Minutes Historic Pres. 6 15 06
MEETING MINUTES
tI~TORIC P1?~V'(fl10N OO~ION
Thursday, June 15, 2006
5:30 p.m.
Carnegie Stout Public Library Auditorium
Present:
Chairperson Dave Stuart, Commission Members John Whalen, Mike Coty,
Jim Gibbs and Chris Wand; Staff Members David Johnson, Tim O'Brien
and Wally Wernimont.
Absent:
Commissioners Chris Olson and Mary Loney Bichell.
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE: Staff presented an Affidavit of Compliance verifying
the meeting was being held in compliance with the Iowa Open Meetings Law.
CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Stuart at 5:32 p.m.
REVIEW OF MINUTES: Chairperson Stuart noted a change on Page 4 in the first
paragraph above second design review, should state, "look alikes" instead of "like
alikes." Motion by Wand, seconded by Whalen to approve the minutes of the May 18,
2006 meeting as amended. Motion was approved by the following vote: Aye - Stuart,
Whalen, Coty, Gibbs and Wand; Nay - none.
DESIGN REVIEW: Application of Bethany Golembesky/Mid American Holdings, LLC
for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace a 9'6" by 4' picture window with a 9' by
6'8" slider, add a hip roof to the existing garage to match the house and extend a new
deck around the north side of the house for the property at 1300 Walnut Street located
in the West 11 th Street Historic District.
Bethany Golembesky presented her application to the Commission. She noted that she
previously received approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness to move the house
from Finley site to this site. She indicated that she received approval for modifications.
She noted that she is now asking to remodify the previous proposal. She explained that
instead of a 9'6" window on the north side of the building, they would like to replace it
with a 9' by 6'8" sliding door. She indicated that they are proposing to expand the porch
to the side of the house where the sliding door will access it. She noted that they are
proposing to install roof trusses on the existing garage and not build the previously
approved detached garage.
Chairperson Stuart noted that the roof design will be similar to the house except it will
have a slightly lower pitch.
Staff Member Johnson presented the staff report. He referred to the previously
approved Certificate of Appropriateness. He reiterated the requests for the new
Certificate of Appropriateness to the Commission. Chairperson Stuart asked about the
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 2
staining of the wood. Ms. Golembesky stated that the shingles would be using a
transparent stain.
Motion by Stuart, seconded by Whalen, to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness
with the option of using pigmented stain, transparent stain or paint on the shingles.
Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty, Gibbs, Wand and Stuart; Nay
- None.
DESIGN REVIEW: Application of Bethany Golembesky/Mid American Holdings, LLC
for a Certificate of Appropriateness to use 7 11," width 6" exposure fiber cement board
lap siding in the middle section of the house (above limestone) and behind the
limestone on the lower level and stain cedar shingles in the upper section of the house
from the freeze board to the roof at the gable ends for the property at 550 Arlington
Street located in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District.
Bethany Golembesky presented the application to the Commission. She noted that this
house was relocated from the Finley site to this site. She referred to the previously
approved Certificate of Appropriateness for the design of the building. She indicated
that the previous approval showed a poured concrete foundation with limestone veneer.
She stated that instead of covering the entire poured concrete foundation with limestone
that she would propose to install fiber cement lap siding on a portion of the foundation.
She stated that on the west side of the house, limestone will be installed from the front
fa9ade 20 feet back and then at that point, fiber cement board would be installed that
would not be viewable due to the stair access. She stated on the east side of the
house, limestone will be installed from the front fa9ade to eight feet back and then fiber
cement board would be installed. She also stated that she would like to install fiber
cement board on the gabled dormers.
Staff Member Johnson presented the staff report. He referred to the previously
approved Certificate of Appropriate and reiterated the new request is to install fiber
cement board on the foundation, the first floor level of the house and the gables. He
also stated that Ms. Golembesky is proposing to use cement board on the shed dormer
if they run out of the existing wood shingles. Ms. Golembesky explained the location of
the cement fiberboard on the building to the Commission. She noted that if they run out
of wood shingles, she would like to use cement board.
Commissioner Wand noted that he would like to see wood shingles be put on the
dormers instead of cemplank siding.
Motion by Wand, seconded by Whalen, to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness to
install cement fiber board siding with a 6" exposure on the lower foundation, as
requested, and the use of cedar shingles on the upper dormers. Motion carried by the
following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty, Gibbs, Wand and Stuart; Nay - None.
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 3
DESIGN REVIEW: Application of Bethany Golembesky/Mid American Holdings, LLC
for a Certificate of Appropriateness to use 7 )1," width 6" exposure fiber cement board
lap siding in the middle section of the house above the limestone and behind the
limestone on the lower level and stained cedar shingles in the upper section of the
house from the freeze board to the roof at the gabled ends for the property at 570
Arlington Street located in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District.
Bethany Golembesky presented her application to the Commission. She referred to
submitted renderings and noted the use of fiber cement board underneath a deck. She
stated that the limestone veneer will still be used on the foundation; however, when they
get eight feet back from the front fa9ade they would like to install the fiber cement
board, which would be located underneath the deck. She stated that they are also
proposing to use the fiber cement board on the dormer of the building.
Staff Member Johnson presented the staff report. He noted that the previously
approved Certificate of Appropriateness and reiterated the request for the new
Certificate of Appropriateness.
Ms. Golembesky also noted they will be using fiber cement board on the first story of
the building. Commissioner Wand stated that since they are using cement boards on
the front fa9ade of the building, he has no objection to the use of the cement board on
the dormers. He stated that due to the size of the dormers, he would like to see a
smaller lap exposure than 6". Ms. Golembesky stated that she is amenable to the use
of 4" or less lap exposure on the dormer.
Motion by Wand, seconded by Whalen, to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for
the use of 6" exposure fiber cement board lap siding on the foundation and the first
story of the house and the use of a 4" or less exposure fiber cement board lap siding on
the dormer. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty, Gibbs, Wand
and Stuart; Nay - None.
DESIGN REVIEW: Application of Jan Imhof/PAL, LLC for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to reconstruct the second story porch rail using 2" by 2" wood spindles
to match the existing spindles, install a 46" high black rod iron rail on the third floor
porch to replace the 27 %" high railing, replace the existing 33" by 71" wood fixed paned
windows with 33" by 71" vinyl double-hung windows on the second story porch, and
remove "Park Manor" from the front fa9ade of the building for the property at 1689-1691
Main Street located in the Jackson Park Historic Preservation District.
Jan Imhof, representing PAL, LLC, presented the application to the Commission. Mrs.
Imhof reported on the status of the porch that is being reconstructed. She stated that
they are proposing to deviate from the previously approved porch. She explained that
they would like to use a vinyl double-hung window on the second story instead of the
fixed pane wood storms that were there. She noted the use of a wrought iron hand rail
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 4
on the top of the third story porch for safety and the removal of "Park Manor" from the
building.
Staff Member Johnson presented the staff report. He reiterated the Certificate of
Appropriateness request for the alterations to the building. Chairperson Stuart noted
that he would like to break the multiple requests into separate motions.
The Commission discussed the removal of "Park Manor" from the building.
Motion by Wand, seconded by Whalen, to allow the removal of "Park Manor" from the
porch design. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty, Gibbs, Wand
and Stuart; Nay - None.
Chairperson Stuart then referred to the railing to be installed on the third story. Mrs.
Imhof noted she is requesting a 46" tall railing on the porch instead of the standard 42"
handrail. Commissioner Whalen asked about the handrail design. Mrs. Imhof stated
that they are going with the 46" height for safety reasons. She stated that they were
proposing to use the twisted spindles for the handrail. The Commission noted that they
would much rather see a standard square spindle used instead of the twisted spindle
that was previously used. Mrs. Imhof noted that all the railings are being custom
fabricated and that she is agreeable to the use of a square spindle for the handrail.
Motion by Whalen, seconded by Wand, to approve the third story guard railing with
square metal spindles. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty,
Gibbs, Wand and Stuart; Nay - None.
Chairperson Stuart then referred to the hand railing that will be installed on the first
story. He stated that the handrail that is being proposed does not meet the current
Building Code requirement. He noted that the handrail should be ADA compliant. He
asked Mrs. Imhof if she is willing to withdraw her request for the handrail on the first
story porch and to meet with the Building Department for a new design. Mrs. Imhof
noted that she was willing to withdraw the handrail design and to come back to the
Commission after she talks to the Building Department. The Commission discussed
that the handrail should wrap around and meet up with the brick wall on the first story
porch.
Chairperson Stuart then discussed the request for the windows and handrail on the
second story. He noted that the handrail design is not changed and therefore she does
not need approval for that design. He referred to the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation and the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Restoration.
He noted that the applicants are proposing to duplicate the porch to a specific period of
time. He stated that the use of double-hung vinyl windows on the second story porch is
not in keeping with the guidelines. He stated that 50 years ago, the porch was probably
not being used as a three-season porch. He noted that the previous porch used
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 5
screens and storms on the second story. Mrs. Imhof presented a photo of the porch to
the Commission that showed the previous storm windows. The Commission discussed
leaving the porch as an open porch. Mrs. Imhof stated that they are proposing to install
the windows in order to help make the apartments more marketable.
The Commission discussed the option of leaving the porch open. Mrs. Imhof noted that
if the porch was to remain open, that the handrail design would need to be extended in
order to meet Building Code.
Commissioner Wand noted that he is opposed to the use of vinyl double-hung windows
on the second story porch. Mrs. Imhof asked if they could use wood double-hung
windows. Commissioner Wand noted that double-hung windows could be an option;
however, he is more open to the use of full wood screens instead of double-hung
windows.
Motion by Wand, seconded by Stuart, to approve the changes to the second level of the
porch. Motion was denied by the following vote: Aye - None; Nay - Whalen, Coty,
Gibbs, Wand and Stuart.
DESIGN REVIEW: Application of Ken Moore for a Certificate of Appropriateness to
review the site plan and complete the design review for duplexes for property on
Arlington Street located in the W. 11th Street Historic Preservation District.
Ken Moore, 1816 Vine Street, Maquoketa, Iowa, presented the application to the
Commission. He noted that Terry Koelker, Buesing and Associates, prepared the site
plan and is available for questions. Mr. Moore noted that he is proposing to build two
duplexes and to attach them along a common lot line. He referred to the topography of
the site and the design of the building.
Staff Member Johnson presented the staff report. He referred to the design of the
building. He referred to the previous Zoning Board of Adjustment approvals for the
setbacks. He explained that the applicant is actually proposing two attached duplexes
for a total of four units. He explained the use of materials on the exterior of the building.
He referred to an amended plan that shows that the garage door is now facing Arlington
Street. He reviewed the City's Streetscape and Landscape Guidelines as well as the
Architectural Design Guidelines for the style, structures size, setting, massing, and
driveways as well as new residential construction.
Chairperson Stuart noted that the Secretary of Interior's Standards do not have
guidelines for infill buildings. He stated that the applicant is proposing to construct a
side gable Italianate duplex. The Commission discussed that the overall massing of the
building is too large for the W. 11th Street Historic District. Mr. Moore noted that in
1999, the Commission reviewed the design of the building. Chairperson Stuart referred
to several side gable duplexes located throughout the neighborhood. He referred to the
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 6
two-door and window configuration of these buildings. He stated that the shape,
massing and scale are too large for the neighborhood. He also stated that the gable
overhangs are too small for this building. Mr. Moore noted that the building design is
based on the structure located to the east of the lots. The Commission discussed the
size and scale of buildings throughout the neighborhood. Commissioner Wand noted
that the building is basically two duplexes attached to each other, and that the size and
scale is not compatible with the neighborhood. He noted that if the buildings were to be
separated into two separate duplexes, the size and scale would work. He noted that the
height of the building is not proportionate to the width of the building.
The Commission discussed the location of off-street parking and the garage doors. Mr.
Moore noted that the location of the garage doors on the previously submitted plan were
in error and that they should be installed on the front of the building. He stated that
Arlington Street is mostly rental properties, and the majority of the properties do not
have off-street parking. He stated that historic garage doors could be purchased and
installed on the building.
Mr. Moore asked about the use of aluminum soffit on the structure. Commission Wand
noted that this is an infill structure and he has more concerns with the size and scale of
the building. He said that the Commission can be amenable to material uses of the
building. Commissioner Wand noted that the style of the building and the materials
used will depend on the newly submitted design. Chairperson Stuart noted that the use
of a fiber cement board is more acceptable than a vinyl or aluminum. The Commission
stated that brick should be used to the gable ends of the building.
Commissioner Gibbs discussed the possibility of constructing a federal-style townhouse
building. The Commission discussed with the applicant the federal building style. Mr.
Moore noted that he owns several federal-style townhouses located on Locust Street.
Mr. Moore noted that he is more agreeable to the use of the federal-style at this
location. The Commission stated the buildings could still be connected with a "0" lot
line; however, they would like to see a sidewalk installed in front of the building that
would provide access from the parking area into the building. The Commission asked
Mr. Moore if he would like to withdraw his application and to resubmit a new plan at the
next meeting. Mr. Moore agreed to withdraw his application and resubmit a new plan.
DESIGN REVIEW: Application of Greg and Peggy Stover for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for after-the-fact alterations to an existing flat roof addition located at
the rear of the existing building at 1145 Locust Street located in the Jackson Park
Historic Preservation District.
Greg Stover presented his application to the Commission. Mr. Stover noted that he
purchased the home in 2000 with the idea to make it into a meeting and event center.
He referred to the addition at the rear of the building built in 1932. He stated that it was
constructed improperly and needed to be fixed. He stated that he has met with the
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 7
Historic Preservation Commission in the past, and stated he has several drawing plans
of the building from 1932. He stated that the design for the addition was not concise in
2003.
The Commission discussed that they approved a loosely designed rear addition, and
that Mr. Stover was going to return to the Commission later with a more concrete
design.
Mr. Stover noted that he received approval for the demolition of the garage. He stated
that in the process, they discovered there were massive footings for the garage that tied
into a cistern. He stated he then modified his plan to not include the construction of a
turret as proposed. He explained that his contractor was working the property but left in
the middle of construction for personal reasons.
He then stated the addition sustained several thousand dollars worth of damage caused
by a rain and wind storm. Mr. Stover explained that he was in the process of looking for
cedar siding for over three years for the property and ironically found it at Spahn and
Rose. He stated he used cedar siding and Marvin wood windows as previously
approved, and that he is in the process of installing copper flashing and copper gutters
on the building.
He stated that he changed the turret to a bay window and it was based on the 1932
drawing.
He stated that the dormer on the south side did not match the one located on the rear
of the building and he reconfigured the rear windows because of a structural beam that
needed to be installed for the reconstruction of the addition's substructure.
He stated that he is currently waiting for a qualifying mason to install the tuck pointing
and stone on the building. He explained they went through complete reshingling of the
gate house and a portion of the addition.
He referred to a temporary door that is in the dormer that will be replaced with an oval
door. He described the alteration in the dormer from a triangular window and is
replacing the siding with solid trim to make it appear as one whole piece.
He noted that the previously approved design showed railings. He stated that he will
not install the wood hand railing because of snow sitting on the roof which would cause
it rot. He discussed the possibility of using cresting instead. He stated that there is
currently a lot of "if's" with the building at this time and that he will return on a future date
with more concrete details.
Staff Member Johnson presented the staff report. He noted the history of the property
and the architectural features and style of the building. He reviewed the previously
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 8
approved Certificate of Appropriateness, and noted that the minutes and drawings were
submitted with the Commission's packet. He referred to the applicant's letter that was
submitted with the application.
Chairperson Stuart noted that he wanted Mr. Stover to explain to the Commission what
exactly he is going to do in the future, if there are modifications or deviations, that the
Commission will need to review and approve them. Mr. Stuart noted that the window
fenestration change on the back of the building is not visible with the present window
configuration of the main house, and that he is okay with the modification. Mr. Stover
noted that he did not come back for the alteration for the windows. He stated that he
should have come back; however, they needed to be altered because of the structure of
the addition.
The Commission discussed the entrance to the rear of the building, which is not yet
constructed. They also discussed the triangular dormer located on the third floor.
Mr. Stover explained that he is going to remove the siding between the windows and
install solid molding. He explained that no columns or porch will be built on the rear of
the building. He stated this was going to be constructed for a separate entrance for an
arch itectu ra I fi rm.
Chairperson Stuart noted that the Secretary of Interior's Standards allows additions to
differentiate from the old, but the size, style, shape and scaling should be consistent.
Mr. Stover noted the reconstruction of ship wheel details on the porch and the
installation of ridge cresting. He stated that quartzite stone will be installed underneath
the bay on the south side of the building to match the existing.
Motion by Stuart, seconded by Whalen, to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness
for the changes as they are constructed, and also to allow solid trim to be installed in
the upper dormer and that the south side foundation wall will be covered with quartzite
stone to match existing. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty,
Gibbs, Wand and Stuart; Nay - None.
DESIGN REVIEW: Application for Review of Preservation Alternatives for St. Mark's
Community Center to wrap wood trim with aluminum at 391 W. 1zth Street located in the
Jackson Park Historic Preservation District.
Sr. Inez Turnmeyer, representing St. Mark's Community Center, presented her
application to the Commission. She noted that their previous request before the
Commission was to wrap the wood window trim with aluminum. She indicated that she
went to the City Council on appeal and the Council upheld the Commission's decision to
not allow wrapping with aluminum. She stated that she was present to discuss possible
alternative solutions to wrapping the wood windows. She stated that she needs a
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 9
solution between the Commission and St. Mark's Community Center that is affordable.
She asked if they could seek financial incentives from the City.
Staff Member Johnson explained the Revolving Loan Fund Program and stated that
although it is not free money, it is a low interest loan. Sr. Inez noted that it would cost
$10,000 to scrap and paint the wood trim and remove the aluminum. The Commission
discussed the cost of scraping and painting and removing the aluminum. The
Commission offered names of contractors. The Commission directed staff to provide
the applicant the name of the painter who has done work in the Langworthy Historic
District. The Commission also directed Sr. Inez Turnmeyer to approach Lowe's,
Menard's, Ace Hardware, etc. to help with financing or donation of materials.
ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC:
Bill Brown, 950 Spruce Street, reported on the demolition by neglect of his property. He
discussed the current deterioration of the limestone foundation, which borders along
Wilbur Lane. He stated he felt the deterioration of mortar and the limestone foundation
is from salt and snow removal along Wilbur Lane. The Commission discussed that the
applicant may be eligible for the Historic Preservation Housing Grant program to help
finance repairs. The Commission suggested the applicant look into this grant program
for the repairs and have further discussions with the City Staff. Mr. Brown indicated he
is working with City Engineer Gus Psihoyos to investigate the limestone to see the exact
cause of the damage.
Mr. Brown stated that he may have to file a claim against the City for damage caused to
his property. Chairperson Stuart stated that this is an issue he will have to work out
between the City and himself and at this point in time the Commission is willing to grant
adequate time for the repairs to be made.
The Commission suggested that Mr. Brown to look into the Historic Housing Grant
Program to help finance the repairs. The Commission discussed the possibility of
alternative materials if the limestone cannot be repaired cost effectively. The
Commission said they will ask Building Services Manager Rich Russell to evaluate the
condition of the foundation to see whether or not it is an immediate danger to the public.
Motion by Wand, seconded by Whalen, to ask Building Services Manager Rich Russell
to evaluate if the limestone foundation is an immediate hazard and to establish a
reasonable deadline for repairs. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Whalen,
Coty, Gibbs, Wand and Stuart; Nay - None.
ITEMS FROM COMMISSION
Iowa Historic Preservation Alliance Statewide Conference 2006
Staff Member Johnson stated no action is required. The information was provided for
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 10
their review and consideration.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Buildina Services Dept. - Status Report on Historic Preservation Enforcement: Staff
Member Johnson presented the Building Services Department Enforcement Report.
The Commission discussed the status of 1349 Prairie Street and the installation of
stucco and the report on broken windows. The Commission discussed 1145 Locust
Street. They noted that they approved Greg Stover's request for the rear addition of the
building. By consensus, the Commission agreed that the Certificate of Appropriateness
should be revised to state that any deviation from the approved Certificate of
Appropriateness shall be required to come back to the Commission for those changes
to be approved prior to the work being done.
Demolition bv Nealect Revisions: Chairperson Stuart noted the language was
submitted to the City Council for demolition by neglect to be extended to the
conservation districts. Mr. Stuart referred to a memo that was submitted in the
Commission's packet. The Commission reviewed the memo and the changes to the
ordinance language for the conservation districts.
Motion by Wand, seconded by Coty, to forward the revised draft ordinance extending
demolition by neglect to conservation districts, and to recommend the extension of
eligibility for the Historic Preservation Revolving Loan Fund to conservation districts on
to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty, Gibbs,
Wand and Stuart; Nay - None.
German Bank Buildina: The Commission discussed the current status of the German
Bank building. Chairperson Stuart asked if they could receive a status report on the
building.
Motion by Wand, seconded by Stuart, to direct staff to follow-up with John Gronen and
Steve Althoff on a status report on the German Bank Building. Motion carried by the
following vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty, Gibbs, Wand and Stuart; Nay - None.
Yorkshire Rose: Staff Member Johnson reported the current enforcement of the
Yorkshire Rose rear addition.
Millworkina Historic District Nomination: Staff Member Johnson reported on the
Millworking Historic District nomination. He noted the City Council has approved
Historic District Public Improvement funds to finance the nomination. He also stated
that they were directed by City Council to partner with the Envision 2010 Warehouse
District Revitalization Committee.
Minutes - Historic Preservation Commission
June 15, 2006
Page 11
Motion by Wand, seconded by Whalen, to direct the Commission Chairperson to meet
with the Envision 2010 Committee at their next meeting. Motion carried by the following
vote: Aye - Whalen, Coty, Gibbs, Wand and Stuart; Nay - None.
Comments on Comprehensive Plans Goals and Obiectives and draft 2030 Future Land
Use Map: Staff Member Johnson reported on the Land Use Plan to the Commission
and explained Commission comments may be submitted at any time.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Wally Wernimont, Assistant Planner
Date