant impact to adjacent properties will be the increase in traffic on Red Violet Drive if the proposed street layout is approved as submitted. Development adjacent to Sunny Slopes Estates Phase IV will be single-family development and staff does not anticipate that this will adversely impact those properties. CIP Investments: None proposed. Staff Analysis: The proposed Planned Unit Development District will have two designations; Planned Commercial and Planned Residential. The Planned Commercial area is located primarily along the Northwest Arterial frontage and is comprised of approximately 30 acres of commercial and office lots served by public streets. The Planned Residential District portion of the development is approximately 1 0 acres in size and is adjacent to Phase IV of Sunny Slopes Estates subdivision. The proposed development also includes approximately 7.5 acres of open space that will be used to buffer the commercial area of the development from the residential portion, as well as provide an area for storm water detention. The submitted conceptual plan designates lots as PC and C-3. Rather than have two different commercial designations with separate lists of permitted uses, staff PLANNED DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Page 4 recommend that there be one commercial designation. Staff reviewed this issue with the applicant and he is in agreement. The PUD proposes a right-in/right-out access onto the Northwest Arterial. Access to the Northwest Arterial (Highway 32) must be approved by the City of Dubuque as well as the Iowa Department of Transportation. In addition, a public street is proposed to intersect with Asbury Road and extend to the south where it will intersect with an extension of Red Violet Drive. Several other public streets are proposed to provide access to the balance of the development. The proposed PUD is in substantial compliance with the 1995 Comprehensive Plan. The significant change from the adopted Comprehensive Plan is that the area on the plan anticipated for development of multi-family residential has been proposed for development as commercial and office space. The open space has been reconfigured to provide a buffer between the proposed commercial and office area and the single-family residential proposed for the southwest quarter of the site. The submitted conceptual plan provides for an extension of Red Violet Drive and a new public street that ties into Asbury Road. These streets form a four-way intersection with the right-in/right-out access to the Northwest Arterial. Planning Services and Engineering staff's primary concern with this street layout is that, if the right-in/right-out access is approved onto the Northwest Arterial, Red Violet Drive may experience an increase in the volume of traffic beyond what the street was designed to accommodate. The applicant's proposed street layout was an attempt to comply with City staff's directions that Red Violet Drive should connect to any new access to Asbury Road. However, staff did not anticipate that a connection also would be made to the Northwest Arterial. City staff have put together two alternatives to the street system within the PUD that addresses concerns expressed by City staff. Attached are memos from Public Works Director Mike Koch and Fire Marshal Scott Neyens, which outlines their comments related to the proposed street layout. The submitted conceptual plan provides for approximately 7.5 acres of open space that also will provide area for storm water detention. The proposed open space effectively buffers the proposed residential portion of the development from the commercial and office development. Planning Services staff anticipate that the residential portion of the development will build out relatively quickly, as there is a limited supply of single-family lots within the City of Dubuque corporate limits. The conceptual plan also indicates that a buffer area of 60 feet wide will be provided adjacent to the end of Asbury Court Place, which is a subdivision within the City of Asbury. The Commission may want to consider restricting the height of office buildings in this location due to the proximity of residential property. The OS District bulk standards allow a maximum height of 75 feet. Staff recommend that offices be restricted to two stories in this area. PLANNED DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Page 5 The darker green shaded area on the south side of the development is property owned by the City of Dubuque and is used as a regional detention facility. No changes are proposed to this area, but it does affectively serve as additional open space between the proposed development and the Embassy West subdivision to the south. The applicant is proposing that signage and bulk standards for the PUD are the same as for similar zoning districts within the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dubuque. Signage requirements for the commercial portion of the development will be the same as the C-3 General Commercial District sign regulations. An existing portion of the proposed PUD already is zoned C-3 with conditions. The condition attached to that property restricts signage to a 25-foot high freestanding sign and 108 square feet of sign area, basically the same as the C-2 Neighborhood Shopping Center District sign regulations. The Commission and City Council established that condition for the rezoning, as it is comparable to signage allowed for outlots in Asbury Plaza Shopping Center on the north side of Asbury Road. The proposed PUD District is comprised of individual lots that will be developed as they are purchased. As each lot is developed, the owner will be required to go through the site plan review procedure. At that time, staff will review each development for compliance with off-street parking regulations, screening requirements, and lighting. Staff recommend that under the lighting portion of the PUD ordinance, lighting be required to be horizontally mounted and directed down at a 90 degree angle to the parking lot surface. No angled lighting will be permitted. Recently, two new commercial developments have angled their lighting and staff have received complaints from the surrounding property owners and passing motorists. The proposed language should help to eliminate this problem from occurring. Staff recommend that the Zoning Advisory Commission review the standards for reviewing and approving PUD Districts. Prepared by: ~ ~ Reviewed: p/A- Date: /I/ZS/Q;PJ ... CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM November 20, 1998 TO: Kyle Kritz, Associate Planner FROM: Michael A. Koch, Public Works Director !lJi Ii~ SUBJECT: Quality Properties Preliminary Development Plan INTRODUCTION The following comments are offered upon my review of the Quality Properties preliminary development plan. DISCUSSION Overall, the street plan looks well suited for the parcel, however, I have three concerns relating to traffic. The first of these concerns relates to the direct connection between the two arterial streets of the Northwest Arterial and Radford Road. Such a connection could easily allow this to become a very convenient short cut to avoid traffic delays at the surrounding signalized intersections. Traffic on such a connection could develop to at least a collector street volume, if not even arterial street volumes. If a connection is to be made to both arterial streets, the connection should be circuitous and not provide a "direct" link between the two arterials. The second concern deals with the connection between the R 1 residential properties in the Sunnyslope Subdivision and the commercial properties along the Northwest Arterial. This connection could encourage commercial traffic through the residential neighborhoods. My suggestion would be to delete the portion of Red Violet Drive across the waterway, thereby separating the residential development within the site from the commercial development. The residential development would take access through Sunnyslope Subdivision, while the access to the commercial properties would be limited only onto the adjacent arterial street system. ~ ~ Lastly, there is the issue of allowing another access onto the Northwest Arterial. The access proposed is a right-in/right-out access which would prohibit left turns from or onto the Northwest Arterial. This proposed access is identical to the southerly public street access from the Northwest Arterial into Medical Associates at Associates Drive and the proposed private driveway from the Northwest Arterial into Asbury Plaza. The traffic projections for the development anticipates approximately 10,000 trips per day in and out of the site. This will require at least 2 major entrances to the property, either as shown onto the Northwest Arterial or by upgrading a secondary access to the site from Asbury Road. This access is located at the westerly boundary of the property directly across from one of the Asbury Plaza entrances. The main entrance from Asbury Road at the future signalized intersection with Asbury Plaza just west of the Northwest Arterial. Without the second access point, the traffic signals at the Northwest Arterial and Asbury Road would be overloaded and the Asbury Plaza access would operate at an unacceptable Level of Service F, assuming full build-out of both sites by the year 2020. CONCLUSION Although access onto the Northwest Arterial was never envisioned for this development, the traffic volumes do indicate that a second connection should be developed into the site. The Medical Associates public street access onto the Northwest Arterial has been working well as a secondary right-in/right-out access to the property, with left turns taking place at the primary signalized intersection at Chavenelle Drive. The proposed site plan for Quality Properties would operate much the same with respect to the Northwest Arterial, where left turns would be accommodated at the Asbury Road signalized intersection. Without the access onto the Northwest Arterial, the westerly access from Asbury Road would need to be greatly enhanced, and both the signalized intersections at the Northwest Arterial and Asbury Road, and the Asbury Plaza intersection would operate well below acceptable levels by the year 2020. With the right-in/right-out access onto the Northwest Arterial, the Asbury Plaza signalized intersection would operate at a Level of Service D by the year 2020. Without further capacity improvements, the Northwest Arterial and Asbury Road signalized intersection would operate at a Level of Service F. With additional lane improvements, this intersection could be improved to operate at a Level of Service D through the year 2020. MAK/ksa cc: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM November 23, 1998 TO: Kyle Kritz, Associate Planner FROM: Scott Neyens, Assistant Chief/Fire Marshal f3tJl SUBJECT: Conceptional Plan Quality Properties Introduction The following are comments on the three road proposals of Quality Properties Development. Discussion The comments made on this proposal are based with consideration of the first emergency response unit coming from Station #2 located on JFK Road. The first plan as proposed by the developer offers the best access for emergency response, not only for the new development but it also adds a quick response to the newly developed area of Sunny Slopes. At this time, this portion of Sunny Slopes is difficult to get to from Station #2 and has lengthy response times. This proposal would be preferred by the Fire Department. Alternate #1 cuts off a direct access from the Northwest Arterial to Red Violet Drive but still provides access to this development and Sunny Slopes. The response time would be somewhat longer. This would be our second choice. Alternate #2 divides the new development into two sections. The commercial lots would be accessed off Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial. The residential area would have to be accessed off of Red Violet Drive. Fire apparatus would have to travel west to Radford Road and then back track east through a neighborhood to get to this area. This would add unacceptable response times to an area that is already difficult to respond to. ~ '. ~ ,,~ ~ ;...,g '2 Illlll ~~ ! ~~ ~ :- ,,~"" ;c~ % 2: x -~ ~ ~~ g ~"':- 0 ca~ g ~r ~ ~~ ~ r': ~ 1,z; o ~O;iOC''l''I-01 r;2~~~i~1 /I ~ .3i ~ ~ .3i 1-0 I :a" 0 "^ ~ DO \!jl;,,;nn!U) ~!':'~A~~:fT'Il ~:'4,., ~ ~.!i ,'0 I .. w z :a XI ~jl;jqeINI GI ~.." _. t:' 0 ~~!~p~~ ~ .. l.II .. .. C') ,.. jl;jl; I ... ~ ~ (') ~ ~ ~ ie;: ~ 'U) ~ I~ 10 ~ I~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ > ..... " --_.. -~ -, -- ~-... - ~...~ ~;:~y~- -~-_. " ~., #"' """'- ~ " ',D " IV' 'j " is . -"--'~""-' \ , . ,j ;i. . S .~ .. '1t:' $ . ! p ~ I: ... ,t; wu fU'W8t IWlM! '4 ~ '" \ c I ~ "" '" . \ I \ Ii; ~ ~ ...... YIOUT 10 .-...: 0iM'l 10".,._ .__ _.~ 1IOot( ", ":",,~ .:; ~ I" ........._~ _~ , ~~ 4?; ~ ,. ", c.,. N T ~ . '=' ..X~L..... . .. ~ ~ ~ AUlMY CDlAr ,.~ /.~~..... -,.,. -- - \..... \ \ '=' C """ ~Q %2 ~~ ;;1!!! o % ."" - <::::. "" .... .,.. 5 ! I A 'J Q ~ ~ -_:.+ ,0 :. ,Q ;~ j I --- --- X i ~ PLlN :0"1.'0(; CO"'IUSSIO.~ Sl:IIUTd. ".1.... ~ ~ ~ I I ~ 3 <; .~ ~~ ~ .- ;",,2 g !""... - : '. ,- ~~ II '. , ~~ g , ; '. .. '. .... ~ .'", , ~~ I :- , \ " ~. ~ ., ;"11 ~ ; " -, '. ~I ~ ;Ii. Q n~ ~ :i~1l 1l~2 2: ~ ~p ~ ~ . ~: ~ ~. ~ ~: ~ 'ao~on;J~ c: 'l) ~ "" "" ~ ...... ~:~~i~~ 21 '"Q OVl F- 00 \l~~issVl ljuIIIAr:c(T1 .~~Sr.'~~o ,..,,%s:~n ~;;.. r," ~ 0 ~~~~p';~ ~ .::' 1/1 . ... C') ~ r, r, l.. ~ ~ n ~ III VI ~ VI :;; (') ~ 5 z l> r .., m :0 Z ) ..., m ~ .J. , II ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ o R .:l . 'l ~~ I I~ ~~~ . a : i IUWON ~ IIV-' ~-.' ...... i~~~t.--~~ "'~ .-:... . --; -- o ~ > ... ~'....- ~ - ..~~...... \ \ ... .... ......It;. ~~. . ~ < '.~ \ ~ \ , - ! " ! I I ~ _._____l W1.I ...... """ ~ .,. .. r ..... , \ t i ~ ..- .~:..- \ I \ t ...... \ :..... ""'" DMI "-' 14'''' ~ ~_......_..~ J' ; # .:"'-s\A" \ ~ . ~. \ ' " \ \ 1_ __ cmf!'l~ I em",_ /' ..........._-~ -~ - "~J' ~: ~ ~ ,;, .,. . '-" N ~ ,_' , 10, ~ ~ ~ '",,- I,. ( ENGINEERS SURVEYORS AND P.C. PLAN !OSlS(; CQW\II'UIQ:oo.ll.tnIlT4L ..... ~. "" <:: ;~ 'J~~:-. .. /-U-- ~......- ~- -~ -. ____OI!;~ ~ em",_ ~Q Z~ ~~ ;;!!!! o z ~ - <::::. ~ ..... .,.. i I A !) 'I' t. --\~ ,~ - - .;. X i A ':\ \ ,-- ., ,>0 o ; 6 .> .~ ~ ~~ ~ !"'..., - ~~ ~ ~~ ~ '::~ ,:i =, ?; ~. ~ ;c:~ Z i~ ~ ~z Q n'= :z r~ ~ ~~ g O' ~ ~p ~ ~i ~ oz ... ~: ~ o --,--" ~~ "~~ -- .~..,-.c:..'. .... ........... ~ -<..' ". . .....- - "'''''~ 11:'" ~, IL ~ i. ..'.: I , I . I I I I ~ 0 ~ 0 " ~ ,-0 I I CA :::~ 1:::01 i F % II ~ _ .0 I ~ ~ a : ~ a J2S I ~~~jaa:(f) I -. ~ c: c: rr1 I ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ 10 I ;; ~ ~ ~ P ,N I ".. ~.. ~ ,0 I g ~ ~ .:; is ~ i~ ..... - ", .. . 12 I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1G"l I . I t.. :::::: () i I ~ ::<::<s: Ul 1'1 .!::2 ~ ,." i" 0 Ii r~ 0 III r is z ~ 1/' .., > II m :0 '" i i '" I, z II .5. 5 -< , I ~ ~ ! I I~ .., I Ig >. . m '" -< ~ N i i i ~ I. i r . ! ! I i l ~ i A . -) : ~. I '* i~ ' I 1 I I H..1WON I ' . ; "II!!I!il!!" I I : ! / '- IIV/' '\ I i E\GIi\'EERS SURVEYORS .; ....;:......,.. .~~ ",i.-I. \ ~ . ~ t. '\ ,\:'10 r.c. f'LI'\ IO"'''C CO....IS~lQ... SLh1l1.l -- <"-..~ ~~. '- ., .~.~ ~-- ". " " .- ';'" '0. ~ '!.t ,; ~ ~ I 3 ~l'\ftIIlWft Xl"1IClIII ~ ~ '"" "" . ~ I ~ ::;, -.. ~ .".. , i .~ ""'" ""-\t1t-=-~ '"" ""'" .;I ,&,- ,r ~ '-..~~ ,..., -..... .:I ~/ ~ t:" r err tJI.Ooa.O..l( r;J1"i"0I'.a..r" .". "" ""- '0 ~n .i~ A"l. i~ ~~ "'" ':> "=.. """" ,." -. """" "~I on> ., .......... ~Q z~ ~~ M~ z .,... ~ ':> "" '"" .,.. 1 1 I ~ ~ I :\ : December 2, 1998 Zoning Advisory Commission 50 W. 13th Street Attn: Planning Services - City Hall Second Floor Dubuque, LA 52001 CITY OF DUBUQUE DEe 04 1998 -.-...---...... Dear Zoning Advisory Commission: We recently move into our new home at 4911 Twilight Drive. When we decided to move to the Sunnyslope area we were looking for a nice neighborhood in which to raise our children. Now, due to the proposed development plan designed by Quality Properties, we have some major concerns about this area. We are strongly opposed to developing direct access between Radford Road and the Northwest Arterial via Red Violet. This will not only be used by residential traffic but will become a short cut for commercial traffic as well. This high volume and type of traffic should not be encouraged to go through a residential neighborhood. We are also opposed to commercial development in such close proximity to our residential area. I would rather have this remain along the Northwest Arterial. We would like to see an alternative development proposal that would be acceptable to the homeowners in the affected area. Sincerely, IVl~~ Mary Jungbluth BITTER LAW OFFICES Joseph J. Bitter* Thomas A. Bitter CORNER OF FIFTH & LOCUST DUBUQUE, IOWA 52001 CITY OF DUBUQUE Office: 319-588-4608 Fax: 319-'588~01 03 DEe 0 21998 Residence Joe: 319-582-1768 -' Fax: 319-582-0511 . Also licenSed in Illinois Client parking in rear November 30, 1998 . Tom: 319-582-7545 City of Dubuque - Zoning Advisory Commission City Hall - Second Floor 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 5200 I A Tn.,;: ?lalUling Services Departri1ent RE: QHQ Properties' Rezoning Request To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this letter with regard to the rezoning request made by QHQ Properties on land located just west of the Northwest Arterial and just south of Asbury Road. I am voicing my concerns as a landowner in the Sunnyslopes subdivision, as a taxpayer, as a parent, and as a lifetime Dubuque resident. Due to a prior commitment, I ""ill be unable to attend the meeting on December 2nd, and I want to ensure that my thoughts are conveyed on this matter. My wife and I purchased our home on High Cloud Drive in January of 1997. We will be directly atIected by any rezoning of the property in question because it is located directly behind our home. We have two small children and a.'1other on the way. We chose to purchase our home in Sunnyslopes largely because of the "residential" atmosphere of the area and because it is a quiet area with very little traffic. We have definite concerns about introducing a large amount of new commercial properties to the area. In particular, we are concerned about the nuisance value associated with commercial property, i.e. }'ncr""'''e.-l .no;"~ }'ncren.'td t-afl'="lc "'n,l r ~~tlle+;call-' un~pp"'all'-- -"~''''+''_...n ",..,1 1;,...1~+" . ~u.", U..l ..lJ"".. .' -:1~' 1 , '-U U a.~~ i.J. .,It h.t '"' 115:>l..i U'-'iLl..I.i"'-''') UJ.l~ .1.16.1.1.1....,. The proposals made by QHQ allow for commercial buildings of up to 75 feet in height, as well as an 8.1 acre parcel zoned as planned commercial. Two of the three proposals also call for connecting roads between the commercial portion of the area and the residential portion, including the existing Sunnyslopes subdivision. To connect the two areas would be to guarantee significantly more traffic through residential areas such as ours. Many of the families in our area have small children, and this would certainly be cause for concern. Because the QHQ proposals call for approximately 30 acres of new commercial property, it has been estimated by Mike Koch that 10,000 car trips per day would result. This would be a tremendous burden on the Northwest Arterial. Further, people would leave through the residential area as a short-cut if the roads were joined. It seems to me that Dubuque is in greater need of additional residential property than commercial property. The existing lots in Sunnyslopes have been developed and sold extremely quickly, yet there remains to be commercial property near Nordstroms, near Culvers, and in Key West which is still undeveloped. We want what is best for Dubuque and what is best for the residents of Sunnyslopes. We are concerned with the introduction of a large amount of commercial property into an area that is so highly residential and which has so little access. Thank you. Sincerely, c ~~ Thomas A. Bitter November 30,1998 C/7y 0 F= DUa D Uo~ E C 0 1 1998 Zoning Advisory Commission 50 W 13th Street Attn: Planning Services - City Hall Second Floor Dubuque, IA 52001 -... Dear Zoning Advisory Commission, Good evening my name is Tom Schroeder, I live at 4903 Twilight Dr., I'm sorry I couldn't make this meeting due to business out of town. I would like to voice my concerns on the proposed development offered by QHQ Properties\Mike Quagliano. As the property owner on the corner of Red Violet and Twilight Drive, I am strongly opposed to all development with direct access from Radford Road to the Northwest Arterial. When my family bought this lot back in 1997, we knew someday that this land would be developed. We figured when developed for residential property as told back in 1997, my wife and I thought that this would be a great place within the city to raise our kids. As I look at the plans being submitted by the developer, I have to ask myself the following. 1. What is the true meaning of the word Arterial? (short cut, another traffic light) 2. What will happen to the burm, currently blocking traffic noise? 3. Why does the commercial property have to run through residential property? 4. Is this another JFK in the making? 5. If the development in Asbury Plaza has not been a success to date, why do you think this one will. 6. If zoned do you really think delivery trucks are going to take the truck route? I would like to thank you for allowing me to express my concerns, I know as the commission you will make a decision that the community does not regret later. As I am opposed to the three plans, I have seen todate. ~~ Tom Schroeder November 28, 1998 CITY OF OU8uQue NQV 3 0 1998 City of Dubuque Zoning Advisory Commission City Hall Dubuque, IA 52001 -~-:-:-.-- "-. ::--_- ~.~~ Re: Public Hearing December 2, 1998 Rezoning request of QHQ properties Dear Commission members: We strongly urge you DENY any rezoning of this parcel to C-3, Planned Commercial, and/or Office-Service. The City of Dubuque's Comprehensive Plan determined this property should be R-1. Residential lots are needed in the city of Dubuque. The NorthWest Arterial should not be over-developed. Rezoning this property to commercial would be creating another Kennedy Road monster. Already there is significant amounts of property zoned for commercial development along the Northwest Arterial. The traffic projections detail a future nightmare. The city CANNOT ALLOW a straight cut to Red Violet Drive. The traffic this would generate is a major safety concern of all of us living in SunnySlope Estates. The Fire Marshall doesn't give his people much cedit. SunnySlopes is inside direct straight access: Asbury Rd, Radford Rd, into Red Violet or Pennsylvania, Radford, and into Camelot. Our area is much easier to access than most of Dubuque's hilly neighborhoods. If the QHQ property is developed as R-1 there won't be a need for a new access on/off the NorthWest Arterial. We built our home on High CI~ud Drive two years ago and we always expected the property to the east would develop. But we expected it to develop as R-1. The land to the south (Camelot Dr, etc) is R-1 and the QHQ property should continue this pattern of development. We and many of our neighbors are concerned. Please deny over-development of this property. Thank you. Sincerely, a; ~~~ M'~eSler 2310 High Cloud Dr. Dubuque, IA 52001 November 29, 1998 Zoning Advisory Commission C/O Planning Services City Hall, Second Floor 50 W. 13th ST. Dubuque, Iowa 52001 RE: QHQ Properties - Conceptual plan Public Hearing December 2, 1998 Legal Description: Lot 1 of QHQ Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and Lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NEl/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa Dear Commissioners, Regret tabl y, due to a business trip out of the ci ty, I am unable to attend your public hearing regarding the above matter. However I respectfully request you consider the following comments and my position related thereto. BACKGROUND: As a former P&Z Commissioner I understand a developer's goal is to realize the maximum economic benefit from their property. Unfortunately this objective, if realized, is far too often at the expense of the community, thereby the need for land use policies, zoning regulations, building codes, etc. In 1995 my wife and I purchased Lot 7 in Sunny Slopes Estates (2310 High Cloud Dr). Prior to purchasing this property we reviewed the zoning classification for the subdivision and the surrounding area both wi th the developer and the ci ty PI anning Services staff. In respect to the property now known as QHQ Properties we were shown the Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which clearly indicated that the QHQ property intended land use by the city was R1, with the exception of a multiple family area bordering the N.W. Arterial and a commercial area bordering Asbury Road. We were further advised by the city staff they would not support a change of land use for this parcel of land. DISCUSSION AND POSITIONS: We request that the QHQ Properties petition that would amend the Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan be rejected in its entirety for the following reasons: 1. There has been no evidence produced that the well being of the community would be advanced by destroying the integrity of the current Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2. Current I y there exists a shortage of Rl lots wi thin the City of Dubuque. It makes no sense for the community to eliminate properties planned for such purpose from ei ther an economic or planning standpoint. 3. In the N. W. Arterial corridor there is a gl ut of undeveloped commercial and office properties. The interests of the community are not served by adding more properties to this land use while Rl lots are desperately needed. 4. Intensi fying the 1 and use for this parcel as requested will further encroach on the integrity of the N.W. Arterial concept with another access. Although I have the greatest respect for Mike Koch, I would suggest, in reviewing his memo dated November 20, 1998, that the reason the right turn only into the Medical Associates property is working so well, is because no one uses this access as the only two businesses that exist are the Golden Corral and Medical Associates. Traffic from the proposed QHQ development is expected to generate 10,000 trips per day. Assuming hal f of these travelers would prefer not to do battle with the expected traffic on Asbury Rd. and use the N.W. Arterial access, a safety problem will be created. To correct the safety problem the current 45 mph will need to be reduced or an additional pull off lane added at the taxpayers' expense. I t is our understanding if the Rl designation is maintained the number of trips will be greatly reduced and this access to the arterial would not be necessary. 5. We concur with Mike Koch concerns that allowing the entire QHQ development to have access through Sunny Slopes Estates would be a traffic nightmare. Whether the route is direct or winding Red Vi 0 I et Dr. and Wi I df lower Dr. woul d be undul a ted wi th de I i very vehicles, services vehicles (ie. BFI) and personal autos to the extent safety and the quality of life would be adversely affected as well as the property values. 6. In respect to the Fire Marshall's comments that it would be unacceptable not to have an access through the entire QHQ property to SunnySlopes we respectfully disagree. Currently driving from Firehouse 2 via Asbury Rd. takes less than 4 minutes (2.1 Miles) to reach the intersection of High Cloud Dr. and Red Violet Dr. at or below posted speed 1 imi ts. Travel ing to Nordstroms, or the intersection of North Star and Hummingbird Dr., or the intersection of Seippel Rd. and Middle Road (new industrial area) is further in both time and distance from Firehouse 2. These areas are from a public safety response standpoint assumed to be acceptable. 7. Allowing commercial zoning along the entire crest of the hill bordering the N.W. Arterial could create a continuous billboard that would significantly adversely affect the entire area thereby again detracting from the qual i ty of 1 i fe and property values. In summary there are many more reasons why this pet i ti on shoul d be deni ed, however the above offers enough justifcation for such a decision. rezoning more than Thanking you in advance for 0 r considerations, I remain ? celel~r~ i ane R. Giesler 2310 High Cloud Dr. Dubuque, IA 52002 ! .. .,. ...~itt ...:~.. ~. ~ :.; if "I !f ~ . 4! Ii 1,0" .., I: ~ , ~~,j~:~"","""';'~:ft ~; .~.! ~; Ii . -~~. ..}- ii ~t It. ~ . it . 1; ?: '. .' r'. .::~.:::-~.:;.~ ~~'~~ ~.: ~.... :.. l .~. ~ ~ b--i _ .~C':"~ .J. .~:';:~~ '_.,.~ ~J ,f. t: Ct'.- .""""~ p.... ...... ~2:if ~":'~t::~;., ", ::~.:-~._~. ~~ : '" Oleo NtlQ _ (1'Jg:, oN ... Z(1'JU' ~..; '.. -=~5 ;.... ; "0: ~ ~-IIIII (,)(;:; eo = 0'(0.'" . an '";f.'<tr-: '. '. ~~ ~~ ~'~r . OJ,: ;~~.::~:. o. -~.:"':"?"'~:~~~:. '> .....~~ri 'c-:, Z~g- till <'Q .Cll.o _. . ~ ~5~, -~-~Q,) . -- - ~ t.... .z ........ :: i "-',z... .. . ~L' -...:.... . . ~r _,_ t."f ; ~; , 'I,. k-;. .,.,.., . h ' ~ f;,:~~~; ~~: '" <..-,... -Q:. ~. !-' ~ ~. ~t .: ..t . Q. .~, . .j" i"-.,l " ~-it.. tf~ p8 ;;::-'~~ 'J .-",.........~. .....<,.;.r_ _ =. ~::~%!~;::'~{~ ~ .' ,',.. .- c~ ._; :. .- .< . . . ...--y - .~ ~, ;" = .7" 1 - ... - .~ --;.,.' - . '".... ~ = ;--_....... ~; , - .-~, ~ ~ ~ ::-;,:~/--;; c: =--;--a , c:C; "":c ~ ';, llOe '3]~---;:;;:a-;;c:~-<o~. -' C:SO_Pp_ a:t5::....0~.J:J.t:~ :.5.. :t.::l:;: -:rlo11:: -:;;<l~ ,e.... .....4.l:g CI.luC/lIU ..c::::~ . 'tt11 ~A '~~~2~~-~o cu_ ~"'O; UCU .aU) ~c.- -= :s.!l 0:::']> "E~o:::g :..c:...:; ~.,~~ 01'. ~1l g E g ~~:; --.. o;.5-~lJd S::--'=~Lt f::~l:) " :s-~-~o .!!::S':f::'f ~UJ~ ,." :s ~~:!t~ .'tt ~~ ~3... :: 2.8 '.' ~W >.c ~e~3 ~., g,'=~~g'~~ . ~ ~~ '. O.;.r;o- - 0 0 U)'GJ, 0_ ::S~-ci CJ (I2-C .,,- ... .. ., 'tt ~ c: 0 0::: . .. -;: _ ..0 ~ .. ., _ _ .- ~ :.-.:...:a ai .!l:S 110 .:;; .:l" c; 0 !;co::: .' '.....e.: ....~-'tt"'.,< ~..o:::~ - .;.,....:-~<~..:~:~Q..-~5 ~--;s:::c-;;GJs:::J.... -,- "',.' '.....,"'."...'1:: il:;i ::;;'tt C:'O 0-.. 0_ ~ ..... G d ClI~"'C s:: as 'u"C ().. - . . ~c5~ c.~ 8.--rl:t'::t 4J c: G.I~~ ~~ ~ '. )t.:.L~o-'~'.&-~ g.:~; t,;-;: ~::_::. 0.:: . :. CI)'7.. ":.:oc;:a'. :~r.i~'6-g t' ~:s =.~ J! : . - c:J -bC ::Jc::s!l co :;. ::::~ '- ....c:3 l-'tt....o _' 0:::.. ....~_._ '_0_- -: ..t:... -a"e"ac: ;;.5::1::1::- -or- ::;;[';"<0" "'-..00::1;.-, . ;-ol! <= 3 -~.ll:-a;",:::-- 'tt ~<~'tt:; . -=:'~--:-g~. .7"-z-",:-=~,'1I'5'tt ~;'g .. . ,...~.. .. ""<'..>. .... o. _ _ 0::: _ >>" "" : .:~-c;. ...;; ~11~-, 'tt:S :~..c:,g - . .,: '~11 .J:{ . ~"'.. .:: (j: ~..::I..s ~_ ~_. 0_- .~"'C CQ CD_ cu GoI_ 0''''0.... as : ;:,~,c - g ~;; a >>1': 2 2 :::!.. E ~ bOo '---0 eta c-"'_- c: II) o~ 0 E::s"C g,._ '::. ','. ~c-:':l'="tS-:1'tt..;;:...5 <l~ C:."lo.. o~ ~ ._:::'E~ a~1I:S.~e2~. ~<U.5:S~:; :, s-:a...-ao-c;' :'tt"~::::c:c:~_", .., E~.;c: ~o" 00 c: -." ...5-::::.. 0 '" '" '" . .__.- ...- -......"'....::;; --..... .~. - ;.::.,-...~.s;,;,~-='...c:.r::e;;. :~"iJoo . . :"I'~--; s:: CD .-cu e C"-"C .... s:: ><.0 S en -:':.~ClS:as::., .:::J!1J.-ClCUass::::Cl.I,.... s:::: ._~'tt-~'tt"Ot~~~>~c:.."l.. "'~:::-~':"'_c;;::I.. ~ 0" '. .. c: '''-;3 - - --.' ~ r~:," c:~~,.~~~~-~r:'s"::~",..o..'tt:.. : l1li"";', ':., -'ttb ',"0 c: c:~, .x E ",~'", ' ..:--.~~OClSs::.~!:!.D_~O 4IIGJ 0....:3 'i.. ::...-e,co:S"<l-C:::;r-'_..:s ~.;:;C" : ..c: 1:: ~ 8 ,1': ~- 3. ..c::> "'.. ,g . O~ . -0 g'R.. :::C:;::JA 11 ~ ~:S::I . ..0 >-.c.:S .::::;::11:< c:." ';;::l c:0 0"'-", 01,2;= :sr- ',2;", " 'tIiII ~ '-4 cu.i:i . s::: s::"'C ~~ 0 3 tI(l III c: '. o;~!l g~ 3~:, ~..o.~]~,g . 1': ... ~ 'E t.J _,g ..." ..c: < ~;:: ~ ~ : .Q,tQ,U);3 .>\Q) S::. ~s..~s::: C1.l ' , ., <. '. ']:J ~ b :~=: 11 ~'a...' ~.8 <U ~ ~ 2 . -~. :' --:g"C:f.<1 it{~-:;::....:;. 2 a"5::.:::: '" :.. '. . ;.0_ c:-?:>-"...::;; 0 f!-. 0::: o..'tt 1lO'tt -:: . ~."l~"3 ':'E-~'~~. ~:g..o3.5g .:.- Q;;" ....o;:'gA "'E tlOC: J::-" ;:<::2 ;:::::?..c: .:= ~.' . g.....0<<=:1...20. :=loi::"r-'~~ ~,. , '~.::1I~~':"::::O;>>:::l. ;S~=3'tt~ ;:::~: ,'~ :l-O;;~~S"::;;~~.!i1ii;-g~1I& .::: ., "07' .. .5E-:g e::c,.>>:a ~~. >.01:1. "" _ ... - ~ .. C.-.,. u - p u r;-o ::::;:J cu. CU 0 '" 0 . '.; i:::;;.::lli!. t.J,~".~~c...o =_ .', - - -- - ....-- _' r : ~. - ~'o-:s ;:r'::3! ~ =~ - . ~ ~~~. '~~ CD ~ - .: i~f~<:t~-g ~ l ~ . :-"(1)- "- "'::'.0 +-". ':. - _g.-;:.:s::.. :::::..0 P- .- ? ~:.:::::J CO '" ':.:;: ~'':"C,Q<O ~l) ~ 01 ~ '" .~~. : ~Q.; ~:~~~~ <:l'O:.'tl.it!~ >>:s A ::l ' . , - ~- '0' (jj--'::"5.-:f:~lr:~ ilt-O<U 0 "1 .. -i' .~. %'cu.~a;\orian~;;:~~":"7~~i.O:a ~~ 1l .j'.... ~ ~::I-(I)--C~O"':f-d7.a~:l C:'tt 0 f . ~~ ~C"_'~::;::~~~:lP=:i:;~.g:s~;. ~.--jt::l?oA~C:l~~-g::.te ~-o'g'g ~:g~ . '1iIii'-''''' ~~O>&:::~tlO.~e-'''!-<=:::l'tt;;::l '. ~... "- :so ....~ 0.'0" c: '" c:,<!; -~. .. .Q;fCJ):+-,:~ F.~~' :~e:::f" tl.!!!'tt-, ~ · _"'::'~CO;:co~ C::'~..-':I. 8 a.~':: 2'tt;. .-- ",:,"I!' 1..' --: ~: % :::_c....g- ...~ f: g....~ i::' '-. (.)'-::1 e>:.c;;r: CQ<:5o..c:"1I ::1'''::::1 '.-"Q t+= c;'~ ~ ~'tt g~E-<~ ~a~ '~~'O CO &i'~ ;~'5 O..o:::!< CITY OF DUBUQUE NOV 3 0 1998 TO: KYLE KRITZ ASSICIATE PLANNER CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA FROM: PAUL AND HELEN VARNER 2330 HIGH CLOUD DR DUBUQUE, IA DATE: 24 NOV 98 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING RECLASSIFICATION FROM AG AND C-3 TO C-3 PC, OFFICE SERVICES AND R-l. (AREA BETWEEN SUNNY SLOPES ADDITION & NW ARTERIAL) Helen and I want to go on record as opposing this zoning change as proposed by QHQ Properties and Mike Quagliano. The major objections that we have are the high-density commerical lots and most importantly the extension of Red Violet Drive with an outlet on the Arterial. The commercial development would spoil the tranquility of a highly populated residential area and the proposed Red Violet extension would drastically increase traffic volume and speed through a now quiet neighborhood. Also, the City of Dubuque is running short of residential lots and this area would be put to much better use as residential property. Sincerely, fJav.!} ~~ l~_ V~ Varner Paul P. and Helen I CITY OF DUBUQue NOV 3 0 1998 November 30, 1998 Zoning Advisory Commission Planning Services RE: Public Hearing December 2, .1998 Dear Zoning Commission: This letter is to inform you that, as a citizen of Dubuque County, I strongly object to OHO Properties proposal to make another Kennedy Road off ofthe Northwest Arterial. If the Arterial would have been constructed as it should have been, as overpasses and off ramps, this problem would have been resolved years ago. Therefore, I see no reason to add more congestion to this particular area and infringe upon the communities well being. Sincerely yours, O~,(Jrd X;h R. Dupont 13290 Sherrill Road Dubuque, IA 52002 " .. ----.. --------.-----.------. ---'-'- ._-----~_._-_...... ---~--------_._----~_.__. ------------~..__.._._...__._-._---~-_.- . . ,~~4~:::_~~~& r~~~~~~g/ c-d-r~~L ......nn_.. ..4~,Y..._ ..~..~~{~~...A<[{L~&.~~ a.dI~.~L/'-Y='_~" ',.. ' d, .,~L-~t-~~~_.~.....__~4L~_~~~~_._.__ L-CC-^P-zL--4(~~---L/ .6L ;b-/~ _!f~ ~.. ....,'. ,_I.t/?~ ... . 4. ... . ..... _.~'-L.~~~ --.~--~--~~-/~O-~~~_Z__~____._ --~~~~L. ______. --.-.-.---- G:.----------.- - __.u '..-.---?t::A---- -----. -------. .--------- -----.. ---~~'~r . -..~.._d~~.~ ~~__~____..-. ~~~~.~~- ~ . .~ ,---___.H_H___......~~_____~~-. c-l7,-iL-/cJ ~ G/}/J/w~)j-~~. L~~ . . . .-.--..--------- ..- . -- - :/' F" .. -.. - "7.... -..-------.----. -- uo, _"_n__ - __.... ___~_, ___ h ___ "n___.. _______ ... '_.. ~_.__ __ H JL ~ dt-~~~,~~ dv-c-~ /(.4L~ ~ ,tf?U'A~7l pZ ~~~~ ~ 4~~/. ~~-r4-.~.~~~d G/JU~~~... AJkr-v/ ~. . -- - .--_. y ~ '--~~ tU-L _~ ~waL .~~~~C[~<I~ ~~~ ar../~(..--il ?t4J ~L-t?--C.-{.(7(/ #?G c7Ju.-/ y<--f~~- ~~vt;, ~~~~'-'c.L~ .. .~~.~vZ;; ~~ ;;J4'l/7G ~~- /?~L " _ . __ u_.n____ _ _ ___ n__ y(/~~-LrP~~~~~~ c&.--t~C^-r d y--L~ ~h ~~..:~.. /~A~~~ 0C/~ TU/-C /~ ~.L~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 4..~~. .. .------- . . . .. .... 2-...... . r:J,;~ ~I -....---" . --... 6r - . - --;/: - ...zg f.l A - --- -- . - - - - . .. .IL-~J~~.~-~ . .Lff~f -/ -<-e-~ .~ "/ - ____nun. . --. -. . . 4u-L~/ \,k-_.-.:k?&~ ----- Zoning Advisory Commission Planning SetVices Department City Hall, Second Floor 50 W. 131h street Dubuque, IA 52001 Clly O~D lJ8'Uo: DE.'C 0 1 'l4: 1998 November 27, 1998 ----- Re: Rezoning ofland south of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. Zoning Advisory Commission Members: We are requesting that you deny the proposal by QHQ Properties/Mike Quagliano to rezone property from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District with Conditions to a PUD (planned Unit Development) with a PC (planned Commercial) and PR (planned Residential) zoning designation. After reviewing the Quality Properties development plan we are concerned about the following: 1. The extension of Red Violet Drive to connect with the Northwest Arterial. This will cause Red Violet to become a convenient short cut and bring unwanted heavy and commercial traffic through a quiet residential area. 2. The Office/Service classification which could result in buildings as high as 75 feet. 3. The proposed large shopping center and other commercial properties that will bring a large volume of traffic and congestion into the area. 4. Granting access to the Northwest Arterial - Even though only a right-in/right-out access is being proposed, it will be the cause of unnecessary traffic problems on the Northwest Arterial. 5. We feel the city has a limited nwnber of residential lots available at present but an ablUldance of commercial property. 6. Noise Level - At the very least, the sound barrier along the Northwest Arterial will need to be cut to extend Red Violet Drive causing traffic noise to be funneled into the area. We visited with many of the homeowners who live on Wildflower, Gabriel, and High Cloud and found that like ourselves many built their homes or moved to the area because it was a quiet residential area. Therefore, we are presenting the attached petition signed by many of our neighbors asking you to deny this request for rezoning. Sin~~. elY., . C ~/ . /7 / /....-/ Aff/[~~/r . ~{>- /" "J, 'I v .' _ /1 /' () ~;/ ,~~ fkA'--J~-~~ Bob & Linda Schmidt 2260 High Cloud Drive \Ve, the undersigned, object to the rezoning of the property south of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. We are requesting that the Zoning Advisory Commission deny the request to rezone property from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District with Conditions to a POO Plarmed Unit Development with a PC Planned Commercial and PR Planned Residential zoning designation. I -I J ':.-'}..- A....- ~~_ 2i~(/d x~rd'y" I ,/ - \",0 " ,\oR-V'- 'f-~~~~ " \ ,'---' . y; / 1/ \,0,',,1 ,,1/ -1/-,1 'I ' , I, , ;-! I \0' I ' i1/[ , "1: ' 11h .,: I~ ct L f "-,, I ''1~ 4-Ltb-L t.,,-Je7'- J U-t~1! (~ I u/ (~ Y..-, ( Hu-tL:..,\ ( .' \ -'~ ,,",,' ,/) ~ ---....l~ \ 0 _ 4t); ( ilL {lr' A;J{?{.l l"t NAME S~(C0c~ \\lv'VVSl () '/,' ~ ~C2f)'/' ",J, #1/Y ~ F AA . \~ ,II}! ;-. C(j; !~~'Xu L:)J- ~h~~ r\~\: ' 1Jf? '/ , JtU /\, q/i ') ~j z-ndt;h- i ,( , i C "l. j- '- ~ /' ; .' I , I ~ I' I : /, ~ lL ,i /../,^;....J t \, I' I tY, J '--" .....1...., i) -fJi ' ~' - 11'/ \. ) I - I ,.-----~ I ( '-/ /) / 'i. ,:., ._ . _ (/' I J,J\~ , --c "/~ '1_ (! Y L- --:1><7 / v v....,~1_ "J/ -_./ , I ADDRESS LI9t 9 ! t.:;-!(( nO~61? of? -J(1)'; ~;/~;~-a d ku t/L07z, ~ , / Ie -, i l I '\' \ (I~I ~ (?,-~L CL,tl C' ~- CL~'f/ ~ Jr, Lj 1 j~ J J}j/,,- '!J o;{!~-<-<-- ,^/?;~, 49 sC 'v,h L{) fLcWi: ~ 0 ( , 1;'16& Ii.!: ';cl1j~_~ ~ ~ -ik ,~, LI vi /) " - - ' ;/T (,;J~} : <..) _LJC.J ..r- Z-(.7f'__? Pi if 9~; 5" /~1,u-J.- LC~-" 9'S~ ((-/) ~ / "/7 /-)/ -"-- .' u -(.] -( (,! y /~ /'l L!~S~/"~LQ f)~. &' '. -:'CA' JJ !-( ,/ ' /', " , . "" ' " ' ,j Y'4",r ;'~,'iU- )J95~ 1..1 J /J 1:. - ;/"'l{) <. ,~ (;/ c U l I' t2 U 17 <:-.:""\ r f ;' ~ / / 7 75,'-" /--J 4... LL "', 'I -- I""'" '-f ';~( (<;' .i' ' " bLQ. KYL l.Li J..:.,r Ljr,~-'j &-aJr/e/ /J/ , ~- (~ " '\' ,. 'i...' i_' "1! ,~ -tA.rri'? / ; \( ~ , " ! /, ,y '_I I" (, . _ i) "1 ' ~ :" ,'I j, (7 f (.(Q ~ / ( i~ (l -- \ .( , ,/' 1\ (,1 C{ ;>7r, e J./~' We, the undersigned, object to the rezoning of the property south of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. We are requesting that the Zoning Advisory Commission deny the request to rezone property from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District \\'ith Conditions to a PUD Planned Unit Development \\'ith a PC Planned Commercial and PR Planned Residential zoning designation. ~} ~~- ., - i-:C -~ \_ \- '~1 -01 \ ,//7 /LJ _ ~--fjl-{;{'r/ -~ - J ~7~~~ ADDRESS ;f f C' Cj /l1t",- ~ ~/- #~{:z~c f . \ ".,.- - ...~~'"~ ~ ''f\ \JG71~. ~ ~~~ tV'~ (~\ ~..13 / C ~~.{ (!L'Uf~_ ~ ');)~c J)iC1 ( v'-\ / dd.. :> ,,- bVD ;/ (' - 7-/l1 C / pi< dI . . . Planning Services Department 50 West 13th Street . -Dubuque, 10W.1 52001-4864 DUB~JE ~~~ December 17, 1998 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 RE: Conceptual Development Plan - AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District, with conditions, to PUD Planned Unit Development with a PC Planned Commercial and PR Planned Residential zoning designations South of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial QHQ Properties Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The City of Dubuque Zoning Advisory Commission has reviewed the above-cited request. The application, staff report and related materials are attached for your revIew. Discussion The applicant, Mike Quagliano, spoke in favor of the request stating that the proposed development will provide for a mixture of commercial, office, residential, and open space land uses. The applicant indicated he would be dedicating approximately 2 acres to the City for a neighborhood park. The applicant requested direct access to the Northwest Arterial with a right-in, right- out only intersection approximately 1,740 feet south of the intersection of Asbury Road with the Northwest Arterial, as shown on the submitted conceptual development plan for the proposed planned unit development. Several neighboring property owners spoke in opposition to the request, stating they were concerned about increased traffic, noise and the negative impact on residential property values caused by the large area proposed for commercial development. A petition in opposition to the request was presented. Staff reviewed the proposed development and noted that City staff has developed two alternative street layouts for the proposed development. The alternatives were intended to address concerns expressed by the Public Works Director Mike Koch, Fire Marshall Scott Neyens, and neighboring property owners regarding the extension of Service Responsibility Teil Il1 work People Integrity Innoviltion The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members December 17, 1 998 Page 2 Red Violet Drive straight through to the Northwest Arterial. Alternative #2 was preferred by the applicant, neighbors and Zoning Advisory Commission members. The Zoning Advisory Commission discussed the request, reviewing the alternative street layouts, direct access to the Northwest Arterial, anticipated traffic volumes generated by the proposed development and the impact of that traffic on the Asbury Road/Northwest Arterial intersection. The Commission members discussed limitations on office building heights, screening requirements and emergency response time based on the alternative street layouts proposed. It was noted that the Fire Department was in the process of researching the relocation or establishment of a new fire station to address the growth on the City's west and south sides. Recommendation By a vote of 5 to 2, the Zoning Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council approve the request. Conditions recommended by the Commission are that: 1) There be no direct access between the residential and commercial portions of the development (alternative #2); 2) that office buildings be limited to two-stories in height; 3) that trees used for screening shall be a minimum of 5 feet in height at planting; and 4) that on-premise signage for commercial lots be limited to one freestanding sign per business, a maximum of 25 feet in height and 108 square feet in area. The conceptual development plan submitted to the City Council has been revised to reflect alternate #2. A simple majority vote is needed for the City Council to approve the request. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Jeff Stiles, Chairperson City Zoning Advisory Commission Attachments Planning Services Dep<lrtl11ent 50 W\!st 13th Street "Dubuque, IO\VJ 52001-4864 DUB~E ~~~ December 17, 1998 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 RE: Conceptual Development Plan - AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District, with conditions, to PUD Planned Unit Development with a PC Planned Commercial and PR Planned Residential zoning designations South of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial QHQ Properties Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The City of Dubuque Zoning Advisory Commission has reviewed the above-cited request. The application, staff report and related materials are attached for your revIew. Discussion The applicant, Mike Quagliano, spoke in favor of the request stating that the proposed development will provide for a mixture of commercial, office, residential, and open space land uses. The applicant indicated he would be dedicating approximately 2 acres to the City for a neighborhood park. The applicant requested direct access to the Northwest Arterial with a right-in, right- out only intersection approximately 1,740 feet south of the intersection of Asbury Road with the Northwest Arterial, as shown on the submitted conceptual development plan for the proposed planned unit development. Several neighboring property owners spoke in opposition to the request, stating they were concerned about increased traffic, noise and the negative impact on residential property values caused by the large area proposed for commercial development. A petition in opposition to the request was presented. Staff reviewed the proposed development and noted that City staff has developed two alternative street layouts for the proposed development. The alternatives were intended to address concerns expressed by the Public Works Director Mike Koch, Fire Marshall Scott Neyens, and neighboring property owners regarding the extension of Service People Integrity Responsibility Innov<ltion TeJ111 \\'ork The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members December 1 7, 1 998 Page 2 Red Violet Drive straight through to the Northwest Arterial. Alternative #2 was preferred by the applicant, neighbors and Zoning Advisory Commission members. The Zoning Advisory Commission discussed the request, reviewing the alternative street layouts, direct access to the Northwest Arterial, anticipated traffic volumes generated by the proposed development and the impact of that traffic on the Asbury Road/Northwest Arterial intersection. The Commission members discussed limitations on office building heights, screening requirements and emergency response time based on the alternative street layouts proposed. It was noted that the Fire Department was in the process of researching the relocation or establishment of a new fire station to address the growth on the City's west and south sides. Recommendation By a vote of 5 to 2, the Zoning Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council approve the request. Conditions recommended by the Commission are that: 1) There be no direct access between the residential and commercial portions of the development (alternative #2); 2) that office buildings be limited to two-stories in height; 3) that trees used for screening shall be a minimum of 5 feet in height at planting; and 4) that on-premise signage for commercial lots be limited to one freestanding sign per business, a maximum of 25 feet in height and 108 square feet In area. The conceptual development plan submitted to the City Council has been revised to reflect alternate #2. A simple majority vote is needed for the City Council to approve the request. Respectfully submitted, ~tb ~~ Jeff Stiles, Chairperson City Zoning Advisory Commission Attachments . . . Planning Services Department 50 West 13th Strect . -Dubuquc, Iowa 52001-4864 DUB~JE ~t/k.~ December 17, 1998 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 RE: Conceptual Development Plan - AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District, with conditions, to PUD Planned Unit Development with a PC Planned Commercial and PR Planned Residential zoning designations South of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial aHa Properties Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The City of Dubuque Zoning Advisory Commission has reviewed the above-cited request. The application, staff report and related materials are attached for your review. Discussion The applicant, Mike Quagliano, spoke in favor of the request stating that the proposed development will provide for a mixture of commercial, office, residential, and open space land uses. The applicant indicated he would be dedicating approximately 2 acres to the City for a neighborhood park. The applicant requested direct access to the Northwest Arterial with a right-in, right- out only intersection approximately 1,740 feet south of the intersection of Asbury Road with the Northwest Arterial, as shown on the submitted conceptual development plan for the proposed planned unit development. Several neighboring property owners spoke in opposition to the request, stating they were concerned about increased traffic, noise and the negative impact on residential property values caused by the large area proposed for commercial development. A petition in opposition to the request was presented. Staff reviewed the proposed development and noted that City staff has developed two alternative street layouts for the proposed development. The alternatives were intended to address concerns expressed by the Public Works Director Mike Koch, Fire Marshall Scott Neyens, and neighboring property owners regarding the extension of Service People> Integrity Responsibility Innoviltion Teillllwork The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members December 17, 1998 Page 2 Red Violet Drive straight through to the Northwest Arterial. Alternative #2 was preferred by the applicant, neighbors and Zoning Advisory Commission members. The Zoning Advisory Commission discussed the request, reviewing the alternative street layouts, direct access to the Northwest Arterial, anticipated traffic volumes generated by the proposed development and the impact of that traffic on the Asbury Road/Northwest Arterial intersection. The Commission members discussed limitations on office building heights, screening requirements and emergency response time based on the alternative street layouts proposed. It was noted that the Fire Department was in the process of researching the relocation or establishment of a new fire station to address the growth on the City's west and south sides. Recommendation By a vote of 5 to 2, the Zoning Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council approve the request. Conditions recommended by the Commission are that: 1) There be no direct access between the residential and commercial portions of the development (alternative #2); 2) that office buildings be limited to two-stories in height; 3) that trees used for screening shall be a minimum of 5 feet in height at planting; and 4) that on-premise signage for commercial lots be limited to one freestanding sign per business, a maximum of 25 feet in height and 108 square feet in area. The conceptual development plan submitted to the City Council has been revised to reflect alternate #2. A simple majority vote is needed for the City Council to approve the request. Respectfully submitted, -htb ~~ Jeff Stiles, Chairperson City Zoning Advisory Commission Attachments Planning Services Department 50 West 13th Street Dubuque, Iowa 52001-4864 DUB~E ~YN-~ December 1 5, 1 998 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall - 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 RE: Conceptual Development Plan - AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District, with conditions, to PUD Planned Unit Development with a PC Planned Commercial and PR Planned Residential zoning designations South of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial aHa Properties Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The City of Dubuque Zoning Advisory Commission has reviewed the above-cited request. The application, staff report and related materials are attached for your review. Discussion The applicant, Mike Quagliano, spoke in favor of the request stating that the proposed development will provide for a mixture of commercial, office, residential, and open space land uses. The applicant indicated he would be dedicating approximately 2 acres to the City for a neighborhood park. Several neighboring property owners spoke in opposition to the request stating they were concerned about increased traffic, noise and the negative impact on residential property values caused by the large area proposed for commercial development. A petition in opposition to the request was presented. Staff reviewed the proposed development and noted that city staff has developed two alternative street layouts for the proposed development. The alternatives were intended to address concerns expressed by the Public Works Director Mike Koch, Fire Marshall Scott Neyens, and neighboring property owners regarding the extension of Red Violet Drive straight through to the Northwest Arterial. Alternative #2 was preferred by the applicant, neighbors and Zoning Advisory Commission members. Service People Integrity Responsibility Innovation Teamwork \)QQ ~ ~b ? t.oUAS> ro>>;:....e &.6i.#-O--'" cQ ~ac02('~u ~) ~.. ~~_U) ~- GIJI"'C'~-( - O~j:tCiCL- Cdb.r r=A~ f, e\L:+s.. r~ ~d. . 1 i UL ~~ +j'-~~f<:~- k::C." 11,-" ~~ ~oij ")~J.~QN'~ ~ . \\\)\\<{)\\CJ 1 ~()\ 3 IJ }..\.\IJ 7\~3\ . ).\-.q';~ 10, '''J /.-v S\I\ . :1~ C6~' 't,'i.I II \ ~\\, ~ \ 'J -; 'd (\-~ t\ \ The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members December 1 5, 1 998 Page 2 The Zoning Advisory Commission discussed the request reviewing the alternative street layouts, anticipated traffic volumes generated by the proposed development and the impact of that traffic on the Asbury Road/Northwest Arterial intersection. The Commission members discussed limitations on office building heights, screening requirements and emergency response time based on the alternative street layouts proposed. It was noted that the Fire Department was in the process of researching the relocation or establishment of a new fire station to address the growth on the City's west and south sides. Recommendation By a vote of 5 to 2, the Zoning Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council approve the request. Conditions recommended by the Commission are that: 1) There be no direct access between the residential and commercial portions of the development (alternative #2); 2) that office buildings be limited to two-stories in height; 3) that trees used for screening shall be a minimum of 5 feet in height at planting; and 4) that on- premise signage for commercial lots be limited to one freestanding sign per business, a maximum of 25 feet in eight and 108 square feet in area. The conceptual plan submitted to the City Council has been revised to reflect alternate #2. A simple majority vote is needed for the City Council to approve the request. Respectfully submitted, ~S~~ Jeff Stiles, Chairperson City Zoning Advisory Commission Attachments . . . f , Pia n ni ng Services Depi1 rtmen t 50 West 13th Street "Dubuque, IOWJ 52001-4864 DUB~ ~~~ December 22, 1 998 Michael D. Quagliano QHQ Properties P.O. Box 1125 Quincy, IL 62306 Dear Mr. Quagliano: The City Council has set your request to rezone your property along Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial from AG and C-3 to PUD with PC and PR designations for public hearing on Monday, January 4, 1999. Please attend this meeting, or send a representative to the meeting in your place to present your request and answer questions. City Council meetings begin at 7:00 p.m. in' the Auditorium on the third floor of the Carnegie-Stout Public Library, 360 W. 11 th Street. The Zoning Advisory Commission recommended approval of your rezoning request with conditions. Iowa Code requires that the property owner agree to a conditional rezoning in writing prior to the City Council's public hearing. If you agree to the conditions placed on your rezoning as described in the enclosed ordinance and memorandum of agreement, please sign and date the enclosed acceptance form. Please return the enclosed ordinance, memorandum of agreement and acceptance form to City Clerk Mary Davis, City Hall, 50 W. 13th Street, by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, January 4, 1999, or bring the documents to the public hearing. Please contact the Planning Services Department at (319) 589-4210 if you need more information or have any questions. Sincerely, rL '~\a--JLv~~/dcL Laura Carstens Planning Services Manager Enclosures cc Mary Davis, City Clerk Service Pcople Integrity Rcsponsibility Innovation TCi1mwork . Prepared by: Laura Carstens. City Planner Address: City Hall. 50 W. 13th Street Telephone: 589-4210 ORDINANCE NO. -99 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A (THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY RECLASSIFYING HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST ARTERIAL AND ASBURY ROAD FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WITH CONDITIONS, TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH PC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND PR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS AND ADOPTING A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH CONDITIONS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA: . Section 1. Appendix A (the Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by reclassifying the hereinafter described property from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District, with conditions, to PUD Planned Unit Development District with PC Planned Commercial District and PR Planned Residential District designations and adopting a conceptual development plan, a copy of which is attached to and made a part hereof, with conditions as stated below, to wit: Lot 1 of QHQ Place and Lot 2 of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4, Section 20, Township 89 North, Range 2 East and to the center line of the adjoining public right-of-way, all in the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 2. Pursuant to Iowa Code Section 414.5 (1993), and as an express condition of the reclassification, the undersigned property owner agrees to the following conditions, all of which the property owner further agrees are reasonable and imposed to satisfy the public needs that are caused directly by the zoning reclassification: A. Use Regulations. The following regulations shall apply to all land uses in the above described PUD District: . . ORDINANCE NO. Page 2 -99 1) Principal permitted uses of the lots designated for commercial development shall be limited to: . · General offices--[4J. · Medical office/c1inic--[36J. · Dental/medicallab--[8J. · Personal services--[14]. · Barber/beauty shops--[ 16]. · Motel--[24J. · Gas station--[18]. · Retail sales/service--[ 1 7J. · Laundry/dry cleaner--[19]. · Shoe repair--[18J. · Bakery (wholesale/commercial)--[ 1 9J. · Indoor restaurant--[20J. · Bar/tavern--[20J. · Automated gas station--[ 18]. · Service station--[21 J. · Supermarket--[17]. · Tailoring/alterations--[18]. · Furniture/home furnishing--[27J. · Appliance sales/service--[27J. · Catalog center--[23J. · Drive-in/carry-out restaurant--[28]. · Drive-up automated bank teller--[8J. · Self-service carwash--[8J. · Neighborhood shopping center--[ 1 7J. · Business services--[29]. · Department stores--[17J. · Banks/savings and loans, and credit unions--[31 J. · Indoor amusement center--[37]. · Vending/game machine sales and service--[19J. · Indoor recreation facilities--[37]. · Mail-order houses--[23]. · Lumberyards/building materials sales--[19]. · Printing/publishing--[32]. · Full-service carwash--[8]. · Auto sales/service--[38]. · Motorcycle sales and service--[41]. · Local shopping center--[ 17]. . . . . ORDINANCE NO. Page 3 -99 2) Principal permitted uses of the lots designated for office development shall be limited to: 1) Residential uses above the first floor only--[6]. 2) General office--[14]. 3) Artist studios--[5]. 4) Medical offices/clinics, less than 5,000 sq. ft.--[36]. 5) Dental and medicallabs--[8]. 6) Personal services--[14]. 7) Barber/beauty shop--[16]. 8) Schools of private instruction--[ 4]. 3) Principal permitted uses of the lots designated for residential development shall be limited to: 1) Single-family residential dwelling (detached)--[ 11]. 2) Churches, convents and monasteries--[7]. 3) Cemeteries, mausoleums and columbariums--[47]. 4) Public and private/parochial schools approved by Iowa State Board of Public Instruction (K-12)--[1 0]. 5) Public or private parks, golf courses, or similar natural recreation areas--[ 47]. 4) Accessory uses shall include any use customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use it serves. [ ] Parking group--see Section 4-2 of the Zoning Ordinance. B. Lot and Bulk Regulations. Development of land in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1) All building structures and activities shall be located in accordance with provisions of the PUD District regulations of this ordinance and of Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2) All buildings and structures located on lots designated for commercial development shall meet bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance for the C-3 General Commercial District, Section 3-3.3(F). . . . ORDINANCE NO. Page 4 -99 3) All buildings and structures located on lots designated for office development shall meet bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance for the C-3 General Commercial District, Section 3-1 .1 (F), except that all office buildings shall be limited to two stories in height. 4) All building and structures located on lots designated for planned residential development shall meet bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance for the R-1 Single-Family Residential District, Section 3-1.1 (F). C. Performance Standards. The development and maintenance of uses in this PUD District shall be established in conformance with Section 3-5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and the following standards: 1) Proposed public streets within the Planned Unit Development District shall be designed and built to City Engineering specifications. 2) Erosion control shall be provided during all phases of construction. 3) Parking requirements for allowed uses in the PUD District shall be as per the parking group for the designated use, in accordance with Section 4-2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4) Sidewalks shall be provided adjoining all public streets. 5) Storm water detention facilities will be provided as per City Engineering requirements. 6) Adequate illumination shall be provided to areas used for vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Light fixtures shall be of a cut-off design and be mounted at a 90 degree angle to a vertical light standard. 7) The conceptual plan shall serve as the preliminary plat for the PUD District. Subdivision plats and improvement plan shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 42, Subdivision Regulations, of the City of Dubuque Code of Ordinances. 8) Final site development plans shall be submitted in accordance with Section 4-4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dubuque, Iowa, prior to construction of any buildings. . . . ORDINANCE NO. Page 5 -99 D. Open Space and Landscaping Open space and landscaping in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1 . A screen of deciduous and evergreen trees shall be planted adjacent to Asbury Court Place to act as a buffer between the proposed commercial/office developments and the adjacent existing residential development. The trees shall be planted concurrently with the grading and platting of the lots adjacent to Asbury Court Place Subdivision and be a minimum of 5 feet in height at planting. 2. Those areas not designated on the conceptual plan for development shall be maintained as open space, as defined by Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance, by the property owners and/or association. E. Sign Regulations. Signs in the PUD District shall be regulated as follows: 1) Signage for the lots designated for commercial development shall be regulated by the C-3 General Commercial District sign regulations of the Zoning Ordinance Section 4-3.11, except that each lot shall be limited to one (1) freestanding sign a maximum of 25 feet high and 108 square feet In size. 2) Signage for the lots designated for office development shall be regulated by the OS Office Service District sign regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 4-3.11 . 3) Signage for the lots designated for residential development shall be regulated by the R-1 Single-Family Residential District sign regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 4-3.11. 4) Variance requests from sign requirements for size, number and height shall be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Adjustment in accordance with Section 5-3 of the Zoning Ordinance. F. Transfer of Ownership Transfer of ownership or lease of property in this PUD District shall include in the transfer or lease agreement a provision that the purchaser or lessee acknowledges awareness of the conditions authorizing the establishment of the PUD District. . . . ORDINANCE NO. Page 6 -99 G. Reclassification of Subiect Property. The City of Dubuque, Iowa, may initiate zoning reclassification proceedings to the AG Agricultural District in accordance with Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance if the property owner fails to complete or maintain any of the conditions of this ordinance. H. Modifications. Any modifications of this Ordinance must be approved by the City Council in accordance with zoning reclassification proceedings of Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. I. Recording. A copy of this ordinance shall be recorded at the expense of the property owner with the Dubuque County Recorder as a permanent record of the conditions accepted as part of this reclassification approval within ten (1 O) days after the adoption of this ordinance. This ordinance shall be binding upon the undersigned and his/her heirs, successors and assigns. Section 3. The foregoing amendment has heretofore been reviewed by the Zoning Commission of the City of Dubuque, Iowa. Section 4. The foregoing amendment shall take effect upon publication, as provided by law. Passed, approved and adopted this _ day of , 1999. Terrance M. Duggan, Mayor ATTEST: Mary A. Davis, City Clerk COUNCIL\ORD\qhq.pud . . . ORDINANCE NO. Page 7 -99 ACCEPTANCE OF ORDINANCE NO. -99 I, Michael D. Ouagliano, representing OHO Properties, property owner, having read the terms and conditions of the foregoing Ordinance No. -99 and being familiar with the conditions thereof, hereby accept the same and agree to the conditions required therein. Dated this _ day of , 1999. By Michael D. Ouagliano OHO Properties .. . CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA OFFICIAL NOTICE NOTICE is hereby given that the Dubuque City Council will conduct a public hearing on Monday, January 4, 1999 at a meeting to commence at 7:00 P.M. in the Public Library ,{ Auditorium for the purpose to consider an Ordinance reclassifying property located at L1' ~v------- Southwest corner of the Northwest Arterial and Asbury Road from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District, with conditions, to PUD Planned Unit Development District with PC Planned Commercial District and PR Planned Residential District designations and adopting a Conceptual Development Plan, with Conditions. (Copy of proposed Ordinance is on file in the City Clerk's Office and may be viewed during normal working hours.) Written comments regarding above reclassification may be submitted to the City Clerk on or before time of public hearing. At said time and place of public hearing, all interested citizens and parties will be given an opportunity to be heard for or against said reclassification. Any visual or hearing impaired persons needing special assistance or persons with special accessibility needs should contact the City Clerk's Office at (319) 589-4120 or TOO (319) 589-4193 in the Human Rights Department at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Published by order of the City Council given on the 21 st day of December, 1998. It 12/25 Mary A. Davis CMC City Clerk .DEC-16-98 WED 04:53 PM TELEGRAPH HERALD FAX NO. 3195885782 P. 02 .. CITY OF DUBUQUE. IOWA OFFICIAL NOTlCI! NOrlCE is hereby givon thllt (he Dubuque City Cl)unciJ will conduct ~ public hlllaring on Mondny, J3nulllY 4, 1999 llt 11 meelin!) 10 commence at 7;00 P.M. In tho Public Librwy AlldHorlllm for the purpose 10 con5ider an OrdInance reel as- slrylng property 10c!'Iled at Southwesl corner or the Northwasl Atl"ril:llllnd kbllry Road from AG Agrioullural Dislricl and 0-3 General Commercial Dislric:l, wilh conditions, to PUD Planned Utlil DQVQIO~h'1nnt !1i3tricl wilh PC Plannor..l COmtllClre;!al Oil:. triot and PR Planned Residen- lio1l Olslricl designalions and <.'Idoplin!;l <1 ConceptulIl Oe""I- opmenl Pl~n. with Conditions. (Copy of prolJoSl!d Ordinance is on file III U'B Clly Clerk's Orric" find may be viewed durlno normnl working hours.) Wrlllen comments regarding nbove recl!\ssllicllllon may be submllled 10 Ihe Clly Clerk on or before limo of public hellr- ing, At said time and place or rlllbllc hearino, all interesled cililGnS ;Jnd parlies will be oiven an opporlunity 10 be ha:ltd for or Dgainsl said re- eli'l~$illc<lllon, Any vi!li\lal or h~~rina im- paired parsol1s IHIIOtJil1g spa. cial assistance or persons with spacial acce&siuilily neads should contact tho Clly Clark's OUice at (319) 589.4120 or TOO (319) 589.4193 in the Human Alghts Department at feasl fiB hours prior 10 the I'neeling, Published by order 01 the City Council given on Ulll 2191 day of Decembor, 1998, M::IIY A. Davis CMC Oily Clerk q (~'dLQ ~ I U if , vrlj~"/ I 11 1 2/25 P \98\165\CIV\SDSK\98165-00 ',\?:. ,'::\'.:;', \5:~o(\;:':::- c::: ::;....:; ;- I _ :: ~ \JO;U~8 c~G;:!~ ~z6n~ n [Tl ~ Sri UlZ n ;U\J:::!~)> Of)~~r:- ~ [Tl ., 0.. ~ ::E -...JnN ~-...Ji.,.,;u~ -< . [Tl lD .. lJl ~ Ul Q)~n , n;U lJl;U[Tl ~[TlVJ nUl---.. ;U N [Tl lJl Ul > :1J ~ ~ '" ..... '.. o f~ VI n :1J ~ 6 ." ~g 9 fTlN -- gg ~ I I 'i f'lf'lo '" VI 1l I~ ~ ".. f'l ;~g Z -< Z ~ ;; I~ Q f'lf'l ::( ~, 0 ::(." 'Tl o VI 0 'Tlf'l C n CD 0' C ~ ti g C. f'l o . ~; (5 . '" ~ - > oz ~; ::: > 0 ~ '" f'l VI ~ n ;U [Tl VJ -0 ;::0 o -0 o (J) ('T1 \0 I~ ~ '('T1 o ~ (J) ~ l::j o z r o --i Ul ;U I I II ~ 0 ~ M ~ m ~ ~ :t ;:l ~ ':l I o ~ ~W ~ I~ ~ ~ . IIV' . . tf,scons,n 10..0. 111''''0'5, dwg 09 08: 43: 18 \~ed Dee 1998 o ::E )> '. 'Yo 5-..5:~ ~Z'5 7 . /1/ b' A . '_,._....,_, ,/ .1 1 /4-;."..... I d,i /' "q- ...' .-c~_ ......................- "d?........; !:.{~fJ.Gr Gfjfrf I ~q'";~.:. "'a.-:.~ ~' 0 .f' ~C;..~....... ~ /O.?:.:r i /a-:,"'.... J /o.r.,-;Y (~1ST""F lClt<INc: ,R_, <:::::.. ". I "<:.. ''''- '~..-2.'" ..0....... -~. "0___ .-~:..:., '=.-- , I i ~t., "<:.., .tJ.o, _, ~q:.~ p - - - .'-::S'>o.~ .~- l'.t .... '~!----....~/ .r- .'~...::.....::.... '. lS~ <"C\\,..," ''''__~ '. '<:. ' . -- '~'I/-, / '=___ .", , ...... I ~_-", ~ ~ ", .-i I' ~ I 1,-. .::~__~~ .~ ~ " ::- ox c; ox n .... [; , '" c 'I c '" ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ " ".OUT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J /. . .. ~ . ~ ~ ~ \ ON OfOU~ o"rY Of- .ASBURY Vl N ~ ~ :_~ '<"- is '"", ~ ~ ~~ I "'0 : 11,'t : ~~ ' N~ !ic .~~ . OTl':~~~ Dry Of" ();9JOU( ~Q Z~ :~ i;:j~ o z ~ ~ "" ~ ~ ~ .0__--:;_~ 'q._~- .~:..... .0___....... bQ' "'0.,,: .---=........-.-.. '" ..c.....--;~ ~ ~ ~!. -- ~ ~ life . '" '. ~, '< .0__.....__ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ :'" ~ is ~ > "". . .I!o". ~ ~ ~ ~ / ,.. t~ /--iG' ~ ~ ~i:t> ~ ~ ., '. ,\l 'I '., WILD FtO>l!R DRIVE d ~ ""- (/ ~ ~ f. ~ ~ ~ is ~ ~ L '-" ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ '~ aRm -.." 60' RQ\;t ,~ C .r '-"~ ~ :.0' """ .r ~ ~ ~ Ll '"' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ 4 ~ ;0. IWlfORO RQAD ~ ~ /' ~ ., ~ 1>lIUGIfT ORlYE :.0' RW '" ~ ~ ~~ ~ v ". ~ ~ -"", '-" ., ~ ~"\ ~ ~ ~. -<... " ~ ~ ~ ~ '" I .... " ~ AS8URY <:::::.. '^' -.." COURT rt.ACE Ii ,~ ~ q ~ '-" '" '^' ~ ~ .: M ~ i ~ ~ ~ ---- ~ ~ ~ ~. '4. \ --~--..-f.. ;:~ \\ , \ ~ ,: : ;~"0l ~ ~j\::~ ~ , :: !tl~ ~ l .~ ~. ~~ !: : '. ;0 , , ' ..,' ,: "\' I "'. ,Lr~lr~ \ .~., -(.. ,I .' , ; 02,J~.:j!/ .. '. . '0/,:,-::,/,%,\,,=.. , \ :J'qJ~/5'1>>)~<~~0<~d0':-{ " ,,!_; /{?g{~\J}<>(f1~L~ ' \~q0~:~~:I.~. :\~:~,~-- o A D ( /' c,~ II , NCINEEHS ~j I~VEYOHS S U G' ",n'<,.. fA I" ...cn,e C~lcno, II.. _ t1~ ':1~~ Pef'l~~. 5;OO~.e HOltl Cree". ~.1~9)Q5~5 - 2454 ,'" ~~~;~;"Il i /,.!AZA PC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL PROPERTIES QUALITY UE IOWA UUI3UQ , PLAN I"u.d ru<, SSIO~IT^l ZOr-;lNG COMJ!L._~, COUNCIL AGL"lJA :, ~ " \ '\ , ~ 11-10-96 ~~ nlSte Ura.." U,: Cheded. B,: .0-:.... ~ .: ~ ~ JI'I\ CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM December 30, 1998 TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager FROM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager '~ SUBJECT: Over 20% Opposition to PUD Request of QHQ Properties This memo is to inform the Mayor and City Council Members that the Planning Services staff have received letters and petitions in opposition from owners of more than 20% of the land within 200 feet of the PUD Planned Unit Development request of OHO Properties. The proposed rezoning is for land at the southwest corner of Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial. Consequently, a super majority (3/4) vote of the City Council is now required to approve the request PUD rezoning of OHO Properties after the public hearing on Monday, January 4, 1999. cc Mary Davis, City Clerk Barry Lindahl, Corporation Counsel Tim Moerman, Assistant City Manager Mike Ouagliano, OHO Properties 1 -, , I ) -<~( L/ tC~l f. vtj UtfC( ~ltf'~(<Jf,-!" t?- ~ 1/3/97 l, 1 , , titZtL 4/-' //Ut-"'Lr r-/L-t'/~:2~f hI ~ ;dc'h~/ ~'~ j;"JaFl. tv,,- {Le, tlVUlt~/ i" d/tl ~~ ,h'<ert//77Uidl'" 7- ~ ~U .~ 74L /;/ tv ajJ~~ Chv( ~~ it. "'-<<. ~4 aNt ~~-Zl:_ ~t1~~ c~~"~/+"<1'r . / . / . 1 1 .-;L 1 / .' L l/'4kc~1 Uteff Cet t,;u,::t.y ;;U0..~ .:t-<<-<- ;:7N->>w&- Ji/j<<P-/ 4v6 (t~'&' tT~ ;;~ /l~~/ U/~ iiu~~:i. v4Ui4 J"'Z.~h'~ a,,1 14 cU) J4 .1",,;;1':;2/ {L.J ./ll<./L?t.Ra4<J~~,., dc" i7t;~ .' J/;~ /.x:t{~ A^&--~ II/ tJ tz1:1 cL~ cf1! ~<.e4rU2-v~- 1 ! j~~1p-2~~ , L-1/7/'~ t<<- LI!!rt?~C{ '- /Jd/ r)f"IL.,~~ ;?7c?' at ,~ 12t~L( < ~.;<eo/ .' 6 l CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM December 28, 1998 TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager FROM: Laura Carstens, Planning Services Manager ~ SUBJECT: PUD Proposal for aHa Properties Site Introduction This memo transmits information for consideration by the City Council at their January 4, 1999 public hearing on the PUD Planned Unit Development proposal for the aHa Properties site at the southwest corner of Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial. Planning Services and Engineering staff have received a number of inquiries related to the future land use suggested for this site in the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed right-in/right-out access to the Northwest Arterial. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan suggests that the future land use for this site include "substantial commercial development buffered from single-family and multi-family residential by park and open space with access to Asbury Road." The Comp Plan systems map shows commercial use along Asbury Road, multi-family residential development along the Northwest Arterial, and a future street connection from Asbury Road to Radford Road. The Comp Plan is intended to serve as a guide for development. As a guide, the Plan cannot foresee all possible development options. Consequently, in 1996- 1997, the City reviewed land use and access of vacant property along the Northwest Arterial. The City subsequently established a process to review access and development requests that differ from the Comp Plan. (aHa Properties has followed this process with the PUD proposal.) Arterial Access Access to the Northwest Arterial is not available to any property in the corridor as a matter of right. The City's policy, supported by the Comp Plan, is that access to property in the Northwest Arterial Corridor will be provided via the other major . .' PUD Proposal for aHa Properties Site Page 2 streets in the corridor. If the City Council approves access to the Northwest Arterial after the review process is completed, the minimum allowable spacing of access points is 1,000 feet. It is important to note that this does not mean that access must be allowed every 1,000 feet, but that it could be allowed. The Northwest Arterial also is under the jurisdiction of the Iowa Department of Transportation as State Highway 32. Access requests must be approved by the lOOT as well as the City Council. The PUD proposed by aHa Properties includes a mix of commercial and office uses along Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial, buffered from single-family residential by open space. aHa Properties proposes a right-in/right-out access to the Northwest Arterial about 1,740 feet from Asbury Road. City staff also have had inquiries about access to the Northwest Arterial for the 1 60-acre vacant property at the southeast corner of the Northwest Arterial and Asbury Road. Arterial access to this vacant property would be limited to directly across from the aHa Properties site (if access is approved), due to the 1,000-foot spacing requirement. Engineering staff have determined that aHa's proposed right-in/right-out access to the Northwest Arterial assists in maintaining an acceptable level of service at the intersection of Asbury Road and the Northwest Arterial based on the amount of commercial land use proposed. If the commercial acreage in the PUD proposal is reduced, and replaced with a land use that generates less traffic, access to the Northwest Arterial is not necessary. Asbury Road can accommodate the PUD traffic if the commercial land use is reduced in area. If the City Council chooses to consider a different land use mix for this PUD proposal, then the City Council typically has referred the revised proposal back to the Zoning Advisory Commission for consideration. Conclusion This memo is provided for informational purposes. cc Mike Koch, Public Works Director Kyle Kritz, Associate Planner Mike auagliano, aHa Properties LC/dd ~ Mr. Michael C. Van Milligan 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque, IA 52001 o -- c,......, ~' CD \,.,.... .#./ c: -1 -, 0-<--" c c> . rr1 r- . . CJ _fTlJ> 0:::0< ~^- J> (J) .. CD ex:> D rr"1 C"") r'0 CD ..". ,__ ,.c;,,~ _A....I December 21, 1998 -0 ::3 I--' .-' t~~ Re: Rezoning of land south of Asbmy Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. o r'fl 00 Dear Mr. Van Milligan: We are requesting that you deny the proposal by QHQ PropertieslMike Quagliano to rezone property from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District with Conditions to a PUD (planned Unit Development) with a PC (planned Commercial) and PR (Planned Residential) zolUng designation. After reviewing the Quality Properties development plan we are concerned about the following: 1. Unwanted noise and debris - from the commercial businesses and the Northwest Arterial after the removal of the natural barrier that exists along it. 2. The glaring light produced from the signs and commercial businesses, such as the Hardees and Culver area north of this property. 3. Granting access to the Northwest Arterial- Even though only a right-in/right-out access is being proposed, it will be the cause of unnecessary traffic problems on the Northwest Arterial. 4. Traffic congestion at the comer of the Northwest Arterial and Asbmy Road. As suggested at the Zoning Commission meeting, it may take 2-3 lights to get through the intersection. Traffic corning from Asbmy going east will surely cut through the commercial district to get to the Northwest Arterial and cause even more problems for traffic traveling on the arterial. 5. We feel the city has a limited number of residential lots available at present and would like to see this zoned residential as the city comprehensive plan suggests. 6. We feel property in the SunnyslopelEmbassy West subdivisions would be devalued. 7. Water run-off from many buildings and paved parking areas will be an enormous burden to several areas including Asbmy Place, the drainage ditch on the west side of the Northwest Arterial, and the north fork of Catfish Creek which goes to the Keyway Drive area. We previously lived in that area and know how often the city has had to pump when there was a heavy rain. If you have not viewed this site, we encourage you to do so before the date of the public hearing in order to fully understand our concerns mentioned above and make a sound decision on this matter. We visited with many of the homeowners who live on Wildflower, Gabriel, High Cloud, and Camelot Drive, while getting petitions signed, and found that like ourselves many built their homes or moved to the area because it was a quiet residential area. Therefore we are asking you to deny this request for rezoning. J3;cerVd~ ~~ Bob & Linda Schmidt 2260 High Cloud Drive VMOI '3nOnSnO )OBl8 ),,118 SI^'1(] '''f ) ~W\t'1 00 1 Wd 62 830 86, 0_".;' .:ll\ .'-', , I i' -i t1 . December 29, 1998 Ron Paisley 4781 Asbury Ct. PI. Dubuque, IA 52002 To: Dubuque City Council Subject: Zoning Change QHQ Properties I am writing to you about my concerns on the proposal to change the zoning of the QHQ properties located at Asbury and N.W. Arterial from the planned R1 - R3 to C3 - PC. Traffic: Is becoming an increasing problem on Asbury and the NW Arterial. This development would only add to the problems of the intersection and traffic flow. Plan for traffic! Don't let a developer profit margin determine our roads. Quality of Neighborhoods: The increased noise, traffic and lights would distract from the established neighborhood and change quality of life for the families who call this our home. Look at the Hardee's lights and flashing signs. Is this what we have to look forward to in our neighborhoods? Green Space: Developers designation of green space as a buffer zone. An example of a developer use of a buffer zone is the road east of the Resurrection Cemetery. There is a total disregard for the existing Cemetery. I can sit on my fathers gravestone at night and read a book by the lights of the fast food burger joint. Schools: Resurrection School is .5 miles away and Dubuque Community is planning to build a middle school in Asbury. We have to think of the future ofthis neighborhood not only in commercial development but maintaining the neighborhood for our children. I believe this land would better benefit the neighborhood and the future development of this area by maintaining the R1- R3 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. ~V~ Ron Paisley I!u C:1 1C;~7/fJ? 1: 7;tJ! 4/1-'1' . ~. Larry weitz ~.~ Sign Systems Inc. 2400 KERPER BLVD. P.O. BOX 607 DUBUQUE, IA 52004-0607 (319)556-5316 TOll FREE NATIONWIDE 800-383-1300 FAX (319)582-8064 12fl9198 '=' -,- C -"" CD ("") ~. c: ~ ...'-: o -< -c. r'0 CO:L. (D rrJ _. . n, C.J -0 o::u~ 3 ~^- 1> (f) .. ~:.o CJ rT1 CJ - -1'1 f 1 : ,.........-.,. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Dubuque City Hall 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque IA 52001 t---' ..- 1........ o s'''rl o c..-:J RE: Sign Regulations Conceptual Development Plan QHQ Properties Northwest Arterial area Dear Mayor and City Council Members: I would like to address a few comments for your consideration while reviewing the signage regulations for the above cited development. This area has been designated as a PUD with a PC Planned Commercial designation. It is my understanding however, that although the area has all of the traits of a C-3 district, including the statement that the signage shall be regulated by the C-3 General Commercial District sign regulations, the actual regulations for signs more closely resemble those of the C-2 and C-4 commercial districts. I do not see the logic in having a zoning regulation for signs for specific districts, and then changing it capriciously. This area is to be developed as a commercial area, with all of the needs and requirements that any heavy commercial area will need. The signs are an important part of this. To limit the height, number, and size of the signs to that of a more restricted zone does not make sense. I understand the root cause of this downsizing in the regulations was the comment that "we don't want this to be another Kennedy Road". I'm not sure what that means, but I'll take a wild guess that it is directed at the signs. This in spite of the fact that the signs are only a result of basically uncontrolled development on the Kennedy Road corridor, which is reflected in relatively small lots, subdivided into smaller lots, numerous curb cuts, and "0" setback of the property from the traveled portion of the corridor. I' 2. ., / I i ' i. ( . MEMBER ~ S1CN...SSOC....llOlol . tOwa..... AaaocIATION d1 IlllOlOlSSlOH - . Page 2 December29,1998 This is not the case at all with the NW Arterial. The lots are larger, there is only one or two curb cuts to the area (with access to properties coming from frontage type roads, and a substantial setback of the properties from the traveled portion of the roadway. To limit the signs to anything less than normal C3 regulations seems to me to handicap the businesses attempting to locate and thrive in this area. I think that we can all agree that the survival, and in fact flourishing, of these businesses is, or should be, paramount in developing commercial areas. Construction employment, permanent employment, and municipal tax revenues from any type of business development should be of the utmost concem to the Mure of Dubuque. Why start these businesses out at a disadvantage to market and advertise their product and location, with new regulations less than what is normally afforded similar commercial areas. We have a sign ordinance that has worked well for many years. It has been fair and equitable. It is not perfect of course, and there have been instances over the years where minor amendments have been made, and where variances have been sought on occasion. The occasions, though, have been very infrequent. The proposed regulations for this district do mention that variances are an option, but do we really want to write a regulation with the immediate remedy is a variance? I think everyone's time and money can be better spent on other things. I would like you to reconsider this part of the development plan, and adopt the C3 sign regulations as the goveming doctrine, with the following specific items incorporated into this regulation: 1) 2) Maximum sign square footage to be 2QO-sq. ft. for a single sign. Maximum number of freestanding signs to be limited to 2 per premises, with the height of 1 freestanding sign to be limited to 40', and the ild freestanding sign be restricted to a "monumenf type sign on the frontage road entrance to the business premises. The height of this monument sign will be limited to 10'. If all of the other regulations are adhered to, including building heights, setbacks, sign spacing, sight triangle requirements, etc., I believe that these sign regulations will help to provide the true Planned Commercial look that is intended. Thank you for your consideration. o -;r C ~ roOl> C ---I :;:t: 10 -< -<; C 0 J> rT1 I . ~rT1G 0::01> ~^< 1> (j) .. co """ (-~ co ~ CJ r-., CJ l'0 co rr'l MSINC. ..".'.""""" LJ :3 ..,...."" ........- I---> ,.,;~ o r'll o CJ Dear Sir, As a resident of Sunnyslope developement I ~uest your vote against rezoning request of Quality Properties. This piece of property should remain zoned as was intended in the city land use plan. It is basically bordered on three sides by residential properties. The area of homes are in the $150,000 to $200,000 plus range. A neighborhood developed as a residential area. People enjoy the residential atmosphere and wanted to build in an area of the same.A commercial developement in this area with the lay of the land and close proximity of the arterial make this the beginning of another Kennedy Road. We also value our property values and the neighbor hood setting as it is. We have an abundance of vacant office and commercial space now. Why would the city approve more when we need more available single family lots for people to build upon. The city has a long term land use plan on their books that we looked at as we decided to build and where to build. These are factors we considered before making our decisions. We have an area directly to the north already approved for this type of developement and we believe this is the best situation for all concerned. We thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. S~h~ l{, ct. c '-- 4..~ \), \S \& Dear Sir, <i~~i 'vJ~!Jj As a resident of Sunnyslope developement I erquest your vote against rezoning request of Quality Properties. This piece of property should remain zoned as was intended in the city land use plan. It is basically bordered on three sides by residential properties. The area of homes are in the $150,000 to $200,000 plus range. A neighborhood developed as a residential area. People enjoy the residential atmosphere and wanted to build in an area of the same. A commercial developement in this area with the lay of the land and close proximity of the arterial make this the beginning of another Kennedy Road. We also value our property values and the neighbor hood setting as it is. We have an abundance of vacant office and commercial space now. Why would the city approve more when we need more available single family lots for people to build upon. The city has a long term land use plan on their books that we looked at as we decided to build and where to build. These are factors we considered before making our decisions. We have an area directly to the north already approved for this type of developement and we believe this is the best situation for all concerned. We thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. ~\~~ 47 i2 U\rV\i ~ T ])uvsu6(V~~ ~ 1....-0 () L- ~ \.~ 01Y^' 27 December 1998 Paul Engelberth 4712 Camelot Dr. Dubuque,IA 52002 Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager 50 W. 13th Street Dubuque,IA 52001 Mr. Van Milligen: As a resident of the Embassy West subdivision in the city of Dubuque, I would request that you consider strongly a vote against the rezoning request of Quality Properties. I feel that the property bordered by Embassy West, Sunny Slopes and Asbury residential areas should remain as zoned as currently defined by the city land use plan. The current plan allows for what I feel is a reasonable amount of commercial property to match a residential community. Please consider saving this land for residential development and direct commercial development to the area north of Asbury road that is already zoned to support that type of development. In addition, I am concerned about the volume of runoff from storms and the effect on the retention area behind my house. I have lived at my current address for over 4 years and each summer there is at least one large storm that causes the water to build up behind the Arterial. The deepest that I have seen it is over 8 ft deep. The elevation of my home is such that the water will flow over the Arterial before threatening my basement, but the water covers a very large area in retention basin. The addition of commercial building and parking areas will cause this to be much worse. It is also important to note that the volume of water that did manage to make it under the Arterial caused flooding and damage to houses located on the east side of the road. Thank you for your consideration. Paul Engelberth );(?./~ V j ;.: ~~ /c~.,-?'~/~" 01... ( < /tFA - Sent by: CITY OF DUBUQUE 319 589 4149j 12/30/98 15:33j ~ #515jPage 1/1 December 28.1998 Michael C. VaIl Milligen City Ma~ OOW.131tist DUbUque, Iowa 62001 Dear: Mr. Van MlIIlgen I'm MUng you this letter to voice rrPi oppo&ltlon to a proposed AtZOI'Iing d land at the South of A1buty Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. On City COuncil agenda J8"1uary 4'" 1999. In October of 1997 rrPi 'Nife Mary Kay, and chiltbn Tyler and Ashley purd1ased lot 18 of ~ SIcpes (~3 Twilight Drive). Prior to purchase I rwlewed the zoning c;lassificatian for the subdivision and aurmundlng area with both the developer and city planning. At. that time the property ~ knCNlIl'l as QI-IO Properties was cIearty marked and Intended by the city as R.1, 'lAth the exception of mLMiple family along the WV Arterial and comm&relal bordering Asbury road. It is my under5tanding that teSidentiallots are needed in the city. so I have to ask you and rest c:I the c:cuncll. Why does the city want to CHer deVelop the NW Arterial and create aratler tral'ftc problem? I don' lKlderStand whEit the real purpose cI the Arter1aI, I thougtlt It was to move heavy tnJc::Iai and traffic al'OlM1d the city. With the current development already along AsbJry, becoming an we sore to lOOk at frOm the back of my home. I'm conoert18d that the reN proposed development IMth its buildings..d signa being mLlCh doser, the noise from arterial wit greatty increase, and a tramc nightmare will occur by allo.Nlng the right In! right out access. I'm concerned about v.mt will happen to OW' property value, what about the qualky of Iff! fa' the children d the neighborhood. Would you like to look out your backyard and have a greM view c:I a lumber yard or a tavern. These developers are only looking cd for themselves and don't truly care about the hsrd wor1<Ing people of Dubuque, I trust you will do the right tHng. 1:!k-J Tom &hroeder k'd IZ-3v-ff -'5 ;J /~7 {L.' "* G * GENE DIRD SIGN SERVICE CO. January 4, 1999 Honorable Mayor & City COlmcil Members City of Dubuque City Hall 50 W. 13th St. Dubuque, IA 52001 Subject: Sign Regulation - PUD Development Plan - Northwest Arterial Dear Mayor and City Council: I would like to review the sign regulations for the QHQ Development. This location was designated as PUD, with Planned Commercial Designation. My understanding after reading the regulations, General Commercial District, Sign Regulations aquaints to C- 2 and C-4 Commercial Districts instead of Standard C-3 Zoning. In my opinion, why are we down sizing an intense commercial district. I am referring to the square footage of each free standing sign. The lot~ are larger than any other commercial district in the area, so the way I see this, all of the commercial development as far as signage should refer to C-3 sign regulations. Larry Weitz Sign Systems and Gene Bird Sign Service Co. would request for you to reconsider this part of the development. a. Maximwn sign square footage to be 200 sq. ft. for single sign. b. Maximwn nwnber offiee standing sign to be limited to 2 per premises, with height 1 free standing sign to be limited to 40' and the second sign to be res1ri.cted to a monument type sign on the Frontage road entrance to the business, height of monument sign 10'. Thank you for your consideration, GENE BIRD SIGN SERVICE CO. ~~~~.a/~ :/ / [vA,-(R /- '('- n -3,' ,;t51;11. (\ p. /1I!i/ (!fl/0"J /l v If l ~... 4 .\ PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Address ;; c1 l / )J~....o C; _<<- /1, ,,' ~ ~ "/ "r -, ~~.~ ,rJ.......-~ ~./U. Q.DO'Z- ;~rt.-"- ?-/o) / /~ I t/f2~TL- 7 f .~ ;;r-~I;2~- j;(; o.,~-~ //7) t/ i '1 ~ec 1 If' . -. (A'-.." lEt UIU '1b C:MC...0&. \.)- ~.1 \-.. Iql>EdS /1,,;{t!5 J ,; / ' ,/ I /~/.,/......./\ -jI ~1 (.)0 (> I~- ,.~ /"" ~1 L\~) ~ WO-KY( h: L-U ~-j.:"'. ~ vtS. 4-A <;; L 0 u :) J , ((P~5 (JJ~if.Ij)6f.]:::I(. D "-8. I A. 52041t Dc U, A. C;;J.o~ 7 ",' /'44PLCidoaD07- ~:i'..)Q (.is: Is ~~ ~6' G,..e/~~-Pr $/$S~6..I- ~ZJ'\D~ PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name / 2/~~j~8 ~! JL,~~ I I ~ /,}.~/j-~il ~~'<-- lid- -( j- - J? e,l~ R~/S ~9B l~ . 1:5". '18 Address Q:26i) ,#1 j c;!ou~ /10 6v/!~J ~/-/-I,- L I- b fa 5. LrlJJ r!r CCIo doG J),f&w 51 ~97 ~_~~J 00 I ~u# J'I"-'- ~ 1'3 -c ~ \J),--,\:'- ~,\,5 ';~ / ';;1 () c-4.-~- 5f. .. ~~o/6 S-/.. ~A 5// ~ ). . - 'a PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name Address /5~EC /5 &t co2 =3 30 ~ cJ ~. CiA. ' , Y1' ~, ~ifA , 7.:J~ ~i?;J ~./ !/1)62.. JY}- :0, )J;4 S 7: J), ~ U ~S"2S- ~(J~T ~::p~~ J)BtQ ~ J -2rJ4):Dd PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name Address (;! ~/ d. IJ-; /3 <1933 ~-:: 4 y! 3 3 - ',- A .14. ~~ PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name Address Iou f c/" (~A,-- ~. (7 c; r ,8 h:rq~ u) ~~ki .9- SI-/--. 11 Ut- .s 4J f -N~q.l ) ;2 - J L/- 1 S jP) _ / ~ /dl-/'I-9 ? I d. -/4.9'( /.:z 3 ;).10 ..d. 1/ ,....:/-4. L~- L la III 1;/ t -/~-9B ~ 1-2 (b~ F '()() ~.i- . ~. P-I7- 98' 11fd~.::J/~ t;(}h to /JIM." J.i; ~odh Jli Ifh 7- 9f3 iI/a/f)! (alJ !(a1;, /tlJ/o '*t/M",kjj.b1J~ ..., &L/1 .233Q ,0#-4 r?~,d6r., I E. Q OJL,rceJ PQW~ ~ [;e5SQ St. OJ6v ve Iu. 0-)<Jo3 /~3 PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by GHG Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name '1 . r-- ,i! .., I; i::. 1 iJ' 1.." :.' I-i. ','_ " "" It>. ..,..- iI ' ......:...1A -"",,-' .... J , l.. '1 j '1! } ; , " - ,'/-" .r {~'/L1 .-, ~ .1:."''1].1'''''/1 :'." Address .':'J 1 ( /v,'~/~;- i;h-.Lt.,. /7 -I J. - f 9 . "" , ~ . \ ,. ", / 1 i. --i.. V ,..(-/,.:.. I.J ;.. . 1~" I' ~-- / 7-'-'.:-'i~....(~1A t li,... ',' , t.. ) J.) . ~ 12-17- <II 1.1 7 & c ~ d-S~vt' .' 'I ~~6w/~", 7tr , . '/1 I . . /.. ...//(..- ( ,.....-1. L. t,__; . I .{ ..I \.. ......" \"," c +- - lJi/b ; J. .. ( ) -' <{ S' AJ ')1 , -Ij/ (" , ifl. .x:..t.€ u--( ff? / IC;Y1 !a~ ~llb .~ - I ~ .. 'l Y \..) [ll/",v\../V~_,--cr d.. ~ II .....; J(< - /1 Ii '{It. .1..-<-.- -"~." .~" . , , -, '(J()? (y-- /, v . PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa "",. ,""..."" . We, the und~rsigned residents'tdthe Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name Address 115jt/~v-l f't/ .~. PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name Address ~ :),-\\c, S -'1:. f-\~~z Or, PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name Address PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Address c/&/2 L) UJ 5" d- ( \ 4 t t;} ~-7 J/J - t)Ai - [~")F'I1 r- ... . - 2-UV I-h()t-. C-~ d ~ '3 [) n~ i, ( 1<:, v) PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and tt1e State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date i ~ //-/'/-15, ~- Ipf- /&"- /~~ 1 -C[ti ;. ,qJif' hXb; I ~ ~ f;2 -I 't ~_ ~ ~ .;!.;<{., 3. S /Pl",{ I-- _ Ie ~ I?.{ '-I )?y ;~~~~~g 'm~~~;~j~~:~ -:;Ic~ Address hZ// ~ f1id..~ (j) I r . , .t .. PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date /2-/& '7R Address /057 Avbv.'~ . PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Address '1j-/~f"' ~ 16fcf ~ [rC;f;d Ce;.~ 337C C~~L_--.L_ G- .y9a? 'h~a~L$ZL~V 1!1JY WI{..~;rt</f:::r-n.. ;14: It ~<<~ J /h, ~ ';1/8' ~.I<l~}( a-L~ PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council and State of Iowa We, the undersigned residents in the Dubuqueland area petition the City of Dubuque and the State of Iowa to deny any proposals by OHO Properties to destroy the integrity of the Northwest Arterial by adding another access to the arterial. Date Name Address S7i.sV /'tad6u.) U - d I :L//s:l~r ,. p /-#-- 7r f~~ TO: Dubuque City Council We request the City Council turn down QHQ Properties request to: 1. Add another exit on the Northwest Arterial. There are more than enough. 2. Eliminate single family home sites for more commercial and office space. We need more affordable housing lots and have more than enough fast food places, strip malls and empty office space. ADDRESS /ffc-) flu,..?t 5'/; )0'1'1 ~ Jof f" ~~'itt21 /oO~& 3ole'1n f-R cZO(R~t# AYe ~ P J 113~ A>e_~- ~, ~ / 5" I{ t:VrlL S?: /3'65 h.,;{~'I. Ave. ~ 3::>- EG/V1 ~/~\f H o~ ~JjabJ :J. 79') &tl b7JA 3 }~Ed-~~5~ (jJC"1 ((L- f?.~c.. hl,7 -20.s?()17W~!6/ . 65 'jJ/d~~I>t:t-cc~t/ I ? .;? 5' .?,CL; ~-e?L c/~~~r" c;;~~ flfriL S-J( ~tt( I 1 DATE 10?/YY/ ~ / J. / / ? / r8' /;?-~~- ;7# 12!J-l1/CJi I;</~B! ff::3 /~/.2?/7P /~;J.g/fY IrJ-;Jg-98 I i#- - ;;).g- 98 )~ '"' :J ~ ....~ 8 - 1:L-?-i-1! I;) - ~~--98' (~7-" r-fJ> _ j .2, .;- Z?! ---9Y /(l-a~ ~ 75' /.;) -r-?$-- 7~ - /~-Z8-96 ....~ ~-26-9? . //~ ,;r?-,fl - TO: Dubuque City Council We request the City Council turn down QHQ Properties request to: 1. Add another exit on the Northwest Arterial. There are more than enough. 2. Eliminate single family home sites for more commercial and office space. We need more affordable housing lots and have more than enough fast food places, strip malls and empty office space. ADDRESS NAME ~ - i71lf ./~: f:' '.. " ,~~'- ..' ..~_~ j'~ , i. ~~"t.t--! ( .~" .-<.... ~..:~~.J .. 101' u~"A ~ ~L - L /1/It 'f:;(I> 131 Ct r -/ VifJiA...p CM(~ i LfCi n S,,<~ ~ P'f,;, I.-!-- ~. /(~ (e;fLf- l-f~ / ~ )}~J'l ~ .I..? / / 10.... '/'-(-.. '. . /'02. / I rr~Jhl ?..., t. , , ,. !!:4JrJLU0 S5J &aJJ{Lk ~. "/:~.1 :<. '10 ( Vv/"''' .r O/,~ tfi;Ouw Aljrl,a., 'I OS " f(;M~ ~~ ,~;~J , \ .... . ~ ~ .;.... I" ,,_ ~ 3337~~~ /( It / IYt . 3/Lf GCr..)-4- ?LJ",d 3/k ..?/1sT ~7~~ .""J.. I) ~ (,.,0; . t __" / "'" t ,"',", .~..._ .... ~ <. '"' ~1 .t(' -,L..- ~JJ1 ~ .~rgo W~ DATE !;2-;? ~- c;2 I !;(-;2! - f)? / ~ -c?t:f- - 7P 12/ z;s-f98" - IY2~:7Y t -7 .){ - ,:'-: C.~ ~- _. '-', -.... .,-.' f2.) ).1 / FI' / ;.... ;-1.. 1 ( ()r/~'<ri,. /2/J-.r r~ /.2 . .~ c;:-;;'/ IA. ;u./4Y- /-<-~7-7! 1,}-:27'7) I 7-;J 9 - Cr" s: /) - ~io -- 7 J - 1:1- 31-f?' /;t- 51 -It? ~- TO: Dubuque City Council We request the City Council turn down QHQ Properties request to: 1. Add another exit on the Northwest Arterial. There are more than enough. 2. Eliminate single family home sites for more commercial and office space. We need more affordable housing lots and have more than enough fast food places, strip malls and empty office space. ': '/ /' ,,", .' ~ -1/." .' ~:~~' ~:/1::Jr- ILl If Ai ~cj 7) Iff.:: U L 7/3 ' 1 '~,el.jA,(l r:L /A4t .~ NAME " (-.;.{.~ r:\; , \:n. ADDRESS ..2./~ I CJr ~szo et\V\sl~l\.\A. /?ytJ .~ ;;l9~ - iJ I L# R/lJcJ J1 bll J~~.. 55 G./ (J) n7SC- " i ? /J./' i///~ '7CJC) /FJ~7f: C.,- :?-t:J 3 s- fa1 5.40 ['A.1"- :fl- C 1S2 S fV~A'~V)l~ Or. 7 (')., 15~r- ( '''::J ;J.-os J ~ 01- ;; ///j [:! fil\. F/e-C.O fJ;'z ~tV1 ;/~ DATE -'l '-7(/" I'" ;1 _;/",,_( . '^ I _> Ii.. .1'(- fr I.) )/ - 11 / ->/.;1.//7.P- /~-d/-7~ l2.- Z.l - <'-jo. 1;1 - ;Z)- 9 tr' /;'j/;Z.J/~p I.J-~4 4 ~ /2- 2 i.J-9cP />- 'if --73/ I tc7-dB- re /2.. .2:,y -;7 f- 12,30-% 1~~a9g /~-3 LL~lf /-2.- 3o-c; ~ I )._:JcJ - 7JY ~' TO: Dubuque City Council We request the City Council turn down QHQ Properties request to: 1. Add another exit on the Northwest Arterial. There are more than enough. 2. Eliminate single family home sites for more commercial and office space. We need more affordable housing lots and have more than enough fast food places, strip malls and empty office space. NAME ADDRESS DATE j}lJ[/~j} f A(~/(~ /(;6fo I\AOFI1AN' /~~~ 1~~o~~L>>- ~ /~1~ ~(~ ",. r-' .' ' u:l ::;CUiu2"~ ?() Y!'4' ef~ >0.( I~/ 'l'q ~'j ~ v 21J2.. ~ ' ~ :?Y/d C/en1~J JRUr3~ 1?J7 K&y Will' ~ #df,t~ 773 ~~. ~ VI-k. \,'15 ~~ ~T. /I c5l~ ., to-7"-^ ~ ~;.~ b :; '71 -1J.4/k,~~ C<<.... 2~ z~:~~~ ~' ' a/1LJ- :'.. ~9'(<Z ~ 7/ I;)J!;Ju4f(/~ 7;2- YO i ~I 'bO {q~ I 2/36/ q r.( I '1. -,:50' 9.5' (.)-- 3(: -q S I )-.5)-'~ J d- '36-Y',y I d. -J cY.-crt? /.;J. .... 3c;.. '15 l '2- :,t: - C1 ~ /;< - 30 -78 1.2 50 '7 ~ I ~ 12:>6/ 4J :%'t(,~ / ,i/3~f Icy 3tJI78 / ~13'cJ/ f/J' TO: Dubuque City Council We request the City Council turn down QHQ Properties request to: 1. Add another exit on the Northwest Arterial. There are more than enough. 2. Eliminate single family home sites for more commercial and office space. We need more affordable housing lots and have more than enough fast food places, strip malls and empty office space. NAME '. '-. , ('-----" '\, " ",,- ) \., ,:." {~ _~:~_"~_,,,--~:~:,' L"-,,,,,,^"~ ADDRESS DATE ...:.--'to" h(\7 ( U.J I ~ '--~ 2- , f, ,,/ 12_l=:, ( I C( g' /-). rl~ Y1 _ (,. ./' d"C~ '111 ot~ I ';)l.j(.;) Vw. ') e~ TO: Dubuque City Council We request the City Council turn down QHQ Properties request to: 1. Add another exit on the Northwest Arterial. There are more than enough. 2. Eliminate single family home sites for more commercial and office space. We need more affordable housing lots and have more than enough fast food places, strip malls and empty office space. NAME ADDRESS DATE / ik;~'4d#v ~.~- ~ '- -,'" f/~~~ /'2 - 3/~Y- " .. TO: Dubuque City Council We request the City Council turn down QHQ Properties request to: 1. Add another exit on the Northwest Arterial. There are more than enough. 2. Eliminate single family home sites for more commercial and office space. We need more affordable housing lots and have more than enough fast food places, strip malls and empty office space. NAME ADDRESS DATE B""" tb~ '^96153~ M 1),- A<},9% '- - . . PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: OHO Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request Legal Description: Lot 1 of OHO Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and Lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHa Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. Date Address .';; I/}.l! //)~ 1:l./t~/'J3 "3;,hY\- L. ~~b\u~ I~I J ~ '~/ fR() 'iCJ H ,w;')~~h~t.A.b~u.e. 'fCf ( ( 1-'1 '3 3 4-1bl Uj~!ff PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: aHa Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request legal Description: lot 1 of aHa Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and Lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHa Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive land Use Plan for this property. Date '~i/qt Name ---- ---- -1 1M ~ joe1l'i tJ ~ Address "22 ~o ;J:il- ~~/J~ PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: aHa Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request legal Description: lot 1 of aHa Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHO Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. Date Name Address J Ir; :L /J-/ lid- I'J../ II).. \Z,~ L- ~ ?ull f) ~~ '{b 7-/; ~ Cle '-'-V~ PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: OHO Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request Legal Description: Lot 1 of OHO Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and Lot 2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHa Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. Date Address /.;).-r17-rt ~-N(1L YXfo-toL-b ~ ~~ -y(~ f~ ~~~ '~ ljfSlJ 4f.sy ()diL7\ ~,. ~ft9 ~ ~ Lf~~~ ~ ~ qQ7S 1J:r~uU (!L1rfN t/get.-{ 45buo\./ C/'"QeJ,.t2 { ~9&'4 /'~___ t!~~ LJqJ~ Asl,~ 6Mh .;J.b /Jsbur (1IFL'e-! e- 4Cfzt:, o ~g-q~ ~rk10 t/~f/CJ u # ,;;J77-5 ~ .d2r- Jj?) 2- C;:LI>1 ~Io I D, ~ /~ - ~ 1 - ?% J'2.-27-CJ~ /8 . cJ 7 - ~y v~) fJJ'> I'W\ ~/J IJ../J.-?!'f6 C~~<:"'~ /~/01~/91i/ Yh-~ I'J.h.7 / q 8 fnfu\fL ~ A c1nn uJ I I I;. d- 7 9g 1212- 9g l ;7; ~ ,~I",IH d~AA'~~ ;aJ9t/ff> ~t6rV/ . tzU4z. /'2./2-7 (Or g, ~CA/v 'J);)~/ ',' .,' '/::",. ~ 7 7/~v1i..//'" C / :.-- i ./ )/ : ::W-,,/' ~ ',' PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: OHO Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request legal Description: lot 1 of OHO Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the OHO Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by OHQ Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. ,~ c./~;, z. /" .,_", ~ i,' -; ~ ;; C7"- <.../c/ lr.J:> / () :'- LJ,;--. I , ' { ~ r:AA~-r 9ntU;;~ ~ dd:OO c?;?ID ~3 'I () J-I ~ d"fl-' LJ ~,,-3Io cA/~ ~ PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: OHO Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request legal Description: lot 1 of OHO Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHa Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive land Use Plan for this property. Date Name Address tf?81 A J C/ Ie ?3 -:::;~.r L;tgy '10/ ~ ~-<o~ I,~~/ c;f f if --udPf f?o?/ ~ {!/' ~, I.J. Ja:b/ iB _____ --r l~ ~~ 't7eo .4~~-+-TL- I~J2-oJq'6 -;;~,/duoM\g-A 4rfD !ls~ CJ:- pk ~2~z-h{ ~;(#'~# ~c;c?7' /!~#Y C-,,ect-<E /Z/2~/r~ /~J ~ -cf ~ Z21r.c. /J,. tl ~(tc..r'QfI:i.~ pI( i). 'f? err PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: QHQ Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the OHO Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by OHO Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. Name ~ hlr(Jd~ L~l~ Address /j'1(}.S' ~f;)f ~ /'ftRtJ V;.~ (7 ~- 963~~fk- \""\~S \'<e.~ w....~~~, 3404 b~ Du-b. ~ 9Z4 ;o~6/A- ~N 2-7" /F- , . '1z:; S'~ ~ :~'71 (D&ut ~t B{) , L ~~ 'J,A, ~) ~ I z..12--~ /78 38/'1 CON PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: OHO Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request legal Description: lot 1 of OHO Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHa Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. Date !21 /.S1 jc'l~' Name ~--l-_t't\. C (\ . ~ll,- C. ~.L"--'-~;_~- \ Address /'7 [ \ '\ ,. llJ. ~ li e 2.. '--.c.'~ ""-, ,0 Q I I ~~ -11 -70 I ~-a o~ '8' ~A/ j ~.~~ 'I r3 't ~~:r J5 cr- 1/9/0, ) j Id r;o[VcR De PETITION TO: Dubuque City Council RE: aHa Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request legal Description: lot 1 of aHa Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHO Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. Date Name Address /2. - /~a,f 12/ //7/9B I IOWA The Honorable Mayor & City Counsel Members: Dear Mayor and City Council Members, In regard to reclassifying property located at Sonthwest comer of the NW Arterial and Asbury Road from Agricultural to C 3: Changing this parcel of land to conunercial zoning would most certainly result in a drastic reduction of the values of the surrounding single family homes. Having been a Realtor in this area for twenty years I can well imagine the concern of the home owners in this area-Which is a very valid concern. In order for Dubuque to grow and prosper we must make residential home ownership a top priority and keep this area available for single family homes -And this is exactly what the city had in mind for this area!!!! Please consider these facts before voting on this issue!! Sincerely, '\ ar- ~z~<-tfJ~ Peg H'mgtgen / {J REALTOR 2613 DODGE STREET (u.S. HIGHWAY 20) DUBuaUE,lOWA 52003-7123 PETITION P ;-1-7f c:?' ..;::,' d ~ 1P1. :j~ TO: Dubuque City Council RE: aHa Properties - Conceptual Plan and Rezoning Request Legal Description: Lot 1 of aHa Place in the City of Dubuque, Iowa and Lot 2 of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4, Sec. 20, T.89N., R.2e. of the 5th P.M., in the City of Dubuque, Iowa We, the undersigned, as property owners in the neighborhood of the aHa Properties now being considered for rezoning, hereby submit our opposition to the rezoning as requested by aHa Properties. We respectfully request the City Council maintain the R 1 designation as called for by the City of Dubuque Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property. Date Name ,fi / L. -2-9-'1r Ii";?' 'p~ Ic:l -c1.K'- 9J n~ t~-~-Cfr vA +\~ I 2-7'[-% ~.1 KJJ 4<{Oo 1-ioo Address !f<ff?-Z- /1- > k~~/ C/tr-, {/7Vc;{ ~~. ~cj-(f// f It ~-b1r( e+ PL, .. . i REDMOND 49 I 9 WILD FLOWER DRIVE DUBUQUE IA 52002 319-556-7398 December 21, 1998 Daniel E. Nicholson 889 Walker Street Dubuque IA 52001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Dubuque City Council: RE: QHQ - Quality Properties Rezoning We respectfully request you deny this developers request to change the intended land use of the property in question. We need to protect existing neighborhoods, this proposed rezoning request clearly will harm the people who live in homes adjacent to this property. We don't need to dump 10,000 more car trips into the Asbury-NW Arterial intersection that were not planned for in the approval of Asbury Plaza. We don't need to create another unsightly Kennedy Road, we already have one, that should be enough. We need to have residential building lots within the city to avoid in the future providing costly services to areas that are being built up in the county. We need to have you as our elected governing body for the city, protect us from developers whose only interest is to increase their profits at the expense of the community. Thank you for your consideration and diligence. We appreciate all you do for the City of Dubuque. Sincerely, Steven C. Redmond C~.~f?LL Cynthia Sauer Redmond ~cOO . 1t, December 21, 1998 Mr. Daniel E. Nicholson, At-Large 889 Walker Street Dubuque, IA 52001 Re: Rezoning of land south of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. Dear Mr. Nicholson: We are requesting that you deny the proposal by QHQ Properties/Mike Quagliano to rezone property from AG Agricultural District and C-3 General Commercial District with Conditions to a PUD (Planned Unit Development) with a PC (Planned Commercial) and PR (Planned Residential) zoning designation. After reviewing the Quality Properties development plan we are concerned about the following: 1. Unwanted noise and debris - from the commercial businesses and the Northwest Arterial after the removal of the natural barrier that exists along it. 2. The glaring light produced from the signs and commercial businesses, such as the Hardees and Culver area north of this property. 3. Granting access to the Northwest Arterial- Even though only a right-inlright-out access is being proposed, it will be the cause of unnecessary traffic problems on the Northwest Arterial. 4. Traffic congestion at the comer of the Northwest Arterial and Asbury Road. As suggested at the Zoning Commission meeting, it may take 2-3 lights to get through the intersection. Traffic' coming from Asbury going east will surely cut through the commercial district to get to the Northwest Arterial and cause even more problems for traffic traveling on the arterial. 5. We feel the city has a limited number of residential lots available at present and would like to see this zoned residential as the city comprehensive plan suggests. 6. We feel property in the Sunnyslope/Embassy West subdivisions would be devalued. 7. Water run-off from many buildings and paved parking areas will be an enormous burden to several areas including Asbury Place, the drainage ditch on the west side of the Northwest Arterial, and the north fork of Catfish Creek which goes to the Keyway Drive area. We previously lived in that area and know how often the city has had to pump when there was a heavy rain. If you have not viewed this site, we encourage you to do so before the date of the public hearing in order to fully understand our concerns mentioned above and make a sound decision on this matter. We visited with many of the homeowners who live on Wildflower, Gabriel, High Cloud, and Camelot Drive, while getting petitions signed, and found that like ourselves many built their homes or moved to the area because it was a quiet residential area. Therefore we are asking you to deny this request for rezoning. ~~ Bob & Linda Schmidt 2260 High Cloud Drive . , .. . fj) t= /~~?~ Q /-f Q '4e~~~ J~1'"1' h1-t- ~ '}t~ I jd~/ c;(..c/.~ (.:/~'-~ ;{/~vi/ Cl!t-f/'-{_h~~ --1--~r<--,,'~..::;:{~c.-(.,4:4v~~~~~-t ft'A-~ d-c~~ fl'-U ~~ 'lh4/ d:,~ .4;t<< h1~~A.4-/ a~~~~ 1:/c,e~ )4~~ ~~~/ / vIY(J /J~..::{/ /~4A-<./ /Ck<.~ ?~h~/~ /r::~~ A;(. 1/~.~~ ~ /(-/~2:v A~ ~~A/ ~ i .~ .fi</-t--L<d ~ ----Ch-^-i//V';I ji~~- ~ ~--/~k/t; }LJ~{.~/ ~vC ~v~/~/ ~ A'~~ a/ t~~/t;;. ~~ ~' J/:~ rL/ ^' _~~<-<.--?iv &~,I'- . .. . ~ December 22, 1998 Dan Nicholson 889 Walker st. Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Subject: Qual i ty Properties (QHQ) Rezoning Request and Development plan for area bordered by NW Arterial and Asbury and Sunnyslope area Dear Mr. Nicholson, In regard the above matter we are shocked that the city would consider approving such a proposal that would: * Reduce the value of the beautiful new homes in the area * Reduce the number of potential Rl affordable building lots served by city services when we're trying to bring young professionals back to Dubuque * Reduce the quality of life for the neighbors * Destroy the integrity of the city's Comp Land Use plan * Create another Kennedy Road. When we now have the luxury of available commercial open spaces that would not adversely impact on existing residential neighborhoods, low interest rates, a booming economy and a well thought out land use plan don't you think we would want to do it right and avoid the horrendous mistakes of the past? For the above reasons we request you reject the developers request. Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Brown 433 Kaufmann Ave., Dubuque, IA ~Jf.I3~ . \ Dear Sir, As a resident of Sunnyslope developement I elquest your vote against rezoning request of Quality Properties. This piece of property should remain zoned as was intended in the city land use plan. It is basically bordered on three sides by residential properties. The area of homes are in the $150,000 to $200,000 plus range. A neighborhood developed as a residential area. People enjoy the residential atmosphere and wanted to build in an area ofthe same.A commercial developement in this area with the lay of the land and close proximity of the arterial make this the beginning of another Kennedy Road. We also value our property values and the neighbor hood setting as it is. We have an abundance of vacant office and commercial space now. Why would the city approve more when we need more available single family lots for people to build upon. The city has a long term land use plan on their books that we looked at as we decided to build and where to build. These are factors we considered before making our decisions. We have an area directly to the north already approved for this type of developement and we believe this is the best situation for all concerned. We thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. ~~ 'J ~ () ':-ti lJ Lt q, c "L \L..<2- Dear Sir, tf..,~~i (,lh1 As a resident of Sunnyslope developement I erquest your vote against rezoning request of Quality Properties. This piece of property should remain zoned as was intended in the city land use plan. It is basically bordered on three sides by residential properties. The area of homes are in the $150,000 to $200,000 plus range. A neighborhood developed as a residential area. People enjoy the residential atmosphere and wanted to build in an area of the same.A commercial developement in this area with the lay of the land and close proximity of the arterial make this the beginning of another Kennedy Road. We also value our property values and the neighbor hood setting as it is. We have an abundance of vacant office and commercial space now. Why would the city approve more when we need more available single family lots for people to build upon. The city has a long term land use plan on their books that we looked at as we decided to build and where to build. These are factors we considered before making our decisions. We have an area directly to the north already approved for this type of developement and we believe this is the best situation for all concerned. We thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. C\OJ S"~ ~ -o~{l4 2- CArreL.,'" 1)JeJcQ\Je -rf\ 5~L ~ . 27 December 1998 Paul Engelberth 4712 Camelot Dr. Dubuque,IA 52002 Daniel E. Nicholson 889 Walker St. Dubuque,IA 52001 Mr. Nicholson: As a resident of the Embassy West subdivision in the city of Dubuque, I would request that you consider strongly a vote against the rezoning request of Quality Properties. I feel that the property bordered by Embassy West, Sunny Slopes and Asbury residential areas should remain as zoned as currently defined by the city land use plan. The current plan allows for what I feel is a reasonable amount of commercial property to match a residential community. Please consider saving this land for residential development and direct commercial development to the area north of Asbury road that is already zoned to support that type of development. In addition, I am concerned about the volume of runoff from storms and the effect on the retention area behind my house. I have lived at my current address for over 4 years and each summer there is at least one large storm that causes the water to build up behind the Arterial. The deepest that I have seen it is over 8 ft deep. The elevation of my home is such that the water will flow over the Arterial before threatening my basement, but the water covers a very large area in retention basin. The addition of commercial building and parking areas will cause this to be much worse. It is also important to note that the volume of water that did manage to make it under the Arterial caused flooding and damage to houses located on the east side of the road, Thank you for your consideration. ;61paul En;el!'e!1h Ii' ~ / / '/ // / 1 ./",(~ /.//:t ~ /' . . .. , December 29,1998 Daniel E. Nicholson 889 Walker St. Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Dear: Mr. Nicholson This letter is to inform you that, as a long time resident of the city of Dubuque, I'm strongly opposed to the QHQ Properties proposal along the NW Arterial. My son purchased and built a wonderful home in the Sunnyslope subdivision, which will be effected by this development. Please allow their kids to grow up and enjoy a residential neighborhood like most of us have enjoyed. Therefore, don't allow for more congestion along Northwest Arterial while infringing on the surrounding residential area. T!m,iy~ Pat Schroeder 963 Edison St. Dubuque, IA 52001 .. December 28,1998 Daniel E. Nicholson 889 Walker St. Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Dear : Mr. Nicholson I'm writing you this letter to voice my opposition to a proposed rezoning of land at the South of Asbury Road and west of the Northwest Arterial. On City Council agenda January 4th 1999. In October of 1997 my Vllife Mary Kay, and children Tyler and Ashley purchased lot 18 of Sunny Slopes (4903 TVllilight Drive). Prior to purchase I revievved the zoning classification for the subdivision and surrounding area Vllith both the developer and city planning. At that time the property now known as QHQ Properties was c1earty marked and intended by the city as R-1, Vllith the exception of multiple family along the NW Arterial and commercial bordering Asbury road. It is my understanding that residential lots are needed in the city, so I have to ask you and rest of the council. Why does the city want to over develop the NW Arterial and create another traffic problem? I don't understand what the real purpose of the Arterial, I thought it was to move heavy trucks and traffic around the city. With the current development already along Asbury, becoming an eye sore to look at from the back of my horne. I'm concerned that the nevv proposed development Vllith its buildings and signs being much closer, the noise from arterial Vllill greatly increase, and a traffic nightmare Vllill occur by allCNVing the right in! right out access. I'm concerned about what Vllill happen to our property value, what about the quality of life for the children of the neighborhood. Would you like to look out your backyard and have a great vie\N of a lumber yard or a tavern. These developers are only looking out for themselves and don't truly care about the hard v.orking people of Dubuque, I trust you Vllill do the right thing. #cL0 Tom Schroeder - ~ December 29,1998 Daniel E. Nicholson 889 Walker St. Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Dear : Mr. Nicholson This letter is to inform you that, as a resident of the city of Dubuque, I'm strongly opposed to the QHQ Properties proposal along the NW Arterial. If constructed as it should have been, with overpasses and off ramps, this problem would have been resolved years ago. Therefore, I see no reason to add more congestion while infringing on the surrounding residential area. v~ 'b~ve loeder 2190 Stafford St Dubuque, IA 52001 , . December 29, 1998 Daniel Nicholson Dubuque Cuy Council Dubuque, IA 52001 RE: Public Hearing January 4, 1998 Rezoning request of QHQ Properties Property south of Asbury Road, West of N W Arterial Dear Councilman Nicholson: QHQ is proposing to develop a large area of this property that 1S up for rezoning as commercial and office use. The immediate areas to the south (SunnySlope phases 1 and 2) and to the west (SunnySlope phases 3 and 4 and two courts in Asbury) are all residential housing - quality neighborhoods. It is definitely in the best interest of the whole community to complete this pocket as residential. Residential is the projected use in the Dubuque Comprehensive Plan. There is already an intense commercial development approved to the north of Asbury Road (Corey). To build additional commercial on this corner would be a glut of problems. Commercial development already in place on Asbury Road between the NW Arterial and Heritage Manor is not a good example of blending with the surrounding neighborhood. Spare us an extension of cement block buildings, irritating lights, no landscaping to aid the environment, and large parking lots. We need additional green space throughout Dubuque. We need more R-1 residential lots. Let's consider improving the quality of life for Dubuque. Please deny rezon1ng request for C-3 and office. Sincerely, ~(~ A~~ M. Janice Giesler 2310 High Cloud Dr Dubuque, IA 52002 " December 23, 1998 Daniel E Nicholson 889 Walker st Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Dear Mr. Nicholson, As a resident of the first part of Sunnyslope development I request you vote against the rezoning request of Quality Properties. This piece of property should only be zoned as stated in the City's Land Use Plan. It is basically borderded on 3 sides with residential properties. The houses that exist are in the range of$150,000 to $200,000 plus. Everybody neighbors together and gets along very well. Putting a commercial-office development on this piece of land, when the lay of the land makes it a part of our neighborhood woul d reduce our property val ues and destroy many of the good things we value in a nice neighborhood. Government should protect us from losing these things. We have in this area so much vacant office and commercial space now. Why would the city approve more when we need affordable single family lots for young people to build on? Why would the city go against their own plan when everyone in the area relied on this plan when we invested in our homes or in the case of Mr. Corry when he invested heavily in his 300 pI us acres of commercial development di rect I y to the north? Why woul d the ci ty want to undercut the success of this development when it fits in the city,s plan? It makes no sense to change the planned land use for this property. Thank you for your help, Virgil Nauman 4438 Camelot Dr Dubuque, IA 52002 v ; ,?J/ ;l( a-((hYc.~ ,~ .~,.~"--"" PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND i.1,,-.~', ) South 9f Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned ui Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. I '- 0, ' ,-" '/ /f L2/e,~*( ../t::."7/"-c1I'(../ (t:' ))(":rI~ ~kc~"". Vl cJ L, ' LU(P..Y:).J~J!A2) ;' ~,' ~~~~~t r;;; ~ ~v , __ !.?' C'" "_~ / / '- .' '/" . ,. / ~~ S.~1-~7-7-<' <' ~ A' /L -:V--7~/L-,?',,-'.-!" ~ / . i ( ADDRESS ~:2S>)o, ~_~~ 1-;)-b ~- W:i7-c ~ , , ' 3 7J wfM-fL RJJ u,A-Tj;)~, ~ :2~! (PG(~(1 v/~"v {!( rc./p Dv_D" C' ". /1 '\ .....,.... ~. - I r" i;..) (j () n ,'-J u, -J.- ':) 17:::'- c;ll (S-H1 51 f cu..Q.J.>-cOb1 Ch ,/) - .-1:-. , ! 'l. - i-- L' . 1 J t/:::::. )~ (_:~i 1 J;..J.1 J.,/~ Jr" '... .":'c'~ 1/,1, ... ~ , . f '.' ,;j -5-- 7s~ /11. 7Ck#"I~(-<-.e-.,.(~ 7'1i/ I'L-.-J&"X~ L 'L\ ~C\ \.}.\\\ v~\ ~ \ 0(.. 5'<> 0 t-\J ( a '0J;;].. , 31" 'f II h~A4",^ -- Ie) ,Lv.iRf, i\..\. 0 Ill. (' L l.A.. 2 l.. (..;""-, ~~~~~ ~h' / 71 0 ~<l-V-U ""- 1M, fe'/.: </y? -~';r,j/-' 2.Cz. //~.3;) / la' ('f' Ll. "--- /tlt -.. . 5'-' (-) ( S PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND South of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit Oevelopment) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. NAME '~ ' ~ .... I ~',: ~~:X~.~~ j ..' . )L.~,~ . . ., ~' . # -.-... ~ - - '/' " c./~ " '.A .J .-L -'<-~ ,h / 7,' I ..' / J. .tVvtl.?- >...!~ )--v~~ c~.()) ,'-"-) . r; .. ~?f;:2~~7:f;~#< / ~,' J~/ . ;Z' / i , v! ,& 0'1)"( ~1. . Vi~~<-- . " ~'1' . ..' I" (' . '''''''--- ~ /1 ,'/.d~., ." 9// ~~ br~ \ ADDRESS 7 ~5f;5/ .0 I~~kz;-~!(t ~/;~q O~I ::1d:. ~ . p S' 7 tVI<<"c' I J)~ ~ ~~;1'; '~C -~ ( <tL,\... ' b:Bc ~.~ ~C:i;r-hh . '739~ S' ~ ~ S~ ..L/~ /7 :L d C~~--r:7 -3Yt ~;;)u/.. bLa r / 'i ~ /;- (~.ry___ xl- . Fu-~" Jk-", /2/ ~UA)cJ J (j- }) '1 ~-<q~ ,"}~~ ~I j{AfY. ~~ 1~ ~~ 3 2- R' 0 G-~ ci. l/'.. K~. ' 0 LA- L~ ~ <:J->- I 2_ ,/" . 77 ~. ,'<<";- v:.~ ~ 131T}) , ~ ~~ I I ;,-/-O(J''[j- (/ ,/J h VI) - (/ /J.il.e~.Y /T'd v~~ 'J..<'~ . I tj,s7r /W /f/?/ pi; /-- L. C'~,V'vd/ ;2. '7 9$S",F .. ('2~.()/< /vI ~ ~. 71:l:t. ~ 3707 d"-~"h' /r[!;,,/g,/i.y .,r;- /4 . ? .,4 S)' c-)C~- /f~ dvZ-B /I .LC' /4/' 1/:/ t~~/ 7 J:J~R / . 1(1 C) w~ deL- 5" oJ () tJ../a--I.-'-'--i-~L.. -.J:2 () (,0 () S-=<:'7 L/l/ I~- 0..--1 /7-1 ;f, {) "j r:; V /} Ie' 2'7(;., (;1 iT Ah htJ. ) Vl 1\ -::j' p"z. C S fr-7 J r /-? ' 2.,-{1:3 f(,,/!o~dil/// -, ::r~;~~~~~ ..:)-/ 7C;-..2~Y~~ .c2.-e~-c~~ _ R ,(/" ,tz-',~-i- a)~ ~ t'~ ;.r~ ~ PETITION IN FAVOR OF. REZONING L~ND . Soutn.of Asbury Road and West of the northwest artenal from AG Agncultural to PUD (Planned Unit Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan.- '1/:.,./, /// / / ./', J:.A; V _/ --/~- ("i~4t:/ NAME I ADDRESS , " .' '" " I'"~ 1\ )') ~') ,;' .i,...I ~ ',J..I!J H ,c! . ,"~t: (tc~"~ -4((J-;)))0' '[lr-~cj2,\r { '11] crYUtMI) ~l-:;~ '117k'~ 3~.L I 11.(\5 ;Ji/(L.'L1 / S ,..... II )/ n .-oJ -r ,1::. c / .____i I \, .' ~'~~7Y ,'f ~ M."""'\ -Xl ~~)~ I Jt- ,0, ~ S'~~ ~'-C- /3~ Jd-?J W4- jqi~j-/- J=h0~ I3r y V0-- /.-!p /01-- 4& ('Iu~~ ~~ ~"'- s~~ "7?7~.-~~ c;1~ S 4,v,~ .-.} / 'J. " " J I ' : "'{ ~U~ · L () D&h. A "71-,0 L y /. ~;) 7 --i.- ,J/'?L ~.'i !"''', ;:'/ ,,-.. r"',' r 1 >/../ .? ~j r.,.: ~ '-- d..~ /.;>....-" ~ H LI~!~~U)f~~~~ 1;;::1:/ / /7()/l&n ~ /12 0 12~ /::L-<.d /1 ')U ~~ / I 20 (2/~~ /1 2) ~~ /yo! dk~. I H '/ ;U~ L--;; )YcJ;1 /2A~~ /ftJ9 /2.~~..J. jf/v1 ~~ \::' ~ ,,') z. v' ;AL. ~ j ~f W =:1 ~-.9.-. S'J-, S.l('[ I PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND South,of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. NAME K~-Ed4 %.~ 1i94~)t&)'. - L/~~ <~ ~~t:~t~ '1 '-~~ =-- --1 h/.:v-;r.,);7 C~ - , ';r;; ..--;r'z.A' ,- ~~--t~ //?-'Z~ ~~-7l.A--- .i' /11 ~cr4?: (~ !5C;'lftVl1t(Pv _'S /9 NC /-Ie-z v: ...-:::::." 7LiYt (})e I-/-ere {I ,!. y/~ j<, (. !II) [,.. ':vf( .-, /. I, "';/\I>iiJ.., ~ V:;1 jj,4. U' ) ( "'< '7tI / r~ t:.~~ , J f 'Cv~ (~' s~:~1j: (/ ~~/ti ~ '. ' . ,/ tl c. " j' :{ -- I ,", (/t~ , \ 1t'~.J Jrw~~ ~/ ~ ",. (tl.::J=: (.; 9--goJC.- - 'II i ," "Iv .- tt7~r~ ADDRESS 6-;;?a 5-~ _' \... 5;';6 <( 4v 0'" //,,,(I/'.- /7 /?' !, 1J ,-;-"i /1-' (,', ,'-/ /I/?t ,L;L.'1'- < . 0,', rL '(/ ~ '/ ~ ~"A;:~~I'~~ ~'--' /~p/ if; flux Cf-c( ~Lv/lj{j'_~ -bd 073 I -;> 7 5dY ~ ~~. ~ .z::-~,?-"s-z.lr7 1733__ IJk.h 51 Dl<"" q~ ]q 5~:o/ 5/23 ~ (/ 1(' /1 /' I 'f k/r1!..f<FLI c{ -L- () 'J>&( ~~ 2- 1-( LL 'c:::2 0,:,1~' dr / e/,' ,-" -I, j ZJ.; W i J T 1-1..5'1 D./,(Jvf tX V6- '4:.. A. _j ,. " 7' - ,/ / d ' " I / c ,.') c) /SI .J f. S,V/ ;bf~r-c(..4 '.*z. '" Q . Q ; \SCI ~ / -5 2.. rSQ \ ) e v v -{I -=r 6\ -5 2 0 S I qus S' ,t , 203/ /f c;c 1 ' ' tt:Jl t~i ..'[. /' // ,j. ~ ~ L: d/c-~ :x- --((,,?, ~, ,/ }-V X' /~}/;p;;j;7j/~;4f;;;jf;€:;!' / ~~J(~ .;'Q(J{<C"fPGAA-. :rt /'J,v&"~I/' ~ dcX ((~ LlJU.-M" Sf- J ){j(~ l.-U (x). c.c -1ft: ,1'1 J (" ~~~~71 Jc-c~/0 he) ( ,:2 7-7 C. ,a<-/'wA-t 1/ \.., Y~L-- B q, ,}):; (e; \-r ~ Iv ,-'~ :~) ~" 7 /~ ~l;: ('!~/'Kr~; , ;J 70S Zvv, I'(/-~ Lto V Pi.:< J-A S3cv3 !fv ?IJ~~ '~!!Ji1Lr , , " PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND South, of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit pevelopment) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. NAME /{ ADDRESS d..,':f H ~L?.-rl /' A-3~O ~ jlll.('//; ~_~ (oi./)l~ '----> j J /lJY--0'1d~--? 9 / ~ !ZJj-JLL~ /?sy;!~4 ;",7 !is --Z::;;:r" cJJt <-- j &-'At -"-rn it.;,-/ Oft;) c?O~tY{J V:~~t.~ ~ ~-~#f:{j!p~I I k-' ) ~'7/Y !~!I ft~ q;)~ ) h 7 ( 07 C! P, J,;<.--,-L {j,/vt- -;+0 [ (1. h n ; j (V~71" I (::, ~ ~/. ".'y,-, ~ /___ ~, "'.'; ~I, >, I /-,' ~ _ _" _';; " v-:: ~li .- "-z' '- /i? 0 S-- 4&~c::&(~ C~ JJy,,6 fJ ?'~<YL' ,/j2///~,k- .J ./ fJ,13 ,/r'a j€< -<v &8{J ;', 1/ ~ Q.. !1.:iI:2 /;7) 'j-- ~ ';";:jJr)7 ;(fZ 5-02/1/ 420""7"' C2/~/9 JfJroO;: /1/ /'J)~J~--? 1 ~~\ I 3<;s 0 'fvL~ P ~~~1 . 08 G l-A- , ( ),0 '! II/<. '~fI ,,_u'~-:J .r;,,-~;{ :D-O../JC~I -,~oI f / - /)1 t. j'!l t7 )y~ ~ I ~"V) iAtY' It -' I (',' _ q G / rJ ~~ -v E /j /f~--r---Z---v<-1 J-C ::.;'~}// ~" /1 /!:/i ;; 1 '/'~Y'" -; (),' if '1f V ,n h/ ("l ~ ! /I/--./ f j).. " ':+_ ' i/ -7 7,:} ~~~~ ! <-'1/" ~ ~/( / !l:ifjh5~1 ftYJ; ~ ~;;!) /l y Y ,/ f,/j "'-,t'~ ~/ .~~~ /-' ~ c;/? /' ~.// ~,c:.- LI{ U f/.<;,.Il ~ 1/, '7 ,/L. 'i /)' c- / ; e?, --'--", Q ( (v':J'U-PU.-d"v;o.<..- _7 ~ ~:E'C-vUt.- r~ ~ /. "tJ ) ~'7' /'.! /} d . it), 0 - vcPZd .-&t:- I i tl II R~/V-<Q r 5;)0 q3 PETITIONJN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND SouU1 of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit . Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. NAME y (!./v~ \ ho-.l--'It'\ro-<J'-. 1\ \ t~~\[~ /~cl( I "{~ t3 ~ :VLc-.", ADDRESS t.{ t55 S, r; L' z.. HCltJltJ.:.e' ( eJ. f l;zc:.be~. 'lL (.;, / O'-Z g j~~"' i~N~~ )1~Wii~ Wt. 'J;~~~ ,~c. (0;). pj!~. 0(/..1, .,O'h6.)O~ .;;i() ":.J- , ~ ~/ / i,d - I .5dOQ ~".. M ,d? /t?~5"-- ~ .? S- '{ 81.4 /'d..-. -7 4 lj,-r:'. -CJ//,6 ~-c .i l ~'7 sO ~/ 7 If Vl--/} r 2 / f) if) e (J c ~ f: r ('" j. /) . /O{o~L ~~ '~J5~CLe ~_:r/) 1, . A,.) 00~ ~. Lv&<; s~ ~ I~ /1 /. co I J..p I.. ' '19 ~~ - J~~,S-X ,~4cG ~~ 4>?~~~ 4-i i.~ .L---t/ O'I.,'~'~ &~! L/{l ~/<fY\lL~'-~~ \~J~~ I .. / t,i I' '-I .) _" ',' f / I .,../ /..../. j I{ j_r i( I //1, J ') c. I ~ " . 1 " ,,~ '-. ( " f r~. " , " ~..j'c -'" ,'-"C():''l~(' -, "':..A.Abl' ".~ ~ D~ '-~. Kd j' .-' _57q -\1.)- ~ I.~\' . ',Pi' b, '~ I 70 J ' ~ \ 'J\ 1 ;{ C y ([." . / 2 ~ ~!/ J'> i' }G, ~~ I j ( () JUs '~I (/'" ~ 1 <A"'j .1 1Q, J? 0 ~~-";.- ;(A. O'-'?A~-t".l f --1...... r I 1- f 'f L { Y'~'( ;J- ~~~ '\ J.. J (~_~~./~/.Q- /f~_ Ilt-leuU bf] {J" !.'f;"(-{ v . ~ ( /, / --f,.".' / \ ) ( ;l 93) ,1jcu'f' fl,{iT" (;;; 3/ ~:t..L~ PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND outl1 of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. NAME \. . ~~ L~ /1(57 a /1 ,8 t'!// rJ ~~j: g:e'ifM-~ 7/ ~ J~:U{)n~-e C19 1), tKl-C ~, 7~~<- ~j~ n? ch'L.?-..t~<-1- '- / -- . ADDRESS v' '/: ~ ,,/ /-('/7.A-.~ 4/ <::: /.) -/./'.d.~~/;~,.-/ .- >1./ I " .\' , (. A r~), /:., \ I _ --- \ C'.:'l~j \...> ' \- ': l) I _ r~.)t :S"'Y~ I I !?~cY/{, & 0 ~.- '~l,lbJ ~.e.L-L1P--~.<./<:.\ / ~)~ S-558/~ 0J ..u m:'~ 1'~) .J: .4- '5'/4zr fJ&t( 2ark~ -- J(~C' ~< II ~ .:t~ Vl/ :...b ';".d' , :/~ ,H" .",), '/ I .'-" I I..-U " 1 :i-.:Ac 9- ~ - PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND South of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. NAME 1.t- ~~I~~~ ~~ t~4~ /, ,,4 I;,'-C~ ,~) (J~~~...... ",/~ - ~lJl z;,fl,d~ , T~Ji:;;y ~~~b ADDRESS {' ./5() 5 ph --fi~ Dubu'1 cr3S-~~/ d)1/Je;}.. ":O~/G ~e ?1ft.... ~L ',J-r Ov..b ~""'t>r-R.... I I L- ~c\i 3;-, "::.'-1( ~~r fie,\ C,qS e., cLt, I A_ ;fJ<O-"~ /y~-~y #~, c~ ~ ll/I - 't /7 ~ '/ ~ c;. '5 S i-Co. 1 ,.",r ,-;"-<.. (7\1') - (.) e /, I" (/ 'I" /<l . 101 I ~ VV) t7~ (~~~ LA) 1\ j;.J.\t' I G v e e "-I , V ~ ;J j / ~1 /1) (~1rL<1A~>> /'--'L~-Y7- r ~ , o--n, --1'-1 /7 /.). L 0 '/1/ v ztl ,c' . , . .s,-;;;CceJ / Q (cJS 1: 0\ / sauS3 ?, ft& PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND South-of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. NAME ADDRESS ~~ it!:~- ~~ rn~ 'PfJ~ I, ,;a -~/ ~~ _2' :~~{( I", t . ~~I~'~ ,_/", f, } / ,', " I 0. .( 7 !'I/ ',; . "A'" ",' I ':' /c"/ /'{~.f./-f~l"r',(-il/'-I < ./ "~{,~--~ Vt-yvtLV'v (f ( / , J?f., 1ft !( j'~ AI ~ ~~#',~/'~/~ ~J)-)-d()C('5 - j~ ~a S-,J?", 37-:; 717(:0, .~jd. 2'2' /J/f;I:ff~ -1(~4-~~-L 399;- t-t:'/J uyo/) d 7 (j; {p )41 (/I~I~ /1,( tr ~ { (J Ii Q. 470 f-(C'~--/I(e7.r'1, 0,-, O,./t~~--e./ I/.. /', p- I) y/ /2 ~ )A 11(- ,S/. /1< h e~J'1-.A e / ~ ///')//, j,}/u.0err;: JII rJP/It><Ju. r, -J.c.c t: 7 s-~g,~ ?{~ il!., 1~t1 '" 1(-:. L'::' ~ ;1 />;7 ~! /; )0,,-;)/ <' ~ +-/7/ AI?: " /11' 4 I II 95 , ),:Jc/-c :>0''1 S Trcr q--:O/,'6t'Qu_ J'i I) q '~,J(,~ ~\:. L)V O~ " .~_ /3 c I Lf f) e~tJ ~ ?/' 4' ''h c; p~ 0/3 t; 7'01 .:X J :~ (l c. ' IJr__:lt: ;, e0 15 dJ tV ". k" f"l5;)DO I , "J d3c'l Z=-6.-e,L<.- ~ .~:;'...)aC1/ ~350 uJ,,~~~~ L~ ~r 5200/ g)/ P, i/,I.,/~ / jjV-TtM1/ IJ~( I," ...-;. / t.L /2 -:/ A:- If ,7 / . 7 L ~Z~7vt /...t! tf/? f ~~ 0 c - ,-,,)QtJ~+ ~~~L~~~ / D\Jnr)ll~\\xftJ~~~_ i~~f~J~~Jf ,~~ /6)j)t u~~. /fF/I~/eJ ~ ~,. icr<~5 L:"//~ S~ 77' X g ~.A 'j.\ ~ C~U./-M~ (l on r / Oi)J&.n^~1 ~. Ir> s. fJ", I r I:? 'c, i~ IN 1:i= 107 ,1~~. ,0 G S100? -,' Vu6. ~/) j,). L~ {.)~ , UJ) ~o;> 6'";90J~ , S6Jt!J6:3 ^ /..., " C:mUL rr ... PETITION IN FAVOR OF REZONING LAND Sout.", of Asbury Road and West of the northwest arterial from AG Agricultural to PUD (Planned Unit ..Development) into 25 residential lots, 10 office lots, and 12 commercial lots as shown on the proposed conceptual development plan. ADDRESS