Request for Proposals - Five Flags Theater Masonry Rehabilitation-Fire Escape Copyright 2014
City of Dubuque Consent Items # 5.
ITEM TITLE: Request for Proposals - Five Flags Theater Masonry
Rehabilitation and Fire Escape
SUMMARY: City Manager recommending approval of the release of a
Request for Proposals for a consultant to provide
architectural/engineering services for the Five Flags
Theater Masonry Rehabilitation and Fire Escape Project.
SUGGESTED DISPOSITION: Suggested Disposition: Receive and File; Approve
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
RFP for Fig Flags Theater Masonry Rehab& Fire City Manager Memo
Escape Project-MVM Memo
Staff Memo Staff Memo
Request for Proposal FF Masonry Supporting Documentation
THE CITY OF Dubuque
UBE I
erica .i
Masterpiece on the Mississippi 2007-2012-2013
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
SUBJECT: RFP Architectural / Engineering for Five Flags Theater Masonry
Rehabilitation and Fire Escape Project
DATE: March 29, 2016
Leisure Services Manager Marie Ware recommends City Council approval of the
release of a Request for Proposals for a consultant to provide architectural/engineering
services for the Five Flags Theater Masonry Rehabilitation and Fire Escape Project.
I concur with the recommendation and respectfully request Mayor and City Council
approval.
Micliael C. Van Milligen
MCVM:jh
Attachment
cc: Barry Lindahl, City Attorney
Cindy Steinhauser, Assistant City Manager
Teri Goodmann, Assistant City Manager
Marie L. Ware, Leisure Services Manager
THE CITY ODubuque II-A
U Bi
E
;111 I.mericaCi i
Masterpiece on the Mississippi 2007-2012-2013
TO: Michael C. Van Milligen, City Manager
FROM: Marie L. Ware, Leisure Services Manager
SUBJECT: RFP Architectural / Engineering for Five Flags Theater Masonry
Rehabilitation and Fire Escape Project
DATE: March 25, 2016
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memo is to request City Council approval of the attached Request
for Proposals (RFP) to provide architectural/engineering services for the Five Flags
Theater Masonry Rehabilitation and Fire Escape Project.
DISCUSSION
Five Flags Theater is on the National Register of Historic Places. Preservation of this
community treasure is paramount. In 2005 the department bid out tuckpointing of the
Theater. The bids came in high and all bids were rejected. The project was delayed
until funds re-budgeted at a higher level. The fire escape located on the South side of
the building needs work on the counterbalances and maintenance necessary to keep it
not only looking good but in proper working order into the future. The time to do this is
at the same time tuckpointing is to be completed.
Additionally at the parapet there is a water leak that needs repaired before further
damage is done to the inside of the Theater. Work on the parapet would lead to the
opportunity to repair the leak at the roof seam.
Proposals are due April 26, 2016. The anticipated schedule is that the City will execute
a contract with the selected consultant by May 27, 2016.
BUDGET IMPACT
The budget approved is as follows:
Theater Masonry Restoration CIP 350-1708
Including Consultant Fees —Arch itectural/Engineering and Inspection
Services as well as Construction/Conservation Materials and Labor $ 244,416
1
Theater Fire Escape CIP 350-2511
Including Consultant Fees — Architectural/Engineering and Inspection
Services as well as Construction/Conservation Materials and Labor $ 35,000
Total Project $ 279,416
RECOMMENDATION
I respectfully request City Council approval of the RFP for Architectural/Engineering
Services for Five Flags Theater Masonry Rehabilitation and Fire Escape Project.
MLW:et
cc HR Cook, SMG General Manager
Dave Johnson, Assistant Planner
attachment: RFP
2
THF MY OF CITY OF DUBUQUE, IOWA
LEISURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
LTB E 2200 Bunker Hill Road
Masterpiece on the Mississippi Dubuque, IA 52001
Phone: 563-589-4263
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
FIVE FLAGS HISTORIC THEATER
MASONRY REHABILIATION AND FIRE ESCAPE PROJECT
INTRODUCTION
The City of Dubuque, Iowa is soliciting requests for proposals from qualified consulting firms to
provide professional architectural and engineering services for the Five Flags Historic Theater
Masonry Rehabilitation and Fire Escape Project, in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Five Flags Theater is owned by the City of
Dubuque and managed on a day-to-day basis by SMG under the supervision of The Leisure Services
Department.
Interested and qualified firms are invited to submit a proposal to provide professional services for the
project, as noted below. Proposals prepared in response to this Request for Proposal (RFP) are due
before 2:00 p.m. on April 26, 2016. The anticipated schedule for this project is that the City of
Dubuque will execute a contract with the selected consultant by May 27, 2016 and the project will be
completed by August 8, 2016. Please review the entire RFP for specific requirements.
Any questions regarding the project or this RFP should be directed to Marie Ware, Leisure
Services Manager at 563-589-4263 and/or email mware(aD_cityofdubugue,org prior to
submission.
COMMUNITY BACKGROUND
The city of Dubuque is located on the Mississippi River in northeastern Iowa, adjacent to Illinois and
Wisconsin. As Iowa's oldest city, Dubuque is a community well known for its historic and architectural
beauty. The city is over 30 square miles in area, with a population of nearly 60,000 persons. The
community has a stable and diversified manufacturing base and a growing service sector. Dubuque is
the major retail, medical, education and employment center for the tri-state area. Tourism continues to
be a major economic force in the community.
The City of Dubuque is governed by an elected Mayor and City Council and managed by a City
Manager. The City funds a full range of municipal services. City government works in collaboration
with the private and non-profit sectors to promote economic development and sustainability.
Sustainability and downtown, neighborhood, and riverfront planning and revitalization are long-
standing priorities of the City Council. The City's web site is www.cityofdubugue.org. The City
Council's Goals and Priorities are available online at http://www.cityofdubugue.org/councilgoaIs.
BACKGROUND ON FIVE FLAGS THEATER
The Five Flags Theater was constructed as the Majestic Theater in 1910, replacing a theatre originally
built in 1864 that was destroyed by fire that year. It had been purchased then renovated by local
prominent businessman Harker Brentnal Spensley, Sr. and his partner, C. H. Eighmey. The rebuilt
theater was designed by C.W. and George L. Rapp of Chicago, who eventually became one of the
nation's premier theater architects. The Theater was touted as the most beautiful and safest theater in
Iowa and booked on a circuit of 87 theaters.
The Majestic, as is it was called, has ornate Renaissance Revival Style with French and Italian
influences. It was converted to a movie house in 1920 and renamed 'Spensley Theater' in 1929. It
was later renamed the RKO Orpheum and used to show movies. Eventually, it fell into disrepair and
was slated for demolition during urban renewal in 1969.
A committee made up of concerned citizens began a fund drive in December of 1971 to save and
renovate the theater, which was incorporated in the Five Flags Center project. In November of 1972
the Orpheum was placed on the National Register of Historic Places. Restoration was begun in 1975,
and the theater was reopened in 1976 as the Five Flags Theater. Since then the Theater has
undergone a second major renovation. The 711 seat historic theater is currently the home of the
Dubuque Symphony Orchestra, concerts, ballet, weddings and theatrical productions and more.
Five Flags Civic Center incorporates the five national flags that have flown over the geographical
region since 1673: the Fleur de Lis of France (1673-1763); the Royal Flag of Spain (1763-1803); the
Union Jack of England (1780, during a brief interruption of Spanish rule); the French Republic Flag of
Napoleon (1803); and the America's Stars and Stripes (1803-present).
PROJECT LOCATION
The Five Flags Theater is located at the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Main Street.
Tuckpointing and fire escape work of the Theater will need to be coordinated with the volume of traffic
that passes on each of these streets especially during tourist season.
PROJECT SCOPE
The approved scope of work is to create the necessary bid documents, plans and specifications for
rehabilitation work as well as management of the project contractors to include inspection services for
the Five Flags Masonry Restoration and Fire Escape Project, to be done in accordance with the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and the National Park
Service (NPS) Technical Preservation Services Technical Preservation Brief No. 2 Repointing Mortar
Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings. All masonry cleaning by the gentlest means possible in
conformance with NPS Technical Preservation Services Technical Preservation Brief No. 6 Dangers
of Abrasive Cleaning to Historic Buildings.
The scope of services will include, but may not be limited to, the consultant's approach to
accomplishing the following tasks:
2
1. Conduct site inspection of the Five Flags Theater masonry and fire escape with representatives of
the City of Dubuque and SMG, the City's management company for Five Flags Civic Center.
2. Prepare construction documents and engineering estimate in hard copy and electronic format
acceptable to the City and other governmental agencies.
3. Submit construction documents to the City and other governmental agencies as needed for their
review and approval.
4. Coordinate issuance of plans and specifications for bidding.
5. Provide all bid-related documents and plans.
6. Review bids, prepare bid tabulation, and recommend bid for construction contract award.
7. Conduct pre-construction conference with contractor(s) and City and SMG staff.
8. Conduct progress meetings with contractors and City and SMG staff.
9. Provide construction administration.
10. Review progress payments and develop change orders and punch list.
Scope of services should include preparation and presentation of draft and final written reports,
including all visual aids for public presentations.
The documents, plans and specifications will address:
1. Solve cracking in masonry and/or stabilize brick from shifting;
2. Repair/replace sills if necessary;
3. Repointing moral joints and cleaning of all four (4) exterior building facades including exposed
foundation walls;
4. Replace damaged brick, limestone and/or other stone or clay units;
5. Remove and replace exterior sealant around each and every door, window and opening;
6. Repair and /or replace existing exterior wood window sills, trim, panels and molding;
7. Roof flashing and coping replacement as needed; and
8. Refurbish fire escape and repaint.
A mortar analysis has been completed and is attached as Appendix 1.
BUDGET
The estimated project budget is summarized as follows:
Theater Masonry Restoration
Including Consultant Fees —Architectural/Engineering and Inspection Services as well
as Construction/Conservation Materials and Labor $244,416
Theater Fire Escape
Including Consultant Fees —Architectural/Engineering and Inspection Services as well
as Construction/Conservation Materials and Labor 35,000
Total Project $279,416
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PROCESS
The objective is to select the consultant most qualified to provide the services outlined in this request.
Initial screening will be done without knowing the consultant's proposed fee for services. Evaluations
will be based on the criteria listed below.
3
Responsiveness, Quality, and Completeness of Proposal
• Everything is included that was required by the RFP
• Proposal schedule to complete the project
•Ability to successfully complete the scope of services on time and within budget
• The quality of written material and presentation, relevant experience, answers to questions, and
overall organization
Experience/Qualifications
• Professionally registered engineer(s) and/or architects(s) experience and training in historic
preservation, rehabilitation and conservation of historic structures
• Qualifications and experience of principal consulting staff or project team developing and managing
similar projects involving historically significant structures with work done in accordance with the
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and NPS Technical
Preservation Services Technical Preservation Brief No. 2 Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic
Masonry Buildings
• Qualifications and experience of any sub-consultants (if proposed) on similar projects
• Oversight of rehabilitative work performed
• References
• Experience working with municipalities and City staff
• Project manager's expertise, experience, and unique qualifications especially in performing similar
services on historically significant structures in accordance with Secretary of Interior Standards for
Treatment of Historic Properties
• Supervision of rehabilitation work performed by qualified, licensed and bonded contractors
experience in preservation of historic properties in accordance with federal, state and city standards
including but not limited to the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties.
• Consultant proposed revisions and/or changes to the scope of services that would better serve the
community
Proposed Fees and Compensation
• Reasonability of scope of services to fees proposed
INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN PROPOSAL
Letter of Transmittal - Provide a one page letter of transmittal briefly stating the consultant's interest
in this project, outlining the consultant's understanding of the work and the name, address, office and
cell phone numbers and email address of the primary contact person.
Profile of Consultant - Provide general information about the consultant and its area(s) of expertise
in regards to this RFP, including the qualifications of the project manager and other key personnel to
be assigned to the project, previous experience and unique qualifications for this project..
Background and Organization - Identify name, address, history and organization of the consultant,
including an overview of the services the consultant provides in-house and the number of years the
consultant has provided the requested services. Describe any other relevant professional services
offered by the consultant and how these services may be able to benefit the City.
Experience - Describe recent professional experience with detailed but brief descriptions of
representative projects, including project budgets, team members, community engagement process,
and other applicable information, including work with public sector clients, and a minimum of three (3)
most recent projects related to this project.
4
Team Members - Identify key team members that will be assigned to the project, specific roles and
responsibilities, time commitment to the project, and individual professional expertise/credentials,
especially relating to experience with similar studies.
• List project manager for the team
•A listing of team personnel who will actually be assigned to perform the work on this project, and a
breakdown and description of tasks assigned per project team member.
• For consultants located outside the region, address how the consultant will remain responsive to
short notice requests and meetings
• Identify similar projects that team members have worked on together
Sub-consultant(s) personnel experience
• Names and addresses of any outside consultant(s) or associate(s) proposed to be involved with this
project
• Include each proposed sub-consultant(s) experience and qualifications as described above for firm's
personnel
• Identify similar projects that team members have worked on together with the sub-consultants
Scope of Project Services - The proposed scope of services will describe the firm's detailed
approach to completing the masonry rehabilitation and fire escape project. The scope of services will
include sufficient discussion of proposed methodologies, techniques, and procedures for each work
item. Describe the means or strategy by which the consultant would satisfy the following scope of
services, and/or an alternative or hybrid strategy recommended by the consultant. The proposed
scope of services will describe the firm's approach to completing the masonry rehabilitation and fire
escape project. Scope is shared on pages 2-3.
Proposed Project Schedule - Completion of RFP is targeted for August 8, 2016. Provide a project
schedule outlining the time period and estimated completion date of the proposed scope of work. This
should include a schedule for and description of all deliverable products throughout the period.
Describe the method to assure that the time schedule will be met. Identify the person responsible for
assuring schedule compliance. Products should be delivered in hardcopy and electronic formats
compatible with the City's computer software and hardware.
The proposal shall discuss the firm's ability to integrate this contract into the present workload.
References - The proposal shall include at least three references of past clients with projects on
historically significant structures done in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
the Treatment of Historic Properties. These projects should have been completed within the past five
years with the same project manager, sub-consultants and/or other key personnel proposed for this
project. Full name, title, address, email and phone should be provided.
Litigation - Provide litigation information, if applicable. Any past claims and/or lawsuits and reason
for the claim and/or lawsuit.
Fees and Compensation - Provide a proposed cost plus expenses budget for completion of the
proposed scope of services with cost breakdowns by scope element. Clearly define reimbursable
costs such as travel, printing, etc. Provide hourly and overhead rates for personnel, including for
additional services. Include proposed fee payment schedule. Quotation of fees and compensation
shall remain firm for a period of at least 90 days from the submission deadline. Please separate the
proposed fees and compensation from the other portion of the RFP submittal. Initial screening
will be done without knowing the consultant's proposed fee for services.
5
Certificate of Insurance - The selected firm will be required to meet the insurance requirements
(Insurance Schedule C) of the City upon award of contract. (See attached Appendix 2) Insurance
schedule is not required to be in force for the RFP submission.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
A signed original and five (5) hard copies plus one (1) PDF copy on CD or flash drive of the proposal
clearly labelled FIVE FLAGS THEATER MASONRY REHABILITATION AND FIRE ESCAPE
PROJECT in a sealed box or envelope must be received by 2:00 p.m. CST, April 26, 2016 at the
following address:
Marie Ware, Leisure Services Manager
City of Dubuque Leisure Services
2200 Bunker Hill Road
Dubuque, IA 52001-3010
No faxed or e-mail proposals will be accepted.
To simplify the review process and obtain the maximum comparability, the proposal must include the
following information, at a minimum, and be organized in the following manner. All proposals
submitted must be limited to twenty-five (25) pages not including front and back covers (optional),
transmittal letter, references, and fees and compensation. Fees and compensation must be
submitted in a separate envelope.
• Presented in 8 Y x 11 inch format, minimum 11 point Arial font
•All recyclable materials, no binders or binding
• In the same order as described below
• The original proposal will include original signatures in ink, by authorized personnel, on all
documents that require an authorized signature
• Do not include marketing materials
Failure to provide the required mandatory information may result in a consultant not being considered.
Submitted proposals will not be returned.
Questions should be directed to Marie Ware by telephone at 563-589-4263 or by email at
mware(cDcitvofdubuque.orq.
Proposals will be reviewed by the committee. After the proposals are evaluated, the City will
determine if any of the consultants will be interviewed. The City may choose to contact officials from
other jurisdictions regarding a consultant, its prior work experience, and its ability to successfully
complete the scope of services. The City may request clarification or additional information from a
specific consultant in order to assist in the City's evaluation of a proposal. d. Finally, City may require
changes in the scope of services as deemed necessary by the City, before execution of a contract.
Each consultant assumes full responsibility for delivery and deposit of the completed proposal
package before the deadline. The City are not responsible for any loss or delay with respect to
delivery of the proposals. The City reserve the right to reject any and all proposals and to negotiate
changes with any consultant. The City is not liable for any cost incurred by any consultant prior to the
execution of an agreement or contract. Nor shall the City be liable for any costs incurred by the
consultant that are not specified in any contract. The City of Dubuque is an Equal Employment
Opportunity Employer.
6
APPENDIX 1
Mortar Analysis
Five Flags Theater
Dubuque, Iowa
May 10, 2011
David Arbogast
Architectural Conservator
1803 Pineacre Avenue
Davenport, Iowa 52803
(563)355-1553
arbogast7Wgmail.com
7
Mortar Analysis
Five Flags Theater
Dubuque, Iowa
May 10, 2011
On Friday, May 6, 2011, David Arbogast, architectural conservator, of Davenport, Iowa received a set of four
mortar samples from John Richardson, Operations Manager of the Dubuque Five Flags Center. They were
collected from the Five Flags Theater (formerly the Orpheum Theater) and were submitted in an effort to
determine their original formulas.
The analysis was begun on Monday, May 9, utilizing the standard testing procedure developed by E. Blaine
Cliver, Regional Historical Architect of the North Atlantic Region of the National Park Service. This relatively
simple procedure dissolves the lime and/or cement content of the mortar using a 20% solution of hydrochloric
acid. The carbon dioxide released as a result of the reaction displaces water,which is then measured and used to
calculate the soluble content of the mortar. The insoluble fines and sand remaining from the reaction are
factored into the equation resulting in a final result. In the case of cement samples,the remaining fines are used
to calculate the cement content of the mortar. The remaining sand is then carefully sieved and graded by grain
size to provide a means of identification of the various sand types encountered.
The first sample was collected from the interior of the theater attic. It was buff-colored and was moderately soft
in consistency. Its analysis gave every indication of a lime and sand mortar — a rapid reaction, large water
displacement, and very speedy filtering time. The analysis revealed a mixture of approximately two parts of
sand to each part of lime, by volume if the fines are considered to be dirt associated with the original sand. The
sand sieve analysis revealed fine sand of which all easily passed the largest sieve. Over 21% passed all of the
sieves and almost 56%was trapped in the finest sieve.
The second sample was removed from the interior of the theater stage. It was buff-colored with white specks
and black dirt on its surface. Its reaction and water displacement as well as filtering Lime was virtually identical
to the first sample,leading to the same conclusion that it was composed of lime and sand The relative amount of
fines was exceptionally small. If the fines are considered to be dirt associated with the original sand, then the
approximate original ratio was two parts of sand to each part of lime,by volume,as in the first sample. The sand
sieve analysis revealed fine sand of which virtually all passed the largest sieve. Almost 15% passed all of the
sieves and 60%was trapped in the finest sieve.
The third sample came from the exterior of the north wall of the theater. It was buff-colored with a portion of it
being white. It was moderately soft and had visible sand grains. Like the first two samples, it had a fast and
bubbly reaction with rapid filtering. Its water displacement was the largest of the set. The relative amount of
fines was small. If the fines were dirt associated with the sand,then the relative proportions of the mixture were
twelve parts of sand to five parts of lime,by volume, or, roughly, two parts of sand to each part of lime as in the
other samples. The sand sieve analysis revealed fine sand of which all easily passed the largest sieve. Slightly
less than 18%passed all of the sieves and over 64%was trapped in the finest sieve.
The fourth sample was from the exterior face of the west wall of the theater. It was buff-colored with visible
sand grains. Soft in consistency, it had a fast and bubbly reaction. Its filtering time was rapid. All of these are
indicators of a lime and sand mortar. Its water displacement matched that of the first and second samples. The
analysis revealed a mixture of approximately five parts of sand to two parts of sand, by volume, if the fines are
considered to be dirt associated with the sand. The sand sieve analysis revealed fine sand of which all easily
passed the largest sieve.Over 18%passed all of the sieves and over 54%was trapped in the finest sieve.
8
Mortar/Plaster/Stucco Analysis Test Sheet
Sample No. 1
Building: Five Flags Theater,Dubuque,Iowa
Location: Theater Attic(interior)
Sample Description: Buff,moderately soft,fast and bubbly reaction, extremely rapid filtering
Test No. 1-Soluble Fraction
Data:
1. 18..6 Container A weight 8. no Hair or fibertype
2. 20r,.6 Container A and sample 9. 4.1 Fines and paper weight
3. 758,19 Barometric pressure 10. 2.9 Filter paper weight
4, 22 Temperature u.199.3 Sand and Container A weight
5. 0,73 Liters of water displaced 12. 8.1 cc.of sand
6.yellow green Filtrate color 13.-92.9-Weight of graduated cylinder and sand
7. tan Fines color 14.-19.2 Weight of graduated cylinder
Computations:
15. 20.0 Starting weight of sample: No. 2-No. 1
16. 1.2 Weight of fines:No. 9-No. 10
17, 13A Weight of sand: No. 11-No. 1
18. .519124 Sand density:No. 12 divided by(No. 13 -No. 14)
19. F.1 Weight of soluble content: No. 15-(No. 16+ No. 17)
20. 0.03 MOIs.Of CO2:No. 5 x No.3.x o.016 divided by(No.4 + 273.16 C.)
2L 3.00 Gram weight of CaCO3: loo x No. 20
22. 2.10 Gram weight of Ca(OH)2: No. 19-No. 21
23,0.0283744Mo1s.of Ca(OH)2: No. 22 divided by 74
24. 4.32 Gram total weight of Ca(OH)2:74 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
25. 1.32 Gram weight CO2:No. 20 x 44
26. 2.517 Gram weight total possible CO2: 44 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
27. 7,1.x6 %CO2 gain:No. 25 divided by No. 26
Conclusions:
28. 18.68 Gram weight of sample: No. 15-No. 25
29. 6.42 Fine parts/volume: No. 16 divided by No. 28
30. 43 49 Sand parts/volume: (No. 17 divided by No. 28)x No. 18
31. 251.44 Lime parts/volume: (No. 24 divided by No. 28)x 1.1
Cement(if present)
32. Portland cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x 098
33• Natural cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x o.86
34• Lime with cement parts/volume: (No. 16 x 0.2)divided by No. 28 x 1.1
Test No. 2-Sand Sieve Analysis
Sieve Sieve w/sand weight Sieve weight Sand weight Sand ratio
No. 10 1.8.6 1.8.6 0.0 0.00
No. 20 141.3 140.3 1.0 2.13
No.30 13.51.2 132.9 2.3 4.89
No.40 131.6 124.1 7,5 1 .96
No.50 140.3 114.1 26.2 .51.51.74
Base 89.2 79.0 10.0 21.28
9
Mortar/Plaster/Stucco Analysis Test Sheet
Sample No. 2
Building: Five Flags Theater,Dubuque,Iowa
Location: Theater Stage(interior)
Sample Description: Buff with black dirt on surface,white specks, moderately soft,fast and bubbly reaction,
rapid filtering
Test No. 1-Soluble Fraction
Data:
1. 188.0 Container A weight 8. no Hair or fibertype
2. 208.0 Container A and sample 9. 2.8 Fines and paper weight
3. 758,10 Barometric pressure 10. 2.7 Filter paperweight
4, 22 Temperature u. 204.0 Sand and Container A weight
5. 0.74 Liters of water displaced 12. 9.0 cc,of sand
6.yellow-green Filtrate color 13. 34.E Weight of graduated cylinder and sand
7. tan Fines color 14.-19.2 Weight of graduated cylinder
Computations:
15. 20.0 Starting weight of sample: No. 2-No. 1
16. 0.1 Weight of fines:No. 9-No. 10
Weight of sand: No. 11-No. 1
18. ..06 Sand density:No. 12 divided by(No. 13 -No. 14)
19. 4.8 Weight of soluble content: No. 15-(No. 16+ No. 17)
20.0.02041,20 MOIs.Of CO2: No.5 x No.3.x o.016 divided by(No.4+ 273.16 C.)
21. 3.04 Gram weight of CaCO3: loo x No. 20
22. 1.76 Gram weight of Ca(OH)2: No. 19-No. 21
23. .02376Fi Mols.of Ca(OH)2:No. 22 divided by 74
24. 4.01 Gram total weight of Ca(OH)2:74 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
25. 1.34 Gram weight CO2:No. 20 x 44
26. 2.38 Gram weight total possible CO2: 44 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
27. r,6.30 %CO2 gain:No. 25 divided by No. 26
Conclusions:
28. 18.66 Gram weight of sample: No. 15-No. 25
29. 0..4 Fine parts/volume: No. 16 divided by No. 28
30. 48.23 Sand parts/volume: (No. 17 divided by No. 28)x No. 18
31. 23.64 Lime parts/volume: (No. 24 divided by No. 28)x 1.1
Cement(if present)
32. Portland cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x O.78
33• Natural cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x o.86
34• 0.60 Lime with cement parts/volume: (No. 16 x 0.2)divided by No. 28 x 1.1
Test No. 2-Sand Sieve Analysis
Sieve Sieve w/sand weight Sieve weight Sand weight Sand ratio
No. 10 1.8.8 1.8.6 0.2 0.20
No. 20 141.0 140.3 1.6 1.57
No.30 137.4 132.9 4.5 4.41
No.40 143.51 124.1 19.4 19.00
No.50 17.5_5 114.1 61.4 60.14
Base 94.0 79.0 1.51.0 14.69
10
Mortar/Plaster/Stucco Analysis Test Sheet
Sample No. 3
Building: Five Flags Theater,Dubuque,Iowa
Location: Theater North Wall(exterior)
Sample Description: Buff, moderately soft, visible sand grains, white segment, fast and bubbly reaction,
rapid filtering
Test No. 1-Soluble Fraction
Data:
1. 18..1 Container A weight 8. no Hair or fibertype
2. 205.1 Container A and sample q.__9,.1 Fines and paperweight
3. 7,58,19 Barometric pressure 10. 2.8 Filter paper weight
4, 22 Temperature u. 200_2 Sand and Container A weight
5. 0.86 Liters of water displaced 12. 9.1 cc.of sand
6.yellow green Filtrate color 13. 34.4 Weight of graduated cylinder and sand
7. brown Fines color 14.-19.2 Weight of graduated cylinder
Computations:
15. 20.0 Starting weight of sample: No. 2-No. 1
16. 0.3 Weight of fines:No. 9-No. 10
17. 1Fi,2 Weight of sand: No. 11-No. 1
18. ..9868421 Sand density:No. 12 divided by(No. 13 -No. 14)
19. 4.a Weight of soluble content: No. 15-(No. 16+ No. 17)
20.0.03,534,58 MOIs.Of CO2: No.5 x No.3.x o.016 divided by(No.4+ 273.16 C.)
2L S.Fi3 Gram weight of CaCO3: loo x No. 20
22. 0.97 Gram weight of Ca(OH)2: No. 19-No. 21
23. 0.072 Mols.of Ca(OH)2:No. 22 divided by 74
24. 3. 8 Gram total weight of Ca(OH)2:74 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
25. 1..6 Gram weight CO2:No. 20 x 44
26. 2.13 Gram weight total possible CO2: 44 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
27. 73.24 %CO2 gain:No. 25 divided by No. 26
Conclusions:
28. 18.44 Gram weight of sample: No. 15-No. 25
29. 1.63 Fine parts/volume: No. 16 divided by No. 28
30. 49.nr, Sand parts/volume: (No. 17 divided by No. 28)x No. 18
31. 21.36 Lime parts/volume: (No. 24 divided by No. 28)x 1.1
Cement(if present)
32. Portland cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x 0.78
33• Natural cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x o.86
34• Lime with cement parts/volume: (No. 16 x 0.2)divided by No. 28 x 1.1
Test No. 2-Sand Sieve Analysis
Sieve Sieve w/sand weight Sieve weight Sand weight Sand ratio
No. 10 1.8.6 1.8.6 0.0 0.00
No. 20 141.0 140.3 0.7 1.00
No.30 13.5.3 132.9 2.4 3.44
No.40 133.6 124.1 9.55 13.61
No.50 1.758.9 114.1 44.8 64.18
Base 91.4 79.0 12.4 17.77
11
Mortar/Plaster/Stucco Analysis Test Sheet
Sample No. 4
Building: Five Flags Theater,Dubuque,Iowa
Location: Theater West Wall(exterior)
Sample Description: Buff,soft,visible sand grains,fast and bubbly reaction,rapid filtering
Test No. 1-Soluble Fraction
Data:
1. 187.8 Container A weight 8. no Hair or fibertype
2. 207.8 Container A and sample 9. 3_, Fines and paper weight
3. 758,19 Barometric pressure lo. 2.9 Filter paper weight
4, 22 Temperature u. 202.9 Sand and Container A weight
5. 0.74 Liters of water displaced 12. 9.4 cc.of sand
6.yellow-greenFiltrate color 13. 34.3 Weight of graduated cylinder and sand
7. tan Fines color 14.-19.2 Weight of graduated cylinder
Computations:
15. 20.0 Starting weight of sample: No. 2-No. 1
16. 0.6 Weight of fines:No. 9-No. 10
17. 1a,1 Weight of sand: No. 11-No. 1
18. .622.16.. Sand density:No. 12 divided by(No. 13 -No. 14)
lg.----4-3-Weight of soluble content: No. 15-(No. 16+ No. 17)
20.0.0304139 MOIs.Of CO2:No.5 x No.3.x o.016 divided by(No.4 + 273.16 C.)
21. 3.04 Gram weight of CaCO3: loo x No. 20
22. 3.97 Gram weight of Ca(OH)2: No. 19-No. 21
23. 0.017 Mols.of Ca(OH)2:No. 22 divided by 74
24. 3.511 Gram total weight of Ca(OH)2:74 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
25. 1.34 Gram weight CO2:No. 20 x 44
26. 2.09 Gram weight total possible CO2: 44 x(No. 20 +No. 23)
27. 64.11 %CO2 gain:No. 25 divided by No. 26
Conclusions:
28. 18.66 Gram weight of sample: No. 15-No. 25
29. 3.22 Fine parts/volume: No. 16 divided by No. 28
30. x0.38 Sand parts/volume: (No. 17 divided by No. 28)x No. 18
31. 20.69 Lime parts/volume: (No. 24 divided by No. 28)x 1.1
Cement(if present)
32. Portland cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x 0q8
33• Natural cement parts/volume: (No. 16 divided by No. 28)x o.86
34• Lime with cement parts/volume: (No. 16 x 0.2)divided by No. 28 x 1.1
Test No. 2-Sand Sieve Analysis
No. 10 1.8.6 1.8.6 0.0 0.00
No. 20 141.0 140.3 0.7 2..6
No.30 134.3 122.0 1.4 .5i.13
No.40 129.2 124.1 .51.1 18.68
No.50 128.9 114.1 14.8 54.21
Base 84.3 79.0 .51.3 19.41
12
City of Dubuque Insurance Requirements for Professional Servicer
Insurance Schedule C
I Fall human a seems instant OF Final the rus of mequer all the
commum homes in inner I pror to confirsomming moral arthe end ontums prefirest I the him mass
eas carshWrote final Fish Emh Cartafficate shall M prepares,ontim amensurrientevell more
ormostrumnal
,•w,hFrom
.
thmagamernment
5 Fears all samurai am to moten am maintain dual
comment mail real forthe couseempossfiessoutual in the musearmse Stheme and shall anto
.n•=o .n ac
,mWimu ,m Wiaw
thenthe p�s limits Fair me this Issue
all
renal kreym�mmnimum�mv
City of Dubuque Insurance Requirements for Professional Services
Insurance Schedule C (continued)
Exhibit)
•)
Ins Dernese an1sea ha.�n.nal ®®
.leaamr�w s s.® mnM1
Sol shall be annoth On On call hot alloys Me,forry he Fes
COI shall be worthey In alland WA ISO the OFF OF 31 OFF for shall
10 blay has DO
OF
el 2 mnl9cuuaiaQ; her
® OFF" amrm
Or SO 25 03'Dolyffirld tonstrUdleth Sol(s)ue a
Afferseass III as aP��
Ment, hampeava�
dl
q Include an enskerearnentnthat dessters any takes emplares vdmmn
ni
m�
and whereas all ths Ferry,Formal other ethernet a W than shall
SOnall
B)
p empgeex am va wreea axe soy{ ,wIeMdmm Sqe Lang
WORKEWS COMPENSATION IF EMP�M��
igmmpepn y sevares aemm1 q
I COM 185 35 started
mpvyectlI ers amore
OFF ohl ethanol Sol I
Far
Doess
Far shall shall ml Me S�'I symener m nngeu�m the ay a oegv.
Forms emts mall be givrtre waif an eFMFMMe p umeraa one.
qu
I mrcnye mm mniov m Me Feel the ummnrtp Chas
[I m
�1 rmnxeetveam�vapnzyvame�emmpni mrpmim.
Fl
commusummpuha
rcmner �ts rmn.a��e.�mmdm ed minnem all
Me an
Shall
City of Dubuque Insurance Requirements for Professional Services
Preservation of Governmental Immunities Endorsement
a wool apeex and chavare Moral
monscre Mass police and the harder&ME Uts of Dardscre,Iowa wan Asidessal I nowned derser
not when am of"a comes nonseasonal I formarmor ce ury a Demme,eva
Undeariestrade a lines real 670 4 as it is now real am as 9
Me nor me humorous.test am ry only
come francs,
to the enmz agwmmamm hmm nM ndame atoned Iowa woman
IN 4 as It whor come and wit raw be amended men thare the thare Maine cannew nowl
Code w Iowa smion son stated the mean as the mmx and me mmv of this wma prow.
The cholesterol
shown :rFgwwmmmtaI anninchers,and MW do m at aw none and sell do m upon the Woods
hands order Insurance mandar
* soon Dernal of Clarence Me answer clss nor manor consearrage underthe of and me
insurance met Mail am delta or mempuaad holders waseard formam0 formal
jursecon ares miles mhear nmeddawyltransactional scmunpaw..d tythe aryn
Moral 1.
%are
Me shows
mayeoradamem regsede order the
m mana
mvv
SPECIMEN