Bus Storage and Maintenance FacilityMasterpiece on the Mississippi
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Budget
DATE: December 10, 2013
Dubuque
band
AI- America City
1
2007 • 2012 • 2013
East Central Intergovernmental Association Transportation Director Chandra Ravada is
recommending that the City move forward with the construction of a Bus Storage and
Maintenance Facility at the site of the former Public Works Facility, 925 Kerper
Boulevard.
The City of Dubuque was awarded an $8,000,000 State of Good Repair grant to be
used for an Intermodal Center adjacent to the Historic Millwork District. The Intermodal
Center has three components: parking, terminal and bus storage. The parking and the
terminal are the first priority for the grant funds, with remaining funds allocated toward
the bus storage facility. Based on the parking needs for the Historic Millwork District
and the terminal portion of the Intermodal Center, 75% of the $8,000,000 State of Good
Repair grant funding will be used for the parking and the terminal portion of the project.
The balance (estimated at $2,300,000) will be shifted to the bus storage portion of the
project. If the remaining State of Good Repair funds are not shifted to the Bus Storage
and Maintenance Facility, the State of Good Repair funds will be recaptured by the
Federal Transit Authority and reallocated to other communities and projects.
The Bus Storage Maintenance Facility will provide housing for The Jule's brand -new
fleet of clean diesel buses that were purchased with federal and state grant funds during
2011 -2012, as well as reduce long term maintenance costs by replacing the existing
100 year old facility. The Bus Storage Maintenance Facility will also provide options for
future expansion; reduce deadhead travel and potential delays of the service. The Bus
Storage Maintenance Facility will be located on the Intermodal Campus at the site of the
old City garage and will complement the services provided at the Intermodal Center
The Bus Storage Maintenance Facility remains a priority for the Federal Transit
Authority in Kansas City. The current facility is over 100 years old and has a leaking
roof system causing other structural deficiencies, inadequate space for the fleet, and a
sprinkler system not meeting fire code. The Jule Transit received $257,800 in 2012
from the Iowa Department of Transportation Public Transit Infrastructure Grant funds to
repair the roof and the sprinkler system.
ECIA staff, City of Dubuque, IIW and Conlon Construction reviewed the approved
feasibility study for the Intermodal Center to find efficiencies and cost savings to the
proposed Bus Storage Maintenance Facility. The goal was to set project priorities,
estimate construction costs for the Bus Storage Maintenance Facility, and develop an
efficient and usable bus storage facility plan with the remaining State of Good Repair
grants while meeting the Federal Transit Authority, Iowa Department of Transportation,
Iowa Department of Natural Resources, and Environmental Protection Agency
regulations for a viable storage facility. The exercise proved to be beneficial and
reduced the cost of the Bus Storage Maintenance Facility project from $8,528,752 to
$4,966,187, based on the preferred option.
ECIA staff worked closely with the Environmental Protection Agency, Iowa Department
of Natural Resources, and the Iowa Department of Transportation on the acceptable
uses for the old City garage superfund site on Kerper Boulevard. The three agencies
have agreed to provide a "comfort letter" from their respective agencies approving the
intended re -use. The existing building and steel can be removed down to the footprint
and slab, but the slab cannot be removed and will be re -used.
The City of Dubuque has several funding sources to complete the entire Bus Storage
Maintenance Facility project. The City programmed $433,307 in Fiscal Year 2014 and
$939,206 in Fiscal Year 2015 for local match for the Bus Storage Maintenance Facility.
The City has been able to save $2.3 million in State of Good repair funds through value
engineering on the parking and terminal portions of the overall Intermodal Center
project. The City intends to apply to the Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation
Study (DMATS) for $1.2 million in Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds and will
apply to the Iowa Department of Transportation for $640,000 in Public Transit
Infrastructure Grant funds in spring 2014. The City has received $257,800 in Public
Transit Infrastructure Grant funds to repair the roof and sprinkler system of the existing
transit facility. The Iowa Department of Transportation has indicated to the City that if
the current facility is vacated, the City is obligated to repay the Public Transit
Infrastructure Grant funding for the roof and the sprinkler system on a pro -rated basis at
the time the Jule vacates the facility. This money is available within this project budget.
After carefully reviewing each of the 11 scenarios, the project development team
recommends Scenario 11, at a total estimated cost of $4,916,187. East Central
Intergovernmental Association Transportation Director Chandra Ravada further
recommends submittal of a grant application for $1.2 million in Surface Transportation
Funds (STP) to the Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study. These funds had
been previously designated for the Southwest Arterial, but now that the State is taking
over that project, the funds are available to program for other purposes.
2
I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
Michael C. Van Milligan
MCVM:jh
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
Teri Goodmann, Assistant City Manager
Maurice Jones, Economic Development Director
Chandra Ravada, ECIA Transportation Director
3
RESOLUTION NO. 360 -13
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A GRANT APPLICATION WITH
DUBUQUE METROPOLITIAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE CITY OF DUBUQUE (BUS
STORAGE AND MAINTNANCE FACILITY)
Whereas, The current facility is over 100 years old and has a leaking roof system
causing other structural deficiencies; inadequate space for the fleet; and a sprinkler
system not meeting fire code; and
Whereas, The BSMF will provide housing for The Jule's brand -new fleet of clean
diesel buses that were purchased with federal and state grant funds during 2011 -2012,
as well as reduce long term maintenance costs by replacing the existing 100 year old
facility. The BSMF will also provide options for future expansion; reduce deadhead
travel and potential delays of the service. The BSMF will be located on the Intermodal
Campus at the site of the old City garage and will complement the services provided at
the Intermodal Center; and
Whereas, the City of Dubuque is seeking the necessary funding for project
implementation, and upon completion, in cooperation with the FEDERAL TRANSIT
AUTHORITY, be responsible for adequately maintaining and operating the project for
public use during the project's useful life.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DUBUQUE, IOWA, THAT:
Section 1. The City makes grant application with the Dubuque Metropolitan Area
Transportation Study for funds through the Surface Transportation Program to fund
(Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility).
Passed, approved and adopted this 16th day of December, 201.
Attest:
dor / i
I<evi S. Firnstahl, C ''City Clerk
i VC
Roy D. Buol, Mayor
East Central Intergovernmental Association
a regional response to local needs
TO:
FROM: Chandra Ravada, Transportation Director, ECIA
CC:
Michael Van Milligen, City Manager
Maurice Jones, Economic Development Director
Kelley Deutmeyer, Executive Director, ECIA
Teri Goodmann, Assistant City Manager
Bob Schiesl, Assistant City Engineer
Jenny Larson, Finance Director
Candace Eudaley, Jule Transit Manager
DATE: December 9, 2013
SUBJECT: Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Budget
PURPOSE
To provide an update on the budget for the design and construction of the Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
(BSMF) and the sources of funding to complete the project. Also attached is a resolution that provides
authorization for the City of Dubuque Jule to submit a grant application to the Dubuque Metropolitan Area
Transportation study (DMATS) for Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds to complete the financial
package for constructing the BSMF.
BACKGROUND
The City of Dubuque was awarded an $8,000,000 State of Good Repair (SGR) grant to be used for an
Intermodal Center adjacent to the Historic Millwork District. The Intermodal Center has three components:
parking, terminal and bus storage. The parking and the terminal are the first priority for the grant funds with
remaining funds allocated toward the bus storage facility. Based on the parking needs for the Historic Millwork
District and the terminal portion of the Intermodal Center, 75% of the $8,000,000 SGR grant funding will be
used for the parking and the terminal portion of the project. The balance will be shifted to the bus storage
portion of the project. If the remaining SGR funds are not shifted to the BSMF, the SGR funds will be
recaptured by the FTA and reallocated to other communities and projects.
The Intermodal Center is designed to improve access to various transportation modes in and around the City of
Dubuque and provide parking for users of public transit and the general public. The feasibility study approved
by Federal Transit Authority (FTA) accommodates all improvements listed above with the City contributing
Dubuque Metropolitan Area Transportation Study Eastern Iowa Develop.-- — —Jrporation
Eastern Iowa Regional Utility Services System Eastern Iowa Regional Housing Authority ECIA Business Growth, Inc.
Region 1 Employment and Training ECIA Regional Planning Affiliation Region 8 Regional Transit Authority
7600 Commerce Park, Dubuque, IA 52002 www.ecia.org ecia @ecia.org
563.556.4166 Iowa only: 800.942.4648 Relay Iowa 800.735.2943 f: 563.556.0348
$6.62 million in local funds toward the 200 general public parking and FTA State of Good Repair Grant
contributing $5.69 million to complete the project.
The BSMF will provide housing for The Jule's brand -new fleet of clean diesel buses that were purchased with
federal and state grant funds during 2011 -2012, as well as reduce long term maintenance costs by replacing the
existing 100 year old facility. The BSMF will also provide options for future expansion; reduce deadhead travel
and potential delays of the service. The BSMF will be located on the Intermodal Campus at the site of the old
City garage and will complement the services provided at the Intermodal Center. The City hired IIW and
Conlon Construction to develop a plan to construct the BSMF in multiple phases using the remaining SGR
grant funding. The City programmed $433,307 in FY 14 and $939,206 in FY 15 for local match in the Capital
Improvement Project (CIP 600 -2446) budget for local match to construct the bus storage facility.
The BSMF remains a priority for the FTA in Kansas City. The current facility is over 100 years old and has a
leaking roof system causing other structural deficiencies; inadequate space for the fleet; and a sprinkler system
not meeting fire code. The Jule transit received $257,800 in 2012 from the Iowa Department of Transportation
Public Transit Infrastructure Grant (PTIG) funds to repair the roof and the sprinkler system. The work on the
existing facility must be completed by June 30, 2014 to meet the grant deadlines. An RFP was completed and a
construction oversight company selected to oversee the project design and construction process. A contract for
the construction oversight for the roof and sprinkler replacement is pending. We had inquired to the Iowa
Department of Transportation about transferring the PTIG grant funds to the new BSMF project but they have
indicated that the money would have to be returned and reapplied for and cannot be transferred for a new
purpose.
DISCUSSION
The East Central Intergovernmental Association (ECIA) staff is assigned to coordinate the Intermodal Center
project development with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Iowa Department of Transportation
(IDOT); Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR); and Federal Transit Authority (FTA) and to work with
IIW Engineering and Conlon Construction to generate options for BSMF design and construction.
ECIA staff, City of Dubuque, IIW and Conlon Construction reviewed the approved feasibility study for the
Intermodal Center to find efficiencies and cost savings to the proposed BSMF. The goal was to set project
priorities; estimate construction costs for the BSMF; and develop an efficient and usable bus storage facility
plan with the remaining SGR grants while meeting the FTA, IDOT, IDNR, and EPA regulations for a viable
storage facility. The exercise proved to be beneficial and reduced the cost of BSMF project from $8,528,752 to
a range of $4,800,000 to $5,600,000 based on various options outlined below.
ECIA staff, City of Dubuque, IIW and Conlon Construction later conducted a needs assessment for Jule transit
staff in the BSMF as some Jule staff will use office space in the Intermodal Facility Terminal as required by
FTA. The needs study recommended reducing the office space in the BSMF from 6,052 sq.ft to 3,530 sq.ft. The
change in office space provided a cost savings of $250,000. Following the construction of the office space, there
will be 6,648 to 9,170 sq.ft. of space on south side of the building with no assigned use.
ECIA staff worked closely with the EPA, IDNR, and IDOT on the acceptable uses for the old city garage
superfund site. The three agencies have agreed to provide a "comfort letter" from their respective agency
approving the intended re -use with the following stipulations:
• The existing building and steel can be removed down to the footprint and slab but the slab cannot be
removed and should be re -used. Removing the original slab will trigger soil mitigation requirements
which will add considerable costs to the project.
• The small entrance area currently on the south side of the office area of the existing facility can be
removed down to the slab and does not have to be re -used. The slab can be landscaped over or paved
over.
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Page 2
• Site does not have to be fully capped with pavement;
• Site can include green space and landscaping;
• Special EPA training is required if the site is excavated more than 6 feet below the surface;
• No daycare can be operated at the site.
• The site should not become at any time a Jule transfer point for passengers.
• A fueling station is not permitted at the site.
The project team of ECIA and City staff, IIW, and Conlon Construction developed ten scenarios for the BSMF
with input from the EPA and FTA. Table below provides the list of options and the cost for each scenario. The
scenarios include the following aspects listed below:
Site Pavement
• Capping full site
or
• Capping two thirds of the site and landscaping the remainder
Building Exterior
• Precast exterior with brick
or
• Colored precast
Natural Lighting
• Clerestory for natural light
• No clerestory
Office Build -out
• Full office build -out based on feasibility study in south office space (6,052 sq. ft.)
• Office build -out based on transit assessments needs in south office space (3,530 sq. ft.)
South Office Building
• Remove building and landscape slab
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Page 3
Budget scenarios fov Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Scenario 11
Scenario 10
Scenario 9
Scenario 8
Scenario 7
Scenario 6
Scenario 5
Scenario 4
Scenario 3
Scenario 2
Scenario 1
m
ro
Z
E
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
•
•
Capping full site
O
•
•
•
•
0
o
•
•
o
0
Capping two thirds of the site and
rest with landscape
0
0
•
0
01
0
0
•
0
•
•
Brick exterior
0
0
0
0
•
•
0
0
0
0
0
Colored Precast
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Clerestory for natural light
•
0
�
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
Reduce the South side building to
single floor
0
•
0
•
Full office build -out basing on
feasibility study (6,052 sq. ft.)
•
•
0
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Office build -out in the basing on
transit needs (3,530 sq. ft.)
GA
o
$4,836,187
$4,943,130
$4,886,187
$5,136,187
VD
owe
GA
VD
o"0
Uri
w
0
GA
w
0
GA
GA
w
SA
01
oe
Cost
Figure 1 below provides the elevation for scenarios 1, 2 and Figure 1A provides the elevation for scenarios 3
and 4. These scenarios include a brick faced exterior precast wall panels and a clerestory over the northwest
portion of the building. In Figure lA for scenarios 3 and 4, the site is not fully capped. Only the "traffic flow
area" is paved with the balance of the site landscaped.
Scenarios 1 and 3 provide options to construct the interior office space at feasibility study level (6,052 sq.ft).
Scenarios 2 and 4 provide options to construct the interior office space at needs assessments level (3,530 sq.ft)
with remaining space undefined for future use and build out.
Figure 1 Elevation for Scenarios 1, 2, 3 and 4
Figure 1A Elevation for Scenarios 3 and 4
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Page 5
Figure 2 below provides the elevation for scenarios 5 and 6. 2A provides the elevation for scenarios 7 and 8.
These scenarios include a colored exterior precast wall panels in lieu of the brick faced and no clerestory over
the northwest portion of the building. Scenarios 5 and 6 pave the entire site similar to scenarios 1 and 2 above.
Scenarios 7 and 8 only cap the "traffic flow area" as seen in Figure 2 below.
Scenarios 5 and 7 provide options to construct the interior office space at feasibility study level (6,052 sq.ft).
Scenarios 6 and 8 provides options to construct the interior office space at needs assessments level (3,530 sq.)
with remaining space undefined for future use and build out.
Figure 2 Elevation for Scenarios 5 and 6
Figure 2A Elevation for Scenarios 7 and 8
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Page 6
Figure 3 below provides the elevation for scenario 9. This scenario includes a brick faced exterior precast wall
panels, no clerestory over the northwest portion of the building and removing the second floor reducing the
south side to a single floor. Scenario 9 provides the option to construct the interior office space at needs
assessments level (3,530 sq.) with remaining space undefined for future use and build out.
Figure 3 Elevation for Scenario 9
Figure 4 below provides the elevation for scenario 10. This scenario includes colored exterior precast wall
panels in lieu of the brick faced, no clerestory over the northwest portion of the building and single floor on
south side of the building. Scenarios 10 provide options to construct the interior office space at needs
assessments level (3,530 sq.) with remaining space undefined for future use and build out.
Figure 4 Elevation for Scenario 10
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Page 7
Figure 5 below provides the elevation for scenario 11. This scenario includes colored exterior precast wall
panels in lieu of the brick faced, clerestory over the northwest portion of the building and single floor on south
side of the building. Scenarios 11 provide options to construct the interior office space at needs assessments
level (3,530 sq.) with remaining space undefined for future use and build out.
Figure 5 Elevation for Scenario 11
Figure 6 below provides the site plan for scenarios, 1, 2, 5, and 6. These scenarios will have a 6" concrete
pavement over the entire site, with exception of the area in green along the perimeter which is a landscaped
area.
Figure 6 Site Plan for Scenarios 1, 2, 5, and 6.
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility
Page 8
Figure 7 below provides the site plan for scenario 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11. These scenarios will have a 6"
concrete pavement over only the "traffic flow area" and landscaping for the remaining site area.
1
Figure 7 Site Plan for Scenarios 3, 4, 7 and 8.
FUNDING
The City of Dubuque has several funding sources to complete the entire BSMF project. The City programmed
$433,307 in FY 14 and $939,206 in FY 15 for local match for the BSMF (CIP 600 - 2446). The City has been
able to save $2.3 million in State of Good repair funds through value engineering on the parking and terminal
portions of the overall Intermodal Center project. The City intends to apply to Dubuque Metropolitan Area
Transportation Study (DMATS) for $1.2 million in Surface Transportation Program funds (STP) and will apply
to Iowa Department of Transportation (IADOT) for $640,000 in Public Transit Infrastructure Grant (PTIG)
funds in spring 2014. The City has received $257,800 in PTIG funds to repair the roof and sprinkler system of
the existing transit facility. The Iowa DOT has indicated to the City that if the current facility is vacated, the
City is obligated to repay the PTIG funding for the roof and the sprinkler system on a pro -rated basis at the time
the Jule vacates the facility. Table 2 below provides funding sources for the BSMF. Table 3 provides the
comparison of scenarios with available funding taking into consideration the City's obligation to pay back the
existing PTIG funds at the time the current facility is vacated.
Table 2: funding source
V Funding sourc -
Amount
FTA's SGR funds
$2,300,000
DMATS STP funds*
$1,200,000
City of Dubuque Funds - FY14 & FY15 CIP
$1,372,513
IADOT's PTIG funds*
$640,000
Total
$5,512,513
* Funding is application based
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Page 9
Table 3: Comparison of scenarios with funding availabilit
CONCLUSION
After carefully reviewing each of the 11 scenarios, the project development team recommends scenarios 8, 10
and 11 as the best financial and physical options for Jule Transit. Scenario 11 will be $130,000 more than
scenario 10 but will provide natural light and help in making the building more energy efficient in long run. The
project team is requesting that the City Council review and select a scenario and also adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the submission of an application to the DMATS for STP funds for the BSMF project.
Thank you for your consideration.
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Page 10
Bus
Facility (BS1bIF)
City payback for
roof fix
City CIP funds
Storage and Maintenance
* 80% funds aill
20% Match
a.
Cos
State of
Good
DMATS
State
City CIP
o '
Paid with
Total City
Savings in
Repair
STP funds
PTIG
funds
City CIP
CIP funds
City CIP
funds
funds
funds
used
funds
Scenario 1
$5,646,282
$2,300,000
$1,577,026
$640,000
$1,129,256
$257,800
$1,387,056
- $14,543
Scenario 2
$5,396,282
1
$2,300,000
$1,377,026
$640,000
$1,079,256
$257,800
_$257,800
$1,337,056
$35,457
Scenario 3
$5,373,130
$2,300,000
$1,358,504
$640,000
$1,074,626
$257,800
_$257,800
$257,800
$1,332,426
$40,087
Scenario 4
$5,123,130
$2,300,000
$1,158,504
$640,000
$1,024,626
$257,800
$257,800
$1,282,426
$90,087
Scenario 5
$5,189,738
$2,300,000
$1,211,790
$640,000
$1,037,948
$257,800
$257,800
$1,295,748
$76,765
Scenario 6
$4,939,738
$2,300,000
$1,011,790
$640,000
$987,948
$257,800
$257,800
$1,245,748
$126,765
Scenario 7
$5,136,187
$2,300,000
$1,168,950
$640,000
$1,027,237
$257,800
$257,800
$1,285,037
$87,476
Scenario 8
$4,886,187
$2,300,000
$968,950
$640,000
$977,237
$257,800
$1,235,037
$137,476
_
Scenario 9
$4,943,130
$2,300,000
$1,014,504
$640,000
$988,626
$257,800
_$257,800
$1,246,426
$126,087
_
Scenario 10
$4,836,187
$2,300,000
$928,950
$640,000
$967,237
$257,800
_$257,800
$1,225,037
$147,476
_
Scenario 11
mfgaifias $2,300,000
$992,950
$640,000
$983,237
_$257,800
257,800. $257,800
$1,241,037
$131,476
CONCLUSION
After carefully reviewing each of the 11 scenarios, the project development team recommends scenarios 8, 10
and 11 as the best financial and physical options for Jule Transit. Scenario 11 will be $130,000 more than
scenario 10 but will provide natural light and help in making the building more energy efficient in long run. The
project team is requesting that the City Council review and select a scenario and also adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the submission of an application to the DMATS for STP funds for the BSMF project.
Thank you for your consideration.
Budget Scenarios for Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility Page 10
A Regional Response
to Local Needs
Transportation Improvement Program
Federal Project Application
Instructions
Complete the application in the space provided. Applicants are limited to the application form and 5 pages of attachments
including map, crash data, resolution, project drawings, and other supporting documents. Submit the completed
application and attachments to cravada @ecia.org. If you have questions contact Chandra Ravada at 563 - 556 -4166.
General Information
Project Title:
Project Location and Limits:
Project Length (miles): Federal Functional Class:
Agency:
Contact Person:
Telephone: Email:
Certified Acceptance Date:
Project Screening Criteria
Check all that apply.
Project is consistent with the DMATS, City or County five year program and local land use plans
Project is federally classified as an Urban Collector /Rural Major Collector or above
Project is an improvement project
Project is a maintenance project
Project meets the STP funding regulations
Project is ready to proceed and has a reasonable timeline for implementation
Input from safety teams has been taken into consideration while designing the project
Input from Jule and /or RTA transit has been taken into consideration while designing the project
Input from planning agencies has been taken into consideration while designing the project
DMATS Federal Project Application, p1
Cost Summary
Project Phase
Start Date
STP Funds
Other Funds
Total Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Tota Is
Overall Match Ratio:
Estimated date of project completion (Month /Year)
Funding Partners
List all "Other Funds" contributing to the project: (Must match "Other Funds" from Cost Summary Table)
Funding Source
Amount
Project Information
1. Project Description - Explain the nature of the project, indicate major work involved, and briefly compare
existing and proposed conditions (Attach 8.5" X 11" vicinity map):
DMATS Federal Project Application, p2
2. Describe the work plan and schedule for project completion. Include current project status if the project is
underway or has multiple phases:
3. Describe the performance measures and reporting process:
DMATS Federal Project Application, p3
Mobility
Use DMATS data from the Congestion Management Process, Traffic Count Program, Regional Model, or attached
documentation.
Existing facility type: Improved facility type:
Existing peak hour direction traffic volume:
Existing speed: Posted speed limit:
State truck classification: Existing truck percentage (peak period):
What is the major concern for congestion management and how will it be addressed?
DMATS Federal Project Application, p5
Will the proposed project include the following elements?
(Check all that apply)
Signal integration /upgrade
Provide bus stop pull -outs or shelters
Separate bicycle and /or pedestrian roadways and sidewalks
Increase freight carrying potential
Improve access to meet ADA requirements
Upgrade or improve any rail crossings
Improve roadways adjacent to a barge terminal
Smart transit management /transit signal priority
Improve airport access
Located on or improve a transit route
Explain:
Safety
Number of crashes in the past 5 years: (Attach crash count and severity data)
DMATS Federal Project Application, p6
Describe other safety benefits (transit, pedestrian, bicycle, intersection, and other):
Existing and Proposed Conditions:
What is the current surface type of the facility?
Gravel
Sealcoat, poor base
Low type asphalt, good base
Pavement, asphalt, portland
What is the current pavement condition of the roadway?
DMATS Federal Project Application, p7
Existing Condition
Proposed Condition
Pavement width in feet
Minimum road standard width
Number of travel lanes
Center turn lane /turn pockets
_ Yes
_ Yes
Shoulder width in feet
Paved shoulder
_ Yes
_ Yes
What is the current surface type of the facility?
Gravel
Sealcoat, poor base
Low type asphalt, good base
Pavement, asphalt, portland
What is the current pavement condition of the roadway?
DMATS Federal Project Application, p7
Economic Development
Freight Generators
Improves existing access
Creates new access
Describe how the project will improve access to existing employment, freight generators, distribution center, and
other employers:
Financial /Implementation
Previously Completed Work - Prior to application submittal:
(check all that apply)
Environmental permits approved Date:
Final designs complete Date:
Right of way acquisition completed /No RW needed Date:
Sustainability /Air Quality
Check all that apply
Reduces VMT
Incorporates m ultimoda I transportation
Reduces travel time
DMATS Federal Project Application, p8
Explain:
Other Information
You may use this space to provideany additional project information considered worth noting:
DMATS Federal Project Application, p9
Bus Storage & Maintenance Facility (BSMF)
Jule Transit System
PROJECT PROGRESS
Scenario Approval
JUI 2013
Sep 2013
Nov 2013
The Jule
Construction of BSMF will commence
basing on the following:
• Design is completed in timely fashion
• Funding secured from IADOT and
DMATS
Jul 2014
.0, Sae nu. 1
7'1
• A
•
ME MC MCI
MC
rr MC MC
latsanumaa
I ME
TM■sla..1.1.1.14
Bus Storage & Maintenance Facility (BSMF)
Jule Transit System
PROJECT PROGRESS
Scenario Approval
JUI 2013
Sep 2013
Nov 2013
sosignSconados
*PP
Construction of BSMF will commence
basing on the following:
• Design is completed in timely fashion
• Funding secured from IADOT and
DMATS
Jul 2014
Dec 2013
Selecting Scenario
DMA�nds
[] �]
[ ;] [---]
!! lEr 11117
C ME EPIC Mr
I
GOALS
• Timeline
• Activities
• Funding issues
• Scenarios
• Recommendations
• Future activities
Ju
I
2013
FEASIBILITY STUDY
APPROVAL by FTA
The City need to get project approval
from EPA & IADNR.
LPY00
2, COMOVEIL •0,7 vow( r•ouro BYrT,.
_.. _ •• sun ro r erwwxn
1001.04. IM0(5
eRpCSID 91C:
I EOR225 051 O€'PIYnS YMfR
5 15111 at 1212.1204 Mar, ax-, a '911 a
] SCSI TO CEIEr241 0A31...451 0, 4., ST
e 1111111 01 ',PLOY_ .5 wSF? •0 5145 nrr5•
]SCR+ a 3/050)_ EM 0e ]p s'
Site location
jiw
FIGURE 411A
Feasibility study approval
F.
tfliCti 1,5
AIWA P.1,5,11..
u...6.1,16.;
11•6•421.,
liTCOuLd.
1
r-1:1 11 I_ 1' ,1111
r
•1
- I
1 111111
1111 H 1 111 I 1 ,
1
1- 177-7
•r I
L. - 1 I L__
• -L PUBUGUE BUS STORAGE AND VA NTEIAKCE FAC LITY
FEASIBILITY S 1UDY
El CCR PI AN
wow
jl!!AOJddB Lpius Aificasual
Square footage & Budget
1... SI Maim. Sari CI VvIrma
YAM
MI OR n
... ..,
I
11•0•111...M•
.134t, ;AV.....
.
■
..... ,••••• '14.......,,-.........
(wara01l1v441wrol...01., ... 1.
I
CI
MI
I
■.!
•••■•••■••
NIFe, 113, APKIVI .1 .1.41,.......- ...A...1.....-........
' 1 ,....
..,
.,
,..,:,
...,,
*Mt.
I
Mb
llini....0
145•••.••••
I
NM
*II
1
10
....
.
WSW
W
.... n.,...,
N
414,,alaitansm
I
1110
8.1
PI
11
1.14..... WWYMMOWD
'
SP
111
....., Rs.
106.1110.410
.1,
j*
, f..,1.1•.•
1.4
..I
.- • . .• . •
, Tit
fart..
ii•
rit
N., 4,r•blla A.
1.0.1
44
ism, tvg.e• nap
4•1131
• T.4 • : n ^", F
I
I
.134t, ;AV.....
vu....04
(wara01l1v441wrol...01., ... 1.
I
ER .9d,
111“1,911
ial
01:0040
NIFe, 113, APKIVI .1 .1.41,.......- ...A...1.....-........
' 1 ,....
..,
I
,..,:,
...,,
41,,r3•F f 1....1.1.1A31(1".1.1*.A .:',
I
1.41,11,11........,, 1.11S
hix7•Xn
c.1,,A6
If
assassal
N. MU I t GM
• T.4 • : n ^", F
Table 5.2 - INTERIOR SPACE DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT AREA
TOTAL AREA
Public L- .I;k.y
1:+0
t3C,
Transit Director Office
1
165
165
.1pen office for 3 drspatctlers and 2 future ,,4olstatt :ms
4F.+.)
35O
Office
3
135
405
Break Room
1
225
225
Conference Room
1
245
245
Mens Restroom
100
100
Womens Restroom
1
100
100
IT Room
DO
80
Shower
-
78
312
Driver Break Room
3EJ:1
Mens Locker Room
1
300
300
,"; _amens Locker Room
00
Work Room.' Maintenance Office
1
385
385
$m all Parts Storage
575
`' ■ .:
Secured Vault Room
1
215
215
Large Parts S1oract-
' 045
1,045
Maintenance Area
1
5.683
5,683
In1etr..a Bus Storage
28 34
2B34
Wash Bay
1
500
500
Building Area Subtotal -Net
40.090
ttculatron
Building Total Area - dross
41.625
CONSTRUCTION COST (OFFICE AREAL
6;052
c�
:12.- AF
$726,24000
CONSTRUCTION COST (GARAGE AREA ■
7,22.'2
IL'. ,:_
$867 60 00
CONSTR U ::TION COST (INTERIOR BUS STORAGE AREA1
28,345
$. 1 01) F
S2,834 500 00
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST SUB-TOTAL
41.625
54.428 100 00
CONTINGENCY
15 °b
$664.215 00
INFLATION
roo for 2 v?aN
$2 i
SOFT COSTS - SEE TABLE 5 7 1
$550,810 00
ESTIMATE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION BUDGET
c'., 908 81' .:
ADDITIONAL PROJECT ITEMS
EMERGENCY GE NE RAT(
$400,G0000
TRANSIT EQUIPMENT WITHN FACILITY - SEE TABLE 5 7 2
$473,000.00
AIR :- `NLIITF: NINcG FOR INTERI,:)R BUS- STORAGE AREA FOR SHELTER USE
28,345
SF
' :O SF
$283,45000
SITE COSTS - SOILS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL ( 1' DEEP)- ASSUMES NO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
7,350
CY
$25.'CY
$183,750 00
SITE COSTS - PAVING ENTIRE SITE - 8' CONCRETE WITH 12' BASE STCNE
62.410
SF
$4.5,SF
$280,e45 00
SITE COSTS - FUELING STATION AND EQUIPMENT - SEE TABLE 5 7 3
$340,00000
SITE COSTS - LANDSCAPING
25.940
SF
$I 5.-SF
538,910 00
DESIGN FEES FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT ITEMS
10%
3199,995 50
''','LATIN GENCY FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT ITEP;.S
15%
$299,993 25
INFLATION FOR ADDfflONAL PROJECT ITEMS
3% for 2 years
$119.997 30
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
$$,528,752.05
FTA recommendations
• The project should use left over state of good repair funds from Intermodal Facility.
• The City need to develop a detailed plan explaining the usage of left over State of
Good Repair funds.
EPA, IADNR,IADOT & Mid America Site usage restrictions
• No disturbance or excavation at depth of six or more feet without appropriate
employee safety and health training.
• Disturbance or excavation at depth of six or more feet only if the activity does not
EPA, IADNR,IADOT & Mid America Site usage restrictions
• No disturbance or excavation at depth of six or more feet without appropriate
employee safety and health training.
• Disturbance or excavation at depth of six or more feet only if the activity does not
release or threaten release of hazardous substances.
• Any activity on the property involving soil disturbance or excavation at depth of six
feet or more must first contact MidAmerican Energy for guidance on employee
safety, health and other.
• No water supply wells or private well installation without EPA and City approval.
• Commercial /industrial use only. Current zoning is industrial only.
• MidAmerican Energy and EPA and IDNR must be allowed access for future work
to address contamination.
Sep 2013
Assessing Design
Team:
• City Public works
• City Engineering
• Jule
• ECIA
Consultants:
• IIW
• Conlon
Goals
• Functionality of the project should not deviate from what is submitted to Federal
Transit Authority (FTA) .
• The project should use other existing city services.
• The project should provide good aesthetics and functionality to the location.
Si®
M®®
MEE
M!®
Table 57 Initial F aNlity Construction Costs
QUANTITY
t;NI, ARf A
TotA, AREA
PJt b:kti
IR,
'karma Dirndl), 011k.e
■• r
HIS
■ opo), fl, e hi i disoatcnefs and 2 Mule- foYkstalour;
_
Office
, ,
405
Eh:t.11, Rz.c.r,
,
22F..
CuMerence Room
, :,
245
Melts ResecK4n
VA,
Women:. Rest/Loin
.
100
II Room
60
Sncmer
312
['rt.,. Er€ F.A.r,
Liens Locker Room
100
,.9i0
locker Roan
300
Vhsk rs'flom' 14emlimanr* Office
'
...,
385
':Toll P3115 ,'_4(.;!aae
7!'•-.■
Secured Valli Room
215
21'
L';' '.c•'
Alantenanoe Aro,
'
5.683
!.-...;..6":
hiking Bus $1,orsitt
,8
Wash Bay
.
500
Ekk,
lit/Illing Area Subtotal 4e1
20 ol-4.
6415nd Total Area - Gross
LONSTRUCTION COST ■OFFICE AREA!
".-F
$12(.AF
$72'.; 240.00
,' c ■NS TR i 1r Ti•-,N C: S- .,-.4.1-ok;-,F AREA
,..zc
$12fi SF
5867 WI ki.
CCNSTRUCTION COST kINIERIOR BUS STORAGE AREAI
SF
1100. SF
$283450000
01.IILL,IN ..x.N.ISTRJ.: I FM .. 051 sub.I.JIAL
64 423 I.. - -A
,..I.N1INGENCY
INFLATION
.3% for ,
SOFT COSTS - SEE TARE 5 7 t
ESTIMA7ENSTRUC1ION BUDGET
ADDITONAL PRCLIE.IT ITEMS
- - BATOR
TRANSIT EQUIPMEN ' • .. ITY - SEE TABLE 6 12
471 000 00
AIR ,:•.(iNDITIONItyb =CR INTERLR B... .. - • F AREA FOR SHELTER USE
. . _
_ . . ■ s=
3263 450 ..K1
SITE COSTS - SOILS PELIDVAL AND DISPOSAL II' D ' • - ' • . NO HAZARDIA IS MATERiAc:.
7 ' '
,
.•,,,= .";Y
$'033 750 00
HE '.:..-.6'S PAYING ENTIRE SITE - (..'...*:.-.PETE Willi I"! SASE -_, .
r.' 4
•
S4 SF
Stdo 6=5 ou
SITE COSTS - FUELING STATION AND EQUIPMENT - SEE TABLE 573
$340.00000
- LAW/5', APIWi
-
I., 5.-,,F
$ s.R ,I0141.
DESIGN FEES FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT '
lON.
5199.B85.50
•...CNTINGENCY FOR ADDITP.■ - ' . _ ,_ ITEMS
.
i.2:e., V.2.3 2F.-
ftsFIATION P. — 'T. PROJECT ITEMS
_
3 foi 2 yew,
' 7 30
- •ROJECT BUDGET
58.528 752.05
Table 5 7 Initial T acility Construction Costs
r.itJANOI'l
UNIT AREA
TOTAL AREA
Put L.: Lot t.,
1,;[.
111,1
Transit thiedo, C4ba,
15.5
166
."',:,■-e '0, , Co .1111,1 .0 !..rs Mil 2 Ittute w-lkstribonit
Act)
Ede.* q.....tr.
22'.
•..:onreierv-e Roan
I
245
r.1, -is .•..-.07,-.rt
100
Wcin,n, Restrr•on
I
100
100
CI 7.1er
"'I'
efi
siwe
3
78
312
Lirree! E,+.all Ram
Mans lolser Rom
I
300
300
Wa-ns ',..xise, Room
Arq,
.Xiti
Work Rotel,' Mai menance -.Dffice
I
385
Small Ralf,
Secured Vault RIoni
.. ...
215
Large P'1:s t,t0,34,:'
-
I 1.4`..-.
Mactenanex Aron
..
5.67M
RI, F"i 'ay-
it ;tr,
41/avi Bay
500
Building Area Subtotal -Net
41.1.0L0
. ,,,..1 ht■ ••
15:35
Failing T....tai Area - "ross
114)25
....C.4.4STRUCTION COST !OFFICE AREAL
, C2.52
5,
S1200AF
S726.24000
... Ns 7RD:.1DY1 C051 .r.iARAGE AKEA I
.' z2P
S.
1120 Sr
i5.31 ::45Q O.)
CC4STRUCTIO1$ COST INTERIOR BUS STORAGE AREAi
28345
- -
$100. SF
1,2 ea4 50000
LIJILL•INi ,..:.)6.1SirsIJ: TVA 1.0.1 51.ILI - .. IA_
II ir...,
}.! .12.8 1(0 CO
CCN11NGENC.Y
15%
8 138.1 215 00
aNIF LAT YM
.I:',.. kg ■,:id..>
ia5 58-6 00
SO I G051S - SLL IABLL 51.1
5550.51000
EST ILIAIL BLIIEDIN,3......iNI$TRI.3_:-1,31 DA ,:L1
ii, I.-A SI 1 ii6
MINTY.MAI PW:xiEc.TITFkISi
EMERGENcY GCNERATOR
WO OW 00
TRANSIT EGUIPMEN I WI THIN FACILI 111' SEL I AULL 6 1.2
$4/3 OW 00
AIR •::ONDITIONINFL FOR INTER:OR El IS STORAGE AREA FOP SHELTER I ISE
1
- '
, ...,
SOF COSTS - SOlt S REMOVAI AND DISPOSAL (I MEN- ARM lAIFS NO H/gArzro-Jus WkTFRIAI S
7 , r
. '
■ : ' .
I
SITE .:"...:31.$ FAVING ENTIRE SITE F exthr.:RETE vim, I EASE 5-. tiE
i,, •
.
i,., !._:,,,, 00
SUE ODSTS • FUELING S1AT ION AND U.:1E11141EN T SEE TABLE 5 / 3
1340.000.00
SITE •:..,..1STS LAND9 AT-IN..3
251:411
-
DESIGN FEES FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT IFMS
1199 995 50
CONTIWJENCY FOR MINTY:MAI P7.,174,1 IFYIS
:/•:,'., ..'.f.,:i. /1',
INFLATION FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT PTMS
2A. Inr 2 yd,
$119 997 30
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
S8.528 752,05
Table 5.7 Initial Facility Construction Costs
QUANTITY
UNIT AREA
TOTAL AREA
Public Lohk'
1:, .,
I " +.I
Transit Director Office
i
165
165
ripen Office for 3 dispatchers and 2 future wxkstations
650
6E0
Office
3
135
405
Break Room
1
225
225
Conference Room
1
245
245
',lens Restr .om
1
1OC1
100
Wornens Restroom
1
100
i 00
IT Room
.
Shower
-- 4
78
312
Driver Break Room
350
350
Mens Locker Room
1
300
300
'. "/omens Locker Rc'm
:a :-.,0
300
Work Room, Maintenance Office
1
335
385
Small Pails Storage
~75
575
Secured Vault Room
215
215
Large Parts Storage
1,1:415
1.045
Maintenance Area
1
5,683
5 68:3
Interior Bus Storage
28,:' -45
26 :i45
Wash Bay
1
500
500
Building Area Subtotal -Net
40,090
• ..IIa'i :rl
1,535
Building Total Area - Gross
41,625
CONSTRUCTION COST (OFFICE AREA
6.052
SF
$120r'AF
$726.240.00
:�:(:..NSTRUC TION COST {GARAGE AREAI
7.22E.
SF
$121:1 `F
$E:37,36000
CONSTRUCTION COST (INTERIOR BUS STORAGE AREAI
28.345
SF
$1001 SF
$2.834 500.00
BUILDING CiJNSTRUCTION COST SUE- "i:ITAL
41.62~
$4 428 100 00
,- NTIN(,FNC.V
1c,4s
MI RA 1Il f111
INTERIOR SPACE DESCRIPTION
FEASIHLITY STUDY
REASSESMENT
QUANTITY
UNIT AREA
TOTAL AREA
QUANTITY
UNIT AREA
TOTAL AREA
Public Lobby
I
130
130
I
100
100
Transit Director Office
I
165
165
I
165
165
Open Office for dispatchers and future workstations
I
650
650
I
120
120
Office
3
135
4115
2
120
240
Office Restroom
(1
100
0
I
100
100
Break Room
I
225
225
I
300
300
Conference Room
I
245
245
I
850
850
Hens Restroom
I
100
1110
I
200
200
Womens Restroom
I
100
100
I
200
200
IT Room
I
60
60
I
100
100
Shower
4
78
312
2
100
200
Driver Break Room
1
350
350
0
350
0
Mens Locker Room
1
300
300
0
300
0
Womens Locker Room
1
300
300
0
300
0
Work Room/ Maintenance Office
1
385
385
0
300
0
Small Para Storage
I
575
575
'_
100
200
Secured Vault Room
I
215
215
0
215
0
Large Parts Storage
I
L045
1.045
0
1,045
0
Maintenance Area
1
5,683
5.683
1
300
300
Interior Bus Storage
I
28,345
28.345
I
25.470
25.470
Wash Bay
I
500
500
0
500
0
Office Area
4,517
2,775
Maintanance Area
7.228
300
Circulation Area
1,535
1,535
Interior Bus Storage Area
28,345
25,470
Building Total Area - Gross
41.625
30,080
PTIG GRANT FOR EXISTING JULE FACILITY ROOF
The City has received
$257,800 in PTIG funds to
repair the roof and
sprinkler system of the
existing transit facility
The facility will be in use
until the new bus facility is
constructed. The roof and
sprinkler system should be
fixed to keep the facility in
use.
BUDGET
Funding source
Amount
FTA's SGR funds
: $2,300,000
DMATS STP funds*
$1,200,000
City of Dubuque Funds
$1,372,513
IADOT's PTIG funds*
$640,000
Total
$5,512,513
a` DMATS and PTIG funds are competitive grants
Nov 2013
Environmental
Approvals
• EPA • IADOT
• IADNR • Mid America
Design Scenarios
• Site usage • Office space
• Brick vs Colored precast • Southside
• Clearstory
Environmental Approval
ECIA staff worked closely with the EPA, IDNR, and IDOT on the
acceptable uses for the old city garage superfund site. The three agencies
have agreed to provide a "comfort letter" from their respective agency
approving the intended re -use with the following stipulations:
• The existing building and steel can be removed down to the footprint and
slab but the slab cannot be removed and should be re -used. Removing the
original slab will trigger soil mitigation requirements which will add
considerable costs to the project.
• The small entrance area currently on the south side of the office area of the
existing facility can be removed down to the slab and does not have to be re-
used. The slab can be landscaped over or paved over.
• Site does not have to be fully capped with pavement;
• Site can include green space and landscaping;
• Special EPA training is required if the site is excavated more than 6 feet
below the surface;
• No daycare can be operated at the site.
• The site should not become at any time a Jule transfer point for
passengers.
• A fueling station is not permitted at the site.
■
Tod(bn :51916,Y"
DMATS :1993,950
G9 Sa • tap.3151.1'1
Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility (BSMF)
City payback for
roof fix
City CIP funds
Cost
80% funds
20% Match
Cost
I
State of
Good
Rfunds
DMA TS
STP funds
State
PTIG
funds
City CIP
funds
Paid with
City CIP
funds
Total City
CIP funds
used
Savings in
City CIP
funds
Scenario 1
$5,646,282
$2,300,000
$1,577,026
$640,000
$1,129,256
$257,800
$257,800
$1,387,056
- $14,543
_
Scenario 2
F $5,396,282
$2,300,000
$1,377,026
$640,000
$1,079,256
$257,800
$257,800
$1,337,056
$35,457
Scenario 3
$5,373,130
$2,300,000
$1,358,504
$640,000
$1,074,626
$257,800
$257,800
$1,332,426
$40,087
Scenario 4
$5,123,130
$2,300,000
$1,158,504
$640,000
$1,024,626
$257,800
$257,800
$1,282,426
$90,087
Scenario 5
$5,189,738
$2,300,000
$1,211,790
$640,000
$1,037,948
$257,800
$257,800
$1,295,748
$76,765
Scenario 6
$4,939,738
$2,300,000
$1,011,790
$640,000
$987,948
$257,800
$257,800
$1,245,748
$126,765
_
Scenario 7
$5,136,187
$2,300,000
$1,168,950
$640,000
$1,027,237
$257,800
$257,800
$1,285,037
$87,476
Scenario 8
$4,886,187
$2,300,000
$968,950
$640,000
$977,237
$257,800
$257,800
$1,235,037
$137,476
Scenario 9
$4,943,130
$2,300,000
$1,014,504
$640,000
$988,626
$257,800
$257,800
$1,246,426
$126,087
Scenario 10
$4,836,187
$2,300,000
$928,950
$640,000
$967,237
$257,800
$257,800
$1,225,037
$147,476
Scenario 11
$4,916,187
$2,300,000
$992,950
$640,000
$983,237
$257,800
$257,800
$1,241,037
$131,476
Dec 2013
Selecting Scenario -
DMATS STP Funds
Recommendation
Scenario 9'
Reducing south side to single floor
Precast exterior with
Brick - at
Capping two thirds
site
qlOptipn6
Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility IBSMFl
Scenario 9
Capping full site
Cost
y
Capping Iwo thirds of the site and rest wish landscape
l,.`
Brick exterior
V
Colored Precast
('lervslors tut' natural light
C 1
Reduce the South side building to single fluor
0
Paid with
Cily CIP
funds
Full office build -uut basing on feasibility study 16,052
sq. It.)
Savings in
City CIP
funds
(Mee build-out in the basing ins transit ueeds13,530
sq. ll.)
CI
Cost
54,943.1 511
Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility IBSMFl
City payback for
roof fix
City CIP funds
Cost
y
80% funds
20% Match
Cast
u I
State of
Good
Repair
funds
DMATS
Si 1' funds
Stale
PTIG
funds
City ('II'
funds
Paid with
Cily CIP
funds
Total City
CIP funds
used
Savings in
City CIP
funds
Scenario
Imailigini S 2300,000
51,01.1.504
5640,000
$988,626
7777
S257,81)0
SI,2d6.426
SI26.08i
Reducing south side to single floor
Colored Precast
Capping two thirds
site
Scenario IIl
Options
Scenario 10
Capping Ili ll mu:
Cost
l app., i .o (lord, of Ow sift- and rest .. ilh 4uuhcapc
LJ
Brick cflcrn,r
Q
l'nlorcd Precast
l'Icrostory for natural light
O
Reduce the South .side building to single floor
ili
Full office build-out losing on feasibility study 01.052
sq. n-1
Paid with
City- CIP
funds
Onie• I,odd•ual in the basing on transit m.1,t3 531
sq.11.,
A
C Wl
$.1nsy1,.1117
Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility I RSAI I' 1
City payback for
roof fix
City CIt funds
Cost
80% funds
20% Match
Stale of
Good
Repair
funds
1)11: \'I'S
511' funds
Stab•
Irl'IG
t'unds
City C'IP
funds
-Cost
Paid with
City- CIP
funds
Total l'ih
C'1P funds
used
Sayiny!s in
City CIF'
funds
$4,836,187
i2.300.0(lit
$4289511 •t40.000
3967.237
lingua01 $2i7.siEl
i1.225f 37I - l- F7.47,,
Scenario i
Color
Reducing south side to single floor
Capping two thirds
site
Total cost : $4,' ,187
DMATS : $992,950
City Savings : $131,476
Options
Scenario I I
Capping full site
0
Capping two thirds of the site and rest nilh landscape
•
Brick 'Mellor
0
Colored Precast
Clerastor) fur natural light
State of
(,nod
Repair
funds
Reduce the South side building to single floor
•
Full uRice build• out basing on feasibility stud) (6.052
sq. ft.)
0
Office build•out in the basing on transit needs(3.5311
sq. 1't.)
•
Gast
01.41(,.187
Bus S orage and Maintenance Facility IIISMFI
City payback fur
roof fix
City CIF funds
Cost
80% funds
20% Match
Cost
State of
(,nod
Repair
funds
UI►1ATS
ST1' funds
Stale
PTIG
funds
City or
funds
Paid with
City OP
funds
Total City
CEP funds
used
Savings in
City COP
funds
Scenario 11
$4,916,187
52.300.000
$992.950
5040.0(X)
5983.237
5257,800
S1.241.037
S131.470
DMATS STP Funds
Request to DMATS $1.2 million (80%)
City Match $300,000 (20%)
The funding will be used for following:
• Design
• Administration
• Construction
J
u
I
2014`
Next Steps
FTA Approval
• A final plan for selected scenario will be
submitted to FTA
Design Process
• Design RFP will be released once Jule
gets FTA approvals and DMATS
funding approval
IADOT PTIG grant
• Jule will submit an application in May
2014 to IADOT to secure PTIG funds
q
?it
The Jule
Construction of BSMF will commence
basing on the following:
• Design is completed in timely fashion
• Funding secured from IADOT and
DMATS
Jul 2014
2015