Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Site Selection StudyTHE CITY OF
Dui
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: Site Selection for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
DATE: April 26, 2013
Dubuque
kital
All- America City
II 111!
2012
Director of Transit Operations Barbara Morck is requesting City Council approval of the
Site Selection Study for a new Bus Storage and Maintenance at the former City Garage
location and authorization to submit the study to the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) for their review, concurrence and approval of this site selection.
I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
btitt44 kr,„709,,,
Michael C. Van Milligen
MCVM:sv
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
Teri Goodmann, Assistant City Manager
Barbara Morck, Director of Transit Operations
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
TO: Michael Van Milligen, City Manager
FROM: Barbara Morck, Director of Transit Operations
CC: David Heiar, Economic Development Director
Kelley Deutmeyer, Executive Director of ECIA
DATE: April 25, 2013
Dubuque
btrid
All- America City
'1111!
2007
PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to request City Council approval of the Site
Selection Study for a new Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility (BSMF).
BACKGROUND
May 2012 the City Council approved the release of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
for a Site Selection Study and Environmental Analysis for a Bus Storage and
Maintenance Facility (BSMF). A committee comprised of City and ECIA /Jule /MPO staff
reviewed the six (6) responses to the RFQ that had been received. Three (3) firms
were selected for interview presentations. After the interviews were completed, the
committee reviewed the three presentations, came to a unanimous decision, and
recommended to the City Council to enter into contract with IIW, P.C. City Council
approved the recommendation and the contract was signed in late December 2012.
DISCUSSION
IIW, having been heavily involved in the original site selection study and environmental
analysis that had been performed for the Intermodal Center project, came to the project
with a good understanding of the involved federal requirements, depth of familiarity with
many of the areas that might be placed under consideration as potential sites for the
Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility, and knowledge of some of the possible
challenges faced with sites located in /around the old industrial areas near downtown
(e.g. an identified Brown Field, close proximity to residential neighborhoods, an
identified historical site, etc.).
In order to be considered for any future grant funding, a Site Selection Study and an
Environmental Analysis must be conducted and submitted to the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) for review and approval prior to the grant application submission.
A draft of the Site Selection Study has been submitted to the FTA for review and
comment, and their recommended changes will be incorporated into the final document
for official submission.
A Site Selection Study committee, comprised of City (David Heiar, Laura Carstens,
Todd Irwin, Teri Goodman and Kevin Cornwell) and ECIA /Jule /MPO (Chandra Ravada,
Jodi Johnson and Barbara Morck) staff, was formed and an initial meeting held
December 10, 2012. The purpose of the meeting was for the committee to establish
much of the base line criteria of the Site Selection Study and to approve the selection of
a specific site if one was identified. The following items and needs were identified,
discussed, approved and recommended for inclusion into the Study by the committee:
• Must be on City -owned property. This property must either have been purchased
as per the federal Uniform Relocation Act (URA) regulations or purchased prior
to the enactment of the URA (on /around 1972)
• Able to accommodate (at least) 28,000- 30,000 square feet of indoor
storage /maintenance space, office space and amenities (restrooms, etc.)
• No further south than Grandview /Hwy. 151/61
• No further north than 24th Street (current facility location)
• No further west than Radford Road
• No further east than the river
• Bicycle and pedestrian friendly (proximity to trail and /or existing sidewalk system)
• Proximity to key routes /core of fixed route structure
• Connectivity with Intermodal Center
• Location would reduce or minimize deadhead time and miles (reduce impact to
operational costs)
• Location would have minimal impact on surrounding neighborhood
• Proximity that supports and /or enhances intergovernmental partnerships
• Proximity to Public Works Maintenance /Storage Center (MSC)
• Proximity and good access to main thoroughfares
In reviewing the current and projected needs for The Jule, the committee identified and
approved the inclusion of the following items into the Study:
• Storage space for 30 current buses with room for (up to) 5 more
• Space maintenance activities (primarily preventative maintenance)
• Office space of varying sizes and configuration based on use (3 dispatchers,
Operations Supervisor, Director, Finance /record keeping, etc.)
• Lockers, showers and restroom facilities for Bus Operators, Maintenance,
Dispatch and office staff
• Break (aka "ready") room
• Off - street parking for staff and visitors
• On -site diesel fueling station (above ground)
• Off - street parking for buses (waiting to be processed at end of day)
• At least 28,000- 30,000 square feet of indoor space for storage and maintenance
of buses, offices, staff amenities (restrooms, etc.)
• HVAC system for office space(s), isolated from storage /maintenance space
• Heating (limited) for storage /maintenance space
• Proper exhaust system for storage /maintenance space
Upon approving the selection criteria, the committee began looking at possible sites for
a new BSMF and was able to narrow down and reach consensus on a single site: the
former City Garage which is located at 925 Kerper Boulevard. The committee felt that
the former City Garage site meets the highest number of listed criteria and, barring any
unknown environmental challenges that may be present in the site, is the best site for a
new BMFC. The selection criteria and committee concurrence on a potential site were
relayed to IIW for inclusion in the Site Selection Study. Again, the Site Selection Study
must be completed, submitted to and approved by FTA before the Environmental
Analysis portion of the process can be submitted to FTA for review and approval.
BUDGET IMPACT
City Manager granted approval of funding the Site Selection Study and subsequent
Environmental Analysis, with CIP # 240 -1015, Riverfront Plan Implementation
Strategies — Downtown Urban Renewal Area for up to $25,000; any /all expenses above
that amount will be taken out of the Transit Fund.
A TIGER V grant will be submitted to the US Department of Transportation (DOT) by
June 3, 2013. Notification of a grant award amounts us expected to be released late
September /early October 2013. If the City's application is awarded, the TIGER grant will
provide 80% of the funding needed for this project with the remaining 20% funded with
local match. The current estimated cost of the new Bus Storage and Maintenance
Facility is $12.7 million (80% = $10,160,000; 20% = $2,450,000). If the grant award is
for less than the needed amount the project will be scaled accordingly.
RECOMMENDATION /ACTION STEP
I recommend that the City Council approve the Site Selection Study and the selection of
the former City Garage as the location of the new Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
for The Jule, and to authorize the submittal of the study to the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) for their review, concurrence and approval of the site selection.
THE CITY OF
DUB
Masterpiece on the Mississippi
iiw
Dubuque Bus Storage and
Maintenance Facility:
Feasibility Study
Prepared for the City of Dubuque
April 2013
The Jule
Feasibility Study
Table of Contents
Report
1. Need For and Description of Proposed Action 1
2. Criteria for a bus storage facility 2
2.1 Introduction 2
2.2 Size 2
2.3 Location 4
2.4 Environmental .4
3. Site Analysis 4
3.1 Introduction 4
3.2 No -Build Alternative 4
3.3 Build Alternative .5
3.3.1 Site 1(Former City Operations Center)... ... 5
3.3.2 Site 2 (16th St. Detention Basin, North of 12th St. J...... 5
3.3.3 Site 3 (Next to Detention Basin, South of 16th St.) 5
3.3.4 Site 4 (Port ofDubuque, Adjacent to Star Brewery) .6
3.3.5 Site 5 (Port ofDubuque, End of 3rd Street) 6
3.3.6 Site 6 (1100 Jackson St.) 6
3.3.7 Site 7 (North of 16th St.) 6
3.3.8 Site 8 (Rebuild on existing site, Central Ave) 7
3.3.9 Site 9 (Kennedy Circle Jule Transfer Rt) 7
3.3.10 Site 10 (West of NW Arterial, South of Chavenelle) 7
4. Preferred Alternative ...8
4.1 Introduction .8
4.2 Advantages .8
4.3 Disadvantages .9
5. Preferred Site Operation and Layout .9
5.1 Introduction .9
5.2 Interior Space Program 9
5.3 Exterior Space Program ..10
5.4 Testing the Operational Feasibility of the Preferred Site 10
5.5 Site Layout ..10
5.6 Operation and Maintenance Costs ..11
5.7 Initial Facility Construction Costs ..13
Table of Contents (continued)
Table 2.2 Transit Fleet Inventory 3
Table 3.3 Site Evaluation Criteria Matrix 8
Table 5.2 Interior Space Programs Needs 10
Table 5.6 Operation &Maintenance Costs ..11
Table 5.7 Initial Facility Construction Costs 13
Figure 1.1 Location of Project 14
Figure 1.2 Study Corridor .15
Figure 2.1A Alternative Sites — Downtown .16
Figure 2.1B Alternative Sites — West End .17
Figure 2.2 Preferred Site & Site Layout 18
Figure 2.3 Floor Plan ..19
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Feasibility Study
1. Need For and Description of Proposed Action
The existing transit service in Dubuque is called The Jule (formerly known as Keyline Transit) and has a long
and well established history as the oldest transit system west of the Mississippi. The Jule provides safe,
efficient and effective bus transportation services to the residents and visitors of Dubuque, Iowa, through the
provision of a fixed route and complementary paratransit services. The Jule's fixed route system employs a
combination of traditional route structure with elements of Deviated Route /Demand Response structure. This
mix allows for greater flexibility in route schedule and coverage. The paratransit services provide independence
for persons with disabilities and area seniors by providing Origin -to- Destination transportation and passenger
assistance using a demand- response service structure. Hours of operation both fixed route and paratransit are:
Mid - August through May 314 - Monday - Thursday 6:00 a.m. -6:40 p.m., Friday 6:00 a.m. - 2:40 a.m.,
Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 2:40 a.m.
June 1 through mid - August - Monday - Thursday 6:00 a.m. - 6:40 p.m., Friday 6:00 a.m. — 10:00 p.m.,
Saturday 8:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m., Sunday 10:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
In fiscal year 2012 The Jule provided a total of 440,686 rides (fixed route and paratransit service combined).
Trolley buses operate seasonally on a looped - shuttle service between the Port of Dubuque and key downtown
locations.
The City of Dubuque completed a feasibility study to determine the location for an Intermodal Campus to serve
as a central hub for transit and the various modes of transportation. Design is underway for the components of
the Intermodal Campus which are currently funded. With the completion of the proposed Intermodal Campus,
the current transit transfer point on Iowa Street will be relocated to the new intermodal facility.
The City of Dubuque proposes to develop a bus storage facility. The purpose of the bus storage facility is to
provide housing for a brand -new fleet of clean diesel buses that were purchased with prior grant funds as well
as reduce the long term maintenance costs existing at the present facility. With the development of an
Intermodal Campus which includes a terminal building, intracity and intercity bus loading /transfer and parking
component, the bus storage facility will complement the services provided at the intermodal terminal.
Presently the city bus storage facility is located along Central Avenue and does not have adequate space to
provide maintenance functions. There is no room for staging or storing buses outside. The fueling station at the
existing site is inside which violates existing codes. Street access is challenging due to a narrow alley and
doorway. In addition, the existing facility is more than a century old and is operating beyond its useful life.
The repairs needed are not cost effective given the age of the structure and the transit service has changed
greatly due to the changes in technology, energy efficiency and growth of the city's urban population. A key
element in maintaining an efficient system is reduction of the deadhead miles. Fueling must be performed at
the City of Dubuque operations facility which is 22 blocks from the bus storage facility. Additionally, the
current facility is not in close proximity to the hub of the routes.
1
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
2. Criteria for a Bus Storage Facility
2.1 Introduction
Criteria were developed to ensure that the proposed bus storage facility met the needs of the City. The facility
program needs were evaluated by The Jule, East Central Intergovernmental Association, and City of Dubuque
staff.
2.2 Size
The size of the facility needed to be large enough so that bus storage needs could be met and maintenance could
be performed. A parcel worthy of analysis for the Bus Storage Facility needed to be larger than 55,000 sf.
It is intended that all buses will be stored inside the facility. Some exterior space will be required for staging of
buses that are waiting for cleaning and processing, and some employee parking will be required. Bus storage
needs were assumed using the current fleet inventory. As of April, 2012 there were a total of 33 vehicles: 30
buses, one mini -van, and two service vehicles in combined mini -bus and fixed -route fleets; however it is
anticipated the fleet will grow with added services. The inventory for the fixed -route fleet including trolleys
and the mini -bus fleet are listed in Table 2.2.
Maintenance space was considered to be important to allow Jule staff to perform maintenance and repairs in a
timely fashion, reducing downtime and delays in service. It is intended that most preventative maintenance
activities will occur inside the facility. The maintenance area uses will include preventative maintenance
aspects for the transit fleet, e.g. fluid and /or filter changes, lift maintenance, tire changes, etc., as well as some
repair of said fleet (extent will depend on amount and /or type of repair needed).
In addition to storing buses and serving as a maintenance area, the facility also needed to provide office space
for bus and maintenance personnel, restrooms, and an area to store tires, parts, and supplies. Further, any new
site will need to be able to serve as an emergency shelter and have a generator for heating and cooling.
2
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Table 2.2 Transit Fleet Inventory
The Jule's Fleet
as of 4/30/2012
Fleet
Vehide Vehicl
Type /Use e # Year Make
FX 2579
FX 2580
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
MB
FX
FX
FX
FX
FX
FX
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2003
2003
2010
2011
Model
Date of Placed into
Purchase Service
VIN
Length- Seated # of WC Standee ADA Fade Vehicle
Feet Capacity Positions Capacity Acces
Type
Chance
Chance
Freightliner
GMC
Optima Bus/Streetcar
Optima Bus/Streetcar
Sprinter bus
190" LD Glaval Titan 11
2003
2003
1/7/2011
5/7/2011
11/20/2003 1Z9S2HSS72W216277 29
11/20/2003 1Z9S2HSS93W216278 29
2/15/2011 WDPPF4CC1A9440213 14
5/17/2011 1 GB6G5BL3B 1143052 24
28
28
9
16
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
GMC 190" LD Glaval Titan 11
GMC 190" LD Glaval Titan 11
GMC 190" LD Glaval Titan 11
GMC 190" LD Glaval Titan 11
GMC 190" LD Glaval Titan 11
5/7/2011 5/17/2011 1 GB6G5BL7B 1143605 24
5/7/2011 5/17/2011 1 GB6G5BL3B 1143634 24
5/7/2011 5/17/2011 1 GB6G5BL1B 1143289 24
5/7/2011 5/17/2011 1 GB6G5BLOB 1143817 24
7/19/2011 7/22/2011 1 GB6G5BL6B 1144650 24
16
16
16
16
16
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
GMC
2648 2012 VPG
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
FX 2656
FX 2657
FX 2658
FX 2659
FX 2660
FX 2661
FX 2680
FX 2681
FX 2682
FX 2683 2011 Gilig
190" LD Glaval Titan 11
190" LD Glaval Titan 11
190" LD Glaval Titan 11
190" LD Glaval Tit
190" LD Glaval Titan
7/19/2011 7/25/2011 1 GB6G5BL6B 1144132 24
7/19/2011 8/1/2011 11GB6G5BL3B1142953 24
7/19/2011 7/21/2011 1 GB6G5BL3B 1143794 24
Titan II 7/19/2011 7/21/2011 1 GB6G5BL4B 1143366 24
II 7/19/2011 7/22/2011 1GB6G5BL8B1150644 24
MV -1 (mini -van)
1/18/2012 2/6/2012 523MF1A63CM100058 10
16
16
16
16
16
3
2011
2011
2011
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320
ElDorado
ElDorado
Aero Elite Navistar 320
Aero Elite Navistar 320 7/13/2011
7/12/2011 7/29/2011 5 WEASAAL3CJ554061 28
7/12/2011
8/2/2011 5WEASAAL4CJ554067 28
8/3/2011 5 WEASAAL3CJ554061 28
30
30
30
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320 7/13/2011
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320 7/14/2011
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320 7/14/2011
7/15/2011
7/15/2011
8/1/2011 SWEASAALSCJ554062
8/5/2011 5 WEASAALS CJ554059
7/23/2011 SWEASAAL6CJ554068
7/28/2011 5 WEASAAL1 CJ554057
7/28/2011 5 WEASSAL7CJ554063
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320
28
28
28
28
28
30
30
30
30
30
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320
ElDorado Aero Elite Navistar 320
Gllig
Gllig
Gillig
35 ft. HD LF
35 ft. HD LF
35 ft. HD LF
7/15/2011
7/18/2011
7/18/2011
7/18/2011
6/8/2011
6/8/2011
8/27/2011
7/22/2011 5 WEASSAL2CJ554066
8/10/2011 5 WEASAAL1 CJ554060
8/10/2011 SWEASAAL9CJ554064
8/8/2011 5 WEASSALOCJ554065
8/25/2011 15 G GB 2714 B 1179460
8/24/2011 15 G GB 2716 B 1179461
10/3/2011 15 G GB 2718 B 1179462
28
28
28
28
35
35
35
30
30
30
30
32
32
32
35 ft. HD LF
8/30/2011 10/1/2011 15 GGB 2718B 1179463
32
SV 2562 1999 Chevrdet
SV 2555 1998 Chevrdet
Shop Thick
Lumina
2/22/2008 2/22/2008 1GBJK34FXXF015969
1998 10/29/2007 2G1WL52K6W9268569
2
5
2
2
3
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
1
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
_ 30
30
30
32
32
32
32
n/a
n/a
10
10
0
0
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
0
0
0
0
0
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
0
0
0
0
0
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
0 Ramp
s
10
10
10
Lift
Lift
Lift
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
10
10
10
10
10
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
10
10
10
10
19
19
19
Lift
Lift
Lift
Lift
Ramp
Ramp
Ramp
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
Diesel
19 Ramp Diesel
2579
2580
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2648
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2680
2681
2682
2683
0 No Diesel
0 No
2562
2555
FX = Fixed Route Bus
MB = Mini -bus (complementary paratransit
SV = Service Vehicle
3
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
2.3 Location
A key element in maintaining an efficient system is reduction of the deadhead miles. Any proposed bus storage
facility needed to be located near the Intermodal Campus or other bus transfer points and have access to major
roads. Two of the sites evaluated were on the west side of the City. These locations may, or may not, be viable
options now, but may be good options for a satellite bus storage facility in the future as the City grows on the
west end and the need for transit facilities increases. It may be possible to combine a future satellite facility
with other city services needed to accommodate west -end growth. The bus storage facility location should not
impact schedule reliability, and the location should be appropriate for current land use. Site availability and
ownership was also reviewed to verify ability to meet property acquisition requirements related to potential
funding.
2.4 Environmental
Environmental concerns were also part of the criteria. Any known environmental issues, such as historical
importance, floodplain constraints, or hazardous materials would have to be addressed.
3. Site Analysis
3.1 Introduction
Build and No -Build alternatives were considered to determine the best solution to meet the transportation needs
for the City of Dubuque. The No -Build alternative was to maintain the existing bus storage facility. Rebuilding
on existing site is considered as Alternate 8. Multiple sites for a Build alternative were considered (See Figure
2.1A & 2.1B). The Build alternative evaluated ten sites, including rebuilding on the current site. Eight of the
sites are in downtown locations which are close to existing transit routes. Two of the sites are on the west side
of the City. These sites may, or may not, be viable options currently, but may be a good choice for a future
satellite site as the bus fleet grows and city population moves westward. Figure 1.2 shows the area that was
considered due to the current bus users, transfer points, and bus routes. Each of these alternatives is discussed
below.
3.2 No -Build Alternative
The No -Build Alternative was to maintain the existing bus storage facility on Central Avenue. The current
facility has code violations such that the existing fueling station at this site, which is located inside of the
building, can no longer be used. With the construction of a new transit transfer point on the proposed
Intermodal Campus, impacts could include increased deadhead time and less efficient routing. In addition, the
existing facility has a higher operational and maintenance cost to the transit system due to the age,
condition and energy inefficiencies of the building. Major bus maintenance activities currently take place at the
existing facility as well as the City public works operations. Heavy equipment used in performance of bus
maintenance activities (e.g. floor hoist) are in need of major repair work or replacement. Primary access to the
maintenance area of the current facility, which is through the garage door located on the south side of the
building, is problematic because of the limited turning area (narrow alley -way and narrow door way.) Land
uses would be expected to remain the same. No residences or commercial businesses would be taken, and
access to adjacent properties and travel patterns would remain unchanged.
4
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
The No -Build Alternative would fail to meet the purpose and need for a modern bus storage facility to house the
new transit fleet serving the City of Dubuque with reduced building maintenance costs for the transit budget.
Economic and operational benefits of a transportation campus that houses bus storage in close proximity to the
bus transfer and Intermodal Campus would not be realized by choosing the No -Build Alternative.
3.3 Build Alternative
3.3.1 Site 1(Former City Operations Center)
Advantages:
o City has owned and operated the site since 1971.
o Close to Intermodal terminal building and bus transfer point
o Traffic access from both 9th and 11th Streets
o Existing building large enough to meet all requirements
o Site size and configuration can accommodate bus staging and employee parking
o Major road access to US 61/151
Disadvantages:
o Direct route to Intermodal terminal has at -grade rail crossings, indirect route to Intermodal terminal that
does not cross rail line at grade via Kerper /Fengler /Rhomberg /Elm
o Access by others to monitoring wells has to be maintained
o Hazardous materials present, however use of existing building allows site to be used without disturbing
hazardous material
3.3.2 Site 2 (16th St. Detention Basin, North of 12th St.)
Advantages:
o Close to Intermodal terminal building and bus transfer point
o Site size and configuration can accommodate bus staging and employee parking
o Major road access to US 61/151
Disadvantages:
o Property is not owned by City
o Hazardous material impacts limit use of site, remediated site would need to use more expensive
foundations for building (4" depth restriction)
o Direct route to Intermodal terminal has at -grade rail crossings, indirect route to Intermodal terminal that
does not cross rail line at grade via Kerper /Fengler /Rhomberg /Elm
3.3.3 Site 3 (Next to Detention Basin, South 016th St.)
Advantages:
o Property is owned by City
o Site size and configuration can accommodate bus staging and employee parking
a Major road access to US 61/151
o No environmental or hazardous material constraints
Disadvantages:
o Negative impact on existing traffic since current traffic not flowing at acceptable level of service
o Transit schedules could be impacted by congestion in area
o Further from downtown and Intermodal Campus than other sites
o Site partially leased, 3 acres on west side available
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
3.3.4 Site 4 (Port ofDubuque, Adjacent to Star Brewery)
Advantages:
o Property is owned by City
o Site size and configuration can accommodate bus staging and employee parking
o No environmental or hazardous material constraints
Disadvantages:
o Adjacent to historic site, design would need to consider indirect adverse impacts to historic site
o Not as close to Intermodal Campus as other sites
o Transit schedules could be impacted since only one access to Port Area (3`d Street) that does not cross an
active rail line at grade
o Negative impact to existing traffic
o Land use more suitable for other developments
3.3.5 Site 5 (Port ofDubuque, End of 3rd Street)
Advantages:
o Property is owned by City
o Site size and configuration can accommodate bus staging and employee parking
Disadvantages:
o Further from downtown and Intermodal Campus than other sites
o Transit schedules could be impacted since only one access to Port Area (3`d Street) that does not cross an
active rail line at grade
o Land use more suitable for other developments
o Environmental and hazardous material unknown
3.3.6 Site 6 (1100 Jackson St.)
Advantages:
o Close to Intermodal terminal building and bus transfer point
o Access for buses from 111i St., 12th St., Washington St., or Jackson St.
o No negative schedule reliability impact
o Good land use
Disadvantages:
o Property is not owned by City
o Unknown archeological, historical or hazardous material conditions
o Site size limits flexibility, no space for bus staging
o Negative impact on existing traffic
3.3.7 Site 7 (North of 16th St.)
Advantages:
o Site size and configuration can accommodate bus staging and employee parking
o Major road access to US 61/151
Disadvantages:
o Property is not owned by City
o Negative impact on existing traffic since current traffic not flowing at acceptable level of service
6
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
o Transit schedules could be impacted by congestion in area
o Further from downtown and Intermodal Campus than other sites
o Direct route to Intermodal terminal has at -grade rail crossings, indirect route to Intermodal terminal that
does not cross rail line at grade via Kerper /Fengler /Rhomberg /Elm
o Environmental and hazardous material unknown
3.3.8 Site 8 (Rebuild on existing site, Central Ave)
Advantages:
o Property is owned by City
Disadvantages:
o Historic structure more than 50 years old, expensive to rehabilitate in conformance with Secretary of
Interior Standards
o Site does not allow flexibility for layout and traffic points for access
o Further from downtown and Intermodal Campus than other sites
3.3.9 Site 9 (Kennedy Circle Jule Transfer Rt.)
Advantages:
o Good land use
o Current Bus transfer point
o No impact to Schedule Reliability
o No impact to existing traffic
o Location may be beneficial as City expands westward
Disadvantages:
o Property is not owned by City
o Far from downtown and Intermodal Campus
o Site size limits flexibility
3.3.10 Site 10 (West of NW Arterial, South of Chavenelle)
Advantages:
o Good land use
o Site size provides flexibility
o Major road access to US 20
o No impact on existing traffic
o Location may be beneficial as City expands westward
o City may be able to purchase property easily
Disadvantages:
o Far from downtown and Intermodal Campus
o Topography and wetlands limit site configuration
o Property is not owned by City
The committee members rated the sites on a scale using 1 as meets objective, 0 as neutral, -1 as fails to meet
objective. As a result of the ranking, sites 1 and 3 received the highest ranking. The Bus Storage Facility Site
Evaluation Criteria Matrix is shown in Table 3.3.
7
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Table 3.3
City of Dubuque, Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
SPd
Selection Criteria
SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA
Transportation
Environmenta
I
0
n
F6
2
Remarks
Site Configuration
Proximity to Iniermodal terminal
Schedule Reliability
Proximity to Maintenance Facility
Proximity to bus routes and main ihoroughfain
Impact on Existing Traffic
Major Road Access
Proximity to Bus Transfer points
Large Vehicular Access to Site
Transit Route Viability
Environmental Assessment Requirements
WellandsfFloodplain Constraints
Historical /Archeological Importance
Hazardous Material
Conservation Area/Land
Proposed Sites
1
Former CityOperaiionsCenter
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
17
1
2
161h St. Detention Basin, North of 12th St.
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
-1
1
13
3
3
Next to Detention Basin, South of 16th St.
0
0
1
1
-1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
14
2
4
Port of Dubuque, Adjacent to Star Brewery
0
0
0
1
-1
1
0
1
0
1
1
-1
1
1
9
5
5
Port of Dubuque, End of3rd St.
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
-1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
9
5
6
1100 Jackson St.
1
-1
1
-1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
11
4
7
North of 16th St.
1
1
1
-1
1
0
0
0
1
1
-1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
9
5
8
Rebuild on Existing Site, Central Ave
0
-1
-1
1
-1
1
-1
0
-1
1
1
0
-1
0
0
1
1
-1
0
1
0
9
9
KennedyCircle Jule T ransfer Rt.
1
0
1
-1
1
0
-1
1
-1
-1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
8
8
10
West of NW Arterial, South ofChavenelle
0
1
0
0
1
1
-1
-1
-1
-1
1
1
-1
1
-1
0
-1
1
-1
1
0
9
Scoring System
Meets our Objective
1
Neutral
Fails to meet our Objective
4. Preferred Alternative
4.1 Introduction
Based on the information presented, the Build Alternative using Site 1 (Former City Operations Center) was
selected as the preferred alternative. The location of the bus storage facility is proposed in an area bounded by
Kerper Boulevard, 11th Street, and Pine Street, the site is shown on Figure 1.1.
4.2 Advantages
This site was selected as the bus site for the bus storage facility for the following reasons:
8
o The site is already owned by the City of Dubuque, so no additional acquisition or relocation
costs would be incurred.
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
o The site is near the proposed bus transfer site (Intermodal Campus) allowing for more consistent
bus schedules and less dead head time.
o The site has easy access to Kerper Boulevard allowing a feasible option to use Fengler Street,
Rhomberg Avenue, and Elm Street if trains are blocking 9th Street, 11th Street, or 16th Street.
o The conversion to two -way traffic on 9th St., 11th St., Pine St., and Kerper Boulevard, which is
anticipated to occur in 2014, will make the site even more convenient.
o A bus storage facility is a good use for this currently vacant building.
o The drive distance between this location and the Public Works facility where major maintenance
occurs is 0.6 miles less than the current bus storage facility.
4.3 Disadvantages
The disadvantages for the site can be addressed and mitigated through the design process. Specifically:
o The hazardous materials underground prevent any excavating more than 6 ft. deep. Since the
current building is large enough to permit all storage and maintenance function be done inside,
no excavating is required. Additionally, an impervious surface may be applied to further reduce
possibility of contact with materials below surface.
o Use of this site requires that Mid - American be able to access monitoring wells. Access to
monitoring will be addressed in the design process and can be maintained.
o The direct route from the proposed site to the intermodal facility crosses active railroad tracks.
There is a less direct route that does not cross any at -grade tracks via Kerper Boulevard, Fengler
Street, Rhomberg Avenue, and Elm Street.
5. Preferred Site Operation and Layout
5.1 Introduction
This section presents an analysis of the operational feasibility of the proposed site for a bus storage facility.
The Bus Storage Facility would consist of bus storage, bus maintenance space, office and restroom space, and a
small public space for an area to sell tickets. The minimum square footage needed to accommodate the
proposed storage facility is approximately 37,200 square foot. This proposed facility has 41,625 square feet.
5.2 Interior Space Program
The bus storage building will include office space for a supervisor, dispatcher, a mechanic /service person office,
and additional support staff offices. Additional space needed in the bus storage facility will include a small
employee break area (table, chairs, and small kitchenette), male and female restrooms (toilets, hand sinks,
showers, lockers, and changing area), parts storage area (filters, belts, light bulbs, and fixtures, etc.), and an area
to house above ground storage tanks for fluids (engine oil, hydraulic fluid, radiator fluid, and waste oil) used in
preventative maintenance of bus fleet. The bus storage facility will provide for a small public space where
tickets can be purchased. A large maintenance area will also be needed which will include a hydraulic lift and a
wash bay. The areas within the proposed facility are identified in Table 5.2 with a floor plan shown in Figure
2.3.
9
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Table 5.2 Interior Space Program Needs
UNIT TOTAL
SPACE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY.ALLAWL AREA
Lobby 1 100 100
Office 1 175 175
Open Office 1 650 65()
Office 3 135 405
Break 1 450 450
Toliet /Shower Suites 500 1,000
Toliet 2 100 200
Work Room 385 385
Small Parts Storage 1 575 575
Vault i_ 220 220
Large Parts Storage 1 1,100 1,100
Maintenance Area 5,683 5,683
Bus Storage 1 28,345 28,345
Wash Bay 500 500
Building Area Subtotal -Net
Circulation
Building Total Area - Gross
39,788]
1,837
41,625
5.3 Exterior Space Program
While it is intended that all buses will be stored inside the facility and that all maintenance activities will occur
inside the facility, some exterior space will be required for staging of buses that are waiting for cleaning and
processing. Exterior space will also be needed for parking. It is estimated that 30 parking spaces will be
needed for employees and visitors. The proposed site has adequate exterior space for bus staging and
employee /visitor parking.
5.4 Testing the Operational Feasibility of the Preferred Site
From a transit standpoint, The Jule was contacted and found the access would be acceptable and allow for a
regular transit schedule. Although the most direct route from the preferred site to the Intermodal facility crosses
active railroad tracks, there is another, less direct, route that buses could use without crossing active railroad
tracks which could cause delay in transit schedules. The two -way street conversion of 9th St., 11th St., Pine St.,
and Kerper Boulevard is anticipated to occur in 2014 and will give bus drivers varied options to access the
intermodal campus and transit routes.
5.5 Site Layout
The bus storage facility will fit in the existing, vacant building on the site. The facility will also provide an
office for The Jule transit director and other Jule staff. Figure 2.3 shows a site layout for the buses which
10
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
accommodates pull - through bus storage as well as an area for bus maintenance such as oil changes. Figure
2.1A shows a layout of the existing site and the relationship to Kerper Boulevard, Pine St, and 11th St. Figure
2.2 shows that the turning movements of the vehicles can be accommodated on this site.
5.6 Operation and Maintenance Costs
An estimated operating and maintenance cost was arrived at based on discussions with the City of Dubuque
Transit Division and their typical costs. All transit revenue from the Intermodal Campus will go to maintaining
the facility and supporting The Jule operation. The detailed cost analysis is shown in Table 5.6.
Table 5.6— Operation and Maintenance Costs
Based on FY 2013 to -date actual and FY 2014 projected budget(s):
FT Employee (1 FTE Service Worker/Building
Maintenance)
Employee Benefits
Employee Physicals
$49,176 (base
pay)
$19,441
$100
Total Wage & Benefits $68,717
Cost of Operations (includes Fixed Route, Mini -Bus, Trolley Service and Bus Maintenance):
Uniforms Purchases
Postage & Shipping
DP Equip. Maint.
$6,000
$900
Contracts $5,100
Office Supplies $2,000
OIE Maint. Contracts $0
Printing/Binding $9,000
General Liability
Insurance
Property Insurance
Total Supplies & Services $23,000
$40,000
$3,000
Total Insurance Tax &
Damage $43,000
Travel -City Business
Education/Training
$1,600
$5,600
Total Travel Related Costs $7,200
Utility Exp- Refuse $1,000
Utility Exp -Gas $25,000
Utility Exp - Electric $24,000
Telephone $5,000
Property Maintenance $5,000
11
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Table 5.6— Operation and Maintenance Costs (cont.)
Total Utility & Prop
Maintenance $60,000
Motor Vehicle Maint. $150,000
Fuel (Diesel and Gasohol), Motor Vehicle $250,000
Total Motor Vehicle $400,000
Case Short & Over $0
False Alarm Charges $0
Data Processing $1,000
Mach. /Equip. Maint.
Outsource
Equip. Maint. Contracts
Programming
CustodiallJanitorial Supplies
De -Icing Products
Mach. /Equip. Maint.
Audit Services
$12,000
$4,000
$600
$2,500
$1,500
$1,500
Total Maintenance &
Operating $23,100
Total Contractual
Services
$2,000
$2,000
Total Supplies & Services $558,300
Dispatch Equipment
(desktop 2 -way radios system, telephones, etc.)
Misc. Office Equipment
Desks, Chairs, etc.
Snow Blower
$80,000
$3,000
Total Office
Equipment $83,000
$5,000
Total Office Furniture $5,000
$2,000
Total Property Maint.
Equip. $2,000
Total Equipment
$90,000
Total Estimated Operating
Expenses $760,017
12
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Feasibility Study Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
5.7 Initial Facility Construction Cost
Table 5.7 Initial Facility Construction Cost
SPACE DES
Lobby
0
Open Office
0 ffice'
Break
Toliet /Shower Suites
Toliet
Work Room
Small Parts Storage
Vault
Large Parts Storage
Maintenance Area
Bus Storage
Wash Bay
QUANTITY
1
1
1
3
1
2
UNIT TOTAL
AREA
100
175
650
100
175
650
135
405
450
450
500
100
385
575
220
1,100
5,683
28,345
500
1,000
200
385
575
220
1,100
5,683
28,345
500
Building Area Subtotal -Net
Circulation
Building Total Area - Gross
39,788
1,837
41,625
CONSTRUCTION COST (OFFICE AREA)
CONSTRUCTION COST (GARAGE AREA)
CONSTRUCTION COST (BUS STORAGE AREA)
T
5,997 SQ.FT
7,283 SQ.FT
28,345 SQ.FT
$120 / SQ.FT
$719,640.00
$140/ SQ.FT
$1,019,620.00
$100/ SQ.FT
$2,834,500.00
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST SUB -TOTAL
CONTINGENCY
INFLATION
SOFT COSTS (INCLUDING A/E FEES)
ESTIMATE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION BUDGET
41,625
■ 1
ADDITIONAL PROJECT ITEMS
EMERGENCY GENERATOR
IT EQUIPMENT WITHIN FACILITY
HEATING AND COOLING IN BUS STORAGE AREA FOR
SHELTER USE
SITE COSTS - HAZARDOUS SOILS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL
(1' DEEP)- NO TIPPING FEES * * *
SITE COSTS - PAVING ENTIRE SITE - 8" CONCRETE WITH
12" BASE STONE
SITE COSTS - FUELING STATION AND EQUIPMENT
SOFT COSTS (INCLUDING A/E FEES)
CONTINGENCY
INFLATION
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
15%
12%
$4,573,760.00
$686,064.00
$274,425.60
$548,851.20
$6,083,100.80
28,345 SQ.FT
7,350 CU.YRD
21,780 SQ. YRD
$22 /SQ.FT
$250 / CU.YRD
$45 /SQ. YRD
12%
15%
$400,000.00
$900,000.00
$623,590.00
$1,837,500.00
$980,100.00
$340,000.00
$480,704.22
$762,178.50
$333,713.65
* ** TO ACCOUNT FOR POSSIBLE COST OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL
$ 12,740,887.17
13
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility l IIW, P.C. April 25, 2013
Figure 1.1 - LOCATION of PROJECT
Dubuque Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
City of Dubuque, Dubuque County, Iowa
Dubuque County
iiw
Project Location
19
Project Located in Section 19
Township 89 North, Range 3 East
City of Dubuque, Iowa
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40
NORTH DRAWING MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED
MYSTIQUE
CASINO
CURRENT BUS',v
STORAGE FACILITY <
KAUFMANN AVE.
CLARK
COLLEGE
SENIOR HIGH
SCHOOL
IHILLCREST R0.
LORAS
COLLEGE
,GR ANDVIEW AVE
Ipj!,
PROPOSED INTERMODAL
FACILITY LOCATION
AND JULE TRANSFER POINT
., r .
PROPOSED BUS
STORAGE LOCATION ,
%
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.
ROSHEK /k
BUILDING ,.
UNIVERSITY OF'-,
DUBUQUE
?)N. GRANDVVEW AVE.
•JULE TRANSFER POINT
PORT OF DUBUQUE
5111 STREET STOP
MERCY HOSPITAL
WARREN PLAZA
HY -VEE
TARGET
PLAZA 20
K -MART
SAVE -A -LOT
•
1
SITE OF PROPOSED JULE BUS
STORAGE FACILITY
STUDY CORRIDOR
IIW, P.C1
IIw
ARCHITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
MU NICIPAL EN GIN E E RING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
NIEGFITYEXPERT6E.SOLUIIONS
U COPYRIGHT2012 ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN
PREPARED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS
PROJECT ONLY. NO PART OF THIS
DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED
OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM
WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF IIW,
P.C.ALL INFORMATION IN THIS
DOCUMENT IS CONSIDERED
PROPERTY OF MN. P.C.
Q
LLI
U
P :112\ 101 \101- 02'DRAri1WGS\aNL\12101 -00 AERIAL E*IIBITS.DNG 4/4/2013 1:57 IN SCOTT CHRISTENSET1
U
0)
U
CO
a
M
1
0
FEASIBILITY STUDY
TRANSIT BOARD REVIEW
Sheet I'lo j
FIGURE 1.2
Project No: 12101 -02
LEGEND
• •
i1111111
SITE CONSIDERED FOR INTERMOOAL FACILITY
NOT OWNED BY CITY (IDENTIFIED BY SITE #)
SITE CONSIDERED FOR INTERMODAL FACILITY
CITY OWNED (IDENTIFIED BY SITE #)
VIEW SHED TO BE PRESERVED
RAILROAD TRACKS
t •
4■ 1
474„;
• V •
- tr,t), •
,
-e-A74
'' , • ,
- ,
;Aar
_10.1
'PT
I '
it
• •
4
02
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
0 300 600
DRAWING
MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED
CURRENT BUS
:„..44
STORAGE FACIU TY s
• •
IIW
ARCHITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
MU NICIPAL EN GIN EERING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
• '41.
• -0,-4,:\ci
It
47. k NI
• Yo■
v
,
,•,t •:•••
4
\IP
• , *INV,
AC,
4\ • 10
•
COPYRIGHT2012 ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN
PREPARED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS
PROJECT ONLY. NO PART OF THIS
DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED
OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM
WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF
P.C. ALL INFORMATION IN THIS
DOCUMENT IS CONSIDERED
PROPERTY OF 190.,. P.C.
• i •
IOWA ST. JULE
TRANSFER POINT
--") • ' '''
PROPOSEO INTERMODAL
FACILITY LOCATION w 2.•
.or
>—
0
H
U)
H
CT2i
(7)
Lil
uJ
0<
w
OD
og
CO
U) 8
L.L1
t
w
uJ
z
L.L1
A�ia1 Gi►[ i�Qyal� ]�SSId[nj[ef�I��PI[QQ�:�I1S17: 111 .51i11�E7II:11 iK C167NPE: :1
us
0
1
Iff
FIGRE
Project No: 12101-02
LEGEND `F
SITE CONSIDERED FOR INTERMODAL FACIUTY
NOT OWNED BY CITY (IDENTIFIED BY SITE #)
SITE CONSIDERED FOR INTERMODAL FACIUTY
CITY OWNED (IDENTIFIED BY SITE #)
RAILROAD TRACKS
Wimmomm
I
/111111/ 11111 +'
uulllllllllull,,..
NORTH
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
0 300 600
IIW. P.0
DRAWING MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED
r! M E
4 ' NNW
J#
J�
[
IIW
ARCHITECTURE
CNIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
MU NICIPAL EN GIN E E RING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
IIIEGRITYLVERITiESOLUMS
f KENNEDY C IF CLE~ —'
--,. JULE TRANSFER'
POINT
[C� COPYRIGHT2012 ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN
PREPARED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS
PROJECT ONLY. NO PART OF THIS
DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED
OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM
WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF IIW,
P.C.ALL INFORMATION IN THIS
DOCUMENT IS CONSIDERED
PROPERTY OF 11.Y. P.C.
.e,
HEMPSTEAD
HIGH SCHOOL
\ ASSOCI -.TES 0011
dakk
P: \12\ 101 \101- 02 \DRA4AHGS\CRAL \12101 -00 ALTERNATE 91E ExHIEITS.01% 4/4/2013 2:10 PM SOOTT CHRISTEIISEN
KENNEDY r ALL
U
0)
U
7
W
ANSIT BOARD
1-
FIGURE 1.B
Project No: 12101 -02
hpg /7,y
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60
DRAWING MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED
■� -.'
QP
62 4:7
SURVEY NOTE
THIS SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF RECORD AND NOT OF RECORD.
UTILITY NOTE
THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
ONLY. THE UTILITIES PRESENT MAY NOT EXIST AS SHOWN. ADDITIONAL
FACILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY BE PRESENT. IT SHALL BE
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ANYONE USING THIS DOCUMENT TO ASCERTAIN
THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE, TYPE, MATERIAL, AND ELEVATION OF ALL
UTILITIES THAT MAY BE PRESENT.
UTILITY PROVIDERS:
ONE CALL •(800) 292 -8989
EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA
S
S
s
1V
W
W 1V w
w
-- 0 0
0
D
0 0 - 0
S\8
0- 0- 0- 0- 0
0 0 0
�WWSF
° AF if
OHE.
0
IIW. P.C1
• •
IIW
ARCHITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
IIIEGRITYDPERTTESCLUIM
219
0 ®-M^-_ 0 0
0
0[70
11TH STREET TWO WAY CONVERSION
A.
'%
14/ SS��,
as
PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
U COPYRIGHT2013ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN
PREPARED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS
PROJECT ONLY. NO PART OF THIS
DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED
OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM
WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF IIW,
P.C.ALL INFORMATION IN THIS
DOCUMENT IS CONSIDERED
PROPERTY OF IM!, P.C.
10,
ADD A THIRD DOOR
TO THIS WALL
/4/
9Ro
4C
rL7(U
W
U
o
W ❑ Q
Z J
W LD
r�
m
- 0
W - U)o-
C9C0❑>-
LLI
� �w
CO a
NJ
O
0
0
EX ASPHALT CURB~ O
LEGEND
MW
- D -
— s
- FM-
- O -
9%
MONITORING WELL
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
FORCE MAIN
CHAINLINK FENCE
I _ > PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW
WHEEL PATH
TRAVEL
PATH
CURRENT TRAFFIC FLOW
RI IC
e
1
0)
cm
�aP
Sheet No
U U
CO CO
CO CO
H
U
P: \12 \101 \101- 02\DRAWINGS \CML \12101 -00 91E PLAII LAYOUTDrii 4/4/2013 2:17 PM SCOTT CHRISTEIISEN
m
e e
0
0 0
FEASIBILITY STUDY
TRANSIT BOARD REVIEW
1
FIGURE 2.2
Project No: 12101 -02
Irel FLOOR PLAN
O
Z
22.34 SCALE. 9/16 = 1' -V
BUILDING PROGRAM
SPACE
CURRENT BUILDING
GENERAL OFFICE
4,260
MAINTENANCE /PARTS
7,860
BUS STORAGE
28,345
GENERAL CIRCULATION
1,160
BUILBING AREA TOTAL
41,625
CURRENT TRANSIT INVENTORY
QUANTITY
VEHICLE
4
35' BUS
12
28' BUS
2
29' TROLLEY
11
24'
LIGHT DUTY BUS
3
14' SPRINTER
1
10' MINI VAN
P Cj
I I w
ARCHITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
NIEGRIIYF)IPERIISE.SOLU11018
U COPYRIGHT 2012 ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN
PREPARED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS
PROJECT ONLY. NO PART OF THIS
DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED
OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM
WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF IIW,
P C. ALL INFORMATION IN THIS
DOCUMENT IS CONSIDERED
PROPERTY OF IIW, P C.
U
w
U
D0�'
—• H0°—
O >- 0
w — CO 0
00300
oc�E5
c nn - w LWL
mLLLU
m
`-w
I_
10
o m
0
P El 2V 4 A 01 - 02VDRAWINCSVc N VCYO 000000ER
4
2
00 0)
6 0
DCC1LL
V
o
O - 4
L m
q t LL
0 6 a
00
00
m
0
FEASIBILITY STUDY
TRANSIT BOARD REVIEW
0
5
0
Sh etNOf
FIGURE 2.3
Projec o 12101-02