Loading...
Van Buren Traffic Petition - A .:,.~ CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM November 10, 1999 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager SUBJECT: Van Buren Traffic Petition In April, with the plans for reconstruction of Van Buren Street, the City Council received a petition for the installation of a four-way stop at the intersection of Alpha Street and Van Buren Street. The City Council did not approve the stop sign, but directed City staff to further investigate the situation and other possible traffic calming options. The City's investigation determined that the accident rate is 0.84 accidents per million vehicles entering the intersection. This is a low rate of accidents and is indicative that there is not a problem with the current two-way stop condition at the intersection. Traffic volumes were surprisingly low, ranging from 24 hour totals of 590 to 674 vehicles per day. These volumes are typical of low volume residential streets. The results of the travel speed analysis and the unexpectedly low traffic count indicates that van Buren is not the high speed diverter of traffic between University and Pennsylvania Avenue as originally thought. Public Works Director Mike Koch is recommending that the street be reconstructed as it currently exists, without any realignment or stop signs. I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council approval. &1i~~ I\Mchael C. Van Milligen MCVM/j Attachment cc: Barry Lindahl, Corporation Counsel Tim Moerman, Assistant City Manager Mike Koch, Public Works Director CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA MEMORANDUM November 8, 1999 TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager Michael A. Koch, Public Works Director 1I./;f/c{; FROM: SUBJECT: Van Buren Traffic Petition INTRODUCTION On April 1, 1999, a petition was received from David Reardon and 28 other homeowners for the installation of a four-way stop at the Intersection of Alpha Street and Van Buren Street. DISCUSSION The City's investigation determined that the accident rate is 0.84 accidents per million vehicles entering the intersection. This is a low rate of accidents and is indicative that there is not a problem with the current two-way stop condition at the intersection. Traffic counts also indicated that the intersection does not meet the warrants for multi- way stop signs. This is the only four-way intersection along Van Buren, as you can see on the attached map. The offset between the two portions of Alpha Street north and south of Van Buren is a problem and would place the stop signs approximately 100 feet apart. The legs of the intersection are completely separated, creating a question whether this is really one intersection, or two; and whether the stop signs would require one stop or two. All of the other intersections along Van Buren Street are "T"-intersections, none of which would be conducive to stopping traffic on Van Buren Street. Consequently, the City Council denied the petition on October 4, 1999. The City Council did, however, suggest that alternatives be considered for slowing the traffic down within this corridor. Travel speeds taken along the corridor range from 85th percentile speeds of 29.8 miles per hour to 34.5 miles per hour. These speeds are certainly within the range of expectancy of the current 25 mile-per-hour speed limit. Traffic volumes were surprisingly low, ranging from 24-hour totals of 590 to 674 vehicles per day. These volumes are typical of low-volume residential streets. Besides the installation of a four-way stop, other "traffic-calming" techniques could include narrowed pavement at intersections, diagonal diverters, mid-block bulbouts, traffic circles, partial intersection closures, total street closures, and many others. Enclosed are several options considered by City staff both before and after the public hearing on the project. Most of these options center around some form of diversion of traffic near the intersection of Van Buren and Drexel, which is about at the middle of the street. RECOMMENDATION The results of the travel speed analysis and the unexpectedly low traffic count indicates that Van Buren is not the high-speed diverter of traffic between University Avenue and Pennsylvania as originally thought. These speeds and traffic volumes are among the lowest we have ever analyzed and below the threshold where corrective traffic control devices have ever been utilized. In my opinion, the street should be reconstructed as it currently exists, without any realignment or stop signs. Experience in other reconstruction projects has shown that there is not an increase in travel speeds as might be anticipated subsequent to a paving project with its smoother riding conditions. Before and after traffic studies have shown this to be the case time after time. While I don't believe that any corrective action is necessary, if the Council chooses to proceed, I would recommend a design which would not require a lot of roundabout traffic diversions. Such an alternative would be to narrow the pavement in the vicinity of the Alpha Street intersection, since this is where the highest traffic speed was recorded, as traffic comes off Pennsylvania eastbound on Van Buren. I believe the narrowed pavement concept is the best alternative since it does not change existing traffic patterns or possibly create other problems associated with many of the other alternatives studied. Attached is a sketch of such a concept which can still be incorporated into the project even though the project is already under construction. ACTION TO BE TAKEN The City Council is requested to consider the traffic analysis and recommendation and to give direction to City staff on the various alternative concepts studied, or new concepts not yet addressed. If there is consensus to proceed with some form of traffic control, City staff would then set up meetings with the neighborhood to address alternatives. MAK/vjd Cccs ~.!: :JQ. ca<( C-c CCSc >ccs C) c: ~ L- ea C- o Z '+- o ea ~ <(