Request to Award 30- and 42-inch Sanitary Sewer Force Main-Lift Station Copyright 2014
City of Dubuque Consent Items # 15.
ITEM TITLE: Request to Award 30-and 42-inch Sanitary Sewer Force
Main and Lift Station Assessment and Rehabilitation Project
SUMMARY: City Manager recommending authorization for the City to
enter into a contract with Strand Associates to perform
engineering consulting services including, but not limited to,
survey inspection and assessment of the City's 30-and 42-
inch sanitary sewer force mains and Terminal Street and
Cedar Street Lift Stations
SUGGESTED DISPOSITION: Suggested Disposition: Receive and File; Approve
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Sanitary Sewer Force Main and Lift Station Assessment City Manager Memo
and Rehabilitation Project-MVM Memo
Staff Memo Staff Memo
Notes Supporting Documentation
THE CITY OF Dubuque
UBE I
erica .i
Masterpiece on the Mississippi 2007-2012-2013
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: Request to Award Contract
30" & 42" Diameter Sanitary Sewer Force Main and Lift Station
Assessment and Rehabilitation Project
DATE: March 16, 2016
City Engineer Gus Psihoyos requests City Council authorization for the City to enter into
a contract with Strand Associates to perform engineering consulting services including,
but not limited to, survey inspection and assessment of the City's 30" and 42" sanitary
sewer force mains and Terminal Street and Cedar Street Lift Stations for an amount not
to exceed $122,935.
1 concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
Mic ael C. Van Milligen
MCVM:jh
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
Teri Goodmann, Assistant City Manager
Gus Psihoyos, City Engineer
THE CITY OF .. DUB
DUB E fAlll•AmmeedcaCC�ity
1111111
Masterpiece on the Mississippi ).00'1.2012.2011
TO: Michael C Van Milligen, City Managor
1;
FROM: Gus Psihoyos, City Engineer � •
DATE: March 15, 2016
RE: Request to Award Contract
30" & 42" Diameter Sanitary Sewer Force Main and Lift Station
Assessment and Rehabilitation Project
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memorandum is to request authorization for the City to enter into a
contract with Strand Associates of Madison, Wisconsin to perform engineering
consulting services including, but not limited to survey inspection and assessment of the
City's 30" and 42" sanitary sewer force mains and Terminal Street and Cedar Street Lift
Stations.
BACKGROUND
In general, the force main system is comprised of lift stations and pressure sanitary
sewers known as force mains. Each component of the lift station and force main system
requires periodic evaluation and improvements to continue its vital role in conveying the
City's wastewater. Approximately 80% of wastewater that flows to the Water &
Resource Recovery Center for treatment arrives via the City's Cedar Street and
Terminal Street lift stations through a 30" and 42" force main network, the remaining
20% arrives via the Catfish Creek Lift Station through an 18" force main. A large
majority of the force main is located along the river and is parallel to the CN Railroad.
The City's force main system is showing signs of wear and should be evaluated so that
system improvements can be planned. Notably, several sections of the 42" force main
along the banks of the Mississippi River are exposed and need to be further secured, a
sluice gate at Terminal Lift Station requires replacement, and the Terminal Street valve
house needs to be upgraded to ensure flows can be redirected for the replacement of
the sluice gate at Terminal Street lift station.
The City sought qualified professional service proposals in October 2015. On
November 6th, the City received four proposals. The proposals were from hbk
Engineering of Iowa City, Iowa; Horner Shifrin of St Louis, Missouri; the team of HDR &
WHKS of Des Moines, Iowa; and the team of Strand Associates & IIW of Madison,
Wisconsin. At the January 11, 2016 Council meeting, approval was sought and granted
to enter into contract negotiations with Strand Associates.
R PROJECTS\30 and 42 inc FM and LS Assessment Proj 2015\RFQ\Force Main RFP Award Memo March 3 2016.docx
DISCUSSION
Following further discussion with Strand Associates on February 5, 2016, Strand has
submitted a revised project phasing statement which better serves the City along with a
revised cost proposal. Strand demonstrates a clear understanding of the scope and a
prioritization method in sync with the proposal request. They recognized the critical
issues of the exposed force main and the need to immediately address the evaluation of
the Terminal Street Lift Station; and reprioritize other items into later phases. The
following key points are taken from the revised project scope as negotiated on February
5, 2016:
Revised Phase 1 — FY2016
➢ Assessment (including initial assessment by [Strand] team as well as any
required detailed condition assessment by a third party inspection firm) of
Terminal Street Pumping Station and the associated force main are highest
priority and should be completed as soon as possible in 2016. Assessment of the
Cedar Street Pumping Station and force main can be de-coupled from the first
phase of this project and bumped back to a later date.
➢ The results of the assessment of the Terminal Street Pumping Station and force
main will greatly impact the next phases of the overall project, including the need
for any emergency repairs or longer term improvements to this infrastructure.
➢ City would likely fund any capital improvements associated with the Cedar and
Terminal pumping stations and force mains via SRF loans. For this reason, it
would be beneficial if the reporting for the project met the SRF facilities planning
requirements. A planning initiation meeting between the City and IDNR will be
held in the near future.
➢ Preliminary costs for additional assessments of Cedar Street Pumping Station
and force main as well as preliminary costs for capital improvements will need to
be identified as part of the 2016 assessments so the City can include these costs
in the 5-year capital improvements plan. This plan is developed in September of
each year.
Strand Associates also provided a preliminary estimate to conduct an internal inspection
of the force main between Terminal Street Lift Station and the W&RRC. The internal
inspection of the force main will be conducted by a third party due to the nature of the
work and specialized equipment to complete an internal inspection without taking flow
offline. Currently, Pure Technologies of Alberta, Canada is a leader in infrastructure
inspection technology and would be a possible third party candidate to conduct the
inspection. The estimate to conduct the necessary internal inspection is approximately
$350,000.00; final costs for this work will be competitively sought and will be presented
for approval under separate correspondence.
BUDGETIMPACT
The consulting engineering project is funded through CIP 7102606 Cedar and Terminal
Street Force Mains and Lift Station Assessment and Improvements, in the amount of
F:\PROJECTS\30 and 42 inc FM and LS Assessment Proj 2015\RFQ\Force Main RFP Award Memo March 3 2016.docx
$250,000. The project is phased as it is unknown at this time of the final cost of the
improvements until after the assessment phases listed below are completed. The
original proposal from Strand Associates to complete the assessment phases totaled
$148,881.00. Following reprioritization of the phases and Strand's scope clarification the
contract has been renegotiated to not exceed $122,935.00.
REQUESTED ACTION
I respectfully request authorization for the City to enter into a contract with Strand
Associates of Madison, Wisconsin to perform the work presented in the February 5,
2016 Meeting and Proposed Changes to Project Scope and Level of Effort document as
provided by Strand and hereby attached, the amount of$122,935.00.
Attachment: February 5, 2016 Meeting Notes and Agreed to Project Changes as
prepared by Strand Associates.
cc: William O'Brien, Acting Plant Manager, WRRC
Steve Sampson Brown, Project Manager
Denise Ihrig, Environmental Engineer
I
F:\PROJECTS\30 and 42 inc FM and LS Assessment Proj 2015\RFQ\Force Main RFP Award Memo March 3 2016.docx
Summary of February 5, 1016 Meeting and Proposed Changes to Project
Scope and Level of Effort
Key Discussion Points:
• Assessment (including initial assessment by SAI team as well as any required detailed
condition assessment by a third party inspection firm) of Terminal Street Pumping
Station and the associated force main are highest priority and should be completed as
soon as possible in 2016. Assessment of the Cedar Street Pumping Station and force
main can be de-coupled from the first phase of this project and bumped back to a later
date.
• The results of the assessment of the Terminal Street Pumping Station and force main
will greatly impact the next phases of the overall project, including the need for any
emergency repairs or longer term improvements to this infrastructure.
• Currently Available 2016 Budget:
o $250,000 for engineering and 3rd party inspection firm for condition assessment
of force main. This was also intended to provide money for any immediate repair
needs associated with the 42-inch force main.
o $260,000 for replacement of the sluice gates at the Terminal Street Pumping
Station.
• City is working on an initial emergency response plan. SAI does not need to include this
in their scope of services for the first phase of the project (2016).
• City would likely fund any capital improvements associated with the Cedar and Terminal
pumping stations and force mains via SRF loans. For this reason, it would be beneficial
if the reporting for the project met the SRF facilities planning requirements. A planning
initiation meeting between the City and IDNR will be held in the near future.
• Iowa SRF planning and design loans will also be considered for the assessment and
planning phases of the project. More information is available at:
http://www.iowasrf.com/program/planning design loans/
• Estimated costs for detailed condition assessments would be helpful for budgeting
purposes. Costs from Pure Technologies to perform detailed condition assessments on
both force mains and the abandoned 30 inch force main along the river should be
requested.
• Preliminary costs for additional assessments of Cedar Street Pumping Station and force
main as well as preliminary costs for capital improvements will need to be identified as
part of the 2016 assessments so the City can include these costs in the 5-year capital
improvements plan. This plan is developed in September of each year.
Proposed Changes to Project Phasing
Note -based on changes described below, the task numbering in the associated task and
deliverable figure and fee spreadsheet have changed. Please refer to these updated
documents included as attachments to this summary.
• Phase 1A now includes the initial risk-based assessment of the Terminal Street force
main, the assessment of the Terminal Street Pumping Station, detailed condition
assessment of the Terminal Street force main by a third party condition assessment firm,
and necessary reporting (technical memorandum)to document the results of these
tasks. SAI's project scope for 2016 will include Phase 1A only. It is anticipated that all
of phase 1 A will be completed prior to September, 2016, allowing for preliminary costs to
S:\MAD\1100--1199\1154\051\Wrd\Summary of Modifications to Project Scope 2016-02-10\Summary of Modifications to Project Scope 2016-02-10.docx
be developed for the City's 5 year CIP. Tasks associated with subsequent phases of the
project will be highly contingent upon the results of phase 1A and it is anticipated a final
determination of future project phases and tasks will occur after the conclusion of Phase
1 A.
• Phase 1 B will likely include a risk based assessment and detailed condition assessment
of the Cedar Street force main and an assessment of the Cedar Street Pumping Station.
It is anticipated that Phase 1B will occur in 2017.
• Phase 1 C will include an alternatives analysis for long-term improvements to the
Terminal Street and Cedar Street Pumping Stations and both associated force mains.
Alternatives to be evaluated will be determined at the conclusion of all assessments. It
is anticipated that this will also occur in 2017 immediately following the conclusion of
Phase 1 B. The reporting associated with this task, in combination with the reporting
associated with prior phases, will meet the SRF program requirements for a facilities
plan. The recommendations from this alternatives evaluation will provide opinions of
probable construction cost associated with capital improvements to this system which
can be included in the City's CIP. It is anticipated that this phase will also include
analysis of alternatives for rehabilitation of the Terminal Street Pumping Station. If the
results of Phase 1A(detailed condition assessment) require expedited repairs to the
Terminal Street force main, this project may also be expedited as bypassing of(portions
of) the force main will likely be needed which may also provide a good opportunity to
complete rehabilitation at the Terminal Street Pumping Station.
• Phase 2 may include an emergency maintenance project associated with the Terminal
Street force main. The timing and need for this project will be highly contingent upon the
results of the condition assessment. It is possible that Phase 2 will need to be started
prior to Phases 1 B and 1 C if the condition assessment identifies needs for immediate
repair.
• Phase 3 remains largely unchanged and will likely include design and construction of
any pumping station and force main improvement projects. Timing of Phase 3 will be
highly contingent on magnitude of recommended improvements.
• Phase 4 also remains largely unchanged and includes development of an annual
maintenance program and integration into the City's GIS.
Propgs2Q Qhao-q2s Al Proiggj Scope for 2016
The scope and associated effort by the SAI team has been modified to better meet the City's
immediate goal of gathering condition assessment data of the Terminal Street Force Main. Our
modified scope will provide the City with a complete assessment and reporting of this force main
and the Terminal Street Pumping Station prior to September of 2016 which will allow the City to
include costs for subsequent phases of the project in the 5-year CIP. This will also allow the
City to determine (in 2016) if there are immediate needs for rehabilitation of the Terminal Street
Force Main or if improvements to this system can be delayed until assessments of the Cedar
Street Pumping Station and force main can be completed. Information related to the
development of the updated costs follows:
• The original project scope/fee for the risk-based assessment model (Fee= $69,355) was
divided into 3 main tasks.
o Approximately 1/3 of the fee was associated with the initial model development-
work related to identifying parameter to be included in the assessment, weighting
factors, and development of the supporting spreadsheets, etc.
SAMAW 100-11990 1540511WrdiSamimry of Modifications to Project Scope 2016-02-10`Summary of Modifications to Project Scope 2016-02-10.docx
1
o Approximately 1/3 of the fee was associated with gathering/researching
information and populating the spreadsheet for the Cedar Street force main. This
has been removed from Phase 1A and will now be completed in Phase 1 B
o Approximately 1/3 of the fee was associated with these same tasks for the
Terminal Street force main. We have further reduced the effort associated with
these tasks (1A.6 through 1A.9) by reducing the "resolution"that we originally
proposed with the risk-based assessment model. In summary, the initial risk
based assessment model of the Terminal Street Force Main will be more
"coarse" as we will not be analyzing as many parameters as we originally
proposed. This should still provide us with enough information to make good
decisions regarding the types/extents of the detailed condition assessment that
will be needed. As we work through this process, it is possible that the project
team identifies the need for additional data or resolution.
• We have removed the Cedar Street Pumping Station assessment from our scope. This
will now be completed in phase 1 B.
• We have added the reporting associated with the Terminal Street Pumping Station
assessment to the project scope. This was added to task 1A.13. To improve efficiency,
we have combined this reporting with the reporting of the initial assessment of the force
main in Technical Memorandum No. 1 rather than creating a standalone technical
memorandum. Although hours associated with Technical Memorandum No. 1 have been
redistributed slightly among project staff, the total effort associated with Technical
Memorandum No. 1 has remained unchanged. This is a result of eliminating the
reporting associated with the Cedar Street force main, and adding the reporting
associated with the Terminal Street Pumping Station.
• We have added task 1A.15 to our project scope. This task involves coordination with the
selected third party condition assessment firm, various City departments, regulatory
agencies, and the railroads before and during the detailed condition assessment
process.
• We have added task 1A.16 to our project scope. This task involves updating the risk-
based assessment model with the results of the detailed condition assessments.
• We have added task 1A.17 to our project scope. This task involves developing
Technical Memorandum No. 2 which will include a summary of the results of the detailed
condition assessment of the Terminal Street force main by the third party assessment
firm and the findings from the updated risk-based assessment model.
Approximate Total Phase 1A Costs, 2016
• SAI fee = $123,000
• Possible third party inspection fees (Assuming Pure Technologies, Smart Ball and Pipe
Diver assessments of Terminal Street Force Main only) = $310,000
• Potential additional costs for modifications necessary to launch tools = $10,000-$40,000
• Total approximate 2016 costs associated with assessments of the Terminal Street
Pumping Station and force main (Phase 1A) = $443,000 to $473,000
SAMAD11100--11W11541051 WrdlSurnmary of Mod1@cations to protect Scope 2016-02-10LSwnmary of Mod;ficalions to Project Scope 2016-02-10.docx
Approach / Sequence
Project Deliverable
Approach Provides Significant Collaboration With City and Leads to Successful Project
2
Anticipated Project Start Date:
18.7 Develop Risk -Based
Assessment Model
• Determine Analysis Segments
• Determine Risk FactorsNVeights
(e.g„ age. pressure, exposure,
• Determine Consequences
Factors
(e.g., location, environmental
impacts)
• Significant Collaborabcn weft
City
14.5- Establish Contact
th Railroad nd
Army Corps of
Engineers
• Identify Contacts
• Identify Required Permits
10.4 Kickoff
Meeting
10.6 Review Existing
Information
• Record Drawings
• Failure History
• Soils
• Photos
14..9 Complete Desktop{evel
Risk -Based Assessment
Using Existing Data and the
Results of the Field Survey
Information Will Be Populated into
the Risk -Based Assessment Model
RFP Tasks 1.1, 1.2, 1.3
14..6. Conduct Field Survey
of Terminal Street Force
Main
• Review Force Main Route
• Assess Exposed Areas
• (valves manholesexposed
areas along river)
• Assess Air Release Valves
• Assess Condition of Wood tales
RFP Tasks
PM &
14.1 RC
Program
RFP Tasks
PM &
18.3 Initial
Uata Request
• Record Dravnngs
• Sols Information
• Failure History
• Operating
Condition
RFP Tasks PM & A
:A.2: Submitted At
Project Kickoff and
Updated Monthly
• Work Bkdown
Structure/Task Outline
• Schedule
• Total ProjectCost
Budget
• Progress Report
14.10 Identity Data Gaps and
Needs for Additional
Condition Assessment Data
• Deanne n ne Adtlt lJ ta Nds
Using Model Results
• Delineate High, Medium. and
Low -Risk Pipe Segments
RFP Tasks 1.4, 1.5, 2.3
14.11. Identity Most
Suitable Condition
Assessment Technolojle
Considerations.
• Differing Pipe Materials
• Internal vs. External
Corrosion
• Access to lntenor or Ertenor
of Pipe
• Data Resolution and
Confidence
RFP Task 3.1
14..12: Complete Terminal
Street Lift Station
Assessments
Mechanical
Structural
Costngs
14,15 Detailed 11:10600
dror Exterior Condition
Assessment
• Assist City in Solcitng
Proposals
• Coordinate with Selected
Assessment F m
• Coordinate with Mechanical
Contactor (if necessary to
create toollaunch/retrieval
points)
• Observe Assessments
• Coordinate with City, Regulatory
Agencies. ane Railroad During
Assessment
•
14..15' Update
Risk -Based
Assessment
Model with
Detailed
Condition
Assessment
Data
ntjcjpated Ph
Phase 18 - Cedar
Street Pumping
Station Ytd Force
Main Assesnent
RFP Task 3.1
18.2 t. edar
Street Lffl
Station
A';;msment
H 1 • Arlar Street
re Main 14sk-
az o ASSvssrt•nt
,P4 11 taded
Interior end't.r
xronor.`maitre
et at
Swim Street Serf
Mats;
RFP Task 1.6, 3.2
1A ".ecLnica8Memo el
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Summary of Field
Survey and Existing
Informaton
Section 3: Risk -Based
Assessment Model
Development
Section 4: Recommendations
for Additional
Conditon
Assessment
Section 5: Term al Street Lift
Station Assessment
Summary
Section 6 Terminal Street Lft
Sown
Rehabilitation
Reeommendaoons
Ie'
Notes:
All deliverables will be submitted to City in draft format prior to finalizing, in order to
provide City ample time for review and comment
Figure 2- Project Approach and Scope of Services Summary
RFP Task 1.6
18.14: Bid Documents,
Subcontractor Scope
of Services for 14.17 Technical Memo /12
Detailed Force Main Section 7: Detailed Condthon
Condition Assessment Assessment results.
t Section 8: Updated Risk-
- • Based Assessment
Model
j
14,3Te- tlnr ai Mem.. 03
Update Sections 4-6 with
Cedar Street Pumping
Station and Force Main
Information
1A5 Te•hnicre Memo I/O
Update Sections 74 with
Cedar Street Force Main
Information
Included in Proposed 2016 Fee
Not Included in Proposed 2016 Fee
Phase 1C -CIP
Alternatives
Analysis
1.f s s ve Yate
von
-vied All., a
• la'entfy P mping
Station and Force
Mao Renewal
Alternatives
- Complete Analysis of
Alternatives
• Provide
Recommendations.
F mai
.a.,pa-1
Section 9: Pumping Station
and Force Moan
improvements
Alternatives
Analysis
Section 10 Receminem
deans
Phase 2 - Maintenance
Project / Safety and
Emergency Response
Pla
RFP Tsk 2.1
rn bun
RFP Task 2.1
_ c Bidditrg
RFP Task 2.2
Ucvelop
Sakti a,14
merge,:
R Pan, AI at
RFP Tk 2.1
uesrgn
.,
Prepare Bid
Document for
Maintenance of
424mch Fong,-.,.
Mad Near Railroad / River
RFP Task 2.2
z4 ' .atnty and
ntergent q
Re^..p..nn.• elan
RFP Tk 2.1
2.4
Bei anent lo.
424n. n F or a Main
Sagge
Phase 3 - Lift Station
and Valve House
Rehabilitation Project
REP Tasks 3.3 3.4
-11R,
d
DO,on_.'s for
Lift Station and
Valve 1400s0
Rchabdnatroa
RFP Tasks 3.3, 3.4
3.2: Bidding
Services
RFP Tasks 3.3, 3.4
.4.
RFP Tasks 3.3, 3.4
• 1 at Stationx ane
dab Hem. P• tis r
214 1 in .drient-
Phase 4 - Annual
Maintenance
Program
Development;
GIS Imo
RFP Task 4.2
f Aarrat
11111110
RFP Task 41
r.., .
Froslata
-d n
• R sk
.Assessment C0tate
Pnicess
• ARV Maintenance
• Ins tie into
CMOM,
RFP Task 4.1
/rt
REVISED 2/20116
City of Dubuque
i Sanitary Sewer Force Main and Lift Station Assessment and Rehabilitation Project
Preliminary Task List and Budget
_
Strand Staffing (80%)
Subconsuttant Staffing (20%)
Totals
LLA
°= '
o 05
c-
d y
`m a
g ¢
',
c,y
g a
=
o
�,y
a a
a
c a,
m a
3'o
w
o a
o
o
o,
"
o d
W
o
to
in cn
i t
`o
s s
co c!9
a o
g§-
-
y O
g o
.aa
co in
Total
Hours
Total Fee
(with
Expenses)
BillintRate
$ 161
$ 203
$ 100
$ 187
$ 110
$ 157
$ 100
$ 80
$ 150
$ 139
Task
Corresponding
Description
RFP Task No.
Project Management
General PM Activities/Project Updates/Progress Meetings
40
20
20
80
12
12
24
104
$ 15,775
Phase 1A:
Preliminary Assessment (RFP Phase 1, Tasks 1 through 6)
Task 1A.1, 1A.2, 1A.3:
PM&A
SubmitOA/QC Program and Initial Data Request
2
2
8
4
16
1
1
2
18
$ 2529
Task 1A.4:
Kickoff Meeting/Preliminary Tasks
12
16
8
4
40
0r
40
$ 6,220'
Task lA.S:
Establish Contact with Regulatory Agencies and Railroads/Permitting
Requirements
24
32
0
32
$ 4,385
Task tA.6:
Review Existing Information
8
18
8
4
4
42
12
2
14
56
$ 8,950'
Task 1A.7:
Develop Risk -Based Assessment Model
8
4
12
2
40
2
2
70
12
8
20
90
$ 13,421
Task 1A.8:
1.1 1.2 1.3
Conduct Field Survey of Terminal Street Force Main
8
14
8
8
38
14
14
52
$ 8,057
Task 1A.9:
Complete Desktop -Level Risk -Based Assessment of Terminal Street Force
Main
2
2
8
28
4
44
8
2
10
54
$ 7,891
Task 1A.10:
Identify Data Gaps and Needs for Additional Assessment Data of Terminal
Street Force Main
2
6
6
14
6
6
20
$ 2,918
Task 1A.11:
1.4, 1.5, 2.3
Identify Most Suitable Condition Assessment Technology for Terminal Street
Force Main (Includes RFP Phase 2, Task 3)
14
6
24
6
6
30
$ 4,198
Task 1A.12:
3.1 i
Complete Terminal Street Lift Station Assessment (RFP Phase 3, Task 1)
4
2
26
10
42
0
42
$ 8,191.
Task 1A.13:
1.6, 3.2
Tech Memo No. 1: Summary of Initial Field Survey and Risk -Based
Assessment of Terminal Street Pumping Station and Force Main
12
6
30
16
16
8
4
20
112
12
4
16
128
$ 19,304
Task 1A.14
1.6
Prepare Bid Documents for Detailed Condition Assessment (RFP Phase 1,
Task 6, Last Sentence)
8
2
24
4
38
8
8
46
$ 6,616
Task 1A.15
Assistance with Detailed Interior or Exterior Condition Assessments by Third
Party Inspection
20
2
30
4,
4
34
$ 5,003
Task 1A.16
Update Risk -Based Assessment Model with Detailed Condition Assessment
Data
4
8
16
28
4
4
32
$ 4,501
Task 1A 17
Tech Memo No. 2: Summary of Detailed Condition Assessment Results and
Updated Risk -Based Assessment Model
4
2
12
12
4
34
2
2
36
$ 4,975
Revised 2/12/2016
TOTAL
134
18
236
62
130
36
10
58
684
101
29
130
814
$ 122,935
S:\MAD\1100--1199\1154\051\Spr\Fee Development - Updated 2-10-2016.xise / Revised Scope 2-10-16
2/12/2016 / 1:36 PM